Slashdot Mirror


ThePirateBay Will Rise Again?

muffen writes "IDG.se has an interesting article up giving more details about the raid on PirateBay, and a little history of the organization. The news organ reports that nearly 200 servers were taken, and many of them had nothing to do with the torrent-serving group. After yesterday's raid, the site is back up with a single page explaining the situation. Brokep, one of the people behind PirateBay, claims that the site will be up and running within a couple of days. He also says that there is no legal basis for the raid against them and that he is certain that the case will not go to trial." From the site: "The necessity for securing technical evidence for the existence of a web-service which is fully official, the legality of which has been under public debate for years and whose principals are public persons giving regular press interviews, could not be explained. Asked for other reasoning behind the choice to take down a site, without knowing whether it is illegal or not, the officers explained that this is normal."

465 comments

  1. Cross Link & Clickies by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    I know that yesterday's article is most likely linked above but I would like to point out Christian Engström's post (the vice chairman of the Piratpartiet) which was in reply to my own post.

    I myself live in America and the only way I can find information on this political party is online. I wish that there were more official resources in English aside from their site. There seems to be one page with the content exactly the same as Christian Engström's post.

    Is it possible that this party is popular via lack of information? I would like to see them explain their strategy & give very detailed specifics about what they would like to see changed and why. I think that if this was posted, it may cause them to lose some support but would definitely let Sweden & the rest of the world know a lot more about the Pirate Party. I like their desired end results but how to plan to achieve these goals?

    I don't want to sound like an ass but in my opinion, having 200 servers of a controversial party raided and confiscated by the local government is one of the best things that could happen to said party. Especially since nothing incriminating was found on them. Do political parties now earn "street cred" like this? Certainly would strike a chord with the youth & idealists.
    Asked for other reasoning behind the choice to take down a site, without knowing whether it is illegal or not, the officers explained that this is normal.
    Hmmm, sounds like pretty unlawful search and seize action ...

    Dennis: Come and see the corruption inherent in the system. Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    King Arthur: *seizes the servers* Bloody file sharers!
    Dennis: Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about! Did you see him repressing me? You saw him, Didn't you?
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Popular via lack of information? It's a Swedish party, for Swedes. If you can't read Swedish, you probably won't be able to vote for them either.

      And that's the way it is. There's plenty of information there, but it's in Swedish.

    2. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by psergiu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We would very much like such a party in Romania. It would be hugely popular in the wake of the lastest events: In order to please the EU, the police concluded that all computers connected to local unregistered LANs are used for hosting/trading illegal software/movies/mp3s and began breaking the doors and seizing the computers of anyone not connected to the Cable operators who "sponsored" this operation.
      Link Here (in romanian - but the picture is worth a thousands words)
      The jail term for software piracy in romania is up to 15 years (more than rape) and in a few days the police arrested almost 100 people for this - with the only proof being an IP address.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    3. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True, fellow coward (or paranoid person on an unsecure terminal, like myself. I'm "kinkoblast", but to paranoid to log in) however international support is always good. Also, more brains generaly is equil to more good ideas (and more crap), so it might be to their advantage to encourage non-Swedes to take an interest. Also, their goal is relevent to other nations, too, so encourageing simmiler groups to form in other nations is also a good thing.

    4. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Ossifer · · Score: 3, Funny

      A møøse once bit my sister.

    5. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by udoschuermann · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, sounds like pretty unlawful search and seize action
      IANAL, but United States law has a provision that states you are "innocent until proven guilty". The onus is on the accuser to gather sufficient evidence to prove your guilt.

      Many other countries do not have this, so you could call in an anonymous report to the police that so-and-so has been using drugs or has nasty stuff on their computer or whatever and it is then up to the victim to prove somehow that the allegations are false.

      Where does Sweden fall with respect to this?
      --
      --Udo.
    6. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ø doesn't sound like oo. It sounds like the wovel the Queen of Britain would make if she said "Word. Bird. Nerd. Heard. Turd." And swedes don't write Ø anyway, only danes and norwegians do. They write ö (o with two dots) instead, like the germans.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    7. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Oldsmobile · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Hmmm, sounds like pretty unlawful search and seize action ... "

      Though I am not an expert on Swedish law, I doubt there was anythign exactly illegal in this operation, though it was obviously heavy handed. European law works quite differently compared to US law, so any comparisons are useless.

      If there was no reason for this seizure, of course compensation will be paid and if the evidence used to justify it was flawed or faked or the wrong kind, senior police officers may or may not face disiplinary action.

      Of course, the police in Sweden have been caught lying and faking evidence before, such as when covering their backs after shooting someone (who was unarmed) in Gothernburg during a demonstration there a few years back.

      I'm not sure how that ended up.

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    8. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Ossifer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Typiskt svenskt! Ni svenskar som saknar sinne för humor (dvs alla) kan inte låta bli att visa upp det för hela världen. Om du verkligen ska klaga på mitt inlägg, skall du klaga på Monty Python.

    9. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by wheany · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure how that ended up.

      The guy is still dead.

    10. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think all democratic societies have that policy. I know Sweden does

    11. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by ozamosi · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Piracy Party has stated that one of their goals is to get into EU, and to get there, they want to help out starting Piracy Parties all over Europe. So you (or other persons interested) should probably contact them if you want to start one in your country.

    12. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Xymor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should just move their server to Sealand.

    13. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Vintermann · · Score: 3, Funny

      Translated: "Typically swedish! You swedes who lack a sense of humour (that is, all of you) can't help but showing it to the entire world. If you really want to complain about my post, you should complain about Monthy Python."

      I'm not swedish, and my reply was an attempt to ... well, forget it, you're swedish, aren't you? You won't get it ;-)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    14. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o rly?

    15. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by wheany · · Score: 1

      Heh, you used an internet catchphrase!

    16. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Big torpedo.

      "We were informed there were insurgents on that platform."

    17. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Ossifer · · Score: 1
      I'm not swedish, and my reply was an attempt to ... well, forget it, you're swedish, aren't you?
      Nope, not Swedish either. Not that there's anything wrong with it... Of course there are worse things to be, Norwegian, for example...

      Take a look at: http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/grail/g-titles.htm
    18. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by clickclickdrone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      IANAL, but United States law has a provision that states you are "innocent until proven guilty".

      There is an amendment: "Unless you look a bit dark, enjoy towels as a fashion accessory or take pictures in public or have been abroad in which case you can be locked up indefinitely just in case you met an evildoer and became tainted"

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    19. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny fact: in correct (germanic) pronounciation, møøse acutally is a very colloquial (and rude) word for vagina.
      Which makes your sentence much more funny.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    20. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by flumps · · Score: 1

      He was joking, its a reference to Monty Python and the Holy Grail's opening credits.

      Now, moving to something on topic: Arr we should make 'em eat their own lips.. arr.

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    21. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by flumps · · Score: 2, Funny

      * N.B. Please note that dressing up as a pirate is not really required.

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    22. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by extintor · · Score: 1

      And again I'll have to point out.
      Thepiratebay and the pirate party are two different things. Completely different.
      The pirate party was not raided. prq (the isp of thepiratebay) and Rix|Port80 was raided.
      So are we clear ?

    23. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Möse", OTOH, will make some Germans laugh. :)

    24. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Okay, forgive me, but why have I seen this "møøse" thing twice in the past few days? I have a feeling I'm missing out on a Slashdot-meme I'm not familiar with...

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    25. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was not 200 servers from the pirate party. Those 200 servers was from the customers of the ISP PRQ.

      Yes, that is right. The police raided a colocation facility where piratebay was hosted, along with around 200 other servers belonging to many different clients (companies, private persons, etc), and just took it all! Many companies are paralyzed after this, their webpages does not work, their email is down, etc.

      This is one of the biggest attacks on free speech/press in a very long time here!

      Just imagine if your server at your local colocation company was stolen by the police just because the company also colocated a bittorrent tracker. Or imagine if you owned a company that did colocation for others, just because there is a bittorrent tracker there they take 200 of your clients servers that has nothing to do with piratebay.

    26. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close. Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Watch it.

    27. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by flobberchops · · Score: 1

      I lived in Sweden and its not my native language and I have the right to vote as do many ex-pats, you are so narrowminded, that is one thing I did learn about alot of Swedish people. Intolerant, narrow and materialistic and selfcentered.

    28. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Hast · · Score: 1
      Of course, the police in Sweden have been caught lying and faking evidence before, such as when covering their backs after shooting someone (who was unarmed) in Gothernburg during a demonstration there a few years back.

      The only person I know that was shot during those demonstrations survived. (But that's really a reply to the other replies here.)

      The guy shot was throwing cobble stones at the police. (Though he wasn't even close of hitting them.) Not that this justifies the shooting or the forgery of evidence.

      It was brought up on quite a lot of news during the time though. I'm not sure what happened with the officer but I wouldn't be surprised if he was "let go".
    29. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Hinhule · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_during_the_E U_summit_in_Gothenburg_2001

      The part you asked about:
      Heavy rioting broke out and a smaller group of police officers were subjected to a massive attack in which one of them was struck down. While defending their colleague, the other officers fired warning-shots with their sidearms. This halted the bulk of the attack. One attacker continued to throw rocks in the direction of the fallen policeman. Two officers fired at the rioter who was critically injured. Two other people received light injuries by ricochets.

      A criminal investigation against the police officers was opened but later closed as it found that they had acted in defence of the struck down officer. When more evidence became available in the form of video recordings, the investigation was re-opened twice and both times closed again as the ruling remained the same.

    30. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Btw. Here is some images from the colocation facility where the police took the 200 servers (most of the servers belonged to other clients and was unrelated to piratebay):

      http://82.99.25.142/prq/

    31. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys with the ski masks are the... police?

    32. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by trewornan · · Score: 1
      Of course, the police in Sweden have been caught lying and faking evidence before

      That's exactly right - of course. Police are human like the rest of us and all police forces do this kind of thing occassionally. It needs investigating and punishing when it happens but it's foolish to condemn a whole country's police force on the basis of a few incidents. If it happens a lot that's another matter.

      My guess (and that's all it is) is that the police were working within what they believed were their legal privileges on this occasion, however politically motivated it may have been at the top level.

    33. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by interlingua.ro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worse than that - they are the anti-terrorist unit. I guess you've heard this one before - filesharing is sponsoring terrorism.

    34. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by magetoo · · Score: 1
      [...]the police concluded that all computers connected to local unregistered LANs are used for hosting/trading illegal software/movies/mp3s and began breaking the doors and seizing the computers of anyone not connected to the Cable operators who "sponsored" this operation.
      [...]
      and in a few days the police arrested almost 100 people for this - with the only proof being an IP address.
      What IP address? 192.168.0.1? Or one of those weird local Windows ones?

      (Sorry. This does indeed look horrifying. Hope you get this fixed soon.)

    35. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by magetoo · · Score: 1
      It has already been posted that we do the same. However, I thought I'd mention the fact that we don't have all of the safeguards that are in place in places like the US; for example, anything that the police find as a result of the searches can be used to bring up unrelated charges. And that goes for wiretaps too, under the delicious name "surplus information".

      I'm not so well read on US law, but basically anything goes here. Hence this "we heard there were some shady things going on, so we thought we'd take a look" raid.

    36. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmmm, sounds like pretty unlawful search and seize action ...

      To be fair, the police are rarely ever certain that you've broken a law when they execute a search warrant. The purpose of a search warrant is, after all, to acquire proof of a suspected crime. The weight of that burden of proof differs from country to country. Regardless, I doubt that the Swedish police are required to prove with certainty that a crime is being comitted to obtain a search warrant - it's probably more along the lines of "reasonable suspicion".


      So yes, it might be more or less "normal" to confiscate servers without knowing for sure if the activities were illegal. Furthermore, the sentence in question is - at best - a synopsis of statements made by the police, and then translated to English by someone who A) probably isn't a native speaker and B) probably isn't dispassionate observer. I'm guessing that certain nuances may have been lost, but perhaps I'm just cynical.


      Not that this makes confiscating a slew of unrelated servers okay, mind you. The police are probably looking at it like this: if someone is killed in the kitchen, you get a warrant for the whole house, the suspect's office, etc. So if you think a crime was commited using even one server on the NOC, you get a warrant for the whole network. The consequences are stupid, but this is what *AA is counting on. If the police raid 2 servers, you might not be sure if they were right. But if the police raid 200 servers, clearly they must be getting the bad guys...

    37. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by esper · · Score: 1

      ...but does make it more fun.

    38. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by nilenico · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well.

      I just watched the Swedish news (01.06.2006 Rapport on SVT1). The Pirate Bay story was headlining, and what they said was this:

      (Paraphrasing, and forgive sloppy translations of departments and whatnot. Assume more or less Swedish equivalents.)

      The US organisations (*AA) had gone to the White House, to ask the White House to get something done about those evil Pirate Bay guys. The White House talked to the Swedish government.

      A delegation from Swedish Justice Department, Attorney General and police (or various types of the sort) went to the US and talked to the Americans. When they came back, they concluded that they had shaky legal grounds upon which to take action (this had been looked into closely by the Swedish Attorney General's office earlier), and they told the government so.

      Upon which they were ordered by the relevant Swedish minister of [something or other] to take action anyway. So they did.

      Conspiracy++?

      --
      .sig? No.
    39. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. In the US, the jail term for nearly *everything* is longer than for rape.

    40. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "IANAL, but United States law has a provision that states you are "innocent until proven guilty".

      There is an amendment: "Unless you look a bit dark, enjoy towels as a fashion accessory or take pictures in public or have been abroad in which case you can be locked up indefinitely just in case you met an evildoer and became tainted""

      It's good to be a member of an Red State armed militia preparing for the overthrow of the United States with assault weapons. Even if one of your members blows up a federal building, never will a single white, patriotic would-be government overthrower who associated with McVeigh see the inside of a jail cell. Or the cages in Cuba, which are of course reserved for towelheads. Only those who hate Jesus can be terarists.

    41. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Yes, police investigating themselves are addicted to the truth. And their comrades never lie.

    42. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Yup. The anti-terrorist squads, which we are always assured are to defend us against attackers who don't respect civilization, have once again had their mission redefined by a man on horseback. We feel so SAFE when the cops are wearing masks to defend our freedoms.

    43. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by HerrEkberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      He didn't die (out of pure luck), but was sent to prison.

    44. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by WhiteDragon · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    45. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Owy · · Score: 1

      This is a clasic case of misleading... 100 arested people, Oh come on...

      There was NO arrest done in Romania for filesharing, there were only a few (between 4 to 20 by some sources) houses raided by the police and some pc's confiscated (sometimes only the hdd's), so there was no one arested yet.
      And that picture is not apropriate cause it was made wen aresting some people who made money from seling pirated cd's/dvd's.

    46. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      >never will a single white, patriotic would-be government overthrower who associated with McVeigh see the inside of a jail cell

      Terry Nichols would like a word with you. Visiting hours vary, so call ahead.

    47. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya rly.

    48. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by the-intersocialist · · Score: 1

      The Swedish system of policemen investigating themselves is highly dubious. In the US, I have been told, they have special groups for internal investigation to avoid precisely this thing.

      Anyways, the swedish state television made an excellent documentary about this whole affair where they showed that the video used in court as evidence was "cut" so to make the attack on the police look more violent. The uncut edition showed the other protestors pulling back and this person advancing alone, whereas the police edition conviniently left out the part where the other protestors pulled back. They also applied a sountrack of shouting people that made it sound as if thousands of people where chanting slogans whereas noone was actually shouting anything.

      This was considered correct procedure by the swedish legal system. But what is to expect when the juries are elected politicans - are they supposed to rule that the police acting on their orders is wrong? That would not be in their best interest at all.

    49. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Sunt eu un haiduc... ;-)

      --
      So say we all
    50. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Hinhule · · Score: 1

      Sigh, yes I believe most of the police are honest.

      So the police have had cubic rocks raining down on them pretty much all day. If you were in that situation, your only defence, a plexiglass shield, a helmet, a baton and a gun. Would you not have been rather scared? Then your partner goes down, you fire warning shots and still one moron continues to throw rocks in the direction of the person who has gone down. I can just say, I would have done the exact same thing as the police officers who shot. The moron had his warning.

      Now, just 1 water cannon would probably have been enough to stop this when it started. Instead we ended up with a trashed main street in a big city, plenty of looting and rioting. Is this not argument enough that the police should have other tools at their disposal than guns? I believe it is, but the government doesn't want to.

      So don't be angry with the police, be angry with the politicians who do not give them the right tools for the job.

    51. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1

      If there was no reason for this seizure, of course compensation will be paid and if the evidence used to justify it was flawed or faked or the wrong kind, senior police officers may or may not face disiplinary action.

      This is not the US. In fact, Sweden has a completely different legal tradition from UK and the US - and so, very little that is true about the US legal system is the same in Sweden. (For example; we don't have common law, juries, or small claims court - and suing doesn't work the same way at all.)

      It is unlikely that there will be any compensation (not even for the companies that just happened to be hosted by PRQ too - though they will make a try). Disciplinary action is even more unlikely.

      OTOH our minister of justice is going to be investigated for his role in this action by the constitutional commitee of the parliament. (It's kinda like an impeachment, except any MP can demand an investigation, so investigations are pretty common.)

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
    52. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Funny fact: in correct (germanic) pronounciation, møøse acutally is a very colloquial (and rude) word for vagina.
      Which makes your sentence much more funny.


      Not for him, it does not.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    53. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by binarybum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is one thing I did learn about alot of Swedish people. Intolerant, narrow and materialistic and selfcentered."

        perhaps you meant to say "that is one thing I did learn about alot of people. Intolerant, narrow and materialistic and selfcentered."

            alot of people are like that, period. No political or geographical domain is exempt from this inevitable curse of humanity.

      --
      ôó
    54. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by xarak · · Score: 1

      Swedes have a lot of extraordinary qualities, but they are not (compared to say the Brits) a hugely funny people. Which is not the same as not having a sense on humour: Swedes are huge fans of humour, they're just not very good at making it themselves.

      There's globalisation for you: export trucks and import humour.

      Disclaimer: I'm Swedish myself

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
    55. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Bite my shiny metal derrierre for not resisting a Dracula pun, but it's times like this you wish those cannibal stories about Vlad The Impaler were actually true; it'd drive a stake through an errant police system if regular citizenry had enough fangs to raise a garlic stink about these blood-suckers. There is, sadly, no other silver bullet,

      Okay, so it wasn't outrageously punny.

    56. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by Knuthulu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats true, we have the same word in Norway. Actually the word is "mus", which means "mouse". So if you say "mus" to a person from Scandinavia, he/she will assume you are talking about the little mammal, the computer-mouse, or a vagina.

      It`s about as rude as saying "pussy" in England/USA I imagine. If you want to be really rude you`d say "fitte", which would be the equivalent to "cunt".

      Other norwegian/swedish names for the female genitalia might be kusa, musa, dåsa, slusa, rotta, skjura, skrevet, innovertiss, jentetiss, skjødet, det-du-vet, der nede, nedentil, underlivet, pølsebua, sædbanken, kremkonteiner, fiskeslohølet, penisholder, kukkvarmer, kjøttkløfta,elskovshulen, himmeriket, kjærlighetstunnelen, honninggrotta, det sorte hull. sprekken, musehullet, Grand Canyon ( I suppose thats an internation one eh) , hangaren, høna, indrefileten, rekefabrikken, fiskesuppa, tunnelen, blomsten, glufsa etc ad nauseam.

      Useful words to know if you ever plan to visit here, or if you just want to impress (or freak out) the hot blonde swedish woman living next door.

      I taught a "learn how to use a computer" type of class once, with mostly women between 30 and 50 years as students. The book we used in class had a chapter named "Learn how to use the mouse"...

      Based on that experience I dare say that women have a far filthier sense of humour than most men. ^_^

    57. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Only on Slashdot can you be assured of finding two non-Swedes with a command of Swedish.
      I didn't know very many non-Swedes worldwide studied the language, but I guess so.

      Here, let me try to play this game:
      Bonjour, je me demande s'il y a des américains ici qui parlent français.

    58. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by mpe · · Score: 1

      The US organisations (*AA) had gone to the White House, to ask the White House to get something done about those evil Pirate Bay guys. The White House talked to the Swedish government.
      A delegation from Swedish Justice Department, Attorney General and police (or various types of the sort) went to the US and talked to the Americans. When they came back, they concluded that they had shaky legal grounds upon which to take action (this had been looked into closely by the Swedish Attorney General's office earlier), and they told the government so.
      Upon which they were ordered by the relevant Swedish minister of [something or other] to take action anyway. So they did.
      Conspiracy++?


      Sounds more like "High Treason". Since a member of the Swedish government apparently went out of their way to put the interests of foreigners over those of Swedes.

    59. Re:Cross Link & Clickies by mpe · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but United States law has a provision that states you are "innocent until proven guilty". The onus is on the accuser to gather sufficient evidence to prove your guilt.

      The US looks very good on paper. But the acuall practice does not always appear to follow this route, with this being rather more relevent than how things "should" happen.

  2. PirateBay will rise again? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    This looks like a job for Captain Copyright!

    Seriously - of course the pirate bay will rise again - what they were doing was not illegal under Swedish law.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Seriously - of course the pirate bay will rise again - what they were doing was not illegal under Swedish law.

      What makes you believe this?

    2. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because the average torrent user is an expert on Swedish law and ThePirateBay, who are a group of well respected Swedish lawyers, said so, so it must be true!

    3. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Ithika · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you should tell the people at http://www.google.se/ that directing people to copyrighted works is illegal in Sweden.

    4. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's just a little bit of difference between google and torrent trackers... but I'm sure you have some cute little nuanced opinion as to why they're exactly the same.

    5. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Is hosting torrent files legal in the US then?

    6. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what they were doing was not illegal under Swedish law

      There is one law and that is the law of the US dollar. Democracy? Sovereign nations? Open your eyes!

      Sweden is an outpost in the US empire, just like any other nation in this world. "Why do they hate us?" We hate you because you're our slave masters. You're "spreading democracy", but we're not allowed to vote in the US, the only place where it could have mattered. And in the US, your only choice is to vote for the Republicrats.

      Capitalism equals plutocracy.

    7. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      So, did you enjoy your freshman year of college? Sounds like you read some intersting books!

      Angst angst!

    8. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      ThePirateBay, who are a group of well respected Swedish lawyers, said so, so it must be true!

      *sighs* The piratebay have legal advice saying its OK to link to torrents.

      I haven't seen any legal opinions to the contrary (other then from the IFPI, who said it may be a "contributing infringment").

      Remember this is a country where personal downloads where not illegal until a year ago....

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    9. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not according to the **AA's interpretation of the DMCA, however, such files were NOT being hosted in the US.

    10. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will, we still hate you.

    11. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The logic is inconsistent.

      The argument was that if google.se is legal under Swedish law, then The Pirate Bay must also be legal.

      According to this logic, if google.com is legal under US law, any US torrent hosting site must also be legal.

    12. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Xymor · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but this sorta reminds me of Comunist Propaganda...

    13. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please. Their "legal advice" consists of a law student.

      Real legal experts has been all over the news outlets in Sweden saying that some people responsible for TPB will probably do some hard time for facilitating copyright infringement. Check cs.idg.se or expressen.se.

    14. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by dwandy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They might as well charge them with speeding on the information superhighway ...

      The mpaa (pdf warning) press release is the usual drivel:

      The operators of The Pirate Bay have publicly ridiculed copyright holders and taunted law enforcement for years claiming immunity to copyright laws.
      Hate to break it to the spinster who wrote this, but it does appear (though IANASL) that their actions were not illegal in Sweden, and it seems to me that PB never said they were immune to copyright law; just that their specific actions didn't fall under that particular law in their particular country.

      Like I said ... might as well charge them with speeding; it's equally related.

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    15. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by tcoady · · Score: 1

      It's a pity you they can't receive the votes on where the story line is going next:
      This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

      Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

              captain@captaincopyright.ca

      Technical details of permanent failure:
      PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for captain@captaincopyright.ca

    16. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Just about all links on the internet go to copyrighted material.

      Hint, read slashdot's footer! ;)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    17. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1
      IANAL, but my understanding of the difference between Google and a tracker under US law is the intent. Google has no intent to assist in the unlawful distribution of copyrighted material, it just indexes whatever it happens to find.

      Many trackers on the other hand exist solely to assist in the unlawful distribution of copyrighted material. Yes, I understand that there are trackers out there that offer completely lawful downloads, but we are only concerned with those that offer unlawful downloads for this discussion.

    18. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "This looks like a job for Captain Copyright!"

      You'd think Captain Copyright would be the last person to lift the Cybrus Industries logo.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    19. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by jafac · · Score: 1

      Just like what George Bush is doing is not technically illegal under US law!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    20. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Seriously - of course the pirate bay will rise again - what they were doing was not illegal under Swedish law.

      So ?

      The question isn't if they did anything wrong, or even if they did anything illegal; what matters is do they have more money and power than whatever organization is using police to attack them. Trusting the rule of law is a mistake when your enemy is powerfull enough to bend the rules to their favor, and as this case shows, legal harrassment is pretty efficient tactic as well.

      What really annoys me is that the whole society is being dictated to by the entertainment industry - the most useless sector of all industry.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Danse · · Score: 1

      According to this logic, if google.com is legal under US law, any US torrent hosting site must also be legal.

      Umm. No. US Law and Swedish law are different, so you can't compare the two situations. It's quite possible that according to US law, google.com and a torrent site are very different, while Swedish law considers them to be basically the same.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    22. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by odourpreventer · · Score: 1
      what they were doing was not illegal under Swedish law.

      But the question is: For how long will it stay legal? We (Sweden) have government elections in September so until then things will stay the same, but I'm wondering how soon after that the laws will change.

    23. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by hevenor · · Score: 1

      I think in this case me might be looking for the most famous Swedish pirate of them all: Ragnar Dannekjöld

    24. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by pretorious · · Score: 1

      I am an American, and I could not agree with the above statement more. Wasn't it the MPAA that shut down suprnova?

    25. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      The difference between Google and a torrent tracker is the tracker is usually run by students who can afford at most one or two lawyers, whereas Google can afford half the lawyers in the US at need.

      The difference is that Google makes billions of dollars and employs thousands of people, which generates tax revenue, whereas torrent trackers do not generate government revenue.

    26. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1
      OK, hypothetical time, in the same vein as Google vs. BT Tracker:

      While its spiders are crawling the web, Google indexes a website that traffics in child porn. Before Google is made aware of this so that they can remove it from their index, and report the site to the proper authorities, someone uses Google to find the site.

      Are you still going to tell me that the difference between Google and the scum running the site is the number of lawyers? I know it's popular on /. to disparage wealthy corporations, but come on...

      Google happened to crawl a disgusting site. If given the chance I have no doubt that it would be reported and removed from the index. Those running the offending site on the other hand have no intention removing the content and should be taken out and shot.

    27. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Claiming the law doesn't apply to you doesn't make breaking the law techically legal. It didn't work for Nixon. Cheney worked for Nixon, and he still believes that the law is what the President says it is. He was wrong then and he is wrong now. Thing is, they have Gonzales as AG, and he wrote the book on the Royal Presidency.

      It's not that it's legal. It's just that they've installed their own sheriff. Who apparently asked Sweden to raid PirateBay. Isn't it great how everything's connected?

    28. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Trusting the rule of law is a mistake when your enemy is powerfull enough to bend the rules to their favor

            Or powerful enough to spell powerful with 2 "l"'s...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    29. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Or powerful enough to spell powerful with 2 "l"'s...

      See ? I'm doing it, and I can only shudder to think what the RIAA could do...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "fascist propaganda". Communists believe in sharing. It's fascists (corpratists) that believe in private property, including intellectual property.

    31. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which just goes to show many Swedish law professors & talking heads will bend over and take one for the team, provided the MPAA/RIAA throws enough money at them.

      All the "real legal experts" in the world can say X is true, but it still doesn't make X true, no matter how well they've been paid to hold that opinion.

    32. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swedish Copyright Law may well have a lacuna in the law so far as file sharing goes, and it may follow that the actions taken to remove the Pirate Bay site are in contradiction to Swedish law, but the internet transcends borders and the facilities that the Pirate Bay provides would not be permissible in many other legal territories. Leaving the US and DMCA aside, this is true of other European countries due to the EU copyright directive 2001/29/EC (N.B. not ratified by Sweden).

      The present case highlights a situation in international (and national) copyright law that has yet to be resolved. The key question that needs to be considered is:

      Is posting (c) material on the (international) web liable as a contributoty infringement under the law of other countries, even if it is permissible under local law ?

      After all, who is liable the downloader or the poster? Residents of countries with no (c) law may download as they wish. Surely the burden must be on US residents or residents of other European countries to be aware of their local laws and not to to download infringing material rather than on the posting site to be aware of the (c) of every nation with internet access.

      For those with a jurisprudential inclination, when does the copying occur... on request of the data to the Swedish server? on transmission to the local router? on writing to the users local hard disk?

      All of the above is interesting, and I'm an IP practioner, so I get paid to think about it (hence anonymity - spineless I know), but fundamentally you have to look at people's intentions when situations are complicated and in this case the Pirate Bay seems to carry huge amounts of content designed to allow people to watch films that are presently on release at the cinema, listen to music in the charts and to download commercially available software, all of which is available through legitimate routes, i.e. cinema tickets, CD sales, and your local computer store. Legal technicalities aside, I can't say I have that much sympathy.

    33. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that according to US law, google.com and a torrent site are very different, while Swedish law considers them to be basically the same.

      Indeed it is. It's possible that swedish law considers just about anything. However, I have yet to see any evidence that swedish law is different and does permit sites such as The Pirate Bay.

    34. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Danse · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is. It's possible that swedish law considers just about anything. However, I have yet to see any evidence that swedish law is different and does permit sites such as The Pirate Bay.

      I was just pointing out that your critique of his logic was flawed, and it is. We don't have authoritative answers, and we won't until this case goes to trial and is decided.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    35. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just rise again but probably be even more popular. Look at the publicity it's generating. It reminds people to tell other people about the site. I must have told at least two people who never heard of the site.

    36. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by init100 · · Score: 1

      Check cs.idg.se or expressen.se.

      It is funny that you mention expressen.se as a reliable source of information. Expressen is a major tabloid newspaper that are known to have made up stories in the past, so it is only fair to question its reliability.

    37. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Hate our government, sure, hate our country, fine. But you have no reason to blanketly hate the American people.

      I for one am American, and I hate our government and foreign policy.

    38. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Okay, what of trackers that have a similar policy where any copyright violating torrents are removed as soon as the copyright holder sends the site owner a request to take down the material?

    39. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1
      That is exactly my point. The majority of trackers out there have no intention of removing the offending material. Their intent is to facilitate the illegal download of copyrighted material. I'm not going to argue if this is right or wrong. I'm just looking at it from a legal vs. illegal point of view.

      As I said before, it comes down to intent.

    40. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by mpe · · Score: 1

      But the question is: For how long will it stay legal? We (Sweden) have government elections in September so until then things will stay the same, but I'm wondering how soon after that the laws will change.

      Depends who wins the election dosn't it... Maybe you'll get a bunch of patriots who will tell foreign associations where to stick it!

    41. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is. It's possible that swedish law considers just about anything. However, I have yet to see any evidence that swedish law is different and does permit sites such as The Pirate Bay.

      Why should the default be that something is (or should be) illegal?

    42. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing - In most countries we have a concept of civil liability for damages caused. Also in most countries that have signed the Berne copyright convention, deliberate breach of copyright is considered to be an act that causes financial harm to the legitimate copyright holder.

      Now, typically in civil liability cases, anyone who deliberately and knowingly assisted in causing harm is also liable. The pirate bay knowingly and deliberately assist in redistribution unauthorised of copyrighted works, and appears to exist solely for this purpose. This is different from search engines who, while they may occasionally link to copyrighted content, do not exist solely for this purpose. This is why search engines are legal in the US, whereas the copyright infringing torrent sites are not.

      Now, we're led to believe that copyright law in Sweden is different from the US. The only precedent I have seen on this matter is a 1999 case, that ruled that linking to copyrighted information was not illegal. However, it seems quite clear that a torrent tracker is different from a link. It is a key functional component in a totally automated system. There is a clear argument that this is deliberate contributory infringment. In addition to this, Swedish copyright laws changed last year.

      It may well be that torrent tracking sites are legal in Sweden. However, this doesn't appear to have any basis whatsoever, apart from The Pirate Bay's insistence that torrent tracking sites are legal. Nobody has been able to show any precedent. Many legal experts have stated that this is illegal. This is all however just a legal opinion.

      Now Slashdot comments seem to universally agree that The Pirate Bay is totally legal in Sweden. They may well be right, but why do they think this is that case when it isn't in other countries?

    43. Re:PirateBay will rise again? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Oh, and also, if dozens of people assure me that what I'm doing is illegal and I could be severely punished, I'd want some fairly conclusive proof that what I was doing was legal.

  3. This is bad... by Quintios · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the selling of Pirates is bad. The site should stay down!

    --
    Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
    1. Re:This is bad... by Clazzy · · Score: 1

      Surely it's a good thing? It will help solve global warming, making the world a better place!

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    2. Re:This is bad... by Billosaur · · Score: 1, Funny
      I think the selling of Pirates is bad. The site should stay down!

      But how can I fight the Ninjas if I can't buy Pirates? I have the right to buy Pirates! It's in the Constitution or something, I think...

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:This is bad... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree, the pirate slave trade is terrible. Not only are there jobless, legless, eyeless pirates walking the streets, but now they are being sold to the highest bidder for lowly jobs such as cleaning the plank, srubbing the poop deck and purifying the bilge filters with their tongues.

    4. Re:This is bad... by Elminst · · Score: 1

      In the interest of fairness, I have now registered NinjaBay.org... ;)

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    5. Re:This is bad... by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

      You too have been touched by the noodley appendage.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    6. Re:This is bad... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      For thematic correctness, Shouldn't that be theninjadojo.org?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    7. Re:This is bad... by SpiritusGladius1517 · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Ever since Aramis Ramirez was sold to the Cubs, they've stunk.

      --
      If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.
    8. Re:This is bad... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Bootlegs! They must be runnin' pirates!

      Hardly anyone remembers the apropos lines...

    9. Re:This is bad... by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Damn! You're so right...
      Anyone want a ninja domain name? :-P

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  4. Yeah! We can all pirate again! by stupidfoo · · Score: 1, Funny

    We can all freely download all those shows and movies and music and software produced by the companies represented by the RIAA and MPAA and BSA! We can continue this amazing paradox in which we bash the quality of their product while we spend exorbinent amounts of time and energy figuring out ways to get it quickly and freely!

    1. Re:Yeah! We can all pirate again! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quit your preaching stupidfoo.
      The software isn't shitty because it's downloaded for free.

      It's shitty because it was designed shitty.
      At my workplace we pay for Windows twice for each machine, and it still blows ass.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:Yeah! We can all pirate again! by Virak · · Score: 1

      Yeah! We can all pirate again!
      We could pirate anyways. Bittorrent isn't the only protocol out there, and TPB isn't the only tracker.

      We can all freely download all those shows and movies and music and software produced by the companies represented by the RIAA and MPAA and BSA!
      None of the stuff I pirate is produced by companies represented by the RIAA, MPAA, or BSA. There *is* other content out there, you know.

      We can continue this amazing paradox in which we bash the quality of their product while we spend exorbinent amounts of time and energy figuring out ways to get it quickly and freely!
      You think it takes any significant amount of effort?

    3. Re:Yeah! We can all pirate again! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      exorbinent amounts of time and energy figuring out ways to get it quickly and freely!

      Your name really suits you if you have trouble using bittorrent & the pirate bay huh?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Yeah! We can all pirate again! by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      A bit of a logic primer:

      Driving to a shop, spending 30 minutes or so for it, plus paying 20$ for a movie=="spend exorbinent amounts of time and energy" (hint: for most people, money== time and energy,too) to get it.

      Opening a bookmark, typing in a name, clicking on a link, finding the movie ready to watch after work== simple and easy.

      Maybe if there were an itunes for movies without DRM in retarted proportions (hint, idiots form movie companies: people just rip your dvds and p2p them, so _nobody_ wanting to pirate cares one bit if your stronger compressed (and usually thus worse looking) videos for download are DRMed or not)
      and non-idiotic price (half of a dvd at most (and even that only if its drm-free), as the quality is worse, no shelf-space renting needed, no margins for retailers,ect , no need to truck it across the contry,...
      the balance would shift.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Yeah! We can all pirate again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can continue this amazing paradox in which we bash the quality of their product while we spend exorbinent amounts of time and energy figuring out ways to get it quickly and freely!

      Is this an eloquent way of saying Linux is among the worst pieces of software in the industry, along with all other free software and freeware? I've been working with computers and software since I was about 6 years old, and after about 20 years, I've found that *drumroll* software quality is pretty much unrelated to whether it was produced by a commercial company and sold or not!

  5. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Quintios · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wait wait wait... Is the RIAA posting here now too?

    Anyone that grabs someone by the shirt in a store is going to get sued... I don't believe this story is credible. Plus, someone that sells christian music and calls a patron a "bitch". (Not that christians don't cuss, but again, if the guy is having problems clothing his kids I doubt he's scare off a customer.)

    --
    Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
  6. Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...alternatively assisting breach of copy-right law.

    Are they seriously saying that they are not guilty of this? They are guilty as hell in spirit if not by the letter of the law.

    1. Re:Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking, isn't it a good thing that our courts do not interpret the law based on the spirit rather than the letter?

    2. Re:Are they kidding? by Spad · · Score: 1

      The may be "guilty" of it, but there's no law in Sweden that prevents them from doing it.

    3. Re:Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with torrents or copyright violations and often download stuff I don't want to pay for (Photoshop CS2 springs to mind).

      I do have a problem with people pretending they are doing nothing wrong.

      They are assisting a huge number of people with copyright violations. They popularity of the internet and P2P networks happened so fast that laws have not been put into place yet. In most democratic countires it takes years to get new laws drafted and then passed through the govement to be signed into law.

      Remember, everything was legal at one point or another. Shit, where I live it is legal to have sex with 16 year old girls. Does that make it right, NO but if I did it I wouldn't pretend I was doign nothing wrong, I would simply state that it was legal and thus anyone who didn't like it could go to hell.

      It is not the act that bothers me but rather the attitude that they are somehow doing nothing wrong.

    4. Re:Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in my opinion.

      Generally speaking, they law says if you leave the keys in your car and I take it, I was only borrowing it without your consent (a fine and possibly community service). Generally speaking, the law says if a presidential canidate wins the right states, and loses the popular vote, he still wins the election. Generally speaking, the law says that I can follow you around, and unless you get a restrainig order, it is perfectly legal. Generally speaking, the law says you need to prove you feel threatened to to get a restrainig order.

      So no, I owudl rather the law be interpreted in the manner in which it was meant rahter then the manner it was written.

    5. Re:Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who made you the morality police? just because the american corporate-capitalist mindset believes in "intellectual property" (and in a very different way than the country's founders intended it) doesn't make it the one and only true moral mindset about the issue.

    6. Re:Are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, where I live it is legal to have sex with 16 year old girls.

      It is where I live (United Kingdom) too. I expect it is in lots of places.

      Does that make it right, NO

      Assuming both (or all) parties consent, why wouldn't it be right?

  7. "criminal police?" Oo by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    from TFS: Swedish National Criminal Police

    the police are criminal?
    well at least in sweden they tell it like it is.. i guess Oo

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:"criminal police?" Oo by Vintermann · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not the only departement title that comes out disturbing when translated to english. The new government in Norway changed the name of the Ministry of Education and Church Affairs to the Ministry of Knowledge. They then changed the official translation back to education, because they thought the latter sounded to Orwellian (which it does...)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:"criminal police?" Oo by Thorwak · · Score: 0

      :-)

      Someone did a babelfish-like translation of "kriminalpolisen" it seems (which would translate to "the criminal police" if doing it word bye word) :)

      Just like there is a trafikpolis ("traffic police", department(s) that handle traffic rules violations amongst others, not surprisingly) there also is a kriminalpolis.

      --
      Connection closed by foreign host.
    3. Re:"criminal police?" Oo by ai3 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Sweden, the criminals police you!!11!

    4. Re:"criminal police?" Oo by UpInTheClouds · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the investigation of the murder of Swedish PM Olof Palme that stopped short of actually investigating some suspicious people who happened to be members of the police force. Because, of course, it's impossible that the police would do something like that, you know, even if they are strongly politically opposed to the guy, and seen in strange places on the night of the murder.

    5. Re:"criminal police?" Oo by andersa · · Score: 1

      The problem is one of translation. In Norwegian the ministry is called Kunnskapsdepartementet. Denmark has a ministry that performs the same function which is called Videnskabsministeriet.

      Now, a direct translation of both Kunnskap and Videnskab is not really possible. There is no English word that has the exact same meaning. The closest translation into a using a single English word for Kunnskap or Videnskab would be Ministry of Knowledge, but as you point out it doesn't slip well off the tongue. A longer but more thruthful translation might be Ministry of matters in regard to knowledge.

      I guess Ministry of Education works better in English. :)

  8. Old troll - no longer amusing. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dude, that joke hasn't been funny for years. (I mean why didn't you pull out BSD is dying?)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Old troll - no longer amusing. by mcsestretch · · Score: 0

      Careful with this article, it's an antique!

    2. Re:Old troll - no longer amusing. by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  9. Regarding unlawful search and seize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pigs argue that since all seized servers were in the same serverhall, they could take whatever they wanted. We'll see how that plays out, I suspect they could technically be right even if it would violate the spirit of the law.

  10. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    What kind of idiot buys 1h of music on a disk, when they can get, legally or not, 16, without need to swap the disks? If you were selling vinyl records, you'd be just in the same situation. Compressionless music is in decline. Same as horse coaches replaced by trains. Piracy may have its hand in it but not as much as a source of -free- music but as a source of -music as mp3-.
    Damn me if I'm going to waste 60 megabytes of data storage space for one 3-minute song.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  11. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by mitch0 · · Score: 1

    Erm, nice sad story and all, but probably you should just realize that this will only get worse (from your perspective), so you'd better find another business model...

    just 2 random thoughts:
      - online music stores make a nice profit
      - CDs are overpriced

    regards,
    mitch

    ps: I know there's a fair chance that I'm replying to a troll, but what the heck ;)

    --
    // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
    // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
  12. Sounds familiar... by gasmonso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...the site will be up and running within a couple of days" Hmmm, thought I heard that once when ShareReactor got raided a couple years ago.

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference is TPB made boatloads of cash on all the porn ads which they now have safely stuffed away at cayman and swiss bank accounts. They'll just send their bitches to buy new servers, stack them in .

      No, I'm not kidding, there was a ruckus about this in sweden a couple of months ago. In sweden it's not considered cool to avoid paying taxes. Which mixes extremely bad against the socialist/syndicalist message the pirate bay is trying to deliver. But who'd expect them to live by their own rules.... they're communists after all.

      And no, this is not a troll. It's the unpleasant truth. Check it out yourself (especially if you're a sweden and about to mod this down.. ).

    2. Re:Sounds familiar... by pacroon · · Score: 1

      True - though they where, afaik, from the Netherlands.
      I've never seen a coalition of pirates like the Piratebay and Piratbyrån who believe in the radical changes needed in the world of media distribution, and fight for it with everything they got. Simon Moon is great, but I don't think he would challenge the 'oppressors' in a way that the TPB-crew has.

      I don't think we've seen the last of The Pirate Bay, and until it gets easier to buy media, than it is to steal it, they will probably be around.

      --
      It's all fun & games until someone loses the game.
  13. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    WHOOOSH!

  14. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This evening, my daughters asked me. "Why do the other kids laugh at us?"

    I wanted to tell them the truth - it's because they wear old clothes and have cheap haircuts. I can't afford anything better for them right now.

    "It's because they are idiots, kids", I told them. "Don't listen to them."

    When the kids went to bed, my wife asked me, "Will we be able to keep the house, David?"

    I just shook my head, and tried to hold back the tears. "I don't know, Jenny. I don't know."
    My grandparents and ancesters have been dirt farmers as far back as I know. Now I'm a computer programmer. Why? Because of corporate farming in America.

    Boo hoo.

    Do I cry that my 5th generation industry was stolen out from under my feet? Do I cry that my grandparents and parents endured hardships? No. They rolled with the punches and my dad worked construction/trucking. Maybe you should look into another industry. You smell the times changing, so react (you are allowed to do that, you know). Here's your plan: Get into another business and do it fast. You can keep your house if you're smart. No one is going to be crying over your family drama on Slashdot. Don't be emotionally soft and don't feel sorry for yourself. Pick yourself up and move on. Sell the store or change your business. It was a fun 12 years but the trend is over.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  15. They were ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Im sure the folks at TBP were totally prepared for this raid. Their hilarious abrasiveness in the face of criticism only angered and further instigated the detractors. I am confident this group had prepared statements, lawyers already ready for the case, and these guys knew exactly how to react.

    At least, I hope so.

    Best of luck to them

    1. Re:They were ready by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, they did have a lawyer, but I don't know if the lawyer had a lawyer of his own. The lawyer was one of those who got arrested and got his DNA(!) sampled.

    2. Re:They were ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is the xxAA will compare samples between everyone charged.

      Why? Well, they're searching for "The Pirate Gene" of course. Once they find it, it'll be easy enough to have their politicians pass laws requiring mandatory Piracy Inoculations for all citizens.

      (Consume)

    3. Re:They were ready by javaDragon · · Score: 1

      Their DNA? They want to clone them? How absurd! That would be a copyright violation!

      --
      -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
    4. Re:They were ready by init100 · · Score: 1

      I am confident this group had prepared statements

      I heard that during the police interrogation, one of them actually claimed to have murdered Swedish prime minister Olof Palme in 1986. This is quite obviously a joke (since those arrested are 20, 24 and 28 years old now, making them 0, 4 and 8 years old at the murder), but I'd say it takes quite some courage to say that to the police even if both they and you know that it's a joke.

  16. Don't make me ask by Fiznarp · · Score: 3, Funny

    The news organ reports

    Exactly where on the author's anatomy is this organ located?

    1. Re:Don't make me ask by risutora · · Score: 1

      I am Jack's news organ...

  17. MPAA by muffen · · Score: 5, Informative

    The MPAA's statement after the takedown of thepiratebay.

    Seems like Swedish authorities gave in to the pressure from **AA groups. This may be good as it will put the general public on the side of TPB.

    A poll in the largest evening newspaper in sweden shows what people think of the takedown of TPB. The question in the poll is, is it right to "attack" people that are involved in filesharing. Ja = YES and Nej = NO. The results speak for themselves.

    1. Re:MPAA by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is attack really the literal translation or are there some subtleties of language lost in the translation? "attack" seems like a loaded word to use in a poll, IMHO.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:MPAA by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Informative

      A better translation of "slå till mot" is "crack down on".

    3. Re:MPAA by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean like "theft" is a loaded term for copyright infringement?

    4. Re:MPAA by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did anyone else find it interesting that the MPAA only singled out porn ads when they talked about the ads used to make revenue. Why not just say "ads" and leave the christian-right fluff out of the press release? I'd say its because they are in an uphill battle, they know it, and they know that only a smear campaign that tries to mobilize the vocal religious minority will help them in the capitols. They're not fighting copyright infrigers, they're fighting porn pushers, and you'd better hide the women and children - for their safety of course. ...Well, ya got trouble, my friend - Right here, I say trouble right here in Sweden (River City)...

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:MPAA by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The results do speak for themselves. They say: "This is a web poll, and we have basically no control over who votes and how many times, nor did we pass Statistics 101 or know how to draw even vaguely scientific conclusions from the results."

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    6. Re:MPAA by milamber3 · · Score: 1

      The most inaccurate statment in that whole press release (of which there are many) is when they call "The Poseidon Adventure" a blockbuster! Seriously, that movie wont even make the directors salary back while it's in theatres.

    7. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't read Swedish, but I think I understand what they're saying here: http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789 ,834874,00.html

      USA:s filmindustri pressade svensk polis

    8. Re:MPAA by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      from the MPAA pdf:

      ....
      no safe harbors for Internet copyright thieves
      ....
      The major motion picture studios lost an estimated $6.1 billion to piracy in 2005. Internet
      piracy alone cost the studios $2.3 billion. The
      .....
      For more information, contact:
      MPAA Los Angeles
      Kori Bernards or Elizabeth Kaltman
      (818) 995-6600

      MPAA Washington, D.C.
      John Feehery or Gayle Osterberg
      (202) 293-1966


      I would really like some more information on this propaganda, and to share my views on this topic, if only there were a way to make free phone calls to US phone numbers from anywhere in the world with no way to trace where the phone call is coming from.........

    9. Re:MPAA by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Troll

      Unauthorized redistribution of copyrighted works is in violation of the Berne Convention, which Sweden is a signatory, so it IS illegal for Pirate Bay to do what they are doing. It doesn't matter what some polls say, unless they vote get Sweden to back out of that treaty, it is against the law.

    10. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The true translation would be some thing like "Is it acceptable to make raids against pirates" thats translating the meaning of the sentence and not the real words!

    11. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what a torrent is? It's a pointer, not the actual content. So it ISN'T illegal for Pirate Bay to do what they are doing. It does matter what some polls say and they won't have to vote to get Sweden to back out of that treaty because you are an asshole and don't understand the technology.

    12. Re:MPAA by retrosteve · · Score: 1

      ...and the rest of the page mentions the number who have voted -- over 96,600 at this time.

    13. Re:MPAA by wheany · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Blessed are those who quote themselves." - wheany

      Nobody is stealing stuff in USA and exporting it to Sweden. Even if distributing copyrighted data without permission could be considered theft, the people who "steal" it are just uploading a different file to Sweden. The "thief" holds the copyright to this data file and can do what ever he wants with it. The Swedes are just hosting a file whose copyright owner has given them permission to host it.

      The Swedes are doing nothing illegal. The original "thief" uploads the data directly to other "thieves." None of the data that is contained in the files that are being distributed without permission touches the Swedish server.

      That's what peer-to-peer networking is about.

    14. Re:MPAA by retrosteve · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unauthorized redistribution of copyrighted works is in violation of the Berne Convention

      I suppose that depends on how you define "redistribution". TPB was not distributing, simply linking to, copyrighted works.

      So does Google and every other search engine.

      Nice try.

    15. Re:MPAA by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      A poll [aftonbladet.se] in the largest evening newspaper in sweden shows what people think of the takedown of TPB. The question in the poll is, is it right to "attack" people that are involved in filesharing. Ja = YES and Nej = NO. The results speak for themselves.

      And these things could never be rigged, could they?

      Though I'm curious if that's the actual translation? It would be interesting to see the results if it was phrased like this: "Is it OK for the people who own copyrights to take pre-emptive measures to ensure that people aren't attempting to evade those copyrights?"

    16. Re:MPAA by Suzumushi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jeff, I noticed that you have two "a"'s in you name...you aren't a new incarnation of the RIAA or the MPAA are you? As others have mentioned, hosting torrent files is not illegal...but then again, these days what is operationally defined as "legal" or "illegal" is directly proportionate to how much money one spends lobbying to congressmen and paying off judges.

    17. Re:MPAA by mkro · · Score: 1

      Why do so many put so much energy into arguing legal vs illegal here? First, it could be the law is not exactly clear about this specific case, so it will have to be determined in court. Second, it does not really matter if it is legal or illegal. If this is legal today, you can be sure it will be illegal tomorrow. The *AA has weight (as illustrated by what happened here, and making Norwegian police do what they did to Jon L. Johansen). "Illegal" and "immoral" is not the same. Different example, same principle: The NSA case. Does it matter if they find a loophole in a law somewhere? It still would be wrong. And no responsible heads would roll anyway.

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    18. Re:MPAA by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You mean like "theft" is a loaded term for copyright infringement?

      Not at all. Using the word "theft" to describe copyright infringement is a complete lie. Nothing loaded about it; just a flat-out lie.

      A bit like saying "flesh-eating bacteria" when describing germans. It's just a vile, contemptuous lie.

      But then again, what can one expect from a copyright organization ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the power invested in me by a phone-in poll on Sky News, I declare you a paedophile. Or pirate. Or something.

    20. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not fighting copyright infrigers, they're fighting porn pushers

      If that were the case then they should start by looking at their own membership. For the MPAA to pretend to take a stand against pornography is hypocracy of the highest order.

    21. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPAA spokespeople

      LA: Kori Bernards

      818 995 6600

      DC: John Feehery

      202 293 1966

      Lets show our *support* and light up those lines!

    22. Re:MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to see the next press release from MPAA in a couple of days.

      MPAA

      For immediate release
      June, 4, 2006

      The Pirate Bay is back in business. Please ignore the previous message.

    23. Re:MPAA by trewornan · · Score: 1
      Are you an expert on Swedish copyright law

      Well you started it - are you an expert on Swedish copyright law? More so than thepiratebay's lawyers?

      You claim that the Berne Convention makes piratebay illegal but does it talk about contributing to copyright infringement - I'd actually be interested to know.

    24. Re:MPAA by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Count now standing at 137,116.

  18. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Oh, and damn me if I'm going to walk over to your store and pick the disk, then fumble through 60 disks to find the song I want, if I can sit in front of my computer at home and just download it (legally or not) without moving my lazy ass off the chair, then quickly find it on a nicely sorted list on my harddrive. And add it to the playlist of 40 favourite of given mood instead of swapping 35 disks filled mostly with crap to get to hear the 40 songs I want.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  19. The Purpose of Copyright by amoeba1911 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The media companies make it sound like copyright is a way of limiting your rights, but it was created with the intent of creating more diversity in content by limiting the rights of the content distributors (like MPAA). It used to have clauses which ensured the consumer's rights wouldn't be stifled (such as fair use). Why was copyright law created?? Because with the invention of the printing press things could be mass replicated much easier, the idea behind copyright was to limit who could print/sell stuff, taking power from printing press/distributor and giving it back to content creator, to allow people to create and distribute new content instead of letting the printing press have a field day selling us the same old crap making huge profits. Copyright law was created so that the content creator would be properly compensated. So that the consumer wouldn't be subjected to the same crap over and over again with no new works being created. The copyright law was made to protect the content creator and the content user. The copyright law was created to stifle the content distribution companies like MPAA, not the consumer. I don't know when this changed, but whoever had the wonderful idea of copyright would probably jam a sharp stick in his eyes if he saw what crud the content distributors have turned this law into. The copyright law has obviously failed in the past half a century and content distributors have too much power now. It's time for another copyright law with the original intent of protecting the consumer and the content creator and to make sure media conglomerates like MPAA don't make huge profits from nothing. There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 (and only a dime going to the creator) when the manufacturing cost of CD is in pennies... just my two cents. Sharing is caring. Let's try to put an end to the tyrannical misuse of copyright law. Thanks for reading!

    1. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was copyright law created?? Because with the invention of the printing press things could be mass replicated much easier, the idea behind copyright was to limit who could print/sell stuff

      Almost.. if things were *that* easy to replicate, then there would be even less of a need for copyright law.

      No, copyright law was needed at a time when it was *expensive* to replicate things, i.e. when printing presses were huge expensive machines to buy and run. If you had spent a vast fortune of money acquiring the use of a printing press to copy your work, then anyone else who was rich enough to have access to such a machine could undeservedly profit by selling copies of your work too! If that were the case, the incentive to author new works would be reduced.

      But now, what is the purpose of copyright? Anyone can easily author, and distribute their works - they are easy to create, be it music, amateur video, or written pieces, and with a digital medium they are incredibly easy to distribute. Some would refer to it as zero-cost distribution.

      So, why give such lengthy copyright terms in the modern day and age? Copyright holders should enjoy a short monopoly on the ability to distribute, but today, who can justify needing a period of time longer than a lifetime to recover the costs of developing one's work?

      I personally believe that copyright should last somewhere in the region of 10-15 years.

    2. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Your reading of the history is actually wrong. The original copyright laws were codified because of printers protesting about rival print shops merely printing the same book without recompense. The original print shop's expenditures in finding new and original content were then for naught.

      The purpose of copyright was to protect the investment of the original commissioner, not the artist. Authors then worked on a commission basis, and weren't able to sell their manuscripts to more than one publisher. It wasn't until much later that limits were set upon copyright.

      Copyright in modern sense is supposed to ensure that the author is compensated, but as then it only ensures publishers micromonopolies. It is the loss of this monopoly of distribution that the publishers/studios are afraid of. They aren't so much afraid of bootlegged songs and movies, but of the artists bypassing the studio distribution model altogether. Thus the attack on any distribution scheme that doesn't exist in their realm of control or pay them tithes.

    3. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Well, hate to defend the MAFIAA here, but the content creators gave them the copyright of their own free will.
      If an artist so easily releases his copyright, then they're not really an artist, but more like the guy who draws filler animation cells in North Korea.
      Just an employee of the company.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know, one thing they might do to return copyright to its original intent is to make it so that copyright cannot be "transferred" as property. There should still be the ability to act on the creator's behalf, but it should be more like an agent or manager.

      "Rights" cannot be sold or transferred. If, for example, I decided I never want to vote in a public election again, can I then sell my right to vote to someone who is otherwise not elligible? Could I sell my right to vote to someone so they could vote more than once? Why then can we sell "copyrights"?

      The whole idea of intellectual property is really out of control and clearly well beyond its original intent. (In fact, the notion of intellectual/creative property is well beyond the intent of copyright and patent.) Will there come a day when things are restored? Will that pendulum swing the other way?

    5. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 (and only a dime going to the creator) when the manufacturing cost of CD is in pennies... just my two cents."

      They don't. New releases are around $13.

      A manufacturing cost of a finished CD is a bit north of a buck. I'm guessing you're confusing it with the cost of a CD-R? At any rate, the manufacturing cost of an item usually has very little to do with the cost of sale... stating the manufacturing cost is pointless. The retailer that sells you the CD usually makes more commission than the manufacturing cost. Lots of people -- you're certainly not the first -- are of the impression that the various people who help make the CD a reality work for free, but that's just not the case.

      You mentioned "huge profits" a few times and based on the numbers you threw out, you're apparently believe that "huge profits" are made on the sales of CDs, and this is one of your problems with copyright law (and, I'm guessing, your justification for breaking it). If the net margin made on CDs upsets you, you really don't want to know the margin made by Apple on your iPod, by the manufacturer of your mouse and keyboard, the clothes you're (hopefully) wearing right now. Your CDs are among the lowest-margin products you own. If you want a moral justification for piracy, "CDs have huge net margins" isn't a logical one.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    6. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The copyright law was created to stifle the content distribution companies like MPAA, not the consumer. I don't know when this changed

      First it changed in 1976. Then it changed some more in 1998.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "You know, one thing they might do to return copyright to its original intent is to make it so that copyright cannot be "transferred" as property. There should still be the ability to act on the creator's behalf, but it should be more like an agent or manager."

      That's an interesting idea. Do you have any suggestions for how to make it work in practice?

      In the music world, of course, the artist typically keeps the copyright on their words and music -- of course, it's 100% their creation. The copyright on the recording is owned by the record company or shared between the label and the engineer/producer. For purposes of changing the law, who would you deem to be the creator in this extent? What if the artist went into the studio with just a sheet of lyrics and, due to the genius of the producer, the finished, arranged and mixed recording sounded nothing like what the artist did on their original garage tape, and it's a whole lot better?

      In the case of a film, who do you think should own the copyright? The director, the screenwriter, the cinematographer? What if the editor does an amazing job of transforming an awful directing or writing job that's something quite watchable? Who decides?

      "Rights" cannot be sold or transferred. If, for example, I decided I never want to vote in a public election again, can I then sell my right to vote to someone who is otherwise not elligible? Could I sell my right to vote to someone so they could vote more than once? Why then can we sell "copyrights"?"

      I don't follow that reasoning of thought at all. We buy and sell rights all the time. Ever bought a house? That's property rights you just bought. Signed a rental agreement? Buying and selling IP is just like buying and selling physical property. I'm not drawing the connection between voting and buying or selling property.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    8. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      The "copyright should be returned to the original 14 year period just like the framers of the constitution intended it" crowd probably believe that things started going to hell in 1831.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    9. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by HumanisticJones · · Score: 1

      This was changed when the content distribution companies like the record companies devised Licensing contracts in which the creator of the content signs over a partial ownership of the content to the distribution service. If you look at the back of most of your CDs the Copyright is usually not to the artist but to the company that markets the CDs. For example, my CD by Ozomatli is not copyrighted to the band but is instead copyrighted by Almo Sounds and Universal Music & Video Distrobution. By this logic the **AA companies are well within rights to slam down the lock and key on the piracy with no words at all from the bands.

      The only way this is ever going to be different is to have the content creators stop signing contracts that give ownership of their original creations to the production companies.

    10. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I don't follow that reasoning of thought at all. We buy and sell rights all the time. Ever bought a house? That's property rights you just bought. Signed a rental agreement? Buying and selling IP is just like buying and selling physical property. I'm not drawing the connection between voting and buying or selling property.
      Indeed, you missed the point entirely. The point is that copyright and patents were originally designed to be (and should be again) like voting rights, not like property rights. In other words, you shouldn't be drawing any connection with property rights at all because they're irrelevant to this discussion.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      The "copyright should be returned to the original 14 year period just like the framers of the constitution intended it"

      It looks to me like they really intended the 'limited time' part of what is in the constitution to be 'limited'. 14 years was then the term that was set, but it wasn't put into the constitution for a reason.

      That the term can change due to different circumstances and insights is not the problem I think, but ignoring the explicit purpose of having a limited term copyright is a real problem I believe.

    12. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by erroneus · · Score: 1

      When publishers publish copyrighted material, they do so under the permission granted to them by the copyright holder... the artist. The reproduction of an original copyrighted work should not be copyrightable in and of itself. I cannot copyright a spiral notebook, but I can copyright whatever I write in it. Content is copyrightable, the media is not. So the notion of duplication of copyrighted material is an issue for the copyright holder, not the publisher. Yet, for some reason it is the PUBLISHERS who are acting on behalf of the copyright holders. Their right to act on their behalf is probably buried somewhere in the legalese of their contracts and such, but it certainly escapes the original intent of copyright. And when legal action occurs, the plaintiffs should be the creators of the works, not the publishers. Again, for obvious reasons, it's the copyright [holder] that is being violated and not the publisher even though it's the publisher who feels the hurt the most.

      So I am always left somewhat confused when I see artists protesting the activities of the MPAA/RIAA for misrepresenting their interests or intent. If, for example, James Taylor publically announces that all his copyrighted works are legal for free distribution as an MP3, OggVorbis, WMA or similar digital format, then the RIAA should have no legal leg to stand on... and yet, somehow I believe the RIAA would block any such action.

      And again, while these RIAA and MPAA people are collecting their damages, I have yet to hear of even a penny of the damages going to the actual artists who hold the copyrights. Maybe they have, but I haven't heard of any.

    13. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Bienvenue en France !

      So-called droits d'auteur are not (completely) transferrable.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    14. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Kuj0317 · · Score: 1

      No, the price of a finished cd is far south of a buck. Even on low volume ( 1000), you are talking about mere cents.

      CD's are a throwaway comodity. Take AOL for example. They ship out millions of free CD's, including casing (which is often quite nice) and inserts for free. My university ships out 4-5 different cd's to each of the students each year.

      CD's are very cheap to manufacture, even after packaging is taken into consideration.

    15. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      The band I manage can buy finished, shrink-wrapped, commercially pressed CDs, with artwork, for just under $1 when buying 2000 or more. I seriously doubt that the big boys doing runs of hundreds of thousands of CDs are paying any more than 50 cents per CD for production - and probably even less than that...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    16. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by rikkus-x · · Score: 1
      There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 (and only a dime going to the creator) when the manufacturing cost of CD is in pennies... just my two cents.

      I've bought CDs which were produced by the content creator and cost closer to $20 than pennies. The reason they did was that the artist wanted to make money from the sale.

      Do you think that all artists should give their work away for the cost of distribution, or that they should be allowed to ask their own price?

      If artists only make a relatively small cut of the profits on their media, that's their fault for signing a contract with a publishing company which gives the publisher the larger share of the profit. There are now plenty of ways to distribute music and keep most of the sales income for yourself.

    17. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "The point is that copyright and patents were originally designed to be (and should be again) like voting rights, not like property rights."

      That's an interesting understanding of the history of copyright. The ability to transfer copyright has been around for at least 500 years -- in other words, for about as long as copyright as we know it has existed.

      You can see my misunderstanding, of course -- I was not aware that "copyrights and patents were originally designed to be like voting rights." I'd love it if you can elaborate further.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    18. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "The band I manage can buy finished, shrink-wrapped, commercially pressed CDs, with artwork, for just under $1 when buying 2000 or more. I seriously doubt that the big boys doing runs of hundreds of thousands of CDs are paying any more than 50 cents per CD for production - and probably even less than that..."

      You say a bit under, I say a bit over. We're close enough. Does your price include the Sensormatic tag?

      Since you're in the industry, you know that most CDs are in small runs like that. Hundred-thousand selling (Gold) and million-selling (Platinum) releases are rare in the vast sea of new CDs that are put out each year, and thus, orders for 100K CDs at once are exceedingly rare. This is, however, the standard that many people follow when justifying piracy, when the reality that most of the bands in their collections of MP3s probably had their CDs distributed in batches of a few thousand here and there.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    19. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Yet, for some reason it is the PUBLISHERS who are acting on behalf of the copyright holders. Their right to act on their behalf is probably buried somewhere in the legalese of their contracts and such, but it certainly escapes the original intent of copyright. And when legal action occurs, the plaintiffs should be the creators of the works, not the publishers. Again, for obvious reasons, it's the copyright [holder] that is being violated and not the publisher even though it's the publisher who feels the hurt the most."

      This is because most publishers of content (whether it's music, books, films, or what have you) operate as for-profit businesses. Publishing the content requires a cash investment, and if they don't make that cash back, they're shut.

      Your system would work well for pirates. Somebody might be more likely to build a collection of MP3s if they knew that the typical starving artist out there simply didn't have the funds to mount a legal attempt to stop you. It would certainly put artists in their place, wouldn't it?

      "So I am always left somewhat confused when I see artists protesting the activities of the MPAA/RIAA for misrepresenting their interests or intent. If, for example, James Taylor publically announces that all his copyrighted works are legal for free distribution as an MP3, OggVorbis, WMA or similar digital format, then the RIAA should have no legal leg to stand on... and yet, somehow I believe the RIAA would block any such action."

      That's because the record company has the copyright on the recording -- the artist gives them the copyright in exchange for the assistance in production, distribution, and so on. The artist is typically free to post their lyrics and melodies for free... that is what they've created. A recording is the joint effort of many people.

      There are some record companies that operate differently. Magnatune is the well-known exception. They don't ask for ownership of the recording, but then again, they don't give you any assistance whatsoever in getting that recording made. To work with a label like Magnatune, you have to have the cash and the expertise to produce the recording yourself.

      "And again, while these RIAA and MPAA people are collecting their damages, I have yet to hear of even a penny of the damages going to the actual artists who hold the copyrights. Maybe they have, but I haven't heard of any."

      I think it's a safe assumption that none of the damages go to anybody but the lawyers. The lawsuits aren't designed to make money, but to scare people.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    20. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      the idea behind copyright was to limit who could print/sell stuff, taking power from printing press/distributor and giving it back to content creator, to allow people to create and distribute new content instead of letting the printing press have a field day selling us the same old crap making huge profits

      More accurately, the concept of Copyright was introduced to ensure that the guy who owned the printing press had to enter into a contract with the guy who created the content if he wanted to print and distribute it.

      I don't follow your allegation that "content distributors have too much power now"; all the power they wield today or ever is that which is granted to them by content creators. The RIAA member companies can't sell copies of a song that I recorded without my permission, the MPAA companies can't exhibit a movie I filmed without my permission.

      We're in the Digital Age now, when the scarcity of printing presses and distribution channels has never been scarcer. I don't think it will be much longer before the content creators realize they DON'T need to accept a deal where they get 5 cents out of every ten dollars in sales in order to get their works out there. They'll find ways to make more money by remaining independent.

    21. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Suzumushi · · Score: 1

      I'll elaborate. Copyright, like patents were originally intended to provide a temporary protection of the initial costs of an investment in intangible property. However, since the law has changed so many times, now it is in effect an indefinite monopoly of rights more akin to the right to vote. I can see the analagy clearly, though 500 years ago it may have been quite different...Times have changed, time for the laws to catch up...and some people too apparently.

    22. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Sensormatic tags?? Why would the band care about that crap?? That protects the retail store selling them, not the band. If store X buys 50 CDs, and all 50 are stolen, guess what?? They already paid the band for the CDs. Now if you are selling on commission, it may be an issue. But usually the commission works like so - we give you 20 CDs, you give us either the $ for 20 CDs or $ of X CDs and then return X CDs back to band. Either way if they are stolen, we get paid. The less than $1 price also does include the UPC coding..

      My point was if a small band can get CDs made for just under a buck, the major producers are paying nowhere near that much.. Individual CDs may come out in batches of thousands, but when you have hundreds of bands coming out with CDs, you are talking about hundreds of thousands of CDs being pressed - not necessarily the same band, but the same label - and you better believe they demand big discounts for big orders.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    23. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "No, the price of a finished cd is far south of a buck. Even on low volume ( 1000), you are talking about mere cents."

      Please see the other reply to my post, from Mr. Whirley. He's getting a price of just under a buck for his band's CDs when he orders more than 2K at once. If you know a way of getting them done for just a few cents on an order qty. of less than 1K, he'll be your new best friend! From my experience, the Sensormatic tag alone costs a few cents.

      However, I'm curious myself as to where you're getting your finished audio CDs that cheap. Is it in China? If so, are you shipping them by air or sea?

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    24. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Sorry... in the retail business, the sensormatic tag is the responsibility of the manufacturer, not the store. It's great for you if the retailers you're selling to don't require them, but if you get bigger, it'll be a requirement.

      The manufacturing doesn't scale down as much as you think. Specifically, if I understand you correctly, you believe there to be a tremendous price break if I place 50 orders of 2K each (each order being a unique run), on the order of ordering 100K of the same product. I've no doubt that the record labels get better pricing than you, but not that much better.

      Either way, I'm sure we can agree that the manufacturing cost is nowhere near the cost of sale. It's probably a lot easier on you since you're not pouring thousands of bucks into marketing campaigns, but nonetheless, if a random music fan were to tell you that because your manufacturing cost is a buck, that they should not be expected to pay more than $1.25 for the CD and that anything above that was pure greed, you'd have quite the hearty chuckle. Yet that's the argument put forth by many Slashdotters.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    25. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Your system would work well for pirates. Somebody might be more likely to build a collection of MP3s if they knew that the typical starving artist out there simply didn't have the funds to mount a legal attempt to stop you. It would certainly put artists in their place, wouldn't it?

      Perhaps you should rework your legal system so that you can get justice, whether you are a starving artist or a multi-billionaire. Like, say, have the state pay all the legal expenses of both sides of every case. Wouldn't that work a lot better for everyone ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Copyright was only supposed to be for a rather limited duration of time. I forget the original duration in the U.S. But the idea that it can be sold or transferred to an unoriginating party and that copyright can be extended beyond the death of the creator does nothing to support the original intent of copyright and everything to create and sustain the IP industry as we know it today.

    27. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Copyright was only supposed to be for a rather limited duration of time. I forget the original duration in the U.S."

      The constitution states "limited," not "rather limited." The first US law stipulated 14 years, but the principles of copyright law go back much longer, of course.

      "But the idea that it can be sold or transferred to an unoriginating party and that copyright can be extended beyond the death of the creator does nothing to support the original intent of copyright."

      That's really odd. Another claim that transferring copyrights is somehow at odds with the "original intent." I'll assume you're quite familiar with copyright law. Are you quite sure that the "original intent" did not allow transferring of copyrights? I don't see anything to support this, particularly as the ability to transfer ownership has been around since pretty much the beginning. For what it's worth, transferring copyright to an heir is no new concept, either -- a writer was nailed in the 18th century (Folsom v. Marsh, 1841) for reproducing George Washington's letters after he'd died, without his heirs' permission.

      Interestingly, the judge in the case used the word "piracy" in his ruling. Many Slashdotters are of the misapprehension that its meaning in this context is a new invention (perhaps by copyright holders themselves), but that's not the case.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    28. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my quotation of the GP. His claim is that the original intent of copyrights is that they not be transferrable. You're correct that copyright law has changed many times (as in virtually all areas of law, the technology and society changes, and the law eventually catches up). Do you agree that the original intent of copyrights included non-transferability? In other words, are you of the understanding that this is a fairly new concept?

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    29. Re:The Purpose of Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You want to know what happened? The legislation saw the distributors were too powerful so they gave the rights to the authors. The authors then turned around and sold their shiny new exclusive rights back to the distributors, who promptly shafted them with unfulfilled promises of fame and fortune. Until the authors stop dumbassedly selling away all their rights, this kind of crap will continue. Note to authors and musicians: don't be a dumbass! You don't need book publishers and record labels. You can write a novel with Word and sell it online. You can mix your own tracks with free (or cheap) software, and sell it online. Or give a few chapters or tracks away, and charge for the rest. You don't need "them" and their crap promises. Make a few indie records, and maybe you'll get noticed. If not, then try again. Success takes hard work, and there are no easy paths. Here's a hint: signing a contract with a record label probably looks like an easy path. If you take it, you aren't just a dumbass, you're a greedy and lazy dumbass.

      "Just say no" to record labels. [/rant]

  20. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by gowen · · Score: 1

    Credible? I'd be happy if it had been written by someone with evidence of education above the third grade level.

    Mind you, I felt like that about "A Million Little Pieces", too.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  21. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read much, much closer, you'll realize that post is a satyre. It's been reposted on slashdot for a very, very long time. It's subtle, I know, but still.

  22. My Apologies by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I must be new here.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  23. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

    Its an old troll post. I've seen it a few times before.

  24. Another mystery solved by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... could it be that the mystery around the phrase "talking out of your a.." could be on the verge of being unveiled?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Since when are the **AA confined by mortal laws? by Qa1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The MPAA can hack servers and harvest private information if it wants; not a single MPAA employee would suffer any sort of police harrassment. But someone ostensibly assists violation of MPAA copyrights and BAM! - 200 servers are confiscated by police authorities.

    The reason for this is explained in Sterling's account of the first major institutional crackdown on hackers, ezine publishers and other dispensers of information which some powerful corporation don't want to see in the wild. From the text:

    Another problem is very little publicized, but it is a cause of genuine concern. Where there is persistent crime, but no effective police protection, then vigilantism can result. Telcos, banks, credit companies, the major corporations who maintain extensive computer networks vulnerable to hacking -- these organizations are powerful, wealthy, and politically influential. They are disinclined to be pushed around by crooks (or by most anyone else, for that matter). They often maintain well-organized private security forces, commonly run by experienced veterans of military and police units, who have left public service for the greener pastures of the private sector. For police, the corporate security manager can be a powerful ally; but if this gentleman finds no allies in the police, and the pressure is on from his board-of-directors, he may quietly take certain matters into his own hands.

    So police is acting as mercenaries for the big corporations, since otherwise they'd hire their own. Not a very comforting thought, especially considering you are nowadays likely to be arrested for suspicion of violating corporate copyrights. Remember when police and laws were used to protect citizens, not criminialize millions for hurting corporate profit machines...?

  26. There are NO details in the linked article by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 0, Redundant
    so don't bother reading it, we already know that stuff ...

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  27. Piratebay should have by FudRucker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    mirrored their data to another machine in another nation where the authorities can not touch it...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:Piratebay should have by se7en11 · · Score: 1
      another country?

      My mom's basement has tons of space for extra machines.

    2. Re:Piratebay should have by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like Sweden! Oh, right...sorry.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Piratebay should have by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      That's the reason their server was/is located in Sweden...

    4. Re:Piratebay should have by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      maybe they should get hosting with HavenCo?

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    5. Re:Piratebay should have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, that's what they did....

  28. Thank God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good news for the RIAA and MPAA.

    Without TPD _nobody_ would know, hear or care about their crap^H^H^Hontent and the porn industry would reign the world of entertainment.

    Hmmm... maybe this news isn't so good after all.

  29. They were forced to leave DNA by eddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most amazing thing of all is that the persons that were questioned, were forced to leave DNA. That's totally unheard of, and make one think that maybe this was done, and this will sound completely conspiracy nuts, on request from the US ("MPAA"). Collection of DNA has been reserved for severe crimes; Rape, murder, etc.

    Personally I believe the goal here is to make an example of the ISP, PRQ. Taking non-related servers makes perfect sense in that context. They want to make sure no one dares host trackers, even if it's found to be legal! I believe the charges as they relate to "TPB" will be dropped, but they'll go ahead with materal found on the suspects home computers (sadly, it seems they weren't smart/careful enough to not sample their own warez, so to speak). However, for PR reasons they'll blur this issue, making a case against the individuals based on their home computers seem like a win against trackers.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      "Personally I believe the goal here is to make an example of the ISP, PRQ. Taking non-related servers makes perfect sense in that context. They want to make sure no one dares host trackers, even if it's found to be legal!"

      I'm pretty sure you are right, this is legal intimidation (as in using the legal system, not that what they do is legal)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      "The most amazing thing of all is that the persons that were questioned, were forced to leave DNA. That's totally unheard of, and make one think that maybe this was done, and this will sound completely conspiracy nuts, on request from the US ("MPAA"). Collection of DNA has been reserved for severe crimes; Rape, murder, etc."

      Perhaps that's true where you are, but not in Europe (not sure how much of it) - I got convicted for drink driving a few years ago in the UK and my DNA profile is now sitting in a police database somewhere. In the UK you don't even have to be convicted for them to hold your DNA, just arrested and charged!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by janap · · Score: 1

      So - the crime was considered serious enough to forcibly extract DNA from the suspected criminals. But it was not considered serious enough to warrant the same suspected criminals the aid of a public defender. (As in the case of Gottfrid Svartholm, who was detained and interrogated for six hours, devoid of any legal representation.) That can't be right.

    4. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I believe the charges as they relate to "TPB" will be dropped, but they'll go ahead with materal found on the suspects home computers (sadly, it seems they weren't smart/careful enough to not sample their own warez, so to speak).

      In another comment someplace someone claimed that it's legal to have "pirated" materials on your computer, but sharing them is a moderately serious crime. Is this true? I didn't assume that it was, but I see it as a possibility given the funkiness of law in general and the typical variation from one nation to another (although the US is definitely putting a lot of effort into imposing its view of law on the rest of the world, with distressing amounts of success.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      In the UK you don't even have to be convicted for them to hold your DNA

      And very shortly, if you want a passport, you'll need to hand over a DNA sample amongst other sundry bits of body. Apparantly this will stop terrorists, ID theft and criminals. No-one has been able to explain how though. Best of all, they tell us the US is insisting on this so we have to comply. Umm, no they're not.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    6. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by extintor · · Score: 1

      It was me stating that. I was a bit unclear.
      Pirated movies and music are not illegal to have on your computer.
      But computergames and software is.
      Atleast AFAIK

    7. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We don't want your DNA. The Bush administration might, but the country certainly doesn't. Your DNA profile is only useful for identifying your remains or implicating your presence at the scene of a crime, from a law enforcement perspective. Neither helps prevent action, especially against those willing to die. The latter is a massive fishing expedition, and would probably lead to more false imprisonments from coincidental contamination of areas.

      It seems the most useful aspect of collecting DNA would be performing data-mining on genetic material. Across multiple generations the government could determine actual paternity rather than believed paternity (possibly for blackmail or even much more sinister things...), where your ancestors might be from, descrimination for insurance, and so forth. Perhaps if you're convicted of something they might lean on your progeny more if their genetic material pops up somewhere. The only way to assure that there aren't any illegal uses of this material is for the government to not collect it.

    8. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by Fedasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was apparently the TPB lawyer that had to submit to DNA sampling. That gets really interesting when you factor in that "the brain behind TPB" was denied an lawyer because he was not suspected of anything that could result in jail (the news article in swedish).

      So the "brain behind TPB" (and owner of PRQ which was the webhost that was raided and stripped of all servers, even though most had nothing to do with TPB) is not suspected for anything that could give jail, but despite that they could get a warrant to take all the equipment. Additionally the lawyer has to be suspected of something that can result in jail or otherwise they could not legally have forced him to give DNA. So if all that is true then the lawyer is suspected of something worse than the webhost owner and person behind TPB. That sounds very fishy so either someone is lying or the police has committed several crimes during the raid and interrogations.

      Sadly this is Sweden we are talking about so the government will do something bad, then investigate why they did it until people forget what happened.

    9. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My guess is that the hard drives were imaged, and some MPAA forensic analysts are going to be making lists of IP addresses from the logs as fodder for future lawsuits in the US, and the servers will be returned to piratebay, no harm no foul.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they don't keep logs.

      Ohh and if logs had existed, according to Swedish law, it would be illegal to export them outside the EU.

    11. Re:They were forced to leave DNA by init100 · · Score: 1

      So - the crime was considered serious enough to forcibly extract DNA from the suspected criminals. But it was not considered serious enough to warrant the same suspected criminals the aid of a public defender.

      Yep, it is very strange. To sample DNA from a suspect, the suspected crime must lead to a prison sentence of at least two years. But when Mr Svartholm was denied legal representation, a police officer informed him that he is not suspect of any crime that could lead to a prison sentence. It is quite possible though, that DNA has not been sampled from Mr Svartholm, I only heard that the police sampled DNA from the legal representative of The Pirate Bay.

  30. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    As sorry as I may feel for you, but you have to share the sympathy with all the typesetters, the shoemakers, the tailors, the editors, the layouters and all the others whose profession has become obsolete by technology.

    Do you honestly ask for technology to be rolled back so you can keep your job? If so, how far shall we roll back? To the time before computers so we need more traffic cops (no coordinated traffic lights without computers), too? Or before the industrial revolution, so weavers can get back into their profession?

    Sorry buddy. Time's past you, learn something that's still in demand if you want to stay in business.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by A-Trav · · Score: 1
    Assuming that this is not a fake (which it most likely is), the store was doomed to failure from the start. Here are several basic flaws in your business model:

    1. Clean music, like Christian Rock, does not sell nearly as well as non-clean music
    2. Your store made the same fatal mistake as the entire Music Industry, it attempted to resist the sell of music online.
    3. CD's have not been the perferred way to store music for several years.

    As to why you business is in immediate danger:

    1. You should not threaten customers. When word gets around, considering that you sell "Family Music," you will lose about three forths of your business.
    2. If your having money troubles, then you should have let go of some useless employees, scaled back the size of the store, and/or spent more to advertise
    3. Most importantly, if the threatened customer has any sense, you and your business will be charged with assult.

    The lesson, dont keep an out of date business plan....
  32. Rebuild the servers? by spurtle15 · · Score: 1

    If I were them, I'd rebuild those servers. No telling what backdoors and spy software those RIAA-MPAA goons/law enforcement officials put on the machines while they were searching for incriminating evidence.

    1. Re:Rebuild the servers? by Senzei · · Score: 1
      If I were them, I'd rebuild those servers. No telling what backdoors and spy software those RIAA-MPAA goons/law enforcement officials put on the machines while they were searching for incriminating evidence.

      If I were them I would pay to have the servers professionally audited for just that kind of addition, then if anything turns up make a huge media stink about it and sue the crap out of everyone who so much as touched a system. I'm sure the law enforcement groups involved being publicly confronted with allegations of helping a giant media conglomerate based in another country put backdoors on perfectly legal domestic servers will make them think twice about doing it again.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  33. Re:BAD name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Firstly it's "foul", not "fowl". Crying "fowl" only happens if, for example, you are set upon by a chicken of unusual size.


    Secondly, are you also amazed that Slashdot has survived this long? After all - slash, it's a bit aggressive isn't it? A bit stabby.
    Expecting a site with a name which reminds you of knifing people to last is just being foolish.

  34. The the pirate party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, Swedish Gammer Nazi time! ;-)

    Piratpartiet means "the Pirate party", with the 'et' at at the end of the word making it definate in Swedish. Therefore there is no need to say 'the' in front. You could either say 'The Piratparti' or 'Piratpartiet' but saying 'the Piratpartiet' is like saying 'The the pirate party'.

    In all seriousness of course I didn't expect you to know this but maybe someone will find it interesting nonetheless.

    1. Re:The the pirate party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swedish nazis? That's *my* fantasy! And it's grammar you dolt.

    2. Re:The the pirate party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join Vigrid -- you'd probably fit right in.

  35. WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by N8F8 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If what you seem to be saying were true then the internet and cheap burnable CDs would have wiped out the record industry because there would be no incentived for artists to sign-up. But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything. Sure there is the rare case where some pauper creates a brilliant piece of art in their garage that the whole world starts clamoring for....bat that is the exception. In the real world there tons of folks between the artist and the consumer working to sell a product to that consumer. And those folks work to feed their families like you or I. I'm not advocating draconian IP laws here (I think the exact process I mentioned above already protects the artists and corporations), but let's inject a little reality into both sides of the argument.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything.

      You've been brainwashed. This is only true in the world created by the RIAA, through the tool called the "payola". Well, that, and that Clearchannel (RIAA member) owns about 75% of the radio stations in North America. Why would record companies play anything for free when they can get paid? And if they're owned by Clearchannel, then they have no choice anyway. They are not permitted to play songs not on the playlist; sometimes they can't even play songs by artists whose songs appear on the playlist even by request.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by epiphani · · Score: 5, Informative

      But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything.

      Bzzt, wrong.

      What it takes is hard work. Being the son of a career musician, I can tell you that it is not hard to make a -very- decent living making music. What it does take, just as any other career, is years of constant work building a name for yourself in your community, and then beyond.

      Would people please get it out of their head that labels somehow make music as a career viable. My dad has produced and sold several records, tapes and CDs in his career; has performed all over north america, and now in his late 50s owns his own recording studio and takes students. He has a waiting list of several dozen students, and has hired several teachers to help with the load.

      You've probably never heard of him. His original music doesnt have raw mainstream appeal, BUT, contrary to your idea, he has made a very good living for himself through his music. And he never had a label around to rape his ideas and keep most of the money.

      "Reality" has nothing to do with big buisness advertising, it has to do with hard work. Pure and simple. Does he support getting his music out there via filesharing? Yes. It helps him build his reputation and get other work.

      --
      .
    3. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Record compagnies are only good for the one in a million singer that becomes millionaire, for the other ones, the interest is far from evident.

      My uncle is a professional musician in an indie rock band, they never signed any contract with a record compagny.
      -They keep their copyright and would kill for it, but give away a couple of songs from each album on their web page.
      -They work with a generic CD creation workshop (it's really cheap).
      -They have distribution agreements with a few groups of music stores and sell on the web and pocket more than half the retail price.
      -They tour a lot.
      In the end, their life is not endless party with coke and top models, but they make a realy decent living out of their work and still have their soul.

    4. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Sounds great.

      Then, as his loving son, you wouldn't mind posting a link or two to his site so we can send some business his way, would you?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    5. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything.

      That's not an intrinsic requirement. That's an artificial requirement caused by the record companies. They flood the television and radio with so much promotion that you need to spend as much money as they do just to get your foot in the door. If you eliminated the record companies, the bar for entry wouldn't be anywhere near as high.

    6. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "You've probably never heard of him. His original music doesnt have raw mainstream appeal"

      See the first line of your post for the reason why this is true.

      "But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything."

      This is true if you want to make it to a major label and have a shot at having your work appreciated by bigger audiences. Unless you are already independently wealthy, most artists don't have the capital to do these things for themselves (and working full time can really put a damper on the creativity levels). If you are not a moron, and do the smart thing of hiring a contract lawyer before signing with a label, it isn't that difficult to not get completely screwed. The horror stories of bad contracts you hear are from the coked-up, dumbass "rock star" who will sign any thing you put in front of him without reading it - just dangle a big advance in front of them. If you realize that record labels never give you money - that they give you an interest free loan until they recoop all expenses - it makes things a lot easier to understand from the get go. Can an artist make it sucessfully without record label money? Sure, but it really depends on your definition of "successful". Is signing with a label always "selling out" for an artist?? Hell no, unless if by "selling out" you mean having your art appreciated by a larger audience.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by vertinox · · Score: 1

      But in the real world it takes losts of advertising, promotion and wheel-greasing to create a snger/band/TV show worth anything.

      You mean to create a singer/band/TV show that is a peice of cookie cutter un-imaginative un-original peice of turd crap that monkies and typewriters could have made.

      Seriously, the only stuff worth reading, watching, and listening to are those who don't go through the process of the MPAA/RIAA. It takes a bit of effort on the part of the consumer to find these things, but the stuff they regurgitate on mass media these days makes me ill.

      Maybe I just miss the 90's, but I remember originality and when the radio stations played original music when they were owned by clear channel. I remember when MTV played music videos and showed cool things like Liquid Television. I remember when TV was more than just a guy with a camcorder recording some fake scripted reality TV show drama.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    8. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Suzumushi · · Score: 1

      If what you seem to be saying were true then the internet and cheap burnable CDs would have wiped out the record industry because there would be no incentived for artists to sign-up If what you're saying is true, then telephones would have wiped out the telegram industry...or automobiles would have wiped out the horse and carriage industry...oh wait...

    9. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by deesine · · Score: 1
      And of course this is totally irrelevant to the issue of copyright infringement/reform.

      If you downloaded the music for free, and never purchased it, then you're breaking the law, pure and simple. Tangential facts like the cost of production, marketing, and profits, have no bearing on copyright infringement.

      I download music for free, without paying for it. What I don't do is try and justify my actions by bringing in tangential issues. I justify my actions on the grounds of civil disobedience.

      I have no moral qualms about my actions seeing as how corporate inspired legislation has already rendered this sphere of the law morally sterile: the spirit of justice has left the building.

      Download free music, but don't think that the current law offers you any justification, it doesn't. Tired excuses like 'CDs cost $20!' and 'the artist isn't even making much of that money' hold no water.

      Civil Disobedience, it's your duty.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    10. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll even go you one further. I don't download fre music becuase of civil disobedience, nor do I try to justify the fact with the cost of CDs. I'm just a straight up thief who doesn't want to pay sometimes...

      The good thing is the **AA is on the same page with me on this - and they view all of the "high price of CDs" justifiers and you "civil disobedience" as being in the same boat as me no matter what your convitions/reasons are..

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    11. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      In the end, their life is not endless party with coke and top models, but they make a realy decent living out of their work and still have their soul.

      Are you saying that's what major label musician's lives are like? Well OK, but only if you take out 'endless'. For most bands. the party is over once the label calls in the loan that was their 'advance'.

      Record labels are like loan sharks that get away with it.

    12. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      "Are you saying that's what major label musician's lives are like?"

      Absolutely not, at least not for those who are not the "one in a million" I was refering to and who is the one you see on all TV to lure disposable superstar wannabes.

      My uncle's band is not wanting to sign with any label because they consider it a highly probable bad move on both artistic and financial sides. Just like playing all your money on one lottery ticket that was chosen for you and still have the lottery manager keep 80% of the gain if you ever win.

    13. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I justify my actions on the grounds of civil disobedience.

      I'm sorry to tell you that you're mistaken, then. Civil disobedience (what I understood the last time I read the original essay, at least) is flouting the law and then turning yourself into the authorities to be punished. So, unless you have contacted the authorities and requested incarceration you're no better than people who use those "tired excuses."

    14. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by mibus · · Score: 1

      Turning in, only when asked by the authorities. (At least, so said Gandhi :)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience

    15. Re:WTF? There's no reason why a CD should cost $20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I DON'T download music. I purchase a few CDs, mostly of artists with independent labels. I go to a few concerts, again not the majors. The goal is to support the artists that make the music you like, without supporting the vampires you hate.

      I disagree with the way the industry is being run and I am refusing to acquire (by any means, legal or illegal) the products that support those companies that exploit both fan and artist. If they treat their customers like they are either fools or thieves or both, maybe they have too much money. In that case, we should help them solve that problem by not sending them any more money.

      W^L+

  36. Lawyer-fest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all of the ramifications and harm to innocent people this caused.

    Independent artists use TPB. The Swedish record industry supports the raid. Oops?

    About 100 to 1000 innocent firms were affected due to the raid by the police. Oops?

    The Pirate Bureau which is a political party, was affected by the raid, which means that the media industry uses the Swedish justice system to close it down. Oops?

    The legal advisor they used, who had nothing to do with TPB, was interrogated and forced to give his DNA?! WTF?

    http://www.vg.no/pub/vgart.hbs?artid=118289

  37. Re:BAD name by vrai · · Score: 1

    Cry fowl? In response to their servers being seized they made chicken noises?

  38. Will rise abroad, they say by Bromskloss · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In a swedish article on the same site, one of the pirates states that they will open again, abroad (outside Sweden, that is, duh).

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Will rise abroad, they say by muffen · · Score: 1

      Here's a translation of parts of the article.

      - Jag blev intagen för förhör, och de började fråga om Pirate Bay; vad jag visste och vad jag hade för kopplingar, säger Gottfrid Svartholm. - Jag fick ingen offentlig försvarare, och mitt ordinarie juridiska ombud hade ju också gripits, så jag sa ingenting överhuvudtaget.

      - I was brought in for questions, and they started asking me about TPB; what I knew and what connections I had to TPB, said Gottfrid Svartholm.
      I was not given a lawyer, and my ordinary juridical representant had also been arrrested, so I didn't say a single word.

      ---
      Varför nekades du offentlig försvarare? - Enligt poliserna riskerar jag inte fängelse för brottet jag är misstänkt för och då behöver de inte ge någon offentlig försvarare.

      ---
      Why were you denied a public defender?
      - According to the police, I am not risking a prison penalty for the crimes I am suspected of, and because of that they do not have to provide me with a public defender.

  39. Re:BAD name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...cry fowl...

    YOU'RE A CHICKEN! You turkey!! You're such a pheasant!!

  40. It will indeed rise again. by base3 · · Score: 1

    As a *AA/police honeypot.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  41. That depends... by camusflage · · Score: 1

    If it's CNN or NPR, it's in the very tip of the middle finger of the left hand attached to an outstretched arm. If it's the Wall Street Journal, it's somewhere deeply embedded in a rich person's pocket. If it's Fox News, it's in the middle of the brain, but unfortunately, said the head containing it is suffering from a recto-cranial inversion.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  42. Damn Wiggles by Medievalist · · Score: 0, Troll


    I've had enough of their paedophilic shenanigans... Captain Feathersword? Please!!!

    Keep Pirate Bay shut down and put the Wiggles in prison where they belong!

    Er, what? Oh... I see. Never mind!

    1. Re:Damn Wiggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should be made to walk the plank.

  43. Geek or lawyer? by nbuet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now the big question behind all that: if you want to make a living in the computer world as it is today, should you rather be a programmer or a lawyer?

    1. Re:Geek or lawyer? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I'd say lawyer as far as making a living. You get more money for less work.

      that said, as far as freedom and power, youre better off as a programmer. If they surpress your projects or subject you to DRM you have the power to personally remove those restrictions with a broadband connection and an installer for gnutella

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Geek or lawyer? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Now the big question behind all that: if you want to make a living in the computer world as it is today, should you rather be a programmer or a lawyer?

      Lawyer. If you actually produce something, you run the risk of being targeted for patent extortion.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  44. The drama unfolds by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yep, just like this old fogie predicted, the piracy issues is evolving along nicely parallel to the 50's-60's "legalize marijuana" drug movement. Good luck, but we already know how it's going to turn out. I admire idealistic youth - they're young, they'll learn.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:The drama unfolds by muffen · · Score: 1
      Yep, just like this old fogie predicted, the piracy issues is evolving along nicely parallel to the 50's-60's "legalize marijuana" drug movement. Good luck, but we already know how it's going to turn out. I admire idealistic youth - they're young, they'll learn.
      All internet pirates will move to the Netherlands?
    2. Re:The drama unfolds by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So Sweden is to bootlegging/piracy as the Netherlands is to Cannabis?

      On a different note, it was pointed out somewhere else that Sweden and Finland are forerunners in Free Information because of a different mentality. Up there, information shared helped the community as a whole. Down here in the more temperate climes, information was locked up in guilds, and storytellers guarded their tales. An interesting theory...

    3. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is good news! (For us dutch people at least ;-)).

    4. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "evolving along nicely parallel to the 50's-60's "legalize marijuana" drug movement"

      I agree.

          I'm biased in my views against RIAA/MPAA and friends though. I think it's utter stupidity to risk creating a massive online police surveillance state to protect copyright (What will be necessary for it to happen) Non-techies are pretty dumb though and can't see much beyond threats by an industry that still sees plenty of profit even with rampant duplication of their works.

          But a digress. File sharing will continue for decades to come while police harass and a arrest people for possessing this information illegally (since they paid for the laws). I can hardly wait for the 60 minutes episode.

      Mike

            "You know we caught you STEALING information"

      RMS

            "Why? Did it go missing?"

      Mike

            "50 FBI officers raided your home and found the data"

      RMS

            "I see. Was that 50 fifty PUBLICALLY paid officers that could have been looking for burglary, rapist and murderer suspects?"

      Mike

            "Tsk tsk. We know you're guilty. We've researched your views and caught it all on tape.

      RMS

            "Oh really. Did you ask for my permission?"

    5. Re:The drama unfolds by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The movement for the legalization of marijuana isn't over. It continues all over the country and it's making headway, if not in law (although several states have enacted legislation to decriminalize marijuana at their level) then in mindshare among the american public. Most of the time you can win [rational] people over by showing them statistics on yearly deaths in the US due to alcohol and to marijuana. Alcohol: 85,000, or between 1 and 2 percent of the US population every year. Marijuana: 0. FUCKING ZERO. Oh, it's possible that people have died of lung cancer caused by smoking marijuana, but then, people who don't smoke die of lung cancer, so it's not possible to show a link there. It might be, if the Federal government wasn't in the habit of suppressing all marijuana research in the states. Research done everywhere else in the world (well, just about everywhere) shows that it has numerous health benefits whether you're suffering from some illness or not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:The drama unfolds by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd like to remark that most of the Dutch think that our marihuana policy is essentialy correct. Ofcourse we have many different views, but the general opinion is that marihuana itself is not a real problem.

      It's not entirely without issues, but in general alcohol and tabbacco cause more problems. Most of the marihuana related problems are legal problems (you can get a license to sell marihuana, but not to grow it. Growing is still done in a criminal setting).

      We have far less problems with marihuana users then the countries that surround us. I have never seen any form of violence in a coffeeshop, while pub fights are almost normal.

      What I'm trying to say is, look at the facts. Don't believe what some company with a big stake in the outcome tells you.

    7. Re:The drama unfolds by The+Darkness · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alcohol: 85,000, or between 1 and 2 percent of the US population every year. Marijuana: 0. FUCKING ZERO.

      Let me say up front that I'm for legalizing Marijuana as a substance similar to the way Alcohol is legal.

      I checked what I believe is the source of your data:
      http://www.drugwarfacts.org/causes.htm

      The "zero" number you quote is only for deaths directly related to smoking it. The number for alcohol (85000) includes car related accidents. The number of direct alcohol deaths is more like 68400 - not an insignificant number. The number of car accidents related to "illicit drug use" including Marijuana is included in the 17000 number near the bottom. If we count every incident as a "Marijuana related car accident" (which I know is unreasonable) then we still end up with a number comparable to alcohol. What that says to me is that no matter what substance you have available to let people alter their minds with there is a percentage of the population that will do stupid things like drive and take other people out.

      I think it's stupid that smoking it is illegal but perhaps something a little more realistic than "it's harmless" should be the message. If you tell people its harmless and the statistics start to show more indirect deaths due explicitly to Marijuana then you risk backlash.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
    8. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      marijuana and math don't mix too well though ;). 85,000 / 298,000,000 = .000285, which is about 3 hunredth of a percent, or about one person in 3500.

    9. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm, yes, they will learn. i lived 5 years in BC, Canada, puff puff. yes learn, puff, damn, puff, hippies, puff puff. i agree, puff puff, piracy will come around to be decriminalized and/or un-enforced as puff well. aaaaaaaahh.

    10. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess by "learn" you mean "give up"? That's pretty cynical. Who says it's ideal to defend your rights? It's just basic human rights. You can sit back and enjoy yourself in the few ways you have left. Me, I've got nothing left, so I don't have anything to lose, and everything to gain. So I'm going to fight for what I want. Gee, that's how revolutions start, isn't it? Oh well, I guess you didn't learn that.

    11. Re:The drama unfolds by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I've always been bad at math. Any influence due to drugs is statistically insignificant. I must have left a 0 or two off my 320 million when I punched it into the calculator - boy, is my face red.

      Not that anyone can see that :P

      (woof)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:The drama unfolds by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you tell people its harmless and the statistics start to show more indirect deaths due explicitly to Marijuana then you risk backlash.

      It's still true that there are 0 direct deaths, however. Also I have an easier time believing that a car accident is due to alcohol than marijuana; marijuana does not impair the judgement so seriously as does alcohol, though it does harm reaction times. Then again, it also reduces the road rage factor - typically one is just not in so much of a hurry.

      I think it is clear that Marijuana is less harmful than our primary legal drugs, less harmful than probably any other illegal drug, and is probably less harmful than a coca-cola or coffee habit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:The drama unfolds by chefren · · Score: 1

      At least generation X has finally gotten a cause of its own.

    14. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you do have some point that Marijuana is probably linked to at least a few people's deaths. But trying to put extra meaning into those numbers is just a waste of time. Since the "illicit drug use" number included all types of illicit drugs and all kinds of deaths (suicide, homicide, car accident, HIV, etc.) we really can't conclude nor estimate with any type of accuracy how much effect Marijuana had on that figure.

      But we can still compare the deaths related to direct usage... 68,400 for alcohol, 0 for Marijuana
      still makes for a nice comparison without factoring in other related deaths.

      Another intresting note is that there is no equivalent to a Blood Alcohol Level test for marijuana. So you can't directly measure how "high" a person currently is. You can try and determine by their behavior... but that is hardly acurate (let alone functional on corpses). You can with quite a bit of success look for the metabolized byproducts stored in the persons body to determine if they've had marijuana in the recent past (often up to months), but it doesn't tell you if they're "high" right now, or even when they were "high" last with any real percision.

      So just remember that many of these reports of people being on Marijuana during some accident or what not, that often all it really means is that they smoked some time in the last few weeks... possibly right before the incident or possibly days, weeks, or months before.

    15. Re:The drama unfolds by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 1
      I guess this makes the people who have died feel much better.

      "Oh, it's okay. I'm only indirectly dead. The guy who slammed into my side was only slightly impaired."

      The parent's message is still the same. With arguments like those you propose, you're risking some huge backlash. It's the same old argument, and we see where it has gotten us.

    16. Re:The drama unfolds by bag-o-doughnuts · · Score: 0

      Too bad it is illegal.. Otherwise we would have statistics on the amount of deaths due to cancer it was caused. That shit puts more tar in your lungs can cigarettes. Get your fucking head out of your ass, pot is as harmless as tobacco is.

    17. Re:The drama unfolds by ultranova · · Score: 1

      On a different note, it was pointed out somewhere else that Sweden and Finland are forerunners in Free Information because of a different mentality. Up there, information shared helped the community as a whole. Down here in the more temperate climes, information was locked up in guilds, and storytellers guarded their tales. An interesting theory...

      Until recently that was true. However, here in Finland we made the mistake of letting Tanja Karpela become our Minister of Culture, and the woman has been a constant public embarrassment ever since. Among other things, she forced through a new copyright law that is so unclear that even the government itself isn't quite certain what it actually forbids or allows.

      Finland repelled the Soviet Union twice, but apparently the Copyright Mafia is too much.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    18. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You smoke 20 joints a day?

    19. Re:The drama unfolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that statistic is that it refers to other drugs beside marijuana, and only tests for metabolites in the bloodstream, which do not have psychoactive effects but may be present for 2-4 weeks after smoking.

    20. Re:The drama unfolds by The+Darkness · · Score: 1

      Too bad it is illegal.. Otherwise we would have statistics on the amount of deaths due to cancer it was caused.

      Oh, I must have forgotten that driving under the influence of alcohol was legal. My mistake.

      That shit puts more tar in your lungs can cigarettes.

      Do you have any evidence?

      Get your fucking head out of your ass, pot is as harmless as tobacco is.

      Are you arguing that cigarettes should be illegal, that pot should be as legal as cigaretts, or are you just trying to piss me off with your inane head-in-the-ass comment?

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
    21. Re:The drama unfolds by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How about the argument that even if every single person in the US used marijuana (the estimates are PRETTY DAMNED HIGH as it is) the deaths due to weed would likely be less than those of alcohol without any change in per capita alcohol consumption? How about the argument that if we're allowed to have alcohol, which is far more dangerous and offers almost no health benefits (aside from those you can gain from one small glass of wine per day) we ought to be allowed to have marijuana, which has known health benefits? Oh wait, that research has been suppressed in the US.

      The argument may not be one useful for campaigns for the legalization of marijuana, but then, I'm not working for anything like that either. There's a zillion arguments in favor which are, if not reasonable (basing it on the availability of alcohol is illogical, I admit, because alcohol IS so harmful) at least more reasonable than the arguments against.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  45. Global Warming by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please get the Pirate Bay back up, 'cause less pirates means higher global temperatures

  46. They did... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    ...the country's name was SWEEDEN.

    The whole point of it being in Sweeden was that it was untouchable there.

    1. Re:They did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...the country's name was SWEEDEN.

      The whole point of it being in Sweeden was that it was untouchable there.

      Your expertise on Swedish copyright law might be easier to believe if you knew how to spell the name of the country correctly.

      (Lawyers interviewed by the Swedish press generally agree the PB admins will be going to jail. The "PB is legal" claim comes originally from PB's "legal expert" who happens to be a law student. Place your bets, ladies and gentlemen...)

  47. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by john83 · · Score: 1
    When the kids went to bed, my wife asked me, "Will we be able to keep the house, David?"
    I just shook my head, and tried to hold back the tears. "I don't know, Jenny. I don't know."
    Man, that had me in stitches.
    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  48. Pirate bay will rise again by Strategos · · Score: 2, Funny

    What we need is a server in orbit sharing the links on a stealthed satellite. That'll screw them. Try shutting down the bit torrent links then.

    1. Re:Pirate bay will rise again by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      you do know most developed nations have antisatellite systems, and its invisibility to radar does not change the fact that more primitve radio/laser seeking missiles can home in on it, and signals can be triangulated upon. further, laws can be passed to prevent companies from interfacing with and passing signals from unauthorized satellites.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Pirate bay will rise again by mythandros · · Score: 1

      Do you not recall Ronald Reagan's supposed "Star Wars" project back in the 80's? The facilities that researched it are still in operation and still require a security clearance to get anywhere close to them.

      [queue background music]
      "Orbital backup services! We're the safest place to mirror your..."

      mmmmMMMMMM *ZOT*

      "...crap..."

    3. Re:Pirate bay will rise again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZOMG! Space Pirates!

    4. Re:Pirate bay will rise again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. Duh. Just kill the uplink and the server might as well be dead.

  49. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHOOOSH!

  50. Re:STANDBY by HaydnH · · Score: 1

    If you gon't care about any of this stuff why on earth are you reading /.?!?

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  51. Re:STANDBY by base3 · · Score: 1

    What are you doing about all those ills you're judging the rest of us for not helping fix? Besides osting tripe here, I mean.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  52. Re:BAD name by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure they were being deliberately offensive, but they had solid, legal swedish case law behind them, so seeing whether they would last was a test of the integrity of the legal system (and the speed of the political system in making what they did actually illegal).

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  53. Alternative translation by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
    Is attack really the literal translation or are there some subtleties of language lost in the translation? "attack" seems like a loaded word to use in a poll, IMHO.
    I'd rather use "crack down on". But you never know about those pirates, they may have cannons and stuff! So mabye an attack is appropriate after all. ;-)
    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  54. Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by MOtisBeard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The police in Sweden didn't just take the Pirate Bay servers... they also confiscated servers belonging to other, unrelated businesses as well. This, without even being sure (according to the police themselves) that the Pirate Bay people had broken any Swedish law.

    Some of the other servers were related, insofar as they were also torrent servers. The site known as Karagarga was affected, as was the Asian DVD Club. There was no warrant against these sites, but they are down nonetheless... and I repeat, according to the police themselves, they are not even sure that the Pirate Bay, which they did have a warrant for, was violating any of the laws in Sweden.

    What Pirate Bay did more than anything else to bring this massive shitstorm down upon their heads was not facilitate filesharing; rather, they taunted the MPAA/RIAA and their lawyers egregiously and often, and no doubt caused quite a bit of apoplexy among these people over the last few years.

    Me, I'm not interested in the films that come out of Big Hollywood. I like old classics, I like arthouse, I like cult, I like rarities. The torrent site I frequent specializes in those genres, and doesn't even allow people to share Big Hollywood product. The site owners don't like the DMCA, but they do comply with it, and consequently have never been bothered by MPAA/RIAA about their activities. In their private forums, they have had a running poll going for most of a year now, which is somewhat illuminating... and overwhelming percentage of the members there (82%), people who are all quite familiar with where and how to download anything they want for free, still buy commercial DVDs and CDs! This data corroborates findings of researchers at major US universities, who have concluded that filesharing does not necessarily hurt the sales of traditional media. The research indicates that filesharing of majorly hyped Big Hollywood releases (like a new STAR WARS movie, for instance) has a small but noticeable negative impact on ticket sales and DVD rentals, but that filesharing of more obscure fare actually has a significant POSITIVE impact on ticket sales and DVD rentals -- it exposes more people to the work in question, and consequently, more people go out and buy a commercial copy of it.

    It seems that the real problem is not that filesharers are evil 'pirates' who are cutting into MPAA/RIAA profits due to their wicked refusal to pay for culture... the problem is that when you buy a cinema ticket or buy/rent a DVD, and you have never seen the film or heard the album before purchasing, you are far more likely to spend money on movies and music that you ultimately find disappointing, and people don't like that. Filesharing should properly be regarded by Big Hollywood as pressure to stop making such a tremendous amount of recycled garbage, stop using marketing as the ultimate focus and raison d'etre of every film and CD produced, and get back to the old school traditions of making fine art for fine art's sake, with marketing a strictly post-production affair that has no say in what scripts get chosen or how directors do their jobs.

    Would you buy a car without taking it for a test drive? Would you pay for clothes without trying them on? How many times have you walked out of a theater after a film, or ejected a DVD from your DVD player, and wished for your money back? All the actual hard data that has been collected shows that even hardcore filesharers DO go out and buy commercial DVDs and CDs; they like to own the tangibles and they like to support the artists and companies whose work they appreciate... so filesharing isn't piracy, it's more akin to trying something before you buy it, and rejecting it if it's poorly made. MPAA/RIAA's strident insistence that filesharing is piracy is simply their bid to retain their obscenely high profits without doing the tough job of making products worth buying. They prefer to work according to formulae and sell the same tired bullshit again and again, with explosions and special effects in lieu of actual

    1. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It seems that the real problem is not that filesharers are evil 'pirates' who are cutting into MPAA/RIAA profits due to their wicked refusal to pay for culture... the problem is that when you buy a cinema ticket or buy/rent a DVD, and you have never seen the film or heard the album before purchasing...

      What you have just described is the Sideshow Attraction. The tent with the aggressive sales pitch and wild claims, and most often a tired rundown show inside the tent. And like the carnival barkers, the big studios hate it when you get too much of a peek at the contents.
    2. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by Zephiria · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hi there,
      I just thought I should point out something in your comment that explains the RIAA/MPAA's worries.

      See when you take a car out for a test drive you can tell if its crap or not quite quickly. Its the same with films, most are ones you'd only ever watch once and then never think about again.
      The problem is that the MPAA/RIAA know this and normally they would hype up the film and get as many sales in the first week then let it die while still making back most if not all of their money even though the film was crap.
      By losing the zero day sales due to people knowing its crap and telling their friends in warning their loosing their business.

      I'm not defending them just explaining what i see to be the problem :)

    3. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you buy a car without taking it for a test drive?

      Would you get arrested for grand theft auto if you took a car for a test drive, decided you liked it, and then never returned it to the lot?

      How many times have you walked out of a theater after a film, or ejected a DVD from your DVD player, and wished for your money back?

      Plenty. But how is that relevant? I may wish I could get my money back, but there's no legal reason compelling the theater or DVD seller to do so. I knew there was a risk that I wouldn't enjoy it when I put my money down.

      All the actual hard data that has been collected shows that even hardcore filesharers DO go out and buy commercial DVDs and CDs; they like to own the tangibles and they like to support the artists and companies whose work they appreciate...

      Some filesharers do. I'll concede that maybe MOST do, statistically. But if there's even one filesharer that downloads content, decides he likes it, and then does not purchase a legitimate copy of it... well, he's in violation of copyright law. Whether "piracy" is the correct term to describe his actions is a mere semantic argument, and one I do not wish to get into.

      Making counterfeit physical copies of DVDs and CDs and selling them as the real thing for profit is piracy.

      In no codification of copyright law that I'm aware of does it state that having a PHYSICAL copy of a work is a requisite condition for a copyright violation. Until the pre-digital laws are revised to state otherwise, one would have to assume that the law applies to bits on a hard drive the same as it would to tangible shiny discs on Canal Street.

    4. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Would you get arrested for grand theft auto if you took a car for a test drive, decided you liked it, and then never returned it to the lot?

      Would you still be arrested if you took it home (let's say it is a Ferrari), ran it through a "magic" 3D scanner system (that could identify, tag, and locate every atom of the vehicle), store it in a computer, and then "rebuild" it via another "magic 3D printing" system - after returning the original vehicle to the dealer, because you couldn't afford it?

      What has the dealer lost? They still have their original car, you didn't steal it. All they have lost is potential revenue. At that point in the argument, they might as well jail you for NOT buying their product.

      Someday, they probably will...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    5. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by Siker · · Score: 1

      The GP isn't mainly talking about what the laws are like but what they should be like. So pointing out what is illegal is irrelevant.

      There is no moral problem with filesharing as I see it. Culture is meant to be shared. I blog about the absurdity of trying to control ideas and expressions of ideas here.

    6. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by MOtisBeard · · Score: 1
      It might be worthwhile to point out that most films shared on torrent sites are NOT exact copies of DVDs, though some certainly are. The great majority are "rips" rather than copies... they are sized down to not only transfer faster, but to fit on a single CD (not a DVD). 700 MB is the most common size for a movie that is shared on a torrent site. Therefore, we're not talking about making an exact copy of a Ferrari here, we're talking about making a copy that looks like a Ferrari, but crappier, and doesn't perform nearly as well... but DOES get peoples' attention and make them more aware of the Ferrari brand, possibly inducing them to go out and buy the real thing.

      Analogies aside, the assumption that every movie download represents a lost sale is absolutely bogus and one-sided. I often download films that I would never go see in the theater or rent on DVD, because I have a limited budget for such things... but since it's free, my curiosity allows me to explore beyond the bounds of both my disposable income and my normal range of interests. If I find that I have downloaded something really good, I may add it to my normal range of interests, and start spending money on it and things like it. For instance, I never really liked Westerns until I started filesharing, and saw some really good ones... now I own commercial DVDs of at least a dozen Westerns, because watching movies in relatively low resolution with relatively poor sound quality is not nearly as cool as watching them in their full uncompressed glory on a big screen TV with good sound.

    7. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by jeoy_c_dawg · · Score: 1

      MotisBeard, how come you freely mention these sites but you don't mention the site you personally are responsible for? If you're advertising sites you might as well advertise your own no? You're such a humble guy, I'll do it for you. Cinema Obscura is a great site for movies. Enjoy! http://www.cinema-obscura.com/

    8. Re:Piracy, or Pressure to Make Good Products? by cbnmedia · · Score: 0

      what kind of f*cking MORON are you? He doesn't mention that for good reason (which you are obviously too stupid to figure out without mummy holding your hand) I hope I'm there when you get banned IDIOT.

      --
      Haven't you got anything better to do than read my stupid signature?
  55. Pirate party servers were NOT raided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The servers that were taken down belonged to The Pirate Bay (torrent hosting and tracker) and its sister organisation Piratbyrån (political organisation without party status).

    The pirate party is a registered political party with different leadership and different servers hosted elsewhere. The pirate party servers went down because of the slashdot effect, but are up again (however not fully functional it seems).

    A number of totally unrelated sites where also taken down, probably as an intimidation action pointed against the customers of PRQ, the ISP that has a close connection to TPB.

    According to this website(swedish), the pirate party increased its membership by 25% in one day after TPB went down. The pirate party has a bit over 2000 members.

  56. How is google not liable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, that doesn't mean his argument is inconsistent, it could also be that the law is applied in an inconsistent manner.

    1. Re:How is google not liable? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Which means that the original premise is invalid since the legality of one site would have no bearing on the legality of another.

    2. Re:How is google not liable? by alexhs · · Score: 1

      But to be sentenced guilty of copyright infringement, you first need to be sued by the copyright holder (or its representants). No sane company would sue Google to merely link to them. It would almost be like asking to be removed from the Internet.

      Therefore, if TPB is illegal in the US, Google probably also is, but nobody wants to sue them for that, because this is an illegality they're profiting of. Remember that everybody is breaking some law some times, but often nobody cares.

      Anyway, maybe have you heard about the troubles Google got into about Google News and the Image search. And it was real copyright infringement these times as Google not only links to but also caches copyright material. BTW, I think caching wouldn't count as copyright infringement in the new copyright French law.
      The border between fair use and copyright infringement is sometimes quite blurred (and more and more it seems).

      Beyond that, *AA likes to go after the poor little guy to make the general public fear, not to get money from them. While companies sueing Google probably have a better incentive into making profit from a search engine - especially when that search engine is a market leader while current outsiders like MSN are offering the same service and I haven't heard of them being sued for that.

      Now in both last cases... Has someone really been convicted by the court or everything stopped each time by a settlement ? Because the poor little guy can't afford a lengthy case and Google might not want to open the Pandora Box if being ruled guilty of copyright infringement.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:How is google not liable? by trewornan · · Score: 1
      *AA likes to go after the poor little guy to make the general public fear

      Not only because they want to engender fear but also because the little guy doesn't have the resources for a big legal battle. Google on the other hand might well fight and then the *AA is in danger of setting a precedent - it can't afford to risk losing.

    4. Re:How is google not liable? by hobot · · Score: 0

      No sane company would sue Google to merely link to them. It would almost be like asking to be removed from the Internet. It has been done numerous times.

    5. Re:How is google not liable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the new copyright French law."
      Why in heaven's name would anyone want to pass a law copyrighting French?

  57. Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... is asking for it, imho. It does nothing to help get the concept of fair use and evil market restriction technologies through to the elder blockheads in politics.
    I really can't say if I should wish for these guys to be put away or sued to chunky kibbles at least.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by ylikone · · Score: 1

      If you've ever read anything about the sites history, you would know that it was very deliberately called "The Pirate Bay" to piss off the powers that hate P2P. They WERE asking for it. It's all part of the big plan.

      --
      Meh.
    2. Re:Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Is that the same as saying a woman wearing revealing clothing is "asking for it" IYHO?

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    3. Re:Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you're doing there :)

    4. Re:Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      When you keep going up to people & screaming HIT ME it's only a matter of time until someone does.
      Yes they were asking for it, yes they are probably ready for it, and yes I can almost garauntee that the local equivalent of the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) already has a gameplan for it.
      As to your question - Is that the same as saying a woman wearing revealing clothing is "asking for it" IYHO? - no. But it is about the same as dressing in a skimpy outfit, standing on a seedy corner & asking everyone who stops at the light if they would like to have a good time - eventually someone's going to say yes - and you had better have a gameplan ready.
      [notice type:fine-print] 'good time' is a registered trademark of amusements inc. Varying deffinitions of fun are employed with 'good time' advertising, and no single deffinition of fun should be implied to encompass all aspects of the 'good time' advertising campain.

    5. Re:Calling a p2p related site "The Pirate Bay" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, "piracy" is the equivalent of big flashing letters telling something has gone wrong. Practically everyone does it yet it's attacked fiercely. It'd be foolish to pretend it didn't exist.

      Were the site called say, Fairuse I doubt you'd have even heard of it.

  58. Cost of Movies vs cost of an artist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A hollywood movie has budgets these days in the 100 to 200 million $ range, yet when the DVD comes out it's on average $20.

    You're telling us that it cost the same kind of budget to develope a musician? BULLSHIT!

  59. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I cry that my 5th generation industry was stolen out from under my feet? Do I cry that my grandparents and parents endured hardships? No.

          That's because you're not a jew.

  60. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    I bet if you read shelleytherepublican.com you'd think that's for real too. Guys, engage brain when reading.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  61. Media Companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I no longer buy very much from them. I tend not to buy music CDs, I tend not to buy DVDs, I tend not to really go to the cinema much, unless there is a blockbuster that I, and not THEY like the look off, much to Hollywood's discord.

    I've not bought a playstation, or an Xbox360, nor will I be doing so. DRM based systems die in terms of interest the very moment I find the product is laced with it.

    There seems to be an idea that, certainly in the UK, its fine and dandy to rip off the consumer, create mass uncertainty and doubt about what you can do with your own media. The model that you rent but do not 'own' what you have paid for, is clung to like a rock by every media laced company and entity out there.

    The majority of this comes with a backdrop that these products HAVE to flood the market to be a success, and when they do not succeed its down to piracy. So they claim.

    The distribution model for goods and services is a win/lose equasion that is determined by the consumer, NOT the distributor. The largest angle the media companies HAVE to find is one that makes a evenue stream for them, while actually giving consumers what they want.

    Now, if they want to proceed with DRMing their junk - because a great deal of what they pitch is exactly that, and if they as millionaires, and well heeled celebrities wish to persue getting off on suing teenagers who have hardly a pair of dimes to run together anyway, so be it, BUT I won't help them do it.

    No matter how much you like media, its high time everyone took a hardline, if you don't want to be treated like a victim by the media mafia, and you don't want kids sued for idolising some people, then stop damn well buying goods and services from these people. Tell your friends and family, tell your collegues, tell the news, why you won't support these people any longer.

    If enough people make a stand, it will change whats happening.

  62. Translation, please - ! by catman · · Score: 1

    Can anyone provide a translation of that page?

    1. Re:Translation, please - ! by tibike77 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I could translate that, but it would take a long while. So I'm just going to (loosely) translate (some of) the relevant paragraphs... even by Romanian standards, that article is pretty shabby in legalese and IT-term-wise anyway.
      If it sounds strange to you, don't worry, that's what they actually wrote.

      They are targetting LAN DC++ users (and LAN hubs) right now.
      It is unknown wether they will extend this to torrent users of well-known ISPs or not.
      ___

      The following is the translation of the bolded text in the article:

      A hysteria broke all across the country following operations directed towards those who illegally use the "share" option in the so-called neighbourhood networks (translator note: LANs spanning users from a few buildings up to a few city blocks). Sources from the MAI (translator note: Ministry of Internal Affairs ? well, the police anyway) have declared the operation is code-named "The Gramophone".

      Because in the IP-rights category Romania got a "yellow flag" warning from the EU, Romanian Police has enacted measures regarding weekly raids organisation in order to control this phenomenon, in all counties.

      Within the scope of this endeavour, policemen and prosecutors will work together with ISPs and hub operators. Another method used by the cops to penetrate the hubs is by assuming innocuous user identities.

      In Iasi (translator note: rather large city, "capital" of the county with the same name in the NE of the country, region called Moldova), cops and prosecutors have made several household searches, seizing HDDs, computers and switches. In Tulcea (translator note: city by the Black Sea coast/ Danube Delta), over 20 Internet users have ended up with penal records, and cops have confiscated "dozens" of HDDs.

      The chief of the IP department from the "Parchetul General" (translator note: the higher prosecuting autority), Monica Otava, has declared that prosecutors all across the country will start [such] actions, benefitting from both legal grounds and the necessary logistics for the "annihilation" of LANs.

      The only other relevant (and worying) bit is the following:

      "- Sa inteleg ca de-acum incolo orice utilizator dintr-o asa-zisa retea de cartier se poate trezi la usa cu un procuror cu un mandat de perchezitie in mana?
      - Da, oricand, se poate trezi la usa cu un mandat de perchezitie."


      That loosely translates into something like this:

      *Interviewer* : So, are we to understand that from now on anybody who is connected to a local LAN can end up with the police holding a search warrant at their door?
      *Monica Otava* : Yes, anytime, he can end up with a search warrant at his door

      Well... no comment.
      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    2. Re:Translation, please - ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alo, Salut, sunt eu, un politist

      Vrei sa pleci dar nu ma, nu ma iei

    3. Re:Translation, please - ! by catman · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Perhaps not unconnected with the raid on The Pirate Bay - Swedish TV news ("Rapport") was told that the raid was (illegally!) ordered from government officials following talks with US authorities.
      Here in Norway an ex-prosecutor turned researcher has just come up with ideas about giving the *AA gangs permission to subpoena traffic data from ISPs (and possibly break into servers) looking for "illegal files". The IFPI leaned on an ISP to remove some mp3 files which turned out to be Grateful Dead concert recordings - then acknowledged that they goofed, which is something, I guess ... my Tor server is up and running :-)

      Info about TPB in English at http://tpbeng.blogspot.com/

  63. heh... a time-traveling troll from 2003 by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Dr Michael Hfuhruhurr Notice that in the comments someone says, "I saw this on Slashdot a while ago". And that name? Clearly a reference to a thread-ending historical figure. QED

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  64. Yes, I apologize again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I was hasty with the reply, I apologized for it (see first reply to my post). Again, I'm sorry for making you read more than you had to.

    1. Re:Yes, I apologize again! by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Wow - an apology! Accepted!

      FX: Wanders off muttering about what is the world coming to when people act sensibly.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Yes, I apologize again! by gomoX · · Score: 1

      There must be something in the air. Maybe the spring or something. I posted a comment to a guy's blog the other day, we engaged in not-so-nice argument, and 2 days later, *shock*, an apology from him, to my e-mail and posted in the blog! The IntarWeb is not what it used to be...

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
  65. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Legal or not, the internet will eventually kill your business anyway. You should have recognized that oh, about 6 years ago. If the record industry had an ounce of sense they would have gone to online distribution years ago and put you out of business.

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  66. RE: Pirate Bay by Fluk3 · · Score: 0
    --
    I've been upgraded to "bad"!
  67. So that's what astroturf smells like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what astroturf smells like.

  68. Quote from the leader of Piratpartiet by alaloom · · Score: 1

    "When society sends its police at the young generation for listening to music and watching movies, it's not the young that are in error. It's society that needs to get a grip." - Rickard Falkvinge I think he offers a good argument.

  69. MPAA Gleefully Issues Press Release by DeanFox · · Score: 1


    PDF Warning: MPAA Gleefully Issues Press Release Detailing the "Sinking of Pirate Bay"

    http://www.mpaa.org/press_releases/2006_05_31.pdf

    By the time this is picked up by the media, PB will be back online. I *love* it.

    -[d]-

  70. Proportionality, efficiency and price fixing by gjuk · · Score: 1

    The BBC site says that the raid was carried out by 50 police officers. In one way, it's good to know that Britain's not the only country which mismanages its police resources so badly, but it still seems hugely disproportionate (techy types not known for their violent resistance tactics). Presumably, the operation would have been just as effective (and arguably, just as wrong) with a couple of officers, a couple of techy coppers, and a couple of big blokes to hump off the servers. It does send out a signal about the recording industry's perverse hold on the authorities. I'd love to the monopolies commission going to the HQ of a big record company with 50 officers to seize a few price-fixing files. Somehow I think it won't happen.

    1. Re:Proportionality, efficiency and price fixing by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of Hackers, with the 10 FBI agents with automatics bearing down on those 15-year-olds.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Proportionality, efficiency and price fixing by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      The BBC site says that the raid was carried out by 50 police officers. In one way, it's good to know that Britain's not the only country which mismanages its police resources so badly, but it still seems hugely disproportionate (techy types not known for their violent resistance tactics). Presumably, the operation would have been just as effective (and arguably, just as wrong) with a couple of officers, a couple of techy coppers, and a couple of big blokes to hump off the servers.


      That depends on the quantity of servers that were removed. I've seen some (definatly incorrect) reports that a total of 200 servers were removed - if only a few guys were there, it would take a massive amount of time just to even get the servers on the truck.

      Just remember that if it takes a disproportionate amount of *time*, there's a greater chance that things might end up missing on the servers. While techs can detect if this sort of thing has happened, it also takes a tech to easily set up plausable deniability (e.g. make it look like it was deleted yesterday.)
    3. Re:Proportionality, efficiency and price fixing by init100 · · Score: 1

      I've seen some (definatly incorrect) reports that a total of 200 servers were removed

      How can you claim that those reports are "definitely incorrect"? Remember that the whole colocation site, including a range of unrelated websites, was brought offline, and all servers and even unrelated equipment such as monitors and speakers were seized.

      My guess is that the MPAA and the Swedish Anti-piracy Bureau want to make The Pirate Bay a pariah that noone will risk hosting, and if someone does, scare away all the other customers of that hoster.

  71. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, this story is a crock of shiznit. Nobody who is actually in this position writes such schmaltzy prose. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised is somebody in the RIAA paid an intern to make it up and post it here... well, actually, that kind of quick response to anything *would* be surprising.

    Secondly... Christian rock fans pirating music? So much for the religious moral high ground!

    Lastly, as an atheist and music fan, the P2P phenomenon has made more music available for sampling, from bands who otherwise couldn't have afforded the distribution. I download new acts, listen to them, and then go out and buy the ones I like. I am purchasing more music now than at any time in my life.

    This isn't about protecting music-- we will always pay for music. This is about protecting record companies: folks who are more accountants than music lovers.

  72. Re:BAD name by asuffield · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on, the PIRATES bay?!?!?!?!?

    they were just sayin g NA NA NA NA NA NA: you cant catch us!


    Yes, that is exactly what they were doing. It's roughly similar to civil disobedience.

    They were saying: We are the people, we want things this way. A democratic government is obliged to respect our wishes because we are a majority of the population. Foreign corporations cannot make up ethics and laws to suit their business plan, they require our consent.

    They have always been treating this as a political battle, not a legal one. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Sweden is unusual in that a large portion of the populace is informed about this issue and supports TPB rather than the MPAA. I don't think this is over yet.

    This is the stuff that brings down governments.

  73. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. You realize that you just blacklisted a PAYING customer. The whole flaw in the logic is that the people downloading the songs would have payed for them in the first place. I knew tons of people 10 years ago who taped 100's of CD's which were better quality than most of the MP3's being ripped and distribted. I download MP3's, but things I really want I still buy. Most downloaded MP3's are just not that high quality and I like having the CD. That being said, I usually rip my CD's so I have them on my laptop and MP3 player. I would not buy CD's if I couldn't do this. I occasionally give tracks to friends.

    Look to the record industry for the problems. 15 years ago I could buy a CD for around $10. Now they're 50% to 100% more, when the cost of making the CD's has gone from 2-3$ to next to nothing. And in my opinion the quality of new music has gone downhill. There's certainly much less that I'm interested in buying.

    You, on the other hand, have the audacity to think it's a good idea to drive away one of your admittedly few paying customers because he's going to rip the CD. Good luck to you.

  74. No trial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is certain that the case will not go to trial

    Why not? I would sue the arse of those responsible for this unlawful raid. That would be a nice kick in the face to Antipiratbyrån, IFPI, **AA and similar mafia groups.

  75. Re:STANDBY by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Because there are occasionally real stories worth yammering about.

    Some asshat hosting torrents then dancing around copyright law isn't what I call newsworthy. He's a jerk.

    Hate the studios all you want, but if you didn't like or want the media you wouldn't pirate it. The media is a work product so even if the artist is getting screwed [their choice btw] doesn't mean you should effectively benefit from it without compensation.

    So this guy isn't hosting the files, he's making it damn well easier to get to them though. And while I can see they're not the same action I also won't shed a tear if it gets taken down.

    It isn't like he's hosting torrents to Linux distro ISOes or something.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  76. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by 9Nails · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought a DVD music video of a popular band, it contained a virus.

    I bought an MP3 on-line from a major site, I couldn't listen to it on my portable player.

    I bought a CD from a music store, it contained a root-kit which gave hackers access to my computer.

    The RIAA sued a Grand Mother for Piracy, and she didn't even own a PC.

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Want me to still buy your music after all that has happened? Think again.

  77. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Jon_A_Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    They have fought the war on drugs with skill? Surely you jest. After spending a trillion dollars since the beginning of the war on drugs, all drugs are more available than they were before the war began, and potency is, if anything, improved. If there is a war on piracy, and it is fought as skillfully as the war on drugs, then in 30 years or so we'll have a few more million people to clothe and feed and shelter in prison, we'll be out another trillion dollars, and piracy will have increased.

  78. Very odd by fullofangst · · Score: 1

    In my opinion it's quite strange how much interest the Pirate Bay generates...

    As a techie, I'm all for peer-to-peer sharing earning itself a 'good' reputation, and not being seen as pure evil, in any context, by the mass media, hollywood, recording industries, next door neighbours etc.

    So I'm happy when legitimate uses for P2P (e.g. Sky by Broadband) are introduced.

    But absolutely bewildered why a torrent site blatantly for downloading copyrighted works for free gets SO MUCH ATTENTION.

    1. Re:Very odd by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

      > But absolutely bewildered why a torrent site blatantly for downloading copyrighted works for free gets SO MUCH ATTENTION.

      Might be related to the fact that downloading said works is actually legal in some countries.

    2. Re:Very odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, realistically, it is probably more related to the fact that people like downloading said works, and do so in great numbers, whether or not the act is legal. (Note that this isn't meant as a dig at piracy - there's not necessarily anything inherently bad - morally speaking - about illegal acts. Nevertheless, I always found the moral arguments in favour of piracy far superior to those depending on what are essentially legal loopholes.)

  79. Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, don't think the register is such a good/solid idea. Having that kind of national registry implies that:

    - Some store who still run on very old hardware will be required to upgrade, and to add an internet connection if they don't have one already
    - Stores will be obliged to ask for a photoID (because after all, if no IDs are asked when CDs are purcased then how do we know they aren't a pirate?) which means longer delays in lines.

    In addition, what's simply to stop someone to ask someone else to go purchase the CD? Better yet, what about online music store, how will they verify one's identity for online music sales? Of course there are multiple solutions one could suggest, but most if not all of thosse have an easy work-around.

    I'm 23yrs old, I vacation once a yr, I own an ATV, I have an xbox and I enjoy snowboarding. Now what's all that have to do you say? Well after many conversations with my parents, it's obvious to me that :

    - They didn't have as much disposable income as kids today do, which means their "down time" activities were much more limited. Listening to music was a cheap way to relax and spend down time. Kids today have more priviledges and things to do. They will prefer saving their money to put towards their car insurance bill and pirate CDs so they can listen music in their car while driving around as opposed to paying for their CDs and NOT being able to drive around since they oculdn't afford to pay the insurance bill.
    - Illiterates were much more common some 15, 20yrs ago. Today, kids are being encouraged by their schools and/or teachers to read as many books as possible, since the more you read the more likely your vocabulary will improve.

    Finally, I'd like to say that your opinion is only one side of the story. Don't forget that the Internet helps promote and distribute for small groups who are little or not known at all and who might not have the means to distribute their material.

    I've often bought CDs which had maybe 2 or 3 good tracks on them out of 15, and the rest were, as I like to call them, filler tracks. I do admit, I personally download MP3s and I'm not ashamed of it. I started
    downloading MP3s when I got tired of filler tracks.

    Erik

  80. the illegal drugs... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...were found on a person at Megamall, therefore all people at Megamall can be arrested and all items confiscated as evidence.

    Honestly, they don't care, they just follow orders, about the same anyplace in the world, there's no over-all practical difference between nations in this regard.

    Currently my favorite one they "enforce" in the US is "free speech zones". They swear an "oath" to the Constitution then go ahead and "follow orders" with that concept.

    1. Re:the illegal drugs... by lgw · · Score: 1

      What constitutional objection do you see to "free speech zones"? Your right to speak is protected, not your right to be heard. Your right to peacefully assemble is protected, not your right to disruptive protest.

      Nothing says a politician has to listen to you. Nothing gives you the right to disrupt an event organized by someone you disagree with.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:the illegal drugs... by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      Your right to speak is protected, not your right to be heard.

      What a shame that people like you are allowed to live.

    3. Re:the illegal drugs... by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      ...in America. Dammit, it looks like a threat, doesn't it?

  81. Mod point nightmare (Was Re:This is bad...) by Billosaur · · Score: 1

    Apparently they hand mod points to people without a sense of humor -- admittedly "Offtopic" if you want to be picky, but the parent was modded "Funny," though I note it has now picked up both "Offtopic" and "Troll," for what reason, I cannot fathom. Perhaps it was the work of Ninjas.

    One can only hope the forces of MetaModeration will prevail!

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Mod point nightmare (Was Re:This is bad...) by Quintios · · Score: 0
      Well, at least I'm only *partially* a troll. BTW, I'm a fan of yours, Bill. Keep up the good posts! :)

      And with regards to being Offtopic, at least I *mentioned* Pirates in my post! I'd say that's pretty on topic!

      --
      Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
  82. Good luck by LunaticTippy · · Score: 3, Funny
    There are countless signs in Los Angeles referring to "The La Brea Tar Pits."

    Or, as anyone who knows a smidge of Spanish calls them, "The The Tar Tar Pits."

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Good luck by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Heh. Near where I live there is a large hunk of topography called "Table Mesa".

  83. Copyright is an interesting beastie... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    You see, you can have an infringing copy, and so long as you're not the one that infringed getting it, it's not illegal.
    It's the act of making copies of a covered work without a license from the rights holder to do so that makes it an infringement- and that's how the laws are worded worldwide. They can have bogus copies all over the place, but if they aren't actively seeding a torrent and aren't caught sharing it, there's technically little they can do about the pirated copies. They can ask that you destroy the content, but you don't have to- because Copyright law doesn't give them the authority to compel you to do it. You have to be the one actively infringing (past or present with proof) for them to have a leg to stand on.

    So, unless they find the files in a seeder directory or have logs of them doing the downloads or seeding, they've got nothing on them if they've got infringements on their machines. I'm pretty sure they're not stupid enough to have been seeding, ever, so I doubt the Police, acting on RIAA/MPAA's behalf, will have anything that will stick- they'd have shut them down a lot sooner if they had real ammo on them, as they've been rather defiant and are so big. It's pure intimidation and harassment- and it's going to backfire on the *AA people.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  84. So to summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Record store owner bitches and moans about not getting enough sales.

    Someone comes in who's actually going to buy a CD.

    Record store owner grabs him by the shirt (probably liable for assault in most jurisdictions) and kicks him out of the store... without making the sale first.

    Said teen probably tells all his friends the guy who runs that record store is an asshole, so none of his friends (who may or may not engage in piracy) go there either.

    Record store owner continues to wonder why people don't buy music from him.

    I've learned something today. Assaulting customers before you take their money results in going bankrupt.

    (All of the above is assuming this isn't a laughable fake, which it probably is.)

  85. Oldie but goodie? by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Dude, that joke hasn't been funny for years.

    I don't know... "[The police and other law enforcement agencies] have fought the War on Drugs with skill, so why not the War on Piracy?" That still makes me chuckle everytime.

  86. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh! feel sorry for me.
    Lets make some laws to protect my outdated business model so I don't have to be creative and actually work for my living.

  87. How is filesharing different from a library? by tddoog · · Score: 1
    I often go to the library and borrow copies of books, dvds and cds for free . I do the same off of bitorrent. I download files and watch/read/listen to them and then I throw them away instead of returning them.

    Many times the library does not have the title that I am looking for and so I go to TPB or the like and usually they have it. Instead of maintaining an unreasonably collection at a large brick and mortar library, libraries could run torrent trackers and provide most of their collection online at very little cost to the public.

    I have a large cd and dvd collection that is filled with things that I want to own but some things I do not want to own. I only want to enjoy them once. I suppose if it were up to the **AA, they would shut down public libraries as well.

    1. Re:How is filesharing different from a library? by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      You have to pay for membership of libraries though or they may be funded by government (so funded by all the tax payers).

      Do libraries have to pay for a general license? I know that in the UK at least College libraries pay the CLA (Copyright Licensing Agency) so you can photocopy portions of books for study (one chapter or 5%, whichever is longer).

      But I am not sure if they have to pay for a "library license". Is there a librarian in the house? (Another phrase to add to the list of things I'd never thought I'd say).

    2. Re:How is filesharing different from a library? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The only difference is in how many people can view the copyrighted material at the same time. With a library, it is only one; with digital copies, it is theoretically infinite. If you had a license manager that limited simultaneous use to the number of copies purchased (they do this for software now), then a torrent would be funtionally the same as a library. However, I beleive MP3.com did operate on this principle, and was shut down anyway.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:How is filesharing different from a library? by tddoog · · Score: 1

      In the US, any city of appreciable size has a public library that is free of charge (payed for by taxes) and the only money content creators get is the sale of the original. I guess in some coutries, there is the Public Lending Right where content creators get paid for people viewing their work.

    4. Re:How is filesharing different from a library? by tddoog · · Score: 1
      I consider that fact to be the beauty of the online system.

      Maybe the Public library association could pay an exhorbitant amount for a copy of a work. Maybe $100000 and just put it up on a torrent. Seems to be an amicable/reasonable solution which means no one will be interested. Oh well, more money for the lawyers.

  88. Re:BAD name by Creepy · · Score: 1

    It's memorable and there are already legal examples - Pittsburgh Pirates, Disney's Pirates of the Carribean, etc. I certainly haven't seen any raids on Disney's site.

    Back in the 1980s I even knew a sysop that ran a legal BBS called Pirates Harbor. He promised "booty" as you progressed levels up in the system including download privledges, but all the software available was legal. A lot of the software hosted there was actually created by pirates, but made for use by gamers. I remember stuff like a Wizardry Scenario Editor, an Ultima sprite editor (I know the author of that one), a booklet of hack codes for different games (assembly calls for stuff like infinite lives), and also the one that got me in trouble in Jr High - the BBS version of the Anarchist Cookbook. In a nutshell, I printed 3 pages on bombs and a black powder recipe for a friend at school and then he made photocopies and started selling them. Someone got caught and turned in people up the food chain until I was fingered. I had a scared chat with a police officer and the Principal, but nothing illegal was done and there was no school policy banning information (until the next week). It was long before Columbine - I'd have been expelled and straightjacketed if I brought such a thing today. Incidentally, I did build one bomb - a smoke bomb (saltpeter and sugar) - which was pretty much where my interest in the subject ended.

  89. MPAA Document title : by alexhs · · Score: 5, Funny

    SWEDISH AUTHORITIES SINK PIRATE BAY

    Hmm... How are you going to sink a bay ? Isn't it already full of water ?

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  90. right ... but wrong. by hummassa · · Score: 4, Informative

    RIGHT: Unauthorized redistribution of copyrighted works is in violation of the Berne Convention, which Sweden is a signatory,
    WRONG: so it IS illegal for Pirate Bay to do what they are doing.
    Pirate Bay was NOT, under no circumstances, authorizedly or unauthorizedly redistributing copyrighted works. There were NO copyrighted works in PB's servers. ".torrent" files are just files that contain the following information: "the tracker XXX is keeping files YYY, ZZZ, TTT available for bittorrent swarm downloading." And "contributory infringement" is NOT part of the Berne convention... it's an USofAn "innovation". BTW, down here in Brasil there is no "contributory infringement" either.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  91. Re:BAD name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange that you feel the rights an organization maintains somehow depend on their name...

  92. Mod parent redundant by Robotron23 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You sir, ought to be modded redundant. Before you make ridiculous assertions that the legalize marijuana movement ended during the 1970s, I suggest actually reading the Wikipedia article; The legal issues of cannabis. If continual progress each and every month equates to failure in your mind, then I'm sorry but you need to revise your thought processes somewhat. Even in the U.S. at the state level, authorities are seeing the light and legalizing cannabis in small quantities - full legalization is on the way, whether it'll take 2, 5, 10, 20 or 50 years it will undoubtedly arrive.

    On topic, the supposed "end" of the Pirate Bay doesn't herald the end of BitTorrent - infact this will merely boost the cause of those hosting the site. Once the Swedish authorities wake up and realize PB has done nothing wrong, then the true campaign to relinquish all copyright law can truly begin.

    If this, a raid involving 50 officers, can happen in Sweden, a usually progressive, efficient and liberal nation - what would happen in more authoritarian nations? The sooner as these ridiculous, oligopoly-serving laws are erased from statute books worldwide, the better.

    1. Re:Mod parent redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...happen in Sweden, a usually progressive, efficient and liberal nation...

      That was before Bodström. :-(

  93. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too long / didn't read.

  94. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight. YOUR business model is failing so you want help from the government?

    Damn commies.

  95. Re:BAD name by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More like civil obidience. They (think they) are not doing anything illegal. It's like calling a group of people "The Jaywalkers" and always crossing the road when the go-light is on.

  96. An Inconvenient Raid? by chris311 · · Score: 1

    This is clearly a conspiracy to keep people from seeing "An Inconvenient Truth", the new Al Gore movie. George Bush and his oil company cronies don't want the truth to get out. ManBearPig! I'm Serial.

  97. Some will consider this offtopic... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Some will consider this offtopic, but it really isn't when the discussion moves to filesharing being a sort of: "try b4 you buy". Anyone that goes to a movie is entitled to a FULL REFUND of the ticket price if they go to the box office within a 20 minute window AFTER the movie starts and demand one. Not the trailers, etc., but the actual film. They are REQUIRED to give it to you, no questions asked!

    1. Re:Some will consider this offtopic... by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      Sometimes you don't realize that the movie isn't going to be worth the price of admission until the end, though.

      Of course, Hollywood probably takes that into account and keeps the first 20 minutes at least someone interesting, to keep people in those seats.

      I mean, how many movies have you seen that started out okay, and then just blew for the last half?

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    2. Re:Some will consider this offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Example: "Hostel" (well, there are only T&A on the beginning, which should be unacceptably by itself, but...;-)) well, I hoped that it will be better; unfortunately, it wasn't.)
      Yes, this film is really stupid (BTW - I'm from Europe).

  98. Re:BAD name by JakeX · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with 'Pirate Bay' ? They were never saying 'Na Na Na', they were saying they are a search engine, and plus under Swedish law, they didn't do anything wrong. I fail to see any merit to your comment other than to be flamebait.

  99. How can we give money to them? by ngdbsdmn · · Score: 1

    I think many people would like to donate them money so that they can be helped in this state-sponsored oppression. I know I do, so I would like to know if there is any way to do this. Warning! Answers to this post may lead to phishing sites so beware.

    1. Re:How can we give money to them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about them in particular. Many times publicity, donating time for assisting their family, are as good as gold. Anime fan pages sometimes use Paypal.

    2. Re:How can we give money to them? by Siker · · Score: 1

      I guess you could buy something in the Pirate Shop. I like the 'sharing is caring' design myself. :)

  100. ...the officers explained that this is normal... by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    Huh? It's normal to barge into private premises, arrest people for no reason and siege their property? In a totalitarian government, ya... But I don't think that's the kind of system that is running in Sweden.

  101. lol two edged swords! by Codename.Juggernaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the MPAA's statement: "The bottom line is that the operators of the Pirate Bay and others like them are criminals who profit handsomely by facilitating the distribution of millions of copyrighted creative works and files protected under the law," said John G. Malcolm, Executive Vice President and Director of Worldwide Anti-Piracy Operations for the MPAA. "We applaud Swedish law enforcement for their effort to stop egregious copyright infringement on The Pirate Bay."

    The only Criminals who profit handsomely by facilitating the distribution of millions of copyrighted creative works and files protected under the law in this story are the MPAA. Piratebay is a search engine. You have to break a law to be 'Criminal'

    1. Re:lol two edged swords! by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, I would say a search engine facilitates the distribution of the works. That seems like a nobrainer to me.

    2. Re:lol two edged swords! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      But a search engine doesn't make a criminal. It doesn't matter what the RIAA/MPAA thinks.

      The just of it is, most of them (and a lot of people here) don't see anything wrong at all with copying movies, music, whatever else. There's plenty of ways to pay for stuff such as with advertisements (already works fine for Tv shows), live performances (for music), and support services (for software). Basically, once you have created data, it's a completely non-tangible entity and I'll be damned if somebody is going to tell me I can't duplicate a bit-pattern because they happened to think of it first.

      With this attitude, they frankly aren't going to give a damn if they're facilitating copyright infringement. Hell if it wasn't illegal they'd probably host the files too. They are getting as close as they can to breaking the law without doing so, because in the end they don't agree with the law anyways.

      For a real world scenario, suppose you didn't like to wear seatbelts, but there was some law that said the seatbelt must be latched while a car is moving (and that's all it said). If you happened to latch it behind you so that it's latched but not holding you in, then you'd be legal. It doesn't matter that you've violated the spirit of the law: you didn't agree with it in the first place.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:lol two edged swords! by madcow_bg · · Score: 1

      From the MPAA's statement: "The bottom line is that the operators of the Pirate Bay and others like them are criminals who profit handsomely by facilitating the distribution of millions of copyrighted creative works and files protected under the law," said John G. Malcolm, Executive Vice President and Director of Worldwide Anti-Piracy Operations for the MPAA. "We applaud Swedish law enforcement for their effort to stop egregious copyright infringement on The Pirate Bay."

      The only Criminals who profit handsomely by facilitating the distribution of millions of copyrighted creative works and files protected under the law in this story are the MPAA. Piratebay is a search engine. You have to break a law to be 'Criminal'

      Yup. Two half-truths make one pretty full lie:).

    4. Re:lol two edged swords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Google illegal?

  102. Ever hear of the volstead act? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    It wes highly unpopular, but passed nonetheless at the behest of a highly vocal minority of zealots.

    It stuck around for about a decade before being repealed for 2 reasons: 1, it was abysmally ineffective 2, it was causing more organized crime.

    incidentally, canada also refused to go along with this law as well.

    notice any parallels with a certain 1998 law?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  103. Re:Think Prohibition by vertinox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, just like this old fogie predicted, the piracy issues is evolving along nicely parallel to the 50's-60's "legalize marijuana" drug movement.

    Actually, you couldn't be more wrong. Most people back then didn't do drugs if they were Joe Six-Pack. However, most people already break the law when it comes to pirating.

    Not only that, the RIAA and MPAA want to get rid of fair use.

    They want to make time shifting and recording TV shows illegal because using the DMCA they have made it illegal for Joe Six-pack to by pass the DRM.

    This is stuff that grandma, Bob the Blue Collar worker, and Sara the Single Mom already do and they don't think its morally wrong. This was stuff they were doing in the 70s and 80s with the VCR and tape recorders.

    So this is more like Prohibition of the 30's. People, young and old, don't think it is wrong and they actively do it every day without thinking twice.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  104. "ThePirateBay will rise again?" by payndz · · Score: 1

    Of course it will! They can just put up a torrent... oh, wait.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:"ThePirateBay will rise again?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already has...

  105. As a troll store owner, I hope not by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My business faces ruin. Troll sales have dropped through the floor. People aren't buying half as many trolls as they did just a year ago. Revenue is down and costs are up. My store has survived for years, but I now face the prospect of bankruptcy. Every day I ask myself why this is happening.

    I bought the store about 12 years ago. It was one of those boutique troll stores that sell obscure, lame jokes that no-one laughs about, not even the people that make them. I decided that to grow the business I'd need to aim for a different demographic, the geek market. My store specialised in trolls - stuff that geeks find hilarious and/or annoying. I don't sell sick stuff like Goatse or Tubgirl, and I'm proud to have one of the most extensive In Soviet Russia sections that I know of.

    The business strategy worked. People flocked to my store, knowing that they (and their children) could safely purchase trolls without anuses or violent diarrhea. Over the years I expanded the business and took on more clean-cut and friendly employees. It took hard work and long hours but I had achieved my dream - owning a profitable business that I had built with my own hands, from the ground up. But now, this dream is turning into a nightmare.

    copy Every day, fewer and fewer customers enter my store to buy fewer and fewer trolls. Why is no one buying trolls? Are people not interested in pop culture references? Do people prefer to watch TV, see films, read books? I don't know. But there is one, inescapable truth - Slashdot is mostly to blame. The statistics speak for themselves - one in three trolls world wide appears on Slashdot. On Slashdot, you can find and read hundreds of dollars worth of pop culture references in just minutes. It has the potential to destroy the lame joke industry, from artists, to troll companies to stores like my own. Before you point to the supposed "economic downturn", I'll note that the karma store just across from my store is doing great business. Unlike trolls, it's harder to copy karma on Slashdot.

    A week ago, an unpleasant experience with space ninjas gave me an idea. In my store, I overheard a teenage patron talking to his friend.

    "Dude, I'm going to post this troll on Slashdot right away."

    "Yeah, dude, that's really lete [sic], you'll get lots of +1, Funny."

    I was fuming. So they were out to destroy the troll industry from right under my nose? Fat chance. When they came to the counter to make their purchase, I grabbed the little shit by his shirt. "Zo...you ah going to post zis to your frends on Slushdot, punk?" I asked him in my best Arnold Schwarzenegger/Kindergarten Cop voice.

    "Uh y-yeh." He mumbled, shocked.

    "That's it. What's your name? You're blacklisted. Now take yourself and your little bitch friend out of my store - and don't come back." I barked. Cravenly, they complied and scampered off.

    So that's my idea - a national blacklist of space ninjas. If somebody cannot obey the basic rules of society, then they should be excluded from society. If space ninjas want to steal from the pop culture reference industry, then the pop culture reference industry should exclude them. It's that simple. One strike, and you're out - no reputable troll store will allow you to buy another troll. If the pirates can't buy the trolls to begin with, then they won't be able to post them on Slashdot, will they? It's no different to doctors blacklisting drug dealers from buying prescription medicine.

    I have just written a letter to the GNAA outlining my proposal. Suing space ninjas one by one isn't going far enough. Not to mention space ninjas use the fact that they're being sued to unfairly portray themselves as victims. A national register of space ninjas would make the problem far easier to deal with. People would be encouraged to give the names of suspected space ninjas to a hotline, similar to Bust Your Boss. Once we know the size of the problem, the police and other law enforcement agencies will be forced to take space ninjutsu serio

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  106. So now, when they grow older and get a job... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    So now, when they grow older and get a job, and can actually afford $17 cds full of Christian crap, they wont be able to spend it because you wont let them. So you will force them to borrow it from a friend, or simply download it from the NEXT person who will put it up on the internet.

    Yeah. Really smart. No wonder your store is failing. Those people were about to BUY your cd and now you wont sell them anymore in the future. You're an idiot.

    I own over 400 real cds, and haven't stepped foot inside a recordstore since the 1990s. You're in an industry that does not need to exist anymore; get out now while you can.

    And if you have any stock in telegraph companies, or abacus companies, I suggest you divest yourself of that as well.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  107. Police as a disaster scenario by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    fully replicated servers in multiple countries...

    --
    Deleted
  108. sounds like a scare ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like someone called someone to scare piratebay. Good. Now are they going to look into co-location, and ensuring that however legally questionable some of the content might be, they can at least argue fair and reasonable? I don't know EU organizational law. Where I come from a certain amount of latitude is usually granted in cases where their is no clear legal comment. For instance purchasing a audiobook, then wanting to share it with someone. The *AA would let you think that's not legal. Morally: Sure why not? E-Book same thing: In order to print some E-Book formats in a freelance operation, their were laws clearly saying one way or the other.

    Does someone from sweden know if it Would it be better to co-locate to a place like Sea Haven, that claims to be neutral?

  109. off topic I know, but... by punxking · · Score: 1

    Was that a Yellowbeard reference? One of the most underated films, it's a shame it isn't more widely known...

    --
    You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
    1. Re:off topic I know, but... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      First off, this is not off topic, as Yellowbeard is a film about pirates.

      And now the good news: the DVD is going to be out in June.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  110. siege their property? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    I don't recall any mention of catapults, trebeuchets or battering rams. Sorry, just had to seize the moment.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    1. Re:siege their property? by init100 · · Score: 1

      I don't recall any mention of catapults, trebeuchets or battering rams.

      There are modern siege weapons too, like howitzers and aircraft.

  111. Colbert. by Tiro · · Score: 1

    Wørd...

  112. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, my daughter worked at your store before you went out of business. She gave me hundreds of brand new CDs for my birthday every year.

    Now you're out of business and she's out of a job. Damned pirates!

  113. Is that libel actionable? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    The first one that jumped out was "claiming immunity to copyright laws". They of course never claimed this; they claimed that they weren't breaking any copyright laws. So that's libel, right?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  114. mercenary traffic cops by zogger · · Score: 1

    Too funny, they already have traffic cops + the automated lights! At the same time! I was watching this once in Atlanta, I was crackin up how insanely stupid it was. Two fast food joints right next to each other, noon time rush. Now here, you can RENT a real cop, with his official uniform on, the whole deal, badge and gun, but he is off duty-but still on duty because cops are always on duty, something like that. You must OBEY CITIZEN! It is so much an hour to hire one of these official mercenaries. These two fast food joints had the renta cops "directing traffic", thoroughly screwing up the flow of trafffic with the automated lights nearby, so that their restaurant customers could get in and out of the parking lots fast. Here's the funny part, it was a WAR to see which cop had the most authority presence and could get HIS customers in an out even when the cop just 100 or so feet away was giving CONFLICTING SIGNALS by hand and whistle, stop, go ahead and turn, yield to these guys turning, etc. It was HILARIOUS (unless you were an unlucky driver just trying to drive on down the road by the normal rules and lights and not patronize either restuarant) and a microcosm of what is clearly wrong with the so called law and justice system.

    1. Re:mercenary traffic cops by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      That's an example of why Ayn Rand never supported the Libertarian Party. She said privatizing police functions would only lead to a competition in the use of force.

      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. " - Winston Churchill

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
  115. Latest Update by earthstar · · Score: 1
    I dont know if this can be called official,but thepiratebay.org itself has this message put up :

    SITE DOWN - WILL BE UP AND FULLY FUNCTIONAL WITHIN A DAY OR TWO


    http://thepiratebay.org/
  116. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by BytePusher · · Score: 1

    When you bought the store you adapted it to become more profitable. You found a niche and fit into it well. Markets change and if you're going to be successful, you've gotta change your buisiness model with them. I think you're probably realizing this too late, but I'd say figure out how to fit the new market. Say... sell MP3 players at low prices, provide some computer stations for kids without credit cards to legally download music in mp3 form to their newly bought MP3 player. Start selling things that can't be pirated, like services. Get into recording and publishing. Get a starbucks franchise in your store and build a little stage for upcoming superstars to show their stuff. Learn to be cool and relaxed. Make your store a cool place for kids to be kids, but also safe a safe place so that parents don't worry about letting their kids hang out there. There are a thousand ways you can make profit if you're as willing to change as you were at first. You got stuck and comfortable and now you're afraid of change. You can't fill your wallet or your stomach with tears, new laws or black-lists, but you can fill them by meeting percieved market needs. I might mention that socializing sells. Every new and great money making idea in recent years revolves around social needs, from starbucks to reality shows.

  117. Ever look at a pretty woman? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    You know, across the mall or down the sidewalk? You just catch her out of the corner of your eye. She's got a nice short skirt on and a snug shirt and you just can't help but notice her. She's got really nice legs and you take a moment or two out and just let your gaze linger on them for just a brief before walking on.

    Well, you're guilty in spirit of adultery. I'm telling your wife.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Ever look at a pretty woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever looked at her, and wanted to screw her? She was looking at you too, but wasn't interested. Does that make you guilty in spirit of rape?

  118. It will not rise in Sweden by liangzai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As it turns out, the illegal action against the pirate bay was on direct order from the swedish justice department (this is also illegal in Sweden), which in turn acted on a request from the US government, which in turn acted on behalf of MPAA.

    This is all classified, but leaked to a very authoritative (as BBC) TV channel in Sweden.

    Therefore, the swedish government is determined to ignore the law, as has happened so many times before.

    Look for the pirate bay in the free world, i.e., in china or something.

  119. Legal in Sweden??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people, including those pirate bay fools, seem to be of the impression that a site like the pirate bay is all legal in Sweden. Nothing could be further from the truth. Their behaviour is actually quite silly. Now without quoting paragraphs and stuff I like to point out two of the more obvious problems.

    First off if you have a web page you are responsible for the contents on it. If you let users post something on your site you must moderate it. You might not be breaking the law if someone post something illegal on your page but you certainly are if you fail to moderate, eg remove, said post within resonable time.

    Now the second and in this case probably alot more interesting is the fact that it is illegal to aid or encourage any kind of illegal activities. Wheather we like it or not distributing copyright protected material is illegal right now. And no one can really claim that the sole, or at least very dominant, purpose of this site was to connect people who wanted to break copyright laws. Accoring to piratebay.org "The allegation was breach of copy-right law, alternatively assisting breach of copy-right law." the second part there is just smack on the button, "assisting breach of copy-right law". That's illegal, anyone saying what they did was anything else but that?

  120. Let's go there! by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1
    "down here in Brasil there is no "contributory infringement" either."

    a baía do pirata dot-com, anyone?

    I hear they also have a thing for free software.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  121. the white house behind it all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  122. The MPAA did it by Troglodyt · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to this story It was the MPAA that was behind the raid. After being contacted by the MPAA, the US government got into talks with the swedish ministry for foreign affairs here in Sweden. The ministry of justice contacted police and prosecutors, but they didn't want to do anything since the legal issues here are unclear. So the ministry of justice contacted the national police chief and got orders to raid the server hall. The legality of the operation is highly questionable and borders on ministerstyre, whatever that would be called in english, it means that ministers tell government agencies what to do or how to interpret laws. This is illegal in Sweden.

  123. you are SO wrong by zogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are automatically equating protest with the word disruptive. Look what you have written. This alone proves you have little idea what you are talking about, nor have you been paying attention to the long past history of political "protesting". And before the knee jerk denial that you said that, look what you wrote.

    I have personally witnessed this violation of rights BS and been the target of cops at *completely* peaceful protests where they went apeshit under some orders and attacked the crowd, going back to civil rights days, pre-anti nam war days, and from then onwards. Not to say violent protests don't happen as well, I won't deny that, but by no means are they all, most usually at least start out peaceful until the overt or covert(yes, this happens) functionaires start the violence, giving them the excuse to go nuts. I have seen it too many times now to not know this isn't SOP with them.

    It does no good if you can't assemble where the action is, 10 miles down the road behind a fence is not "the right to assemble",the government has placed illegal and unconstitutional restrictions on a right, they have said you need "permission" to exercise a born-with right. This is illegal. That right no where states you have the right to assemble where THEY tell you to assemble. That's something they just started doing because they got the guns and follow orders from their "superior beings" whomever those entities are.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

    It does not state you have "some" rights to assemble or that you can only assemble in some designated "zone". Show us where it says that, I have provided the full quote. If you can, I'll concede gracefully, but I have read that numerous times in my life, and can't seem to see those little clauses you insist are there. If it is public property, you have a right to assemble there (obviously personal private property is a different subject entirely), you have the right to your speech, and the right to be heard with your petitions, whether the petitions are oral, written, or visual, as petitions could take any or all of those forms. We the people have a right to tell our elected folks what we think about what is going on. Period. If they keep trying to dodge the petition, they are violating their duties as elected people, no matter what media form the petition is in. They can't refuse the petition. They can't legally order their mercenaries to keep you away from them when you are trying to deliver your petition to them, but they constantly do that. I know why of course, it's because by and large they are mostly corrupt crooks and want to keep their cushy well paying jobs and positions of "rule" over people.

    If you got a political beef, you and your peers have a right to assemble, and to petition the government. That's it, it is that simple ancd clearly the intent of the founders. they were just coming from a time where the redcoats broke up crowds, told them they couldn't be in the town square in a group, arrested "ring leaders' for their "speech", kept them from "petitioning" the crown's authorities, etc, that's why the amendment was written exactly like that. It is beyond clear. They do NOT have the right to restrict you in such a way that they are dodging their duties as governmental workers/politicans/or functionaires, they are REQUIRED to listen to your petitions as acceptance of their official office, to follow the laws. Yes, they have to listen. They still might not agree with your petition, but they have a duty that goes with their oath. And if you come in a group, to show solidarity and the numbers,i.e., an assemblage, too bad, that is a free persons right.

    They are NOT RULERS, we are NOT SUBJECTS, much as they and apparently you seem to believ

    1. Re:you are SO wrong by zaroastra · · Score: 1

      In spain they say "se puede decir mas alto pero no mas claro" wich roughly tranlated means:
      you could say it louder but not clearer, and that is my opinion about your post

      MODS PLEASE GIVE HIM +5 "you could say it louder but not clearer" bonus ;)

      Cheers Z

      --
      I'm trying to get modded "Interesting Flamebait Informative and Insightful Redundant Troll" *-* Please Help *-*
  124. Re:Since when are the **AA confined by mortal laws by Aron+S-T · · Score: 1

    "Remember when police and laws were used to protect citizens, not criminialize millions for hurting corporate profit machines...?"

    No I don't actually. There never was a place or period in the history of the human race where the "police" (or their equivalent) worked to protect the average citizen. Yes, some individual police officers do great and important work helping people, at great personal risk. But for the most part, "the law" is structured to protect wealthy interests and the police are used to protect those interests. The biggest dealers of harmful addictive drugs in the U.S. are big pharma, but the police system is used to persecute sellers and users of drugs not produced by big pharma, which threaten its profits.

    In the early 1900s, who did corporations use to break up unions? The police. In the West the police were used to protect the railroads and other landed interests. Before there were corporations, there were feudal lords. They used the equivalent of the police to keep down the peasants. Remember the Robin Hood story? Who was he fighting? The SHERIFF of Notingham.

    The powerful have always used force and violence and "the law" to protect their interests and to keep the weak and powerless in their place. Nothing has changed here.

  125. White House was behind the attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently White House had recieved pressure from a Hollywood organization to somehow get rid of The Pirate Bay. White House thus demanded from Swedish Justice Department to "deal with the situation". Swedish JD forwarded the order to the police department, who informed them that TPB, according to swedish law, had commited no crime. JD, not being famous for interest in the law, put it dollars (crowns really) spinning to end TPB by creating a massive investigation.
    Swedish JD has broken the swedish law before to please USA. For some reason JD seemes to be awfully interested in maintaining their relationsship as a puppy of USA.

    Almost more disturbing is that the police chose to take down not only TPBs servers, but also servers belonging to many other popular sites. For no specific reason beside them being in the same room as the TPB servers and that the police didn't share the opinions expressed by these sites.

    An amusing fact is that the Internet traffic went down with 20% after the close-down of TBP. This shows just how publicly accepted piracy is.

    By the way, if you want to call one of the villains behind this coward attack, the leader of antipiratbyran (bureu of anti-piracy) named Henrik Pontén, his cell phone number is +4670-5929922. Enjoy!

  126. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    you people know this is a well known troll post right? just like bsd is dying.

    Heres the google search of it.

    I think the first time i saw it i naievely replyed to it as well.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  127. Their legal counsel is a law-school student and not a certified lawyer. I don't know if that makes any legal difference though. I am a bit curious as to how they are going to use those DNA samples? I can't think of much use for DNA besides proving that they have actually touched the servers, which they have been filmed doing on several occasions by swedish television.

    1. Re:DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that since he is not a certified lawyer, he can not get public reimbursement from the state for representing the other two guys.

      This is of course not really an interesting point right now, since all three of them have gotten Leif Silbersky as their lawyer. Silbersky is the most famous lawyer in Sweden, figuring in almost all high-profile cases.

    2. Re:DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I can't figure out is why anyone would ever want Leif Silbersky to represent them. He has no sense of loyalty to his clients and walks out on them as soon as his hunger for publicity mandates that he spends his time on a higher profile case.

  128. Hmm... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the possibility (probably nearly impossible?) is of taking one of these, loading it up with a very, very small webserver hardware setup with a largish hard drive (maybe the whole thing potted in epoxy with a heatsink sticking out?), a several watt 802.11g AP and antenna, then getting it put up in orbit by the Russians? I bet you could get this done for about $250,000.00 (US) if you really wanted to (for the sat, hardware, launch costs, and of course, bribes)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  129. Still zero by Ryan+C. · · Score: 1

    Zero of those traffic deaths have been scientificly proven to be caused by pot. There are very few studies available, but those that have been done (here's one link) seem to show that the paranoia more than offsets the loss of attention and motor coordiantion. The US NHTSA and DOT came to similar conclusions. Of course if it were legal, it would stand to reason that there would be less paranoia of getting pulled over and this effect would reduce. In case you're curious, the DOT figures for drivers in injury accidents testing positive for pot without alchohol was 2%, no control figure was given, but I'd wager the figure for drivers on pot is a little above 2%.

    Disclaimer: don't use it, just irked that I'm forced to use inferior drugs like alchohol.

    --
    -Ryan C.
    1. Re:Still zero by The+Darkness · · Score: 1

      Zero of those traffic deaths have been scientificly proven to be caused by pot. There are very few studies available, but those that have been done (here's one link [sciencedaily.com]) seem to show that the paranoia more than offsets the loss of attention and motor coordiantion. The US NHTSA and DOT came to similar conclusions. Of course if it were legal, it would stand to reason that there would be less paranoia of getting pulled over and this effect would reduce. In case you're curious, the DOT figures for drivers in injury accidents testing positive for pot without alchohol was 2%, no control figure was given, but I'd wager the figure for drivers on pot is a little above 2%.


      I did say that counting all 17000 being attributed to pot was unreasonable. :-)

      I agree that the numbers would adjust if it were legal. They probably also adjust now given the drivers age (perception of invincibility, lack of responsibility). My brother in law was run down (walking home) by an idiot high on pot at a 90 degree turn in the road.

      Also, if it were legal the number of users (and hence accidents attributable) would go up but chances are they'd use some other drug to screw themselves up anyway. I expect that the number would go up temporarily then go back down and level off with the alcohol+marijuana numbers being about where they are now.

      It only bothers me when people go on about how it's "fucking harmless."

      Disclaimer: don't use it, just irked that I'm forced to use inferior drugs like alchohol.

      I don't use either, but as with alcohol as long as people stay off the road while under the influence I couldn't care less what they do to themselves.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
  130. Nuff said? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "they're communists after all"

  131. Don't forget history by davycroc · · Score: 1

    How short our internet memory is... http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Indymedia/ Remember when the US went through the UK to get Italy to seize servers?

  132. Re:BAD name by asuffield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would be the 'roughly' part. It's similar in that the goal is to force the hand of the opposing party. With regular civil disobedience, the goal is to force the government to put people in jail for things which are obviously stupid. Here, it's to force the MPAA to take them to court. In both cases the objective is to put an end to rhetoric and vague threats. TPB's position is that they are going to win in court, and then the MPAA will be screwed.

  133. Latest news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that the raid was forced by swedish minister of justice Thomas Bodström after pressure directly from the American government. Thomas Bodström is a member of the currently ruling socialdemocratic party which is also known for having extradited people to Egypt after pressure from the Americans without due process of law. However the one responsible for approving that was a cunt called Anna Lindh who later got stabbed to death in a shoppingmall. More info can be found at http://www.riksdagen.se/templates/R_PageExtended__ __7639.aspx

  134. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by ultranova · · Score: 1

    In the tradition of taking obvious trolls seriously, here's my answer to you.

    My business faces ruin. CD sales have dropped through the floor. People aren't buying half as many CDs as they did just a year ago. Revenue is down and costs are up. My store has survived for years, but I now face the prospect of bankruptcy. Every day I ask myself why this is happening.

    I bought the store about 12 years ago. It was one of those boutique record stores that sell obscure, independent releases that no-one listens to, not even the people that buy them.

    Well, let me help you out: you are facing banckrupty because you are, according to your own statement, selling CDs no one wants to listen to. Furthermore, many independent artists nowadays either give their music away freely to act as promotion, or simply sell directly to customers.

    You can avoid this by either getting CDs people want to listen to, or, preferably, by getting out of the CD business completely and selling something else. CD business is becoming obsolete, buying from iTunes or downloading (legally distributed music) is simply a supreme way of getting music.

    On The Internet, you can find and download hundreds of dollars worth of music in just minutes. It has the potential to destroy the music industry, from artists, to record companies to stores like my own. Before you point to the supposed "economic downturn", I'll note that the book store just across from my store is doing great business. Unlike CDs, it's harder to copy books over The Internet.

    Actually, it is a lot easier to copy books than music over the Internet, since even the whole Wheel of Time series (11+ books) is only 11MB as a PDF file.

    No, the real reason why books sell better is that there are a lot of good books being written all the time, and you don't need to worry about a book containing rootkits or DRM crap.

    For example, I just recently purchased several Pratchett's Discworld novels for 8 euros apiece, and have spent several enjoyable evenings reading each.

    "That's it. What's your name? You're blacklisted. Now take yourself and your little bitch friend out of my store - and don't come back." I barked. Cravenly, they complied and scampered off.

    Throwing customers out propably won't help your sales any either.

    I wanted to tell them the truth - it's because they wear old clothes and have cheap haircuts. I can't afford anything better for them right now.

    I wear old clothes and a cheap haircut. Few people laugh at me. It's all about style - some people have it and some don't.

    You just need to show your girls old episodes of Happy Days, and tell them to watch Fonzie closely. Learn from the master. You don't expect to become a martial arts master without training under some crazy old Japanese man, so why would you expect to have style without training under Fonzie ?

    When my girls ask me questions like that, I feel like my heart is being wrenched out of my chest.

    You might want to see a doctor about that.

    But knowing that I'm doing the best I can to save my family and my business is some consolation.

    Unfortunately, by this account, you are a lousy businessman.

    Some people are offended by my blacklist system. I may have made my store less popular for pirates and sympathisers, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make to save my industry from destruction. I am inspired by artists such as Metallica that have taken a stand against the powerful pirate lobby. When everyone believes 2 + 2 = 5, to simply state the truth, that 2 + 2 = 4, is a courageous act.

    Coming to think of it, I haven't heard a new song from Metallica for years, and had nearly forgotten they exist. That's the price of taking a stance against windmills, I guess. But no worries, I have lots of legally downloaded music - this album by Harvey Danger, for example.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  135. Demonstration in Stockholm by erikdalen · · Score: 1
    For those of you who live near Stockholm. We're (me and others, not behind TPB) arranging a demonstration against the razzia. on saturday 13:00

    More info:
    http://www.jpl.se/~dalen/demo.html

    --
    Erik Dalén
  136. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Acer500 · · Score: 1

    I see this all the time... People refuse to believe that what was once a value-adding activity is no longer that, so in my country we have ascensorists, typists, old equipment operators, etc. going on strike, holding hostage the work environments and machinery, and pressuring the government, which unfortunately folds way too often and creates inefficiency.

    It is my view that we would be a lot better off if those people were encouraged/helped to re-train and take new jobs we have lots of demand for. I see work not as reducing as some "end-of-work" people say, just that it is shifting towards more unstructured or service oriented tasks, and not only hand labor is being automated, now routine "intellectual" tasks are too

    Of course not everyone can be re-trained, but hopefully someone wiser than I will find a solution...

    I've been twice I think to record stores, and I almost never listen to the records I've bought, changing CD's is extremely inconvenient. As everyone else has mentioned, shopping for music, books and movies is actually a more value-added activity online (I can see reviews, listen to samples, etc, way faster than I could in a store), unlike say shopping for a house appliance, clothes, impulse buy/luxury items, or a car where the physical experience hasn't been duplicated yet. So I'd say that as soon as more people think like me, your business model is doomed (it will probably live on but as a niche market).

    --
    There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  137. Swedish law by the-intersocialist · · Score: 1

    Well, to arrest somebody and check their DNA, as they did with the regal representative of the pirate bay, is not allowed by Swedish law unless there is a very high degree of suspicion (in Swedish law stthere are different degrees of suspicion. They are often used in an arbitrary way, but their purpose is to regulate how much force the police uses in relation to how likely is it that the person is guilty) AND the crime they are suspected of is punishable by prison. Copyright violation is not punishable by prison and therefore it would technically be illegal to check their DNA. It is important to note, though, that the swedish legal system is not politically independent as it is in the US. The people on the "juries" are politicians and the number of jury members a party gets is determined by the amount of votes they get in elections. So, as the majority of the swedish parties are against the pirate bay, this will probably pass in a Swedish court.

  138. ahem.. wrong approach by koroviev+(begemot) · · Score: 0
    Some people vote with their money (buying CDs and movie tickets). Some people vote in elections. Some people vote with their feet (and go get stuff from P2P). Except that, voting with money is considerably more efficient in getting things done than the other two ways - the organisations with money have the means to persue their own ends. Voting in elections would be efficient only if there is a majority. Oh, and yes, some people can't vote at all because they are a small minority (the artists).

    Damn it! Could there be an open-source iTunes equivalent, where everyone can post music BUT where downloading an MP3 costs 5 cents (that goes to the artist)?

    As to movies, I'd rather see them in a cinema. As to porn, I really believe that it should be about prostitution, rather than rape (and its the second if noone pays for it). (True) amateur porn is, of course, nice, and for free - thank you folks.

    As to games - I buy them.

    As to Win XP, Id switch to Linux as soon as someone made a good Linux game. And I use OpenOffice.

    Books? I cant read a book on a computer screen. It's no fun. I need to be able to take it in the WC with me. I buy them on paper.

    Patents? Patents as implemented nowadays suck. But its the implementation that sucks, not the idea of patents. And I dont think it can be much better. Id rather go without such implementation, if it wasnt for stupid venture capitalists who would not invest without "protection" and "patents". Really, what are they thinking? Nothing patented actually constitutes a million-bugs-making idea. Ingenius ideas are always obvious (in hindsight), so - not patentable. No idea about that...

    And so, could you use your God given programming skills to make an E-bay/BitTorrent equivalent for free posting of music and video files? The laws dont need to change - whats needed is to put the the CD/DVD publishing industry out of the loop. First hey charge for burning CD, then they charge for distribution, then they charge for being the only node in the network (a monopoly), then they use it to enforce the dominace of the node - it ends here.

    Oh and.. pls dont patent the above idea, will ya?:)

  139. Content requires promotion and creative control by Psychochild · · Score: 1

    The parent post says, "What it takes is hard work." then two sentences later says, "I can tell you that it is not hard...." So, hard work isn't hard?

    Speaking as someone who works in another creative field, it does take good promotion (usually through marketing/advertising) to make a work of art that will get attention, just as the grandparent post said. The trick is, as the parent post points out, that this can be self-promotion. Self-promotion can be done on a much more modest budget than an all-out print/TV/radio advertising campaign can.

    It sounds like the poster's father is good at self-promotion in addition to having musical skills, so it is easy for him to get attention. Unfortunately, not everyone is blessed with these types of skills. Plus, forming contacts can take a long time even if you are good at it; sometimes it takes longer than someone can survive without steady income. True, you can short-circuit the system if you happen to stumble across a good social network to tap into, but you can't rely on that.

    And, you are right in that giving away stuff for "free" can help build a reputation. I write about game design and game business on my game development blog for free and talk at various conventions in order to stay in contact with people in my industry. It is incredibly important to get the word out about you and your work. My reputation and writings have gotten me quite a bit of contract work to help keep food on the table while I starve for my art. This is one reason why I think P2P networks are great: they allow people to distribute their work for free if they want. Not necessarily something I can take direct advantage of in my situation, but I have seen how it helps others.

    However, I think that if we really believe this is the best use for P2P networks, then we do need to take a stand against the people that just want stuff for free. We need to quit with the "it's not theft because you still have the work even though I'm enjoying it without paying!" bullshit. Or the "I wouldn't buy it anyway, so it makes no difference of I download it!" excuses. Don't even get me started on the "I'm doing civil disobedience (from the safety of my basement!)" garbage some people tout as an excuse. These are all excuses people use to justify their own desire for free stuff.

    If we let the P2P networks flourish with a majority of truly free stuff, if we allow content creators who want to give away their stuff to create a counter culture, then we'll see a real change. As long as people are downloading stuff for free instead of looking for independent artists, it puts more control in the hands of the MPAA and RIAA and other associations and large companies like that.

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the best way to hurt the MPAA and RIAA is to stop downloading "mainstream" stuff for free and go look for independent artists that do stuff you like. At the very least, start supporting big acts that give away songs, videos, or even whole albums for free. As long as people continue to violate copyright, these associations will continue to wield so much power and influence. As soon as we have people actively looking for indies, then the large marketing and promotion budgets will become less necessary, and self-promotion will come easier. By violating copyright law and downloading songs/movies/games/whatever, you are just supporting the role of these companies even more. Let me make this perfectly clear: You are not weakening the MPAA or RIAA or other such association by downloading commercial products without paying for them.

    This applies to all creative works: music, writing, games, etc. If you want something, then pay for it. If you don't to pay, then look for cheaper/free alternatives. By giving these alternatives a chance and helping to support the artist, they can continue to give you content and they don't have to sign a contract with the devil (in the form of the MPAA or RIAA) in order to make

    --
    Brian "Psychochild" Green
    MMO developer's blog
  140. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by sr180 · · Score: 1

    FYI: This is a known troll that appears everytime there is an RIAA involved article.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  141. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'd be happy if it had been written by someone with evidence of education above the third grade level."
    You'll only be disappointed if you try to improve your education here.

  142. Totally Nothing Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirate Bay did nothing wrong. If we accuse Pirate Bay of pointing to copyrighted material, then we must accuse Google, Yahoo, and any other search engine on the net of the same crime. Imagine Pirate Bay was manufacturing guns and those guns where used by people to murder each other. Pirate Bay didn't shoot the gun, the people did. You don't see gun companies going out of business just because someone was killed by a gun. Come to America and see for yourself. I'm tired of the manipulation of law and the duel standards used by businesses. For once I would like to see some honesty and uniformity in our American laws and I'd like to see a few passed which enforce the people's constitutional rights rather busniess laws which deminish them.

  143. "News organ"?!?!?! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    "News organ"?!?!?!

    Have the Swiss come up with some sort of cybernetic strap-on appendage that makes a report when information comes across the newswire?

    Perhaps it is called a Pen, model #15. For short, they call it a Pen15 ;-)

    I'm sinking... someone help me out... tough crowd...surely someone can come up with a wittier remark!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  144. In Soviet Switzerland... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    ...pirates raid YOU!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  145. Re:As a record store owner, I hope not by gowen · · Score: 1

    Fair play to you. That's a nice comeback.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  146. For foreign intelligence purposes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think what happened is that foreign (ie US) entities hoped records of access were kept on the servers and wanted to get their hands on those records for prosecution in their home countries, and made a deal with Swedish officials. The Pirate Bay won't be shut down, but its users may end up sued. Just a hunch.

  147. a bit of background explanation on the events by koroviev+(begemot) · · Score: 0
    As you may have gathered from previous posts, similar activities are going on in Bulgaria and Romania who are soon to join the EU. Before they join the EU, though, the EU have asked from both countries to do something about corruption, and that includes enforcing copyright laws. In Bulgaria you could, until recently, buy pirated CD on the street (but thats only because few people have broadband, i.e. BitTorrent). The final decision was to be made on 16 May, and was posponed until October, so that buggs can be ironed out. The Bulgarian government has argued that EU countries (such as Poland) have higher corruption indexes. The EU has argued that this may be true, but its not as blatant as in Bulgaria, the differece being that open/blatant corruption (such as Ferraris parked on sidewalks, and car bombings) leads to a general social and economical pesimism i.e. blatant corruption is much worse than hidden corruption regardeless of the actuall numbers, as it hinders enterprise and economic growth.

    The BG government has argued that there is blatant corruption in the EU as well (but this is just speculation on my side, unlike the above events and exchanges that are public) - ThePirateBay does not keep a very low profile, and indeed their e-mails section doesnt help.

    So, to avoid being perceived as an institution that is hypocritical or keeps double standards - TPB has had to be raided - the Sweedes bought it. Sorry, folks :(

  148. Site is up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://thepiratebay.org/ is up. Also in the Videos Section there is a movie TPBBust1.mov, its any ones guess :)....

  149. PRIATE BAY IS BACK UP!!! by sternone · · Score: 1

    Bow down for the ones we serve... it's back up!!!!! http://thepiratebay.org/

  150. .. and it's back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that didn't take long; The Pirate Bay is up and running again. They're even sporting a brand new, fresh logo.

    And a new name; "The Police Bay". At least they haven't lost their sense of humour :)

  151. Marijuana and Lung Cancer by billstewart · · Score: 1
    This past week there were a number of articles in Google News about studies showing that marijuana doesn't cause lung cancer. The earlier publicity saying that it did was from studies that showed that if you smoked one pack a day of marijuana you'd get about as much tar as three packs of tobacco - I don't know about you, but I'd _really_ have trouble lighting the joints if I were smoking that much :-)

    But marijuana today is much safer than marijuana in the 1960s - in the US, it's mainly high-potency buds, rather than low-potency leaves, so you're smoking a tenth as much green plant material to get high. Europeans seem to smoke it as hashish instead, probably because their supplies are imported from places like Morocco where you can grow it outside and pay off the police rather than being locally grown inside or on hidden farms, but either way the concentrated stuff seems to be more useful commercially. I did once meet some Americans out at a hot spring who were extracting hashish oil from leaves - they'd soak it in butane to dissolve the THC, squeeze it out, and evaporate the butane using the heat from the hot spring so they didn't need to risk using fire.

    Either way, you ought to be protecting your lungs by using a decent bong instead of one of those little pipes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks