You've apparently never seen Mayhew. He's a very distinctive looking fellow and regardless of who does the make-up, Chewie doesn't look like other Wookies because of who is under the make-up.
Episodes 7, 8 and 9 are supposed to deal with a character that is supposed to be introduced in Episode 3.
These episodes will take place after the New Jedi Order series. That allows for Lucas to use the original stars (Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Mayhew, etc.) and place them into the timeline approximately 30 years after A New Hope which is right around the end of the Yuuzhan Vong series (NJO). This is perfect. In 2007 these performers will be 30 years older than they were when they took the roles in the first place. This gives a lot of credibility to the whole concept.
So, where did they get these figures?
Would it appear that you deleted all your music files on a P2P if you disabled the shared folder?
If that's the case, it sounds more like a lot of people stopped sharing their music and the spin of the report is that they deleted all their files.
AAC is superior to MP3. Simple enough. Outside of that, I don't care too much about your analysis, it seems a bit skewed. Difficult to determine which file is which, too.
If your claims were true, then maybe MS wouldn't be on the whole "Digital lifestyle" kick that Apple started. On top of which, you obviously cared enough to attempt a response. An attempt at comedy, is not, however, comedy.
So, you've now talked yourself in a circle. You started out by insinutating that "symbols" are bad, then you admit to being a "symbol" type yourself. So, what are you saying?
Especially in this sentance: "...which just reiterates what everyone of any mind has known since Apple because a company..."
It's all fixed, so what are you babbling about? This is in regards to Recordable DVDs at 2x and 4x, not any "new DVD". Pioneer came out with the fix for this a couple of weeks ago too. So, again, what the hell are you babbling about?
Nicely put. It is amazing what happens when one actually follows the links and reads the page. You are 100% correct and the poster of this particular story and the moron that posted it for them should probably verify the stories once in a while before putting them up.
Ignorance flows of you like the robes of some old somebody or other...
Come on, there was no name attached to the MS "ad". The author was divulged due to a mistake by the author leaving their name in the Word data. This is nothing like the Apple switch ads. The article you mentioned never went anywhere in the last two months because the writer found nothing and didn't responsibly follow up with a retraction to the suggestion of wrongdoing that he invented. This is the fault of a bad "journalist" looking for a story to make himself with. Too bad for them, it failed miserabley. Just like your lame little attempt here to dig it back up again after all this time.
Slashdot Mirror
You've apparently never seen Mayhew. He's a very distinctive looking fellow and regardless of who does the make-up, Chewie doesn't look like other Wookies because of who is under the make-up.
Episodes 7, 8 and 9 are supposed to deal with a character that is supposed to be introduced in Episode 3. These episodes will take place after the New Jedi Order series. That allows for Lucas to use the original stars (Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Mayhew, etc.) and place them into the timeline approximately 30 years after A New Hope which is right around the end of the Yuuzhan Vong series (NJO). This is perfect. In 2007 these performers will be 30 years older than they were when they took the roles in the first place. This gives a lot of credibility to the whole concept.
No, no books yet. But back in the day Lucas always claimed that this was a nine part story.
It seems that it is you that's hiding... Geez, you've really got some issues, don't you?
There's no mention of the price that it will hit...
April 28, 2003.
Aren't they going to jump on the bandwagon with everybody else?!?!?!?
So, where did they get these figures? Would it appear that you deleted all your music files on a P2P if you disabled the shared folder? If that's the case, it sounds more like a lot of people stopped sharing their music and the spin of the report is that they deleted all their files.
Sounds like the same concept, only in the correct order...
Now, that I would go out to see.
This is such a load. Why has everybody that's reporting on this story giving out so much misinformation?
The tracks are STARTING at $0.79 with many over $0.99. There a Missy Elliot track that goes for $1.79 for Gods sake!!!
The albums are STARTING at $7.95 with many over $11.99.
Are all reporters suffering from the NY Times syndrome or what?!?!?!?!?!?
Wow, if it's true, we could get a whole new anti-trust suit going.
AAC is superior to MP3. Simple enough. Outside of that, I don't care too much about your analysis, it seems a bit skewed. Difficult to determine which file is which, too.
I got mine without any troubles...
Well, this has only been in the rumor mills for about three months now. I guess you feel even more stupid than you already did, now, don't you?
Bwahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahaha!!!!!!
Gotta bear in mind that you are running on a G3 processor in the iBooks and not a G4. Substantial speed differences come between the two.
If your claims were true, then maybe MS wouldn't be on the whole "Digital lifestyle" kick that Apple started. On top of which, you obviously cared enough to attempt a response. An attempt at comedy, is not, however, comedy.
So, you've now talked yourself in a circle. You started out by insinutating that "symbols" are bad, then you admit to being a "symbol" type yourself. So, what are you saying? Especially in this sentance: "...which just reiterates what everyone of any mind has known since Apple because a company..."
Preach on brother. It's unfortunate that most people rely on the media for their information as the media just doesn't get it in the first place.
Then they use any number of superior alternatives. Like, Netscape, Eudora, Appleworks or just about anything other than Microshaft products.
Please expand on your description. Where were you pulling the data from? I want to try this.
It's all fixed, so what are you babbling about? This is in regards to Recordable DVDs at 2x and 4x, not any "new DVD". Pioneer came out with the fix for this a couple of weeks ago too. So, again, what the hell are you babbling about?
Nicely put. It is amazing what happens when one actually follows the links and reads the page. You are 100% correct and the poster of this particular story and the moron that posted it for them should probably verify the stories once in a while before putting them up.
Ignorance flows of you like the robes of some old somebody or other... Come on, there was no name attached to the MS "ad". The author was divulged due to a mistake by the author leaving their name in the Word data. This is nothing like the Apple switch ads. The article you mentioned never went anywhere in the last two months because the writer found nothing and didn't responsibly follow up with a retraction to the suggestion of wrongdoing that he invented. This is the fault of a bad "journalist" looking for a story to make himself with. Too bad for them, it failed miserabley. Just like your lame little attempt here to dig it back up again after all this time.