Slashdot Mirror


BlueSecurity Database Compromised?

EElyn writes "Numerous users of Blue Security's anti-spam system now report of a new form of aggressive spam. An unknown group of spammers claim to have derived a way to extract the member email addresses of Blue Security group's anti-spam system, called Blue Frog. Blue Frog, a small tool which once installed on the user's computer, enables Blue Security to systematically flood a known spammer's website with opt-out messages; much to the headache of the spammer. Tens of thousands of users have already signed up, so can it really be true that spammers now possess this database? Or is this yet another frail attempt by spammers to intimidate the user?" Another reader sent the text of the letter; read more to see.

Stray1 writes ""You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity...." An email from unknown detractors has taken the Bluesecurity anti spam lists and decided to take matters into their own hands. I recieved this Email from an anonymous, and garbled host, which went on to say in not so fantastic english that I, as a Blusecurity member, would recieve this and many more (about 20 -30) spam messages a day until I left the blue security community. Blue Security, (www.bluesecurity.com)a website and community designed to lessen your Spam Email, is down for the moment. Is this what we have come to? Spam,(erm 'high volume email') companys holding your address hostage until you comply? "...We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user". I have to say, up until this point, my spam was down by about 70% to 80%."

375 comments

  1. Blue? by LCookie · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess their server feels "blue" too..

    1. Re:Blue? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      here's the whole thing:

      X-Gmail-Received: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxxxx
      Received: by xxxxxxxxxxxxx with SMTP id xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      Received: by xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with SMTP id xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
      Mon, 01 May 2006 05:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
      Return-Path:
      Received: from 3CF5918 ([218.23.108.114])
      by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id a1si5179001ugf.2006.05.01.05.49.58;
      Mon, 01 May 2006 05:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
      Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 218.23.108.114 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of thabto@esplanade.com)
      Received: from 250.0.102.32 by 218.23.108.114; Mon, 01 May 2006 16:44:55 +0300
      Message-ID:
      From: "BARTHOLOMEW Julius"
      Reply-To: "BARTHOLOMEW Julius"
      To: xxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com
      Cc: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxgmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com
      Subject: re:Don't pay attention to this email!
      Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 14:40:55 +0100
      X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
      MIME-Version: 1.0
      Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
      boundary="--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
      X-Priority: 3
      X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

      ----8335755536655359
      Content-Type: text/plain;
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

      You are being emailed because you are a user of BlueSecurity's well-known software "BlueFrog." http://www.bluesecurity.com/

      Today, the BlueSecurity database became known to the worst spammers worldwide. Within 48 hours, the database will be published on the Internet, and your email address will be open to them all. After this, you will see the spam sent to your mailbox increase 10 - 20 fold.

      BlueSecurity was illegally attacking email marketers, and doing so with your help. Many websites have been targeted and hit, including non-spam sites. BlueSecurity's software has been fully analyzed, and contains an abundance of malicious code. This includes: ability to send mass mail to users; the ability to attack websites with Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS); the ability to open hidden doors on any machine on which it is running; and a hidden auto-update code function, which can install anything on your computer and open it up to anyone.

      BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves. When all is said and done, they will be able to run, hide and change their identities, leaving you to take the fall. YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it. This email ensures that you are well aware of the situation. Soon, you will be found guilty of computer crimes such as DDOS attacking of websites, conspiracy, and sending mass unsolicited bulk email messages for everything from viagra to porn, as long as you continue to run BlueFrog.

      They do not take money for downloading their software, they do not take money for removing emails from their lists, and they have no visible revenue stream. What they DO have is 500,000 computers sitting there awaiting their next command. What are they doing now?

      1. Using your computer to send spam ?
      2. Using your computer to attack competitor websites?
      3. Phishing through your files for your identity and banking information?

      If you think you can merely change your email address and be safe while still running BlueFrog, you are in for a big surprise. This is just the beginning...

      ----xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
  2. Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blue Security to systematically flood a known spammer's website with opt-out messages; much to the headache of the spammer.

    And by flood I taeke it you mean spam

    When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

    1. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blah blah blah.

      'Vigilante' would imply something illegal is going on. This is market forces at work - more effective, generally, than government intervention.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:Eye for an Eye? by MrHeartbreak · · Score: 1

      If it's a flood of OPT-OUT REQUESTS, then it's not really spam, is it?

      --
      Don't drag me into your petty squabbles.
    3. Re:Eye for an Eye? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

      Actually, I've found that things some people think are unfortunate or bad beget shallow, empty platitudes.

      Sometimes, violence simply ends violence, because there is no other way. Sometimes, fighting fire with fire is the best way. Sometimes showing someone what it's like to suffer the consequences of their own actions actually changes their behavior.

      I'm all for as many technical approaches as possible, but finding "a real solution to the problem" that doesn't involve some degree of making this painful/costly for the spammers simply isn't going to work. Even if, through filtering, you can get 99% of the stuff blocked, all they have to do is increase the volume that much more to make that remaining 1% still pay off. Remember, they're not paying for their own overhead most of the time.

      Your "real solution" comment, in the context of "violence only begets violence" is completely tone deaf. You're applying Israeli-Palestinian-conflict-type babble to a completely different situation. The spammers are not oppressed, or the victims of some historical violent wrong... they're a parasitic, bandwidth sucking plague. Any means by which we can stop them is called for. Surely you don't think that you're going to just turn the other Bayesian Filter Cheek, or write a Korea-bound, thought-provoking appeal to integrity and expect the onslaught to stop? Tempting as it is, no one is suggesting actual violence - just a substantial response in kind, only when provoked. It's called self defense, and it's an appropriate measure because it only happens when an illegal spammer causes it to happen.

      How fortunate for you that you've never had anything violent threaten you, requiring you to offer up a physical deterrent to stop it. If you had, you might rethink your metaphors.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Eye for an Eye? by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When will the world learn, violence begets violence and spam begets spam. Lets find a real solution to the problem rahter then a vigalante justice.

      Naaah, let's just spam the bastards 'till they're blue. If I got a blackmail message like that, I'd change my e-mail (I know it'as not easy but it isn't THAT hard too) and setup a friggin server cluster to spam the spammers.

      It's the war against spam people, if you're not with us... you're funding spam activities, there we go.

    5. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vigilantism is the act of taking the law into your own hands. It carries an implication of illegal, or more specifically, 'by any means necessary'.

      This is 'a community action to produce a market incentive', which is wholly different from 'vigilantism', at least in a literal sense.

      Sure, sure, it looks like we're locked in this huge digital superhero battle between the evil spammers and the innocent citizenry, but face it: We're making an attempt to prevent high-volume e-mail to our e-mail addresses from being profitable, and that is all. We are consciously generating market pressure to achieve a goal, and we are doing it in an unorthodox, but morally and legally clean way.

      A segment of the population has said, 'High-volume e-mail is annoying enough to be a breach of the peace, as far as I'm concerned. I want none of it, and I will make an effort to prevent my mailbox from recieving them, by filter and by incentive."

      Your use of the term 'vigilante tactics' is an obvious attempt to cast a dim light on the activities of the Blue Security community. It brings a baseless accusation to mind - and this being slashdot, I'm inclined to make it - but I think I'll leave the obvious to the outside observer.

      Frelling trolls.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was shot in the leg when I was 17 and dealing heroin.

      I didn't stop dealing heroin until I was 27.

      I did start carring a gun.

      Violence alwasy begets violence. There is no questions about that. The only way violence ever stops future violence is if one party is killed.

    7. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, an "Eye for an eye" is a good strategy in a game-theory sense, and it may be the basis for all cooperative behavior. If you doubt this, simply Google "tit-for-tat" and "game theory."

    8. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it seems - strictly from your story - that desperation (addict needing a fix and happening to have a gun) and greed (competing dealer wants your territory) begets violence, which appears to beget self protection (have you ever shot someone out of anything but self-defense?).

      I was both addict and dealer back in my late teens. I got out of there damned quick when I saw how dangerous it was (got clipped in the ear during a soured deal - damned lucky I got out alive).

      You say you continued to work in an extremely dangerous field for ten years AFTER the world suggested to you that it might be a bad occupation for you, yet you still put that statement out as if it's supposed to validate your little nugget of cliched wisdom.

      Seriously, nobody likes violence, but like anything it's a tool, and its use is only as evil as its weilder (shoot a lunatic who has a knife to your wife's throat: good or evil?)

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    9. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Blue Security seems to be taking seriously its responsibility to not initiate or be perceived as initiating bandwidth or server DDOS attacks against spammers. Yes, it's a DOS, but against the ordering infrastructure of the spammer. They've been emphasizing the human review process in the loop, and part of that is a review team that actually does review the spam to make sure it's really spam, and gives notice to the involved parties before launching an opt-out barrage. Said team also crafts the barrage though, so I suspect there's a bit of a conflict of interest. If one has a gun and doesn't have to answer to real authority for its use, they're going to want to fire it more than not.

      As a business model it's probably bound to failure due to inherent scaling factors. 'course they said the same thing about FedEx, so maybe it's more a matter of execution -- if I knew for sure, I'd have that MBA by now.

    10. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, questioning self-serving simplistic platitudes begets a single anecdote presented as supposed "proof"...

      Must be slashdot.

    11. Re:Eye for an Eye? by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up on blue security! Now I can sign up and get these jerks. I hope their plan backfires and blue's subscriber base triples!

    12. Re:Eye for an Eye? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was shot in the leg when I was 17 and dealing heroin.

      I didn't stop dealing heroin until I was 27.

      I did start carring a gun.


      The fact that you were too stupid to get out does not mean that violence is never a way to stop other violence.

    13. Re:Eye for an Eye? by KCMO11 · · Score: 1

      The spammers are bluffing. I signed up long ago to find out info about BlueSecurity, but never ever installed or used the software. I am very careful about the several email addresses I use when signing up for questionable things like this. The spam threats I am receiving (about 3 per day, slipping past the spam filters) are *NOT* using the address BlueSecurity has in their data base for me. The address in the BlueSecurity data base, which I have verified, is *NOT* receiving any spam. So odds are if the spammers are using any widely used email address list, they would hit some/most of BlueSecurity users, who would think they are being targeted because of BlueSecurity.

    14. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a bad example that's all. The original guy who wrote fight fire with fire is just a plain good ol' moron. Just make sure you'll clean up your enemy really well, without leaving any traces. Shit works both ways,you dweeb.

    15. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the latest email they're sending. They can have their limelight for a few mins, they can increase my spam (like they wouldn't anyway.). Anyone can run "diff" against two files.
      Between dspam and bluefrog, they won't last. That and spam vampire works wonders too when you make changes. It's entertaining to say the least. The part that amused me the most is the "playing fair" statement. You'll see it below.
      -----

      Hey,

      You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

      You signed up because you were expecting to recieve a lesser amount of spam, unfortunately, due to the tactics used by BlueSecurity, you will end
      +up recieving this message, or other nonsensical spams 20-40 times more than you would normally.

      How do you make it stop?

      Simple, in 48 hours, and every 48 hours thereafter, we will run our current list of BlueSecurity subscribers through BlueSecurity's database, if
      +you arent there.. you wont get this again.

      We have devised a method to retrieve your address from their database, so by signing up and remaining a BlueSecurity user not only are you opening
      +yourself up for this, you are also potentially verifying your email address through them to even more spammers, and will end up getting up even
      +more spam as an end-result.

      By signing up for bluesecurity, you are doing the exact opposite of what you want, so delete your account, and you will stop recieving this.

      Why are we doing this?

      Its simple, we dont want to, but BlueSecurity is forcing us. We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails, but do
      +not believe for one second that we will stop this tirade of emails if you choose to stay with BlueSecurity.
      Just remember one thing when you read this, we didnt do this to you, BlueSecurity did.

      If BlueSecurity decides to play fair, we will do the same.

      We are quite sure you will think this will not continue, that we will not continue wasting our resources doing this, feel free to wait out the
      +first 48, or the second, and see whether these stop, you will be quite suprised.

      If you have another email under the protection of bluesecurity, and have not recieved this there, do not worry, you will soon enough.

      We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user.

      You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site(http://www.bluesecurity.com) is down..

      Just remove yourself from BlueSecurity, and make it easier on you.

    16. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Stellian · · Score: 1

      It seems everyone agrees they should sign up for BlueSecurity, now that the spammers are so pissed by it.
      I'm afraid it could be a Trojan horse. It is well known that "do not spam" whitelists do not work: even if you give spammers only 1-way hashes of the emails, they can easily set-up a dictionary attack against the database. They already do this with remote mail servers; it's infinitely easier to do this against a local database, since they have almost limitless computing power for such an attack.
      So my conspiracy theory is that the spammers are trying to provoke exactly such a response and make people sign up. So I would advise anyone to download and use the client, but only subscribe with a disposable email address.

    17. Re:Eye for an Eye? by AdamD1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Several of the emails I received feature this line in the body text:

      YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it.

      So... but it's okay to forge headers, right? And use a botnet to flood my inbox with this crap, right? A botnet which was built by writing a virus that would turn an unsuspecting user's computer into a zombie so you could pump out more of this crap like a frikkin' coward from some bunker in the midwest. That part is totally a-okay right?

      News flash for pathetic spammers like these ones: The whole point was: we didn't want to hear from you idiot spammers in the first place. Period. We attempted unsubscribing and you didn't unsubscribe us. In fact most of you spammed us even harder. You didn't take our collective "no" for an answer. Now that we had a new outlet for our "no" to be sent to you, as an apparent last resort, you're calling what we're doing "illegal?!?!"

      Spammers are retarded.

      ad

      --
      Because I can! [Brainrub.com]
    18. Re:Eye for an Eye? by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I was shot in the leg when I was 17 and ... The only way violence ever stops future violence is if one party is killed."

      Exactly. so what your example demonstrates is that ineffective violence begets more violence. Had that guy been a better shot, it would have stopped.

      Translated to this context, if the BlueSecurity effect is potent enough, it could have a subsantial effect. If it's not, it'll just spark more back-and-forth.

    19. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      Sounds to me like they've tried submitting each email address in their distribution list to BlueSecurity to see if it already exists. The ones that exist get emails. However, since BlueSecurity is no longer accepting these checks, there's no way the spammers can continue along this vector... ALL email addresses from now on will be rejected.

      Plus, it should be trivial for BlueSecurity to fix this; a simple check of where the address check is initiated from should do the trick. If someone signs up using a Comcast IP, and then checks to see if they're signed up via a proxy in Korea, it should be pretty easy to foil. Hey... they could even use captchas to slow down the spammers... who will then be devoting a significant part of their time to comparing email addresses instead of spamming the world at large.

    20. Re:Eye for an Eye? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      If violence never solved any problems, then why do police officers (in the United States) carry guns?

    21. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Stellian · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Eye for an Eye? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      > When will the world learn, violence begets violence

      What a load of hippie crap. Next thing you will probably move on to even more idiotic bumpersticker philosophy like "violence never solved anything."

      Learn the difference between initiating force and resisting it. One is perfectly moral and one isn't. Resisting violence often reduces future violence instead of 'begating violence.' Since you lack clue I'll state the obvious, the violent only attack those who they believe to be weaker. (unless they are truly insane, then all bets are off)

      Spammers are attacking our systems hourly with impunity. We build our defenses higher and higher yet they continue to attack. Because they know we will sit there and take it as they learn to penetrate each new defense. Failing to resist their violence is only begating more violence.

      They don't believe we can hurt them in return so they prey upon us with impunity. These parasites cost the world millions for every thousand dollars they scam off some idiot who falls for their 'herbal viagra' scams. Governments can't stop these people. ISPs won't do it, preferring to sign 'pink contracts' instead. Hosting companies won't turn away the money. That leaves US to evolve some sort of collective defense. Ultimately self defense is our own responsibility anyway. The police just pick up the body parts and attempt to arrest the killer, if you don't want to get killed in the first place that is your responsibility. Same with spam.

      Personally I think the solution is something like the Usenet Death Penalty. A collective decision to simply disconnect users, networks, ISPs and even whole nation states who refuse to curb their network abuse. A distributed list loaded into the routers of who is currently failing to police their system and simply refuse all traffic for a few weeks as a punishment. The Internet is a peer to peer network, but there is no inferent 'Right' to connect to any system and no duty to allow connection from anyone.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    23. Re:Eye for an Eye? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Tempting as it is, no one is suggesting actual violence

      Speak for yourself, because I certainly am. As in violently removing their freedoms and placing them in "pound me in the ass" Federal Prisions for years at a time. And if that doesn't work I'm all for public flogging, caning, etc. These people must be stopped. Period.

      > Sometimes, violence simply ends violence, because there is no other way.

      Exactly, violence SOLVES things. We might not always like the solution, we might not approve of the means. But violence does work. Sometimes you have to tell the hippies to STFU and "Give War a chance." If spammers were in actual FEAR of our wrath most would find a safer line of work.

      It might be messy, it certainly WOULD be illegal, but if the major network operators took 1% of the billions they spend fighting spam and oversizing their networks to transport it and hired ninjas to take out the spammers it would cease to be a problem overnight.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    24. Re:Eye for an Eye? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a load of hippie crap.

      I believe that some 2000 years ago they nailed someone to a cross who had pretty similar ideas.. Seems he has a huge following outside the hippie scene also. Ok, I have to say that he looked a bit like a hippie.

      Learn the difference between initiating force and resisting it. One is perfectly moral and one isn't. Resisting violence often reduces future violence instead of 'begating violence.' Since you lack clue I'll state the obvious, the violent only attack those who they believe to be weaker. (unless they are truly insane, then all bets are off)

      Well considered and restrained violence can in specific cases work as a defense, and can even be the only defense, yes. That in no way means that violence is the only way to respond to violence or will solve it most of the times.

      The problem is that you are wrong about whom get attacked by 'the violent'. They attack those whome are easiest to intimidate, regardless of actual strength. (which is one reason why terrorism is such an effective offensive strategy against the USA btw)

    25. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Inda · · Score: 1

      My wife? The Trouble and Strife? The all seeing government?

      Good or Evil?

      I'd prefer a sports question please.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    26. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please be trolls. Please. I cannot accept that people who are intelligent enough to use an opposable thumb to hold a mouse have yet to evolve beyond this thought process. It is ignorant. It is refuted by every great thinker, ever, and it...well, it is ignorant.

      Violence is NEVER the best option. Easiest, yep. Quickest, sure. Requires the least amount thought and effort, check. It is never the best option.

      Before one of you brainiacs pulls "France" out of your intellect (or a$$, the line is thinning based on the above posts), pretend that you have an IQ above your previous statements and identify my point.

      Your "see how you feel" argument with your guy-with-a-knife-holding-your-wife just makes me laugh, because I imagnine you smirked thinking you had made such a great point, while in truth calling it "moot" would be generous. In any situation of alarm or danger, I am going to act as I have been programmed over millenia to do. This, however, does not change the fundamental point. If I go after the guy, there is a good chance my children will end up parentless, not just motherless. If I am successful, there will be someone in his family who will mark me the violent one and deserving of THEIR retribution. Etc. Would I try to take the mother out? I can't imagine not trying. However, I have also matured beyond a toddler's intellectual level and can recognize that it would probably be a bad choice in the immediate situation, and undoubtedly in the bigger.

    27. Re:Eye for an Eye? by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Uh, have you never heard of "burnback" and a "controled burn?" It's used to burn out fuel so a forest fire cannot use that fuel and get out of control. For example, fire fighters can start a fire from the fire break and let the burnback burn towards the main fire, expanding the firebreak.

    28. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Spudley · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if you're sending an opt-out message, you must presumably be telling them what email address you want opted out.... so why are we surprised that they know who to send these emails to?

      On the other hand, if you've been sending opt-out messages with invalid return addresses, then that presumably breaks at least some of the various anti-spam rules, so yes - it would count as a vigilante action.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    29. Re:Eye for an Eye? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      In a "guy with a knife holding your wife scenario" the danger to your wife is probabilistically much more than to you, or from his mom to you. It is called "immediate" danger.

      That is why people have the hormone called "adrenalin" in their blood: to react physically and quickly in danger.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    30. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me that if you used one of several free Bayesian Spam filters out there in addition to BlueSecurity, this could be easily foiled and all such e-mails could be targeted on their misspellings alone.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    31. Re:Eye for an Eye? by tbannist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I disagree... Killing spammers will end the spam problem! Violence can be the solution, if applied correctly. Support the death penalty for spammers... It's the only way they'll ever learn.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    32. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite right, marxie. In fact, GMail has already quashed the whole debacle. The next step is for the Blue guys to locate the asshat and see if a formal complaint is in order - or better: a class action suit. Harassment is not a way to save your business.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    33. Re:Eye for an Eye? by darkonc · · Score: 1

      In a second to Marxist's comments: May I suggest Mozilla Thunderbird (I'm presuming that you're not already running Linux). It should eat those emails pretty quickly. Just turn on the "junk mail" controls and start marking those emails as junk.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    34. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember a few years ago when spammer's web sites had a forms page to solicit interest in their crap. This was when cross scripting was more possible then today. The code basically sent thousands of form submissions to their server, and I wasn't afraid to include a REAL Email address so they could write back.

      Eventually I got their attention, after making about 150,000 forms page submissions to their forms page. They threatoned me with lawsuit, and I wrote back and told them I would stop submitting these requests as soon as the spam stopped. The spam stopped (FINALLY), and I even identified the spammer that way, by fishing them out.

      I see nothing wrong with using these tactics and would continue to do so, if it were still possible. Now only a very small portion of forms page would allow me to do this.

      I wish I were able to read the article, but it's been slashdotted... I don't suppose someone would take the bother to post a mirror site? Or a copy of the article?

      J

    35. Re:Eye for an Eye? by idesofmarch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I believe that some 2000 years ago they nailed someone to a cross who had pretty similar ideas.. Seems he has a huge following outside the hippie scene also. Ok, I have to say that he looked a bit like a hippie.

      Are you actually trying to use the bible as a foundation for your argument?

      The problem is that you are wrong about whom get attacked by 'the violent'. They attack those whome are easiest to intimidate, regardless of actual strength. (which is one reason why terrorism is such an effective offensive strategy against the USA btw)

      First of all, terrorism is often performed by parties who, due to anonymity, are immune (or are difficult) to counterattack. Second, the USA is actually fairly hard to intimidate. Say what you want about the many bubbas of this country, but they are the first to say "let's go kick their ass." Third, and most relevant, while you can debate whether the strong get attacked too, you seem to blissfully ignore the fact that the poster is absolutely correct on the specific point addressed - spammers have nothing to fear in terms of an actual counterattack. To draw an analogy from RTS games, the defending mail servers are just "turtling," building up stronger and stronger defenses in the hope the attackers will decide that spamming is not worth the effort. Maybe the strategy will work, maybe it will not, but we all know the flaw with turtling - you can never kill the opponent, only survive.

    36. Re:Eye for an Eye? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Are you actually trying to use the bible as a foundation for your argument?

      No, I am pointing out that dislike of violence has absolutely nothing to do with being a hippie.

      Maybe the strategy will work, maybe it will not, but we all know the flaw with turtling - you can never kill the opponent, only survive.

      That is only a flaw when you believe that killing the opponent is needed. Sometimes it is, more often it is not.

      Violence is an at times unescapable evil if you want to survive, that doesn't make it a good solution for most situations however.

    37. Re:Eye for an Eye? by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Harassment is not a way to save your business."

      It is much more than harassment, it is a federal crime called extortion.

      I hope Blue Security makes such a complaint to the FBI. These assclown spammers are compounding crime with more crime.

      They really *should* be locked up in a labor camp for the crime known in the former Soviet Union as "parasitism."

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    38. Re:Eye for an Eye? by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      "Just turn on the "junk mail" controls and start marking those emails as junk."

      To what end? Just delete and move on? Forget about it?

      Sorry, my idealistic chum, but a crime has been committed. Specifically, theft. Of my bandwidth. That I pay for. That makes it personal. I want a pound of flesh, literal or cyber.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    39. Re:Eye for an Eye? by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      You do not understand how the system works. It is designed to PREVENT the spammer learning your or anoy other member's email address.

      The opt-out request instructs the spammer to download and *encrypted* list of member email addresses from Blue Security, which the spammer then uses to "wash" his spam list and rid it of member addresses. The spammer never sees any legitimate email addresses.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    40. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Alan+Jay+Weiner · · Score: 1

      I view this differently...

      I was hit by a joe job a few years ago. I tracked down the spammer and called their toll-free number every time I received their spam bouncing back to me. It was an answering machine, so I just left a very nice message telling them what they had done and requesting that they not use my domain in their From headers. Alas, I never told them my domain. (I'm not stupid :)

      I figured it was a bit of my time, but I wasted their toll-free line (hopefully a per-call charge - and yes, I do know they have my phone number from those calls) and they had to wade through a bunch of messages - after all, they might have been real.

      One spam, one phone call.

      I look at Blue Security as doing the same thing.

      I *could* investigate each spam and respond myself. This would take a lot of time that I'm not willing to put out. (I get 6000+ spams/day to my catchall account) Or I could hire someone to do this work for me. That's effectively what I've done - I've hired Blue Security to wade through my email, figure out who's sending it, verify that it *is* spam, and send the spammer a message requesting they not spam me any more.

      The advantage is they have economy of scale - they only have to analyze a particular spam once regardless of how many hundreds of thousands of copies they receive. Then it's one "don't spam me" request for SOME of those spams - they throttle the requests so they *don't* DOS the spammer. They send a *maximum* of one message per spam; in reality they send far fewer.

      As long as they only "ask the sender to not spam me" one time for each spam they send to me, I don't see that there's anything wrong - it's the same as I could do by myself. (and the other few hundred thousand people do by theirselves.) But each of us doing it ourselves is massively inefficient.

      - Al Weiner -
      (who received the "stop using Blue Security" spam today - and it just tells me the spammers are scared! If they weren't, they wouldn't *care*! :)

    41. Re:Eye for an Eye? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      All well and good if you have the right guy 100% of the time. Try not to let too many innocents get caught up in your mad drive for vengeance. A somewhat better way to reduce spam to a more manageable level would be to have a little heart to heart talk with your greedy, horny neighbors that are trying to cash in on some "unclaimed" inheritence or find some cheap viagra-like substance. The spammer will always have plenty of money as long as they have willing customers. Like most things, it takes two... If you want to stop the flow of money, you need to go to the source.

      --
      What?
    42. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Spudley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The opt-out request instructs the spammer to download and *encrypted* list of member email addresses from Blue Security, which the spammer then uses to "wash" his spam list and rid it of member addresses. The spammer never sees any legitimate email addresses.

      So what's stopping the spammer from washing his list, and then comparing the resulting list with his pre-wash backup? Seems like it would still give him a list of addresses to target, even if the encryption was watertight. Doesn't even need any hacking; just a diff program.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    43. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, I think he meant "mother" as in mother****er.

    44. Re:Eye for an Eye? by darkonc · · Score: 1
      To what end? Just delete and move on? Forget about it?

      No. I set the junk mail controls to move junk to a separate folder. That allows me to deal with it on my own terms. and at my own time.
      Check my note on shutting down zombies.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    45. Re:Eye for an Eye? by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Having read your post, I can tell ypou I do the same thing via Spamcop--for all the good it does. My experience is that the major ISPs (Comcast, Road Runner, SBCGlobal, et al)--who are also the worst "offnders" when it comes to spam-spewing zombies--rarely take any action. Occasionally, small to mid-size ISPs take action, but that is rare.

      Bluefrog has the right idea: Make to cost of spamming more than it returns for the object of the spam, and the incentive to spam goes away.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    46. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what happened. A spammer got the hashed list of addresses (the do not spam registry or whatever), pretending to comply with the list, but merely compared the hashes with a list of his addresses, hashed in the same way.

      But this is good for the bluesecurity network, since this will generate a huge amount of reports from people that won't ever read or be fooled by a spam message.

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    47. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      here's the one I got: From: "xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" Reply-To: "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" To: xxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com Cc: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxgmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com Subject: re:Don't pay attention to this email! Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 14:40:55 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit You are being emailed because you are a user of BlueSecurity's well-known software "BlueFrog." http://www.bluesecurity.com/ [bluesecurity.com] Today, the BlueSecurity database became known to the worst spammers worldwide. Within 48 hours, the database will be published on the Internet, and your email address will be open to them all. After this, you will see the spam sent to your mailbox increase 10 - 20 fold. BlueSecurity was illegally attacking email marketers, and doing so with your help. Many websites have been targeted and hit, including non-spam sites. BlueSecurity's software has been fully analyzed, and contains an abundance of malicious code. This includes: ability to send mass mail to users; the ability to attack websites with Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS); the ability to open hidden doors on any machine on which it is running; and a hidden auto-update code function, which can install anything on your computer and open it up to anyone. BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves. When all is said and done, they will be able to run, hide and change their identities, leaving you to take the fall. YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it. This email ensures that you are well aware of the situation. Soon, you will be found guilty of computer crimes such as DDOS attacking of websites, conspiracy, and sending mass unsolicited bulk email messages for everything from viagra to porn, as long as you continue to run BlueFrog. They do not take money for downloading their software, they do not take money for removing emails from their lists, and they have no visible revenue stream. What they DO have is 500,000 computers sitting there awaiting their next command. What are they doing now? 1. Using your computer to send spam ? 2. Using your computer to attack competitor websites? 3. Phishing through your files for your identity and banking information? If you think you can merely change your email address and be safe while still running BlueFrog, you are in for a big surprise. This is just the beginning...

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    48. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      Sorry, damn html.

      Subject: re:Don't pay attention to this email!

      You are being emailed because you are a user of BlueSecurity's well-known software "BlueFrog." http://www.bluesecurity.com/
      [bluesecurity.com]

      Today, the BlueSecurity database became known to the worst spammers worldwide. Within 48 hours, the database will be published on the Internet, and your email address will be open to them all. After this, you will see the spam sent to your mailbox increase 10 - 20 fold.

      BlueSecurity was illegally attacking email marketers, and doing so with your help. Many websites have been targeted and hit, including non-spam sites. BlueSecurity's software has been fully analyzed, and contains an abundance of malicious code. This includes: ability to send mass mail to users; the ability to attack websites with Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS); the ability to open hidden doors on any machine on which it is running; and a hidden auto-update code function, which can install anything on your computer and open it up to anyone.

      BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves. When all is said and done, they will be able to run, hide and change their identities, leaving you to take the fall. YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it. This email ensures that you are well aware of the situation. Soon, you will be found guilty of computer crimes such as DDOS attacking of websites, conspiracy, and sending mass unsolicited bulk email messages for everything from viagra to porn, as long as you continue to run BlueFrog.

      They do not take money for downloading their software, they do not take money for removing emails from their lists, and they have no visible revenue stream. What they DO have is 500,000 computers sitting there awaiting their next command. What are they doing now?

      1. Using your computer to send spam ?
      2. Using your computer to attack competitor websites?
      3. Phishing through your files for your identity and banking information?

      If you think you can merely change your email address and be safe while still running BlueFrog, you are in for a big surprise. This is just the beginning...

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    49. Re:Eye for an Eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The spammers are not oppressed, or the victims of some historical violent wrong... they're a parasitic, bandwidth sucking plague. Any means by which we can stop them is called for.
      The same goes for the "palestinians" except that they don't suck bandwidth.
  3. I'd call the bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're able to do so, what will stop them from *not* spamming you in the future anyway? Their ethics, integrity or your stupidity?

    1. Re:I'd call the bluff by Jessta · · Score: 1

      ummm...isn't the point of sending spam to sell stuff.
      If you specifically send your spam to users who specific attempted to stop you from sending them spam then you're wasting your time and money.
      It's like the do-not-call register.

      They are much better off using this data to avoid sending spam to these people and just continue sending it to the other millions of addresses

      Spammers aren't sending you spam because they hate you, they are trying to sell stuff and people are actually buying that stuff due to the spam.

      - Jesse McNelis

      --
      ...and that is all I have to say about that.
      http://jessta.id.au
    2. Re:I'd call the bluff by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, because your post was deserving.

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    3. Re:I'd call the bluff by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      Spammers aren't sending you spam because they hate you, they are trying to sell stuff and people are actually buying that stuff due to the spam.

      Normally... but in this case, I think they're sending spam because the recipients are seriously impacting their business model. They are trying to "make an example" of BlueSecurity to discourage people from taking actions that actually affect their bottom line. Sorta like the RIAA :)

    4. Re:I'd call the bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS a bluff. I've received the spam today (I expect my spamfilters will catch it from now on, now that they've seen it) and I've never even heard of bluesecurity, let alone signed up with them. I expect the spammers are just spamming every single email they can get their hands on, while DOSing bluesecurity.com. I highly doubt they were actually able to compromise anything.

    5. Re:I'd call the bluff by Inglix+the+Mad · · Score: 1

      "It IS a bluff. I've received the spam today (I expect my spamfilters will catch it from now on, now that they've seen it) and I've never even heard of bluesecurity, let alone signed up with them. I expect the spammers are just spamming every single email they can get their hands on, while DOSing bluesecurity.com. I highly doubt they were actually able to compromise anything." Precisely. Althought it's possible blue was /.'ed too. Ironically enough, I posted the email at work I received and several other non-frog members received it. They succeeded in driving them to download and join the frog. The best advertising money can't buy.

      --
      People say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Why? Is there any shortage of bad ones?
    6. Re:I'd call the bluff by zenetik · · Score: 1

      I think the spammers are bluffing anyway. I don't think the list has been cracked. Here's why:

      The spammer(s) in this case have been targeted by the Blue Security community, which means that a number of people on their spam lists are using Blue Security. So, all they need to do is simply spam those lists again with the claim that Blue Security's user list has been cracked. It is guaranteed that every Blue Security user on the list will receive the email and think they have been targeted specifically. For all those other people receiving the spam, they have no idea what Blue Security is and simply delete the message without a second thought. It's a numbers game.

      The other reason I don't think the list has been cracked is because only one of the 6 email addresses I use through Blue Security has received these spams. That email address happens to be the oldest email address I have -- the one that is on the most spam lists and receives the most spam anyway.

  4. Screw the spammers. by Vengeance · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the hell does 20 or 30 messages mean? Nothing at all to me. I reject anywhere from 20 to 40 THOUSAND emails daily, on a domain with precisely two email users: My wife and me. The vast majority of the crap I get is easily rejected because it's sent to bogus (as in, they never ever existed) email addresses. SpamAssassin catches much of the rest.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:Screw the spammers. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Same here. It used to be worse (relative to the period) when I had my address within the company I created at the time (late 90s) with the domain dotcom.fr. Nowadays it doesn't really strain my line but it's still a bit sad to see all that crap thinking of the amount it represents worldwide.

      And I still know of people who don't have the faintest clue how to deal with it (i.e. no filters or anything).

      For the record I don't use the blue thing either, I maintain my own mail server.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Screw the spammers. by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      /dev/null: The mail server maintainer's greatest friend!

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    3. Re:Screw the spammers. by McFadden · · Score: 1
      > I reject anywhere from 20 to 40 THOUSAND emails daily, on a domain with precisely two email users.

      I've often wondered how on earth this gets to happen. I've been using the 'net almost daily since 1991 and I've never yet received a single piece of unsolicited email to any of my email addresses. Yet somehow I don't feel like I am in possession of some secret that no one else knows.

    4. Re:Screw the spammers. by PRC+Banker · · Score: 1

      I reject anywhere from 20 to 40 THOUSAND emails daily, on a domain with precisely two email users: My wife and me.

      Personal domain... WOW! Not much more has to be said.

      --
      Oh.
    5. Re:Screw the spammers. by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      You and me both. I get this funny feeling that I'm actually being attacked by someone, as I can think of no other good reason that so very many emails would be generated with random strings @my.own.personal.years-old.domain.named.after.me.a nd.never.previously.registered.by.anyone.else.

      Indeed, the occasional 'you have registered for xxx' message certainly points to this.

      Without SpamAssassin, I'd be dead in the water.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    6. Re:Screw the spammers. by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      What the hell does 20 or 30 messages mean? Nothing at all to me. I reject anywhere from 20 to 40 THOUSAND emails daily
      what? what was that? oh, sorry, we meant 20 to 30 MILLION spam emails a day
    7. Re:Screw the spammers. by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      D'oh!

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    8. Re:Screw the spammers. by Infoport · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of setting up a honeypot within my router (using a flavor/branch of OpenWRT on the router), but I'm starting to think that I'm really not doing so bad after all.
      Sure I get spam, but I guess I'm not receiving "family size" spam deliveries.

    9. Re:Screw the spammers. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered how on earth this gets to happen. I've been using the 'net almost daily since 1991 and I've never yet received a single piece of unsolicited email to any of my email addresses. Yet somehow I don't feel like I am in possession of some secret that no one else knows.

      Note the majority was recieved by the server to non-existant e-mail boxes. However- I guarantee you that if you want spam, all you have to do is use an un-obscifacted e-mail address in the HTML code of a website, perhaps in a mailto tag. Then you will have about 20 minutes before the crapflood starts.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Screw the spammers. by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to own foo.com, test.com, or asdf.com, do you? If you do..I'm really, really sorry.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    11. Re:Screw the spammers. by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Would it make sense to return the message to the sender in the case of mass spam?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    12. Re:Screw the spammers. by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      you can protect your domain with bluesecurity too, when their site finally comes back online.

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
  5. What must be done by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We really need to take the internet back from these guys. Reply to every spam e-mail by going to their web site, and filling out bogus info. Give them bad information overload. Same thing goes for junk mail and telemarketers. When somebody sends you a credit card offer, send it back to them, writing "Take me off your list". Make sure they have to waste so much time throwing out bad mail that it isn't worth their time. When telemarketers call, ask them to hold on a minute. Then set down the phone and don't pick it up again for 10 minutes. That will dig into their costs.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:What must be done by Vengeance · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This method also helps if you need to recycle paper in your community (as I do). I just tear up the external envelope and add it to the postage-paid package I send back.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    2. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seems like a good approach actually. Perhaps some script could be developed that would do nothing but look at a web form, fill in appropriate bogus info, and just hit the site repeatedly with bogus orders. I'll bet any CC provider would soon get tired of having to constantly do verification on bogus CC numbers and would end up closing the spammer's account.

      Sure, it's a nasty form of attack, but then that's no less than spammers deserve.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    3. Re:What must be done by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better Yet, tape the Business reply envelope to a Brick (wrapped in shipping paper), the Post Office has to deliver it, and it will cost the receiving company a fortune in shipping costs.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    4. Re:What must be done by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's exactly what BlueFrog does. Except it does it automatically, so we don't have to waste our time actually letting these people know they're useless.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:What must be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While "a taste of their own medicine" sounds nice in theory, the reality is that your proposed response will likely expose you to even more security risks. Not only that, if they get your IP, you'll certainly be receiving more spam from them. [Although I've never seen it, I'm convinced there's a spammer database (probably more than one) that cross-references IPs and email addy's.]

    6. Re:What must be done by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Perhaps some script could be developed that would do nothing but look at a web form, fill in appropriate bogus info, and just hit the site repeatedly with bogus orders"

      Actually, there's a very nice client written in C++ that does a damn good job. No CC data or anything, but 'please remove me' forms. If you're confused, read the article again; it's mentioned.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    7. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing that most of these "please remove me" BS forms do is confirm that the email address is a valid one, and can be resold to more spammers. If anything filling those out actually causes more harm than good.

      If you're confused, read the article again; it's mentioned.

      Thanks Tips, but all four links in the article seem to be unreachable.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    8. Re:What must be done by HaloZero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've heard that you play NES games on your GBA. Please tell me how.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    9. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 1

      hmm... never mind, I see what you meant now, but I thought there was more information in the unavailable links.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    10. Re:What must be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you suggest takes time, effort, and money. The best thing that can be done is to completely and totally ignore spammers - if everyone did that then spamming would no longer be profitable and they would stop on their own.

    11. Re:What must be done by mpaulsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_356.html

      'According to rule 917.243(b) in the Domestic Mail Manual, when a business reply card is "improperly used as a label"--e.g., when it's affixed to a brick--the item so labeled may be treated as "waste." That means the post office can heave it into the trash without further ado.'

    12. Re:What must be done by Drathus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Better Yet, tape the Business reply envelope to a Brick (wrapped in shipping paper), the Post Office has to deliver it, and it will cost the receiving company a fortune in shipping costs.


      No, they don't. And no, they won't.

      To quote:

      'According to rule 717.243(b) in the Domestic Mail Manual, when a business reply card is "improperly used as a label" -- e.g., when it's affixed to a brick - the item so labeled may be treated as "waste."'

    13. Re:What must be done by toastyman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be awesome, but unfortunately it doesn't work.

    14. Re:What must be done by Fordiman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Get an X-ROM cart from Easybuy 2000. Get PogoShell. Place X-ROM cart in GBA. Insert reader into GBA. Place NES games in Pogo filesystem. Upload PogoShell to GBA via X-ROM cart.

      The software used to do these things varies. On a Windows Machine, you can use LittleWriter, but on a Linux >=2.6 box, I'd suggest using the xrom drivers found on my website (http://www.fordi.org/xrom.html). Pogo is something you'll have to build from source, I'm afraid.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    15. Re:What must be done by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Problem is, that to waste their time, you have to waste your time. I sometimes do respond to junk (paper) mail by sending random junk in the envelope. Sometimes I actually write a letter demanding they remove me from their lists. No matter what I do, it doesn't end. Capital One still sends me junk mail despite multiple letters between us -- me demanding them to stop, them reassuring me they will honor my request. Junk mail is even worse because it is more anonymous -- it is easy to forge headers and mask where a mail truly came from. Yes, there are ways to track it down, but it isn't always easy. Filling out information on a web site in the email doesn't do much, since odds are it doesn't go to the same person. Even then, it takes time to screw with the spammers, electronic or paper, and I don't want to waste my time.

      Sometimes I do get bored and do screw with them. Such as using my brand new photo printer to print stuff and put it in those return envelopes. After visiting certain not-work-safe sites for photos.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    16. Re:What must be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to just mail them offers from other credit card companies.

    17. Re:What must be done by pla · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would be awesome, but unfortunately it doesn't work.


      The brick idea, no. But the SD article made a nice suggestion - A rectangular chunk of nice thick sheet metal would fit well inside the return envelope, yet weigh far more than one ounce.


      Also, one point on the SD article:
      of the 161,000 people who wrote to the DMA last year, 116,000 wanted more junk mail. They were sent a booklet entitled "How To Get More Interesting Mail" (as God is my witness, I am not making this up), which tells you various key catalogs that you can send for to guarantee you'll be deluged with stuff.
      I can tell you exactly why people ask for more junk mail...

      They own wood stoves.
    18. Re:What must be done by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Better Yet, tape the Business reply envelope to a Brick (wrapped in shipping paper), the Post Office has to deliver it, and it will cost the receiving company a fortune in shipping costs.
      Besides the problem of it just being disposal pain for the post office, I wouldn't want to pay for that darn brick.

      Also, don't bother getting clever with the form, as most of the time it's just scanned in (with the pre-printed information) and there is a chance that they won't figure out that you were just being 'funny' until it's a pain in the butt for you as well. (You might have printed 'Santos L Halper', but all they really wanted was a signature)

      I'd suggest just a little piece of paper saying 'no', or perhaps a few scaps of paper (also, keep an eye out for bar codes on the envelope not related to the postage).

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    19. Re:What must be done by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      The only thing that most of these "please remove me" BS forms do is confirm that the email address is a valid one, and can be resold to more spammers. If anything filling those out actually causes more harm than good.

      Possibly. Some of the links do embed information identifying your email address. If you're smart, you'll pull that out of the URL first.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    20. Re:What must be done by tidokoro · · Score: 2, Funny

      When solicitors call me at work, I don't make them wait 10 minutes, but I do put them on hold for a minute or so. I figure that's enough to throw off their curve.

      We also have in our small company a fictitious employee whose sole job is to have telemarketers routed to his voicemail box.

      It's gotten a little tricky once or twice when vendors have showed up at our office actually looking to meet him!

      --
      tidokoro
      what turns a man's karma neutral? lust for gold? power? or just a heart born full of neutrality?
    21. Re:What must be done by Tom · · Score: 1

      You have a simplified view of reality. All of this might've worked 10 years ago. Then, someone tried it. Then, the spammers found a way around it. Today, you can be sure none of these simple schemes will cause so much as a dent in their revenue stream.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:What must be done by clevershark · · Score: 1

      Even then I don't think it's that effective a method, and the way it seems to be implemented (link is verified, then propagated on the network) it can easily be considered a DOS attack. What a smart spammer does to thwart things is just take the opt-out page offline, or better yet link to an opt-out page from a competitor. In any case anyone who makes good money spamming will have equipped himself with a load-balanced server cluster ahead of time just to counter this sort of tactic; it's not that expensive to rig something up nowadays, when you can get a PC for $200-300 *retail*.

      I would rather see something (a thunderbird plugin?) that goes after only the email that got to you personally, and sends, say, 50 bogus orders per spam, only from your system. It's straight-up payback, and (I think) less legally ambiguous.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    23. Re:What must be done by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just put a bunch of washers or rocks or pennies or fridge magnets or anything else flat and fairly heavy. I have some brake pad backs with the lining completely rubbed off that would be nice candidates.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:What must be done by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to be a big anti-spammer, back when I had time on my hands. I generated a list of proper-pronouns that was somewhere just over 500k long (I forget the exact #s now). I wrote a number of scripts that used wget and curl (depending on the form) to stuff addresses generated from the pronoun list and about a dozen spam-hole domains I registered into those Remove Me forms. Within hours I was getting tens of thousands of pieces of spam. Within days my Cox cable connection was saturated. I offloaded it onto a co-lo box for another couple of months before I finally changed the MXs to 127.0.0.1 and shut the system down. I had automated scripts for auto-forwarding a copy of the spam to the FTC and to post the messages to NANAS (news.admin.net-abuse.sightings). I also archived the incoming spam and used it to seed my Bayesian filters and DCC system for the ISP I worked for. I can't begin to tell you how effective that was. It was a helluva rig. I wish I still had time to dick around with that kind of stuff.

    25. Re:What must be done by Stellian · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. The problem is highly asymmetrical : the spammer needs spambots and webservers worth a few thousand $, and can flood the Internet with crap. If every recipient is to spend a few minutes to do a mDOS (manual denial of service), it sums up to tens of millions of lost minutes, or millions of $ in lost productivity.
      We need an automated descentralized P2P network to attack the spammers and the spam-friendly ISPs.

    26. Re:What must be done by jtdennis · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that a bunch of that 116,000 people were kids that saw something about that booklet on TV.

      --
      -- "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" -Optimus Prime
    27. Re:What must be done by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
      One thing I do is make sure to put all of the material they sent me back to them. That means I fold up the original envelope, the disclosure information, and all the shiny marketing material they send me, along with the application.

      Also, going along with your suggestion, I got a fundraising request from an organization that I absolutely despise. So I took about 30 pennies and taped them on to the back of their fundraising slip and dropped it in the mail. Needless to say, I never received another fundraising letter from them.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    28. Re:What must be done by Pollardito · · Score: 3, Informative
      When somebody sends you a credit card offer, send it back to them, writing "Take me off your list".
      you can get off the prescreened credit mailing lists altogether, just use one of the methods suggested on the FTC website
    29. Re:What must be done by coaxeus · · Score: 1

      Too bad feeding tens of thousands of raw spam into bayesian doesn't work now, with intentional bayesian poisoning e-mail campaigns :(

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    30. Re:What must be done by hazzey · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this assume that their web server and their email server are on the same machine? Who cares if you bring down the unsubscribe form when they can still send out emails at the same rate?

    31. Re:What must be done by Forces · · Score: 1

      Then just bounce all of the spam back to them or even better find out their personal email addresses and send the crap to them. The webserver isn't the problem, the human controlling it is

    32. Re:What must be done by dbc001 · · Score: 1

      Here are a few good tricks for telemarketers that I've learned (I was one for a brief while):
      Act interested, put them on speaker phone, set the phone down and do something else. When you hear them pause, ask them a question. Then set the phone down again. This takes up a lot of their time and also saves someone else from getting a call.

      Keep a phone in the bathroom - especially if, like me, you only use your phone for DSL. After they give you their pitch, don't hesitate to tell them where you are and exactly what you are doing (be careful that you dont violate any laws though!). After giving a two minute upsell, a simple "I'm taking a dump right now" can be very effective.

      When I was in college, some friends & I kept a list of 800 numbers for companies that had pissed us off. While on the john we would just go down the list, waste their time, and then politely inform them about the status of turtle head / how much cable was just laid / etc.

      Yeah, I know, I'm a mean bastard. They deserve it though.

    33. Re:What must be done by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Reply to every spam e-mail by going to their web site,
      > and filling out bogus info

      Wow, how clueless. Your address is not, apparently, in the databases of any serious spamming rings.

      If I quit my day job and work on this twelve hours a day, seven days a week for the next decade, I could probably just about get that little project done for all the spam I received last month.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    34. Re:What must be done by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      >>So I took about 30 pennies and taped them on to the back of their fundraising slip<<

      Yuo should have glued them on with something like shoegoo or an epoxy type glue then it is a little harder for them to use em anyway ;=)

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    35. Re:What must be done by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It just depends on how good your bayes filter is. I agree though that it was much more effective back in the day. Now things like the SURBL are essential. Spammers have to make money some how. To make money they have to get you to buy one of the contract company's products. To get you to buy one of their products/services they have to get you to their website. That's where you nail them. No matter how well they obfuscate the URL you can always figure out what site they're trying to spamertise. Then you just use that as your qualifier for identifying spam. The SURBL is nice.

    36. Re:What must be done by Alan+Jay+Weiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are absolutely right. The problem is highly asymmetrical : the spammer needs spambots and webservers worth a few thousand $, and can flood the Internet with crap. If every recipient is to spend a few minutes to do a mDOS (manual denial of service), it sums up to tens of millions of lost minutes, or millions of $ in lost productivity.
      We need an automated descentralized P2P network to attack the spammers and the spam-friendly ISPs.


      It takes me less than 5 minutes to forward the 5000-7000 emails in my catchall account each day. I use Thunderbird with the Blue Frog plugin, and forward about 400 messages at a time - I could do it all in a minute if I could attach all the messages at once but that ends up to be too large a message...
      Doing it manually would take *far* longer - I've enough time sinks as it is!

      According to my Blue Security statistics, my Blue Frog has sent 11,152 "opt-out" requests in the past 7 days. (which also points out that every spam doesn't generate an opt-out) Blue Security's idea is to be enough of a thorn that it's easier to not send to the Blue Frog list than to fight it. (one of the spammer tools has recently added a "clean emails of Blue Security registered names" button - making it trivially easy to remove the registered names. This implies that Blue Security is having an effect.

      Right now there are 471,000 names in the list - surely not all are really active, and not all are sending opt-out messages, but it seems spammers are sitting up and noticing now. According to Blue Security's blog, in the past month several spammers have negotiated with them and agreed to clean their lists. If I remember right they generate something like 8% or so of spam volume. Not a *lot* but I'd expect more in the coming months. Spammers are in it to make money - once they get over the initial irritation, it'll just be easier to clean their lists than to try to fight back. Which also makes sense - the list is people who won't buy from them in the first place, so in the end it's a waste of time to send spam to them.

      In my opinion (everyone's got em! :) this is the best shot I've seen at drastically reducing spam. Laws aren't as helpful as they could be - especially against spam from other countries. And it takes a long time to catch and convict a single spammer. Do you *really* want your tax dollars used that way? (we don't even need to get into how gosh-darn *wonderful* CAN-SPAM is...) Filters help, but that's not stopping the spam, it's just preventing you from seeing it. Killing spammers might have an effect but seems a bit severe. (although there are days... :) Baysian filters help - but a business can't lose a mail to false positives, so they need to check the spam anyway. Challenge-response is ugly and annoying. And I sure don't want to go down the pay-for-email road! RBLs are too dangerous - throwing out the good with the bad. (one listed the entire Comcast.net domain, for example) Greylisting isn't a bad idea, but it does use extra computing power, and delays some email. Seems to me that being a thorn in the side of a spammer has a decent chance of working. They're not stupid, not even necessarily lazy. They're just taking advantage of the way things work. (excepting those who use trojans etc to take over other's machines - they're evil!) Once they reach the point where it's easier to accept and comply, and recognize they're not losing any revenue (because those emails won't become customers anyway) they'll clean their lists - and spam will go down. It won't disappear, but hopefully be significantly reduced.

      - Al Weiner -

    37. Re:What must be done by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory, however burning catalogs, magazines, etc.. in a wood stove is a really bad idea. (using a small amount of newspaper to start the fire is okay)

      1) Chemicals used on the paper to do the printing along with glue, plastic, colored pages create highly toxic gases when burned.

      2) Burns too hot and too fast - can cause chimney fires on existing creosote buildup.

      3) If burned along with wood logs, colored paper will lower the burning temperature of the logs creating more creosote buildup.

      4) Creates a lot of incompletely burned ash, which will likely have toxic residues from the items in #1.

      Of course, just because it is a bad idea doesn't mean people won't do it... The Darwin Awards exist for a reason.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    38. Re:What must be done by k1t10 · · Score: 1

      I put other peoples junk mail in the reply paid envelopes and post it back, so i send visa lots of pizza vouchers and mastercard lots of real estate pamphlets :P

      --
      "Don't ask me, i'm just a girl"
    39. Re:What must be done by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      To all those who say the post office doesn't have to deliver it, you are wrong.

      Yes, I did read straightdope.com.

      Tape the label to a brick, and the Post office doesn't have to deliver it.

      Tape the label to a "Brick (wrapped in shipping paper)" and the Post Office DOES have to deliver it.

      In the first case it is obvious you are sending a brick, in the second you are sending a wrapped package that meets all the postal requirements.

      I worked as a mail carrier for the Post Office for several years in the 80s, I don't think I ever delivered any bricks.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    40. Re:What must be done by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Check out 'formfucker' if you can find anyone who will send you a copy.

    41. Re:What must be done by RedToad · · Score: 1

      You have described REFI Retaliator. But that is real vigilanteism (EH?) and whether it is valid to post creative credit card numbers is questionable . . . but then, who is questioning?

    42. Re:What must be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps some script could be developed that would do nothing but look at a web form, fill in appropriate bogus info, and just hit the site repeatedly with bogus orders.
      I think Blue Frog already did that job.
  6. A head for an eye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, Let's kill the spammers.

    1. Re:A head for an eye? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Better yet, let's kill their customers.

      --
      What?
  7. Unrestricted Warfare by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pretty soon the spammers will be conducting unrestricted submarine attacks on civilian shipping in the North Atlantic.

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    1. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      attacks on civilian shipping

      Shortly thereafter, the global average temperature will fall a few degrees?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its all fun and games until the Lusitania gets sunk.

    3. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

      It may be unrestricted warfare, but I reserve the right to put up a missle shield in the form of a spam filter. I tried bluesecurity's bluefrog for one day last summer, took it off, and have never used it since. They can spam me all they want. My filter is holding at 100% of the messages now. I see nothing. The effort is all on their part.

      --
      UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
    4. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Pretty soon the spammers will be conducting unrestricted submarine attacks on civilian shipping in the North Atlantic.

      And if that's not bad enough, you're not going to believe what the Mexican spammers have been planning...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No. Shortly thereafter the spammers will bomb a naval base in Hawaii.

    6. Re:Unrestricted Warfare by Zebadias · · Score: 2, Funny
      How can you compleatly miss this FSM reference!!

      Yarrrh!! Arrrrrh!

  8. So, is the database compromised? by Dynamoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A big question here is.. is the database compromised? From the poking around I've done, it does seem that the only people who have received this message are BlueFrog users.. those who don't use it, don't seem to have it. It could simply be that the spammers have used tracking information embedded in the spammy URLs to find out who is using BlueFrog.

    BlueFrog has been criticised for it's so-called "vigilante" approach.. it's not alone in this approach, but perhaps this does go to show a potential downside: spammers are evil - pissed off spammers will simply direct the evil at the people who pissed them off.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure that only Bluefrog users getting the message proves anything. The spammers can get the list from Bluefrog themselves by agreeing to not spam its users. I'm sure they agreed to do it, got the list (including all the bogus email addresses) and have just started spamming everyone.

      One would hope that the people at bluefrog were smart enough to put a few unique bogus email in each list they sent out to see if the list gets used as spam.

    2. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful
      BlueFrog has been criticised for it's so-called "vigilante" approach.. it's not alone in this approach, but perhaps this does go to show a potential downside: spammers are evil - pissed off spammers will simply direct the evil at the people who pissed them off.

      So what do we do -- surrender, because some spammer compromises this one system? Blue Frog has its own problems, but their idea is sound, if a bit "above the law." Let Blue Frog users forward the emails to them and let the company go after the spammers (aren't they violating CAN-SPAM or the law against harrassing emails?).

      Look, Wyatt Earp was a lawman looking to see justice done and occassionally he had to step outside the law. Call it vigilantism if you like, but the fact is, these spammers have been operating under the assumption that they are untouchable, and can do this all day long with no repercussions. It's time for users around the globe to go on the offensive, give them a taste fo their own medicine. Shut down their ISPs if they won't stop the spam. Jam up their systems. Let them know we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore. The court system can rule against them, but so many of them are overseas that I seriously doubt they can be touched. So hit 'em where it hurts, right in the servers.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not possible; the reply mails are from 'honeypot' accounts, created on your behalf for every e-mail you want protected.

      What's more likely: A spammer downloaded the 'e-mail list cleanser', copied his mail list, cleansed the copy and sent spam to the removed mails, thinking he's all kinds of clever.

      He's not. A quick spam-block-and-Blue-report, and guess what? No more asshat spam. Consumers one, spammers zero.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    4. Re:So, is the database compromised? by ShibaInu · · Score: 1

      As pointed out above, they'll just send you spam, which is what they've done in the first place - so who cares!

      One thing is clear - there are more of us then there are of them. If everyone immediately bounced 20 messages back for every one they sent us, they'd be in trouble. Of course, given that they are using zombie machines to do their spamming, this isn't exactly going to work...

    5. Re:So, is the database compromised? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am a victim of the blackmail letter as well. It's easy to figure out how the spammers got my email address, they already had it. They simply backed up their address book, cleaned their list with Blue Security's tool, then "diffed" the database to figure out who was BlueSecurity member.

      Another note, BlueSecurity is not Slashdotted. It is unavailable because of a DDoS attack started sometime earlier this week. The attack started submitting invalid PHP requests, making the site slow to a crawl and at times be completely unavailable.

      I write about it on my blog. More on the attack here. The threating letter I received is also on my Slashdot journal.

    6. Re:So, is the database compromised? by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt the database was compromised. Rather, I am willing to bet that this spammer has a sufficiently large database that it was possible for him to correlate the mountain of opt-out requests he got to emails it was sent to and make some simple deductions. This makes me wish I could run two copies of BlueFrog on my machine at the same time, and double the amount of opt-outs I was sending him.

      As far as directing their efforts towards people like me, that's fine. That means less spam around the world for the rest of you. I accepted that risk when I signed up.

    7. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet Storm Center is saying that the database was not stolen. They've got a link to Blue's official response, but their website is down. Slashdot or spammers? ;-)

    8. Re:So, is the database compromised? by jcr · · Score: 1

      The threating letter I received is also on my Slashdot journal.

      That kind of thing could easily inspire me to go medieval on that spamming git. "Blue security is forcing us"? What a load of bullshit!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:So, is the database compromised? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      A big question here is.. is the database compromised? From the poking around I've done, it does seem that the only people who have received this message are BlueFrog users.

      I have never used a blue frog :)

      Seriously, I have never heard of blue frog or blue security until Sunday or Monday when about 10 or so emails escaped my spam filter. I am getting these mails sent to a number of email aliases and even one harvested email address that is not known or valid. Regarding the harvested one, I'm assuming it came from a mailing list or a web archive of a mailing list. The deal is that I'm an admin of a domain, and I have all of the workstations on the domain MX entry pointing to the main mail server. So, its like workstation1.example.com and the MX entry is for mail.example.com. I have been getting spam mails to me@workstation1.example.com for years, yet I have NEVER implicitly or explicitly told or given an email address of me@workstation1.example.com to anybody. me@workstation1.example.com IS listed in some email headers, but never as a From or Reply-To address.

      Back to this blue stuff. I have no clue what it is, nor do I care besides the fact that some of the mails are escaping my spam filter. All of the mails I have looked at in detail appear to be coming from compromised Windows machines from around the world. For a full example, see the body of one of the mails below in fixed font. The middle appears to always be the same, but there is random english text at the beginning and end. The subjects appear to be 2 random words.

      What a PITA. I cannot tell what the purpose of these mails are. At first, they look like extortion to try to get me to get more spam to stop getting spam. I don't know.

      Sometimes a sting can cause a comatose condition which is."He began to laugh then, and her face darkened for the first time since she had come back, and she left the room with the manuscript under her arm..

      Hey,

      You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

      You signed up because you were expecting to recieve a lesser amount of spam, unfortunately, due to the tactics used by BlueSecurity, you will end up recieving this message, or other nonsensical spams 20-40 times more than you would normally.

      How do you make it stop?

      Simple, in 48 hours, and every 48 hours thereafter, we will run our current list of BlueSecurity subscribers through BlueSecurity's database, if you arent there.. you wont get this again.

      We have devised a method to retrieve your address from their database, so by signing up and remaining a BlueSecurity user not only are you opening yourself up for this, you are also potentially verifying your email address through them to even more spammers, and will end up getting up even more spam as an end-result.

      By signing up for bluesecurity, you are doing the exact opposite of what you want, so delete your account, and you will stop recieving this.

      Why are we doing this?

      Its simple, we dont want to, but BlueSecurity is forcing us. We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails, but do not believe for one second that we will stop this tirade of emails if you choose to stay with BlueSecurity.
      Just remember one thing when you read this, we didnt do this to you, BlueSecurity did.

      If BlueSecurity decides to play fair, we will do the same.

      We are quite sure you will think this will not continue, that we will not continue wasting our resources doing this, feel free to wait out the first 48, or the second, and see whether these stop, you will be quite suprised.

      If you have another email under the protection of bluesecurity, and have not recieved this there, do not worry, you will soon enough.

      We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user.

      You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site(http://www.b

    10. Re:So, is the database compromised? by karldavidson · · Score: 1

      I signed up for it a long time ago and never used it. yet I am now a part of this the amount of spam I have been receiving over the last two days has definitely increased 5 fold.

    11. Re:So, is the database compromised? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      It's easy to figure out how the spammers got my email address, they already had it. They simply backed up their address book, cleaned their list with Blue Security's tool, then "diffed" the database to figure out who was BlueSecurity member.

      Why should such a tool exist? What do BlueSecurity want to help spammers for? If the spammer wants to be sure he's not hitting any of their subscribers, he can trash his old list and build a new one by confirmed opt-in. Anything less just allows - and indeed helps - spammers to continue spamming.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    12. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, don't piss off the spammers. They're Evil!

      What can they do? Spam you? Hack your computer? You don't know how to do the same back at them? Its really quite simple..

      There are more of us than there are of them. If more of us w/ a clue had a spam problem maybe we'd do something to help the rest of you out. But at the moment, it is us these spammers don't want to piss off. We know you're frustrated, but you're also not on our side, why should we help out? You can oursource your way out of spam the American way.

      Pwning spammers is easy, basic computer science. Much easier than programming. Spammers are retarded.

    13. Re:So, is the database compromised? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > The attack started submitting invalid PHP requests, making the site slow to a crawl and at times be completely unavailable

      I guess PHP still hasn't fixed those algorithmic complexity attacks.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    14. Re:So, is the database compromised? by mczak · · Score: 1

      I got some of these messages late last night, and I didn't even know what bluesecurity is (the spam got past mozilla's filter, and for some reason it took my attention, so I looked it up). Thus I quickly decided it's a spammer who is just lying (you're not surprised spammers are lying aren't you...). What happens is that probably some spammer just sends this out using its usual address db it has, and people which don't use bluesecurity will just ignore/delete it, whereas the actual users of bluesecurity will (or so the spammer hopes) think they really get this spam because they use it.

    15. Re:So, is the database compromised? by docbombay · · Score: 1

      No, the database is not "compromised". If you actually read about how BlueFrog actually works, you should know that the list containing users' e-mail addresses is *public*. The whole point of the system is to make spammers agree not to send unsolicited e-mail to anybody on BlueSecurity's list, or face the consequences.

    16. Re:So, is the database compromised? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      Spammers are supposed to use the BlueSecurity Cleaning Tool to end opt-out requests from spamming victims. The tool is encrypted and has a numerous amount of bogus email addresses listed. I think most people are missing this point: Spammers cannot collect extra email address from the tool, however they can potentially see who is a BlueSecurity subscriber in the list of email addresses they currently have.

      I personally do not care if a spammer knows if I am a member or not. I joined less than a week ago and my spam has decreased from a few dozen to a hundred a day down to maybe a dozen in the past 24 hours, including the spam threats. It seems to be working.

    17. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Elminst · · Score: 1

      I am a BlueFrog user, and I did NOT receive any email like this.
      So either;
      1. The spammer is full of crap.
      2. They spammed every address they already have as a scare tactic. (see #1)
      3. they broke SOME of the database, which is not good.

      My money is on 1 or 2.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    18. Re:So, is the database compromised? by Bubba · · Score: 0

      Yep, you can download the tool yourself and try it: http://download.bluesecurity.com/registry/linux/rc t-1.3.3.1041.i386.tar.gz

      rct --use-wget

      Put a bunch of email addresses in the source file, and dest will be your clean list.

      Scanning emails records in email addresses file...
      100% file complete, 100% total complete

      Success:
      addresses.txt: OK, processed 6 addresses, 3 protected addresses found
      Done.
      Output file clean.txt created (Scanned 6 records, found 3 protected addresses)

      The files are easily diffed to expose the registered addresses. Also remember that bluesecurity allows users to register a full domain to be protected. It will allow every address within the domain to be excluded (or in the spammers case, included if they are doing a diff).

  9. I had wondered by shadowknot · · Score: 1

    It did seem odd to me that my spam per day count had actually gone up in the last few weeks. I'm not unsubscribing though if they've got my address they've got it may as well keep flooding the scum.

  10. Monty Python by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, if I got this right, the spammers that are getting spammed are now spamming the spammers? Sounds like a flying circus to me!

    --
    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
    1. Re:Monty Python by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Baked beans are off today... Isn't the real problem with SPAM (other than it's annoyance factor) that tons of emails are going across networks and hogging bandwidth?? So how will creating even more messages help this?? Someone explain please...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:Monty Python by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Sometimes war IS the answer when negotiating fails. These people don't care about negotiating or removing people from their mailing lists, they don't care that you will never open a spam email or buy something from a spammer... their clients pay by the message, so you get a message whether you want one or not.

      So how does this help? If the spammer stops spamming, then the spam traffic in both directions drops to zero. And the "real" problem isn't traffic... you probably generate more internet traffic accessing slashdot once or twice then you'd get in a day of spam email. The problem IS the annoyance factor.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Monty Python by __aanhjr1420 · · Score: 1

      Close... The spammers who are getting spammed are now spamming the spammer spammers. What we need to know is if anyone has anything that hasn't got any spam in it.

    4. Re:Monty Python by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Which would be great IF the spammers stop sending messages. But according to the article, it is actually increasing the number the send out, and increasing the messages the spamees send out. I really don't think this is "the solution to end all SPAM" - but I am more than willing to let others get bombarded to find out..

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Monty Python by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      As others have been pointing out, these guys must be getting desperate. It may all come to nothing, but then it may cause some spammers to quit. It may also start getting national attention and cause more penalties for these guys. I mean, I'm all for technological measures to fight spam, but fining misleading, fraudulent, and, in this case, threatening emails doesn't go against my libertarian instincts at all.

      So there may be some good, there may not be, but it's worth a shot.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:Monty Python by idontgno · · Score: 1
      The spammers who are getting spammed are now spamming the spammer spammers.

      "Bloody Vikings!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Monty Python by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Let's put it this way..Does SPAM bug you enough to quit using email all together?? Hell no, you just use filters or other software to make it manageable. Which is exactly what the spammers will do to the blue frog folks. The opt-out emails will not be enoguh to make the spammers quit sending SPAM. They won't quit spamming, they will just adjust how they do it. The only way SPAM will stop is when not a single person on the planet buys whatever it is they are selling. Don't hold your breath for SPAM to end (there is no shortage of idiot consumers on the planet), just learn better techniques so it doesn't affect you.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    8. Re:Monty Python by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, it sounds like a circle jerk to me.

      --
      UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
    9. Re:Monty Python by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Well, normally I'd agree with you - but then explain the reaction we're seeing from the spammers on this issue.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:Monty Python by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      knee jerk reaction. I'm sure they figure, hell let's give these folks a scare to see if they will relent, it's worth a try..(And I guarantee you some people went and dropped themselves off the blue frog list after getting the email) And why not, it costs them nothing. This is the problem with spammers - generally it costs them nothing or next to nothing to do their thing. Until THAT fact changes nothing else about SPAM will.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    11. Re:Monty Python by IndigoParadox · · Score: 1

      "I don't like SPAM!"

  11. So... by yngv · · Score: 1

    What do we do? I'm getting just what they said -- about 50 emails since they started last night. I can't even get to bluesecurity.com to unsubscribe if I wanted to. I can handle 50 or so I suppose and want to continue to support BS (hmmm...) but what would you do?

    1. Re:So... by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://members.bluesecurity.com is still up; I don't know what they did to www., but it seems to be down.

      Meanwhile, stay on, ride it out. Use your spam filter to catch the spams; heuristics will still capture the spams they're sending if they're reported. This guy is desperate - likely going bankrupt - and some of us in the Blue Community would like to see him and his sort become paupers for their asshattery.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you need to do is get the domain name from the email and look it up in dnsstuff.com and find out who is hosting all the servers the spam is comming from. Then you need to contact individual ISPs and hosting companies and tell them that spam is coming through their networks and just let them do the rest, usually emailing abuse@(hosting or ips).com/net will do the trick when it comes to spammers. Hosting companies will just suspend the domain and look into any spam coming from there and if they find out that someone has done something to compromise the server it when through then they will find the source and try to stop it there. I know because I work for a Hosting company.

    3. Re:So... by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      What do we do? I'm getting just what they said -- about 50 emails since they started last night. I can't even get to bluesecurity.com to unsubscribe if I wanted to. I can handle 50 or so I suppose and want to continue to support BS (hmmm...) but what would you do?

      Step one, get over it. "Oh my god, I'm getting 50 spam emails a day now! What should I do?!?!?!" Delete them, duh! Most of us have to contend with hundreds or thousands of spam messages a day. 50 is chump change.

      Step two, get a good anti-spam solution that plugs into your mailserver or email client, preferably one with Bayesian or similar filtering capability. Those tend to work well.

      Step three, realize that whether or not you subscribe to BlufeFrog is meaningless. The spammers have your email address now. Of course, they had it before too, or else you wouldn't have needed BlueFrog. So what's the difference?

      Step four, realize that there is no story here. "Scumbag spammers continue to act like scumbags and continue spamming!" You might as well say that the sun rises every morning.

    4. Re:So... by nystire · · Score: 1

      Currently, members. is down and www. is up

    5. Re:So... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      WAS up, might be a good idea NOT to let the attackers know about these sorts of things.

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yah, Checking if a website is up by digging through slashdot comments is about the easiest way to do it.

  12. ah ha by boredomrisen · · Score: 1

    I was wondering when this was going to get reported. Its funny I checked this about 5 minutes ago and it wasnt here yet. The same email landed in my mailbox yesterday and since yesterday afternoon i've been floded with spam definitly by the same group. Looks like they are probably being dosed off the face of the earth as well. That or they closed shop and ran :) although I doubt that. Seemed like a great service. I suppose when you go after the type of people that run spaming bot networks you gotta expect things like this to happen.

    1. Re:ah ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reported it 8 hours ago, but slashdot didn't care.

  13. Errr, what? by Otter · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Between this and "Multi-threaded Programmation Makes You Crazy ?" I'm wondering if May 2 is Even More Incoherent Than Usual Story Day here.

    If so, I have to complain about the "New Apple Campaign" item. "In one of the ads the PC repeat itself several times" and "In an other one (and maybe the most aggressive of all) PC is sick because of a virus, while Mac is healthy" fall far short of the mark.

    1. Re:Errr, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maypril Fools!

      Er, no. Actually all these stories are being posted by Hemos. Go figure.

  14. How about posting the web site addresses involved? by clevershark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure that we're all interested in what these people have to sell... also that would probably cause a massive slashdotting.

    --

    My sig is too lon

  15. Is anyone really surprised? by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

    Did they really expect the spammers to just sit there and not retaliate? It's been proven time and time again that spammers will go to any length to spam without regard to the law.

  16. So..uh.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else get a powerful urge to install the client on as many machines as possible?

    I can handle the increase in spam, I hardly ever see it anyway ( thank you spamassassin+bayes+RBL+spamhaus ).

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:So..uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for installing the client, although it looks like Blue Security's web site is down. Does anyone have the installer?

  17. Opt Out Message? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    If you want to opt out, surely you need to specify YOUR address to the spammer.

    If 10,000 people all from around the world using this software all suddenly swamp the spammer with "Unsubscribe me" then the spammer has the list of users?

    Forgive me for being a bit thick if this isn't how it works.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  18. Email I Received by duerra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Below is an email that I received, which pretty much confirms that they have been hacked.

    ----

    You are being emailed because you are a user of BlueSecurity's well-known software "BlueFrog." http://www.bluesecurity.com/

    Today, the BlueSecurity database became known to the worst spammers worldwide. Within 48 hours, the database will be published on the Internet, and your email address will be open to them all. After this, you will see the spam sent to your mailbox increase 10 - 20 fold.

    BlueSecurity was illegally attacking email marketers, and doing so with your help. Many websites have been targeted and hit, including non-spam sites. BlueSecurity's software has been fully analyzed, and contains an abundance of malicious code. This includes: ability to send mass mail to users; the ability to attack websites with Distributed Denial of Service attack (DDoS); the ability to open hidden doors on any machine on which it is running; and a hidden auto-update code function, which can install anything on your computer and open it up to anyone.

    BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves. When all is said and done, they will be able to run, hide and change their identities, leaving you to take the fall. YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and expect to get away with it. This email ensures that you are well aware of the situation. Soon, you will be found guilty of computer crimes such as DDOS attacking of websites, conspiracy, and sending mass unsolicited bulk email messages for everything from viagra to porn, as long as you continue to run BlueFrog.

    They do not take money for downloading their software, they do not take money for removing emails from their lists, and they have no visible revenue stream. What they DO have is 500,000 computers sitting there awaiting their next command. What are they doing now?

    1. Using your computer to send spam ?
    2. Using your computer to attack competitor websites?
    3. Phishing through your files for your identity and banking information?

    If you think you can merely change your email address and be safe while still running BlueFrog, you are in for a big surprise. This is just the beginning...

    1. Re:Email I Received by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do they even realize the sheer irony in accusing others of sending mass emails?

    2. Re:Email I Received by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I dont think it has been hacked. Apart from the fact that i think they are too stupid to be able to break the kind of encryption small governments would like to be able to.
      The list works in way that the spammers can feed addresses into it, and get a positive or negative result depending in whether the address is in the list.
      This is why i have seen these emails coming into addresses that are on a domain i have chosen to protect. But those email addresses were never specifically supplied to bluefrog! My domain name is known to them, but not the address before the @.
      These guys are only able to spam email addresses that they already had before. they can find out if an existing address they already have is a member of bluefrog, but thats all.

    3. Re:Email I Received by discHead · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure you're right. I have an entire domain registered with Blue Security, but it looks like the spammer has only been hitting some well-worn addresses I have seen other spammers using. I'm sure whoever it is "cleaned" his list, looked at what addresses got filtered out, and singled out those addresses for "special" treatment.

    4. Re:Email I Received by ettlz · · Score: 1
      BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves.
      [Clicks fingers, sarcastic] Damn, I knew those Zionist devils had to be involved somewhere along the line! I'm reporting this to Indymedia!
    5. Re:Email I Received by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Below is an email that I received, which pretty much confirms that they have been hacked.

      No, it absolutely does not confirm that they've been hacked. See my previous comment about how it's likely that the spammer simply confirmed BlueSecurity registration for addresses he already has, but is unable to get new addresses out of the BlueSecurity database.

      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=184656&cid= 15245875

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    6. Re:Email I Received by virago81 · · Score: 1

      Blue Security's user database has _not_ been cracked. I have several email addresses protected by Blue Security and this @ss4at's message has only gotten to 2 of them. What this means is that these addresses were already on his spam list and he has simply used Blue Security's encrypted database which contains both valid and honeypot addresses to make an inference.

      Again, the database has not been cracked and the technique the spammer is using doesn't matter. If your email was on his list, it's still on his list and he's not going to remove it unless forced to do so. Those in the Blue Community hope to be able to persuade them it is in their best interest to do so. And there have been some notable successes.

      --
      Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards. -- Aldous Huxley
    7. Re:Email I Received by bruhinb · · Score: 1

      That's just an absurd pile of bluster. I got the same kind of message, accusing the author of SpamCop of the same kind of nonsense five years. I laughed my ass off, and continued using the service.

    8. Re:Email I Received by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, BlueSecurity has NOT and will NEVER be hacked. And anyway, what BlueSecurity does is not DDoSing. To be a DDoS, the emails would have had to come from different people. In this case, all of the emails telling the spammer to stop are coming from BlueSecurity and BlueSecurity ONLY.

    9. Re:Email I Received by d_54321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's the email I got:
      ------
      Dear Sap,
      You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

      The blue frog is poisonous and causing us all a very excrutiating and slow death. Please make it stop. Or else...
        Or else what you ask? Oh, don't worry-- we'll think of something. Something bad. Very, very bad.

      If you do not cave in to our harmless threats, a great wrath of biblical proportions shall be visited upon your house the likes of which you could never conceive in your most awful nightmares. Seriously. God, the law, and logic are all on our side. Think about it...

      Sincerely,
      Yet another punk ass bitch who couldn't cut it in the real marketplace.

      PS, click here for v1agra.

    10. Re:Email I Received by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      No, this doesn't confirm it. That email was sent by a pissed off spammer.
       
        Until you recieve an email from BlueSecurity, I'd pass it off as bs. Sure these guys can do a diff before_filter.txt after_filter.txt, But I'm sorry, that doesn't count as a hack for anyone besides spammers.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    11. Re:Email I Received by Antarius · · Score: 1

      I was more interested in the fact that they were "spamming themselves."

      I quickly disregarded the first mental image - involving a tin of spam, one handed typing and appropriate websites... You get the idea.

      Then I realised that they must have been sending Spam to themselves. This brings the obvious question - If you are sending emails to yourself, is it unsolicited?

      Unless you're suffering from a Holywood form of MPD, the answer would likely be "no, it is solicited. I gave myself permission."

      Therefore they cannot spam themselves; they can only email themselves.

      Taking into consideration that this statement is a lie, it can therefore be concluded that the rest of the email is a lie and should be deleted (or forwarded to BlueSecurity as spam)

      QED.

      (And now I shall prove that Black is White, yada-yada-yada)

  19. Don't Back Down by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As Shadowknot said earlier, you may as well stay subscribed. If they have your email address and are spamming it, do you really think they are going to delete it from their lists if you unsubscribe from BlueSecurity? I doubt that. You're in the 'fight' now, no point backing down in my opinion.

    All the best with it.

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  20. Sent abuse report by ad1c · · Score: 1

    I noticed a calpoly.edu address in the header, so I sent a copy of the message to abuse@calpoly.edu. Who knows whether it will matter?

    1. Re:Sent abuse report by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I noticed a calpoly.edu address in the header, so I sent a copy of the message to abuse@calpoly.edu.

      Well if it's in the header then that must be where it came from. Congratulations on your superlative detective work.

      I'm sure that the abuse admin at calpoly.edu will also soon be writing to you to let you know how much he appreciates your skills.

    2. Re:Sent abuse report by ad1c · · Score: 1

      Not the response you were expecting.... Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Network access to this computer has been blocked pending identification of the user and the root cause of the problem. If you have additional evidence regarding this incident, please forward it to abuse@calpoly.edu and reference our case number CP#199662.

  21. Maybe not the latest database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the spammers have managed to steal the BlueSecurity e-mail database, this may have happened some time ago. I've registered two e-mails to their database during the past two weeks and I have not received any mail from any spam group threatening me.

  22. Heh by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, a small website which once viewed on the users computer, enables teh Intarweb to systematically flood Blue Frog's website with web traffic; much to the headache of the poor frog.

  23. I don't think they've compromised the database by thridur · · Score: 1

    I registered a few different addresses with Blue Security, and only one of them has been receiving these messages so far. It sounds like it's just some spammers that are annoyed that they can't get through and are getting reverse-spammed.

  24. The REST of the story ... by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Gmail spam filter is filtering nearly every one of these spams, only a couple out of 60+ yesturday got into my inbox. .... and every one of that bastard's spams advertising a website went right to bluesecurity to hurt his business. He's just shooting himself in the foot.

    Contrary to what the author wrote, there's closer to 475,000 members, not just a few 10's of thousands, enough that several major spammers have already agreed to not spam members due to the huge financial hits they were taking with the bluefrog choking off their websites.

    What a joke, what dumbass would really believe that the spammers will not spam you if you leave blue security? Who here will admit to believing the criminals? ... I think that about covers the points that were lost when slashdot decided to post this boring version of the story, instead of what I submitted yesturday afternoon :)

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  25. What I received by Carny+Trash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's what I was sent:

    "Hey,
    You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (http://www.bluesecurity.com).

    You signed up because you were expecting to recieve a lesser amount of spam, unfortunately, due to the tactics used by BlueSecurity, you will end up recieving this message, or other nonsensical spams 20-40 times more than you would normally.

    How do you make it stop?

    Simple, in 48 hours, and every 48 hours thereafter, we will run our current list of BlueSecurity subscribers through BlueSecurity's database, if you arent there.. you wont get this again.

    We have devised a method to retrieve your address from their database, so by signing up and remaining a BlueSecurity user not only are you opening yourself up for this, you are also potentially verifying your email address through them to even more spammers, and will end up getting up even more spam as an end-result.

    By signing up for bluesecurity, you are doing the exact opposite of what you want, so delete your account, and you will stop recieving this.

    Why are we doing this?

    Its simple, we dont want to, but BlueSecurity is forcing us. We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails, but do not believe for one second that we will stop this tirade of emails if you choose to stay with BlueSecurity.

    Just remember one thing when you read this, we didnt do this to you, BlueSecurity did.

    If BlueSecurity decides to play fair, we will do the same.

    We are quite sure you will think this will not continue, that we will not continue wasting our resources doing this, feel free to wait out the first 48, or the second, and see whether these stop, you will be quite suprised.

    If you have another email under the protection of bluesecurity, and have not recieved this there, do not worry, you will soon enough.

    We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user.

    You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site(http://www.bluesecurity.com) is down..

    Just remove yourself from BlueSecurity, and make it easier on you.

    Sal Webber"

    1. Re:What I received by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Brilliantly twisted world view, "We would much rather not waste our resources and
      send you these useless mails."

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:What I received by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do i get the impression this is a lot bigger then it seems. If anything people reading this would be MORE inclinced to install this BlueFrog software, whatever its doing its apparently working.

      Think about it...when it comes right down to it, There's more of us then there are spammers.

      [ www.milw0rm.com ]

    3. Re:What I received by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

      This seems to be a standard view of those who cannot pass the "kindergarten test" by being able to play well with others.

      --
      UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
    4. Re:What I received by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 1

      Anyone else notice the irony that they want us to remove ourselves from BlueSecurity's website but they want us to notice the site is down.... Tells you a little about their intelligence level.

      I for one can live with a high volume of E-mails of this type, now I just need to set any E-mail with the word BlueSecurity straight to spam. Remember no one is paying spammers to send E-mails to BlueSecurity users like this, eventually the all mighty dollar will make them go back to using their resources for profit generating spam.

      Oh I was able to get to the site.

    5. Re:What I received by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      hmm thanks spammers i didn't know about bluesecurity, but now i do i am trying to sign up, i dont suppose you know where to go to sign up do you?

    6. Re:What I received by jjhall · · Score: 1

      > You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site(http://www.bluesecurity.com) is down..
      >
      > Just remove yourself from BlueSecurity, and make it easier on you.

      Anyone else see the problem here? You must remove your address, but you can't since we are DDOSing the server.

      The thing I don't get, what good do these spammers think this will do? For one, anyone signed up on this service are the exact addresses they want to weed out of their lists anyway, as they will NEVER buy anything from a spam they receive. All efforts to remove the users from the service will be wasted effort. Do they think that people will start reading and buying from spam if they are forced off of the spam removal service? If anything, it is in their best interest to remove users from their lists and use the CPU cycles and bandwidth of their zombie net to attack more vulnerable e-mails.

      Second, they are advertising this service now to more people who were either not aware or hadn't signed up due to questions of effectiveness. Now that they are stating in public that the service works well enough that they are going to try and fight back, they just confirmed the signups of the fence-sitters.

      Third, they are now making this personal to many people. When it is random spam that is sent out, it is easy to just ignore it and forget it. Now that they are specifically attacking people, more and more geeks are going to start attempting to track them down and give them what they deserve (either via legal action or good-old-fashioned vigilante justice.) They are no longer the anoying fly at your picnic, they are now the mountain lion that has been killing neighborhood pets.

      I'd heard of BlueSecurity before, but hadn't looked into it much. I'm now going to look closely at it and probably sign up.

      Jeremy

    7. Re:What I received by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      It seems a simple solution to me: Provide a new internet service: a small off-shore mercenary force who's sole purpose is to discover and eliminate spam at the source: the spammer.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    8. Re:What I received by oni · · Score: 1

      I'd heard of BlueSecurity before, but hadn't looked into it much. I'm now going to look closely at it and probably sign up.

      Same here. I'll run the bluesecurity client in a VM just in case, I'm going to run it. Fuck the spammers. Fuck them right in the ear.

    9. Re:What I received by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Good for you, only get yourself a new email account, and post using it to a forum somewhere asking "I'm really interested in Nigerian Teens selling Viagra in casinos. where can I find them?". Wait a couple of days and let BlueFrog go to town :-)

    10. Re:What I received by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      You just hitted the nail in the head.

      They are actually acknowleding that the service works and it is hurting them. Their DDOS of bluesecurity.com will only draw more attention to the service, just watch the number of bluesecurity subscribers skyrocket in the following days.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    11. Re:What I received by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      I'll run the bluesecurity client in a VM just in case

      The client end seems to be open source:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/bluefrog/

      Its no guarantee, but you can always inspect the source for anything fishy. I usually feel at ease when installing open source programs.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  26. Re:I suspect.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they prolly figured out a way to reverse hack the client and install something that goes through your address book.

  27. Rebounding Wave by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this has been discussed in the past, but what prevents recipients of spam from turning around and nuking the spammer's machine into oblivion? If you spam 10,000 machines, and then they turn around and tell you to quit it, repeatedly, until you stop, then mathematically it would seem the culprit's machine would be rapidly overwhelmed.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  28. Blue security must be working by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If BlueSecurity wasn't hurting Spammers they would ignore it. If they are fighting back it must mean that BlueSecurity is actually doing damage to them.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    1. Re:Blue security must be working by w0lver · · Score: 1

      This speedbump just increase my resolve to stick with BlueSecurity. I think I am going to start installing the BlueFrog client on a few more machines as well. Between the web reporting tool for my web mail accounts and a few Outlook rules to forward spam to my BlueSecurity address, I only have to see a few email a day. Let them flood, it will just increase the amount of mail I send to BlueFrog. The BlueSecurity site is not responding... it it the ./'ing or the spammers causing the issue?

    2. Re:Blue security must be working by Aero · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. My ISP provides SpamAssassin at their relay, and after I signed up with BlueSecurity, I widened the tolerances so as to get more spam in my inbox -- the better to feed the frog with, m'dear.

      --
      We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
    3. Re:Blue security must be working by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Not only that but this is generating a lot of publicity for the BlueSecurity "service".

      If it turns out that its just a scared spammer trying to break BlueSecurity down (which it looks likely this is) then how many more people are going to join up because they heard about it through this little episode?

  29. you need some kids... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    they help with the chores...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:you need some kids... by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      Got two of 'em, but they're still a bit young for most chores.

      I'll tell you what: As soon as my oldest is big enough to push the lawnmower, my life is gonna get a bit easier! For now, though, it's mostly about helping to set the table and such.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  30. Bluefrog does WHAT? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not sure that only Bluefrog users getting the message proves anything. The spammers can get the list from Bluefrog themselves by agreeing to not spam its users.

    WHAAAAAT?

    Bluefrog HELPS SPAMMERS LISTWASH?

    Holy fuck. They should say to spammers, 'No, we won't tell you who our users are. Just stop spamming everyone for whom you don't have a confirmed opt-in, and you won't have any more trouble from us.'

    If they're helping spammers listwash, then they're firmly on the Dark Side. Fuck 'em.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:Bluefrog does WHAT? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      what they basically do is send the spammers the list and say "don't spam these addresses or else".

      if they ignore that and psam the list, they get bombarded.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  31. Looks Like Another Criminal Act ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

    ... taken in the best possible light, the letter claims it is fighting a crime by committing another crime.

    Their predicate is questionable; I don't know, and don't want to get into, whether Blue Frog is doing anything wrong. However, whoever sent the email you cite is threatening spamming if the recipient of the email fails to perform a particular act. That may be cyberterrorism under USA/PATRIOT or some similar law.

    We need to put more spammers in jail by getting prosecutors to set up false-flag operations, place orders for Viagra, prosecute whoever fufills the orders, and display their heads on pikes from the city gates (... or whatever the internet equivalent may be...)

    But I suppose the cops are already busy stalking pervos who solicit kids on the internet, and I must admit that's a higher priority.

  32. Mod parent up! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    That's it in a nutshell. This alone inspires me to create some throwaway addresses, post around the net from them, and set up us the Bluefrog.

  33. Probably not compromised by jhernand · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll bet this spammer already has your e-mail address from some other source. He checks it against the Bluesecurity DB, and if it's a positive match, he sends you the Bluesecurity-targeted spam. Since there is no web site associated with these messages (because he's not selling anything), he does not suffer any consequences for these particular messages.

    1. Re:Probably not compromised by tehaxer · · Score: 1

      God finally. I was about to post the same deal. ALSO, Blue Security's software is only supposed to send ONE anonymous opt-out (has no email addr, soas not to verify, but refers them to bluesecurity's website) per spam received by the user who installed it. That means it's just a quick opt-out generation tool, not a DoS tool. What's it mean when the spammers themselves say that when all the people they send spam to choose to opt out, it's a DoS attack? rolfenstein I'm pretty sure if email had been around when all those fun little phrases were being coined, there would be one that went like this, "Don't start what you can't finish, newbz."

  34. Sounds like it is effective by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    If the spammers are upset enough to generate such a threatining email, then it sounds to me like it must be very effective. If it wasn't seriously cutting into their bottom line, then they wouldn't be this upset.

    Plus, I like the fact that the spammers are getting their email bombed into uselessness. Maybe they will begin to understand how we normal people feel about their crap.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  35. Vigilante by linvir · · Score: 1
    Can't find anyone saying this above me, so here goes.

    Doesn't this piss you off? Doesn't it make you want to declare War on Spam, in the time-honoured fashion of the Bush Administration(TM)?

    BlueSecurity needs YOU!

    Join up today and make them pay!

    1. Re:Vigilante by nytes · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      I didn't know such a FF extension existed. I don't need it too much with GMail, but I'll be installing this at home tonight.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  36. According to an employee it does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to my Mother In Law who works for the Post Office, it does!

    They are quite willing to deliver such items as it helps the revenue stream. $.39 for the letter, or $5.00 for the brick. To Them its all the same, and if its wrapped in shipping paper as the original post mentioned they don't know whats inside and MUST pass it along to the receiver.

    Who knows if it does or not, I am just going on her information.

    I figure if anyone would know its someone who works for the post office!

  37. Go ahead, grab the snake... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    If spammers begin writing to us, they'll only increase the form spam they receive.

    PLUS! The blue security e-mail database contains a bogus honeypot address per each valid e-mail address.

    If this rumour is true, it will be a fatal mistake for the spammers. Because the blue community are ALREADY fighting back. Not only with form complaints on the spammers' websites, but with FORMAL complaints to the FCC, geocities, Microsoft,the MPAA and the FDA about illegal offers.

    I joined Blue Security because I already receive 100 spam mails PER DAY. Do you think it'll make a difference whether I receive 100 or 500 e-mails a-day? (99.9% of it is sent to my junk-mail, where it's fed back automatically to Blue Frog)

    I feel no mercy for spammers. That's right, you're messing with the wrong guys. The release of this list will only make us MORE POWERFUL.

    Do you feel lucky? PUNKS?

    P.S. Interesting - the captcha for this post was "predate". I like it. B-)

    1. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I joined Blue Security because I already receive 100 spam mails PER DAY.

      I used to receive a couple of dozen per week.

      Then some bright spark decided to use my domain to spoof email addresses from for their spam.

      I checked my email at around 10pm last night. A little while ago, about 14 hours later, I checked again; I had 593. Now, it's not all spam, as I also get a metric shitload of bounces, along with the odd out of office response, an occasional "die spammer die!" mail, etc.

      So anyway, I sympathise with your predicament, and confirm your opinion - once you're at this level, 500 a day is nothing. Thunderbird's junk mail controls catch most of them, most of the rest have easy to spot subjects, and all my friends filtered off to separate folders.

      So the spammers are fighting back? I say let them; it will just spur the anit-spam groups to ever greater efforts.

    2. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by radish · · Score: 1

      I've been through the same thing - I feel your pain. A couple of points. I found that adding SPF records to my domain helped somewhat. Secondly, it stopped in the end. In my case I now get no bounces (and no spam, thanks to greylisting) - all in all I was being swamped for probably 2 months.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by Mr.+Mindless · · Score: 1

      [i]Then some bright spark decided to use my domain to spoof email addresses from for their spam.[/i]

      sucks, don't it?

      Thankfully they're using mostly form addresses that are easilly filtered, I'm only getting a couple dozen bounces a day that aren't filtered. I want to see when legit messages I really send bounce so it's a bit tricky....

      --
      - MM
    4. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by coaxeus · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to use a catch-all alias on your domain ? Scripts find those, and then generate huge lists of "valid addresses" to sell to spammers. E-mails on these lists are both spammed and used as spoof senders.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    5. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      I'm curious; what are you using to have your spam mail automatically fed to blue security?

    6. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      possibly Mailwasher (www.firetrust.com) which recently added BlueSecurity to their anti-spam providers (in addition to Spamhaus and SpamCop).

      I guess this development has seen the number of BlueFrog users increase dramatically, which is probably what is pissing the spammers off.

    7. Re:Go ahead, grab the snake... by JakartaDean · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm joining the fight. Now downloading the "frog" and I'll add (slightly) to their woes.

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
  38. I got flooded yesterday by wwphx · · Score: 1

    I've been using BlueFrog for a month or two now. Normally my Yahoo account will receive no more than a half dozen spam emails daily. Yesterday I left for dinner at about 4:30, no spam. Got back to my computer about 8pm, 44 spam messages! Yahoo's spam filter caught them all, something that I cannot say for my Gmail account. It had some 15 messages in the spam folder, but a half dozen in my inbox had gotten past BlueFrog.

    So yeah, I'd say something is up.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    1. Re:I got flooded yesterday by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I have been using Gmail for a year and a half and not a single SPAM has made it through their filters to my Inbox. I get probably 2-3 SPAM messages a day - all filtered into the SPAM box. Haven't used Yahoo in a while (2 years) but used to get SPAM on that account all the time...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:I got flooded yesterday by linvir · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it seems to be quite subjective. God only knows how...

      I had a Yahoo account which I deliberately seeded around things like guestbooks, and most of the spam it receives beats the filters. My normal GMail account gets similar amounts of spam, and a few per week beat the filter. Back when I used Hotmail, only the spam sent by the big names like Amazon and Ebay got through - very suspicious. It was my suspicions that MS was being paid off that finally drove me to GMail, which correctly identifies those same messages as spam.

  39. Blue Security coming back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From http://www.bluesecurity.com/Announcements/spam.asp

    As many spammers choose to comply with the Registry (see our recent blog posts here, here and here), other spammers may resort to other means in an attempt to avoid compliance.

    A major spammer had started spamming our members with discouraging messages in an attempt to demoralize our community. This spammer is using mailing lists he already owns that may contain addresses of some community members.

    We have also received complaints from users about spam allegedly sent from Blue Security promoting our anti-spam solution and our web site. This is yet another tactic used by some spammers in an attempt to slander us by sending unsolicited email forged to appear as if it was sent from Blue Security. Blue Security is an anti-spam company determined to fight spam and as such never has and never will send unsolicited email.

    Our answer to those criminals should be one - we will not be discouraged; We will continue to exercise our right to opt-out of spam.

    If you are not a member of our community, now is the time to actively fight spam and make spammers leave you alone. For more information click here.

    If you are already a member of our community, make spammers hear you load and clear - report your spam, let Blue Frog fight spammers on your behalf.

    We regret any inconvenience caused by this incident.

    Best Regards,

    Blue Security.

  40. BlueSecurity wasn't hacked: Spammer FUD by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was sent out on an anti-spam list this morning:

    http://www.bluesecurity.com/Announcements/spam.asp

    "A major spammer had started spamming our members with discouraging
    messages in an attempt to demoralize our community. This spammer is
    using mailing lists he already owns that may contain addresses of
    some community members.

    "We have also received complaints from users about spam allegedly
    sent from Blue Security promoting our anti-spam solution and our web
    site. This is yet another tactic used by some spammers in an attempt
    to slander us by sending unsolicited email forged to appear as if it
    was sent from Blue Security. Blue Security is an anti-spam company
    determined to fight spam and as such never has and never will send
    unsolicited email.

    "Our answer to those criminals should be one - we will not be
    discouraged; We will continue to exercise our right to opt-out of
    spam.

  41. join by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    I was unaware of bluesecurity, looks like a nice idea to fight with spam, I think it's high time for me to join them.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:join by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      oops I cannot see a linux download...

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
  42. Thanks to the message by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

    these cretins are trying to send, I felt all the more motivated to install BlueFrog and have done so. Let them come.

  43. Its more than that by Lanoitarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...blue security takes another step, besides re-spamming the spammers sites. They also directly contact every advertiser featured in spam, asking them to stop paying these spammers because they sent emails to X number of users who arent interested. It may not be very effective, who knows. But its a great idea. If companies stopped paying for spam, it would sure dry up pretty fast, and the companies care allot more about the customers than the spammers. Im sure at least *some* companies genuinely dont even realize that the publicity firms they hired are using spam.

  44. They don't have the database! by drosoph · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I am seeing, I am now receiving 1,000s of these stupid "Because you are using the BlueSecurity Software ...." emails .... but they are all being directed to Mike, Jan, Cindy, Lucy, Bobby, and Greg@mydomain.com .... They are NOT directed to MY email address. These addresses that they are using were ONCE entered by an ignorant relative of my onto one of those online greeting card sites, (even mispelled) and those are the addresses that are being spammed. Since I ALSO registered my DOMAIN with BlueSecurity, I would ponder to guess that the spammers are using the domain list, matching it up to ANY email they have in their spam database with that domain and spamming the heck out of it. They HAVE NOT, I repeat, HAVE NOT hit ANY of my REGISTERED email addresses with BlueSecurity. They are only hitting random crap email addresses on my domain. They're shooting in the dark, they're angry, and they're running scared ... and I hope that you all keep up the good work!

    1. Re:They don't have the database! by coaxeus · · Score: 1

      You could be right.. I have many domains and many addresses in the do-not-spam database and process lots (tens of thousands per day) of spam to bluesecurity. I can't login to check which is which, but I'm looking at some accounts right now and only see these threats coming to random addresses of protected domains, not to any indvidual accounts. So they don't have a database of accounts, but they have a database of domains ?

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    2. Re:They don't have the database! by Yinepuhotep · · Score: 1

      They're also using dictionary attacks against registered domains. I'm getting a whole lot of their crap to @macmanusnet.net, despite the fact that I have not issued ANY accounts to ANYONE. That tells me that the spammers are just generating a whole lot of @ spam.

      --
      Gun control: The belief that a woman, raped and strangled with her panties, is morally superior to a dead rapist.
  45. First they ignore you... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then they laugh at you...

    then they fight you...

    then you win :D

    One thing is safe to know: At least the spammers are now PAYING ATTENTION to us. A year ago they didn't even know we exist. Then they tried to give bad publicity to Blue Security in anti-spam websites (they said bluefrog was a botnet).

    Later, SendSafe included an option to use bluefrog's list to NOT send spam to those addresses.

    Finally, they're targeting us directly. You know what that means B-)

    Also, I doubt the database's been compromised. I'm sure they only diffed the original and the filtered e-mail list. This means that only a small percentage of e-mail targets has been truly released.

    1. Re:First they ignore you... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just got this funny one:
      <tt>
      Dies ist eine automatisch erstellte Benachrichtigung +APw-ber den Zustellstatus.
      +ANw-bermittlung an folgende Empf+AOQ-nger fehlgeschlagen.
                  dunham@cardse.com

      Final-Recipient: rfc822;dunham@cardse.com
      Action: failed
      Status: 5.1.1

      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
      From: "BlueFrog member" <bryan@fordi.org>
      To: <dunham@cardse.com>
      Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 20:28:24 +0300
      Subject: {Spam?} FW:Join the top-level Israel internet security company

      The trackback URL for this blog entry is:
      http://community.bluesecurity.com/

      Bringing spammers to Their Knees:
      Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army capable of crippling spammers' Web sites.

      A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts: current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the answer.

      Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good.

      The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are fighting for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with
      hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce commercial loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success, and plan many more!

      We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with our botnet growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies involved for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef, for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based Rembrandt Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued support. And a very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet come to life.

      If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue frog yet, please sign up now.
      If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do so.

      Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers.

      Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time.

      Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info:

      2077 Gateway Place, Suite 550
      San Jose, California 95110 USA
      Phone: 866-6SKYBOX
      Phone: 408 441 8060
      Fax: 408 441 8068

      Israel HQ:
      60 Medinat Hayehudim St.
      P.O.Box 4109
      Herzliya Pituach 46140 Israel
      Phone: +972-9-9545922

      Current and potential investor relations:
      Rembrandt Venture Partners
      2200 Sand Hill Road, Suite 160
      Menlo Park, CA 94025

      T: 650.326.7070
      F: 650.326.3780

      -----
      Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today.
      Download our .EXE here: http://www.bluesecurity.com/blue-frog/
      </tt>
      Is it just me, or is this REALLY weak?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:First they ignore you... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      That's the one I got, too. I can't decide whether it's from BlueSecurity, or from someone trying to discredit them. The message is weird either way you look at it. If it is legit (meaning, sent by BlueSecurity), then spamming me is a pretty odd way of trying to get me to help them fight spam. On the other hand, if it's sent by spammers as part of a campaign against BlueSecurity, why are they doing it in a way that's likely to get more people to download and run their software? The links all go to Blue Security's actual web page, after all. (In fact, they're not even links. Just URLs, sent in plain-text.)

      I've never heard of BlueSecurity or Blue Frog before. I managed to browse their site a little and I wasn't able to determine whether or not their software actually does what this message claims it does. If they're just running some sort of mass opt-out service, that's fine. (I don't think it'll work, but no harm done.) If they're actually counter-attacking spammers then I'd say they're no better themselves.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    3. Re:First they ignore you... by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

      They have only hit one of my addresses. I had four messages yesterday. None today so the filter is working properly and learning well. I also notice that the spammers still do not send an actual working address which I can reply to, not do they offer any URL which can be visited. They do demand we go to http://www.bluesecurity.com/ to remove our name, then laugh about the site being down, then again demand we go to a site which they say is down and remove our name. My, what intelligence.

      --
      UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
    4. Re:First they ignore you... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      To clear things up: they are running a mass opt-out service, as well as petitioning those who pay spammers to stop. Essentially, the BlueFrog client will, for every spam you report (or comes to a 'honeypot' account that corresponds to an address you requested protection for), the bluefrog client sends an opt-out request. Since the most egregious spammers around send out something in the millions of spams, this CAN have a DoS effect on them - but only if they keep spamming.

      The message above did not come from Blue Security or from anyone associated with it (the above 'from' address is one of mine, and I certainly didn't send out something so misguiding); the Blue Security team would never state that their mission is DDoSing anyone; it's not true, but is instead what spammers consider they are doing.

      My theory is that the people threatening BlueCommunity members are trying to make some kind of e-mail trail establishing that BlueSecurity is engaged in something illegal. It's a weak tactic; since the spammers must ensure that the mail can't be trailed back to them, they also ensure that the mail can't be tracked back to Blue Security.

      Meanwhile, Blue/GMail users already won; this asshat's message is already finding its automatic way to gmail's spam folder. The next thing is to report the guy for harassing e-mail.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  46. Simple solution? by smbarbour · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just sign spam@uce.gov up? That way the US government will have a nice log of who is sending these emails. Plus, if the spammer shares the list, there will be additional spammers who will happily be reporting themselves for violating the CAN-SPAM act.

    1. Re:Simple solution? by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

      Nah, sign up the email address of the current CIA director. Hee hee.

    2. Re:Simple solution? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Why not just sign spam@uce.gov up?

      But they're ALREADY doing that! With fake e-mail addresses called honeypots.

    3. Re:Simple solution? by querist · · Score: 1

      Granted, this is Slashdot and making comments on the lack of mental capacity of spammers, etc. is normally fair game here, but I strongly suspect that even spammers are not dumb enough to send spam to a .gov address. I know many other forms of malware specifically filter out .gov addresses.

      I think that, if anything, it would be more amusing to send emails to OTHER spammer sites... for example, if you receive an email that sends you to v1agr4.com to order the little blue pills, sign up a bunch of email addresses at cial4s.com, for the other pills, etc. Let them spam each other.

    4. Re:Simple solution? by clesters · · Score: 1

      You would think that... But working on .mil mail servers all day, I see just as much spam coming in as I do on my non DOD mail servers.

  47. This is going to backfire on spammers by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

    This is going to end up working like a giant marketing campaign for blue security once the spammers fail miserably. Sending more spam to people who are already using BlueFrog is going to backfire because BlueFrog works. Publishing the list blue security subscribers isn't going to do any good since they all have BlueFrog, and will just push the little "Report New Messages In Spam Folder" button. Then, having shown that BlueFrog works, and having foiled the spammers, more people will sign up. Also, the blue security website is still up. check it

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  48. Anyone even bother to research this? by Audigy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The site hasn't been hacked.

    Hasn't anyone gone to bluesecurity.com to actually see what THEY have to say about this "security breach"?

    I have two other email address that WERE NOT signed up with BlueFrog also getting this spam.

    BlueSecurity's official statement is this: ...which I would be pasting here if I could get to the goddamned site. Thanks a lot, slashdot. I'll be back to post the full text once I can get in the bloody site.

    In short, the spammers are PISSED and they'll do anything to get people to unsubscribe from BlueFrog, including sending spams with lies. Don't fall for it. Keep fighting spam.

    --
    [an error occured while processing this directive]
  49. A thanks to the spammer by phalanx · · Score: 1

    I would like to thank the person that is using their spam servers to send these bluesecurity emails. Since the emails don't sell or link to anything, all the spammer is doing it letting the BlueFrog Community know that BlueSecurity is hurting his/her pocketbook, spending time and money on us instead of regular spam and giving us the ip addresses of all the machines they use to spam.

  50. Re:So, is the database compromised? No. by MrNougat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comments on BlueSecurity forums last night demonstrate that users with multiple protected addresses are getting these attack spams to some, but not all, of the protected addresses.

    What's lkely happening: Spammer has a mailing list. Spammer uses BlueSecurity's "cleanlist" tool to clean registered addresses from his mailing list. Compare original list to cleaned list - email addresses that are in the first but not the second are BlueSecurity registered.

    By this logic, email addresses that the spammer does not already have are not made available to the spammer in any way via BlueSecurity's own list. Delivery patterns of the attack spams support this observation.

    I'll also note that Gmail's own spam filters are already capturing all of these attack spams; I only got two in my mailbox this morning, about 50 more were filtered.

    This is the first time I'm aware of that a spam prevention service has worked so well that it's got a spammer pissed off enough to lash out. BlueSecurity++

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  51. How it works by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blue Security sends an ANONYMOUS request to the spammer and give him instructions to download SOFTWARE that will clean up their e-mail lists. What it does is hashing each e-mail and checking the database.

    This way, no e-mail address is being released to the spammers. They could as well diff the lists to see which addresses were removed, but they won't get NEW e-mail addresses that way.

    1. Re:How it works by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      That does of course depend upon the algorythm and the way the software works.
      If it keeps a closed bloom filter locally on the spammers machine which is checked against these hashes, then without very much work indeed the spammer could brute force this quite nicely.

      However, if this software was on the bluesecure site, then the spammers would have to connect once for every mail about to be sent.
      Hash, connect, test, drop or send.

      rinse repeat.

      This sounds like a lot of trouble to go to to remove just a few people from a list.
      bluesecure will then know how much mail is being sent by these guys and just rob THEIR list.

      Think about it, the "hash" algorythm has to be strong enough to be none reversable, but also long enough to reduce conflicts.
      Since the source data is already just a short digest, even 32 or 64 characters could be munged up and encrypted to look like a one way function, when in reality they are a 2 way encrypted and compressed mapping of the mail address.

      Do we know which hashing algorythm is in use, and even if the spammer has to send his entire list to bluesecure?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  52. It is true by karldavidson · · Score: 0, Troll

    I received that strange message yesterday, and sure enough I am now receiving a lot more spam It is all very similar too. I thought the message was a hoax, I checked the bluesecurity web page yesterday on they had a message stating that these spammers are using their own databases guessing that they would hit a bunch of the bluefrog users. I think it is obvious now that this is not true, the bluesecurity database has been compromised.

    1. Re:It is true by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Think about that for a moment. Why did you sign up for BlueFrog? Was it 'cos you were getting spam?

      Meanwhile, these criminals can get Blue Frog's listcleaner for free. They copy their list and clean the copy. Now they have a list of who is not a bluefrog member.

      How hard do you think it is for them to get a list of who is a blue frog member? It's easy to do a dictionary attack in this way.

      I'm certain they don't have all the addresses; my gmail account gets this fucker's spam while my wharton address does not. They are both protected, and both on one spam list or another, yet only one gets this guy's impotent threats.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  53. Massive Spamming... by turtleAJ · · Score: 0

    PEOPLE OF THE WORLD!!!

    I AM SORRY!!!

    My fault... it was me... I accidentally sent an eMail to my entire friends list... I couldn't stop it in time... please disregard.

  54. Sounds like fair play to me... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, let me get this straight:
    1) Spammer sends you an e-mail [okay, a /lot/ of spammers send a /lot/ of e-mail]
    2) You sign up to a DDOS community to flood the spammer
    3) Spammer points out the difference between a reckless assault and a malicious one, by example.
    4) Post to slashdot to complain about (3)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Sounds like fair play to me... by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1

      DDOS? From what I've seen, all it does it send back an opt-out request on your behalf while masquerading your real e-mail address.

    2. Re:Sounds like fair play to me... by tehaxer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this guy's a moron. It sends ONE anonymous opt-out request referring the spammer to bluesecurity's website per email received from that spammer. It's a JSBWYSM attack... that's Just Sending Back What You Sent Me attack...

    3. Re:Sounds like fair play to me... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      1) fuck you
      2) The site itself is down, so I am going based on the article's description
      3) fuck you

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are about 400,000 users. So far, it has been one single source IP sending these. I got 12 of these emails at once, so I BlueFrogged them all.

  56. a la guerre comme a la guerre by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    There is a cyberwar in cyberspace between good and evil. Spammers are evil because they target innocent people with their schemes. They are thieves and hooligans.

    Cyberspace nowadays reminds me of situation in the early history of US, when the government was weak and citizens had to defend themselves and their property from attacks with what they had.

    Saying "do not spam the spammers" is like saying "do not kill the enemy in the battlefield without judge's ruling".

    He enters my house to steal my property, to scare my wife and to expose indecent material in front of my kids. That is what it is. The fact that it is in cyberspace does not change it much, it is just a tool, like phone or mail, used by criminals before.

    My message to BlueSecurity users: do not give up.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  57. I know how they did this by Rekolitus · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I checked out BlueFrog, but I seem to recall Blue Security provided a database of MD5 hashes of members' email addresses, to allow spammers to avoid emailing them.

    Then just use rainbow tables.

  58. DoS and Explanation by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this article BlueSecurity is the target of a DoS attack.

    Also, here's their explanation of the spammer's countermeasure:


    This sounds scary, but it's not as bad as it sounds. Blue Security's email address registry remains secure contrary to what this spammer would have you believe. The way subscribers' emails were obtained was by checking the spammer's own list of emails against the Do Not Intrude registry. Normally spammers will get the emails of those who subscribe returned to them and will then remove those emails from their spamming lists. This one, however, has taken another approach. Instead of taking those hits off of his spam lists, he is sending them these intimidating emails.

    Makes sense to me, and explains why only BlueSecurity users are getting the emails.

  59. So it works? by Tom · · Score: 1

    If it didn't cause them any trouble, they wouldn't bother, right?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  60. SpamAssassin linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have my own email server and was a little scared to set it up fearfull of spammers taking it over. So far SpamAssassin has caught every single piece of spam and nobody has hijacked it. I even setup a fake account and gave the email address to every website I could find mostly ones known for selling/using the address for spam. Not one single spam has come thru. I'm very lucky I guess because other people have commented in this thread that they havent had the same luck. So again Linux sendmail SpamAssassin, has worked perfectly so far. Thank you for your time.

  61. BlueFrog database has not been compromised ... by slb · · Score: 1

    ... but spammers are using BlueSecure API to validate their list, and instead of cleaning it, they send these futile threats.

    This is clearly the proof that the idea of Bluesecure is sound, it please me to see how much those scumbags of spammers are annoyed >:)

    --
    http://www.transparency.org
  62. Ever think it's a phishing attack? by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight.... they send out e-mail from a bank saying "we are your bank give us your password" and it happens to actually be your bank... but as a smart user you don't believe it.

    They send out an E-mail to the whole cleansing list or even just random addresses, and because you happen to be a member it must be true? Besides for the time it would take to send these all out BlueSecurity has no defense against this... so the honeypot caught it... not like it has an Opt-Out link in the E-mail for it to send back too. But eventually the Spammer will go back to his profit making mails while managing to scare a few thousand people off of BlueSecurity.

  63. MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That changes everything.

  64. Doesn't hurt the spammer by a16 · · Score: 1

    99% of all spam comes from a virus infected zombie machine on a broadband line, or a compromised account on a web server somewhere.

    By directly attacking that machine, you are simply taking offline a machine owned by someone who has nothing to do with spam. You can only blame them for being slow on security updates.

    You could say that taking their machine offline benefits the anti-spam community anyway, and forces the sending machine to notice that there is a problem. But the chances are they are already receiving anti-spam complaints and wondering why they have a huge bandwidth spike to pay for (in the case of servers) - while the spammer will have moved on to the next vulnerable Windows 98 PC, or FormMail script running on a dedicated server.

    The overwhelming majority of anti-spam techniques in use today (blacklisting IPs in crazy vigilante run databases, blocking whole countries, DDoSing the source or the host of the source) all have one thing in common, and that's that they don't work, at all, and they go after the wrong people (and cause a huge amount of problems for legitimate email and network providers constantly fighting their own battle with spammers).

    We need a huge change to the underlying basics of how we communicate with email, or to simply keep filtering away. These new "solutions" may get people excited, but they are nowhere near a solution - and arguably cause more problems for the internet as a whole.

  65. Re:I suspect.... by jaseuk · · Score: 1

    I run into a similar problem, it was caused by a catch all address. Trouble is spammers use dictionary attacks and this can generate an insane amount of spam if you use a catch all address. Makes a nice spam honeypot though.

    Jason

  66. Like they'll take you off. . . by lucidityZ · · Score: 1

    The part of the threat that i find most facinating is that the spammers threaten to send more spam for what they say is, "illegally attacking email marketers." Usually if you're doing something illegal you get a cease and desist, not a threat of more spam.

  67. A fundamental change of spam economy by ericald · · Score: 2, Informative

    What many spammers already understand, including the criminal who is now threathening Blue Security's users and trying to DDoS their website, is that this is a new era in the fight against spam - and for the first time, spammers know they are losing the fight.

    This is not just another passive mesure tryig to keep spam away; Blue Security's solution undermines the economy spammers rely on, the economy that motivates them to send billions of unsolicited messages. They know they will have to adapt to this new reality - some will comply now (Blue Security claims top spammers already comply) and others will try to put up a fight before understanding they have no other choice but to stop spamming the users that are willing to stand up for their rights and do something to fight spam.

    I call all Internet users with any sense of responsibility for the future of the Internet to join the ranks of the Blue Community and make sure that spammers realize that common sense and justice will prevail.

    Blue Frog can be downloaded from Blue Security's site or from major download sites such as download.com.

    Do the right thing - join the fight now!

    -- A proud member of the Blue Community

    http://www.bluesecurity.com/register
    http://download.bluesecurity.com/BlueFrog
    http://www.download.com/Blue-Frog/3000-2092_4-1052 7188.html (download.com)

  68. dev.bluesecurity.com still up by Mixel · · Score: 1
  69. Blue Frog Thunderbird client by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

    If, like me, you were convinced by this story to install Blue Frog and fight spam, and if, like me, you use the Mozilla Thunderbird email client, then this official open source extension is for you!

    Blue Frog Thunderbird extension

    Note - You need a Blue Frog ID to use this software and the Blue Security site is currently down. I will definitely get this going ASAP to give spammers a swift kick to the database!

    1. Re:Blue Frog Thunderbird client by Sinister+Stairs · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

    2. Re:Blue Frog Thunderbird client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ordinary spam count per day is around 15. Today it was 153. Most of them appear (superficially) to be "postmaster" originating emails, claiming that emails I sent were not to a legitimate end user. However, I never sent the emails these notices claim I sent, and the path information is very interesting.

      I can't get to bluesecurity right now either; it's an issue. Fortunately, I've changed my primary email address, and I'm not getting spam on that one yet.

  70. Another possible way to report this? by nero4wolfe · · Score: 1
    The way I read the messages people are getting, containing threats, etc. is that they exactly match the legal definition of the crime of extortion. In the US, I think that comes under the jurisdiction of the FBI.

    While each individual message is probably below the threshold the FBI usually investigates, if the whole block of threats could be reported to the FBI, maybe they could do something.

  71. Nothing to worry about. by Professr3 · · Score: 1

    I'm a Blue Security user, and I haven't gotten an increase in spam, or any threatening emails. My guess is, this spammer just checked all the email addresses they could find against the list, and sent messages to the ones that came back positive. They can't keep up the spam forever, as it will just result in more opt-out requests (assuming what they send is actually spam, not just evil messages). Also, a DDOS attack on blue security's site won't last forever, and won't stop the project. So, /panic everyone.

  72. Neville Chamberlain, is that you? by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever anyone says "violence never solves anything" I always remember the part in Starship Troopers where the History and Moral Philosophy teacher says "Perhaps you could tell that to the Carthagians..."

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  73. Point? by Gattman01 · · Score: 1

    Whats the point?

    Would someone who spams for a living bother to check incoming mails? I wouldn't.


    :0:
    .*
    /dev/null

  74. The point is, they're right by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1, Troll

    I hate spam as much as the next guy, and have even helped design some solutions to the problem for service providers, but the points made in the back-spam are valid.
    1: By mailbombing suspected spammers, you guys are committing a crime.
    2: The potential for innocent victims in this scheme is huge.
    3: You are trusting a group of people whose credentials you don't really know. It's entirely possible, even probable, that they are, in fact, using your systems for purposes you don't support.
    4: Even if 3 above isn't true, all it would take is a compromise of the system, which is a pretty juicy target, to make it true.
    The probelm with a war on spam is the same as the problem with a war on terror. How do you tell who the bad guys are, and who gets to decide? It's not the same as a war against a state actor that engages in unrestricted U-Boat war. In fact, it's more analagous to having a bunch of destroyers depth charging where there are both U-Boats and friendly submarines, and hoping the gunnery officers get it right.
    The problem with diffuse threats is that you can ONLY defend, not attack, and no defense is perfect.

    1. Re:The point is, they're right by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1
      You are trusting a group of people whose credentials you don't really know. It's entirely possible, even probable, that they are, in fact, using your systems for purposes you don't support.

      Bluefrog is an Open Source project hosted on Sourceforge.

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/bluefrog

      If it contained mal-ware, I think we would have heard about it by now.

    2. Re:The point is, they're right by bezzeb · · Score: 1

      But sadly you're wrong. I hate when people talk about things they haven't researched.

      1. No mail bombing has occured from Blue Frog members to the spam kings. Blue Frog only automates the opt out requests I always used to type into their bogus boner drug web sites. Never a single e-mail issued in return.

      2. No innocent victims. I'm a willing and proud Blue Frog user. Spammers are willing crooks if they don't listen to my personal requests to be removed from lists. (We all know they don't.) To my knowledge no adverse impact to 3rd parties has been reported. Advise if you know of any innocents that are being affected. (Irresponsible computer users that allow their boxes to be hijacked aren't innocent in my mind. You're responsible for what your dog does. You're responsible for what your box does.)

      3. Two words. Open Source. If you have an IQ above room temperature - go download and read their code. Compile yourself. Compare check sums. It's been done.

      4. I'm pretty sure your rationalle suffers from inappropriate analogy syndrome. I understand though. How could you select a fitting analogy when you haven't studied the subject? It's an understandable and common mistake - that's why I'm writing to help you out.

      This isn't a war against terror. It's just a community of brave folks standing up and saying "we are sick of Spam". No laws broken. The anger it's drawn from the Spammers is proof of it's effectiveness. (The war on terror could benefit from more community action such as ours.)

      We are not idiots. We knew from day one that any "List Cleaner" tool could be used to confirm addresses that were already posessed. We signed up anyway. It's a tribute to the spammers complete lack of brains that it's taken them a year to figure out how to do a DIFF comparison of an old list versus their originals and come up with a threat e-mail to us.

      I put my addresses in that list because the more spam they send me - the more opt-out requests I will send to their criminal web sites. The difference between us is that I have a lucrative day job and can keep this up for YEARS. They have to make a living from it and won't be able to divert their spam resources against us Blue Froggers for ever.

      And please don't get it wrong - it is MY laptop that issues the opt out messages. *I* am the one absolutely sick of criminals. Blue Frog is just a helpfull tool towards that end. And I dare say - Blue Frog is much more civilized than the nasty things I used to do against them. (I've got my Lad Vampires annoying 419 scammers as I type. And that IS a DDoS attack. :)

    3. Re:The point is, they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Slashdotting of the bluesecurity.com site stops aggrivating the spammer DDoS, check the site out and you can learn what the bluefrog apps/plug-ins actually do. They don't spam the spammers.

    4. Re:The point is, they're right by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      I did attempt to research this, but the BlueSecurity site (which, as I understand it, is one of the ways in which BlueFrog is controlled to send messages) was down, and the documentation on SF is sparse. Even with the site back up, there is no real documentation on it.

      SO, pardon my ignorance, but I am going from memory based on prior publicity, as well as from the other posts on /. . My understanding is that BlueSecurity leads to ALL subscribed BlueFrog clients sending opt-out messages on behalf of individuals who determine that a message is SPAM. It's entirely possible that I am confusing BlueSecurity with something else.

      The matter of trust and redirection refers to a compromise of the database telling the client machines to DDos someone. Doesn't require a trojan to do that, just a command from the controller (which could be hacked, or even spoofed), since the client is, in effect a DDos engine by design. However, just because the code from SourceForge compiles and the checksums are correct doesn't mean that there isn't some function there that allows subversion, either by design, or through a bug. The only way to verify it would be full source audit and code coverage testing. Have you done that?

      I'll disregard the ad hominem stuff. However, insulting people you don't know but disagree with on one topic in a public forum doesn't indicate that you are a rational person who stays within the law and accepted practice in general, so I doubt you stay within the law in your battle against SPAM (you admitted as much).

      Have you thought about the effects on your ISP, and the intermediate networks, or the hosting facilities (which are often the simple free to cheap ones used by ordinary people but constantly used as throwaways by spammers) of your actions? Seems to me that a smart spammer would point their opt-out form at someplace that wasn't them. Alternatively, by DOSing the opt-out site, you are preventing spammers who actually DO honor the opt-out's systems from working.

      Last, but not least, to use your analogy, "Community Action" in the war on terror would be lynching middle eastern looking people who happened to express opinions you didn't like, which is the meatspace equivalent of DOSing sites.

      There are better ways of solving the problem. As another poster said, violence begets violence. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

    5. Re:The point is, they're right by bezzeb · · Score: 1

      Hey ZwithaPGGB,

      Might surprise you but I actually want to agree with you on a philosophical level really badly. And sorry about any insult that came through - heat of typing and all. My bad. I appreciate your openness and concede that Eye for Eye philosophy it isn't the highest moral ground.

      But to use higher reasoning requires reciprocal action which I'm not seeing from the irresponsible bulk e-mailing organizations in question. So although we may agree that Blue Frog isn't perfect in a higher moral sense (we're talking J.C. himself here), I must ask if you've got a better solution up your sleeve?

      Civil discourse has been exhausted with these folks. The responsible bulk e-mailers have already left me alone. Judging by the content of my SPAM now, only the most criminal section of the industry is still assaulting me. They seem to feel it is their god given right to phish, scam, cheat and steal anything they can get their hands on. They prey on our good morals. Many aren't reachable by US law.

      So it's easy:

      If you take every SPAM message you receive as an invitation to an offer (which they are for the most part) than I see no flaw in visiting and lodging a single complaint for each offer they make. We've been technically unable to do this until now - frogger makes it easier. It's still ME making the complaint from MY laptop. Eye for eye is too strong a term even. It's more like an eye for a pinky toe. Who needs their pinky toe anyway? The spammer is getting a great deal here. All they need to do to stop hearing from me is to stop spamming me. Where's the flaw? I don't think this amounts to a DDOS attack.

      And yes, you raise a fine point regarding the effects on our ISP's and the net as a whole. My position is that Blue Frog requests aren't high bandwidth with the intent of bottlenecking traffic - they are aimed at forcing a human to distinguish real Viagra orders from opt-out requests. In fact Blue Security even goes as far as to coordinate opt out requests over time so as to not deal damage to our ISP's out there or shut down compromised but otherwise innocent systems.

      Talking volume: A typical SPAM is 4-60 K. Not sure but I'd say the content of an opt out request may be smaller. Certainly no more than if I visited their site and filled out the text fields myself. If they remove my address from their list then the ISP saves buckets over time on bulk mail volume that ceases to exist.

      Big "if" I agree, but if it happened: ISP wins. I win. Joe Spammer enjoys a richer list of potential contacts (because I sure as hell won't ever give him a penny.) Everyone wins.

      All the best.

    6. Re:The point is, they're right by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've been involved in many of the "better" (IMNSHO) solutions, and am working on a new one.
      In all cases, my first rule has to "Do no harm" as much as possible.
      BTW: I'm not the only one with a "misconception" as to how BF works. Wired seems to think it is, essentially, a DDOS engine directed @ Spammers.
      P.S. On what planet is a considered response that someone happens not to agree with a Troll? Troll is ad-hominem and inflamatory. Someone fix the moderation of the parent (and remove moderator access from whoever abused it)!!!

  75. Spammers exposed their resources? by VikingThunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like the spammers might have forgotten who they were messing with. They were essentially flooding a number of users of which a high percentage actually report their spam. Could it be that the sudden drop of their FUD spam e-mails to 0 over the last 6 hours be due to this mass reporting? In particular, to SpamCop.

  76. If I was a Clever Hacker by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

    I would just generate huge lists of fake email addresses and run it through blue security's tool. Then you diff and get the email addresses that were stripped. Now, because this is using a hash to validate the email addresses, you're going to get a lot of false positives (an infinite number obv). So what, if you are a spammer you are used to dealing with millions of email addresses; just spam them all. This could be why people are picking up the thread-spam at addresses that are not registered. . . .

  77. Rice Chex and Raisin Toast by IHateAllofYou · · Score: 1

    Im kinda tempted to setup another machine and load it with as many email addresses as possible. Logic to me says if they start spamming you and you remain a bluefrog member then they are going to choke the hell out of their networks with unsubscribe messages. I have no idea what the bluefrog ratio is but I would guess its 1 to 1. If they increase the mail they send you 10-20 fold the systems they are sending from will get 10 to 20 fold more autoreply's from bluefrog. I don't know what bluefrog's hosting situation is but I bet the mail going out is alot easier for bluefrog than it is for the spammers who probably have smaller operations and have to recieve it. If they are already hurting I doubt they can keep the tactic up for long and the increased traffic generated by their increased traffic is probably enough to cripple a mail server and drag a network down. Some of the mails from the "hackers" don't seem to well thought out either. Whether or not the BlueFrog company is run by Jewish people is completely irrelevant. Whether or not bluefrog's tactic's are illegal is questionable. So they are spamming the spammers big deal who cares. And the whole fair play thing is laughable. Sure I don't want the email's so I go to the unsubscribe link and enter my real email address and they sell it to 20 other companies I would hardly call that fair. While I try to stay somewhat ethical and I don't agree with DDoS attacks I find it extremely hard to care if someone sending out massive amounts of mail gets attacked. I'm actually kind of upset that Im missing out on the fun.

  78. Nice FUD but... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blue frog is open source...

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  79. Publicity is exactly what this needs. by Bubba · · Score: 0

    Publicity is exactly what a situation like this needs, so I'm glad Slashdot finally picked up on it. Hopefully those of you who don't use Bluesecurity will decide to join in (when the DDoS stops), and for the folks that do use it continue to do so. The fact that the Spammers have recognized Bluesecurity obviously means that it is working. Hopefully things will work out in the end...

  80. vigilante rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    correct, it is a maligned word for no reason. Vigilante. One who is vigilant, pays attention, does their job and duty..

      Crime is everyone's problem, it isn't only the police's job. They can't be everywhere all the time and numerous court cases says that they don't even have to help if they don't feel like it. Strange but true facts. If I saw an old lady getting mugged, I would thump the attacker, right on the spot. Vigilante (with some politically correct bad connotation), or concerned citizen? If I saw bank robbers fleeing the scene (masks on, bags of loot, obvious stuff)and jumping into the getaway car, and I was in my car, I would ram them to disable the car. If they wanted to get nasty, I am a tool user and owner, I could deal with that as well.

    I know some nations have it so that joe ordinary citizen isn't supposed to "interfere", and passed laws against it, I am glad I do not live in such a place. I call that the criminal protection acts. It's uber-lame.

    Want to know why all the illegal immigrants decided to "protest" their status as illegal border jumpers and illegal job jackers and illegal US government benefits stealers? Concerned US citizens noticed the government was NOT enforcing the laws on the books, so they take action, watching, reporting, in some cases citizens arrest when they caught the jumpers on private prperty trespassing, now they building their own border fences, which is entirely legal. It started small but grew in size and importance, started to get some press, millions of legal residents all went RIGHT ON, INCLUDING all the legal immigrants who are honest and went through the necessary steps, and it was obvious it was working. The criminals decided to "fight back" with demonstrations. Screw them!

    Sorry, if you are here illegally, GO HOME, clean up your own nations *first*. If it is SO BAD wherever you come from that anyone "you" feel the need to flee, it is ALSO bad enough you should take "emergency drastic action" in your own nations FIRST. Be a patriot, clean up your own nations and make them more productive and more free, don't abandon your fellow nationals.

    1. Re:vigilante rant by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      ok, I'm really confused as to how this became about illegal immigrants.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:vigilante rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      vigilante, current illegal immigrant protests, concerned legals being "vigilantes" and becoming demonized in the press and by the government which doesn't do the job they are supposed to do.

      spammers-government not doing job, ISPs not doing the job, telcos not doing the job-anti spam vigilantes.

      I noticed the conversation in the thread was pro and anti "vigilante" and I wanted to show a real world and concurrent example of another situation that needs vigilantes.

      I labeled it a rant and posted at zero, just wanted to get it out here, /. isn't running a "politics" section illegal immigration protest thread to post on, so I took advantage of the mention of the word vigilante. It's a general rant, not meant to be directed at anyone specifically, just thought it fit in the thread someplace. We can duscuss IT outsourcing, but no one seems to care if you are a blue collar and the illegals are just as much a threat to you as outsourced coding projects are to the more wealthy members of the board here. /. isn't all white collar IT people, but that is the assumption. You can be a geek without being a coder.

    3. Re:vigilante rant by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the government's job concerning illegal immigrants? I don't believe they should have one. Same for spammers. I prefer to allow market forces to do the work for me.

      Anyway, that sort of behavior will almost always get you marked offtopic. Just cos it relates in some vague, hazy way does not make it relevant.

      I may be ignorant, but I'd like to see how illegal immigrants are more of a threat to a 'blue-collar' (unskilled labor) job than legal immigrants. Further, I'd like to know why there's such a glut of 'grey-collar' (skilled labor) jobs, yet the 'displaced american workers' don't seem to be getting some training and flocking to them.

      Yeah. I'm actually for job market liquidity in the interest of free trade. The initial costs are worker displacement, but the benefits are improved conditions for both countries. Resistance to the process only exacerbates the costs. Got to a damned trade school, get some training, fill in the huge grey gap, make a good hunk more money, and finally, stop your bitching.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    4. Re:vigilante rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sorry, if you are here illegally, GO HOME, clean up your own nations *first*. If it is SO BAD wherever you come from that anyone "you" feel the need to flee, it is ALSO bad enough you should take "emergency drastic action" in your own nations FIRST. Be a patriot, clean up your own nations and make them more productive and more free, don't abandon your fellow nationals."

      And what if YOUR F***** COUNTRY started the spin-off in MY COUNTRY?. Gee, much bla bla, but you are like corps, NEVER ACCEPT GUILT.

    5. Re:vigilante rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this spin-off and how do I bear the guilt for it?

  81. Coral Cache Link by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

    BlueSecurity

    The site is under a double whammy attack right now. DDoS from spammers and the Slashdot Effect from, well, you.

  82. BlueFrog ... how does it work? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    So, apparently their website is down right now, due to either a DDoS or Slashdotting (humm, that's kind of a redundant distinction, isn't it) ... can you or some other BlueFrog user provide some insight into how their software works?

    Is it something that works server-side? Or do you install it onto your desktop computer? And if it goes onto your desktop, does it work as a plugin for your email program, or what? And what email clients does it support, etc. etc.?

    I'd be very interested in using it, but I don't use Windows and I've seen no indication as to what platforms it's available for or how it works.

    Anyone want to clue me in?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  83. I got my spams and... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    I received a couple of spams from these assholes. I signed up with Blue Frog a year or so ago but I never have used the software to report anyone so I guess they may have compromised the Blue Frog database rather than gather information any other way.

    I will make a couple of comments.

    1. Thank you for reminding me about Blue Frog I had forgotten that I had even signed up. It obviously works well enough that it's pissing you off. Although I haven't downloaded the software and used it I will now that I know it's effective. Thanks.

    2. For the FUD that's being put out about spammers being behind Blue Frog and backdoors and everything else in the software I say "Bull Shit.!" The software is open source Bozo.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:I got my spams and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue Frog give you NO WAY to remove yourself after signing up with them. That makes them no better than the spammers. I've been fighting them to get off their list for some time now (I am one of the people being deluged by spam over this crap and I do not like being caught in the middle of anything).

      I've e-mailed them a bunch of times asking HOW can I unsubscribe from their list? How can I remove my account from their database? All I get back are form letters and nothing is done.

      IF they are going to act like slimes too and give you no way to unsubscribe, then, frankly, they are no better than the spammers themselves.

    2. Re:I got my spams and... by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1
      Not True,

      You can simply log into your Blue Security Account. From here, you can add or delete protected email addresses.

      You won't get in right now because they've been slashdotted. Just bear with it. The spammers are taking shots in the dark. My work account is getting these messages and it's not even registered with Blue Security.

  84. go frog go by coaxeus · · Score: 1

    I see this attack as another sign that this is an effective way to deter these spammers, and they are really feeling the heat. I run a farm of mailservers that hosts many domains and deals with about a half million messages a day, I'm feeding some of the big spam target domains' spam into bluesecurity and take up a few spots on the top 10 contributors list. I think the bluefrog approach is very effective, takes care of all the reporting that spamcop does, plus is a pain in the spammer's ass. As you can see it's putting pressure on these spammers or they wouldn't be doing this. I got over 20,000 of these threats just to a single address last night.. pretty fun. The retry queue of mail trying to get to bluesecurity's servers right now ? not fun. Going on 2.5 million peices of spam in there :)

    --
    My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
  85. I never signed up with BlueFrog by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    I never signed up with BlueFrog (in fact, the first I heard of them was when a few pieces of the current spam flood made it into my mailbox at work). So my guess is that any claim to have obtained the membership list is a bogus claim by the spammer(s) responsible for the current flood. My 2-cents, FWIW.

  86. I got a different "joe job" mail... by shark72 · · Score: 1

    I'm not on Blue Frog's list. This morning I got the note below. It's clearly a joe job; that is, sent by a spammer to discredit the Blue Frog people:

    The trackback URL for this blog entry is:
    http://community.bluesecurity.com/

    Bringing spammers to Their Knees:
    Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army capable
    of crippling spammers' Web sites.

    A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our
    mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of
    spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts:
    current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the
    past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the
    answer.

    Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers
    ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim
    our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good.

    The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are fighting
    for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many
    users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with
    hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce commercial
    loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous
    Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success,
    and plan many more!

    We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with our botnet
    growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies
    involved
    for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef,
    for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based Rembrandt

    Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued support.
    And a
    very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet come to
    life.

    If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue frog yet,
    please sign up now.
    If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do so.

    Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers.
    Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time.

    Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info:

    2077 Gateway Place, Suite 550
    San Jose, California 95110 USA
    Phone: 866-6SKYBOX
    Phone: 408 441 8060
    Fax: 408 441 8068

    Israel HQ:
    60 Medinat Hayehudim St.
    P.O.Box 4109
    Herzliya Pituach 46140 Israel
    Phone: +972-9-9545922

    Current and potential investor relations:
    Rembrandt Venture Partners
    2200 Sand Hill Road, Suite 160
    Menlo Park, CA 94025

    T: 650.326.7070
    F: 650.326.3780

    -----
    Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today.
    Download our .EXE here: http://www.bluesecurity.com/blue-frog/

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    1. Re:I got a different "joe job" mail... by DrVomact · · Score: 1
      It's a "joe job"? Are you sure? It sounded kinda appealing to me.

      From what I can discern (can't load the articles) Blue Frog is basically a variation on the good old mail-bomb. Back when spammers were naive enough to use real "from" addresses, a little script could send a lot of replies in a short time. I assume BF follows URLs in spam, and emails the admin account of that domain? Or what? Hmmm...I'd sure like to know more about how this works, and how they can be sure they don't target innocent sites.

      If you use this type of solution, don't you become part of the problem? Don't you just add to the amount of trash congesting the internet? If I could be sure that using BF results in surgical strikes against spammers with no collateral damage, I'd join the Great Botnet Army of Light in a heartbeat. Maybe some day these sites will be back up and I'll be able to find out how it works...

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    2. Re:I got a different "joe job" mail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that at first sight it would appear that BF is resorting to such tatics, but there are checks and balances in place. For a start if Spam is CANSPAM compliant with valid optout links they don't complain (personally not something I agree with as I don't see why I should get spam I haven't agreed to or why I should have to opt out, thus verifying an email addy). The spam sent into them is manually checked and the details traced and tracked back to ensure that they have the right people. Then they enter into negotiations with the spammer / spamvertised site to get them to dowload the registry and clean their spam lists. It's only after several weeks of talk that it would come down to activating a complaint campaign via the frog and even then it is proportional, complaints are sent over a period of time(not all at once to bring a site down) and it's one complaint per spam received. Complaints also go to the relevent authorities and to the ISP and domain owners. So if the spammer were acting in a legal fashion they wouldn't receve automated complaints anyway.
      All that happens is that BF initiates a complaint on behalf of people who have the right to go to that site and complain anyway, but it's done in such a fashion that you don't have to worry about giving away personal details which you wouldn't want to do at such a site.

  87. Re:I suspect.... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

    I was quite content filtering with SA until the most recent dictionary attack run (which is still in progress). Overnight, they started sending thousands of messages through a distributed bot network, and SA was eating up serious resources as a result. I ended having to dedicate half my weekend to reworking my filters to bounce known dictionary attack e-mails (of which there are currently 4500) so that they wouldn't hit SA - and this is an incomplete solution. Really, what I need is something to stop them at the SMTP level - someone suggested mailavenger , but since I'm not running my own box for mail, that would be a bit hard to implement.

    At this point, I'm filtering using a .redirect file, procmail, SA, and pine. Pine feeds the unknown e-mails to a folder for review and extraction to fine-tune the .redirect file. procmail filters out the worms. SA does a hell of a job defending against regular spam (of which I get about 300-400 a day).

    No, I wouldn't shed a tear if every spammer in the world was rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Well, maybe tears of joy...

  88. Diversion tactic #1 by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 1

    Blame the Jews, lol.

    BlueSecurity lists a USA address as their place of business, whereas their main office is in Tel Aviv. BlueSecurity is run by a few Russian-born Jews, who have previously been spamming themselves.

    I dont see spam stopping as long as these people are making money, as long as there are idiots buying shit or clicking links in spam its not going to stop.

  89. Hashing Algorithm by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Do we know which hashing algorythm is in use, and even if the spammer has to send his entire list to bluesecure?

    Apparently they're using MD5 hashes truncated to 30 bits.

    From http://www.bluesecurity.com/technology/registry.as p :


    Blurry Hash

    Blurry hash was developed by Blue Security to safeguard the content of the Registry from being jeopardized by malicious hackers. It is an evolution of traditional hashing methods that ensures that even brute force attacks are futile.

    Traditional hashing solutions use one-way encryption methods that transform clear-text data into a pseudo-random bit sequence. For example, hashing each Do Not Intrude Registry entry transforms the e-mail address into a 128-bit string.

    The idea behind Blue Security's blurry hash is simple. The process starts by using a standard hash function to calculate the 128-bit hash values of the e-mail addresses in the Registry. The output is then trimmed to a shorter sequence (e.g., 30-bits). A large number of random 30-bit values are then added to the list to create the Do Not Intrude Registry.

    Blurry Hash mitigates the privacy risks associated with publishing the Registry;

            * Using addresses removed from the spammer's original mailing list.

                When a spammer notices that an e-mail address has been deleted from his list, he has no way of knowing if it was filtered because it was a legitimate user's e-mail address, a honeypot address or a random entry in the hashed Registry.
            * Dictionary Attacks

                A spammer may also attempt to uncover the registry's content using dictionary attacks. These attempts are worthless due to the random information in the Registry that ensures that some percentage of e-mail addresses enumerated by the spammer will match hashed registry entries, even though they are not actually listed in the Registry. Hence, a spammer will not be able to tell whether the matches are valid e-mails addresses.


    I find this very interesting. If an e-mail has one (and only one) MD5 hash, it also has one and only one 30-bits prefix of an MD5 hash. For practical purposes, it's equivalent.

    This Blurry Hashing was reviewed in the Spam Kings blog, and it appears to have a 1/1000 probability of false positives, but who cares? It works! :)

    Regarding submitting the e-mail list, apparently the entire hashed list is downloaded (a few megs) and processed locally via software. I haven't checked if the "do not intrude" checking tool is published in the source code. But just knowing that Blue Frog is open source, is a relief.
    1. Re:Hashing Algorithm by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I couldn't get anywhere near the site even in the mysterious future.

      I also don't understand running the hashing algorythm then truncating it though, it makes no sense whatsoever and instantly leads to false positives rather than a clean(ish) practically unique hash.

      2 seperate md5 hashes simply truncated give a partial hash which could match lots of other source patterns, and certainly not practical for other uses.

      They would have been better looking for a hashing algorythm which fits the bitsize they wanted.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Hashing Algorithm by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      It's precisely the false positives that prevent spammers from harvesting valid e-mails by diff'ing. And no, it's not practical for OTHER uses. But in this case, there's only ONE use: Remove (at least) all the known entries in the e-mail list.

      IMHO I'd boost the hash size to 40 or 48 bits to reduce the unintended false positives, but the false positives only affect the spammers, not us.

  90. Re:So, is the database compromised? No. by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Comments on BlueSecurity forums last night demonstrate that users with multiple protected addresses are getting these attack spams to some, but not all, of the protected addresses.

    Exactly, whoever it is that has resorted to all of this only had one of my two email addresses. So I receive this spam to one account and not the other.

    OTOH, they may have started spamming before completing the scan. Dividing their address books into smaller segments to scan through so as to start before finishing the whole list.

  91. Victimized? File a complaint. by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

    If you have received an email threat please take the time to fill out a complaint at the Internet Crime Complaint Center. The threats are a crime whether they are personal or to a business address. I also have a friend that is contacting someone at the U.S. Atty's office here. It may seem futile but spammers get sloppy sometimes and they have been sent to prison before.

  92. Re:Is the database compromised? No, the company is by MrNougat · · Score: 1

    Why are you paying money for a "spam solution" when you use gmail, which apparently has a better spam filter?

    Oh you bought into their advetisments? These people are no better than "Stop Sign" security, which sounds great but turns out to be something completely retarded. I wouldn't be surprised that the russians who run "Blue Security" are part of the mob that is responsible for much of the spam themselves.


    No, you Anonymous Turd, Gmail filters my spam into a spam folder so I don't have to look directly at it, but it does not prevent the spam from reaching my (and your) mailbox. The only way to prevent spam from being delivered in the first place is to make it unprofitable to send. Since convincing the unwashed masses that they shouldn't buy C1AALL1$$ from random emails is impossible, the way to make it unprofitable is to make the process of sending spam increasingly inconvenient and costly. Responding services like BlueSecurity do that.

    For free.

    I have wondered what good BlueSecurity has done me, as the amount of spam I've been receiving hasn't decreased (though the sources do appear to have changed; I'm getting a lot of spam in Chinese and Hebrew now). This pissy little spammer lashing out clearly demonstrates that BlueSecurity works to make spam delivery unprofitable.

    Now, commence with the STFU already.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  93. Re:Is the database compromised? No, the company is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They RESPOND to the spammer?

    So basically they are running a service for spammers, showing them which addresses are valid...

  94. Not getting hit here by TheQuietDan · · Score: 1

    I have been a member of Blue Security since the first day I read about it here on /. , I was tired of getting hundreds of emails everyday. For the first couple of months I was wondering if I was waisting my time forwarding all the spam I was getting, then over a period of one month my spam level dropped from hundreds per day to now about 15-20 and many days much less per day, my best day was only 1 in the several accounts I have registered with Blue Frog. Some of the smart spammers realized I would never buy any of the crap they are hawking, it is now just the stupid ones that are left that have not figured out the obvious, "Not only do I not want to buy your crap, but I am tired of hearing about it from you too." To the fellow members of Blue Security--- KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK To all the people who have yet to join-- Please join us and get the spammers out of your life. I am not employed by Blue Security, just a firm believer.

  95. Even More importantly... by chriso11 · · Score: 1

    Why do spammers send email? To make money, pure and simple. The fact that they are trying to retaliate indicates that this is hurting their bottom line. I'm pretty sure that the spammers would rather be spamming, since that is the only way they make money. Any activity that is not spamming is a a money-losing process for them. Economics is the only way to hurt them, and Bluefrog is increasing their cost of business.

    --
    No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
  96. Re:I suspect.... by jaseuk · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't save any resources by using mailavenger as SA still needs to run on each message.

    Do you have a catch-all address? The simplest thing to do would be to switch it off.

    Jason

  97. Re:Is the database compromised? No, the company is by MrNougat · · Score: 0

    They RESPOND to the spammer?

    So basically they are running a service for spammers, showing them which addresses are valid...


    Why do I bother? I am compelled.

    Twit: This article is a great description of how it works. Most specifically, from that article:

    "In The FTC's report on the feasibility of a national do not email registry,[1] they conclude that a registry would be a greater detriment to the Internet community than it would be a benefit. The report even considers the possibility of using a hashing algorithm to make it impossible for the "harvester" to directly use the registry as a recipient list, and concludes that hashing would not help because the harvester could use the same hashing approach to validate addresses from their existing email recipient list, thereby defeating the purpose of the hash. In fact, this is poor logic because there is no evidence that bulk emailers care about the accuracy of their lists - since it costs them nothing to send the messages in the first place, there is no reason for them to concern themselves with ensuring that their lists are accurate."

    Would it help you to STFU if I put your tinfoil hat in your mouth?

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  98. I got the following 'recruitement' email. by nblender · · Score: 1
    > From: "BlueFrog member" > Date: May 2, 2006 5:19:45 AM MDT (CA) > To: > Subject: FW:Prevent spam, by participying is a DDOS attacks against > spam sites > > > The trackback URL for this blog entry is: > http://community.bluesecurity.com/ > > Bringing spammers to Their Knees: > Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army > capable > of crippling spammers' Web sites. > > A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our > mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of > spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts: > current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the > past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the > answer. > > Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers > ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim > our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good. > > The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are > fighting > for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many > users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with > hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce > commercial > loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous > Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success, > and plan many more! > > We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with > our botnet > growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies > involved > for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef, > for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based > Rembrandt > > Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued > support. > And a > very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet > come to > life. > > If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue > frog yet, > please sign up now. > If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do > so. > > Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers. > Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time. > > Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info: [ Contact info deleted.] > > > ----- > Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today. > Download our .EXE here: http://www.bluesecurity.com/blue-frog/ >
    1. Re:I got the following 'recruitement' email. by nblender · · Score: 1

      [Crap. Accidentally hit instead of ] > From: "BlueFrog member" > Date: May 2, 2006 5:19:45 AM MDT (CA) > To: > Subject: FW:Prevent spam, by participying is a DDOS attacks against > spam sites > > > The trackback URL for this blog entry is: > http://community.bluesecurity.com/ > > Bringing spammers to Their Knees: > Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army > capable > of crippling spammers' Web sites. > > A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our > mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of > spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts: > current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the > past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the > answer. > > Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers > ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim > our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good. > > The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are > fighting > for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many > users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with > hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce > commercial > loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous > Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success, > and plan many more! > > We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with > our botnet > growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies > involved > for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef, > for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based > Rembrandt > > Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued > support. > And a > very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet > come to > life. > > If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue > frog yet, > please sign up now. > If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do > so. > > Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers. > Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time. > > Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info: [ Contact info deleted.] > > > ----- > Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today. > Download our .EXE here: http://www.bluesecurity.com/blue-frog/ >

    2. Re:I got the following 'recruitement' email. by nblender · · Score: 1

      I'm just losing today. Not enough cold medication. Back to bed with me.

    3. Re:I got the following 'recruitement' email. by Oztechreich · · Score: 1

      Another spam outfit is planting a joe-job campaign against BlueFrog, actually spamming millions of addresses with propaganda asking people to join BlueFrog, and putting the BlueFrog email addresses as the return address for the emails. They are doing this to try to get BlueSecurity blacklisted as a spamming outfit. One side-effect of this is that I know of several people who have joined BlueFrog as a result. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. The spammers are actually giving BlueSecurity free (albeit lame) publicity.

      --
      10001001111001110110011000011101110
  99. Dictionary Attacks against Catch-All Addresses by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Yeah, those can get ugly. I had a client with a similar problem (dictionary attack against a secondary MX server we were providing) who was getting tens of millions of spams a day, and we didn't have a way to identify valid vs. invalid addresses (client's out-of-date Exchange server didn't support that) so we had to forward them all to the client's primary-MX spam filter box, which promptly fell on the floor and died from overload. The first attack was on a weekend, and we had an entertaining Monday trying to understand what happened and how to prevent it - they couldn't set their box to reject everything from our MX server, because it also provided primary-MX to some of their major real customers. Nothing happened all week, so we hoped it was a one-shot, but the next weekend they were back. And the next Monday, we jointly decided that while secondary MX was once a good way to improve your reliability when the primary fails, that the problem wasn't fixable so we should shut it down.

    But if you're running your own email server, you can have a lot more fun with dictionary attacks - make sure to seed the web with some dummy addresses like aaaa@yourdomain and zzzz@yourdomain to encourage the spammers to get some bad addresses, and any IP address that tries to reach a bogus address on your system gets banned or teergrubed because you know it's a spammer. (No longer a perfect solution - spammers these days are using zombie farms and not just single servers, but identifying and banning a bunch of zombies is a Good Thing too, because you know They'll Be Back.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  100. Re:Is the database compromised? No, the company is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Welcome, Spammer, to Slashdot!
    You are truly welcome here, if only because we are hoping you'll accidentally let slip something like, say, your home address and a time you'll be home alone.

    And I guess you'll fit in nicely with the rest of the trolls....

  101. Re:Eye for an Eye? Response shows effectiveness by darkonc · · Score: 1
    There are only two things that will stop a spammer:
    1: Make it financially unviable for them to spam,
    2: Make it physically inviable for them to sepam (e.g. prison)

    Other than true (and truly illegal) violence, like shooting spammers, #2 is pretty much the domain of the government -- and they've been notably lax at doing so.

    Blue security goes path number one, and attacks the statistics of spam.

    The spamming industry is based on the fact that 99.99% of the spam that they send out is ignored, and that pretty much all of the responses they get back are actuall business.

    You see, the really wierd thing is that if everybody responded to every spam that they got and, for example, asked the spammer to stop -- or simply visited the site, and did nothing else with it, they'd be blasted into complete oblivion.

    If we each responded to one spam per day, with bogus information, they'd never be able to filter out the "good" marks from all of our bogus info.

    The fact that they are attacking blue is an indication that Blue security is having an effect

    If you think that spam is a bad thing, then follow up on blue security --

    • Go to their 'mortage' sites, and plug in false informatin.
    • set up a wget script to 'visit' their web site 3 or 4 times.
    • Respond to their emails (from a throwaway email address) telling them to go away.
    That's all it takes... 10 million people responding at a far lower level than the Blue Security users are would be more than enough to blanket these creeps in unusable data.

    And it's not illegal -- all each person is doing is responding to their messages.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  102. New attack email text by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just got the following NDR email (which GMail flagged as spam, but I read anyway). Looks like the pissy spammer is using email addresses from his list in the From field, and generating false spam for BlueSecurity.

    I have deleted contact information at the end, for the sanity of those involved.

    Begin

    Subject: FW:Automaticly send 1000s of DDOS complaints for each spam you recieve

    The trackback URL for this blog entry is:
    http://community.bluesecurity.com/

    Bringing spammers to Their Knees:
    Bluesecurity.com hopes you'll join thousands of others in an army capable
    of crippling spammers' Web sites.

    A few thousand spammers have ruined our internet. They've clogged our
    mailboxes with filth. Already, 90% of email traffic is made up of
    spam. Let us no longer blind ourselves to the irrefutable facts:
    current measures have failed to stop spammers. The experience of the
    past several years has proven that passive measures are just not the
    answer.

    Retribution is the only real answer to spam. We must punish spammers
    ourselves to prevent them from taking over cyberspace. We must reclaim
    our territory. We need direct action to eliminate spammers for good.

    The magnitude of the task which lies before us is great. We are fighting
    for the future of the Internet. What we need to do now is get as many
    users as possible into our community. We already have a botnet with
    hundreds of thousands of computers working together to induce commercial
    loss on spammers and their ISPs. We have launched numerous
    Denial-of-Service Attacks on Chinese spam networks with great success,
    and plan many more!

    We have excellent financiers who allow us continued success with our botnet
    growth and Denial-of-Service Attacks. We thank the government agencies
    involved
    for their continued cooperation. We thank our leader, Eran Reshef,
    for continued strategies of DoS attack operations. Also, US-based Rembrandt

    Ventures & Skybox Security for their extensive funding & continued support.
    And a
    very special thanks to Douglas Schrier who has helped our botnet come to
    life.

    If you haven't signed up with the registry and installed a blue frog yet,
    please sign up now.
    If your friends have not yet joined us, we will convince them to do so.

    Let's stop filtering spam and start eliminating spammers.
    Together, we will reclaim the Internet, One ddos at a time.

    Please Contact Us for any questions on signup via the following info:

    address and phone deleted

    Israel HQ: address and phone deleted

    Current and potential investor relations:
    Rembrandt Venture Partners address and phone deleted

    Fight back spam! Join our Botnet today.
    Download our .EXE here: http:/// www.bluesecurity.com/ blue-frog/

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  103. Another attack on Blue Security: joe job e-mails by owlmon · · Score: 1

    There is another attack just started against Blue Security, I think. Someone has been sending out e-mails that appear to be sent by me. These e-mails urge the reader to join the Blue Security effort. In other words, these e-mails look like spam that "sells" Blue Security, and they look like they came from me.

    I know this because I have received three "delivery failure" messages from mailer daemons.

    In other news, the number of spams that I get per day has almost doubled recently.

  104. Complaints? How filing a report with the FBI? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Cause this email sounds a lot like blackmail to me. This is no longer a unsollicited commericial email. This is a direct threath to force you take an action or they will damage you economically.

    Last time I heard the FBI doesn't like that kinda thing. Oh and this time no direct mailing companies lawyers will jump in to defend the freedom of speech. This email is simply a blackmail letter. Treat it as such.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  105. More worried when the spammers didn't care by Oztechreich · · Score: 1

    I was more worried about these spammers when they didn't care about Blue.

    Now I know they are scared.

    Once BlueSecurity gets over its slashdotting, check out their forums. Lots of angry rhetoric from spammers is posted there (http://community.bluesecurity.com/webx?14@780.8kU AaIRZk2e.54@.3c52c5a1)

    For what its worth, I have about 30 protected email addresses at BlueFrog, and only the ones that were already getting spammed have been at all affected. Their extra spam is insignificant. They doubled my spam catch for a day. Feel me tremble.

    --
    10001001111001110110011000011101110
  106. Nice .... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    So as I understand it, they have just gone from possibly legal mass mailings - depending on the nature of the products they are hawking & the formatting - to extortion/blackmail and Misappropriation of computer services (DDOS) both Federal Crimes in the US & at least the extortion/blackmail claim has a history of successfull extradition.
    This is the kind of briliant manuevering I have only seen from SCO's lawyers and the News of the Weird site.
    FBI - moron
    moron - FBI
    you 2 play nice now.

  107. why would anyone sign up for BlueSecurity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving up any informatin about your email addresses to the public is the exact opposite of security.
    Now the spammers have a verified list of email addresses known to belong to stupid people - 1-0 to the spammers.

    1. Re:why would anyone sign up for BlueSecurity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are ONLY spamming people whose email's they had already. All they know now is who belongs to blue security, which after their site goes up will increase.

  108. That *is* basically what Bluesecurity does by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I can't check the details, because they've been Slashdotted as well as spammer-dotted, but that's basically the kind of thing that the BlueSecurity system does. Spam one BlueFrog user and suddenly thousands of users go hit you with unsubscribes - I don't remember if they're hitting you with legitimate or bogus ones (probably both? presumably at least some honeypot addresses.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  109. Spam attack plan by RedToad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (killthem)
    FoGGeR lol yeh sure am a fed and you a blueguy :)
    anyway fuck you and your company we're fighting you and i recived around 100 pvt msgs
    telling me that they're with me. No need to remove them we'll just show them who we're. Thanks

    (killthem)
    LCS yes it's been down :) our good friend and master of hes job did that. heh it's just a beginin.

    (ebulker)
    yes down but members.bluesecurity.com still up need to down www, members, community ! ...
    need to fuck all aliases afaik this domain used in bluefrog ?

    (killthem)
    xxzindoxx and bluefrog feeel me babys :)
    you can both of ya blow me and belusecurity company as well. the game started i am the winner
    hehe and yes Hello to all the feds they're most welcome to get over and visit me hehe.
    bleu i got over 400 pm's last days and feel the power of this people very soon.
    we walk slow but the heat gonna TO BIG FOR YOU.
    all the sponsors contact me if you having problems with this fuckers i'll give you everything
    you need help people servers money and all.
    LETS FUCK BELUSECURITY.COM bleusecurity.com are down already lol

    (crazy)
    You BlueFrog faggots, you think this is the only community that has your whole database?
    You honestly think a community of people you are trying to take down are going to
    REMOVE you from their lists? Look, killthem is not an anti, I know him personally,
    so let that whole bullshit idea go to rest. Second, by running that database as froms
    or mailing them on a dedicated box will not result in any "fed" coming to your door,
    more so you'll just be pissing off another bullshit internet-lamer who can't understand
    how to filter a simple spam message, so they join some bullshit community called
    "BlueFrog" and think they can run this shit. BF, newsflash: do you realize how many
    resources this community as a whole controls? Do you honestly think you stand a chance?
    Your domain is down, it's a matter of time before more nets are mounted to bring down your
    members area and it'll be held down continuously until BF userbase has gotten to the
      point they can't perform their equally illegal DDOS attacks. Guys, download the DB,
    spam it, compile your lists with it and trade it around. Use them as froms, mail your
    anti DB with them, do whatever you want.
    Let this database leak to the point all these stupid ass fucks have to get new e-mail addresses.
    Adios bluefreaks

    (killthem)
    did you ever try to protect your websites and all ? you're fucking down baby
    Date 5/2/2006

    (crazy)
    Pinging 194.90.8.20 [194.90.8.20]:
    Ping #1: * [No response]
    Ping #2: * [No response]
    Ping #3: * [No response]
    Ping #4: * [No response]
    Done pinging 194.90.8.20

    Boy oh boy
    Date 5/2/2006

    (dollar)
    "baby why dont you hit me with your best shot!!" da daa da daa "I said baby why dont you hit me with your best shot"
    Thats what these bluefrog idiots have been singing the whole time. They simply asked for it.

    "Slap an anti a day to keep spamhaus away"
    Great Affiliate Programs
    Custom Bulk Applications
    BP Mailing/Hosting/Direct Servers
    Contact Me
    Date 5/2/2006

  110. Re:I got the following 'recruitment' email. by RedToad · · Score: 1
    A small group of spammers have mounted a concerted attack on Blue Security. Over 3 days from May 1, they have
    • sent a wave of spam messages containing misleading information about Blue Security, and scurrilous attacks on its executives, urging members to cancel
    • sent another wave of spam with threats against Blue Security members
    • sent a third wave of Joe-Job spam purporting to be from "Blue Frog Member" with forged sender name, but describing Blue Security's operation in misleading terms. This spam is targetted to annoy those people on their spammer lists who usually complain the most
    • mounted a denial of service attack on all Blue Security web sites. Although they claimed success, the www.bluesecurity.com web site was actually unable to cope with the deluge of interest from Slashdot readers!
    As a result of this concerted attack, Blue Security's profile in the electronic media has been considerably raised. Slashdot has this vibrant thread of postings, and other media have been quick to follow suit. (See http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3011 )

    The attackers have not succeeded in their aims. Members of Blue Security have been expecting such a retaliation from the renegade element of the spammer community for some time. If anything, this attack has simply served to draw the community closer together, and has hardened their resolve to combat the scourge of spam. Furthermore, the attack has failed to reach the core of the Blue Security service. The Blue Frog application is still sending requests to spamvertised websites that they clean up their mailing lists using the registry compliance tool. And spam reporting to Blue Security is continuing at record levels.

    These illegal actions by this small spammer group are poorly chosen. They lay themselves open to detection, arrest and prosecution.

    Their strategy has also clearly revealed the source IP addresses of their open relays and bot-net.

    We live in interesting times.
  111. Honeypot.... by Jerrycan · · Score: 1

    I think i'll join this fight,

    Having setup a honeypot about the size of a jerrycan, i actually registered at slasdot to ask for help:

    Could somebody please send me some SPAM ? if it gets through GMails filter i'll get back to you ASAP ;-)

    1. Re:Honeypot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Problem, gimme a destination...?

    2. Re:Honeypot.... by Jerrycan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't realise anonymous cowards don't see the sigs & profiles... Please send your spam to jerrycant@gmail.com !

  112. From bluesecurity com. Please spread by mungos · · Score: 1

    The Blue Independence War
    Today is Israel's Independence Day. It's a public holiday in Israel, but all of us in Blue Security are working. But we are glad we're working. We're helping the community fight the Blue Independence War. We fight for our freedom from spammers and cyber criminals. This is our big chance to reclaim the Internet. We must not let it slip from our hands.

    Some desperate spammers are doing its worst to harm our community. They'd like us to back off, and agree to get their spam silently. Needless to say, that is not going to happen. We're not here to listen to their vile threats and fraudulent advertisements. We're here to stand up for our right not to be let alone.

    You may wonder what you can do to help win the Blue Independence War. Here are some ideas:

    Run your frog and report your spam
    Tell you friends to join the fight
    Write to your local newspaper about Blue Frog
    Search for news sites, blogs and forums that discuss "blue security" or "blue frog" and post positive comments
    Ask your representative to show support for the Blue Frog
    If you have a blog, write an item about the blue frog
    We need to be patient and prepare for more attacks. Some top spammers embrace the change and comply. Other spammers believe they can coerce us into obedience. Let's show them this is not going to happen.

  113. Monitor where the spammers hang out online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We also need to keep track of what they are saying in their own forums, like http://www.specialham.com/specialham/m_36028/mpage _1/p_/tmode_1/smode_1/key_bluefrog/tm.htm.

    As you'd expect from the incestious children of script kiddies, a few spammers are coming up with the list and then passing it out to their "collegues".

  114. Jesus drove bad guys out of the temple by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    Matthew 21:12-16
    Mark 11:15-18
    Luke 19:45-48

    Jesus also drove out the bad guys when he had to. I'm not saying that revenge or retribution or retaliation is always, or even often, the right answer. But sometimes something has to be done to stop evil and injustice.

    I'm not saying that BlueSecurity is doing the right thing here either, but it seems like they're generally the good guys.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    1. Re:Jesus drove bad guys out of the temple by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Matthew 21:12-16
      Mark 11:15-18
      Luke 19:45-48


      Point was not so much to use the biblke to say that violence is not acceptable, but to show that dislike of violence isn't specific for 'hippies'..

      Jesus also drove out the bad guys when he had to. I'm not saying that revenge or retribution or retaliation is always, or even often, the right answer. But sometimes something has to be done to stop evil and injustice.

      Using violence to defend oneself can be the right answer. Revenge and retaliation do not qualify as violence to defend oneself however. As said already, the one reason I was pointing at him earlier was to dispell the 'you like peace so you must be a hippie' idiocy. but if you want to look at it from a new testament point of view, it seems pretty obvious that for someone who really believes in that, revenge cannot be an acceptable option ever.

      I'm not saying that BlueSecurity is doing the right thing here either, but it seems like they're generally the good guys.

      My issue is with people who believe violence as a first response is perfectly acceptable, and that revenge can be justified by the actions of others. Bluesecurity doesn't seem to qualify, quite a few of the very fanatical 'spam fighters' however do qualify.

  115. the largest legal botnet in the world. by gnuguru · · Score: 1

    There are those of you who will argue that it's not a botnet, however it looks like a botnet to me.
    425 000 odd machines running that little blue frog app.

    Are you sure you want to fsk with them?

  116. Re:Is the database compromised? No, the company is by Tezkah · · Score: 1

    that doesn't explain it, that doesn't even make any sense.

    What are you quoting? how is that going to help with spam? "WE HAVE A SECRET LIST THAT YOU CANT SEE AND CANT SPAM THE PEOPLE ON THIS LIST". How does that prevent spam coming to you?

    ohhhh yeah that doesn't make sense at all. what do they do besides get you to install software on your computer to "link up" with the bluesecurity antispam solution? ????

  117. MOD PARENT DOWN by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    Why is this being modded up? "Below is an email that I received, which pretty much confirms that they have been hacked"??

    No, it confirms that the spammers are *claiming* the database has been hacked. Um, not the same thing.

    The spammers have not managed to extract any addresses from the BlueSecurity database. The only addresses they have are addresses they already had. Sure, they can do a diff on a full list vs. a cleaned list -- but they can't actually extract any emails from the database that aren't already exposed.

    No, the BlueFrog software does not send spam, organize DDoS attacks, or "await" BlueSecurity's next command; they only submit single requests to spammer sites, one per message that you personally have received -- and the client is open-source, so any user with a coding background can confirm this. Nothing even remotely illegal (on the other hand, sending threats like these to users and DDoS'ing BlueSecurity itself is quite illegal).

    Yes, BlueSecurity has a revenue stream (and plenty of venture capital as well; google for "blue security million"); they are charging companies for protection, and plan to start charging for entire domain protection for individuals. Obviously they don't charge for the software download, because they need a pool of individuals to give them they clout they need to market to enterprises. Win-win for us little guys.

    All of this is covered in other threads, but somehow mods are modding up the parent message.

    Please explain -- what did that email prove?

  118. Lovely. Um... then don't. by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    Brilliantly twisted world view, "We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails."

    I like that. The obvious reply:
    Dear Spammer:
    Perhaps you were unaware, but Blue Security has provided a freely downloadable and easy-to-use software API so that you don't have to waste your precious time and resources sending emails to me, or anyone of the other members of the BlueSecurity list. Obviously, we are not an revenue source for you (if we needed ch34p onl1ne \/iagrra we would not be complaining), and we will only request removal each time -- so your returns can only be better with us off your lists.

    Please contact BlueSecurity or almost ANYONE for assistance in scrubbing your lists -- we will be only too happy to assist.

    Sincerely,
    "Useless Mail" Recipient

  119. They aremessing with spammer customer order forms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly what Blue Frog does ... it simply puts a "Stop spamming me" text request in the website's ordering form and submits it ... one submission for each spam. Not that big of a deal ... unless thousands of customers do it at once.

    The website owners are freaking out, and telling their spammers to stop sending email to people who inflict this particular hurt on them.

    The spammers are freaking out because their paymasters are getting angry.

    Heh.

  120. Want us to quit BF then do a DDOS? by Nok · · Score: 1

    These spammers aren't very smart. They send out an email saying unregister from Blue Frog, then in the next sentence they say "by the way we have DDOSed Blue Frog so their site is down". So one can't unregister with Blue Frog even if they wanted to. They haven't given this too much thought what are they trying to achieve? Free publicity for BF?

    1. Re:Want us to quit BF then do a DDOS? by RedToad · · Score: 1

      It doesn't stop there.

      To prevent opt-out requests, many spamvertised sites were blocking known IP addresses of thousands of Blue Frogs. So they mass mailed the Blue Security community, and others, advertising a web site which they then prevented Blue Security members from visiting!

      Surely applying the Registry Compliance Tool to the mailing list would have been a whole lot simpler?

      Doh!

      Sometimes the penny drops v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y

    2. Re:Want us to quit BF then do a DDOS? by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the frog works happily through a proxy.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  121. Re:Another attack on Blue Security: joe job e-mail by RedToad · · Score: 1

    There have now been four stages of attacks on Blue Security, three of which are documented in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Frog and the fourth is the DDOS attack on bluesecurity.com. The next stage is already set up, comprising another Joe Job using discovered Blue Security members' addresses as the forged "From".

    (QUOTE) Date 5/3/2006
    > From bluesecurityDB:

    Donwload bluesecurity.com database from >>>>>
    Enjoy people use them as froms will provide some txt's to mail soon :)
    cheers

    (QUOTE) Date 5/3/2006
    > From killthem:

    i have recived over 200 msg's last two days by people telling me that they wanna join and give all the support they can provide to drop this bluesuecirty.com

    BLUESECURITY.COM are down with full services.

    Now i wanna say sorry to people that i didnt reply so far, give me sometime and i'll msg you back to all of you guys thanks for support.

    GREAT JOB TEAM KEEP GOING. ////////////////////
    ANTIS FUCK OFF
    **************

    (END QUOTE)

  122. Bluesecurity DNS entries poisoned! by davygrvy · · Score: 1
    C:\Documents and Settings\davygrvy>NSLOOKUP -type=any BLUESECURITY.COM
    Server: cns.sanjose.ca.sanfran.comcast.net
    Address: 68.87.76.178

    Non-authoritative answer:
    BLUESECURITY.COM internet address = 127.0.0.1
    BLUESECURITY.COM nameserver = 127.0.0.1
    BLUESECURITY.COM
    primary name server = ns1.mdnsservice.COM
    responsible mail addr = hostmaster.mdnsservice.COM
    serial = 743932014
    refresh = 10001 (2 hours 46 mins 41 secs)
    retry = 7200 (2 hours)
    expire = 2419200 (28 days)
    default TTL = 86400 (1 day)
    BLUESECURITY.COM MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = 127.0.0.1
    BLUESECURITY.COM MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = 127.0.0.1
    That ain't right. Everything is pointing to localhost. This one is right though:
    C:\Documents and Settings\davygrvy>dig.exe @dns.netvision.net.il
    members.bluesecurity.com +all

    ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @dns.netvision.net.il members.bluesecurity.com +all
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: printcmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 959
    ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2

    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;members.bluesecurity.com. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    members.bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN A 72.36.247.10
    members.bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN A 206.225.91.229
    members.bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN A 64.15.129.18
    members.bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN A 66.197.244.214

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN NS nypop.elron.net.
    bluesecurity.com. 3600 IN NS dns.netvision.net.il.

    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    dns.netvision.net.il. 86400 IN A 194.90.1.5
    nypop.elron.net. 86400 IN A 199.203.1.20

    ;; Query time: 250 msec
    ;; SERVER: 194.90.1.5#53(194.90.1.5)
    ;; WHEN: Thu May 04 01:13:25 2006
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 201
    I tried editing mods/cfg.lua so fred can connect by direct IP, but no luck getting fred to reconnect Please add commects to this bug report: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid= 789032&aid=1481597&group_id=153754
    --
    -=[ place .sig here ]=-
    1. Re:Bluesecurity DNS entries poisoned! by RedToad · · Score: 1

      Those addresses would make sense as a measure when you are under a DDOS attack.
      The propagation of the change would take 24 hours, hence the old address is still embedded in some other DNS.

    2. Re:Bluesecurity DNS entries poisoned! by RedToad · · Score: 1

      Ta Da!

      Hey, lookathis.

      From the Prolexic web site, the big blurb babbles blissfully, and I quote -

      Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have rapidly become a commonplace threat to doing business on the internet. With over 2,000 distinct attacks per week, denial of service has quickly become the most costly form of cyber-crime businesses face today.

      Then lookie here, lookie here -

      bluesecurity.com. SOA IN 300

      Primary DNS server: gdc.prolexic.net.
      Serial: 2006050403
      Refresh: 86400 (1d)
      Retry: 900 (15m)
      Expire: 1209600 (2w)
      Minimum/NegTTL: 7200 (2h)

      There are no lapses in your synapses. Zip-pe-de-doo-dah!

  123. Re:flamebait? wtf? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    how the fuck is that flamebait? I've yet to see any evidence pointing against it being 100% true. If bluesecurity were up, maybe I could read more about how it works, but all the information I have on it either implies or specifically states that it is an attempt to DDoS spammers.
    If you disagree that maliciously attacking someone without care for collateral damage is either worse or the same as carelessly causing lots of collateral damage through a selfish and non-malicious act, you are welcome to express that opinion and I welcome you to do so in a non-flaming manner.

    If you respond to someone with unequal force, their responding to that response with equal force seems fair. In a general sense.

    I think spammers are cockwits, sure, but I also think every "this solution will work! I will end spam!" idea that I've seen has been thought up through equally cock-based means.

    Examples:
      - this one ("what they do has the effect of a DDoS! Let's DDoS them back!")
      - huge catch-all blacklists ("Spammers are breaking the internet! Let's break the internet on our own terms!")
      - purposely blacklisting non-spammers as a means of extortion ("Some of your customers are breaking the internet! Broken internets are bad. Here is an example of a broken internet. Really horrible, isnt it?")
      - whitelists ("Well if we just didnt talk to anybody, we'd never have anyone say anything bad to us!")

    Web-of-trust sounds like a good idea, but I generally disagree with systems which rate people instead of actions. Should I ignore steve just because I dont like something he said or did? Wouldnt that make me the worst kind of person? I'm very conflicted about this one, mostly because it seems open for abuse or bad judgements. If I /think/ I always agree with Bob and Alice and they say I should always ignore Cindy because she keeps trying to steal their individual photons, but I've never actually talked to Cindy.. can I really trust their judgement? A large web of trust might balance things out, but unfiltered Mob Rule can make very bad decisions and I dont like the idea of ignoring someone completely just because 90% of the world thinks 90% of what they say is full of crap. [replies: insert obvious joke here!]
    It all seems too uncertain for me to trust, personally, but the flaws it has are potential consequences of the design, it isnt built on intentionally being flawed- a flaw going by another name.

    See? I can ramble at length and still say only as much as 4 short lines. Short and to the point != flamebait.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  124. Re:flamebait? wtf? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I may as well note that I do realize that Web-of-trust is not intended to do anything like I described, but it would be completely naive to assume that when someone has a magic button they can push to say they no longer believe a person is who they say they are, that it will only be pushed under those circumstances, and only used to calculate that particular thing. People use "flamebait" to mean something other than "this person is trying to cause other people to post flames", for example ;)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  125. Anyone upstream helping!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to know whether or not any of you that may use Blue Frog and operate upstream from them are doing anything to help other than piss and moan on Slashdot!? For that matter, why is this not a priority issue in general. We all hate spam... or do we accept it as long as it is our own? Null route the hosts performing the DDoS, who cares if they are "innocent", if you were exploited in the first place you are no longer innocent! Blue Security should point their domain at: CIA, FBI, MOSSAD, etc... perhaps then some pertinent attention would be paid.

  126. Firmens my resolve! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see two strong messages from this recent attack by the spammers:

    (1) BlueFrog is having the desired effect. The spammers are now diverting some of their resources to fighting back which means less resources for traditional spamming. This is an increase in their costs and a decrease in their bottom line.

    (2) The spammers have shot themselves in the foot. Nobody likes to be threatened. Even more important, incremental escalation is taken in stride, but sudden escalation gets noticed. If cigarette taxes increased ten-fold, a lot of people would quit immediately, but nickle-and-dime increases don't cause dramatic change in behavior. The same is true for spam. We've all accepted the slow but steady increase in our spam counts, but if I'm going to suddenly get hit with ten-times the amount in an overnight increase, then that's not going to make me lay low. That's going to firmen my resolve and fight back. It's also going to be immediately noticed by major ISPs and regulatory agencies because it will suddenly and drastically affect email services worldwide.

    I think the spammers are going to suddenly get a lot more attention and they're not going to like it! I'm not backing down. In fact, I'm even more ready to fight.

    Bring it on.

    You've already trained me how to manage my spam, I can handle an increase... can you?

  127. Distributed P2P Blue Frog Like Set Up by cyberscan · · Score: 1

    I am a member, and I got the email. I will stay a member as well. I also knew that spammers would eventually crack the Blue Security database even if it took such efforts as a physical break in. Spammers are running scared because some people decided to give them a dose of their own medicine. I would also like to say that I monitored all connections from the computer on which I have installed Blue Frog, and I have not seen the first spam sent as alleged by spammers.

    It is simple to write a worm, trojan, or other peice of malware that sends spam or causes a DDOS. I could do it myself if I wanted to. However, I have ethics and choose to allow poeple that choice of using my software. I have written such offensive tools such as:

    SpamFryer - A java application that allows a user to paste in website's URL and set the number of times that the URL is to be accessed. SpamFryer works with https URL's as well as with http URL's. The application's source code is embedded within the Java archive so that people can play with it and hopefully improve it. It is also a project on SourceForge.net SpamFryer can be downloaded via http://www.plaza1.net/SpamFryer.jar

    SpammerSlapper - A signed java applet that causes the browser of a webpage visitor to repeatedly download URL's specified as parameters (can use http and https URL's). This applet can be used on any webpage, and I highly encourage people to use it on their personal webpages. Again, the source code is included in the Java archive. One must choose to accept the certificate if one wants to give the applet permission to access other websites. SpammerSlapper can be found at http://www.plaza1.net/SpammerSlapper . If you want to look at the webpage but not allow the applet to access other webpages, then click no when asked to accept the certificate. Otherwise, accept the certificate and slap some spamvertised pages.

    SpammerSlammer - A simple cgi program that generates a real looking but fake name, address, phone number and test credit card numbers (known to pass typo checks but not allowed to be actually charged). The program works by accessing a zipcode and area code database. The rest of the information is randomly created. This is a great way to waste the time of many spam site operators. The URL for SpammerSlammer is http://www.plaza1.net/spammerslammer.cgi

    I wonder what would happen if Google's phonebook was used to look up the names, addresses and phone numbers of well connected citizens (lawyers, judges, and politicians) and this information was entered into the forms on spamvertised pages. I wonder how many fines will be charged to these companies for violating the don not call list. I know that the information would have to be entered from an Internet cafe, or otherwise public system. If only a million users would take offensive action against only one spammer a day, spam will cease to be profitable.

    Another idea might be a peer to peer version of Blue Frog. If a signed list of spamvertised sites was downloaded from peer to peer networks then the spammer scumballs would have no have no stationary target to attack. Rather than fowarding emails to Blue Security, users of Blue Frog could save the emails to a file and allow the peer to peer versions parse them when instructed to. The more spammers attack me, the more pissed off and aggravated I become, and the more I work to make their lives miserable. I called one spammer's toll free number about 800 times from different locations. I never received another spam from his company again. Spam will cease when it becomes unprofitable. The like of Blue Security will hopefully make it unprofitable. I believe that they are making a significant dent in spammers' profits, or else thay would never be attacked in this way.

    1. Re:Distributed P2P Blue Frog Like Set Up by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      I meant to add that I was trying to point out that I received a much more malicious message than the one in the article.

      I'm sticking with blue frog for sure. In fact, I wish spammers would send me more spam, as this also improves the gmail adaptive filters.

      Just be sure to route them through tor:
      http://tor.eff.org/

      Or someone could try busting you for credit card fraud.

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
  128. The database was not compromised... by krinsh · · Score: 1

    The users are getting the hate mail based on addresses associated with the opt-out letters. That of course is illegal itself I'm sure; but it's hard to police the Internet is it not?

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.