I know it's not very adventurous, but I've been put off buying a scope for sometime as even the best scope I could buy would not come anywhere near the kind of images or information I can find on the net...
Re:All I want
on
USB Menorah
·
· Score: 2, Informative
http://www.usbgadget.com/usb-misc.htm
I got mine for 10 from www.maplin.co.uk - they don't seem to carry them anymore tho...
[Note that this does not include most "enterprise" software development, which is typically for internal use only. In this case, they can simply use the Free Edition of Qt. As long as they never distribute the code, they don't have to abide by the GPL.]
most enterprises outsource dev work to 3rd party software companies - software is perhaps 'internal' to the enterprise, but my understanding of the Qt licensing would indicate that this is commercial development - i.e. you can't use the free edition, you have to buy the commercial edition.
one disadvantage of any sort of licensing issue is the administration of the licences - i.e. you've got to audit that you have the right number of licences or face potential fines etc, there's also the lag time, add a developer to a project and wait a few weeks for the licence purchase order to go through...
been a long time - but generally no - there tends to be a lot of secondhand bookstores in university towns - they often carry a huge no. of secondhand books tho..
acutally windows xp used to lock my machine solid after a few hours use - same machine with Redhat or Mandrake works fine, machine is rarely rebooted and turned on permanently...
QT's licencing is a big no-no as far as I am concerned...
There are millions of bespoke apps businesses rely on out there, it's these apps that will be crucial for most companies when deciding to go Win -> Lin.
The os/server software/office suite (i.e. the infrastructure) etc. is all fine when licenced under GPL (or similar) but when it comes to these bespoke apps they 'have' to be closed source - they encapsulate business processes and business decisions etc. - of course framework code could be LGPL and CRM systems like Compiere are potentially useful frontends to these bespoke systems... but for the most part these sort of systems are best closed source and probably would be of little benefit being open source since they solve a very specific problem domain...
The QT commercial licence is pretty expensive - comparable to the whole MSDN Universal IIRC (of course most of the other tools are free...)
KDE is a good 'major version' ahead of Gnome - I still use Gnome at home and plan on moving towards bespoke app development with Gnome.
Re:Ummm.. yea, everyone basically does this.
on
Open Source at TiVo
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Me: But we can't even get someone on a phone to help with the {insert issue} problem.
having worked on numerous MS based projects where we've come across problems which did not appear to be due to our code, picking up the phone - quoting some 'contract number' (can't remember what it's called) - explaining issue - sending sample code - speaking to the guy in charge of that area of code - getting a tested patch some weeks later... no charge if it was an MS bug...
Isn't oracle available as a free download for non-production use (ie. you could use it at home as a dev/learning system ? or is it only an eval version ?
here in the uk the cable/satellite and I believe digital terrestrial broadcast a load of radio channels so your tivo can already record them... mainly larger national stations mind...
should've been locked up in the brig for 12months, demoted to lowest rank and then kicked out of starfleet (or whatever its called) to spend the rest of his life doing some sort of janitorial work...
I enjoyed the first 3/4 books in this series - a few years ago - was wondering what happened to the remaining books tho, I thought they were due out ages ago...
As long as we're wishing, I wish redhat would let people run their own up2date servers. I don't know of a way to do that. I would much prefer to keep a local repository of updates and let my machines log into that with the up2date stuff.
I agree completely, this is the reason that I, as a commercial app developer, have just switched from KDE to Gnome, even though KDE is better at the moment!
The QT licence cost is not that excessive considering other development costs (staff, testing etc), but other licencing issues can be a pain on any development team - new people joining/people leaving etc - the LGPL licence takes a lot of hassle out of the equation. (I'm mostly thinking in terms of developing bespoke business apps that can never have an OS counterpart as they are tightly coupled to a business process.)
how much testing goes into this sort of thing. I mean the XFree team do their testing - but have the people who have produced the 'packages' for the distros tested that it doesn't break anything ?
sounds like they didn't get enough of the story told in ep1 and ep2, with ep4 a known entity they were either going to have a really long and sprawling ep3 or miss a huge amount of what happened between ep2 and ep3 or ep3 and ep4....
I know it's not very adventurous, but I've been put off buying a scope for sometime as even the best scope I could buy would not come anywhere near the kind of images or information I can find on the net ...
http://www.usbgadget.com/usb-misc.htm
...
I got mine for 10 from www.maplin.co.uk - they don't seem to carry them anymore tho
[Note that this does not include most "enterprise" software development, which is typically for internal use only. In this case, they can simply use the Free Edition of Qt. As long as they never distribute the code, they don't have to abide by the GPL.]
most enterprises outsource dev work to 3rd party software companies - software is perhaps 'internal' to the enterprise, but my understanding of the Qt licensing would indicate that this is commercial development - i.e. you can't use the free edition, you have to buy the commercial edition.
one disadvantage of any sort of licensing issue is the administration of the licences - i.e. you've got to audit that you have the right number of licences or face potential fines etc, there's also the lag time, add a developer to a project and wait a few weeks for the licence purchase order to go through...
"If we say it's absolutely wrong for MS to include Media Player with Windows, we're also saying that Apple is wrong to include iTunes and Quicktime, "
when you buy Apple, you buy a product which consists of hardware+OS+software... Microsoft only sells the OS - thats a big difference..
been a long time - but generally no - there tends to be a lot of secondhand bookstores in university towns - they often carry a huge no. of secondhand books tho ..
acutally windows xp used to lock my machine solid after a few hours use - same machine with Redhat or Mandrake works fine, machine is rarely rebooted and turned on permanently ...
Holier conspiracy shit - it means Prince William won't take the throne after his dad Prince Charles ....
QT's licencing is a big no-no as far as I am concerned ...
... but for the most part these sort of systems are best closed source and probably would be of little benefit being open source since they solve a very specific problem domain ...
There are millions of bespoke apps businesses rely on out there, it's these apps that will be crucial for most companies when deciding to go Win -> Lin.
The os/server software/office suite (i.e. the infrastructure) etc. is all fine when licenced under GPL (or similar) but when it comes to these bespoke apps they 'have' to be closed source - they encapsulate business processes and business decisions etc. - of course framework code could be LGPL and CRM systems like Compiere are potentially useful frontends to these bespoke systems
The QT commercial licence is pretty expensive - comparable to the whole MSDN Universal IIRC (of course most of the other tools are free...)
KDE is a good 'major version' ahead of Gnome - I still use Gnome at home and plan on moving towards bespoke app development with Gnome.
Me: But we can't even get someone on a phone to help with the {insert issue} problem.
... no charge if it was an MS bug ...
..
...)
having worked on numerous MS based projects where we've come across problems which did not appear to be due to our code, picking up the phone - quoting some 'contract number' (can't remember what it's called) - explaining issue - sending sample code - speaking to the guy in charge of that area of code - getting a tested patch some weeks later
I can honestly say MS ain't that bad
(speaking as a Linux user that is
Isn't oracle available as a free download for non-production use (ie. you could use it at home as a dev/learning system ? or is it only an eval version ?
apparently the hybrids first words were "Whats up Doc?"
, you old machines
A: Provide it is 10
can re-case you existing machines
and for all intensive purposes (intents and purposes?)
god I feel sooo anal, were they using speech recognition software?
if they can't quality control their Q&A section how good are their products?
GM often seems to introduce 'alien' dna into the host - i.e. there no way on earth crossing a pig and with spinach that you'll get offspring.
spinach and pigs
here in the uk the cable/satellite and I believe digital terrestrial broadcast a load of radio channels so your tivo can already record them ... mainly larger national stations mind ...
and also ...
...
what exactly was his punishment for this ??
IIRC some 'counselling'....
should've been locked up in the brig for 12months, demoted to lowest rank and then kicked out of starfleet (or whatever its called) to spend the rest of his life doing some sort of janitorial work
IMO - its precisely this sort of episode which makes star trek a steaming pile of dung
I enjoyed the first 3/4 books in this series - a few years ago - was wondering what happened to the remaining books tho, I thought they were due out ages ago ...
thought methane was CH4 ??
CH4 + 2H20 = CO2 + 4H2
PS
belgians make very strong beer...
seems to be just about bugs' cross dressing habit.
...
;)
maybe it's just me, but I find cross dressing fun, so long as you don't take it too seriously
nothing better than sticking an old dress on and going out for a few beers with some mates...
here in the UK it's a fairly common way of celebrating a stag night... just a bit of hetero fun...
course, anyone who reads anything else into this is obviously hiding something
As long as we're wishing, I wish redhat would let people run their own up2date servers. I don't know of a way to do that. I would much prefer to keep a local repository of updates and let my machines log into that with the up2date stuff.
...
autoupdate does the trick
I agree completely, this is the reason that I, as a commercial app developer, have just switched from KDE to Gnome, even though KDE is better at the moment!
The QT licence cost is not that excessive considering other development costs (staff, testing etc), but other licencing issues can be a pain on any development team - new people joining/people leaving etc - the LGPL licence takes a lot of hassle out of the equation. (I'm mostly thinking in terms of developing bespoke business apps that can never have an OS counterpart as they are tightly coupled to a business process.)
how much testing goes into this sort of thing. I mean the XFree team do their testing - but have the people who have produced the 'packages' for the distros tested that it doesn't break anything ?
One was a sega mega drive in the same case as a desktop
... linkage:
that would have been the amstrad mega pc
here and here
sounds like they didn't get enough of the story told in ep1 and ep2, with ep4 a known entity they were either going to have a really long and sprawling ep3 or miss a huge amount of what happened between ep2 and ep3 or ep3 and ep4....
lets hope they manage to build the skycat 1000 then ...