Slashdot Mirror


User: TweeKinDaBahx

TweeKinDaBahx's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
221
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 221

  1. Re:Warchalking? on Warchalking Visual Cues To Urban WLANs · · Score: 1

    or even better, "open vandalism"

  2. HAAHAHA on Two Towers Teaser Trailer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I still haven't seen LoTR, SW:E2, or Spider-man.

    I haven't been to a theatre in over 5 months. (last movie i saw was 'how high').

    Boycott the MPAA.

  3. Re:Matrox cards always look good on paper on Matrox Parhelia Benchmarks and Review · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This isn't just an issue with matrox, but the while video card industry.

    Every card I have ever purchased has never come with a worthwhile driver. The Geforce 2 Ti I bought hasn't had even remotely good drivers until the last revision, and the card still occasionally causes a bsod under winxp.

    I think that these companies need to get on top of writing better drivers for their cards because simply put, the card may be the l33test thing ever, but it won't beat an S3 trio off of the starting line w/o good drivers...

  4. Re:what am I missing about vid cards? on Matrox Parhelia Benchmarks and Review · · Score: 0

    Get two computers with identical monitors. Make sure one has a card that pumps 70 fps and one has a GeForce 4 4600 Ti in it pumping 150 fps. You will see a very noticable difference in the smoothness.

    Sure the human eye can see only 30 fps, but the higher the framerate the smoother motion will appear to be.

  5. Re:uhh.. on Matrox Parhelia Benchmarks and Review · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Like I said, just wait. The 5's should have the whole 'peripheral vision' thing too.

    As for the low res/framerate thingy, that's why i think it will be a great card for workstations.

    I don't think this card is garbage at all, it has some neat features. It just doesn't pump out the high res framerates/picture quality I'd want in my next gaming rig.

    Then again, this is just the first run of this techology. In the current atmosphere of PC technology, in 6 months a newer version of this card may be the cat's meow.

  6. Re:What is it? on Matrox Parhelia Benchmarks and Review · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's an astronomy term given to the effect which occurs when water crystals in the upper atmosphere make it look like there is halo around the sun i believe, but it could also be when it makes it look like there are two suns.

    I'm just bored, look on google. I might be right tho.

  7. uhh.. on Matrox Parhelia Benchmarks and Review · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this card is not woth the asking price. It's nice to see Matrox trying to get back into the game, but the technology in the card is well... so last year.

    I predict that this card may eventually be popular in high-end workstations, with matrox fans (if there are any), and with people who for one reason or another just don't like nVidia.

    It may also take some market share away from ATi, but I don't suspect it will cause a huge dent.

    The stats really just don't impress me. Then again, I'm a heavy Windows gamer, and from reading their white papers on this card they must not be trying for the gamer market.

    I'm just gonna sit back and wait for the GeForce 5, just like I waited for the Voodoo 5500. Hopefully nVidia doesn't go out of business :P.

  8. this is cracked.... on Shocked, Shocked at Payola · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Clear-Channel puts SO MANY ADS on their lame ass radio stations, it must cost so much to put on a single because no one will listen to their damned sprint commercials all morning long.

    Here's a tip for clear-channel: You want more listeners? PLAY MORE F*cking music and less DUMB DUMB DUMB RETARD LOVING CRICKET COMMERCIALS@!!!&^$!

  9. Re:In other news.... on XBox + UltimateTV for $500 · · Score: 0

    why is this funny?

    This is off-topic.

    damnit, the mods smoke low quality crack.

  10. YEAH!! on XBox + UltimateTV for $500 · · Score: 0

    This is good news. I was already thinking about buying an Xbox anyway, but now it has a TV recorder too. Now if I can play my DivX movies on it as well, the PS2 be damned!!

  11. Re:umm on Virtual Machine Design and Implementation in C/C++ · · Score: 0

    Unless you're trying to learn how to code, in which case a lot of well documented code in a book such as this one can make all the difference.

    Not like my CS text, which promptly introduced such concepts as templates before anyone in the class could even use a class in C++...

    Ah well, I like code in books, that way I can compare my code to someone elses without having to use another terminal (ALT+F* baby)

  12. Re:OT: Perl Virtual Machine? on Virtual Machine Design and Implementation in C/C++ · · Score: 0

    Isn't perl technically an interperted language like basic?

    I'm not trying to troll, but I guess I should have stayed awake in my CS class because i was under the impression the 'scripting' languages were not compiled.

    I guess that would be why it runs on a virtual machine, if I'm right (and I think i may be way outta whack).

    Someone throw me a bone here.

  13. Re:Operating Systems on Virtual Machine Design and Implementation in C/C++ · · Score: 0

    Well, not yet at least.

    Lets remember, XP is kinda like ME in the sense that it's just an interface update. The actual OS behind XP is essentially just Win2k. 'Whistler' AKA .NET is still in the works.

    I'm actually interested in seeing what it's like, in all seriousness, I've heard M$ programmers refer to it as MS UNIX. I can only imagine what that means...

  14. weee on Virtual Machine Design and Implementation in C/C++ · · Score: 0

    virtual machines are leet because you can test your virus code without actually damaging your own system. Unless you're clueless, in which case you'll probably infect yourself and the rest of the internet and get ass raped in prison.

  15. huhuh on XPlay: iPod with Windows · · Score: -1

    foooo chunky fooooo

    liek cheeze

  16. Re:GURPS on New Mobile Phones Showcased · · Score: 1

    shouldn't that be GPRRS?

  17. Re:ech on New Mobile Phones Showcased · · Score: 1

    point being?

  18. Re:I really want a cell phone on New Mobile Phones Showcased · · Score: 1

    This is such a good flame.

    Teach me to flame liek you flame :P

  19. ech on New Mobile Phones Showcased · · Score: 1

    now we're going to have to worry about people looking at porn while driving.

    Only hands-free porn viewing allowed in Santa Fe.

  20. Re:rofl on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: 1

    Another expansion on the car thing:

    When you get linux, you get a car in a box you have to assemble yourself. Some parts aren't right, don't function, or are currently unsupported. By the time you're done you have something that looks like a cross between a yugo and pinto and runs like colt vista.

  21. Re:rofl on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Such as Linux.

    You want something robust and Open source? Use BSD you lamers. You don't even know what you're missing out on.

  22. Re:Lets play... on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: 1

    OH NO THE TRUTH IS OUT!!!!

  23. Re:rofl on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it's only evil because you're not the one making money off of it so STFU and post logged in bitch.

  24. Re:rofl on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: -1, Troll

    1) 5% of the market doesn't count
    2) Just because a server has a GUI doesn't mean it's a desktop system suitable for giving to say you grandmother. KDE, GNOME, et al, are all far to buggy, bloated, and user UNFRIENDLY. As a systems administrator I would NEVER subject my users to that sort of abuse.
    3) OSX is cool, but is BSD based. That's a whole different can of worms. And it's mac only. Macs are goood for one thing: graphics. No one want to spend $3500 on a e-mail checking workstation.

    Thanx for the flame, it was mildy entertaining to make fun of an AC.

  25. Re:Lets play... on IBM Kernel Hackers Respond · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It doesn't sound like something a business analysts would say.

    OSS is an economic nightmare.