So this milking machine runs linux but you can't view the videos if your a linux user??? Someone needs to contact these butt munchers and ask them to have a chat with there webmaster. If the vids were mpg, everyone could view without issues.
Everyone "I" know has both. A DVD player for rentals and VCR for recording "Lost". I think someone is intentionally underestimating the number of VCRs.
Yep, and the same thing happened with documents, hence OpenDocument format might save the day. Unfortunatly, Microsoft is doing the same shit with the WMV format. It is closed and encrypted and only works on proprietary systems. This was sole purpose for this was to swqeeze FOSS out. Folk are making home video with webcams and don't realise that they are making "closed" movies. It's very sad that the monopolistic behavior is not being stopped.
I think It's a GREAT idea for the actioneers to be bonded and certified and stuff. Seeing how Ebay is the actioneer and I'm just letting Ebay auction the item for me these greedy bastards looking for a quick $35 + $5000 (times the number of ebay'ers) for nothing will only get one payment from Ebay which covers the only actioneer involved in the transactions. (holy run-on sentence!)
This idea obviously came from one of the backwards redneck states.
is not a wiki. Does that make the information you find there credible at all?
Although it is amature, It's better than many google results where all you get are people trying to sell you the things you want to learn about.
for example:
GOOGLE "light" result (right hand column)
www.ebay.com, Great deals on light! Seems ebay now sells light. Do they sell it by the particle and charge more for fashonable wavelengths? Perhaps I'll buy gallon drum of light.
You can always count on the sponsored ad from ebay to sound amusing.
Actually, we shouldn't get lured into helping the federation with the war machines until they loosen up on the "FBI over VoIP" and bit-torrent crap. Give Americans thier freedom back and Americans will help built the killing machines of tommorow. Don't get me wrong, I like killing just as much as the next guy but remember, we are trying to preserve our way of life which includes freedom and privacy. Get your priorities right. PS- I'm drunk.
My workplace, a 16B per year food and candy manufacturer (think 4th rock from sun) thinks Office 97 on W2K is just peachy. Fine with me, I go home to a pair of boxen.
No, with a polarizing filter.
This "invention" may just be sending out polarized light (in pulses for ambient subtraction).
The detector would look for unpolarized pulses returning from the retroreflector (camera lense). Or a ratio change relative to the polarised light reaching a "calibrator" sensor VS. the unpolarized light reaching the main sensor.
A polarizer would both block polarized light from reaching the camera lense AND polarize the light that retroreflects off the lense. As I said in a previous post, this may require a pair of polarizers crossed at just the right angle along with slower shutter speed.
Perhaps a flat glass polarizer over the camera lense. Light that retro-reflects off the lense will be polarized, most of which will not pass back through the polarizer.
I'm thinkin a pair af polarizing filters crossed at a 45 degree angle should filter most light let alone any polarized light. Just jack up the exposure time to make up for the attenuation. (and stand very still).
My girlfriend makes over $90k per year teaching public school 7th graders in a town just outside of philadelphia (and she is hot).:)
I realize this is an enigma to the average slashdotter.
Clarification,
I'm not suggesting that slashdot caused a problem.
The event was described as "Company A linked to company B, Causing company B strife."
This is identical (enough) to a slashdot effect, Therefore, slashdotters have no right to (hypocritically) take offense to simular actions. (although I'm sure someone out there will exercise thier right to argue the fine details of this.)
I didn't mean to suggest that slashdot was directly responsible.
a major company such as [who ever], with countless hits per day, linking like this to a site, without even notifying the site to verify if they have the bandwidth available,
Wait till they find out that we hid the C: drive from them....and with the fifth ammendment I don't have to tell them where I put it. (hint: It's in an AES512 encrypted reiserfs drive.) Gotta protect that resume.
Slashdot Mirror
So this milking machine runs linux but you can't view the videos if your a linux user???
Someone needs to contact these butt munchers and ask them to have a chat with there webmaster.
If the vids were mpg, everyone could view without issues.
>>> Methane -
I'll patent air with Methane > 5%
Anyone who produces this will owe me an ass-load of money.
Everyone "I" know has both.
A DVD player for rentals and VCR for recording "Lost".
I think someone is intentionally underestimating the number of VCRs.
Yep, and the same thing happened with documents, hence OpenDocument format might save the day. Unfortunatly, Microsoft is doing the same shit with the WMV format. It is closed and encrypted and only works on proprietary systems. This was sole purpose for this was to swqeeze FOSS out. Folk are making home video with webcams and don't realise that they are making "closed" movies. It's very sad that the monopolistic behavior is not being stopped.
> I think this is a good idea.
I think It's a GREAT idea for the actioneers to be bonded and certified and stuff. Seeing how Ebay is the actioneer and I'm just letting Ebay auction the item for me these greedy bastards looking for a quick $35 + $5000 (times the number of ebay'ers) for nothing will only get one payment from Ebay which covers the only actioneer involved in the transactions.
(holy run-on sentence!)
This idea obviously came from one of the backwards redneck states.
is not a wiki. Does that make the information you find there credible at all?
Although it is amature, It's better than many google results where all you get are people trying to sell you the things you want to learn about.
for example:
GOOGLE "light"
result (right hand column)
www.ebay.com, Great deals on light!
Seems ebay now sells light. Do they sell it by the particle and charge more for fashonable wavelengths? Perhaps I'll buy gallon drum of light.
You can always count on the sponsored ad from ebay to sound amusing.
Ok, what cockbag didn't mark that funny?
Actually, we shouldn't get lured into helping the federation with the war machines until they loosen up on the "FBI over VoIP" and bit-torrent crap. Give Americans thier freedom back and Americans will help built the killing machines of tommorow. Don't get me wrong, I like killing just as much as the next guy but remember, we are trying to preserve our way of life which includes freedom and privacy. Get your priorities right.
PS- I'm drunk.
>Screw the Ducks, Shoot the Dog.
Looks like multiple PeTA violations here. oh, and the FBI is cracking down on deviant porn so don't take pictures of the duck activity.
Sure, act like we haven't been downloading games since the 80's. Sharing games via Pirate BBS pre-dates music sharing on the internet by a long shot.
My workplace, a 16B per year food and candy manufacturer (think 4th rock from sun) thinks Office 97 on W2K is just peachy. Fine with me, I go home to a pair of boxen.
Large pieces of retroreflective tape on all your friends cloths?
>You mean like with a lens cap?
No, with a polarizing filter.
This "invention" may just be sending out polarized light (in pulses for ambient subtraction).
The detector would look for unpolarized pulses returning from the retroreflector (camera lense).
Or a ratio change relative to the polarised light reaching a "calibrator" sensor VS. the unpolarized light reaching the main sensor.
A polarizer would both block polarized light from reaching the camera lense AND polarize the light that retroreflects off the lense. As I said in a previous post, this may require a pair of polarizers crossed at just the right angle along with slower shutter speed.
Perhaps a flat glass polarizer over the camera lense. Light that retro-reflects off the lense will be polarized, most of which will not pass back through the polarizer.
I'm thinkin a pair af polarizing filters crossed at a 45 degree angle should filter most light let alone any polarized light. Just jack up the exposure time to make up for the attenuation. (and stand very still).
The EPA has evaluated: Analube Synthetic Lubricant :D
Analube? you have GOT to be kidding?!
Someone call tha fashion police. Every one knows you don't wear nylon over wool.
My girlfriend makes over $90k per year teaching public school 7th graders in a town just outside of philadelphia (and she is hot). :)
I realize this is an enigma to the average slashdotter.
It runs linux too in case you don't like being limited and encumbered.
Maybe noboby wants to sell anything for a penny.
Clarification,
I'm not suggesting that slashdot caused a problem.
The event was described as "Company A linked to company B, Causing company B strife."
This is identical (enough) to a slashdot effect, Therefore, slashdotters have no right to (hypocritically) take offense to simular actions.
(although I'm sure someone out there will exercise thier right to argue the fine details of this.)
I didn't mean to suggest that slashdot was directly responsible.
The fuddrucker effect?
>if a suspect's computer happens to run Linux.
...and with the fifth ammendment I don't have to tell them where I put it.
Wait till they find out that we hid the C: drive from them.
(hint: It's in an AES512 encrypted reiserfs drive.)
Gotta protect that resume.
So MS will charge Unilever 5x what their crap is worth instead of the usual 20x that all the dolts pay.
> think it's a bit childish to crave other people telling you how they like something you like.
Agreed. Let's put an end to Playboy, Rolling Stone, Getting laid, Sportscasters, Prepaired food, Money, Thongs, Name brand TV, videocards...etc.
Anything that gets popular by word of mouth needs to go.
Score is zero because there is no (+5, Dick)