I wanna know what is right. I'll kill them all if I like. I am a time bomb inside. No listens to reason and I am ready to fight. I am ready to fight. So what?
You became a thrill seeker. kill for a thrill. thrill seeker comes from all walks of life. A home where the parents are too busy to show respect. respect. respect.
[yeah!]
WATCH OUT LINUX...WINDOWS HAS BEEN FIXXXXED!
on
MindStorms Madness
·
· Score: -1
Dear Windows User,
Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 95, 98 and ME to nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's professional and industrial version of Windows.
The new WinFix is a very effective way to improve the reliability of Windows, because it makes Windows fault-tolerant and self-repairing.
And WinFix is very safe, because it operates completely independent of Windows.
CLICK HERE to find out more about WinFix, the safest, most effective way to keep you working, by keeping your PC working non-stop.
Arlen Dixon, CEO
Pinewood Software Marketing
ok, let me explain, than. There are several reasons why _I_ do not support Mozilla, or don't like it as a product. Technical ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) startup time is HUGE. b) minimize/maximize time is enermous c) User Interface is *terrible* d) CSS support is far away from being completed e) Mozilla supports broken Netscape table alyout (HTML) Political ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) Netscape (AOL Time Warner) is backing Mozilla, and *uses* Mozilla for own *games* AOL needs to protect "icon on genuis Microsoft Desktop"? Let's threat them [MS] that we will use Gecko/Mozilla as an engine in next AOL browser. Again, it's fine with me if AOL or even MS will use Mozilla - but not for *dirty games*, please!... b) Mozilla developers are often paid by Netscape, and those developers do not respect *normal* Mozilla users. To understand it better - compare Mozilla-layout list with, say, KFM-devel, (or Konq-bugs), where key Konqueror developers (and advanced users) are subscribed and *answer questions*, including "what will be in next version" and "when it will be released" Business reasons ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) Mozilla is in development almost 4 years but results its developers achieved are not impressive, at all. Again: Mozilla is slow, bloated, consumes a lot of memory and lacks support for many important standards (partially implemented standard can't be called "reference implementation" or "standard compliant implementation") b) it's time to recognize (in case there is a least one Real Manager behind this project) that Mozilla project failed.:-(( It's really a pity, but you can't ignore facts. c) unfortunately, it seems that neither Netscape or AOL itself has good managers. So, may be, it's good time to look for such managers outside?... Again - answer is "no!..." from Netscape. So, what can I say seeing such arrogance from Netscape's side? It's a pity. I wish it could be better. But this is out of my control at a moment. So, if we left political reasons outside, only Technical and Business reasons theirself are enough to recognize that Mozilla is *failing*, if not failed already. That's my opinion, and I strongly back it.
I had Jessie's girl. Why can't I find a woman like that?
I wanna know what is right. I'll kill them all if I like. I am a time bomb inside. No listens to reason and I am ready to fight. I am ready to fight. So what?
killing time is appropriate to make a mess and fuck all the rest. we say: so what?
I only kill to know I'm alive. So what?
You became a thrill seeker. kill for a thrill. thrill seeker comes from all walks of life. A home where the parents are too busy to show respect. respect. respect. [yeah!]
Dear Windows User, Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 95, 98 and ME to nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's professional and industrial version of Windows. The new WinFix is a very effective way to improve the reliability of Windows, because it makes Windows fault-tolerant and self-repairing. And WinFix is very safe, because it operates completely independent of Windows. CLICK HERE to find out more about WinFix, the safest, most effective way to keep you working, by keeping your PC working non-stop. Arlen Dixon, CEO Pinewood Software Marketing
do you go around sticking it in watermelons?
but I can tell you this right now: I probably have a bigger penis than you.
Jenny Jones is hot. I would get a full time job for that action
first post if for LOGGED IN trolls you cock stroking AC dog dick
have you heard about Evil Knievels latest stunt? he is going to run across ethiopia with a chicken tied on his back. sssss booom bahhh
it's a love affair. mainly jesus and my hotrod
OK... #6 is a pretty good point... but those OTHERS are just plain mean *sniff*... get over it and loose some weight you porky AC bitch
shitwich goes well with piss broth soup. oh yeah brap brap brap brap blllllarppppp *eyes begin to water* brrrrrap plop
here is something you can grab and spread
I want the three minutes of my life back that I wasted on the horrible flash cartoon.
dont forget masturbating/and or having sex on company time.
ok, let me explain, than. There are several reasons why _I_ do not support Mozilla, or don't like it as a product. Technical ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) startup time is HUGE. b) minimize/maximize time is enermous c) User Interface is *terrible* d) CSS support is far away from being completed e) Mozilla supports broken Netscape table alyout (HTML) Political ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) Netscape (AOL Time Warner) is backing Mozilla, and *uses* Mozilla for own *games* AOL needs to protect "icon on genuis Microsoft Desktop"? Let's threat them [MS] that we will use Gecko/Mozilla as an engine in next AOL browser. Again, it's fine with me if AOL or even MS will use Mozilla - but not for *dirty games*, please!... b) Mozilla developers are often paid by Netscape, and those developers do not respect *normal* Mozilla users. To understand it better - compare Mozilla-layout list with, say, KFM-devel, (or Konq-bugs), where key Konqueror developers (and advanced users) are subscribed and *answer questions*, including "what will be in next version" and "when it will be released" Business reasons ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a) Mozilla is in development almost 4 years but results its developers achieved are not impressive, at all. Again: Mozilla is slow, bloated, consumes a lot of memory and lacks support for many important standards (partially implemented standard can't be called "reference implementation" or "standard compliant implementation") b) it's time to recognize (in case there is a least one Real Manager behind this project) that Mozilla project failed. :-(( It's really a pity, but you can't ignore facts. c) unfortunately, it seems that neither Netscape or AOL itself has good managers. So, may be, it's good time to look for such managers outside?... Again - answer is "no!..." from Netscape. So, what can I say seeing such arrogance from Netscape's side? It's a pity. I wish it could be better. But this is out of my control at a moment. So, if we left political reasons outside, only Technical and Business reasons theirself are enough to recognize that Mozilla is *failing*, if not failed already. That's my opinion, and I strongly back it.
smells like cat shit
good idea. i just turned it on and bought me an instant subscription. thanks AC
it's an article by timmeh what do you expect
to evil knievel
break yourself bitch fool.
humungous sodomization post
this bastard ate my sister!