While I can see the value of making versioning control system manipulation seamless from filesystem level manipulation, the issue of space isn't really one that crops up in any significant fashion. What I want is to be able to manipulate different versions side-by-side.
How come everyone who throws around the term Orwellian have a different problem with a lack of privacy than the one Orwell envisioned. In Orwell's book, there was punishment for having unapproved desires.
What I'm interested in is the notion that it is immoral to do something that is against the law or contrary to the legislative branch, or to straight up ignore democracy entirely. Do you consider the matter settled and it is definitely immoral, or are people like anarchists sufficient enough to have the matter still be in the unresolved category?
But I asked whether opposing slavery was wrong given laws that were in effect in a time when slaverery were not such a violation. You changed tenses on me. You may have failed to realize that i was referring to actual laws, which may have made you fail to realize I meant ones at that time period.
I am more interested in the notion of the legitimacy of democracy, the power of the rule of law... On what evidence do you base the notion that slavery violated then established fundamental human rights?
Care to clarify that? All this technology we have was done with little legislative involvement. You seem to be somewhat limiting your scope of change by mentioning law, but your meaning is still unclear. Are you saying that everyone who illegally helped escaped slaves were wrong?
I have no problem with having them. If someone can manage to get a paid job working in that field without doing unpaid, in a job climate where doing so is the norm, that is fine too. It's all about what rules i believe we should be living under. Keep coming up with examples that could potentially change my mind, though. I may indeed find a situation that is so unbearable that I may say that I don't want this after all. Or go for how anpther system could have much better results. All i know is that I've spent quite a bit figuring out why things should be the way I think I want them.
Your way of accounting for exchange is fundamentally flawed. People don't actually pay for "work", they pay for end results. You may have built a fancy chair that has neat features that would be covered under the concept of intellectual property, but I should be able to ask another person to duplicate that chair without you having any say in it. The concept remains the same when the ability to make copies takes little effort. You want to ensure you get money for something? Prove yourself first and you can ask for money up front with a Kickstarter or Patreon account.
I knew that I personally wouldn't be experiencing much winning as a result of Trump, but the people opposed to him the most oppose any person winning more than any other person so they put roadblocks in place to prevent it. We are all worse off as a result.
Quit complaining about how others are bettering their lives that incidentally make their lives more unequal from others and work on bettering your life and incidentally make your life more inequal from other. That's what this general complaint boils down to. When people focus on equality, the result is that everyone's life is worse off.
The Tower wasn't the instrument of bad translation, just the beneficiary of it. My takeaway was that much like your example with the word, "Tower" different words had different meanings for different people but were close enough to work in enough contexts, but fell apart in all the contexts that were needed to build the tower.
Most browsers also allow you to hold down the left mouse button to access the tab history menu, which is what I do. I hate Edge for not using it, but it also doesn't allow you to drag and drop to rearrange the bookmarks toolbar, a more important feature. I have an alphabet running along the bookmarks toolbar and all my bookmarks live there.
Slashdot Mirror
I get an error message that says the error message needs replacing with a custom one.
While I can see the value of making versioning control system manipulation seamless from filesystem level manipulation, the issue of space isn't really one that crops up in any significant fashion. What I want is to be able to manipulate different versions side-by-side.
Your saying otherwise won't fool anyone into not believing that this is the false flag operation, you two anti-Trump people.
How come everyone who throws around the term Orwellian have a different problem with a lack of privacy than the one Orwell envisioned. In Orwell's book, there was punishment for having unapproved desires.
My best guess is that "it" refers to "PS3/PS4" and stuff refers to "ads". I could be wrong though, but I don't think so.
What I'm interested in is the notion that it is immoral to do something that is against the law or contrary to the legislative branch, or to straight up ignore democracy entirely. Do you consider the matter settled and it is definitely immoral, or are people like anarchists sufficient enough to have the matter still be in the unresolved category?
But I asked whether opposing slavery was wrong given laws that were in effect in a time when slaverery were not such a violation. You changed tenses on me. You may have failed to realize that i was referring to actual laws, which may have made you fail to realize I meant ones at that time period.
So what makes slavery different?
So if it is determined in the future that something you support is such a violation, you are wrong here and now?
Whatever gave you the idea that anything I typed had anything to do with talking points?
When Microsoft can figure out how to monetize information I share with them in exchange for an Office 365 account, sign me up!
I am more interested in the notion of the legitimacy of democracy, the power of the rule of law... On what evidence do you base the notion that slavery violated then established fundamental human rights?
Care to clarify that? All this technology we have was done with little legislative involvement. You seem to be somewhat limiting your scope of change by mentioning law, but your meaning is still unclear. Are you saying that everyone who illegally helped escaped slaves were wrong?
My brother is an analyst. It would appear that part of his job is tending to AI platforms. https://www.linkedin.com/in/oc...
No, we should not pay for work What we want is more and higher quality stuff for less work. When you reward work, that gets messed up.
It os when Symphonic is at the beginning of it!
I have no problem with having them. If someone can manage to get a paid job working in that field without doing unpaid, in a job climate where doing so is the norm, that is fine too. It's all about what rules i believe we should be living under. Keep coming up with examples that could potentially change my mind, though. I may indeed find a situation that is so unbearable that I may say that I don't want this after all. Or go for how anpther system could have much better results. All i know is that I've spent quite a bit figuring out why things should be the way I think I want them.
Your way of accounting for exchange is fundamentally flawed. People don't actually pay for "work", they pay for end results. You may have built a fancy chair that has neat features that would be covered under the concept of intellectual property, but I should be able to ask another person to duplicate that chair without you having any say in it. The concept remains the same when the ability to make copies takes little effort. You want to ensure you get money for something? Prove yourself first and you can ask for money up front with a Kickstarter or Patreon account.
I think what it meant to say wasMicrosoft has begun "actively getting rid of ways that allow users to disable automatic updates",
I knew that I personally wouldn't be experiencing much winning as a result of Trump, but the people opposed to him the most oppose any person winning more than any other person so they put roadblocks in place to prevent it. We are all worse off as a result.
Quit complaining about how others are bettering their lives that incidentally make their lives more unequal from others and work on bettering your life and incidentally make your life more inequal from other. That's what this general complaint boils down to. When people focus on equality, the result is that everyone's life is worse off.
No, this is very clearly an example of, "When they go high, we go low."
You see, the software isn't predisposed to one interpretation or another. After the training is another matter however.
The Tower wasn't the instrument of bad translation, just the beneficiary of it. My takeaway was that much like your example with the word, "Tower" different words had different meanings for different people but were close enough to work in enough contexts, but fell apart in all the contexts that were needed to build the tower.
Most browsers also allow you to hold down the left mouse button to access the tab history menu, which is what I do. I hate Edge for not using it, but it also doesn't allow you to drag and drop to rearrange the bookmarks toolbar, a more important feature. I have an alphabet running along the bookmarks toolbar and all my bookmarks live there.