Anything powerful enough to act as a decent fileserver for me, by which I mean able to tunnel rsync through ssh at a decent rate, is fast enough to run inetd servers of BSD games or host a MUD.
I won't buy machines that are crippled. Does it do more than an $80 120gb hard disk dropped into a $5 PC with an ethernet card?
come with a crippled version of Sun's compiler, and offer GCC on a latter CD. Older Solaris software is designed to use their compiler rather than GCC.
Solaris comes with GCC in this respect as SCO OpenServer comes with pthread support. It's available, but is not installed by default.
(I'm speaking from heresay, I just run Solaris 2.6 and then only on one of my sparcs.)
google doesn't bother with extraneous crap. Altavista and AllTheWeb both support more types of searches than google.
A single feature is useless when another engine still returns better results. I still use google for text searches, only hopping over to altavista for a music search.
share portability in common. I can write an app in C, and run it on my server, laptop, palmtop, ancient SunServer, or even a Windows machine. The same goes for Java and C++.
If I use C#, I'm effectively locked into.NET. Mono is a good start, but not enough to make my code reliably portable.
C# has all the speed of Java with all the portability of X86 assembly linked to Windows libraries. Microsoft's BS patents will help ensure that the portability problems aren't corrected.
The real purpose behind.NET is to make the platform compatibility promised by NT 4 available without opening the source.
I can't patent "A Device that Catches Small Animals", but I can patent "An Improved Device for Capturing Small Animals by Use of Magical Cheese" in the hardware world. In the software world, I can go so far as to patent "Magical Cheese" without the recipe for said cheese or an investigation into my magical bacteria.
We don't need to do completely away with software patents any more than we need to do away with all patents. We need to make both reasonable.
By reasonable, I mean non-profit groups should be exempt, patents should last 2-5 years depending upon the technology involved, and nothing that significantly advances a previous technology should fall under that technology's patent.
Patents should spawn innovation in exchange for the disclosure of the underlying technology. They shouldn't hold innovation hostage for decades to come.
And let us take a crack at them. Suddenly you'll have NetBSD running directly on the card, twice the framerate in Linux as in windows, and (worst of all) both companies' products will be advanced, eliminating the advantage over one's competitor by tossing more money at the problem.
Betterment serves no profitable purpose unless it is unatainable by one's competitor. If someone can show how they'll make more money by making a better product while also aiding their competitor in the same endeavor, they might help us out a bit more.
Let a second processor take care of the rendering. (Firewire being too slow. If you can only read at 50 billion letters a second, feel free to use such antiquated technology.)
I run OpenBox to avoid the overhead of KDE or GNOME, as well as for its better interface.
If a 3d interface is begun, it won't be an openbox/blackbox style system in which one can quickly and easily do what's needed after learning the controls. It will be a feature-barren, "dumbed down" interface like KDE or GNOME that for all intents an purposes is designed to look like winshit.
I have nothing against KDE and GNOME, they show how beautiful X can be and help entice new users. We already have 3d in the sense of virtual desktops, and 3d graphics are irrelevant in comparison.
I thought OBSD would keep me same fram them!
(good job theo; great OS/distro)
forward microsoft all of your M$ worms, asking how the hell they could get defense contracts without bribery/extortion.
If that involves too much thought, just go streaking at SCO.
If I was blackmailed into writing a spambot, I sure as hell wouldn't write a good one.
already has DRM
spamthistohelpusout@someresearchcompany.com
and can I get a shell on it?
Anything powerful enough to act as a decent fileserver for me, by which I mean able to tunnel rsync through ssh at a decent rate, is fast enough to run inetd servers of BSD games or host a MUD.
I won't buy machines that are crippled. Does it do more than an $80 120gb hard disk dropped into a $5 PC with an ethernet card?
come with a crippled version of Sun's compiler, and offer GCC on a latter CD. Older Solaris software is designed to use their compiler rather than GCC.
Solaris comes with GCC in this respect as SCO OpenServer comes with pthread support. It's available, but is not installed by default.
(I'm speaking from heresay, I just run Solaris 2.6 and then only on one of my sparcs.)
Just to take a peak at the regerative systems.
Locking people into getting repairs fromt he manufacturer has been a major influence on automotive design for years, why should this be any different?
I for one welcome our new florescent desk lamp overlords...
google doesn't bother with extraneous crap. Altavista and AllTheWeb both support more types of searches than google.
A single feature is useless when another engine still returns better results. I still use google for text searches, only hopping over to altavista for a music search.
and evil Monte Python has an even larger evil cult following.
(In all seriousness, Evil Dead 3 sucks. Evil Dead 2 is "meh". The original is awesome. Can't attest the musical, it's a self respect thing.)
So tell us stranger...
What is it like living in the future?
Days ago. And IIRC, it was a /. article that inspired me.
to reboot without rebooting, such that uptime remains the same but kernel upgrades can take place?
I remember reading about it somewhere, but it was skimpy on details, sufficing to say that it was a "bad idea".
but it can still compile KDE3 in a few minutes.
and I did.
Why not fake an email from verisign's CEO to cut the crap? I've always wondered why such a technique isn't used more often.
It's one of the few jobs that doesn't involve killing animals, though I'm sure such an act is somehow entailed in it.
share portability in common. I can write an app in C, and run it on my server, laptop, palmtop, ancient SunServer, or even a Windows machine. The same goes for Java and C++.
.NET. Mono is a good start, but not enough to make my code reliably portable.
.NET is to make the platform compatibility promised by NT 4 available without opening the source.
If I use C#, I'm effectively locked into
C# has all the speed of Java with all the portability of X86 assembly linked to Windows libraries. Microsoft's BS patents will help ensure that the portability problems aren't corrected.
The real purpose behind
but it seems to me that bribes from Mirrosoft for "defense contracts" comprise the largest threats to national electronic security.
Let's just switch everything over to OpenBSD and pray to cueriel that we keep good relations with Canada.
I can't patent "A Device that Catches Small Animals", but I can patent "An Improved Device for Capturing Small Animals by Use of Magical Cheese" in the hardware world. In the software world, I can go so far as to patent "Magical Cheese" without the recipe for said cheese or an investigation into my magical bacteria.
We don't need to do completely away with software patents any more than we need to do away with all patents. We need to make both reasonable.
By reasonable, I mean non-profit groups should be exempt, patents should last 2-5 years depending upon the technology involved, and nothing that significantly advances a previous technology should fall under that technology's patent.
Patents should spawn innovation in exchange for the disclosure of the underlying technology. They shouldn't hold innovation hostage for decades to come.
http://tinyurl.com/na9o"> http://tinyurl.com/na9o </a>
And let us take a crack at them. Suddenly you'll have NetBSD running directly on the card, twice the framerate in Linux as in windows, and (worst of all) both companies' products will be advanced, eliminating the advantage over one's competitor by tossing more money at the problem.
Betterment serves no profitable purpose unless it is unatainable by one's competitor. If someone can show how they'll make more money by making a better product while also aiding their competitor in the same endeavor, they might help us out a bit more.
Let a second processor take care of the rendering. (Firewire being too slow. If you can only read at 50 billion letters a second, feel free to use such antiquated technology.)
I run OpenBox to avoid the overhead of KDE or GNOME, as well as for its better interface.
If a 3d interface is begun, it won't be an openbox/blackbox style system in which one can quickly and easily do what's needed after learning the controls. It will be a feature-barren, "dumbed down" interface like KDE or GNOME that for all intents an purposes is designed to look like winshit.
I have nothing against KDE and GNOME, they show how beautiful X can be and help entice new users. We already have 3d in the sense of virtual desktops, and 3d graphics are irrelevant in comparison.
/: bin boot cdrom dev devs etc floppy home initrd lib lost+found media mnt music opt proc root sbin tmp usr var vmdebian vmlinux vmlinux26 /bin:
arch
bash
cat
chgrp
chmod
chown
cp
cpio
csh
date
dd
df
dir
dmesg
dnsdomainname
echo
ed
egrepe--
false
fgconsole
fgrep
fuser
grep
gunzip
gzexe
gzip
hostname
kill
ksh
ln
loadkeys
login
ls
lspci
mkdir
mknod
mktemp
more
mount
mt
mt-gnu
mv
nc
netcat
netstat
pidof
ping
ps
pwd
rbash
readlink
rm
rmdir
run-parts
rzsh
sed
setserial
sh
sleep
stty
su
sync
tar
tcsh
tempfile
touch
true
umount
uname
uncompress
vdir
zcat
zcmp
zdiff
zegrep
zfgrep
zforce
zgrep
zless
zmore
znew
zsh
zsh4
And the list goes on. One HELL of a ferris wheel.