I just had a conversation with Elbot, it asked what led me to it. I told it slashdot and it said
no wonder I've had so many geeks chatting with me recently. Obviously scripted response but I LOLed.
Yeah, there's definitely some good game music out there already. As to OP's suggestion of "cooperative fun" games; Little Big Planet looks pretty cool. I dig the soundtrack on the demo too.
Your future employer might think you had a predilection for drug use. That is, if they could divine your handle somehow -- which in your case seems unlikely, so I guess it's all good.
Tweak the algorithm to boost the rank of pages that have been around for a long time but then you'd get bobby's homepage that hasn't been updated in eight years.
Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum
on
Google, Circa 2001
·
· Score: 1
Then
Results 1 - 10 of about 7,700 for sex robots from Japan.
Now
Results 1 - 10 of about 221,000 for sex robots from Japan.
Real-life physical ID is not accessible. If you have to show up somewhere in person this is infeasible. If you have a hotline to call for access codes you're going to have to provide a TTY alternative -- easy enough to create a TTY bot. It ceases to be Completely Automated at this point anyway.
Foolproof CAPTCHA is an impossibility, you would need true AI at which point it would be self-defeating.
Not to mention the pr0n hole (people solving CAPTCHA for you, for free, by proxy).
They don't even need JavaScript, there was a bulletin recently which outlined hiding everything in the <iframe/> but (part of) the button. Maybe we need a new extension like NoScript and CookieSafe which blocks CSS by default until enabled on a site by site basis.
You're right but you also sound like you know what you're doing. It's both sad and dangerous how many web developers haven't the faintest clue WTF is going on.
Not at all, everything is vulnerable, some things are harder to attack/easier to defend though. You can easily use a nonce with form data or even more intricate mechanisms. Yes you can use similar protections with GET but that doesn't make it a good idea.
I didn't say anything about not having GET, I was talking about safe GET requests. Obviously it's OK to have a link to your user profile/picture gallery/&c. What is a bad idea is a link that will add someone as a friend or delete a picture, you get the idea.
I think there's a distinction to be made there between law and morality, it's a fascinating philosophical discourse though. I hope people studying law are considering these scales/factors.
We're talking about the last person left on the planet, so either there is no Johnny Law or they're it. I guess that person could make laws against their own behaviour but that is a matter for themself.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd say /. is relatively unique.
I just had a conversation with Elbot, it asked what led me to it.
I told it slashdot and it said
no wonder I've had so many geeks chatting with me recently.
Obviously scripted response but I LOLed.
Yeah, there's definitely some good game music out there already.
As to OP's suggestion of "cooperative fun" games; Little Big Planet looks pretty cool.
I dig the soundtrack on the demo too.
Come on, admit it.
You just wrote up that big rant so you could brag about having a girlfriend who gets naked and/or having been laid.
=)
Your future employer might think you had a predilection for drug use.
That is, if they could divine your handle somehow -- which in your case seems unlikely,
so I guess it's all good.
No no, if it were an ad for a tech job the requirements would be more like:
must be 20-something and have 30 years sexual experience.
Most of them have an audio alternative. And 'everyone else does it' isn't a good excuse for unfair discrimination.
Tweak the algorithm to boost the rank of pages that have been around for a long time but then you'd get bobby's homepage that hasn't been updated in eight years.
Then
Results 1 - 10 of about 7,700 for sex robots from Japan.
Now
Results 1 - 10 of about 221,000 for sex robots from Japan.
Have you used the FreeType plugin?
I often get much better results using this.
Cheers
It's Open Source
Because of the pr0n hole (people solving CAPTCHA for you, for free, by proxy).
*via proxies or bot net to avoid IP blacklisting.
Does that not discriminate against people with physical impairment?
Real-life physical ID is not accessible. If you have to show up somewhere in person this is infeasible. If you have a hotline to call for access codes you're going to have to provide a TTY alternative -- easy enough to create a TTY bot. It ceases to be Completely Automated at this point anyway.
Foolproof CAPTCHA is an impossibility, you would need true AI at which point it would be self-defeating.
Not to mention the pr0n hole (people solving CAPTCHA for you, for free, by proxy).
I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few UIDs got used up in QA/UAT and not reset afterwards.
But talk about dumb criminals.
I know, *chortle*, let's win every game.
facepalm.jpg
Yeah, but how much energy does generating one tonne of CO2 give?
Given approximately 1.5 lb CO2/kWh, somewhere around 1400 kWh.
That's a good argument for off-site backups, or if you want to get creative, something like encrypted Usenet posts.
The same meaning can be taken in proper English as well, however the GP's meaning was apparent given the context.
They don't even need JavaScript, there was a bulletin recently which outlined hiding everything in the <iframe /> but (part of) the button. Maybe we need a new extension like NoScript and CookieSafe which blocks CSS by default until enabled on a site by site basis.
You're right but you also sound like you know what you're doing.
It's both sad and dangerous how many web developers haven't the faintest clue WTF is going on.
Not at all, everything is vulnerable, some things are harder to attack/easier to defend though. You can easily use a nonce with form data or even more intricate mechanisms. Yes you can use similar protections with GET but that doesn't make it a good idea.
I didn't say anything about not having GET, I was talking about safe GET requests. Obviously it's OK to have a link to your user profile/picture gallery/&c. What is a bad idea is a link that will add someone as a friend or delete a picture, you get the idea.
Repeat after me boys and girls "GET requests shouldn't change anything on the server".
I think there's a distinction to be made there between law and morality, it's a fascinating philosophical discourse though. I hope people studying law are considering these scales/factors.
We're talking about the last person left on the planet, so either there is no Johnny Law or they're it. I guess that person could make laws against their own behaviour but that is a matter for themself.