Slashdot Mirror


User: Elminst

Elminst's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
405
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 405

  1. Re:This is bad... on ThePirateBay Will Rise Again? · · Score: 1

    In the interest of fairness, I have now registered NinjaBay.org... ;)

  2. Re:Photo Op? on Refund of Long-Distance Telephone Taxes · · Score: 1

    Does that include Texas?
    If so, go for it!

  3. Re:Bingo! on Soldiers Bond with Bomb-Defusing Robots · · Score: 1

    Me, I think it's useful when we don't have American secrets for reporters to divulge...
    I prefer accountability to ignorance.

  4. Re:20 days to get a number from them on Ahead of IPO, Vonage Faces User Complaints · · Score: 1

    I know you're trolling (and cowardly, at that), but I'll bite.
    I don't work in Rochester. Each Division is an individual entity, and handles management, equipment and resources differently. All I know is that sort of thing doesn't happen up here. YMMV.

  5. Re:20 days to get a number from them on Ahead of IPO, Vonage Faces User Complaints · · Score: 1

    That 20 days to port the number has nothing to do with TimeWarner. That delay is ALL on Vonage's side. We request the number, they take 20 days to give it to us. Frontier takes 14, and sells your number first. Verizon takes 7 (11 if you have DSL).

    And the price for digital phone isn't meant to compete with Vonage. It's competing with the local telcos, where it is provably cheaper.

  6. 20 days to get a number from them on Ahead of IPO, Vonage Faces User Complaints · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work for TimeWarner cable. We've got the digital phone product (not true voip, btw, but voip thru the cable system before it's handed off to Sprint).
    We are happy to port numbers from other providers... the "normal" is 7 business days to get the number from Verizon.
    It takes TWENTY business days to port a number from Vonage. That's a full calendar MONTH.
    And they have the balls to bitch about telcos dragging their feet??

    At least they don't do what Frontier (smaller local telco in upstate NY) does; Give/Sell your number to telemarketers before porting it! Nothing like a little "fuck you!" as you leave them...

  7. Re:Fragile Internet? No... on BlueSecurity Fall-Out Reveals Larger Problem · · Score: 1

    When your empty, parked car rolls down a hill and damages a house, aren't you still liable?

    Ahh.. but this is not the same....
    this is more like; you park your car on the street and leave the keys in it. Someone comes up, hops in and drives off with your car, then uses it to smash into a bank.

    you are not responsible for their commiting a crime, whether they did it with your car or not.

    Yes, you're an idiot for leaving your keys in it, but you are not commiting the crime. the person that stole your car is.

    Ahh... the never ending stream of "computer is like a car" analogies...

  8. Re:From their Website on Blue Security Gives up the Fight · · Score: 1

    If I had points, you'd get one...
    that made me lol.

  9. Re:Thank god! on Trojan Deletes Your Porn, Music & Warez · · Score: 1

    Seeing yourself in the mirror of the bathroom in your mom's basement doesn't count...

  10. Re:Virtual machines on Trojan Deletes Your Porn, Music & Warez · · Score: 1

    Much of the documentation I download is infected

    Ahh... I see you also use "documentation" as a euphamism for pr0n... ;)

  11. Re:The only thing they forget is on A Solar Race Around the World · · Score: 1

    Because everything the government says is true, right?

  12. Re:What nonsense on What Happened to Blue Security · · Score: 1

    BTN = Beyond The Network
    They are a tier 1 provider; Headquartered in HongKong/USA
    http://www.btnaccess.com/

  13. Re:?H?uh??? on What Happened to Blue Security · · Score: 1

    Sibling post to me is correct.
    I see this problem in both FF at home and work, and IE at work.
    all the apostrophe's are showing as ?'s
    They've got bad code.

  14. Re:So, is the database compromised? on BlueSecurity Database Compromised? · · Score: 1

    I am a BlueFrog user, and I did NOT receive any email like this.
    So either;
    1. The spammer is full of crap.
    2. They spammed every address they already have as a scare tactic. (see #1)
    3. they broke SOME of the database, which is not good.

    My money is on 1 or 2.

  15. Re:This might be for real on World's Largest Pyramid Discovered in Bosnia? · · Score: 1

    So why is none of this "proof" posted or printed anywhere for any one else to see? IANAA, but the images presented on the website don't look "man-made" to me.
    And anyone who has seen erosion tunnels can tell what made that hole in the ground; water. Look at that soil, it's not rock. It's an amalgamation of dirt and small stones. See how the stones have collected near the center depression of the "tunnel"? Go look at a dried up creekbed, you'll see the same thing. If a person built that tunnel, would he leave all those annoying rocks right in the middle where his hands and knees are going to go? Not likely.

  16. translation on Intel Admits To Falling Behind AMD · · Score: 1

    he also suggested that Intel's recent market share losses... were in line with historical variations which tracked to Intel's product generations."

    corporate-speak translation- "Yeah we always lose money when we make shitty product and bad decisions, this ain't new."

  17. Re:Monkeys monkey with the monkeys on An Alternate Human · · Score: 1

    Which is still nowhere near the "100 million years" of the original poster...

  18. Re:Monkeys monkey with the monkeys on An Alternate Human · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to go back to school...
    Humans have not been around for anywhere near 100 million years.

    The longest estimates have humans as a species (Homo Sapiens) arriving around 50 thousand years ago. Some early hominids may have existed as much as 700 thousand years ago. But even that is fraction of what you suggest.

    We're barely even a speck at the end of the earth's timeline.
    Here's a fun analogy - http://jersey.uoregon.edu/~mstrick/AskGeoMan/geoQu erry16.html

  19. Re:Ah, I found them on the ubuntu wiki! on Planning Dapper +1, The Edgy Eft · · Score: 1

    OMG POnies!!!1

    (if ever there was a time for this post, this is it ;) )

  20. Re:I don't see what they mean on What Do You Think of the 'Hitman' Ad? · · Score: 1

    Mildly off topic, but I just saw a standup show from Carlos Mencia last night on Comedy Central. Besides being fucking hysterical, one of his main points was just what you said; You want equal rights, then don't complain when we treat you just like everyone else.

  21. Re:real.com WTF? on MySpace Makes it to Top 10 Internet Sites · · Score: 1

    Hey now!
    That's an insult to King's Quest!!
    *thinks back to days of flipping 5.25" floppies in and out of his apple IIc*

  22. Re:Personal Experience on When Telecom Mergers Hit Home · · Score: 1

    I think it's been said... but Slashdot needs a "Groan" moderation. The question is whether it should be +1 or -1... :)

  23. Re:Has to be said... on The Call Girl Character Class · · Score: 1

    Unlike the bash entry, his link has ALL the cyber exploits of boodninja. Not just the britney one.

  24. Re:Phone number on VOIP Cell Phones Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    The point of this is so that you can use your cell phone when you are NOT in range of the cell network... So having the phone always connect to the cell network defeats one of the main purposes of this technology.

    FireFury03 already gave a more clear explanation of what I was trying to say.

  25. Re:Phone number on VOIP Cell Phones Coming Soon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I just realized that my comment doesn't really address your real concern; that the internet carriers are going to want a piece of the pie for carrying data for the cell phone carriers.
    The upside is that many of them are owned by the same people, eg. Cingular is owned by ATT & BellSouth. Verizon is, well, Verizon.

    Although it's mentioned in the article that "internet minutes" may be cheaper that "cell tower" minutes because wifi radio spectrum and the internet are cheaper than running cell towers.

    But the problem comes when you're not at home. Pop down to the coffee shop and start talking on your cell phone using the wifi hotspot. You pay the cell company less... but who pays the internet bill for your cell traffic?

    Sounds like a new level of peering agreement wars... Yay.