"Democracy severely restricted? " that is the facist part, citizenship only open to those having gone thru military (federal service). You haven't gone through the service ? Then you are not a citizen with degraded rights. Saying it is open to everyone does not make it more democratic.
People like me do not mind that you insult/disparage/hunt/kill extremist islamist terrorist. What we find racist is when somebody jump from "extremist islamist terrorist" to "the moslems". That is it generalize to the whole islam. E.g. all those pretending that islam is a religion which makes people violent, or that inherentely all moslem are violent etc...
They just don't like it because it is *near* other words, look it up. It is an important precision. And france is not under daesh control and a lot of very young idiot are using it.
It is an acronym, and it is near other word pronunciation, daes for example, that is why they dislike it. But it is not per see pejorative and some youth have been praising it and using it even tagging it on wall (see north banlieu la courneuve, saint denis, even heard a rap on it)..
He refused the deal went before a tribunal and got a harsher sentence. That alone tells me there is a whole unsaid part, or the tribunal judge are idiot. I tend to think unsaid part, as very usually important details are left out. But hey it is the french, so let us bash happily, and show how unürejudicied we all are....
the tool of the thieves are 1) those giant pincer for cheap cable lock 2) hammer and screwdriver for the U one or 3) cheap can of liquid N i saw used + hammer 4) and the usual small but of metal used as picklock.
nobody will be using an angle grinder to steal a bike.
Youtube can decide to have their own private process which is "better" (at least from the claim side) than the law. In fact they could stop at step 2 and not care about the accused's side. You are thinking this is a process youtube should follow. No it is a process they can utterly legally within their TOS cut short in favor of the claim.
If youtube was taking it as it legal value, yes it would be for a court to decide. But youtube , as a private entity, can STILL decide to accept take down request in spite of the court , and still remove video from their private property. And it is quite clear that youtube has taken this direction, not carring about the takedown requests validity. In fact they could rename it as fluffy-fluff-take-down-request if you prefer and have the same process and no court could tell them what to do.
I am betting that they can still take it down on group of defending their trademark. The way I read it he was using the likeness of the object. And like it or not , the look feel and name are trademark. So it is not as simply as reusing copyrighted material as this is also about trademark to which the copyright laws do not apply. The DMCA was probably used because youtube has only 1 takedown form "copyright" not "trademark".
It should read "American spend 25% more time at work than worker Europe". My experience working and watching various type of environment, is that at the end of the day, your average US worker did the same work as your average Europe worker, just in a longer time.
They were given a two months notice. Whatever the reason. They can still access their assets and move them elsewhere. A PITA, yes, but a far cry from "frozen".
Simplified, Natural selection is only about competitive advantage to reproduction and escape predator to come to reproduction age. It is not about the *most* efficient ways to get there, but sometimes simply just be a bit better than the other species. As such, it can simply stay stuck at a local minima if there is no selection pressure. In other word, there is not always a trade off. Sometimes it is simply that there is no selection pressure where this could bring something to the plant reproduction.
Have the ballot a paper that you hand down, the person vote, and the other ballot paper are trashed or kept by the eprson. Et voila, you don't even need complex mail psot scheme excpet for those wanting to vote in absentia. Heck, anybody can then recount at will the ballot. Both party they want.
Baby boomer are full of shit, and their "we worked harder than you" are full of shit on average. The reality is that they are like us (ethically) but had it easier economically.
That is nearly 8 meter. So you only need to be in proximity doing nothing reading a book while your conspicuously hidden laptop is doing the job, with scripts already prepared is trying. Then once the max dose of insuline is given you can simply safely go. Remember that the effect will not be *immediate* has if it was cyanide administered, the blood sugar will take a bit of time to be absorbed. So yeah. The risk of being charged is actually much lower than you think it is. If nobody catch you red handed with a laptop, then once symptom start to apepar just calmly head for the exit, and wipeout your laptop.
I am wanting a few reform in the economic and politic current environment, but wanting reform does not mean putting a gun to your figurative head and pulling the trigger. I want reform with a good candidate, and doing a protest vote with an utterly disturbing populist candidate like trump is then being an utter imbecile.
And oxygen/water production in a complete autonomic bunker. Because once it comes down to laying siege to a bunker, the one outside can wait for a looooong time. The one inside may not.
I mean you can download a MP4 from the stream with a few add on. Then use an open source project to transfer the sound track to mp3. What is the difference with that youtube mp3 service ?
Once you remove all add-ons you are left with "there is a group of people which believe there was a holy man named Jesus of Nazareth who had a number of followers, and was put to death by the Romans." AFAIR he does not directly speaks of J, but of the believer of J.
That is what I would say the typical "american dream" BS of the self made man. Most successful people are a mix of luck, good networking, chance of opportunity, and a bit of their own effort. 2 of those are out of control of anybody. Heck I would arguably add networking to that too. (and that does not even count things like wanting to do a carrier in science which pays shit).
As you said there need to be a forensic examination to determine that, as it could have been a 45Â shot above his property limit downing the drone outside (so 40 feet or 12-15 meter outside the property).
You can't be pro hillary without being anti trump and vice versa you can't be anti hillary and not being pro trump. The way the election are in the US, if you are anti-one you are automatically supporting the other. All you can do, is see which one you think is worst for the US, and vote for the other, thus supporting him/her. The only other solution is abstaining, which unfortunately nobody look at.
Slashdot Mirror
"Democracy severely restricted? " that is the facist part, citizenship only open to those having gone thru military (federal service). You haven't gone through the service ? Then you are not a citizen with degraded rights. Saying it is open to everyone does not make it more democratic.
People like me do not mind that you insult/disparage/hunt/kill extremist islamist terrorist. What we find racist is when somebody jump from "extremist islamist terrorist" to "the moslems". That is it generalize to the whole islam. E.g. all those pretending that islam is a religion which makes people violent, or that inherentely all moslem are violent etc...
and never repelled. So if you want to complain about not learning, look at UK, USA, France.
They just don't like it because it is *near* other words, look it up. It is an important precision. And france is not under daesh control and a lot of very young idiot are using it.
It is an acronym, and it is near other word pronunciation, daes for example, that is why they dislike it. But it is not per see pejorative and some youth have been praising it and using it even tagging it on wall (see north banlieu la courneuve, saint denis, even heard a rap on it)..
He refused the deal went before a tribunal and got a harsher sentence. That alone tells me there is a whole unsaid part, or the tribunal judge are idiot. I tend to think unsaid part, as very usually important details are left out. But hey it is the french, so let us bash happily, and show how unürejudicied we all are ....
the tool of the thieves are 1) those giant pincer for cheap cable lock 2) hammer and screwdriver for the U one or 3) cheap can of liquid N i saw used + hammer 4) and the usual small but of metal used as picklock.
nobody will be using an angle grinder to steal a bike.
Youtube can decide to have their own private process which is "better" (at least from the claim side) than the law. In fact they could stop at step 2 and not care about the accused's side. You are thinking this is a process youtube should follow. No it is a process they can utterly legally within their TOS cut short in favor of the claim.
If youtube was taking it as it legal value, yes it would be for a court to decide. But youtube , as a private entity, can STILL decide to accept take down request in spite of the court , and still remove video from their private property. And it is quite clear that youtube has taken this direction, not carring about the takedown requests validity. In fact they could rename it as fluffy-fluff-take-down-request if you prefer and have the same process and no court could tell them what to do.
I am betting that they can still take it down on group of defending their trademark. The way I read it he was using the likeness of the object. And like it or not , the look feel and name are trademark. So it is not as simply as reusing copyrighted material as this is also about trademark to which the copyright laws do not apply. The DMCA was probably used because youtube has only 1 takedown form "copyright" not "trademark".
This windows version is the msot "open" version of all windows, it even leaks your data and stuff you do not want to Redmond.
It should read "American spend 25% more time at work than worker Europe". My experience working and watching various type of environment, is that at the end of the day, your average US worker did the same work as your average Europe worker, just in a longer time.
They were given a two months notice. Whatever the reason. They can still access their assets and move them elsewhere. A PITA, yes, but a far cry from "frozen".
Simplified, Natural selection is only about competitive advantage to reproduction and escape predator to come to reproduction age. It is not about the *most* efficient ways to get there, but sometimes simply just be a bit better than the other species. As such, it can simply stay stuck at a local minima if there is no selection pressure. In other word, there is not always a trade off. Sometimes it is simply that there is no selection pressure where this could bring something to the plant reproduction.
Have the ballot a paper that you hand down, the person vote, and the other ballot paper are trashed or kept by the eprson. Et voila, you don't even need complex mail psot scheme excpet for those wanting to vote in absentia. Heck, anybody can then recount at will the ballot. Both party they want.
Baby boomer are full of shit, and their "we worked harder than you" are full of shit on average. The reality is that they are like us (ethically) but had it easier economically.
That is nearly 8 meter. So you only need to be in proximity doing nothing reading a book while your conspicuously hidden laptop is doing the job, with scripts already prepared is trying. Then once the max dose of insuline is given you can simply safely go. Remember that the effect will not be *immediate* has if it was cyanide administered, the blood sugar will take a bit of time to be absorbed. So yeah. The risk of being charged is actually much lower than you think it is. If nobody catch you red handed with a laptop, then once symptom start to apepar just calmly head for the exit, and wipeout your laptop.
I am wanting a few reform in the economic and politic current environment, but wanting reform does not mean putting a gun to your figurative head and pulling the trigger. I want reform with a good candidate, and doing a protest vote with an utterly disturbing populist candidate like trump is then being an utter imbecile.
And oxygen/water production in a complete autonomic bunker. Because once it comes down to laying siege to a bunker, the one outside can wait for a looooong time. The one inside may not.
the producer just need to take down the screenshot/video on steam and replace it with a current one and they are fine.
I mean you can download a MP4 from the stream with a few add on. Then use an open source project to transfer the sound track to mp3. What is the difference with that youtube mp3 service ?
Once you remove all add-ons you are left with "there is a group of people which believe there was a holy man named Jesus of Nazareth who had a number of followers, and was put to death by the Romans." AFAIR he does not directly speaks of J, but of the believer of J.
That is what I would say the typical "american dream" BS of the self made man. Most successful people are a mix of luck, good networking, chance of opportunity, and a bit of their own effort. 2 of those are out of control of anybody. Heck I would arguably add networking to that too. (and that does not even count things like wanting to do a carrier in science which pays shit).
As you said there need to be a forensic examination to determine that, as it could have been a 45Â shot above his property limit downing the drone outside (so 40 feet or 12-15 meter outside the property).
You can't be pro hillary without being anti trump and vice versa you can't be anti hillary and not being pro trump. The way the election are in the US, if you are anti-one you are automatically supporting the other. All you can do, is see which one you think is worst for the US, and vote for the other, thus supporting him/her. The only other solution is abstaining, which unfortunately nobody look at.