I believe the legal term is tortious interference and Facebook could pursue civil action for it. Possibly even pursue criminal action under the CFAA by arguing it is still unauthorized access despite the fact that the password was disclosed.
"Tortious interference with contract rights can occur where the tortfeasor convinces a party to breach the contract against the plaintiff, or where the tortfeasor disrupts the ability of one party to perform his obligations under the contract, thereby preventing the plaintiff from receiving the performance promised."
It occurs to me that someone may not even have been in HS yet when the game was announced, graduated from HS, gotten a college degree, and could now be working on DNF.
Ah the old NSA DES conspiracy theory. The NSA suggested two changes to DES: 1) shorten the key 2) changed the S-boxes. They gave no public explanation for the latter and for years the story was that this somehow introduced a backdoor into the algorithm. The truth came out over a decade later:
"Some of the suspicions about hidden weaknesses in the S-boxes were allayed in 1990, with the independent discovery and open publication by Eli Biham and Adi Shamir of differential cryptanalysis, a general method for breaking block ciphers. The S-boxes of DES were much more resistant to the attack than if they had been chosen at random, strongly suggesting that IBM knew about the technique in the 1970s. This was indeed the case; in 1994, Don Coppersmith published some of the original design criteria for the S-boxes. According to Steven Levy, IBM Watson researchers discovered differential cryptanalytic attacks in 1974 and were asked by the NSA to keep the technique secret."
Of course, they could still be lying, better keep the tinfoil hat on.
In this Third Report and Order ("Order"), we remedy shortcomings in our CableCARD rules in order to improve consumers' experience with retail navigation devices (such as set-top boxes and digital cable-ready television sets) and CableCARDs, the security devices used in conjunction with navigation devices to perform the conditional access functions necessary to access cable services.
Maybe they should get around to actually implementing the provisions of the Telecommunications Act that requires the cable system to be open to innovation!
If you distribute baking soda (sell/give away/etc) and tell people that its crack, you can be arrested and held to the same liabilities as if you had actually sold crack..in fact..some states have laws to where you'd get charged for selling it, but not possession. Some will tack on an extra charge on top of possession/sale.
Kaffee: It was oregano, Dave. It was 10 dollars worth of oregano. Lieutenant Dave Spradling: Yeah, but your client thought it was marijuana. Kaffee: My client's a moron that's not against the law. Lieutenant Dave Spradling: Kaffee, I have people to answer to just like you do. I'm going to charge him. Kaffee: With what? Possession of a condiment?
"citing 'the chilling effect that would occur if agency employees believed their frank and honest opinions and analysis expressed as part of assessing California's waiver request were to be disclosed in a broad setting."
So why not just redact the names and leave the statements intact? Oh yeah, that would actually make sense.
I'm pretty sure the encylopedias that my parents had (published in the late 70s) mentioned driverless cars as something coming in the near future. So forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical on this. I still want my flying car!
Firefox does the sane thing and limits Realm to a hostname. Not sure about any other browser but we use HTTP Auth here and I've accidently switched from partial to fully-qualified domains and had it prompt me again.
Slashdot Mirror
By finally securing the CANbus so that you can't just patch in anywhere and control the car with it.
http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/
I haven't timed it to see how well its been doing in the 6 years I've had it though.
I would like to keep my shoes on and be able to take a 2L through the checkpoint.
I believe the legal term is tortious interference and Facebook could pursue civil action for it. Possibly even pursue criminal action under the CFAA by arguing it is still unauthorized access despite the fact that the password was disclosed.
"Tortious interference with contract rights can occur where the tortfeasor convinces a party to breach the contract against the plaintiff, or where the tortfeasor disrupts the ability of one party to perform his obligations under the contract, thereby preventing the plaintiff from receiving the performance promised."
Fun Fact: The MS Exchange team thought this was hilarious and named their blog msexchangeteam.com
Ugh, I worked at a place that was still running P4s, that should have set off alarm bells in my head.
It occurs to me that someone may not even have been in HS yet when the game was announced, graduated from HS, gotten a college degree, and could now be working on DNF.
I'm well prepared for the zombie apocalypse.
Ah the old NSA DES conspiracy theory. The NSA suggested two changes to DES: 1) shorten the key 2) changed the S-boxes. They gave no public explanation for the latter and for years the story was that this somehow introduced a backdoor into the algorithm. The truth came out over a decade later:
"Some of the suspicions about hidden weaknesses in the S-boxes were allayed in 1990, with the independent discovery and open publication by Eli Biham and Adi Shamir of differential cryptanalysis, a general method for breaking block ciphers. The S-boxes of DES were much more resistant to the attack than if they had been chosen at random, strongly suggesting that IBM knew about the technique in the 1970s. This was indeed the case; in 1994, Don Coppersmith published some of the original design criteria for the S-boxes. According to Steven Levy, IBM Watson researchers discovered differential cryptanalytic attacks in 1974 and were asked by the NSA to keep the technique secret."
Of course, they could still be lying, better keep the tinfoil hat on.
From the TFO (the fraking order):
Maybe they should get around to actually implementing the provisions of the Telecommunications Act that requires the cable system to be open to innovation!
Call me when I can watch digital cable through a non-crippled device. Then I might be willing to subscribe to it again.
In theory, a SAM classified as a destructive device and you could buy one with the right ATF paperwork.
ICANN considered this option, but decided that it didn't extend the deadline out far enough to be worth the costs.
http://blog.icann.org/2008/02/recovering-ipv4-address-space/
Old news!
So Michigan is the new middle east, eh?
Kaffee: It was oregano, Dave. It was 10 dollars worth of oregano.
Lieutenant Dave Spradling: Yeah, but your client thought it was marijuana.
Kaffee: My client's a moron that's not against the law.
Lieutenant Dave Spradling: Kaffee, I have people to answer to just like you do. I'm going to charge him.
Kaffee: With what? Possession of a condiment?
That it doesn't belong to the parent company either:
$ whois 134.17.0.0
OrgName: SF Bay Packet Radio
OrgID: SBPR-1
Address: 1490 W 121st Ave
Address: Suite 201
City: Westminster
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80234
Country: US
NetRange: 134.17.0.0 - 134.17.255.255
CIDR: 134.17.0.0/16
NetName: BAY-PR-NET
NetHandle: NET-134-17-0-0-1
Parent: NET-134-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS1.SFBPRSERVICES.COM
NameServer: NS2.SFBPRSERVICES.COM
Comment:
RegDate: 1989-04-12
Updated: 2007-10-05
So why not just redact the names and leave the statements intact? Oh yeah, that would actually make sense.
Why limit yourself to subtle disastor relationships?
SimCity Classic:
* San Francisco 1906 Earthquake
* Firebombing of Hamburg in 1944 are both scenarios!
SimCity 2000:
* 1991 Oakland, CA Firestorm
* 1989 Hurriance Hugo in Charleston, SC.
I'm pretty sure the encylopedias that my parents had (published in the late 70s) mentioned driverless cars as something coming in the near future. So forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical on this. I still want my flying car!
Firefox does the sane thing and limits Realm to a hostname. Not sure about any other browser but we use HTTP Auth here and I've accidently switched from partial to fully-qualified domains and had it prompt me again.
Since when did having snow on the ground preclude it from being April Fools' Day? I've seen snow on the ground in May.
Give that RSA encryption is:
c = m ^ e (mod n)
and RSA decryption is:
m = c ^ d (mod n)
I'm interested in how you have determined that encryption is O(N^2) and decryption is O(N^3).
And all 3 are anonymous CVS read operations. Not a single checkin is reported.