Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Attempt To Calm Volcano

An anonymous reader writes "Since May 2006, a mud volcano in Indonesia has spewed out up to 126,000 cubic metres of mud a day, flooding an area of more than 4 square kilometres. This unprecedented natural disaster has become so bad that geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano."

244 comments

  1. tha audacity! by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This unprecedented natural disaster has become so bad that geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano.

    They've got a lot of balls, trying something like that.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:tha audacity! by antarctican · · Score: 5, Funny

      They've got a lot of balls, trying something like that.

      High pressure, large projectile type object....

      Why do I have visions of this turning in to one giant canon? :)

    2. Re:tha audacity! by blazematrix · · Score: 0

      Balls? More like butt plugs! What will happen if it needs to fart? 8^P BM

    3. Re:tha audacity! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Funny

      yea, if they wanted to calm it down, they shoulda just poured a few truckloads of valium into it instead.

    4. Re:tha audacity! by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      I would've thought 10 million gallions of Pepto-Bismol would've done the trick.

      Oh well.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    5. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be playing AC/DC while they block off the volcano?

    6. Re:tha audacity! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Complete mis-diagnosis. I think Lomotil should be prescribed here. Works for me

      --
      What?
    7. Re:tha audacity! by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 5, Funny

      yea, if they wanted to calm it down, they shoulda just poured a few truckloads of valium into it instead. The *traditional* method is to toss in a virgin (hey, if somebody tossed ME a virgin, I'd calm down....eventually).

      Unfortunately this method runs afoul of modern legislations (it violates the Endangered Species Act).

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    8. Re:tha audacity! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oops. forgot it was a 'mud volcano' we were dealing with. damn chili night!

    9. Re:tha audacity! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1, Funny

      you mean the WWF hasn't heard about slashdot?

    10. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to turn into a printer? Oh, hang on, you meant cannon!

    11. Re:tha audacity! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      You know they changed their name, right?

      --
      What?
    12. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent -1 dumbass

    13. Re:tha audacity! by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Great Balls of Fire, even...

    14. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've got a lot of brains and they've got a lot of... chutzpah!

    15. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's to... mud in your eye!

    16. Re:tha audacity! by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      Just a thought. I had this flash back of a WKRP Sit-Com TV show.

    17. Re:tha audacity! by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Why do I have visions of this turning in to one giant canon? :)
      That's if they are lucky. Are there any geologists or geophysicists who could shed some light on why they are trying this? My education (both theoretical and empirical) tells me that if you have something that is generating gases (whether via heat, chemical or otherwise), the gases must escape in some manner. If you plug the hole where they are currently escaping, you will have a buildup of pressure. This will be followed by either a rather violent removal of the plug (cannon) or the formation of a new hole somewhere to relieve the pressure. If the latter happens, the new hole may be formed in an even less convenient spot -- perhaps in the middle of a city. Am I wrong on this?
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    18. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Endangered Species Act

      Fortunately, the act of endangering the supply of virgins, tends to produce replacements.

    19. Re:tha audacity! by Ermin · · Score: 1

      I've heard that throwing a virgin in works.

    20. Re:tha audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, if the volcano's seen enough of the internet, they could just toss it a virgin llama?

    21. Re:tha audacity! by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The *traditional* method is to toss in a virgin
      In Soviet Russia, Virgins toss you !

      (Vulgar English slang, sorry)

    22. Re:tha audacity! by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Valium? I was thinking Pepto.

    23. Re:tha audacity! by InFire · · Score: 1

      You need to toss in two virgins to cover the financial loss. Anybody know the going rate to attend a "virgin mud wrestling" event?

    24. Re:tha audacity! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      depends on whether they're becoming endangered from losing their virginity or from being thrown into volcanos.

    25. Re:tha audacity! by Durf · · Score: 1

      The *traditional* method is to toss in a virgin

      Hey, they're scientists, where are they going to come up with a virgin?

    26. Re:tha audacity! by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Hey, they're scientists, where are they going to come up with a virgin?

      Duh.

      They'll grab the smallest among them and throw him in.

      (whoosh)

      Oh. You were joking. Nevermind...

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    27. Re:tha audacity! by NARbrat · · Score: 1

      I have been reading the many comments about this scheme. Many of them are quite amusing, and some are well thought out. I have a question which those of you with some geology background may be able to answer for me.

      Living in the mid-west of the United States, I have seen instances where whole towns have been "sucked up" buy subsidence caused from removing large coal deposits under the towns years ago. Now the overlying ground is falling into the caverns left from the mining and the ground above is falling in, taking the towns with it.

      As all this mud is ejected, won't the land in the area of the mud volcano eventually start to fall in to replace the missing volume from the mud that has come to the surface? This situation even has the added disadvantage of having millions of tons of mud accumulating on the surface above to put downward pressure on the surrounding soil, thus hastening the collapse?

  2. When you thought global warming was bad... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I forgot what happened in an old science fiction movie where the scientists tried to calm a volcano. Did the lone scientist inside the volcano turned into a lava monster or was he eaten by the lava monster?

    1. Re:When you thought global warming was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here in L.A., we diverted the flows on Wilshire into the Ballona Creek using concrete barriers... oh wait, that also was a movie.

    2. Re:When you thought global warming was bad... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      L.A. doesn't need natural disasters, its movies are disastrous enough all by themselves!

  3. Sacrifice a virgin by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure you can find plenty here *looks around nervously*

    1. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by metlin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey! Speak for yourself. My realdoll took my virginity.

    2. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha! Mine turned me down. And you call yourself a nerd...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea I tried but like most women, mine wont even talk to me. I try to say something and she just stares blankly at the wall.

      Ohh well.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you can find plenty here *looks around nervously*
      Nice try, but we've all seen Zap Brannigan's website.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'd try shouting "IT'S ONLY A COMMERCIAL!" at it a few times first.

    6. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by metlin · · Score: 1

      Dude! It's called duct tape, man. And you call yourself a geek?

      Tsk, tsk.

    7. Re:Sacrifice a virgin by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      mine wont even talk to me. I try to say something and she just stares blankly at the wall.


            You should be greatful for that. Most women come with a defective "off" switch in their Broca's area.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  4. Not a natural disaster. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    This was not a natural disaster:

    The disaster occurred as the company, Lapindo Brantas, drilled thousands of feet to tap natural gas and used practices that geologists, mining engineers and Indonesian officials described as faulty.
    but a poster child for why environmental regulation is a cornerstone to a successful economy:

    Eight villages are completely or partly submerged, with homes and more than 20 factories buried to the rooftops. Some 13,000 people have been evacuated. The four-lane highway west of here has been cut in two, as has the rail line, dealing a serious blow to the economy of this region in East Java, an area vital to the country's economy. The muck has already inundated an area covering one and a half square miles.
    Sadly, the company responsible is shirking their responsibilities:

    But as the liabilities have escalated, Lapindo was sold - for $2 - last month to an offshore company, owned by the Bakrie Group, and many fear it will declare bankruptcy, allowing its owners to walk away.
    Have a look at some hi res satellite images of the disaster
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      From the Wiki link in the article:"About 86% of released gases are methane, with much less carbon dioxide and nitrogen emitted"

      I wonder what the greenhouse gas contribution of this mud volcano is, especially since methane traps more heat than CO2.

      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:Not a natural disaster. by umbrellasd · · Score: 4, Funny

      The real disaster will come when citizens start dying left and right from the concrete bowling balls that come spewing out of the volcano. "Ok, maybe we were wrong on the drilling thing, but concrete bowling balls--that's a no brainer; nothing can possibly go wrong."

    3. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Skinner: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the concrete bowling balls simply freeze to death.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is proof humans are causing global wamring!

    5. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, that's really serious.

      Here's a coral cached version of the link, the server was melting...

      These before/after pictures show the damage this mud is causing:
      http://www.crisp.nus.edu.sg.nyud.net:8090/coverage s/mudflow/index_IK_p3.html

      Here's links to the rest of the pictures:
      http://www.crisp.nus.edu.sg.nyud.net:8090/coverage s/mudflow/index.html

    6. Re:Not a natural disaster. by alshithead · · Score: 1

      "Sadly, the company responsible is shirking their responsibilities:"

      Not only are they shirking their responsibilities...they have been denying any responsibility despite the fact that they ignored drilling best practices.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    7. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Foxpaw · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      According to Basuki Hadimuljono, head of the national team managing the disaster, the project will have a budget of 4 billion rupiah (US$440,000) paid for by PT Lapindo Brantas, the oil drilling company that some locals blame for the disaster.

    8. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Methane traps more heat than CO2. The thing is, they didn't drill the hole to simply release the gas into the atmosphere. They were releasing the gas from a reservoir with the intention of subsequently capturing it. It's called natural gas. After capturing the methane and other substances, it is generally combined with oxygen in a controlled reaction to release heat, with water and carbon dioxide being the side products. Yes, water is a pretty strong greenhouse gas as well, but probably something we really don't have to worry about as the hydrologic cycle keeps it in pretty decent equilibrium.

    9. Re:Not a natural disaster. by nfarrell · · Score: 1

      Not only is this manmade, but the company doing the exploration is closely related to the Indonesian president.

      This story is also months old. The geyser formed around last August and they tried concrete around October.

    10. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pages 3 and 11 of the satellite images linked above include JPEGs rather than Flash, if that's what you prefer.

      Do look at these satellite images. If you're imagining this as being some wilderness area with the "villages" being a few huts in the jungle, you're so wrong! This is a semi-urban area full of houses and factories, with some fields in between. Or at least that's what you see in the "before" picture. Now it's just a sea of grey mud.

    11. Re:Not a natural disaster. by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      "The thing is, they didn't drill the hole to simply release the gas into the atmosphere."

      No, I didn't think this was masterminded by Dr.Evil, but Exxon didn't commission the "Valdez" as an efficient way to color coordinate the northern pacific wildlife either. They both fucked up, bad. They both need to held accountable.

      --
      We are all just people.
  5. Re:Those cursed oil companies, setting off volcano by djc6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There may be some truth to that:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidoarjo_mud_flow#Flo w

    Looks like the mud flow started eminating from an exploratory well

  6. Well... by BrunoBigfoot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The first effort, virgin sacrifices, had no effect. Being scientists, they were in great supply though.

    1. Re:Well... by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Let us only hope that virgin concrete balls are equally as easy to come by.

  7. Doesn't seem like a good idea by dickeya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As one of the physicists said "The mud will find another way out". Maybe if they plug the hole, enough pressure will build up to cause a real eruption.

    These events happen for a reason. It's the planet's way of staying in balance.

    1. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The company selling the concrete did several studies, and dumping concrete into volcanoes is definitely good.

    2. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by kfg · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they plug the hole . . .

      They'll make the coolest potato gun ever!

      KFG

    3. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      That can't be good [TM].

      Don't they install safety valves on pressure vessels as mandatory equipment to prevent... explosion. Aren't volcanoes nature's own pressure release valve?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    4. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by tilde_e · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's just a pour and the planet is going through puberty.

    5. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      they realize that, but this wasn't a natural event. it was caused by drilling. controlling the mud flow so it doesn't flood a populated area seems like a good thing to me. the point of the concrete balls isn't to block the passage of the mud. it's to control the flow so it isn't devastating a populated areas as it is at this point.

    6. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not usually in favour of superstition but if only we could find a tradition in that country of human sacrifice to appease the volcano. We could then try and plug up the volcano with celebrities. Won't do anything to stop the eruptions but it's an excellent excuse to get rid of a few of the celebs that we most want to remove from the gene pool.

      p.s. In case it's not obvious this is a joke. I'd never condone violence for real.

    7. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the mud will just find its new way out on another country, far away from Indonesia.

      Just like what developed countries like Finland or the USA do with cheap enslaving labor.

    8. Re:Doesn't seem like a good idea by badspyro · · Score: 1

      aww, and that post was looking so promissing...
      I tought you were going to be a good candidate for a BOFH possition that I have going...

  8. It's Guybrush's fault by User+956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I like how the locals blame the oil companies on the volcano erupting.

    Actually, someone fed the Volcano God some cheese. Sherman's lactose intolerant.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  9. Must be made of brass..., um, er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least they're hard as rocks.

  10. That should work just fine by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ever have a bottle of soda suddenly start spraying? How well does sticking your thumb over the nozzle help?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:That should work just fine by neax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what? untested...? This might be the equivalent of throwing ice-cubes into a vat of hot oil...

      --
      Hard work is just an accumulation of the easy things that you didn't do when you should have.
    2. Re:That should work just fine by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Troll

      Although I would hate to have to be the guy who sticks his finer in that hole.

      I dunno ... I've stuck my finer into plenty of nice holes over the years.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:That should work just fine by Kootenay_Kid · · Score: 1

      Your thumb might just be too small. I've plugged a pop bottle successfully before. Besides that point this is more like just screwing the lid back on. Not all that uncommon in oil and gas exploration. This may be a little bigger case. However similar principles apply. My bet is on them being successful.

    4. Re:That should work just fine by cookieinc · · Score: 1

      In this situation, we follow the geophysicists' advice - substituting concrete balls with something a little smaller, like a Mentos

    5. Re:That should work just fine by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      What they hope to accomplish is more like a muffler on car exhaust. Plugging the exhaust pipe doesn't work the way you want, letting it out unimpeded is too loud, so you let it out but only through a maze of twisty passages all alike. A muffler produces some backpressure but not enough to blow holes in the rest of the exhaust system.

      Which is not to say that it will work. Mother Nature is quite capable of hearing both of us out and then saying "Analogies are like goldfish -- sometimes they don't illuminate the discussion" and creating an earth shattering kaboom.

    6. Re:That should work just fine by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      They should just turn the lights off and let the exhaust be eaten by a grue.

    7. Re:That should work just fine by tgd · · Score: 1

      Next time try your balls.

    8. Re:That should work just fine by khallow · · Score: 1

      Looking at the problem, I don't think pressure buildup is the issue. Instead it's the likelihood that the fluid will find another way to the surface if the main one is impeded too much. From reading through other stories on the issue, it appears that the problem is that a Indonesian oil company broke through the sealing (layer of clay or something like that) on a pressurized aquifer with a well that wasn't structurally sound (ie, lined with steel). The issue then appears to be the hole in the seal. That break is more than two kilometers down. The cement balls are intended to act as an obstruction about 100 meters down. There is no exhaust system, but rather that the current path to the surface was the weakest of the possible paths to the surface. There are no doubt other weak spots.

  11. It'll never work by Loadmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    They want to drop concrete balls into it? Do you take concrete balls when you have an upset stomach? Me neither. What they need is a dump truck full of Tums and a concrete mixer full of Mylanta. If that doesn't work you can always use a virgin. But concrete balls? These "scientists" need to get a real scientist--a witch doctor. They're witches and they're doctors. That's a lot of school. And if they can't fix it you can just throw them in there and save your concrete balls for outside a library or something.

    Swi

    1. Re:It'll never work by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, They are basicly dropping Tums and mylanta into it. The active ingredients of Tums involve calcium carbonate. One of the active ingredients of Mylanta is Aluminum Hydroxide. Note the core elements are calcium and aluminum. The compounds allow them to be digested and used easily in the body.

      The chemical make up of concrete (portland cement mainly) is mostly
      1. Tricalcium silicate
      2. Dicalcium silicate
      3. Tricalcium aluminate
      4. Tetracalcium aluminoferrite
      5. Gypsum
      Notice that these are all compounds of calcium and aluminum. I asume the heated water will help disolve them.

      pfft, we have just solve this problem. Give us another challenge ;)

      Strange how close you are. The witch doctor might add some value too. Maybe they can start a cultist religion surounding the "apeasing the volcano god" and use the funds from the colection plate to pay for the balls. Once a month the witch doctor could say the volcano god said supply it with Tums or it will cause destruction just before the colection plate is passed around.
    2. Re:It'll never work by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      dude, did you like study pharmacology and material science in college or something?

    3. Re:It'll never work by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Dude, you are totally not living up to your nick.

    4. Re:It'll never work by AndersOSU · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know if you're trolling or not, but since you've been modded so highly someone needs to correct these horrible mis-statements.

      First, you have the antacid chemistry precisely backwards. The active part is the hydroxide. You know the part that isn't an acid... as in antacid. The aluminum is there in the Mylanta because they wanted a stable liquid formulation, which hyroxides usually aren't. Aluminum hydroxide is an insoluble salt, and very stable on the shelf, until it reacts with your stomach acids neutraling them.

      Second, the "active" part of the concrete is the silicate. The calcium and aluminum are there because when they hydrate in the presence of sulfates (the gypsum) they act as binders. A binder is undeniably useful, but alternatively we could line our streets with mined chunks of silicate and if would be similar to concrete. The only reason we need the binders is so that we can grind it up for easy transport, slurry it for easy application, and it will still be hard like silicate when all is said and done.

    5. Re:It'll never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy is flawed. Dropping chains of concrete balls in a mud volcano is more like using these to cure diarrhea.

    6. Re:It'll never work by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Settle down a bit. reread what I wrote then get back with me.

      Well, I guess you might have read it wrong so i will eleborate a little. Seeing how I was posting to someone who was claiming we should dump Tums in the thing instead of concrete, I'm not too sure we should get very serious about this. In fact, maybe that wooshsssh noise you just heard..the witch doctor.,. ahh never mind,. Just think to yourself "it's all fun and humor"

        First, I didn't state the chemistry of the antacid. I stated the listed active indredients and then said The compounds allow them to be digested and used easily in the body. I also said the core ingredients were calcium and aluminum because if i remeber my chemistry correctly, you name the value that either the reaction happened to or has the most weight and usualy it is both the same. So saying the core elements of the are aluminium or calcium should be somwhat corect. Maybe not to what causes the antacid to work but to the compound yes.

      Next, What causes concrete to work Is FASCINATING and all but for this exorcise all we need to do is look at what is in it. Namely the same root ingredients as the root ingredients of theactive parts in the antacid. Add a witch doctor and a colection plate and we have the problem fixed.

      Seriously though, Did you miss the humor in there? BTW, If your still were your name implies I'm about 30 minutes from you once I get out of the cattle fields and onto the highway. We should drink some beer and toss coins at prostitutes some night. Well, maybe not but we need to work on your sarcasm and humor skills a bit. And thanks for the explaintions on concrete and tums.

  12. Dog in a bathtub! by lindseyp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it just my filthy internet-corrupted mind, or did anyone else immediately think "dog in a bathtub"

    No I'm not linking, go and look it up if you must

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    1. Re:Dog in a bathtub! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dog in a bathtub is impossible.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Dog in a bathtub! by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      Almost. But not totally.

      One word: "Booyah!"

      Seriously, if you look hard enough you'll find it. This is the internet, after all.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    3. Re:Dog in a bathtub! by kypper · · Score: 1

      No, it's just difficult... like getting a dog in a bathtub.

    4. Re:Dog in a bathtub! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Cool! by second+class+skygod · · Score: 3, Informative

    Like I always say:
    There's pretty much nothing that can't be accomplished if you have big enough balls.

  14. How Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Teabagging a volcano...

  15. Dangerous by jonadab · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like a good way to turn a shield volcano into a stratovolcano.

    The milk jug analogy is flawed. With holes in the bottom of a milk jug, it's just gravity that lets the water pour out under the force of its own weight, so yes, plugging one hole, or plugging the hole halfway, reduces the rate of flow and doesn't change the pressure -- because there's no pressure in the first place.

    Hook up a garden hose to the milk jug and then try it, though, and you've got an entirely different situation. Now you can turn the jug _over_, so that the holes are on the top, and you'll still get water squirting out, just like mud flowing *up* out of a volcano, against gravity. Plug one of the holes in the jug then, and you will indeed get more flow out the other hole.

    If the article accurately describes their strategy, they're only going to make matters worse, not better.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a first year engineering student I also quickly noticed that their thinking was undeniably flawed. You perfectly explained the error in their thinking and a more correct way of envisioning the situation.
      Pressure is constant, and Pressure = Force /Area , reducing area increases the force, but the pressure is still constant.

    2. Re:Dangerous by khallow · · Score: 1

      It probably won't work, depending on how far down the obstacle gets. My take is that the break that needs to be plugged is almost 2 miles down (where Lapindo Brantas broke through into the aquifer that is currently leaking). But they're aiming to get only 100 meters down.

    3. Re:Dangerous by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Pressure is constant

      And that's why you're a first year, where they teach you perfect "ideal" models.

      In the real world it's not a static condition. The well hole will have resistance to flow, as such there will be a gradual pressure drop over it's length. As you plug near the surface the flow is reduced, thus reducing resistance based pressure losses, and the pressure in the rest of the well hole will increase.

  16. I recommend "pacing and leading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a technique which is quite effective for calming an individual, for instance an angry co-worker or customer. I suspect it would be effective on volcanoes as well.

    Step 1: adopt the energy level and tone of the individual. For instance if he is nervous and agitated, you should act the same. Appear genuinely interested in his problem.

    Step 2: once you've matched his energy level, begin to "come down". Start talking more calmly and rationally. Describe how you will resolve his issue. The individual should start to calm down with you.

    For a volcano, this should work as follows:

    Step 1: Raise your internal temperature to one or two thousand degrees. This helps you match the heat of the volcano's molten lava. Then, begin cracking, smoking, or spewing small columns of molten rock. This lets the volcano believe you're "on his side".

    Step 2: Begin to cool. Allow your lava streams to become glassy and hard. Act like a normal run-of-the-mill mountain, and talk about how great it is to NOT eject molten liquid all over everything.

    The volcano should now be calm.

    1. Re:I recommend "pacing and leading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds kind of wishy-washy to me. If the concrete ball thing ends up working on the volcano, perhaps you should start using that method for dealing with angry co-workers.

    2. Re:I recommend "pacing and leading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First offer the volcano a free personality test.

  17. Just use by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chuck Norris's balls.

    I don't know why I said that.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Just use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck would only have to clear his throat in the direction of the volcano and it would not only stop, but suck back in all the mud that has been deposited......and impregnante every woman on the island.

    2. Re:Just use by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why bother? He should just roundhouse kick it shut!

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    3. Re:Just use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris' balls are so big you only need to use one of them.

    4. Re:Just use by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Funny

      they passed a UN resolution prohibiting Chuck Norris from roundhouse kicking as it's classified as a weapon of mass ass-whoopin.

    5. Re:Just use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God is dead-Nietzsche Nietzsche is dead-God
      Nietzsche is God - The Dead
    6. Re:Just use by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Why bother? He should just roundhouse kick it shut!
      That is assuming the possibility of Chuck Norris wanting it shut. He could have wanted to watch some mud wrestling awhile ago and roundhouse kicked it open in the first place.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  18. right by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

    This idea will work about as well as a butt plug would to stop explosive diarrhea.
    (not that I have tried that !!!)

    1. Re:right by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      congratulations for being the hundredth person to not read the article. they're not trying to clog the hole with concrete balls. they're trying to absorb the energy from the mudflow by converting it into rotational energy.

  19. Where's a virgin when you need one? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last November they were tossing in live chickens and goats......

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Where's a virgin when you need one? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Army Sergeant Sumariyanto, who is in charge of granting permits for rituals, says firstly it was gruesome and many animals were running amok trying to escape their fate. It didn't work either, he adds drily, saying that in some cases the mud got worse immediately after a sacrificial ceremony." http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2 0987236-5003416,00.html

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Where's a virgin when you need one? by RMB2 · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's /. I'm sure we can find one around here SOMEWHERE....

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    3. Re:Where's a virgin when you need one? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Yea right, I only read slashdot because of the chicks.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  20. Indiana Jones by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    Time to call in Indy for some special consultation. Next thing you know, they'll be dropping natives, snakes, and Nazis into the volcano.

    1. Re:Indiana Jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like MacGyver. He stopped acid running out of a tank with a chocolate bar. Mud should be easy.

    2. Re:Indiana Jones by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Time to call in Indy for some special consultation. Next thing you know, they'll be dropping natives, snakes, and Nazis into the volcano.
      In reality, Harrison Ford would just call George Lucas who would just drop Jar Jar Binks into the volcano, thus causing the volcano to experience a massive sudden existence failure and killing off that damn Jar Jar character.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  21. Almost right... by Cordath · · Score: 1

    It is incorrect to say that there is no pressure at the bottom of the milk jug. There *is* pressure due to the weight of water above the holes. This is why the water will come out of the holes at a higher rate when the jug is nearly full than when it's almost empty.

    The garden hose analogy is also a tad flawed. If you attach the hose to the jug the jug will wind up being at same the pressure of the hose whether there's one hole or two in it.

    An analogy that is actually applicable in this case is that of a large tank with a brittle bottom that is out in a rainstorm. Say that with two holes the water flowing out equals the rain coming in, so the system is stable. Now, plug a hole. The flow rate out is cut in half and the tank starts to fill up. The pressure at the bottom of the tank increases as the weight of water above increases. If that pressure reaches a certain point, the bottom of the tank will form other holes or even catastrophically rupture.

    If the scientists had presented this analogy then there would probably have been fear that plugging the volcano could result in an explosive eruption. It certainly would be something I'd be concerned about, although maybe the geophysicists involved somehow know that the pressure won't build up to the point where an eruption will be possible.

    1. Re:Almost right... by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The think best effect this might have should be compared with a percolator coffee pot. Their approach is trying to reach a different means but it could have a positive effect for other reasons. And I beleive the solution they are trying is simular to the same process of a percolator even though they are only trying to block the channel the mud is comming from..

      Now, If you examine a percolator you will notice a tube with a wide part at the bottom and narrower at the top. The large surface area of the heated part bring water to boiling wich then forces some up into the tube, Once the water burst out the top, it tips the tube letting fresh cooler water in to repeat the process. This volcano is simlar because it is spewing hot mud and not "hot lava". It probably isn't an actual erupting volcano in the sence that hot lava is in the bottom of the hole either. It is likley just a layer of bedrock or something with ground water sitting close by heated to an extreamly high temperature.

      Imagine taking rocks and placing them in the bottom of the tube to displace as much water as possible were the heating element is. the reaction is going to be less water heated and spouted to the top. Eventualy the rocks will heat to some degree but the flow of water will also cool them so they sholdn't get as hot as the heating element.

      The effect is that this volcano will take less water and materials in and push less of the same out. I don't think it will actualy plug the hole and slow/stop it from happening if it has any effect at all. Once more material is in the hole, Materials that make up the mud will also coat the balls proving an insulation layer that should slow the movment to the water even more from the change in heat disapation.

      The scary part is that the push for enviromentaly friendly energy is running to a proccess simular to whats happening here. Geothermal electricity production can be done by drilling 4 or so miles into the earth were the heat is about 400 degrees and then pumping a coolant liquid into a heat echanger and the resulting steam would power generators. But we are purposing drilling deep enough and close enough to heat that we could run the risk of starting much of the same thing.

    2. Re:Almost right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your name is extremely relevant to your post. You failed to read the article tied to the mudd valcano, ie, the wiki article. Mud volcanoes are not hot, they aren't volcanoes (in the heat sense) at all, just read the wiki article.

      Also, your information on Geothermal energy production is way off!

      Fundamentally you have a bad conception of the problem. It is not a percolator, the mud is not moving to the surface due to temperature, The mud is moving because there is pressure behind it expelling the mud. His hose scenario is quite correct, there is a constant flow (pressure is constant) of mud, blocking some of the escape area only increases the force behind the rest of it. For example, use your thumb on the end of a hose, as the thumb covers more of the connector the force of the water increases (proof is that the water travels farther, force = Mass * Acceleration.).

      Keep trying, Stay in School,
      Matt~

    3. Re:Almost right... by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      Quote: "Fundamentally you have a bad conception of the problem. It is not a percolator, the mud is not moving to the surface due to temperature, The mud is moving because there is pressure behind it expelling the mud. "

      Mr. Matt, I am under the impression that either you never saw a percolator work or that you misunderstood the principle behind the thing. Liquid isn't moving to the top compartiment because of the _temperature_ of the water, but simply because the boiling water produces water vapor at sufficient pressures to push the remaining water from the bottom compartment to the top compartment. Thus the analogy holds.

      Oh, and as for your force=mass*accelleration thing, here's a brain-teaser: how do you determine the mass of a constant stream of water?

      Cheers,

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    4. Re:Almost right... by phayes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your percolator analogy still has little to do with the mud volcano's processes. The percolator works because the water vapour bubbles upwards and induces motion in the surrounding liquid. By bringing the heat into the process you're only confusing the issue as dissolved gasses have very little to do with it.

      Instead of using a percolator, imagine a waterbed covered with books. The water in the bed is the mud layer, the membrane containing the water is the clay layer, and the books represent the earth above the clay. Once the membrane containing the water is pierced, the weight of the books forces the water out much as the weight of the earth is now forcing the water out of the bed. Now imagine that the water in the bed erodes the hole once it has been made making the problem worse.

      To stop a percolator, turn off the heat. To fix a leaky waterbed, you need to patch the liner or wait until all the water drains out.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    5. Re:Almost right... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > although maybe the geophysicists involved somehow know that the pressure won't
      > build up to the point where an eruption will be possible.

      I had that in the back of my head, too, but the article doesn't mention it. All it does say is that the milk jug analogy is what the scientists used to sell their idea to the suits. It doesn't say they understood their analogy was inherently flawed, but then, it's possible that they simply wouldn't mention that to a layman reporter, for fear it would get back to the suits.

      Which is why I qualified my statement about the probable efficacy of their plan with the "if the article accurately explains" clause.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  22. Just use some... by TheSexican · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Kaopectate. Every time I have a mud volcano spewing from my backside this seems to work.

    --
    Hey, guys. Big gulps, huh? Cool. All right! Well, see ya later.
  23. That takes balls by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Pun intended. Does anyone else forsee in this the comedy that will likely unfold? I fully expect to read a story next week about a vocano in Indonesia that is firing concrete balls into the orbit and that they're taking our Chinese satellites or that they're pummeling a nearby city. I liken this to sticking your finger in the end of a shotgun barrel.

    1. Re:That takes balls by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      They tested this on mythbusters and while, sure the finger was destroyed it also did cause significant damage to the gun. Perhaps just enough to stop this volcano.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  24. Video by RMB2 · · Score: 1

    For reference: Mud volcano

    --
    [/sarcasm]
  25. Water Bottle Example by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So they demonstrated their theory using a water bottle with two holes cut in the bottom, and showed how covering one hole slowed the rate of water leaving the bottle. That's all good and fine, but we're talking about water that's responding to the force of gravity, not pent-up pressure and geothermal heating. If the weight of the balls can counteract that, great, but if that's their idea of a physically accurate analogy, I think they might be in for some surprises. Here's hoping it works, anyway, despite their faulty physics.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    1. Re:Water Bottle Example by Takichi · · Score: 1

      Not that I think their plan is a good one based on the information the article provided, but we shouldn't judge their calculations based on the water experiment. The article says that they used the demonstration "to sell the project to the government". I imagine they followed up the experiment with a summary; that the volcano is a series of tubes that can be blocked if you put a lot of things into it.

    2. Re:Water Bottle Example by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      let's just hope it doesn't turn out to be a big truck...

    3. Re:Water Bottle Example by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought it was more like a truck. ;)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  26. simple solution by azakem · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Have they tried a virgin sacrifice?

  27. Dunking their balls into a volcano.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're attempting to stop up the volcano though, I'm sure they'd make a great projectiles.

  28. Mud Volcano by sokoban · · Score: 1

    Uh, when I first heard the term "mud volcano" I immediately thought about what happens when I eat too much Taco Bell.

    And the idea of sticking 4 concrete balls with metal chains attached to them into my "mud volcano" is kinda sickening.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Mud Volcano by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You're plagarizing Fark. Classy.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:Mud Volcano by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Its still funny ;-D ...and gross

      --
    3. Re:Mud Volcano by sokoban · · Score: 1

      I don't read fark. Did they do that same thing?

      I've met Drew Curtis a few times though. He's a pretty cool guy.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    4. Re:Mud Volcano by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      "Indonesian mud volcano may have been caused by oil drilling, not Taco Bell lettuce as previously reported"

      from
      http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink =2546705

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  29. I see they are using rule 6 by jon787 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The opposing viewpoint shown in the article reminds me of the 6th networking truth:

    "It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it." --RFC1925

    --
    X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
  30. Easy fix by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    Just cram a couple of nukes down it. If you want any how to infomation consult SciFi Channel or any one of a hundred low budget scifi films.

    1. Re:Easy fix by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Nuke the volcano from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Easy fix by mjwx · · Score: 0

      I just don't get this reliance on nukes. Surely nuclear weapons wont solve all natural disasters. I mean for once cant we travel to the centre of the earth and not detonate a nuke? Can't we just give it flowers instead

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  31. The point is to buy time for the company by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    to get the hell away from the problem. If they bottle it up causing a worse problem in 5 or 10 years, they won't care.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  32. Scientists are smart. by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    geophysicists now plan to enact an untested scheme to try and slow the flow: dropping concrete balls into the volcano

    So basically when the volcano explodes, it won't just throw lava, but we'll also have raining canon balls. Smart!

    1. Re:Scientists are smart. by mikael · · Score: 1

      I?f the pressure builds up high enough, we might have the first man-made object launched into space by natural means.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Scientists are smart. by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part where they said it's a "mud volcano"? That means it spews mud, not lava. A different process is responsible. Usually, the mud is 2-3 degrees Centigrade warmer than ambient. Definitely cool enough to bathe in, for instance.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  33. Re:Those cursed oil companies, setting off volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I like how the locals blame the oil companies on the volcano erupting.


    I like that too. It's much better than blaming some innocent scapegoat.

  34. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This calls for the superpowers of TEAM VIRGIN!

  35. Re:Those cursed oil companies, setting off volcano by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, I'll bite. The oil company drilled a borehole next to the volcano. When the borehole exploded it provided a vent for the mud to flow out of. According to This site the oil company was not following standard operating procedure designed to minimize the risk of this kind of event.

    --
    Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  36. Traditional methods? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So how, exactly, is this any different from the traditional volcano-god appeasement technique of throwing hundreds of naked virgins into the volcano? Apart from being less exciting.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:Traditional methods? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I think it would appease the gods more to throw all the American Idol contestans into the volcano instead. Naked virgins are worth saving. At least, any god I would believe in would think the same thing!

    2. Re:Traditional methods? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So how, exactly, is this any different from the traditional volcano-god appeasement technique of throwing hundreds of naked virgins into the volcano?

      The scientists are smarter: they keep the virgins for themselves and throw just the clothes into the volcano.

    3. Re:Traditional methods? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      they keep the virgins for themselves and throw just the clothes into the volcano

      Oh hey good one. I'll have to remember that for next time I'm in front of the ethics committee.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:Traditional methods? by initialE · · Score: 1

      Flying naked virgins, flying concrete cannonballs, you really need me to tell you the difference?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    5. Re:Traditional methods? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      This way you save the naked virgins for yourself..Guh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. Uh, Hello?! We are Geeks... by WED+Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't we missing the most obvious solution here?

    We are geeks after all. And we know what will calm a volcano.

    V I R G I N S

    O.K., I need 3 Linux nerds, and 3 Linux nerdettes (come on, you know, you mention Linux at a party, you ain't getting laid).

    Volunteers?

    Free trip to Indonesia.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:Uh, Hello?! We are Geeks... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      I'll take the nerdettes. Ill show here how to fsck.

      --
    2. Re:Uh, Hello?! We are Geeks... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      (come on, you know, you mention Linux at a party, you ain't getting laid).

      I just go to parties where they like masochists.

    3. Re:Uh, Hello?! We are Geeks... by AgentPaper · · Score: 1

      ::shrugs:: I'm sure there are some people who find comparing Linux distros to be quite a turn-on. "Come on back to my place, I'll show you my Edgy Eft..."

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
  38. Tom Hanks and Projectiles! by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    Just hire Tom Hanks to jump into it. If that doesn't work, at least we'll be rid of Tom Hanks and have a great new You Tube Video!.

    Seriously though, by adding these concrete balls, isn't that like putting shot into a black powder gun? The reason this is happening is to release pressure. Backing up the volcano and building up more pressure can't be a good thing. Especially with such conveniently sized plugs... I can just imagine the first report of someone being killed by man-made volcano debris.

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    1. Re:Tom Hanks and Projectiles! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant Tom Hanks and something else

  39. Two words by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...muzzle loader.

    rj

  40. Scientists Attempt To Calm Volcano by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have they tried burping it? It might have a little gas trapped it its belly. That and a story should get it to calm right down.

    1. Re:Scientists Attempt To Calm Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFA, someone named Nurhandoko said, "It will make the mud tired. We're killing the mud softly.".

      Killing it softly, with his balls.

  41. I can see the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Balls thoroughly licked mud volcano

    1. Re:I can see the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indonesia was never part of the Soviet Union.

    2. Re:I can see the headline by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      +1, Much More Clever than the Parent

  42. Cartoons by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Haven't we learned from cartoons that this is a really bad idea? Shortly after dumping the balls into the volcano, it's going to contract, then spit them out. The will fly high into the air, then crash into the people, stuck running in place, who threw them in.

    Think of the poor cartoon creatures that will be harmed!

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  43. hope they film it by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    The volcano will be angered by this and most likely erupt immediately spewing giant concrete balls into the nearby towns causing many more deaths and destruction than the volcano would have.

  44. Plop, plop..... by blankoboy · · Score: 1
    Fizz, fizz. Oh what a relief it is!

    First thing that popped into my head...imagining a helicopter flying over "plopping" them into a smiling volcano".

  45. Score by 6ame633k · · Score: 1

    Earth - 1 | People - Zip

    --
    You had me at merlot
  46. Free markets are always by Todamont · · Score: 2, Funny

    best off with more government controls. Unless you want "real" freedom...

    --
    Kharma is like a boomerang. Mine is broken.
    1. Re:Free markets are always by sporkme · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The drilling company is owned by members of their government.
      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidoarjo_mud_flow:

      The drilling company Lapindo Brantas was a subsidiary owned by PT Energi Mega Persada Tbk, in turn 60% owned and controlled by the Bakrie Group. [9] The Bakrie Group is owned by the Coordinating Minister for the People's Welfare Aburizal Bakrie and his brothers[10]. Lapindo Brantas has taken over the initial responsibility and costs caring for the mitigation of the effects of the mud flow. It indicated to have set aside $ 140 million of which half had been used by September.[10] While officially not running the family business since joining the cabinet, A. Bakrie received protests by environmentalists in view of the damage done by his family's company. [11]
      Yeah, government controls sure could have helped in this case. If their government had more control, they would probably claim to have been drilling for mud. Behold, the glorious mud harvest of the patriotic people of our great land! Surely all can see that the mud has proven to be most beneficial to the "People's Welfare!"
  47. Sounds like a cannon... by Progman3K · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And once the pressure builds up enough on those balls, there might be a shower of concrete balls on the surrounding countryside.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:Sounds like a cannon... by RMB2 · · Score: 1

      Ugh, seriously! That's enough of these nonsense "concrete volcano-cannonball" posts. Did anybody even bother to check out the video link provided above? This thing isn't gonig to blast clusters of concrete spheres hundreds of meters into the air. Presently, it isn't even sending little tiny bits of mud 10's of millimeters into the air.

      --
      [/sarcasm]
  48. Already Tried by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Funny

    dropping concrete balls into the volcano. I already tried that and ended up sleeping on the couch for my efforts. They should try some flowers instead.
    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  49. Pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first thought is the build up of pressure; they covered it in the article:
    FTA
    "But he points out that reducing the size of the channel is likely to increase the pressure, just like squeezing the end of a hose. "I would predict that the mud would probably exit at the other holes, or farther along," says Swarbrick. This would just transfer the problem to somewhere else. "The mud will find another way out," he says."

    Either there are going to be:
    1) Flying balls (not FSM)
    2) Leakage from other areas
    3) More pressured release from the current opening; (no tube girl pics; please).

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. In a test of wills between.... by bmo · · Score: 1

    the Universe and Man, the Universe always wins.

    My Dad calls this "shovelling shit against the tide."

    And in this case, it's almost literal.

    --
    BMO

  52. A more practical solution by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would be to explode a deeply placed high explosive device, in the range of kilotons. The idea is to breakup the the flow channels, and let it collapse on itself and clog itself up. The explosive does not have to be nuclear, but it needs to be both large and deeply located. Correct placement would help as well.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:A more practical solution by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      would be to explode a deeply placed high explosive device, in the range of kilotons.

      Except for that tedious problem of obtaining, placing and detonating a few thousand tons of HE in the right spot deep down inside a mud volcano that is busily spewing mud upwards.

      But that's just a minor engineering problem, isn't it?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:A more practical solution by phayes · · Score: 5, Informative
      As I remember it from the initial stories, the problem arose when the oil company drilled through a relatively thin clay layer into a very thick mud bearing layer under very high pressure. The clay layer acted as a dike to stop the underlying liquids from migrating upward. Normal drilling technique when such geography is present would have been to insert a liner in the drillhole in order to protect the clay strata from erosion, but this was not employed here. When the drillhole pierced the clay strata, the high pressure mud below it quickly eroded the initial breach into a large breach which followed the drillhole upward to transform it into the mud volcano that now exists.


      It is a situation that has a lot in common with the levee breaches in NO after Katrina. In NO, initial attempts to repair the levee breaches by transporting large, heavy blocks into the breaches were unsuccessful as the breaches were just too large and the blocks were swept away. I expect the big ball method described in TFA to have as little effect as the big block method did in NO. It was only when the water levels equalized in NO that the corps were able to finally seal off the breaches.

      It seems to me that your method of using explosives to fix the problem would do nothing to help and would probably only widen the breach in the clay layer, much as using explosives would not have helped in NO. Using explosives in the mud bearing layer is impractical (beyond just getting the into place as another poster noted) as the mud bearing layer is too thick to be obstructed in this manner. Using explosives in the clay layer would only widen the breach. Using explosives above the clay layer would do nothingf as the pressure is already high enough to work it's way to the surface once it is through the clay layer.

      The only means of resealing the breach as I see it would be to drill through the clay layer (using liners to protect the clay from erosion) and then inject cement in large enough quantities to cause a plug to be formed below the clay. I have no idea if it is feasible as I do not know how large the breach has become and how much cement could be pumped in before being swept away.

      The "experiment" described in TFA where the debit was halved by plugging one out of two holes in a bottle is false as there is only one hole at present. Even if they achieve their goal of dumping the balls so that they settle on the clay layer, the mudflow will just erode around them and create a yet larger breach as nothing in the plan allows for the erosion of the mud layer.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:A more practical solution by Anonymous+Know-It-Al · · Score: 5, Funny
      Except for that tedious problem of obtaining, placing and detonating a few thousand tons of HE in the right spot deep down inside a mud volcano that is busily spewing mud upwards. But that's just a minor engineering problem, isn't it?

      This is were Bruce Willis comes in.

    4. Re:A more practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the problem arose when the oil company drilled through a relatively thin clay layer into a very thick mud bearing layer "

      NO MUD FOR OIL!
      NO MUD FOR OIL!
      NO MUD FOR OIL!

    5. Re:A more practical solution by solitas · · Score: 1
      The "experiment" described in TFA where the debit was halved by plugging one out of two holes in a bottle is false as there is only one hole at present.

      Worse than that: apparently they don't understand the difference between internal pressure and gravitic flow.

      You plug all the holes in the bottle and it's still going to be at the same pressure (head). No big deal. BUT, you plug the hole(s) that internal pressure is forcing the mud through (against gravity, mind you), and you're going to have a 'situation' at hand.

      Pressure builds (unlike the emptying bottle) and velocity/flow/erosion will increase.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    6. Re:A more practical solution by Teun · · Score: 1

      The retaining layer of clay that was since many thousands of years keeping the mud from reaching the surface was breached by an oil drilling rig in the hands of greedy and corrupt owners/politicians.
      This layer of clay is far too thin to be able to 'collapse' into itself and thus close the breach.
      Quite a few world-class experts from oil companies have had a look at the problem and so far no one has devised a reliable cure for the problem.

      Some 15,000 people have due to the floods lost their homes.
      Dumping the Indonesian political establishment in the crater might not stop the flow but at least prevent recurrence of such a disaster...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:A more practical solution by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      Pressure builds Why will the pressure build? (This is a legitimate question that I'm hoping to get an answer to because I don't know what the answer is)

      This isn't a real volcano (the kind fueled by lava & other hot things moving around deep inside the earth)... they just drilled in a place/way they shouldn't have and sprang a leak.

      Sounds like the proper analogy is if you drill a hole in a compressed air tank (assuming it doesn't explode!). If you plug the hole back up with something, sure there will be pressure on whatever you use to plug it with but not any more than there was on the part you removed when you made the hole. No pressure is building...
    8. Re:A more practical solution by phayes · · Score: 1

      The volcano may be relieving pressure on the artesian system enough to lower the pressure, but we don't know. The Indonesians who are the only ones with detailed knowledge haven't been exactly forthcoming on the issue that I have seen. The method proposed in TFA doesn't exactly inspire any confidence that they have a good idea...

      The major issue is: Has the breach weakened the previously impermeable layer?
      If so, plugging the hole won't be enough. If not, then it may be possible.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    9. Re:A more practical solution by AllergicToMilk · · Score: 1

      We'll just throw a few FPGA's into the system and solve it in software later.

      --
      There are only 6,863,795,529 types of people in the world.
    10. Re:A more practical solution by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      The method proposed in TFA doesn't exactly inspire any confidence that they have a good idea... Stranger things have been tried like pushing railroad cars into a hole in the Susquehanna River. Thats basically the inverse of the problem they've got, so who knows.

      I think if their plan is just to slow the flow to buy time to make a way to channel the mud someplace then its worth attempting. Otherwise, they're just delaying the inevitable.

      I don't get their plan of "throw 1 in, wait & see what happens, then throw 2 in, wait & see what happens, etc.". They should just dump in everything they've got as fast as possible, otherwise they won't be able to get ahead of the erosion.
    11. Re:A more practical solution by jafac · · Score: 1

      I'll take another stab at this; (though I like your idea of trying to form a concrete plug beneath the clay layer - I wonder if the dynamics of the mud at such high pressure would even allow this - and I also wonder how long it would take to drill down that deep. . . )

      Seems like it might be a good idea to dig a trench to divert the mudflow, and let it flow out, though away from populated areas. Depends on how far away the sea is though, a long trench could take a very long time to dig too.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:A more practical solution by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Several kilometes of mud would have a fair inertia. Blocking the flow rapidl;y could lead to the same effect as "Water Hammer", with devastating consequences.

  53. Mud Volcano may erupt for years by jonfr · · Score: 1

    The main issue that they have to deal with is the pressure inside the mud volcano. How long this mud volcano continues to erupt is anybody guess, since it's eruption period depends on the pressure of the gas (maybe also water, I am not sure on that) that creates this mud eruption. This might continue for years or decades if they can't stop it now.

    Here is a interesting blog about this mud volcano.
    http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/mud-volcano-in-java -may-continue-to-erupt-for-months-maybe-years-1242 9.html

  54. Great balls of fire! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Is a volcano without fire still a volcano?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  55. What? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 0

    Are they TRYING to piss off the volcano god?

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  56. Goodness gracious.... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Great balls of fire!!!!

  57. John McPhee by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    John McPhee's book The Control of Nature has a large section on Icelanders' attempts to divert lava flows from a town and harbor. It's a heck of a good read if disaster science turns you on.

    http://www.johnmcphee.com/controlofnature.htm

  58. Therapeutic mud spa... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    If they turn the place into a health spa, they can have lots of tourism and make more money from selling mud, than from selling the rice that used to grow there.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  59. Rock the house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shake my nerves and you rattle my brain
    Too much love drives a man insane
    You broke my will, oh what a thrill
    Goodness gracious great balls of ...

    great big balls ...

    Awww, screw it, you go, Jerry Lee!!! WOOT!

  60. well, mine.. by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    .. served me with a restraining order

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  61. Oh noes! by mjeppsen · · Score: 0

    Don't do it! It's a trick!

  62. Hmmpff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Bush's fault!

    If Bush and Cheney hadn't sent Haliburton in to drill, this never would've happened.

  63. East Java? by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

    Well, atleast it's happening in a Java environment, and since Java is so slow, they still have some time to ponder this idea before they set it into action.

    (Sorry, had to be said)

    -E

  64. You, however, are stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a mud volcano. By definition, there is no lava. Skipping even the summary these days, are we?

  65. And In Other News... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
    Washington, DC - A Congress belching forth shit is causing huge problems for the average US voter. The ravages of this shit-blowing Congress have caused an enormous stench, and scientists are preparing to drop concrete balls on their heads.

    "We're gonna fill Capitol Hill's shit pit with concrete." says Dr. Wulf B. Snerkfart, senior director of the Anti-Shit League. "That should calm down that shit volcano, and then we'll drop large iron anvils on the White House, which is probably the shittiest place on Earth. We also have plans to drop screaming, horny monkeys on top of Bill O'reilly."

    Attempts to contact Congressional leaders lead us to a couple of five cent hookers and a guy named Rod who stores his saliva to overthrow his Martian overlords.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  66. Clever Racket. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    The key to the "throw the virgins into the volcano" trick seems pretty clear to me. It's a cheap ploy by the local volcano appeasment committee to convince the winsome wenches to prove their vacant virginity through deleterious deeds.

    Obviously this leeds to some pretty lame pick-up/reject lines. "If it were a choice between you and the volcano, I pick the volcano..." Although I wonder how many would really risk it...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  67. Ben Wa Balls! by GayBliss · · Score: 1

    Sounds like giant Ben Wa Balls! Could be an effective alternative to throwing a virgin in the volcano. Especially if the volcano is female.

  68. I thought ... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    ... all your problems start AFTER your balls drop.

  69. slowing things down. by rew · · Score: 1

    My first reaction was: That will just make it mad.

    After reading part of the article, they argue that the speed of escape of one hole doesn't influence the speed of escape in another. This is fine, if you have a volcano with two holes spewing. You might slow one down if the flow of lava there is "annoying".

    But Volcanoes in general tend not to show the behaviour of "Mwah there is hole, the lava flow will be proportional to the size of the hole". Volcanoes tend to "want to" spew this much material, and if it can't get out, pressure builds up until something bursts. Volently.

  70. The less Indonesians the better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that's how a select few Australian people feel, that place is a complete disaster, fuck them all.

  71. Louie! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

    I wanna dip my BALLS in it!

  72. Oh no... by JakartaDean · · Score: 1

    Oh boy, is this ever a mistake.

    This thing has been spewing thousands of cubic metres a day of fairly foul mud for many months now. There are two alternative explanations of why it started. The one most people around here (cynics all) believe is that the drilling caused the mud flow because the drilling company didn't install casing as they went, which is standard procedure -- especially in a populated area. Casing, after all, costs money. There is an alternative position, that it was caused by an earthquake two days earlier. The earthquake view has been taken up by the Indonesian Coordinating Minister for People's Welfare because (you'll love this) his family owns 50% of the well.

    IANA Geologist, but as it happens a friend of mine is in the oil well service business, and there is a method that has worked in the past: pumping, as fast as possible, dense liquid into the well (through a couple of new wells drilled to intersect the source). I mean really, really dense liquid, really a suspension of heavy fine powders with additives to adjust the viscosity. It sinks under the mud and blocks the source. Incidentally, this only works if it was caused by the drilling, not the earthquake nearby. This method would cost millions of dollars (a few mil just for the heavy liquid, because you need a LOT of it).

    Here's the problem with the concrete balls. If they get don't work, I would imagine that they could get down far enough that they would interfere with the flow of the heavy liquid, removing that possibility. This looks like the ultimate in "penny wise, pound foolish" to me.

    Dean in beautiful downtown Jakarta

    --
    The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    1. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup,

      They are going to need to import a few tens of thousands of tons of Barite (heavy spar) to make up a mud that will equalise the pressure between the flowing zone and the surface.

      My father once had to help kill a large flow from a high pressure zone that was caused by an idiot that decided to work the pipe when the well kicked from a fractured zone, the high pressure zone was 20% H2S, 40 % CO2, mild steel doesnt stay together long in those conditions. They had to burn 200,000 bbls a day of natural gas just to buy some time, had to open up a barite mine for about 20,000 tonnes of barite, and needed a cement factory for the sealing process after the well kill. The upper zone was rising in pressure and would have reached the weight of overburden in just 18 months...

  73. So, that's where it was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Elbonia!
    It fit's the description.

  74. Its only the 3rd world who cares by sphazell · · Score: 1

    The interesting thing about this is look at the satellite pics and see where they were drilling for oil. Surrounded by peoples houses. Typical 3rd world exploitation imagine getting approval to drill like that in the middle of suburbia in the UK, US, of Aussie.

  75. Aburizal Bakrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The subject of Aburizal Bakrie and all the corruption related to this case is even more interesting. Now the corrupted government officials try to call it a "natural disaster" why it was clearly caused by incompetent drilling activities by a company related to one of the ministers, Aburizal Bakrie.

  76. NOT A NATURAL DISASTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mudflow was caused by incorrect drilling done by PT Lapindo Brantas. It is due to the corruption related to one of ministers that government is trying to declare it as a natural disaster! Scientific evidence shows that all this was caused by human error!

  77. Did no one think of Tom Hanks? by SuperSnooper · · Score: 1

    And Meg Ryan, too!

  78. dumbest shit I've ever heard by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    scientist 1: uh yeah, let's drop these big concrete balls in that volcano
    scientist 2: that sounds like a plan
    me: uh, yeah let's put a cannon ball into the live cannon?

    so you're going to teach mother nature a lesson by arming her?

    one thing is certain, the pressure will build up until that concrete ball goes flying into some village.

    how could a scientist be so dumb as to think that a force which can move the earth is going to fizzle at the presence of man made obstacles?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  79. Mt. Etna experience by Nuffsaid · · Score: 1

    A previous experience in Italy shows that something can be done even against lava flows, not just slow mud eruptions. If not at the volcano emission site, at least in the "tubes" that keep lava hot and allow it to travel very far semi-buried under its own crust.
    In 1992 a huge eruption from Mount Etna in Sicily (the biggest volcano in Europe) threatened some villages. A lava flow running straight toward them was partially diverted by breaking and obstructing its channel with concrete blocks dropped from helicopters. Once the crust was broken, the lava expanded into a new artificial channel, was exposed to air, cooled faster and slowed down. The village was saved. More info here (PDF, in Italian).

    --
    Nuffsaid
    ________

    Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
  80. we are a;ll living on a volcano, its earth by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Theres less than 10-20 miles of hard rock between us and liquid gold, ie molten metals.

    Its like living on hard dirt floating on water.

    It might look safe, but hey, its all still active, not as bad as Venus, but worse than Mars.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  81. That reminds me.. by fbjon · · Score: 1
    Mud volcano?


    Is this in any way related to tubgirl.jpg?

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  82. What movie was it?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember seing a movie like this too when I was a kid. moments that really shocked/scared me
    was when the rest of the scientists were leaving an underground control room, a control panel shorted out, causing a huge door to shut trapping the remaining scientist inside. When the others took the elevator to leave the underound lab where they were monitoring the eruption, a huge boulder ripped right into the evelvator cab through the wall, and the team had to climb out through the shaft. One more scene I vividly remember is the lone trapped scientist watching the eruption on video monitors. Very scary stuff, and I would love to see this movie again!

  83. They've got the idea from old Superman cartoons by Knux · · Score: 1

    Superman tried that long ago...

  84. I've heard that... by Anonymous+Know-It-Al · · Score: 1

    ... in Soviet Russia, concrete (shoes) calm crazy scientists.

  85. Dam by egandalf · · Score: 1

    Ever see a cartoon where the character attempts to plug a leak in a dam by sticking his/her finger in the hole?

    This seems about the same. Except the cartoon character is a scientist who should remember cartoons like that and the dam is Indonesia.

    Silly people.

    --
    Those who have telepathy have no need to RTFA.
  86. Calm a volcano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How?

    "Good volcano... Nice volcano..."

  87. Simpsons quote by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    Homer: Oh, boy. It's gonna take a lot of fireworks to clean this place up.

  88. To calm my mud volcano... by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

    I usually use Imodium. ;)

    --
    "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
    "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
  89. Drill through the clay in a safer place by spun · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if the mud deposit is large enough, there are other areas that could be drilled through to help relieve the pressure. The mud could be chanelled away from more economically important areas. Once enough pressure is released, the original hole could be capped.

    I find it interesting that proper precautions weren't taken while drilling, as the wiki article on mud volcanoes mentions they are almost always associated with hydrocarbon deposits. You'd think oil companies would have a lot of experience dealing with these things. I certainly hope anyone who's livelyhood has been damaged by this negligence has the means to mount a lawsuit against the company.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  90. Tomorrow... by allochthon · · Score: 1

    No boom Today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. So, what happens if it goes wrong? by userw014 · · Score: 1

    Do these people have a plan for what to do in case this goes all wrong?
    Such as if they do block up the mouth of the volcano, and then it explodes (catastrophically) out somewhere else nearby?
    ... or it slowly ooozes out all over?
    If these people doing the chain-ball thing are the same people as the original drilling company, then I doubt they have thought about how it could go wrong and how to respond.

  93. Genius! by plopez · · Score: 1

    We drop in virgin turkeys! I'll split the Noble prize money with you. Just send me you bank name, acctount number, routing number, mother's maiden name and SSN.

    Trust me...

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  94. The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha. This is going to confuse the hell out of future archeologists! Just think of the face Charlie Brown gets when his mouth turns into a squiggle...

  95. Facts make a difference by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    the problem arose when the oil company drilled through a relatively thin clay layer into a very thick mud bearing layer under very high pressure. The clay layer acted as a dike to stop the underlying liquids from migrating upward. Normal drilling technique when such geography is present would have been to insert a liner in the drillhole in order to protect the clay strata from erosion, but this was not employed here. When the drillhole pierced the clay strata, the high pressure mud below it quickly eroded the initial breach into a large breach which followed the drillhole upward to transform it into the mud volcano that now exists.

    Of course this changes everything. But maybe venting it in a more convenient place (the location is problematic) will cause the outflow to drop. The geology is everything.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  96. Volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this would stop the volcanic bleeding at Ford, GM, and DaimlerChrysler.

  97. dumb idiots, what happens when pressure builds up? by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    hmm the concrete blocks will block an eruption for a little while, more pressure is gonna build up and
    "The Volcano is gonna blow!" Big time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  98. forget the concrete! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like what they need is a little ice-nine.

  99. This should make Indonesian girls horny by vinn01 · · Score: 1


    Who wants to be a virgin aournd a volcano?

  100. Sounds like something out of bad sci-fi... by AgentPaper · · Score: 1
    So, let me see if I have this right: On the one hand, these chains of concrete balls are supposed to slow down the mudflow by means of friction. On the other hand, they're supposed to decrease the volume of mudflow (and hence increase the pressure on the mud reservoir) by decreasing the diameter of its major vent. To me, that looks like the two forces will cancel out, and that may well be the best case scenario. If the pressure overwhelms the friction provided by the balls, you've turned a medium-velocity flow into a high-velocity one, to say nothing of potentially ejecting large chunks of debris.

    TFA describes said mud reservoir as under sufficient pressure that drilling extra vents hasn't reduced the mudflow at all, and the amount of mud being emitted has overwhelmed all previously attempted damming/diversion measures. IANA geologist, but that's got to be a hell of a lot of pressure. I'm not sure any man-made measure (be it throwing virgins down the borehole or otherwise) is going to stop it, and this business of throwing giant concrete balls at it seems like foolishness of the first order.

    I'm reminded of a scene from an old TV series, which despite being about submarines, contains perhaps the best line ever about dropping man-made objects into volcanoes:

    "I'll carry on working. I don't think [geologist] or his ceramic suppositories will mind my absence."

    --
    First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
  101. You can mod this guy troll, honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be intimidated by the low user ID. -1 Troll works on him just the same as everyone else.