IDK, if you had a vasmir pushing at.1G for a year, you would be going about ~.1c, in that case you could be there in 20 years. I think this would be semi-reasonable.
The articles aren't really discussing absolute trust, they are talking about only one aspect of SSL -- identification.
A root CA doesn't tell me "you can trust example.com", it tells me that example.com really is example.com. The root CA supposedly put the effort in to making sure the domain owner provided supporting documentation to prove they are who they say they are.
This is analogous to what States do in requiring proving identity before issuing a driver's licenses. Or, as Federal Governments do before issuing passports.
We trust the governments with this function now. I don't see what the big issue is in trusting them with the digital version.
Wow that makes perfect since, and yet I still find somehow to completely disagree.
Yeah so I've been playing with HTML5 lately, Chrome handles about everything I've thrown at it yet. When I take my site to firefox or IE9 it just falls apart, Somehow I don't consider this a problem. for me the big thing is being able to use the tag. This is just so much easier then doing some sort of jquery it's not even funny.
Take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5)
There are several solutions available currently that offer 1" or better absolute accuracy off of GPS signals.
That doesn't help where you can't get GPS - which is what this thing is for in the first place! It's for indoors, undergound etc.
This solution instead requires accurate local time references
No it doesn't. If the article gave you that incorrect impression there is another on the website of Australia's ABC Science Show from a program several months ago.
This uses local transmitters at high power to allow them to operate in less advantageous terrain.
Such as underground where GPS signals do not go!
Because I get lost walking from oneside of the bomb shelter to the other all the time.
But the real question is: would you have come up with a less lame excuse for building a realistic robot in your own image (using the university's money and labs) ?
No Cost consideration?
2 Servers with Raid 7 Arrays/Servers using enterprise drives of course. LTO 5 Stacker With Weekly Iron Mountain Pickups.
This is the same setup I would suggest for my clients for Seismic Data.
I'd be happy to set it up for you for $125k.
Depending on your opinions and general level paranoia, we can discuss online backups, the pricey part always seems to be fat pipe.
Ha, reminds me of what my prof said about interrupts. Your going to have to memorize them for this test. Then just forget them, becuase if if you need to know one you can just google it.
Because some times the UN is our puppet. I think that McCain generally likes the UN, more so than other Republicans, although I could be way off on this one.
Except that's obviously not true. If the right to life can not be taken away by man's laws, how do you justify the death penalty? If the right to liberty can not be taken away by man's laws, how do you justify imprisonment? Obviously the enumerated rights can be taken away, via due process, when it is deemed in the interest of society to do so.
I don't think you understand.... The DoI protects your rights more then you think
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
Protecting these rights is why the constitution was written in the first place. The threat of a 2nd declaration of independence is what keeps the government in check.
> last time I read the document, it began with "WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT". *Self-evident*...
Read it again. That line is not in the US constitution, it's in the declaration of independence. The sentiment definitely informs all of the founding documents, but it's far from a legally-binding portion of the highest law of the US.
But it also says that the rights are inalienable, and endowed by our creator. i.e. can't be taken away by man's laws.
Slashdot Mirror
Dumb Question time:
Would a real controlled fission reaction work or mars? How about the moon?
I must be new here, I thought it was traditional to at least RTFS, if not RTFA.
Your not the new one.... someone needs to tell Soulskill the obligatory XKCD belongs in the comments not the summary.
Jeez, taco's gone for one day and posters start slacking.
As a Texan, I consider New York to be part of New England, They're all yanks to me.
You should probably add "Fast inverse square root" to that list. IMHO
IDK, if you had a vasmir pushing at .1G for a year, you would be going about ~.1c, in that case you could be there in 20 years. I think this would be semi-reasonable.
Regardless, this baseball game needs some new maps instead of these boring re-textures.
Funny, Baseball is probably one of the only major sport to have any variability in the field. My park even has a hill in center field.
Actually, that is a good idea.
The articles aren't really discussing absolute trust, they are talking about only one aspect of SSL -- identification.
A root CA doesn't tell me "you can trust example.com", it tells me that example.com really is example.com. The root CA supposedly put the effort in to making sure the domain owner provided supporting documentation to prove they are who they say they are.
This is analogous to what States do in requiring proving identity before issuing a driver's licenses. Or, as Federal Governments do before issuing passports.
We trust the governments with this function now. I don't see what the big issue is in trusting them with the digital version.
Wow that makes perfect since, and yet I still find somehow to completely disagree.
Yeah so I've been playing with HTML5 lately, Chrome handles about everything I've thrown at it yet. When I take my site to firefox or IE9 it just falls apart, Somehow I don't consider this a problem. for me the big thing is being able to use the tag. This is just so much easier then doing some sort of jquery it's not even funny.
Take a look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5)
um.... working from home is fine, but how do you expect to get food to the grocer?
I prefer ADHD
A CoolerMaster and a well-aimed Vornado can fix anything.
Never underestimate the cooling potential of a box fan and an open case.
That doesn't help where you can't get GPS - which is what this thing is for in the first place! It's for indoors, undergound etc.
No it doesn't. If the article gave you that incorrect impression there is another on the website of Australia's ABC Science Show from a program several months ago.
Such as underground where GPS signals do not go!
Because I get lost walking from oneside of the bomb shelter to the other all the time.
so they reinvented 1950's tech
But the real question is: would you have come up with a less lame excuse for building a realistic robot in your own image (using the university's money and labs) ?
I'm sure there are better usage of college funds
http://clas.asu.edu/node/10122
: American Exceptionalism
I really despise this term. every time I hear it I think "Radical Nationalism"
Wow, and to think I had lost faith in the Canadian extradition process.
The artificial neurons of this network can take incomplete inputs, interact with each other, and come up with a complete conclusion.
So they've managed to create a republican using only a few brain cells...
Well, it's not that impressive considering republicans can do it without any brain cells
No Cost consideration? 2 Servers with Raid 7 Arrays/Servers using enterprise drives of course. LTO 5 Stacker With Weekly Iron Mountain Pickups. This is the same setup I would suggest for my clients for Seismic Data. I'd be happy to set it up for you for $125k. Depending on your opinions and general level paranoia, we can discuss online backups, the pricey part always seems to be fat pipe.
Ha, reminds me of what my prof said about interrupts. Your going to have to memorize them for this test. Then just forget them, becuase if if you need to know one you can just google it.
Because some times the UN is our puppet. I think that McCain generally likes the UN, more so than other Republicans, although I could be way off on this one.
Sometimes? We have veto power.
It's all about the spin, you see it's a spy sat with night vision.
We’ve created a memory device with the physical properties of Jell-O
Yes, yes but which does it work better with: rum or vodka?
Except that's obviously not true. If the right to life can not be taken away by man's laws, how do you justify the death penalty? If the right to liberty can not be taken away by man's laws, how do you justify imprisonment? Obviously the enumerated rights can be taken away, via due process, when it is deemed in the interest of society to do so.
I don't think you understand.... The DoI protects your rights more then you think
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
Protecting these rights is why the constitution was written in the first place. The threat of a 2nd declaration of independence is what keeps the government in check.
> last time I read the document, it began with "WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT". *Self-evident*...
Read it again. That line is not in the US constitution, it's in the declaration of independence. The sentiment definitely informs all of the founding documents, but it's far from a legally-binding portion of the highest law of the US.
But it also says that the rights are inalienable, and endowed by our creator. i.e. can't be taken away by man's laws.
This maybe offtopic, But this guy also introduced legislation to legalize online poker.