The subject is a noun,
A person, place, or thing.
It's who or what
The sentence is about.
The predicate's a verb.
(That's an action word!)
It gets the subject
Up and out.
The cat stretched.
The sun beat down.
The neighbor had chased his kid.
(Get back here, kid!)
And the sentence ends
Only when
You know what the subject did!
See? Mr. Morton is the subject of my sentence, and what the predicate says he does!
But seriously, right after you said that, you then said that spamming (his wrong) "is an acceptable... way of getting the message to him..." Remember - an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth - we do so love it though we might not admit it.
This tech is obviously not for everyone. If all you want your computer to say is "click" and "beep" and "you got mail" then this tech would be fine for you. Otherwise, turn your monitor speakers off and plug into your stereo or some nice computer speakers and subwoofer.
Of course they will have a disclaimer on this fact. Somewhere in that manual you read. You did read the manual, didn't you?
I never do. I was raised a Christian. My mother is in seminary. I am far from not understanding.
I find it to be a fascinating phenomenon. I might say something against the idea, that is freedom of speech. I don't care what religion you follow, that is freedom of religion.
If you believe in little green fairies, more power to you. That doesn't mean I can't make fun of little green fairies, and the act of worshiping such things.
Everybody knows a yoot is a young person. Of course it is relative. The older you are, the more yoots there are. In the event that we claim all your yoots are belong to us, our entire obligation will be the greater of: the purchase price of your yoot, or $5. Please uncross your fingers before accepting this agreement. You must also agree that you will not decline this agreement. By declining you agree to the terms.
Yeah, sounds good to me. Throw in how they eat human flesh and drink human blood, calling it a "Communion of Saints" - saints that have been dead for 2,000 years. She probably talks to that invisible guy often. Lock her up before she raises the dead! Darn cult of canibalistic vampires.
It supports the new UDO disks and it is developed for professional data storage markets, covering archiving, document imaging, call centers, email archiving, GIS, medical, telecom, banking, insurance, legal and government.
... and for the non-professional data storage of personal pictures, pr0n pictures, legal music, pirated music, movies, and pr0n videos.
Actually I-95 comes in from PA between Ewing and Pennington. Or, if you want some fun, cut through Trenton on Rt 1. Where they meet in Lawrenceville, I95 stops. (This is quite far from Camden, considering it is less than 10 miles from the border.) Then you have the choice of going up Rt. 1 (if you weren't in any hurry) or go south on I-295 and jump onto I-195 which you can take to the great NJ Turnpike (I-95).
Trenton isn't bad either though, if you don't mind a school with a 97% failure rate. Of course the safety of the city may decrease with the new police chief.
But I do love NJ. Since I live here, I can make fun of it all I want. It's a love punch.
...every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.
Try a different angle on this significance issue. Think of an infinitely large universe with no conscious life. Now think of a universe with only one conscious lifeform, limited to the minimum size required to sustain said lifeform.
Which universe is more significant?
(To say it differently, or over-simplify the meaning, would you rather have the most powerful computer in the world, or the only AI in the world?)
Earth is the most significant spec on the fly's ass even if just because that's where we keep all our stuff. It's rampant self-awareness, and nothing can belittle that.
Most likely it is a classic money making scheme. If you are stupid (ahem) misinformed enough to believe this stuff, you are probably not witty enough to keep your wallet closed. It's probably totally legal too.
Even in the last couple of months, there [krqe.com](#1) have [krqe.com](#2) been [cnn.com](#3) lots of [courier-journal.com](#4) school shootings.
The only thing that's changed is you're not hearing about them.
#1 is hardly a school shooting. It is merely a disgruntled kid attacking what was probably his girlfriend's parent. The gun was fired in a struggle. The kid was shot out of self defence. #2 s the exact same story.
#3 may be considered a school shooting, but no one was hurt. A gun was fired. That's it.
#4 was a robbery performed by teens that resulted in a murder. A teenager firing a gun does not make it a school shooting.
I am sure there are plenty of kids getting a hold of guns and shooting people. They just aren't going to school and going on a murder spree. Now THAT is something we would be hearing about.
Excellent point, but I would not consider those to be pr0n, whether it involves a kid or not. If a fine looking woman getting undressed in a locker room can turn you on, it doesn't mean that it is pr0n.
You could argue, though, that hidden cameras are an invasion of privacy and are therefore illegal regardless of age. You would need permission for a "hidden" camera, and minors are not at an age of consent. Could a parent consent to such a thing? It is not a pr0n issue.
There are sites that show naked pictures of children, yet they are legal under U.S law.
I wish more people could understand that. Nudity is to porn as grapes is to wine. I can a million pictures of naked people and still have none that are pornographic. The nudity is not the illegal part. It's the leud, sexually suggestive things that are illegal. A child under twelve normally wouldn't do most of those things. Minors are too young to make the decision to be exploited. Nudity is just grapes off the vine and is completely natural.
It's wacky that courts can order companies to do things, and not suggest ways of doint it.
What's more is that they can't legally do it. IANAL, but it seems that the only way to determine if a site contains kiddie porn is to take a look at the pictures, at which point the pictures will be downloaded onto your computer. You will then be in posession of illegal 1's and 0's.
I propose that we develope a self-sustaining ecosystem as a man-made satellite of earth.Get that down and you can colonize anywhere (last I heard, the US and other countries are a part of a treaty that forbids colonization on any natural body in space).
We can have shuttles that are built specifically to go to said station and back to Earth... and that would be the extent of their function. Watch the efficiency grow. Every trip made should bring up more supplies than needed so that there is an abundance, limiting the number of emergency supplies-only trips. Have a couple suitable space stations and you can develope a transport vessel. No entering/exiting atmospheres, just zero-gravity transportation from one to another. Then you can build a station orbiting Mars, creating a dedicated transportation system to and from Mars' orbit from and to Earth's orbit. Then we can think of colonizing Mars.
But if these stations aren't mostly self-sustaining, they will not survive.
The programs are not making assumptions about people. People take the suggestions too personally. It doesn't "think you're gay," but it does "conclude that gay themes may be of interest to you."
If not, then ignore the suggestions. Eventually it will obtain more data to (supposedly) more accurately deduce what you may want to watch or buy.
If you bought a baby book, it doesn't assume you're pregnant, but it will suggest other baby books.
On the contrary, it reads as follows: The simplest way is to make sure you have no trusted publishers, including Microsoft. See, they are saying not to trust any certificates. They are effectively implying that the certificate is not trustable, not that the company can't be trusted. Or if you take the sentence out of context, you might show that they are saying don't trust any companies, even them. So that would mean that they are not the problem, but that everyone is a problem.
But you are forgetting one thing. Though you may hate the taste of dog food, it is actually a lot more nutritious than almost every made-for-human alternative.
Slashdot Mirror
You are absolutely correct. Remember?
The subject is a noun,
A person, place, or thing.
It's who or what
The sentence is about.
The predicate's a verb.
(That's an action word!)
It gets the subject
Up and out.
The cat stretched.
The sun beat down.
The neighbor had chased his kid.
(Get back here, kid!)
And the sentence ends
Only when
You know what the subject did!
See? Mr. Morton is the subject of my sentence, and what the predicate says he does!
Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right
No, but three lefts do!
But seriously, right after you said that, you then said that spamming (his wrong) "is an acceptable ... way of getting the message to him..." Remember - an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth - we do so love it though we might not admit it.
Jesus of Nazareth did not die so we could enjoy eggs and chocolate bunnies!
Maybe not, but it's a nice perk.
This tech is obviously not for everyone. If all you want your computer to say is "click" and "beep" and "you got mail" then this tech would be fine for you. Otherwise, turn your monitor speakers off and plug into your stereo or some nice computer speakers and subwoofer.
Of course they will have a disclaimer on this fact. Somewhere in that manual you read. You did read the manual, didn't you?
Don't speak of what you don't understand.
I never do. I was raised a Christian. My mother is in seminary. I am far from not understanding.
I find it to be a fascinating phenomenon. I might say something against the idea, that is freedom of speech. I don't care what religion you follow, that is freedom of religion.
If you believe in little green fairies, more power to you. That doesn't mean I can't make fun of little green fairies, and the act of worshiping such things.
Everybody knows a yoot is a young person. Of course it is relative. The older you are, the more yoots there are. In the event that we claim all your yoots are belong to us, our entire obligation will be the greater of: the purchase price of your yoot, or $5. Please uncross your fingers before accepting this agreement. You must also agree that you will not decline this agreement. By declining you agree to the terms.
Yeah, sounds good to me. Throw in how they eat human flesh and drink human blood, calling it a "Communion of Saints" - saints that have been dead for 2,000 years. She probably talks to that invisible guy often. Lock her up before she raises the dead! Darn cult of canibalistic vampires.
It supports the new UDO disks and it is developed for professional data storage markets, covering archiving, document imaging, call centers, email archiving, GIS, medical, telecom, banking, insurance, legal and government.
... and for the non-professional data storage of personal pictures, pr0n pictures, legal music, pirated music, movies, and pr0n videos.
"Snozberries? Who ever heard of a snozberry?"
Gosh I love that movie.
If a cheap house costs you $250,000 then somebody must like it.
Actually I-95 comes in from PA between Ewing and Pennington. Or, if you want some fun, cut through Trenton on Rt 1. Where they meet in Lawrenceville, I95 stops. (This is quite far from Camden, considering it is less than 10 miles from the border.) Then you have the choice of going up Rt. 1 (if you weren't in any hurry) or go south on I-295 and jump onto I-195 which you can take to the great NJ Turnpike (I-95).
Trenton isn't bad either though, if you don't mind a school with a 97% failure rate. Of course the safety of the city may decrease with the new police chief.
But I do love NJ. Since I live here, I can make fun of it all I want. It's a love punch.
Try a different angle on this significance issue. Think of an infinitely large universe with no conscious life. Now think of a universe with only one conscious lifeform, limited to the minimum size required to sustain said lifeform.
Which universe is more significant?
(To say it differently, or over-simplify the meaning, would you rather have the most powerful computer in the world, or the only AI in the world?)
Earth is the most significant spec on the fly's ass even if just because that's where we keep all our stuff. It's rampant self-awareness, and nothing can belittle that.
Most likely it is a classic money making scheme. If you are stupid (ahem) misinformed enough to believe this stuff, you are probably not witty enough to keep your wallet closed. It's probably totally legal too.
Is it too much to expect a technology to last a few decades, rather than it being a shock?
Even in the last couple of months, there [krqe.com](#1) have [krqe.com](#2) been [cnn.com](#3) lots of [courier-journal.com](#4) school shootings.
The only thing that's changed is you're not hearing about them.
#1 is hardly a school shooting. It is merely a disgruntled kid attacking what was probably his girlfriend's parent. The gun was fired in a struggle. The kid was shot out of self defence. #2 s the exact same story.
#3 may be considered a school shooting, but no one was hurt. A gun was fired. That's it.
#4 was a robbery performed by teens that resulted in a murder. A teenager firing a gun does not make it a school shooting.
I am sure there are plenty of kids getting a hold of guns and shooting people. They just aren't going to school and going on a murder spree. Now THAT is something we would be hearing about.
Upskirt/toilet cams! Dressing room cameras! Assorted hidden locker room cameras!
Excellent point, but I would not consider those to be pr0n, whether it involves a kid or not. If a fine looking woman getting undressed in a locker room can turn you on, it doesn't mean that it is pr0n.
You could argue, though, that hidden cameras are an invasion of privacy and are therefore illegal regardless of age. You would need permission for a "hidden" camera, and minors are not at an age of consent. Could a parent consent to such a thing? It is not a pr0n issue.
Are they pr0n? Well, yes.
I am curious how you came to that conlclusion.
There are sites that show naked pictures of children, yet they are legal under U.S law.
I wish more people could understand that. Nudity is to porn as grapes is to wine. I can a million pictures of naked people and still have none that are pornographic. The nudity is not the illegal part. It's the leud, sexually suggestive things that are illegal. A child under twelve normally wouldn't do most of those things. Minors are too young to make the decision to be exploited. Nudity is just grapes off the vine and is completely natural.
It's wacky that courts can order companies to do things, and not suggest ways of doint it.
What's more is that they can't legally do it. IANAL, but it seems that the only way to determine if a site contains kiddie porn is to take a look at the pictures, at which point the pictures will be downloaded onto your computer. You will then be in posession of illegal 1's and 0's.
Truly epic software is written in iambic pentameter.
One line can be in iambic pentameter. An epic can have no meter. I like the others though.
I propose that we develope a self-sustaining ecosystem as a man-made satellite of earth.Get that down and you can colonize anywhere (last I heard, the US and other countries are a part of a treaty that forbids colonization on any natural body in space).
We can have shuttles that are built specifically to go to said station and back to Earth... and that would be the extent of their function. Watch the efficiency grow. Every trip made should bring up more supplies than needed so that there is an abundance, limiting the number of emergency supplies-only trips. Have a couple suitable space stations and you can develope a transport vessel. No entering/exiting atmospheres, just zero-gravity transportation from one to another. Then you can build a station orbiting Mars, creating a dedicated transportation system to and from Mars' orbit from and to Earth's orbit. Then we can think of colonizing Mars.
But if these stations aren't mostly self-sustaining, they will not survive.
The programs are not making assumptions about people. People take the suggestions too personally. It doesn't "think you're gay," but it does "conclude that gay themes may be of interest to you."
If not, then ignore the suggestions. Eventually it will obtain more data to (supposedly) more accurately deduce what you may want to watch or buy.
If you bought a baby book, it doesn't assume you're pregnant, but it will suggest other baby books.
How soon we forget that the stronger we make our antibiotics, the stronger our viruses become.
"Don't trust us"
On the contrary, it reads as follows: The simplest way is to make sure you have no trusted publishers, including Microsoft. See, they are saying not to trust any certificates. They are effectively implying that the certificate is not trustable, not that the company can't be trusted. Or if you take the sentence out of context, you might show that they are saying don't trust any companies, even them. So that would mean that they are not the problem, but that everyone is a problem.
As a side note, I wouldn't trust them anyway.
But you are forgetting one thing. Though you may hate the taste of dog food, it is actually a lot more nutritious than almost every made-for-human alternative.
And profiling customers is a bad thing?
Yes. Price Discrimination. I don't get the special deal because I don't go there often enough. Stuff like that.
Yes. They require name, address, phone number, etc, to get the discounts. I guarantee you that way more than just store managers get this information.