Slashdot Mirror


ITT Tech Is Officially Closing (gizmodo.com)

Reader Joe_Dragon shares a Gizmodo report: ITT Technical Institute is officially closing all of its campuses following federal sanctions imposed against the company. The for-profit college announced the changes in a statement: "It is with profound regret that we must report that ITT Educational Services, Inc. will discontinue academic operations at all of its ITT Technical Institutes permanently after approximately 50 years of continuous service. With what we believe is a complete disregard by the U.S. Department of Education for due process to the company, hundreds of thousands of current students and alumni and more than 8,000 employees will be negatively affected."
ITT Tech announced it was closing all of its campuses just one week after it stopped enrolling students following a federal crackdown on for-profit colleges. ITT Tech and other higher education companies like it have been widely criticized for accepting billions of dollars in government grants and loans while failing to provide adequate job training for its students. Last year, ITT Tech received an estimated $580 million in federal money (aka taxpayer dollars), according to the Department of Education.

420 comments

  1. finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now if we could just get the balls to crack down on obvious corruption in other mainly government funded industries. Looking at you defense.

    1. Re:finally by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The private universities are amateurs. Look at the public ones. Palatial campuses, massively inflated salaries, infinite job security, price gouging, on and on

    2. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. How about devri?

    3. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look again.
      The number of poorly paid freelance non-tenured Professors is on the rise.
      Poor Pay and No Job Security.
      The College Presidents are well paid.
      The Palatial campuses are not free either.
      Soon they will be just like the private colleges.

    4. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, DeVry (Phoenix campus) was merely overpriced when I was a student there in the early 2000s. The quality of the education was good at the time too.

    5. Re:finally by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      How much do you think professors make?

    6. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public university budgets have been cut quite a bit over the years and as a result, they're operating more and more like privatized education companies (such as ITT). Tenured positions at smaller institutions are being replaced with adjunct (short term contract) positions that pay pretty terrible depending on the university (it's laughable). Most palatial buildings you see come from large donations from some wealthy alumnus that wanted to be immortalized with a building name.

      Education in this country still isn't a priority, contrary to the STEM slogans we sing (and neglecting other disciplines). Most simply want their rubber stamp into the professional work force. I fear ITT is a foreshadowing of higher education's future if it's not provided as a government funded service which seems to be the direction things are headed.

    7. Re:finally by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correct! Expenses for Academia at State Universities have been flat the past 15 years while administrative expenses (especially college athletics!!!!) have risen by over 300%. So all that high tuition does not go to the profs, but to the greatest money waster of all time: college sports and licked campus gardening. My advice: learn German and study in Germany. Top notch universities with 0€ tuition.

    8. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a public university, the only thing on your list that's correct is infinite job security. When I was hired I was told there are only 2 ways to get fired: steal, or diddle the college kids. Otherwise you can do almost anything and get out of it with your job intact.

    9. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all colleges lose money on athletics, football in particular is quite a money maker at many schools and merchandising that goes with it is a pretty penny too. Because of Title IX the athletic departments of many small to medium colleges go into the red but even with it most larger schools do quite well with many athletic departments making large donations back to the general funds of universities.

    10. Re: finally by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If that is what your school told you, then you are working at a private school or just lying. No public university in America would say such BS.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re: finally by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He never claimed they did. Learn to read.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a tenured professor at a state school and I have to say it's kind of awesome. For some reason everyone bitches about how hard their jobs are like if they don't bitch people are going to hate them for liking their job or they won't get a raise. Being a professor is awesome. I worked for IBM while finishing my phd and I was always scared of getting cut. I've never even thought I would lose my teaching position. The pay is great, the benefits are great, use of school facilities is beyond great. For the most part I set my own hours. I also get to be in an atmosphere filled with people who want to learn, at least some of the time. Some people complain about the hours but they are full of it. My extra hours are spent doing stuff in enjoy and I get to call work. Messing around with an api for a drone controller, work. Networking some raspberry pi's to do some stupid task, work. One of my friends has a phd in golf course design and maintainance and teaches at the same school. He'll often complain he worked all weekend. Yea worked you played golf for free while evaluating some things on their courses. He was also working when he got paid and expenses covered to go to Hawaii for a month and play golf. The way he complained you would think he got drafted to clean latrines.

    13. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My advice: learn German and study in Germany. Top notch universities with 0€ tuition.

      Yeah, but how much is that in good ol' US dollars?

  2. Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

    1. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I went to ITT and now I write for Gizmodo. I applied to slashdot but I didn't have the errors per article count needed to be an editor

    2. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I had a job lined up before I graduated, 20 grand in debt later. I didn't wait until graduation to start applying, plus I don't have a degree in something like archaeology

    3. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time we address the cultish aspect of university. These profit-driven businesses need to be regulated, and they need to stop spinning the fantasy about "education" and "learning to learn".
      Universities have made themselves into an essential part of getting a simple job in western society, and they'll suck every penny they can out of you.
      They need to be stopped.

    4. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what research into job prospects did YOU do prior to enrolling in the university? What research did YOU do to determine if the potential job prospects warranted spending $180K? Or are you just one of those people who must blame everyone else for your own stupid decisions?

    5. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you cant expect to get your keys mailed back to you if you lose them.

    6. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Just write a 'script to add random apostrophe's' to the 's''s' in your article's.

    7. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Funny

      I went to ITT and now I write for Gizmodo. I applied to slashdot but I didn't have the errors per article count needed to be an editor

      I don't think that was the issue, the powers at be at slashdot can often be forgiving about missing errors. But did you make sure you made a dupe application? That's how you get past round one of the process...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    8. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These for-profits generally exist solely to make money. They recruit students who aren't qualified simply so they can get those student loans. (And they can't pay, the taxpayer is on the hook.) Traditional universities at least obey their requirements to limit this problem (need decent high school grades, SATs, etc.).

      Traditional higher ed probably needs to reformed as well, but I don't see for-profits helping the situation. A few may survive, but most should close.

    9. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2

      ... plus I don't have a degree in something like archaeology

      And that's why you don't get to do nifty things like fighting Nazis or collecting alien skulls.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    10. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude you totally reminded me of that scene where sheev says "for that matter" in rots
      for that matter
      hah. I can picture the things his cheecks do

    11. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      I don't recall the public universities claiming 99% job placement rates.

      We need quality trade schools, like ITT use to be. I'm in the mid-west, there are so many manufacturing facilities that cannot find enough trained machinists to keep up with production.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    12. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by I75BJC · · Score: 0

      Quite right! The USA Federal Government and all the local and state governments HATE competition. For-profit schools are definitely competitors to the Government Schools and the Governments have a long history to discrimination, bias, and persecution of non-Government schools. And why not shut the for-profit university that Bill Clinton is paid $18+Million to be the "honorary" chancellor.

    13. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by DaveMikulec · · Score: 1

      ...or destroy ancient temples full of priceless artifacts.

      --
      "Shall we play a game?" -W.O.P.R.
    14. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Pitawg · · Score: 1

      I think you mis-spelled Univision (what is GIZ), but am not certain. I could not afford ITT either.

    15. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0, Troll

      So what research into job prospects did YOU do prior to enrolling in the university?

      The problem with federally guaranteed student loans is that when ill educated people default, the taxpayer is on the hook. So it is not just "their own stupid decision".

      As a hiring manager, I learned long ago to just throw out any resume that mentioned ITT (or Heald, or Devry, or Univ of Phoenix). I have a perl script that does that automatically, so I don't even see them. Their degrees are worthless, and the if you paid them money there is a very good chance that you are an idiot. These scam schools should not be receiving tax dollars.

    16. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by zrobotics · · Score: 0

      Now now, he did go to ITT Tech. Hey may not be quite as challenged as our esteemed editors, but writing a script might be a bit much to expect.

    17. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But a degree in Liberal Arts won't get me me a high paying job???????

      You laugh, but even down here in the republic of Texas kids are being fed a boatload of lies, usually in the name of classroom economy. If I had a dollar for every time I heard "the nation's largest tech companies are demanding these skills" (group work, collaboration, well-rounded, etc.) I could retire and start my own school. What I hear when they say this is "we need to reduce teacher workload to shave some dollars off the budget", because all the things they say they won't do in class I find myself doing for my kids at home because 4 kids who don't know the alphabet can't teach each other the alphabet. I have no doubt the CEOs are saying these things, but I question their motives and perspective.

      Normally they talk to fortune 500 CEOs, of which by definition, there are 500 in the world and they make hiring decisions only for the most senior executives. Those that they even see represent the very cream of the crop in terms of demonstrated results and pedigree which eliminates the vast majority of the world's population. You would be better off following your dream to pursue professional sports rather than pursue such positions, there are more employed pro-athletes. They are NOT talking to hiring managers and rank and file employees who actually make the hiring decisions for the majority of employees which is far more useful information for the vast majority of students. Unfortunately what they find might be expensive.

      The net result is we have kids who have been force-fed bad information and have then made bad choices in their education based on that bad information. Be a collaborator, be a team player, be a leader, just pursue your dream, get a degree in anything etc. All horrible advice. Archaeology maybe your dream and you may passionately love it, definitely pursue it, but have a very viable backup plan of something that will net you a job with high probability and that you can live with. Very likely that is the job you will be doing while you wait for the archaeology position to open, possibly indefinitely. Also don't mention to prospective recruiters that your first love is archaeology but plumbing is a second choice: the odds that they will resonate with your dream are low, but the odds you get marked as "overqualified" (code for: will probably leave us for another job before we're ready) are very high.

    18. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

      The FEDs are the problem.

      My B.S. degree cost me $30k - graduating in 2000. I paid mostly cash by driving tow trucks at night and had my student loans paid off within the first year out.

      Then government "Made College Affordable".

      You poor, poor, bastards.

    19. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a college flunky.

    20. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      LMOL right. You may want to RTFA. Moron.

    21. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They need to be stopped.

      Nope, but requiring a degree or considering it on a job application needs to be stopped, I've worked in places where we won't even hire people who don't come from a short list of 8 colleges. There's a reason things like the bar association and the medical board exist: anyone's daddy can buy a degree, but not everyone can pass tests of competence.

      The only barrier to employment should be certifications of competence in a field, either ad hoc (interview) or standardized (ex. the bar). You can go to all the Ivy League schools you want and get a large alphabet of degrees, but if you can't get certified you can't get employed. Unfortunately because of the need to justify H-1B's and outsourcing, employers are reluctant to embrace this model. If you could show that a large body of qualified applications do exist and are unemployed, it casts a big shadow on your statements that there aren't enough bodies to fill reqs. Even in careers like IT where there are some certifications, it seems to be a moving target of expensive and narrowly defined skills that you have to continuously chase. It's possible that industry professionals and the government are going to need to team up and create laws.

    22. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      that cannot find enough trained machinists to keep up with production

      That's because the entry level job is now open for Journeyman with 5+ years of experience, working $8/hr. Maybe if they did what they used to and hire dozens out of highschool for minimum wage, laid off the stoners and kept the ones who learned they'd have trained machinists again like companies did for centuries, but there's no instant gratification in that plan.

      Instead they just hope someone else trains their employees for them, and whine like entitled brats when it turns out nobody's interested in doing that.

    23. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      he dont sound like bill gates

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    24. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by bfpierce · · Score: 1

      They were pretty honest to me. Get a CSC degree and have your choice of jobs.

      Maybe you just didn't actually read what the job prospects for your major are/were?

    25. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why any tax dollars go to any for profit business. Doesn't sound the least bit capitalist, but I'm guessing conservatives will defend farm subsidies, defense contractors, etc.

      captcha: armament

    26. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      id argue no colleges should receive federal funding. If people want an education they should pay for it. the cost has gone up and up since when? oh yeah since the government guaranteed it would pay for it

      so the schools keep increasing because they know they are getting paid no matter what happens to the kid

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    27. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rent-uh-k0d3r five d0lla da

    28. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      You should look more closely at the data. That 4-year degree (from a real institution, not ITT or Devry) is worth much more than $180,000 in increased wages and increased prospects over the course of a career.

      Unemployment in particular drops more than 25% for those with a 4-year degree.

    29. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But a degree in Liberal Arts won't get me me a high paying job???????

      You laugh, but even down here in the republic of Texas kids are being fed a boatload of lies, usually in the name of classroom economy.

      The main goal of the "education" policy in Texas for Public school and higher education is to reduce the cost to zero.
      The reasoning is other states can pay education for workers, then they can move here.

    30. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a hiring manager, YOU are one of the lazy fucking shitbags that caused this whole 'for profit' college and general student loan mess.

    31. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      If people want an education they should pay for it.

      That's funny. Higher education used to be free or low cost.

      the cost has gone up and up since when?

      When state politicians decided it was a brilliant idea to stop subsidizing high education and cut the education budgets to the bone.

    32. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Copid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the problem with government money for college is that we went demand side rather than supply side. States have a good history of building public universities that provided a great education at a great price and admitting students who could actually benefit from that education. Eventually, we shifted tons of money into providing loans and grants, which ultimately just arms both sides in a bidding war over the same set of seats for already existing universities. In general, when that happens, the price goes up and more suppliers enter the market to satisfy the demand. The problem here is that it's a lot easier to build a shitty fake university to soak up easy tuition dollars than it is to build a real university that actually educates people and has standards.

      Worse, as more and more people are selected for seats in real schools, the remaining people with piles of federal cash burning holes in their pockets are, on average, worse and worse students. So building a good quality school with high standards isn't even necessarily the right thing to do even if your heart is in the right place and you're willing invest the money doing so. Ultimately, you just end up with a bunch of fly by night operations that specialize in separating vulnerable students from their loan money.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    33. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ExEm2SS · · Score: 1

      Remind me never to apply to your company. Not all ITT graduates are idiots.

    34. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by starX · · Score: 1

      The role of a college or university is to provide education, not necessarily job training, and I don't know of any not-for-profit institutions of higher education that are being dishonest about that. ITT Tech, and its ilk, by contrast, explicitly promise to provide vocational training that will give you the skills needed to be able to get, keep, and excel at certain jobs, and they have clearly failed to do that, while engaging in predatory admissions processes.

    35. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem with federally guaranteed student loans is that when ill educated people default, the taxpayer is on the hook.

      I was under the impression that people cannot get out of student loans by declaring bankruptcy.

    36. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I see what you're saying. We still need to control the ravenous beast that are universities. They are the tool of the plutonomy to keep the poor in their place, and the money flowing up.

    37. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      180k in loans and no job prospects? I'm curious as to what you can blow $180k on and be unemployable ?

      Meanwhile all the people that used to work in factories are whinging because there are no crappy factory jobs anymore - for simple economic reasons.

      Meanwhile the trades are short of people, its fairly cheap to get into a trade, and after 4 years you're making good money with minimal debts, after about 8 years you're probably in a good position+experience to start your own company - all before you are 30.

      How many people that became disposable software coders end up better off than that?

    38. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Streetlight · · Score: 2

      This year Colorado, where I live, found they might have an income problem and would need to cut expenses, IIRC,~$350 million. The first thing that come out of the mouth of the governor was support for higher education would be cut to fund the anticipated deficit. That from a Democratic governor, no less. This has been going on for 30 years or more. When I started as an assistant professor many years ago the public university system I started at had state support for its education component at about 70% of its cost. Now it's less than 10%. One way public universities have tried to compensate for the loss of state support is to recruit more and more out of state and foreign students who will pay the much higher non resident tuition. This results in a reduction in the number in qualified in-state students enrolled.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    39. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It's possible that industry professionals and the government are going to need to team up and create laws."

      They do that shit for their own benefit plenty of times. Now that they've had so much practice they can actually do it for a reason other than unbridled greed and cronyism.

    40. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Degrees are extremely over-rated, and we have too much emphasis on them in our society-- but they give you some kind of baseline. I will likely never hire a devry, ITT, or University of Phoenix graduate (and so help me, I hope I never again have the misfortune of hiring a Harvard or MIT grad).

      It used to be that a degree meant that you had a balanced education, and you had proved that you can learn new things. Now, it seems like universities are becoming more like trade schools (at least my alma mattar's engineering school). People might graduate with more engineering hours, but they are so specialized that they are often useless.

      Specific to IT though, I really wish more of the people we work with had better communication skills rather than trying to explain a plan with Visio.

      Too bad labor laws now make it too dificult to hire people for (> 1year) internships. Most kids today would be better off with a good internship than college.

    41. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Easy solution: fix student loans. Repeal the laws that make student loan debt persist through bankruptcy in most cases. This would force student loan providers, just like every other lender in the world, take risk into account when deciding whether to give a loan or not (and at what interest rate). That way, if University A charges $50k for a degree, but University B charges $40k for a better degree, nobody will want to give loans for college A, thus forcing them to either get their act together or lower their tuition. It would also clamp down on the less useful degrees, since lenders would be much more willing to give loans for STEM degrees with job prospects than underwater basket weaving. As it stands, there simply isn't enough of an incentive for higher education to compete on the basis of price, nor is there an incentive for student loan providers to deny anyone a loan.

    42. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a hiring manager, I learned long ago to just throw out any resume that mentioned ITT (or Heald, or Devry, or Univ of Phoenix).

      University of Phoenix doesn't belong in that list, and you're shorting yourself if you can those résumés. It takes a lot of work for folks to complete the course, and I have found that it is often indicative of people that are willing to throw in a lot of elbow grease.

      I'm a hiring manager, and have happily employed an engineer that went there. Their attendance was a definite factor in my considering them. They have worked for me for many years, and have proven to be energetic, productive, intelligent, professional and organized.

    43. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by davester666 · · Score: 1

      As long as I get the artifact I'm looking for, fuck the rest of them.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    44. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that people cannot get out of student loans by declaring bankruptcy.

      It is difficult to discharge a student loan during bankruptcy, but it can be done. In practice, it doesn't matter. If someone with a journalism degree and $120K in loans is making french fries at McDonalds, then they are not going to be able to service the debt, and there is nothing that can be done about it.

    45. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or walk through stargates

    46. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Jzanu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are truly out of touch with this issue because US student debt is not removed with a bankruptcy filing. It could be paid off with another bank loan intended for other purposes, and that loan would be subject to bankruptcy partial repayment based on priority. However, in that case there is no unpaid public loss due to unpaid loan principal, nor is there any unpaid interest cost absorbed by the public. As a hiring manager you are largely failing to do your job by using automated filters that are not keyed to actual job requirements. I hope your supervisor sees your post above and sanctions you for the practice.

    47. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When their default rate approaches the levels the for profit Colleges have.

    48. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should probably let smarter people do your thinking for you, tbh.

    49. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well I know where I live there is Dunwoody, DCTC and Hennepin technical College. While Dunwoody is a private school, the other 2 are part of the MnSCU system, it was considered to be a good trade school and I would assume it still it. Then again it isn't run as a for profit business like a lot of the dodgy schools were.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    50. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Quote a lot of very good jobs have nothing at all like certificates of competence. If you discount corrupt certificates (classes for sale by creator of certain products) then it's even more rare.

      The university degree tells you one thing basically: the candidate is adaptable and can learn.
      The certificate tells you only one thing: the candidate can probably do this year's job.

      ITT schools were good for the latter - you need a technician fast to do grunt work.

    51. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by fiziko · · Score: 1

      They are not responsible for the available job prospects, only for your ability to do the job the paperwork says you are qualified for. That's the difference here.

      --
      - W. Blaine Dowler
      http://www.bureau42.com
    52. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do wonder, were Devry and UoP good at one point? I work with two guys in their late 50s, one went to UoP and the other to Devry, like back in the early 80s. They're good. They're really good. Smart guys, extremely competent. Did those schools just go down hill over the course of 30 years?

    53. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I used to think that way. But I've met some really bright people from DeVry, people I assumed had university electrical engineering degrees based on their competence. I was down on DeVry for a long time because it really is geared towards simplicity and basic tech skills, and they have a seriously hard sell approach to convince parents that their kids are essentially guaranteed "a job" after graduating.

    54. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Then we go back to the days when only elites have good education?

    55. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its really interesting that a lot of students I have talked to at the local university (WVU) who complain about not having a job, usually have degrees in worthless fields. And by worthless fields I mean liberal arts, African American studies, women's studies, philosophy, and just about any literature degree. If you want a good job you should try getting a degree that is not a waste of money.

    56. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Archaeology maybe your dream and you may passionately love it, definitely pursue it, but have a very viable backup plan of something that will net you a job with high probability and that you can live with.

      Actually Science magazine had a story on the job prospects in anthropology, and the prospects were actually quite good. OTOH last time I saw the numbers, the unemployment rate for biology majors was pretty bad, about 5%.

      My belief is that you should spend your time in college learning a diversity of things, which is what the liberal arts does (the liberal arts includes a lot of science; Antioch produced one Nobel laureate).

      You have a lot of good points in your post and a lot that I disagree with. Fortunately, my liberal arts education (which included a lot of hard science courses) enabled me to separate the good from the bad.

    57. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You need something to compare it against. Do you know guys of a similar age who didn't go to college at all? How good are they?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    58. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, nevermind the fact that the average student loan debt at graduation is more like $20-30K. Someone who spent $180K on school and can't get a job and/or has no marketable skills is unquestionably doing it wrong.

      One can make the case that colleges and universities are overpriced, do a poor job of preparing most students to enter the workforce (not that the primary goal of higher education should be job training, but most could probably do better at preparing students for the next steps beyond school), or other criticisms, but I wouldn't say they are dishonest. They try to limit entrants to ones with the tools and experience to be successful in school, and usually don't make any guarantees about employment after graduation. That would seem to be in direct contrast with ITT tech and the like, who would happily enroll anyone capable of getting student loans, promise them exceptional placement rates, and (apparently) provide little in the way of marketable knowledge or skills.

    59. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Awesome comment... wish I had mod points for you.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    60. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Not all ITT graduates are idiots.

      Perhaps not, but the vast majority of them are. I am not going to interview 100 turds just to find one halfway competent ITT graduate, especially when I have plenty of other applicants with degrees from real colleges.

    61. Re: Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They better. Farm subsidies was a democrat thing. Take that away and you lose all the farmers and a sizeable chunk of the Midwest and plains states.

      That's all a republican needs to do, threaten the farmers they can't get subsidies anymore.

    62. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the pleasure of working with a gentleman who graduated from Harvard, CO 1957. Best programmer I ever worked with, and a quality human being on top of it all.

      RIP, Jim.

    63. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Fuck, and me without any mod points...

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    64. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Go back? These schools aren't providing a decent education, just taking the money.

      You can't make an unprepared student ready by giving him a loan for tuition. You can't make a school when you have unmotivated morons for a student body.

      Sure the management of the schools are crooks, but their students are just as culpable.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    65. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

      Because generally the 'big' universities are political subdivisions of the states. This means they have state's rights and sovereign immunity... Students do have borrower's defense though..

    66. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe minimum wage and/or other employment costs make that uneconomical.

    67. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you lumped ITT in with Devry or UoP hints to me that you probably shouldn't be making and decisions about hiring at all.

    68. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Archaeology maybe your dream and you may passionately love it, definitely pursue it, but have a very viable backup plan of something that will net you a job with high probability and that you can live with.

      Can't say I wholly agree. A lot of that "planning" may be what limits you, in the end. I'd say be prepared to be flexible. If the plan's gotta change, pivot. I've had a pretty satisfying career but if you asked me at 17 what I wanted to do with my life, the stuff that's actually made a living for me all these years wouldn't have even made the list.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    69. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I do wonder, were Devry and UoP good at one point? I work with two guys in their late 50s, one went to UoP and the other to Devry, like back in the early 80s. They're good. They're really good. Smart guys, extremely competent. Did those schools just go down hill over the course of 30 years?

      They may be good, but they're also experienced. You can't lay it all at the feet of the school they went to. Maybe the school gave them the foundation and the confidence to be able to dive into the workforce, but I'm betting all those years of on-the-job training deserve more of the credit for what you see in them today.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    70. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      The average outstanding student loan balance per borrower is $23,300. Again, there is substantial heterogeneity in balances of individual borrowers. The median balance of $12,800 is roughly half the average level, which indicates that a small fraction of people have balances significantly higher than the median. About one-quarter of borrowers owe more than $28,000; about 10 percent of borrowers owe more than $54,000. The proportion of borrowers who owe more than $100,000 is 3.1 percent, and 0.45 percent of borrowers, or 167,000 people, owe more than $200,000. The distribution also varies by age group: for example, borrowers between the ages of thirty and thirty-nine have the highest average outstanding student loan balance, at $28,500, followed by borrowers between the ages of forty and forty-nine, whose average outstanding balance is $26,000 (see chart below).

      http://libertystreeteconomics....

    71. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "alma mattar'"

      Sounds delicious, I'll take two. You can't spell, so I believe you work in engineering?

    72. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      ...or fight re-animated mummies!

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    73. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by nbauman · · Score: 1

      There were a lot of good technical schools in the 1980s and earlier.

      The old RCA Institute was very good; Bell Labs used to hire technicians there. But after the phone company broke up, they couldn't be economically viable.

      Devry just became a university in New York State, which isn't easy to do (just ask Donald Trump).

      I think that at least some of the technical schools were good, gave a good education, their graduates could get good jobs.

      However, once they were under financial pressure, they had to move into marginal classes and outright scams to make money, like medical assistant jobs that didn't lead to certification. A good concept destroyed by the market. Government guaranteed loans didn't help either.

    74. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      ... because 4 kids who don't know the alphabet can't teach each other the alphabet.

      One of my college engineering courses kindof echoes that thought. The course itself was just fine, but the majority of it was lab, and I was a slow learner, and I don't think my lab partner really understood anything from the course. I ended up doing almost all of the programming work. It came to be the night/morning before the enormous project that would decide our grade was due, and I couldn't do it anymore. I had totally burned out and hit some sort of rock bottom, and I sortof gave up. He was quite good at motivating me, cracking the whip, whatever it took. Every moment I stopped and gave up he was there to get me working again somehow. I don't think we got a great grade, but it got done.

      Of all of our engineering classes, I think that was probably the one that prepared us both the most for how things would actually work in "the real world."

    75. Re: Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Degrees are useless pieces of paper. They are supposed to imply competence in a specific field, but too often, as elsewhere, money can get you a degree whether you gain competence while attending or not. Well designed tests of skill cannot be fooled by money. Not to mention the great swath of the job market for which there is no appropriate degree path, and on job training provides almost all of the final skill set. Now, employers simply require a degree AND experience to compensate for the fact that everyone has a degree.

    76. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is that logic? They have money to hire high-demand skilled employees but no money to hire and train unskilled but trainable employees? If they can't find skilled employees to work, then the logical move would be to train some untrained employees to do the job. If they can't afford to do such a thing, then the business deserves to cease its operations and shut down.

    77. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      my alma mattar's engineering school

      Or its liberal arts department.

    78. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      For profit universities tended to promise placement.

      However, public and private non-profits were not founded with job placement in mind. They were founded where there was a need to train originally theologians, clerics, doctors, and some lawyers, in that order. You got your training, but no guarantees. And if you couldn't pay for college, you either got a scholarship or you didn't go.

      Providing loans and more school access was important as we needed to fill more white collar jobs, but now there are so many colleges that your college degree is almost obligatory and means nothing after a certain point. I pretty don't give a shit where the people I hire went to college except for some very top schools where I knew they needed something to actually get admitted. In fact, I don't even care if they went to college at all, unless they have a job requiring theoretical experience that they could not get without classroom instruction.

      I do think if we really want to actually get more coders out there (a goal I am actually somewhat dubious about, I admit), you don't push them through CS programs in college, you increase community college programs and create professional apprenticeships for on the job training. That means that you learn while being paid, instead of being forced to mortgage your future while you learn.

      Going to college to learn a what should be a trade is basically just like going to college to spend vast sums of money so you can have leisure time to act like an entitled scion of a rich family while the government pays for some of it and you're presented the bill for the rest, like a few weeks in Vegas where you had a little *too* much fun.

    79. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Archaeology has pretty decent employment prospects at least here in the EU.

    80. Re: Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not dead you fuck. Stop saying I'm dead.

    81. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It's about time we address the cultish aspect of university. These profit-driven businesses need to be regulated...

      By whom? You? The government? I don't trust either one of you.
      By what right?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    82. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for.
      Higher education has become expensive because government gifts and loans have removed spending constraints and the schools have become wasteful.
      Do the math yourself to calculate what schooling (outside of lab courses) should cost: Classrooms (use typical rent prices, heat and electric and water) and a teacher, costs shared among 30 students. Don't count room and board. If the answer comes to more than $3000 a year, there's either theft or incompetency involved.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    83. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why any tax dollars go to any for profit business.

      You wasted a post to proclaim your ignorance?

      Governments require goods and services of all sorts. Electricity. Paper. Desks. Firearms. Uniforms. Vehicles. Buildings.
      Why do you insist that all these things be provided by non-profits?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    84. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Pretty crazy considering all of the new taxes they've raised from cannabis.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    85. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      Not all ITT graduates are idiots.

      Perhaps not, but the vast majority of them are. I am not going to interview 100 turds just to find one halfway competent ITT graduate, especially when I have plenty of other applicants with degrees from real colleges.

      That is the attitude that makes it hard for the high performers from ITT to stand out. This is why I am going to just spend the money to go to a not for profit school and essentially re-certify on all the same material. It is less problem rather than having to engage in the same argument at every interview and having to deal with the same attitude due to ITT soiling it's brand through no fault of mine or most everyone else that worked hard there and did well. Unfair? Undoubtedly! This is life though Sometimes you find the best people stand out because when things like this happen they knuckle down and work harder rather than throw their hands up and give up. This is war!

    86. Re: Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Degrees are useless pieces of paper. They are supposed to imply competence in a specific field, but too often, as elsewhere, money can get you a degree whether you gain competence while attending or not. Well designed tests of skill cannot be fooled by money. Not to mention the great swath of the job market for which there is no appropriate degree path, and on job training provides almost all of the final skill set. Now, employers simply require a degree AND experience to compensate for the fact that everyone has a degree.

      Great, prove it, drop a million and get a degree at Harvard and report back to us in 2 years.

    87. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what research into job prospects did YOU do prior to enrolling in the university?

      The problem with federally guaranteed student loans is that when ill educated people default, the taxpayer is on the hook. So it is not just "their own stupid decision".

      As a hiring manager, I learned long ago to just throw out any resume that mentioned ITT (or Heald, or Devry, or Univ of Phoenix). I have a perl script that does that automatically, so I don't even see them. Their degrees are worthless, and the if you paid them money there is a very good chance that you are an idiot. These scam schools should not be receiving tax dollars.

      Sounds like you are a worthless employer, so what happens when your script throws out someone who mentions ITT who didn't go there? Where did you get your degree from? I am skeptical of employers that throw out resumes without oversight and wears that like a badge of honor.

      What happens when you have an applicant that taught at ITT, hated it , quit then went to Stanford.. What does your script do then?

      Sounds like your resume is the vocational equivalent of a Darwin award! I would throw your resume in the trash by hand after passing it around th office for a good laugh!

    88. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 2

      If I had a dollar for every time I heard "the nation's largest tech companies are demanding these skills" (group work, collaboration, well-rounded, etc.) I could retire and start my own school.

      Well, being a university professor I've hear the same things, and you know, the companies are absolutely right. I think you're a bit too cynical. The reason they say these things ("we need engineers who can write and present and work well i groups") is that they do feel a real need, and also feel current graduates lacking in these respects.

      However, that's always been the case. It's a pretty stable criticism. So then you have to figure out why. And the answer is very simple and I always point it out when I meet industry representatives who lament the current state of teaching: "We could do that. We could turn out engineers who are much, much better at writing, speaking and what have you. But if we do, we have to cut something else. And we already have trouble cramming the vital subject matter into the education as it is. We've already, during my lifetime added a whole year to the master's engineering degree (from four to five), and you still have to spend too much effort to train them until they can become really productive. So do you really want us to spend more time on writing/presentation, at the cost of less time teaching programming and whatnot?"

      The answer is always, "Well, not not really..." and "Well, when you put it that way..."

      So, if you ask people what they want, its always always something else than what they would actually spend money on, and pay for. Schools as a general rule don't understand this (an affliction they share with many others in the public sector), the opt for asking and delivering that, instead of realising that wishing and actually putting your money where your mouth is, are two very different things.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    89. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      anyone's daddy can buy a degree, but not everyone can pass tests of competence.

      We used to give people IQ tests, but they outlawed those for hiring in the 70s because they were "racist." So we replaced the simple test that would tell you whether a person was trainable with a degree requirement. But the degree mills have no incentive not to pass people who give them money. So now we have lots of people spending lots of money on questionable education and worthless degrees no one trusts anyway.

      Society's wounds are self-inflicted.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    90. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Streetlight · · Score: 2

      Colorado, like most states, has complicated tax law and some of it is unique. One thing is the Tax Payer's Bill of Rights,(TABOR) which requires tax revenue for any taxing district (state, county, city/town) to refund revenue in excess of that based on population growth and inflation and may be part of the budget problem this year. The total state budget is ~$27 billion of which somewhere around $75 million is state marijuana tax revenue is expected - ~ 0.28% of revenue - not much in the grand scheme of things. Looking around it seems that TABOR will require the return to taxpayers of something like $350 million. It looks like the Governor and Legislature underestimated revenue and the amount to be returned to us under TABOR, though I'm not completely sure about all this. I may be wrong, but IIRC, the marijuana revenue is supposed to go to K - 12 schools and can't be spent on anything else and cannot be used to replace normal state support for schools. The bottom line is that the arithmetic results in a projected deficit of something like ~$350 million and universities will bear a substantial part of that reduction in spending. These numbers seem to change montly.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    91. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, many degree requirements originated due to laws put in place to fight racial discrimination in the 60s. It was decided that job tests ( such as when you applied for a general position, and they gave you a logic test) were deemed racially discriminating, and were being slanted to eliminate certain races. Companies were mostly prohibited from being allowed to give such test, except in narrowly defined fields or professions where that skill was explicitly required.
      As a result, companies needed some way to judge candidates as they couldn't interview everyone. Then someone hit on the idea of requiring a degree...

      You should be able to google it up if interested.

    92. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet my sister, with a Masters from University of Phoenix, is the Nursing Director at a very large hospital in a high priced city.

    93. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      We used to give people IQ tests,

      Even if you believe in this witchcraft, you very likely would end up with smart, totally unqualified people who aren't interested in their jobs.

    94. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      witchcraft

      Okay.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    95. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I will likely never hire a devry, ITT, or University of Phoenix graduate (and so help me, I hope I never again have the misfortune of hiring a Harvard or MIT grad).

      As a hiring manager, I won't draw a line in the sand like you. But, agree in general that the odds of getting a good candidate from the first three are slim, and I probably wouldn't extend an interview to them if other candidates are available. And, in my experience the odds for the other two aren't much better than any other major universities. In fact, we've had a few seriously bad employees from those schools...overinflated egos don't make for good workers. I don't care if you're a genius, if you can't play well with others.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    96. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that these guys didn't have degrees, but had experience, and later needed them to stay employed, or to get their food in the door somewhere else, so they took the quick/dirty route. Degrees didn't matter so much 30-40 years ago, and I've know many people to go this route.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    97. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Apparently Bill, the mods can't handle the truth.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    98. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Remind me never to apply to your company. Not all ITT graduates are idiots.

      So, you're suggesting that we (hiring managers) shouldn't consider that these grads chose an "institution" that's produced "graduates" that have had troubles finding work, because they're not getting decent training there? You and others may not be idiots, but I'd suggest that that lack of awareness, and the useless sheepskin received, in all likelihood, don't make for good interview candidates in an extremely high percentage of the cases.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    99. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that your typical college student is not really ready to learn about group work and collaboration until you can ask the all important question: "Do you want to get paid?" :-)

      And there is the issue of how to grade students when they have collaborated. Unless you have a course on collaboration...

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    100. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's that. The grading that is. I don't think its as difficult that we often make it out to be, but since engineering studies require a lot from the students, the notion that "we have to make sure that no-one can get away with coasting or cheating" seems quite spread (in the west at least, which is the only academic culture I can speak of).

      So since collaboration invites questions about who did what, and that could lead to "cheating", we're institutionally weary of it.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    101. Re:Universities aren't completely honest either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to get their food in the door somewhere else

      They were delivering pizza?

  3. Loans by eriklou · · Score: 1

    Good, this company was worthless and everything they offered was worthless. Thanks for the degree! I really need it as a farking custodian...

    1. Re:Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITT tech school became what every business person is trained to create, a institution that takes in money without delivering anything of value

      It is the ultimate outcome of constantly trying to lower costs while increasing income

      Apollo schools (Univ of Phoenix, etc...) should be next on the list.
      They have created billions of dollars in revenue while delivering less real value than if the same money had been spent at state colleges.

      What we really need in this country are 4-year community colleges that are really focused on delivering value. Unfortunately pacs funded by private colleges have stopped this repeatedly

    2. Re:Loans by kenh · · Score: 0

      What we really need in this country are 4-year community colleges that are really focused on delivering value.

      We have them, they are called state colleges and universities... oh wait, you said "focused on delivering value" - nevermind. They are currently designed to make their students feel OK about not getting accepted into a four year college or university.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apollo Schools has ties to Bill Clinton, so that isn't happening.

    4. Re:Loans by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What we really need in this country are 4-year community colleges that are really focused on delivering value.

      What we really need are good 2-year vocational schools + apprenticeships that teach young people actually useful skills, like plumbing, mechanic, welding, electrician, etc.

      My company recently advertised a marketing position, and we got over 300 applications.

      I recently tried to find a plumber for a kitchen remodel, and it took me over 3 weeks to find someone who wasn't fully booked for the next month, and he was only able to squeeze my job in by working on Sundays while my daughter watched his kids. I paid him $80/hr, and he paid my daughter $5/hr for babysitting, so he netted $75.

    5. Re:Loans by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      These days, at least in my state, almost all of the former community colleges ARE four year colleges. In addition, if you complete an AA you are guaranteed a spot at a state UNIVERSITY (it may not be your first pick), so you haven't really screwed yourself if you screwed up high school.

    6. Re:Loans by funwithBSD · · Score: 3, Funny

      My nephew just turned 27, and makes 100K+ with overtime as a high voltage electrician.

      I have a degree, and 20 years on him, and I make just a bit more than him.

      However, my office is not 100+ ft in the air, with 45 mph crosswinds and humming 100K voltage lines of death over head.

      My hats off to him, I will stick with the computer and office chair.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    7. Re:Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but there is a reason those jobs need more people and get such good rates: They suck. Seriously, imagine working under a house in the tightest space you can imagine with a floor beam pressed on your chest and you can barely move while spiders and centipedes crawl in your pants and it's 110F (or in winter, 10F). All while trying to solder up a pipe that's leaking the smelliest, slimiest, shit right on your face as you inhale toxic lead fumes.

    8. Re:Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad they're actually paying their electricians a living wage these days. My Dad used to throw breakers the size of fridges. The kind of breakers that are a bit touchy and prone to exploding in fireballs. He's retired now, but never got anywhere close to earning $100K. Worth taking into consideration in those days he spent 4,000GBP on a house, and that same house is probably worth 150,000GBP+ now.

      The good thing about electrical work is there are always going to be people living in houses with vacuum cleaners. Those people need someone on the doorstep to fix the vacuum cleaner. You can't bring someone over from China or India to fix your vacuum cleaner, ergo you can't really be outsourced. Better, as wages drop through the floor people are going to have to ditch the disposable lifestyle and actually repair vacuum cleaners (instead of taking the trip to Walmart).

      Electrical work is a pretty safe bet. You won't get rich but you'll always have a job.

    9. Re:Loans by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The job title you guys are looking for is 'lineman'.

      Electricians typically work in buildings, not on transmission lines.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Loans by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Those people need someone on the doorstep to fix the vacuum cleaner.

      I am very skeptical if it is possible in any first world country to have a vacuum cleaner repaired for less than the cost of replacing it. Service calls are very expensive. Manufactured goods are cheap.

    11. Re:Loans by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      You can't bring someone over from China or India to fix your vacuum cleaner, ergo you can't really be outsourced. Better, as wages drop through the floor people are going to have to ditch the disposable lifestyle and actually repair vacuum cleaners (instead of taking the trip to Walmart).

      Electrical work is a pretty safe bet. You won't get rich but you'll always have a job.

      Just wait until the Goobacks arrive from the future to take everyone's jobs for a small fraction of what these jobs pay to contrmporary workers. :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    12. Re:Loans by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      ITT tech school became what every business person is trained to create, a institution that takes in money without delivering anything of value

      It is the ultimate outcome of constantly trying to lower costs while increasing income

      Apollo schools (Univ of Phoenix, etc...) should be next on the list.
      They have created billions of dollars in revenue while delivering less real value than if the same money had been spent at state colleges.

      What we really need in this country are 4-year community colleges that are really focused on delivering value. Unfortunately pacs funded by private colleges have stopped this repeatedly

      The standard of education that is held up is MIT, and you can audit those classes via open courseware if you have the time and motivation to do so. I did it and I found that the material being presented was the same material and skills that were being taught at ITT when I went. I would say if I could get into MIT (which I could if I could get past the admissions department going back and looking at my SAT scores) I would do just as well as I did at ITT where I performed highly, based on what I am hearing across the internet in the light of the news about ITT closing, I am an outlier. I am listed in Who's Who from my time at ITT.. which I gather does not match with what is being said about ITT students in general.

  4. Don't Worry... by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry. The same people will have already started a new company, under a new name, which does exactly the same thing as the old company. Bonus points if they also have ITT Educational Services, Inc. sell all the trademarks for "ITT Technical Institutes" to the new company.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Don't Worry... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      If they do *EXACTLY* the same thing, then they will also be subject to the US DOE crackdown. They will *HAVE* to do something differently in order to survive.

    2. Re: Don't Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITT received $580m in federal grant money?!? That is over $72k PER EMPLOYEE. wtf.

    3. Re:Don't Worry... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      They will *HAVE* to do something differently in order to survive.

      Programming boot camps. Big money now that the federal government is getting involved.

    4. Re: Don't Worry... by kenh · · Score: 2

      I think they included GI Bill money (which is part student, part federal gov't money) and federally-guaranteed student loans.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re: Don't Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly right. I took an adjunct position teaching Linux at a local ITT once. I taught for one semester and about two days into the second semester I quit. That place was all kinds of fucked up and the ONLY thing they were ever good at was getting GI Bill money.

    6. Re:Don't Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      under a new name

    7. Re:Don't Worry... by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if they cannot do exactly the same thing. The problem ITT Educational Services, Inc. currently faces is the sanctions imposed on them. A new company won't be under the same sanctions. It takes time to build up enough history to be sanctioned by DOE. Playing whack-a-mole with unethical corporate entities is a long-held tradition in the US. This is because we consistently fail to hold corporate officers accountable for their actions.

      I would love to be wrong about this.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    8. Re:Don't Worry... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If they do *EXACTLY* the same thing, then they will also be subject to the US DOE crackdown. They will *HAVE* to do something differently in order to survive.

      That depends on how profitable it is to keep a cat and mouse game going.

    9. Re: Don't Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you are wrong but not how you think. DOE is energy, education has its own abbreviation.

    10. Re:Don't Worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong. ITT has the sanctions because they couldn't pass accreditation, any new school would have to pass accreditation to qualify for federal student aid. This is the problem that ITT and so many other for profit schools ran into. They let their standards drop so far that they could no longer pass accreditation, when it wasn't required they didn't care.

  5. Well Good. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Now people can take a look at their local community college options without being distracted by ITT ads.

    If the feds could arrange to move the the $580 billion to the community colleges to fund more technical programs, they might find they get value for money.
     

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Well Good. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I have seen commercials for ITT Tech over the past 40+ years, but I have never worked with anyone who attended there. Conversely, I attended a Technical Institute that didn't broadcast commercials all the time.

      The moral of the story is: Let your curriculum and graduates speak for the school's quality, not a TV commercial.

    2. Re:Well Good. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Now people can take a look at their local community college options without being distracted by ITT ads.

      Right, that's what kept people from applying to their local community college...

      If the feds could arrange to move the the $580 billion to the community colleges to fund more technical programs, they might find they get value for money.

      Don't confuse federal loan guarantees with actual money - that $580 Million (not Billion) is owed by the students to the lenders, not as grants from the federal government. In order for the local community colleges to get the $580 Million that previously went to ITT Tech the local community colleges would have to raise tuition to the level charged by ITT Tech.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Well Good. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now people can take a look at their local community college options without being distracted by ITT ads.

      Right, that's what kept people from applying to their local community college...

      If the feds could arrange to move the the $580 billion to the community colleges to fund more technical programs, they might find they get value for money.

      Don't confuse federal loan guarantees with actual money - that $580 Million (not Billion) is owed by the students to the lenders, not as grants from the federal government. In order for the local community colleges to get the $580 Million that previously went to ITT Tech the local community colleges would have to raise tuition to the level charged by ITT Tech.

      In the case of my local college, it was oversubscribed and the technical programs were limited and oriented to licensed trades.
      However for first year college, they cover the same stuff as any other college for a fraction of the price and the results counted towards a degree in the state universities. So you if you played it right, you could get a serious discount on your education. This worked for 2 of 4 children, the other 2 went straight to uni. It also serves as a path to escape high school early. College is such a better learning environment than high school.

      Hence - if the US government wants cost effective college teaching, fund the community colleges to do it. They have a track record and a customer base. The local colleges would not need to raise tuition at all. They are able to teach at a specific cost per student. There's no need for it to change because they take on a few more techy courses.

      Point taken on it being loans though.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Well Good. by slew · · Score: 2

      Hence - if the US government wants cost effective college teaching, fund the community colleges to do it. They have a track record and a customer base. The local colleges would not need to raise tuition at all. They are able to teach at a specific cost per student. There's no need for it to change because they take on a few more techy courses.

      As a reminder that sometimes community colleges aren't necessarily the panacea you only need to look at City College of San Francisco...

      Apparently the financial governance at CCSF is so bad, they have been threatened with losing their accreditation. They are currently now on probation. Elected officials (since it is a public community college, board members are elected by the citizens of SF) were convicted of diverting/laundering bond money to finance election campaigns, and accreditation audits showed 14 failures including maintaining minimum spending levels required for students, failure to track educational outcomes, allowing department heads control over the payroll system that allowed for systematic overpayment for travel expenses and recurring payment to contractors that no longer had assigned jobs, over-funding politically popular department, and short changing student access to courses that could transfer to the university system, etc. On top of this, the board approved a silly capital improvement bond and went on a silly construction binge (including a mostly vacant "chinatown" branch) which is thought to have been pushed by contractor donations to the bond campaign.

      Over protests by student groups and faculty, the state finally decided to step in and strip the CCSF board of their oversight powers and appointed a special trustee to see if they can correct the situation before the probation period expires (in Jan 2017) and CCSF could end up closing their doors.

      Of course there are many community colleges that do an excellent job, but like all red-blue generalizations, there is a lot of grey in the middle.

    5. Re:Well Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to learn autocad, not get any sort of degree. Tech schools, like itt, let me do this. I looked into community college, it was mandatory to take english and science, ect, just to learn autocad.

      Tech school has served me well for the past 20 years, hopefully people will still have non-college options to obtain the training needed to learn a skill.

      I'm glad I was able to go the tech school route, I would have never passed college, I had / have no desire for any sort of degree, it wouldn't help me at all in my current career.

      So now instead of having multiple corrupt private institutions we will only have government provided choices, yay progress

    6. Re:Well Good. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness are community colleges basically the same thing as technical/vocational colleges in most places?

      Where I live, Minnesota, we have both as separate entities under the MnSCU system, as well as non U of M universities. For example the 2 closest MnSCU schools to me are DCTC and Normandale with DCTC being a vocation school were you at most get an AAS degree but get those practical skills. Normandale being a stereotypical community college where you go to start a 4 year degree to be finished else where, prove that you can hack college, pay lower tuition for gen-ed courses, take college classes as a high school student, etc.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Well Good. by dcollins · · Score: 1

      To my understanding, one of the points of debate was that this was an administrative finance-tracking scandal, and at no point were any aspersions being placed on the teachers or quality of education coming out of CCSF. At least that's what I got from the local public protests over the threat of loss of accreditation; the local populace was very happy with CCSF and its effects as students.

      “The actions of the ACCJC –- an organization accountable to no one — have unnecessarily put at risk the livelihoods of the nearly 2,500 hard-working men and women at the college,” Tim Paulson of the San Francisco Central Labor Council said in a statement. “What’s more, their move to deny CCSF accreditation has imperiled the future of San Francisco’s working people, who rely heavily on a CCSF education for workforce training, language learning, and a pathway to better futures for themselves and their communities.”

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/09/city-college-of-san-francisco-protest_n_3569046.html

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    8. Re:Well Good. by slew · · Score: 1

      To my understanding, one of the points of debate was that this was an administrative finance-tracking scandal, and at no point were any aspersions being placed on the teachers or quality of education coming out of CCSF. At least that's what I got from the local public protests over the threat of loss of accreditation; the local populace was very happy with CCSF and its effects as students.

      “The actions of the ACCJC –- an organization accountable to no one — have unnecessarily put at risk the livelihoods of the nearly 2,500 hard-working men and women at the college,” Tim Paulson of the San Francisco Central Labor Council said in a statement. “What’s more, their move to deny CCSF accreditation has imperiled the future of San Francisco’s working people, who rely heavily on a CCSF education for workforce training, language learning, and a pathway to better futures for themselves and their communities.”

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/09/city-college-of-san-francisco-protest_n_3569046.html

      I have no doubt that teaching was probably fine at CCSF: they spent 92% of their budget on salaries and benefits (all staff, not just teachers).

      The problems are simply not just finance-tracking, though, it's actually, that they didn't have any money left over at all (as I understand it, they 3-day operating reserve and intended to rely on bond money which presumably gets paid back by taxpayers, not tuition and fees, for contingencies).

      Instead of addressing this issue, they actually increased salaries by 7% the next year after being warned about it. The risk of investing dollars from student (and federal student loan) into an institution that might implode financially (and cut a program leaving students out in the cold) at any time is an important aspect of any accreditation program. Sure, CCSF could be bailed out by SF (or the state as UC gets from time-to-time), but a perilous financial condition seems like something an accreditation program should warn prospective students about, no?

      Apparently CCSF, ignored auditor warnings about continuing to offer many classes for free that staffed by CCSF employees (such as “Weaving and Tapestry,” “Arts and Crafts for Older Adults” and “Baking and Pastry”) which apparently cost 1/2 million a year in salaries not including that these non-revenue courses occupy time and space in expensive SF real estate. In comparison CCSF's technology investment rate was only $1.5M/year, and the reserve for unpaid tuition was $3M/year. This in the context of under-investment in student support services and Articulation courses that can transfer to CSU and other colleges contributed to their problems. Instead of using operating funds and grants for "free" classes, they should have perhaps have sought out volunteers and foundation funding sources for community outreach which didn't come from student dollars/loans? Just thinking out loud here...

      Teaching, though, was likely not a problem at CCSF...

    9. Re:Well Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full disclosure: part-time community college CS instructor. Posting as AC for obvious reasons.

      While not defending the board or staff decisions of CCSF, this soap opera was partly caused by the accrediting agency, ACCJC, The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. It has lost a couple of lawsuits relating to this fiasco, and there is a move underway to remove it as the accrediting organization for a number of community colleges.

      Having served at a community college which underwent their review...which cost lots of effort with little positive results...my sympathies are with CCSF, whatever their shortcomings may be.

      One real sore spot in the ITT shutdown is its timing. The semester has started for a lot of schools, low-enrollment classes may already be cancelled, and high-demand classes are full with no room to add late students. And the time needed to evaluate student levels, counsel them, and form a new educational plan will push their return to school into the next semester. (Quarter system schools, not so bad, but no one in the community college system was planning on this.) We may add some late start classes if we can provide the rooms and instructors to help the ITT students, but administrations are wary of adding new costs without a reasonable enrollment in return. Hopefully it only winds up being a few months delay in the lives of the ITT students...

  6. Job training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We live in a society that does not value education at all, and these worthless for-profit colleges are a symptom of that. Most people go into higher education primarily for "job training" and money, instead of doing so because they are deeply passionate about the field of their choosing. For those who want a truly good education, getting one is often prohibitively expensive because essentially only the best-of-the-best schools offer it. This problem is made worse by lazy, ignorant, unprincipled, and short-sighted employers requiring an ever-increasing amount of credentials for every job in existence; that just leads to more demand from the ignorant masses for "job training" from colleges and universities, and many of those institutions gladly step up to take their money.

    Colleges and universities should not be about job training. That's what trade schools are for.

    1. Re:Job training by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      This is the way it used to be. You learned a trade and went to work.

      Not everyone is cut out for University and have no reason to go - other than accumulating large amounts of debt

    2. Re:Job training by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      ITT was a bunch of trade schools. Not good ones.

      Like anything else, there are shades of grey. Good schools teach you how to learn independently for life _and_ teach you valuable skills. Bad schools indoctrinate. Many of the schools that claim 'life training' are, in fact, the worst indoctrinators (*studies programs in general).

      Trade schools are better than indoctrination centers. At least you don't come out stupider than you start.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Job training by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help that congress has been steadily removing funding from universities all in the name of fiscal responsibility or some crap like that. If employers want people with accredited education, they need to be taxed appropriately and help pay for college so that it is actually within reach. The plan instead though is to throw up their hands and say we are not getting hwat we want, and let's get some H1Bs instead! The whole thing is one big scam, and we Americans are being screwed over.

    4. Re:Job training by Dracos · · Score: 1

      This is the way it used to be. You learned a trade and went to work.

      The new version is you pay to get a degree. Learning the trade is extracurricular.

    5. Re:Job training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't help that congress has been steadily removing funding from universities all in the name of fiscal responsibility or some crap like that.

      Or that state legislatures are slashing higher education spending for public colleges, resulting in higher prices.

  7. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have talked to numerous students about ITT Tech and they all say the same thing. "They treat you like a number and only care about your money". They don't care if you get a good education or not.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will say that the ITT I attended (15+ yrs ago) actually had teachers that were interested in making sure you learned what you were supposed to and had fun doing it. But, that was when they had CAD and Electronics Engineering courses, not that myriad of options available 2 weeks ago. We Built/Designed Circuits from simple voltage regulators to Amplifiers, including broadcasting FM down the hallway of the school (1W). Programmed Allen-Bradley PLCs w/ ladder logic and an 8bit motorolla processor for machine coding. The PC side of the course was basically, take it apart, put it back together, load DOS in the lab, and learning about the interfaces, designs, whys and hows, for the classroom side.

      That said, I went there because I didn't apply myself in High School, and it was no problem to get in knowing that I just needed a piece of paper to get past HR.

    2. Re:About time by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      I will say that the ITT I attended (15+ yrs ago) actually had teachers that were interested in making sure you learned what you were supposed to and had fun doing it. But, that was when they had CAD and Electronics Engineering courses, not that myriad of options available 2 weeks ago. We Built/Designed Circuits from simple voltage regulators to Amplifiers, including broadcasting FM down the hallway of the school (1W). Programmed Allen-Bradley PLCs w/ ladder logic and an 8bit motorolla processor for machine coding. The PC side of the course was basically, take it apart, put it back together, load DOS in the lab, and learning about the interfaces, designs, whys and hows, for the classroom side.

      That said, I went there because I didn't apply myself in High School, and it was no problem to get in knowing that I just needed a piece of paper to get past HR.

      I went to ITT and graduated the first time in 2009 and the second time in 2011 and we learned the same things in the electronics program, I also took software application programming and we created a platform agnostic banking application for multiple users that operated on a network with multiple levels of user and administrator access to track customer bank accounts, net worth, interest on savings and loan eligibility. I built a robot for my final project in my associates electronics degree that mapped the floor plan of a building by just driving around and using a laser grid to map where it could go and couldn't go (basically the entire surface of a floor) In my bachelors program we made a serial digital radio where we could implement data logging from sensors within a mile range such that each system had the whole system of data to implement a multi node control system (in our case controlling heating elements to maintain and data-log temperature at multiple points over digital radio.)

      HR at companies I have applied to acknowledge almost none of this because it is over their heads, the piece of paper is devalued because it says ITT.. which is sad. usually when I see that look on their face when they talk about ITT I start getting ready to get up and thank them for their time.. usually though when they see that I have spent half a decade working for IBM and working on 911 phone systems, they get interested again.. but usually ITT works against me from what I see which is something that should not happen in my view. Don't let it get you down though, It is the sign of a good company, that they would actually look at your achievements rather than just looking at what school you went to and basing their decision off of that. IBM was a good employer and I learned a lot from them and they acknowledged the skills and my quality of work and time at ITT. It is sad that IBM seems to not be the company that it was a decade ago also. I don't know what has happened that has caused their decline, but I chalk it up to mismanagement. This can bring down any company.. when the bean counters start thinking that because they make loads of money they are somehow qualified to make technical decisions.. this is why disasters like the Challenger accident happen.

  8. Despite the fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That there are numerous articles online written by professional journalists who have taken the Dept of Education to task for this, Slashdot uses the Gizmodo article written by a "blogger" who apparently doesn't do any fact checking.

    Taps is playing for the web - it was brought down by amateurs.

  9. Just get out of education by hierofalcon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How much money goes to the favored public and private institutions from the federal government? There are plenty of worthless degrees you can get at any institution. None of their promises of employment or employment at a particular wage are worth anything.

    Why is it all right to go after the technical schools and not go after everybody else?

    They should just stop the funding and let all the colleges adapt. The more they've subsidized students costs of attending, the higher the tuition has been priced. Just stop already.

    1. Re:Just get out of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political Science Degrees, worthless.......

    2. Re:Just get out of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot karma whoring techniques #24233, #3234, #342343

      "Government bad", "Public education bad", "Persecution of the geeks"

      C'mon man. This is low effort even for slashdot. ITT was a scam designed to harvest federal student loan dollars. You can't compare them fairly to legitimate higher education institutions, of which ITT was not.

      You're note even angry at the real problem, which is federally backed student loans - These loans cause market distortion and are in large part responsible for increasing education costs.

      Oh wait. You're probably a Libertarian - Sorry. All that's over your head and nobody cares what you have to say. Carry on.

    3. Re:Just get out of education by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Take away a GI's right to go to school after service. That's a great political move.. The reason ITT and co. were specifically targeted was because they were playing games with their employment numbers. That assumes that the enrollee's even completed their programs, which should be a condition for that individual's education.

      Basically it comes down to people making bad decisions with their education choices and having someone else (the gov) paying for their mistakes. If you're giving someone free money, make sure that they're using it wisely (nanny state and all that), turn off the tap (most poor people will stay poor forever), or some narrow middle-ground that doesn't insult the left or the right too much (current-ish system).

      --
      Bye!
    4. Re:Just get out of education by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      RTFA ass-hole. These for profit schools are ripping off students and tax payers. FYI they want access to student loans because that's all the federal money available. Pell grants provide next to nothing for financial aid so you need loans to pay for education.

    5. Re:Just get out of education by fropenn · · Score: 1

      Subsidized loans and a few grant programs are about the only way the federal government invests in higher education (not counting the research dollars, which are also huge but cover research activity). Most states have reduced their funding of the public institutions, which pretty much guarantees higher tuition for students. The biggest driver of costs in higher education is personnel, and one of the biggest personnel costs is health insurance.

      If you want to reduce the cost of attending a public university, do two things: 1) encourage states to increase their subsidies for their public institutions and 2) get health care costs under control.

    6. Re:Just get out of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much money goes to the favored public and private institutions from the federal government?

      A lot. That's why to be good public stewards, it has to be examined.

      There are plenty of worthless degrees you can get at any institution. None of their promises of employment or employment at a particular wage are worth anything.

      They don't make promises though, that's the key.

      Why is it all right to go after the technical schools and not go after everybody else?

      They can, and will go after others.

      Read the GAO report

      They should just stop the funding and let all the colleges adapt. The more they've subsidized students costs of attending, the higher the tuition has been priced. Just stop already.

      That's an interesting solution, but the thing is, the government needs a certain amount of educated population, just for its own employees. That many people have earned those payments, like the GI bill, further complicates matters. Then there's all the existing land-grants and tax advantages.

      It isn't as simple as saying get rid of it.

    7. Re:Just get out of education by Chalnoth · · Score: 0

      You might want to look into precisely why ITT lost their accreditation. They were essentially operating a scam: promising students that they would prepare them to enter the workforce, while actually providing nothing of the sort. This is the norm with for-profit institutions. I don't understand why you think that more for-profit institutions would help with this.

    8. Re:Just get out of education by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      My comment wasn't directed at ITT or Corinthian or any other now defunct business and absolving them of any wrongs that they may or may not have done - I'm not their judge.

      A private college can be structured to provide training in particular fields with faster certifications and without the broad spectrum of courses that you would have to take to get the same training that you are after at a public school. Whether they are or not is an exercise left to the potential students. Whether they succeed or not is almost always harder to judge, because the people who select these schools frequently have strikes against them at the outset, either from lack of time or resources or additional responsibilities that are making them look at a focused program rather than a longer term broader spectrum education you would get at a public or private college. They may have already had a host of problems that make them a poor candidate for public or private colleges, but might have a chance on a focused curriculum.

      I was trying to say that the federal government's paying for education (grants, research dollars, loans that are forgivable if you do favored things) just allows the colleges to increase tuition till they are still getting the same money from students and parents. The costs of all higher education has - like medical care- risen much higher than inflation (3x or more in some cases). As long as there is an infinite pocket available, this will continue. All degrees have worth, but the comparison between tech colleges and community/public is not much different than the supposed benefits of top ranked colleges and their humble cc and state competitors. The hype isn't much different.

      I guess part of the frustration I have is I like the principle of the tech education - get the degree you are interested in without supporting the broad based garbage you have to take to get a science or engineering degree at most schools. I read War and Peace (unabridged) on my own because I wanted to. I didn't need a college class to broaden my experience. Likewise, people interested in teaching English (or Russian) aren't expected to take Calculus. Probably just a gear head's perception at the existing inequalities in what people have to take, but anyway..

    9. Re:Just get out of education by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      1. Having a broad education is valuable for a number of different reasons. Not least of which is that it benefits society as a whole when people have a decent understanding of the world around them. University isn't and shouldn't be all about job preparation.

      2. Most of the uptick in university costs has been a result of ballooning administrative pay. This has in large part mirrored the exploding pay of upper management in many private organizations. Making more schools private won't help this problem: it may well exacerbate it.

      3. An actual solution to this kind of thing would involve more direct funding of the schools. If states and/or the federal government directly funded schools to the point that education was close to free for students, then they could quite reasonably put into place policies that would restrict administrative pay at such institutions. In fact, there would be a lot of pressure to do exactly this as expensive universities would look quite bad.

    10. Re:Just get out of education by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      Or, Econ 101 could actually be used. If there isn't anyone able to pay the cost of housing and tuition and books and lab fees and miscellaneous fees because there isn't any lender of last resort, they'd also have to reduce their administrative overhead, close or just - you know - fire their overpaid sports coaches and close the athletics departments and have IM teams for exercise. Wow - I must still be dreaming and not awake yet. The thought that schools would put teaching ahead of building new training facilities for athletes - that's crazy talk.

      The other big expense at colleges has been in buildings and particularly dorms. When I went back to visit the college I attended, I couldn't believe the changes in the dorms. My old dorm was still there and in use (and I know it was - well - aged would probably be polite compared to when I was there). It was still in use but it and its companion were slated for destruction soon and may have been by now. There wasn't anything wrong with the dorms I was in in my opinion, but in the attempts to attract new students all of the big colleges have been building new facilities to try to look attractive and provide all the amenities.

      I agree that having people who want a broad education receive one is great. I completely agree that such an education is good for many careers. I also believe engineers, doctors, and scientists should be able to write well and spell and should know something of history and perhaps be familiar with some economic theory and a foreign language. I also believe that high school English, History, Foreign Language and the rest should be sufficient training for most everyone in those disciplines. Only economics and basic law are probably not taught in high school.

      If they didn't go to a high school that taught anything, or they partied and didn't choose to learn anything in high school, then they probably aren't going to be in the school of engineering or in the science department anyway because they're tough majors. There are many other requirements at most colleges that are not useful for many degrees but are still requirements for graduation because colleges feel everyone should be well rounded and the big liberal arts programs need money. But it's not a two way street. The liberal degrees don't generally have to do much hard science or basic engineering. I'm not painting all degrees at public / private colleges as worthless, but there are certainly a great many courses being taught that are.

    11. Re:Just get out of education by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the economic theory results that produce good outcomes for market systems have a number of major assumptions, assumptions that are entirely violated in this situation.

      One of those assumptions is perfect information. For-profit schools are very good at deceiving their students with a variety of wild promises, and as new students don't usually have good access to the people who would be making decisions about hiring them later, those students just aren't adept at separating the truth from the lies.

      Another issue is that these market arguments rely upon the concept of individual utility maximization. But education is one of those things that doesn't just benefit a single person in isolation: a more highly-educated populace is better for everybody, not just for those receiving the education. By ignoring overall utility, these simple macroeconomic arguments are maximizing the wrong thing.

      Finally, the simple macroeconomic case here assumes that everybody has the same capacity to spend, even if they have differing desire to spend. In reality, making student loans less available will do nothing but price poor students out of college, which will exacerbate intergenerational income inequality (that is, it will serve to help keep the poor poorer and the rich richer). If we want a society where everybody has a chance to succeed based upon their own merits and work, then we need to have free education for all. Period.

  10. Good riddence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thousands fewer paper MCSEs and generally unqualified "techs" in the field.

    1. Re:Good riddence by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Future healthcare workers.

  11. What about DeVry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same scam, different label..

    1. Re:What about DeVry? by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      DeVry and ITT both have ripped off so many of my classmates. People, mostly from working class families, tried to get a technical degree they could use right away. But instead they got a mountain of debt and a degree that was often not of any value once the person got even a year of industry experience. Getting that first job with just a DeVry degree is a matter of luck, luck that employers didn't simply throw out your resume.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:What about DeVry? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      In my personal experience, employers are looking for work history over education. I spent two years at DeVry (as a EET), but for family reasons I transferred to a "traditional" university to finish up. I graduated with a decent enough (3.3-ish) GPA, certainly not top of my class, but high enough to prove I wasn't an idiot. I had nearly zero trouble getting into a job in my industry (once I got out of the tiny town I grew up in). I can't say whether or not the place where I got my degree made a difference in the hiring process, but I can tell you that it wasn't even mentioned in my interview. They were more interested in my work history than my education. I had worked various shit jobs since I was 15, including some that were mildly applicable to my degree.

      As far as the quality of the education... I'd say it was a horse apiece. Both places had good instructors and shitty instructors. Both had classes I would use and ones that I would never use in my life. All said and done, it would have (probably) been smarter to just start out at the University, more from a financial standpoint than anything.

    3. Re:What about DeVry? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      For an employer, it makes the decision a lot easier for taking a junior/green person if they have a relevant college degree, preferably from a good college. What has happened is some of these for-profit technical schools have such a bad reputation that employers can rank a junior person a bit lower because of it. I'm not certain the reputation is deserved, to me it smells a little bit of classism. In the end, going to a university is probably the better deal. I'd compare it to buying furniture on a lay-away plan, in the long run you end up paying a lot more just because you were too poor to raise the money up front.

      Some people go to a big university for that "college experience", because they'll want to join a fraternity/sorority, they'll have the excitement of college sports (either as spectator or athlete), etc. And you won't really have those things as ITT. I don't value those things myself, but many people do.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:What about DeVry? by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      This has been my experience. I graduated from DeVry with a degree with a similar GPA. I enrolled in 2005 right about the time the deregulation of the student loan industry occurred. I don't remember hearing anything bad about private colleges or how bad student loans were. I was out of high school and I didn't expect to go to college in the first place.

      After some work experience it never became a topic of conversation for any prospective job. No one cared about where I got a piece of paper. What was a concern was whether I could do the job and fit in with the company. That first job was probably luck but it was the reason I haven't had issues with finding a job.

      Fast forward and I have taken various other courses at public universities and my wife is currently getting her B.S. in Biology from a state university. She tells me her experiences which mimicked mine; it is hit or miss on the teacher and class. Some are great. Some are awful.

      This isn't an apology to those institutions. It is the experience I have had with private colleges and state universities.

    5. Re:What about DeVry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say this and I would never let where someone went to school* determine if they got an interview or not but ITT kids normally had a different way of carrying themselves than the college kids (even community college) did. I was asked to sit in on a number of interviews by my old boss and some of the things I seen come through the door was amazing. Sadly, the "trade" school types often displayed a level of informality that just doesn't play out well in my environment. It seemed like too many hacker wannabes who thought that throwing around a (very) little bit of knowledge with a laid back demeanor was what they thought was desirable to get a job. Sometimes we'd hire one on for a help desk position and these kids had their cube toys in full bloom before they even got through basic compliance training. I understand that has little to do with ITT's current problems with the government but something just seemed to push a lot of these kids into bad habits with little understanding of how to even get their foot in the door in a large office environment.

      *An education is an education and someone not being able to step up to a higher institution shouldn't blackball them from an entry level position. This is the same reason I don't frown on certs. Too many people around here crap on certs but it's better than nothing and some people needed to get those certs for employment purposes.

    6. Re:What about DeVry? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not my experience, I have two friends who went to ITT. one is SAN engineer making $130K and the other does virtualization (vmware) for $120K a year. I think it's what the particular student does with their education that is deciding factor on whether it was worth the money. With all the price gouging by the colleges and Universities in my area (chicago) for degrees for jobs that will have miserable pay I'm not understanding the hatred for ITT or why the feds singled them out

  12. "Taxpayer dollars" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> received an estimated $580 million in federal money (aka taxpayer dollars)

    Heh - as if what we paid came close to what the Feds spent. If you're going to use snide-ness, why not try "a.k.a. yet more debt"?

    On the other hand, where do you think all those "job training" dollars that a lot of people keep demanding go? The Feds feel pressured to spend them on...well...something...regardless of actual results.

  13. Good for the goose... by kenh · · Score: 1

    It would be great if the Department of Education would impose the same scrutiny on the so-called non-profit state and private colleges...

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Good for the goose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are so man not-for-profit state schools where the board of directors still manage to pull in a significant salary for job that amounts to meeting for about 2 hours a month. There are luckily still many universities that operate a board of trustees who serve without compensation. When they vote to raise the university president's salary (US/UK/etc translation: president = chancellor = rector).

    2. Re:Good for the goose... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They did it's called accreditation. Moron.

    3. Re:Good for the goose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are fifth-rate accreditation boards for the fly-by-night institutions. Anyone can get accredited by somebody.

    4. Re:Good for the goose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if a private college is accredited, all is well?

  14. devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    devry or university of phoenix ms hill?

    1. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard anything about Devry in a long time but I had a friend that went there in the early 80s, he worked on the internals of teddy ruxpin while he was still in school.

    2. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So devry taught him how to insert a cassette tape? Or was he just stuffing tapes into teddy bears recreationally while he was in college?

    3. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I attended DeVry in the late 80s and got a good education and a valid bachelor's degree from a regionally accredited university no different from any other legitimate university. Graduates were regularly interviewed and hired by Fortune 500 companies and were often sought after more than graduates of other local state universities. Of course, DeVry may be complete shit now, though. I have no idea.

    4. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm friends with a guy who (weirdly) got a full scholarship to DeVry, graduated with a bachelors in three years, and pretty quickly got a good job at Siemens. At the time, the rest of my circle of friends (most of whom went to the state engineering research university) laughed at him for picking a shitty school, but in retrospect he was the smartest of us all...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by slew · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard anything about Devry in a long time but I had a friend that went there in the early 80s, he worked on the internals of teddy ruxpin while he was still in school.

      Devry is also facing a lawsuit for deceptive advertising for saying they have an 90% placement rate. Also with declining enrollments (due to people being more skeptical about for-profit schools like Corinthian), last year DeVry closed 14 campuses and moved the students on-line. The writing is probably on the wall for them as well...

    6. Re:devry or university of phoenix ms hill? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Last I heard that friend was doing something electronics design in aviation for the airforce in the 90s.

  15. Good by geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a friend that worked at the office of one of these campuses. She told me that 99% of the time they didn't even have a teacher for the class until the day before it started, let alone lesson plans or anything else. She quit after the second FBI raid and never looked back.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why did the FBI raid them?

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State colleges do the same thing. Check out any course catalog. The busiest professor is always TBA.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She told me that 99% of the time they didn't even have a teacher for the class until the day before it started, let alone lesson plans or anything else.

      Past ITT instructor here. They had canned pre-made lesson plans that were terrible, full of typos and sometimes outright errors, and management was pretty insistent you followed it exactly (they gave some lip service to "academic freedom" and designing your own lesson plans, but they mostly assumed and pushed you to not do it). Often they would throw me or others in a class last-minute a couple days before it started, so that we were not prepared (I wouldn't have time to even read the canned lesson, much less prepare my own). Often the instructors would have a bare minimum credentials (a degree and a few years work experience), but not even necessarily experts in the topic, so would have difficulty teaching or even recognizing problems with the curriculum.

      On paper, the degree program was good, but it was a pretty awful implementation. As others have said, it was more about covering a checklist of topics in a quick manner to say they meet requirements, not presenting the material in a useful way to students. Excellent students did have the opportunity to learn, so you shouldn't judge all ITT students (I met some quite brilliant ones), but they were definitely the oddity. Most students were not prepared to enter such a fast-paced and terrible environment, and did poorly.

    4. Re:Good by dcollins · · Score: 1

      I've been at a poorly-run community college where assignments for teachers were made, maybe, 3 days before class started. I fear that's semi-common. Current school is much better, and of course, I've never seen any FBI raids.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:Good by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      I used to teach at ITT as well, and it was a joke. We had to follow the pre-made lesson plans, because every instructor was supposed to be able to assume each student who had taken a particular course had learned the exact same material. As you mentioned, the material was riddled with mistakes. Also, the students were woefully unprepared, even the ones who were in their 2nd year. If you gave a test with a matching section, but had a larger answer pool than there were questions, they'd freak out. They also couldn't handle short answer or multiple choice questions where more than one answer could be true (i.e. "select all that apply" types of questions). I'd have one or two students who learned quickly, but the majority were just there because they thought programming was a quick way to get rich and had no business behind a keyboard.

      Good riddance.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  16. Let me fix that for you... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    "permanently after approximately 50 years of continuous service. "

    Should be:

    "permanently after approximately 50 years of ripping off the American taxpayer and tricking it's so called students"

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  17. Went to ITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having gone to ITT Tech AND then having gone to get my BSEE from an accredited university I can say without doubt those schools are designed to let you pass with a minimum amount of effort. HOWEVER, you CAN get a tremendous amount of knowledge IF you step up to do the extra work, which is what I did. That being said if you are willing to step up and be that self motivated to do that much work then it's no harder to go to a normal uni and getting a real degree.. which I did 2 years after going to ITT tech.. it was an expensive waste of time and energy that would have been better put to something else.... like a real degree. I did find the first few years of EE classes pretty easy due to what I had previously learned... but the path I took mistakenly took is not one I would recommend for others.. It REALLY wasn't worth it in time or money.

    good riddance.

    1. Re:Went to ITT by Khashishi · · Score: 0

      How'd you get suckered into it?

    2. Re:Went to ITT by Acron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess it's gotten a lot worse from 20+ years ago. My ITT two year degree from 23 years ago is accredited, and employers at the time were very happy with graduates from the particular ITT I attended. At the time, they had a 100% placement rate for everyone who graduated and did not go on to further education (and that was my whole reason for going, as my 4 year engineering degree from a top 10 school got me and 70% of the graduating class na-da : and the rest broke down as 20% going on to grad school and 10% being the chem engineers getting hired to go work in Saudi Arabia). But that quality came from the local ITT staff, not the corporate level. I heard even back then that the quality of your education depended on which location you went to. And it was definitely a heck of a lot easier than my 4 year degree, but also one heck of a lot more practical (which makes sense given it was a degree for a technician working on circuit boards, etc, not an engineer designing parts or systems).

    3. Re:Went to ITT by Tesen · · Score: 1

      Hot Coeds in the advertising? Mmmmmm Coeds...

    4. Re:Went to ITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to ITT (graduated in '03) as well, and you nailed my experience. I was 18, first in my extended family to go to college, and signed up not knowing any better. Not very many from my class actually ever got a job in IT. My degree didn't open a ton of doors at first, but I worked my way up from the bottom and am doing fine these days. I paid the student loans off a few years ago.

    5. Re:Went to ITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having gone to ITT Tech AND then having gone to get my BSEE from an accredited university I can say without doubt those schools are designed to let you pass with a minimum amount of effort. HOWEVER, you CAN get a tremendous amount of knowledge IF you step up to do the extra work, which is what I did. That being said if you are willing to step up and be that self motivated to do that much work then it's no harder to go to a normal uni and getting a real degree.. which I did 2 years after going to ITT tech.. it was an expensive waste of time and energy that would have been better put to something else.... like a real degree. I did find the first few years of EE classes pretty easy due to what I had previously learned... but the path I took mistakenly took is not one I would recommend for others.. It REALLY wasn't worth it in time or money.

      good riddance.

      It is unfair that I have to go back and do it, but after having being a high performer at ITT across 3 degrees it seems my best option is to go to a not for profit university and use the skills I gained at ITT to get the same 3 degrees again so that I get recognized for my work. It is unfair that I have to pay twice for what I should have gotten from graduating at ITT with a 3.8 GPA, but that is life. FYI I went through ITT tech while working and supporting myself full time without outside help but that also counts for nothing along with the degree due to the fact that the brand is now irreparably damaged and I would do better to distance myself from it and start over. I might as well have gone to Trump university. I am not going to miss a beat though, I am applying to universities in the northeast and am going to get in and do well, because I have nothing better to do at this point. I have become exceedingly efficient at working and going to school.

  18. so sad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was a student there. That was the best 7 years of my life -- good friends, better drugs, best sex. I'd drink a red bull and viagra on Friday afternoon and fuck 10-15 dudes before Monday came around. I'm working as a fullstack junior web engineer at a SF startup so there's just as much, if not more, sex, but I miss the drugs and friends. Skipping work because I'm hungover isn't quite the same as skipping class because I'm hungover.

    I plan on doing my own startup in a couple months, once I get a cofounder, raise a series A and find an idea. I wouldn't be here without ITT so this is a little sad for me :(

    1. Re:so sad :( by ADRA · · Score: 1

      You're comment was just sad and ridiculous enough to have the hint of reality. I enjoyed that, so thanks for warming my morning.

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:so sad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're" means "you are".

      "Your" means "your".

    3. Re:so sad :( by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      I was a student there. That was the best 7 years of my life -- good friends, better drugs, best sex. I'd drink a red bull and viagra on Friday afternoon and fuck 10-15 dudes before Monday came around. I'm working as a fullstack junior web engineer at a SF startup so there's just as much, if not more, sex, but I miss the drugs and friends. Skipping work because I'm hungover isn't quite the same as skipping class because I'm hungover.

      I plan on doing my own startup in a couple months, once I get a cofounder, raise a series A and find an idea. I wouldn't be here without ITT so this is a little sad for me :(

      Wow. It took you seven years to graduate from ITT Tech?

      I enrolled my cats into ITT Tech and it only took them a year and a half to get a degree in network security and electrical engineering with honors.

      If it took you that long: You must have been stoned out of your gourd, mate.

    4. Re:so sad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10-15/week/7 = low end -- 10 * 50 * 7 = 3500 dudes, will you contact them all when you go HIV positive?
      So sad for you :(

  19. As an Employee (not of ITT Tech) by Dust038 · · Score: 1

    As an Employee out in the world, I would have to have some fear now if I held an ITT Tech Degree if my Employer would now scrutinize and review my placement in the company. I am sure most level headed Employers will still look at their actual performance, but I'm sure some man/woman out there in a position of power will look at this as a legitimate way to "trim the fat" Course I have to wonder how ITT Tech compares to the H-1B Contract people in terms of knowledge.

    1. Re:As an Employee (not of ITT Tech) by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      My brother is an ITT grad, doing very well for himself. He probably would be on a similar career path had he gone to a 4 year university as well.. it all comes down to the effort the individual puts in.

      Out in the real world, once you have just a little bit of experience the name of the institution on the degree no longer matters (to most).

      I wouldn't want to work for a company that would even considering a retro-active review of a person's credentials that were not forged. They are hired, all that matters is performance. I wouldn't care if their degree came from Shithole University, if they performed well then good for them.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:As an Employee (not of ITT Tech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diplomas are useful for getting job interviews with no experience or track record. That's it.

      Once you're hired, a diploma from a tier one school will not save your ass if you can't do the work. Likewise, if you somehow were hired with an ITT Tech diploma and can do the work, you're A-OK.

    3. Re:As an Employee (not of ITT Tech) by rayd75 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to work for a company that would even considering a retro-active review of a person's credentials that were not forged. They are hired, all that matters is performance. I wouldn't care if their degree came from Shithole University, if they performed well then good for them.

      I'm with you but the problem is, that in today's world, you aren't expected to take and keep a job for any consequential length of time. In the blink of an eye, all of ITT's graduates will be subject to automated resume parsing and job application scoring. They will immediately fall prey to what the various HR software providers call "knock out" questions. If you haven't heard of these, they're essentially immediate disqualifiers that prevent your resume or application from ever bothering a busy HR admin due to running afoul of some education-tied rule, lack of an experience keyword, etc. I've been involved in a number of demos lately and have been horrified both by the ubiquity of this feature and the vendors' zeal for including them in product demos.

    4. Re:As an Employee (not of ITT Tech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends entirely whether the person acquired their knowledge before or after attending ITT. If the latter, the degree requirement was an artificial HR filter blocking a skilled individual from getting a good job. Some kids in high school are competent programmers ( maybe 1%, but they exist ).

  20. State colleges give garbage degrees by y86 · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but state colleges give garbage degrees. My brother just graduated from the University of Maine degree with a liberal arts degree and is sweeping floors at a gas station. Most schools offer shit degrees, and shit people take shit degrees. Then they end up with a shit load of debt and a shitty life. It's the cycle of shit.

    The problem is that we loan them our money, so they can be stupid shits and continue the cycle of shit. This shit needs to stop.

    1. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry but state colleges give garbage degrees. My brother just graduated from the University of Maine degree with a liberal arts degree and is sweeping floors at a gas station.

      No, your brother chose a garbage major, and chose to spend a lot of money on an education that doesn't align with a career doing anything but sweeping floors at that gas station. It's not the state college's responsibility to make your brother face reality and study something that's actually challenging. If he wants to take on debt so he can spend four years on poetry or Russian literature or on women's studies, that's his business, and HIS debt. Quit whining - yourself, and on his behalf. You're as bad as he is, if you're blaming anyone other than him for his absurd choices.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      Most schools offer shit degrees, and shit people take shit degrees. Then they end up with a shit load of debt and a shitty life. It's the cycle of shit.The problem is that we loan them our money, so they can be stupid shits and continue the cycle of shit. This shit needs to stop.

      What we need is shithawks to cull these shitrats, before the shithurricane buries us all in a shitslide. You hear that, Bobandy? A SHITSLIDE.

    3. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Uh... "liberal arts degree" it's not the college, it's the degree field....

    4. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your brother isn't too smart. But by the looks of it, neither are you.

    5. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by dcollins · · Score: 2

      I went to the University of Maine and starting almost immediately afterward I've been working with Harvard-trained people, on AAA PC video games in Boston, and now as a full-time college math lecturer in New York. I always felt that you got out what you put into it.

      There's a legitimate debate to be had whether a student like your brother would be better off if they'd been flunked out or not accepted by the university in question. Most of the cultural pressure, however, is to pass those students on.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    6. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/shit/shark/ and I think they already made that movie

    7. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They already made that TV show too. TwoTacoCombo is a trailer park supervisor. Must have graduated from ITT.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvqTRyvp0bw

    9. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No education is garbage.
      The purpose of education is not employment.
      The purpose of education is education.

      if we're supposed to be entering this world where leisure is abundant because robots replace us, where we're free to pursue our own interests, why do so many people insist on keeping us stuck in dark ages where "your purpose in life is to make someone else money and be a cog in the economy" ?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    10. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said and spot on.

    11. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I replied to the GP, who connected his brother's liberal arts education with his brother's employment sweeping floors. To the extent that he concludes that his brother's education was a poor fit for the available jobs, I'm pointing out who is really to blame.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I graduated with a BA from a liberal arts college (DePauw) after majoring in Biology and minoring in Math and Comp Sci. I'm making $148k/yr in the midwest (IOW, low cost of living). The problem isn't the liberal arts degree. It's what was or wasn't done with it.

    13. Re: State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your immediate goal in life is to make YOURSELF money.
      It doesn't matter how you accomplish that as long as you do.
      Spending years of life and going into debt for a leisure pursuit before having done significant work to secure your immediate goal (getting on a path to being financially self-supporting) is the mark of a fool.

      Children of wealthy parents can study whatever they damn well want because dear old Dad is their safety net. Anyone who is not them cannot afford this.

      If you trolled, I don't care. People must still know the hard truth.

    14. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Education for the sake of education is fine - if you're rich enough. Personally, if I'm spending $$$,$$$ on a degree, I'd expect a lucrative job from that.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    15. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      This is generally not true. Sometimes it's a matter of people picking the wrong degree. But these days a bigger problem is just people who graduated around 2008-2010. A huge fraction of the pain of this most recent crash fell squarely on the shoulders of recent grads, and this had nothing at all to do with their skills or the quality of their educations.

      Today, new grads are doing better, though we're still not back to healthy levels. What we need for this kind of issue where it relates to education policy is that education should be publicly-funded to the point that it's free or nearly free, so that people can go to school without fear of winding up deep in debt and unable to pay that debt. Having better macroeconomic policy at the national level to prevent or mitigate this kind of crash would also be nice.

    16. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UMaine (or at least their Orono campus) is a dying school.

      I was a PhD candidate in their computer science program roughly ten years ago. At the time, there were very few remaining full time faculty, and they were all at (or long past) retirement age. Additionally, there was strong opposition to hiring anyone new. The other grad students and I felt this was really destroying the entire computer science department and petitioned the administration in an attempt to remedy the situation, but were told there was a campus-wide hiring freeze. My roommate, a grad student in the physics program there, told me they were in the process of hiring three new tenure-track faculty at this time.

      Any school whose administration has no problems outright lying to motivated and engaged graduate students about the viability of their own department is of questionable quality. I dropped out shortly thereafter.

      But I'm not sweeping floors. I recently got out of DoD contracting to work in cybersecurity. I can't complain about my salary, but I'd also like to point out that my wife, 5 years my junior, makes more money with her liberal arts degrees (philosophy, international relations) in an unrelated field (advertising sales) than I make with my technical degrees (EE, CS) in a technical field.

      Posting anonymously because I'm a coward..

    17. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a college education? I'm flabbergasted.

      A liberal arts COLLEGE and a liberal arts DEGREE are two different concepts. Neither one of your claimed degrees fit into the liberal arts degree category.

      Next!

    18. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      I went to uw madison, getting a comp-eng degree, now making 130k at 31 doing consulting.

    19. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how would that have worked out if you'd chosen to pursue Medieval Philosophy at the same school? See how that works?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    20. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      I went to the University of Maine and starting almost immediately afterward I've been working with Harvard-trained people, on AAA PC video games in Boston, and now as a full-time college math lecturer in New York. I always felt that you got out what you put into it.

      There's a legitimate debate to be had whether a student like your brother would be better off if they'd been flunked out or not accepted by the university in question. Most of the cultural pressure, however, is to pass those students on.

      Indeed you are right about getting out of it what you put into it. This is true no matter where you get your education from.
      I have a serious interest in electronics and computer programming and my money was well spent learning about those things at ITT Tech while I was working full time and supporting myself. I did very well at ITT tech and though ITT tech was not Harvard, I got what I needed to move on into the workforce and have a good understanding of what I can do for a potential employer. I love my work and I have continued by auditing classes from MIT and Harvard and Stanford using Open Courseware and other services. From my experience using Massive open online courses I have realized in retrospect what a value my ITT education actually was and how much of it was at the same time, dependent on my interest and effort. ITT was convenient because I was able to go to work in the morning and get off work at around 5 pm and get to school and take classes until about midnight and then get home and get to bed then rinse and repeat day after day.. This would not be possible if I were going to a 4 year school, I would have had to have paid my own way to get through school and then get a job after graduation. That would not have been possible in my situation because I could not hold off paying rent or eating or having medical care for the few years it would take to get such a degree. Anyone who looks down on me because I went to ITT tech, well they lose respect in my eyes.. and how dare they? I worked hard and I did well and asked nothing of anyone other than the freedom to work and go to school. Looking at ITT like it is some sort of ghetto high school, is part of the problem with the economy, and the devaluing of the American workforce that is leading companies to H1b employees. H1b employees are cheaper, but I fail to see how American companies that expect information security to be respected are going to not be in for a rude awakening by funding people from india and china and elsewhere to come in and work on sensitive systems for pennies on the dollar..

      I find it funny though how I get less interested employers looking at my resume now that I have ITT tech on it. Just as an experiment I think I am going to stop listing ITT just to see if I get more hits.

    21. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't diss the liberal arts degree. They are great for VERY HOT women who also want to be interesting conversationalist at cocktail parties.
      They can appear very intelligent and get the arm of the richest guys.
      Your brother should work out and move to SF. Then he can marry a rich guy too.

    22. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you don't see the govt stopping this same bullshit in the "public" sector.

    23. Re:State colleges give garbage degrees by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Wow, (Score:5, Smackdown)

      Very well said, sir.

      For better or worse, in this economy education is pretty much vocational. Unless you are very wealthy there is no value in pursuing a liberal arts degree since there are very few jobs that require one.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  21. Oh Noes! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Where else can I go and do very little and get a degree that no-one takes seriously if they close down ITT Tech.

    Thank goodness I still have the University of Phoenix to go to.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Oh Noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess it depends on how you apply yourself. I went to a paid tech school and learned autocad. Just autocad, not english, science art, ect... I needed 1 skill it was something only they provided. To learn autocad at the community college I would have had to take all kinds of crap courses like english, science , math, that were unnecessary for my goal.

      If you want a degree go to a college, if you want a skill for a trade go to a tech school.

    2. Re:Oh Noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strayer University is the big diploma-mill in the DC area.....

    3. Re:Oh Noes! by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      If you don't want a degree, you can just take any courses you want at the CC.

      While I was in HS I took the whole drafting sequence at the local CC, along with a couple of programming languages. Saved my 2 courses in Engineering school, but that wasn't the point.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  22. $580 Million in "taxpayer money" by kenh · · Score: 1

    Last year, ITT Tech received an estimated $580 million in federal money (aka taxpayer dollars), according to the Department of Education.

    In the form of federal grants? GI Bill Tuition payments? Or, the most likely form, as federally guaranteed student loans - which aren't really "taxpayer dollars" until the student fails to pay their loan payments.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:$580 Million in "taxpayer money" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing all of the above: GI Bill, grants, and defaulted student loan payments.

      dom

    2. Re:$580 Million in "taxpayer money" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > until the student fails to pay their loan payment

      This is the real source of the crackdown. Nobody would complain or care if people were repaying their loans. That is just business. However, a great majority of these for profit colleges are funded by loans and being that the education and degree is not effective in getting good jobs, then a great majority of the students are defaulting on the loans, which in the end are costing the government time and money.

    3. Re:$580 Million in "taxpayer money" by fropenn · · Score: 1

      Pell Grants (which do not have to be repaid) and subsidized loans, which do, but the interest is covered by the feds until they are paid (they are interest-deferred while in school).

    4. Re:$580 Million in "taxpayer money" by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      ITT was one of the groups that specifically targeted GI's. At one point I remember reading that 80% of their revenue came from the DOD. The Fed's have moved aggressively against these colleges targeting vet's. ITT was disbarred from taking GI bill money a week or so ago and this is the result.

    5. Re:$580 Million in "taxpayer money" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, that's all? The government changed its policy regarding how military benefits may be used? When I read ITT Tech complain about "due process," I assumed that the government had issued sanctions against them or otherwise infringed on ITT Tech's Constitutional rights. You know, actions in which a person (or I suppose a corporation) is actually entitled to due process.

      I guess this spokesperson must have learned Con Law from ITT Law School.

  23. devry & ITT used to be good but collage for al by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    devry & ITT used to be good. But collage for all push made it so you needed an degree so they kind of got roped into the degree system. Now for real good accreditation you needed the full load of filler and fluff with I think masters or higher / phd level professors.

    Now unlike the trade schools the professor at the collages they for the most part have little to no real world work experience (out side of the ivy tower)

    https://www.dslreports.com/for...

    I used to know an Programer who went to an state school got an job and I used some of the stuff he worked and it was very buggy so he did not last to long and got fired / forced to quit and then moved back home. I am not in QA or work for the place he worked at but some of issues where like how that did get passed testing / qa?

  24. Finally! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    I know ITT Tech and other for-profit schools fill a gap in the education system, but this whole sector seems perfectly positioned to scam uneducated people out of student loan money, VA benefits, trade adjustment benefits, etc. and give them very little in return.

    The vast majority of potential students would be much better served going to community college, or if they're in a strong union state, joining a trade's apprenticeship program and actually getting paid while learning.

    1. Re:Finally! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      Be careful, you just suggested that Trade Unions have some value. The Randroids are probably massing at your door right now.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are strong unions necessary for apprenticeship programs?

    3. Re:Finally! by al0ha · · Score: 1

      It is the failure of our country to realistically commit to the education of the populace that is to blame for the rise of for-profit schools like ITT

      For as long as I can remember, every politician in every election has espoused the position that they support education - damn liars every single one of them, Republican or Democrat.

      I can remember at least 4 decades of broken promises on supporting education, as community and state colleges around the nation cut costs and negatively effected the student population at every turn. Interesting that ITT has been around for 50 years - yep I bet that's just about when they lying about supporting education by politicians began...

      --
      Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    4. Re:Finally! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      We clearly have too many unqualified students going to (and graduating) college.

      Which means that college education is over supported and K-12 is under supported. A BA used to mean something, now it's basically a certificate of attendance. Some schools BSs aren't much better.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Finally! by G00F · · Score: 1

      Why are strong unions necessary for apprenticeship programs?

      Who wants to train their younger, cheaper, gullible replacements?

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  25. Simple rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There should be a simple rule, NO federal loans going to FOR PROFIT institutions. It does not make sense to give out federal loans to institutions that exist mainly to make money out of their students.

    1. Re: Simple rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most - including "public" universities are for all practical purposes for profit.

    2. Re: Simple rule by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Except for the most practical purpose, that they don't make profits or have stockholders.

    3. Re: Simple rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Thanks for that. Don't make profits. Too funny.

    4. Re: Simple rule by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I mean it is literally true. They don't have shareholders that could take the profits. But thanks for your flippant comment that adds nothing to the discussion. Real good stuff.

    5. Re:Simple rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think public institutions do? They exist to educate students, who should go on hold and make jobs, which pay taxes, which...feed the coffers of educational institutions.

    6. Re:Simple rule by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If a school is accredited, then what difference does it make? Now, if the accreditation bar is set too low, that's another issue.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  26. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    my god man. what skool did you's go to for lerning to spelling?

    I want to make damn sure my kids do not land in the same place!

  27. Between Trump U and this story by marmot7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People now have no excuse to choose to go into debt to attend one of these places. If there are still people open to a pitch like this, what else can be done? Sure, go after the colleges but they're like moles. It's buyer beware and take some responsibility. Frankly, I would choose a state university or community college or some other option that enables you to get a decent education without too much debt. It's not worth the crazy debt levels and everyone should now know that the for profit college space is more than a bit sketchy.

  28. False equivilency by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

    You do realize that you don't have to go to an expensive private university, right? Anyway if I go get a Harvard degree it will cost me a lot of money but I will in all likelihood have gotten an actual education along the way. You can argue that it isn't a good deal financially but you do get something at the end of the day. If you can't turn a Harvard degree into some sort of job you're doing it wrong. Comparing Harvard to or even a state university to ITT Tech is ridiculous.

    Companies like ITT (I don't really think of them as schools) basically provide a near worthless degree which nobody respects and doesn't open doors. They do so knowing that a large percentage of their customers (students) will fail out. They exist to load credulous low income people with debt while failing to provide them a real education. They prey on people who probably really aren't the sort of people who are college material in the first place. College is great but it isn't the right path for everyone. Trade schools would serve many of them much better and there is a clear need for skilled trades.

    1. Re:False equivilency by dosius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Part of the problem is that there's a push to put as many high school students into college (even 2-year college) as possible, even those who would be better served going to vocational schools.

      Protip: You can't outsource blue collar work.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    2. Re:False equivilency by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      Protip: You can't outsource blue collar work.

      That's what "temporary" employment visas are for.

    3. Re:False equivilency by Etcetera · · Score: 2

      So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

      You do realize that you don't have to go to an expensive private university, right? Anyway if I go get a Harvard degree it will cost me a lot of money but I will in all likelihood have gotten an actual education along the way. You can argue that it isn't a good deal financially but you do get something at the end of the day. If you can't turn a Harvard degree into some sort of job you're doing it wrong. Comparing Harvard to or even a state university to ITT Tech is ridiculous.

      Companies like ITT (I don't really think of them as schools) basically provide a near worthless degree which nobody respects and doesn't open doors. They do so knowing that a large percentage of their customers (students) will fail out. They exist to load credulous low income people with debt while failing to provide them a real education. They prey on people who probably really aren't the sort of people who are college material in the first place. College is great but it isn't the right path for everyone. Trade schools would serve many of them much better and there is a clear need for skilled trades.

      What part of "ITT Technical Institute" makes you think that you're not going into a program that's functionally at the trade school level? In San Diego, it and Coleman College were both seen by anyone I've known as a way to learn functional skills in a given area. It's not a 4 year collegiate undergrad experience, and I can't see why anyone would think so.

      People are ragging on "for-profit colleges" as some hideous evil, but whatever your experiences with Brightpoint, Ashford, or some other trendy places, ITT and Coleman have been around forever and shouldn't be lumped together with these.

    4. Re:False equivilency by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      LMOL no one is forcing you Potsy. And the so called push is employers that require a college degree.

    5. Re:False equivilency by zrobotics · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While you can't outsource blue collar work, look at the way many of the trades have changed in the last quarter century. While plumbing, electrical, and HVAC are still great money-makers, many other trades are nowhere near as good as they once were. Craftsmanship isn't valued, customers don't know or care how shoddily their mcmansions are built. Additionally, it's hard to find Americans (of any race) who are willing and able to do the work. Anyone with a work ethic and half a brain has been convinced they need college and an office job. Technology has also eliminated many blue collar jobs, mainly in manufacturing. This is happening worldwide; a machinist friend is one of only two machinists employed at his plant. 15 years ago this company employed 14 machinists and machine operators, and the business has grown since then. While the trades are safer than programming jobs, they aren't immune or safe by any measure.

    6. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I didn't know that China and Mexico are importing all their goods that are manufactured in the USA. I thought the opposite was true!

    7. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b-b-but....The 'Murkin Dream, its owed to me! I'm entitled!

    8. Re: False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, didn't ya hear?

      "You're just another american who is willfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick being shoved up your asshole every day... The owners of this country know the truth... it's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it!
      That's all it fucking is, a dream. You'd have to be asleep to believe that fucking lie."

      Oh but you 'work hard, which means you get to play hard to'? Another fucking lie, which plants this 'entitlement' that having a degree somehow guarantees a high paying steady job.

      Bend over bitch!

    9. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can't outsource blue collar work.

      Protip: robots

    10. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A machinist now is a CNC programmer. The skill set is different, but the knowledge base is still engineering. I know guys my age that are doing quite well in this area.

    11. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you vote Hillary, that will definitely be true. Her 1% friends already work hard to make these slaves available to them. By bullshitting the voters using all their mainstream outlets.

    12. Re:False equivilency by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are few 'production' machinists these days. I remember rooms full of lathes being operated by ex-cons producing the same part over and over. Not that's all CNC.

      But you still need prototype machinists. If you want 1 relatively simple thing made right away, there is unlikely to be a faster way than a machinist on manual machines.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:False equivilency by dcollins · · Score: 1
      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    14. Re: False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they were targeting the underprivileged (most commercials during daytime tv, or late night programming) and had mentioned two and four year degrees; I don't find it unusual that people bought into the advertising. Even if people like you and I saw things differently.

    15. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITT Tech was a trade school.

    16. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

      You do realize that you don't have to go to an expensive private university, right? Anyway if I go get a Harvard degree it will cost me a lot of money but I will in all likelihood have gotten an actual education along the way. You can argue that it isn't a good deal financially but you do get something at the end of the day. If you can't turn a Harvard degree into some sort of job you're doing it wrong. Comparing Harvard to or even a state university to ITT Tech is ridiculous.

      Companies like ITT (I don't really think of them as schools) basically provide a near worthless degree which nobody respects and doesn't open doors. They do so knowing that a large percentage of their customers (students) will fail out. They exist to load credulous low income people with debt while failing to provide them a real education. They prey on people who probably really aren't the sort of people who are college material in the first place. College is great but it isn't the right path for everyone. Trade schools would serve many of them much better and there is a clear need for skilled trades.

      Ok, I will chime in now..

      I am an ITT tech alum with two associates degrees and one Bachelors.

      The whole argument about ITT being "not a real education" really depends on 3 factors, just like it does at any educational institution.

      1- What the student puts into it , More than half of students at any institution do not graduate.. this is a fact of life and not a reflection on ITT.
      2- Not all teachers are created equal, Each teacher is to be accepted on their own expertise, merits and gifts outside of the framework of the provided curriculum.
      3- Science does not change between schools, I personally performed audits of each class as I was taking them at ITT, for MIT through open courseware and guess what? The material being taught was exactly the same. It was exactly the same material, but because I am not associated with the MIT brand, I have ITT with the damaged brand reputation now through no fault of my own or through any lack in my skills. I made straight A's and was in and out of 3 degrees within 6 years, perhaps I am an outlier but I take offense to the idea that "All ITT tech students are equally worthless to employers." It is a bad assumption.

      A business does not stick around for 50 years and screw people for that long.. so if ITT tech is such a ripoff it is a very recent development, otherwise ITT tech would have gone out of business a long long time ago.

      I find this frustrating because I know that I know that I know I have a good education and solid skills, but get treated like I am delusional for believing that I am as good of a hire as someone from a not for profit university. I call shenanigans!

    17. Re:False equivilency by zrobotics · · Score: 1

      While that's true, there are only a few prototypes made for each product. What of all the machinists who used to crank out production parts? Those jobs are gone forever, so are the motor machinists who used to rebuild your motor every 50k miles. Manufacturing is almost all CNC now, and consumer products are either non-repairable or last longer than they used to. Nobody overhauls their car engines anymore, and nobody fixes televisions. I wouldn't go back, but there are a lot of formerly promising careers that don't exist now.

    18. Re:False equivilency by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

      You do realize that you don't have to go to an expensive private university, right? Anyway if I go get a Harvard degree it will cost me a lot of money but I will in all likelihood have gotten an actual education along the way. You can argue that it isn't a good deal financially but you do get something at the end of the day. If you can't turn a Harvard degree into some sort of job you're doing it wrong. Comparing Harvard to or even a state university to ITT Tech is ridiculous.

      Companies like ITT (I don't really think of them as schools) basically provide a near worthless degree which nobody respects and doesn't open doors. They do so knowing that a large percentage of their customers (students) will fail out. They exist to load credulous low income people with debt while failing to provide them a real education. They prey on people who probably really aren't the sort of people who are college material in the first place. College is great but it isn't the right path for everyone. Trade schools would serve many of them much better and there is a clear need for skilled trades.

      I have gone to ITT in two different states, and I would say that the negative attitude towards the educational quality of the ITT brand is unfounded. ITT was a good school between 5 and 10 years ago so if there was funny business going on with the educational quality since I went there that is on them and does not reflect on it's alumni, however we have to deal with it. It is unfair but the students that worked hard will continue to work hard and will get other degrees regardless of how the negative press against ITT hurts them. When I get that attitude from people about going to ITT Tech I quickly ask them questions regarding their understanding of the skills and materials and I find that usually the people that scoff at ITT students skills don't demonstrate a solid understanding of the skills they are interviewing for.. per the dunning kruger effect. This is to be expected because everyone that knows how to click a mouse this days think that they are an IT expert.. everyone that has compiled an arduino program thinks that they are an embedded systems expert and everyone that has made a Velleman christmas tree thinks that they are an electronics expert. The best thing that can happen here is the employers knuckling down and finding that a large number of the ITT tech graduates are experts and that you need to judge people not based on the college they went to but based on what they did with the skills they gained there. You can tell a lot about a company by the way they handle that conversation in the first interview!

    19. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does this sound so similar to the 2007 debt crisis, where people who weren't qualified to get loans ended up owning houses anyways?

    20. Re:False equivilency by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      As opposed to Trump?

    21. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that many universities ( I won't say all because I don't know for a fact) won't accept credits of any kind from ITT or places like it in transfer situations. so if you go to an ITT you're invested in ITT period.

    22. Re:False equivilency by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I have gone to ITT in two different states, and I would say that the negative attitude towards the educational quality of the ITT brand is unfounded. ITT was a good school between 5 and 10 years ago so if there was funny business going on with the educational quality since I went there that is on them and does not reflect on it's alumni, however we have to deal with it. It is unfair but the students that worked hard will continue to work hard and will get other degrees regardless of how the negative press against ITT hurts them.

      I think the GP said is for the majority of people who get education from ITT. You are the minority of those who could graduate and got into the market. However, what is the failure rate of those who went to ITT and graduated? If the majority fails over and over again, stereotype will show up.

      And I agree with GP on "They [ITT] prey on people who probably really aren't the sort of people who are college material in the first place. College is great but it isn't the right path for everyone." This is not only for ITT though, most if not all for-profit schools are the same way...

    23. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The three safest jobs are probably in providing food (everyone needs to eat), burying people (everyone dies sooner or later), and medicine (everyone gets sick sooner or later).

    24. Re:False equivilency by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      customers don't know or care how shoddily their mcmansions are built

      You clearly don't know many of the owners. I am one, and do. I was on site nearly every day during construction. We've lived in that neighborhood for 15+ years now, and I guarantee that the neighbors care dearly about their homes. Who the hell lives in a home and doesn't care about how well it's constructed...very few.

      So, what are the options?....One, try to find skilled tradesmen to build your home....good luck with that. Two, if you manage #1, your place just lost about half of it's size because your project just doubled in labor and material costs. Three (what I did),...buy what's available, but not so well built, and improve on it over time.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    25. Re:False equivilency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just wait to the next horror after Trans Pacific Partnership: TISA. Trade in Services Agreement. Need a vet for animals? Import him from Costa Rica, only $10/day.

  29. Total waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in 78 I tried to hire some girl that went to ITT for computer repair
    She had all A's and letters from her teachers
    Girl could not even draw a truth table for a NAND gate

    1. Re:Total waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how was that relevant to her ability to, like, you know, WORK?

    2. Re:Total waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when my computer stop working the first thing I do is start drawing a fucking truth table.

    3. Re:Total waste by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      That sounds like lot of the theory stuff that people forget / don't know on the spot but can look it up / say can you tell me the issue that needs to be fixed?

    4. Re:Total waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you were judging someone from the computer networking degree program for not having information from the electronic engineering program. Sounds like you are the person who made the stupid mistake here.

      A lot of the employment SNAFU's here are being caused by idiots in the HR department not the fault of ITT.

      Talking about you I would say , "Guy can't even tell the difference between the requirements for a networking student from an EE student." which is a bigger oversight than the "Failing" you point out for this girl.

  30. helpful government by micahraleigh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The federal government is helping people understand where the good schools are !
    Just like the IRS is helping people choose political parties.
    Just like the DHS is helping the outcome of the next election.
    Just like NASA is helping reach out to muslims.
    Just like the EPA has been helping write laws without Congress, and helping to "crucify" people who don't comply with them.
    Just like the state department is helping people who donated to the right campaigns. And Chris Stevens.
    You might think it would help to shut down the atrocities at PUBLIC schools (rapes, drugs, teachers who don't care, etc), but you would be wrong. Just helping with some naked assertions.
    So thank the federal government for all the new kinds of help they have extended to us over the last 8 years. I feel like we are just beginning to learn how much help they can provide!

    1. Re:helpful government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like the EPA has been helping write laws without Congress, and helping to "crucify" people who don't comply with them.

      Fuck yes. The assholes they are crucifying are actively and knowingly poisoning me; I'll even help out and I have no issues with swinging the hammer or holding an arm if they need that kind of help.

      Remember leaded gasoline? They knew how dangerous that crap was 40 years before it was banned--let the crucifixions begin.

    2. Re:helpful government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah wtf? If congress was involved we'd be fucked since they'd go where the money is any all the big polluters would just pay to get laws passed to allow them to pollute.

      And even with what the EPA is doing we still have stories like this from earlier today:

      https://science.slashdot.org/story/16/09/06/1359237/toxic-air-pollution-particles-found-in-human-brains

    3. Re:helpful government by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Who is buying all this "poison"? If you know better, then why are you buying it?

      Studies during the Coolidge administration determined leaded was OK as long as you took the right precautions. The people who were dying from leaded gasoline were mostly refinery workers. OSHA is several levels beyond the required precautions now.

      With all the organic stuff out there (which has never been shown to do anything to help someone's health) in the free market , there would be alternatives to leaded gasoline it it were still legal. I believe there were alternatives before it became illegal.

      As far as determining what "poison" is, should the government help us determine what we can drink if alcohol is a neuro toxin?

      Nobody is dying from going to the "wrong" school, though.

  31. What liberal arts actually means by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But a degree in Liberal Arts won't get me me a high paying job

    Basically nobody has a degree in Liberal Arts. Liberal arts is a group of subjects which includes many of the the STEM fields. If you have a degree in Physics you have a liberal arts degree. Same with Mathematics, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Biology, plus of course Languages, Literature, Psychology, Philosophy, Social Sciences, Arts, and more.

    Some liberal arts degrees are more valuable to employers than others but saying that liberal arts as a whole = no jobs is to misunderstand the term.

    1. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      But a degree in Liberal Arts won't get me me a high paying job

      Basically nobody has a degree in Liberal Arts. Liberal arts is a group of subjects which includes many of the the STEM fields. If you have a degree in Physics you have a liberal arts degree. Same with Mathematics, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Biology, plus of course Languages, Literature, Psychology, Philosophy, Social Sciences, Arts, and more.

      Some liberal arts degrees are more valuable to employers than others but saying that liberal arts as a whole = no jobs is to misunderstand the term.

      The OP is probably confusing Liberal Arts with Liberal Studies. The former is a broad category of programs, the latter is exactly what it sounds like... Lots of courses in a lot of fields without digging much into any of them, and usually more in the humanities than the hard sciences.

      Can't speak for your area, but in CA it seems like the most common profession for someone with a Liberal Studies degree is K-12 teacher (possibly with a specialization if they have additional study).

    2. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, a BSc is not a B.A

      Liberal Arts degrees are just that, Arts Degrees. There USED to be a BASc, and probably still is, for some of the "softer" less rigorous subjects, like programming or IT.

      Physics is a SCIENCE degree, rooted in science and mathematics.

      Liberal Arts is rooted in theoretical nonsense, like Philosophy, Basket weaving, gender studies, sociology, etc.

      He's right, you're wrong. Check your facts.
      Physics, mathematics, chemistry, astronomy, etc are liberal arts degrees as are the English, history, philosophy, art, etc degrees.

      Engineering degrees, medical degrees, applied math, etc are not liberal arts. Not liberal arts would an English technical writing degree be or art restoration. These are professional degrees, i.e. training for a job.

    3. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a SCIENCE degree, rooted in science"

      Sounds like a plan...

    4. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Liberal Arts is rooted in theoretical nonsense, like Philosophy...

      This kind of thinking is how someone like Donald Trump ends up becoming the nominee of a major political party for President.

    5. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically nobody has a degree in Liberal Arts. Liberal arts is a group of subjects which includes many of the the STEM fields. If you have a degree in Physics you have a liberal arts degree. Same with Mathematics, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Biology, plus of course Languages, Literature, Psychology, Philosophy, Social Sciences, Arts, and more.

      Some liberal arts degrees are more valuable to employers than others but saying that liberal arts as a whole = no jobs is to misunderstand the term.

      I believe you've confused the Bachelor of Arts degree with the Bachelor of Science. Many universities offer both in nearly all of these fields, the former is a liberal arts degree with a large breadth and not much depth, while the latter has great depth and due to its reduced breadth, should not be considered a liberal arts degree at all.

      And the job prospects are quite different between the BA and BS variants.

    6. Re:What liberal arts actually means by rjh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Liberal arts is rooted in theoretical nonsense...

      I hold a B.A. in computer science from a fairly good private college. One of my best friends graduated with a triple-major B.A. in physics, mathematics, and computer science, from the same institution. Other close friends from undergrad received B.A. degrees in chemistry, biology, geology, environmental science, and botany.

      In fact, my undergrad alma mater doesn't offer the B.Sc. degree at all.

      In 20 years in the software industry, not once has anyone ever asked whether I hold a B.A. or a B.Sc. It's a total nonissue. Some institutions offer the B.A., some offer the B.Sc., some offer both but differentiate them on how many differential calculus classes you've taken.

    7. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mathematics (and all of the sciences) are rooted in philosophy, you tool.

    8. Re: What liberal arts actually means by DingerX · · Score: 2

      The Liberal Arts are originally those pursuits (arts) deemed worthy of a late-Roman free (hence Liberal) man. Taken up in the nineteenth century, the idea is applied to free citizens in a free society (and some skools run by abolitionists were very aggressive in their application of the ideal). The 6th-century codification of the liberal arts that formed the original "undergraduate" curriculum at the first universities was: Trivium: grammar, rhetoric, and logic Quadrivium: arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy To which they added Physics and Metaphysics So, yeah, it was all what they called "philosophy" Engineering? That's for slaves. In short, a Liberal Arts degree is by definition not a degree for a career, but someone with a Liberal Arts degree has the critical skills and interests to be a valuable asset. The rest you'd have to train anyway.

    9. Re:What liberal arts actually means by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You say it yourself. A BA in a science is a BS with the math and other difficult parts removed.

      You would never know, I've trashed many resumes for a BA in a science.

      Also: The terrible judgement displayed by selecting a liberal arts school to study a science at.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re: What liberal arts actually means by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The first universities fell into two categories. Schools for preachers and schools for engineers/soldiers.

      Liberal arts is the end path of the divinity schools. It is still just indoctrination.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:What liberal arts actually means by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      For the more common types of programming, the complex math and difficult parts are irrelevant. The two semesters of physics and two semesters of calculus I took in my BS program have gone completely unused and forgotten about. The courses that came only with the BA I switched to (Computer Networks, Computer Hardware, Web programming and design, and even upper level psychology) were a lot more useful in the real world. The pinnacle course of the program involved interviewing for jobs with actual recruiters for local tech companies, in which the recruiters graded us on how well we interviewed.

    12. Re:What liberal arts actually means by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      90% of programmers do boring bean counting with databases.

      You excluded yourself from all the interesting work. Should have finished the calc and physics sequences.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things I really like about the software industry is that it is less focused on credentials and more focused on actually being able to do the job properly.

    14. Re: What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hold a Ph.D in Applied Mathematics. The highest order is a Philosopher of Mathematics.

      Shh... It is adult discussion time.

    15. Re:What liberal arts actually means by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      I did finish them. What got me to drop the major was the worst instructor in the history of mankind for a mandatory CS 400 level course , that had no hope of there being a different instructor in the forseeable future.

      To give you an idea how bad he was, for the first test, getting 70 points out of 400 curved to an A. And, he yelled at and berated the student who got that score. My 30 out of 400 was a D+. I made the decision midway through the second test, which I proceeded to fill out with utter nonsense. It still got a 20 (out of 300ish), and another D+. There was also one moment in class where a light fixture had fallen on top of him. The groans of disappointment when we realized he was OK were louder than his moans of pain.

      I had actually completed the applied physics portion of the BS, all that was left was a handful of 400 level courses. But my bean counting job is pretty stress free, so no complaints. I dodged a bullet there, wouldn't want what I do to actually matter, that would be terrifying...

    16. Re: What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... you wasted your youth. Still hanging around schools or have you found work

    17. Re: What liberal arts actually means by nbauman · · Score: 1

      You had it right up to the part about engineering.

      Starting in the 18th century, the liberal arts expanded to include the sciences.

      Take a look at the Nobel prize web site. A lot of the laureates started out in the liberal arts.

      https://www.nobelprize.org/nob...

      "for their discoveries concerning signal transduction in the nervous system"

      Eric Kandel was born in Vienna, Austria, where he lived until his family emigrated to New York in 1939 to escape the Nazi regime. He studied history and literature at Harvard University, before becoming interested in psychoanalysis, learning and memory. At New York University medical school he turned to the biological basis of the mind

    18. Re:What liberal arts actually means by rjh · · Score: 1

      A BA in a science is a BS with the math and other difficult parts removed.

      I said that was true for institutions which offered both. And even then, it's not that math is removed -- it's that a couple of upper-level courses covering esoteria are removed to make room for a better grounding in the humanities.

      My friends with BAs in math did the full gamut of differential and integral calculus, number theory, differential equations, analysis, linear algebra, statistics, and more. Even as a CompSci major I took differential and integral calculus, differential equations, and statistics.

    19. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that class, but regularly scored above 90%. It was one of the few in my college career that I did well in. Oddly enough, I took a 400 giveaway class (supposed to be a GPA booster for seniors) and failed it. No challenge.

    20. Re:What liberal arts actually means by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The problem with philosophy is that there are dozens of philosophies ( and an immense number of sects within each philosophical system ) and at most one of them can be true.

      In some sense, philosophy is the basis of all knowledge and you ignore it at your peril. The challenge is choosing the right philosophy, which requires - sigh - the right philosophy.

      Here are two clues: reject philosophies that lead to murderous dictatorships. Reject philosophies that claim it's impossible to learn the nature of reality, whether the excuse is that your senses are defective or reality doesn't exist.

      One area within philosophy is politics, and even if you don't want to be a politician, it's good to know some history of political systems so that you can recognize the lies. Don't get fooled again.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    21. Re: What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A liberal arts major is someone who realizes how naive you are for thinking differential calculus is "difficult math." It's real analysis for engineers who can't handle the necessary levels of abstraction.

    22. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You say it yourself. A BA in a science is a BS with the math and other difficult parts removed.

      Not necessarily. Some old places call everything a BA, because tradition.

      http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/uni...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:What liberal arts actually means by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >whether the excuse is that your senses are defective or reality doesn't exist.

      So... ignore any philosopher who states a view which has since been absolutely and incontrovertibly proven by the hard sciences ?

      Weird way to choose.

      Human senses are just about the least reliable measuring devices ever invented and the evidence of their lack of reality only gets bigger with every new discovery in science.
      Your eyes measure radiation levels in a teeny-tiny band of the radiation spectrum, then processes those values through a huge and utterly opague process set of algorithms of which you have no knowledge where 'what you expect' is the single biggest tool used for filling in blanks and connecting dots (and that's about all we know about it) ... and finally presents your conscious mind with an 'image' of 'things' - despite that image being a complete fabrication and not offering any evidence whatsoever that the 'things' are really there. Indeed cinema exists entirely to make our eyes present us images of things that are NOT there.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    24. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do! My degree actually says "Liberal Arts and Sciences". I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life, so I got a general degree that would allow me to have the piece of paper everyone wanted me to have and still get a broad and general education. Because we had to focus on at least one hard science as part of the program, I chose biology and microbiology. I learned philosophy, art (mainly photography), music, theater, algebra, trigonometry, western civilization, language arts, literature, etc. I work in IT now!

    25. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe OP's use of terminology is consistent with both the use of the term in antiquity and how it is used where I went to school (a fairly well known liberal arts college.) The universities that are called liberal arts colleges tend to emphasize what OP calls liberal arts and what you call liberal studies--a well-rounded education that includes foundation level courses in a wide range of fields, including STEM fields.

      While you are correct that the terms "liberal arts" and "liberal arts degree" are often colloquially (and derisively) to refer to an education that excludes STEM fields entirely (and sometimes excludes "useful" social sciences such as economics), this is a new, informal, and far from universally accepted use of the term. And to be honest, I think part of this has been due to people of a certain outlook deliberately conflating non-STEM education with the term liberal arts in order to undermine the credibility of the traditional liberal arts universities.

    26. Re:What liberal arts actually means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for some engineering degrees, the difference between the BS and BA is something like 4 higher level engineering courses and the level of difficulty of your senior design project. Not sure if this was a distinction set by my university or based on ABET requirements.

  32. Good Riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have done nothing but pump out people completely ill prepared for the real world. Worked with 2 different people who went to ITT at my past job, they didn't even know how to use the software they were being "taught". ITT is and was a joke.

  33. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We live in a society that does not value education at all,"

    1) We have a society that effectively mandates education for a minimum of 12 years

    2) We spend more per pupil than any country in the world to educate people

    3) The subsidies to universities number in the hundreds billions of dollars

    4) We encourage everyone to go to college. Everyone.

    If you're whining that you don't get college for free, keep in mind that if you lived in a society that pays for "free" college, the admission standards for college would have to be raised so that only the 10% of the smartest people are allowed to go to college.

    You would likely be excluded from any sort of higher education based on your complete lack of ability to even articulate a problem properly.

    1. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) We have a society that effectively mandates education for a minimum of 12 years

      The quality of the 'education' in K-12 is abysmal. Try again.

      2) We spend more per pupil than any country in the world to educate people

      Simply spending more does not mean the education will be good. It's the same for number 3.

      4) We encourage everyone to go to college. Everyone.

      Yes, because we treat it as job training; it's simply seen as a way to make it more likely that you'll get a good job, rather than a way for passionate individuals to obtain a rigorous, academic education in a field. Employers treat it as a simple way to weed job applicants out. The quality of the actual education is treated as secondary at best.

      Not everyone should go to college. People who primarily seek job training definitely should not do so.

      None of your points prove what you think they prove. I can't believe you were modded up.

    2. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you show your numbers that prove statement 2?

      I'm curious whether this is measured by spending in U.S. dollars based on exchange rate, percentage of country's GDP, or whatever metric.

      Also, a substantial portion of the subsidies for universities come from research grants. While a fraction of this trickles down to student education--either by funding their research assistantships, or indirectly by attracting professors who happen to teach when they're not conducting research--the overall amount that's really focused on the universities' teaching function is probably an order of magnitude or so shy of your "hundreds of billions" figure.

  34. For-profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what about all of the universities that operate with the same motives? I happen to know that the drive to get more Adjunct
    Faculty is money/profit driven. As are all of the fees ( Parking, meals, activity, recreational, computer, lab, etc... ).
    They scream for tuition and fee hikes while having billions of endowments and holdings...
    Graduate students are used as cheap intellectual laborers...
    Most Universities ask a job applicant (technical only, in my experience ) "How much money can you bring in?"
    Research money pays a lot of bills...

    So, in my opinion, most universities have shifted from behaving like educational institutions to behaving like corporations.....
    This is a big mistake. Really Big.

    But the world will go on, and after the excrement structure falls apart, small conclaves of educators will begin rebuilding
    education from the rubble left.

  35. University != Job Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when are the FEDs going to shut down the big Universities? $180,000 of student loans and NO JOB prospects ... They aren't being honest either.

    The goal of a university education, at least at the undergrad level, is not be "job training". If it is being advertised as such, that is dishonest.

  36. My former "school" went down too by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    Just before the dot com collapse of the last century, I was just getting started with a couple years of freelance PC tech stuff and minor web design under my belt as I worked my way up the business desktop support chain at Gateway dreaming of more challenging things. These "schools" were hot stuff then. I foolishly decided to go for it. I don't remember the name of the place, although a lady friend of mine I met there insists to this day it was a satellite office for Stanford University. Needless to say it is not, she does not work in IT, and the school went poof shortly thereafter.

    As a testament to their teaching, in the Linux class, I had to show the instructor how to compile source code and so on. By the time I was thinking about calling quits, it was obvious that I was now effectively teaching the more general A+, Network, 50+ student class. The day before an open note test, the lady mentioned above asked to xerox my notes. When I came in the next day, every last student had a copy of my notes. Why? Because they had zero confidence. I walked right out.

    So now I am just reminiscing but you get the idea.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:My former "school" went down too by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

      Were you ever able to leverage this learning experience to get a job?

    2. Re:My former "school" went down too by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      No. But I also never mentioned it for fear it would represent bad judgement.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:My former "school" went down too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like me when I was in high-school in the 80's. Ever since elementary school I wanted so badly to take some sort of computer course but they never offered anything whatsoever until I was in 11th grade. I signed up for the very first programming class ever offered. They even made me submit some of my code to prove I was capable of taking this super-advanced class. After just a few days of class, I was the one teaching it because the "teacher" was a dumbass that thought they could "program" because they knew how to use a word processor. After a few weeks I dropped the class because it was obviously a waste of time. I learned a lot more in Shop.

  37. Trades by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Part of the problem is that there's a push to put as many high school students into college (even 2-year college) as possible, even those who would be better served going to vocational schools.

    I could not agree more. I have a staff full of people who are definitely not college material but would be (and are) served well by a vocational education. There is always a need for skilled trades, welders, machinists, etc. Trying to turn everyone into a computer programmers regardless of aptitude is just idiotic and counterproductive. Not to mention costly.

    Protip: You can't outsource blue collar work.

    Care to wager on that? Ask the folks who work the assembly lines in Detroit if blue collar work cannot be outsourced. There are plenty of blue collar jobs that are very vulnerable to outsourcing when you live in a place with high labor costs like the US.

    1. Re:Trades by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      skilled trades, welders, machinists, etc

      And those were great 19th & 20th century trades. The 21st century trades are IT, networking, programmers, etc. Part of what makes it hard to get modern trades started is people like most Slashdotters that insist programming requires a 4 year degree.

    2. Re:Trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HVAC/R bro. IT and coding is white collar to me. Not that I don't consider those jobs essential to our economy, but I don't think you can really call them trades. Get on a 120 degree roof on a hot ass september day to test the heating systems on a half dozen rooftop units (like I did today). That's trade stuff. (yeah testing heat when it's hot feels weird, but it's easier to change a bad heat exchanger when you aren't fighting 3 feet of snow)

    3. Re:Trades by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      welders and machinists are as much 21st century trades as they were 19th century. We still can't 'program' a new building. Every construction company, factory, power plant, fleet maintenance yard, etc needs welders and machinists.

    4. Re:Trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to wager on that? Ask the folks who work the assembly lines in Detroit if blue collar work cannot be outsourced. There are plenty of blue collar jobs that are very vulnerable to outsourcing when you live in a place with high labor costs like the US.

      The distinction being factory vs. service-level blue collar work, of course. No one from China or India is coming here on a temporary visa to install your air conditioner on your house or business or to repair your plumbing anytime soon.

    5. Re:Trades by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time before we can program a new building, or at least the instructions for automated construction devices ("robots," if you will).

    6. Re:Trades by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      IT may be a trade, but programming and engineering is not. That's product design and support. I think quite a lot of programming definitely needs the degree. If yu're just doing yet another dumb web page for a dumb startup then sure, "web programming in 21 days" may be good enough. But if you're building and programming a medical device, space satellite, automobile safety systems, etc, then you do not want to treat the team as being composed of fungible and interchangeable personnel. Working with a lot of EE people doing programming, it is very frustrating to see people with 30 years of programming experience who are utterly clueless about basic concepts like algorithms, computability, graph theory, etc, and then they go and try to reinvent things that were done in the 70s.

    7. Re:Trades by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Some of these are actually jobs where a skilled human is going to be still better at it than a robot well after we've gotten a decent percentage of jobs that ask for four-year degrees automated; my understanding from people who are machinists or work with machine shops is that everything that can be reasonably automated at this point has been. What is a complex task for a human is not the same as what is a complex task for a robot.

      From some of the estimates I've seen that I consider reasonably likely? Some of these are actually harder problems to automate than some jobs held currently by people with 4-year degrees. (And some things are automated that we can demonstrate oughtn't be, like issuing DMCA notices.)

    8. Re:Trades by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And part of the problem there is that for decades, people have been pointing at blue collar workers - all those welders, machinists etc - and telling their kids, "if you don't study well, you'll have a crappy job like this guy". Our society has made careers in all those skilled trades that require a vocational education shameful. Is it surprising that everyone wants a degree now, and that job descriptions include a degree as a prerequisite even when none is actually needed?

      For that matter, even when speaking of programming, a lot of it is also really just skilled trade. You don't need a CS degree to churn out CRUD websites. You need the equivalent of vocational education for programming - how to put pieces together in known ways so that they work. I suspect that more than half of all developers out there would do just fine with a "vocational IT school", and could still perform their day-to-day duties just fine, and possibly even better, given the quality of some of the degree programs that I've seen.

    9. Re:Trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an IT professional, I would call it a trade.

      However, I appreciate the work you do and anyone who looks down on it should be kicked in the ass. I spent a Texas summer doing roofing when I was younger and know what it is like! *RESPECT!*

    10. Re:Trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are just going to setup your computer network in the woods among the trees? Cause it takes skilled trades to build the roof, walls, HVAC system, plumbing, etc. around your super important IT network to protect it from things like rain and excessive heat. Where do you think things like buildings and roads come from...hint: they are not programmed into existence? Someone has to actually build things and the skilled trades are perfect for that. I know plumbers that make more than a network administrator or programmer.

  38. Received $$$ via government loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "ITT Tech received an estimated $580 million in federal money (aka taxpayer dollars),"

    The wording in the article and summary make it sound like government just wrote them a check. Wrong. The school received the money because its students, like 70+% of the rest of the students in the country, are taking government loans and grants to pay for their schooling.

    Too bad the story wasn't about the Department of Education closing its doors forever.

  39. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harverd

  40. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > devry & ITT used to be good

    I can see exactly why you'd think that just from the quality of your own writing.

  41. There goes that job track by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was considering applying to be faculty at ITT. I figured at this point in my career if I can no longer be part of the solution I might as well be part of the problem, right? I'll have to find a different for-profit college to go after instead.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:There goes that job track by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      If you can't be a shining example, at least you can be a horrible warning.

    2. Re:There goes that job track by Tesen · · Score: 1

      Look my friend, you would have been wasted at ITT. With a degree of ambition to be apart of the problem, why not aim for upper management at some fortune 1000?

      Check out the following link (a bit old, but hey... I am sure they are worse by now!): http://247wallst.com/special-r...

    3. Re:There goes that job track by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Even for 2014 I'd say that list was wrong and inaccurate. Really, IBM as the worst run company in the country? Think of all the large companies that have collapsed since then. And don't forget the large company whose collapse is imminent - Sears - and it would be hard to even place IBM in the top 10 worst of 2014.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  42. ITT Tech is not a trade school by sjbe · · Score: 1

    What part of "ITT Technical Institute" makes you think that you're not going into a program that's functionally at the trade school level?

    Perhaps because they don't advertise themselves as being a trade school? Or because they aren't one. ITT Tech advertises having 6 schools. Please point out which one is the trade school:
            School of Electronics Technology
            School of Drafting and Design
            School of Information Technology
            School of Business
            School of Criminal Justice
            Breckinridge School of Nursing and Health Sciences
    Not one of those except maybe nursing is fairly described as a trade school. No cooking, welding, plumbing, carpentry, machining, or anything else that you would normally find in a trade school.

    People are ragging on "for-profit colleges" as some hideous evil, but whatever your experiences with Brightpoint, Ashford, or some other trendy places, ITT and Coleman have been around forever and shouldn't be lumped together with these.

    I've actually lectured at an ITT Tech school. Yes they absolutely should be lumped together with the rest of the the scumbags. They take a lot of money and provide little in return to a lot of people who often don't know any better.

    1. Re:ITT Tech is not a trade school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      School of Electronics Technology

      "Electronics Technology" is a very well-established "code word" for "Electronic Technician" (Not "engineer" -"technician"). In fact, some schools call it "Electronic Engineering Technology."

      I took that course in a school that was later brought out by ITT. It was a technician course, and qualified me for a bench tech job. They never advertised it as anything but that.

      I have since gone way beyond that, but this was as a result of OJT and extracurricular stuff. I work in an R&D capacity and manage Ph.Ds, these days.

      I am grateful for that old EET certificate (It was never referred to as a "degree." It was always a "certificate."). It got my foot in the door. I didn't have the means or the background to get into a real college in those days, and had to get working as quickly as possible. The student loan (in those days) wasn't too bad. Best investment I ever made.

      That said, I can completely see how schools like this (Trump U., anyone?) can be little more than shams.

    2. Re:ITT Tech is not a trade school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "ITT Technical Institute" makes you think that you're not going into a program that's functionally at the trade school level?

      Perhaps because they don't advertise themselves as being a trade school? Or because they aren't one. ITT Tech advertises having 6 schools. Please point out which one is the trade school:

              School of Electronics Technology

              School of Drafting and Design

              School of Information Technology

              School of Business

              School of Criminal Justice

              Breckinridge School of Nursing and Health Sciences
      Not one of those except maybe nursing is fairly described as a trade school. No cooking, welding, plumbing, carpentry, machining, or anything else that you would normally find in a trade school.

      I wish I had some of what you're smoking, because they all sound like trade schools.

      School of Electronics Technology-> work at a factory doing soldering; Not Electrical Engineer

      School of Drafting and Design -> CAD operator; Not mechanical engineer or commercial art

      School of Information Technology -> A+ & networking; Not computer science

      School of Business -> fast food manager/franchise owner; Not Business Administration or MBA

      School of Criminal Justice-> Cop; Maybe Pre law, but not close to a JD.

      Breckinridge School of Nursing and Health Sciences -> LPN, maybe, but more like medical technician or retirement home employee, perhaps dietitian, maybe RN; but not an MD.

      None are anything like Computer Science,

    3. Re:ITT Tech is not a trade school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring that they're housed at ITT, "School of Business" is ambiguous, because some will offer "BA in Management" (real degree) and some will offer "AA or BA in Business Administration" (trade school). "School of Nursing" is also ambiguous, because it may offer a legitimate bachelor of nursing and accreditation or may offer essentially a nurse's helper degree. All the rest of them are trade schools. It's not 1960 anymore. Pretty much any degree with "Technology" in the name is trade school.

      That's the problem with ITT: it was a trade school charging university tuition and trying to disguise its nature from naive students. For what it actually was, I'm sure it was pretty average, and people who went in with eyes open can get jobs commensurate with their training. For people who got bamboozled and thought a 2 year degree in engineering technology would get them the same job as a 4 year degree in electronic engineering, it looks like a scam.

    4. Re:ITT Tech is not a trade school by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      School of Electronics Technology

      "Electronics Technology" is a very well-established "code word" for "Electronic Technician" (Not "engineer" -"technician"). In fact, some schools call it "Electronic Engineering Technology."

      I took that course in a school that was later brought out by ITT. It was a technician course, and qualified me for a bench tech job. They never advertised it as anything but that.

      I have since gone way beyond that, but this was as a result of OJT and extracurricular stuff. I work in an R&D capacity and manage Ph.Ds, these days.

      I am grateful for that old EET certificate (It was never referred to as a "degree." It was always a "certificate."). It got my foot in the door. I didn't have the means or the background to get into a real college in those days, and had to get working as quickly as possible. The student loan (in those days) wasn't too bad. Best investment I ever made.

      That said, I can completely see how schools like this (Trump U., anyone?) can be little more than shams.

      I graduated from ITT 5 years ago and my teachers were top notch and had experience in the workforce in major places. I had a PHD instructor that was a materials science major that had worked for GE and had worked on the design of the engines on the F-117 nighthawk before he retired to teaching. When I left ITT tech I ended up working for IBM for a number of years and every employer acknowledged that my skills were top notch. Whatever is the problem with the placement of graduates at ITT in the past few years that has precipitated this problem causing the failure of ITT is on the students who are not getting hired and on the management that has been in place in the past 5 years. To say that ITT always was a failure and all the students are idiots.. is a cop out. I don't care what school you went to, you get out of your education what you put into it. I take my work very seriously and I am passionate about it and I never stopped learning. ITT is not a get rich quick scheme.. and science and engineering consists of the same information and material no matter what school you go to. I personally have audited MIT courses via open courseware on an ongoing basis to keep my skills sharp and the material that was presented at ITT was the same material that was being taught at MIT.. I concede that MIT's admission standards are prohibitively restrictive, but when I graduated high school I did not know what I wanted to do with my life like I do now.. But it doesn't change the fact (and you can confirm this if you have the stamina to sit through a few years of classes on youtube from MIT open courseware) that the material presented at ITT when I went there is the same material and quality that is presented at MIT. I will never be given the opportunities on the level of an MIT graduate though.. not fair but that is life.. and those that are the high performers and who are passionate about what they do like I am do not let that stop them. They work an order of magnitude harder because of that fact. I have been working on pursuing a masters degree in computer science and despite performing well in prerequisite classes at a higher level than my education at ITT would account for, I get judged harshly because I went to ITT. That is something that I consider a failure of the professors and admissions employees of where I went to graduate school. I also found that the quality of the classes at the graduate school I attended were not as high as the corresponding classes I audited at MIT , Stanford and Harvard. This issue is more nuanced than the people that just come on here and say "oh ITT tech is a ghetto school and none of those guys know anything." etc.. You have to expect that though because we live in a soundbite driven culture and they really don't care or know the details about what is going on.

  43. Virginia College... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I taught at RETS ( a standardized electronics school with canned lesson plans and specific lab work - actually pretty good for electronics. ) before it was bought out by Virginia College.... the trend was to shift to student loans and grants.
    When more than one person at any school mentions applying for federal money, take it as a warning sign.

  44. You forgot to mention Laureate University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know, the for-profit university system that paid Bill Clinton $16 million "while Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. pumped at least $55 million to a group run by Laureate’s founder and chairman, Douglas Becker, a man with strong ties to the Clinton Global Initiative."

    1. Re:You forgot to mention Laureate University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no.
      The money doesn't matter any more than the sleaziness,
      Remember this is slashdot and you're talking about the clintons.
      Besides, hilary doesn't remember anything about this.

  45. What about DePain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me about it. Mine really didn't even get me an "industry" job, except in the looses sense. Trying to get them forgiven but that's an even bigger minefield which involves the IRS. Overall I have a strong feeling when the education bubble collapses there's going to be a big mess for decades to come, and a lot of schools and students are going to be hurting, because education will no longer be seen as a way to improve oneself, or society, but as a burden to be avoided at all costs.

  46. Nobody Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody cares where you went to U, unless it was Phoenix, ITT, or Devry.

    You could go to podunk U, and still get hired.

    Then again, in the great white North, Schools are nationally accredited for engineering programs.

    Unlike the US of Eh, where schools can be accredited by the 3rd street accreditation board, comprised of people from that street, on that school district.

    1. Re:Nobody Cares by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares where you went to U, unless it was Phoenix, ITT, or Devry.

      You could go to podunk U, and still get hired.

      I've seen hiring managers reject resumes when they saw the applicant's degree was granted from DeVry.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    2. Re:Nobody Cares by GaAs+oldAce · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares where you went to U, unless it was Phoenix, ITT, or Devry.

      You could go to podunk U, and still get hired.

      I've seen hiring managers reject resumes when they saw the applicant's degree was granted from DeVry.

      Lazy hiring managers are part of the problem with the economy. Wasting time looking for the perfect employee is the enemy of hiring a good employee.

  47. Loan Sharks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/08/21/student-debt-can-balloon-with-little-notice.html#

    "Student debt can balloon with little notice "

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/28/hedge-funds-puerto-rico-close-schools-fire-teachers-pay-us-back

    "Hedge funds tell Puerto Rico: lay off teachers and close schools to pay us back"

  48. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    In the Engineering schools it is almost unheard of for a professor to not have at least 5 years in industry. Long and old tradition.

    But that is engineering, CS is different.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  49. Sorry to be ya! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out!

  50. Good. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    Good riddance.
    This will end one of the major sources of hacky/bad programmers.

    1. Re:Good. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Its called De Vries because of the only job their grads can get: "you want de vries wid dat?"

  51. too dificult to hire people for ( 1year) internsh by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you want free labor?

  52. Germany has a good apprenticeship system by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Germany has a good apprenticeship system that mixes real paid work with a trade school like classroom. That is what is needed in the USA and not years of pure class room at an high cost.

    1. Re:Germany has a good apprenticeship system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not really supposed to do "real paid work" during an apprenticeship in Germany - You're supposed to learn a wide variety of skills that are part of the "official" curriculum for the profession you're training for, and the employer is supposed to provide actual training, supervision, etc.

    2. Re:Germany has a good apprenticeship system by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      The best way for many people to learn is to do. If you go through an apprenticeship and haven't done any "real paid work" than neither the employer or the apprentice received anything of value.

    3. Re:Germany has a good apprenticeship system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there should be a continuum from Expensive school to cheap labor to well paid with experience.
      If you don't go to college, get paid less to get experience.
      Work in the morning and classes in the evening.
      Or High School having Vo-Tec classes (OMG)

  53. And nothing of value was lost. by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    It's not a good sign when in the first week you find out your Electronics instructor's work experience amounts to Laser tech in the military and former cop in CA. It's even worse when he spends way too much time making jokes about "Siemens" (as in conductance).

    Sorry not sorry, fuckers.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  54. Re:too dificult to hire people for ( 1year) intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you want free labor?

    There are such things as paid internships.

    Besides that, a good internship should provide experience that is actually valuable and this a worthy investment of the intern's time. I assume this is why it was proposed as an alternative to college (which doesn't generally pay students either).

    In terms of preparing students to find a well-matched career, I think that internships are a good idea. Certainly better than the bastardization of liberal arts education into "job training".

  55. Re: like mcse and ccna by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah like a nice mcse in mouse click systems engineering. Haha that is a joke in certification and something to be ashamed of getting outside HR as managers filter those out.

    CCNA are even worse. Do they even know what a vlan is?

    Certs therefore are not the reason either

  56. Re:too dificult to hire people for ( 1year) intern by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, but the pay cap is about $8-10/hour and it can't fund healthcare benefits. Paying $15/hour when investing so much in a person (18-20 year old child) just doesn't work. Honestly, I would prefer to pay $5/hour plus pay for some formal courses for them to take (of our choosing).

    There is a way to do it, but it takes a lot of paperwork and you need to prove they aren't doing billable work or something. It ends up being more community service than anything-- which I don't really object to, but there isn't much in the way of a business benefit.

  57. Re:too dificult to hire people for ( 1year) intern by sakono · · Score: 1

    most internships I found were not paid or below min. wage. and they wanted 40hrs a week and you were not allowed to work another job. kinda made it hard to try when i was living on my own with roommates and was unable to move back home. I had a coworker lose his internship because they found out he was working part time at another job so he could pay rent and have food, since it was a unpaid internship. I would of loved to have been able to have done a internship though. hear they are really helpful if you do them when your just out of high school.

  58. Germany has it right they divert people into trade by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Germany has it right they divert people into trades schools and do not push for college for all. The real killer is the lack IT / TECH apprenticeships as it's more trade like. also the must have an degree and then the you went to X tech school = passed over BY HR.

    Then the tech schools did poorly on the degree part leading to the HR that went to an real school and likely had an 4 year party to not like people who where not able to cut it an real school. Even when the tech schools are way more hands on and tech real work place skills vs lot's of theory. I have seen HR say we want an CS degree and not an IT / MIS / etc one for IT admin rolls. It very school to school but some CS ones are very theory loaded.

  59. that is why an apprenticeship system is needed and by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    that is why an apprenticeship system is needed and gov can take that grant / loan funds to fund it. But not the big corps want the locked to job H1B's that they can unpay and work 60-80 hours.

    Say you pay $5/hr and grant covers other costs / the student has to cover their class room costs and you can kick in if you want to.

  60. Not every region has that option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do realize that you don't have to go to an expensive private university, right?

    I agree in principle, but its not that simple. I'm in the Pittsburgh region, and there is no cheap public option for 4 year degrees. University of Pittsburgh and Penn State are private-public hybrids with high tuition even for in-state students (starting at $20k, more on if you need room/board, etc.). Carnegie Mellon is extremely expensive private university. We have a few smaller private universities that are also expensive liberal arts schools: Carlow, La Roche, etc. Even the small Point Park University in the city is $27k per year and I'm pretty sure its private too. There's NO public city/state university with ~$5k tuition as other regions/states have, they all cost as much as an average private school. If you try to go to a cheap out of state school, you pay out of state tuition which is -- surprise! -- much more expensive and unaffordable. If you live here, you have to be relatively rich (expect ~$100k student debt when done, at least), or you don't go to college. (Well, there is community college but that isn't sufficient if you are pursuing a career like engineering that requires 4 year degrees).

    Only recently did they start the "Pittsburgh Promise" to help pay tuition for residents, but that only applies to people that live within the city proper as far as I know. If you live in metro area but outside the city, you still don't get any help (If someone knows more, please feel free to correct me; I would love for their to be a good public option for everyone that I can refer people to. But as far as I can tell, students that grow up here are screwed unless the qualify for federal aid, but even a modest income disqualifies you for most aid. You pretty much have to be minimum wage to get it, and even then Pell Grants are capped at I believe ~$6k per year so wouldn't cover most of your tuition anyway).

    1. Re:Not every region has that option by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You always have to option of doing the first 2 years at a community college. I know Penn State accepts transfers, and that would save a ton of cash. Here in VA, every state school participates in a program that allows those transfers as long as the student maintains a 3.0 GPA. As for price, my own kid went out of state, and over 4 years, including room board, and just about every other little thing, the total was around $140k for her business degree. It would have been about half of that in state. Anybody who's paying looking at shelling out $180k hasn't thought it through, or doesn't care about the cost.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  61. They and devry used to be good & they had nigh by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    They and devry used to be good & they had night school as well (now days a lot of the big schools do not really like to have night / adult education)

    community colleges are very hit or miss on what class they offer / have trades / tech class. Some even let you take tech school like class as dropin / non degree track needed.

  62. Skilled trades by sjbe · · Score: 1

    And those were great 19th & 20th century trades

    They're still great trades today. If you think otherwise you don't understand them. A good welder or CNC mill operator can make a very decent living in the US. I'd be happy to introduce you to more of them than you care to know. A good skilled tradesman who works hard and hustles a bit can make a six figure income. I have some plumber and electrician friends who make very comfortable livings, albeit with substantial hard work.

    The 21st century trades are IT, networking, programmers, etc.

    If your point is that some of those things have become important jobs then you are correct although only to a point. If your point is that we no longer have a need for welders and machinists and plumbers then you couldn't be more wrong.

  63. There needs to be an badges system to fill the gap by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    There needs to be an badges system to fill the gaps in the overall system and it needs to fix the real issues without the all of the other stuff that dragged down ITT and the other tech schools.

    The coder boot camps seam to be acting a lot like ITT and others with the employment numbers and right now are at where devry & ITT used to be. But there cost is an little high and unlike devry & ITT you don't even get an degree.

    Why can't there be an badges system that add up to an degree?
    Community college where your 2 year degree = full credit at any 4 year school for at least 2 years?

    The coder boot camps seem to get the idea that all stuff can fit into the old 2/4/6+ year system.

  64. Sure ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillarys donors from Riad do that. What makes you think Hillary and her corrupt 1% bunch will not implement the same policies in America ?

    Rich people always look for slaves and they despise rich people who say the truth about rich people.

    1. Re: Sure ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get a liberal studies degree to shill this hard for trump?

  65. Yes George Soros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your ilk does not get it until it is too late.

  66. sounds like some university's that tech out the bo by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    sounds like some university's that tech out the book and have the same type of errors,

  67. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary and her friends will rather let some folks pay themselves 5 millions of bonus per year, then after a couple of years rescue their institution for hundreds of billions.

    YOU are the "Minions", you are useless in their eyes and the best they can do with you is to use you as slaves, optimally by means of debt slavery.

    This all works because you and your fellow minions consume their Hollywood propaganda like the burgers and the sugar water.

  68. shutdown the mitt romney back full sail university by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    shutdown the mitt romney backed full sail university!

  69. False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some smart people of the finance industry can effectively suck off this persons income above the mcd level forever. Just sell the debt to someone who can then charge 20% interest or the like.

    As long as you folks let yourself be bullshitted by them not to vote Trump, this will all get worse. Much worse.

  70. Been going on for a long time by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Since at least the 1990s (when I first became aware of them). Basically the modus operandi is you found a school in some field where students can get college loans, preferably government-backed since a lot of the students aren't very credit-worthy. The students apply and are accepted into your school, pay their tuition with government or government-guaranteed student loans, and you "educate" them in the promised field. Net effect is you get the loan money, student gets the debt, and the government is on the hook for any debt the students can't pay back. You're effectively using the students to launder the money you're receiving from the government (they are listed as the recipient, not you).

    The problem is this is the exact same MO as a legit school. There are supposed to be accrediting organizations which audit the schools' programs and confirm that they are legitimately teaching students marketable skills. But some of these accrediting organizations aren't very good and should've been removed from the authorized list decades ago. Basically the same problem that led to the housing bubble - the bond credit rating agencies which were supposed to investigate mortgage-backed investments (because the average investor/student has nowhere near the resources or skill necessary for a through investigation) shirked their duties and just rubber stamped them as low-risk when they were anything but.

    It's ok to put a high-performance engine into your car. But you damn well better be sure the instruments and gauges monitoring that engine are working properly, lest it blow up on you.

  71. Jay Sherman by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    http://gizmodo.com/itt-is-offi...

    I am a current student at ITT. Went to campus today to study and was kicked out. The dean stated they were closing campus early for the holiday. I sat in the parking lot and watched staff go in and clear out personal affects. [...] other rumor is its prep for the shut down. [...]I am one of several students that are suppose to graduate 9/29

    And nothing of value was lost.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Jay Sherman by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I have a couple friends that went to ITT and have the same kind of job I do, (low) six figure salary IT job. Not understanding why ITT held to different standard than most other schools

  72. $580 million in Federal money by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    From the number of commercials ITT Tech had on television last year, my guess would be that they spent all that Federal money on ads.

    I'm glad I won't have to watch any more of their inane commercials.

  73. Is it really that different? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Most students were not prepared to enter such a fast-paced and terrible environment, and did poorly.

    Isn't that true of most college students though? Quite lot do poorly in the first year, even at "real" colleges.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  74. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I wasn't cut out for collage, it was too fast paste so I didn't stick with it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  75. Production machinists by sjbe · · Score: 1

    There are few 'production' machinists these days. I remember rooms full of lathes being operated by ex-cons producing the same part over and over. Not that's all CNC.

    No it is most definitely not all CNC. I deal with machine shops and production metal fabrication all the time. While CNC is heavily utilized there still are plenty of old machines that don't have a computer of any sort still in use. Many of these are skilled labor jobs too. My father-in-law owns a company that has about 40 presses and machines of various sorts and only a handful of them are computer controlled in any way. I routinely go into plants that have machines that predate WWII which are still spitting out plenty of parts. No CNC machine is going to replace them in the foreseeable future either.

    But you still need prototype machinists. If you want 1 relatively simple thing made right away, there is unlikely to be a faster way than a machinist on manual machines.

    Depends on what you are making but as a general proposition there is truth in what you say. However the implication that there is no need for production machinists in a country like the US with high wages is simply untrue and demonstrably so.

  76. Machinists by sjbe · · Score: 1

    While that's true, there are only a few prototypes made for each product. What of all the machinists who used to crank out production parts? Those jobs are gone forever...

    News of the death of machinists is greatly exaggerated. Even in high wage areas. According to BLS statistics there are approximately 400,000 machinists in the US. While that is a far cry on a percentage basis from days of yore, there still is steady demand and it isn't going to go away any time soon. Manufacturing has become a little like farming. The percent of the workforce directly involved has decreased as productivity has increased but the same jobs still exist and there still is substantial employment opportunity.

    Manufacturing is almost all CNC now, and consumer products are either non-repairable or last longer than they used to.

    It is untrue that manufacturing is all CNC. It's not even close to all CNC. I am in metal fabrication plants on a routine basis and there are plenty of plants with numerous machines without any computer controls at all. People who think everything in manufacturing is computerized are almost invariably people who don't work in manufacturing. CNC is widespread and important but it has not and will not eliminate all non-CNC manufacturing any time soon. I've worked a plant with 50 turret lathes that date from around WWII - still going strong today. No CNC machine is going to drive them out any time soon for economic reasons if nothing else because CNC is expensive.

    Anecdotally, my father in law has an entire plant filled with machines that require skilled operators. Most of the machines he owns are older than most of the people reading this, myself included. He has CNC machines too but they aren't universal like you are implying. In my plant roughly half our presses are computer controlled and the other half aren't. We aren't going to replace the non-computerized presses either - they are built like tanks, are fully depreciated, easy to repair, and work great for numerous applications. It would be economically stupid to replace them.

    Even in places where there are CNC machines you still need a skilled machinist in most cases. CNC machines are not plug and play and you need people who understand fabrication to get the most out of them, set them up, diagnose problems, etc.

    1. Re:Machinists by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      I've worked a plant with 50 turret lathes that date from around WWII - still going strong today. No CNC machine is going to drive them out any time soon for economic reasons if nothing else because CNC is expensive.

      Yes, but in a sense they're worse for employment than CNC are. With a turret lathe you'll get an even lower cost per item than with a CNC machine, if you have the steady, large scale, and stable-over-time, demand to keep them running.

      The demand scale is still: If you need a couple, do them manually. If you need more, CNC. If you need even more than that, build (or adapt) a specialised solution (aka turret lathe).

      I remember when I was at SKF, the production engineers could tell me to the cent how large a run of what part made the most sense to produce with what tools available. (Of course I was at the research laboratory where we had exactly one really skilled machinist, with two or three manual machines, as we only did one-offs and not enough of them to keep more than one guy busy.

      Back in the day though, you didn't have CNC, so either you used manual, or a turret lathe. The majority of machinist were busy doing the production work "in the middle" that CNC now has dominated. That's where all the jobs went, and that's why CNC was the killer it was/is. Not that we still don't people of all skills. (Even though they're getting harder to find.)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  77. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Now unlike the trade schools the professor at the collages they for the most part have little to no real world work experience (out side of the ivy tower)

    Depends on the school. The University I went to was not a research school and had a fair amount of professors who had worked in industry and encouraged professors to take sabbaticals for a year or two to go and work in industry as well as bringing in professors who had recently retired from industry to teach. My father-in-law did the latter after retiring from working in the semiconductor and taught several courses over the next 7 years doing it part time as did a number of others. There were some professors who did do research as well but even they were accessible to undergrads unlike the ones at a standard research university.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  78. Director from ITT! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    At my old job, the "manager" who stood between everyone and getting a raise was the ass kissing best friend of the Information Technology VP.
    He was even better than an ITT grad: he was an almost ITT grad, left before completing his program.
    I hear he's now currently a Director. I may call him up and hassle him about this.

  79. Did Not Meet Gov't Standards by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Lack of diversity and sensitivity training courses.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  80. His debt, transformed into our liability by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    If he wants to take on debt so he can spend four years on poetry or Russian literature or on women's studies, that's his business, and HIS debt

    If the leftists who want to make public universities "free" get their way, it will no longer be his debt. His education will be paid for by the taxpayers who didn't choose garbage majors.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  81. A great video that backs up your assertion by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1
    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  82. Re: professor my @$$. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, I hardly doubt you are a professor! Your grammar sounds like someone who didn't even graduate high school!!! If you are going to post a statement or opinion and expect people to believe you are an educator of any status, please try to form complete and educated sentences. And second, DO NOT expect anyone to take you seriously as a "professor" when you post "anonymously." If you truly are a teacher of any kind and this post reflects the level of your grammar skills, then perhaps you are exactly one of the reasons our education system is failing and for lack of better words, has "dumbed down" our society and younger generations. Proof read before clicking the submit button!

  83. Thirty years too late for me... by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    This story made me happy. My parents pressured me into enrolling when I was fresh eighteen, and I was burned out after one year and dropped out. I liked the education and was all about electronics, but I had never held a job before then, and should have gone that direction instead. What followed was mostly twenty years of working in different places and moving on when the Department of Education would catch up to me. I should have bankrupted myself out of it before they created that lovely exemption for student loans when I had the chance.

    Oh well, I lived, learned, and found work that paid well enough to let them siphon my hard-earned money for almost a decade while barely getting by. Three years ago it finally ended and I no longer had to be creative with my taxes so I was always paying $10-$50 at the end of the year so they had nothing to garnish beyond my paycheck. At that point, I bought a van. The cost of payments, insurance, and gas was equal to the price of a monthly bus pass and what they were taking out of my paychecks. My last van payment will be next March, and I plan to celebrate and start building my bank account faster than ever with an eye towards using my electronics and programming knowledge to become self-employed.

    While much of this was my own fault, ITT still robbed me of a good portion of my life. I'm glad to see them go, and maybe more stories like mine will make the next generation think twice before getting trapped in a student loan. Looking back, working and paying for college is a smart thing to do, but going in the direction of Entrepreneurship is even better. There will always be a limit to how much money you can make if you're working for someone else. There are no guarantees, but there is always the possibility of raking it in with the right product or service, and the education needed to run a business doesn't have to be expensive. What good is being a lawyer if you're paying thousands every month for your education until you're in your sixties?

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  84. Re: like mcse and ccna by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    When I took the MSCE in 2000, you had to know (among many other subject) how to super and subnet a network segment. Like actually how to do the math and figure out the broadcast and network addresses, and what the subnet mask should be.

    I don't think you know what the MCSE ever took to achieve, as it is far more in depth than you would expect.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  85. Re:devry & ITT used to be good but collage for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For whatever reason--culture of the field or low cost to tinker around--CS is an area where you find some a large number of amazing people who were largely self-taught, often at a young age. In my university, CS is pretty much the only department that would hire undergrads to be teaching fellows.