A brand new AMD graphics card will happily drive two monitors at 4k from the dual-link DVI and HDMI outputs with the stock driver under Linux, with no user interaction required.
The same card, under Windows in the same computer will drive the same monitors at 4K from the HDMI output, but will limit the DVI output to a paltry 2048x1152.
And then there's the mountains of older computer hardware that still work fine under Linux but have long been abandoned by their manufacturers so don't run under any recent Windows at all.
Different people react differently when confronted with imminent death.
You want to prepare and screen people as much as possible on Earth, so that if something goes wrong during the mission you lessen the chances of someone going moonbat crazy and jeopardizing the rest of the mission.
Whoever is designing such a system needs to remember to keep it client-side.
Given the ridiculous amount of processing power available on even low-end phones and tablets now there's really no excuse to rely on the horrible latency and dependence that comes with server based voice recognition.
Any voice processing that relies on server-side processing has already failed.
My understanding of the matter is that while both have similar health effects, consuming HCFS does not suppress the appetite the same way sugar does. So people who consume HCFS beverages are in danger of not feeling full as quickly and so are in danger of idly consuming more if self control is an issue.
One anecdote (not data): The one time I drank a can of HCFS fizzy, I was surprised to find I didn't get the bloated feeling I usually experience when consuming regular sugary drinks. Of course that wasn't exactly a blind study.
Oh, bullshit. Genocide? Perhaps you mean the nations surrounding them that want to wipe jews off the planet.
You think your laundry list above of cherry-picked offences don't go on every single day in other dirtball countries?
Israel's worst 'crime' is defending itself, and perhaps the heinous crime of being the only democracy in the Middle East. Or perhaps you take exception to the fact that women and minority religions there have more rights than in any other surrounding nation.
Your example is plagiarism (ie passing off someone else's work as your own), not copyright violation. Scummy, yes, but not what we're talking about here.
For better or worse, in this economy education is pretty much vocational. Unless you are very wealthy there is no value in pursuing a liberal arts degree since there are very few jobs that require one.
Solar is great but it is not a base load. Without a massive, MASSIVE, bank of batteries solar has no effective buffering - it generates full power when the sun is out, less when cloudy, and nothing at night and so cannot be depended on as a single source of power. Likewise for wind.
They are best served supplementing renewable base loads such as hydro, so when there is plenty of sunlight/wind the hydro use, and thus depletion of the water level, is reduced.
Of course, there may be better base loads in the works. Molten salt perhaps?
Is there anyone here who believes that this is not a completely stupid ruling?
If so, please explain to the rest of us how pointing to something that is already publicly available (ie published on a web page) could possibly be a violation of copyright.
A fatal crash of a Tesla Model S in the United States earlier this year knocked the company's shares and raised concerns about whether automated driving technology was being released to consumers safely.
Simple answer: It isn't.
Stop all this automated up-selling bullshit and give me my damn electric car.
Slashdot Mirror
Did they find any?
Counter example:
A brand new AMD graphics card will happily drive two monitors at 4k from the dual-link DVI and HDMI outputs with the stock driver under Linux, with no user interaction required.
The same card, under Windows in the same computer will drive the same monitors at 4K from the HDMI output, but will limit the DVI output to a paltry 2048x1152.
And then there's the mountains of older computer hardware that still work fine under Linux but have long been abandoned by their manufacturers so don't run under any recent Windows at all.
Really?
I have never seen a washing machine made after 1975 that *didn't* have an off-balance shutdown.
In what part of the world do you live?
Different people react differently when confronted with imminent death.
You want to prepare and screen people as much as possible on Earth, so that if something goes wrong during the mission you lessen the chances of someone going moonbat crazy and jeopardizing the rest of the mission.
That's great news!
Could you please reply here with step by step instructions on how to accomplish this?
Thanks.
Whoever is designing such a system needs to remember to keep it client-side.
Given the ridiculous amount of processing power available on even low-end phones and tablets now there's really no excuse to rely on the horrible latency and dependence that comes with server based voice recognition.
Any voice processing that relies on server-side processing has already failed.
Wait, Trump makes electric cars?
So, you *don't* eat snails and frogs legs in real life?
Sssh! We call that one Dalvik!
No. That is wrong, low quality and dangerous.
Kat?
You don't have children, do you?
Pro tip: Not all behaviour comes from family. Not even close.
I think you've happened upon the wrong web site there, son.
Abolish copyright. Now.
My understanding of the matter is that while both have similar health effects, consuming HCFS does not suppress the appetite the same way sugar does. So people who consume HCFS beverages are in danger of not feeling full as quickly and so are in danger of idly consuming more if self control is an issue.
One anecdote (not data): The one time I drank a can of HCFS fizzy, I was surprised to find I didn't get the bloated feeling I usually experience when consuming regular sugary drinks. Of course that wasn't exactly a blind study.
So their own countries won't take them back. Again, how is that Israel's fault?
What do you mean prison? They're free to leave and settle in Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia or Turkey any time they want.
Tell me again, what is keeping them where they are?
Oh, bullshit. Genocide? Perhaps you mean the nations surrounding them that want to wipe jews off the planet.
You think your laundry list above of cherry-picked offences don't go on every single day in other dirtball countries?
Israel's worst 'crime' is defending itself, and perhaps the heinous crime of being the only democracy in the Middle East. Or perhaps you take exception to the fact that women and minority religions there have more rights than in any other surrounding nation.
Pro tip:
SJWs are never, NEVER satisfied. They will always find a cause to whine about with righteous indignation.
Once someone has offended them, they think that gives them moral power over them for all eternity.
Your example is plagiarism (ie passing off someone else's work as your own), not copyright violation. Scummy, yes, but not what we're talking about here.
Wow, (Score:5, Smackdown)
Very well said, sir.
For better or worse, in this economy education is pretty much vocational. Unless you are very wealthy there is no value in pursuing a liberal arts degree since there are very few jobs that require one.
Nope.
If your content can be accessed via a link over the Internet without requiring any kind of authentication, then it is public. End of.
Given that password protection is trivial (even in an .htaccess would do) there is really no excuse for such poor judgement.
Solar is great but it is not a base load. Without a massive, MASSIVE, bank of batteries solar has no effective buffering - it generates full power when the sun is out, less when cloudy, and nothing at night and so cannot be depended on as a single source of power. Likewise for wind.
They are best served supplementing renewable base loads such as hydro, so when there is plenty of sunlight/wind the hydro use, and thus depletion of the water level, is reduced.
Of course, there may be better base loads in the works. Molten salt perhaps?
I'm genuinely curious:
Is there anyone here who believes that this is not a completely stupid ruling?
If so, please explain to the rest of us how pointing to something that is already publicly available (ie published on a web page) could possibly be a violation of copyright.
A fatal crash of a Tesla Model S in the United States earlier this year knocked the company's shares and raised concerns about whether automated driving technology was being released to consumers safely.
Simple answer: It isn't.
Stop all this automated up-selling bullshit and give me my damn electric car.