Kodak press release containing the patent number - 6,292,218 - and also stating that Kodak has won a ruling that the patent is valid and relevant in a similar case against Samsung.
As I understand it, the T1 and T2 chips both have on-chip crypto accelerators (one per core) already - what's the difference with the Rainbow Falls version?
I assume that you RTF link, and realised that the point Canute was making was that even the king couldn't make the tide turn on his command.</pedantry>
Oops, try that again with a real list (and a slight rewrite)...
No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more
Write your content on Facebook.
Delete Facebook account.
Publish dead-tree book of your content.
Realise Facebook still has your content available to users (e.g. if you mailed it to your BFF).
Sue Facebook for copyright infringement.
Facebook tell you to get stuffed, because you agreed to licence it to them.
There's more of an issue when 4 is replaced by the following:
4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.
No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more
1. Write your content on Facebook.
2. Delete Facebook account.
3. Publish dead-tree book of your content.
4. Realise Facebook still has your content available to users (e.g. if you mailed it to your BFF).
5. Sue Facebook for copyright infringement.
6. Facebook tell you to get stuffed, because you agreed to licence it to them.
The issue might more be what happens when 4 is replaced by the following:
4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.
On Windows, presumably the shared objects are the files stored in %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\#SharedObjects (usually c:\Documents And Settings\%USERNAME%\Application Data\... ) - can you not just delete the files directly?
The point of the story is that companies publish the successful trials on a drug, but don't publish failed trials on that same drug - i.e. they cherry-pick the results.
Slashdot Mirror
Bonus points for the first person to make an MMO where all the characters are photons, and refer to it as "Masslessly-Mulitplayer"
"Give me a few of your tired, some of your poor, and a reasonable proportion of your huddled masses ..."
It's about patents - NetApp claim that ZFS contains their patented technology (that NetApp incorporated into their WAFL filesystem).
Don't be silly, those are obviously the footprints of the Martian gorillas.
To be fair, an SSH client/terminal emulator isn't exactly stretching the limits of Windows APIs, as compared to e.g. GTA 4.
Kodak press release containing the patent number - 6,292,218 - and also stating that Kodak has won a ruling that the patent is valid and relevant in a similar case against Samsung.
Not to be confused with "Tortoise interference", which severely disrupted the 2009 hare-racing world championship.
They were actually having a flamewar on LKML about what the best scheduler for the Linux kernel is.
As I understand it, the T1 and T2 chips both have on-chip crypto accelerators (one per core) already - what's the difference with the Rainbow Falls version?
I assume that you RTF link, and realised that the point Canute was making was that even the king couldn't make the tide turn on his command.</pedantry>
I used to wonder it the Windows 98 Critical Update Notification Utility was originally going to have been a Tool.
Also, Sun supply the Solaris Crash Analysis Tool, and trust me - if you're googling for the documentation, make sure you turn Safe Search on ...
/me turns on short_open_tag in php.ini, then cackles maniacally ...
"Why?"
"Oh, it's got a million and one uses ... [sprinkles down pants] Ah, soothes the fire!"
"Tyranno-saur-us, but did anyone ... [puts on shades] ... see them?"
[The Who] Bwaaaaaaaaoooo ba ba! (etc)
Wasn't that supposedly one of the main reasons that they bought BEA - to get Weblogic to merge with/replace OAS?
Er, which "cheek" do you mean?
Just say "414" and waggle your eyebrows suggestively ...
Oops, try that again with a real list (and a slight rewrite) ...
No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more
There's more of an issue when 4 is replaced by the following:
4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.
No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more 1. Write your content on Facebook. 2. Delete Facebook account. 3. Publish dead-tree book of your content. 4. Realise Facebook still has your content available to users (e.g. if you mailed it to your BFF). 5. Sue Facebook for copyright infringement. 6. Facebook tell you to get stuffed, because you agreed to licence it to them. The issue might more be what happens when 4 is replaced by the following: 4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.
On Windows, presumably the shared objects are the files stored in %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\#SharedObjects (usually c:\Documents And Settings\%USERNAME%\Application Data\... ) - can you not just delete the files directly?
The point of the story is that companies publish the successful trials on a drug, but don't publish failed trials on that same drug - i.e. they cherry-pick the results.
... the domain transfer took more than 30 mins, so it was free.
Looking at the version numbers (0.2 on the Souceforge page vs 2.0.2 on the page linked by the original article, I think that's a different libarc.
Exactly, that's why they should make the law permanent - then it's not temporary safety that we're gaining, so that's all right. Er, hang on ... ?