But I'm hoping that in trying this case, the court takes into account the media levy and clarifies the whole thing, pretty far on the side of the consumer.
Normally each side would pay for their physical plant... to the peering point, and meet in the middle. The rooma at a datacenter of sufficient size to do so, is called a meet-me room.
I personally find it funny to see AT&T talking about tier-1 status peering, when referring about themselves... It's my understanding it's been a while since they did so.
They're not "unimportant" they're being efficientized. Which means neglected except in market where the customer explicitly refuses to buy if they're not included/is willing to pay extra for them.
There is also the ex-military dolphin version that comes with a full on drug-addict and unreasonable computer-hacking ability. (The novella was much better than the film, nuff said).
I've seen in one case where a.cn name was used, it was all nice and all, saying they had to get our permission. But it really was a ploy to try to get us to register the.cn at inflated prices... On the other hand, there was no existing site in the.cn at the time, so I'll admit it's not an identical situation to the article.
Actually, that's exactly what's wrong with that reasoning. If Noone is aware of the problem, it's not a problem. If just one potential hacker is aware of the problem, it's a problem.
The lack of general awareness of the problem just means those public companies whose stock value is dependant on there not being any problems will be protected from being "punished by the market" like they deserve to.
Right now, the law is pretty unclear what happens if a company you give your information to, loses it. But what about other crimes? If a company is caught in some scheme by say an employee, it has insurance. Those with good security practices have lower premiums. Let's just clarify the law, and let the cost of those security measures be borne by those who require keeping the information.
Every other content owner makes a similar attack on fair use. The content owners should never get a license to ban the legal trading. What this amounts to is an attempt to get out of the onus of proving the content is infringing in the first place, on a case by case basis. "We're not allowed to kill off fair use, so you must all be pirates"
I'm sorry mister producer, but the law says you have to prove infringement, and please, let's see you just caring about the infringemetn of your product, we'll deal with the other producer later. Cartels be damned.
OF course, at that point he'd have to admit the size of his potential market, and maybe he'd prefer a canadian-style tax on removable media.
Meme is an ancient greek word, it predates english, and is a derivative of memory(IIRC)... Please try again. What you mean is it predates the use in english of the word meme to mean "viral idea". The word meme in english new, in the same sense that english is a comparatively "newer" language, the idea that some ideas are viral has been around for probably longer than writing...
I think you got something there. "Natural language" is far less dense than specialised languages. Legalese, or technical language above a certain level, you cannot skip a single word, or sometimes, even a single comma. Most people I know read about 50% of the words on a page, then make up an opinion of what is meant. That's why legalese is scary. It's not that it's hard to understand, it's that the natural process these people use makes it 95% likely to get the meaning wrong. When they say complicated, they mean "newbie-friendly" or at least, "user-friendly". And the whole point of a jargon is to be "specialist-friendly" it's not easy to combine the two.
I imagine the technique could be spread to locate the upstream fish provider who illegally caught the endangered fish... Is there any movement in that direction?
I realize polyandry is much rarer, but did they try to contrast this with it? I suspect the cultural expecations that make polygamy possible make the stress-free living that really generates the longevity possible. Up to the point where the opposite would be true for polyandry.
How about we look at ARIN first. Despite the fact that a quadrillion is still a small portion of the available space, they still expect an isp to pay for getting assigned one. Since your isp's don't want to pay to upgrade their equipment to give you something you likely won't know enough about to desire and pay for, they don't upgrade.
IPv6 adoption will start when you can't get assigned a block or address, or when it becomes free(at least to tier 3 and below isps). I'll grant Tier 1s might be considered a special case, because of size, etc... profitability of being able to tunnel ipv4 in ipv6 etc...
But as long as a mom and pop has to pay 3000$/year to get a block of ipv6, don't expect them to spring for it. And unlike you've been told, they're the adoption drivers of the internet... Mostly because they don't have anything to lose
I thought my post was attached to a post that treated it like technology, not science. If not, apologies.
I was trying to address the fact that despite it being in the science section, slashdot was going to treat it like technology, and comment on applicability, instead of theoretical merits.
I'm all for mimicking natural processes(nature's got many more testing and debugging hours than humans do, as a rule), in how we do things. Nature has us beat in the self-replicating, energy-efficient gizmo department though.
I'm also not storing anything so important that I need a technically superior solution.
And yet you're asking slashdot? *sarcasm*Are you sure you shouldn't be on the fortune500 forums? */sarcasm*
I doubt(and the rest of the thread proves it, I think), that we'd debate much of anything but 1) technically superior solutions 2) pet solutions we happen to like, no matter if they're good or not
That Ryanair could just have blocked the sites pre-emptively, instead of taking the customers money, then cancelinng the tickets, means they just want some of the smaller fish to go out of business. As pointed out elsewhere in this thread, travel agents tend to have volume, so would be easy to spot on a ip/username/pass basis.
How much of that experience is due to the "for the experienced user" selecting criteria? Commercial support costs a lot, because there are a lot of calls, which requires lots of people, which means you have more level 1 and less level 3 people(proportionately anyways), which makes those people overworked, which lowers the qualify of their work(again if only proportinately). But the costs don't go down(indeed, they tend to go up). So the perceived value of support goes down.
How about we say the deserts allow the earth's thermal system to reach a balance? We have more deserts, which sequester more carbon, which makes us cooler, which sequesters less carbon, which makes us hotter, which makes more deserts.
We shouldn't worry about global warming, we should worry if we can survive global warming...
I meant "usually" in the sense that even if companies would systematically put it in the contract, not everyone reads, or understands such provisions...
Slashdot Mirror
Two nintendo-related stories on the same site at the same time, one referring to the others.
News at eleven?
But I'm hoping that in trying this case, the court takes into account the media levy and clarifies the whole thing, pretty far on the side of the consumer.
Normally each side would pay for their physical plant... to the peering point, and meet in the middle. The rooma at a datacenter of sufficient size to do so, is called a meet-me room.
I personally find it funny to see AT&T talking about tier-1 status peering, when referring about themselves... It's my understanding it's been a while since they did so.
They're not "unimportant" they're being efficientized. Which means neglected except in market where the customer explicitly refuses to buy if they're not included/is willing to pay extra for them.
There is also the ex-military dolphin version that comes with a full on drug-addict and unreasonable computer-hacking ability. (The novella was much better than the film, nuff said).
I've seen in one case where a .cn name was used, it was all nice and all, saying they had to get our permission. But it really was a ploy to try to get us to register the .cn at inflated prices... On the other hand, there was no existing site in the .cn at the time, so I'll admit it's not an identical situation to the article.
Actually, that's exactly what's wrong with that reasoning. If Noone is aware of the problem, it's not a problem. If just one potential hacker is aware of the problem, it's a problem.
The lack of general awareness of the problem just means those public companies whose stock value is dependant on there not being any problems will be protected from being "punished by the market" like they deserve to.
Right now, the law is pretty unclear what happens if a company you give your information to, loses it.
But what about other crimes? If a company is caught in some scheme by say an employee, it has insurance. Those with good security practices have lower premiums.
Let's just clarify the law, and let the cost of those security measures be borne by those who require keeping the information.
Can openmoko support both models of phone, one with a cam, the other without?
Most likely
Will both models be offered
Unlikely, business decision will likely nix one
Your need of having the cam with you will most likely overrule the desire of those that want a cheaper phone that does whatever it does, 100%.
It's regrettable, and I'm already offtopic anyways, since the choice you're not being offered has nothing to do with openmoko.
Every other content owner makes a similar attack on fair use. The content owners should never get a license to ban the legal trading. What this amounts to is an attempt to get out of the onus of proving the content is infringing in the first place, on a case by case basis. "We're not allowed to kill off fair use, so you must all be pirates"
I'm sorry mister producer, but the law says you have to prove infringement, and please, let's see you just caring about the infringemetn of your product, we'll deal with the other producer later. Cartels be damned.
OF course, at that point he'd have to admit the size of his potential market, and maybe he'd prefer a canadian-style tax on removable media.
Meme is an ancient greek word, it predates english, and is a derivative of memory(IIRC)... Please try again. What you mean is it predates the use in english of the word meme to mean "viral idea". The word meme in english new, in the same sense that english is a comparatively "newer" language, the idea that some ideas are viral has been around for probably longer than writing...
I think you got something there. "Natural language" is far less dense than specialised languages. Legalese, or technical language above a certain level, you cannot skip a single word, or sometimes, even a single comma. Most people I know read about 50% of the words on a page, then make up an opinion of what is meant. That's why legalese is scary. It's not that it's hard to understand, it's that the natural process these people use makes it 95% likely to get the meaning wrong. When they say complicated, they mean "newbie-friendly" or at least, "user-friendly". And the whole point of a jargon is to be "specialist-friendly" it's not easy to combine the two.
If you can plant a 300$ mac mini and get a 4500$ xServe, I'd say that's a cash crop. *goes to do that with mine*
I imagine the technique could be spread to locate the upstream fish provider who illegally caught the endangered fish... Is there any movement in that direction?
But if the contractor messed up this bad, and can't come up with a solution in time, just what does the contract include as penalty?
Seems to me the contract is just a cashcow for that Premium Voting corporation...
I'd have said reschedule the election at their expense, but I imagine that's not possible in this case.
I was just thinking that the release of this rumor on slashdot at the same time as ATI's new linux drivers for crossfire couldn't be a coincidence...
I realize polyandry is much rarer, but did they try to contrast this with it? I suspect the cultural expecations that make polygamy possible make the stress-free living that really generates the longevity possible. Up to the point where the opposite would be true for polyandry.
How about we look at ARIN first. Despite the fact that a quadrillion is still a small portion of the available space, they still expect an isp to pay for getting assigned one. Since your isp's don't want to pay to upgrade their equipment to give you something you likely won't know enough about to desire and pay for, they don't upgrade.
IPv6 adoption will start when you can't get assigned a block or address, or when it becomes free(at least to tier 3 and below isps). I'll grant Tier 1s might be considered a special case, because of size, etc... profitability of being able to tunnel ipv4 in ipv6 etc...
But as long as a mom and pop has to pay 3000$/year to get a block of ipv6, don't expect them to spring for it. And unlike you've been told, they're the adoption drivers of the internet... Mostly because they don't have anything to lose
I thought my post was attached to a post that treated it like technology, not science.
If not, apologies.
I was trying to address the fact that despite it being in the science section, slashdot was going to treat it like technology, and comment on applicability, instead of theoretical merits.
I'm all for mimicking natural processes(nature's got many more testing and debugging hours than humans do, as a rule), in how we do things. Nature has us beat in the self-replicating, energy-efficient gizmo department though.
And yet you're asking slashdot? *sarcasm*Are you sure you shouldn't be on the fortune500 forums? */sarcasm*
I doubt(and the rest of the thread proves it, I think), that we'd debate much of anything but
1) technically superior solutions
2) pet solutions we happen to like, no matter if they're good or not
How about we let them work out the bugs before posting to slashdot?
Seems a lot of the stories get posted to get into "the media" without having the required science/adverse analysis/hostile counterpoint process done.
That Ryanair could just have blocked the sites pre-emptively, instead of taking the customers money, then cancelinng the tickets, means they just want some of the smaller fish to go out of business. As pointed out elsewhere in this thread, travel agents tend to have volume, so would be easy to spot on a ip/username/pass basis.
How much of that experience is due to the "for the experienced user" selecting criteria? Commercial support costs a lot, because there are a lot of calls, which requires lots of people, which means you have more level 1 and less level 3 people(proportionately anyways), which makes those people overworked, which lowers the qualify of their work(again if only proportinately). But the costs don't go down(indeed, they tend to go up). So the perceived value of support goes down.
How about we say the deserts allow the earth's thermal system to reach a balance? We have more deserts, which sequester more carbon, which makes us cooler, which sequesters less carbon, which makes us hotter, which makes more deserts.
We shouldn't worry about global warming, we should worry if we can survive global warming...
I meant "usually" in the sense that even if companies would systematically put it in the contract, not everyone reads, or understands such provisions...