Wait, needs some changes and anyone who disagrees is a bigot and will be quickly fired.
Mom should be caregiver and should have transitioned. The plot you suggest doesnâ(TM)t work so how about the caregiver attends a rally and is brutally abused by police, but the police work for a corporation... they then work with a helpful government regulatory agency that takes down the corporation which was actually a religious group run by a neo-nazi.
Perfect, fixed it!
That was a disgusting shooting, the guy basically was shot 10 rounds into a game of Simon Says. Swat teams need to consider that they are meant for shock and awe but trained and give instructions expecting calm and careful reasoning of subjects in front of them.
Common carrier status was the point all along. Simple Trojan horse meant to tag along with a popular idea. Donâ(TM)t tell me that you had no intentions of implementing all the restrictions and powers of Title 2 to allow Google Et al to regulate and control at will and then cry bloody murder when your same issue gets solved by altering the current status. Just another set of laws promised not to be implemented until some civil servant decides otherwise.
Yeah, total trick.
Heâ(TM)s trying to add the requirements to the current telecom provider rules instead of reclassifying as common carriers.
Since common carriers is the goal of net neutrality and the net neutrality was a Trojan horse... his legislation is horrible.
The goal is to put ISPs under a whole new set of rules, right? Promise not to use them and then immediately go back on your word and regulate the hell out of the internet. How dare someone try to take their shiny issue away by solving it.
I know, this is why all plans to put them in place also have the common carrier rules with nothing more than a pinky-swear promise not to apply them.
If Net Neutrality was the goal, then those rules could just be put in place.
Of course, when putting in a trojan horse, find a horse that someone wouldn't mind having and sell it to everyone... but don't forget to put a lot of fangs in it no-one will notice.
The true test is how they want to properly enact Neutrality. If it is the same âoeredefineâ as a common carrier trick from before and pinky swear that although theyâ(TM)ll have so many other powers they wonâ(TM)t use them, then it was a scam all along. If they put in narrow language to the current definition of telecommunications provider, then fine. I donâ(TM)t have any doubt theyâ(TM)ll keep with the redefining to common carrier though.
You mean like things like this get done in those old school-house rock videos? It does seem like having a âoemoronâ president who doesnâ(TM)t understand all the workarounds and keeps dismantling things that were worked around is bringing us back to that reality.
Read original post. The child was unable to give consent so the surgery was denied per their description. In a US court the parents would have given consent for the minor and the government would have accepted their roles as guardians and granted the surgery unless a case was made that they shouldnâ(TM)t have the ability to give consent.
If only children had someone able to give consent for them. In Europe they call these people politicians and the state, in the US We shall call them Parents/Family...
Look at news services that rely on something other than his tweets or press releases for the accomplishments.
As far as the hand over heart- we donâ(TM)t care. We all get busy and wrapped up in things and many have wanted the president who puts appearance and listening to pollsters at 20% of his job rather than 100%. Our current political class uses how close someone is to 100% uncontroversial and polished as itâ(TM)s currency, the American people arenâ(TM)t too dumb to realize this, they are often just too busy to care. You want to show yourself as not being a politician like Trump did, show yourself as having very little or none of that currency and make it clear no one in that crowd would back you.
My any chance do you work for a big pharma company?
Make drugs available when they show promise and they are proven safe but before they are proven effective. Drug companies hate this because the current system kills small drug makers when they canâ(TM)t realize a profit for 10 years (assuming a fair FDA process theyâ(TM)ll never get)
Let cancer effectiveness work properly, put genetic information about the cancer and patient into a database, go over the drugs effects and gather data while telling people itâ(TM)s a trial and letting their doctors choose whether to use it.
Or whine that some people had drugs given to them that werenâ(TM)t proven effective...
In the life-safety industry, yes!
Unless the fireproofing on your building and alarm systems arenâ(TM)t that important in a regional hospital. Read up on Engineering disasters and how they happened. A good majority in construction are some salesman or designer overriding their specs to do what they âoeknowâ is right while shaking their heads at the no-nothing PE they were required to ask For permission to go off spec. Representing yourself as one and making those decisions letting people think you are acting professionally is disgusting.
Take charge of your career. Take charge in general.. I showed up on time every day and wore appropriate clothing used to work. I saw the light during my first job and just started taking charge of what needed to be done and decided to be independent of others. The exact opposite of a victim/tell me what I they did wrong to not understand I was perfect for their job....
Recruiters are realtors who had their car break down.
I have a PE and a good set of skills but get 2-3 phone calls, 5 targeted new connections with emails upon accepting a week at minimum. LinkedIn works well and the big opportunities are usually a friend of mine or former co-worker calling and giving me a heads-up to get in front of someone before they can even post a job.
I had a guy call himself an engineer in his email signature without an ABET degree or PE license in my office with three PEâ(TM)s in management.
It was: Not. A. Smart. Idea. Write ups and a serious dress down.
Any real world physical impact requires a PE involved. Fire alarms are just big computers and require a PE sign off in the process of design (usually at the initial layout design and sometimes at the shop drawing stage.
A PE is a commitment and brings you into a different tier of engineering and professionalism. It is not easy to take or bought, being heavily supervised by other PEs and having the FE and PE exams having pass rates expecting people to fail. Getting the four years of experience in most states is difficult, as is getting character witnesses who are PEâ(TM)s to sign off on you to their possible detriment.
Not the formula we need. The formula needed determines maximum personal power, political control, and wealth generated by managing the level of projected impact, time to impact, revenue before timeframe, revenue after timeframe and ability to make subsequent false predictions without skepticism.
Our elites have had much more success with their models solving the issue above.
I get the Walker Trump non-union nature of the deal means we have to discuss politics... but is this a trend or will it become a trend? If all the major suppliers of electrical components and manufacturing equipment/maintenance of that equipment have a "working" location in the central US does that mean that a lot of other factories like this become viable in the US?
I wonder about how this is related to robotics and advanced manufacturing and if the third world cheap labor advantage is rapidly being plowed under by the first world precision and automation and support functions?
I don't see a reason to doubt Foxconns word on this, they've seen this trend if needing higher skilled manufacturers and locations with stable power grids, advanced support functions (robotics experts and engineers), and possibly distribution advantages for awhile and Some deals didn't work out.
As far as "this is the tax hating sellout turning the state over to Foxconn". Those jobs are needed. A lot of secondary effects, like a huge number of landowners who just became wealthy, are occurring and will continue to occur.
The summary makes a bold claim and then gives the legal nuance which was "just because someone sold you our phone with an X year contract doesn't mean we give you an automatic X year warranty." Suddenly most people look at the actual statement and say "well, yeah, of course they're right about that" and move on.
Slashdot Mirror
Wait, needs some changes and anyone who disagrees is a bigot and will be quickly fired. Mom should be caregiver and should have transitioned. The plot you suggest doesnâ(TM)t work so how about the caregiver attends a rally and is brutally abused by police, but the police work for a corporation... they then work with a helpful government regulatory agency that takes down the corporation which was actually a religious group run by a neo-nazi. Perfect, fixed it!
That was a disgusting shooting, the guy basically was shot 10 rounds into a game of Simon Says. Swat teams need to consider that they are meant for shock and awe but trained and give instructions expecting calm and careful reasoning of subjects in front of them.
Common carrier status was the point all along. Simple Trojan horse meant to tag along with a popular idea. Donâ(TM)t tell me that you had no intentions of implementing all the restrictions and powers of Title 2 to allow Google Et al to regulate and control at will and then cry bloody murder when your same issue gets solved by altering the current status. Just another set of laws promised not to be implemented until some civil servant decides otherwise.
Yeah, total trick. Heâ(TM)s trying to add the requirements to the current telecom provider rules instead of reclassifying as common carriers. Since common carriers is the goal of net neutrality and the net neutrality was a Trojan horse... his legislation is horrible. The goal is to put ISPs under a whole new set of rules, right? Promise not to use them and then immediately go back on your word and regulate the hell out of the internet. How dare someone try to take their shiny issue away by solving it.
I know, this is why all plans to put them in place also have the common carrier rules with nothing more than a pinky-swear promise not to apply them. If Net Neutrality was the goal, then those rules could just be put in place. Of course, when putting in a trojan horse, find a horse that someone wouldn't mind having and sell it to everyone... but don't forget to put a lot of fangs in it no-one will notice.
The true test is how they want to properly enact Neutrality. If it is the same âoeredefineâ as a common carrier trick from before and pinky swear that although theyâ(TM)ll have so many other powers they wonâ(TM)t use them, then it was a scam all along. If they put in narrow language to the current definition of telecommunications provider, then fine. I donâ(TM)t have any doubt theyâ(TM)ll keep with the redefining to common carrier though.
You mean like things like this get done in those old school-house rock videos? It does seem like having a âoemoronâ president who doesnâ(TM)t understand all the workarounds and keeps dismantling things that were worked around is bringing us back to that reality.
And Lawyers administer the bar exam and doctors administer their exams....
Read original post. The child was unable to give consent so the surgery was denied per their description. In a US court the parents would have given consent for the minor and the government would have accepted their roles as guardians and granted the surgery unless a case was made that they shouldnâ(TM)t have the ability to give consent.
If only children had someone able to give consent for them. In Europe they call these people politicians and the state, in the US We shall call them Parents/Family...
Look at news services that rely on something other than his tweets or press releases for the accomplishments. As far as the hand over heart- we donâ(TM)t care. We all get busy and wrapped up in things and many have wanted the president who puts appearance and listening to pollsters at 20% of his job rather than 100%. Our current political class uses how close someone is to 100% uncontroversial and polished as itâ(TM)s currency, the American people arenâ(TM)t too dumb to realize this, they are often just too busy to care. You want to show yourself as not being a politician like Trump did, show yourself as having very little or none of that currency and make it clear no one in that crowd would back you.
My any chance do you work for a big pharma company? Make drugs available when they show promise and they are proven safe but before they are proven effective. Drug companies hate this because the current system kills small drug makers when they canâ(TM)t realize a profit for 10 years (assuming a fair FDA process theyâ(TM)ll never get) Let cancer effectiveness work properly, put genetic information about the cancer and patient into a database, go over the drugs effects and gather data while telling people itâ(TM)s a trial and letting their doctors choose whether to use it. Or whine that some people had drugs given to them that werenâ(TM)t proven effective...
In the life-safety industry, yes! Unless the fireproofing on your building and alarm systems arenâ(TM)t that important in a regional hospital. Read up on Engineering disasters and how they happened. A good majority in construction are some salesman or designer overriding their specs to do what they âoeknowâ is right while shaking their heads at the no-nothing PE they were required to ask For permission to go off spec. Representing yourself as one and making those decisions letting people think you are acting professionally is disgusting.
Take charge of your career. Take charge in general.. I showed up on time every day and wore appropriate clothing used to work. I saw the light during my first job and just started taking charge of what needed to be done and decided to be independent of others. The exact opposite of a victim/tell me what I they did wrong to not understand I was perfect for their job....
Recruiters are realtors who had their car break down. I have a PE and a good set of skills but get 2-3 phone calls, 5 targeted new connections with emails upon accepting a week at minimum. LinkedIn works well and the big opportunities are usually a friend of mine or former co-worker calling and giving me a heads-up to get in front of someone before they can even post a job.
I had a guy call himself an engineer in his email signature without an ABET degree or PE license in my office with three PEâ(TM)s in management. It was: Not. A. Smart. Idea. Write ups and a serious dress down.
Any real world physical impact requires a PE involved. Fire alarms are just big computers and require a PE sign off in the process of design (usually at the initial layout design and sometimes at the shop drawing stage. A PE is a commitment and brings you into a different tier of engineering and professionalism. It is not easy to take or bought, being heavily supervised by other PEs and having the FE and PE exams having pass rates expecting people to fail. Getting the four years of experience in most states is difficult, as is getting character witnesses who are PEâ(TM)s to sign off on you to their possible detriment.
Not the formula we need. The formula needed determines maximum personal power, political control, and wealth generated by managing the level of projected impact, time to impact, revenue before timeframe, revenue after timeframe and ability to make subsequent false predictions without skepticism. Our elites have had much more success with their models solving the issue above.
I get the Walker Trump non-union nature of the deal means we have to discuss politics... but is this a trend or will it become a trend? If all the major suppliers of electrical components and manufacturing equipment/maintenance of that equipment have a "working" location in the central US does that mean that a lot of other factories like this become viable in the US? I wonder about how this is related to robotics and advanced manufacturing and if the third world cheap labor advantage is rapidly being plowed under by the first world precision and automation and support functions? I don't see a reason to doubt Foxconns word on this, they've seen this trend if needing higher skilled manufacturers and locations with stable power grids, advanced support functions (robotics experts and engineers), and possibly distribution advantages for awhile and Some deals didn't work out. As far as "this is the tax hating sellout turning the state over to Foxconn". Those jobs are needed. A lot of secondary effects, like a huge number of landowners who just became wealthy, are occurring and will continue to occur.
The summary makes a bold claim and then gives the legal nuance which was "just because someone sold you our phone with an X year contract doesn't mean we give you an automatic X year warranty." Suddenly most people look at the actual statement and say "well, yeah, of course they're right about that" and move on.