Slashdot Mirror


User: Jzanu+Syr

Jzanu+Syr's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
28
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 28

  1. Re:Drawing more attention to Pepe on Pepe the Frog Is Dead (theguardian.com) · · Score: 0

    God damn you are stupid. The creator of the character killed it so that the degraded and unlicensed misuse of its image wouldn't be given tacit support.

  2. Re:Drawing more attention to Pepe on Pepe the Frog Is Dead (theguardian.com) · · Score: 0

    You mean the author of the comic and creator illustrator who had legal rights that were ignored and so chose not to reward that by devaluing it, and you are magically blaming the "left"? You are retarded!

  3. This isn't a fucking TV drama, it is more important to get the psychological leverage over the terrorist groups who are reminded they can't use tech to hide. It is also more important to remind the public that terrorists can't do that.

  4. Re: But but, it'sâ a Republican idea! on Kill Net Neutrality and You'll Kill Us, Say 800 US Startups (google.com) · · Score: 1

    Here this will help you communicate better.

  5. Re: But but, it'sâ a Republican idea! on Kill Net Neutrality and You'll Kill Us, Say 800 US Startups (google.com) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, actually I doubt that seriously. Hilary would have been a vast improvement over Trump as someone who studied and understood law, international relations, had exposure to military strategy, and faced over 30 years of investigations while continuing to be squeaky clean. In contrast, Trump has 300+ active lawsuits, flagrantly violated labor laws, immigration law (yeah!), tax law, and everything else. As well as the whole committing treason bit by selling state secrets to Russia as a bribe not to expose his homosexuality.

  6. Re:big businesses asking for special favors on Kill Net Neutrality and You'll Kill Us, Say 800 US Startups (google.com) · · Score: 0

    You are bad at trolling. You are discriminating based on content and against a class of businesses out of misguided deference to entrenched communication monopolies (that only exist by mandate, and thus owe their existence to the public). There is no excuse for billing based on destination for Internet packets. Consider simple movement which has costs. Information flow is also movement and has costs, but they are very different. For physical goods those costs include maintenance of particular roads and compatible rail gages, transport containers, etc. For information none of that applies and costs depend only on the existence of a network which is in place, telecommunications equipment which is in place, and electricity which is widely available and already paid for by all parties: the host, the user, and by the ISP which is billing the user already. Sending packets to fox.com or espn.com or buttfuck.ru is all the same. Local caches that mirror remote content and thus speed up access are paid by serving ads that are viewed by users. Either make access free and charge providers, or realize the bed is made instead of burning down the house.

  7. Re:I don't see the problem. on Cutting H-1Bs Could Mean More Competition From China and India, Says GoDaddy CEO (cnbc.com) · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You are a fucking retard!

  8. Try thinking about the article itself, put your past post in context, then it does.

  9. Re:The course is clear on Schneier: We Need a New Agency For IoT Security (onthewire.io) · · Score: 0

    That isn't right - businesses have more stakeholders than simple investors and there are frequent cooperatiosn between Unions and management to maintain operations and training.

  10. God damn these whiny ass Republicans embody the very traits they claim to despite. "Oh whoa is me I am despised!" except it is for the shit you are advocating.

  11. Re:Climate change,yep millions of years of change on China Tells Trump Climate Change Isn't a Hoax it Invented (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 0

    So fucking what? What matters NOW is what effects HUMAN habitats and especially human settlements i.e. everything from mega-cities like NY, Shanghai, Tokyo, etc. to the subsistence farmers in Burma and everywhere else on the entire planet. Massive population shifts are exactly what brings increased death, disease, and destruction. Humans have been fucking up the global atmosphere for more than 200 years and it was KNOWN 200 fucking years ago.

  12. Re:Trump kept a Hitler from being elected on Microsoft Survey Shows Negative Online Interactions Affect People In Real Life (computerworld.com) · · Score: 0

    Trump is the antichrist who will bring on the destruction of the US and the destruction of the world unless he is stopped early and never returns. Prison works.

  13. Re:It doesn't matter, we're screwed either way on FBI: Review of New Emails Doesn't Change Conclusion on Clinton (cnn.com) · · Score: -1

    You are a fucking idiot, but perhaps you are simply overly sheltered. Everything you wrote is incorrect and easily observable as wrong if you step outside your comfortable bubble. But you won't, or can't. Just shut the fuck up.

  14. Re:Does anyone else think this is insane? on Secret Service, DHS Scramble To Secure America's Election (yahoo.com) · · Score: 0

    ISIS is failing, while Trump's ties by electronic evidence to both Putin and Russian-state-sponsored groups are stacking up, all while Russian aggression is increasing, and Trump hasn't shown any evidence of a backbone that would support US interests against Russian aggression. He has even demeaned NATO, the backbone of global security and stability for nearly 70 years.

  15. Re:Oh Germany... on Munich Court To Try Facebook's Zuckerberg For Inciting Hatred (dw.com) · · Score: 1

    His personal ancestry doesn't absolve him of fault for company operations contrary to German law. Facebook must comply in a timely manner not shift responsibility.

  16. Re:Why is Slashdot anti-trade? on CETA Signed Off As Wallonia Folds Under Pressure (freezenet.ca) · · Score: -1

    Wrong agreement, between different parties. This is CETA between the EU and Canada. You've got to read and understand the headline, bare minimum.

  17. Re:Attacks by foreign powers ARE Acts of War on Top Democrats Request FBI Investigation of Trump Campaign Ties To Russia Over Hacking (politico.com) · · Score: 0

    If you understood anything you would know that isn't actually true. Using a proxy isn't a magic wand, and everything can be traced. I expect the spy experts who devote billions to this to be the best at tracing, and of course Russia's budget is smaller so they can't compete with hiding against tracing.

  18. Re:B-b-b-but GUNZ is SKEEERY!! on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    Just same examples here and here since like so many here you don't understand what professional adult obligations are. I'm tired of idiots grandstanding without knowing such basic things.

  19. Re:B-b-b-but GUNZ is SKEEERY!! on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    That was a parody of the parent acting in exactly the way he claimed others were, follow the link.

  20. Re: B-b-b-but GUNZ is SKEEERY!! on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    So I bet you've got two dicks, one in each hand.

  21. Re:B-b-b-but GUNZ is SKEEERY!! on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 0

    You are fucking missing the point idiot, it is about the kids being watched by professionals who are obligated to report threats. Threats bringing court cases, and parents suing Apple (or Microsoft) for repayment and damages.

  22. You've said nothing the whole thread so no loss.

  23. Re:B-b-b-but GUNZ is SKEEERY!! on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 0

    OK you fucking idiot: Who fucking uses emojis? Kids. Why do you make it easy for kids to make threats, and give them that ability without making their parents sign legal release? You fucking doing unless you're a dumb ass (apparently just like you). What happens when professionals and others with legal responsibility over the actions of children are compelled to forwards threatening messages to police? Parents get upset, and they fucking sue. Apple does NOT need that. You fucking idiot.

  24. Re:How the hell are gun emojis tied to violence? on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    No, as a commercial entity with significant marketing research division you make an intelligent call on the expected impact of introducing new features into existing products, especially highly profitable and successful ones. Apple is a private entity, not the fucking state you fucking idiot.

  25. Re:How the hell are gun emojis tied to violence? on Microsoft Swaps Toy Gun Emoji For Revolver -- Days After Apple Does the Opposite (arstechnica.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    Don't be stupid, threats in common usage lead to violence. Idiots like you will use it like a regular emoji but it changes messages into major liabilities requiring reporting and intervention, especially when used by kids who are the main users of emoji. Censorship isn't the issue here, you can write gun and shooting range, etc. all you want, this is about preventing issues arising from careless misuse of encapsulated messages with legal implications.