1) GnomeVFS support in Open/Save and opening in Evolution? 2) GDM > Install theme... Select theme 3) Mozilla is broken, yes 4) System theme is the best 5) Don't know about that one maybe somebody else knows 6) Redhat alert icon is now in red carpet if you subscribe to chanell 7) Yes 8) I like it too
Funny, I just tested on my Cel 1.7, 1GB RAM, Maxtor IDE40GB, 1(only one) SMC 1GBit ethernet, plain RH9 (no tuning, fresh installed). Samba to Win2000. SMC Level2 switch, SAMBA to Win2000 27.9 MB/s ftp RH9 to RH9 (same configurations) 41,3 MB/s
And they were able to get how much over 4 or 8 GBit ethernets. Anybody who would take him self some time to look at result should see that results over such bandwith are stupid.
No, thanx, been there, never liked it, but that's just me
Re:Why you gottat go and do a stupid thing like th
on
SCO DOS'ed
·
· Score: 1
I generally like linux users (but not everybody), hell I'm one of them. But then again everyone has it's own peace and own ways to deal with his life. As for BSD, well real BSD yes, MOX-(Net)BSD no, they're way too pushy for my taste.
Politics, well, as much as I hate to admit, yes it's vital for free system to grow to masses.
Re:Why you gottat go and do a stupid thing like th
on
SCO DOS'ed
·
· Score: 1
If, as you said, everyone (including the linux pricks) moves to BSD and pollutes it, I will move to something else... or nothing.
So, if I may ask: "this is just your way to be unique. Running away from crowded teritory."
As for help, BSD and Linux have good support, except Linux support is easier to find because there is more Linux users than BSD. (please no flame wars on that)
But then again: "your unique speciality of running, isn't that making you getting support a bit harder than you're supposed to?"
All the bullshit politics make me consider doing so even now
Well, I share your opinion on that
Re:lets act like adults, ok ? ...
on
SCO DOS'ed
·
· Score: 1
Funny you mention that, but how many people do you know with such bandwidth. I don't see how fans could do it, this would have to be well organized and kept in quiet. No way, you're on/.
Even if exactly the same code was used, it still wouldn't crash on the Mac. Why? RTFL, people. It's a null-dereference bug. That means something tried to access memory location zero. Apparently under Winderz, location zero is not mapped to anything and causes a crash from an invalid memory access.
Maybe in some other world, but not this one. Mac codebase is completely different than Win-version. Mac and Windows version have nothing in common. Try to compare rendering of sites and you will see what I mean.
It's not that Mac would be perfect, it's just that people who wrote Mac version didn't make the same mistake as those who wrote Windows version
I always smile when I read that. Not because it wouldn't be true, because it's not gonna happen'. Apple is hardware reseller so forget it. If Apple would make OSX for PC, it would be just as making suicide. Lot more work on drivers and support with lower range of reselling. Everybody could put their OS on machine that wasn't made by Apple. Even if Apple would made Macs on Intel or AMD, believe me you wouldn't run OSX on custom built PC.
By the way it doesn't need much, to be better than XP, it should just work 6 months without reinstalling because machine is slower for 50% than fresh installed one.
Yes, I hate XP, hell I hate even OSX. No I'm not interested in Apple, highly overpriced and slow hardware (got three of them, they are all new not some old ones), where your freedom is even more in question than with MS. No Darwin is not OSX, yes it's OSS and for PC but you practically can't get PC to run on perfectly, bad hardware support, and by the way Darwin doesn't make you run Aqua so you can forget OSX I know about fink, but to run most apps in OS9 emulation and others in XFree emulation, hell I'm gonna buy my self Nintendo.
So for serious work in my line of bussines Apple and Windows are just sidewheel, but that's my own opinion.
Almost all features they claim are not even present in their latest version. Check nr. of CPU they support, Numa, LVM etc...
You can't say it's yours if you haven't got it. But on the other hand they own a few patents that would be viable in C++ world at least some patents defining base C++.
By the way, not even one fact was substantiated with proof. So either they get some or all the stories are bsht. Any word without them is just gasoline to the fire they wanna set on stage
That was a long time ago if I'm not wrong. Please correct me if I am.
Meanwhile they crossed to Qt widget library, so porting to anything would be very easy. Taking that to consideration I really don't see other reason to use Qt instead of their own.
Wouldn't agree. Small fonts on WinXP look blury on WinXP (at least on my notebook, and yes I tryed all types of font rendering on windows), while linux displays them clear. When you enlarge fonts on windows results get better, but fonts become too big
If it has come to some changes on XP I don't know, because it's a long time since I trashed them.
For what's on CRT I don't know, never tryed them. But I can tell RH makes rendering very clear on my 22".
Slashdot Mirror
Coffe:) No thinking needed
I love *X workstations, and I can say "Not interested". Too slow, too expensive.
...don't know for other guys
Yes, I have tryed MOX and didn't liked it. In fact I still have two G4's one MacOS one MOX, they mostly serve as dust collectors.
Hey, but that's me,
1) GnomeVFS support in Open/Save and opening in Evolution? ... Select theme
2) GDM > Install theme
3) Mozilla is broken, yes
4) System theme is the best
5) Don't know about that one maybe somebody else knows
6) Redhat alert icon is now in red carpet if you subscribe to chanell
7) Yes
8) I like it too
Ok, I unpacked one switch and few ethernets.
Funny, I just tested on my Cel 1.7, 1GB RAM, Maxtor IDE40GB, 1(only one) SMC 1GBit ethernet, plain RH9 (no tuning, fresh installed). Samba to Win2000.
SMC Level2 switch,
SAMBA to Win2000 27.9 MB/s
ftp RH9 to RH9 (same configurations) 41,3 MB/s
And they were able to get how much over 4 or 8 GBit ethernets. Anybody who would take him self some time to look at result should see that results over such bandwith are stupid.
No, thanx, been there, never liked it, but that's just me
I generally like linux users (but not everybody), hell I'm one of them. But then again everyone has it's own peace and own ways to deal with his life. As for BSD, well real BSD yes, MOX-(Net)BSD no, they're way too pushy for my taste.
Politics, well, as much as I hate to admit, yes it's vital for free system to grow to masses.
If, as you said, everyone (including the linux pricks) moves to BSD and pollutes it, I will move to something else... or nothing.
So, if I may ask: "this is just your way to be unique. Running away from crowded teritory."
As for help, BSD and Linux have good support, except Linux support is easier to find because there is more Linux users than BSD. (please no flame wars on that)
But then again: "your unique speciality of running, isn't that making you getting support a bit harder than you're supposed to?"
All the bullshit politics make me consider doing so even now
Well, I share your opinion on that
Funny you mention that, but how many people do you know with such bandwidth. I don't see how fans could do it, this would have to be well organized and kept in quiet. No way, you're on /.
Even if exactly the same code was used, it still wouldn't crash on the Mac. Why? RTFL, people. It's a null-dereference bug. That means something tried to access memory location zero. Apparently under Winderz, location zero is not mapped to anything and causes a crash from an invalid memory access.
Maybe in some other world, but not this one. Mac codebase is completely different than Win-version. Mac and Windows version have nothing in common. Try to compare rendering of sites and you will see what I mean.
It's not that Mac would be perfect, it's just that people who wrote Mac version didn't make the same mistake as those who wrote Windows version
heh, just fsck html for eating characters :-)
#include <stdio.h>
#include
god damn this modern times and copy-paste without thinking
sorry to bother but kernel is written in c not c++, so every .cpp file could hardly be a case
#include stdio.h
well that's a win-win situation
yep, you just wait for all
"{"
and
"}"
lines.
That's a fool proof case they have
"OSX on x86 would kick ass"
I always smile when I read that. Not because it wouldn't be true, because it's not gonna happen'. Apple is hardware reseller so forget it. If Apple would make OSX for PC, it would be just as making suicide.
Lot more work on drivers and support with lower range of reselling. Everybody could put their OS on machine that wasn't made by Apple.
Even if Apple would made Macs on Intel or AMD, believe me you wouldn't run OSX on custom built PC.
By the way it doesn't need much, to be better than XP, it should just work 6 months without reinstalling because machine is slower for 50% than fresh installed one.
Yes, I hate XP, hell I hate even OSX.
No I'm not interested in Apple, highly overpriced and slow hardware (got three of them, they are all new not some old ones), where your freedom is even more in question than with MS.
No Darwin is not OSX, yes it's OSS and for PC but you practically can't get PC to run on perfectly, bad hardware support, and by the way Darwin doesn't make you run Aqua so you can forget OSX
I know about fink, but to run most apps in OS9 emulation and others in XFree emulation, hell I'm gonna buy my self Nintendo.
So for serious work in my line of bussines Apple and Windows are just sidewheel, but that's my own opinion.
Nope, they aren't
Almost all features they claim are not even present in their latest version. Check nr. of CPU they support, Numa, LVM etc...
You can't say it's yours if you haven't got it. But on the other hand they own a few patents that would be viable in C++ world at least some patents defining base C++.
By the way, not even one fact was substantiated with proof. So either they get some or all the stories are bsht. Any word without them is just gasoline to the fire they wanna set on stage
By the way the date of that article is PC Magazine April 30, 2002. Meanwhile a lot could change
0 .asp
and a link
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,5543,0
That's why they make PS for MOX (which is kinda'UNIX). And that's why they moved to Qt???
heh, I'm glad I don't need that. I could be dissapointed, but thx for info.
Ooops, I didn't know that.
That was a long time ago if I'm not wrong. Please correct me if I am.
Meanwhile they crossed to Qt widget library, so porting to anything would be very easy. Taking that to consideration I really don't see other reason to use Qt instead of their own.
Ever heard about Ximian Connector and Evolution?
Wrong, Linux is free, Windows ain't.
I buy almost every Linux distro I use, but I wouldn't need to do that, I just like to support them.
Windows I could get for free if I would go into Windows reselling program, but I don't wan't them, they suck.
So if everybody would switch as you say, exclude me
Please, check your facts
Charging money for a week is no different than charging money indefinitely
Charging money for RHN subscription is not connected to Charging money for distribution
Only RHN users can get their RH9 early (from RH at least), retail is comming out next week, same time as FTP version.
RHN subscription has it's own benefits. You would know that if you'd be subscribed.
Wouldn't agree. Small fonts on WinXP look blury on WinXP (at least on my notebook, and yes I tryed all types of font rendering on windows), while linux displays them clear. When you enlarge fonts on windows results get better, but fonts become too big
If it has come to some changes on XP I don't know, because it's a long time since I trashed them.
For what's on CRT I don't know, never tryed them. But I can tell RH makes rendering very clear on my 22".
Maybe, but if I see it correctly, this is more like extortion. Premature stop of updating old system just a few days before anouncing new????!
What a coincidence.