Slashdot Mirror


iTunes 4.5 Authentication Cracked

fooishbar writes "Yesterday, Apple released iTunes 4.5, which deliberately broke the 4.2 authentication scheme, which had been successfully reverse-engineered. However, crazney has been at it again, and within 24 hours of downloading iTunes 4.5, has broken the new scheme, and added more features to this library along the way. If you want to incorporate iTMS support in your program, give libopendaap a go!" Reader ScottGant submits this story about the Pepsi/iTunes promotion: "News.com has this story about Pepsi's iTunes promotion give-away. The promotion, which is slated to end this Friday, was to have given away 100 million tracks through Apple's iTunes music site. But according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed."

725 comments

  1. Only five million? by Liselle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's way less than they anticipated. Only 5 million out of 100 knocked me flat. Since iTunes serves a pretty specific market, I guess that says a lot. Especially since the tracks are free. The question on my mind: how many of those 100 million winners actually reached folks? TFA mentioned something about distribution problems.

    Also, about the new authentication crack: I am curious how this will impact their deal to offer free weekly songs, I'm assuming it's some sort of deal with the record industry. Today is a fairly uninspiring Avril Lavigne track (but free! I got it anyway! :P), but I have to wonder.

    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    1. Re:Only five million? by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to a lot of posts on Macrumors.com and other Mac news sites there were a lot of posts from people in the *huge* markets like New York, LA, San Fran, etc who were posting that they never found a bottle with the promotion on it.

      Personally in Raleigh, NC I never saw a 'iTunes' bottle but then again I don't drink a lot of soft drinks anyway.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    2. Re:Only five million? by Revolution+9 · · Score: 1

      I got a free Foo Fighters track from iTMS last night. You said you got an Avril Lavigne track. Have they already changed it or are these two different promotions?

    3. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This week, there is a different free single each day. From then on, there will be one free single each week.

    4. Re:Only five million? by pudge · · Score: 2

      FF was yesterday, Avril today. Check back for something else tomorrow. You missed yesterday's, sorry.

    5. Re:Only five million? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Well, I redeemed about 3 songs myself. I guess the rest of the Pespi drinkers just couldn't figure out what iTunes was.

      *shrug*

      (P.S. I'm really a Coke drinker, but after getting a free iTunes song on a Pepsi from a Pizza place, I just couldn't resist trying a few more times.)

    6. Re:Only five million? by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I hardly drink pepsi in the bottle, just the cans from the vending machine. The couple times I did buy bottles, the 24 ounce bottles where winners, the smaller bottles never won.

      Bad thing, I never remembered to keep the bottle, I tossed it like normal. Dont know how many other people don't know, or don't care.

    7. Re:Only five million? by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TFA mentioned something about distribution problems.

      In the area I'm in (Downtown Long Beach, Ca), the iTunes bottles didn't reach most stores until the end of February. All of the stores were carrying Lakers promotional bottles instead.

      Once the iTunes bottles started showing up, I won a few songs. When I went to redeem them, iTunes didn't have any of the specific songs that I wanted. They didn't have any Led Zeppelin songs, so I went looking for some songs off of a CD that my wife wants. They didn't have that either, so my caps didn't get turned in.

    8. Re:Only five million? by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny
      Especially since the tracks are free
      I only got about five free songs...See, I have this odd aversion to developing type 2 diabetes that limits the amount of sugarwater I want to drink.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    9. Re:Only five million? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      20 minutes out of NYC (in jersey) i managed to get 18 pepsi caps, and another of my friends found 40. For me, it took until about halfway through the first month of the promotion, since the vendors i get soda from usually don't restock as often as a real store or soda machine.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    10. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I drink Diet Pepsi, so I opted for cancer instead.

    11. Re:Only five million? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      They're both listed as 'free' at the moment. Trying to walk my wife through downloading them onto my Powerbook via AIM now because I don't want to download it to my work laptop

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    12. Re:Only five million? by chrome · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh, I hear that hot chick in Pepsi's Marketing division wants to marry you ...

    13. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got over twenty, but didn't drink a drop of Pepsi. I dug through trashcans and recycling bins in persuit of a way to support indie music and hurt Pepsi at the same time.

    14. Re:Only five million? by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thing that gets me is this - who is it that's going to go buy a Pepsi for a free song? $1.29 for a bottlecap with a 33% of a 99-cent song. Doesn't add up. So the only people who would get the songs in the first place were the ones who drink Pepsi to begin with - but most of them drink it in cans. If every cap had a free song then I would see Pepsi sales shoot up - but that's not good for Pepsi to eat 99-cents of whatever they get from the $1.29 sale.

      I'd say the only ones who benefit from this deal is Apple, but that credit card requirement scared away most people. So, other than more awareness, Apple didn't gain much from this.

    15. Re:Only five million? by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the St. Louis area, the local Pepsi bottler ran a promo giving away free Blues tickets instead of the iTunes promo. Right about the same time as the Blues fired their head coach during a massive slump, which they pulled out of in time to reach the playoffs and be eliminated in the first round. Pepsi sure knows how to market their product...

      I'll stick with Coke, thanks.

    16. Re:Only five million? by saddino · · Score: 1

      Especially since the tracks are free.

      This is a common misconception. The tracks are only free to those who are regular buyers of Pepsi in single (not six packs nor other bundles) 20 oz or 1-liter bottles (not 2-liters, cans or other sizes). If you don't regularly buy this exact product, then you have to make the choice to buy it for the chance of getting a free iTunes track.

      I would've liked the chance to win some tunes, but I buy Diet Pepsi in 12 packs.

    17. Re:Only five million? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      My (extremely attractive) wife might have a thing or two to say about that... ;-)

    18. Re:Only five million? by kb0pin · · Score: 1

      I also wonder if they are counting those songs that were actually downloaded or not. I, for one, have about five free songs sitting in my queue, so I have redeemed the codes, but not used them yet. It could be that they are only counting those codes that have been used to download songs, and not those codes that have been redeemed.

    19. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I redeemed some last night for the first time. They had a spot to enter credit card info, but it was not required.
      There is a 10 cap redeem limit per day for those who were waiting to redeem caps.

    20. Re:Only five million? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 0
      That's way less than they anticipated. Only 5 million out of 100 knocked me flat. Since iTunes serves a pretty specific market, I guess that says a lot. Especially since the tracks are free. The question on my mind: how many of those 100 million winners actually reached folks? TFA mentioned something about distribution problems.

      I redeemed my 3 free songs and to be honest with you, I'd never use iTunes Music Store again unless they had another free song promotional giveaway. I can't easily convert the songs I downloaded to MP3s unless I burn and re-rip (loss of quality). In the end I will continue to use Poisoned for my music needs since: a) songs are free with that, and b) no DRM mp3 format. Besides, who has 99 cents to blow on a single friggin song? I'd rather spend my money on something more useful and just use P2P networks to get lame ass songs.

    21. Re:Only five million? by goon+america · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's way less than they anticipated. Only 5 million out of 100 knocked me flat.

      100 miliion is the maximum possible number of redemptions; that's the number of winning labels they printed. You'd have to expect every single winning label to be redeemed to reach that number.

      Apple expected of the 100 million winning labels, about 30% would ultimately be redeemed, or 30 million. 5 million compared to that isn't good, but it's better than compared to 100 million. I blame Pepsi's rather lackluster promotion efforts in part (a brief, off-handed mention in a commercial that ran once during the superbowl).

    22. Re:Only five million? by Methuseus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Have both! I'm sure neither one would mind....

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    23. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you post a link to a pic, we will all assume she is a 274 lb, 4ft 6 inch ugly woman. :->

    24. Re:Only five million? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " That's way less than they anticipated. Only 5 million out of 100 knocked me flat."

      Does it really matter though? They still got the credit for offering 100 million, and that PR is all that matters.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    25. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've learned to never trust men's opinion of "attractive" on slashdot.

      Score: 0, what did you expect? Laugh.

    26. Re:Only five million? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, she is 4'6", but she only weighs 120 lb. She *enjoys* running every morning, and she actually loses weight after each kid! I'd say more, but she'd probably kill me if she ever found out. :-)

    27. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not even realize that the iTunes contest was still going on. All the vending machines in my area stopped despensing the Pepsi bottles with iTunes caps many, many weeks ago.

    28. Re:Only five million? by m_maximus · · Score: 1

      Type 2 diabetes is more often than not caused by excessive fat consumption, not sugar.

      --
      I have a solution but you're not going to like it. (Something I say far too forten to my boss)
    29. Re:Only five million? by Shrubber · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of people had close to 100% success buying Pepsi bottles with winning caps. Since you could see the bottom of the cap through the bottle you could ensure yourself a free tune every time. I buy a soda for lunch in the cafeteria at work some days so it was easy for me to just switch to Pepsi for a few. I got 6 free songs, but really don't like Pepsi as much so I didn't keep at it.

      I know other people have though, there are pictures out there with people showing off dozens of winning caps.

    30. Re:Only five million? by bwy · · Score: 1

      One thing to consider, how many people actually redeem their bottle caps when they win something like "A free 20 oz Pepsi."

      Don't know about you guys, but when I get one of those off a soda from the office soda machine, I usually toss it. Mainly, because I haven't figured out how to redeem the damn thing AT a vending machine. And I don't make a habit of traveling to the grocery store every time I want a soda.

    31. Re:Only five million? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It wasnt worth the hassle for me to install itunes and browse their shitty (imo) selection to find a single song that I might want to listen to - of course only from my own computer.

      I'm surprised they redeemed 5 million. I'd think it would be less. Most people simply don't care about a free download of a song from apple. And I mean most as in 99.9% of the population who aren't Apple geeks.

      Just because apple charges a buck a tune doesn't mean that's what people think it's worth. "Hooray here's your prize, a song - net value for you: nothing".

      The whole point of the promotion was to get iTunes on TV, and the Pepsi ads "Im gonna download free music so fuck you copyright laws nyah nyah" did just that.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    32. Re:Only five million? by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

      I agree!! I couldn't find any Led Zep either and most of the songs I like. What's the use of getting something free if you can't find something you like. Collecting free stuff is good, but collecting free junk is absurd.

    33. Re:Only five million? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, I'm 6'2" so we do make quite a pair. But she's not *that* short. Women are just generally shorter than men, and many of todays women easily fall under the 5 foot mark. As a result, I find the idea of anyone being under 4'11" being classified as a midget suspect. Perhaps for men, but definitely not for women.

    34. Re:Only five million? by unother · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. Just tried it myself, and although the FF track is still listed as "free", when you attempt to DL, iTunes gives a message that it's not available for download, etc. right now. Oh well...

    35. Re:Only five million? by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      ... the only people who would get the songs in the first place were the ones who drink Pepsi to begin with...

      You're forgetting another group... those that drink Coke. Or those like me that really don't have a preference (Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi are about equal in my opinion). So I have a choice of $1.29 and no free song or $1.29 and a possible free song. Of course, there are ways of increasing your odds

      Still, I'm shocked as well by the 5 million out of 100 million redemptions.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    36. Re:Only five million? by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was planning to switch from Coke to Pepsi for the duration of the promotion, but as you say it's not cost-effective for heavy drinkers such as myself to buy individual bottles.

      I did buy a few and I won all but one of them. I really liked the promotion and I'm sorry it's (nearly) over. There are still caps in the stores, so I think they should have extended the redemption period.

      Since I wasn't able to tilt the bottle and see which bottles were winners, I thought it was interesting that I won most of them. I live in LA, and we've only had the bottles for a couple of weeks now. Perhaps they had to use up the winning caps and so a higher percentage of people here were winners.

      I think they should have stuck in maybe 3 codes for each 12-pack. That would have given the heavy drinkers a chance to win. The contest as it is seems designed for light drinkers, and that's just plain silly. Why not cater to your huge customers and hope to snag a few from Coke?

      (I'm afraid that I like Diet Coke in cans quite a bit more than Diet Pepsi in bottles, so from a conversion perspective this was a flop).

      D

    37. Re:Only five million? by outZider · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What credit card requirement? I don't have a credit card, and I use the service just fine... Gift cards from Target and Pepsi free songs.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    38. Re:Only five million? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      One of my co-workers drinks Diet Pepsi and has quite a collection of iTunes caps. However, he illogically hates Apple and hasn't cashed them in yet. I kept trying to get him to give them to me, but he kept insisting that he'd end up getting them once he found a good way to break the DRM and re-encode them.

      I personally waited until yesterday to cash in the 3 credits that I had. I rarely drink the stuff either.

      They had a decent supply of them in Charlotte, but Diet Pepsi faired better than Pepsi as far as the yellow caps were concerned for some reason.

      --

      mbbac

    39. Re:Only five million? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Yeah,

      I'm not terribly surprised after reading many many other stories just like mine.

      Here, we had the unfortunate problem of the bottler plant going on strike. This happened right near the begining of the promotion and went on about half way through it. For a little while it wasn't horribly tough to get an iTunes promo bottle, but they quickly faded. We would normally see about 7 rows of non-iTunes pepsi and about 2 columns of iTunes promo endorsed goodness.

      I'm not really sure why they went to the trouble of actually having a promotion when it was terribly difficult to purchase said product. (Not counting the time the plant was on strike)

      In any event, I made the most of it as I did take steps to ensure I was a winner.

      I still have a few sitting on my desk here. I'm not really going to use them. As soon as I did find some new things on iTunes a friend of mine went and nabbed whole albums by the artists I had sampled. Now, my friend didn't use iTunes, but another "network."

      For once, I had these downloaded songs which were not of the other variety of downloaded music. It was initially a nice feeling... I chalked it up to something new. Then of course that was all washed away when my friend offered me the apple from the garden.

      In any event... one free iTunes song for the world from me.

      kzhlr tmjpr

      Enjoy

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    40. Re:Only five million? by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      I blame Pepsi's rather lackluster promotion efforts in part (a brief, off-handed mention in a commercial that ran once during the superbowl).

      I saw the same ad several times after the superbowl and as late as last week. I only won one song however and that was from a discarded cap that my son found in the street. I'm a Coke drinker and I wasn't about to switch to a drink I didn't like for a 1/3rd chance to win a free 99cent song.

    41. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's 4'6" and 120lb., she's a fat cow.

    42. Re:Only five million? by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      They finally did show up, just not for at least a month after the promotion started. First one i found was in a gas station, a few weeks later a couple of the local supermarkets carried them, but only in the refrigerator cases in front of the store.

      the odd find was the bottlecap for a summer promotion...meaning last summer.

    43. Re:Only five million? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Listen to at your computer, or another one you authorize, or any CD player, or any portable music player that supports MPEG-4 AAC

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    44. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I redeemed about 20 songs... Drink diet.

    45. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got caps from a local middle school (wife is a teacher) from other teachers who didn't care to redeem them.

      20oz bottles at the school are still a dollar, but when you have a school of teachers drinking, but otherwise tossing the caps...

    46. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only bottles that ever made it to my market were a few "Sierra Mist" bottles w/ the iTunes cap.

    47. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative
      No it's not.

      Fat consumption has nothing whatsoever to do with diabetes. You could eat bacon 3 meals a day and not have high glucose levels. (Your blood pressure and cholesterol levels might not be so terrific...)

      Type 2 diabetes is one of two things: 1. You are not producing insulin fast enough to process large amounts of glucose in the blood.
      Or 2. Your body is not absorbing the insulin fast enough to do so.

      In either case, when you eat foods that are quickly turned to sugar in the blood (any foods which are high in starch or sugar, including white bread and potato products, and especially sugary foods like Pepsi) your blood's glucose level goes way up, because your body can't process it. This causes all kinds of problems. Fatty foods do neccesarilly raise your blood sugar levels. You may be confused because obesity (fat tissue, not fat consumption) slows insulin absorbtion, and is a contribuiting factor to Type 2 diabetes.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    48. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      5% redemption doesn't sound so bad. Consider:

      + The person has to give a shit about getting music. That eliminates a huge portion of the poulation right there.

      + The person has have a personal computer -- not just a work computer.

      + The computer has to be pretty new -- 2000 or XP, which means consumer PCs since 2003 only. Your Compaq Presario running 98SE can not apply. Even older Macs can't do it (50% of the installed base).

      + The person has to download and install iTunes -- which is a pain-in-the-ass over modem. This is assuming they even can find where to get it from.

      + The person has to figure out the itunes UI -- could be difficult for the AOL crowd.

      I dunno how they ever got an estimate of 30%. The system requirements themselves make that impossible.

    49. Re:Only five million? by mns · · Score: 1

      The Handy Hugo on Glenwood, across the street (north side) from Crabtree Valley Mall still has the yellow-capped bottles. So does the BP station up at Millbrook and Six Forks. Just so you know. I've "won" 28 free songs, but as soon as the contest is over, I will likely switch back to orange juice drinking most of the time.

      --
      - Eat it.
    50. Re:Only five million? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the song credit!

      --
      For more information, click here.
    51. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Diet Pepsi is not carcinogenic. Saccharine has not been used in either Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi since NutraSweet (a.k.a. "Aspartame") was introduced in the 80s.

      There are all kinds of people (a.k.a. "kooks") who are now trying to tell you that Aspartame is bad for you. Funny how they came to that opinion just as NutraSweet's patent on Aspartame ran out, so anybody can produce a generic form of it cheaply.

      I'm convinced that all this hand-wringing about Aspartame is driven by a desire to sell you on new sweeteners, like Splenda. Every time I "follow the money" on somebody issuing warnings about the Aspartame in Diet Coke, I discover somebody who's competing with it.

      (Splenda and Sorbitol, by the way, often contain warning that "large quantities my cause mild diarrhea," by which they mean "even a few drops of this stuff will make you explosively burst out liquid faster than a fire hose within the hour, making severe dysentery seem healthy by comparison.")

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    52. Re:Only five million? by augustz · · Score: 1

      Never saw a bottle either (San Francisco). After the super bowl went looking and didn't see anything. Forgot about it after that.

    53. Re:Only five million? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      That's acutally not bad. Considering that I could find lots of caps myself and I only came within 80 of the maximum 200 (Why have a maximum??? Would Pepsi not just sell more pepsi if there was not one??). Plus my fav (Diet Pepsi) ran out of caps way too soon.

      --

      Gorkman

    54. Re:Only five million? by Eraser_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was activly searching my town (east la county), neighboring ones (san bernadino county) and even a few stores in Santa Barbara california. It took about 3-4 weeks before the damn LAKERS caps went away so I could buy iTunes caps. Won about 6 or 7 songs in 10 bottles.

      Distribution sucked majorly.

    55. Re:Only five million? by the+sabster · · Score: 1

      The local grocery store near me had 20 oz bottles of Pepsi for $0.89 /ea... cheaper than the price of a song alone. I wouldn't normally have bought Pepsi or songs from ITMS, but the combination made it too tempting not to. I had 100% luck in finding free songs, using the "tilt the bottle & check" method.

    56. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would you want to convert them to a lower-quality format like MP3? Are you one of those people who has an MP3 player than can't handle the new standard?

      (That's right, I said standard. AAC is the audio layer of MP4.)

      Poisoned for my music needs since: a) songs are free with that, and b) no DRM mp3 format. Besides, who has 99 cents to blow on a single friggin song? I'd rather spend my money on something more useful and just use P2P networks to get lame ass songs.

      Oh, I see. You want to steal music, and probably want to illegally distribute the songs you got from the iTMS give-away. Forget I asked.

    57. Re:Only five million? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Oh but if you spend time picking yout bottle, you can get within about 80 percent of getting a cap everytime! :)

      The technic isn't really new either as one guy at one place who saw me checking my bottle said they had no more of the ones that gave you a free one and then I told him about the promo with iTunes. This was also in a record store that sold pop! :P

      --

      Gorkman

    58. Re:Only five million? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Saccharine isn't cancerous, either. The rats died from drinking 800 cans of soda a day.

      Apartame is metabolized into Formadelhyde by the liver.

      It's all in the dosage. A can or two a day isn't going to hurt you. Drink a case a week and you're going to have all sorts of problems.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    59. Re:Only five million? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      It also looked like, to me, they only ever produced one commerical. I bought the Green Day I Fought the Law song, but I got so sick of hearing it I cringed when the commercial ran.

      --

      Gorkman

    60. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      and I live in Canada, where the iTunes promotion wasn't valid, and the bottles were in the stores here. What the hell?

    61. Re:Only five million? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Agreed - like any rebate program, the redemption rates are usually quite low. And those are redemptions on 10,20 or 30 dollar rebates - the return is much more substantial than the effort invested. Though the return from this promotion is high relative to the product cost, they might have had a much higher redemption rate if they were giving away something with a higher perceived value and giving it away less frequently than 1 in 3. Though it's nice to get a 99 cent free item with a 1.29 bottle purchase, there's still the cost of remembering to hold onto the bottle cap, signing up for the service and so on to redeem it - realistically, the costs of this effort may be valued by many people at pretty close to the dollar value of the item itself.


      Then, as you pointed out quite accurately, there's the system requirements, bandwidth requirements, computer-experience and application installation experience requirements, and the need to be interested in music (many people don't listen to much music, or are just interested enough to listen to what's on the radio). Frankly, I think a 5% redemption rate should be viewed as a rather decent success of this product. If they thought honestly that they'd get a 30% redemption rate, they were kidding themselves. Personally, I think I would have guessed more like 10% based on my sense of the market.


      I also think the promotion would have been much more successful if it targetted regular Pepsi drinkers who drink from cans. The return from cashing in these free songs is much higher if you've collected 10-15 free songs, and I'd say the likelihood of that person getting the songs and going through the effort is much higher than the likelihood of somebody else.


      I'll us myself as an example (though I'm a bad one in most ways). I am not a regular Pepsi drinker - I drink Pepsi usually only when there are no other options (i.e. no Diet Coke around). I won an iTunes cap while on the road driving from Boston to New York at a rest stop in Connecticut where they only sold bottles, and only sold Diet Pepsi. I have used iTunes and purchased probably 15 dollars worth of songs from iTunes in the past. I thought it was very cool and great that I had a bottle cap worth a dollar, and I put the bottle somewhere meaning to keep and redeem the free song. Nonetheless, I didn't really give it enough thought to be terribly careful with that bottle, and ended up throwing it out by accident when cleaning my car after the drive. Had I gotten that bottle cap upstairs and dropped it by my computer, I probably would have redeemed it at some point. So even among people interested enough, competent enough, and so on who happen to get a winning bottle cap, the redemption rate is likely to be at best maybe 50%? And that's a pretty small fraction of the population

    62. Re:Only five million? by binain · · Score: 1

      Right, and what's the likelihood of winning the lottery? No way any patriotic capitalist americani would spend a buck (or 5) on THAT! I'ts called advertising, and if it works on just a small part of the population, Pepsi makes money, and Apple Music Store gets name recognition.

    63. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but he kept insisting that he'd end up getting them once he found a good way to break the DRM and re-encode them.

      For those people for whom "Free is not good enough"

    64. Re:Only five million? by flakaddict · · Score: 1

      The soda machine at my college sells Pepsi bottles for exactly $1 each. That makes it worth it to me.

    65. Re:Only five million? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, the parent post confused me. I rechecked. She's 5'6". Doh!

      Sometimes it really sucks being such an easily confused individual. :-(

    66. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you only listen to led zeppelin, and there's only one cd your wife wants? Christ man, the songs are free, try changing the channel for a minute!

    67. Re:Only five million? by afish40 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's all in the dosage. A can or two a day isn't going to hurt you. Drink a case a week and you're going to have all sorts of problems. Yes, but think of all the iTMS songs! *rushes to Safeway to grab up remaining winning Pepsi bottles*

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    68. Re:Only five million? by PxT · · Score: 1

      4' 10" and under is the general guideline for membership in the LPA.

    69. Re:Only five million? by Darth+Daver · · Score: 1

      I was tempted, but I don't drink Pepsi. I wish I could get the same deal with Coke.

    70. Re:Only five million? by li99sh79 · · Score: 1

      I just did a little recycle-bin diving at work and snatched up the winning caps that people threw out, I got almost twenty songs that way.
      -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    71. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

      And like they say: If you can't give cancer to a white lab rat, you're just not trying.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    72. Re:Only five million? by 0zzy · · Score: 1

      OMG iTunes could have killed you!

    73. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, there is no evidence linking sugar intake to developing type 2 diabetes. Feel free to drink up. ;)

    74. Re:Only five million? by DreamerFi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      There are all kinds of people (a.k.a. "kooks") who are now trying to tell you that Aspartame is bad for you

      Thank you for calling me a kook. I know from personal experience what it can do to a person. Perhaps I'm hypersensitive to this crap, but sure as hell I'm reading packaging to make sure I never get it into my system again. You probably won't believe me or think it was something other than aspartame that was working on my seratonine levels, but I sure as hell am not going to prove it by ingesting it again. And I do know that should I ever meet somebody at VP level from Coca Cola or Pepsi, I will break his or her kneecaps.

      -John

    75. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's frightening is that you could so easily confuse the heights 5'6" and 4'6"...

    76. Re:Only five million? by frission · · Score: 2, Informative

      there was plenty in the Raleigh area, atleast in RTP. i got a couple of friends to do the 'look up the bottle' trick and we all won every time...whoops...maybe that's where all the bottles went :) i even ended up giving a few tracks away to people who hadn't used iTunes yet.

    77. Re:Only five million? by DraKKon · · Score: 1

      I live in Los Angeles and I first saw a pepsi iTunes bottle in early April.. and ONLY diet Pepsi... regular pepsi was still in football or baseball promotion mode.. For something that was supposed to start early Feb, it took 1.5 months to even hit the stores.. so 5 mil in a month seems ok.. since the pepsi bottles are still not "everywhere" Target and Rite Aid and other store STILL do not carry the iTunes pepsi bottles...

      --
      "It's not like your minds are as open as the source you love..." - Me to the majority of Slashdot.
    78. Re:Only five million? by parksie · · Score: 1

      You'd have to decode and reencode to go from AAC to mp3 anyway, so burning to CD in the interim makes no real difference.

    79. Re:Only five million? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I didn't bother with it at all. It's not worth the hassle of downloading, installing and figuring out iTunes, registering for an account at the iMusic store, and poking around to see if they happen to have what you want, all for one single track that's permanantly tied to Apple!?

      Good grief, even those chinsey "CD Clubs" give you a few free albums up front (just for signing up - not just if you're a "winner"), and sell uncompressed, non-DRM discs for about the same price as an album download from Apple.

      And no, I don't blame Apple for the situation.

    80. Re:Only five million? by jp10558 · · Score: 2, Troll

      You know, here in buffalo, I saw some 20oz winners, I even got one. I couldn't give it away. No one here saw a value in it, downloading extra software that might mess up your machine, and would take up hd space to get one free file that had restricted use.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    81. Re:Only five million? by swb · · Score: 1

      Total bullshit. Aspartame is the most widely studied food additive ever, and none of the claims about formadelyhyde, methanol poisoning, headaches, lupis, or anything else have EVER been proven true.

      Stop spreading this lie.

    82. Re:Only five million? by tdemark · · Score: 1

      he'd end up getting them once he found a good way to break the DRM and re-encode them

      I guess the concept of the "Burn CD" and "Import" buttons are just a tad outside his mental prowess?

      - Tony

    83. Re:Only five million? by BusterD · · Score: 1

      I remembered I had a winning bottlecap in my desk after reading this headline. I went to the itunes website and, not being a member, downloaded the itunes program just so I could download my one free song. Then I had to create an accoutn, give them my email and then they asked for my credit card number. Screw that! Maybe thats why only 5 million people have redeemed their caps and most likely those 5 million were already users of the service.

    84. Re:Only five million? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      I live nearbye in Rochester and I never saw a bottle with it. I don't drink Pepsi regularly, but I probably had a dozen or so bottles in the time the offer went on. I don't really care, I wouldn't have used it anyway.

    85. Re:Only five million? by nitehorse · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yes, and DDT is perfectly safe! It certainly doesn't cause cancer, or poison entire food chains and it absolutely wasn't responsible for the near extinction of both the peregrine falcon and the bald eagle.

      Please.

      Just because the aspartame-industry-funded research finds no serious problems with aspartame (huh, I wonder how that might be possible?) doesn't mean anything. There is still no serious data about the long-term effects of consistent sustained aspartame intake, either. So your claim is complete bullshit.

    86. Re:Only five million? by general_re · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A can or two a day isn't going to hurt you. Drink a case a week and you're going to have all sorts of problems.

      So two cans a day is okay, but 3.4 cans a day (24 cans per case divided by 7 days) will fuck you up. Obviously, something's wrong with that last can-and-a-half, so all you have to do is not drink 2 out of every 7 cans - thus, you can buy 14 cases a week, throw 4 of them away, and you'll be fine.

      :^)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    87. Re:Only five million? by stankyho · · Score: 1

      Did you get some free Clutch songs?

      /Binge and Purge

      --

      ---
      eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
    88. Re:Only five million? by kev0153 · · Score: 1

      "but most of them drink it in cans" Where do you get this information?

    89. Re:Only five million? by cfl99 · · Score: 1

      personally i hate pepsi but love itunes, so when i found out 7-11 was stocking itunes-big gulp cups (ie i can fill my pepsi cup with coke and still win some music), i got excited that i might be able to win. but you know what, after at least 2 big gulps a day (not to mention my roomates!)for a few weeks, no winners turned up! my guess is that the pepsi nanotech was able to tell when you filled your cup with coke, and instantly changed into a non-winner. oh well. should've learned my lesson trying to play the monopoly game at wendy's.

    90. Re:Only five million? by starshot · · Score: 1

      Huh.... I live in Syracuse, it felt like I couldn't STOP winning free songs, every single 20oz I got seemed to have a song in it.

    91. Re:Only five million? by graikor · · Score: 1

      I call BS! Sure, sorbitol (and maltitol) have a tendency to cause severe (not mild, I don't care what it says on the package) diarrhea, and it doesn't require what a normal person would consider an excessive dose, either. Some of the sugar-free products on the market can have a strong effect with little more than one serving's worth.

      Having said that, there are absolutely no links between Splenda (a.k.a. Sucralose) and such side-effects. I guarantee that any problems you or anyone you know suffered from a product containing sucralose were from the massive levels of sugar alcohols (the aforementioned sorbitol, maltitol, lactitol) that food manufacturers insist on putting into their products, despite the possibility of horrible discomfort.

    92. Re:Only five million? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Personally in Raleigh, NC I never saw a 'iTunes' bottle but then again I don't drink a lot of soft drinks anyway.

      I don't drink Pepsi (yuck), but I picked up six Big Gulps (filled with Diet Coke, usually) that had winning codes rolled into the lip of the cup. I think I managed a bit better than 1-in-3 odds.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    93. Re:Only five million? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You are welcome!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    94. Re:Only five million? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Sucralose is good for fruit-flavored stuff such as fruit-flavored carbonated water or fruit flavored soda, it sucks in Colas and is ok in tea

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    95. Re:Only five million? by graikor · · Score: 1

      I wonder if even all 5 million ended up downloaded.

      I noticed a problem with the Music Store near the end of the promotion - I had several credits from caps, and I tried to use them up, but the downloads aborted before they were complete. No big deal, that bug had bothered me for a while, but I could always eventually get the songs downloaded.

      This last batch of songs, however, was different. At some point, the Music Store decided that I had successfully downloaded all the songs, but only one of them actually completed.

      So now, I'm out those songs and my credits. I have written to Apple, but their response is glacially slow, and it's pretty much impossible to get a human being to respond, so I'm probably SOL.

    96. Re:Only five million? by CatOne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saccharine *is* still used in fountain sodas. The stuff you get at 7-11 from the machine, or at the local burrito joint DOES have saccharin in it. Only the bottles and cans use NutraSweet.

      This is because NutraSweet has a relatively short shelf life. It's something like 3-6 months (very vague recollection here), and then it loses its sweetness, completely.

      The fountain soda is in containers or "bags" and can be in the channel for months or (gasp!) a year or more before it's hooked up and served -- really the distributors have little control over when restaurants or convenience stores hook it up. As such, it's still saccharine based to ensure they don't start serving out big "crap batches."

    97. Re:Only five million? by clichekiller · · Score: 1

      Here in Phoenix AZ I redeemed more then 60 winners myself. Between my wife and I we drank about 6 bottles a day easily. We found the percentage of winners to be slightly higher then the projected 66%, closer almost to 75% really. In my eyes the campaign worked like a charm because I'm normally a diet coke drinker. So for me to buy that much diet pepsi. I realize I'm just a drop in the proberbial bucket, but I can't be the only one.

      --
      Sir, there is a dragon outside with an armful of armor. He's inquiring if we offer free refills.
    98. Re:Only five million? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      I wanted to download it but it asks for a credit card and i dont have one :(

    99. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, goddammit, if you can't be with the song you love, love the song you're with!

      (Okay, how old am *I*?)

    100. Re:Only five million? by pod · · Score: 1

      Just because it's free doesn't mean you shouldn't complain or that you should be grateful. If you can't or don't want to use it, what good is it to you even free?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    101. Re:Only five million? by Pii · · Score: 1

      Not if it's 30 pounds in tits...

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    102. Re:Only five million? by swb · · Score: 1

      DDT isn't a food additive, it's a pesticide, and in fact it is non-toxic to humans, but it does build up in the food chain with deleterious effects in some birds. These problems are almost always directly linked to the overruse of DDT, which is far more effective infrequent doses than in regular usage.

      But then again, it's also saved millions of lives by preventing malarial infection and other tropical diseases spread by mosquitoes and other insect pests.

      Every major food watchdog group and several major medical associations, including the Mayo Clinic have both refuted the tinfoil hat claims about aspartame.

      What kind of data do you need? It's the most studied food additive in the FDA's history. Do you need 50 year histories to be satisified?

    103. Re:Only five million? by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      The 'might mess up your machine' and 'would take up hd space' arguments are pretty weak. It's legal free music. The Kazaa and bundled spyware you currently use to download tunes take up more space than that. I've never, nor will I ever exceed Apple's level of restrictions on my mp3 (non iTunes) collection. I don't see the big deal about being able to burn a playlist to CD 10 times and use a file on up to 5 computers.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    104. Re:Only five million? by RandomWhiteMan · · Score: 1

      I lucked out. I usually drink either Mountain Dew or Diet Coke, but switched to Diet Pepsi for the itunes promotion. Between the one's I found, and the ones all my co-workers got and gave to me (they all drink Diet Pepsi,) I got about 25 free songs. It seemed like pretty good odds in Missouri.

    105. Re:Only five million? by mictho · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect. Type II diabetes is not a single disease, but rather a collection of phenotypes/genotypes that result in a common endpoint: hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose).

      Unlike Type I (also known as Juvenile-Onset) diabetes, Type II diabetes is most certainly a "polygenic" disorder, characterized by some individuals who have insulin resistance, some with relative insulin deficiency, and many who have both.

      Obesity contributes to insulin resistance through multiple mechanisms. Although eating "fat" may not raise your blood glucose level acutely, it will probably cause other metabolic derangements that could be equally detrimental.

      Some diabetologists feel that hyperglycemia may be a rather late endpoint of insulin deficiency/resistance, and that other complications may be inflammatory in nature, not necessarily due to glucose directly. Whether this is borne out by ongoing research remains to be seen.

      Also, insulin is not "absorbed", it acts on a cell-surface membrance receptor, and stimulates the uptake of glucose and free fatty acids. Fat tissue releases numerous cytokines that modulate the action of insulin and other metabolic hormones.

    106. Re:Only five million? by N1KO · · Score: 1

      There are many sources other than kazaa for mp3s, and they all offer the chance of having free mp3s without restrictions.

      Other than the moral part, there's no advantage in using itunes over anything else and I guess most people don't care about the moral implications of downloading mp3s.

    107. Re:Only five million? by parcel · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why the Atkins diet makes me cringe... I am a (type 1) diabetic, take insulin injections and check my blood glucose levels several times a day. Believe me, fat and protein do raise your blood glucose level. The raise is spread out over more time, but it seems to give a net raise to my glucose levels of about the same as the equivalent weight in sugar or starch.

      To address the type 2 diabetes caused by fat consumption, there has been at least one recent study (fueled by the Atkins craze) showing that excessive fat consumption leads to increased free fatty acids in the blood stream, which subsequently does directly affect incidence of type 2 diabetes. There is only to my knowledge one or two studies, so not a great deal of evidence, but that is more due to research into this field being fairly new rather than an abundance of evidence to the contrary.

      Type 2 diabetes is still a mysterious beast... although we have a decent understanding of it, it is far from complete. What we do know goes back to a very basic principal: to decrease your blood sugar levels (thus, decreasing risk of type 2 diabetes) you need to reduce caloric intake. Simple as that. A balanced diet is certainly preferable... although I disagree completely with the author's reasoning behind it, the "Zone" diet makes a lot of sense to me in the context of my experience as a type 1 diabetic. Balancing intake of the different types of calories results in far more stable blood glucose levels.

    108. Re:Only five million? by LocoBurger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except with a "free" iTunesMS track, you can only play it in iTunes. For those PC users who already like their player, switching to a whole new player with a gaudy Apple interface completely unlike anything else on Windows is reason enough to toss the bottle cap for the "free" track.

      Thanks, but no thanks, Apple.

    109. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such an ass Golias, really. Last I checked the earth revolved around the sun, not you. Simply because you aren't allergic to aspartame, doesn't mean no one else is. I'll have you know that accidentally "overdosing" on aspartame (accidentally chewed two packages of sugar free gum) put me in the hospital with severe shortage of breath, heart palpitations, hypertension and an overwhelming feeling of disassociation. The stuff is poison to some people which is probably why the FDA makes them label a warning in RED on all containing packages. Not to mention PKU. Why don't you look that up while your at it sport.

    110. Re:Only five million? by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      The Apple interface is pretty bloated, but I have yet to find any player that has such intuitive playlist and library management. I currently use Quintessential, have used Winamp. Do you recommend any library plugins for either of those (or another player)?

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    111. Re:Only five million? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      naw. i got the prerelease through my schools radio station. nad i own the other albums.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    112. Re:Only five million? by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this was an issue with Pepsi not incorporating the 100 million songs into enough products. I heard that only their bigger bottles usually won songs, that's one way to show your customers that you are just trying to reclaim your costs instead of promote your product... maybe some people will get fired.

      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    113. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. "Extra software that might mess up your machine" - that quote speaks volumes.

      Other reasons, I can see; if you don't want to use the player, why would you bother for just one or a few free songs, or whatever.

      But the idea that by default you'd be worried to install new software...from a major software vendor... because it "might mess up your machine" -- boy, is that ever a Windows worry, basically foriegn to Mac users (pre- and post- Mac OS X).

      Sorry for the chauvanism... but had to say it.

      Cheers!

    114. Re:Only five million? by Dever · · Score: 1

      That pissed me the hell off!!! I'm in East LA area and the damn lakers caps don't mean half a shit to me. well, neither do the itunes ones either, well, i would have liked the choice.

      honestly, what i'd do with a few mp4 tracks is beyond me though. with hundreds of cd's and their ripped analogues, i don't care for a few crippled or extra-effort tracks...

      but yeah, distribution sucked majorly. that it's all ending now seems so anticlimactic, ending with a whimper...just like it ran...

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    115. Re:Only five million? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Other than take issue with insulin being "absorbed", in what way did you disagree or refute the parent poster's statements? Sure sounds like your message is the same but using different words.

    116. Re:Only five million? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that what's needed. How long have we been ingesting hydrogenated fats only to now find out that they, not saturated fats as we've been led to believe, may be the real culprit in elevated cholesterol and heart disease?
      What about glucose-fructose as a replacement for sugar? Sure, it's perfectly non-toxic but the mass introduction of that into the food supply does seem to have co-incided with the staggering increase of obesity in North America.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    117. Re:Only five million? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I quake in my boots at installing Microsoft software, and Symantec software can be a huge pain. I usually have more problems with the big companies than the shareware like getright(Which I did pay for - 2 times they offer optional upgrade payments). Adobe Acrobat Reader seems ok too. Sorry for the tangent on "good" windows software vs "bad" but I just think Mac users need to understand that windows users are more at risk from Major vendors than any others in terms of system stability, uninstallibility, and changes to really unrelated parts of the OS.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    118. Re:Only five million? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      How does your experience with type 1 diabetes make you knowledgable about type 2? Have you had a meal composed of nothing but fats and proteins? I doubt it considering your condition. I don't think you know as much about Atkins as you think. Seeing as though your dietary considerations are so different than most others I doubt you will try Atkins and doubt you will have the personal experience to understand it.

      My father was diagnosed with type 2 and his condition was entirely reversed by going on Atkins. After several years and over a hundred pounds of weight loss, he reverted on his diet, quickly gained a massive amount of weight and died of a massive heart attack. His experience, and mine, convince me that the Atkins approach is very effective. Atkins rejected all carbs in the reduction phase regardless of glycemic index because he didn't think considering it was ultimately worthwhile. Other diets take this into account and many could be effective. I haven't personally tried them. As far as I'm concerned low carb is the only way to eat. Fats and proteins have no effect on blood sugar levels for me but carbs sure do.

    119. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes for Windows is not a regular application -- it installs all sorts of OS-level guck to handle the DRM business. The iPod Service occassionally crashes on my machine when I hotplug a firewire harddrive. It also does not uninstall completely cleanly.

      So, there is a legitimate concern. I kinda doubt you'd just go install any random Mac app that ran two demons and installed device drivers either without thinking about it a little.

    120. Re:Only five million? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I told him about that... *shrug*

      --

      mbbac

    121. Re:Only five million? by kubrick · · Score: 1

      There are all kinds of people (a.k.a. "kooks") who are now trying to tell you that Aspartame is bad for you. Funny how they came to that opinion just as NutraSweet's patent on Aspartame ran out, so anybody can produce a generic form of it cheaply.

      I've been hearing that "Aspartame causes cancer in rats" for at least 15 years or so. Of course I have no opinion either way on the truth of that statement, but the people who say these sorts of things have been pretty consistent with their message for at least that length of time.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    122. Re:Only five million? by gadlaw · · Score: 1

      Hi there, I'm one of those 'Hand Wringers' who will tell you my own personal experience with Aspertame is that ingesting any amount of it causes me to get a huge migraine headache. It's a mild hobby of mine to avoid the various things that contribute to anything that gives me pain. (with the painful exception of women of course) I own no stock in any sweetener company that I am aware of and I don't go around telling people not to drink the stuff. I merely don't drink it and politely refuse any offers of any product with it. There are no rants about aspertame at my personal website and I'm perfectly happy letting you consume as much of it as you would like. But, by your own analysis I might take your concerns about those other sweeteners as evidence of your own 'kookiness' as it would lead me to think that perhaps you are a representative of the aspertame makers. If I followed your logic that is.

      --
      Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
    123. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My best friend drinks about 6 or more cans of diet coke a day and has done since he was a kid. He developed diatbetes quite a few years back (despite being one of the fittest guys I know). 2 years ago he was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (which many people are linking to Aspartame).
      His identical twin brother drinks DC a little less and he developed diabetes a few years after his brother. He hasn't yet got MS (here's hoping and praying he doesn't). Make of it what you will, but I'm trying to ween myself off any soft drinks these days. -Mart

    124. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are all kinds of people (a.k.a. "kooks") who are now trying to tell you that Aspartame is bad for you.

      If you're a phenylketonuric, they're right.

    125. Re:Only five million? by Lun1x+h3r0 · · Score: 1

      i live in nyc and i have only been able to get the itunes pepsi's in new jersey uptil about march.

    126. Re:Only five million? by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      Here in Rochester NY, about half of the 20oz bottles I've purchased from vending machines have been winners. I've put them all into tunerecycler.

    127. Re:Only five million? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Saccharin (See also: Saccharine was found to be carcinogenic in a single study out of several in which a whole batch of rats died. I'm not sure what the story is there, but afaict it was not really conclusive.

      Aspartame is a big complex molecule (C14H18N2O5) which is even more complicated than Saccharin (C7H5NO3S) and thus it is even more diffucult to determine what it is up to in the brain. It enters the bloodstream very rapidly. With that said, I drink quite a bit of the stuff.

      As for Splenda and Sorbitol leading to "loose stool" as it is often referred to, I have noticed that Sorbitol has that tendency (and tastes funky to boot) but I have not had any such problems with splenda, which is simply Sucralose (one atom away from being sucrose, from what I understand) plus a small amount of Maltodextrin which is a pure carbohydrate, meaning it should be broken down quite readily in the body - this is indeed a known quality of maltodextrin.

      While sucralose may indeed by indigestible, it is approximately 600 times sweeter than sugar (gram for gram) and it's basically fluffed up, there's almost nothing there. The maltodextrin in the product gives it some of the same characteristics as sugar when you cook with it, which is to say that it slightly helps foods hold together (where sugar does a much better job.)

      I've eaten a lot of splenda, cooked and uncooked, hot and cold. I've made ice cream with it, baked with it, put it into iced tea and basically done just about everything else that you do with sugar with splenda, and never had any problem with "anal leakage" ala olestra/olean. (Actually, I once ate a whole bag of those lays wow! chips and did not experience any anal leakage, so maybe I'm just special, but I know many other people who use splenda without issues.)

      Aspartame is probably not carcinogenic, but I have repeatedly heard rumors (I don't know if they are founded or un-) about it causing MS-like symptoms in some individuals. Given its complexity it is not hard to believe. Remember that the FDA has screwed up before, and will likely screw up again.

      Have you used splenda? Does it give you the hershey squirts? (Hershey is making some chocolate with the stuff now, making it an even more apt phrase than is typical, in this instance.) Or are you just spreading FUD whose source would likely be manufacturers of aspartame and other assorted non-dietary sweeteners?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    128. Re:Only five million? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Glucose and fructose have nothing to do with it. sucrose is added to basically every processed food, and the increased consumptions of processed foods correlate (which still does not prove causation, though it may indicate it and certainly supports such an argument) strongly with the American obesity epidemic. The problem is specifically a dramatic increase in our intake of "ready" or easily processed carbohydrates, plus an increase in our consumption of carbohydrates in general, and finally the generally more sedentary life of the average American citizen combined with our wealth relative to the majority of the world, which means we can eat what we want when we want - and we frequently do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    129. Re:Only five million? by Monx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Other than the moral part, there's no advantage in using itunes over anything else

      iTMS is a music store. iTunes is a kick-ass audio player/organizer. It is second to none, imho. No winamp user I know who tried iTunes ever went back.

    130. Re:Only five million? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > That's way less than they anticipated. Only 5 million out of
      > 100 knocked me flat.

      Actually, no matter what the marketdroids SAY they expected, I'd bet that is EXACTLY what the suits HOPED for: lots of publicity with much less cash outlay than what it could have cost them.

      No doubt, the arrangement called for Pepsi to pay for the songs that were redeemed by the deadline, not the whole 100 million. Otherwise, why have a deadline at all? They probably had some people work the numbers as to how much "brand awareness" they would build vs. the number so songs they'd likely have to pay for. It's like when CompUSA sells memory at $40 for 256MB, with a $30 mail-in rebate. They're counting on most people being lazy or forgetful and not cashing in the rebate.

      Five percent.... I bet that's pretty close to the number of people who actually redeem mail-in rebates too.

      Myself, I had a stack of ten or so codes, sitting on my desk, that I didn't get around to using until yesterday and today. If I had forgotten the deadline, or been busy and put it off, those codes would have expired tomorrow.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    131. Re:Only five million? by mictho · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for to the immediate parent, but based on my previous experience, persons with Type I have far more knowledge about diabetes in general than those without any diabetes, whether Type I or Type II is being considered. Diabetics may respond differently to different types of foods, whether it is protein, carbohydrates, or fat. Insulin release is triggered by glucose (which is rapidly converted from a variety of other carbohydrates), and some amino acids (the substrates that compose proteins). Fat won't acutely trigger insulin release, but can if glucose production occurs in the liver. The comments on Atkins do not apply to Type I, but as far as Type II diabetes is concerned, there is little biochemical evidence that there is any rational basis for subscribing to this hypothesis. It might work for some persons, but it often does nothing for many persons. No long term studies have demonstrated that this is an effective dietary therapy. Some persons might benefit for reasons that are still unclear, but many do not, and you never read about those folks. As for how the other comments rebut the original parent, here are the explicit differences: Fat consumption has nothing whatsoever to do with diabetes. Yes, for many, but not all, individuals, excess fat calories lead to weight gain, and insulin resistance. No prospective trial has been conducted to address this question. You could eat bacon 3 meals a day and not have high glucose levels. (Your blood pressure and cholesterol levels might not be so terrific...) Some persons do get elevated glucose levels. Paradoxically, some persons do not necessarily have elevated cholesterol or BP, but why that happens to some persons is unclear. Type 2 diabetes is one of two things: 1. You are not producing insulin fast enough to process large amounts of glucose in the blood. Or 2. Your body is not absorbing the insulin fast enough to do so. Basically, this is true, but there are many shades of grey between the amount that is contributed by these 2 causes. In either case, when you eat foods that are quickly turned to sugar in the blood (any foods which are high in starch or sugar, including white bread and potato products, and especially sugary foods like Pepsi) your blood's glucose level goes way up, because your body can't process it. This causes all kinds of problems. Fatty foods do neccesarilly raise your blood sugar levels. You may be confused because obesity (fat tissue, not fat consumption) slows insulin absorbtion, and is a contribuiting factor to Type 2 diabetes. The above statements are generally true, except that the "processing" of glucose is dependent upon glucose uptake by tissues. The issue about elevated glucose levels is variable in different individuals, as commented above. The final sentence would be more correct if it read that obesity contributes to insulin resistance, which means that individuals may become resistant to insulin, but "insulin absorption" is not affected. Final disclaimer: Atkins (and South Beach, etc) is controversial. I think the jury will be out for several months-years. These ideas are not new, but have not been rigorously tested by formal scientific investigation (there are about a half-dozen well-designed published studies to date). It might help some persons, but may not work for other persons. Extrapolating the benefits of one dietary therapy for a polygenic disorder would be premature at this point.

    132. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi there. Count me among the ones that switched back. iTunes on Windows is slow. Part of the problem is Apple's stubborn insistence that the interface had to look exactly the same as the Mac version, right down to the brushed metal texture that slows the drawing down to a crawl (on a 1.6 GHz P3 with 576 MB RAM). Add the performance problems to FairPlay and iTunes becomes just another piece of corporate bloatware. No thanks. Winamp 2.95 is fast, convenient, and smart. It doesn't presume to tell you how you may and may not use the music you purchased. It's also easy on the computer.

    133. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1
      I have in front of me, at this very moment, a carton of Blue Bunny "No Sugar Added" ice cream, which contains Splenda, and no sorbitol. Allow me to read to you from the side of the carton:

      "Excessive consumption may have a laxative effect in sensitive persons."

      This carton has been sampled by several people, including myself, but has remained in my freezer uneaten ever since. Damned if it didn't turn out that every last person who has tried so much as a single serving had the trots within the hour. I guess all six of us happened to be what they consider to be "sensitive persons."

      So tell me, if it's "BS" that Splenda causes diarrhea, why does Blue Bunny participate in spreading this ugly lie of mine by printing a warning of that very side effect right on the side of every carton they sell?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    134. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking of the goofy general health warnings, such as those that were aired a few years ago on "The 700 Club," not the possibility that you, AC, might be allergic to it. I'm allergic to many common antibiotics myself, but I don't crusade to have them banned from the general public just because they are lethally dangerous to me, or call people "such an ass" for pointing out that they are safe.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    135. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Holy shit. I post one simple rant about the pseudo-scientific myths surrounding Aspertame, and every goddamned person with a headache-causing allergy to the stuff immediately assumes I'm attacking them!

      Calm down. I'm talking about the people who claim Nutrasweet causes memory loss and death, not allergy suffering people who avoid things which give them headaches (which is always a sensible policy.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    136. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Have you used splenda?

      Yes.

      Does it give you the hershey squirts?

      Dear Lord in Heavan, I thought I was going to achieve escape velocity and end up in orbit.

      Any other personally intrusive questions I can answer over the whole damned Internet for you?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    137. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Well, I can speak for my own experience without fear of contradiction anyway.

      I had been hypoglycemic my entire life... until recently, when diabetic symptoms prompted me to buy a glucose-level tester and discover that I was hovering well over 200 all day, and frequently much higher.

      By cutting out all foods sweetened with added sugar, all grains except for whole wheat and sourdough (which has enzymes that slow the digestion), all potato-based foods, and all pastas cooked past the "al dente" point. I also stepped up my work-outs from every other day to every day. My blood-glucose levels immediately improved. I now vary between the high 80s and low 100s, and seldom go over 120. All my diabetic symptoms are gone. I'm still working on losing weight, but I've never felt healthier in my life.

      Best of all, I did not need to give up either beer or red meat, which I would consider a severe reduction in my quality of life. :)

      The "GI" ratings in the back of the book "The Glycemic Life" probably helped me avert an early grave.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    138. Re:Only five million? by Golias · · Score: 1
      I should be clear that what I'm doing is not really Atkins, and certainly not South Beach. There are certain high "Glucose Index" foods that I avoid, but I don't count carbs. There's even one or two breakfast cereals I can eat without raising my blood-sugar very much (such as Special K, which has the added benefit of printing thirtysomething hotties on the side of the box to promote it as a "weight loss" food. Nice to have something pleasant to look at as I eat.)

      I have a healthy dose of skepticism about both Atkins and South Beach, but I strongly feel that people who are dangerously obese are probably better off slimming down with an unorthodox diet than remaining fat and eating at McDonald's every day.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    139. Re:Only five million? by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1

      Fnord! Fnord! :-)

    140. Re:Only five million? by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1
      You Americans need to start using real *cane* sugar instead of the corn syrup crap your government mandates for you!

      Why? It's very healthy, very tasty, completly natural, quite cheap, won't give you cancer, doesn't rot your teeth like corn syrup will, is less fattening than corn syrup, provides more raw energy than corn syrup, and is a natural part of a human diet!

      When you eat a teaspoon of cane sugar, it is not converted by your body into a poison. All current artifical sweeteners are.

    141. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LOVE METRIC!

      GET WITH METRIC!

      METRIC IS t43 5UP3R10R!

      --
      Slashdot kindly informed me to use less caps because it's like yelling which seemed kind of strange to me considering typed text doesn't make any sound, let alone a loud one. Nevertheless, in order to continue I have decided to adhere to slashdot's solution and use less capital letters, relatively that is.

    142. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very useful for general information on Diabetes.

    143. Re:Only five million? by Squozen · · Score: 1

      I tried to download too, but I'm in Australia and therefore not special enough to download a free song.

    144. Re:Only five million? by filenabber · · Score: 1

      I'm in Raleigh too and my wife drinks diet Pepsi every now and then. She gave me two "winning" caps. I redeemed the two songs only becasue I got a $20 iTunes GC elsewhere.

      --
      Are you a Candy Addict?
    145. Re:Only five million? by bruce+RedHead · · Score: 1

      Come to Southeast Ohio!! Nice hills, pretty flowers, dialup connections and (referring to post)..We bought 5 bottles of Pepsi and won 3 times.

      Oops. Forgot to download those free songs.

      Bummer. And I'm pretty sure I lost the caps.

      Did I mention we have dialup?

    146. Re:Only five million? by sh00z · · Score: 3, Funny

      Houston was the same way. I got hooked when my first three all won. Six out of the nine bottles I bought were winners. Then my wife, in an amazing display of pity, gave me an iTMS gift certificate because she knows how much I prefer Coke.

    147. Re:Only five million? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sure, please input your full name, social security number, current address and phone number, credit card and bank account numbers below. Thank you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    148. Re:Only five million? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      It's not a lie. Aspartame is metabolized to formaldehyde in the liver.

      That's a fact.

      Note I also said it's the dosage that counts. Miniscule amounts of formaldehyde aren't going to hurt you.

      Feeling awfully defensive, aren't we?

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    149. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should any one believe your statement. Because you brashly proclaim "That's a fact." ?

      I (and I'd guess I'm not alone in this) am not interested in your or anyone else's proselytizing about the evils of aspartame (or anything else for that matter). If you have strong, verifiable facts that back your claim please share them. Otherwise, please shut up.

      Here are some useful links on the safety of aspartame and some of the more common "complaints" spewed about by people who apparently have nothing better to do.

      A link from MIT

      A link from Harvard with a reprint of an article from TIME magazine.

      One, two links from the "evil" FDA.

      And a reprint of an article from "The Lancet" posted at aspartame.net. These links were all from this page at snopes.com. That took me a whole 3-5 minutes to find.

      I also found a lot of pages making claims about formaldehyde and brain tumors and multiple-sclerosis. All of the "aspartame alarmist" pages lacked links to any scientific studies, any papers by third-party organizations, etc..

    150. Re:Only five million? by graikor · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't speak for the carton you have, but the Blue Bunny web site certainly says that all of their "No Sugar Added" Ice Creams featuring Splenda do contain sorbitol and/or lactitol. Check the ingredients list, and/or note the presence of a "Sugar Alcohols" line under the "Total Carbohydrates"

      I have yet to see a single product that contains Splenda with that warning unless it also contains sugar alcohols, but many products do have both. It unfairly gives Splenda a bad name.

    151. Re:Only five million? by parcel · · Score: 1

      I'm very sorry for your father. Diabetes truly is becoming an epidemic... fortunately, research related to curing both type 1 and 2 have increased accordingly. Hopefully a cure will come soon.

      To respond, my experience includes both my type 1 diabetes and my parents' type 2. This, combined with keeping up with various medical journals and current research in the field, makes me knowledgable not only about diabetes in general, but the endocrine system relating to blood glucose levels. A type 1 diabetic is tasked with complete control of their insulin/glucose levels, and develops an intimate understanding of how various foods and activites affect them. I have had meals composed of nothing but fats and proteins; I experimented with the atkins diet (against the recommendation of my endocrinologist) for a few days. The biggest difference I noticed was a high sugar level through the night, due to the delayed effect of fats and proteins on blood glucose levels. I ended up taking insulin injections in the middle of the night to compensate.

      One very important note about type 2 diabetes: it is a progressive degenerative disease, and cannot be reversed. It can be controlled, to an extent, through diet, exercise, etc. However, it cannot be cured, and as the disease progresses over time a type 2 diabetic will need to start insulin injections to maintain good health. You and your father's experiences may have given the appearance of "reversing" the diabetes, but essentially the symptoms were only being hidden by tightened glucose control (which the Atkins diet does, to an extent, provide, but not in a healthy manner).

      Finally, let me reiterate this very important point, because it is common misinformation that can have a dramatic effect on a diabetic's life: fats and proteins DO have just as much of a cumulative effect on blood sugar levels as carbohydrates. It is merely spread out over more time.

    152. Re:Only five million? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Saccharine has not been used in either Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi since NutraSweet (a.k.a. "Aspartame") was introduced in the 80s.

      You're mistaken. Because aspartame breaks down with heat, the diet soda makers have been using saccharine in conjunction with aspartame, so that if a soda gets too hot in transit or storage, you don't end up with a drink that has no sweetening at all.

      If they just brought back the cyclamates, I'd switch to diet sodas in a heartbeat.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    153. Re:Only five million? by joshlewis · · Score: 1

      500,000 songs, and you can't find one that you like? And I thought I was picky.

      --
      If senility was a race, I would win.
    154. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lactitol != sorbitol

    155. Re:Only five million? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0
      No winamp user I know who tried iTunes ever went back

      look harder. iTunes is a resource hog. Many people tried to try it but it sucked up their RAM like a, (ah hell, it is slashdot anyway) new version of windows

    156. Re:Only five million? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0
      I quake in my boots at installing Microsoft software

      I think you need to format and start over. EVERY microsoft product I've installed, installed and works perfectly, surviving a reinstall of the OS without requiring to be reinstalled themselves.

    157. Re:Only five million? by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Why are you quoting free? Just because you personally can't use it doesn't mean it's not free.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
    158. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading a hassle? Maybe if you're still using the old two-tin-cans-and-a-string internet connection.

      Installing a hassle? Criminey, double clicking on an icon is a hassle now? Holy crap.

      Figuring out a hassle? You're calling it a hassle without even ever looking at the software? Hellloooo McFly!

      Registering an account a hassle? You obviously went through the "hassle" of registering an account for Slashdot, and this site is virtually worthless - at least a song you like has some value.

      Poking around to see if they happen to have what you want? Oh yeah, it's so hard to use a "Search" field and type in names of bands you like, or, if you're really crazy, names of songs you like. Such a huge hassle, I tell you, I don't know why Google has managed to make hassles like that their business.

      Permanently tied to Apple? How fscking ignorant are you? Here's an idea - get your free song. Burn said song to CD-RW. Import song, through iTunes so as to preserve tag information, as an MP3. Gosh, that 5 minutes was such a hassle...

      Goddamn kids these days.

    159. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I was thinking it was my horrific fast food diet that was giving me the runs, but turns out it was artificial sweetener all along.

      Thanks, Tin-Foil Beanie Man!

    160. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience, the people who experience problems with olean/olestra eat a lot of high-fat foods (can you say "Atkins"?) - and the two kinds of "fat" don't mix well in your digestive tract.

      You can eat an entire can of fat-free pringles without a problem - provided you haven't eaten a diet consisting almost entirely of burgers for the past day or two.

    161. Re:Only five million? by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for my iPod, and the fact that I then upgraded to Macs entirely, I would have stuck with WinAmp for my mp3 playing.

      Why?

      Simply put, my directory structure is an easier and more customizable audio organizer than id3 tags can ever be.

    162. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true, but unfortunately you're missing the main point: artificial sweetners have a "sweetness index" (by weight) that is thousands of times sweeter than normal sugar (which has an index of 1). *That* is why there's so much of it around, with all the associated advertising lies such as "no added sugar", it's dirt-cheap compared real sugar!

    163. Re:Only five million? by Cais · · Score: 1

      It took a month or two to get em here (around San Fransisco) and, well, it only took me 2 bottles to figure out you could check for a winner >=).

    164. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I only got about five free songs...See, I have this odd aversion to developing type 2 diabetes that limits the amount of sugarwater I want to drink.


      I would strongly suggest you start with education. Drinking too much soda won't cause Type-2 diabetes. Diet doesn't cause Type-2 diabetes. You're either going to get it or not. Your diet can control the symptoms, so it may appear that you're staving off the inevitable, but it's not a causative factor.

      It's very irritating to people that are diabetic when people that don't know what they're talking about keep insisting that adult onset Type-2 is just a matter of diet and exercise and that diabetes is preventable.
    165. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's "free" because you got it after paying money for something.

    166. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did!!! I love winamp... itunes was big, bloaty, and ate my memory so out it went.

    167. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very sorry to hear about your father; my dad also has type 2 diabetes and is overweight, and I worry about him. But your story is indicative, to me, of one of the problems with the Atkins diet - most people can't maintain it, and will rebound.

      For most people, any diet will initially be better than no dietary restriction, because it makes them think about what they eat for what may be the first time. It's not the individual mumbo-jumbo in the particular diet book that matters, but that the individual is now aware of the food choices they make and trying to exercise some control. But unless that control can be maintained indefinitely, it's frequently all for naught. The Atkins diet is just too extreme for most people to remain on. On the other end of the spectrum vegans can eat a healthy diet too, but it's just too hard for most (I'm vegetarian, but not vegan).

      The predominant factors affecting type 2 diabetes are (1) being overweight and (2) not getting enough exercise. Eating simple sugars is also a long-term contributor IMO (I minimise mine), but there's less evidence for that. Really if most people get some walking in every day and lose ten pounds, they can avoid experiencing or completely reverse the diabetes syndrome.

    168. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, lots of legal drugs(*) have LD50s within a power of two or so of the ED50. Alcohol, for instance, and some pain remedies. So you may not be far off.

      (*) I consider refined sugar to be a legal, psychoactive drug - particularly having watched its effects on a twelve year old.

    169. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that all alchohols are sugar alcohols, right? Like ethanol. Pretty much organic chem 101 (or 220 in my case). I don't disagree with your assertions, but you may need a better term to describe the particular substances that concern you.

    170. Re:Only five million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a search for "jaggery" or "gur" to get more info on this; these are the Hindi / Punjabi / Urdu / Swahili names for unrefined cane or palm sugar.

      Note that the same phenomenon has been observed in the case of refined white salt (usually rock salt) vs. unrefined sea salt - the former raises blood pressure and has other harmful effects, while the latter does not (and tastes better too IMO). The funny thing is that the other minerals aren't removed from salt to "purify" it, but because they can be sold commercially - edible salt represents only about 5% of the total market, and the rest is sold as constituent parts for chemical industrial uses.

      Moderation is still the key, of course, but there's really no amount of refined white sugar or salt that's any good for you.

    171. Re:Only five million? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      If you are drinking anywhere near half the lethal dosage of alcohol and are considering that an effective and appropriate dosage, perhaps you need some help.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    172. Re:Only five million? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      All type 2 diabetics have some insulin deficiency, even if it is only relative deficiency. They all have impaired beta cell function.

      Insulin resistance alone doesn't cause diabetes, but it does damage of its own and (in some cases) eventually causes your beta cells to malfunction and die - then you get diabetes - and there is no hope to not be diabetic thereafter (until someone can fix/replace beta cells and undo the glycation of your proteins and remove the amyloid deposits from your pancreas - good luck).

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    173. Re:Only five million? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Going from 120 to 140 for several hours is better than going from 120 to 300 for an hour as far as damage is concerned.

      Spreading out a blood glucose rise reduces damage and possibly slow progression of diabetes (very high BG levels hurt insulin production severely). That is why acarbose is given to many diabetics. It slows down the absorption of glucose, thus spreading out the BG rise.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    174. Re:Only five million? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      It's part of the blame the victim mentality that is rampant in the medical community.

      Sounds much better than them admitting they don't know why people get sick and that they can't cure or even properly treat their illnesses.

      They'd round up the obese into camps if they could. And for those that think obesity is due to gluttony, they had some prisoners eat extreme amounts of calories (like 7000). They gained only a small amount of weight on average.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    175. Re:Only five million? by mictho · · Score: 1

      All type 2 diabetics have some insulin deficiency, even if it is only relative deficiency.

      Semantics. Some diabetics have extremely high insulin levels, albeit not high enough to overcome their insulin resistance.

      They all have impaired beta cell function.

      Not true. In many cases of insulin resistance, the beta cells are taxed to overproduce insulin in order to attain glycemic control. The beta cells work quite well, early on. The impairment is thought to arise from either beta cell overload (after months-years of excess taxation), amyloid deposition, or glucose toxicity. Other mechanisms may also be responsible.

      Insulin resistance alone doesn't cause diabetes...

      Not true for some (but not all) cases. NIH has identified several individuals with specific mutations in the insulin receptor which lead to severe insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. Persons with Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) have insulin resistance from mutations in certain gene transcription factors that mediate some of the downstream actions of insulin. An extreme example is genetic knockout mice that lack the insulin receptor die of diabetic ketoacidosis within hours of birth. A whole array of other knockout mice have been produced that lack some key mediator(s) of insulin action, producing insulin resistance. Some, however, never become diabetic or even hyperglycemic. Insulin resistance is thought to be one of the hallmarks of type II diabetes mellitus, perhaps in concert with other diabetes genes that may trigger other mechanisms of diabetes, including glucose toxicity and beta cell overload. However, some lean type II diabetics may have little, if any insulin resistance at all, and are biochemically similar to a type I diabetic, albeit, without the autoimmune insulitis.

      Loss of beta cells occurs at different times in different type II diabetics. Some patients with profound insulin resistance and diabetes due to insulin resistance can become normoglycemic with weight loss (such as gastric bypass), but it is highly dependent on the individual and when the weight loss occurs.

      My only point was that type II diabetes mellitus is not one single disease, but is a collection of subtypes with polygenic causes, all with a common endpoint, hyperglycemia. For some individuals, treating the insulin resistance will be effective, but for others, it will not be. Determining all the biochemical causes of type II diabetes mellitus through genomic medicine should elucidate the best way(s) to treat various subtypes of type II diabetes

  2. This is annoying. by Pave+Low · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idea that Apple is "breaking" or "crippling" this part of iTunes is misleading. It wasn't a feature that Apple provided to begin with, and any hacks to break the DRM scheme will be thwarted by Apple eventually.

    If you don't like this, you shouldn't use iTunes at all and don't buy their music because this is something they need to sell music online. Last I checked, you can just buy the CD at the store that contains no DRM at all.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:This is annoying. by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First Sale Doctorine. You can do what you want with things you purchase.

    2. Re:This is annoying. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      This is exactly how I feel. If you don't like the terms of service that come with a transaction, don't do it.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:This is annoying. by amembleton · · Score: 1

      CDs at a music store are crippled with 'Copy Protection'. All that means is that I have to download the album if I want to play it on my computer. It begs the question 'Why buy it in the first place?'

    4. Re:This is annoying. by scifience · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If Apple doesn't want people to hack iTunes, they need to provide a way of playing the files on operating systems other than Windows and Mac OS.

      Most people who are using these hacks aren't using them to illegally copy music, but are using them to play the songs they purchased on unsupported hardware. As far as I'm concerned, this constitutes fair use.

    5. Re:This is annoying. by wanerious · · Score: 4, Informative

      You did not purchase the song. Read the agreement. You purchase the right to listen to the song subject to the conditions outlined in the agreement. If the agreement is not to your liking, do not purchase the song.

    6. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or purchase the song and crack the encryption. That way Apple gets paid for their excellent service.

    7. Re:This is annoying. by Nasarius · · Score: 0
      CDs at a music store are crippled with 'Copy Protection'.

      Some of them, sadly yes.

      All that means is that I have to download the album if I want to play it on my computer.

      No it doesn't. Copy protection is almost trivial to get around. Doing an analog rip is the easiest method.

      It begs the question 'Why buy it in the first place?'

      1. No, it raises the question.
      2. Because buying the CD gets you much better quality, the freedom to choose which format you want to encode to, gapless playback, the artwork, an actual portable object, etc. for a few bucks more (don't buy at your local chain store; Amazon has most CDs for $11-15).

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    8. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't actually beg the question, since that is a formal english term that refers to a completely different concept, but thanks for trying. Those of us at Slashdot always appreciate a good mangling of that phrase.

    9. Re:This is annoying. by amdg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Last I checked, you can just buy the CD at the store that contains no DRM at all.

      The problem is that you never know what you are going to get when you buy a CD. Many CDs these days come with DRM that stops you from playing the songs on computers and even some stereos. And you don't know until you try it at which point the stores won't let you return it because it was opened. So given the choice between a useless, ~$15, round, shiny piece of sh... err... plastic or a ~$10 downloaded album that I can burn to a CD, copy to my iPod, or play on 5 different computers, I think the choice is obvious. The phrase "lesser of two evils" comes to mind.

    10. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The idea that Apple is "breaking" or "crippling" this part of iTunes is misleading.


      Yeah, you're right. The only thing that Apple is "breaking" or "crippling" with these mindnumbing changes (see the libopendaap changelog) is their DRM mechanism. Pretty soon we won't need the hackers.

    11. Re:This is annoying. by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you knew going in that iTunes only runs under MacOS and Windows. You knew that when you agreed to the EULA. You agreed to their conditions when you signed up.

      You are under obligation to abide by the terms of the agreement you entered with Apple. Apple is under no obligation to support every OS out there.

      If you don't like the conditions Apple places in iTunes Music Store, including the limited number of supported platforms, don't use the service.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    12. Re:This is annoying. by nickstance · · Score: 1

      it's not like Apple doesn't tell you that the songs are supported only on Windows and MacOS. If you don't like the terms of the sale, then simply don't buy the item.

    13. Re:This is annoying. by scifience · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And use what other service instead? Oh, that's right, there aren't any legal music download services that work on Linux.

      I think that it is much better to crack iTunes's file format so I can play the songs I legally purchased than to download songs completely illegally over a P2P network.

    14. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WELL FUCK! Stop whining! If you absolutely NEED to download music then it looks like you picked the wrong fucking OS retard! Do some research next time! Dumbass.

    15. Re:This is annoying. by jubei · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that it is much better to crack iTunes's file format so I can play the songs I legally purchased than to download songs completely illegally over a P2P network.

      I agree with you, but you could do even a little bit better if you spent money on services that don't utilize DRM. Emusic, magnatunes, audio cds, etc.

      If/When these DRM-free sites get more market share than the DRM sites, record companies will start to rethink their positions on it.

    16. Re:This is annoying. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Insightful
      People seem to be conflating two unrelated things. iTunes can stream music from its library to other clients on the network. This is entirely independent from iTMS, the music streamed by DAAP can easily be music you ripped yourself.

      So really this has nothing to do with hurting Apple, or not agreeing to a "EULA", and it has everything to do with Apple cynically attempting to manipulate network effects. Your brother sharing his CD collection on the home network using iTunes? You can't use WinAmp, WMP, RhythmBox, Muine or whatever to access that, you have to use iTunes too. Then when you share your music, it cascades onwards.

      This is especially true in places like homes, student flats and college networks, like the ones crazney is on. Really, Apple have no excuse for this: restricting DAAP can only have one goal and that is to use peer-power of the type that keeps Windows entrenched to give iTunes an upper hand. As such it frankly deserves to be cracked.

      I know crazney. He's a good guy. We talk often - he isn't out to screw Apple or steal music. He wants to play the music on his Mac laptop using the iTunes streaming system: this seems totally fair to me.

    17. Re:This is annoying. by Nasarius · · Score: 0

      By the way, the CD I linked to is $28 because it happens to be an import. Everything from Bad Religion to Britney Spears is less than $15. How local stores can continue to charge $20+ plus sales tax is a mystery to me.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    18. Re:This is annoying. by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      It ought to be required by law that any rights-restricted CD be labeled as such in the store, just as it would be for having "explicit lyrics."

      DRM bothers me a lot more than some guy saying "Fuck" a few times. It certainly has made ME say it quite a bit.

    19. Re:This is annoying. by groomed · · Score: 1

      If Apple doesn't want people to hack iTunes, they need to provide a way of playing the files on operating systems other than Windows and Mac OS.

      No, they don't. They just have to get out of our way as we hack it.

    20. Re:This is annoying. by wanerious · · Score: 1, Informative

      The third option is to realize that because you are choosing to use an operating system that is not supported by iTunes, you are not entitled to break the rules in the licensing (not purchasing) agreement.

    21. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then don't use Linux. If downloadable legal music is what you want then choose an OS that lets you use it. I wish people would pick tools for the job rather than the jobs and bitch when their tools don't work with it.

    22. Re:This is annoying. by jtrascap · · Score: 1

      I agree with your idea of choice ("Emusic, magnatunes, audio cds, etc") but do Linux users have to crack software in order to achieve their goals? Can't they just buy from another source without having to destroy another, reasonable concept in the process?

      I am seriously more than a little tired though of people cracking Fairplay for the sake of doing so - this only enforces a draconian view of music downloaders, legal or otherwise. Enter politicians, stage right...

      I'm all for a non-DRM solution and yet I don't mind the limitations of the Apple system. I live in Europe and can't even take advantage of iTMS but I certainly would...for me, it's perfectly fair and I'm eager to give it a go, if I ever get a chance to.

      Soon we'll have NO choice and NO rights left...

    23. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You did not purchase the song. Read the agreement. You purchase the right to listen to the song subject to the conditions outlined in the agreement. If the agreement is not to your liking, do not purchase the song.

      Do I detect a certain contradiction here?
    24. Re:This is annoying. by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      NO, you purchased a file. Which you can do what you want with, short of violating copyright. This is still a case where they (EULA writers) are trying to fudge around first sale with hair splitting semantics.

      Now the DMCA still applies and probably makes this illegal.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    25. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought he did not purchase the song? :P

    26. Re:This is annoying. by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      its kinda like how you cant do anything to a cable modem, you do your toast. You purchased the RIGHTS to the modem but THEY own it.

      Even if you buy it outright, if you read the contract it stipulates that they then own the firmware to the modem thus you cant change that.

      it plays off the underlying fact that people dont realize a lot of things they "own" they really dont own but buy the access rights to.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    27. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, you purchased a license. If you don't agree to the license, click "no" and see how many files you puchased.

    28. Re:This is annoying. by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      hmmm last I looked there wheren't any DRM CD's out since the Celien Dion debacle

      If there are, I sure as hell havn't gotten any cause I have had no problems ripping my catalog of 215 CD's.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    29. Re:This is annoying. by Golias · · Score: 1
      1. No, it raises the question.

      (sigh)

      Sing it with me now, Slashdotters. You all know the words.

      Usage defines language, not the other way around.

      The original etymology of the expression "which begs the question" is not relevant in any way. It has become extremely common to use that expression to mean, "which demands that the following question be asked," which, considering the common modern definition of the word "begs," actually makes more sense than the traditinal use of the phrase.

      P.S. All nouns can be verbed.

      P.P.S. The plural form of virus (in biology) is virus. (You're never infected with just one.) The collective plural for more than one type of biological virus is viruses, but it is not "wrong" to invent a plural like "virii" when speaking of more than one computer virus. Most of the jargon in our industry is comprised of words which were simply invented by people who don't know any Latin, and barely know how to write in English.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:This is annoying. by localhost00 · · Score: 1
      Do I detect a certain contradiction here?

      No, that really wasn't a contradiction, technically (as in, he didn't say P and not P). Stupid, but not a contradiction.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    31. Re:This is annoying. by badasscat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You did not purchase the song. Read the agreement. You purchase the right to listen to the song subject to the conditions outlined in the agreement.

      I have two words for you: bull, and shit.

      I don't care what their agreement says. Nobody has to "purchase rights" to "listen" to a song. If I want to listen to a song that's playing out on the street as I happen to be walking along, nobody has any right to charge me for the privilege. Conversely, nobody is allowed to sign away their rights under the law. If I sign an agreement saying "I hereby grant you the right to kill me by strangulation" that still doesn't give you the right to kill me and it doesn't give me the right to commit suicide either (which is illegal in most states).

      Copyright law is pretty clear and the first sale doctrine well established. If I buy a song from iTunes, it's mine and I can do what I want with it provided I don't do anything to violate copyright law. That includes stripping the DRM to exercise my rights as expressly provided in copyright law (don't forget, fair use is not some nebulous concept someone came up with on Slashdot, it is part of the actual law).

      Now, you can try to quote various things from the DMCA if you want, but that won't win you many friends around here. And I don't interpret the DMCA as overriding fair use rights anyway, and neither does anyone else I know of.

    32. Re:This is annoying. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a retarded ass argument. It's a bit like a burgler saying, "well, if you'd installed an open door on this side of the house, I wouldn't have had to break the window, mate!"

      It's Apple's perogative to write software to play their files wherever they like. If it doesn't meet your needs, you're welcome to use a different player. What you're not welcome to do is break the law -- even a silly law like the DMCA -- and cry "fair use" while you're doing it.

      Besides, Apple's already GOT an out for fair use...burn and rip! Shit, you can burn a CD of iTMS music and rip it back USING iTunes, with negligible quality loss. The whole point of "fair" use is that it allows you to use a work you purchased in your own way without opening the possibility for you to unfairly infringe on the owner's exclusive copyright. A slight quality drop is fair in my book -- now, HDTV on the other hand...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    33. Re:This is annoying. by wanerious · · Score: 1

      Which rights would you like to exercise after stripping the DRM? First sale principles do not allow for the full copying of material, nor is this covered in fair use clauses as ruled upon by courts so far. A musician playing out on the street is performing a "broadcast", and no one would think that they would have to be charged for listening in a public place.

    34. Re:This is annoying. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I believe the copy protected ones aren't allowed to carry the CD logo - given that the don't conform to the CD standard. Might be worth checking out if that's true.

    35. Re:This is annoying. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How do you know what "most people" are doing? You haven't a clue what they are doing.

    36. Re:This is annoying. by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      spent money on services that don't utilize DRM. Emusic, magnatunes, audio cds, etc

      The problem is that every time you use one of these services, you directly or indirectly benefit a RIAA signatory company, and RIAA itself, through licensing fees, etc.

      At least if you purchase from the artists themselves at concerts or from the band websites, you stand a better chance of the money going to the artists.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    37. Re:This is annoying. by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      There aren't any legal music download services that work on Linux? What a bunch of bul....err wait a second.

      Ok so that's true. What are you going to do about it? Huh? C'mon what do Linux guys do about things like "no legal music download services that work on Linux" when they run into problems like this?

      That's right, you go make one. You get a bunch of hackers together and you start a project up to crank out a legal music download service that works on Linux and you do it right this second!

      C'mon! Who's with me? The "iTux Music Store" is waiting to be born!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    38. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AgrEEE cOmPLETeley I do dear dear sirr: not languaeg DefINes USAGE but versa-vice! THANK U!

      GREEEEAT injustice was english class my in 2dary skool failing!

    39. Re:This is annoying. by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1
      IT is not really that difficult to use, now is it? 7 burns of the SAME playlist (you can change it up) and share on 5 computers and infinite iPods. rather DAMN lose, don't you think. Or are you an all or nothing person? Personally, i like the restrictions because of the ability it has to somewhat protect artists funds. Would like it to be more for them, but this is the legal option that we have... oh well.

      btw, i have done the burn, rip circumvention, it gave me a good sound file. It really was not that bad, even on the classical selection that i had. Also, do you think that this is the way that Apple wanted it? I doubt it. It is the RIAA pushing this extensive DRM scheme, the least evil of them.

    40. Re:This is annoying. by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      And just where is this license I purchased? I don't see any contracts laying around, but I do have this here music file.

      And just where on the checkout page or "reciept" does it say anything like, "1 license for song by band ----$0.99"? It doesn't.

      where in any of the advertising does it say, "Download your license for CoolBand500's new alubm here!"

      It's like software, have you seen any boxes in the store that say License for windows 2000? No, There's a box of windows that you buy before you ever see this license.

      (not meaning to be anti Apple, or pro pirate cheapskate. But this idea that because it's digital that the transaction is any different is a load of crap. IMHO, that is.)

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    41. Re:This is annoying. by Sarth · · Score: 1
      don't care what their agreement says. Nobody has to "purchase rights" to "listen" to a song. If I want to listen to a song that's playing out on the street as I happen to be walking along, nobody has any right to charge me for the privilege.

      Time for me to call bullshit on your bullshit calling.

      say I'm playin' my music on the street, and you happen to be walking by.. do I charge you? (I might think a tip would be nice, but thats not charging). Of course not.

      On the other hand, if I'm playing my music, and you walk up to me and say, "I really want to hear X!", I can sure as hell go, "Well, I wasn't going to play that today, but tell you what, give me a buck, and I'll play your song."

      Unless you're suggesting that the iTMS doesn't let you control the music you want to listen to -- in that case, why aren't you just listening to some free streaming net radio?

      --

      ... and, so began, the legend of the Five-point Atkins Exploding Heart Technique!

    42. Re:This is annoying. by aeryn_sunn · · Score: 1

      As much as the DMCA irritates me, here is a few tidbits on it:

      First, the DMCA is part of copyright law, section 512 to be exact

      Second, the DMCA does not interfere with your fair use rights, you can still copy the song, theoretically. What the DMCA does prohibit is circumvention of a technological measure that controls access to the song...hence, the DRM. You may own the song (or DVD), but you are still prohibited from circumventing that measure. (there is that nasty other part of the DMCA that prevents trafficking in of any technology, device, etc...that would circumvent said technological measure)

      Technically, if by contract, the seller of the song, whats to prevent you from reselling it, they could, if they show you assented to some licensing contract (Federal Copyright Law does not necessary pre-empt state contract law in the area of copyrights, as long as there is some extra element involved in the contract beyond what copyright covers, i.e. breach of contract)...as long as the seller can show you consented to a contract, you are bound...this is where nasty shrinkwrap or clickwrap contracts come into play

      The DMCA does not take away your fair use "rights" but merely makes them a hell of a lot harder to exercise...you can still copy that song by say, putting a tape recorder by the speaker...but you cannot break or strip the DRM away, as that would count as circumvention and hence is prohibited

      All of the court cases involving the DMCA do not put forth the proposition that it overrides fair use rights, they are still there. It just makes it harder to exercise them

      The DMCA is a nefarious piece of work...very frustrating in that it is well written to make it extremely hard for consumers to do things that were a lot easier before the DMCA and DRM

    43. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I didn't purchase it at all. I got it some other way.

      You didn't respect my rights, and I didn't respect yours. Oops.

    44. Re:This is annoying. by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      Hey i'm not saying that anyone should be pirating music here. I'm just responding to the contention that these people who found a way to disable the lock of the files they purchased are going to be the downfall of Apple.

      I've done the same thing, and it seems to work ok for me too. But remember, that even then you're still violating the license that everyone is on about. Not that it matters in my opinion.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    45. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "It's a bit like a burgler saying..."

      He bought the music, why is he a burgler? What is he stealing?

      "It's Apple's perogative to write software to play their files wherever they like. "

      Its their perogative to TRY to write software that plays their files however they like. This simply shows they failed, are we all supposed to hush up and pretend a crippled DRM system isn't really crippled?

    46. Re:This is annoying. by Arker · · Score: 1

      You knew that when you agreed to the EULA.

      Who agreed to it? I certainly didn't.

      As a practical matter, I'd really prefer these guys keep their work lower-key. It'd be nice if the publicity went to cracks of MS drm instead, for purely tactical reasons.

      But they clearly are within their rights to do it, and it's really a tribute to the popularity of iTunes.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    47. Re:This is annoying. by MConlon · · Score: 1

      Have you looked hard enough? Here in Canada I think everything by EMI has DRM now. It's stopped me from buying a few CDs, since I didn't know whether or not they'd be able to be put on my iPod and I don't feel like running a $15 experiment.

      Interestingly, EMI's "quality control" department has reading comprehension problems. I sent them a "will this work on my computer" question and they responded with "we're sorry you're having problems with our CD; send us your address and we'll send you a replacement."

      What part of "I haven't bought your CD yet, because I don't know if it will work" don't they understand?

      MJC

    48. Re:This is annoying. by Arker · · Score: 1

      Actually fair use does allow you to copy the song. It just doesn't allow you to sell copies. Big difference.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    49. Re:This is annoying. by Snaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you knew going in that iTunes only runs under MacOS and Windows. You knew that when you agreed to the EULA. You agreed to their conditions when you signed up.


      Don't be silly. Nobody agrees to any EULAs, its just some crap one has to click on. Nobody actually reads or agrees to it. And if you ask people you'll find that something like 99% have that attitude, question then is can you really have such a minority law.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    50. Re:This is annoying. by wanerious · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm pretty sure it doesn't --- see the following link:

      copyright tutorial

      Certainly you can't sell the copies, but it is also against the current interpretation of the spirit of the law to copy material in its entirety.

    51. Re:This is annoying. by Snaller · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that exculusive copyright IS unfair.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    52. Re:This is annoying. by CatOne · · Score: 1

      You should READ the contract before you make the purchase. Before you sign up for one-click purchase you are given something rather long to read, which says SOFTWARE IS LICENSED, NOT SOLD. It's quite standard.

      It's on the iTunes Music Store songs, and it's on that copy of Windoze you purchased, too. In fact it's on nearly every copy of commercial software in the universe. The license specifically states what you can and can't do with the software/media/etc.

      Just because you're ignorant, doesn't mean you can do what YOU think is right. It IS a contract, the validity of which can be established in the judicial system.

    53. Re:This is annoying. by jcr · · Score: 1

      And just where is this license I purchased?

      It was shown to you by the iTunes installer. You had to click "I Agree" to proceed.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    54. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's Apple's fault? There we go people not being RESPONSIBLE for their actions. Just because you were too illiterate to read the EULA doesn't mean you have any right to break it.

      Don't use the service if you dislike the terms of them. It's pretty black and white to me.

    55. Re:This is annoying. by Sabriel · · Score: 1
      The DMCA does not take away your fair use "rights" but merely makes them a hell of a lot harder to exercise...you can still copy that song by say, putting a tape recorder by the speaker...but you cannot break or strip the DRM away, as that would count as circumvention and hence is prohibited
      Of course, since the DRM is digital and the tape recording is analog, you've just circumvented and stripped the DRM. You naughty DMCA-breaker you. :p
    56. Re:This is annoying. by Gropo · · Score: 1
      Who agreed to it? I certainly didn't.
      Yes, if you downloaded a music track from the iTMS--even a free track through the Pepsi or Apple promotions--you clicked through a EULA. You have to do it again on every new point release of iTunes.
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    57. Re:This is annoying. by Gropo · · Score: 1
      Yes that's just what the RIAA's been waiting for: a mob of OSS geeks banging on their door demanding a music licensing contract.

      "Yes, so, what DRM scheme will you ladies and gentlemen be using?"

      "INF0RMA7I0N W4N7S TUO BE FR33!"

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    58. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did not purchase the song. Read the agreement. You purchase the right to listen to the song subject to the conditions outlined in the agreement. If the agreement is not to your liking, do not purchase the song.

      Except Apple charged me sales tax, which is not charged on "services", but only on products, not on "rights". Since they charged me sales tax, they are denying their own agreement.

    59. Re:This is annoying. by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      Conversely, nobody is allowed to sign away their rights under the law.

      Ever go skiing/snowboarding/do anything remotely dangerous? You sign away your rights to sue the people if you get hurt every time. And yes, if it is for a non-necessity e.g., housing or employment, those waivers are enforceable.

      And killing you is a crime. You cannot have an enforceable contract to commit a crime. There is no consideration since killing you is illegal, even if you say it is ok.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    60. Re:This is annoying. by johnbeat · · Score: 1

      You are not, in the United States at least, under any obligation to follow an invalid EULA. License agreements for sales do not exist; if this is a sale, the EULA is invalid. As far as I can tell from the few songs I've purchased from the iTunes music store, these are sales. I buy the file, I get to listen to it forever without further payments.

      This was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1906 in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus; it has been continually affirmed by the Supreme Court and by lower courts, most recently by the ninth in Softman Products Company, LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. The copyright monopoly must be strictly interpreted to not override the property rights of the individual purchasing the product.

      What the courts have continually found is that calling a purchase a license does not turn a purchase into a license, whether you're buying a book, software, or anything else. Bobbs-Merrill did not call their EULA a EULA, but it is clearly recognizable as such today. It, like today's EULAs, is invalid insofar as it attempts to use the copyright monopoly to enforce restrictions that the monopoly does not confer.

      Cites

    61. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Sale Doctorine. You can do what you want with things you purchase.

      So if i buy a gun or nuke, I can do whatever I want with it? Like kill random people?

    62. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AgrEEE cOmPLETeley I do dear dear sirr: not languaeg DefINes USAGE but versa-vice! THANK U!

      See, you are trying to invalidate the grandparent's point by being absurd, but it's not working. Educated people don't write like you do, but many of them use the phrase, "begs the question," in the exact manner which was criticized earlier in the thread. Language evolves, and usage is what drives the evolution.

    63. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with Emusic and maganatune. They are independent. Emusics also have a great selection

    64. Re:This is annoying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSS geeks: "I'm sorry, but the standard agrrements dont' say anything about DRM. i'll guess you'll have to trust you customers to to be criminals"

      RIAA: "Eh"

    65. Re:This is annoying. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, you can just buy the CD at the store that contains no DRM at all.

      Check again. Most new albums aren't released on CDs anymore, but rather DRMed discs that look exactly like them.

    66. Re:This is annoying. by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      And how many artists on Emusic and magnatune are signed with RIAA companies?

      Eventually, we'll have to destroy them as well.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    67. Re:This is annoying. by Arker · · Score: 1

      'Clicking through a EULA' != agreeing to anything.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    68. Re:This is annoying. by Gropo · · Score: 1
      1. 'Clicking through a EULA' != agreeing to anything.
      I'm sure the Judge will see it your way. Best of luck with that law degree. ;D
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    69. Re:This is annoying. by Arker · · Score: 1

      There's so many things wrong with this.

      First off, what are the chances of a Judge ever needing to see it any way? Practically nill.

      Second, even in that case, what on earth makes you think that such a thing could be binding? Burden of proof is on the plaintiff. What are they going to claim? Violation of a license? The EULA is not, despite it's name, a license in the legal sense. It grants no rights, rather it purports to forfeit them. A contract? There are several legal requirements for something to be a valid contract, and this EULA looks to me like it fails those requirements on several points. Even if it only fails one, it's not a valid contract.

      There are thousands of these bloody EULAs around, and the only reason anyone ever clicks 'accept' is because that is the action you must take in order to use the software you already bought. Practically no one even reads the things, let alone agrees to them. It's just a mechanical task that poorly designed software imposes on the user.

      If you copy a song and sell it, you've violated copyright law. If you copy a song and give it away, without destroying your original copy, you may have violated copyright law. For better or worse, those are real legal offenses. Violating a 'EULA' you never read and never signed, which doesn't meet the legal requirements for a license or a contract or anything else binding, is not.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    70. Re:This is annoying. by Gropo · · Score: 1
      First off, what are the chances of a Judge ever needing to see it any way? Practically nill.
      You can de-DRM songs 'till the cows come home as far as I'm concerned. The only thing that could possibly inhibit you in the act would be legal prosecution. That's all we're talking about. Should you be brought before a Judge, he or she would most certainly rely upon the fact that a EULA is a binding agreement in a wholly legal sense.
      Practically no one even reads the things, let alone agrees to them.
      It's one thing to agree to a concept on philosophical terms, and entirely another to agree to the restrictions placed upon your actions by binding yourself to a contractual agreement. The legal precedent for 'clicking through a EULA'='equivalent to signing a contract' has already been established. Your personal opinions on the subject don't change this matter of fact.
      Violating a 'EULA' you never read and never signed, which doesn't meet the legal requirements for a license or a contract or anything else binding, is not.
      Unless you can present the case in U.S. law that decided that a EULA is a non-legal contract, or even questioned the constitutionality of the concept, help yourself to a nice foamy sconce of STFU.
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    71. Re:This is annoying. by Arker · · Score: 1

      Unless you can present the case in U.S. law that decided that a EULA is a non-legal contract, or even questioned the constitutionality of the concept, help yourself to a nice foamy sconce of STFU.

      It's not a legal contract on it's face, as you could easily verify yourself if you'd spend half an hour educating yourself on what a contract is.

      Can you present a precedent clearly stating that these 'agreements' are, in fact, legally binding? I've been following these cases with some interest myself for years, and I can't think of one. There are very few precedents, and they tend to be rulings on very narrow particulars that neatly sidestep the broader question.

      I repeat, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof. Unless you can present a case in US law that a click-through EULA is a valid contract, you can feel free to choke on your STFU yourself.

      And, btw, since you seem to have some confusion on the issue, US Law doesn't apply outside the US anyway. So even if US courts are so corrupt that they would enforce such a thing, that doesn't necessarily mean that the courts where I live would.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  3. What stopped me from downloading by RobertB-DC · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I collected iTunes numbers, more for the heck of it than anything else. But I figured I'd go ahead and use one when my daughter had trouble believing that someone -- she didn't know Who -- had recorded "Behind Blue Eyes" before Limp Bizkit.

    So I took my number and went to iTunes.com. What a mess! What I was looking for was a place where I could enter my code and get a song. Instead, there was a confusing assortment of links like "Download", "Music Store", "Jukebox"... noplace that says "Enter your code here".

    Now, I'm savvy enough to figure out that I'm going to have to download Apple's special player, run it, and *then* enter my code. But they didn't put the codes on the Slashdot homepage... they put them under the lips of Slurpee cups. If you want to appeal to Joe Slurpee, you need to learn from the "spank the monkey" advertisers: make it mind-numbingly simple.

    Here's what I'd have done, if Apple had any interest in hiring an old VB hand. Put a textbox right in the middle of the itunes.com page. Put a big button next to it that says "Download song and player". Generate an install packet that's already got the free song code in it. If the installer sees that iTunes is already installed, just feed it the song code, otherwise install and download.

    Joe Slurpee sees: enter code, push button, hear song.

    So... anyone want my leftover iTunes codes?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Revolution+9 · · Score: 1

      I'll take the codes (c: My email addy is linked from my website.

    2. Re:What stopped me from downloading by BlackHorse · · Score: 1

      I'll take the codes. wes@xwarzone.com

    3. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap. You're right. All this time we've been expecting users to install software before they use it. But when you put it that way, it's hard to believe how naive we were. From now on we'll have to make sure that software works even if it's not installed. It'll be a new revolution in computers! Now all we need to do is find a way around this little causality thing.

      (Without the sarcasm: Once you start to discuss users that are that incredibly stupid, I would say it's time to give up on them.)

    4. Re:What stopped me from downloading by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean you missed the big honking Pepsi logo right in the middle of the iTunes home page that said "Redeem your free song here"?

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    5. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big Pepsi logo "Redeem Song" button just right of center was too hidden for you?

    6. Re:What stopped me from downloading by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      yes email em to jorge @ blackmonday .info

      Thanks

    7. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The codes were from free songs from the "iTunes Music Store." So open iTunes go to "Music Store" and Click on the ginormous fucking button in the center of the page with the huge ass pepsi logo on it that says "Redeem Song." It isn't rocket science, are you a fucking retard? are you?

    8. Re:What stopped me from downloading by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I took my number and went to iTunes.com. What a mess! What I was looking for was a place where I could enter my code and get a song. Instead, there was a confusing assortment of links like "Download", "Music Store", "Jukebox"... noplace that says "Enter your code here".

      Gee, you mean that big icon on the main page of the music store, consisting of a Pepsi symbol with the text "REDEEM SONG", wasn't obvious enough, Mr. Savvy? Heeeere's your sign.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    9. Re:What stopped me from downloading by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Funny

      apparently a huge one, even my ex girlfriends nearblind mother found it without using speech help!

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    10. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll take 'em.. tytanic11 (at) comcast.net

    11. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to have your unused codes... debiangeek at hotmail dot com Thanx!

    12. Re:What stopped me from downloading by SDLightman · · Score: 1
      Oddly enough when I did exactly as you instructed, there was no huge pepsi icon or anything that said Redeem Song. I also did a search on both the page and the page source and there was no mention of "pepsi" or "redeem" (song shows more times than I am willing to count). :)

      Now I have not installed the player on my machines so maybe it does something differently when the player is installed, but I have to agree with the original poster that it appears to be harder than it needs to to simply redeem a song.

    13. Re:What stopped me from downloading by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      You mean you missed the big honking Pepsi logo right in the middle of the iTunes home page that said "Redeem your free song here"?

      I've seen the replies, and the moderators are punishing me as well, but I swear, when I go to the site, I don't see any Pepsi logo. There's a big link now that says "Download now", but I don't remember seeing it there two days ago. When I click on a song title, it attempts to redirect to a "itms://" link that, since I don't have iTunes' player installed, errors out.

      Where is this Pepsi logo everyone's razzing me about? Is it getting blocked by my firewall, or something? Would that mean that my sysadmin is on Coke?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    14. Re:What stopped me from downloading by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      The Pepsi dedemption logo/button is not on a web page, it's on the screen you see when you download, install, and run the iTunes program. Of course, the instructions on the Pepsi bottles specifically say, "Go to iTunes.com and download iTunes to your PC or Mac," which ought to have given you a hint right there...

    15. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see it either. What OS are you using? I have a banner on the page that says: "Windows 2000 or Windows XP is required to install iTunes for Windows". I'm running Linux.

    16. Re:What stopped me from downloading by geeber · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to install the iTunes software first:

      Step 1 - go to iTunes website.
      Step 2 - download iTunes software - click on the download now button.
      Step 3 - install the iTunes software and then run it.
      Step 4 - Access the music store from within the iTunes software by clicking "Music Store" in the top of the righthand pane.

      You should now see the big Pepsi logo and the phrase "Redeem your free song here."

    17. Re:What stopped me from downloading by wesmills · · Score: 1
      Granted, I'm no photoshop major, but this might help:

      http://wyvern.org/images/lj/redeem.png

      Of course, the filename that the image is in contains the word "promo," so it's possible ad-block software nukes it.

    18. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Holy crap.

      If you failed to see the huge button, dead-center in the middle of your screen, with the big Pepsi logo and the message saying "redeem your song here," you are probably not capable of taking care of yourself, let alone a little girl. Even white lab-rats can be trained to push one button. I pray that your wife is the smart one... and the primary care-giver. If not, we need to find a good home for that poor child.

    19. Re:What stopped me from downloading by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      You do realize that you have to install iTunes in order to download the song right?

    20. Re:What stopped me from downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a clue, genius - to purchase a song from the iTunes Music Store requires (gasp) the installation of iTunes.

      Who would have thought?! I mean, the fact that the software title's NAME is in the TITLE of the store isn't enough of a clue to you? The fact that you've even deduced that you're attempted to be redirected to itms:// links isn't enough of a clue that maybe iTunes might be necessary?

      Christ. Kids these days. This is what happens when parents can't hit their children with the clue stick.

  4. Fantastic. by Sheetrock · · Score: 0, Insightful
    By all means, keep antagonizing the best online music provider with these innovations. I don't know what endgame they're working towards, if any, but the two possibilities I can think of are Apple making a foolproof DRM scheme and cracking down on the freedoms they today permit or Apple deciding this market just isn't worth it and pulling down the service entirely.

    This reminds me of a historical anecdote. One of the many advancements made under Lord Tokugawa's rule, which is arguably the point at which Japan began to transform into the powerhouse of technological innovation we know and love today, was the world's first sukaisukure ('skyscraper'). Built as the southernmost endpoint of the Great Wall to commemorate its completion, the sukaisukure could hardly compare to today's structures; however, given that its architecture predated the use of steel in building design it stands as a testament to Tokugawa's extraordinary vision.

    Despite Tokugawa's status as a visionary, he could not contend with the constant threat of an armed and discontented populace -- to secure his reign, he confiscated the weapons of the lower classes and permitted only those of samurai rank or higher to carry swords. Viewed as a tyrannical measure that sowed some degree of discontent, this nevertheless permitted Tokugawa's innovations to come to fruition and ultimately benefit society.

    Apple is in a similar situation. They are at the bleeding edge of the industry, particularly in relation to the music industry's philosophies, and need desparately to prove that this model works. They can't afford to look on these hacks with benevolence because they've got to work with the RIAA and affiliated labels just to make the music available. Can't the people who want their music in freer formats simply buy it on CD and convert it for their own use -- thereby voting with their dollars for a better scheme -- rather than creating software that threatens Apple's relationship with its business partner and ultimately its customers via the policies it has to adopt in reaction?

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Fantastic. by 74nova · · Score: 1
      Apple making a foolproof DRM scheme and cracking down on the freedoms they today permit
      has anyone accomplished anything that hasnt been cracked given (even a reasonable) time? i think they might come up with something that is hard enough to do that they can still make money despite a crack for it, if thats what you meant.
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    2. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. That's fascinating. I never realized the Great Wall of China ended in Japan.

    3. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. The famous Great Wall of Japan.

      Can it really be seen from space?

    4. Re:Fantastic. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a bit confused. So what you're saying is that Steve Jobs is the Emperor of Japan?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:Fantastic. by imr · · Score: 1

      So apple is going to confiscate people's weapons?

    6. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By all means, keep antagonizing the best online music provider with these innovations.
      What has Kazaa got to do with this? :-P
    7. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      First of all, The Tokugawa era had many lords - it lasted about 250 years. Second, the Tokugawa era was a technologically stagnant period of feudal classes - when Commodore Perry of the US Navy arrived in 1853, he found warring factions and city-states reminiscent of 12th century Britain. The Tokugawa era was not the beginning of Japan's industrial revolution. That didn't happen until the Meiji Restoration in 1868.

      And last but not least: Great Wall? You do realize that Japan and China are different countries, right?

      Your metaphor may be correct, but I can't really tell since you have your historical facts so confused.

    8. Re:Fantastic. by bogie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Better that Apple and DRM fail completely and we are stuck with Store bought CD's then we move to a market where all music has DRM built in and you have no freedom. Sorry but beyond letting you avoid buying entire albums Apple isn't doing anyone any favors with the Itunes store and they certainly aren't contributing to World Peace.

      "I don't know what endgame they're working towards,"

      Oh, but I know what Apple's endgame is. Gaining complete control over your music collection and deciding what you are and are not allowed to do. Witness the restrictions which are already increasing. 10 burns to 7? What next? Did you really think that Apple's "loophole" of allowing you to go DRM->CD->non-drm was going to last forever? The endgame for Apple and the rest of the online music industry to completely take away any rights you might once have had with regard to doing what you want with your music. Eventually there will come a time when people forget that you didn't had to have a license for every God dam machine you wanted to play music on.

      If the current "Apple" model wins eventually we will all lose. You need to get over your whole benevolent dictator fantasy if you think that was ever going to be the long term model for online music sales. Better we force their hand now then slowly get caught up in their DRM like a lobster in a pot heating up on a stove. If you don't get out now you never will.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    9. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh, but I know what Apple's endgame is."

      You don't know shit. Pure speculation.

    10. Re:Fantastic. by HeghmoH · · Score: 0

      I call shenanigans.

      I'll go from less confident to more confident here, in terms of how much I know and how confident I am about what I'm saying.

      First, there were lots of Tokugawas, but they all seem to have ruled before Japan began to really industrialize.

      Second, don't you think this policy of popular oppression might have had something to do with Japan provoking a couple of major wars, killing tens of millions of other countries' citizens, and generally acting like a total jackass in the first half of the 20th century? Maybe it wasn't such a good idea. Plenty of other countries managed to become nicely industrialized and technologically advanced without provoking idiotic wars and going on murderous rampages.

      Third, the Great Wall is in China. Japan didn't own the part of China where it resides until the 20th century, and almost by definition, Japan was industrialized before it conquered large chunks of China. Also, it runs east-to-west. Maybe you're referring to some other structure here, perhaps one in Japan.

      Fourth, every reference I've found mentions that the first Japanese skyscraper was buit in 1968. Given that this was fully 27 years after Japan posed enough of a threat to a certain other country's well-being (if not its existence) as to be bombed flat and conquered, I think this is comfortably after the industrialization and technological rise of Japan.

      Last, a google search for "sukaisukure" turns up no hits, so I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that it's not a real word.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    11. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't the people who want their music in freer formats simply buy it on CD and convert it for their own use -- thereby voting with their dollars for a better scheme -- rather than creating software that threatens Apple's relationship with its business partner and ultimately its customers via the policies it has to adopt in reaction?

      So, let me get this straight. You want someone who runs linux to by the cd instead of using iTMS?
      You seem to be missing the point that the restrictions they place on you, for whatever reason, are not a good thing for consumers.

      On a side note, unless they control the hardware, DRM will *never* work. Even if they do control the hardware, it's then just reduced quality.

    12. Re:Fantastic. by DrXym · · Score: 1
      By all means, keep antagonizing the best online music provider with these innovations.

      This antagonisation as you call it is people wanting to use the Apple iTunes store, wanting to purchase and legally download music, but being unable to do because iTunes uses a shitty DRM and other 'features' that prevent fair use.

      Apple have only themselves to blame here. By all means integrate the store with iTunes, but where is the harm with offering a web-based version? Where is the harm in offering music in non-proprietary (ogg) or industry standard formats (mp3)? It doesn't prevent Apple from making a bundle from their iTunes - far from it since it brings more eyeballs to their site where they can sell songs, iPods and perhaps even Mac stuff.

      And neither does DRM or AAC help protect the songs as we have seen with the release of tools to strip out the DRM.

      It would be much smarter of Apple and other online music stores to release the music in any format the user wants and watermark them. Watermarking does not stop piracy, but it does dampen trading since law abiding people don't want to trade tracks if they have their identity stamped all over.

    13. Re:Fantastic. by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Last, a google search for "sukaisukure" turns up no hits, so I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that it's not a real word.

      I can't comment on any of the other issues, and I suspect there was a lot of crack smoking involved in the post, but "sukaisukure" looks an awful lot like an English semi-phonetic approximation of the Japanese Katakana alphabet, which is primarily used for creating Japanese words based on foreign words.

      Pronounce sukaisukure. It sounds like skyscraper without the last syllable (skyscrae). So what we likely have here is an approximate English translation of a Japanese approximation of the pronunciation of the English word skyscraper. 'Nuff said.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re:Fantastic. by horza · · Score: 1

      They are at the bleeding edge of the industry, particularly in relation to the music industry's philosophies, and need desparately to prove that this model works. They can't afford to look on these hacks with benevolence because they've got to work with the RIAA and affiliated labels just to make the music available.

      I can't believe you just put those two sentences next to each other. They put a hack on a broken system (the RIAA monopoly) and because you feel it's the least worst offering so far people should give up their fair use enshrined in law?

      Phillip.

    15. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your facts are all wrong, go back and reread your history book.

      Toyotomi Hideyoshi was the one who confiscated the farmer's weapons, not "Lord Tokugawa". What Tokugawa Ieyasu did do was establish the Baku Han Regime which in essence imposed strict boundaries on the previously "loose" class system (I use the word loose quite loosely here, as it was not that free).

      Please also note that the Tokugawa Shogunate lasted 268 years, spanning 15 separate Tokugawa Shoguns. Based on your use of the confiscation example I assumed you meant the progenitor Ieyasu but it wasn't exactly clear especially seeing as how he held the title of Shogun for only 2 years before ceding to his son (though in actuality he did retain the true power).

      I'm not even going to bother with the Great Wall bit. Where the hell did you even come by this ridiculous information/story?

    16. Re:Fantastic. by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I agree, but that doesn't mean that there won't be any Google hits. Normally there is a set system for representing a language that uses a different alphabet in the Roman alphabet. I don't know squat about Japanese, but I'm not completely clueless about Chinese. Every word that Chinese borrowed from English that I can think of (which is about four) comes up with Google hits, and the right hits too. (E.g. searching for 'zhijiage' gets you pages talking about Chicago, 'kelindun' goes to pages talking about our illustrious former president, and so on.) So if "sukaisukure" is a real word, people should have used it on web pages and it should show up on Google. Of course, it's possible that the OP just misspelled it, but given the rest of his post, it's more likely that he's talking out of his ass.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    17. Re:Fantastic. by Ararat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think your vision of civilization is seriously warped, and your grasp of Japanese history is terribly flawed. While Tokugawa exhibited genius in uniting Japan into a single nation under the Shogunate, the culture that evolved from his social theories trapped Japan, for centuries, into a static class-ridden state that rejected change, both social and technological innovation, and was very much the equivalent of the European Dark Ages.

      The elevation of the samurai to a ruling class, and the rigid caste system that they enforced, froze Japan's cultural development and reduced what had been a vital nation into a backward and primitive country that was fragile and all but helpless when it confronted aggressive US and Western neo-colonialism in the mid-1900s.

      (It remains to be seen if such model, a culture largely shaped by fear of change and innovation -- and a desperate effort to freeze a economic elite in power by oppressive laws -- will prove irresistible to the RIAA and the US Congress;-)

      For the vast majority of Japanese subjects, the experience of the Shogunate -- despite the peace that it brought to their nation -- must have been excruciating terrible. You were what you were born to be, period. Social mobility disappeared. Economic development, technical development, social development, and political development were all but brought to a grinding halt. Even the damn wheel seems to have been forbidden on carriages. Women (even samurai women) were, for the first time, forced into a state of utter dependance on males.

      Rule by oppressive soldiers -- soldiers, mind you, in a centuries long interregnum in which there was no war -- made for a sad, damaged, pitiful, feudal society that is only retroactively redeemed in its ruling class poetry and Bushido myths.

      By the mid-19th Century, culminating in the Imperial Restoration, the social structure had become so corrupt and self-destructive that -- when it briefly confronted the West -- it collapsed into a fascist monarchist revolution that set the stage for the aggressive Japanese militarism and imperialism that roiled Asia and the world for 50 years, until the WWII surrender placed them in MacArthur's thrall.

      Step cautiously when you recommend Tokugawa's social vision. The new millennium already has an overabundance of fearful powerful folk and "leaders" who dream of extending the status quo indefinitely.

      _Ararat
    18. Re:Fantastic. by angryelephant · · Score: 1

      "Sorry but beyond letting you avoid buying entire albums Apple isn't doing anyone any favors with the Itunes store and they certainly aren't contributing to World Peace."

      Last week I heard a Johnny Cash song on the radio that I liked. I walked in to a music store to try to get it. The clerk tried to find it using a terminal in the store hooked up to amazon. After about 20 minutes and not being able to figure out what CD it was on, let alone if it was in stock, he gave up. I went home. I was able to get it in about 15 minutes off of iTunes. This included time spent downloading the program and signing up for the service.

      I would say iTunes has helped me out a great deal.

    19. Re:Fantastic. by Diabolus777 · · Score: 1

      People love the fact that you can buy a single song instead of a whole CD. They are voting with their dollars for the better scheme.

      They just don't want DRM crippled songs. They vote against it by using cracking tools built by the people, for the people.

      What's so hard to understand?
      Executives should just wake up and give the consumers what they want, and that's been the basis of business forever.

      As for apple's relationship with their business partners, I couldn't care less. If they don't do it, someone else will, or I will put my money elsewhere. I owe them noting.

      I'm sure that in fact, they would really like to sell non-drm songs, but it's probably part of the business deal and they have no control over it.

      --
      We should have been
      So much more by now
      Too dead inside
      To even know the guilt
    20. Re:Fantastic. by travler · · Score: 1


      So it is ok to take away my freedom if the entity who took it away uses its power to build large monuments to itself and make itself even more powerful at my expense?

      I'm not saying you're wrong. I will say however that I disagree with you. At least until that freedom is taken away as well.

    21. Re:Fantastic. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      RSA 2048 encryption.

    22. Re:Fantastic. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      By all means integrate the store with iTunes, but where is the harm with offering a web-based version? Where is the harm in offering music in non-proprietary (ogg) or industry standard formats (mp3)? Without a player that understands the DRM, the songs won't play. What does it matter if they're in OGG, MP3 or AAC if they are wrapped in DRM. And without DRM, Apple wouldn't have any songs to sell you because the record labels wouldn't have entered into the agreement. It doesn't prevent Apple from making a bundle from their iTunes - far from it since it brings more eyeballs to their site where they can sell songs, iPods and perhaps even Mac stuff.

    23. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the word, as much as it is used (i think the loan word is pretty rare compared to the native word formed from chinese characters), is sukaisukureipaa.

    24. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! Best troll ever. Props.

    25. Re:Fantastic. by valmont · · Score: 1

      why this clueless paranoid numbnut behind the parent post got modded-up as "insightful" is beyond me. But hey it's an opinion i guess.

      You, "bogie", may not deem the Apple Music Store useful, but there are quite a few hundred thousand satisfied customers out there, including myself, who beg to differ.

      Online digital music distribution does not replace CDs. It complements them. This is the one true distinction you have to make here. Sneaking DRM onto a physically-purchased CD without informating the buyer is a NO-NO. It does deny fair-use in the fact that you, as a consumer, are not warned AHEAD of time of the presence of DRM and cannot make an informed decision about buying the CD and vote with your dollars. This is way different from online music. DRM exists as a clearly-stated condition of purchase of online music. You KNOW ahead of time what to expect. You are making an informed choice. If you do not deem the service fit for your needs, you have MANY OTHER OPTIONS for purchasing music: CDs, Cassettes, DVDs, VHS, and more. This is why both online and physical music distribution coexist nicely: they fill DIFFERENT NEEDS.

      DRM->CD->NON-DRM will last forever, that is, if Apple wants to retain their customers. Again, rules are always clearly stated, when they change, people will vote with their money. It's that simple. Going from 10 burns of the SAME playlist to 7 by no means restricts your fair use, you can easily clone audio CDs, or switch tracks around. These are just bones Apple throws at RIAA to keep them at bay. What is more relevant is the fact that you can NOW listen to your music on 5 computers AT THE SAME TIME, from the original digital file your purchased. And you can listen to your music on an unlimited amount of computers, even if you format your hard drive, change CPUs or whatnot, as long as 5 remains the total number of machines authorized simultaneously.

      Apple is not restricting OWNERSHIP of your purchased music. In fact it is PROMOTING IT by encouraging YOU to retain sole control over who can or cannot listen to your music. Apple is merely trying to limit the post-sale, illegal distribution of online music by putting simple, easily avoidable, "ROADBLOCKS" in the straightforward digital distribution chain. There is nothing revolutionary about breaking or circumventing their DRM scheme. Those processes are in place to enable them to do business with the RIAA, hoping that the few marginal geeks that get around the DRM will stay below RIAA's radar. But noooo, not only geeks are stupid enough to pursue their cracking efforts, they're stupid enough to go out and BRAG ABOUT IT.

      The end result of Apple's DRM scheme is that you can do anything you could LEGALLY, WITHIN FAIR USE ever want to do with your music, aside from turning right around and swapping it in P2P networks.

      As a consumer, I want as many options to buy music as possible. The success of iTMS proves that I'm not the only one out there. I happen to still be a faithful buyer of physical Music CDs from Amazon.com because I very much relate to physical goods. I like CD cases, I like album art that is already printed for me, I like having lyrics in inserts. Once in a while I'll get a song from the iTMS. When i get batches of 10 iTMS-purchased songs, i burn them to a CD, which I bring to my car thereby making my one-hour commute to work more and more enjoyable. I can duplicate those audio CDs I've made as much as I want, and/or rip them back as MP3s.

      What you advocate thru your cluelessness and paranoia will do nothing BUT remove the options I have as a consumer of Music. There is no getting around this: *COMMERCIAL* MUSIC that is distributed online, in digital format NEEDS some sort of DRM Scheme. It is the only way this form of doing business will ever survive and Apple's scheme happens to the loosest scheme on the market.. Sit down and let the reality of this last sentence hit you in the face. Now, take a deep breath. And try to prove me wrong.

    26. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...I think Sheethead would be a better nick for him.

    27. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but I know what Apple's endgame is. Gaining complete control over your music collection and deciding what you are and are not allowed to do. Witness the restrictions which are already increasing. 10 burns to 7

      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

      Are you really this insane? Just fucking shoot yourself now before your paranoia infects anyone else. You're probably the same person who is against ANY kind of change.

    28. Re:Fantastic. by humina · · Score: 1

      It's so great that it can cross the ocean. As a student I feel that I have not been left behind.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    29. Re:Fantastic. by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > What is more relevant is the fact that you can NOW listen to your music on 5 computers AT THE SAME TIME

      Just make sure you start them all at exactly the same second or it sounds really, really weird. Well, sometimes kind of cool, but definitely weird.

      You can get pretty much the same effect by opening the song five times in Quicktime, changing the settings so that the backgrounded players play audio, and then hitting play on each of them in turn.

      It's cool once, but I don't know that I'd want to make a habit of it.

      Er, what were we talking about again?

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    30. Re:Fantastic. by valmont · · Score: 1

      teehee :) +1 funny :)

      now, imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

    31. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was fragile and all but helpless when it confronted aggressive US and Western neo-colonialism in the mid-1900s

      Probably just a typo, but I think you meant "mid-1800s". early 1940s japan was far from helpless.

    32. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no, no, you've got it all wrong.

      Windows Media has shitty DRM.

      iTunes just has passable DRM.

      The difference is that with iTunes, you can take their DRM file, burn it to a CD-RW, then reimport it as an MP3, all within their software, all supported by the software, and thereby strip the DRM out of the audio file.

      DRM, provided it does not intrude on what you want to do, is just a concept. When it does intrude, then you can bitch. Bitching about nonsense like iTunes music files have intrusive DRM is a nonsensical argument - for the reason I just provided. They allow you to strip the DRM off.

      Welcome to the real world. Please have exact change ready for the toll.

    33. Re:Fantastic. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everything will be better when you can't buy music online and all CDs have some copy protection scheme.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  5. I knew it... by g3head · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "But according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed."

    I knew I should have climbed into that dumpster...

  6. On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm hardly surprised by the results. Personally, I don't drink Pepsi usually (though it's not a religious thing, no matter what people think). But I'll drink a Sierra Mist, which is included in the contest.

    So when My Lovely Wife (MLF) would go to the store, she knew to look for Sierra Mist with the label. For about the last 5 months she's looked, and every so often I'd take a peek.

    Nothing. Nada. I've talked to other people in the San Diego/Southern California area. Nothing. I was on a business trip to Chicago - didn't see any out there (though maybe someone who lives there might have had more luck).

    I don't know if it's that Pepsi had a lot of "warehouse" Pepsi to sell that just never got to the market, or if they only shipped it to certain areas. But whatever the reason, I have not seen one iTunes Pepsi cap - and those friends I have who have seen them in their area mention that it's not 1/3 that one, but typically more like 1/10 (though perhaps they were victims of the "Bottle Tilt Trick" in their area from ambitious music buyers).

    I'd like to hear that Pepsi extends the contest for another 6 months in the hopes that the labeled bottles will eventually reach stores, but I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I was on a business trip to Chicago - didn't see any out there (though maybe someone who lives there might have had more luck).

      I'm in Chicago. I won thrice. However, they were all 1 liter bottles. I haven't seen any 16 oz bottles with the iTunes promotion.

    2. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by EboMike · · Score: 1

      I had a smiliar problem - until March or so, I hadn't seen a single yellow-cap Pepsi, and I had been looking hard. But then, they started appearing in Southern California. First in Irvine, where I work, and first Diet Pepsi only.

      Using the tilt-bottle trick, I got a 100% success rate, and I also recruited all my co-workers to give me their caps (I also searched our recycle bins) and ended up with well over 30 free songs.

      Now, I see the yellow caps everywhere. Diet Pepsi, regular Pepsi, Orange County, San Diego County. Too bad it's over tomorrow.

    3. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      To add another data point: my school stocked iTunes Pepsi in the soda machines. I went on a streak where 5 or 6 in a row (bought one every couple nights) were winners. Overall I probably saw 1 in 2 or 1 in 3.

    4. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by beattie · · Score: 1

      I have actually never seen one of the itunes bottles either here in Jersey.

    5. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      I'd split time between the Western New York/Northwest Pennsylvania areas due to a job search, and had no problem finding the bottles after about February 10th. (Downloading the music without broadband was another matter.) The bottles were pretty common in these parts till about mid-March, when they started either a) having been left behind by folks using the bottle-tilt trick (which I used pretty extensively, when I wasn't being watched) or b) just not being restocked. I'd actually thought at that point that Pepsi had run out of codes, but I suppose that wasn't the case.

      I'm not an expert on product distribution by any means, but Pepsi (like any food) probably needs to be hurried out the door and sold as soon as possible, as it doesn't have an infinite shelf life. Granted, the shelf life can be protracted compared to, say, a gallon of milk, but there's still an explicit expiry date for Pepsi. (Proof, sort of: I have a Vanilla Coke bottle here in front of me, purchased this morning, with an expiration date of June 14th, 2004. Not sure what the TBA1957 means after the date-- either it's a batch number or the soda is good until 7:57p on June 14th.) I think I still have a code on my account, so I'll probably be grabbing one last track tonight. I had a good run while job searching, though-- managed twelve caps in a row, which paid for Keoki's "Jealousy".

      (completely off-topic: Thanks for the mention in your final column, John. I never got the chance to say that, and I hope you're doing well at Gamer's Press. How's your daughter enjoying "Courageous Princess"?)

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    6. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1
      Using the tilt-bottle trick, I got a 100% success rate, and I also recruited all my co-workers to give me their caps (I also searched our recycle bins) and ended up with well over 30 free songs.

      You dug in the trash and only ended up with 30 free songs? You could have purchased them for only like $30, or even got them for free from P2P sites.

      I have a friend who is collecting Mountain Dew caps in the hopes of getting an Xbox. Needs 550, is already up to 200. He'll at least get an XBox Live out of the deal.

      And an XBox Live is something that won't be had for free. Period.

      That's why I can't understand people who will save and collect for silly little promotions like iTunes. In order to build any kind of collection, you would need to spend at least a hundred dollars, in addition to the caps you won.

      And the fact that there were caps in the recycling bin was very revealing. I bet if they were free physical CD caps from a store, you would have a lot more people redeeming them.

    7. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...My Lovely Wife (MLF)...

      I'd be careful about using the letters 'M', 'L' and 'F' to describe your wife, dude. That's dangerously close to 'MILF' and that's just wrong.

    8. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by bitweever · · Score: 1

      Guess we're just lucky. I'm in Tulsa, Oklahoma (which happens to be a bottling plant and distribution center for Pepsi), and I saw all kinds of caps. I don't drink sugar water, but was able to purchase them off of a cola-addicted friend for 3/$1 (he had about 12 of them). I also got a couple given to me by other friends.

    9. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by graikor · · Score: 1

      I guess if she's the mother of your children, then it should be OK that you'd still L to F her, right?

    10. Re:On Pepsi's iTunes Contest by darkstream · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did extend the contest, actually, though nobody seemed to notice. Originally, you had to register your winning iCap by March 31st, and redeem it by tomorrow. But well into April I could still register iCaps. I won 20 songs myself, but it was a pain to find them. Towards the end, the available iCaps had been picked over (Yes, I was a tilter). And Sierra Mist iCaps were rare. In fact, if there had been better Sierra Mist support I would have bought truckloads of bottles. I'm just not much of a cola drinker. Pepsi missed out by being cheap, in my opinion. I'd love to know the behind the scenes story on this one. I can't find any yellow capped Pepsi products now. Haven't been available here in Salt Lake Valley for weeks. At least not in all the locations I've been in...

      --
      Fun with Inkwell | www.coo
  7. 4.5 busted sharing with previous versions by crackshoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    my main problem with 4.5 is that it no longer allowed sharing with other itunes running boxen on my home network - the one machine i had updated to 4.5 ( my parents imac) couldn't accesss my music on the g5. it seems like a fairly annoying thing that wouldn't be particularly hard to not break for no particular reason. while i personally think theres no reason to break apple's authentication or other security features in itunes (the current permisions are more than enough for me, and i have less than 20 pruchased tracks, and only 2 machines i play em on), its nice to know that work arounds do exist.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    1. Re:4.5 busted sharing with previous versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live with your parents and yet you have a G5?

      BASTARD.

    2. Re:4.5 busted sharing with previous versions by tuxedokamen · · Score: 1

      Did you upgrade iTunes on all the boxes. From what I understand, 4.5 cannot share with lower versions of iTunes. I'm experiencing this myself. A couple of people on my network here at uni share their libraries, but neither has upgraded iTunes yet, so I get a message about them being incompatable.

    3. Re:4.5 busted sharing with previous versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, in English, we generally spell our plurals with an "S" or "ES" at the end. There are some exceptions. But box isn't one of them, you fucking retard.

  8. Only 5 million songs is no surprise by profet · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in NYC and have seen exactly 1 bodega with iTMS Pepsi bottles.

    Maybe someone forgot to ship these things to places where people actually would use them?

    1. Re:Only 5 million songs is no surprise by danuary · · Score: 1

      I'm also in NYC. I see none near my home (Brooklyn) but I see them all over the place in the downtown/Wall Street area - every bodega down here has a fridgecase full of 'em...

    2. Re:Only 5 million songs is no surprise by bwy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably Pepsi donated a bunch of product to our troops in Iraq or something. While a nice gesture that I'm sure our guys appreciated, the freebie songs are all tossed in the desert somewhere.

  9. Re:That was quick by pudge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope apple didnt invest too much time/money in this new fixed drm. Will these media pimps ever learn?

    This isn't about DRM, it is about access to the music store, sharing, etc. outside of the iTunes application.

    And despite the poster's assertion, there's no real reason to think the authentication scheme was intended to break compatibility; as most developers know, sometimes you need to make changes for other reasons that force a break in compatibility. If this WERE about DRM, I'd say it was likely, but I see no reason to think this separate change was deliberate. It may have been, but no one's given any reason to think it.

  10. Check out the new Ninnle for Mac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MacNinnle, of course! The latest port of Ninnle Linux V3.

  11. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's because for a "free" song you had to give them your credit card number.

    No, you didn't. I got two free, no credit card required.

  12. No they didn't by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've worked for marketing companies that created similar promotions for their clients. Promotions like this are created with the full knowledge that the vast majority of winning caps will be tossed. 5% is actually a pretty strong number considering the L.A. Lakers caps they had in L.A. were only redeemed at a rate of 1.2 % (You got $10 off at Foot Locker) Have you noticed that 90% of the time McDonalds announces "We're giving away a million dollars!" that you never hear about anybody winning the prize?

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:No they didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10 off at Foot Locker? If sneakers were priced correctly, that would bring the price down to $15.

    2. Re:No they didn't by LOL+WTF+OMG!!!!!!!!! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was $10 off of any $50 or more purchase.

      Of course Nike's do cost $1.50 to manufacture (this is not an exaggeration), but still 20% off ain't none too bad.

    3. Re:No they didn't by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Crap. This is what happens when you don't use preview. Trying again:

      The McDonalds Monopoly game was rigged.

    4. Re:No they didn't by flying_monkies · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason you didn't hear anyone winning at McDonalds had more to do with fraud

      --
      I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it to the death - Voltaire
    5. Re:No they didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No wonder this didn't make noteable headlines, look at the day the report was released =/

  13. Apple should hire him by sustik · · Score: 1

    Why Apple does not hire this guy? (David Hammerton)
    Appearently the current developers have no clue.

    Matyas

    1. Re:Apple should hire him by Rahga · · Score: 1

      From this his webpage:
      "I am an advocate of the Linux operating system, and I work on a commercial product developed mostly for the Linux operating system. I do this for money, enjoyment and to further expand my knowledge and experience."
      "I have strong feelings about politics and 'civil liberties'. I do not believe in capitalism or the free market. I am a hard line anti-American (please note, I do not dislike Americans, only the fucked up political entity that the poor souls have to live in). I do not believe representative democracy works."
      (bold emphasis mine)

      I don't think anybody working for Human Resources at Apple would touch this person, and I wouldn't blame anyone else of steering clear of him either. He's obviously a hypocrite... speaks loudly about anti-cpaitalism, but working on a 'commercial product for Linux' speaks volumes about his character.

    2. Re:Apple should hire him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      But he's also an idiot.

      Maybe one day he'll get some pussy and give up on his little "cause" some university professor instilled in him.

  14. I got one of these bottlecaps... by LilMikey · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    but the effort of doing what needs to be done to dl them in linux then convert them/remove the 'bad' parts so that it plays where I want it to is just too much...

    Besides, NPR past shows are all free on the internet anyway.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    1. Re:I got one of these bottlecaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the effort of doing what needs to be done to dl them in linux then convert them/remove the 'bad' parts so that it plays where I want it to is just too much...

      I'm sure that's the reason the promotion wasn't more sucessful. 95 million Linux users found it far too difficult.

    2. Re:I got one of these bottlecaps... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Hey, I feel you man. I got a free pair of pantyhose in the mail. But the effort of doing what needs to be done to convert them into sweatsocks and remove the "bad" parts so they don't squash my nuts is just too much.

      BTW: I doubt that anybody at Apple is upset that you were too lazy to illegally remove their DRM protection so you could play them on an unsupported device. In fact, you might say that's the whole reason for putting the DRM on in the first place. It's good that you posted; now we know it works.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:I got one of these bottlecaps... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Wow... I got an mp3 player. Do you have what normally fits in panty-hose? The point wasn't to bitch about their DRM itself... really, I could care less, notice the NPR thing. The point is: not everyone is willing to infest their computer with Apple's crap for a free damn song... apparently that goes for a lot of people being a solid 5% of the 'winners' haven't claimed anything. Whether it's Linux of Windows people it's more effort than it's worth. But hey, it's Apple I'm criticizing so obviously I'm the idiot.

      you were too lazy to illegally remove their DRM protection so you could play them on an unsupported device

      Kinda funny you attack me for bitching about DRM preventing me from using what I purchased (or won or whatever) while quoting verbatim the thing that is most wrong with DRM.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    4. Re:I got one of these bottlecaps... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      It's a shame your mp3 player can't play AAC files.

      Does your blender make spaghetti?

      Does your TV get good radio reception?

      How well does your car work underwater?

      The zero effort I put in to running iTunes was really worth the free songs. I mean, how can you claim that iTunes -- a program that, if you use it the way it was designed to be used, will never give you trouble -- is "more effort than it's worth," when you run fucking Linux? If you think a program that "just works" is more of a headache than an operating system that demands that you edit configuration files and compile every program that you might want to use, you have got some serious time management issues.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:I got one of these bottlecaps... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Again... NOT ABOUT LINUX. It's about forcing a proprietary player/format then being suprised that only 5% of the people that won something FREE won't use it. Like another poster said, almost none of the 'winners' are Linux users... FORGET the linux thing and focus... the argument is just as valid for Windows users.

      They are surprised only 5% of the songs are claimed... I'm telling them why... you have to install their player and only use their portable. If they were tossing out free mp3s that play everywhere they might've moved more than 5% of them. And your blender car crap is just backwards talk... They're giving away free songs that only play in one place. It's a tire company giving away free tires that only work on 1 car. It's a blender company that only blends 1 kind of smoothie... and yes, my TV does get decent radio reception.

      I know you love your iTunes and iPod... got it man. That doesn't change the fact that DRM in general sucks and the hoops one has to jump through to use their free song is the reason they aren't moving many of them.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  15. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    But according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed.

    So... 95 million valid codes left, where's the code generator? :-)

    1. Re:Hmm by shark72 · · Score: 1

      In case it wasn't clear, there's no math involved in the codes. They were randomly generated at the start of the promotion and stored in a 100 million row SQL table.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:Hmm by Matthew+Schultheis · · Score: 1

      There must have been some math involved in the (psuedo)random code generator, therefore, it should be theoretically possible to crack the code. I'm not saying that this will be easy, or even do-able, but that the codes must follow some pattern.

    3. Re:Hmm by shark72 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I knew somebody would point out that there's math involved in RNGs! I guess I should have said that there's no math of the checksum variety in the codes!

      With statistical analysis of a large enough sample set, one could discern how the RNG works and most likely figure out which RNG was used (an easy guess is whatever RNG is included in the libraries of whatever variety of OS ships on those XServes). The promotion ends tomorrow, so that will be an impressive feat!

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      whatever RNG is included in the libraries of whatever variety of OS ships on those XServes

      On OS X (both normal and "server" version), /dev/random and /dev/urandom point to the same hardware-based entropy thingy. If that's what they used, it would be tough to duplicate.

  16. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Slowtreme · · Score: 2, Informative

    They must have changed this a while back. You do not need a CC to have an iTunes account. This is how they allow for Prepaid cards and gift certs now.

    I know that I did not enter a CC number when creating a login for my 9 y/o daughter to download free itunes.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  17. power to the crackers by quelrods · · Score: 1

    Anyone who is inteligent and bored can crack just about anything in relatively short order. I'm sure most /. readers are all too aware of how easy cracks, keygens, and serials are to get ahold of. Though kudos to him as he got the job done faster than the latest yahoo protocol was reverse engineered, or maybe just kudos to yahoo! Though, I don't think apple will be hiring him anytime soon.

    --
    :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:power to the crackers by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Anyone who is inteligent and bored can crack just about anything in relatively short order.

      I do not think that you could teach an intelligent but bored person with no technical experience to "crack just about anything" in even a year, and while "relatively short order" isn't that well-defined, at least for me a year does not fit into that category.

    2. Re:power to the crackers by djinn87 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple should hire him to work on the next version tweak of their DRM so that its less easy for someone else to crack. That would kill two birds with one stone.

    3. Re:power to the crackers by quelrods · · Score: 1

      Alright, i suppose I should have limited my statement to programmers. Though, for anyone with the know how, reverse engineering is just a matter of time.

      --
      :(){ :|:&};:
  18. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 5, Informative

    I dunno what iTunes *YOU* were using, but I never had to give my credit card # and I'm on free song #9 and counting...

    --
    Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  19. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by DraKKon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well there's that.. and I didn't see any of the special bottles until the beginning of April. Wasn't it supposed to start in the middle of february?

    But to keep myself on topic.. Apple probably has a standard singup path.. They assume that if you are going to redeem a free song.. that you might buy something later.. But yes.. its lame to require a credit card when you are making a purchase of $0.00..

    --
    "It's not like your minds are as open as the source you love..." - Me to the majority of Slashdot.
  20. Pepsi Redemption Rate by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed...

    I wonder what the typical redemption rate is for the Pepsi, Coke and other softdrink give aways. I know for paper coupons the redemption rate is about 2 percent. Granted alot of those coupons go straight into the trash. However, when people print coupons from the web only 20 percent are redeemed. And if someone is going to print them, you would think they would use them.

    My point, is the Pepsi-iTunes rate of 5 percent unexpected?

    1. Re:Pepsi Redemption Rate by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      And if someone is going to print them, you would think they would use them.

      Sunday morning. I know there's something I want at Michaels. I carefully tear the coupon out of the paper. I go to Michaels. I realize that the coupon is on the dining room table.

      Intent != follow-through

    2. Re:Pepsi Redemption Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the other 80% are being used for Quiznos subs...mmm, mmm, mmm, Toasty!

  21. Deliberately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does the poster mean by "deliberately broke the 4.2 authentication scheme"? I would think it obvious that they didn't change the protocol by accident.

    Perhaps the poster meant that Apple deliberately broke compatibility with certain third-party applications; if so, where is his evidence for such a claim?

    Mike

  22. I'm sure Apple doesn't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their new strategy seems to be fixed, and it's a strict policy of lip service. If they make sure:

    - The De-Fairplay utilities don't have public development sites, and instead are forced to be these little files passed around on USENET and P2P and slashdot like they're some sort of contraband, well out of the public eye

    - The way things work change just *SLIGHTLY* with every minor release of iTunes, causing all the De-Fairplay utilities to have to be updated with every minor release

    Then, well. The slashdotters get to keep their de-Fairplay utilities and use them as much as they want; and from the RIAA's perspective, Apple's "doing something" about piracy, because there's no longer a publically visible way to crack Fairplay, and so they don't revoke Apple's license to sell music. Everybody wins! Except our civil liberties.

    1. Re:I'm sure Apple doesn't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil liberties? I don't remember anything about the right to free music in the bill of rights... Just because you're used to getting it for free doesn't make it a right.

    2. Re:I'm sure Apple doesn't care. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      This article has nothing to do with DEDRMS or FairPlay. It has to do with the way software communicates with ITMS and iTunes itself.

      libopendaap is a library written in C which enables applications to discover, and connect to, iTunes® music shares.

      Thanks for playing, though.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    3. Re:I'm sure Apple doesn't care. by weld · · Score: 1
      >The way things work change just *SLIGHTLY* with every minor release of iTunes, causing all the De-Fairplay utilities to have to be updated with every minor release

      This should be part of any modern DRM scheme. Media players should ask the vendors web site if their version's DRM scheme has been cracked, and if so, download a new scheme. The media player vendor should have a constant supply of ready made new slightly different DRM schemes to constantly keep the crackers busy.

      Its a cat and mouse game of attrition. Get used to it.

      -weld

  23. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by 0xC0FFEE · · Score: 1

    IMHO, right there is the explanation for why there was only 5 millions dl'ed songs. I can't imagine a parent giving away a CC number just to get a free songs for their children

  24. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's because for a "free" song you had to give them your credit card number

    No you don't...at least I didn't have to anyways. When I created my account to redeem my free music the credit card part was optional.

  25. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by 0xC0FFEE · · Score: 1

    you have to provide one to create an account...

  26. Right-- fairplay still works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is about authentication with the itunes music store, not removing the playfair drm protection.

    Fairplay still works without any changes. A "friend" did the following last night:

    1. Using an old version of itunes on a pc, purchased a new song from the music store.

    2. Launched VLC on the PC, and found it had no problem playing it. Checked c:\documents and settings\[username]\application data\drms and there was a new file: XXXXXXXX.005, in addition to the other two files that were already there. They had extensions .002 and .004

    3. Upgraded itunes on the PC to 4.5. Bought another song. It shows fairplay v2 when you look at it's info.

    4. VLC can also play this one. No new file in the drms directory was created.

    5. Copied both songs.m4p and the key files from drms to the mac running the latest itunes. Put the keys in ~/.drms

    6. Ran playfair (v 0.5.0) against the two songs. They decoded into .m4a files which show no protection, and play fine in VLC, and itunes.

    7. Just to double check, bought a third song using itunes on the mac. Ran playfair against it (still using the keys from the PC) and it decoded and plays fine.

    My conclusion is that as long as you have the keys, you can still use playfair. My friend gets the keys from the PC running VLC. I don't know if other techniques may have been broken by the new itunes.

    I don't have any problem with the ethics of removing the protection. I don't-- I mean, *wouldn't* use it to illegally share the music. It's just nice to have clean files in case Apple quits developing itunes for the PC, or some other unlikely scenario.

    1. Re:Right-- fairplay still works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up!

    2. Re:Right-- fairplay still works. by pudge · · Score: 1

      My conclusion is that as long as you have the keys, you can still use playfair. My friend gets the keys from the PC running VLC. I don't know if other techniques may have been broken by the new itunes.

      I think you're right, because playfair did not work for me after I upgraded my iPod firmware, but it does continue to work for those who updated iTunes, but not iPod. It looks like the change is that the iPod won't so easily give up the key.

    3. Re:Right-- fairplay still works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting...This procedure works for me on a "real" PC, but not if I use Virtual PC.

  27. In Cali, by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in beautiful Glendale CA I only bough 2 losing Pepsi bottles, and I drink a lot of diet Pepsi. The bottles didn't show up until recently and i think they were playing catch up. I waited over a month after the promo started before I finally saw a bottle for sale. This could be a factor in the lower than expected numbers.

    1. Re:In Cali, by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      I've got a great one for you:

      The vending machine at work has a giant sticker on it advertising the promotion. Only one problem... none of the Pepsi bottles have the caps. Only within the last 2-3 weeks do the Diet Pepsi bottles have them. Fortunately, a friend of mine wasn't using them and gave me about 10 of the winning caps.

  28. Lack of Linux iTunes by KimiDalamori · · Score: 1

    I have neither Windoze nor MacOS and Wine doesn't feel like running iTunes today. Well, screw it, it's not like they had the music I was hoping for anyways. Anybody want my free song codes?

    --
    Lagito ergo expectabo
    1. Re:Lack of Linux iTunes by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I probably had about 20 of them I never cashed in. I was not till part way through the promotion that I found out you can download the iTunessoftwar to windows for free. I sort of figured it was an iPod thing.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Lack of Linux iTunes by wanerious · · Score: 1

      Um, yes please?

  29. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by spyrral · · Score: 1

    Mod the parent down. There is no insight contained within the post. He/she is completely incorrect about needing to enter a credit card number to redeem a song. When you open up iTunes Music Store, all you have to do is click on the pepsi logo in the center right on the window. It clearly says Redeem Song.

  30. Free iTune download by G27+Radio · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found a link to this on Ben&Jerry's site after reading the news.com article. Pledge to vote in the next election and you get a free iTunes download with 24-48 hours.

    Get 'em while they're hot--er, or before they melt?

    1. Re:Free iTune download by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. My personal information costs $0.99...

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    2. Re:Free iTune download by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My personal information costs $0.99

      Actually, the price varies depending on who you buy it from, how detailed it is, the number of people on the list you buy, and how specific of a demographic the list targets.

      I'm not overly concerned about getting free coupons for ice-cream in the mail. I doubt they'll sell my e-mail address, but if they do I'll know it and close that particular sneakemail account. Giving my work number or a fax number works for keeping telemarketer's from bugging me.

    3. Re:Free iTune download by phearlez · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they'd taken 7 seconds to determine if it worked with any other browser than IE I'da gotten my free song :(

      --
      Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
    4. Re:Free iTune download by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Get 'em while they're hot--er, or before they melt?

      Or, thanks to you, get to their page before the server reaches supercritical connection mass from the slashdotting and turns into a melted pool of plastic and silicon substrate leaking through the raised floor in the datacenter.

      I know a good concrete guy that can put the sarcophagus over the datacenter if the place explodes...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  31. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by pudge · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point. The only reason they can give a free song is because it has DRM. The only way the DRM works is if it is tied to an Apple account. The only way you can get an Apple account on iTMS is by having a credit card. Requiring the credit card is pretty indirect. Your mistake is in forgetting that these are DRM'd files, like everything else on iTMS.

  32. Ummm... isn't this illegal? by Kunt · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why is it that people don't want to pay for software and media content? If I like something, if it has any value for me, I will pay for it, no problem. I have a job, so I can affort to pay for the stuff I want. I pay for quality. But if someone were to steal from me or my company, I will bloody well see them in court! And so, Apple and the record companies should SUE this guy.

    1. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      "Teh information wants to be free!!!!1"

      Because many people have this idea that anything that exists in an easily duplicatable format should be free because it's so easy to duplicate. That and they are greedy, selfish little twits who have never tried to make a living with their intellectual gifts. They insulate themselves from their twinges of guilt by beleiving that because recording artists are getting screwed by the RIAA that it is okay for them to screw the artists even more. They claim that artits whould give their creations (music, games, movies, what have you) away for free (the stuff they want) and make money selling t-shirts, posters, mugs and performing live in concert (things that don't want).

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by neelm · · Score: 1

      Ummm... no?

      The service is free. Apple doesn't offer an linux option for their service or the music *you payed for*. You seem to buy the line you have a say in the bits on my network. Well you don't. The bits on my network and computer are mine to do with what I will.

      I'd love to see Apple hit this guy with a DMCA suit. It would be a great case for the EFF, just like the DeCSS case, to take to the courts.

      Apple, rather than fight the hacks, should look into why they are written in the first place and address the missing features. No one hacks something that does everything they want.

    3. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by makeyougohmmm · · Score: 1

      However, when you click on the 'Agree' button to the software license agreement you agree to not try and circumvent Apple's efforts to provide protected content. The methods to overcome the protection are really not that difficult. I would think that any /.er would be able to figure it out. On the other hand, to use this method of 'cracking' the protection scheme only forces the RIAA to start looking at M$ for their solution. Basically by working so hard to thwart a DRM scheme that is actually decently fair - geeks are helping M$'s case for .wma. Is that really what you want for you Linux box? To run a M$ file format? Just checking...

    4. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Why is it that people don't want to pay for software and media content?

      Because the marginal cost is virtually zero, and people have a natural aversion to paying near-infinite markup percentages. But that's not relevant, because Playfair and similar utilities only work on music that you've *already bought*. It's not stealing even if you buy into the **AA meme that copyright infringement==theft.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    5. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by neelm · · Score: 1

      How did an Apple iTunes file become an M$ file format.... nevermind, I'll leave the faulted logic of helping M$ alone.

      But, A) I never clicked on an agree button, I never saw it (remember I'm not using iTunes?)

      B) As stated before, see DeCSS. I paid for the song, I can play it on what every device, using whatever OS or media I want. These right are expressly given to me though copyright law, though RIAA/MPAA have bought enough of our congress to pass the DMCA to undo these rights - which is the exact reason projects like these must exist so that the DMCA is challanged and thrown out or amended to not limit the fair use of copyright.

      Any real /.er would know that.

    6. Re:Ummm... isn't this illegal? by makeyougohmmm · · Score: 1

      If you bought the song, you have installed iTunes Because that is how you access the iTMS. If you have installed iTunes, you have clicked on the 'Agree' button. If this is not the case then what are you whining about?

  33. Why so few redeemed songs... by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ii might have something to do with the inconvenience of downloading and installing iTunes, creating an account (which includes entering a credit card number), and then finally entering the code and picking a song.

    But I think more importantly, the vast majority of people simply don't know much about iTunes (or don't even know what it IS). I dug a lot of "one free song" bottle caps out of the wastebaskets in our office because people didn't have a clue what they were...however, once I showed them how to redeem them, their reaction was usually something like "I can get any song I want?!? COOL!". This leads me to believe that Apple still has a ways to go in terms of public interest and awareness of the online music store scene...which is actually an exciting opportunity for them.

    1. Re:Why so few redeemed songs... by burtman007 · · Score: 1

      I agree that a lot of people aren't in the know of iTunes. Not everyone who drinks a Pepsi product owns a computer and wants to go through the hassle of getting an account for one song. On a slightly related topic to your post: I have to wonder what else you find when you dumpsterdive in the office???

    2. Re:Why so few redeemed songs... by spyrral · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod parent down. There was no requirement to enter a credit card number to redeem free songs. You did have to create an account, but that consisted of picking a user name and password and giving up your already spammed to death email.

    3. Re:Why so few redeemed songs... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      I think it's also because having just one song isn't very useful. If I'm someone who doesn't keep music on my computer, am I really going to download just one or two songs? And then what, I'll leave my stereo and go to the computer when I want to hear just that song? Or I'll burn the one song on a cd?

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    4. Re:Why so few redeemed songs... by Aumaden · · Score: 1

      Well, I must admit that originally I was under the impression that using iTunes was somehow linked with having an iPod. I also would have been more interested had they put the caps on Mountain Des.

    5. Re:Why so few redeemed songs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe people dont want to enter their credit card # for 1 song if they never plan to actually use the service. Or maybe they're 15 years old and they dont have a credit card to create an account.

  34. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by metalion · · Score: 2, Informative
    But according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed.

    That's because for a "free" song you had to give them your credit card number. I complained twice to Pepsi and Apple...never got a response. So, as far as I am concerned, they've fucked themselves on this one.

    Actually, when signing up, the option was given to input a credit card number now or later. I opted for later. I have downloaded several songs with the Pepsi promotion but I still have yet to give them my credit card number. :P

    I have to admit that I do like iTunes. It has a nice interface, the music store seems well designed, and I haven't run into any issues with the DRM yet. But still wouldn't mind seeing a new version of software like PlayFair that addresses iTunes 4.5.

  35. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by crackshoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except you didn't have to give them a credit card to get the songs. I didn't have to put in any credit card informtaion until i actually bought a track -- after i had downloaded 18 free iTunes songs. So yes, they were actually free. You only needed to give them an email addy to create the account (or at least I did, but i used the account i'd had with apple for 2 years, so they already had my email).

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  36. Katanagari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was done LONG before ol Tokunaga. Minamoto no Yoshitsune (1192AD) is one as did his immediate successor, Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Shall we visit the whole Genji vs Heike period?

  37. 5% sounds about right by 71thumper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given the classic assumptions on "mail-in rebates" that only 10% of the people actually bother if the amount is less than $100...5% is actually amazingly high for something that has a very narrow audience given the number of people who by Pepsi (i.e., lots of people that bought winners didn't care about iTunes).

  38. I personally got about 30 free songs by ScottGant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My wife and I would go out of our way to get the Pepsies with the promotion. We won quite a few times.

    It wasn't a bad promotion, but many times we had to go out of our way to even find the Pepsies with the offer. They were hard to find.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  39. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong. I just one for the first time the other day. I downloaded iTunes, installed it and clicked on the link in the iTunes store to redeem a free song code. It asked me for an email address and password and my name. Nothing more.

    The problem was Pespi did a horrible job with regards to distribution. Bottles with codes didn't even hit the stores for weeks after the promotion started. They only just showed up in my area of Los Angeles a week and a half ago. So if you feel the need to blame someone, blame Pepsi for sabatoging the promotion.

  40. Wrong way round by LordK2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    any hacks to break the DRM scheme will be thwarted by Apple eventually
    Wrong way round. Any hacks that Apple implements to enforce DRM will be thwarted by geeks eventually (and usually sooner rather than later).

    For better or for worse, DRM is a battle that content providers will lose.

    K

    1. Re:Wrong way round by hanssprudel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For better or for worse, DRM is a battle that content providers will lose

      No they won't.

      Don't be surprised when Apple suddenly becomes one of the biggest supporters of "trusted" computing, and introduces a palladium technology of their own. And all the Mac zealots who were busy telling us before why Apple DRM was good, while Microsoft DRM was bad, will come back to tell us why Mac Palladium is good.

      I'm not saying the coders here are doing something wrong because they are pushing Apple in that direction: if we self censor ourselves to appease the DRM monglers, then we are where they wants us anyways. Apple picked sides in this battle, and for all the bullshit their fans are feeding us about "nice" DRM, the side they chose leads only one way. Goodbye user controlled computer. Welcome Palladium controlled user.

    2. Re:Wrong way round by LordK2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Goodbye user controlled computer. Welcome Palladium controlled user.
      Fine. Goodbye American locked-down computer. Welcome Chinese non-TCPA alternative.

      Seriously, the far East is rapidly catching up with technology, and I can think of few things that will spurn the Chinese into producing a viable PC alternative than the risk of being locked down to American corporate rule.

      Of course the performance will never be bleeding edge, but for most tasks a 3 GHz processor (or whatever they are up to by the time TCPA becomes standard) will be overspecified, and I know where I will be placing my money.

      By the time it becomes technically viable to mandate lockdown technology in Western PC hardware, it will certainly not be economically wise.

      K

    3. Re:Wrong way round by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this is true. Problem is that SOMEONE is paying for this. Apple loses out, the RIAA loses out, the consumers lose out, and the rest of us lose out too.

      Look... We get to have downloads, supposedly what everyone wanted (speedy, somewhat of a selection, etc). What do we do? We break it, in minutes (as predicted), and we look like a bunch of fucks. "We gave them what they wanted and they break in anyway." They are just going to make it harder and harder.

      This process takes time and money from all sides. We are all going to continue to pay out the ass in the end.

      Support free music (see link below). Do NOT support bands that demand their music is paid for. Do NOT support bands that are run by the RIAA.

    4. Re:Wrong way round by hanssprudel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fine. Goodbye American locked-down computer. Welcome Chinese non-TCPA alternative.

      Goodbye Internet access, which will require that your computer authenticates itself as correctly TCPA user hostile.

      And even if you do find an ISP that will let you online, goodbye web content, since webpages will consist of encrypted content that only TCPA can read.

      Goodbye IM access (they are currently breaking third party clients for "security reasons" every other month. With TCPA in place they will do it ones and for all).

      Goodbye email access (Bill Gates is talking about using "trusted" mail agents to stop spam).

      Goodbye computer gaming (TCPA "trusted" clients to stop cheating).

      Goodbye reading Microsoft Office documents.

    5. Re:Wrong way round by valmont · · Score: 1, Troll

      i live for karma suicide and worship my foes. so here goes:

      no you silly

      Geeks invoke Fair-Use as a cop-out from facing the legal and moral responsibilities for their actions which are, IN FACT, all-too-often, either STEALING MUSIC, or illegally breaking a copyright-protection scheme. There is no bullshitting your way around this. There is no way you can argue a decent case in court for protecting your so-precious rights to fair-use, because this is not what this is about.

      You wanna do something productive with your time? here are a few suggestions:

      One day geeks all up in arms against Apple digital music business will have to realize the sad truth: they're not out to fight some noble battle that'll change the world for the better in a nirvana of computing where everything is free and nobody makes money. They are in fact acting like childish lifeless nerds with too much fucking time on their hands. Most DRM schemes are not hard to crack. in fact, they are easy to crack. The reason why so few people publish their work is because most people understand that online digital music sale NEEDS DRM to survive as a business model.

      See it works this way: artists want money for their work, even if it means they get screwed by RIAA labels from a percentage standpoint, at least they get fame and plenty of fucking money ANYWAY. RIAA labels wants to make money off of songs. Apple wants to sell songs online. RIAA doesn't trust people to not spread around music they've purchased. Apple comes with scheme to make RIAA feel better. Agreement is reached. RIAA labels benefit, Apple benefits, and, believe it or not, WE CONSUMERS BENEFIT TOO: we consumers are no-longer stuck with buying entire albums for 2 songs we like. I don't know about you but i'm not exactly looking forward to a world where my only alternative for online music purchase is WMA-DRM'ed music, subscription services that'll render my songs useless as soon as i discontinue my service, and clumsy online stores.

    6. Re:Wrong way round by MouseR · · Score: 1

      For better or for worse, DRM is a battle that content providers will lose.

      That's somewhat shortsighted.

      The DRM battle is a battle that the consumer will lose.

      The music industry is already touting the idea of hicking up download music price up to 2.49$ USD a piece.

      People like David Hammerton are playing along just fine with the RIAA's plan to force the download industry to be more expensive than buying wholesale albums (it's already the case for some Universal music, priced at 10$ CDN).

      Way to go.

    7. Re:Wrong way round by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Not really. DRM is a battle that neither side will "lose," they'll just keep fighting forever. There will be occasional victories on either side, but the result of the back and forth battle will be that, unless you keep up on your cracking software, the latest format will always be protected from the majority.

      This is how it works with the gaming industry vs. crackers. Yes, game X is crackable by some, but not by most. And that's far better than leaving the format open to all.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:Wrong way round by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is always a workaround. It may be "chipping" the motherboard - possibly will be illegal, but who cares. It may be even running a pair of computers, using the TCPA one as an access device for the non-TCPA one. Even in the VERY worst case, we can return to the age of BBS systems, acoustically coupling non-TCPA computers with the TCPA ones, then communicating with audio-encoded data over VoIP phone clients. Would be rather slow, but even that would be enough for sharing an AES256 key and arranging sending an encrypted DVD-R by mail or by a courier.

      There is almost always a solution. In virtually all the other cases, there is at least a workaround.

    9. Re:Wrong way round by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Hello universal turing machine. If TCPA becomes a reality, it will be cracked and emulated and life will go on as usual.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    10. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reason why so few people publish their work is because most people understand that online digital music sale NEEDS DRM to survive as a business model.
      Bullshit.

      If the major labels made their collective catalogs (current and back-catalog releases) available through a single point of access (a la Orbitz for the five major airlines), with a convenient user interface (which iTunes has essentially nailed down already), with high quality encoding and fast, reliable pipes (ditto), some reasonable assurance of anonymity (on par with paying cash for a CD at Tower/HMV/etc.), and with no DRM whatsoever, widescale copyright infringement of music recordings would disappear tomorrow. At that point, they could continue to flood P2P networks with bogus files, sue those who make substantial numbers of copyrighted files available, etc., and I for one would have no problem with it.

      Unfortunately, the troglodytes who, for the most part, make the high-level strategic decisions in the music industry don't get that, and probably never will. Just look at their litigious and bass-ackward attitudes toward virtually any technological advance in the past century (wax cylinder recordings and copyrights in Edison's time; audio cassettes; VCRs; DAT decks and the resulting SCMS; the Diamond Rio lawsuit; DMCA; and so on).

      Credit goes to Apple for at least dragging the music (and, indirectly, movie) industry (kicking and screaming) in a more progressive direction, but they are very, very far from what I would consider "enlightened." The only extent to which digital distribution "needs" DRM is that the head honchos still have their pathologically risk-averse heads up their asses.

      -H

    11. Re:Wrong way round by lordholm · · Score: 1

      "The reason why so few people publish their work is because most people understand that online digital music sale NEEDS DRM to survive as a business model."

      Since no one have proven this, it is not possible to draw these conclusions.

      I know several people who would gladly buy music online if it were DRM-free. So while some may share what they bought on the Internet or to friends, there will be additional sales as well. The most interesting thing about iTMS is the availability and that alone will sell lots of music.

      I personally will not buy into a technology that binds me to a platform (I have used Macs all my life (almost), but I refuse to be locked to the platform) and I certainly will not buy into a technology such as this if Apple doesn't guarantee that if they shutdown the iTMS they will release a tool to free the songs that I have bought.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    12. Re:Wrong way round by valmont · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you are only locked into Apple's platform if you choose to remain locked. Apple is giving you the tools you need to pursue fair use to its full extent. You can burn your iTMS music to CDs all you want, DRM restrictions are EASY to get around and LEGAL within fair-use, they are merely there to prevent the mainstream crowd to instantly feed their iTMS music to P2P networks.

    13. Re:Wrong way round by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Then ...

      Goodbye internet.

      Hello Dark ages.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    14. Re:Wrong way round by valmont · · Score: 1

      i call bullshit on your bullshit calling. If no DRM whatsoever was placed on music purchased online, you can bet your ass that P2P networks would have far more music to play with. And you can bet your ass the RIAA would never go for this. There's just no way. Why do you think they are suing music swapers right now? How much credibility do you think the RIAA would get in court when on one hand they sue students who swap music on campus, on the other hand, sell their music in digital format, FOR CHEAP *AND* without any DRM so digital files could instantly be swapped in P2P networks??? It would not make any business or litigation sense for the RIAA to sell commercial music in digital format without imposing DRM. At least not with the information that they currently have. If usage of the iTMS increases while fileswapping subsides, then MAYBE, they'll evolve.

      in any case, the DRM scheme behind iTMS was developed to address one simple, specific problem: the RIAA does not want their music to flow around networks in digital format. One of their early initiatives was to SNEAK, without warning the user, encryption onto regular, physical CDs to PREVENT users from ripping their CDs. Now THAT is bad: aside from crashing many computers and regular audio CD players, it was preventing users from exercising their rights to fair use. Apple's DRM scheme is slowly educating RIAA labels to chill the fuck out on crippling their CDs and allowing them to migrate into the new digital millenium of the instant digital music gratification so many of their potential customers craved.

      Incidently, Apple has also provided a fair online digital music marketplace business, which MANY independent record labels have come to embrace, as this business model allows their artists to gain far greater exposure while retaining much of the profits as Apple doesn't make shit on music sales.

      i've said it before and i'll say it again: fight the RIAA by not purchasing RIAA-controlled music. Fighting Apple thru reverse-engineering is only hurting Apple's credibility in front of the RIAA, not the RIAA. If Apple's credibility is shot, their business model goes to shit, and indie labels and artists suddenly become deprived of the last opportunity for their music to come out of the indie darkness and onto mainstream distribution. Apple is slowly but surely building more and more "community" features into their platform, the same way Amazon has done it for years, which will be a great way for people to share great music with one-another, thereby educating them about music they may have not otherwise heard of thru mainstream media, which are in bed with RIAA labels in the first place.

      People need to start thinking about consequences of their actions and stop addressing complex problems with oversimplified, unrealistic solutions: "Hey let's solve world hunger: KILL ALL THE MOFOZ WHO STARVE".

    15. Re:Wrong way round by datawar · · Score: 1

      I can't wait. Cyberpunk all the way!

    16. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The reason why so few people publish their work is because most people understand that online digital music sale NEEDS DRM to survive as a business model.


      How do you support this rather bold (and I say retarded) claim?

      From 1965 to 1990 (yes, I'm old) CDs were not common but the "compact cassette" was quite popular. The recordable compact cassette did not destroy the music industry and it was a completely "free and open" technology.

    17. Re:Wrong way round by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Geeks invoke Fair-Use as a cop-out from facing the legal and moral responsibilities for their actions which are, IN FACT [...] illegally breaking a copyright-protection scheme


      I don't know about you, but I don't have any moral responsibilities to surrender my rights to my private property to further someone else's interests.

      If someone legally sells a copy of something to me, that copy is mine, period. I have no moral qualms whatsoever about modifying property that is mine. If you think it is at all immoral to play DVDs on linux or crack your iTunes songs then you believe that any of the copyright holder's rights trump your rights to your private property.

      I think I'll just stick to worrying about my rights and those of like minded people. I'm pretty sure that the media corporations have enough laywers looking out for their rights. They don't need my help, or yours either.

    18. Re:Wrong way round by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Geeks invoke Fair-Use as a cop-out from facing the legal and moral responsibilities for their actions which are, IN FACT, all-too-often, either STEALING MUSIC, or illegally breaking a copyright-protection scheme.

      Two things:

      - copyright infringement is not stealing

      - just because something is illegal does not mean it is immoral, or even that the law making it illegal is right

      Now, don't misunderstand me, I'm opposed to illegally copying copyrighted music and deleted my mp3 collection a long time ago and replaced it with legally bought music. I'm just saying that laws like the dmca treat the symptoms, not the cause, and do more harm than good. The entire music distribution model, which creates artificial scarcity in a product that doesn't know scarcity by nature is hopelessly flawed, and it is only technological retardedness that has kept it working as long as it did. The new anti-circumvention laws promote technological retardedness to prop up a model that doesn't work.

      There needs to be a real debate about the future of the music industry, and how culture will be paid for, rather than lawmakers just trying to maintain the status quo, however poorly it is suited to modern society.

      However, I will admit that given that lawmakers have much bigger issues on their hands than copyright, it would probably be advisable to, for now, back temporary fixes like the dmca, and grudgingly accept a patch to the distribution model that involves drm. However, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, so people have to be careful to not compromise too long or too much.

    19. Re:Wrong way round by valmont · · Score: 1

      retarded? holy shit. read my other posts i've addressed this way too many times already. your analogy, like most analogies, is FLAWED. There is a generational loss and considerable overhead in duplicating cassettes: analog signal degrades with each copy. Making copies requires playing the original at normal speed. Digital music is an entirely different technology, if i have to further explain why, then YOU are acting retarded, and as a different technology that allows instant, lossless duplication of music, requires a different business model.

    20. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you all go to jail. Once people start getting hard time for this shit your *law breaking* attitudes will change.

    21. Re:Wrong way round by valmont · · Score: 1

      hey fair enough, but i'll tell you what: as soon as people no-longer feel they can confidently make fair-use of their online-purchased commercial music, they'll stop using those services. Apple is not sneaking anything up on anyone. Rules are clearly stated up-front. People are mixing together DRM associated with online music and DMCA laws, and bagging it all together as one big evil thing. A DRM Scheme is supposed to promote copyright protection within a framework that has properly educated the user as to what the scheme will allow them to do and not do. When properly implemented, it would make sense to invoke the DMCA to prosecute circumventions of that scheme.

      I would say that the DRM scheme implemented in iTMS is one of the very few schemes that should be protected by laws under the DMCA. The problem with DMCA is that it is abused left and right by corporations and various software and hardware companies to actually limit activities that should fall under fair-use. For example the RIAA will sue your ass if you're caught trying to bypass encryption that was snuck onto an Audio CD without your prior knowledge when buying the CD. That, in my opinion is abuse of DMCA, because the consumer was not properly educated in the first place.

      People tend to put all acronyms in the same "evil" bag. DRM CAN be fair. And I challenge anyone to prove me Apple's DRM scheme isn't, in fact, fair.

    22. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look... We get to have downloads, supposedly what everyone wanted (speedy, somewhat of a selection, etc). What do we do? We break it, in minutes (as predicted), and we look like a bunch of fucks. "We gave them what they wanted and they break in anyway." They are just going to make it harder and harder.

      I didn't get what I wanted - the ability to listen to them anywhere, without fooling around with stupid DRM. (You always remember to deauthorize before reinstalling...right?) Being able to download means a lot less to me without that.

      Now, the scheme has been broken and still I've heard no reports of anyone stealing iTunes music. So I think the majority of people actually did want this to restore their fair use rights, not to steal music.

      I'm quite pleased with PlayFair. I have used it successfully, and can now listen to those files on my Linux machine. Fair use wins.

    23. Re:Wrong way round by G-funk · · Score: 1

      ... or illegally breaking a copyright-protection scheme

      No, we (almost unanimously) think it should never be illegal to break a copyright-protection scheme. It should be illegal for me to download decss,decrypt my DVDs, and put uploads on kazaa. Howver it definitely should not be illegal for me to download decss, decrypt my DVDs, and put divxs on my modded xbox.

      Disclaimer: I don't own an xbox, I'm a nintendo man.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    24. Re:Wrong way round by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 1

      Haha, thank you for that laugh. Perhaps if you weren't trolling you'd realize that Apple fans are also Apple's harshest critics. Every time they do anything everyone jumps all over them, even if it's as mundane as slightly lightening the pinstripes on a menu. Remember the iPod? Almost every mac board out there was screaming about the price and how Apple was retarded for thinking they could sell them.

    25. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can bet your ass that P2P networks would have far more music to play with. And you can bet your ass the RIAA would never go for this.
      Well, sure, but my original point was that a soultion based on market/economics considerations seems to me to be far more workable than one based on an ever-escalating spiral of technological measures and countermeasures. The software industry in the 1980's went through the same drill with copy protection, and eventually just gave up.

      How much credibility do you think the RIAA would get in court when on one hand they sue students who swap music on campus, on the other hand, sell their music in digital format, FOR CHEAP *AND* without any DRM so digital files could instantly be swapped in P2P networks???
      I don't think they lose any credibility at all, and I think they could make a perfectly consistent argument addressing both sides of this particular coin. Suing people who really are making thousands of copyrighted files available via P2P is still the right thing to do, because it goes after (massive) copyright infringement. And to a judge who says "but you're making this possible by selling your files unprotected," you politely reiterate that selling non-DRMed files does not in any way legalize or legitimize copyright infringment -- sharing a copyrighted file is still illegal. There is nothing about selling non-DRMed content that implicates direct, contributory, or copyright infringement in any way.

      As for your other point, I fully agree that the RIAA -- as it exists right now -- would definitely not go for this stuff. But that is exactly my (original) point: the prospect of attacking copyright infringement by simply making it impractical/annoying/unreliable enough, by presenting a sufficiently attractive alternative, is simply too big a leap for most of the old-guard RIAA types to make.

      By "attractive," I mean exactly the set of criteria I set out in my original post: if it costs a buck, comes from a fat pipe, is guaranteed to be properly encoded/tagged/tc., and has no DRM to worry about, it simply makes no sense to spend time finding a file with all the same qualities over Kazaa or other P2P service. Think about all the (potential) drawbacks: you don't know much about the quality of encoding (at best you can guess bitrate from file size, and you'll never know whether it was done with LAME or something really bad, like Xing), the speed of the pipe, or the reliability of the server.

      If, on top of that, they continue to flood the P2P networks with bogus files and/or sue the most egregious violators, they can fairly easily create a situation in which it simply makes no sense to turn to illicit (copyright-infringing) sources -- all without pissing off nearly as many people as they have so far.

      Apple's DRM scheme is slowly educating RIAA labels to chill the fuck out on crippling their CDs and allowing them to migrate into the new digital millenium of the instant digital music gratification so many of their potential customers craved.
      Agreed, both about the malware being snuck onto some "CDs" and about the gradual education process. Maybe I'm just impatient because the logical conclusion of all this is (or seems) so clear to me, whereas the old farts running the show at RIAA will take half a generation or more to come around, possibly doing some things that adversely affect me as a researcher and engineer in the process.

      Heck, maybe I should just chill the fuck out, too (would probably do me some good, anyway).

      -H

    26. Re:Wrong way round by Markonen · · Score: 1
      Well, sure, but my original point was that a soultion based on market/economics considerations seems to me to be far more workable than one based on an ever-escalating spiral of technological measures and countermeasures.
      Market economics have nothing to do with this. You make this sound like there's fair competition between the record labels and P2P music sharers. That's just plain false. Two distributors can't compete fairly if one of them is paying for the production and promotion of music and the other one doesn't have to.

      The only things that can protect the labels are laws and DRM. You seem to argue that the laws should be enough, but really, will they ever be? I think it's pretty obvious that law and law enforcement (as they exist today) are doing next to nothing in preventing illegal music sharing.
    27. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe "market/economics" isn't quite the right term semantically, but I stand by my original point. I wasn't talking about competition in the traditional sense, because by definition illegal sharing offers goods at a price (zero) that the legal alternative can't possibly compete with.

      My point is more pragmatic: when the effort required to get the same result via P2P significantly exceeds the equivalent of a dollar or so, (most) people will stop using P2P. Sure, there will always be a few jackasses who do it out of some misguided sense of "sticking it to the man," but that's a minority. Most people just want music with a minimum of hassle, with perhaps a small aspect of philosophical consideration about not wanting to support DRM, RIAA member lablels, etc.

      The other point is that it wouldn't be difficult to manipulate the situation (legally -- I'm not talking anything that would have anti-trust implications, since as you correctly point out the "competition" in this case is illegal in its own right) in such a way as to make P2P use for the purpose of copyright infringement impractical, without significantly crippling P2P itself or cannibalizing their own sales. Seriously, if I can get a track from iTMS for a buck with none of the nonsense described in this thread, why would I want to spend half an hour searching, downloading, and hoping (that the track is not corrupted)? Throw in the assurance of a comprehensive catalog (that is, the chances of finding a particular track should be > 99% if it has been published in the last 50 years or something along those lines) and perhaps some degree of anonymity (though that may not be possible practically due to credit cards, etc.), and it's even more of a no-brainer.

      I've never used Kazaa/Morpheus/etc., and I don't ever intend to. On the other hand, I was just about to buy my first track from iTMS, because Playfair had apparently reached a point where it was quite reliable. But now that the iTunes 4.5 update breaks it, I'll wait. If no one releases a fixed version, I won't buy from iTMS at all.

      -H

    28. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only things that can protect the labels are laws and DRM. You seem to argue that the laws should be enough, but really, will they ever be?
      p.s. In theory, the laws should be enough, but I never said I thought that was working out in practice. What I did say was that I see a solution to the problem that doesn't involve
      1. Militant enforcement of existing laws that steps on so many (innocent) toes, and paints with such a broad brush, that it does far more harm than good; and
      2. Rewriting legislation to address the problem, but doing so with such a lack of foresight or understanding of technology that the revisions have many adverse and unexpected consequences, a la the DMCA.
      The law has always struggled to keep up with technology, and the past century-plus of history is littered with examples of this intersection yielding either very bad results (read up on the Wright Brothers/Glenn Curtiss saga, the regeneration suit between Edwin Armstrong and Lee de Forest, or more recently, the DMCA) or reasonable results only after much legal bloodletting (e.g. the Henry Ford/George Selden fight over automobiles, or more recently something like the Betamax decision).

      As a researcher and engineer, I have no interest in getting caught in the buzzsaw of someone broadly overstepping and improperly expanding their rights under the guise of simply protecting them.

      I think it's pretty obvious that law and law enforcement (as they exist today) are doing next to nothing in preventing illegal music sharing.
      Really? Perhaps you didn't notice all the RIAA lawsuits over the past year? And Napster didn't exactly close on its own...

      -H

    29. Re:Wrong way round by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Do NOT support bands that demand their music is paid for.

      Right, because nobody should be paid for his hard work.

    30. Re:Wrong way round by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's right! Just like public key encryption has gone the way of the winds because everyone could reverse-engineer and crack it, and so it became useless.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    31. Re:Wrong way round by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > Don't be surprised when Apple suddenly becomes one of the biggest supporters of "trusted" computing, and introduces a
      > palladium technology of their own. And all the Mac zealots who were busy telling us before why Apple DRM was good, while
      > Microsoft DRM was bad, will come back to tell us why Mac Palladium is good.

      Glad to know you're privy to exactly what Apple will do at any given time, in response to any given stimulus. But, of course, that's what people who have a serious dislike of something do... they automatically assume the worst. If they're right, they are vindicated, and their dislike becomes more intense. If they are wrong, they simply ignore the inaccuracy until the are next right.

      Of course, having said this, I wouldn't be at all suprised if there is a Palladium-like technology in Apple's future. Because, frankly, I expect Congress to pass a requirement that all computers have a widget like this in them, and I expect ISPs to start keeping people who don't have them from connecting, and so forth. It would piss me off no end, of course, but I'm hardly going to blame Apple for that kind of development. If all the ISPs in the country won't let Macs connect, and half the web pages are encrypted so they can't be read by Macs, 'it's DRM-free!' would be a pretty hollow consolation.

      When I worked there, what I heard from Apple people was, 'You can't stop people from copying things without turning the computer into a CD player, and that's the last thing we want to do. The best you can do is slow them down a little.' That seems to be the prevailing wisdom there. If it changes, it will be because Apple is left no other alternative.

      And people like you will act self-righteous, because you were 'right'.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  41. Arms race by Erbo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The "arms race" has definitely begun. And, from all indications thusfar, this one will be hard-fought.

    In the end, though, if this stays a technology arms race, Apple will lose. Why? Because most of the smart people in the world don't work for Apple. (That's also true even for Microsoft, incidentally.)

    Apple will have to take another tack if they want to preserve the integrity of the iTunes DRM. What that'll be, I dunno, but I hope they don't resort to suing their customers.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
    1. Re:Arms race by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Nor, I feel compelled to point out, do most of the smart people in the world crack DRM schemes.

      I do agree that in general, implementing DRM is harder than cracking it, and that I don't think DRM on the computer is going to happen.

    2. Re:Arms race by shawnce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually if you have listened to Steve Jobs comments he doesn't believe that DRM can unbreakable in this regard. Instead you provide a compelling service with flexible allowances to win folks over and in doing so you attempt to grow the market for bought music. So in general they have not attempted to make an unbreakable system.

      That however doesn't mean you don't attempt to enforce those allowances (legally in general they need to do that to insure proper precedents are set). I believe Apple will try to do that without causing problems for its customers, without punishing folks for the acts of a few, at least based on comments by Steve and company. Apple also has to attempt enforcement to likely placate record companies and artists listing song on the store.

      Anyway, it is like the issue of cassette tapes back in the day... folks worried that rampant pirating of music would take place and kill sales. Well pirating did take place but the connivence of the tape form factor allowed things like tape players in cars, smaller/cheaper/easier to use stereos, and portable players like the Walkmans. This grew the market size for music and the large gains in market size easily offset the loss do to piracy.

      You make a good way to buy and listen to music, one easier to use, more convenient and reasonably priced to out compete the illegal channels (generally most folks like to do the right thing). This is the thinking that Steve and company has stated a few times.

      Personally I see hacking around FairPlay as a waste of time, it yields me nothing that I cannot already do based on my needs. If it pushes the business world to more draconian DRM and/or stronger legal actions that "punishes" everyone then it is doing folks more of a disservice then a service.

    3. Re:Arms race by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Oops... connivence picked the wrong one from the spell checker popup on that one, it should have of course been convenience... didn't notice it until after clicking submit.

      To bad I have to use a spell checker in the first place, I blame it on my parents, the schools and hell why not Mr. Bush.

      At least I learned the definition to connivence in the process.

    4. Re:Arms race by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Too bad you published the correction. You had me thinking you were quite witty. The connivence of the tape form factor indeed!

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    5. Re:Arms race by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Yeah I did see that it fit in overall context but at last, no my light bulb wasn't on enough at the time for me to be intentionally that... witty.

  42. Good? by wanerious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And cracking the authentication scheme is considered ... good? I love iTunes and the iTMS. If Apple pulls out of the market because it tires of people breaking their rules out of a overblown sense of entitlement, we'll all be worse off.

    1. Re:Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never break the rules, that's naughty!

      You might cost Apple Corporation shareholders a few $100,000 in profits!

      I can see you for one welcome your corporate overlords, but not everyone does.

      Of course you're probably one of those idiotic walmart employees that says "Oh we don't need a union, the Walton family treats us peons with dignity! Now let me check how many hours they shaved off my paycheck!"

    2. Re:Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love iTunes and the iTMS.

      Get a life, identifying yourself with an over hyped consumer product is about as low as a human being can get.

      If Apple pulls out of the market because it tires of people breaking their rules out of a overblown sense of entitlement, we'll all be worse off.

      If Apple pull out of the music market my life will be impoverished nearly as much as if Kalvin Klein pulled out of the underwear market, i.e. not at all.

    3. Re:Good? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, but most people on Slashdot don't know what they're talking about (including you it seems).

      Crazney has broken the pointless encryption on streaming things in the iTunes library to other machines on a LAN.

      It has nothing to do with iTMS. Repeat after me: it has nothing to do with iTMS.

      The encryption on streaming tunes between clients only serves two purposes: to try and keep people on the Apple upgrade treadmill and to force people to use iTunes on all their machines if they want to stream music between them from the iTunes library. This is your own music we're talking about here, no copyright violations are taking place.

      To be frank, Apple is taking the piss with this sort of encryption, and now the piss is being taken out of them. Too bad, but it has nothing to do with FairPlay.

    4. Re:Good? by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

      As long as they're making such a killing in profits, they will not care. It's the RIAA you need to worry about.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    5. Re:Good? by wanerious · · Score: 1

      Ah. You're right, I didn't know what I was talking about. Thanks.

    6. Re:Good? by pla · · Score: 1

      If Apple pulls out of the market because it tires of people breaking their rules out of a overblown sense of entitlement, we'll all be worse off.

      How the hell did this get a "5, Insightful"?

      If Apple pulls out of the market because the market won't accept DRM'd products, then we all BENEFIT. Other sources of music without DRM will eventually appear, and in the interim, we can still get music via conventional routes (ie, buy CD, rip CD, add to playlist).

      I for one do not really understand why people like iTMS so much. Convenient? Okay, I'll grant that, purely from the POV of making the actual purchase. But how about price and use? I have somewhere on the order of 500 CDs, and have paid full price (usually $12-$18, though I have a handful of multi-CD sets for which I paid around $25) for fewer than two dozen. The rest I obtained used, or from the "cutout bin", or just on sale. I'd say that, over my whole collection, the average CD cost me roughly $6. And from the "use" perspective - Yeah, sure, many folks have defended Apple's DRM on the grounds that it still lets you do quite a lot (as long as you run a Mac or Windows, and have an iPod as your portable - Otherwise, don't even bother trying). But no matter how lax they make the DRM, I will always have more flexibility from doing my own CD rip to a totally non-DRM'd format. So, where does the greatness of iTMS come into this?

      Overall, an unneeded product, with unwanted "features" (such as FairPlay, needlessly encrypted streaming, and both software and hardware lock-in), and VERY unwanted forced upgrades, for at best a small savings over just buying an actual CD (and for those like me who (used to, until the RIAA pissed me off enough) purchase a lot of music, it actually costs more). Yeah. Cool, where do I sign up? The IRS didn't screw me hard enough this year, I feel a need to atone.

    7. Re:Good? by bigbadbob0 · · Score: 1

      This library doesn't crack any DRM "stuff." Read the README. I use this software at home. I have a FreeBSD machine that is a PITA to get vmware running so that I can have some sort of iTunes app running on that machine. Instead, I use this libopendaap to connect to the share on my G4 machine and listen to my mp3s. Notice I said mp3s. It does not (read: will not and can not) play protected aac files, aka m4p). Last time I checked, the tunesbrowser that crazney also wrote to demo libopendaap won't even open up m4a files (aac, un protected files).

      It is my understanding that as of current, in order to break the DRM you either need to burn to CD and rip back to some other format -or- you can use playfair to "strip" the drm from songs that -you- have purchased -legally-. Yes, you had to -purchase- the song first because you use -your- key to strip the drm.

      Please, get the facts straight before ranting off on how these intelligent "crackers" are ruining iTunes for you.

    8. Re:Good? by wanerious · · Score: 1

      For me, the value is in convenience. I'm often in front of the computer all day, so when the itch strikes, I can click over to the iTMS and download what I want, and it automatically appears in my Library and iPod. Nice. I don't have to go to the store, don't have to rip the CD. Since the iPod and iTunes are basically the only ways I listen to music any more, the online store is a blessing. I also never encounter the limits imposed by the DRM.

    9. Re:Good? by SideshowBob · · Score: 1

      Other sources of music without DRM will eventually appear

      No they won't. Not without a massive upheaval in the way that professional music is recorded and sold (e.g. all the record labels go belly up simultaneously and all the musicians sign deals directly with online distributors)

      That is such an unlikely scenario that we can safely ignore the possibility of it happening (and if it does, we can all be pleasantly surprised)

      Instead, Apple, Napster, and the other legitimate services need to establish that there is demand for buying (note that word, buying, as in an exchange of money for goods/services) music online. Then slowly as more and more music is sold online and less is sold by pressing little discs out of petrochemicals Apple et. al. can start applying pressure to the industry to lower prices etc.

      Or the industry can decide that piracy makes digital distribution a lost cause and they can go back to physical distribution only. And by physical distribution I mean their previously hatched plan of designed obsolescence, by phasing out CDs and forcing everyone to upgrade to SACD.

    10. Re:Good? by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      That's it! Convenience!!!

      You actually answered your own stupid questions.

      Please try to work on your overblown sense of self-importance. It is truly tiring.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    11. Re:Good? by pla · · Score: 1

      That's it! Convenience!!!
      You actually answered your own stupid questions.
      Please try to work on your overblown sense of self-importance. It is truly tiring.


      Sorry to bore you. Please, add me to your "foes" list and give them a -6 modifier; wouldn't want to waste your time by making you read the entirety of my comments, rather than just the first sentence of the biggest paragraph.

      For a more serious response...

      Does paying (usually) more, and getting less, really outweigh a five minute stop at a local CD store on the way home from work? I just can't understand that mentality.

      Guess I need to go back to marketing 101... You just can't go wrong by overestimating people's stupidity or laziness.

      Sigh. What a great world we live in. (commence sarcastic comeback about "then feel free to leave it")

    12. Re:Good? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Apple is also trying to prevent people from using stream rippers with iTunes, effectively turning it into a P2P program. This is also why they removed streaming across the Internet in iTunes 4.0.1.

    13. Re:Good? by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Your 'force people to use iTunes on all their machines' argument is a bit specious, since it's free, as is your "upgrade treadmill" comment. If they want to change their hidden protocols between versions they are within their rights to do so, whatever their motives are.

      Their are no legitimate reasons to hijack an iTunes stream, for any reason. If you don't agree with how iTunes works, use something else. You're right - it's your music, so you can use whatever the hell you want to share it. iTunes is a tool that makes it easy to share with other computers running iTunes. If you alter how a tool works or use it in an unintended way and then it no longer does what it was originally supposed to, that's not really the tool's fault.

      None of us know the exact reason they changed how they communicate so all versions have to be 4.5, but one possible (and IMHO more likely) reason is they've added new sound file types and rather than deal with some machines coughing on them when they are shared they make sure they can all play the files. Makes more sense to me than screwing with people for an "upgrade treadmill" that provides no actual benefit to Apple whatsoever.

      Another conceivable reason for encrypting their music sharing stream and changing it each version is about ensuring that they are relatively free from any anti-P2P laws/legal actions. They don't expect to 'win', but being able to show that they do something about it is enough to fight any lawsuits that may popup. Frankly, I doubt this is the reason, but to me it's still more reasonable than your reasons.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    14. Re:Good? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Your 'force people to use iTunes on all their machines' argument is a bit specious, since it's free...

      "Free" in this meaning sadly doesn't mean "works on every machine and every OS". So modifications may be necessary, including but not limited to reverse-engineering the protocol.

      Their are no legitimate reasons to hijack an iTunes stream, for any reason.

      Compatibility. Ease of use. Streaming to an Ethernet-connected device just built for that purpose. With a bit of creativity, you can see a plenty of reasons on a glance.

      If you don't agree with how iTunes works, use something else.

      Or modify it. It's a tool. A hammer is a tool, and if I want to do something different with it, I have two choices: use a different tool, or modify the hammer. The choice depends on the situation.

    15. Re:Good? by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      "Free" in this meaning sadly doesn't mean "works on every machine and every OS".

      Well, yeah. "Free" as it applies to iTunes means "it didn't cost anything," pretty much a dictionary definition. I think the word you're thinking of is "Open," which no one would attribute to iTunes.

      Compatibility. Ease of use. Streaming to an Ethernet-connected device just built for that purpose. With a bit of creativity, you can see a plenty of reasons on a glance.

      No, these are reasons to want a tool to share music any way you want. iTunes is not intended to be that tool.

      Or modify it. It's a tool. A hammer is a tool, and if I want to do something different with it, I have two choices: use a different tool, or modify the hammer. The choice depends on the situation.

      Exactly. But don't complain if the new model hammer you are given can't be modified in exactly the same way.

      To stretch the analogy a bit in the physical world, lets say you win a hammer (read: it was free/without cost) that has a wood handle that goes through the metal head. You modify it by drilling into the wood and putting in some kind of screwdriver tip. Now the hammer breaks and you get a replacement based on a lifetime warranty (just to stretch why you'd need a replacement). If the manufacture stops using to wood and switches to sold metal, your method of modifying it will no longer work. But since that wasn't their intent in the first place, nor did they ever state it would be, there's not really a foundation for complaining about it. (To twist the this to fit better we could simply say they sent you the metal hammer unsolicited because it is lighter/has a better grip/whatever, and it's your choice to use your old modified hammer or the new one that you'd have to re-modify.)

      Of course, part of my implied point was that by using iTunes you agree to the EULA blah blah blah, but frankly I'm not a fan or defender of those. My main goal was two fold: 1) I don't think breaking this was their main reason for changing things, even if they might be glad it did. 2) There is no reason to hold a grudge against them for doing so, since they never said they wouldn't. I'm not saying you can't be annoyed with the inconvenience, just that they never intended for you to have that convenience so they had no compulsion to maintain it.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  43. Shameless hypocrisy by Sanity · · Score: 2, Insightful
    By all means, keep antagonizing the best online music provider with these innovations.
    Why don't you just marry Steve Jobs and get it over with?

    Some people here have their tongues so far up Apple's ass that they are even willing to defend their DRM technology, and attack those that work around it.

    Shame on anyone that is defending Apple here but didn't defend the MPAA's attack on DECSS.

    1. Re:Shameless hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My suspicion that Apple is paying these people in itunes songs for tactical moderation points.

    2. Re:Shameless hypocrisy by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      AMEN! Some people also blame apple too much. The recently had a Airport update and some peopl eclaimed it was teh cause of their non connectivity when they were only getting like 3-4 lights in Internet Connect in teh first place! While I am sure the software affect them, they ignored the fact that maybe they need another AP on thier network. They completely blamed apple even though they were well in control of fixing the problem and when the fix comes out their network would be even more reliable.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:Shameless hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAldredge, I think I speak for the greater Slashdot community when I say I sincerely wish you'd quit spending your days trolling forgettable stories on forgettable news sites and find more fulfilling ways to spend your time, such as making sure your daughter is doing well at school. Just because her parents are divorced doesn't mean she should suffer for it.

  44. And why not... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 2, Informative

    mirror
    oh, and playfair:
    mirror

    1. Re:And why not... by phearlez · · Score: 2, Informative

      PlayFair 0.5 won't work anymore once you've upgraded to 4.5 -OR- if you agree to the new store ToS to get your free daily song. Sorry, your desperate need for the newest Avril Lavigne tune has cost you your DRM removal tool.

      --
      Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
    2. Re:And why not... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      err, i'm not even in the us, did you look at the domain?
      and i don't like drm, and thus spread information to whoever wants it.

  45. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, and another problem I saw was it was bitch to read the caps soemtimes. Another problem was that they only let you enter 10 a day. I guess they don't like my practice of ferreting them out of trash cans (we are a pepsi campus). I plan on getting a Xbox this way as well thanks to DewU. If I fail to get 550 points, I will get a minifridge for my desk.

    --

    Gorkman

  46. Blind eye by pumpknhd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple's authentication scheme is probably just placed to satisfy the RIAA. Not wanting to alienate their user base, and likely their most vocal supporters, Apple is just turning a blind eye. RIAA is happy, and iTunes users are happy.

    Sun Tzu on the Art of War: Attack your allies to weaken your enemy

    1. Re:Blind eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup! I'm definitely happy!

    2. Re:Blind eye by thefiremonk · · Score: 1

      Ahh, Sun Tzu:
      "Avoid the enemy for the time being when he is stronger. If your opponent is of choleric temper, try to irritate him. If he is arrogant, try to encourage his egotism. If the enemy troops are well prepared after reorganisation, try to wear them down. If they are united, try to sow dissension among them."

      Sun Tzu

      --

      -----
      Feeling ugly? Check this
  47. Look at this link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Look at this link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Holy crap. You would have to pay me to download stuff from any of those acts!

    2. Re:Look at this link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have besmirched the name of Dave Grohl. Now you will die.

    3. Re:Look at this link by afish40 · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's free. Get over yourself and just download the songs. I personally don't give a damn about Avril Lavigne ("Complicated" was so damn overplayed on the radio that fateful summer...), but I grabbed it up anyway. Does that make me a tool? Possibly! The Foo Fighters track wasn't terrible... one might even say it was downright tolerable!

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    4. Re:Look at this link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those guys who grabbed 80 bottles of KY lube and 100 condoms from your student life office in college just because they were free aren't you? Just outta curiosity, how many of those 100 condoms do you have left? 99?

    5. Re:Look at this link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I offer you a free bucket of monkey shit, you'll take it?

  48. How is this authentication Cracked. by raptor21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If a person still needs a account to login to iTMS with this bit of reverse engineered method, the Authentication hasn't been cracked!!!

    Authentication cracked means that you cand take an encrypted password and retreive the plain text for and already existing account.
    All this guy seems to be able to do is figure out where and how iTunes sends its login information, so he can put it in his own application.

    1. Re:How is this authentication Cracked. by vluther · · Score: 1

      Checkout PHPTunes

      http://phptunes.gforge.linuxpowered.com/

      You don't even need Windows anymore.

    2. Re:How is this authentication Cracked. by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      Authentication _is_ the login. Logging in authorizes you to get access. If you mean registration, then sure.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
  49. 5million, because they want a credit card. by Comsn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they want a credit card for you to retrieve your free itunes aac, and since this was a promotion geared towards teens, how are they supposed to get thier free music?

    i had a couple caps but i didnt feel like signing up. great promotion there. only .5% went thru with it.

    1. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by emars · · Score: 1

      I must be the only one signed up for iTunes with no CC. It was easy to do as well.

      --
      ...18...19...20 Submit
    2. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by jmays · · Score: 1

      Not .5% ... 5%.

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    3. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      So, you never bothere to sign up. So, you don't even know if what you are saying is true or if you are simply pulling it out of your ass, do you?

      The simple fact is that redemtion rates are always extremely low in any kind of promotion. And if Pepsi's ability to ship promotional bottles is anywhere near their historic rates, I bet many people didn't even start seeing iTunes bottles until very recently.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    4. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      they want a credit card for you to retrieve your free itunes aac, and since this was a promotion geared towards teens, how are they supposed to get thier free music?

      i had a couple caps but i didnt feel like signing up. great promotion there. only .5% went thru with it.


      Would you be one of the teens without a credit card? I believe that's a whole whopping 5%, not half a percent. Keep up the good work in school - we're counting on you to be a business leader.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    5. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by mattkime · · Score: 1

      make that 5%

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    6. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by shawnce · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do not need to provide a credit card.

      They ask for it if you want set up the ability to purchase music at the time you open the account but you do NOT have to provide it to redeem a free song.

    7. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by dvdave · · Score: 1

      The iTMS lost my credits. I signed up and entered my codes, but didn't opt to download at that time. The next time I went to the store, I had to do another confirmation of my info, etc. When I was done and properly logged in the credits were gone. I'd of course thrown the caps away since then.

      Sure it was 5 out of 100 million, but how many others didn't get redeemed because of a snafu?

    8. Re:5million, because they want a credit card. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      You do not need to provide a credit card.

      Yeah, and there's a free version of Real Player... Bigfoot all over again...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  50. If only it worked by Enry · · Score: 1

    tunesbrowser doesn't work. Doesn't see other itunes machines, and is quite unstable (running on FC1 anyway).

    Little documentation, so it's hard to figure out where the problem is, or what is supposed to happen.

    1. Re:If only it worked by cdavies · · Score: 1
      Yeah, tunesbrowser sucks arse.

      The only working client I've actually found is one2ohmygod which is a java client. Works really nicely.

      I added a song download button (see the project page's feature request forum for my crumby patch) and if and when my flatmates start upgrading to the new itunes, I'll add itunes new auth support (if someone else doesn't first).

      Yes, the name sucks, but the client works nicely :)

  51. 100,000 winning caps were not produced! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I collected over 150 bottle caps and not one was a winner! I drink about 6 diet pepsi's per day. And my friends at work saved the caps for me. So this is no suprize to me. I don't personally know anyone who won a song.

    1. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six a DAY?

      What? Are you a walking kidney stone that never sleeps?

    2. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by dethface · · Score: 1

      If you really collected 150 losing caps in a contest with 1 in 3 odds of winning, I only have one thing to say: Never Go To Vegas!

    3. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by beattie · · Score: 1

      ... you are correct, 100,000,000 were produced.

      you do know you need to buy the pepsi bottles with the yellow caps... not the blue ones.

    4. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      "yellow caps... not the blue ones."

      No kidding? Yah think? The blues don't have the advertisment!

    5. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      Bad habit I know! I don't smoke, do drugs or drink coffee but put a blue bottle of diet pepsi with a screw on cap next to my keyboard and it's gone before I can complete the next "for" loop!

    6. Re:100,000 winning caps were not produced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I drink about 6 diet pepsi's per day.


      Man, are you kidding? I have one fizzie drink (doesn't matter which), and I swear I'm never gonna have it again for the next month at least.

      Nothing like guzzling down cool glass after glass of water.
  52. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, you don't. It's not a 'must fill' field, they'll probably ask for one when you buy the first song.

    For the promotion, all I needed was an email address.

  53. Am I the only one who thinks this is bad? by eatmadust · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DRM is evil (or at least user-unfriendly), yes ... but this just means that WMA will be more used where DRM is 'needed'. To be honest, I'd prefer a DRMed iTunes song (that I can burn to CD, put on an iPod and play on several different PCs) than a WMA (more restrictions, only playable in Windows Media Player, and disgusting compression!) OGG rules :)

    1. Re:Am I the only one who thinks this is bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Where are all the projects setting out to crack DRM'ed WMAs from the competition?

    2. Re:Am I the only one who thinks this is bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMA only has as much DRM as the content provider wants to put on it. You can make DRM free WMAs if your heart so desires. So yes, you can burn a WMA to a CD and play it on several PCs. You can't play it on an iPod, but you can play it on dozens of other mobile audio players (unlike iTunes files which can only be played on the iPod and it's clones).

    3. Re:Am I the only one who thinks this is bad? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      When millions of DRMd WMAs are sold (like there are millions of DRMd AACs from iTMS sold) it will be cracked. There's not enough interest yet.

  54. i thought it already ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause it's been more than a month since i've seen any pepsi's w/ the promotion in my local stores

    1. Re:i thought it already ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iTunes-marked bottles should have already disappeared from most stores that go through a lot of product, because they stopped production of them a while back.

      I was surprised to find a few yellow-capped bottles in the cold case in the the employee cafeteria of the client I'm at today, because there weren't any the last two Thursdays I was here. But I got one, and it was another winner. Gotta redeem it quick...

  55. Sheeesh... by tony1c · · Score: 1

    Finally... what took them so long?

  56. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know why they bother trying to up the security. There is no way to secure media content that is compatible with mass distribution. It's the same problem they had with DVD encryption---you can't cut out the illegitimate users while not cutting out the legitimate users at the same time.

    They need to work on their business model, because this piecemeal anti-cracking stuff is a joke.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  57. Sounds like an ego thing to me by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Hah! I cracked it in a matter of hours!"

    Ok, you're a clever guy. We get the message.

    But is your ego helping those of us who would like the RIAA to see the light and start being more open in their approach to digital music?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Sounds like an ego thing to me by evilviper · · Score: 1
      But is your ego helping those of us who would like the RIAA to see the light and start being more open in their approach to digital music?

      Is posting this to /. making the world a better place to live in? No.

      His ego isn't going to have any effect on RIAA. If anything, removing restrictions almost immediately is going to force them to accept their lack of control, and maybe see that there's no point in it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  58. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    I also got a cap, but don't run Windows or a Mac. I did try it on a Windows machine at work, but after I saw all of the crap that had to be done to register to download a "free" $.99 song, I decided to just throw the cap in the trash. The work involved in redeeming it just wasn't worth it.

  59. Not seen one either, and should have. by hirschma · · Score: 1

    I live in Brooklyn, NY, one block away from a design and architecture college. This would seem to be a pretty target-rich environment for the yellow caps.

    Guess what? I've seen THREE, and that was for a week about a month ago. I drink a whole lot of Diet Pepsi, too.

    I'm guessing that either Pepsi totally botched the distribution, OR the local bottling companies didn't play ball, OR they simply didn't distribute anything like 100 million songs.

    Jonathan

  60. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by LookSharp · · Score: 1, Troll

    I tried three times to not give it a credit card number when I first redeemed some caps, the first week of March. No dice. Was absolutely required to set up an iTunes account from iTunes for Windows 4.2 at that time. I was kind of upset, but used a pre-paid card with like $3 left on it to set up the account... so in the end, it was a minor hassle. I agree it would have been much easier for "winners" to redeem songs if the account setup process was easier, that took me far longer than it should have.

  61. Upgrade the other machines! by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

    What the planet of Hell do you need a workaround for? Just upgrade the other machines! iTunes is *DUM, DUM, DUMDUM* FREE (as in beer)! Is it really so hard to upgrade a free program?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Upgrade the other machines! by crackshoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yeah, i upgraded it. and i don't think i'll never need a workaround (although at some point i anticipate apple doing the whole "unless you upgrade your OS for 130 bucks you can't get the latest versions of this software" like they did with safari. my main point was that they're forcing the upgrade via incompatibility -- i have no problem upgrading, but i was pointing it out for everyones benefit.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    2. Re:Upgrade the other machines! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      they're forcing the upgrade via incompatibility

      Apple usually does a good job about compatibility. If they failed in this task here, it is because incompatibility was part of the plan. They know people are breaking the DRM, and in order to keep the record companies happy they must show that they are at least doing a token effort. Then again maybe they just screwed up - that would be the excuse given to MS, so why not Apple too?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:Upgrade the other machines! by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > (although at some point i anticipate apple doing the whole "unless you upgrade your OS for 130 bucks you can't get the
      > latest versions of this software" like they did with safari.

      You do know WHY they did this with Safari, don't you?

      In 10.3 they built all of the web access routines into the OS, called it WebKit (?), and opened it up to all comers. So now instead of trying to code your own http requests using sockets and such you can just toss the OS one line of 'get me this page from this machine' and it'll return it in a buffer. They would have had to maintain two VERY VERY different versions of Safari in order to make 1.2 work on 10.2. Serious engineering effort. Not worth it. Don't assume that this was done just to insult you.

      And yes, I'm quite aware of the irony... for Apple, the browser now really IS mostly part of the Operating System. Oh, cruel fate...

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    4. Re:Upgrade the other machines! by hobbit · · Score: 1

      In 10.3 they built all of the web access routines into the OS, called it WebKit (?), and opened it up to all comers. So now instead of trying to code your own http requests using sockets and such you can just toss the OS one line of 'get me this page from this machine' and it'll return it in a buffer. They would have had to maintain two VERY VERY different versions of Safari in order to make 1.2 work on 10.2. Serious engineering effort. Not worth it. Don't assume that this was done just to insult you.

      You don't understand how frameworks and packages work, do you?

      Find an old version of Safari. Ctrl-click, "Show package contents". You'll find WebKit in there. On Panther it's a system framework, so they could make the Safari download smaller.

      That "serious engineering effort" is minimal to non-existent.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  62. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, as far as I am concerned, they've fucked themselves on this one.

    Other people's comments aside (about the CC field as optional for a signup), why would you say they fucked themselves?

    They got the PR associated with giving away $100M worth of stuff. They only had to pay out $5M (less, since this certainly doesn't cost them as much as it would cost an actual customer). And you say they fucked themselves?

    More like they fucked us. At least they used lube, but still... "Distribution problems" my ass. For anyone who considers every aspect of this as anything but well thought out and perfectly coordinated, I have a bridge to sell you...

  63. crazney should be declared 'enemy combatant' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And his hometown bombed.

    Dudez, everytime you hack a piece of Commerical Software (yes its important enough to be capitalized p.i.) you increase the cost/risk to produce viable Commercial Software, thus you are shiting where you eat. foos.

  64. but the sex is free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  65. Hooray! by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a great day! We found a new way to screw over the one company who actually found a way to provide what everyone said they wanted: convenient, electronic distribution of music at a fair price.

    But wait, that's not really what they wanted. What they really want is stores with no cash registers and libraries of thousands of pieces of music representing the creative efforts of generations of people while valuing those libraries at zero.

    Oh, and they also want to complain about greed.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Hooray! by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget free quality pr0n, we want that too!

    2. Re:Hooray! by Diabolus777 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wrong.

      What they really wanted is convenient, electronic distribution of music at a fair price WITH A FAIR LISCENCE AND NO DRM CRIPPLE.

      The message is pretty clear it seems.

      --
      We should have been
      So much more by now
      Too dead inside
      To even know the guilt
    3. Re:Hooray! by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      This has NOTHING to do with DRM. Sheesh. Pull your head out of your arse. Try doing a bit more research before jerking your knees all over.

      libopendaap is a library written in C which enables applications to discover, and connect to, iTunes® music shares.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    4. Re:Hooray! by travler · · Score: 1


      It's a great day! We found a new way to screw over the one company who actually found a way to provide what everyone said they wanted: convenient, electronic distribution of music at a fair price.

      There are some apologists who have said this but I think this it is misleading to assume that they speak for all or even a majority. What I want (and I believe I am far from alone) is the freedom to use any information that I have in my possession in any way that I choose.

      If someone is foolish enough to publish information with the expectation that they can somehow control/protect it later then that is unfortunate. They should know by now that ANY information protection scheme can be broken. A company as large and technically sophisticated as Apple should know this and understand its implications.

    5. Re:Hooray! by valmont · · Score: 1

      well said! the hypocrisy of it all infuriates me. At least Apple has been clear about what they're about from day 1. Can't say as much of some geeks in here :\

    6. Re:Hooray! by Mateito · · Score: 1

      I can see the promotion now:

      "Buy a coke bottle, get free pr0n!"

      Mmmm.. coke bottle pr0n.

    7. Re:Hooray! by dfghjk · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't recall me (being a member of "everyone") ever saying I wanted anything like what Apple decided to provide. I think Apple decided to provide what they wanted regardless of what "everyone" else wants. Of course, that would be music that can only be used with Apple products. Who the hell wants that?

    8. Re:Hooray! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      We found a new way to screw over the one company who actually found a way to provide what everyone said they wanted: convenient, electronic distribution of music at a fair price.

      DRM is inherently inconvient.

      I can list hundreds of websites somebody has posted to complain about what a hassle the DRM'd iTunes files are.

      How is this any different than DeCSS?

      Incidentally, this story isn't about DRM at all... It's about the iTunes to server connection being reverse-engineered, so programs other than iTunes can connect to Apple's music store.

      Now can somebody mod this idiot as Offtopic or Flame?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Hooray! by C-Diddy · · Score: 1

      But don't you understand that "corporate greed" is always bad, while outright theft in support of "use rights" is a much lesser sin? Geez!

      --
      "Me fail English? That's unpossible." - Ralph
    10. Re:Hooray! by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > I think Apple decided to provide what they wanted regardless of what "everyone" else wants.

      Uh... no, see, companies that do that, there's a word for them. It's... uh... delicious? No, no... derogatory? Noo... Defunct! Yeah, that's right.

      It's fine that you don't want what they are providing, but don't mistake the righteous indignation boiling in the pit of your stomach for universal. It seems, if anything, that the previous poster was closer to the mark than you were... I've met a lot more people who haven't ever heard of iTMS than I have people who refuse to use it on principle.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    11. Re:Hooray! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I'm not indignate at all nor have I said that nobody likes iTunes or iTMS. I just object to morons claiming to speak for me. The word "everyone" includes me after all and Apple most certainly didn't do what I wanted.

  66. People!! We are all on the same team! by AnotherLostAtom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alright, so all I have to say about this is, don't make a Windows version of the hack Please !! If we all agree not to port the code to windows, then all the script kiddies will be waiting for a DRM breaker that naver comes, and they might BUY some CDS. I dunno I think that what is happening with File sharing is criminal. If I go to a US court I will just pull out the legal papers from my home Countre Canda, and try to prove that online file sharing is PERFECTLY FINE. It only got a slight drop when everybody was doing it, now with this suing shit happenting, everyone is back in the red. So what the hell is the problem? It's not illegal, it's fine, and content proveders. WE know you need money.. I will all works itself out, lets just stop the madness. Please?

  67. Dear God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a thought for you who didn't find a Pepsi Bottle with a yellow cap: TRY ANOTHER STORE. Just becaue 9/10 stores in my immediate area don't sell Sobe's Love Bus Brew, ndoesn't mean I won't travel somewhere that does.

    To those who couldn't find where to insert your code on iTunes. USE YOUR EYES. It was right there on the front page: "PEPSI iTUNES GIVEAWAY." With a Pepsi logo with headphones on it. Click on it, insert your code, then it says ONE FREE SONG in the upper right hand corner. Find a song, click DONWLOAD, and it downloads it free.

    To those complaining about having to use a credit card: How else are you going to pay for the songs you download? Food stamps?!

    And about the DRM. c'mon people. Apple has to play the game of the law and the game of the recording industry in order to sell these things. But you tell me. How many other service let you KEEP the rights to the songs you bought, allowing them to be burned with the only restriction: Can only burn the same PLAYLIST 7 times to CD....Hell, Add or subtract a song from that playlist and you have a whole new playlist ready to burn.

    People...just have no sense of reason. This is the BEST legal download service available on the market. Plus, the software is free, and is THE BEST jukebox software, on ANY platform.

    Even WINBLOWS users are stating that "opinion." Should be more like fact if you compare all the others.

    1. Re:Dear God... by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      A lot of us live in urban areas. I'm not travelling more than a block to buy a Pepsi. If they wanted this promotion to work, they should have distributed it properly.

    2. Re:Dear God... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      A lot of us live in urban areas. I'm not travelling more than a block to buy a Pepsi. If they wanted this promotion to work, they should have distributed it properly.

      Personally delivered (by S. Jobs) cases of certified winners, direct to your door?

    3. Re:Dear God... by Desirsar · · Score: 1

      First, let me say that I have no idea how this got modded up as Insightful (maybe Underrated, but...) and not down as Troll. You make good points, but you phrase them to look like attacks. "To those complaining about having to use a credit card: How else are you going to pay for the songs you download? Food stamps?!" The people complaining are the ones who don't want to have to give out credit card info in order to redeem something that is supposed to be free. I'd try and compare the logic to, say, the free month that comes with MMORPGs, but they use your credit card to bill you if you don't cancel after the free month, where iTunes just wouldn't let you download if you didn't have a payment method set and didn't have any free downloads left (assuming it were set up intelligently.) I myself wouldn't have any problem with it, I know I can just contest the charges if I was charged anything redeeming free downloads (not that I would use their service anyway.) "Plus, the software is free, and is THE BEST jukebox software, on ANY platform." I'm kind of curious, what does it do as a "jukebox" that WinAmp doesn't? (Or even WMP, other than WMP lacking basic playlist management functions that WinAmp has.)

    4. Re:Dear God... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      You forgot the best feature of the pepsi section: a HUGE FUCKING ARROW that pointed to the free song counter when you redeemed a song.

    5. Re:Dear God... by lost_n_confused · · Score: 1

      Personally I am offended by your comment. Not all of us poor people want to use Food Stamps at the iTMS. I have no Food Stamps left over at the end of the month after I buy my cigs and beer.

      --
      -- To mess up an OS X box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.--
    6. Re:Dear God... by damiam · · Score: 1
      To those complaining about having to use a credit card: How else are you going to pay for the songs you download? Food stamps?!

      Funny, I always thought the point of a free download was that you didn't have to pay for it.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:Dear God... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      This "WINBLOWS" user doesn't believe in any way that iTunes is THE BEST jukebox software. I couldn't get it off my machine fast enough. In no way is it better than alternatives on Windows platforms.

      Did I mention how ugly the brushed metal look is? Even mac users are stating that "opinion".

    8. Re:Dear God... by Pahalial · · Score: 1

      The best legal download service? Way to not investigate all the options. I learned about allofmp3.com through another /. thread ( here ) and it works. Awesomely. Cheaper, good quality, just as legal judging by the lack of threats to their company..(hey, it's one way of measuring it)
      Please do more research before you make so many declarative statements.

      Also, the hell is this: "Even WINBLOWS users are stating that "opinion." Should be more like fact if you compare all the others."
      You're posting on SLASHDOT, remember? Since when do geeks value the "common opinion", as it were. If you have to refer to numbers rather than features or hard facts, you really shouldn't be modded +5 insightful.

      --
      Stuff.
  68. wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE!

  69. Just like Rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have personally won three or four songs, I use a mac and iTunes. I have never redeemed any of them. I always forget and throw the cap away about 5 minutes after the "haha I won".
    Woops. Oh well, who cares about one free track anyway? What am I going to do with one free track. I've used the music store twice and it was to purchase full albums that I could't find on IRC to download.

    1. Re:Just like Rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.overnet.com

  70. I only saw 2 yellow caps at all by amigabill · · Score: 1

    >TFA mentioned something about distribution problems.

    That could explain things. I only saw two yellow cap bottles around here the whole time the promotion was on, and those were both Sierra Mist. I never saw one single Pepsi with a yellow cap. And that wasn't because of other promotions getting in the mix, all I ever saw was plain ordinary Pepsi bottles. How was I supposed to even try to participate or use winning codes when I couldn't find any freakin yellow caps??

  71. So by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Funny

    was to have given away 100 million tracks through Apple's iTunes music site. But according to Apple on Wednesday, only about 5 million free songs have been redeemed."

    So iTunes is a failure.

    Let's close it up. Unplug the servers and shut down the site.

    They haven't sold enough Macs either, so let's close that down too. Can't make a dime unless they're the #1 record-setting, fastest-growing business in the history of civilization.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:So by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      so 1 in 20 pepsi drinkers doesn't have a computer. :D

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
  72. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by shark72 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I don't know why they bother trying to up the security. There is no way to secure media content that is compatible with mass distribution."

    It's the "a little goes a long way" paradigm. There's not a car lock that will stop a sophisticated thief who wants your car, but it stops 90% of the punters. Same with locks on doors and copy protection on computer games and gaming consoles. There are likely professional car thieves who also wonder out loud why the car manufacturers don't just give up because it's a losing battle, etc., but it's not going to happen, either.

    "They need to work on their business model, because this piecemeal anti-cracking stuff is a joke."

    Apple has sold 70 million songs in their first year, and the iTMS is the most wildly successful of any of the legitimate download services, by a wide margin. I think their business model suits them just fine. Remember, Slashdot readers != the general populace. The little annoyances of playing cat-and-mouse with the "all music must be free" crowd is just one part of doing business and is similar to the fraud and theft issues that many other retailers deal with.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  73. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    bull, I set one up sans credit card fine, I didnt put in a credit card number untill I decided to buy a song.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  74. Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've never even seen one of these Pepsi bottles in stores and I looked for them. No wonder they couldnt get all 100 million redeemed.

  75. I have 21 unredemmed by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    Had no idea that there was any deadline (let alone *tomorrow*) for redeeming these things. Trouble is... I'm never going to buy iTunes songs. Probably never going to buy any online songs. I'm happy buying a CD every few months and ripping it to enjoy at work.

    I just don't see installing iTunes so that I can listen to the 21 songs I've won, meanwhile my 1000's of other songs are over in another application. That's what we call a dumb hassle. Maybe I should switch all those other songs over to some iTunes playlist. Maybe, or, blah...whatever.

    So, really, I don't know anything about iTunes other than the promotion gave at least one bored boy a little something to do.

    I'll give it a try. Redeem those caps today. But, if the CC is required then they can just go krunk themselves.

    1. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by kylector · · Score: 1

      hmm, or you could redeem the 21 caps you have, burn the songs to a cd, rip them, and get 21 free songs that don't have DRM. But, it's your 21 wasted dollars, not mine.

    2. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Cool, thx. Like I said, don't know anything about iTunes. Don't much care to learn about it. Not sure how I'm wasting 21 dollars? I bought some pop, I drank some pop. Send me your 21 dollars and I'll do my best to waste it!

    3. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by kylector · · Score: 1

      yeah, I sp'ose you're not really wasting $21 since it's not like you ever had $21...just like if you invest $2000 in stocks, it jumps to $5000, and then falls to $4000, you didn't lose $1000 you still gained $2000. All a matter of perspective.

      I personally would consider it wasting $21 (free money), but you may not consider it any loss at all.

    4. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Tell you what then!

      I'll sell you my 21 codes for only 50 cents each. If you decline my offer then you are wasting $10.50!!!

      Alarming!

    5. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just post the codes here and I'll try to redeem them. that'd be great. : )

    6. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Here are my 21 codes for Mr. Anonymous Cowpie

      1. Haha
      2. Haha
      3. Haha
      4. Haha
      5. Haha
      6. Haha
      7. Haha
      8. Haha
      9. Haha
      10. Haha
      11. Haha
      12. Haha
      13. Haha
      14. Haha
      15. Haha
      16. Haha
      17. Haha
      18. Haha
      19. Haha
      20. Haha
      21. Haha

    7. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by kylector · · Score: 1

      haha, clever! And I would seriously consider it if the promotion didn't end tomorrow. :( I don't have 21 songs I want to buy by tomorrow night, and it's truly a waste of money if I buy them only to buy crap songs just to spend it. Then I didn't really gain anything, I just wasted the money because I thought I was saving money. Like those sales that always dupe people into spending money just because they're "saving" money. Those sales and the amount of takers just kill me.

      Thanks, though.

    8. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks, but iTunes didn't accept any of those codes. : )

    9. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      kylectormon, I did it! I redeemed my caps. Well, 10 of them. Stupid thing says you can only redeem as many as 10 in a day...but today is the last day. So, I gave 10 to a buddy and you can have #21: 3GJHO HEHNP.

      BTW, no CC needed.

    10. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by kylector · · Score: 1

      hah, thanks man! Glad you got 10 songs of it! :) I just redeemed the cap before someone else saw the code, but I haven't chosen the song yet. Thanks again. :-)

    11. Re:I have 21 unredemmed by kylector · · Score: 1

      I chose: "Need" by "The Benjamin Gate" Not that you really care. ;-)

  76. Any sex is only between two consenting adults, and is IN NO WAY RELATED to the $0.99 song transaction. If the I and the Ben & Jerry Corperation do indeed engage in this sort of behavior, it is A PERSONAL MATTER BETWEEN BETWEEN US and NOT RELATED to the exchange of personal information for objects of value.

    And anyway, it takes at least two songs -- one of which must be Marvin Gaye -- to get me.

    HTH HAND!

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  77. hacking itunes is wrong by voss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Itunes maybe drm but they consistently have the most generous terms and usage limits. They also are reasonably priced. They put out a good product at a fair price...and they dont charge subscriptions. They are also the only paid song program for Mac users.

    Itunes is a good thing , and if you hack their songs without paying you are a thief. It is not like Kazaa where you might say there is no victim, Itunes is based on selling its product,and if Itunes fails mac users are screwed.

    If there is someday an Itunes for Linux are you going to hack that until it dies too?

  78. Pepsi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The contest only ran for a few months. It's hard to say if 100 million pepsi's were sold (or could ever be), let alone 100 million iTune pepsi bottles.

    -Anonymous Coward aka Kevin

  79. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by jrj102 · · Score: 1

    They fucked themselves by saving a buck on the free song you were entitled to? Uh... yeah.

  80. RIAA wanted the DRM changed not Apple!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey folks, look through what Jobs has said about this. He clearly thinks that what did happen is what was going to happen from day 1. He doesn't believe that the encrypted protection of the music is the way to keep selling it. He believes that the reason the iTunes store will do well is because it is more convenient than P2P. And, from an acquisition perspective he's hit that dead on.

    Jobs has explained in countless interviews how he has tried to convince the RIAA that copy protection is a pointless investment. But, they would not be convinced. Copy protection only exists because of them, not Apple. Apple obtained the most liberal liberal licenses up to that point in history (by far).

    They're just trying to appease the RIAA, and I am certain the whole time they are preparing (or making) arguments that there this DRM chasing is a fruitless endeavor. I believe this primarily because Jobs is a pig headed sonofabitch who will want to eventually get his point across.

  81. Anybody go to Crazney's website? by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

    The guy is apparently a bit eccentric, labeling himself a hard-line anti-American and an opponent of capitalism... but I thought this bit was just hilarious...

    brb have to shut chooks in.

    "I have just deconstructed the encryption protocol designed by Apple's finest enginee..ah fuck the chicken has escaped"

    --
    "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  82. free ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it interesting that the quote at the bottom of slashdot as i read this is "Anything free is worth what you pay for it."

    KidFunkyFried

  83. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    Is it possible there were multiple account setup procedures? I spent almost an hour trying to set up an account. It would not let me leave the CC information fields blank.

  84. My experience. by rdewalt · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've redeemed 24 caps. My "find" rate was on the order of 50%. I still have three left in my "To be used" stack, that I doubt I -will- be able to use before the expiration period.

    Why? Because there is not enough music I -LIKE- on iTunes. I don't like 90% of the pablum they tried to force to me, and when I was browsing around, there wasn't anything I wanted that I Didn't Already Have. Nearly a third of my 24 redeems were recommendations from friends, or re-aquisitions of songs I don't have on CD alreay.

    Did it change my soda drinking habits? Sort of. Before the promo, I was a diet coke drinker, I swapped to Diet Pepsi while I could find the bottles. Now, I drink Diet Coke again. (Well, Diet Mt Dew, there's another promo on Dew Points...)

    As for breaking it? Eeh, I never worried about the first one. I burned to CD all the songs I DL'ed, and listen in the car. My MP3 Player is my PC where I have them legitimately anyway. Perhaps in the future that will change.

  85. Pepsi F*CKED the distribution by rjung2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    End of February? You were lucky -- I was working in Anaheim since January 2004, and we didn't see any yellow iTunes caps until the third week of March, which was right before the promotion ended.

    I'm still getting yellow caps now; it's a good thing Apple is still letting me redeem them (at least through tomorrow), because I've already cashed in 7 or 8, and could reap a few more between now and the end of work tomorrow.

    1. Re:Pepsi F*CKED the distribution by boogahsmalls · · Score: 1

      There were stores all thru Anaheim that had the caps since the begining of March - which granted, was a bit late. Plus most of the 7-11's [Where I'd spotted the caps] in California had iTunes promotional cups that had you cut and unroll the lip of the cup for a code since the middle of February.

      I used to take my chances with the cups and get a Coke instead of a Pepsi. I'd already down a Big Gulp of that a day anyhow. That technique netted me 24 songs. *shrug*

      --
      gomi no sensei :: hav
  86. Re:hacking itunes is wrong by Eliman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps you don't understand: libopendaap isn't about hacking iTunes. libopendaap is about other programs "talking daap" with other programs (and specifically iTunes). It's about interoperability; interoperability is perfectly legal.

  87. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your 9-year-old daughter may not use the iTunes Music Store. From the terms and conditions:

    2. Age requirements for use of the Service. This Service is available for individuals aged 13 years or older. If you are 13 or older but under the age of 18, you should review these terms and conditions with your parent or guardian to make sure that you and your parent or guardian understand these terms and conditions.

    I'm sorry, but I'll have to terminate your daughter's account and rescind the licences to her so-called "free itunes."

  88. Re:Only five million? NO CARD REQUIRED by XavierItzmann · · Score: 1

    There was no credit card requirement.

    --
    The next pasture is always greener
  89. No, it's not misleading by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The authentication doesn't just prevent DRM-removal. It also cripples iTunes' ability to connect to non-iTunes music shares.

    I have my entire music library--which, incidentally, is 100% legal and paid for--on a Linux server running daapd. iTunes 4.5 broke iTunes so I could no longer pay my legally purchased music on my Macintosh.

    Fortunately, the maintainer of daapd worked out the fix about as quickly as the maintainer of libopendaap did, and I've been able to upgrade iTunes after all.

    Make no mistake, Apple's screwing around does have a negative impact on their customers, even the ones who haven't infringed copyright.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  90. no win 98 by tyler083 · · Score: 1

    I think a large reason that this happens as well is because iTues doesn't play on Win 98.

    Mac doesn't have a large user base to begin with (well, it does, but not in %).. and iTunes is only available on Win 2000 and XP.

    I'm in college and i know sooo many people who are still running '98. Most people don't care or know enough to upgrade, or have computers with more than 128mb of RAM or something better than an old Dell with a celeron in it.

    Even if they won a free song they wouldn't even be able to play it.

  91. Tokugawa era by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Informative

    I admit that my Eastern history is not really up to snuff, but I don't remember any point in history where Japan took chunks of China long enough to both worry about defending it to the north *and* worried about improving northern defenses (much less decorating them).

    I can't even figure out what major Tokugawa construction project you might be referring to. I can't find anything other than a number of castles that were built.

    Apparently, one of the edicts of the Tokugawa era (not sure which Lord Tokugawa you're referring to) was that each province was required to have a castle. This resulted in a lot of castle-building, so it's hard to figure out exactly which one you're thinking of. I can't easily find any reference to a building at the end of a region.

  92. Not surprising (in retrospect) by groomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The target group for this just wasn't that big.

    1) Most people don't care about music. They put on the radio, and will buy a "Greatest Hits" collection perhaps once every 6 months, but that's about it.

    2) The number of people who can be bothered to check out the iTMS, and know how to find Apple's software, and are savvy Internet users, is a minority of a minority of a minority. Sure, if all you read are trade rags on the Internet, you'd think it was the Second Coming of the Messiah. But most people couldn't care less.

    3) So you're left with a comparatively small group of hipsters and gadgeteers who love music and know about the promotional offer. Now all that has to happen is for them to bump into a bottle (not can! not cup!) of Pepsi. Odds are pretty small.

  93. this has nothing to do with fairplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy reverse engineered the protocol used to share iTunes music on a network. he wanted to play music stored on his mac laptop using his Linux box; music that, i presume, has either already been stripped of drm or didn't have it in the first place.

    he also maintains a library that can be used to write iTunes clones.

  94. Nothing I wanted by bazabba · · Score: 1

    I found a free cap at a local So. Cal Detention Center (jail--dont ask). I've looked through iTMS and couldn't find a single thing I wanted. Now if the cap was good for a free audiobook that would be a different story. I tried looking through iTMS' exclusive lists but still nothing enticed me.

  95. This is stupid by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Apple doesn't want people to hack iTunes, they need to provide a way of playing the files on operating systems other than Windows and Mac OS.

    Uh, yeah. And if Ford doesn't want people to steal Explorers, they need to provide a way of distributing cars to people who don't have any.

    What planet are you from?

  96. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    There are likely professional car thieves who also wonder out loud why the car manufacturers don't just give up because it's a losing battle, etc., but it's not going to happen, either.

    Detroit isn't trying to keep the owners of cars from starting them though.

    Alarm systems, starter kill switches, fuel pump kill relays, and laser cut keys are a lot different than, say cars that refuse to start in certain neighborhoods.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  97. Fucking Evil Link! by rthille · · Score: 1

    I hate it when webpages move my windows around. I put my windows where I have them for a _REASON_. don't fucking move /resize my windows.

    If you want to have a window of a particular size/location then open a new one!

    Bastards. If it weren't Ben & Jerry's I'd boycott!

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    1. Re:Fucking Evil Link! by extra88 · · Score: 1

      Mozilla

      Edit | Preferences
      Advanced | Scripts & Plugins

      Allow scripts to:

      [uncheck] Move or resize existing windows
      [uncheck] Raise or lower windows
      Click OK

      All done!

  98. Re:hacking itunes is wrong by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    How said anything about hacking songs without paying?

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  99. Just legally download free music by pherris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Places like etree have long lists of bands (over 1k listed on etree) that are cool with trading (mostly live shows). There's some great legally free music downloads out there, start checking them out.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Just legally download free music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because music is music right?

      You sound like my mother when I was growing up:

      "You don't need those Nikes, I bought you these cute KMart shoes instead"

      or

      "why get McDonald's when I can just fry you up burgers in the stove?"

  100. You forgot to list the 10c 7/11 cups... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You forgot to list cups from 7/11. You could buy the cups (without soda) for 10c at most 7/11 stores.

    1. Re:You forgot to list the 10c 7/11 cups... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, 7/11 uses the cups to keep track of their soda sales. Most will not sell you their normal soda cups for less than retail price. It screws up the paperwork.

  101. Not here by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    I live on Diet Pepsi and never saw even one cap in Northern VA.

  102. Don't like it don't use it. by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't like this, you shouldn't use iTunes at all and don't buy their music

    I won't, thanks! Oh, and if you don't like Playfair, don't use it either! Software should not be illegal. People in America should not be GOING TO PRISON FOR SPEAKING PUBLICLY about algorithms.

    Some things are just absolutely wrong - don't you get that? The music business is of very little importance compared to the sickening law which Apple is invoking to protect their business interests.

    1. Re:Don't like it don't use it. by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      A troll if I ever saw one^ especially since ADOBE isnt APPLE.

      The DRMA has its problems but the truth is it was enacted for a reason everyone seems to forget... PEOPLE WHERE LIGITIMATLY STEALING MUSIC AND NOT FOR "BACKUP" PURPOSES!

      Obviously the legislature went to far, but it was because of us in the first place that the DRMA exists, we couldnt justifyable argue our case because the truth was no one was downloading for back up period, we where all stealing it to play and not pay.

      Worse things like cracking the DRM ruin our case. Rather than going along with it while we argue it in courts we break the law, and SHOW the morons in charge why they where right in the first place rather than showing that we can be trusted.

      The truth is DRM will win in the end, and we will all lose if we continue to battle the way we do. They have more money than us and are staffed with programmers who DONT care about DMCA or the DRM, they just want to lock it down tight. Pretty soon you will get code encripted with military levels of encription, or stuff coded to damage your computer when you try to bypass it, why? cause they have more money to devot to the effort.

      I have said this a million times, we have to step back and come up with a new battle plan if we ever think we are going to win in the end against the unfair practices of the other side.

      alas there are too many hotheaded geeks and whiny teenagers who would rather take the "hackers" approach that I dont think it will happen, despite the fact that breaking the law the way we are doesnt work in the real world. the DRCM is just not a hotbutton issue for most people

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:Don't like it don't use it. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't software be illegal? Software is a way of performing repetetive tasks in an efficient, controlled manner. If the repetetive task you are performing are illegal, than so's the software.

      I'd think this would be obvious.

      Anyhow, the whole point of the Sklyarov case is that you can't lock somebody up for talking about algorithms. The precendent his case sets will make it more difficult to arrest anybody else under the same circumstances. Sklyarov was a big win for cryptographic discussion and the law; how can you complain about it when it worked out in our favor?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  103. Taller and longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an old saying: For every taller wall, there's a longer ladder.

  104. Correction by geeber · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oops, Step 4 should say the "Music Store" is accessed from the top of the lefthand pane. Didn't mean to confuse you.

  105. Not the first my friend by SengirV · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of a historical anecdote. One of the many advancements made under Lord Tokugawa's rule, which is arguably the point at which Japan began to transform into the powerhouse of technological innovation we know and love today, was the world's first sukaisukure ('skyscraper').

    Thanks for playing, but... The world's first skyscraper was actually one of the 7 ancient wonders of the world. It was the Pharos(lighthouse) in Alexandria. constructed as three three different structures on top of each other(square base, an octagonal middle section, and a cylindrical top). The combined height of the Pharos was 117 m (384 ft), the size of a present day 40-story building. Some historians claimed it to be as high as 600 feet(63 stories). The Pharos was completed in 270BC and "stood" until a final earthquake took it down in 1326.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  106. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    To all you saying I'm wrong. Nope, sorry. I tried with 3 separate winning caps at three separate times. Each time when I followed somone's advice to skip the CC entry it came back at me REQUIRING it. If I knew I'd run into people like you all I would have gotten a screen capture of it. It was required. Did they change it recently? Fucked if I know, and fucked if I even care. I *was* going to buy into the service (as it was a pretty good deal), but not when they pull shit like that. That's what I mean by "they fucked themselves."

  107. I got 43 winning caps out of 45 diet pepsi by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    Once someone pointed out that if you hold the bottle at eye level at a 45 degree angle you could see enough of the cap to determine a winner before buying. Most of the ones I bought were during a sale at $0.99 each.

  108. I think this is only the music sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No store crack, no DRM crack.

    This is just cracking the system of sharing music so that you can again write your own program to share music.

    Is sharing your own music across a LAN illegal? Is it deplorable? iTunes still won't let you do it across networks (i.e. across the network), so the potential for abuse on this is low.

    Apple had broken backward and backward compatibility with iTunes 4.2 in music sharing, apparently to stop MyTunes. Where was the outrage about that?

  109. So you admire this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "iTunes 4.5 uses a new authentication algorithm. However, not even 24 hours after I downloaded it, and that includes a little sleep and lots of uni time, I've broken it. Hah."

    Ok, so he's a young student and linux zealot trying to be arrogant. But still, why would he think its funny to break the law and harm a legitimate U.S. business? Especially since its the best and most honest music service out there, and they're just trying to earn a decent profit for providing a good service.

    "I do not believe in capitalism or the free market. I am a hard line anti-American..."

    Oh...

  110. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Golias · · Score: 1

    Wow. That would be a good point if it was an actual fact that you need a credit card number. I just helped a friend redeem a bunch of caps on her computer last week. No credit card needed.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  111. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clicking on a "redeem song" button and entering an e-mail address was too much work for you!? Remind me never to hire you for anything ever.

  112. FUD vs. Tin Foil by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    Did you really think that Apple's "loophole" of allowing you to go DRM->CD->non-drm was going to last forever?

    It's still there. Are you implying that they'll be closing this 'loophole'? If so, you should rephrase as "Do you really think that Apple's 'loophole' of allowing you to go DRM->CD->non-drm will last forever?"

    Big difference. One's FUD, the other is tin-foil hat.

    -T

  113. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    hmmm what where you installing iTunes into, a PC or a Mac (I did it on my iBook)

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  114. Penn State area hosed because of Napster deal? by spanklin · · Score: 1
    I searched for Pepsi bottles with the caps near the Penn State campus, but they were late to arrive and didn't last long here.

    I'm not a tinfoil hat type, but I wonder if they hosed us because of our well publicized deal with Napster (which I don't have access to, and wouldn't use if I did).

    They should have *saturated* this area with caps, to show people how much better iTMS is.

  115. That's funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fact that a legally developed and legally created utility such as PlayFair can be called illegal just because it gets you "free music".

    Who said you have a right to free music? The point is people do have the right to write algorithms in computer languages on hardware they own, have the computer translate those algorithms into executable programs, and then distribute it to other people. In fact, "I have the right to write something I came up with and distribute it online, even if it's written in a language other than english" sounds an awful lot like the right to free speech.

    Meanwhile, neither Apple or the MPAA has a "right" to prevent utilities to destroy their ineffective and truly unworkable "drm" systems from working. Similar to how if it turned out that corn syrup caused Masterlock products to melt, Masterlock would not have the right to have corn syrup banned.

    1. Re:That's funny. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      neither Apple or the MPAA has a "right" to prevent utilities to destroy their ineffective and truly unworkable "drm" systems from working

      Actually, they do have that right. It was granted by the DMCA and that part of the law yet to be proven unconstitutional. It may never be, for the same reason that bans on assault rifles and public obscenity are upheld: there are other ways to protect the essence of the rights granted by the constitution while still protecting the rights and wishes of others.

      In short: your rights are protected, but you don't have to be a dick about it. You can protect your home with a shotgun instead of an AK. You can say "fornicate" instead of "fuck." And you can back up your itunes sons, or re-rip the backups, as easily as you can use fairplay.

      The constitution was purposefully vague, so that future generations wouldn't be tied down to loopholes in strict syntax. The rights granted by the Constitution override those imposed by legislation. And the DMCA has been tested and found unconstitutional in some respects -- Sklyarov comes to mind.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:That's funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they do have that right. It was granted by the DMCA and that part of the law yet to be proven unconstitutional.

      That means they have a legal enjoinment. That has nothing to do with whether they have a right.

    3. Re:That's funny. by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And if they do, is it God-given? Or man-given? Or dog-given?

      Personally, I have the self-given right to throw rocks off of my fifth-floor balcony.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  116. free songs, not free by dten · · Score: 1

    Not free. You have to pay $1.29 or whatever for a bottle of Pepsi. That's $.30 more than if you bought the song by itself on iTMS. If you weren't going to buy some Pepsi anyway, then it's not a good deal at all.

    I'd believe distribution problems too, though. I only found a few bottles in the Seattle area (not that I really went looking too hard, though).

  117. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    I just tried to sign up for today's free song, and they wouldn't let me without a credit card. I refuse to store my cc info on any merchant's site.

    Is there a workaround to this, or is it different with the pepsi caps?

  118. Re:hacking itunes is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bullshit. It's about removing DRM from Apple's protected AAC files, thereby a.) breaking the terms that you agreed to *before* you downloaded anything from the iTMS to begin with, and b.) being a TRUE violation of the DMCA, as these programs do, and were designed to do, nothing other than circumvent Apple's copy protection.

  119. This is not a way to screw over Apple by ASquare · · Score: 1

    This is a way to reclaim rights. They only person who can crack a song's DRM under this scheme is the person who bought it. That means they've already paid Apple. All people want to do is play their songs on non-Apple players, play them on Linux machines, and other fair uses. There's no reason to get all huffy about it.

    1. Re:This is not a way to screw over Apple by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > All people want to do is play their songs on non-Apple players...

      It's nice that you know what everyone wants.

      Of course, if this is the impression you've gotten, perhaps you've been hanging out at slashdot for a little too long.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  120. Pepsi only, not Pepsi products by log0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personally took advantage of the promotion - all in all got about 50+/- free songs. I don't drink all that much soda, I had a lot of help from friends/coworkers (they all know me as the lone Powerbook guy among the sea of Dell - since it was Apple's promotion, they figured I was the only person who could use the caps ;-) ).

    I think one thing that hurt the promotion was the lack of variety in sodas that could win. Pepsi, Diet Pepsi. No Caffiene Free Pepsi, Lemon Pepsi, Vanilla Pepsi, etc. No Mtn Dew (I can safely assume that the 5mil would break 10mil from the Slashdot crowd alone), no Dr Pepper, etc. I prefer Pepsi over Coke so when I was interested in a cola, it was going to be Pepsi. But I know a lot of people who generally like Pepsi products, just not Pepsi.

    I'm in the DC area, we had the new bottles pretty quick after the promotion started (largely due to the lardy fatsos in Baltimore w/ a caffiene craze I bet ;-)).

    $.02

  121. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You raise a good point but I think you're being a bit harsh on Apple's DRM restrictions, particularly with the understanding that Slashdot users != typical users. Apple's DRM allows sharing on three (or is it five now?) PCs. The vast majority of their customers likely do not personally own more than three PCs upon which they want to play music. Likewise, the ability to burn no more than seven (as I believe the new number is) copies of a playlist before you have to re-shuffle them -- again, the vast majority of customers don't have more than seven cars or other locations that need their own CD.

    The only feature of their DRM which is likely to be an inconvenience to the typical user is the inability to convert directly to MP3 without an intermediate burn/rip. But, I certainly understand why this is the case. Apple -- like the businesses that you and I work for or even run -- are in business to make money. If making money on the back end by selling iPods is what allows them to sell songs at a buck a track, then that's fine with me -- if I want to put music on my Zen and it's too big of an inconvenience for me to burn/rip, then I'll get my tracks from an online store that offers WMAs. There are plenty of choices for consumers out there; using a cracking tool and violating license agreements is not the only way.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  122. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Different with the pepsi caps. The Redeem function is a different section.

    And for today's free song, they should pay us to listen to it. Avril Lavigne? please...

  123. Here're three unclaimed codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I never got around to install iTunes, nor will I do until Friday, so here are the codes of 3 Pepsi caps I have lying around for the quickest of you:

    PPQ4F KKAI(D or less likely O)

    HEWGG IHA4C

    FPMFN DACVF

    All are "One free song" of course, so enjoy !

  124. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by afish40 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of people seem to be up in arms over this, so let me clear it up somewhat: when the Pepsi promo was started, there was an option in the account settings to choose "none" for your credit card. However, in the last week, that option was disabled, and new accounts now require a valid credit card to be entered in order to be created. So both sides of the argument are correct.

    An interesting side note: my account had the "none" option selected, so even though that's no longer an option, my account has been unaffected! Meaning, unless Apple figures it out, I can keep my account open without entering any credit card information. I intend to do all my future purchases via iTunes Gift Certificates. ^_^

    --
    Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
  125. Would someone please crack M$'s DRM? by potuncle · · Score: 1

    Is Microsofts DRM included in their purchased music store files (such as the ones purchased at Wal-Mart's site) that much harder than the DRM used with iTunes Music Store files? What if I want to purchase $.79 songs from Wal-Mart and play them on my Linux box (or on my Mac)? At this point if only Apple's DRM is cracked and not Microsofts then its got to be whole lot easier for Mircosoft to negotiate contracts with record labels/artists. Right?!

  126. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cars that refuse to start in certain neighborhoods? That totally happens all the time. Why just the other day as I was passing a trailer park I saw 3 or 4 cars out on the lawn. I would like to think they worked fine up to that point.

  127. Re:Not surprising (in retrospect)/iTunes #'s by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You say not surprising like it were a bad thing for Apple to have 5 million songs downloaded - if even 1/10th of 1% of those = 5000 people - purchased additional songs it was worth the FREE publicity Apple got.

    This promo wasn't a failure by ANY means:

    Let's say Pepsi produced 100 million bottles with free song caps. Out of those, 70 million were sold. 50% of the buyers had computers (down to 35 million) and 50% of them had broadband (down to 17.5 million) and 50% of them were interested in digital music (now down to ~9 million).

    Apple got over 1/2 of those people to use iTunes, many for the first time. Many of these people, now that they had to download the software are likely to remain apple music customers.

    Then you break it down further - those who like the iTunes Store that also drink Pepsi and those that have a portable player that will play them and those that were just generally confused and thought that it was STILL stealing or thought that it was exclusively an Apple Promotion.

    I KNOW older people that think ALL downloaded music must be stolen or illegal AND I know people who think iTunes ONLY works on Macs or if it has an Apple Logo and says Apple Computer it must be Apple/Mac ONLY.

    I'd say; if we take ALL that into consideration they actually had a 75-90% redemption rate.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  128. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Informative

    iTunes for Windows 4.2 (see above).

    Clicked on Redeem Song. Asked me to log on. Clicked Create Account. Page did not load. Navigated back, repeated several times. Popup comes up asking for information. Get submission errors if I try to submit without valid / complete CC info. Finally enter the info and await an email verification. Log on. Click redeem song, asks me to log on again. Log on with username and password. This time I'm allowed to enter codes. Once I find the song I want, it takes me 5 minutes to figure out that "Buy Song" is scrolled off the right side of my screen. Do a Help search to figure out how to buy the music in my cart. Realize I can't because nothing is in my cart, I'm "not logged in." Log in. Re-add song to cart. Click on Shopping Cart in left pane, click Buy Music. Enter username and password AGAIN. Confirm purchase (free).

    I love iTunes, it's the best player/net radio/music file organizer/burner I have ever used, but the learning curve on the store's UI was ridiculous. Since then, I have had no problems redeeming 12 more codes.

  129. Why I didn't care. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I have Windows 98. All free songs I would have won, would have never gotten redeemed.

    iTunes is for Windows 2000 or greater

  130. iTunes and Hawaii by MrIcee · · Score: 1
    I don't know about the rest of the nation, but here on the Big Island of Hawai'i the iTunes Pepsi's did not show up until the 1st week in April. There were only on bottles in the cooler - none on the shelves had the yellow caps or deals.

    So MOST of the pepsi sold here didn't have the deal. They ONLY gave us less than 3 weeks... and then to top it off, a week ago all the remaining ones were pulled and replaced with non-iTunes bottles.

    Basically, you had to know - go out of your way to find them - and then hope there would be some next week.

    I was able to cash in about 12 tops though - got alot of nice Hawaiian music for it. Thanks Apple :) No thanks Pepsi - you coulda done better considering there's a frig'n bottling plant right in town.

  131. please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    further

    1. Re:please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a kook, he can't explain without risking further harm to his tin-foil beanie.

  132. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    i have noticed the PC version iseems to not be as esy as the mac version, they say they are the same but I have not nearly had the problems with the mac version as I do the PC

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  133. Pepsi/iTunes promotion by Pete+Johnson · · Score: 1

    I'm a Coke drinker who was planning to buy Pepsi specifically to win some free songs, but I never once found a single iTunes Pespi product anywhere where I live, in Springfield, Missouri, or in Kansas City, or in Southern California when I went there for a visit. I even wrote an e-mail to Apple complaining about this, which went unanswered. So, if anything is to blame for the low numbers, this would be it.

  134. That DRM must be a breaze to crack! by amichalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So let me get this straight...
    (1) I spend 99c downloading a song
    (2) I spend the next X hours of my life writing or downloading an Apple DRM decoder
    (3) I end up with a non-DRM song and a 99c credit card bill

    I can see why this is easier than just performing step 1 and quitting. I mean, since I have 6 computers I need to play the song on, or I want to burn 8 of the identical CD, or I have no life.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:That DRM must be a breaze to crack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see why this is easier than just performing step 1 and quitting. I mean, since I have 6 computers I need to play the song on, or I want to burn 8 of the identical CD, or I have no life.

      So caring about DRM implies that one has no life, does it? An interesting argument: I could just as easily say that naively accepting DRM will lead to a vast reduction in the amount of freedom in your life.

      I wish people would stop belittling the guy who did this - there are very good reasons to use this software which do not include nefariously distributing songs over p2p networks. Just because you can't code something like that yourself doesn't mean you should blindly succumb to tall poppy syndrome.

    2. Re:That DRM must be a breaze to crack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that would be:
      (1) I spend 99c downloading a song
      (2) I then encode it into non-DRM MP3 via PlayFair
      (3) I download it to my non-Apple HW player.

      Just one of the fair use things (space-shifting) that Apple doesn't want people to do.

    3. Re:That DRM must be a breaze to crack! by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > (1) I spend 99c downloading a song
      > (2) I then encode it into non-DRM MP3 via PlayFair
      > (3) I download it to my non-Apple HW player.

      > Just one of the fair use things (space-shifting) that Apple doesn't want people to do.

      Well, if they didn't want to, then they sure could have gone about it more efficiently. Because even without PlayFair, all you have to do is burn a CD and then reimport the tunes as MP3s. And that gives you the exact same quality as you get using PlayFair, because you're exporting to an uncompressed format and then doing the recompression, which is exactly what happens when you go from AAC to MP3.

      The damn story isn't even about DRM. Why do I even bother?

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    4. Re:That DRM must be a breaze to crack! by jgs · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you bother either, because you're wrong. The iTunes->CD->MP3 route (or the even less stupid "encode with iTunes-LAME" route) is not as good as un-DRM'ing the files. I find it bizarre that people continue to assert that it is.

      Here's why:

      I have a biggish music library that I manage with iTunes. One of the ways I play my music back is through a SliMP3. Of course, the Slim can't play the DRM'd files, but the server software will happily play back normal AACs by transcoding them on the fly. (If I had a more recent Slim there'd be no transcoding needed to another compressed format since it'll play straight-up AIFF natively, but that's beside the point).

      Anyway, I'd like to have my AACs in my music library in their native format, not transcoded, since as everyone knows you lose fidelity when you transcode. I'd like to keep them in my music library, not elsewhere in my filesystem, because that's the tool I use to manage my music files. I'd like to have the music in a form I can play through my Slim. And I don't want to have dups of the songs floating around my library, for reasons which should be obvious.

      Right now I cannot have all these things at once. It would be fine with me if there were a way to stream the music to my Slim without stripping the DRM from the files -- this makes at least as much sense copyrightologically as it does to let me play it on my iPod. But that failing, stripping the DRM from the AAC and leaving it otherwise alone, as playfair is supposed to do, fulfills all my requirements.

      So yeah, I know I can work around the limitations imposed by the DRM (and I do), but to claim that doing so is just as good as doing it The Right Way is -- at best -- to miss the point.

  135. In other news... by kneel · · Score: 1

    4.5 million teeth have fallen out due to this promotion.

    --

    indierock / punkrock band photos and more... http://www.digitaldefection.net

  136. Should have waited. iTunes 4.6? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    within 24 hours of downloading iTunes 4.5, has broken the new scheme

    He should have waited a couple of weeks until the 4.5 base was firmly established first. Now how long before 4.6 comes out with another tweak to the system? Every time Apple has to update the system, they will piss off more people because of the DRM.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  137. Not iTMS authentication by kekeruusperi · · Score: 0

    The post is a bit misleading, what was changed is the authentication when connecting to other persons' iTunes shares. Also, the libopendaap library is meant for browsing and streaming audio from iTunes shares.

  138. First Come First Serve by [AraGorn] · · Score: 1

    Merry Christmas from a linux user who happened to win.. P9RX4 96RHX

  139. We ran out by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

    Around here (delaware), we got the yellow caps after a couple weeks, and I redeemed about 7. Unfortuantly, they don't have any more around here. I guess they ran out: there just aren't any around. None. At all.

    --
    "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
  140. Credit card requirement? by LionMage · · Score: 1
    I'd say the only ones who benefit from this deal is Apple, but that credit card requirement scared away most people. So, other than more awareness, Apple didn't gain much from this.

    Funny, but many people are able to get into the iTunes Music Store and make purchases without a credit card. That's why Target is selling stored-value cards for the iTMS starting at $15 a pop.

    Also, you can get credit from others as "allowances." It's pretty spiffy, especially for parents. This way, kids who aren't old enough to qualify for a credit card can still make purchases.
  141. This has nothing to do with the DRM! by Otto · · Score: 1

    Some people need to RTFA before spouting off.

    The guy didn't crack the new DRM scheme. He cracked the new authentication method for DAAP, which is the protocol iTunes uses to stream music to other iTunes clients over the network.

    It's the "Music Sharing" functionality. It's what let's iTunes play from other iTunes shares. All that breaking the auth does is let you write programs to share music back and forth with iTunes over the network.

    This has NOTHING to do with the DRM methodology in purchased iTMS songs!

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:This has nothing to do with the DRM! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This has NOTHING to do with the DRM methodology in purchased iTMS songs!

      Except that it allows people to use Linux (or whatever) to access your legitimately-bought DRM-protected songs without having to break the encryption.
      And this can only be a good thing.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    2. Re:This has nothing to do with the DRM! by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that it allows people to use Linux (or whatever) to access your legitimately-bought DRM-protected songs without having to break the encryption.

      No, it doesn't. The streaming protocol doesn't decrypt the music first. If you're not authorized (and would thus have the decryption key), you still can't listen to the music.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  142. Doesn't Help Toast Users by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    Until 4.5 I was able to burn purchased tracks using Roxio Toast. It stopped working and Roxio tells me that these are changes implemented by Apple and this mens I must use Apple software to burn them now.

    *grumble*

  143. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    You are correct in that Apple's DRM isn't overly intrusive. In fact, I believe that their DRM is one of the best current incarnations.

    I do understand the fact that the vast majority of computer "users" have never even heard of an inode, or a hash, or XOR and they think that a "register" is where you pay for groceries. In the end I am thinking of what is good for them as well. Maintaining freedom is important, even for people who do not wish it or even understand why other people do.

    I don't have any problem with Apple using technological means to try to keep people from breaking the DRM in this case. I take issue with using the threat of physical harm (which it is whenever someone invokes the law) to stop reverse engineering.

    It's the equivalent of a big stupid kid planning to get into college by threatening to beat the crap out of anyone who blows the grading curve.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  144. Re:cerebral rectumitis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    browse their shitty (imo) selection

    Well, just because it is the largest selection of any (legal) online music service, with all five major labels, and hundreds of indie lables, I guess they should have hired you to weed out the shit. Geez.

    Just because apple charges a buck a tune doesn't mean that's what people think it's worth

    This is where you really need to get your head out of your ass. A product is worth what the market will pay. So far over 70 million songs downloaded from ITMS means that a lot of people think it's worth 99 cents

  145. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    It's the "a little goes a long way" paradigm. There's not a car lock that will stop a sophisticated thief who wants your car, but it stops 90% of the punters. Same with locks on doors and copy protection on computer games and gaming consoles. There are likely professional car thieves who also wonder out loud why the car manufacturers don't just give up because it's a losing battle, etc., but it's not going to happen, either.

    Except in the case of digital data protection schemes on the Internet, just *one* person who cracks that scheme and releases it out on the 'net makes that crack available to literally millions of people. Not so in the physical realm. There it takes time to get the word around, and get the idea implemented in new areas for it to be useful. The Internet gets rid of that nasty in the middle step and makes it all instant. A little does not go a long way on the Internet in terms of prevention.

  146. Only 5 mil? Blame Pepsi's distribution by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I'm just outside of San Francisco.

    I have *rarely* seen the iTunes caps - FAR more often, I saw NCAA "Final Four" promo caps or some other sports stuff. Very rare to see the iTunes caps. Whenever I did see a bunch of them, I made sure I selected the winning ones and redeemed them. I hate Pepsi and I still managed to guzzle down at least 15 bottles.

    Pepsi had way more "sport theme" contest caps out in the wild than iTunes caps, at least around here.

    I also drank a few more Slurpees, too. Really easy to peel back the cup edge to see if you're a winner before you even pour the Slurpee. :P

  147. In other news.. Apple announces... by djcatnip · · Score: 1

    a new Pepsi/iTunes promotion - 95 Million free songs by the end of the quarter! /ha ha

    --
    I make these: http://beatseqr.com
  148. The more you tighten your grip... by meehawl · · Score: 1

    The more you tighten your grip, Steve, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

    --

    Da Blog
  149. Re:They don't by platypussrex · · Score: 1

    Not sure what ya'll are doing wrong. I have iTunes on Mac and Windows, (same account on both), no credit card was ever given, and have downloaded Pepsi cap songs and the new Free Songs on both machines with no problem at all.

  150. It wasn't on Mt. Dew. by kiddailey · · Score: 2, Funny


    They surely would have reached all 100 million if they had put the codes on bottles of Mt. Dew as well :)

  151. Single data point by mcc · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend switched from normal to diet soda at the beginning of this semester. Very shortly afterward, she began to have debilitating headaches. Unfortunately, we failed to make any connection. These headaches continued until two weeks ago when she learned about the concept of "aspartame sensitivity" and stopped drinking aspartame products. Her health dramatically reversed the next day.

    Would you like to call her a "kook", or imply I am somehow an astroturfer in the pay of Diet Rite?

    1. Re:Single data point by Hobbex · · Score: 1

      In statistics there is a saying: "The plural of anecdote is not data."

      Your girlfriend got better. Good for her. It proves nothing.

    2. Re:Single data point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet it provides a useful starting point for someone else suffering from debilitating headaches. The plural of anecdote is not data, but statistical data and for that matter the scientific method are not the only means of inquiry and problem-solving in the world.

  152. You know.... by NickRuisi · · Score: 1
    Me and another developer had come up with an I-tunes-ish idea a few years back, around the time of the death of napster. The problems with digital music production, as far I as I could think of were as follows:

    Any transfer of media involved making a copy. We all know how the recording industry feels about copying.

    In my personal opinion, I didn't think a music dowload service could be sold to media companies without near-bulletproof copy protection. Every scheme I could think of was either crackable (one extreme) or would hinder fair use (other extreme)

    And most importantly, how do you get someone to pay for something that can be obtained freely?

    When the idea hit me, I was floored. I was going to make millions. Then, once I began working out some technical issues, those 3 points kept popping into my mind.

  153. Distributors are the limitation by Vandil+X · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess the bottle availablity has more to do with your local distributor than Pepsi.

    I live up in the North Country in New York. I'd consider my city to be pretty darn far from a major population center, yet strangely enough we had iTunes Pepsi's available by the second week of the promotion.

    Fearing diabetes in my late 20s, I have long-since switched to Diet Pepsi, so collecting caps wasn't a problem -- I've amassed 47 winning songs thus far...

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Distributors are the limitation by flamingnight · · Score: 3, Informative

      >I guess the bottle availablity has more to do with your local distributor than Pepsi.

      Exactly. The marketing agency I work for currently has Pepsi as a client. One of the biggest hassles in getting promotions going is dealing with the bottlers and distributors. If the bottlers still have items in stock waiting to be sent out, then it's even tougher to get the new bottles out.

  154. So, let's see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Grandparent post makes an unverified claim saying aspartame is bad, and does not link to back up
    - Parent post makes an unverified claim saying aspartame has been disproven to be bad, and does not link to back up

    How about I just don't take either of you seriously?

    Here's something solid. Aspartame accounts for over 75 percent of the adverse reactions to food additives reported to the FDA. Your move.

    1. Re:So, let's see here. by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Interesting link, but the claim was not backed up on that site. Your statement is no more solid than anyone else's by your own terms.

      Aspartame is widely used and the parent of you post did not claim aspartame "has been disproven to be bad". That's suggesting that claims to the contrary have sufficient validity to be researched.

      You may be wise to withhold judgement on the safety of aspartame, but I seriously doubt you are going to find hard evidence that proves that it is unsafe. The FDA would take that very seriously.

    2. Re:So, let's see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reported by whom? Scientists running double-blind studies? Nope, these are anecdotes reported by people with no proof whatsoever that their symptoms were caused by aspartame.

      Just because I feel happier with a raw egg in my shoes doesn't mean that the raw egg made me happy.

    3. Re:So, let's see here. by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Aspartame is thought to cause multiple sclerosis.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  155. Information wants to be free. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Yesterday, Apple released iTunes 4.5, which deliberately broke the 4.2 authentication scheme, which had been successfully reverse-engineered. However, crazney has been at it again, and within 24 hours of downloading iTunes 4.5, has broken the new scheme, and added more features to this library along the way. If you want to incorporate iTMS support in your program, give libopendaap a go!

    In other words...

    *I*N*F*O*R*M*A*T*I*O*N* *W*A*N*T*S* *T*O* *B*E* *F*R*E*E*
    And any idiot who says otherwise is, well, an idiot.
    1. Re:Information wants to be free. by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      *I*N*F*O*R*M*A*T*I*O*N* *W*A*N*T*S* *T*O* *B*E* *F*R*E*E*

      My first instinct was to either ignore this statement, or challenge it. Then my brain kicked in.
      Problem is many people read (and sometimes even say) this statement meaning "free as in beer", when if you apply it to "free as in speech" then you can't do anything but agree.

      Information doesn't want to be contained or restricted. (And end-users don't want it to be)
      Put something anywhere and someone will want to read it. Also (and companies please listen up here...) there are still people who are actually willing to pay for the chance to do so. (We're not all freeloaders all the time, y'know?)
      But if you don't make a legitimate method of accessing files available, someone will code around it - especially on Linux/Unix/whatever. In this case, it looks like they're trying to allow you to contact an iTunes share, and beginning on allowing you to access the store. This ain't decryption/"piracy", this is someone trying to play by the rules except on a different platform.

      Yes, some platforms are going to be less cost-effective. Yes, there will always be someone who refuses to pay, or who just wants to rip out the DRM and fling it on P2P-R-Us.
      Yes, chances are they wouldn't get quite the lockin or profit-margin that they're really after. But if they made iTunes more easily accessable from multiple platforms (including hardware-players), then it would reduce[*] the number of attempts to reverse-engineer everything.
      Make it more accessible, and less people will try to force it to be so.

      [*] It won't stop it entirely. Never gonna happen. But by reducing the attempts, you also reduce the resource-pool for everyone else trying.

      Currently I'd say there were two main groups of homebrew software. Those trying to emulate legitimate use (information wants to be Free - speech), and those trying to crack it wide-open (information wants to be "free" - beer). but once the former's out in the wild, what's to stop the latter from building on it.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  156. Dont buy RIAA label music! by slithytove · · Score: 1

    All your points are valid, but I think its important to realize that there are plenty of reasons to despise the RIAA and similar organizations. I'm not going to go into them; I simply want to emphasize one of your points: If you want to hurt the RIAA, the most effective action is to buy lots of non-RIAA label music! Give indie labels the money to publish new artists so they won't have to sell their souls ;)

    Listening to and spreading RIAA label music, without paying them directly, is mostly providing ammunition for the pro-DRM crowd and making their music more popular. Some people do buy CDs by artists they've downloaded and if most of whats available is RIAA label....

    I choose a lot of what I buy after listening to illegal copies of it. Theres so much out there that I find it necessary if I don't want to buy a lot of CDs I'll never listen to. And I buy a LOT of music: $100+ a month on AVERAGE! So, while I may represent a small segment of the music-downloading, "childish, lifeless nerds", if I were buying RIAA label music, I'd be helping them through the efforts of those who rip/decode and spread the mp3s.

    Fortunately for me, and the labels I support, I despise pop and the stuff that's my cup of tea is hardly ever picked up by a major label.

    1. Re:Dont buy RIAA label music! by valmont · · Score: 1

      i think we're in agreement. the key here is to fight the RIAA, *not* Apple. Apple's online store ALSO supports non-RIAA labels and indie music. Money spent on such non-RIAA-owned songs gets back to the artists in far greater percentages, since Apple isn't really looking to make a profit on music sales themselves, while Apple still offers music lovers a framework for a fair online music marketplace.

  157. Distribution problems... by carlmacd · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing there must have been some, because in my area there were still coolers stocked full of these bottles as of a couple days ago. I will bet dollars to pesos that at that point they didn't all even leave stores. Then factor in how few people actually use iTunes and just threw winners away. Personally I thought it was a great deal...tilt the bottle, make sure you have a winner, and pay 1.49 for a liter of Pepsi and a .99 cent cong. (I never saw any contest caps on bottles of less than a liter)

  158. Even MORE annoying by CapnGib · · Score: 1

    From the license aggrement:


    Important: After installing iTunes 4.5 for Windows, you'll only be able to transfer music to your iPod using iTunes. To transfer music from MusicMatch Jukebox or Audible Manager to your iPod, you'll need to first import the music into iTunes. For more information, search iTunes and Music Store Help.


    What the hell is that?

    --
    Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
  159. If they had run the promo in England... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    I could have explained the missing bottle vouchers, since Ive got about 500 emptys in my room, bah all that music I could have had, instead Ive only got a bad case of wind *burp* :)

  160. Wasted Caps by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When I went to redeem them, iTunes didn't have any of the specific songs that I wanted. They didn't have any Led Zeppelin songs, so I went looking for some songs off of a CD that my wife wants. They didn't have that either, so my caps didn't get turned in.

    Ok, now that's just plain silly. These are FREE songs we're talking about. So they didn't have a specific tune you wanted. What was keeping you from downloading a track from someone you never heard of? (The previews are there for a reason.)

    You could have discovered something new that you really liked, without any risk of wasting money. Be a little more adventurous...

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Wasted Caps by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Adventurous?

      I _already know_ that the following are either tedious or just plain gay:

      http://homepage.mac.com/stevemsmart/forums/itmsf re e.jpg

      Foo Fighters are just about bearable, nothing else has any balls at all. So the free songs are _utterly worthless_.

      I get better music for free from listening to snake net metal radio, fight for rock, metal express, and even aural moon, etc. It's really not worth one extra click to download dross when I can listen to decent stuff with a single click, and make my own unrestricted selections with one more.

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    2. Re:Wasted Caps by damiam · · Score: 1

      The Pepsi caps allow you to freely download any song, not just the free songs of the day/week that Apple just started offering.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  161. you are such a jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tard.

  162. Re: Saccharine by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 2, Informative

    From Coca Cola:

    Aspartame by itself is heat and pH sensitive (meaning it loses its sweetness over time), the concentrated fountain syrup causes aspartame to lose its sweetness faster than it would in a finished beverage. Fountain diet drinks, therefore, are sweetened with a blend of and saccharin to assure maximum product quality.

  163. Re:Yay for hackers!!! by shark72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your comments are very astute if we assume that most people are similar to Slashdot readers. Apple has done a tremendous job of getting iTunes / iPod awareness into the mainstream -- there's a higher non-geek ratio than many people understand. Most iTMS users don't read Slashdot or other tech blogging sites, nor visit Sourceforge regularly. Most iTMS users don't have more than five PCs, or need to burn more than eight copies of a CD, or have a huge desire to dump their collection of iTunes-purchased tracks into their Kazaa share directory.

    It just may be so that among your circle of friends, awareness and use of the iTunes crackers approaches 100% -- no debating that. However, among my circle of friends who use iTunes, awareness is practically zero, and when I've mentioned it to them, their responses have been more along the lines of "how retarded," rather than "ooh, just what I've been looking for." Internet or no, there's a whole different strata of users beyond the Slashdot crowd.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  164. Re:150 Losing Caps - Explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's my theory. You routinely buy your Pepsi products at the same store. You are also completely unaware that a very sneaky warehouse clerk in the back of the store performs the well-known tilt cheat on every Pepsi bottle on every pallet that comes in and deftly sets aside the winners for himself and his friends. It's not like management would know or care what he was doing. You gotta love a good conspiracy theory now and then.

  165. Re:"Consciousness is finite?" by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    You modify it by drilling into the wood and putting in some kind of screwdriver tip. ... If the manufacture stops using to wood and switches to solid metal, your method of modifying it will no longer work.

    Then it's the time for another version of the modification, this time using a drill bit designed for steel, and a more powerful power drill.

    Which is exactly what the auth crack was. :)

  166. Health information on Slashdot by parcel · · Score: 1

    I strongly feel this is important... don't get health information from slashdot... Medscape
    is a very good source of information which is geared towards a more scientific-oriented crowd than sites such as WebMD. (Although Medscape was recently bought by WebMD, it existed previously as a source of information primarily for health care providers, thus of a more technical nature, and WebMD seems to have left it relatively alone).

  167. Did you peek for the code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did for all except for one, which was at a café and didn't feel like making a fool out of myself.

  168. Here's another: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    VNLGA
    W7CPJ

    (that first V could maybe be a U, kinda hard to read the font on the cap)

    That one's been sitting in my desk drawer for 3 months, too much hassle for me to install iTunes for one cheesy song.

  169. Apple and Free Software? by R.+M.+Stallman · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am surprised to find Slashdot promoting a company that has abused free software to its own ends. By taking BSD UNIX derived code they did exactly what the GPL is there to prevent. How long will it take for people to realise that the GPL is a protection for software? Then, they took advantage of the goodwill of free software developers to develop for their proprietary product.

    When Apple makes Quicktime, Cocoa and Quartz free software the community can take their free software support as sincere and not a thinly veiled attempt at gaining free labour.

    --
    You can read more about the GNU project at http://www.gnu.org/.
  170. whats it abt itunes by earthstar · · Score: 0

    I havent tried / used itunes as yet. what is the reason so many rae dloadin songs from itunes?is it really bcoz they are getting the songs for a low price (is it so tempting to quit free mp3's).
    What is the advantage over mp3, which does not hav restrictions at all (like no. of times to write etc..)

  171. They were here by jnetsurfer · · Score: 1

    I didn't see that many, but I definitely saw some of the iTunes bottles in the Raleigh/Durham area. Target, WalMart, Eckerd, and Lowes are a few retailers that I've seen carry them. I got a free song with one of them, too.

  172. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by jcr · · Score: 1

    I tried with 3 separate winning caps at three separate times. Each time when I followed somone's advice to skip the CC entry it came back at me REQUIRING it.

    Call iTMS customer support. A CC isn't required for redeeming pepsi caps or gift certificates.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  173. Obligitory paranoid reply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The FDA would take that very seriously.

    The FDA is part of the problem, they're in the pockets of the evil corporate executives!!!!

  174. iTunes Codes by Sockpuppetofdoom · · Score: 1

    If anyone has some extra ones that they won't use, could they email the extra codes to me?

    Email: flamingmonkeyofjustice@hotmail.com

  175. Here in California... by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    Here in California my brother and his buddy culled the herd at our local store (at a lake where they work) and got a whole case (24) of winners.

    Win early, win often!

  176. go here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  177. TCPA may eventually be un-crackable by Peter+Eckersley · · Score: 1
    There is always a workaround. It may be "chipping" the motherboard - possibly will be illegal, but who cares. It may be even running a pair of computers, using the TCPA one as an access device for the non-TCPA one.

    Not necessarily. At some point, they're going to start using tamper resistant hardware. Good luck mod-chipping that. The only hole you can actually count on, is digital-to-analogue-to-digital conversion, to get data out of your "trusted" box and into an ordinary computer. That might be fine for ebook pirates, but it's going to be one hell of a PITA for daily life.

    Rather than planning to spend tens or hundreds of hours on work-arounds when this happens, it would make sense to donate tens or hundreds of hours of your wages to the EFF or similar organisations which are working to prevent this problem from prevailing in the first place.

  178. Hey there, nerd by mns · · Score: 1

    Get a life, identifying yourself with an over hyped consumer product is about as low as a human being can get.

    Actually, posting your predictable "anti-consumerist" dismissal of a statement that was lighthearted to begin with, under the anonymous coward veil is about as low as a human being can get. The only way it could get worse is if you revealed yourself to be a GNU zealot, living in mommy's basement, covered in zits from forehead to ass, only leaving your hole at night to go get more Bawls or whatever it is that fuels your all night sessions of writing shitty, disorganized, inefficient code, the likes of which resulted in you failing out of the only community college whose standards were low enough to let you in in the first place, while all your intellectual peers were signing up for the army, which is what initiated your move into the basement in the first place.

    Don't you have a rally at SCO headquarters to go to or something, nerd?

    --
    - Eat it.
  179. Re:"Consciousness is finite?" by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    At some point, they're going to start using tamper resistant hardware. Good luck mod-chipping that.

    They can't possibly achieve that way. Nothing is 100% tamper-resistant. Doing this to the entire market will create rather huge demand for "tampered" devices, which is a decent incentive for black market. Tamper resistance is also rather expensive; consumer devices are unlikely to use that all - and look at the "I ported Linux on Gameboy" crowd, it's fairly likely at least some devices will be modifiable in the required way. You can make a decent computer from off-the-shelf chips, even "mere" microcontrollers have interesting power now, see eg. ATMega family; the market with general-purpose chips would have to be tightly controlled as well, at which point all the small and middle-sized development-doing companies (or dependent on custom development) start screaming bloody murder, and black market inevitably appears. (Or the "legal" systems will be flexible enough to fulfill any needs - then they are likely to be flexible enough to run just about anything on them - including an emulator of a non-TCPA computer.) The countries that deploy this measure effectively kill most of their R&D, which will cause mighty cheer in the "underdeveloped" nations.

    The only hole you can actually count on, is digital-to-analogue-to-digital conversion, to get data out of your "trusted" box and into an ordinary computer. That might be fine for ebook pirates, but it's going to be one hell of a PITA for daily life.

    Multiple options exist. The D/A-A/D conversion with audio coupling is a bit extreme, however many other possibilities exist; odd kinds of network protocols, serial link (if present), high-speed lab equipment. You can even bump the audio link speed up by using multiple channels and higher samplerates; I think the successor of AC'97 codec should go up to 192 kHz on 24 bits and 5+ channels, even a rather ineffective data encoding scheme could get quite fast here, presuming the setup is local and the cables are high-quality. Many people here derided it as an overkill - for audio maybe, for unintended purposes it may get pretty handy. Also don't forget various options for video - from digital cameras to DV camcorders to anything exotic the future may bring.

    Rather than planning to spend tens or hundreds of hours on work-arounds when this happens, it would make sense to donate tens or hundreds of hours of your wages to the EFF or similar organisations which are working to prevent this problem from prevailing in the first place.

    This presumes two things: a) the belief that the organizations will be effective and successful, preventing the problem instead of just slightly delaying it, b) that the money from the wages will have more worth in the global scheme than development of purely technical politics-independent countermeasures, and b.1) that the technician in question is so swamped with paid-for work that he can pick as he pleases between working for money to donate and working on a countermeasures project - which was maybe true in the US at the peak of the dot-com boom, but may not be always an available choice for an underemployed technician, a student, or somebody in a low-dollar-wage country (eg. East Europe or India/China, and the most of the world in general, if you look outside of US/EU/Japan).

    Whatever approach you think is the best, do it. If we can survive, it's by diversity of approaches - being it donations or tinkering. Do what you believe will have the most effect, whatever it is.

  180. Sorry, elinks caches subject in the form. by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Elinks caches forms when being told so. It's fine for username and password, but it also remembers the subject line and fills it into the form, and when I forget to change it, it bites me.

  181. Re:hacking itunes is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really are a moron, aren't you...

  182. Maybe someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... can explain why Apple don't shut these guys down w/ the DMCA?

  183. Re:hacking itunes is wrong by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

    You must've read a different article/page then me, then.
    All I saw was links to software that allows you to access an iTunes share. Something that, as far as I can tell, is allowable. I saw nothing about stripping out DRM.

    --
    Tiggs
    "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  184. Some shortcomings, but the DB makes up for them by Monx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    iTunes on Windows is slow

    I believe that it was a poor design choice on Apple's part, but iTunes performance degrades quickly in the presence of shoddy video drivers. This may have been your problem. Also, if you disable SoundCheck (or just let it finish running) performance improves dramatically. SoundCheck determines the volumes of your music files and has iTunes compensate for bad rips, etc.

    iTunes on Windows is slow

    FairPlay is the DRM system used on files from the iTMS. iTunes could care less what you do with any of your files that were acquired elsewhere. It will even let you stream audio across your network with almost zero setup.

    Winamp 2.95 is fast, convenient, and smart.

    It sure is better than the 3.x version, but it has zero library management functions. It takes no time to search for a song in my library in iTunes. If I want to hear a song, I can begin to type any part of its name or its artist's name or even the album name and the song list updates live with each keystroke. It often takes just one or two characters to bring the song you want into the window. That is the one feature that sets iTunes apart from Winamp for me. I really liked Winamp and Macamp but I hated trying to find a particular song. I had to use filesystem searches, but that's not good enough.

    You might want to take a second look at iTunes after you update your video drivers. Since you want it to be light weight, turn off all of the music store and sound enhancement features (turn off SoundCheck!). Then you will have an awesome music library management program. I think that if you have a significant music library that you will appreciate the search feature so much that it will eclipse iTunes other shortcomings.

    1. Re:Some shortcomings, but the DB makes up for them by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0
      It sure is better than the 3.x version, but it has zero library management functions

      Just the way I like it. If I want to browse by a certain artist, I'll put in the CD of MP3s with that artist's name on it. MP3s arent the kind of file I need to be on my hard drive. Thats for my OS (XP, I'm happy with it, tried linux, had nothing to do on it) and programs

    2. Re:Some shortcomings, but the DB makes up for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, best not to put MP3s on your HD. There's dragons there, you know, and they eat MP3s for breakfast.

      Oh, wait, nevermind, that's just the latest Windows-based worm that's floating around.

    3. Re:Some shortcomings, but the DB makes up for them by stewartjm · · Score: 1

      It's admitedly not well documented. But winamp 2.x for at least the last 3 years(probably longer) has had a jump to file dialog accessible anytime by hitting the J key.

      Basically you hit J the dialog pops up and you start typing and as you type you can watch the list of matches narrow itself down in real time as you add more letters. If you hit enter it plays the first match, or you can select other matches using the arrows keys or the mouse.

      I haven't used itunes but compared to any other media player with search functionality I've tried it sure is fast and convenient. For instance these days I'm mostly using foobar 2000 but it's search functionality is:
      1. Much slower. Even with a relatively short list there is a noticable delay between starting typing and rhe results showing.
      2. Much less streamlined. You have to reach for the mouse or tab from the search field to the match field to actually make a selection.

  185. Cracking software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The day is coming when you criminals who think it is funny to break code will go to prison for the rest of your pathetic lives. If you were any where near as clever as you think you are you would have a real job doing something to benefit mankind rather than attempting to constantly destroy things. "Constantly destroy things...", hmmm sounds like some thing a terrorist would do.

  186. 5 Million is unsurprising by WapoStyle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I did not see a yellow cap until about a month after the promotion started and the yellow caps disappeared during the last week of March. I didn't see any caps at all during the month of April.

    It would seem that Pepsi did indeed screw up big time with the distribution. It's a shame the caps were only around for about a month, I would have gotten many more free songs if they didn't disappear so fast.

  187. email me any codes... by ohasten · · Score: 1

    I have no problem with the DRM.

    --
    "You can tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs"
  188. True by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
    You are right about the iTunes, I have to concede that. It is illegal to break the agreement. (note the popular burn-rip secnario is also illegaly breaking the DRM)

    But the box of windows I already paid for before seeing any license. The transaction has already happened, how do they get to modify it after the fact? Just beacuse it's SOP doesn't mean it is or should be legal.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:True by CatOne · · Score: 1

      Windows uses a "shrink wrap" license, which is pretty standard practice. There's usually a seal on the box which talk about the license, and says that opening the package indicates you accept the license. You can almost always return software products that you haven't opened (broken the seal)... have a read of the box, carefully, next time ;-)

      They're not modifying ANYTHING after the fact, I'm quite certain the license was written and included with the product long before you even purchased it. Almost all consumer software includes a variation of the "shrink wrap" license.

  189. HERE'S WHY (AND WHEN) IT REQUIRES A CREDIT CARD... by FredFnord · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...just so y'all will shut up.

    iTMS tries to figure out where you are located. If you are connected to the internet via a computer in the United States, and it is fairly certain of this, it doesn't require a credit card to make an account.

    If it is not sure, it requires a credit card to verify that your address is in the US.

    It's a licensing issue: since they can't sell to people overseas, they can't give songs away to them either.

    Now, having heard this, some people overseas might get ideas about bypassing such protections. They may well work, and they are Not My Problem.

    Geez, guys. With 30 seconds of thought, any of you could have figured this out. Why are there so many 'but *I* needed a credit card!' 'but *I* didn't!' posts all over the place?

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  190. MyTunes by zx2c4 · · Score: 0

    I wonder if cowpimp will make a new version of mytunes with crazney's new libs. If not, he should at least share his source. Check it out: CowPimp.com.

    --
    ZX2C4
  191. I'm not surprised about the Pepsi giveaway by dburr · · Score: 1

    Somebody, whether it be PepsiCo themselves, some distributors, or something, really messed up on the iCap rollout. Everyone I know did NOT see them anywhere near the launch date. I myself didn't see any iCaps until **late March**. The only people I heard of who had iCaps even remotely close to release day were the people working at Apple, and I believe that even THEY had to wait a week or so before the campus vending machines were stocked up. (and had to suffer with frequent out-of-stock)

    --
    Yomigaeru Aiyan Geek!!!
  192. Diabetes and diets, but wait, what about Pepsi? by nonameisgood · · Score: 1

    So we've all agreed that too much Pepsi is bad. We also mostly agree that overconsumption is the main cause of obesity.

    We can discuss the biochemistry of glucose and fat metabolism all day, but it is apparent that most people around here, people in general, and most doctors, don't really know biochemistry.

    YMMV!

    I'll close with a fortune cookie I've never seen, but imagine is somewhere: "Don't ask a fat person how to lose weight if you want to be skinny."

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  193. Re:Why do "free" songs require credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, right in among the Visa, Mastercard, etc there is a No Credit Card option, if you could just read...