I was debating exactly this with some friends and it would be very hard not to use a computer today. Technology has penetrated our dailty lives. Even my HS job at a grocery store involved regular use of computers.
The opposing viewpoint shown in the article reminds me of the 6th networking truth:
"It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it." --RFC1925
Don't have numbers to back it up, but most things I read say that the Secondary MX is *more* likely to be targeted by spammers on the belief that fewer filters will be in place to prevent spam.
Those statements could be refering to their use as open relays though.
I guess another question is whether your university has the public IP space to actually do that for all your students. If you don't already have enough public IP space then you're gonna have to deal with begging ARIN for a bigger allocation which might not be worth your time./my university has a/16//its only using 16% of it by my last check
Bell Labs wasn't killed by shareholders, it was killed by the US Government. The Bell System was heavily based upon the idea of the less profitable areas being subsidized by the more profitable areas. One example is the urban telephone subscribers subsidizing the rural telephone subscribers' connections. They both paid the same amount, but the rural lines actually cost more. Another would be the regional Bells subsidizing Bell Labs.
With the breakup of AT&T in 1984 this method of doing business died. In fact from 1956 to 1984 AT&T was mostly prohibited from profiting from the research from Bell Labs. One notable item they were forbidden from profiting from was UNIX.
Slashdot Mirror
I consider anything that isn't baseband as broadband, but what do I know :P
My guess is that they reserve odd minor version numbers for development branches. 3.0 and 3.2 are stable versions.
Ah but SSL/TLS can be detected and they can just block it.
Mac Gamer Commercial
I was debating exactly this with some friends and it would be very hard not to use a computer today. Technology has penetrated our dailty lives. Even my HS job at a grocery store involved regular use of computers.
Self checkout lanes?
Electronic timecard systems?
Cell phones?
On the extreme end of things even a car's ECU is modifiable by an owner...
Snopes can answer your question about fasicsm and trains. It involves Mussolini.
We all know where this will lead us
Totally Agree. Where I used to live Charter was the *only* high speed internet access in the area for a long time.
The opposing viewpoint shown in the article reminds me of the 6th networking truth:
"It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it." --RFC1925
Don't have numbers to back it up, but most things I read say that the Secondary MX is *more* likely to be targeted by spammers on the belief that fewer filters will be in place to prevent spam.
Those statements could be refering to their use as open relays though.
People should not be afraid of cookies, cookies should be afraid of people.
you could link to the real thing
Can we use this to create a CowboyNeal option in the next election.
I guess another question is whether your university has the public IP space to actually do that for all your students. If you don't already have enough public IP space then you're gonna have to deal with begging ARIN for a bigger allocation which might not be worth your time. /my university has a /16 //its only using 16% of it by my last check
Bell Labs wasn't killed by shareholders, it was killed by the US Government. The Bell System was heavily based upon the idea of the less profitable areas being subsidized by the more profitable areas. One example is the urban telephone subscribers subsidizing the rural telephone subscribers' connections. They both paid the same amount, but the rural lines actually cost more. Another would be the regional Bells subsidizing Bell Labs.
With the breakup of AT&T in 1984 this method of doing business died. In fact from 1956 to 1984 AT&T was mostly prohibited from profiting from the research from Bell Labs. One notable item they were forbidden from profiting from was UNIX.
Not if the package versions need to go downward instead of upward
Actually you probably can dist-upgrade Debian to Ubuntu. This is not a task for a novice and is definetly not supported, but it should work.
/etc/apt/sources.list;apt-get update;apt-get dist-upgrade" though.
Its slighty more involved than "vim
WILL WRIGHT IS GOD!
I can bring the marshmellows is someone else can bring the chocolate and graham crackers!
I wish PHP had correct and useful user contributions.
...this time they are making completely new ones.
i
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
What I want in a war simulation
Diet Coke with Splenda has all the sickening sweetness of regular Pepsi.
There I fixed it for ya
The article says the worm was written in assembly and I assume it means x86 assembly. Can the worm infect non-x86 Linux hosts?
I use the IRC channel of my local Linux User Group. (course I'm also slightly biased as it's administrator)