Slashdot Mirror


6.8GHz 1TB RAM and 2TB HDD Laptop?

Stuk writes "Research & development company AtomChip have announced a new 6.8GHz 1TB RAM and 2TB HDD laptop, which is "coming soon". Apparently it does not use a hard disc, instead it is based on "solid state AtomChip® optoelectronics". A new "non-volatile Quantum-Optical" type of RAM is used. Other features include voice commands, "Num Lock mode, Caps Lock mode, Scroll Lock mode". They're spoiling us." If Nintendogs has taught me anything, it's that voice recognition is awesome and should be used for everything. *cough*. And also to be skeptical of this many buzzwords.

687 comments

  1. Does time travel as well by ContemporaryInsanity · · Score: 5, Funny

    April is not for ages yet.

    1. Re:Does time travel as well by m4dm4n · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ahh but in the timewarp that spawned this article, its already April... 2021

    2. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has hit a new low. I don't think I'm going to read this garbage anymore.

    3. Re:Does time travel as well by golfhakker · · Score: 3, Funny

      An optional flux capacitor is available for the swap drive.

    4. Re:Does time travel as well by SebNukem · · Score: 0

      what's the reason for your web site?

    5. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the Phantom, Where is the Phantom

    6. Re:Does time travel as well by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope we have something more than 6.8 GHz by 2021.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    7. Re:Does time travel as well by Mehtuus · · Score: 1

      No more Warrant songs for You! Haha...

      --
      http://mehtuus.googlepages.com
    8. Re:Does time travel as well by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      You comment sounded like Ignignoc in my head. Thanks! (I think it was the elipsis that did it.) "We do what we want, to whom we want ... at all times."

      Google is creepy: I searched (to check my spelling) for "inignoc and ur" and Google gave me only one matching web site, but also asked "Did you mean: ignignoc and er "!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:Does time travel as well by Mehtuus · · Score: 1

      CONSUMER ELECTRONICS SHOW Las Vegas, January 2006?

      They must have more than just a new laptop. Or it does more than they are disclosing. I wish my laptop would send me to the future too...

      Plus the dope that did their website has the main image double named on the extension (ces2004-floor.jpeg.jpg). At least that is not dated for the future too...

      --
      http://mehtuus.googlepages.com
    10. Re:Does time travel as well by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I like this phrase: Fibers Optical cable

      Seriously, how did this make /.?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a dupe from last April.

    12. Re:Does time travel as well by SteveAyre · · Score: 1

      That would be the Deadline Extending Feature(tm), which is covered by a non disclosure agreement hence the lack of mention in the specification.

      Oops, I shouldn't have said that...
      *sounds of scuffle followed by dragging of body across floor*

    13. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The web site doesn't mention if it runs CherryOS... that would be nice, huh?

    14. Re:Does time travel as well by MattGWU · · Score: 1

      Just means they are using multiple fiber optic cables.

      Think 'Surgeons General'.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    15. Re:Does time travel as well by pmpc00 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, but I bet this run CherryOS really well! I've orded this laptop, and my copy of CherryOS, i expect to get both at the same time.

    16. Re:Does time travel as well by j4mes · · Score: 1

      Wow, that thing's actually fast enough to run Windows XP!

    17. Re:Does time travel as well by wzzrd · · Score: 1

      In the immortal words of Will Smith in Indepedence Day:

      "I've got to get me one of these!"

    18. Re:Does time travel as well by m50d · · Score: 1

      Java on the desktop can finally become a reality!

      --
      I am trolling
    19. Re:Does time travel as well by Silentnite · · Score: 1



      Yeah, but does it run linux...

    20. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that's wrong. "Surgeons General" is pluralized that way because it comes from French -- General is an adjective modifying Surgeons -- so you pluralize it that way. Fibre optic cable is just a compound noun, and doesn't come from a foreign language so it's plural should be "fibre optic cables."

    21. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear Sir or Madam,

              Allow me to be the first to congradulate you on your purchase of a sense of humor. We hope that your recent purchase will enable you to see things that were meant as a joke for what they really are in the future. We wish you lots of luck in your future endevours.

    22. Re:Does time travel as well by fantom2000 · · Score: 1

      Bizzaro...

    23. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember Lieberman's products?

      http://www.go-l.com/

    24. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's do the timewarp again! :D

    25. Re:Does time travel as well by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      When are people going to stop quoting GHZ and start counting FLOPS instead, you can not compare frequency between arcitextures not even 2 competeing manufacturers of x86(32 an 64 bit) ar comparable on raw clock freq. Tip to the inventors: sponsor a bort of linux for youre hw, run a bencmark, spck up a nice amd64 box, run the smae bencmark and publish the resoult together with an est price of youre laptop

    26. Re:Does time travel as well by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      Maybe Fibers is the manufacturer's name? I have a book which has the following text on the cover: Software Design for Real-Time Systems Cooling where Cooling is the author's name.

    27. Re:Does time travel as well by tod_miller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shit, I had better wake up all my customers...

      We run Java on desktop apps for banks and retail outlets on close to 100,000 desktops.

      Anything from signature retrieval, and complex comfortable drag and drop, fluid document management suites in Java, to advanced sales systems.

      The only real issue with Java on desktop was installation, and webstart kinda kicked that one in the nut.

      If you webstart something, it is so nice to install it.

      google square heads demo, click web start, then some back and apologise.

      yip.

      --
      #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    28. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but where is the zero latency, infinite capacity write-only memory option we've been reading about since the 1980's?

    29. Re:Does time travel as well by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Can you respell that? I need to be able to read it.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    30. Re:Does time travel as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    31. Re:Does time travel as well by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      Fibers Optical cable

      Especially as it's the heatpipe for the CPU cooler. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    32. Re:Does time travel as well by ifitzgerald · · Score: 1

      How does a post, which is obviously making a joke at the absurdity of this article, get modded "+5 Informative"? Shouldn't it be "+5 Funny"?

  2. Vaporware? by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe Duke Nukem Forever will run on it.

    1. Re:Vaporware? by suso · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Vaporware? by knipknap · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but only under Hurd :(.

    3. Re:Vaporware? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      I'm surprised the whole ACC / transcapacitor / alien story hasn't been written up in Wikipedia.

      (The Internet Archive has it, though...)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Vaporware? by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 0

      But only if you opt for the upgraded graphics option from Bitboys Oy!

      --
      How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
  3. Good Games Spec... by RobertTaylor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    which is "coming soon".

    Ideal to play Duke Nukem Forever on :)

  4. Time and again... by devaldez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first time I heard about holographic memory replacing conventional methods (RAM/ROM/HDD), I was a kid just beginning work at NCR...let's see what the way-back machine says: 1991.

    I've been waiting for 14 years for the technology to become real, and like nuclear fusion, I suspect I'll be waiting forever...

    --
    "... but you can love completely without complete understanding." - Norman Maclean, "A River Runs Through It"
    1. Re:Time and again... by jimbolauski · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only reason I give this any credit is because the creator Shimon Gendlin has won multiple awards and unless he plans on retiring he would not make that bold of claims. On the other hand they claim the price will be $4.50 per GB of ram which is about the price of a pen with a light on it.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    2. Re:Time and again... by markbark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Quoth the poster:
      they claim the price will be $4.50 per GB of ram

      So... the box as specced will cost nine grand just for the memory?
      This must be the system Thomas Watson was speasking of when he was quoted as "seeing a worldwide market for about five" of them (I'm paraphrasing, of course)

    3. Re:Time and again... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      unless he plans on retiring he would not make that bold of claims.

      They certainly are bold claims. In fact, almost the whole damn site is in bold type!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Time and again... by Punkrokkr · · Score: 1

      I think that would be $4,608 for the RAM. The box (laptop) only has 1 TB of RAM; but 2 TB of storage space.

      --

      There's no emoticon for what I'm feeling! -- CBG, "The Computer Wore Menace Shoes"
    5. Re:Time and again... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the box as specced will cost nine grand just for the memory?

      Ah, but you may still be in the market when I point out this word: lease.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    6. Re:Time and again... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      The HAL 9000 used holographic memory, didn't it? Too bad about that problem on the way to Jupiter, though. I wonder what really happened out there. Maybe we'll figure it out in a few years.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    7. Re:Time and again... by monopole · · Score: 1

      Back in '91 I was developing holographic memory (quantum in fact) for my dissertation, and I relied on work done in the '70s. It's the technology of the future and it will stay that way!

    8. Re:Time and again... by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I think the Russians are planning an investigative mission in 2010.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    9. Re:Time and again... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for 14 years for the technology to become real

      Exactly. So just 3 more years till the patents expire, and everyone will be using it. All physical inventions take 17 years to "develop" from the time the patents get filed.

      Unless it's turning lead into gold, it's just not worth paying the patent holder 99% of your revenue, better to wait the 17 years.

      Of course, that doesnt mean it's not vapor in the first place.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    10. Re:Time and again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been waiting for 14 years for the technology to become real, and like nuclear fusion, I suspect I'll be waiting forever...

      You can find Nuclear Fusion lots of places. H-bombs for example, the problem with fusion is CONTROLLING the reaction as to not blow the fuck up.

    11. Re:Time and again... by vanka · · Score: 1

      No, it will be $6,000. Check out this website that contains info on their RAM. Then if you factor in the $5,000 price of flash storage it will be $11,000 just for RAM and storge. A double amputee is able to count on his fingers the people who are lined up to buy this laptop. But what I would really love to do is get some hands on time with the system pictured in TFA, make sure that it is not a fake.

    12. Re:Time and again... by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      We know what happened to the HAL-9000 computer that caused it to kill crewmen Dave Bowman and Frank Poole, along with the 3 Hybernauts.

      The HAL-9000's primary operating objective was the accurate processing of information. However, he had also been given another order, of equal priority, and that was that the true objective of the mission to Jupiter (Saturn, in the book,) was to remain hidden from the Beta Crew (Bowman and Poole). This caused a conflict.

      For HAL to function as he had been designed, he could not hold anything back from Bowman and Poole -- and to function as he was designed he had to do just that. This created a logical paradox within HAL. The way HAL saw to fix the situation was to remove Bowman and Poole by killing them, since he was also programmed, in the event of crew incapacitation, to carry out the mission by himself.

      That is why he killed Bowman and Poole, as revealed by Doctor Chandra in 2010: Odyssey Two.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    13. Re:Time and again... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      (psst... I know you enjoy being a Mr. Knowitall, but hey, look at your calendar... you've entirely missed the point)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    14. Re:Time and again... by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      What? The point that the HAL-9000 used Holographic memory because Arthur C. Clarke and others seriously expected our technology to have advanced that far by then?

      I think you're just being silly.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    15. Re:Time and again... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Not as bad as Time Cube

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    16. Re:Time and again... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      No, blockhead, the "pretend it's really 2005 in that storyline" theme.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  5. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now if somebody would only invent the readable web page...

  6. Yeah right by kyle90 · · Score: 1

    A terabyte of RAM? I'll believe it when I see it.

    --
    Real_men_don't_need_spacebars.
    1. Re:Yeah right by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The screenshots show Windows reporting hard drive space and RAM measured in TB.. unfortunately it's Windows XP 32-bit which can't handle more than 4GB of RAM. Clearly a hoax...

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Yeah right by buttersnout · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seeing that the the other specs are buzzwords really, I doubt it has 1TB of ram. It's probably some trade marked word they made up. For example, it says 6.8 ghz atomchip processor. But then you find out this is there word for 4x1.7ghz pentium ms. They use the word "or" to mean "in other words" here. Of course must of us know this really isn't equivilent to having one 6.8 ghz chip, though it should be fast. Also, it appears that there is no quantum technology in the ram. That's just a trademarked term for there implementation of flash memory.

    3. Re:Yeah right by WillerZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can - I have a number of 32-bit Windows machines with 8Gb RAM.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    4. Re:Yeah right by dusik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just curious - how do you figure out the memory addressing with 32-bit pointers?

    5. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8Gb (little b) is quite different from 8 GB (big b)

    6. Re:Yeah right by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some versions of 32 bit Windows support PAE, which is an Intel extension for addressing more 4GB of RAM. You're still restricted to 4GB of virtual memory per process, though.

    7. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the way it sounded to me, you can choose between 1 6.8 Ghz Atomchip or 4 1.7Ghz pentium chips. When giving the battery life and weight they have it listed twice, once for if you have 1 atomchip and once for having 4 pentims.

      As you pointed out 4 x 1.7 Ghz pentiums is not equal to 1 6.8Ghz so why anybody would go that route other than cheaper cost, is unknown to me.

    8. Re:Yeah right by saider · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is just a guess, but they probably just ressurected the segment:offset method. This is what allowed the 8086 to access more than 64k of memory.

      Some current DRAM controllers have a 40-bit address, so Windows could do the shift and add ((segment << 8) + offset) of two 32-bit registers to get the 40-bit address.

      Again, just a guess, but this has been done before.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    9. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Look up AWE on SQL Server.

    10. Re:Yeah right by TyrelHaveman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a pretty good guess. The PAE (Physical Address Extentions) option on all of Intel's recent 32-bit processors allows up to 64 GB of RAM (certainly not 1 TB!) (which is 36, not 40 bits, that's probably for the EM64T).

      Switching to this mode requires that you use a 4 MB page size instead of a 4 KB page... but these days that's not as crazy as it was when we had 32 MB of memory.

      If you're more interested in PAE and other higher memory addressing modes, all of this information is available in the IA-32 manual available in PDF form from Intel's web site.

    11. Re:Yeah right by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      I originally thought the same thing, but they're not even consistent in that. If you check the weight, the system with 4x Pentium M's weighs more than the one with the super AtomChip Quantum Mega-whatever. So at least sometimes they're trying to claim they have this awesome chip.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    12. Re:Yeah right by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually thought you had to enable PAE if you wanted to use more then 3GB RAM because of some sort of addressing issues.

      We have a couple VMWare servers here with Xeons on Windows 2003 that have 32GB of memory, and they run fine. Currently, VMWare on 32-bit windows only supports 3700MB RAM per VM, though.

      PAE does slow things down quite a bit though, so it'll be one of the huge advantages to going x86-64 in the near future.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    13. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Switching to this mode requires that you use a 4 MB page size instead of a 4 KB page

      This isn't quite true. Windows running in PAE mode still uses 4KB pages by default, but this comes at the cost of an extra level of indirection in page table lookups. Older pentiums didn't cache these lookups, so they were slow and 4MB pages were recommended.

      Windows applications can choose to allocate memory in large pages if they want to (and the system is running in PAE mode.) Access to this memory is slightly quicker because it avoids the extra level of page table indirection.

    14. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does addressing happen?
      You have address lines right?
      now do yourself a favour, get chip pinouts for pentium4 and athlons and count the number of address pins. I think you'll be shocked to find it is larger than 32.
      are we done?

    15. Re:Yeah right by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      A terabyte? 640K ought to be enough for anybody.

    16. Re:Yeah right by SebNukem · · Score: 0

      So what's your point? 8Gb = 8 gigabits = 1GB = 1gigabyte

    17. Re:Yeah right by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      It is a hoax. But Microsoft had extensions to cheat to get the OS to address up to 64GB of ram using Intel's 36 address pins with a software hack?

      The hard drive modules are nothing more then CF cards in adapter boards for connecting them to a laptops 44 pin ide socket. Then ram looks like someone sloppily put some stickers or paper on a normal so-dimm. And oh man did I get a good laugh off the incredibly lame camera lense glued on the CPU to act as a transceiver for the Fibers Optical cable. They really didn't try on this one. What are they hoping to get out of this? Maybe they are trying to rob some gullible investor? Clearly something they should have saved for April fools day.

    18. Re:Yeah right by eneville · · Score: 1

      Because windows really does need all that ram.

    19. Re:Yeah right by rk87 · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is if this really was real, how did they get Windows XP to use a terabyte of RAM when even the latest pentiums can only address something like 64GB?

      --
      I'M NOT ANGRY!
    20. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have posted, 32 bit windows DOES support more than 4 GB of ram with PAE enabled. You are still limited to 4 GB of address space per process however, and PAE allows up to 64 GB of physical memory to be addressed, not 1 TB, so yea, I'd have to agree that the image is faked.

    21. Re:Yeah right by Darth+Liberus · · Score: 1
      Actually it's much closer to the bank-switching method used in the ancient (pre-286) EMS cards than the segment:offset method of x86 Real Mode.

      From a program's standpoint, you have a flat, 32-bit address space, thus you're limited to 4GB. Through the magic of paging, the OS can map any 4K block of a program's address space to any 4K block of physical address lines. So while a single process is restricted to 4GB of address space, the overall system can access much more.

      --
      Beauty is just a light switch away.
    22. Re:Yeah right by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Xeon systems can handle 36 bit addressing, which is like 64 GB of RAM max, although the Athlon 64 and Intel P4 600 series are 64 bit chips, they have 40 bit memory addressing, which is 1TB memory max. This says nothing of chipsets, which don't support nearly that much. Plus, 32 bit windows could not support that much memory. Windwos can support more memory than 4 GB, but not 1 or 2 TB.

    23. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 2K/XP 32-bit can address something like 64GB of RAM and a filesystem of several (8 I think) exabytes.

    24. Re:Yeah right by randyest · · Score: 1

      Did you really not instantly see that this is a joke?

      The suckers falling for this and offering to spare us all from being mislead and providing their serious doubts about the truthfulness of the specifications are almost as funny as the AtomChip(TM) laptop itself.

      --
      everything in moderation
  7. OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're not convinced, just check out the video http://www.compu-technics.com/images/solar memory.WMV.

    Only an idiot would think that was fake. ARE YOU AN IDIOT??!?

    1. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm a beleiver. They created a solar powered mirror. What will they think of next.

    2. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by StupidStan · · Score: 0

      that is some of the most amazing video I have ever seen... watch our PIXAR!

    3. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      That was _so_ fake. Everyone knows RAM does _not_ come in 516MB incriments, only 512MB.

      I can't prove it, but I suspect those weren't even real satellites.

    4. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 4, Informative
      Here's what they will display at 2006 International CES: exhibitor details.


      The link also contains some contact info.

    5. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, interesting link.. note that ONLY the 1TB memory chip has a cost of USD $6000. From the product specification:

              Specifications [200-pin SODIMM]: 1) DC Input Voltage : 1.4V ±5% ; 2) Standby :
      The 2 TB disk will cost $5000

      Specifications [2 x 1TB (ATA IDE)] : 1) DC Input Voltage: 5.0V ±10% ; 2) Standby :

      Unfortunately the notebook specification does not contain the price.. which I think would end being something like USD $15000
          haha

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by xtracto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Darn... somehow slashdot managed to cut my comment..
      Yeah, interesting link.. note that ONLY the 1TB memory chip has a cost of USD $6000. From the product specification:

      <i>
              Specifications [200-pin SODIMM]: 1) DC Input Voltage : 1.4V &#177;5% ; 2) Standby : <0.25&#181;A; 3) Read : 1.0 &#181;A ; 4) Write: 1.5 &#181;A ; 5) Reading time : 0.3 ns ; 6) Update time : 0.5 ns ; 7) Temperature Operating : -50+125 C ; 8) Humidity Operating : 5 - 95% ; 9) Shack Operating [max] : 2,000G . The expected seling price.is $6000 .
      </i>

      The 2 TB disk will cost $5000

      <i>
      Specifications [2 x 1TB (ATA IDE)] : 1) DC Input Voltage: 5.0V &#177;10% ; 2) Standby : <0.5&#181;A ; 3) Read : 1.5 &#181;A ; 4) Write: 2.5 &#181;A ; 5) Reading time : 60 ns ; 6) Update time : 120 ns ; 7) Temperature Operating : -50+125 C ; 8) Humidity Operating : 5 - 95% ; 9) Shock Operating [max] : 2,000G . The expected seling price.is $5000 .</i>

      Unfortunately the notebook specification does not contain the price.. which I think would end being something like USD $15000
          haha

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by The+Cubelodyte · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to figure out where they put the flux capacitor.

    8. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      We are world leader in the manufacturing of Quantum-Optical RAM and storage. In one cubic millimeter 3.2GB of non-volatile memory are contained. The devices do not employ any mechanical or moving parts.

      Just to note, there would be a different type of mechanical technology - quantum mechanics.

      If the memory can be scaled in all tree dimensions, a sugar cube sized 1 cubic centimetre is 3 TB. Even if the 1 mm cubes have to be separated by 1 mm for interconnects, that's 400 GB per cm^3.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    9. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      It also includes a list of "Company Contacts" on that page. Except... some of those names sound familiar for some reason.

      Oh yeah, I remember now... their 1st Vice President, "Mr. Arthur Gendlin", wrote me recently about a WINNING NOTIFICATION in an INTERNATIONAL LOTTERY I never entered! And their Vice President "Mrs. Marina Adams" is the widow of some billionaire heir to the throne of an African country I'd never heard of!

      This company must be legit; they certainly have some wealthy members on their board!

    10. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by temojen · · Score: 1

      I think I'll contact their "Prodaction Director"

    11. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by mojotooth · · Score: 1
      How lucky for this guy to live so close to work:

      home? look at the map below. Looks residential to me.

      Atom Chip Corporation
      Old Country Road
      Westbury, NY 11590
      binniz? How about a random road name close to home, that sounds good!
      Administrative Contact:
      WIPOI
      Shimon Gendlin
      21 Reed Lane
      Westbury, NY 11590
      US
      Phone: 516-368-4800
      Email: shimon_gendlin@msn.com
      Google map
      --
      -- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
    12. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by acoster · · Score: 1

      Wonder if that lappy will require 1.2GW to run... and if it comes with plutonium batteries.

      --
      "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
    13. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should drive over there and pay a visit, eh? I'll sell him a p-p-p-p-power book while I'm at it.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    14. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by jidd · · Score: 1

      Move along, nothing to see here... This guy has been peddling this same story for a long time now.

    15. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by kirel · · Score: 1

      Awww... crap!
      I kept hoping I wasn't an idiot, but I guess that dream has now been crushed.

      I'm gonna go cry.

    16. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by randyest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's it. The price is too high. There's nothing else fish.

      Nothing at all.

      --
      everything in moderation
    17. Re:OBVIOUSLY LEGIT by generic-man · · Score: 1

      For the record, Old Country Road is a major road in that area and has a lot of office buildings. If you follow it over to Garden City, you'll find several enormous malls and even more office buildings.

      Because of this, just listing an address of "Old Country Road" makes a letter pretty much undeliverable. For all we know, it could be a Mail Boxes Etc / UPS Store somewhere in a strip mall.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  8. Re:FIRST by Hitto · · Score: 1

    Here's a real first post from a long-time lurker : Imagine a beowulf cluster of... Oh, nevermind.

  9. HAHAHAHAHA WHAT BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get slashdotted too if I make a fancy website with bullshit claims? Why even post this shit it's a waste of everybody's bandwidth.

  10. A 6.8GHz what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's not an overclocked Pentium. From the article:

    Processor: 6.8GHZ CPU (AtomChip® Quantum® II processor or 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz)

    And what does "soon" mean? I smell bullshit..

  11. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Funny, the "quantum processor" looks like the lens of a webcam. How's that for technology.

    Can windows xp even recognize 1TB ram?

    1. Re:Funny by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative


      Can windows xp even recognize 1TB ram?

      Hell no, it can't. The limit for 32-bit is 4 GB, and the limit for 64-bit is 128 GB.

      In short, it can't even come close to recognizing that amount of physical memory. The article is complete and utter bullshit. Slashdot is dumber for having posted it as 'news', and we are all dumber for having read it.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Funny by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean a limitation in XP 64-bit. 64-bit addressing goes WAY over 128gig.

    3. Re:Funny by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Yes, I was referring to the limitations of Windows XP Pro/Home and Windows XP 64-bit edition, respectively. Thanks for the clarification.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is dumber for having posted it as 'news', and we are all dumber for having read it.

      You assume we read it? You're new here, right?

    5. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The limit for 32-bit is 4 GB, and the limit for 64-bit is 128 GB

      This post is misleading... These limits are for a single program to address. The actual amount of physical RAM the system could handle is higher (but I don't know the limit)

      The 8086 was 16-bit, but used 'segments' to have an effective address space of 20-bits. I've seen XP running with 8GB of RAM, so the same technique is still possible.

      The article is complete and utter bullshit. Slashdot is dumber for having posted it as 'news', and we are all dumber for having read it.

      [Your comment] is [just short of] complete and utter bullshit. Slashdot is dumber for [your] having posted it as ['fact'], and we are all dumber for having read it.

    6. Re:Funny by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm...maybe you can partition your RAM?

    7. Re:Funny by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Golly, I thought the dilithium crystal lenses WERE kind of unusual. "'Capt'n, I canna get it to store any more data or it'll blow UP!"

    8. Re:Funny by PetyrRahl · · Score: 1

      Ahha I knew it! I've been looking for an example of negative quantum information for a while and now I've finally found it!
      Having read this article I actually *FEEL* dumber. Thanks TripMaster Monkey, for telling me. My IQ had dropped so low I almost couldn't even type this post anymore. Thank you slashdot for enriching my work experience once again ^^
      Petyr Rahl

    9. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The article is complete and utter bullshit. Slashdot is dumber for having posted it as 'news', and we are all dumber for having read it.


      You mean you're supposed to read the articles?!
    10. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought XP could address 16 GB RAM because of PAE.

  12. Power by Hansele · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it only requires 1.2 Jiggawatts of electricity for the flux capacitor!

    1. Re:Power by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, power usage for this laptop, according to spec, is very low.

      "Battery Life: Approximately 8 hours for AtomChip® Quantum® II processor" ... and the battery back is a 6-cell Li unit.

      OTOH, I suspect that the true power usage for this laptop will be zero.

      Seeing as vaporware doesn't actually draw any current.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Power by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      That's 1.21 Jiggawatts...and you call yourself a geek...

    3. Re:Power by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's 1.21 Gigawatts. Ungeek.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    4. Re:Power by davandhol · · Score: 2, Informative

      1.21 gigawatts. Try again.

    5. Re:Power by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Bah...I was writing it like Doc Brown said it.

      But I like the user name, BTW...

    6. Re:Power by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Hollywood, pronouncing something incorrectly in a movie? Say it ain't so! ;)

      There's a funny story behind the username. There's more than just sex and drugs in it...there's bovinity, too.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    7. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... All you have to do is realign the warp matrix and then you can run it on a plain battery

    8. Re:Power by dusik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jigga what??? Jigga WHO???

    9. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My flux capacitor only requires 1.12 gibiwatts, neener neener neener!

    10. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.21 gigawatts. Try again.

      *thumbs up*

    11. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jigga who? Jigga watt?

    12. Re:Power by rpdillon · · Score: 1
      Actually, I always thought the *real* way to pronounce it was "jiga", and Back to the Future actually got it right. Apparently, I'm only sort of right. From the wikipedia entry for "Giga":

      The accepted English pronunciation of the initial G of giga was once soft, (like gigantic), but now the hard pronunciation, (like giggle), is significantly more common. However, both pronunciations are likely to be understood by most English speakers, though the second is likely to be preferred. As example of the soft g sound is found in the 1985 movie Back to the Future, where gigawatts was pronounced like jigawatts. This was before units like gigabyte were commonly used.

      Anyway, I kind of like to say the G soft every now and then...people tend to look at me funny more often than the Wikipedia article would suggest. =)

    13. Re:Power by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      Hollywood, pronouncing something incorrectly in a movie? Say it ain't so! ;)

      It ain't so.
    14. Re:Power by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      "...AtomChip® Quantum® II processor"

      What I want to know is whatever happend to the "AtomChip® Quantum® I" processor!

      or was that the AtomChip® Quantum® Pro?

    15. Re:Power by hurfy · · Score: 1

      ""Battery Life: Approximately 8 hours for AtomChip® Quantum® II processor" ... and the battery back is a 6-cell Li unit."

      BEFORE you press the ON switch of course ;)

    16. Re:Power by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Seeing as vaporware doesn't actually draw any current.

      It's not as funny when you have to explain the joke.

    17. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no you've got it all wrong. It will require 1.21 Jigawatts of electricity for the flux capacitor.

      ~chuckles~ Silly humans thinking they can always shortcut that last hundredth of a Jiggawatt.

    18. Re:Power by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Seeing as vaporware doesn't actually draw any current.

      Well duh! Vapourware obviously runs off Vacuum energy!

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    19. Re:Power by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Since anyone can edit a Wikipedia article, it could just be someone playing a practical joke :) It's not hard to make stuff like that up.
      ---
      The only thing I hate more than a hypocrite is a person who hates hypocrites.
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    20. Re:Power by rpdillon · · Score: 1
      Yes well, while it may seem logically that Wikipedia is filled with inaccurate information, it doesn't actually bear out in truth. While it may not be hard to "make stuff like that up", you can do research elsewhere and check the information.

      This is an age old Slashdot debate, but I have found through several hundred hours of browsing topics I know very well that Wikipedia very rarely has an error that lasts for any significant time. Too many people check the "recent changes" for significant errors to go unnoticed.

      If you care to do further research, you'll find that sites like Merriam Webster also list the perferred pronunciation of Giga- to be with a soft g.

    21. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, its 1.21 GWatts, not 1.2. Yours will not run. Unless it can flux the capacity under-powered, which will take Marti approx. back to '84. what? '83? '86?

    22. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure go ahead, and speak like a guy dead 200 years. yeah the Webster dictionary (which still lists most word pronunciations as they were originally written out by webster) says we should use a 'soft g' sound. well give me my jibibits and my jigabytes..and my jiggly wiggly oh never mind.

  13. Wow, what utter BS by spun · · Score: 1

    First the electric universe, now this. Please, if any of this were true, this would be a huge story, but it's not. So the huge story is, the editors of slashdot have gone off the deep end and are now just printing anything no matter how ridiculous.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Wow, what utter BS by thc69 · · Score: 1
      he editors of slashdot have gone off the deep end and are now just printing anything no matter how ridiculous.
      They're not printing anything, no matter how ridiculous. That is, unless there is a dead tree edition about which I don't know.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    2. Re:Wow, what utter BS by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      " unless there is a dead tree edition about which I don't know."

      One of the many little-known perks of being a /. subscriber! (The football phone is still my favorite!)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  14. Still not enough! by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny
    According to the specs, for all this you get an Intel®855GME video chipset.

    With all those powerhouse specs and without decent video, how am I supposed to play WoW on that?

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:Still not enough! by king_penguin_05 · · Score: 1

      YOU STOLE MY F*CKING CLOUDSONG. I know you're one of the motherf*ckers. I'm gonna f*cking beat your head in.

      http://wowseriousbusiness.ytmnd.com/

      --
      "I can't drive 55. It only goes 38."
    2. Re:Still not enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind WoW, this card has trouble playing 3-year-old fscking Morrowind! Intel 855GME owner

    3. Re:Still not enough! by E8086 · · Score: 1

      "for all this you get an Intel®855GME video chipset."

      My first couple thoughts on this; it would be nice if it really existed, only an Intel video chipset and only 100mbits LAN. If they can make a 6.8GHz CPU they should at least be able to give you a 1.21 gigga Hz GPU and 1.21 gigga bit LAN. I least I feel better that is was inspected by #24, whoever that is.(pic of the QuantumII at the bottom)

      How about a Back to the Future PC/Laptop, with 1.21 gigga-everything (Great Scott!)
      except CPU and hdd, 1.21GHz and 1.21GB would be a bit limited.

      2TB storage for a laptop? How about multi-TB storage for desktop? Guessing at the size, A 5.25" bay could probably hold them 3x4 and 4 or 5 thick, 48 or 60TB. Maybe we can blame the RIAA for stalling development, 60TB would hold LOTS of 320+VBRkbits mp3s. Or for a "home media center" would be nice to be able to make 1:1 copies of my dvd collection and play as a media player playlist not having to get up to change the disk.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    4. Re:Still not enough! by m50d · · Score: 1

      Play games which support software rendering (most still have the option). On a system like that it'll probably be faster.

      --
      I am trolling
    5. Re:Still not enough! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      well if the cpu is fast enough you could just do real-time raytracing!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  15. The sound you just heard... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...was everyone's bullshit detectors exploding in glorious unison. The earlier thread on OSNews has thoroughly debunked this device as a hoax. All you need to know is that 32-bit Windows XP only supports 16 gigs of RAM and this claims to have 1 terabyte of RAM.

    And this, gentlemen, is why I don't pay for a subscription to Slashdot.

    1. Re:The sound you just heard... by ltbarcly · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it took an article to convince you this was a hoax then you are more than just a little retarded.

    2. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can't afford the subscription either, with the replacement of bullshit detectors because of this place...

    3. Re:The sound you just heard... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Informative

      Taco should read the description of this page. It's supposed to be news for nerds, not for idiots.

      This place is going downhill, so i think i'll just join the others migrating to some other nerd site.

      Who knows, maybe i'll donate this account to GNAA. They at least have some editorial quality, journalistic integrity and some entertaining value.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    4. Re:The sound you just heard... by Gondola · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Is* there another decent site like Slashdot used to be?

      Frequent articles, interesting stuff?

      Inquiring minds want to know...

    5. Re:The sound you just heard... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Not everyone can keep themselves up-to-date on processor speeds, memory sizes and limits. So yes, some of us would like to see a write-up first and get a flavor for what's going on. In fact, I found out about the OSNews discussion because someone mentioned it in a /. a little while ago.

    6. Re:The sound you just heard... by mpsmps · · Score: 5, Informative

      While certainly a hoax, it's an unusually thorough one. Check out their appearance as a CES Innovations 2005 Awards Honoree.

    7. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found technocrat.net to be pretty good. And of course good ol' arstechnica.com.

    8. Re:The sound you just heard... by ptlis · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    9. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when is 2^32 = 16gig?

      Me thinks you mean 4GB.

    10. Re:The sound you just heard... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      "And this, gentlemen, is why I don't pay for a subscription to Slashdot."

      Seriously? You mean with the endless dupes, Zonk's predictable same run of "news" everyday, slash-vertisement "news," missing links/butchering of the english language, only the common occurance of non-factual stories keeps you from subscribing?

      Christ, my standards must be pretty high :)

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    11. Re:The sound you just heard... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Aw, poopsie! Don't worry, the move to CSS will be finished soon. Once that's done, you'll be able to select HumourImpaired.css, and stories like this will be enclosed in tags.

    12. Re:The sound you just heard... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      1. I don't see them in the page you have linked.

      2. In the screenshot here the 6,80 GHz has a comma instead of a period, in both the places it is displayed in the 'system properties' window.

      3. There are no commas in the disk size on said page, and someone photoshopped again for commas instead of periods.

      I don't mind a crappy photoshopped hoax, but at least they could be mildly EFFECTIVE about it. I mean, the something awful forum goons do ten times as well every week.

    13. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum processor??? Last time I checked, Quantum Computing was a myth that no one else even knew where to start to get it working.

    14. Re:The sound you just heard... by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      cesweb.org. IN A 12.154.88.103

      That's actually the real CES site, don't know what the backstory is though...

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    15. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. I don't see them in the page you have linked.

      Maybe you should open that page and look then...because they are there.

      Why do I even bother?! Here is the 2005 CES Innovation Award for this company:

      Compu-Technics Inc.

      Ultra-Portable Wireless NoteBook Design by: Compu-Technics Inc. www.atomchip.com

      The exquisite unique Ultra-Portable Wireless NoteBook "SG111" to access the world anywhere! This Computer does not employ Hard Disk or any mechanical parts, and is completely based on AtomChip optoelectronics.

    16. Re:The sound you just heard... by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      Nope, probably meant 32G or 64G see eg. microsofts info

      2^32 is not relevant - google intel and PAE

    17. Re:The sound you just heard... by rkasudia · · Score: 1

      Yea but if you use windows 64 bit, you can have well more than 4 gigs of ram. 32 bit windows only allows up to 4 gigs by the way not 16.

    18. Re:The sound you just heard... by gliph · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://www.digg.com/

      I've been surfing over that way quite a bit lately, most /. stuff ends up over there or starts there.. there are usually a lot more articles, although some of it isn't very interesting... its a nice place to find some of the less mainstream stuff that won't make it on /. these days....

    19. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While certainly a hoax, it's an unusually thorough one. Check out their appearance as a CES Innovations 2005 Awards Honoree.


      They only appear on the list for paying the ~$1000 entry fee. They did not actually win an award. The award-winners have a badge beside the name.

    20. Re:The sound you just heard... by oc255 · · Score: 1

      I'm beating a dead horse.

      In the screenshot shown here, the line that says "Capacity 2 200 038 744 064 2,00 TB" is clearly digitally edited. The "TB" at the end of the line (lower right) isn't aligned correctly to the "2,00", to the left. The real screen wouldn't be misaligned, even if it had to display "TB". Smart-guides in Photoshop could have helped them align it correctly. Clearly, a fake.

      On the tech side, Atomchip says "4x Pentium M 1.7 Chz"[sic]. Since when did anyone have dual or quad Pentium M systems? Pentium M SMP? What? What motherboard/chipset?

      The closest thing to Pentium M SMP I've heard of is the new Yonah chip, which is a stretch. Pentium M's are the reference for the new Yonah 65nm chip (ousting the P4). Yonah will be dual core and similar to Pentium Ms. But will likely not be called M.

      But SMP in the sense of dual core not "4x Pentium M" chips as they claim. Dual Yonah / dual core = 4x? What? Bah, I'm done thinking about this.

      Dead horse.

    21. Re:The sound you just heard... by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I see the number of comments per item hasn't improved since launch then... shame.

    22. Re:The sound you just heard... by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      You just slashdotted OSNews without even linking in, you insensitive clod!

    23. Re:The sound you just heard... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I know it's a hoax too, and I'm sorry to nitpick, but they don't claim the device has 1Tb of RAM, they say 256Mb of RAM and 1Tb of solid-state mass storage (shown in the screenshots as disk space). This wouldn't violate the Windows RAM limit.

      Haven't read the debunking yet, but what made me doubtful was the Photoshopped look of the component labeling.

    24. Re:The sound you just heard... by MrDRwin · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice that this thing is not DX9 compliant and that it lacks 1000mb LAN support? What a POS.

      And only a 1.3 megapixel camera? Pfffh.

    25. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a bookmark to over there, but have yet to pull the plug on Slashdot.

      Even a bunch of monkeys banging on the keyboard would produce more in-depth discussions of the articles then what we see on Slashdot.

    26. Re:The sound you just heard... by Gondola · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I found the site chock full of nerdy time-wasting links, and spent a lovely hour or two browsing the recent "articles."

      Mod the parent insightful, informative, interesting, whatever...

    27. Re:The sound you just heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not worth a subscription, but it sure as hell is funny reading everyone's "OMG THIS IS FAKE" comments...

  16. Nice, but does it play Doom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really. Does it?

  17. Is it April already? by Soong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cuz, it looks like people are getting fooled.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
    1. Re:Is it April already? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not an april fools kind of a hoax.

      it's the kind of "some guy spewing shit to get some money from idiots every now and then" thing(the guy has some even older shit like this on his back).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Is it April already? by aonaran · · Score: 1

      Cuz, it looks like people are getting fooled.


      Are they really?

      Who here was fooled ...even for a second? anyone?

      If so you ought to be ashamed. C'mon, look at the picture of the chip with the lenses on it, the cheesy stickers on the CF cards, the cut and paste screenshots, the video of the solar optical chip (mirror) if none of that bothers you e-mail me and we'll talk real estate. (On second thought, don't. I don't want to have to explain what a swamp is...)

      I mean really does anyone think for a second that Quantum would put up with another company trying to trademark the word Quantum in reference to storage devices? or are they supposed to be involved and for some reason they think letting these guys break it to the press is the best way to go?

  18. If this was true... by Ranma-sensei · · Score: 1

    I'd be the first one to buy it. :P

    btw, nice to see you alive, Taco!

    --
    Non-supporter of Online Activation and any other draconian DRM
    1. Re:If this was true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the first one to sell his children for a laptop too :P

  19. CPU looks like a camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The "CPU" photo seems to show the guts of a cheap digital camera.

  20. Beware spelling errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I likes the Fibers Optic.

    Dunno, that HDD looks a lot like a CF card with a fancy sticker on it.

    And since when can Windows recognize 1TB of RAM? 2TB happens to be the NTFS limit, so that I can buy, but....

    I call shenanigans. But I hope I'm wrong. :)

    1. Re:Beware spelling errors by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      Dunno, that HDD looks a lot like a CF card with a fancy sticker on it.

      Sticker? Maybe.
      Fancy? No.

      Gosh are these people dumb. My standards for a rippoff are much higher. What kind of poor sob falls for this?

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  21. Why a low res screen? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    That laptop looks like it's running at 800x600.

    1. Re:Why a low res screen? by ajservo · · Score: 2

      Who wants to doctor a photo at 1280X1024?

      Look at the pisspoor job he did on the Memory counter. I know the old chestnut of "a bad photoshop" can be applied here because all you have to do is look at the CPU/Memory count and you can see the freakin' grey box around it.

      But, hey, maybe my eyes are going.

      Any laptop that has built in Bluetoth can't be all bad.

    2. Re:Why a low res screen? by nite_warrior · · Score: 1

      because of the video card... maybe if the use at least a decent nvidia with 512MB video card they will make it to 1024x768 (at most)

    3. Re:Why a low res screen? by max99ted · · Score: 1
      Look at the pisspoor job he did on the Memory counter. I know the old chestnut of "a bad photoshop" can be applied here because all you have to do is look at the CPU/Memory count and you can see the freakin' grey box around it. But, hey, maybe my eyes are going.
      Actually, due to the 'Quantum' nature of this laptop, one can never really know the exact location of said digits and as such they appear fuzzy in the screenshots. This would also de-bunk the period/comma conspiracy.
      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

    4. Re:Why a low res screen? by DrLex · · Score: 1
      Look at the pisspoor job he did on the Memory counter.
      I really wonder what the heck is everyone talking about here. I can't find any screenshots of CPU/memory specs. A few posts above, someone links to this image which is not to be found anywhere on the site. My guess is that they read forums too and removed the most suspicious stuff that people laugh with?
  22. Multi-tasking on Windows XP by ironwill96 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will this finally allow me to run multiple programs on Windows XP? With that much ram it should be able to handle the ram-hungry Windows XP.

    Of course, maybe by "TB" they don't mean tera-byte, but instead 'tiny-byte', a brand new term meaning really, really freaking small.

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    1. Re:Multi-tasking on Windows XP by cahiha · · Score: 1

      The SI unit for 'tiny-byte' is "tB", not "TB".

  23. Seems reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And a battery life of 3 seconds! Awesome!

  24. Infineon Console..? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first time I read the specs here, I thought "Wow - Infineon are finally getting their new console specced up."

    Then I realised it had nothing to do with them.

    Strange how I confused a vapourware console with this.

  25. Looking for venture funding, hmmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure...this new product belongs in a line up along with countless other fine product not making it out of the door, nay, not making it out of the schemer's mind, such as:

  26. Is it April First already? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative
    How the hell did this get posted?

    When I read the summary, I looked for the 'It's funny. Laugh' foot icon to the right, but my search was in vain...apparently, we're supposed to take this seriously.

    In the article, there is a screenshot of a supposed 'System Properties' dialog box showing the following:
    AtomChip(R) Quantum(R)
    processor 6,80 Ghz, 1.00 TB of RAM

    Never mind the indecision between using commas (6,80 Ghz) and decimal points (1.00 TB), but according to Microsoft, the most physical memory a Windows XP Professional system can support is 4 GB (or 128 GB for 64-bit edition).

    In short, I call shennigans.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Is it April First already? by LocalH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another proof - look at this image. See where it says "1,99 TB"? Look carefully at the position of those 9's as compared to the 1.

      --
      FC Closer
    2. Re:Is it April First already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to go home and get my broom.

    3. Re:Is it April First already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind the indecision between using commas (6,80 Ghz) and decimal points (1.00 TB)

      The comma and decimal point usage is correct if you speak German as well as a few other European languages.

      I definately agree though. Where's the "It's funny. Laugh' icon?

    4. Re:Is it April First already? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Look at the screen shot again. It uses both commas as a decimal separator (6,80 GHz) and periods as a decimal separator (1.00 TB). Unless they meant one thousand TB and dropped a 0 off the end, that's not consistent usage.

      It's a pretty lousy fake, but I commend the company for making it onto Slashdot. I hear they also have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you...

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Is it April First already? by RobbieGee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hm, I checked my system properties and what's listed is:

      AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor
      2800+
      1.81 Ghz, 1,00 GB RAM

      Same indecision, albeit at opposite sides. I'd let this single one slide because of this, although I don't believe the story as a whole.

      --
      If you get this, we're 10 of a kind.
    6. Re:Is it April First already? by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      In the article, there is a screenshot of a supposed 'System Properties' dialog box showing the following:

      The big clue is the box itself. When the 'Support' button is there, the hardware properties MS usually puts there is replaced by custom text from the OEM. Obviously these guys are trying to make it appear that info is from Windows, but it's custom text.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    7. Re:Is it April First already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhg. I didn't see the bottom picture. The top pick has 1.00TB RAM. The bottom pic has 1,99TB free disk space.

      Ok that doesn't make sense, even in German! What did they do change the regional settings between screenshots? heh

    8. Re:Is it April First already? by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even better, look at the *SHAPE* of the 9's in 1,99 versus the 9 in the disk capacity.

      Definite Photoshop.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Is it April First already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awwww c'mon. You can't expect people that make up .... uuhh I mean invent such great products are Photoshop experts.

      Other hint: when you buy HDDs, the capacity is not exactly the size times 1024 but only times 1000. Thus, I would expect something like 1.81TB rather than exactly 2.00TB.

      But they're selling it as memory product, so they might offer full 2TB capacity if it weren't vaporware.

      Their connectors on the "industrial products" convinced me too. I'm wondering why we always but those plastic covers on fiber-optics before storing the cables or cards.

    10. Re:Is it April First already? by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 1
      Never mind the indecision between using commas (6,80 Ghz) and decimal points (1.00 TB)


      Most countries use commas where we would use a decimal point and vice-versa. there are many different formats for units like that. just like dates. while this story is obviously vaporware, for a company based overseas, that is true-to-form.
      --
      Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
    11. Re:Is it April First already? by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      How the hell did this get posted?

      Well, apparently by the same rigorous screening process that, just in the last couple of days, brought us this and this.

      Lately, I've been wondering why I keep coming back for more... All I seem to be getting is stuff that doesn't matter, and hoaxes for nerds. How the mighty have fallen...

      But, hey, we'll be getting CSS soon! :-)

    12. Re:Is it April First already? by miruku · · Score: 1

      the crappy stories are getting really tiring, but the main reason i keep coming back is the comments. there's some really smart and some side-splittingly hilarious stuff posted so i always have a quick trawl beneath most stories.

      --
      MilkMiruku
    13. Re:Is it April First already? by yuriismaster · · Score: 1

      Although this whole article is bulls***, you CAN insert OEM text in the support information.
      Instructions for the curious

  27. ** LOOK ** SPECIAL OFFER ** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myar SE has just announced a new 16.1GHz 100TB RAM, 5 Elephants and 20TB HDD laptop, which is "to be announced in the very near future". Apparently it does not use a hard disc, instead it is based on "solid state Myar SE® imaginary Pixies"

    What the fuck?

    Why is Slashdot basing its news on rumour all of a sudden?

    Wait, I'm new here aren't I.

  28. Trust No One! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake! Just search for "atom chip"

  29. A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The general consensus at OSNews is that this is a fraud and a complete lie.

    http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=11784

    Some people have pointed out some interesting discrepancies in the images and so forth.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by sucker_muts · · Score: 1

      Well, they are pretty b0rk3d. Even the nyud.net:8090 link fails.

      A mirror, anyone?

      --
      Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    2. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by AccUser · · Score: 1

      But they are going to be showing at CES so it must be true!</sarcasm>

      --

      Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

    3. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by Surt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if nothing else gives it away, how about the image of the stereo connector with a bunch of labels on it describing the optical components and the massive memory it contains:

      http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page3.html
      particularly:
      http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/256Mx6M.jpg

      Now, supposing you're a super genius engineer, who has come up with all this clever technology advancement which no one else has been able to think of. Do you:
      a) design a nice new physical interface for it?
      b) make it 100% physically compatible with devices it is not meant to be plugged into so that it can be easily accidentally damaged?

      This site is a pretty thoroughly obvious fake. In fact, you pretty much have to assume that the fakers are intentionally leaving it sufficiently fake to avoid tricking anyone even slightly technologically inclined, and that it is in fact only targetted at trolling news media morons and slashdot editors.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      It's working fine, even if a bit slow. Their MySQL database was throwing out errors a little bit earlier, but it now appears to be working fine.

      http://osnews.com.nyud.net:8090/comment.php?news_i d=11784

      Try it again.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    5. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny
      trolling news media morons and slashdot editors
      Gee, and I always thought Slashdot editors were trolling news media morons!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by david.given · · Score: 1
      Well, if nothing else gives it away, how about the image of the stereo connector with a bunch of labels on it describing the optical components and the massive memory it contains:

      Not discounting the fact that this whole thing looks about as bogus as a whale with nine legs, I actually have a connector such as they describe --- it's a 3.5mm stereo jack with a optic fibre down the core. It's used as the optical in for my Minidisc Walkman. If I were prototyping some funky new technology that needed three electrical lines and a fibre-optic line, then yes, I might decide to use one of those...

    7. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by dpaton.net · · Score: 1

      Actually, Sony used an optical connector very much like that for the TOSLINK output on some of the high end Discman models a while back. They made a special optical adapter cable which had a white plastic 1/8" TRS on it and the optical window at the end. I still own mine, tho the discman is long gone.

      It's not out of the realm of reality that someone else would do it, but with the rest of the BS on the site, as well as the baaaaaad MS Paint image hack, I tend to disbelieve it, just like OSNews.

      --
      This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
    8. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by Surt · · Score: 1

      To clarify, I was using trolling as a verb, and in no way intended to elevate the slashdot editors to the level of media morons, even of the trolling type.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I like the picture of three guys in clean suits gathered around a paper board in a room with a regular split A/C unit, 2 foldable tables, and garden plastic chairs. See: http://atomchip.com/index.html/. I guess I could start a company like that in my garage.

    10. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      My question is why?.. their server stood up to a slashdotting and they (or someone) paid for all that bandwidth so they must have put some $ into this joke... bored national labs sysadmin?.. backbone ISP with idle time?..

    11. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'home' page has pictures of their facilities. Looks pretty genuine to me.

    12. Re:A fraud, according to the OSNews community. by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      another humorous fake: http://www.cambridge.ac/">The University of Different Studies

      --
      FGD 135
  30. W00t by minginqunt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I® for® one® welcome® our® new®...

    I can't be bothered with this.

    [Something about a beowulf cluster of these goes here]

    Martin

    1. Re:W00t by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      But does your boredom run Linux®?

    2. Re:W00t by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Step 1: ®
      Step 2: Beowulf cluster
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: Boredom!

      And what does the pirate in the circle say? He says "®"!

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  31. Nanomicrons...? by sarlos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tagline from the website... "Welcome to the world of nanomicrons and beyond!" All credibility went out the window right there. Seriously, how much pot do you have to smoke to come up with stuff like this. My grandma can photoshop better than the morons at "Atom Chip Corporation." If anyone gives these people money, they deserve what they're getting - absolutely nothing.

    --
    Government's view of the economy: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
    1. Re:Nanomicrons...? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Oh, I suspect they'll get more than that!

      Probably on the order of a case and a couple of bricks.

      It's like Shooting Fish in a barrel...

  32. HAHAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha whatever. This is right up there with unlimted energy mangets, the BatMax battery life enhancing sticker and the MPT Fuel disc that you put in your gas tank to get improved mileage by "harnessing the power of holograms and frequencies to directly affect the properties of the fuel in your tanks, thus affecting the way it
    burns giving you more miles per gallon"
    Seeing is believing.... I now believe the articles posted passed a filter that consists of a monkey hitting a keyboard with mostly "reject" buttons and one "accept" button.

  33. Right. by brucmack · · Score: 4, Funny

    6.8 GHz, 1 TB RAM, 2TBHDD? Right. And Slashdot's only going to post this article once.

    1. Re:Right. by Tribbles · · Score: 1

      Oooh - I think it's worth 3 dupes at least!

    2. Re:Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, I posted the same story and it got rejected. Maybe the computer's real too.

    3. Re:Right. by kflash15 · · Score: 1

      How many /.'ers out there currently have PCs with 512MB of RAM and only 1GB hard drives? I would expect anyone that needs a terebyte of RAM would need a hell of a lot more than 2TB of storage space...

    4. Re:Right. by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 0

      My machine kicks the crap out of that old dog. 256-bits, bitches.

    5. Re:Right. by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 0

      Oh, and for my petabyte of memory I have a RAID 5000 array that hold 10 exabytes. I like to have a copy of the whole internet on hand.

    6. Re:Right. by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Not actually a problem. Since your OS can only see the first 4Gb of that RAM, all the rest is a RAM disk. Unless you want 250 multiple OS's running in parallel.

      But why, you ask, does it have that 2Tb storage? It's quite straightforward: the first set of stickers they printed were the wrong size for a SODIMM, so they stuck them on a Compact Flash card.

      Anyhow, onto more important matters. When this story gets duped, I say we storm Taco Castle with pitchforks and burning torches. A riot is an ugly thing, and it's about time we had one. Who's with me?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    7. Re:Right. by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      Actually I have a computer with 512MB RAM and a 504MB hard drive. I use it for testing hardware with knoppix. (the HD is one swap partition)

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    8. Re:Right. by Kasracer · · Score: 1

      Ha, same here. I submitted it about 6 hours or so before this one. BAH

  34. Video card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it also have a Bitboys video card and come with Duke Nukem Forever?

  35. Reminds me of a bong... by itistoday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their "dylithium crystal" based transceiver, at least the one on the left, looks really familiar...

    1. Re:Reminds me of a bong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else would they be able to communicate with the space aliens from their.. I mean, Uranus.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a bong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and those home page images are straight out of "Plan 9 from Outer Space".

  36. Can anybody say BULLSHIT by paradizelost · · Score: 1

    I have worked in some large datacenters, and even high-end machines that cost over $1,000,000 can't come close to those specs. there is NO WAY POSSIBLE for this to actually be real. I'm almost sure that they just photoshopped stuff and made some "special" labels for things. Are there even solid-state storage devices out there that are 256GB????

    --
    "In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
    1. Re:Can anybody say BULLSHIT by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, M-Systems (who makes the Disk-on-Chip, and some UFDs) has a 128GB 2.5" (read: laptop sized) SATA drive...

      They also go as high as 176GB for 3.5" SCSI.

      So, no 256GB, but close.

    2. Re:Can anybody say BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in defence to what is written, but a general point to ponder. When an entirely new way of looking at a problem produces corresponding solution, it is possible to solve the problem more efficiently. What we are doing is advancing showels of the computer industry. Make them bigger, make handles more ergonomic, make them of lighter material, etc, etc, etc. but at the end of the day, we haven't really made much progress in terms of developing new way of solving a problem.
      I think that the announcement is a hoax or an attempt to make a corporation, make people invest millions and them dissapear. In Russia it used to (and still is) a popular way of making money. But people should not be quick to discard new technologies.

  37. This is sooo obviously fake... by RouterSlayer · · Score: 1

    omfg! this is sooooo obviously fake, it's not funny
    on second-hand it IS funny... omfg!
    a couple of photoshop enhanced pics... augh!

    there are so many problems with the info shown its hard to tell where to start.

    Hint: it has 256mb of ram, and a 1gb drive ;)

  38. Welcome to the world of nanomicrons... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1
    ...AND BEYOND!

    Did you know that this guy totally won a Gold Genius award, a Special Gold Award, and the prestigious Grand Prix for an Excellent Scientific Invention at the World Genius Convention in Tokyo, Japan?

    I used to laugh at sites like this. Then the nanomicrons got me. I don't laugh anymore, man.

    1. Re:Welcome to the world of nanomicrons... by jma05 · · Score: 1

      Well! They are in Wikipedia now

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAM

      "In 2005, Compu-Technics Inc. presented a 256 GiB/4GHz non-volatile Magnetic RAM array, as well as a notebook using this chip, SG220."

  39. Kessel Run benchmark score ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it will make the Kessel run in 11.9 parsecs ? Good way to measure. By the way, my brand-new Nissan makes the New York-Los Angeles run in only 1000 miles !

    1. Re:Kessel Run benchmark score ? by Alphax.au · · Score: 1
      And it will make the Kessel run in 11.9 parsecs ? Good way to measure. By the way, my brand-new Nissan makes the New York-Los Angeles run in only 1000 miles !

      The point about the Kessel Run is that Han Solo went dangerously close to large gravitational objects (eg. black holes) to make the journey in a shorter distance. Now if this laptop could bend spacetime...

    2. Re:Kessel Run benchmark score ? by keltor · · Score: 1

      Though let's be honest here. What are the chances that human, even a great pilot could beat a computer from the same technological age that can travel such great distances in a few hours. I realize that the Kessel run would be a good TSP problem ... but surely for these super fast computers a program requiring O(n^2 2^n) time is possible.

    3. Re:Kessel Run benchmark score ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be but he was boasting how about FAST his ship was, therefore claiming it made the run in under 12 parsecs makes no sense. Taking a short cut and going a shorter distance doesn't make the ship any faster.

    4. Re:Kessel Run benchmark score ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you SEE the computers in the original star wars? They didn't look like they could run PONG much less circumnavigate a black hole ;)

  40. Exhibiting at CES 2006 by Tanami · · Score: 1

    I posted this story earlier but had it rejected... If it's all a fantasy, which sounds fairly likely, they're going to look rather daft on the 5th of January:

    http://cesweb.org/attendees/show_floor/product_loc ator/product_details.asp?prodid=5420

    1. Re:Exhibiting at CES 2006 by Sirch · · Score: 1

      I strongly suspect that they're not the ones who will look daft in January, and that's their point.

  41. Quantum Everywhere by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    Everything on the page is quantum this and quantum that. Hell, my right pinky is quantum if you want to get technical.

    Well, their RAM (if it actually exists oustide of someones head) is actually some form of holographic storage according to this other page of theirs.

    1. Re:Quantum Everywhere by shippo · · Score: 1

      Heard of The Quantum Clip, then? http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/product/quantum/quantu m.html

      Yours for just £500.

  42. So... by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 1

    ...I wonder how long it will take to defrag...

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
    1. Re:So... by Traxton1 · · Score: 1
      You wouldn't need to defrag a solid state device since the benefit from defragging is shorter load times, due to the time it takes to search for something on the HDD platter. With solid state it would find it no matter where it is.

  43. It is a product from the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that scares me is that its still running on Windows XP. Whats with Vista?? Or Mac Os X or Linux..... Is that a OEM Product of the future where vendors are forced to use a version of Windows .
    And why does it still use old fassion keyboards??

  44. So... by sqlrob · · Score: 1

    They've finally released the specs for Phantom?

  45. Sounds like they're using video game console math by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

    6.8GHz? Sounds like they're summing up two 3.4GHz chips or something screwy like that. That in itself may be pretty cool, but like the original author, I'm skeptical that anything new and exciting is being introduced here.

  46. From the site: by drexel.aj · · Score: 1


    "Welcome to the World of Nanomicrons and Beyond!"

    So... "The world of femto and even atto, zepto, an yocto!"

    Sends shivers, dosn't it!

  47. Steve Jobs... by pointguy · · Score: 1

    ... should fire every single employee of Apple's laptop division and hire these guys... or not. Slashdot keeps sinking.

  48. Fake, obviously by brokenarmsgordon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Obviously fake, but as anyone looked at the rest of the website? It's hilarious!

    This image alone... http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/256Mx6M.jpg (from http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page3.html )

    It's the "NvIOpRAM 24GB [3-pin]", also known as the 1/4" to 1/8" gold-plated headphone adapter available at RadioShacks everywhere.

    1. Re:Fake, obviously by quakeroatz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey then apparently my headphones have 24GB of memory in the connector! Who needs the Mp3 player?

    2. Re:Fake, obviously by British · · Score: 1

      What this looks like to me, is they sent out someone to buy some random electronics at AxMan.

      After that, they took pictures and did the science fiction documenting approach(as seen in Star Trek tech manuals). You just point to a random, tiny point and give it some technical gobbledygook name. Put this all together, and it looks convincing.

      The more I read this website, the more I'm starting to see the fun fakeness in it.

    3. Re:Fake, obviously by chasingporsches · · Score: 1

      to be fair, you didn't RTFA, you just LATFP (looked at the f***ing pics), and even then the pics showed a headphone adapter with an optical cable through the middle. this is not uncommon, the apple airport express uses the same technology with an optical cable through the middle of the headphone adapter. the technology for that (optical through the middle of a headphone jack) is available today, but what they do on the other end is another story.

    4. Re:Fake, obviously by brokenarmsgordon · · Score: 1
      You're right, I didn't read it at all. Which is why I didn't find "1. Removable NvIOpRAM 2. Optical lens" hilarious to describe the precise model of audio adapter that I have sitting on my desk, right in front of me. Because, you know, cylindrical pieces of metal are "lenses".

      But you wouldn't even know that if you didn't look at the accompanying picture.

    5. Re:Fake, obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hey then apparently my headphones have 24GB of memory in the connector! Who needs the Mp3 player?
      Right, but those 24Gb are only storage. You still need the player to PLAY what is stored. So don't think about discarding those players. And in the same way that there are different file systems, information stored on different headphone connectors may not be accessable on different players. Or at best will sound differently due to different pseudo-random initialization vectors. And if you have more questions "Well why does it only have 256 or 512Mb storage?" that is due to compression/de-compression losses.

      Best regards,
      omi

    6. Re:Fake, obviously by tantrum · · Score: 2, Informative

      another nice image is this:
      http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/RAMComp2.jpg

      Looks like they're using a memory controller from 1999 to control 1 tb of ram.. wonder how the access time will be.

    7. Re:Fake, obviously by six · · Score: 1

      This is no memory conrtoller, it is a PC BIOS chip like the one found on most 1999 motherboards ...

    8. Re:Fake, obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Moley! Is brokenarmsgordon the only one here who gets it? Debunking the plausibility of fiction is the task of troll. This crowd would be no fun to watch Star Trek, Dr. Who, or Star Wars with. Every five seconds, "impossible", "unlikely", "violates quantum mechanics", "I can see the string". Just shut up already, I'm trying to enjoy myself. Reducing fiction or artwork to a binary true/untrue, plausible/implausible, real/unreal completely misses all the deeper meaning and suggestions in the artistic expression. Because Atomchip presents it self unironically, few of you can even percieve its irony. Underneath the delightful bunk, Atomchip poses a sci-fi question that is not entirely impossible: What if a new discovery allowed us to *instantly* jump two orders of magnitude in computing storage and processing power? Or, are we stuck in this tedious silicon incrementalism?

    9. Re:Fake, obviously by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      You're completely insaine

  49. Highly dubious by red_dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Register has a link to the company's press release with a few pictures. The so-called "Quantum II" processor shown in the "processor compartment" bears a striking resemblance to a mobile Pentium III chip with a heat pipe and fan assembly arranged almost identically to those in Dell laptops. The various

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:Highly dubious by red_dragon · · Score: 1

      Ignore the oops there. I was bereft of intracraneal activity when the incommodious event recorded above occurred.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  50. Phantom? by msobkow · · Score: 4, Funny

    DNF is finished, but it's been rebundled as an exclusive release for Infineon's Phantom game console. They're waiting for the hardware to ship to customers... ;)

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Phantom? by bigtangringo · · Score: 1
      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    2. Re:Phantom? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Only partially true. It's finished, but they're waiting for April 1st to make their announcement on Slashdot.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    3. Re:Phantom? by absolut_kurant · · Score: 1

      meh. Infineon is a real company, with real products (also real losses... but that's another story *g*). I think you're referring to Infinium.

      --
      Yes.
  51. Quite funny. by labratuk · · Score: 1

    This is hilarious bullshit.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  52. Very misleading... by lar3ry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it very misleading to state that the speed of a quad system (4 1.7 Ghz processors) is the speed of each processor multiplied by the number (4 * 1.7 = 6.8).

    After reading that portion of the specification, I find it difficult to read the rest of it without laughing openly.

    Nice try.

    Let me play: I have a 1.4 Ghz Thinkpad, a 2.8 Ghz HP Presario laptop, and a 500 Mhz iBook. Using the logic from the specifications at that site, those three laptops mean that I have a single 4.7 Ghz laptop? If so, please tell me how I can get Tiger to run at that speed on that 500 Mhz iBook!

    --
    "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    1. Re:Very misleading... by lunaman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Using the logic from the specifications at that site, those three laptops mean that I have a single 4.7 Ghz laptop?
      Yes, given sufficient duct tape.
    2. Re:Very misleading... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      That laptop would go great with my 16 CD burners (and 24 CD readers).

    3. Re:Very misleading... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      You've skipped over the 64-bit processor generation directly to a 96-bit processor!

  53. Appearently this will be quite expensive! by lordsilence · · Score: 1

    If this isnt a hoax, and the technique is real.. from their own pricing 1GB of ram based on this ram-technique cost $750 .

    1. Re:Appearently this will be quite expensive! by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      > If this isnt a hoax, and the technique is real.. from their
      > own pricing 1GB of ram based on this ram-technique cost $750 .
      > --
      > Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm here to learn.

      You're wrong.

    2. Re:Appearently this will be quite expensive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being funny are we? Lol.

      AtomChip has a site where they price 1gb of optical yada yada memory for $750 which is the same as the one used on that laptop.

    3. Re:Appearently this will be quite expensive! by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but everything on the AtomChip site is fake. If they've faked 95% of it, what on earth makes you think that the "1gb of optical yada yada memory for $750" is real? It isn't - it doesn't exist.

      No idea why I'm bothering to respond to an AC post.

  54. Emulator-nation here I come! by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    I'll finally be able to run all the console emulators without the damned lag! Hoorah!

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  55. Re:Unfortunately, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the article says it will. Did you RTFA?

  56. Interesting they will be at CES 2006 by cyberlotnet · · Score: 2

    http://cesweb.org/attendees/directory/rd_exhibitor _details.asp?exhibid=7059&

    I would love to be there to see a demo... While being at CES doesn't mean its ready for the world it does mean this is more then just a prank.

    Its a real company, with possibly real products although they could just be fishing for stupid investors also, Wish I could be there to find out

    1. Re:Interesting they will be at CES 2006 by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      And of course the real humor is that all their email addresses are @optonline.net (A cable internet provider).

  57. This is a fake by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Windows does not support 1TB of RAM nor 2TB of diskspace. If it were Linux, I could believe it but this is just another photoshop.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:This is a fake by dusik · · Score: 1

      I also wouldn't be surprised if Windows would croak from too much RAM or disk space, but do you know of any technical reason for it or are you just pulling this out of your ... ? ;)

    2. Re:This is a fake by PIBM · · Score: 1

      You know what 32 bits mean, right ?

    3. Re:This is a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 GB ram limit for the x86 CPU line, x86-64 on Windows XP 64 only supports 128 GB (it can do more on a real OS)

    4. Re:This is a fake by Bill+Wong · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're mistaken about the diskspace limitation.
      Windows XP (using NTFS) does support 2TB disk volumes. 64-bit Windows XP even supports volumes up to 256TB in size.

    5. Re:This is a fake by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Windows does not support 1TB of RAM, but *will* support a 2TB disk partition.

  58. You forgot to add... by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that with every order will come with two strippers to entertain you while you set the machine up. I mean, c'mon, Taco, if you're gonna give us a nerd hard-on, at least include something naughty, too.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  59. Yes but will it run Windows Vista... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still don't think this hardware is enough to run Windows Vista. Nice try though :)

  60. Super hi-tech website huh by dusik · · Score: 1

    I can't believe with all their hi-tech prowess they can't create a decent website!

    How is anybody supposed to take them seriously?

  61. poor investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already feel sorry for those poor souls(or shall I say idiots) who give that crook some money. The penalties for this type of scam should be much higher and much more strictly enforced.

  62. Funniest Part by hamlet2600 · · Score: 1

    Has to be the fact that their, "NvIOpRAM 24GB" is just a mini-stereo jack, available at Your local Electronics Store. Sweet that means i can build one of these for like $20!

    --
    Sometimes I wish computers were less friendly.
  63. I'm disappointed by jessecurry · · Score: 1

    This laptop looks awesome, but why is it still running Windows?

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  64. hummm by PIBM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who allowed this bullshit to go through ? First, no company that respect itself would show a web page like this one. Ok, their device (6.8ghz) to read their memory might be legit, but which intel board with the 855 support four pentium M, again ?

    And their 2GB device, I mean, 2TB device, that use 5V and 2.5 --> MICRO -- amps to WRITE 6GB per second ? It would take much more just to have the circuit resistance beaten =)

    They also claim 2000g operating shock .. Anyone know what that would do to this small 2GB flash dri.., err, 2TB ram :)

    1. Re:hummm by jcorno · · Score: 1

      I've seen operating shocks of 2000G listed on other flash cards. I'm surpised they didn't make it higher to match the rest of their claims. I thought the 125C max temp was funnier.

  65. OSNews discussion link. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a link to the OSNews discussion itself:

    http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=11784

    Read the debunking for yourself.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:OSNews discussion link. by ds9 · · Score: 1

      The best thing about all this is that all of you are actually going for it and try to find the "hoaxness" in all kinds of little details and whine about them beeing fake.

      Come on! You really don't need to go into detail, you can just see this is crap. It's like going to the junk yard, trash together a car, and paint the letters "porsche" on it, and you people asking: "hey, those letters don't very look real to me".

    2. Re:OSNews discussion link. by tzot · · Score: 1
      Good job. Your linking to the osnews.com page lead to slashdotting of the site:

      Warning: mysql_connect(): Lost connection to MySQL server during query in /home/osnews/web/connect.php on line 11
      , then a nice pic of a janitor, then
      Dang. Our database has apparently gone down. The janitor has been paged.

      Now back to our normal life...

      --
      I speak England very best
    3. Re:OSNews discussion link. by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Troll

      But what if it turns out this is real?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:OSNews discussion link. by ds9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you'd have to wake up first!

  66. Atom Chip Corp showing up in the news by Goggi · · Score: 1

    It's a really entertaining hoax, I think. Something to dream about, and long for the "future" when specs like this will be common. (-:

    Most interesting with this is the way clueless media reports about it. Do a search for news at google and you'll find a few already picking up on it:
    http://news.google.se/news?q=atom+chip

  67. News? by Fungus+King · · Score: 1

    Yet another smudge on the apparently fine line between "news for nerds" and blatant rubbish. Mod me down all you like, really - how _did_ this get on the front page?

  68. ROLFORZOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wE cAN uSE iT tO hAX0R tEH gIBsON!!!!11111!!!!!!!11!!one

  69. It DOES run Linux !!! by burts · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you read the Specification section it is mentioned that this beast does run Linux.

  70. and yet by StupidStan · · Score: 0

    running 1024, i cant get the entire page on my screen

  71. Does WinXP scale that high? by Petaris · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity can WinXP SP2 even scale to those specs? I know *nix machines can and have, but I would be curious what issues might arise with reguards to memmory management.

    Also What might the price tag be for such a toy, and does it have any other nice hardware? What about the graphics system, not to mention the system bus?

    Will these bits be the bottle neck that makes that ultra fast processor and large RAM and storage cappasity preform no faster then a curent desktop?

    Also if the solid state storage is so large and I would assume close to speed in the memmory, why have any memmory? Just fill it up with storage modules and there you go.

    Just some thoughts,

    --
    ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
  72. It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by SkjeggApe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Just look at this picture from CES-2006 !

    http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page5.html

    1. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by mrmagos · · Score: 1

      If you follow the links on that page, you will see that they actually plan on displaying this at CES '06.

      What exactly will they display is my question. A laptop with these screen shots taped to it? Or just the screen shots? I hope they're up for a little public humuliation...

      --
      Never start vast projects with half-vast ideas.
    2. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      And it's the exact same on as the one on this page, except that this one says "Photo courtesy CES". I bet AtomChips took the picture for CES and CES thought it was so good that it bought the rights to it.

    3. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Alan · · Score: 1

      Ok, so 1TB of ram = $6000
      1TB of storage = $2500
      Tack that 8500 onto the rest of a notebook and you'll have a price high enough that you would really have to fight with the supply department to justify the cost of a new laptop :)

    4. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The more I look into this the creepier this gets
      They have a website claiming this since 2002, the guy, creator even has a patent

      CES? US Patent? How could he make such a big lie? Why ?
      Link to the patent

    5. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by sabernet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's using a dummy-proof 5 page 49$ a year website service called "WebSiteNow". I hope that's not his whole website budget:P

    6. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Valegor · · Score: 3, Informative

      If anyone is there please point out that XP will not recognize over 4 gigs of RAM.

    7. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      I looked at the screenshots and it looks like a (bad) photoshop or MS Paint job.

      Look closely at the Free Space. It is obvious that the 2,189,394,472,960 bytes is a cut and paste job. Also, what's with the one tab in Cyrillic (Perevod if written in English letters, not sure of translation) while everything else is in English.

      Methinks this may be a wee bit of vaporware. I'll believe it when I see it.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    8. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Is that true of the 64-bit edition also?

    9. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      Perevod if written in English letters, not sure of translation

      Perevod is russian for "translation". I kid you not.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    10. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Valegor · · Score: 1

      The 64-bit edition gives up to 16 gigs of physical memory. It does allow up to 16 terebytes of virtual memory.

    11. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Methinks this may be a wee bit of vaporware. I'll believe it when I see it."

      You know, the only thing that's really absurd is the memory. 1TB RAM? Exactly how many ram DIMMS would that be?

      The 6.8ghz is plausible, never been done in a laptop but some guy did manage 7ghz.

      And 2TB hard drive isn't too far off, not in laptop drives but he could have four 500gB SATA-II desktop drives in there.

      So, as crazy as this sounds only his ram specs make it obviously vaporware. Had he said 2 or 4gB it'd actually be almost possible, or at least more believable.

      Oh, and the 256mB cache? Give me a break. Makes me wonder if this guy really knows anything about computers, obviously a 6.8ghz wouldn't have a 256mB cache. Anything over 2mB is silly on a desktop.

      Wonder if that 256mB is full speed, he doesnt say. Is it L1 or L2?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Auraiken · · Score: 1

      MONIES!

    13. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE NEXT TIME. They aren't using standard components according to thier site. THEY ARE NOT USING DIMMS, they are NOT USING HARD DRIVES. The hard disk is supposedly optical as well as the ram. Hence it doesn't matter how many DIMMS or standard drives you would need to build a comporable system.

      While the page is still probably bullshit, they are marketing A NEW TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY, not the same old stuff that every other pc manufacturer is selling.

    14. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by sabernet · · Score: 1

      tweak the levels in the system info screenshot and you see the "grain" of a square area around the processor and ram spec does not match that of the surrounding area.

      Not only is this a photoshop job, but a very bad one by someone who doesn't know how to use layer blending.

    15. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by bjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      and if you do a wee tiniest bit of Googling, you'll find that this guy has been peddling this vapor since at least 1997:

      http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is _n2191_v43/ai_19951759

    16. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 1

      1TB of storage = $2500? Where have you been shopping? Here is a 500 gig HITACHI for $341. That brings our price down to: 1TB of storage = $682 your off by about 2 g's buddy.

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    17. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by allanw · · Score: 1

      "Apparently it does not use a hard disc, instead it is based on "solid state AtomChip® optoelectronics"" Do you know how expensive solid state drives are?

    18. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      The "1TB non-volatile Quantum-Optical Synchronous RAM" storage fits into an SODIMM slot & is due to be priced at $6000 (!!) according to this page

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    19. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 1

      And what is the magical name of that file:

      http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/ces2004-floor.jpeg.jpg

      What a bunch of assclowns.

      Kristopher

    20. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by randyest · · Score: 1

      That's the only thing that makes you wonder, eh? Nothing else seemed odd?

      Huh. I suppose with the editorial staff so goes the readership. What am I still doing here?

      --
      everything in moderation
    21. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Ractive · · Score: 1

      Actually the cost would be :
      A fraction of the electricity bill fot the time his computer was on, downloading the version of photoshop he used.
      Cost of the time he invested in learning how to use the software.
      10 minutes of pay for the lousiest web designer on the planet.
      That sums like ... he owes us money for having to see this crap.

    22. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by admdrew · · Score: 1
      If anyone is there please point out that XP will not recognize over 4 gigs of RAM.

      ...assuming we're talking 32bit Windows. A 64bit OS will handle... 32TB of RAM? I think that's what it is. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    23. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by admdrew · · Score: 1
      http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/64bit/evaluatio n/overviews/tech_benefits.mspx

      64-bit Windows (Windows XP Professional x64 Edition):
      128 GB physical RAM
      16 TB virtual memory
      512 TB paging file

    24. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by zopf · · Score: 1
      Clearly only a few people on /. actually RTFA, so I'll respond to your questions with a quote from the referenced website, as you seem to have enough time to read the myriad comments on each article if not the article itself.

      Atom Chip Corporation has developed and designed the new ultra-high density, ultra-high speed and extremely compact size non-volatile integrated optoelectronic Random Access Memory (NvIOpRAM). 3.2GB of non-volatile RAM are contained in one cubic millimeter.


      [...]

      In this NvIOpRAM the information is recorded and read by a laser beam. The density of information of this memory is 128MB/square millimeter having the thickness of the recording media (array) of 20microns. 3.2GB of NvIOpSRAM are contained in one cubic millimeter. Also, this new Quantum-Optical technology allows NvIOpRAM to be built up to 256GB in one package. 256GB of memory fits in a recording media with the physical dimensions of: length- 10mm, width- 4mm and thickness- 4mm.

      [...]

      Beam splitter divides a laser beam to reference and object beams. Then spatial light modulator imposes the image of data to be stored onto an object beam, and through a transform lens focuses interference figure (of the image) from object and reference beams onto an area 1m in diameter in a particular region in the recording media. In order to record information to a recording media an electromagnetic field is formed, which allows to fix the light interference figure (of the image) to be fixed on the focused area. In order to record numerous words onto the same area, the angle where the reference beam crosses the object beam is changed. This is done using the invented ultra-high speed optoelectronic mirror.

      The data is retrieved by disconnecting the object beam and allowing only the reference beam with necessary angle of multiplex transformation to pass through the recording media. The source of the electromagnetic field in the recording media is also disconnected, being needed only during the recording of information. Light image from the recording media is projected onto a matrix decoder where optical display is transformed into digital electrical signals.

      "What?", you say? "So how does that connect to the computer?"

      Again with the website:

      The non-volatile integrated optoelectronic random access memory device consists of three functional units: Decoder/transceiver, memory cartridge and adapter with optical fiber.

      DECODER/TRANSCEIVER is mounted on the motherboard of the computer (or other electronic devices) and is electrically hooked up to the processor. The following devices are located in the decoder/transceiver: laser beam splitter, spatial light modulator, optoelectronic word mirror with transform lens, matrix converter of the optical display in electrical signals and other circuits for the interface.

      MEMORY CARTRIDGE -removable memory chip or removable memory module has only a few pinouts (Power, Ground and Read/Write enable) and optical input/output for the laser beam. Memory array, optoelectronic address mirror with transform lens and detector are located in the cartridge.

      ADAPTER is permanently mounted on the outer case of the computer (or other electronic devices) and is intended for the hook up of the removable memory cartridges and for the transfer of light through the optical fiber and electrical signal through the electrical cable between the cartridge and the decoder/transceiver . The optical fiber has two independent optical lines intended for reading and recording of information. There are a few versions of the adapter.

      Basically, the processor connects electrically to the decoder. The decoder connects optically to the memory chip, and information read optically from memory is fed optically back through the decoder and then electrically back to the processor. The memory chip itself only has three pinouts: power,

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
    25. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oooh, there's a Longhorn joke in there somewhere, I'm sure of it!

    26. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by hyperventilate · · Score: 1

      The website works fine on Slashdot day, so the $49 is clearly enough of a budget.

    27. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Wonder if that 256mB is full speed, he doesnt say. Is it L1 or L2?

      Actually, it is L5.

      Kneel mortal! ;-)

    28. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by OrbNobz · · Score: 1

      Notice it says 256 m B.
      That's milli as in .256 Bytes.
      .256 is close enough to 1/4.
      1 Byte = 8 bits
      8 bits / 4 = 2 bits.

      So in other words: it has a 2-bit cache.
      Good joke.

    29. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      kinda sad though when the vaporware guy's vapor products of the past are staples in today's market. (less the speed etc)

      128MB on magnetic media. . hmm

      I joined the Georgia State Defense force during the summer of 1996. I was to stand as a guard, and assist people etc. My plan was to take the $1600 I would make and use it to buy 32MB of ram.

      I was a wee lad in highschool and I wanted to buy 32mb of ram after working hundreds of hours in uniform in the hot sun.

      And I found a 512mb dimm in the back of my car I have no recollection of last week.

      Does my rambling have a purpose? Do I have a message to share? A point to make?

      Sure. Here it is.

      we still get all frothy when we hear something like 6.8ghz mystery chip. 1TB of solid state drive?

      WTF is wrong with us?!

    30. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked.
      It seems it is not a cut&paste job, but ugly artifacts of extremal JPEG compression, so it is not the proved fake, nor proved true picture.
      Just simply look to other texts, they are also blurry

      |Look closely at the Free Space. It is obvious that the 2,189,394,472,960 bytes is a cut and paste job.

    31. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by emandres · · Score: 1

      4 Gigs is actually a hardware limitation for 32 bit processors, as far as I understand it. And if we're talking about "64-bit" windows, good luck. The 64-bit version of XP is little more than a hastily put together 32 bit emulation for 64 bit hardware.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    32. Re:It actually does! (and they have the pictures!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer from INPEX ( www.inventionshow.com ):
      Yes, he did win INPEX awards. He first exhibited in 1999 with his Non-volatile Magnetic Quantum-Optical Random Accessible Memory Device. He received a gold medal and an Excellence in Science Award. He returned to INPEX in 2000 to display 256GB Non-volatile Quantum-Optical RAM and Quantum-Optical Solarchip. He received 2 gold medals and the Grand Prix Runner-up Prize of $2,000.
      ---
      now no idea what to think about, also theirs notebook is on list page of awarded items for CES 2005

  73. Prototype by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Show us a prototype - then we'll talk. Until then, I think this can be dismissed as vapourware, and a rather feeble attempt at it for that matter.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  74. Some fun facts... by eviltypeguy · · Score: 1

    Apparently this "magical computing" corporation has sprinkled their pixie dust on others too. They're actually registered for the next CES:

    http://www.cesweb.org/attendees/directory/rd_exhib itor_details.asp?exhibid=7059

    Personally, I'd rather have the pixie dist they're using then whatever supposed invention they're presenting :)

  75. But you know what is going to happen... by toupsie · · Score: 1

    It will be dupped in at least 2 days. Count on it.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:But you know what is going to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You appear to have duplicated the 'p' in 'duped'.

  76. I must be obsolete by stevesliva · · Score: 1

    Because both Foxtrot and CmdrTaco are referring to this Nintendog thing and I still haven't heard about from more boring conventional sources. Or real human beings. I don't know what this latest brain-sucking innovation in kiddie electronics is, but if it's anything like a FurbyTomigotchiPokemon, I'll puke.

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    1. Re:I must be obsolete by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what it is...It's a "virtual pet" that responds to voice commands and gives your kid the feeling of having a pet without all that troublesome work and responsibility. Your bag's under the seat.

  77. OMFG!!!! by paradizelost · · Score: 1

    ROFLMAO That is f*ing hilarious.....

    --
    "In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
  78. Alien Autopsy by Hamhock · · Score: 1

    I think the atom chip people are the same people who produced the alien autopsy video shown a few years ago on Fox. At the least, it looks like they are using screen grabs from the autopsy on their home page.

    --
    Two Minus Three Equals Negative Fun -Troy McClure
  79. Bullshit detector on overdrive by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

    If this company really did have a non-volatile 2TB memory chip, like hell they would dump all the engineering time into developing a LAPTOP based around it. Bullshit! They would package them up, 20 or so in a box with a couple power supplies, and start shopping them around to raid manufacturers. They'd put 10TB in a 3.5" package and sell it to systems integrators. They'd put seagate out of business, and then use the money to do cool things with processors or whatever.

    No, you can tell from the hairbrained business-plan that this is cowflop. Noone is going to go straight into consumer electronics right out of the gate. You'd need to raise so much capital just to deal with customer support issues, sales, inventory, marketing, no way. If they had come up with a real product, they'd be oem-ing it out to the mainframe or supercomputer world as a first step.

    1. Re:Bullshit detector on overdrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this thing were for real then some company like Intel would buy this guy out for a few hundred million and then procede to put every hard drive and ram manufacturer out of business and make even more billions than they do now...

  80. Fake or not? by dusik · · Score: 1

    I still cannot convince myself that this isn't a hoax... but here's some actually coherent info on the laptop:

    World's first solid state laptop?

    Atom Chip Corporation Reveal Ultra Fast 6.8GHz Laptop

  81. Slashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the bright side, maybe the slashdot effect will take care of the site. (Assuming they're not running their Apache/1.3.27 Server on their quantum-optical machines)

  82. Domain Registration by SirCyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, this looks like a corporate website. The admin contact is an @MSN.com address?! Check out the WHOIS info:

          Registrant:
                Shimon Gendlin
                Shimon Gendlin
                21 Reed Lane
                Westbury, NY 11590
                US
                Email: atomchip@optonline.net

          Registrar Name....: REGISTER.COM, INC.
          Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
          Registrar Homepage: www.register.com

          Domain Name: atomchip.com

                Created on..............: Sun, Aug 25, 2002
                Expires on..............: Fri, Aug 25, 2006
                Record last updated on..: Fri, Jul 29, 2005

          Administrative Contact:
                WIPOI
                Shimon Gendlin
                21 Reed Lane
                Westbury, NY 11590
                US
                Phone: 516-368-4800
                Email: shimon_gendlin@msn.com

          Technical Contact:
                Register.Com
                Domain Registrar
                575 8th Avenue 11th Floor
                New York, NY 10018
                US
                Phone: 1-902-7492701
                Email: domain-registrar@register.com

          DNS Servers:

          dns1.register.com
          dns2.register.com

    1. Re:Domain Registration by doctor_no · · Score: 2, Funny

      What you don't know?!?

      Shimon Gendlin is a "Gold Oskar" winner!

      http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/22/index.htm

      Not to mention a "World Genius"!!!

      http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/18/index.htm

    2. Re:Domain Registration by griffm · · Score: 1

      WIPOI stands for the World Intellectual Property Organisation. From the atomchip website "THE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) AWARDED A GOLD MEDAL TO SHIMON GENDLIN FOR THE QUANTUM-OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY". So I guess the guy gave himself an award.

      Besides that, the Shimon Gendlin name is related to some patents (of which there are many bullcrap ones) and when you google the name, you end up picking up many crackpot sites.

      An obvious hoax, but I am still curious as to what the motivation is for it.

      Griff

    3. Re:Domain Registration by mibus · · Score: 1

      @msn.com?

      Worse yet, he probably uses MSN Messenger... :)

  83. Steven Glass is back! by MartyJG · · Score: 1

    That inimitable web-designer Steven Glass is back - and he's having delusions about impressing the IT industry!

    Seriously - how did this get posted as a Slashdot story?

    If we're talking about hard news I know of several relations of deposed-dictators of third world countries with approximately US$24,500,000 each that needs to be transferred to my personal bank account for which I will be handsomely rewarded. I keep all these e-mails in a folder marked 'spam', but I don't mind telling my friends it's 100% genuine.

    --
    insignificant sig
    1. Re:Steven Glass is back! by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about hard news I know of several relations of deposed-dictators of third world countries with approximately US$24,500,000 each that needs to be transferred to my personal bank account for which I will be handsomely rewarded. I keep all these e-mails in a folder marked 'spam', but I don't mind telling my friends it's 100% genuine.
      AS WE TOLD YOU BEFORE, THIS MUST REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL OTHERWISE WE RISK THE MONEY WILL BE TAKEN BY THE UN OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME WILL SEIZE IT.
      -- YOUR GOOD CHUM SADAM

  84. RIGHT by eebra82 · · Score: 0

    Jesus christ Slashdot, it's so obvious that this is either a hoax or a really huge mistake. I mean, how on earth could such laptop be possible?

    Just look at this bullshit:

    "Packing Accessories: Quick Guide, Support CD"

    The rest I do believe but THAT is just tooooo much!

  85. Heat Pipe Fiber Optics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I particularly liked the diagram that identified the copper heat pipes for the CPU as fiber optic cables.

  86. This Computer Is Real! by MobileMrX · · Score: 1

    I have one already. I keep it on my desk next to my photo of bigfoot, plugged in to my pocket-sized cold fusion reactor. It runs Duke Nukem Forever like a dream!

  87. Registration at CES 2006 are real by Goggi · · Score: 1

    They actually registered at CES 2006 with their fantastic product specs, the 2TB CF-card for example.

  88. And I bet it'll run the Bitchin' Fast 3d 2000 by llamalicious · · Score: 1
  89. OMFG!!! Scroll Lock mode!!! by scovetta · · Score: 1

    Who cares about the quantum-optical doohickey or the 6.8 Ghz chip. The damn thing has Scroll Lock Mode! Finally, after years of needing to use a USB-based Scroll-Lock button taped to the side of my keyboard, I can finally boost my productivity. I can't wait. Hey, do they support the SysRq key as well?

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  90. 2012 called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...MS wants Vista's recommended system configuration back...

  91. I've got one of these! by drachenfyre · · Score: 2, Funny

    I own one of these beauties. It's parked next to my Phantom game console. I even have Duke Nukem Forever running between them on my 25 TB/s wireless network.

  92. Sounds very familiar by timecop · · Score: 0

    Maybe the guys from http://www.go-l.com/ are at it again.

    PuRAM(tm) anyone?

  93. april fool? by AxemRed · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait...

  94. doubtful by gregulrajani · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He must be a genius if he is not standing on the sholders of giants.
    scholar.google.com

  95. And yet... by http101 · · Score: 1

    ...it still takes over an hour to install a service pack for Windows.

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  96. gleek by dhart · · Score: 1

    I've laughed at a lot of funny hoaxes before, but this one is the first that's had me pointing and hooting embarrassingly while uncontrollably choking saliva out my nose!

  97. Very Funny by red_dragon · · Score: 0

    The limit for 32-bit is 4 GB, and the limit for 64-bit is 128 GB.

    Ha ha, you so funny me laugh lots. A 64-bit bus can address 16 exabytes of memory.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:Very Funny by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0


      Please refer to this post for your response, as I cannot be bothered to type it out all over again.

      In addition, next time try reading the thread before responding to it...your post wasted both my time and yours.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Very Funny by photon317 · · Score: 2, Informative


      Yeah, but an actual 64-bit processor is not capable using 16 exabytes of memory. AFAIK, both x86-64 platforms (amd opteron/athlon64 and intel's ripoffs) are limited in silicon to addressing 1TB of physical RAM. Operating system support can of course push this number lower. The kernel shipping with SuSE Enterprise Linux on an Opteron can address up to 512GB.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    3. Re:Very Funny by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      First... XP64 can only address 128GB RAM, because it's not using 64-bit addressing. It's using 36-bit, which is what the EM64T chips use.

      Now, the AMD64 chips can *AT MINIMUM* address 1TB, b/c they use 40 and 48-bit addressing.

    4. Re:Very Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now, the AMD64 chips can *AT MINIMUM* address 1TB, b/c they use 40 and 48-bit addressing.

      Oh, I'm sure they can address much less than that. I only use 1GB in my machine with no problems.

    5. Re:Very Funny by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      That just means that there's no memory at the address space above 1GB. The address space above 1GB all the way to 1TB (on a 40-bit CPU - it's 256TB on a 48-bit CPU) most definitely still exists[1], but there's nothing there[2].

      [1] Actually, in 32-bit mode, the address space is reduced to a 32-bit address space, limiting it to 4GB.
      [2] The OS uses that area for virtual memory, in fact. So, there actually IS something there. However, there's no physical memory there.

    6. Re:Very Funny by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 1

      That's right. I just got a new Opteron and have been playing with it. The architecture manual says that addresses can be up to 52 bits wide (4 petabytes), but specific implementations may support only smaller addresses, which can be queried using CPUID EAX=0x80000008. Mine says that virtual addresses are limited to 48 bits (256 TB) and physical addresses to 40 bits (1 TB). Of course the OS and in particular the motherboard may have further constraints.

    7. Re:Very Funny by GodGell · · Score: 1

      just thought i'd add some extra (obvious) info:

      32-bit addressing has a limit of 4GB.
      36-bit addressing has a limit of 64GB.
      40-bit addressing has a limit of 1TB.
      48-bit addressing has a limit of 256TB.

      and finally, 64-bit addressing has a limit of as much as 16 petabytes - 16,777,216TB!

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    8. Re:Very Funny by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec... ah, crap, that means XP64 uses 37-bit addressing...

      So, that screws up everything...

      Hmm... looking, it almost looks like I was wrong, and EM64T is 40-bit, and AMD64 is 48-bit...

    9. Re:Very Funny by GodGell · · Score: 1

      AMD64 is 48-bit...

      wait a sec. if you have a 64-bit databus, why use only 48 bits of it for addressing?

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    10. Re:Very Funny by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I should say...

      AMD64 is 64-bit.

      To save transistors, I guess, K8 is 64-bit word size, 48-bit address (FWIW, it doesn't HAVE a traditional data bus. 128-bit RAM bus, and a 16-bit HT bus (IIRC))

      Of course, this isn't the first time that's been done... I'm thinking of the 68000. 32-bit word, 16-bit data, 24-bit address...

      The 68008 was even worse - 32-bit word, 8-bit data, (IIRC) 20-bit address.

  98. I did not believe either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is most likely a fraud but it does contains some interesting tid-bits of info that make it appear that it could be true.

    First off they won an award for there laptop by CES.
    http://cesweb.org/attendees/awards/innovations/rd_ 2005honorees.asp?category=48

    Second, Windows 2003 Datacenter (64-bit) edition does support 1TB, maybe they hacked Windows XP with those files to get 1TB (If they are so super smart you would think they could do this).

    Ref: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/64bit/x 64/datacenter.mspx

    Third, They are going to CES to show off there product: http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page5.html

    So these pieces of info make it seem in the realm of possibilty even though that chance seems so small

  99. Does anybody have a brain by deceiving99 · · Score: 1

    Look at the pictures. You can see they have been edited. The screenshot that shows available space on the drive had a real hack job done to it. The TB doesn't even line up straight with the rest of the line. What about the picture of the goofs in clean suits. Looks like they are sitting at a beuty shop. What about the fact that the web page is extremely lack luster? I mean it looks like they used Microsoft paint to do their very amateur editing. This doesn't even begin to look like a good hoax. Ok, if you do a search of Atom Chip Corporation you may come across a CES site that lists them as attendees (http://www.cesweb.org/attendees/directory/rd_exhi bitor_details.asp?exhibid=7059). But, their email address are @optonline.net See they were too cheap to even pay for webhosting that would at least allow them to have email addresses using the atomchip.com domain. Oh well, maybe high quality hoaxes will make a come back some day!

  100. April Fools! by msblack · · Score: 1

    Oops. I mean, Back-to-School Fools!

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  101. copyrighting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA ... Quantum (R) ...

    WTF?

  102. /. == Bullshitdot.org?? by Guru+Goo · · Score: 0

    Thats right !

  103. Can't even get a 1gb NIC? by BigAssRat · · Score: 1

    You would think they would include a 10gb NIC or at least a 1gb NIC. To funny, it is usually the little things that kill hoaxes heh?

  104. Confounding Specs. by iSeal · · Score: 1

    And I quote from the site:
    SPECS: 6.8GHZ CPU (AtomChip® Quantum® II processor or 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz)

    So its their chip... or Quad Pentium 4 Ms... And we all know that 4x1.7GHz (mispelt on the site) is supposed to equal 6.8GHz. Two things wrong with this - or 4 x PentiumMs? WTF! Weasiling out? Its as if I said "Oh here I came out with this super duper chip... but hey, I'll package the laptop with a Sempron instead..." And as much as it was questionable to fit any of the other components into the laptop, we know for sure that fitting 4 PentiumM CPUs in that space is an impossibility.

  105. Mr. Oz revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whois of atomchip.com

    Administrative Contact:
    WIPOI
    Shimon Gendlin
    21 Reed Lane
    Westbury, NY 11590
    US
    Phone: 516-368-4800
    Email: shimon_gendlin@msn.com

    Whois of COMPU-TECHNICS.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Compu-Technics Inc atomchip@optonline.net
    21 Reed Lane
    Westdury, NY 11590
    US
    516-997-8999 fax: 516-9978188

  106. Their amazing Logo by cwolves0 · · Score: 1

    This company has obviously put $$$ into developing tihs laptop. With their huge R&D budget, you'd think that they would have been able to spring for a graphic artist to get a nicer logo than "AtomChip" in a 24pt arial font.

    1. Re:Their amazing Logo by jonoverdose · · Score: 0

      ... and their search engine optimisation budget seems to know no bounds:

  107. Patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This appears to be their patent:
    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r =2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=5,841,689&OS=5,841,6 89&RS=5,841,689

    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

    This invention concerns a new non-volatile memory cell where, during the reading of information, a magnetic quantum-optical method is used. This method is based on the recently discovered magnetic quantum-optical effect, named after its discoverer, "Gendlin Effect". This invention also deals with a new composition of materials for non-volatile carrier that could be used as an environment of accumulation with high-density recording of discrete information; it also concerns a non-volatile storing device with random access, built with the use of a new composition of materials and new memory cell.

    Thin metal magnetic films with high specific resistance to electric current with various crystal structures are used as the record carrier.

    More definitely, this concerns the new magnetic record carrier on thin films with high specific resistance to electricity, deposited from both sides in a thin film-base conductive electrode made from non-magnetic metal with low specific resistance to electric current, which is the source of an electromagnetic field when electric current passes through it, and are packed in porous silicon, whose caverns are filled with the magnetic material of the carrier.

    When electric current is sent through the electrode, a magnetic field is generated around it, directed through all layers of thin magnetic films and adjoining areas of porous silicon, whose caverns are filled with the magnetic material of the carrier from the layer next to the porous silicon and thus magnetizes or changes the direction of the magnetic field inside the magnetic carrier. Meanwhile, the magnetic domains of the carrier located between small-sized "hairs" (less than 2.5 nm) in porous silicon, generate resilient mechanical pressure on them (compression and expansion). As a result, the "hairs" are deformed and, according to the principles of quantum mechanics, the energy state changes as the position of electrons is localized, and a quantum of light is generated in the bordering zone of this interaction. (Gendlin Effect, described in detail in the discovery application entitled "Magnetic quantum-optical effect in polycrystalline silicon"). This quantum of light is used to define the characteristics of the carrier concerning its magnetic reversal (signal of reading), that has found its implementation in the real device. ....

  108. But... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has to exist first!

    Y'know, I've seen Linux run on a washing machine. I've even seen Linux run on a toaster, but I ain't never seen Linux run on no phantom Atomchip laptop.

    1. Re:But... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      "Does it run Linux?"

      " It has to exist first!"

      It's possible to write an emulator and run Linux (or anything else) on a totally imaginary architecture.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  109. Power Usage by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    OTOH, I suspect that the true power usage for this laptop will be zero.

    Oh, I wouldn't say that. I see Windows running on it and the one thing I have learned over the years is that Windows can suck the power out of anything.

    For every advance in processor, disk and memory technology, a new release of Windows follows which ties more of it up. Heck when this thing starts up Windows probably fills up half the available memory (like it does on my 1.25GB desktop system) with DLLs and whatnot, whatever it can't find on the system disk it'll probably create just to meet expectations.

    I shudder to think what Longhorn will demand of systems for minimum hardware.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  110. HA stinking HA! by halgorithm · · Score: 0

    You would think that they'd take screenshots and not digital pics of the screen itself and then modify the pictures... This is a very poor hoax, at least they could have had Slackware 20.1 or something on it, that would have been believeable.

  111. Uh,bullcrap!!! by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Gimme a break, this site is showing pieces of a CD drive and a fan with copper heat pipes and then badly Photoshopping its logo on things and claiming it is an optical drive? WTF, Slashdot needs some quality control.

  112. You should start your own news site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TripMaster, you totally have to start your own news site, where you're completely in control of the content that is posted! It'd be such a rad site that I'd visit daily.

  113. How come were they at CES??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For sure, it's fake. No question about that.
    I thought it could be a website for a scambaiter at first but they are not talking about the possibility to buy anything... and moreover, they have a link showing they were at CES 2006!
    How can they pay the fee to attend to that kind of shows? Is that a hobby for some rich old man?

  114. No, no, no by 3770 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not true according to this quote:

    "The new AtomChip® Quantum® II processor with 256MB on-board memory has a high speed with very low consumption of electrical energy."

    It uses very little elecrical energy. What I have to figure out though is what other type of energy it uses. I'm suspecting bullshit or some other type biological energy source.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    1. Re:No, no, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It harvests it's own bogon emissions! It's a perpetual clean energy source!

  115. 16 gigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...try 4gigs. Anything over 4 gigs requires a 64-bit OS since 2^32 bytes = 4gigs.

    1. Re:16 gigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAE, motherfucker. Do you SPEAK it?

    2. Re:16 gigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      32 bit intel processors have a memory segmentation/paging feature that allows them to address up to 16GB, just not all at once.

  116. Someone's science project...? by Karyyk · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I'd expect better web-design from such pioneers... "WE ARE #1." Right...

    Here's my favorite bit of BS:

    DECODER/TRANSCEIVER is mounted on the motherboard of the computer (or other electronic devices) and is electrically hooked up to the processor. The following devices are located in the decoder/transceiver: laser beam splitter, spatial light modulator, optoelectronic word mirror with transform lens, matrix converter of the optical display in electrical signals and other circuits for the interface.

    And the components themselves...hmmm. Some look straight out of some middle schooler's summer science project (though I don't mean to insult some of those). 256MB cache? LOL...this is great.

  117. Re:Looks tell all by TampaDeveloper · · Score: 1

    Exactly; Who would make a $$$ machine that looks like such ass.

  118. It's not even a good hoax.. by tji · · Score: 1


    Beyond the nonsensical claims about the product features and capabilities, you can easily see where all their screen caps have been edited.

    If you're going to put effort into a hoax, at least make it good. I thought it would take a better job of photoshopping to make it to the front page of /.

  119. Re:Reminds me of... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Tom Servo with a full-head cataract.

  120. CES by cfredette · · Score: 1

    I saw this guy at CES last year and apparently they are buying another booth. Where is the money coming from? Personally it looked liek he took CF cards and glued on stickers with big numbers. They were trying to lease laptops with the tech for $6000 where you return it later.

  121. Easy answer - mutli-core! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never mind the indecision between using commas (6,80 Ghz) and decimal points (1.00 TB), but according to Microsoft, the most physical memory a Windows XP Professional system can support is 4 GB (or 128 GB for 64-bit edition).

    Well obviously they have a Quantum multi-core design, with eight cores each running XP Pro you get a TB of memory supported and the dialogue just adds it all up!

    The whole comma/decimal point inconsitancy is a byproduct of the quantum design, which locks in actual characters used in a dialogue only when a user views the screen. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  122. Bulgarain Oscar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you click through the contact pages, you may end up here...

    http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/22/index.htm

    at the bottom is a picture of an oscar with "Gold oscar from EWEI - bulgaria" crudley scrolled on it. not to mention their WIPO certificate for quantum technology!

  123. Too funny. by shift3 · · Score: 1

    I love how the "name" of the chip uses the exact same font as the quantum line of HDs. Quantum Fireball HD

    --
    You fall and receive 6334 damage.
    You die.
  124. It's all true! by slashflood · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't be that sceptical. Check out an earlier version of the website and you'll see that there are actually a lot of hiqh quality products.

    Rock on, Atomchip!

  125. boom by bullshit+detector · · Score: 1

    Tell momma I love her!IN4$%JK#%DAT+0+0[NO CARRIER]

  126. AtomChip Logo? by Necroman · · Score: 1

    Is it me, or does the AtomChip Logo look a lot like the LSI Logic Logo?

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  127. Have you seen these jokers? by crovira · · Score: 1

    This must be some school prank. Apart from the claim made (TB chips? Yeah, right!)

    To do it in the facilities they claim to be doing it in (with that 'air shower') is impossible. And the image of them 'working' in the 'clean suits' at a vertical marker easel has to be a joke...

    (btw. Where's the XP Window everybody's talking about? I haven't seen hide nor hair or it on the site.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  128. I won't believe it... by Ruphuz · · Score: 1

    ... until it runs CherryOS.

    --
    My other post is a First.
  129. Check your units, everyone! by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

    Hmphh. Check out the tagline on one of their home pages:

    Atom Chip Corporation: Welcome to the World of Nanomicrons and Beyond!

    Nanomicrons? Since the adoption of "femto" in 1964, (and considering the fact that there were much fewer uses for it before then) this word was supposed to have died. Really... why don't they just use "Billiardth-inches" while they're at it. [--to say nothing about whatever groundbreaking processing techniques allowed them to fabricate a processor at 1/100,000 the wavelength of x-rays]

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  130. They forgot the most important feature of all by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it runs Longhorn!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by wed128 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...at minimum spec!

    2. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but it'll be dog slow. Longhorn should have 2 TB of ram, at the least.

    3. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by Golias · · Score: 3, Funny

      And it runs Longhorn!

      And gets outstanding frame rates on Duke Nukem Forever.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Er... 4. 4 TB of ram, is what I meant.

      Way to blow the punchline, sb.

    5. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      And gets outstanding frame rates on Duke Nukem Forever.

      Yeah, but so will your GeForce 4

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by Metteyya · · Score: 2, Funny

      And it runs Longhorn!
      And comes with Duke Nukem Forever preinstalled!

    7. Re:They forgot the most important feature of all by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny
      And it runs Longhorn!

      That's only the second most important feature.

      The most important feature is its amazing three million nanosecond battery life.

  131. a 56k modem? i'm sold by squison · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Communication: 10/100 Base-T LAN on board, MDC Fax/Modem V.90/V.92 on Board"

    Screw the 1TB of RAM.. It's got a V.90/V.92 modem that FAXES TOO! ON BOARD! Wow, what will they think of next?

    Not to mention the air shower, gatta get me one of those.

  132. morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats waht you going to look like if its true... I'd PM each of you and remind you about your moronity :P

  133. I like the prices. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    They say they are price competitive with non-quantum technology.

    Then they have the following prices:

    1. The NvIOpRAM [ATA IDE] products have the selling price of $2.50 per 1GB.
    2. NvIOpSRAM [144-pin SODIMM] products have the selling price of $4.50 per 1GB.
    3. NvIOpSRAM [200-pin SODIMM] products have the selling price of $6.00 per 1GB.

    Let's see, then that 2TB drive will cost $5000, and that included 1TB of RAM will cost $6000, for a minimum notebook cost of $11,000. And that's assuming the rest of the notebook (including their miracle processor) is free. While 1TB of RAM for $6000 is a good price, 2TB of hard drive for $5000 is a bit on the steep side.

    Oh, and some loony hardware enthusiasts have already shown that even some current processors can run at 7GHz.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  134. John Titor would be proud by Mille+Mots · · Score: 1

    While looking at the pictures, I thought, 'Man, John Titor probably needed one of these to control his microsingularity drive(s).' Hell, maybe good ol' John is on the board over there at AtomChip!

  135. It's not a hoax!! by WarDancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    They just forgot to mention the stats were for 1,000 units :)

  136. Look no further! by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The first posts identified this for what it was...a cute joke. If only they had put miniature hamster wheels powered by pet roaches in the power bay...

    If you trouble yourself to view other posts you will not dozens of idiot geek wanna-bees shocked that slashdot editors did not spot the technical errors of this article. I imagine they are outraged by the obvious political bias of The Onion and Madd Magazine?

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  137. Garden Plastic chair, strange pics by uomolinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On one of the company pics, I saw one person siting on a garden plastic chair. Also, the facilities don't impress me much, 4 scientist in a small bathroom looking at some stuff. http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/8GBAdapters.JPG These pics look funny to me, I could do the same hoax at home with some sort of glue and electronics component I have in here. The most funny part of it is the 2T memory allocation of Windows XP, and why XP OS by the way? Common Slashdot!!! you could do better!

    1. Re:Garden Plastic chair, strange pics by DrLex · · Score: 1

      Again I wonder where you found that image, because it's not used anywhere on the site... as it is now. Which makes me suspect that they cleaned up their hoax to make it less suspicious.
      By the way, I bought exactly the same 3.5mm jack about 7 years ago at an electronics store. Of course it didn't have that little red doohickey.

    2. Re:Garden Plastic chair, strange pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went back on the site, I guess they are also Slashdot readers and saw my message regardin this Garden Party and remmoved the pics. I will look on my browser cach.

  138. Re: Yes, It runs GNU/linux by vettemph · · Score: 1
    All you need to know is that 32-bit Windows XP only supports 16 gigs of RAM and this claims to have 1 terabyte of RAM.

    It runs linux too in case you don't like being limited and encumbered.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  139. includes free time machine by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    They even took a picture from next January's CES. You'd think they'd advertise the time machine feature... http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page5.html

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  140. Battery Life?!? by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    Exactly how long will I get from a dirty-nuke's worth of Plutonium in a lead backpack? Sheesh, no one answers the tough questions anymore.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  141. hoax by muzik4machines · · Score: 0

    scam, joke, making fun of... i seen this one 3-4 days ago and i laugh my ass off just google any of the components, no links whatsoever

  142. Interesting... by slashflood · · Score: 1

    The CEO has a patent on his invention. Hm... And here is a somehow interesting post about the guy and his company. As a teenager he invented the floppy disk and leased it to IBM.???

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, the floppy disk was invented by Yoshiro Nakamatsu. This inventor is Russian // Israeli

  143. Bullcrap detector... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    The 1.0TB line was the first one to call my attention. Windows wasn't ready for TB's yet, shouldn't it say 1024 GB?

    Also, this line seemed to have some contrast with the surroundings (typical photoshop edition) ... adjust your gamma correction to see a faint distinct-border around it.

    The laptop looked streamline, I'd expect a prototype using a desktop PC. Laptops are very expensive to produce, a customized laptop of this magnitude would've appeared in /. *before* production like .... "Company plans to develop 1TB laptop" or something.

    Finally, what the heck is "nanomicrons and beyond"? It's the most stupid buzzphrase i've ever heard.

    1. Re:Bullcrap detector... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Windows wasn't ready for TB's yet, shouldn't it say 1024 GB?

      In what sense? I have a networked drive displayed in my explorer window on XP Pro right now showing as having 1.09 TB total space.

      Finally, what the heck is "nanomicrons and beyond"?

      A nanomicron, apart from being a bullshit made up term, would be 10E-9 of a micron, or 10E-15 of a metre. So that's a femtometre (fm) then. You'd have thought a quantum mechanical engineer would know something like that...

    2. Re:Bullcrap detector... by millennial · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've somehow managed to glitch out my floppy disk drive a few times so that it said that several PETAbytes were in use. It actually said "petabyte", and that was back in Windows 98.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  144. Shoot the graphics guy by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

    Those aren't even GOOD photoshop mock ups. Even within a given pic of the "processor" some fonts are sharp and clear while others are fuzzy. The whole site took no more than a drunken hour and a half. I expect a better quality of internet hoax in this day and age, dammit.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  145. Price?? by TarryTops · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it won't cost much, right?

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
  146. Toaster... by burts · · Score: 1

    I don't want to sound like a jerk but i believe that NetBSD runs on the toaster and not Linux.

  147. I found the XP page. by crovira · · Score: 1

    It is a better fake than I usually see. But really. Windows would know about terabytes?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:I found the XP page. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Yes. If you have a disk volume that is very close to, at or over 1TB it will show "TB" accordingly. ie .99TB or 2.2TB.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  148. Secret by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    Or it could be top secret government technology that some russians have discovered and posted a funny website to say: hey we know about your secrets now.

  149. I hate the voice commands for Nintendogs so much by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

    I told my roommate if I heard him yelling "Sit Stacy" one more time I was going ot murder him. I'm pretty sure I was serious too. Almost as bad as constantly hearing him speak is watching him. He sits there with the DS on his lap. It looks like he's screaming at his crotch. Guests at my house think he calls his penis Stacy.

  150. I'M POSTING FROM ONE RIGHT NOW by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

    IN FACT I'M RUNNING IT IN THE FUTURISTIC "CAPS LOCK" MODE. .. however slashdot is not compabitile with this new technology. It gave me a "lameness filter" when I tried my orginal post, so I'm now running in regular mode.

  151. What is happening to my Slashdot? by TintinX · · Score: 1

    My favorite site is going to the wall!
    Some other /. regulars may be aware of 'Tech news/social bookmarking (or however it's being described this week)' website, digg.com.
    It's taken a lot of it's modding ideas from /. but iplemented them rather differently and there is no editorial control - stories make it to the homepage by virtue of their mod rating.
    That site featured this 'news' last week where its legitimacy was quickly demolished (it's hardly difficult).
    I mention this because I see a number of digg.com stories making their way to /. some days later and I suspect it's because folk are reading digg and then submitting the item here where the editorial intervention creates the few days of lag.
    I've always considered Slashdot to be a place for interesting and intelligent news and debate. The more I see of stories like this making their way on here, the more I am (sadly) beginning to doubt that.
    I'm all for a bit of 'dumbing down' for light relief every now and then (that's why I dig digg) but can we please try and maintain at least a reasonable level of genuine geek newsworthiness?

  152. Apparently... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ...the thing that's been holding up quantum computing is the task of requisitioning a lot of hot glue and play-doh.

    And what's with the lone cyrillic tab on the properties window?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  153. Check 'em out at CES!!! by mackman · · Score: 1

    You can check out their quantum-optical headphone jacks for yourself at their CES booth

  154. I cant wait to play DooM on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at the angle the laptop is at and then look at the property window http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page4.html
    IDK could be my eyes but it to me looks like its been overlayed onto the screen..

    two more to point out (Although you can change'em with windows so this my just be out there) The mouse cursor looks like its off OsX and the help and close buttons at the top look iffy to me...

    I will buy one when I can get my new Radion xt99999 with 10 TB of video memory and a 10 TB GPU.....

  155. Re: Yes, It runs GNU/linux by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    True, but they show a Windows XP screenshot going into terabytes.

  156. Great specs and all but .... by bizitch · · Score: 1

    .... will it run Lotus 1-2-3?

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  157. What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pity the foo' who continues to generate money for them after THAT article hit the fp.

    Bye Slashdot.

  158. All Jokes Aside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see all kinds of jokes posted here about flux capacitors, jiggawatts, april fools, Duke Nukem Forever, and the like. But nobody seems to have noticed that this is a website FROM THE FUTURE!!! Proof is on the CES-2006 page. They were ALREADY at the Consumer Electronics Show 2006 in Las Vegas. This show is taking place this comming January! I for one welcome our new time traveling superpowered laptop slinging overlords.

  159. Should have used Linux by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    They should have created their fake screen shots using Linux instead of XP. Then the /. crowd would have bought it. :-)

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  160. Finally by Andrew+Lenahan · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the rackmounted server version of this, I need two of them to power my Holodeck.

    --
    Andrew Lenahan http://www.starblind.com/
  161. Just in time for Longhorn^WVista by fabu10u$ · · Score: 1

    (Cue the M$FT-bashing trolls...)

    Isn't this about as much machine as what Vista will need to be functional?

    --
    They say the mind is the first thing to ... uh, what's that saying again?
  162. Somebody in Westbury NY go check out their offices by mackman · · Score: 1

    From their CES reg.:

    Atom Chip Corporation
    Old Country Road
    Westbury, NY 11590
    USA Telephone: 516-428-9859
    Fax: 516-997-8188

    From their WHOIS:

    21 Reed Lane
    Westbury, NY 11590
    Phone: 516-368-4800

  163. seriously by bkerygma · · Score: 1

    Someone somewhere is laughing their ass off right now.

  164. They were at CES 2004 and someone saw them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  165. For real! by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    This is not shenanigans!

    The guy took my credit card information when I order up one of these super laptop!

    When you order make sure you have your social security number, birth date, maiden name, banking info and pin handy. They need all that info so you can pass the tight security screening process to buy one of these things.

    Order now! I can hardly wait the 4-8 weeks till I get mine. Maybe Windows will work really fast!

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    1. Re:For real! by Torinir · · Score: 1

      Maybe Windows will work really fast!

      Windows will find a way to bloat that 1TB of RAM, and still work like it was installed on a 386. :-p

      Maybe this will give cause for M$ to create some new BSOD messages (or red screen for "Vista"). I'm sure there'll be boundless new ways for Windows to crash now!

    2. Re:For real! by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      Maybe this will give cause for M$ to create some new BSOD messages (or red screen for "Vista")

      Windows already has a "Red Screen of Death", it's for when hardware fails.

  166. I want one! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Let me know when it is real. In the mean time I will get that new flying car I have been hearing about.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  167. Get a look at this WMV!!! by stamima · · Score: 1

    This company (atomchip/compu-technics) was also supposed to have 'solar memory' (http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/3/index.htm).
    Well, found the following on the net: http://www.compu-technics.com/images/solar%20memor y.WMV
    Best laugh I've had in YEARS!

  168. Bad source on ram issue by SurgeryByNumbers · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a mistake on that Microsoft page linked by the parent.

    "PAE is an Intel-provided memory address extension that enables support of up to 64 GB of physical memory for applications running on most 32-bit (IA-32) Intel Pentium Pro and later platforms. Support for PAE is provided under Windows 2000 and 32-bit versions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. 64-bit versions of Windows do not support PAE."

    Up above that (where the parent is referring to) they say that only 2003 (in a few additions) support the feature. I'm not sure if it was intentional or an oversight, but regardless I'm pretty sure that this is an issue that was addressed quite a while ago for 2000/XP.

    (On a tangent, I had a really hard time proving to /. that I wasn't a script, in order to post. Figures.)

    1. Re:Bad source on ram issue by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Win2K had PAE, but only in the Advanced Server and above series. We had to test PAE mode to get our Fibre Channel drivers WHQL'ed.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  169. Did no one else notice by asynchronous13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Processor: 6.8GHZ CPU (AtomChip® Quantum® II processor or 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz)
    Hmmmm, 4 x 1.7GHz = 6.8GHz. Interesting.
    1. Re:Did no one else notice by utlemming · · Score: 1

      More interesting is what type of platform is it? Is it 64bit? x86? Alot of good these numbers mean if you don't have any information about what type of chip it is. Is it a new type? More info please.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    2. Re:Did no one else notice by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      Hmmmm, 4 x 1.7GHz = 6.8GHz. Interesting.
      Why yes. That does seem to compute. Am I missing something, or is this just a basic math lesson?
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    3. Re:Did no one else notice by jekewa · · Score: 1
      Like, you mean, your math doesn't add up, or the 1.7 "CHz" typo?

      In my math world four times one-point-seven does equal six-point-eight. One-point-seven, three-point-four, five-point-one, six-point-eight. Yup. Works.

      I'd guess the CHz is a typo, although it's in their list of specs twice; once for the processor, once for the battery life. From the site:

      SPECIFICATION:

      Processor: 6.8GHZ CPU (AtomChip® Quantum® II processor or 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz) / System Compliance: Two Operating Systems with Voice Command (Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional and Linux®) / Memory: 1TB Quantum-Optical non-volatile RAM (NvIOpSRAM-SODIMM 200-pin) / Storage: 2TB non-volatile Quantum RAM (NvIOpRAM-ATA IDE) / Optical Drive: DVD Super Multi / LCD Display: 12.1" WXGA (1280 x 800, 16:10) TFT Glare Type LCD display with 1.3 Mega pixel CMOS camera / Video & Graphics: Two Integrated graphic controllers [Intel®855GME internal graphics, support Intel® DVMT (Dynamic Video Memory Technology) and AtomChip® DVM (Dynamic Video Memory)] / Communication: 10/100 Base-T LAN on board, MDC Fax/Modem V.90/V.92 on Board, 802.11a/802.11b/802.11g WLAN, Intel® PRO/Wireless 2100/2200BG/2915ABG network connection, WiFi, Bluetoth, GPRS -with Bluetoth antena, CMOS camera with USB interface, Mega pixel resolution CMOS image / Pointing Device: Synaptics touchpad with 4 way scrolling button / Application Launch Key: E-mail, Internet, Capture, WLAN / LED Status Indicator: Power, Suspend/Resume, Battery Charging Status, Quantum Storage Access, Num Lock mode, Caps Lock mode, Scroll Lock mode, WLAN Lock mode / Keyboard: 3.0mm travel, inverted-T, 88keys with 2 windows key (Internet & Microsoft For Connectivity) / Interface Ports Front Side: One 4-in-1 card reader slot (support SDIO/SD/MS Pro/MS), Audio line out, Stereo Microphone-in / Interface Ports Left Side: LAN port, Modem port, SVGA-out port, One Type II PCMCIA slot (support CardBus), 1394A port (mini jack) / Interface Ports Right Side: USB 2.0 ports x 3 / Interface Port Rear Side: DC-in, Kensington Lock / Audio: Built-in two stereo speakers and Built-in Microphone / AC Adapter (Input: 100-240V AC, 50-60Hz, 1.5A. Output: 20V DC, 2.5A, 50W) / Battery: 6 cell Li-lon battery pack. Battery Charge: 3 hrs charge time to 100% capacity while system off and 4 hrs charge time while system on. Battery Life: Approximately 8 hours for AtomChip® Quantum® II processor and 3 hours for 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz / BIOS: AMI, Support PnP, password, Bootable from USB and DVD / Power Management: ACPI 2.0 compliance / Smart Battery System Support / Security: Kensington Lock / Size: 320.0(W) x 242.0(D) x 22.0(H)mm/28.0mm (front/back) / Weight: 1.9kg(when fully equipped with AtomChip® Quantum® II processor) and 2,20kg(when fully equipped with 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors) / Packing Accessories: Quick Guide, Support CD (Driver, Utility, Manual), AC Adapter, Power Cord, Battery Pack, BOSE Headphone Music System with noise Cancelling.

      What I want to know is why all the horsepower and only a 12" 1280x800 screen, and a crappy Intel video? Throw a big 15" or 17" on there and a decent nVida or ATI graphics chipset. Heck, the thing probably costs $10K anyway.

      At least it runs LINUX...

      --
      End the FUD
    4. Re:Did no one else notice by lloydtesterman · · Score: 1

      "or 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz" WOW, 1.7 ChiaHertz I bet that is sooperfast!!

    5. Re:Did no one else notice by pithen · · Score: 2, Funny
      Not only that, but why only a 10/100 MBit NIC? Shouldn't it be a 1 TBit wireless NIC (or better, 1 CBit!)

      Oh wait, I guess that technology isn't available yet.

    6. Re:Did no one else notice by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      It runs as fast as a chia pet grows.

    7. Re:Did no one else notice by p4ul13 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think what the GP was saying was that while:
      4 x 1.7 = 6.8
      is true,
      4 x 1.7GHz != 6.8GHz

      In other words a system with four processors running at 1.7GHz aren't going to deliver 6.8GHz of processing ability.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    8. Re:Did no one else notice by Bloater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > In other words a system with four processors running at 1.7GHz aren't going to deliver 6.8GHz of processing ability.

      processing ability isn't measured in Hz (the unit of cycles per second), the rate at which a small group of transistors and capacitors will wiggle at is measured in Hz. Since modern CPUs have several clocks, the Hz for a single CPU is just as made up as that for a group of four CPUs.

      6.8GHz is as real as 1.7 GHz and just as uninteresting.

      When they say "clockless" I might pay attention.

    9. Re:Did no one else notice by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I can't help but wonder what it would take to create a similar computer with 1 Peta Bytes of RAM, and 2 Peta Bytes of HDD? The applications would be boundless.

  170. Apparently headphone jacks are now optical lenses by squison · · Score: 1

    Scroll down a bit on this page to the NVIORAM pictures. Not only does it give you TB's of storage, but it also lets you plug your headphones into your record player.

    And also, proof the US Patent office will give a patent to anything from anybody

  171. Dupe!!! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    This was already posted -3295 days ago!

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  172. Apple switching ... by mbaudis · · Score: 1

    ... to AtomChip? That's why Steve Jobs canceled the keynote in Paris!

    I want one!

  173. Now with Scroll Lock! by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

    Boy howdy am I excited about this new machine. Perhaps finally I will know the true meaning of Scroll Lock!

    --
    You say you got a real solution
    Well, you know
    We'd all love to see the plan
    (The Beatles)
  174. Fake hardware like fake convention presention? by leesweet · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is intended to be similar to the folks that created the paper using the bafflegab (I forget the actual name) generator and got it admitted to a convention as a presented paper, and were later kicked out when the 'non-scholarly' method was discovered. This could be another attempt to see how far fake hardware can go until it's also found out. (I did like the Jan 2006 CES photos, though... nice touch!)

  175. Wow, what sort of crap is this... by OSDever · · Score: 1

    Look at this bullshit!!! On the homepage the guys in the "clean room" are wearing SURGICAL MASKS!!! And one of them is wearing jeans! I bemoan the fate of Slashdot.

    --
    What is the airspeed of a fully laden swallow?
  176. How do they do it? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Do they have a Handwavium doping process or what?

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  177. courtesy of the wayback by vladrac25 · · Score: 1

    How professional their site looked in 2003 *cough http://web.archive.org/web/20030403045220/http://a tomchip.com/

  178. Even more interesting... by slashflood · · Score: 1

    I did some google research and found some interesting stuff.

    Gendlin, the CEO of AtomChip and Dr. NakaMats founded the Gendlin-NakaMats Institute. NakaMats is either a dreamer, a genius inventor or just simply nuts - his website. Here is an interview and an article about that guy.

    NakaMats admits, that he's getting royalties from IBM for every single floppy drive sold.

    It all sounds very strange to me, but on the other hand... who knows.

  179. Me by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I want to believe this.

    As a programmer I don't know too much about the hardware specifications but it seems to me if a phone can handle radio oscillations at 5.8 gighz then why is it unthinkable that other hardware could?

    All this talk of why the CPU companies haven't done this before now rings false, we all know that for the last few years technical hurdles haven't been a problem and more and more it has become a financial struggle.

    The AMD Intel fight brings this totally to light, Intel could have had it's current technology available years ago without the P4 architechture, either they are really stupid or something is going on.

    Their marketting budgets are getting bigger and bigger and they are attacking parralel processing instead of massive power.

    The first quantum computing chip that comes out will be as I understand it the last processor we ever need, there is simply no money in this if they succeed.

    Genius' of the past have faced similar financial hurdles and have perservered in the same way, with public exebitions and without comment from their competitors.

    We all know what he's proposing doesn't break the laws of physics (like for example the nuclear bomb?) but we are sceptical none the less.

    I'm not going to put off buying a new computer based on this possibility but I won't be surprised if it happens either.

    1. Re:Me by randyest · · Score: 1

      The "5.8GHz" refers to analog circuitry that oscillates at that rate to generate an analog signal for propagation in the air or other media. This is very different from clock rates in digital circuits, where millions of transistors organized into chains of combinatorial circuits (logic AND, OR, etc.) which process digital (1 and 0, if you will) signals before their outputs are captured by memory (sequential, or storage elements) all of which are activated by a synchronous clock. There are no transistors that are fast enough to do any significant number of logical operations between clock edges of a 5.8GHz clock (~172 picoseconds, or 1.72413793 × 10^-10 seconds).

      The more transistors shrink and the lower their operating voltage gets, the faster they get, but the lower the noise margin and greater the chance for error (failure to properly distinguish a 1 from a 0.) But, even with the lower voltage, shrinking the transistors and packing more into smaller spaces creates heat dissipation problems. This, and managing design complexity, are the motivation for multiple cores. Not sure what you were trying to get at, but I am sure it was painfully wrong.

      The first quantum computer will not be the last processor anyone ever needs any more than 640kB is "enough for anyone."

      I hope you are not suggesting that nuclear bombs violate the laws of physics, because they do not, but I would not really be surprised given the rest of your post.

      In conclusion: be surprised if this happens any time soon. Oh, and please, stick to programming very high-level languages, and only those with good compilers.

      Keep a healthy skepticism,

      --
      everything in moderation
  180. The one thing that stuck out to me... by Skudd · · Score: 1

    "4 - Connector for Fibers Optical cable" Granted, they're probably not a primarily English-speaking company, but hmm... Where can I get some Fibers Optical?

  181. OK but, by vimbuza · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

  182. Re:Unfortunately, by booch · · Score: 1

    Actually, it says it WILL run Linux.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  183. What's more amusing than this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People feel this intrinsic need to debunk... THIS. Come on people. 1TB ram? That's right folks, I've got 1000 sticks of 1GB SODIMM in my laptop casing. ....Go figure ;P

    (I have a nasty feeling this'll get modded flamebait. Oh well.)

  184. Would CES 2005 Give Award for Vaporware? by Levendis47 · · Score: 1

    On the fence on this one myself, but this does seem to ligitmize them a bit more:
    http://cesweb.org/attendees/awards/innovations/rd_ 2005honorees.asp?category=48

    Now... they do have a crappy website and the optical 1/8" jack "memory modules" tickle the crap out of me, but it looks like this may actually have some legs.

    Also see the under-the-hood photos at: http://p2pnet.net/story/6160

    I'm sure Thomas Edison's first light bulb experiments didn't look all that ligitimate either...

    cheers,
    Levendis47

    --
    --==[ AOL YIM ICQ : Levendis47 : levendis47@yahoo.com ]==--
  185. Cromulent (tm) technology! by wsanders · · Score: 1

    AtomChip® optoelectronic non-volatile Quantum-Optical memory pwoering a voice-actuated Caps Locks command? How perfectly cromulent!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  186. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys are way ahead! Even their website has been designed for a 7220 by 6144 screen resolution!

  187. But of course! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    Mark my words;

    "1TB of RAM should be enough for anyone!"

  188. Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Geezo, I'm impressed... BS detector overload - Which makes me wonder, does any program ever use Scrollock mode?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > does any program ever use Scrollock mode?

      Yes, it's the key that has been pressed when your spreadsheets start acting strage!

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    2. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by klang · · Score: 1

      does any program ever use Scrollock mode
      LED goes on, LED goes off, LED goes on, LED goes off, LED goes on, LED goes off, LED goes on, LED goes off, LED goes on, LED goes off, LED goes on, LED goes off

      it get's pretty boring after a while ..

    3. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      My keyboard doesn't even have a scroll lock light though it has the key. It has an "Office Lock" light in its place (but hey, it has like, two dozen hotkeys which I can use in media players. t'least in Windows)

      But anyways, I can only recall ONE program that used scroll lock. If I'm not mistaken, it was the key to exit Sopwith. :D

      Other than a single old DOS game, I can't think of anything..

    4. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Sopwith!!! Woohoo, thanks for that link - guess what I am playing now... :-) Together with DoubleDOS, I could wait for a 30 minute compile on my blazingly fast 4.77MHz PC and play Sopwith - the good old bad old days, sigh...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    5. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. ^^

      If I understood that right.. well, you could use DOSBox to play the DOS Sopwith. In Linux. From Windows. Mac. Whatever.
      Then you could tweak the speed setting in DOSBox and pretend it's a 4.77MHz PC. ;)

    6. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wasn't aware of DOSbox - is it any better than DOSEmu?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    7. Re:Numlock, Capslock and Scrollock modes by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      Um.. I've never used DOSEmu.
      Well, I know DOSBox emulates.. pc speaker, adlib, sound blaster, gravis ultrasound, joysticks, um.. CGA, EGA, VGA, I think hercules mono..
      Maybe we should take this to a journal rather than spamming up this article? *shrugs*
      http://slashdot.org/~yRabbit/journal/116601

  189. Re:Attn: Moderators by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    This one seems to be a time paradox.

    The post is it's own parent, created by some time flux and a mixture of usenet bitterness. The parent posted itself as a reply to its own "cid".

    There, this explains it quite well. I'm sure i'll get lots of scientific cred for it since most people are still in trance from the 1TB laptop.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  190. Looking for a source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    atomchip.com has its data on compu-tech.com which is located in NY.

    While I was unable to find a "Shimon Gendlin", a "Valentia Gendlin" is filed as the Chairman of Compu-technics Inc.

    The last Experian Business Report is from 1998.

  191. mee to, b and B by phsdv · · Score: 1

    Yes my PC has also 8Gb. At work we have a few AMD64 machines with 256Gb SRAM. However this machine claims to have 8Tb which is the same as 1TB. That is 1024 times more than my desktop PC! For you info b=bit, B=byte.

  192. Property Sale by thed00d · · Score: 1

    I'll give away one of these laptops for every acre of land my pacific beach-front property purchased. Located in Oaklahoma, and only $2500 per acre. Just send checks made out to me, Cash, and I'll send you the laptop and the property deeds. Any buyers?

    --
    http://www.accelerateglobalwarming.com
  193. Well, that's just what I've come to expect from /. by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    I mean, last week I submitted a story about my imaginary friend Harvey getting Linux to run on a cheese sandwich. And did they post that? Nooooo. I had the Beowulf Cluster comment already written and everything.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  194. Probably some poor kid's info design 101 final... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mine was about saving sea lions ... for bbq.

  195. The Register got there first. by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    El reg has a page on this malarkey

    According to the register's quotes, the memory is "read by a laser beam. This memory does not have any moving mechanical parts." So if there are no moving parts, the laser beam won't be able to move, right? So how then can it read more than one bit, total? This is an amazing breakthrough accomplished in secret. Take that, mainstream scientific research!

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  196. Target market for this scam/hoax by doublem · · Score: 1

    I have at least three former bosses who, upon seeing the site, will have their purchasing department order one ASAP.

    Even if they read the rest of the site.

    And anyone who tells them it's a hoax will be permanently discredited in the eyes of said PHBs

    If this is a scam, I know exactly the kind of "Manage IT by magazine articles" twits they're targeting. If it's a hoax, their targets are the same set of PHBs.

    It could be a psychology study in human gullibility, or the tendency to believe unconfirmed sources if the news is what you want to hear. Let's be blunt, we'd all be thrilled if this were true, and if someone less technologically inclined were to see this many would believe it.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Target market for this scam/hoax by myslashdotusername · · Score: 1

      Personally I like how they used the stock guts of a CD-ROM drive as the 'optical' processor. :) other than the sucky at photoshoping, they've gone out and creatively 'hacked' together a nice piece of vaporware, either for laughs, or to part gullible VCs of there money... if it's the latter i suspect someone is going to be living in paradise under an assumed identity heh.

      --
      Everyone whom you love, loves no one else. You must be special.
  197. Contact details by nmg196 · · Score: 1

    The contact details are here:

    http://www.cesweb.org/attendees/directory/rd_exhib itor_details.asp?exhibid=7059

    Everyone ring in *now* and ask about this product and post your results below :)

  198. Atomchip corporation or.... Pink Floyd by theolein · · Score: 1

    I did a few minutes of googling on various bits from that site and apparently the guy who runs it is called Shimon Gendlin, a mad russian spammer^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hscientist, who, apart from not only not having the luxuring of an msn email account, also has one on optonline.net, but none on atomchip.com nor on the only other site on the web crosslinked to his site, compu-technics.com, which pretends to be an industry trade show giving out medals to our dear mad russian.

    It's all good for a laugh, though. Props to him if he actually finds some poor fucker of an investor dumb enough to part with dollars for some gold plated audio jacks and some photshopped jpgs.

    Talking about photoshopped jpegs, the image of the laptop is a bit strange since they somehow managed to stick in the trackpad and single button of an apple powerbook instead of the usual PC two button one.

    So perhaps it's really all an atom heart mother.

  199. Photoshoped by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    Other than sounding ridiculous, even the images are badly photoshopped. Just have a look at the artifacts around the clock speed section of the System Properties screenshot.

    1. Re:Photoshoped by slazzy · · Score: 1

      If they would have at least used gimp in linux they would be a lot cooler...

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  200. what, no beowulf cluster post yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets not forget our traditions:
    a beiwulf cluster of these ....

  201. vaporware by AMABITxS · · Score: 0

    if I wanted vaporware updates I'd make them up

    --
    Telling the truth to people who misunderstand you is generally promoting a falsehood, isn't it? -- A. Hope
  202. Solar Memory Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hilarious... you've got to see their "solar memory" video for yourself:

    http://www.compu-technics.com/images/solar%20memor y.WMV

    Yes, evil WMV format, not my fault...

  203. Intel® Pentium® M processors 1.7CHz / BI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Intel has a new processor speed of 1.7ChigaHertz!!! Also, I guess they got AMI onboard somehow :-p

  204. my filesystem does 16TB by phsdv · · Score: 1

    why limit your self to NTFS? The file system I am currently using can handle 16TByte . Besides Reiserfs there are many other filesystems. And I am sure that most of them do not have those small limits NTFS has.

  205. Re:Apparently headphone jacks are now optical lens by AGTiny · · Score: 1

    Actually, mini-TOSlink jacks are the same size as 1/8" headphone jacks. You get an adapter to fit to a standard optical cable (see link). My iRiver IHP-120 mp3 player has a single jack that does quadruple duty as optical in/out and line in/out.

  206. Oh I heard about this! by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    Apparently also they've replaced the USB ports with an ODN access. It also functions as a tricorder.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  207. But Watch out... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    "According to myth, the Earth was created in six days. But watch out, here's Genesis, we'll do it for you in six minutes."
    -- McCoy, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

    Just sounded appropriate considering the outlandish claims.

    Besides if it were real, don't you think SOMEONE would have found out about this BEFORE this "announcement"?

    In addition it would be more believable if the T's were G's.... So, instead of 1TB of RAM, it would be 1GB of RAM, and instead of 2 TB's of HD it would be something like 640GB of HD (couldn't help it... :) )...

    Oh well, back to reality.

  208. Call me sceptical but.... by MadEE · · Score: 1

    Somehow I doubt a bios from 1999 will support 5Gigs of ram let alone 1T of ram.

  209. clearly a joke by swatthatfly · · Score: 1

    People this is clearly a joke, not a hoax. If they were smart, a few commercial banners on the site could've proved to be an excellent revenue source, considering the number of misguided /.ers visiting.

    --
    keyboard not found! press any key to continue...
  210. How many MP3's could you get on one of these by halvis · · Score: 1

    Imagine, if you could get all this memory to be addressable in an operating system other then Windows that can address this 1TB. You can make an iPod replacement to die for if you could make it small too.

  211. New age of computing! by Primotheproton · · Score: 1

    It's even got laser beams that shoot into your eyes and a fiberoptic uplink to the net ala-Snow Crash. Virtual reality worlds, anyone?

  212. Cough... SCAM... Cough by prototype · · Score: 1
    Ok.. Looking at this "website of dubious quality" there are several interesting things:
    • they managed to make it x86 compatible to run XP!
    OR
    • they managed to recompile the XP source to make it run on their piece of EEPROM and make XP recognize 1TB RAM
    • they have manage to break the way RAM is mis-sized in XP (516MB??)
    • They use audio jacks to connect to 3 pin memory
    • looking at the solar ram video, seems to me like they invented a "light powered mirror"
    So to me, this just screams SCAM... or its a Mossad false front for black ops. PT Barnum was right.
  213. Windows Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This ought to be powerful enough to run Windows Vista at a usable speed I reckon.

  214. CmdrTaco is hereby relieved of duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For posting obvious nonsense at least three times in the last week, outside the humor section, and it not being April Fool's; CmdrTaco is hereby relieved of duty, and demoted to the rank of EnsTaco.

  215. I call shennigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone go get your brooms! Shennigans!

  216. Lighten up by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

    Seems like a lot of people are getting worked up about how fake this all is, outraged that Slashdot accepted it as a story*, etc. But in the end, it's clearly a joke. I got a kick out of the scientists sitting on cheap plastic chairs, the minijack RAM, etc. Lighten up folks.

    * That said, I have no doubt that CmdrTaco probably bought this one hook, line, and sinker and was excited to break this news.

  217. Sigh ... so low ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The recent rash of fakes presented as legitimate news stories, from the "electrical supernova" to the linking to the Onion ... Slashdot has sunk so low, it's hard to imagine it could sink much lower.

    Go on, mod me -1 Redundant, you insensitive clods!

  218. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent is right, and by that time we'll apparently still be waiting for Longhorn.

  219. When's the IPO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like a fantastic GROUND FLOOR opportunity for the informed investor!

  220. AtomChip is legit, this is my uncle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you guys should really be using all your brainpower to find ways to invest in my uncles company instead of making fun of it. Anyone who puts money into this company today will get 10^10 return within 8 quantum optical years! You may have good questions from the information at http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page2.html. Questions such as, how can you address 1TB through a CF to IDE adaptor? Or, "In one square millimeter there are 512 x 512 = 262,144 stacks, each 1m in diameter" wouldn't that be 25cm thick? Don't worry, the answer to all your quetions is QUANTUM! Quantum processes make everything possible! My uncle is a genius! Send money! I need your help transfering $10 million from a Nigerian bank account!

  221. Fraud all the way around by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Looks like a fraud all the way around. That an unknown fabless company might have developed a single component of an improved computer I might buy. But that they've created every aspect of it -- and it's Windows compatible -- nah!

    And as far as the GHz rating, means nothing! Nothing I tell you! Not until you know how much work/clock it can accomplish.

    Frankly this whole article is a waste of bandwidth.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  222. 6.8ghz by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    The small print says 4x Pentium M 1.7ghz.

  223. Two words by Shoten · · Score: 1, Troll

    Russian Mafia.

    Two more words:

    Money Laundering.

    This should be called the "Slim Whitman" laptop. Slim Whitman was a fictitious singer whose albums were for sale by tv commercials back in the '70s; the commercials stated that he'd sold hundreds of thousands of records in Europe or Elbonia or something like that. The guy looked lame, the music sounded like ass, and the whole thing was just a shell business for money laundering. There was no album, even. Trick was, he actually became something of a cult figure, so they ended up having to produce an album after all.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Two words by prototype · · Score: 1
  224. whois anyone? by atlacatl · · Score: 1

    Registrant:
                Shimon Gendlin
                Shimon Gendlin
                21 Reed Lane
                Westbury, NY 11590
                US
                Email: atomchip@optonline.net

          Registrar Name....: REGISTER.COM, INC.
          Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
          Registrar Homepage: www.register.com

          Domain Name: atomchip.com

                Created on..............: Sun, Aug 25, 2002
                Expires on..............: Fri, Aug 25, 2006
                Record last updated on..: Fri, Jul 29, 2005

          Administrative Contact:
                WIPOI
                Shimon Gendlin
                21 Reed Lane
                Westbury, NY 11590
                US
                Phone: 516-368-4800
                Email: shimon_gendlin@msn.com

          Technical Contact:
                Register.Com
                Domain Registrar
                575 8th Avenue 11th Floor
                New York, NY 10018
                US
                Phone: 1-902-7492701
                Email: domain-registrar@register.com

          DNS Servers:

          dns1.register.com
          dns2.register.com

    --
    Esta es una firma en Espanol.
  225. ZeoSync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow. I better sell my ZeoSync stocks.

    http://slashdot.org/science/02/01/08/137246.shtml

  226. Does it run Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone had to say it.

  227. All that horsepower... by DrFishstik · · Score: 1

    ...and only intel integrated graphics.

    Wheres the nVidia opticalforce or ATi opticalon?

    bleh

  228. Here's some news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot goes downhill, continues to report jokes as news. Credibility is a thing of the past, etc etc etc. Get a grip guys, a few more of these idiotic jokes and I, and many others I suspect, will simply no longer bother to come to this site.

  229. Just In... by PDoc · · Score: 1

    Apple moving to AtomChip architecture and hardware...

    --
    Give a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
  230. DNF, BitBoys Glaze3D video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll come bundled with DNF already installed, plus I'm sure the video will be the BitBoys Oy's "Glaze3D" doncha know!

  231. Hoax, but why? by zizzo · · Score: 1

    Clearly this is a hoax but for what reason? It's funny, I'll grant them that.

    The only motivation I can think of is to stress test the web server by getting the link posted on slashdot. I must admit, I'm impressed they're still online after what must have been a brutal slashdotting.

    Screw the phantom computer they're shilling. Sell me one of their webservers.

    1. Re:Hoax, but why? by JawzX · · Score: 1

      Mod parent uP!

      I agree, whatever other crap they are pushing thier webserver seems to have taken the slashdot effect without a hitch. This sort of resiliency is usualy only available to huge corporate entities, which atomcorp clearly isn't. Maybe they have a quad-Quantum-II server in a 1-u rack space with 35TB of ram?

    2. Re:Hoax, but why? by JawzX · · Score: 1

      OK, so it aparently DOES run linix, but like OP noted, it sure has taken a slashdotting in stride..

      Netcraft Results

  232. Re:Two words - Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, that was one word.

    Your discussion of Slim Whitman is in complete disagreement with Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slim_Whitman

    Among other places.

    Care to cite sources for your story of Slim Whitman?

  233. Re:FIRST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shoudn't have bothered.

  234. They are just getting the patents registered by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    so that when someone actually invents it, they can collect royalties. That's the new USPTO business model.

  235. Another quantum chip *ruined* by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Do *NOT* observe the quantum chips. That totally ruins them.

  236. They Laughed at Charles Parsons Too! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Well, at least until he did this.

  237. This thing could hold some truth in it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a revealing (albeit old) article on Shimon Gendlin from a 1997 issue of Electronic News:


    NEW YORK-A Russian emigre scientist brought a 128MB magnetic memory device to Electronic News' editorial office here last week, demonstrated the leapfrogging non-volatile memory storing files via his Toshiba laptop, and with his interpreter described the billion-dollar possibilities from this and other prototypes he has developed.

    The scientist, Shimon Gendlin, may hold, in the sense of magnetic memory science available at prices anyone can afford, a holy grail. He described the device as thin films of a combination of Cobalt and Gold over a polysilicon substrate; the "metal spin transistors" he says can withstand 200 degrees Celsius temperatures and are produced with standard fabrication equipment.

    Strangely, U.S. researches into magnetic memory have never heard of Shimon Gendlin, or Kappa Numerics, the Israeli R&D house for whom he worked. But, the fact that he, using technology that Kappa claims it owns, fabricated a 128MB nonvolatile part and is ready to sell these and more in OEM quantities for about $1,000 per Gigabyte drew neargasps and several incredulous statements.

    The president of flash memory lead player SanDisk was aghast, and skeptical. Eli Harari likened this to "someone telling you he can fly at one and a half times the speed of light." Dr. Daughton said, "God, I'd be surprised . . . That sounds about five years ahead of where anybody is right now."

    Until now, Dr. Gendlin says he was barred from speaking on his work under an injunction that Kappa Numerics obtained from a Delaware court. Dr. Gendlin's own Coral Gables, Fla.-based attorneys last year convinced the court to lift the ban and then the scientist filed the U.S. patent for it, he said.

    HERE COMES THE QUANTUM

    Dr. Gendlin says he is ready to commercialize this "Quantum" technology. Quantum is the term he uses, perhaps to avoid using the term magnetic memory which would get closer to the words used in existing patents. The two principals of Kappa Numerics to whom EN spoke were incensed by discussions of Dr. Gendlin commercializing the work, saying "everything he says is incorrect" and that they would prosecute.

    NRL researcher and magnetic memory expert Dr. Gary Prinz placed this device technology in perspective. The theory behind it is "50 years or older" and this in fact was the way computers originally held data; he recalled purchasing (very expensive) "DEC 11s, DEC 8s" in the 1960s which used magnetic, non-volatile memory. In the 1970s, semiconductor memories altogether displaced magnetic memory because it was so much more practical to make in commercial volumes. The government's funding in these magnetics therefore died down, and so did academic research and industry's engineering of it.

    Still, the NRL has projects ongoing at IBM, Motorola and Honeywell, he said, because the Department of Defense wants that. Dr. Prinz has seen the interest and investment in magnetic memory become "fast and furious," a veritable "bee hive."

    IBM recently purchased patents from a German concern and Watson researcher Bill Gallagher is leading Big Blue's charge in the area. "Motorola (under Herb Goronkin in Phoenix) has the broadest investigation," he said, and Honeywell continues to make special, extremely durable magnetic memories for its DoD customers, a fact Honeywell researcher Jerry Granley confirmed. Non-Volatile Electronics of Minneapolis, under Jim Daughton, is a commerical spin-off from Honeywell.

    GENDLIN HOLDS THE PATENTS

    Nevertheless, U.S. patent numbers 5,673,220 (issued Sept. 1997), 5,602,791 (issued Feb. 1997) and 5,390,142 (issued May 1995)-all three entitled "Memory Material and Method for its Manufacture"-list Shimon Gendlin of Jerusalem, Israel, as their inventor and Kappa Numerics of Guiderland, and New York, N.Y., as their holding "agents." (It should be noted that all three are accessible on the Web server that IBM maintains.) From his testimony and a glimp

  238. CF = Quantum Ram? by jlraptor · · Score: 1

    Anyone else thing the "quantum ram" looks a lot like a CompactFlash card?

    http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/HDDComp.jpg

  239. Oscar for a World Genius by rca66 · · Score: 1

    Amongst the awards this company got, is an Oscar: http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/22/index.htm (scroll down).

    Head of Atom Chip Corporation is Shimon Gendlin (although one might notice the complete absence of any names, addresses etc. on their web page).

    5 years ago, this fellow got a gold medal at the 14th World Genius Convention (http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/18/index.htm) , which, as a side remark, is organized in Tokyo by a company, founded by no one else than Yoshiro Nakamats! The inventor of the floppy disk!! (No, I am not making this up...)

  240. V A P O R W A R E by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    This is as vaporwarish as anything that I've ever seen from Leibermann, Inc.. The only differnce? These guys seem to make even more outrageous claims than Leibermann (but didn't set up a phoney "store"). My question is: what the hell this BS is doing on Slashdot? Are the /. editors trolling us with stories, or did they forget to turn their bullshit story filters on after getting out of bed this morning?

    Nothing to see here, move along people.

    --

    -Turkey

  241. I believe it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd have to be that fast - look how much crap the dude has running in his system tray.

  242. An elaborate fake by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    This site is a pretty thoroughly obvious fake. In fact, you pretty much have to assume that the fakers are intentionally leaving it sufficiently fake to avoid tricking anyone even slightly technologically inclined...

    While it looks like a fake, and smells like a fake, and tastes like a fake, who's paying the bandwidth bill for this fake and why? It doesn't seem like it's suffering at all from the /. effect. Maybe the webserver's running on quantum-optical hardware...

  243. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  244. The patent for their "Quantum-Optical Memory" by iamnotaclown · · Score: 1
    linky


    In case the lameness filter borks the link, the patent number is 5,841,689. You can look it up at www.uspto.gov.


    The patent references a "breakthrough" called the "Gendlin Effect". Needless to say, the only references to this ground-breaking discovery are in the company's web pages, and a single forum post on goldenplanetforum.net.


    Looks like a very clever scam to me.

  245. Amusing but... by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

    Its a fun hoax, brazen enough to be worth laughing at instead of just ignoring.

    But what's the motivation? The usual reason is to try and get investment, but it seems too over the top for that. Perhaps they guy is just mentally unstable. Given his "awards" that seems pretty likely.

    Possibly he is seeing how far he can push an obviously ridiculous story in the media. Could be an amusing study :)

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  246. Re:Crackpot, Fraud, or Genius? by doctorjay · · Score: 0

    All three.

  247. Also... by oPless · · Score: 2, Funny

    Preinstalled with ... DUKE NUKEM FOREVER

    No Seriously,

    lol

  248. mildly confused by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Almost nobody actually respects the "b" = bits, "B" = Bytes convention. Why do you bother? (Not trying to rant or troll, just curious.)

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
    1. Re:mildly confused by phsdv · · Score: 1
      The reason I bother is that I can not believe that (especially) nerds do not pay attention to little things like this. When you are calculating someting in b instead of B it would make an 8 times difference! This can mean the differnce between a crash and a working system.

      If you ever did any low-level programming, you will know what I mean.

      In this case I could not tell if the poster was joking or serious. After reading your comment I gues he was serious.

    2. Re:mildly confused by Pusene · · Score: 1

      It has also been used by PR agents with great success to utilize b/B. I.e. Sony Playstation One was marketed with 8Mb Video RAM and 16Mb Main RAM in Norway back in the good old days. Sony has of course changed this to Mbit on their current website http://www.us.playstation.com/consoles.aspx?id=1/i nfo/415007665.html

      --
      Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
    3. Re:mildly confused by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, I think you missed my point.

      I have done a smattering of low level programming, and I'm well aware there's a huge difference between a bit and a byte. A byte is after all nearly, but not quite, ten bits. So for example suppose we were to compare 100 bits and 100 bytes size-wise. We see that 100 bytes is eight times as much as the 100 bits which is nearly ten times as much (it's gross rounding, I know) which is something even id10ts with their tongues lolling on the ground should be able to comprehend.

      What I meant was, it seems to me there are many people that mentally evaluate the size abbreviations ending in "b" or "B" case insensitively so that there's no good way to tell if [bB] means "bit" or "byte" without context.

      Now, if the convention that "b" = bits and "B" = bytes had near universal acceptance, then I could understand correcting the occasional weirdo/freak that happened to mix up their usage. But as it happens, with only nerds getting it right, and even then not always, I just don't see how attempting to correct someone's usage of [bB] is really, in the long run, pragmatically speaking, effective. :-)

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  249. HAHAHA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow this is the worst fake I have ever seen! I created one 10x better in photoshop in like 2 mins.

  250. This reeks of ACC by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Jack Shulman and American Computer Co. of the 90's.
    Remember that? He claimed to be making chips from crashed UFO technology..

    http://www.compamerica.com/">http://web.archive.or g/web/19970106064603/http://www.compamerica.com/

    (above link doesn't display properly, copy & paste it into your broswer --> http://web.archive.org/web/19970106064603/http://w ww.compamerica.com )

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/acc.html

    and here's his website where he still claims outrageous bullshit..
    http://compamerica.com/about_us.htm

  251. obvious fake by unix_geek_512 · · Score: 1

    They just took standard laptop components and put their stickers on them!

    The memory modules were standard 144pin and 200pin SO-DIMMs and their 2TB storage device was a standard compact flash card plugged into a CF to 44pin PATA IDE adapter for a laptop.

    144pin, 200pin DIMM sockets simply aren't fast enough to access all that memory and the buses aren't wide enough to address 1 terabyte.

    44pin PATA IDE interfaces have similar limitations.

    Not to mention the 3.5mm audio connectors that they converted to "optical" connectors.

    Their transceivers appear to be partially made up of silicone glue or something similar.

    The clean room pictures are obviously borrowed or fake.

    1. Re:obvious fake by rampant+poodle · · Score: 1

      Gotta love the 3 huge soldering lugs on the NvIOpRAM Stationary Adapter. Must be using a "patent pending" multiplexor. Sheesh - April is a long way off.

  252. Smell of faeces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The smell of faeces from this is so strong that I am gagging.
    Windows XP doesn't support 1Tb of RAM. The screenshot is not even a good edit. It's even clear where someone has done a cut and paste job.
    4 CPUs in this package would require very good liquid cooling. I don't see how the heat would be extracted. Such blatent attention seeking is just sad.

  253. Wouldn't 3M be proud... by furiousx · · Score: 1
    ...to see such revolutionary trade secrets being kept on their latest line of Post-It easels? Microsoft should be beaming to see the liberal use of Paint in diagraming these new miracles of modern technology.

    How will such a wonder run a laptop on anything other than cold fusion? Wait!"...with very low consumption of electrical energy..." (known in the scientific circles as "electricity".) Wow, they'll never cease to amaze me.

  254. Location of the factory! by jolas · · Score: 1

    Atom Chip seems to be a 'brand' of Compu-Technics. However, the address listed for both domains is a residential address. http://maps.google.com/maps?q=21+Reed+Ln.,+11590&s pn=0.007188,0.013393&t=k&hl=en

    WHOIS for atomchip.com

  255. Wow! by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    How did they fit Wireless A/B/G, Intel ProWireless A/B/G AND Wifi into one laptop?!?!?! It must be awsome! I also love the webcam labeled as an optical processor. They didn't even bother to remove the lense or USB cable (opps, I mean fiberoptic processor bus or whatever).

  256. You're extremely astute. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Thanks for telling us that this was a fake.

  257. Re:mildly not confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost nobody actually respects the "b" = bits, "B" = Bytes convention. Why do you bother?

    Because it is a unit of measurement and needs to be clarified to make any sense. That's how things work.

    My laptop has 10Gb of RAM which sounds like a lot until you realize that it's only 1.25GB which is still a goodly amount but it at least is believable. I could go into discussions about if 1kb is 1024 bits or just 1000 but that would confuse you further.

    If I told you that that 10Gb of RAM was all in the space of 182ml/mi, then I have not followed any established measurement conventions and just confused you. This is why we have these conventions and why people should follow them.

  258. The problem has always been moving parts and heat by mhearne · · Score: 1

    I've been expecting this for several years, maybe not in this form, but something along these lines.

    I've read the patent, and it looks viable. Here is the link
    We'll have to wait for the field tests before we judge.

    A big problem with computers has always been moving parts. Moving parts wear out, and hard drives just aren't repairable. They can be recovered for a high price, but if you keep proper backups, there is rarely a need for the expense.

    It has always been possible to make a solid-state hard drive, in the form of eprom. The problem with this is that silicon produces a lot of heat, and a chunk of memory the size of a sandwich would probably destroy itself in short order.

    If anyone remembers, the first semiconductors were made of germanium, and the transistors just melted at the slightest overheating. So germanium was replaced by silicon, since it didn't self-destruct so readily.

    I had always assumed that a new material would have to be found, which didn't produce the high heat that silicon does. I hadn't considered using internal optics before.

    If this really works, it should be a happy day for us all. If not, then at least someone is trying.

    Michael

  259. Done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google maps is your friend:

    http://tinyurl.com/7avmx

    It's a house. From such humble beginnings come great advances in semiconductor technology...

  260. Fake ?? Didn't you see the Quantum Engineers ? by Aqua04 · · Score: 1

    You guys just don't get it. It clearly shows on the first page of their site (http://atomchip.com/) that the Atomic Chip engineers seem to wear their atmospheric suits even in a classroom while working on their cutting edge designs.

    Only quantum engineers know that it pays to wear their suits as early as the design process. You guys from the "old chip technology" just don't know that. That's proof to me that the web site is deeply, deeply serious in what it proposes.

    The engineer to the right is lead designer, designated by his exposed trouser pants.

  261. One word... by woah · · Score: 1

    defaced.

  262. Re:Two words - Nope by Shoten · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I'd exactly post his phone number, but a good friend (and former boss) worked in the DEA for decades; he was there when it started, as someone starting off his career, and retired several years ago. He's the source. I never said he wasn't real, I said that at first there wasn't an album. And the CMT and wikipedia entries mirror the old commercials, so I tend to wonder about that as well.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  263. looky what i found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  264. yup! by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

    Actually, yes. It says so right on their page! So it *must* be true!

    And you can switch between the two OSes using Voice Command (tm) (pat. pend.) (rx)

    You see...

    In Soviet Russia, laptop tops you!

    --
    Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
  265. Quantum my arse by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I don't believe that if a true quantum processor was built, it would have an x86 instruction set (the data is just too different).

    Now, if they're just talking about ultrafine-process chipmaking, say nanotube arrangement or something of the like, I'd say it's plausable. But calling it Quantum, then running windows on it just makes me think "Photoshopped".

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  266. Has anyone mentioned?? by Jynx97 · · Score: 1

    A Beowulf Cluster of these would be interesting.

  267. Common mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your confusion is easy to understand: it was actually Walt Whitman who was a money laundering front for the Russian Mafia.

  268. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  269. Fake PC, but hey lets imagine its real by DS_User · · Score: 0

    I know this is a fake computer, but these are speacs close to those that Bill himself expects computers to reach in 2 years. He also said the OS will waste, I mean take advantage of the newer and faster CPUs and additional RAM. Then again a 3 Ghz CPU with 2 Gigs of RAM is the minimum requirement, Vista will horde I mean require more resources to actually do something. Years later of course Windows 2095 will require a mere 320TB and recommend 640 TB for better performance, because M$ will never find any use for more RAM than 640 TB. It will also have the start menu replaced with an elf hand print icon, which in no parts is a copy of the GNOME foot. It will go nicely with their brand new AQUAL (don't say AQUA Apple may sue) GUI.

    1. Re:Fake PC, but hey lets imagine its real by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I know this is a fake computer, but these are speacs close to those that Bill himself expects computers to reach in 2 years. He also said the OS will waste, I mean take advantage of the newer and faster CPUs and additional RAM. Then again a 3 Ghz CPU with 2 Gigs of RAM is the minimum requirement, Vista will horde

      Wow you really know a lot about Vista, can I be cool like you too someday?

      Oh wait, I am actually running Vista on a 128mb, 266mhz Laptop, and sadly it is out-benching Win9x and even WinXP...

      But hey I still want to be cool like you someday and make up neat stories I pull out of my butt.

    2. Re:Fake PC, but hey lets imagine its real by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      But by then computers will be so large and so expensive that only the ten richest people in the world will be able to afford them.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  270. I've read about this before... by chrstphrb · · Score: 1

    I've seen this technology before - These devices are designed around the same principles that are outlined at http://www.timecube.org/ It's about time someone took advantage of this ground-breaking technology...

  271. True or fake? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    If it's true, this company and all of its employees deserves the Nobel prize or whatever applies to this field.
    If it's fake, this company, especially its marketing people, deserves the Nobel prize or whatever applies to this field.
    Please, don't wake me up!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  272. But still, only a 12.1" Screen by donnieb199 · · Score: 1

    How about a 24" Telescopic 3D display? Why suppress that technology when you've got it developed? THe rumour is that it was co-developed with the Quantum-Optical non-volatile RAM (NvIOpSRAM-SODIMM 200-pin) chips.

    And only a 100MB Ethernet? Come on! I'll sell you the rights for the 10TB ZONP (Zero Overhead Network Protocol) card I've been developing (I have only been able to realize 6.7TB/s throughput, but I've not yet compiled the code for performance, only for code size).

    April comes earlier and earlier each year.

  273. Jiga-what? by ImaFraud · · Score: 1
    I figured it out...

    These guys went forward in time in their hyper-modified 1983 Delorean hatchback, powered by a 1.21 jigawatt flux capacitor (yes, I said jigawatt), flying at a velocity near the speed of light around the earth, moving time forward (in a superman like fashion) which caused a rip in the space time continuum allowing them to bring back technology from the future...

    Incidentally, this may account for the recent fuel shortage.

    You see, according to Einstein's special theory of relativity (E=m(c^2)) the closer an object of intrinsic mass comes to reaching the speed of light, the greater the mass of the object being accelerated becomes. And as the object, in this case, the hyper-modified 1983 Delorean hatchback, becomes larger, it's energy needs become larger as well... requiring it to consume more fuel. Hence, $3.29 a gallon.

    On a side note, is it just me or does this site looks as if it was designing and maintained by a nine year old autistic kid with Tourette's.

    /Never drop acid and watch Back to the Future.

  274. This is FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop spreading your FUD here. NTFS is a 64 bit filesystem, it supports exabytes or whatever the name for that insanely huge number is, certainly a lot more than 16 TB.

  275. Ummm, Guys.... by Legendof_Pedro · · Score: 1

    Firstly, How does the CPU dissapate heat when it's not sinked?

    And secondly, thanks for the Windows serial number.

  276. Even the SODIMM isn't possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if enough ownage hasn't been dished out against this company, here's a bit more...

    http://atomchip.com/_wsn/page3.html - 512GB SODIMM-144, eh?

    A 144 pin FP/EDO SODIMM has 8 CAS lines, four RAS lines, 64 data lines and 12 multiplexed CAS/RAS address lines... so, (2^12)^2 * 8CAS * 4RAS * 8 bytes per 64 bits = 4 gigabytes.

    Now how about this 1TB SODIMM-200? Lets see. 200 pin SODIMM's have 16 multiplexed address lines, 64 data lines, one RAS and one CAS. Yielding a maximum SODIMM size of (2^16)^2 * 8 = 32 gigabytes.

    sheesh, they could have at least bullshitted some sort of new quantum fiber optic microwave memory interface for this stuff...

  277. Wow. by PatamonKid · · Score: 1

    This must be the sister to the Phantom (think that's what it was) console by Infinitium Labs. (I think. x.x)

  278. post more hoaxes by QAChaos · · Score: 1

    I learned more from what is missing from the laptop than if the laptop was an actual product

  279. This laptop will never exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we are capable of creating hardware like this, we will not want to put it in a laptop. The reason I say this is because by that time, we'll have the ability to connect into centralized grids from a low-end piece of hardware.

  280. Fake system properties. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The system properties window is fake, I just found the "processor 6,80 Ghz, 1.00 TB of RAM" was inserted, with a gamma correction check.
    Just grab the image with a image editor and add contrast and low the bright. A pattern will easy to see.

  281. no, it is no FUD! by phsdv · · Score: 1

    No! It is really limited by 2TB Next, AC, show some proof!

    1. Re:no, it is no FUD! by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1
      No it isn't. Microsoft's info on NTFS

      It's limited at 256 TB with 64KB clusters. ntfs.com is simply wrong.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    2. Re:no, it is no FUD! by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Blah, didn't link the right page. Click the "What Is NTFS" link in that page. The info's there.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
  282. LOL by dominicand · · Score: 1

    After looking at the website with more detail, it looks so fake.... funny... Look at the website and check out their high tech easel. LOL.

  283. Holographic Storage by Denix · · Score: 1

    While this laptop may be bogus, holographic storage is not:

    http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/07/iss ue/dealflow.asp?p=1/

    --
    "Simple words such as 'better' or 'faster' are best used by simpletons. Life [...] is more complicated." - TMC
  284. They just removed the screenshots! by tendays · · Score: 1

    Maybe they noticed the screenshots looked bad, they are gone from that page (but you can still see them e.g. through mirrordot)

  285. Absolutely true, here are more facts by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    This is awesome, they say it will be released with duke nukem forever, a subscription to phantom online gaming,

    Now I am going to read other comments, and find out this really is a dell laptop which has been photoshopped, on a troll website.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  286. Slow progress by lazy321 · · Score: 1

    According to archive.org http://web.archive.org/web/20031226182902/atomchip .com/_wsn/page3.html
    they already had 25G NvIOpSRAMs in late 2003.

  287. Patent Number Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the patent that is being referenced in the webpage: Patent Number 5,841,689 Interestingly enough, the owner of the domain is also the owner of the patent....

  288. Re:Wow, you're cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I call you Ass?

  289. Nah! by joto · · Score: 1
    It should all be taken up pretty quickly by openoffice 25.0.

    There are however some limits. Assuming we need at least a few atoms per bit with nanoscale technology, counting in zettabytes would probably be the near the limit for portable devices. I don't bother making a distinction between primary and secondary storage here, because nobody knows what the future will bring.

    Then again, atoms can be excited into several states, and the future might bring storage devices working with this, or even subatomic particles, or various kinds of exotic matter. In that case, it's hard to come up with an educated guess.

  290. Re:Two words - Nope by ediron2 · · Score: 1

    I think you've been punked. Twice, if you count being gullible enough to post this to slashdot.

    Speaking of which, I just noticed that wikipedia has the wrong definition for the word 'Gullible'?

    Heh, make that three times...

  291. Bogus (at least partially) by cyanics · · Score: 1

    Several things strike me as bogus about this.

    #1 The specs say "Weight: 1.9kg(when fully equipped with AtomChip® Quantum® II processor) and 2,20kg(when fully equipped with 4 x Intel® Pentium® M processors"

    Meaning that it "supports" quad Pentium Ms. This is bogus, as the chip will not support dual, let alone multi processor SMP.

    #2 The quoted spec of "6.8 ghz" seems strikingly similar to "4x1.7Ghz" Pm or 6.8ghz. Hence, again bogus. See falacy #1

    #3 the interface for the storage device is labeled on board as "IDEX1," which means that it is an IDE implementation of CF onboard. Max speed is maybe 20MB/s, hardly operable for a "6.8ghz" machine

    #4 it has a "Windows XP" sticker, which you can only carry as a VAR if you have done Windows XP certifications.

    #5 "PRO/Wireless 2100/2200BG/2915ABG network connection" These are three different chips... pick one, cause you can't pick all three. 2200BG is a centrino chip, meaning that it would nont work with the custom opti-quantum cpu.

    #6 whats "Bluetoth"

    #7 "welcome to the world of nanomicrons" wtf is a nanomicron, small microns? is that like inch-feet? or something? try taking a class in physics.

    #8 http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/Teacher.jpeg

    That said, I will eat my words gladly if anything of this turns out true. Anyone up for a trip to CES this year?

  292. This is one of the laptops they used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://home.planet.nl/~advan010/images/flybook-3.j pg

    They did a bodge photoshop job on a red version of this REAL transmeta based laptop.

  293. Is that CF memory with Duct tape on it ? by coaxeus · · Score: 0

    ... sweet

    --
    My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
  294. This could not be better news by FishandChips · · Score: 1

    Wow, fantastic news. Anyone who's followed this story knows that after their amazing showing at the Moscow Exhibition President Putin has ordered six examples of the special "InterCosmos" gold-plated edition of the laptop for himself. These puppies come with an ingenious three-way hinge over the electro-capacitors of the optico-laser micron-designator array, offering storage for as many as 25 Balkan Sobranie cigarettes and a gram of Medicinal Powder.

    Unique to InterCosmos is the two-way hyperbung next to the Bluetooth docking gate. Made from pure 8UFT5OMD-2.6AO military-grade polystrene and featuring a solild boron screwhead encrusted with industrial-style diamonds, the hyperbung's removal allows as much as 440ml of 120-proof vodka to be stowed as fuel in the event of battery failure. Independent benchmarks using the well-known Symonovksy-Heffer algorithm prove beyond doubt that the InterCoshmosh [stop drinking that battery fluid or you're fired - Ed] can carry enough liquid fuel to maintain the average Russian IT consultant at 100% usage for up to two hours, followed by automatic, clock-chipped sudden-decline sleep mode for nearly a day and a half afterwards.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  295. 14 YEARS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's supposed to take 14 years to get from something in the lab to a product, of course I can't remember where I heard this and have nothing to substantiate this with so you'll have to take my word for it!

  296. obviously fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the picture, they used Windows XP Professional, but windows only support 4gb of ram, 128gb of ram with x86 edition, anymore and windows would not know what to do with it, so having 2tb of ram is impossible. and looking at the pictures closely would reveal 100000000 flaws....man...the guy who made the website pisses me off

  297. Definately a hoax, and here's some proof: by mattzog · · Score: 1

    At this link (http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/25/index.htm) , reached through AtomChip's contact link, they have a product listed as their own which is actually a Flybook (http://flybook.biz/) with the logos crudely covered. Not that they were believable claims anyway, but there's my nail for the coffin.

  298. Um... I think what he actually meant was... by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

    It's akin to having four people each running 10 miles per hour. They cannot reach 40 mph that way; they can only each run 10 mph at the same time. A 6.8 GHz [non-fictional] processor would be at least as fast as four 1.7 GHz CPUs in all cases, but usually will be four times as fast, assuming each CPU did equal work per clock cycle (unlike Pentium 4 vs Pentium M vs Athlon).

    --
    ~CGameProgrammer( );
    1. Re:Um... I think what he actually meant was... by Bloater · · Score: 1

      > It's akin to having four people each running 10 miles per hour. They cannot reach 40 mph that way

      No its not, clock cycles are discrete, miles is continuous. It's akin to having four people each take 60 strides per minute, they *do* reach 240 strides per minute between them.

    2. Re:Um... I think what he actually meant was... by randyest · · Score: 1

      No its not, clock cycles are discrete, miles is continuous. It's akin to having four people each take 60 strides per minute, they *do* reach 240 strides per minute between them.

      What? Are you with AtomChip? Both miles and clock cycles can be interpreted discretely or continuously. Neither is inherently either. Note that I can run 1.5 miles just as easily as I can measure 1.5 clock cycles. Synchronous logic, however, tends to function on one of the edges of a clock cycle (often rising edge) which is perhaps the source of your confusion. But it need not be, and isn't, limited to that: note the existance of DDR logic (triggered on both rising and falling edges, one of which must be considered happening at a "half" clock cycle, which isn't discrete) and even QDR logic, which operates four times per clock cycle. Analog circuits (such as PLLs) often sense and respond to many, many more than 2 or 4 points per cycle.

      Just because you're more familiar with fractions of miles than fractions of clock cycles doesn't mean both don't exist. I'm not even going to bother with your confusion of adding up strides and adding up clock cycles. You're not ready.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Um... I think what he actually meant was... by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most programs won't know how to take advantage of the four processors, and will run the same on a 4x1.7 machine as a 1.7 machine. I have dual 3.2 GHz Xeons on my desktop, and most programs don't even see a performance increase. However, multitasking does - I can encode video and play WoW at 1920x1200 and have no problem at all. My music production software also sees a huge performance increase. However, if I try to run a program that doesn't take advantage of SMP, it will perform just the same as if I only had one 3.2 GHz Xeon.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
  299. The screenshot is REAL by rdebath · · Score: 1

    It's XP Home and there's a 2TB USB drive connected to the back of the portable (Like a LACIE disk). The AC power's plugged in too. But I don't expect the C: drive is the windows drive. I could almost do this picture myself, but I only have a 1TB drive.

  300. It's a laptop for giants, silly by bosko0 · · Score: 1

    It also features a 12.1 feet screen.

  301. One way to disprove this, this is a hoax.... by absentmindedjwc · · Score: 1

    Think of it, you get a brand new 300 GB HDD, bring it home, and install it. When it is formatted and installed, you come to realise that the "300 GB" drive only lets you have a 270 GB partition. It is called a page file kiddies, a drive over a terabyte will have to be at least 20-50 GB, if not more. Also, an "optical processor".... it looks like a chip ripped from a CD drive... what exactly is the point of the lens???

    Another thing that I noticed... I do not know how Vista works with the so called terabyte of ram, but last time I checked, just about all OS's only allow a max of 8 GB's of ram...

    the system window can be easily manipulated through the registry, and you can throw something together and call it superior.

    This would be great if it worked, but something like this would cost WAY to much to even think of making..... why go with something like this for hundreds of thousands of dollars, when you can buy a blade server for a fraction of the cost.... almost infinite upgradeability.

    This will be a GREAT TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIVEMENT, hopefully it comes soon,

    Jason

    --
    Are you absentminded?
  302. But those strides are useless by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Clock cycles don't matter. Computations matter. Since programs are far more sequential than parallel, even two CPUs won't give nearly the benefit a single twice-as-fast CPU would, and four CPUs would see no advantage over two, even if they're equal speed. Of course I'm referring to everuday computer usage, not mathematical or scientific programs designed to be run over large networks.

    --
    ~CGameProgrammer( );
    1. Re:But those strides are useless by Bloater · · Score: 1

      > programs are far more sequential than parallel

      They certainly are not, any compiler author will tell you that. Go read up on GCCs DFA scheduler - modern CPUs are pipelined which is a simplified parallelism. There are far fewer barriers than not in most ordinary programs.

      > even two CPUs won't give nearly the benefit a single twice-as-fast CPU.

      Yes, See Athlon vs Pentium 4. Pentium 4 has a much longer pipeline, so it is a simplified hugely parallel design whilst Athlon has a much shorter pipeline and is thus less parallel. The Athlon is actually a few fast clocks instead of many slow clocks. Due to the pipeline simplification of parallel designs made possibly by a discrete clock (hard edges that looks approximately the same at any scale) the out of phase clocks can be combined into one signal that is mathematically equivalent to one faster clock.

      I hope this explains why the regular Hz quote is the same as quoting four times the Hz of four parallel CPUs (ie, the regular Hz quote *is* several times the Hz of several processing units).

    2. Re:But those strides are useless by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the way processors work. A 2GHz CPU has two billion clock cycles per second. A 3GHz CPU has three billion. Therefore a 2GHz CPU has 50% longer (slower) clock cycles than a 3GHz CPU. Yet a 2GHz Athlon64 is about equivalent to a 3GHz Pentium4 because they do more per clock than the Pentium 4. I am well aware of instruction pairing and pipelining, having written optimized assembly code for Pentiums. And that is not the same thing as parallelism -- only two CPUs, or a single dual-core CPU, is truly parallel. A single CPU can only execute a single instruction at a time. Of course many instructions take more than one clock cycle to execute, so traditionally some clocks would be wasted, reading no instructions, while the old one gets processed. Pipelining allows the proceeding instructions to be read and executed while computations are done on the previous one. But only one instruction can still be read and 'consumed' per clock. A program with 50k instructions cannot possibly be finished in less than 50k clocks. If you don't believe me, read benchmarks on various systems and see for yourself that doubling the number of CPUs does not double the speed of the system.

      --
      ~CGameProgrammer( );
    3. Re:But those strides are useless by Bloater · · Score: 1

      > A single CPU can only execute a single instruction at a time. Of course many instructions take more than one clock cycle to execute

      That hasn't been true for years.

    4. Re:But those strides are useless by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I don't think you read the rest of my post.

      --
      ~CGameProgrammer( );
  303. This is all nice, but... by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux? Or at least Doom II?

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  304. Only WXGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit, there's always something!

  305. You are kiddintg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all this ultra cool hardware... theres no gigabit ethernet.
    Ripped off. I'm not buying one.

  306. Communication: 10/100 Base-T LAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think for the price, they could've made it 10/100/1000....

  307. Uhhhh... yeah* by papastout · · Score: 1

    No matter how fast they make them, there's still going to be someone who has to sit on the phone listening to some poor soul drone their way through menu after menu seeking out an answer as to why they are havening problems connecting to the internet.

  308. 6.8GHz with 256MB on-board memory by PCWizardsinc · · Score: 1

    I don't think slashdotters are actually reading the specs: AtomChip® Quantum® II processor 6.8GHz with 256MB on-board memory It doesn't have over 4 Gigs of RAM it has 256 Megs of RAM, what they are claiming is that they have in essence linked an IDE interface to a Terabyte Compact Flash Disk. Look closely at the pics! I experimented on my own system with a similar idea, putting a USB 2.0 Interface to a 512Mb Compact Flash Disk and using the disk as a page file for windows xp. It WORKS! Its fast, and it probably is the basis of this idea.

  309. Their Vapor-State Drives are cheaper than Flash by billstewart · · Score: 1
    They're not using hard disk, but they're also not using flash memory. They're using their own special technology, which is an order of magnitude cheaper than flash (they say $6/GB, compared to flash prices which tend to be about $50/GB), which is where the $6000 for 1TB figure came from.

    Think of it as Vapor-State drives - the chances that one small company that nobody's ever heard of has simultaneously developed a radically new memory technology and also a general-purpose CPU that's significantly faster than Intel's hottest laptop or desktop CPU sounds pretty minimal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  310. Comparing GigaHZ between Processor Families by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I thought their choice of "Four Pentium M chips at 1.7GHz" sounded more absurd than "One 6.8 GHz Magic Vaporware Chip" - 6.8==4*1.7, but I don't know why you'd need that many CPU chips burning batteries, especially if you're claiming whatever reasonably-long battery life they claimed.

    Also, remember that you really can't compare processors based on raw clock rate - it's like comparing internal combustion engines based on RPM, rather than horsepower/torque/etc. It's quite possible that their 6.8 GHz could be the speed of a DSP, or adding up all the parallel processor elements of a vector processor or something similarly bogus.

    On the other hand, because they've developed a magic new vaporware-based memory technology, it may be that 256MB of cache is a perfectly reasonable thing to include in their processor. If *I* were designing a laptop today, using normal technology, I'd almost certainly want to include a gigabyte or two of flash RAM as a disk cache - it lets you install the OS and some of your main applications in it, so you don't need to power rotating machinery most of the time.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  311. poorly manipulated images by weighn · · Score: 1

    The "Quantum II" emblazoned on the photo of the CPU looks a bit dodgy when you zoom in. The JPG artifacts surrounding the text make me think that they were added to the (already compressed) image of some chunk of alloy. http://atomchip.com/db4/00366/atomchip.com/_uimage s/Processorclosed5.98x5.67.jpg

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  312. They're just trying to outdo... by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1
    --
    Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  313. might get a little warm by uptoeleven · · Score: 1

    why would anyone use a headphone adapter to connect to a fiber network?

    what about heat dissipation - given the voltages you'd need to transmit through metal wires, across a plug with contact resistance, with data at the proposed speeds a shitty fan ain't gonna do much other than melt.

    The operating temp range for their solar panel (supposedly for powering memory in satellites) is too narrow. 5 minutes sunlight for a 24 hr charge - work out the size of the solar array and the amount of light hitting it and the stated power usage and you have > 1000% energy efficiency.

    Hilarious

  314. where did the system specs go? by ottodebotsotto · · Score: 1

    when i surfed to atomchip's site yesterday, i got to see some screenshots of the ultramegasystem specs today however these seem to be removed. google cache does still show them. Why were they removed? The russian? The photoshopping? I wonder?

  315. Re:Crackpot, Fraud, or Genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, this is what happens when someone smuggles a soldering iron and some IEEE journals into an insane asylum.

  316. um, no gigabit? by ad68 · · Score: 1

    because this would rock my 10baset.

    --
    the best beer is always the local - uncle arnold
  317. Is it just me... by millennial · · Score: 1

    ... or are those 2TB chips really just CompactFlash cards? Wow... LOTS of BS here.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  318. Whoops, I missed a bit by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Up to that last sentence, I argued why a single CPU cannot execute programs in parallel. A dual-CPU system can, but only in a multithreaded environment where each thread does exactly equal work and no thread depends on the other. Because this never happens except in certain major scientific or mathematical programs, a dual-CPU system does not get double the speed of a single-CPU system, as any benchmark can tell you.

    --
    ~CGameProgrammer( );
  319. gold medal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look closely at the certificate on

    http://www.compu-technics.com/pages/22/index.htm

    Then at the awards for 2000's "East-West Euro Intellect" on

    http://www.wipo.int/innovation/en/wipo_awards/win_ 00.htm

    And then tell me, with a straight face, that you still believe this guy.