1. find out their new computer budget
2. find a mac that is up to the required tasks, and close to the budget
3. pull some cash out of your bank account to make up the difference, go to apple.com/store and know you've just purchased countless hours of personal recreation time you would have otherwise lost for the next god-knows-how-many years.
** sure its not quite solid state, but close enough **
what? i'm all for people loving macs and all (nice sig btw, where's the site?) but is there any need to recommend an iPod to someone who favors a SOLIDfreakinSTATE device by saying a miniature hard drive is (paraphrasing here) close enough to solid state???
if anyone i knew told me to get an ipod because it's close enough to sold state, i would brand them a source to be immediately discounted when considering future hardware purchasing decisions.
need a ruggedized solid state device to take measurements while base jumping? use a powerbook with the included waist strap. it's not quite solid state, but close enough i think you'll find.
;)
for those who still don't get it, solid state, a device with no moving parts
Only on slashdot would riding a motorcycle with a laptop and wireless internet installed count as exercise...
next thing you know, river rafting with a cluster of notebooks running folding@home with a propulsion system of 120mm pana-flo fans will be extreme sports...
You know, having installed linux on my laptops (compaq cx1000 and vaio grt160) and moved on from APM to ACPI daemon, i've had excellent power management. i've got my prism2 based wlan cards working fine, and can use powermanagement fine (S1...).
You can even get custom DSDT's (Differentiated System Description Table, config info about the underlying system) for many laptops that have broken implementations (the bane of linux compatibility in most cases imo). It's not perfect yet, but it's come really far.
A good distro for seeing if bits and pieces work on newish laptops (read:after2001 or so) quickly is suse. i slap it on a 2 gig partition and see what happens.
although in the case of suse and many others until recently, centrino wlan was not doable
Speaking from personal experience, one of my great friends died last year and after his domain went down (has anyone though of that? whether your loved ones or others in the know who cared, would want to keep your site up, sort of as a memorial? something as simple as having the hosting companies and enough pertinent information on a paper with your other legal documents would be nice.) i found one of my old answering machines, from a few years ago.
you'd probably have to have personal experience, but just listening to your friends voice asking you to call call him back to help him get his cd burner working (heh) is a priceless thing when one you love is gone.
That pissed me the hell off!!! I'm in East LA area and the damn lakers caps don't mean half a shit to me. well, neither do the itunes ones either, well, i would have liked the choice.
honestly, what i'd do with a few mp4 tracks is beyond me though. with hundreds of cd's and their ripped analogues, i don't care for a few crippled or extra-effort tracks...
but yeah, distribution sucked majorly. that it's all ending now seems so anticlimactic, ending with a whimper...just like it ran...
uhm no, i think perhaps we're all reading this a bit differently. i doubt he means our country should act in a manner to look out for the best interests of other countries. but the reality is that we can't just look out for our own interests without taking other peoples feelings and regard for our actions into account, we live on a planet, that consists of many countries, some working with others for mutual benefit and some not.
that's the thing, we can work with other countries for everyones benefit, or we can act as if we are the only ones who are right (yeah, i'm sure the entire world is wrong but not us) and act unilaterally.
what's important though, is that even if you *do* feel that we're right and everyone else is wrong, the fact remains that we are but one country amongst hundreds. it behooves us to work with the rest of the world usually, not against.
if we do happen to have to go against the popular current, doing so in a manner reminiscent of a spoiled five year old strung out on amphetamines is not going to pay back any positive dividends tomorrow.
I will own this emerging massive modpoint role playing game yet!!!
This is the year of Linux on the desktop!
Micro$oft is evil!
*BSD is dying!
The imminent death of the internet is here!
We'll see who's laughing when all your mod point have been outsourced to India!
I'll subscribe when they fire CmdrTaco!
You think *you* have it hard?! When i was a kid, we had to buy *actual* guns, and walk up hill *both* ways to school in the snow, in *india* in the summer *and* winter!!! just to kill a bunch of people i didn't know! And then we had to go to PRISON!!! AND WE WERE GRATEFUL!!!
People are such creatures of habit when it comes to things like daily news. Having a site unavailable even one day probably dents readership measurably.
i would personally think it wouldn't really dent readership for more than a day. Think about it, as a creature of habit, if slashdot (or some similar site that you've a habit of checking) was down today, besides googling like mad to try and find out who/.'d slashdot, we'd just check again later, or tomorrow...or more likely, every 5 minutes...
I also think that one of the best and easily repeated ways to net new readers, is to have constant exposure. If people end up at your site often enough because of a third party, they will probably eventually start checking your site of their own volition.
I'd actually consider it quite nefarious in a possibly unintended / unpublicized kind of repercussion way.
How would you feel if you and your buddies all got new phones eventually, new gadgets and new little smart-fobs...
only to wake up one morning to realize that you and everyone you know are carrying around at least one, possible more RFID tags / devices everywhere you go.
Any chance that other huge corporations will pick up on this and we'll see a fruckin HUGE push (through addon conveniences in large chain stores, grocery markets) to make these devices more popular?
wouldn't these tags have to be uniquely identifiable? even if you didn't use it to purchase anything with it per se, imagine the marketing data of knowing where in the store you walked, where you loitered and eventually when you left. I'm sure they could just see who (or what was bought, more innocently?) was standing at the checkout counter when your rfid # was detected there through rewards cards.
Be careful how something innocent that appears to be bearing fruits technological niceness can sneak other, possible more things requiring due concern into your life.
I'd actually consider it quite nefarious in a possibly unintended / unpublicized kind of repercussion way.
How would you feel if you and your buddies all got new phones eventually, new gadgets and new little smart-fobs...
only to wake up one morning to realize that you and everyone you know are carrying around at least one, possible more RFID tags / devices everywhere you go
So, instead of pushing a button to automatically sync our devices, we'll just touch them. oh, ok, that's just lightyears ahead of anything we could *ever* do today...
Besides not having a damn thing to do with being a problem for bluetooth or wifi (do submitters read the articles? i thought we just didn't...) how is waving my phone at a movie poster going to buy me a ticket? Am i going to end up buying a bunch of cars, jackets and vietnamese girls when i walk downtown and go buy some food at a market? Sounds like i'll really have to configure it, go through a few dialogue boxes perhaps and do the usual thang i do today, as far as electronic device convenience goes. not to mention, it's not like anyone will ever have the proper convergence/convenience to actually make it doable to wave your phone at more than a few places and have it do something useful.
For these things to work as advertised they're going to need to saturate the shit out of the market, so businesses will want to use them *everywhere*. They'll need to come with everything, cheaply I think, for it to become some easy to use super gadget opportunity.
WIll that happen? probably not. Perhaps it will be tied in greatly with home elctronics, and personal gadgets, but it will probably be nowhere as ubiquitous (ubi..ubu...ubo...damn) as credit cards, and i doubt it will bridge the gap from bluetooth+ that it looks like it will reside in to super convenience.
excluding the WB, BET etc...all the other channels are white channels.
does the sea of white on the screen somehow not magically reach your eyes? The only reason that BET and the few others exist, is because there already are a hundred or so white channels.
speaking of 1.1 era activities, i was noodling around a few weeks ago and searched for some old haven addresses i used to hang out at, namely opium den at hemi.com and omnisolve.com...
re: to: "[...]The rest of the amendment goes on to say that Congress shall make no laws RESTRICTING THE FREE PRACTICE THEREOF! For those that need a primer, it basically states in no uncertain terms that Congress shall not play favorites, when it comes to religion. By the same token, it also means that Congress shall NOT knock one religion down just because some loud mouth doesn't like it." (emphasis added is my own)
Would you deny then, that legally mandating citizens (their young children actually, which I find all the more sad) of this country to pledge to the Christian God every morning for most of the year isn't playing favorites with religion?
I happen to know a few people personally (perhaps you know of them, or have heard myths about these elusive folk) that happen to not believe in / worship God as Christians know it to be. I would be angered at my children having to pledge to some Higher Power contrary to the one my family worhips, in any country, and I would be doubly ashamed to have this happen in America to boot.
"[...] By the same token, it also means that Congress shall NOT knock one religion down just because some loud mouth doesn't like it."
Is Congress 'knock'ing one religion down? It seems more like Congress is raising one up above the others (would that be playing favorites?) by making it required by law to pledge your personal allegiance to its' God.
I don't recall any counties where children are made to worship to Allah, Shiva or contemplate the knowledge that Buddha offers us.
Sure seems like some religion is being chosen as a 'favorite' to me.
-Dev
Please excuse me if I have wielded my Liberal Left views in such a way as to deafen you to your own or others view points. I did not mean to.
" And when it does happen, look for some big corporation to be backing something that looks a lot like XML, but it will have a different more friendly name and will be claimed as innovative. "
Yeah, and it will come from Redmond and be proprietary, and it'll break everytime you try to do something not exactly covered in the included Office-annoy-you-to-death-Avatar tutorial.
Did I mention that it will overshadow whatever well implemented version OSS may (who knows) have released, through sheer force of product lock in.
--
If that were indeed their position, why don't they say clearly in the letter that allowing software patents of any kind if a huge mistake!?
--
Becasuse perhaps they see it as being worthwhile to ask for something more achievable / realistic, given the present climate and mood of those involved who will soon be voting?
I mean, shit, I think they should just ask for every reasonable policy we can think of. I mean, it's reasonable!! There's no need to not demand it! Doesn't everybody agree with our reason?!?!
It's not like asking for things that have a tiny probability of actually happening might make them seem ill reasoned or unable to accept the reality of the situation.
--
I think we have just witnessed a major GNU/Linux vendor betray the Free Software movement.
I used to be a customer of SuSE. I will not buy from them again.
--
Good, go away then and save me from this absurdity.
[...] As much as we bitch about how the US going down the tubes, Americans still enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom, while living one of the highest qualities of living in the world.
---
That's well and nice, but for how long will we enjoy this relative utopia? will we not eventually succeed in having gone down the tubes?
So we enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom? More than we enjoyed last year? Two or even three years ago? What about five years ago?
Do you think this trend will continue or do you pray to the crystal cathedral that Christ will return and give us our liberties back?
It's rather useless to say how fine things are because they haven't gotten worse yet, while you admit (or perhaps you think everyone is bitching about nothing) that they are getting worse, and will continue that way barring some large improbable catastrophic scale event of good luck.
I love hearing people tell me how fabulous this country is concerning liberties and quality of life, as we all hear the loudest pneumatic toilet sound and watch our previously taken-for-granted liberties go down the drain. I absolutely love the quality of life too. It's not as if our draconian drug laws and blatant hypcocrisy are putting half of the current 18-35 year olds in prison, having our lives run by huge corporations and trade groups, or are blessed with some of the finest examples of muddled law in the world.
No, lifes just dandy. If I can drink my cheap swill and watch the game, I'm doing ok. I stay informed with Fox News and can honestly say I'm a responsible citizen of the world, living in the country that smells the least (you wish) of shit.
I mean, it might be shitty smelling, but it's not as shitty smelling as everyone else.
-Dev
Re:Spill coffee, get rich.
on
RIAA Bits
·
· Score: 1
From http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm and what I remember about the case (facts).
McDs had it's coffee at ridiculous temperatures, to save it's taste they say but more likely so it could be kept longer without having to make more pots.
"A vascular surgeon determined that Liebeck suffered full thickness burns (or third-degree burns) over 6 percent of her body, including her inner thighs, perineum, buttocks, and genital and groin areas. She was hospitalized for eight days, during which time she underwent skin grafting. Liebeck, who also underwent debridement treatments[...]"
and
"During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of this hazard. McDonalds also said during discovery that, based on a consultants advice, it held its coffee at between 180 and 190 degrees fahrenheit to maintain optimum taste. He admitted that he had not evaluated the safety ramifications at this temperature. Other establishments sell coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees. Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above, and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing the "holding temperature" of its coffee."
Slashdot Mirror
2. find a mac that is up to the required tasks, and close to the budget
3. pull some cash out of your bank account to make up the difference, go to apple.com/store and know you've just purchased countless hours of personal recreation time you would have otherwise lost for the next god-knows-how-many years.
oh yeah...
5. PROFIT!!!!!
sounds like a cheap way to slap a email-msn-horde-opportunity for marketing or somesuch.
fuck that, i would want them to fix the OS that they broke, not require 0wnz3r5h1p of my email address...
what? i'm all for people loving macs and all (nice sig btw, where's the site?) but is there any need to recommend an iPod to someone who favors a SOLIDfreakinSTATE device by saying a miniature hard drive is (paraphrasing here) close enough to solid state???
if anyone i knew told me to get an ipod because it's close enough to sold state, i would brand them a source to be immediately discounted when considering future hardware purchasing decisions.
need a ruggedized solid state device to take measurements while base jumping? use a powerbook with the included waist strap. it's not quite solid state, but close enough i think you'll find.
for those who still don't get it, solid state, a device with no moving parts
next thing you know, river rafting with a cluster of notebooks running folding@home with a propulsion system of 120mm pana-flo fans will be extreme sports...
You can even get custom DSDT's (Differentiated System Description Table, config info about the underlying system) for many laptops that have broken implementations (the bane of linux compatibility in most cases imo). It's not perfect yet, but it's come really far.
A good distro for seeing if bits and pieces work on newish laptops (read:after2001 or so) quickly is suse. i slap it on a 2 gig partition and see what happens.
although in the case of suse and many others until recently, centrino wlan was not doable
you'd probably have to have personal experience, but just listening to your friends voice asking you to call call him back to help him get his cd burner working (heh) is a priceless thing when one you love is gone.
we're dying to know!
That pissed me the hell off!!! I'm in East LA area and the damn lakers caps don't mean half a shit to me. well, neither do the itunes ones either, well, i would have liked the choice.
honestly, what i'd do with a few mp4 tracks is beyond me though. with hundreds of cd's and their ripped analogues, i don't care for a few crippled or extra-effort tracks...
but yeah, distribution sucked majorly. that it's all ending now seems so anticlimactic, ending with a whimper...just like it ran...
uhm no, i think perhaps we're all reading this a bit differently. i doubt he means our country should act in a manner to look out for the best interests of other countries. but the reality is that we can't just look out for our own interests without taking other peoples feelings and regard for our actions into account, we live on a planet, that consists of many countries, some working with others for mutual benefit and some not.
that's the thing, we can work with other countries for everyones benefit, or we can act as if we are the only ones who are right (yeah, i'm sure the entire world is wrong but not us) and act unilaterally.
what's important though, is that even if you *do* feel that we're right and everyone else is wrong, the fact remains that we are but one country amongst hundreds. it behooves us to work with the rest of the world usually, not against.
if we do happen to have to go against the popular current, doing so in a manner reminiscent of a spoiled five year old strung out on amphetamines is not going to pay back any positive dividends tomorrow.
I will own this emerging massive modpoint role playing game yet!!!
This is the year of Linux on the desktop!
Micro$oft is evil!
*BSD is dying!
The imminent death of the internet is here!
We'll see who's laughing when all your mod point have been outsourced to India!
I'll subscribe when they fire CmdrTaco!
You think *you* have it hard?! When i was a kid, we had to buy *actual* guns, and walk up hill *both* ways to school in the snow, in *india* in the summer *and* winter!!! just to kill a bunch of people i didn't know! And then we had to go to PRISON!!! AND WE WERE GRATEFUL!!!
Lucky for you nobody else did.
People are such creatures of habit when it comes to things like daily news. Having a site unavailable even one day probably dents readership measurably.
/.'d slashdot, we'd just check again later, or tomorrow...or more likely, every 5 minutes...
i would personally think it wouldn't really dent readership for more than a day. Think about it, as a creature of habit, if slashdot (or some similar site that you've a habit of checking) was down today, besides googling like mad to try and find out who
I also think that one of the best and easily repeated ways to net new readers, is to have constant exposure. If people end up at your site often enough because of a third party, they will probably eventually start checking your site of their own volition.
I'd actually consider it quite nefarious in a possibly unintended / unpublicized kind of repercussion way.
How would you feel if you and your buddies all got new phones eventually, new gadgets and new little smart-fobs...
only to wake up one morning to realize that you and everyone you know are carrying around at least one, possible more RFID tags / devices everywhere you go.
Any chance that other huge corporations will pick up on this and we'll see a fruckin HUGE push (through addon conveniences in large chain stores, grocery markets) to make these devices more popular?
wouldn't these tags have to be uniquely identifiable? even if you didn't use it to purchase anything with it per se, imagine the marketing data of knowing where in the store you walked, where you loitered and eventually when you left. I'm sure they could just see who (or what was bought, more innocently?) was standing at the checkout counter when your rfid # was detected there through rewards cards.
Be careful how something innocent that appears to be bearing fruits technological niceness can sneak other, possible more things requiring due concern into your life.
I'd actually consider it quite nefarious in a possibly unintended / unpublicized kind of repercussion way.
How would you feel if you and your buddies all got new phones eventually, new gadgets and new little smart-fobs...
only to wake up one morning to realize that you and everyone you know are carrying around at least one, possible more RFID tags / devices everywhere you go
I believe the Cue::Cat was just a usb barcode reader.
So, instead of pushing a button to automatically sync our devices, we'll just touch them. oh, ok, that's just lightyears ahead of anything we could *ever* do today...
Besides not having a damn thing to do with being a problem for bluetooth or wifi (do submitters read the articles? i thought we just didn't...) how is waving my phone at a movie poster going to buy me a ticket? Am i going to end up buying a bunch of cars, jackets and vietnamese girls when i walk downtown and go buy some food at a market? Sounds like i'll really have to configure it, go through a few dialogue boxes perhaps and do the usual thang i do today, as far as electronic device convenience goes. not to mention, it's not like anyone will ever have the proper convergence/convenience to actually make it doable to wave your phone at more than a few places and have it do something useful.
For these things to work as advertised they're going to need to saturate the shit out of the market, so businesses will want to use them *everywhere*. They'll need to come with everything, cheaply I think, for it to become some easy to use super gadget opportunity.
WIll that happen? probably not. Perhaps it will be tied in greatly with home elctronics, and personal gadgets, but it will probably be nowhere as ubiquitous (ubi..ubu...ubo...damn) as credit cards, and i doubt it will bridge the gap from bluetooth+ that it looks like it will reside in to super convenience.
excluding the WB, BET etc...all the other channels are white channels.
does the sea of white on the screen somehow not magically reach your eyes? The only reason that BET and the few others exist, is because there already are a hundred or so white channels.
they're just called AmericanTelevision instead.
speaking of 1.1 era activities, i was noodling around a few weeks ago and searched for some old haven addresses i used to hang out at, namely opium den at hemi.com and omnisolve.com...
i came across one years EdgarEdgar awards too...
oh well...i think it's illusions that's still up, if anyones familiar with there.
kinda miss those days, friendships and intellectually stimulating discourse came alot easier it seems...
damn idiot populace, get off my laaaaaaaaaawn!
re: to: "[...]The rest of the amendment goes on to say that Congress shall make no laws RESTRICTING THE FREE PRACTICE THEREOF! For those that need a primer, it basically states in no uncertain terms that Congress shall not play favorites, when it comes to religion. By the same token, it also means that Congress shall NOT knock one religion down just because some loud mouth doesn't like it."
(emphasis added is my own)
Would you deny then, that legally mandating citizens (their young children actually, which I find all the more sad) of this country to pledge to the Christian God every morning for most of the year isn't playing favorites with religion?
I happen to know a few people personally (perhaps you know of them, or have heard myths about these elusive folk) that happen to not believe in / worship God as Christians know it to be. I would be angered at my children having to pledge to some Higher Power contrary to the one my family worhips, in any country, and I would be doubly ashamed to have this happen in America to boot.
"[...] By the same token, it also means that Congress shall NOT knock one religion down just because some loud mouth doesn't like it."
Is Congress 'knock'ing one religion down? It seems more like Congress is raising one up above the others (would that be playing favorites?) by making it required by law to pledge your personal allegiance to its' God.
I don't recall any counties where children are made to worship to Allah, Shiva or contemplate the knowledge that Buddha offers us.
Sure seems like some religion is being chosen as a 'favorite' to me.
-Dev
Please excuse me if I have wielded my Liberal Left views in such a way as to deafen you to your own or others view points. I did not mean to.
" And when it does happen, look for some big corporation to be backing something that looks a lot like XML, but it will have a different more friendly name and will be claimed as innovative. "
Yeah, and it will come from Redmond and be proprietary, and it'll break everytime you try to do something not exactly covered in the included Office-annoy-you-to-death-Avatar tutorial.
Did I mention that it will overshadow whatever well implemented version OSS may (who knows) have released, through sheer force of product lock in.
Yippee
--
If that were indeed their position, why don't they say clearly in the letter that allowing software patents of any kind if a huge mistake!?
--
Becasuse perhaps they see it as being worthwhile to ask for something more achievable / realistic, given the present climate and mood of those involved who will soon be voting?
I mean, shit, I think they should just ask for every reasonable policy we can think of. I mean, it's reasonable!! There's no need to not demand it! Doesn't everybody agree with our reason?!?!
It's not like asking for things that have a tiny probability of actually happening might make them seem ill reasoned or unable to accept the reality of the situation.
--
I think we have just witnessed a major GNU/Linux vendor betray the Free Software movement.
I used to be a customer of SuSE. I will not buy from them again.
--
Good, go away then and save me from this absurdity.
Dev
[...] As much as we bitch about how the US going down the tubes, Americans still enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom, while living one of the highest qualities of living in the world.
---
That's well and nice, but for how long will we enjoy this relative utopia? will we not eventually succeed in having gone down the tubes?
So we enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom? More than we enjoyed last year? Two or even three years ago? What about five years ago?
Do you think this trend will continue or do you pray to the crystal cathedral that Christ will return and give us our liberties back?
It's rather useless to say how fine things are because they haven't gotten worse yet, while you admit (or perhaps you think everyone is bitching about nothing) that they are getting worse, and will continue that way barring some large improbable catastrophic scale event of good luck.
I love hearing people tell me how fabulous this country is concerning liberties and quality of life, as we all hear the loudest pneumatic toilet sound and watch our previously taken-for-granted liberties go down the drain. I absolutely love the quality of life too. It's not as if our draconian drug laws and blatant hypcocrisy are putting half of the current 18-35 year olds in prison, having our lives run by huge corporations and trade groups, or are blessed with some of the finest examples of muddled law in the world.
No, lifes just dandy. If I can drink my cheap swill and watch the game, I'm doing ok. I stay informed with Fox News and can honestly say I'm a responsible citizen of the world, living in the country that smells the least (you wish) of shit.
I mean, it might be shitty smelling, but it's not as shitty smelling as everyone else.
-Dev
From http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm and what I remember about the case (facts).
McDs had it's coffee at ridiculous temperatures, to save it's taste they say but more likely so it could be kept longer without having to make more pots.
"A vascular surgeon determined that Liebeck suffered full
thickness burns (or third-degree burns) over 6 percent of her body,
including her inner thighs, perineum, buttocks, and genital and groin
areas. She was hospitalized for eight days, during which time she
underwent skin grafting. Liebeck, who also underwent debridement
treatments[...]"
and
"During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700
claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims
involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This
history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of
this hazard.
McDonalds also said during discovery that, based on a consultants
advice, it held its coffee at between 180 and 190 degrees fahrenheit to
maintain optimum taste. He admitted that he had not evaluated the
safety ramifications at this temperature. Other establishments sell
coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is
generally 135 to 140 degrees.
Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company
actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185
degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn
hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above,
and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured
into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn
the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns
would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing
the "holding temperature" of its coffee."
There you go.