In many rural areas, wireless broadband is making inroads. Find the nearest neighbor that *can* get cable, and set up a wireless bridge to them. If there's a few people around you, set up a good access point and resell it.
I know, some cable plans don't like that... but on the other hand, it's not like they were planning to sell it to those folks anyway. Also, in my area, you can pay for "enterprise cable" service which is very reasonable, and they won't complain about what you run on it.
That's no fix, that's a hack job. I meant what I said and trying to be "cool" by putting words in my mouth is no way to make a point.
You must be new here. "Fixed it for you" is a common/. joke similar to "you mispelled...." in which someone "hacks up" (to use your terminology) a statement - usually in a funny way, but often making a point. It's almost satire. Ok, maybe that's a stretch.
For example, you could reply to this post with:
in which someone "hacks up" (to use your terminology) a statement - usually in a not so funny way Fixed it for ya....
That's circular logic... If we can create our own oil through TDP, then we could conceivably continue to burn more carbon than plants scrub out of the air. The only way to balance the equation is to burn less, or scrub more. It doesn't matter if it came from old oil or new oil.
It is carbon neutral, in that the carbon in the plant came from the atmosphere, and goes back to the atmosphere as exhaust. Better than gasoline, which takes carbon from the ground and sends it to the atmosphere.
I just don't get this at all. "Carbon neutral" is a bad term, and bad science. I first saw this when reading about thermal depolymerization. (I don't see it in this article)
You have plants removing X per time amount of carbon from the atmosphere. You have cars and stuff emitting carbon at Y per time. If Y > X, then we are spewing more carbon into the atmosphere than is being scrubbed, period.
It doesn't matter if the carbon in Y came from recent plants or from plants a million years ago; it doesn't matter if the carbon was harvested from the surface or 500 feet down. If carbon emissions are harmful (not debating that here) then we have to stop burning carbon. It doesn't matter if it's oil or ethanol or coal or any other form of carbon.
I agree... $2000 for 1.4 TB is a bit expensive. I just put together a box with 1.4 GB Raid5 for just under $800 using decent parts from newegg. OTOH, this doesn't include hot-swap bays and such, but it's a great storage solution on a small budget.
I scanned the article summary above and thought that Boeing was going to a Weird network. I skipped right to the article to see the details and was disappointed.
Umm, then you obviously didn't read it, as it said they had AP's above every row. Sounds weird to me.
that spammers ignore the priority of your MX records.
That's when they pay attention to MX records at all. I have seen numerous times where they attempt to connect to the IP for the domain or www.domain, ignoring the MX records.
Rails provides so much more than just MVC. It *is* built on solid OO design, and the ActiveRecord framework is pretty solid, and would take a lot of time to recreate by hand. Why reinvent the wheel? The point of rails is to free you from having to do that stuff all over again. "Don't Repeat Yourself" is the motto, and I find that to be the biggest reason to use rails. As I have grown in my own programming abilities, I've discovered the greatest frustration is when I repeat code (or worse, copy and paste).
With the rails framework, you also get(besides MVC and AR): Built in data validation, error reporting from the validation(model) immediately available to the view, session flash (temporary message carried through to next page view), the new RESTful approach (try it!), different responses based on request type, all sorts of view helpers, easy to integrate ajax.... man I just can't list it all.
Aside from the storage dangers where a spark would create a bomb, you would have to make sure your rocket nozzle spit the stuff out faster than the combustion rate... otherwise the flame will backtrack into the tank, and you end up with a bomb again.
Of course, if your nozzle could spit things out at that rate, why bother with combustion?
No, not always, and I don't think they started out with credit card capability. If someone else has paypal tied directly to their bank, as do I, they can transfer money to me with absolutely zero charges. I get exactly what they transfer to me. Neither one of us get charged.
Actually, since they make two small deposits to test/activate your account, I'm slightly ahead.
Yes, on my other business account that accepts credit cards, they charge a fee per transaction.
PayPal is not a registered financial institution (bank, savings/loan, credit union or any similar) and therefore unable to collect "float" interest on deposited monies.
Then how the heck do they make money off the whole thing? It's that float time that they make money from.
Slashdot Mirror
How about, "I'm not closed minded, you're just wrong!"
In many rural areas, wireless broadband is making inroads. Find the nearest neighbor that *can* get cable, and set up a wireless bridge to them. If there's a few people around you, set up a good access point and resell it.
I know, some cable plans don't like that... but on the other hand, it's not like they were planning to sell it to those folks anyway. Also, in my area, you can pay for "enterprise cable" service which is very reasonable, and they won't complain about what you run on it.
See, that's what I'm talking about.... LOL
You must be new here. "Fixed it for you" is a common
For example, you could reply to this post with:
You owe me a new keyboard.... LOL
That's circular logic... If we can create our own oil through TDP, then we could conceivably continue to burn more carbon than plants scrub out of the air. The only way to balance the equation is to burn less, or scrub more. It doesn't matter if it came from old oil or new oil.
I just don't get this at all. "Carbon neutral" is a bad term, and bad science. I first saw this when reading about thermal depolymerization. (I don't see it in this article)
You have plants removing X per time amount of carbon from the atmosphere. You have cars and stuff emitting carbon at Y per time. If Y > X, then we are spewing more carbon into the atmosphere than is being scrubbed, period.
It doesn't matter if the carbon in Y came from recent plants or from plants a million years ago; it doesn't matter if the carbon was harvested from the surface or 500 feet down. If carbon emissions are harmful (not debating that here) then we have to stop burning carbon. It doesn't matter if it's oil or ethanol or coal or any other form of carbon.
I carry a laptop... and run an intense amount of software over a given day. So for me shutting down nightly just makes sense.
So????
Original question still stands...
I put my MBP through a lot of intense work, and yet leave it on overnight, so the backuppc process can get to it.
This site has some interesting viusal perspectives on the issue.
I really wonder what would have happened if we had a culture that wasn't so paranoid about guns and allowed more guns on campus.
Which is why I have 4 disks in the array... :)
I agree... $2000 for 1.4 TB is a bit expensive. I just put together a box with 1.4 GB Raid5 for just under $800 using decent parts from newegg. OTOH, this doesn't include hot-swap bays and such, but it's a great storage solution on a small budget.
Base64... http://makcoder.sourceforge.net/demo/base64.php
I use IMAP to check several accounts, and the last time I tried Outlook, it choked on IMAP.
Course, I haven't used windows for quite a while now.
and from there comes higher public office... state legislature, federal, and presidency. Kinda explains a lot, doesn't it?
I only use Windows for maybe 2 hours a day to play a game, then I reboot to Ubuntu for real work.
Yeah, actually it's really annoying, because AVG is always trying to scan the hard drive when I go to play a game.
My submission was rejected on the 13th.
Brain: Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
Pinky: I'm thinking I am never thinking what you are thinking...
Brain was astonished.
That's when they pay attention to MX records at all. I have seen numerous times where they attempt to connect to the IP for the domain or www.domain, ignoring the MX records.
Rails provides so much more than just MVC. It *is* built on solid OO design, and the ActiveRecord framework is pretty solid, and would take a lot of time to recreate by hand. Why reinvent the wheel? The point of rails is to free you from having to do that stuff all over again. "Don't Repeat Yourself" is the motto, and I find that to be the biggest reason to use rails. As I have grown in my own programming abilities, I've discovered the greatest frustration is when I repeat code (or worse, copy and paste).
With the rails framework, you also get(besides MVC and AR): Built in data validation, error reporting from the validation(model) immediately available to the view, session flash (temporary message carried through to next page view), the new RESTful approach (try it!), different responses based on request type, all sorts of view helpers, easy to integrate ajax.... man I just can't list it all.
According to the release notes, Rails 1.2 works with Unicode.
Aside from the storage dangers where a spark would create a bomb, you would have to make sure your rocket nozzle spit the stuff out faster than the combustion rate... otherwise the flame will backtrack into the tank, and you end up with a bomb again.
Of course, if your nozzle could spit things out at that rate, why bother with combustion?
No, not always, and I don't think they started out with credit card capability. If someone else has paypal tied directly to their bank, as do I, they can transfer money to me with absolutely zero charges. I get exactly what they transfer to me. Neither one of us get charged.
Actually, since they make two small deposits to test/activate your account, I'm slightly ahead.
Yes, on my other business account that accepts credit cards, they charge a fee per transaction.
Then how the heck do they make money off the whole thing? It's that float time that they make money from.
In fact, this is *exactly* what I tend to do. Tailgating me only makes you go slower.