Slashdot Mirror


LCD Screens Double as Speakers

An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has a story about a company who has developed an LCD screen that can produce sound as well. They claim that the sound quality is quite good, and compare it to average multimedia computer speakers. Also NEC is making and selling computers that use this technology in Japan. Hardware integration like this should make for some interesting appliances in the next few decades."

216 comments

  1. That's crazy! by austinij · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems like an awesome idea, but how does it handle stereo? And I'd love to hear a wav file or something of how it sounds...

    1. Re:That's crazy! by ThePretender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd love to hear a wav file or something of how it sounds...

      Well that would most certainly let you know how *your* speakers sound... but would tell you nothing about how their product sounds.

    2. Re:That's crazy! by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just don't understand why they paradoxically claim the quality to be quite good like basic multimedia speakers??!? Last I checked basic multimedia speakers sucked a donkeys ass. But oh well, I guess this is targetted at the L-top market. As far as I'm concerned I mute my laptop unless I have headphones plugged in. Because it always sounds like sh!t.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    3. Re:That's crazy! by PseudoThink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stereo is accomplished in a single-monitor setup via synesthesia...they watermark the display image with an almost undetectable waveform representation of the second audio channel. Sort of like "joint stereo" in mp3s. But people with two monitors get true stereo. But I might be crazy...

    4. Re:That's crazy! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Stereo should require running two screens.

      I'm a bit worried where this technology is going, when will the TV be watching me? How do I know it isn't, already? ;-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:That's crazy! by EinarH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I usually back off when i hear the word multimedia
      Multimedia is so 1995....
      It's the taste of a tiny 14", IBM Aptiva, Windows 95, 2X CD-ROM, SoundBlaster and that new interactive "Internet-thing". *Shrug*

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    6. Re:That's crazy! by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      Mods, you can do better!

      The parent is supposed to by +1 funny, not interesting. Please RTFA, it is nothing like that anyway!

    7. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      when will the TV be watching me?

      Well, in Soviet Russ...oh nevermind, I'll go now.

    8. Re:That's crazy! by djdole · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'd love to hear a wav file or something of how it sounds" Reminds me of a request I got from a friend. *hands me a VHS tape* "Can ya record me a few episodes of Blahblahblah on HD-TV? I wanna see the diffrence." ....nope...not gonna work.

    9. Re:That's crazy! by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I guess this is targetted at the L-top market.

      I thought the same thing at first... It would be one hell of a step up for most notebook speakers. However, the reason most notebooks have croppy speakers is purely price. And somehow, I doubt they can make this LCD-speaker cheaper than two tiny little 1", 0.1 milliamp speakers.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:That's crazy! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny
      Multimedia is so 1995....

      Or, if you're a Mac or Amiga user, so 1988...
      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    11. Re:That's crazy! by snowsalt · · Score: 1

      And the troll wins this round handily, gentlemen. Tune in next week for the mods to mark "+5, Informative" a randomly generated series of letters and numbers, or an to rate an ascii picture of hello.jpg as a "+9, sexy".

    12. Re:That's crazy! by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Funny

      And in order to get 6.1 channel sound, you'd need to carry around an entire room with one of these screens making up each wall/floor/plane surface.

      Sorry, I'm just not going to carry around an entire room to get 6.1 sound on my laptop. Although a room made of LCD screens would be good.

      P.S. I'm joking.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    13. Re:That's crazy! by CriX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but consumers might pay for enhanced sound quality. I don't know how these LCD speakers are supposed to work, but just the idea of a 15 inch wide speaker equals one very important thing missing from laptop sound: BASS!

      How sweet would it be to hear a nice deep, sub-woofer quality bass coming from a laptop? Very nice indeed.

      --
      Moderation: +1 pwnage
    14. Re:That's crazy! by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They can embed both circuitry and speakers on an LCD panel.

      Now, they need to make an LCD VNC-like device with stylus control and 802.11b built into the LCD itself. It could also dock and perform as a normal LCD screen while charging.

      Using an ultra-thin battery behind the screen, you could have an extremely portable device with long battery life.

      Would you buy a .5" thick 15" LCD screen that you could pick up and carry with you to connect to any device running a VNC-style service that laster 7 hours?

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    15. Re:That's crazy! by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

      ....nope...not gonna work.

      Actually, I'm betting that it would. The difference here is that your friend wanted to go from a superior signal to something inferior...ie the vhs which obviously can't do hdtv res. I'm betting that the output of these things is inferior to a decent traditional speaker setup. Therefore, if the output of the panel was recorded uncompressed with high quality recording equipment, you would be able to discern the quality when played on a normal setup. If, however, the panel output is superior to what you've recorded/replayed it on, then yeah, you're right....it doesn't work.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    16. Re:That's crazy! by kavau · · Score: 1

      Please, somebody mark the parent as "funny" instead of "interesting"! It's utter BS (if you want to learn something about synesthesia, try this site), but admittedly, it's quite hilarious.

    17. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're a Microsoft Smart Display salesman.

    18. Re:That's crazy! by luzrek · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the application would be for a desktop computer. However, it would be a handy for notebook computers where a good chunk of the volume of the device, and the surface area around the keyboard is occupied by speakers. Remember that for notebook computers space and weight are at a premium.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    19. Re:That's crazy! by arkanes · · Score: 1

      The new tablet PCs do this - you can get a docking framework with connectors for power, keyboard, and mouse. You fold the screen over into notebook/landscape mode, connect it to the dock, and it acts as a normal flatscreen. Very spiffy.

    20. Re:That's crazy! by m4ximusprim3 · · Score: 1

      rofl so for stereo you need an expensive video card with multimonitor support...great :)

    21. Re:That's crazy! by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      I was thinking thinner, lighter, less inside, less expensive. But I would definately like to try out a TabletPC.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    22. Re:That's crazy! by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      but how does it handle stereo?

      Well, we are using dual-display setup here in our office...

    23. Re:That's crazy! by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Not only price, but space and power constraints as well. Granted, if you threw money at the problem, I'm sure you could find some tiny speakers that don't need much airflow that have better sound, but lets fact it, who would really pay for something like this? I dunno, personally, mine are okay for music, and I plug in headphones or external speakers if I'm going to be listening for long.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    24. Re:That's crazy! by henele · · Score: 1
      If you are a Windows guy Microsoft have already done it...

      Its a scaled down tablet, which is just a remote access screen for XP boxes, which I guess won't be as popular as full-on tablets which don't have to be within wi-fi range, but the fact you just asked for it means there is a potential market :)

    25. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real bass requires moving lots of air.. I doubt the LCD would vibrate that much

    26. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a dual-headed video card and two LCDs !

    27. Re:That's crazy! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Not really. Even the 1995 Macs I have did a crap job of video and audio - and Windows did a slightly less crappy job.

  2. light music? by TomRitchford · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and what will it do to the lifespan of the LED?

    1. Re:light music? by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's just an acrylic panel over the front of the display, so it shouldn't affect the lifespan of the LCD at all.

    2. Re:light music? by grub · · Score: 1


      Considering it's an LCD panel, I would guess Not Much.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:light music? by valkraider · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wouldn't the vibration *right on* the LCD screen do something over time? Especially at high volume. It seems like - other than laptops - this is kinda strange to marry the two techs...

    4. Re:light music? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No more than already happens with LCD screens that have speakers built into the sides / bottom of the display.

    5. Re:light music? by inaeldi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he was talking about that little green on light. Those things are a bitch to replace, I'd be worried to.

  3. Obligatory Simpsons quote by visgoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the music!

    --
    My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I can see the music!

      Work it so you get feedback on a joystick, driven by the audio and you'll be able to feel the music, too.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by mattsucks · · Score: 4, Funny

      DAMMIT!!! Every time I see a story that will let me show off my l33t Simpson's-quoting sk1lz, someone beats me to it!!! Don't you people ever sleep???

    3. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by rograndom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't sleep. Clowns will eat me.

    4. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by syle · · Score: 5, Funny
      Don't you people ever sleep???

      "Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a Viking!" - Ralph

      --

      /syle

    5. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      " Every time I see a story that will let me show off my l33t Simpson's-quoting sk1lz, someone beats me to it!!! Don't you people ever sleep???"

      Worst quoting sk11z ever.

    6. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just because I don't listen doesn't mean I care."

      AR

    7. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by oO0OoO0Oo · · Score: 1
      This

      is my voice

      on teeeee veeee

      --
      We Are Familiar With Elephants By Virtue Of Their Size.
    8. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "DAMMIT!!!"

      "Don't have a cow, man."

      Man, I was a kid when Bart said that.

  4. Yaarggh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Yaarggh! First pirate post! Ahoy, here be landlubbers abound!

  5. Eye problems? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whont having the screen vibrating cause eyestrain?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Eye problems? by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Will songs with lots of bass cause the picture to distort? (press on a lcd, watch the colors!)

      Who'll be the innovative club/dj to use this to enhance visualization-esque displays?

    2. Re:Eye problems? by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Lessee.... I frequently stare intently into my monitor when it's vibrating... Ok, well, shaking anyway... usually because the desk is shaking... because... oh... uh, oh....

      OH MY GOD! I'M GOING BLIND!!!

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  6. *bzzt* wrong by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't like LCDs to have _any_ form of integrated speakers.

    I have my surround sound system and don't want to pay for stuff I'll never use.

    1. Re:*bzzt* wrong by Jaycatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It would be nice for travelling presentations or training, however. The lightweight LCD is already useful for that. Not having to carry around speakers would also help with the travel weight.

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    2. Re:*bzzt* wrong by Scooter · · Score: 1

      I agree with ya Matt - if I buy a screen, it's because I want a screen. If I want speakers I'll buy some damm speakers!

      I tried to explain this to the TV guy when I bought my current TV - all I wanted was a big screen - the remote only needed buttons to turn it on and off, and switch between the various inputs. I also tried explaining this to the Ky engineer. I gave up in the end and let him use the internal speakers - and then re-wired it after he left...

    3. Re:*bzzt* wrong by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 1

      I don't like LCDs to have _any_ form of integrated speakers.
      I have my surround sound system and don't want to pay for stuff I'll never use.


      Well not everyone takes their surround sound system with them when they are travelling. Think laptop or PDA, not desktop PC.

      --
      --Drunk as in Beer
    4. Re:*bzzt* wrong by mrtroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because it does not suit your particular needs, think of all the niches this fills.

      I personally have my sweetass stereo hooked up to my computer, however, if I am listening to a CD or the radio I still like computer volume. So...I still have some decent computer speakers.

      Now, if my monitor had integrated speakers, that would save some equipment and maybe money.

      Then, what about the 3/4 of computer users who have those ghetto computer speakers or none at all? This will be super-duper-fantastic for them.

      Good idea, well done, now its a matter of price.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    5. Re:*bzzt* wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most LCDs include speakers because of, you know, the whole space saving idea. They're still mostly used in office-type setups, where there's just no room (or budget) for regular desktop speakers. So including them is a natural move.

  7. Appliances by DaemonGem · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh boy, soon my microwave will be playing techno, and my keyboard will be outputting a crummy rendition of Tchaikovsky. I can't wait.
    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
    1. Re:Appliances by SkOink · · Score: 1

      and my keyboard will be outputting a crummy rendition of Tchaikovsky. I can't wait.

      Only if you play it badly :)

      --
      ---- I'll take you in a Hunt deathmatch any day.
    2. Re:Appliances by The+Zody · · Score: 1

      wow you're behind. my cell phone plays fully orcastrated movie musicals.

  8. Image integrity? by Mikey-San · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm no LCD scientist (though, I can tell you how they're made, thanks Apple Service Training for Losers with No Fscking Life), but it seems to me like heavy low-frequency sound coming /through/ the LCD would alter its color accuracy, at the least.

    Granted, I have to put a good amount of pressure on my LCD to make it change color deeply, but don't you think if heavy low-frequency sound came out of it, something would happen, at least occasionally? What about the almost paper-thin glass sandwiched in the LCD layers?

    I dunno. Seems to me like sound was made for speakers, not a display medium.

    Does anyone out there have more info about the crap I just wrote? :-)

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    1. Re:Image integrity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      The technology works by placing a thin acrylic panel over the computer display. This is attached at the edges to a couple of exciters.

      These moving coil motors make the acrylic screen vibrate to produce the sound.

    2. Re:Image integrity? by Musashi+Miyamoto · · Score: 5, Informative

      It sounds like these speakers are similar to Martin Logan electrostatic speakers, and the screen will not produce anything close to low-frequency sound. The screen will likely require a midrange/woofer to reproduce the full spectrum of sound.

      Electrostat speakers are typically transparent like glass, but held between two screens to allow the sound to travel. The article says the company claims the monitor has a "universal sweet spot", but that is probably corporate marketing talk for "no sweet spot". Most panel based electrostat speakers have a very very tiny sweet spot, and you need to be sitting perfectly between the two speakers.

      From howstuff works:

      These speakers vibrate air with a large, thin, conductive diaphragm panel. This diaphragm panel is suspended between two stationary conductive panels that are charged with electrical current from a wall outlet. These panels create an electrical field with a positive end and a negative end. The audio signal runs a current through the suspended panel, rapidly switching between a positive charge and a negative charge. When the charge is positive, the panel is drawn toward the negative end of the field, and when the charge is negative, it moves toward the positive end in the field.

    3. Re:Image integrity? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I appologize to go off on a tangent here, but were you ever around Apple's repair service?

      The reason that I ask is that I had more experience with ApppleCare than I would have liked. Had to replace the LCD and they sent me one with dozens of tiny bad pixels and 3 washed out spots.

      If you are qualified to answer, do the AppleCare guys ever use LCDs from refurbished or scrapped PowerBooks as replacements? Because thats what I suspect happened during the first install. But who knows.

      After the initial repair, my line out jack stopped working. Do these guys monkey around so much that it is possible for them to screw up the hardware inside?

      (Sent it a second time for repairs - lcd and line out - and got back a good lcd, but the line out untouched... Have to send it in a third time)

    4. Re:Image integrity? by kaamos · · Score: 1
      That is a good resume of the technology. I have had the chance to do some searching on the subject for a physics class and there is also another fact that troubles me. Electrostatic speakers require very high tension (around 1-10 kV) to generate the electric field between the two cunductive layers. That would, for sure, disrupt the LCD, unless they find a way to lower the field of shield the screen, which I find doubtful. There is also the problem of low-frequescies reproduction. Two exemples are:

      1. http://monsoonaudio.com/index_mmedia.htm - monsoon audio, that market low-end electrostatic speakers with a mall sub to generate the low-frequencies

      2. http://www.soundlab-speakers.com/m2.htm - the millenium-2 system that will set you back 10 k$ but produces full-range audio

      The problem with the first is that altough you have the low-range, you do not have the clarity in the full spectrum like the second more expensive one.

      All in all, a good idea but you have to wait for electrostatic speakers to mature before enjoying them on their own

      --
      In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
    5. Re:Image integrity? by uwbbjai · · Score: 1

      Pressing into this LCD not only will change the color of the image, but also change the frequency of the sound.

    6. Re:Image integrity? by Entropy_ah · · Score: 4, Funny

      The screen will likely require a midrange/woofer to reproduce the full spectrum of sound.

      No dude, they'll just build the woofer into your keyboard. Though I fear it will turn into some kind of high-tech ouija board when you crank up the Dr. Dre.

      --
      my other penis is a vagina
    7. Re:Image integrity? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Put the woofer in your chair, so you can get the effect of your whole body shaking without disturbing the neighbors nearly so much...

    8. Re:Image integrity? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I suspect that this would be really nice for laptops, because the frequencies where you can detect where the sound is coming from come from straight in front of you, not off to the side. Of course, you don't get stereo, but a laptop won't give you sufficient speaker separation to be good anyway. Do the low-frequency stuff from under the keyboard, because it travels well and can't be localized anyway.

    9. Re:Image integrity? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a very good desciption of how electostatic speakers work but that is absolutely nothing like how NXT speakers work. Sorry.

      I actually set up some NXT panel ceiling speakers and can testify this to be the case. Neat speakers they were too, the ceiling tile effectively *is* the loudspeaker.

      NXT speakers work more like a piano sounding board. The flat panel is exited at one place (or maybe two) and the board vibrates. Obviously, that is a *very* simple explanation of what happens, no doubt there is some heavy-duty maths involved in getting it to work well etc.

      As for the "sweet spot", well maybe the marketing guy was exagerating a tad but NXT speakers are a lot different to electrostatics in this respect also. They definitely do not have a miniscule sweet spot like electrostatics. They have a very diffuse directional output. They don't even follow the inverse square law as moving coil speakers do. I'm not sure what law they *do* follow, IIRC it is some sort of logarithmic law. Anyway, the upshot is that the sound decays less with distance than you would normally expect it to.

    10. Re:Image integrity? by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      I'm the Apple support contact for Virginia Commonwealth University. Before that, I worked for a retailer here in Richmond, CapitolMac, an Apple Specialist.

      Apple, like other computer companies, use refurbished replacement parts at its discretion. They will never put a known-bad module in a customer's unit, ever, but as with even new parts, sometimes the replacement parts can fail. Apple, again like other companies, have refurbishing guidelines for service parts. In other words, they test 'em well.

      Here is your warranty, and it does indeed say that they may use new or refurbished service parts:

      http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/wty-pos t1 997.html

      It's also in your manual and AppleCare statement if you have one.

      Now that I've said all of that junk, I'm sorry 'bout your Mac, dude. :-)

      As far as I know, no company refurbishes LCDs. They may take a PowerBook with a dead logic board, for example, and scrap it for its good LCD after testing it, but I don't think you can really go in and repair an LCD to spec.

      As for your line-out, humans are humans. It's not impossible that someone repairing it could have knicked something on the logic board somewhere, but they test all of your ports before they send your unit out of Houston. If it arrived with the new port problem, it should have been sent right back with a phone call to AppleCare. :-/

      As for your replacement LCD, Apple Service guidelines state that an LCD with three dead pixels or six dead sub-pixels warrants replacement. If your replacement was that bad when it got to you, it should have been replaced again.

      There's no official "after this many times, we replace your computer" policy, but speaking as a /consumer/ and not a service provider, if it were to come back a third time with something wrong, I'd start bitching for a complete replacement. Apple are usually good about taking care of their customers, so don't be afraid to ask what you're supposed to do if you get it back and it's still got a problem. (Don't be a pest (the customer reps are just customer reps, after all), but do ask if it concerns you.)

      -/-

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    11. Re:Image integrity? by Beltway+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that it will hurt image quality, but not for any LCD-specific reason. Even the glass touchscreens that are overlaid on PDA screens gives them a "coke bottle" look. I can't wait for OLED screens on laptops, with nothing between the pixel and me but air.

    12. Re:Image integrity? by nattt · · Score: 2, Informative

      These speakers are nothing like the electrostatics you mention. They work on a completely different principle - the distributed mode loudspeaker. They use exciters (moving coil units) to drive a panel into breakup mode (chaotic) where it produces sound. You can turn lots of types of materials into speakers this way - the trick being where you place the exciters and the exact specs of the material. The sound produced is an area source rather than a line or point source of conventional (or some electrostatic) speakers, which means it interacts with the room, and yes, it doesn't produce much bass. Electrostatics however, if large enough can not only produce bass, but very high quality bass too. Martin Logan's often use a bass driver but that's so that they can make the panels smaller and cheaper. A full range electrostatic like a QUAD, is a wonderful speaker to hear as it produces very little distortion compared to a conventional cone speaker.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  9. nice comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The sound quality is very good, probably better than with most multimedia speakers you would buy with a computer," he said. "It is a much better listening experience.

    yeah mod that one up to +5 informative.

    by the way, most el cheapor computer speakers have stereo sound and don't vibrate your monitor.

  10. Re:i don't know what's happening by curtisk · · Score: 1
    where's this story about the invis-cloak? That sounds interesting.....

    oh and to keep my post on topic, I don't think this speaker technology will do much but help office workers who "aren't allowed" to have speakers on their machine...can these be disabled if need be?? (Other than liberal use of a screwdriver:) If not they could piss off many a network admin

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  11. Re:Average... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Average multimedia speakers vs. laptop speakers = laptop ones lose every time

  12. Nice One by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great news - because we all know how expensive speakers are and how cheap LCD screens are! Imagine the cost savings... Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  13. But what about by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

    integrated cameras? It seems like an integrated camera would be much more useful for applications like video phones. The way these devices are set up now the angle is all wrong and it doesn't look like you are looking into the eyes of the person you are speaking with. If you put small cameras interspersed with the pixels you should be able to get the desired result.

    Or maybe I'm just stupid.

    1. Re:But what about by ites · · Score: 1

      Or, use two cameras at either side of the screen and provide the viewer with a stereo image of you looking at the center of the screen. Could work... what you'd want is a mouse pointer of two eyes (o.o) that you move over the face of the person you're talking to so that the computer can shift the stereo image as needed.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  14. Not New Tech... by FosterSJC · · Score: 5, Informative
    First, obviously, the sound isn't coming from the light or the screen or whatever. There is a thin acrylic sheet that is used as a sounding board:

    The technology works by placing a thin acrylic panel over the computer display. This is attached at the edges to a couple of exciters.

    These moving coil motors make the acrylic screen vibrate to produce the sound.

    This is the same tech, essentially, that drives those flat-panel computer speakers, and the Soundbug over at thinkgeek.
    1. Re:Not New Tech... by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

      both of which sound LIKE CRAP!

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    2. Re:Not New Tech... by fermion · · Score: 1

      And much too complex. They should have looked at the Newtons. Mine have been singing to me for the past five years. After all this time, I find it quite conforting. All I have to do is turn on the backlight, and I have wonderfull musak quality noise. All they need to do is figure how to tune the high volage thingy.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Not New Tech... by ChrisJC · · Score: 1

      The SoundBug is _not_ NXT technology. That's why it sounds crap.

      --
      -- PC architecture - what a mess.
  15. Re:i don't know what's happening by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    Damnit, you can't just casually mention quasi-invisibility cloaks without posting a link. Don't leave me hangin' here. Also, you will go to slashdot, it is completely crappy for anything other than a fun discussion area.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  16. Vibration and delicate electronics... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...two great tastes that go great together!

    1. Re:Vibration and delicate electronics... by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...two great tastes that go great together!

      Nuts and gum, together at last!

    2. Re:Vibration and delicate electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I used to love those really powerful magnents.. carried one around in my pocket all the time.

      It was a sad day when I discovered that magnents and computers don't mix.

    3. Re:Vibration and delicate electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Your GF likes her vibrating electronic device while you're off reading Slashdot.

  17. laptops by Snuffub · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This could be great for the laptop market where "average" multimedia speakers would sound alot better than those tin cans.

    --
    --aiee
    1. Re:laptops by bandit450 · · Score: 1

      I dunno...the harman/kardon tincan speakers on my toshiba satellite 5100 blow away most average multimedia speakers (and all but one TV in my house). They're downright tiny too, with a subwoofer built into the bottom of the thing. I highly reccomend getting a laptop with a speaker system like this.

      Though it would be nice to put a centre chanel into the display, you'd have no channel separation without at least some form of standard speakers. The new wide-screen laptops would be a good market for these sorts of things...put two speaker-pads on either side of the wide screen, or on either side of the keyboard...no extra bulk, but more sound-producing area.

      --
      -- Bandit450...If-Else-Do-*TWITCH*!
  18. A paradox? by ignoramus · · Score: 4, Funny

    These screens get thinner, yet they pump up the volume

    :P

  19. hrm, by Viper168 · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/5a15/ Attaches to any glossy surface, But with LCD, I'd imagine you might get those warpy colors. Like you see when you touch it.

  20. That would suck.. by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    ..every time I crank up some Motorhead I'd be picking my display up from the floor.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  21. this would be cooler if... by digifuzz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...the lcd's were touchscreen.

    [john doe]: *touch touch touch*
    [lcd screen]: dammit, stop touching me! you're smooshing my liquid crystals!

    or... well.. need i mention the possibilites for multi-sensory interactivity the pr0n world....

    granted, this could be possible now... i mean.. sound card and speakers do a fine job on their own.. but...

    yeah.. i forgot where i was going with this.

    damn. i need more coffee.

    happy monday. :-/

    ~ fuzz

    --
    http://www.digifuzz.net
  22. Based on my experience with LCD� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pixel response, these speakers will have a frequency range of 20-40Hz.

  23. Not more integration please by AlanS2002 · · Score: 1

    I hope this doesn't take of in a large way like sound on motherboard did.

    --
    Not all conservatives are stupid,
    but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
    - Hume
  24. Invisibility Cloak by Radnor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Story here. Neat stuff. :)

  25. Re:i don't know what's happening by Ano123 · · Score: 1

    http://www.star.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/projects/MEDIA/xv/ oc.html

  26. Re:i don't know what's happening by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "you can't just casually mention quasi-invisibility cloaks without posting a link"

    He did post a link, but he used the <quasi-invisible> tag.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  27. Dual headed stereo! by clutch110 · · Score: 1

    And when you put two monitors on in a dual head configuration, you get stereo sound! Wonder how many monitors it would take to get a completely immersive 360 degree experience with video and sound!

  28. Would it be ironic by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 2, Funny
    If I played Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds on such a device?

    Or not...

    1. Re:Would it be ironic by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Lucy in the Clouds with Diamonds maybe...

  29. Won't that hurt your eyes? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can see the screen flickering now and then on older (or especially low refresh rate) setups, but wouldn't the screen vibrating to sound really mess with the picture? Still, it sounds like a good idea in that it would save more desk space, especially if you had a really BIG LCD on the wall that did away with really big desktop speakers.

    --
    stuff |
  30. Smooth Fonts? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, will the vibrations do pretty much the same thing as anti-aliasing and make all of your fonts look smooth around the edges? ;)

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  31. real world application by digifuzz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i could see this really taking off in the hand-held market, where the machines are really small and would benefit from having less components to have to cram into their small encasing..

    ~ fuzz

    --
    http://www.digifuzz.net
  32. Superb multimedia quality? by subreality · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I admit I'm kind of an audio snob. I have full size, full range speakers at my desk, because I like to really listen to music while I work / play / whatever.

    But I don't think that *anyone* thinks that "the sound quality is quite good" coming from "average multimedia computer speakers".

    I don't mean to knock this technology - if it's like multimedia speakers, it's probably great for people who just want to hear the Happy Sound when their computer boots up, and to watch some video clips from the news online. But, c'mon, Slash, you guys are supposed to be smart enough to filter this BS, and just tell us that it lets people hear their login "zing" without having extra speakers on their desk.

    The coolest thing I anticipate from this technology is really cool crack patterns in LCDs from people trying to crank the bass way up (since most compact flat panel speakers have trouble with deep bass).

    --Keepiru
    --slashsuckATvegaDOTfurDOTcom

    1. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by phelddagrif · · Score: 1

      I think the only people who will think that their monitor can also function as a sweet speaker, are the same people who cannot differentiate between a C.D and a 128kbps MP3, and sadly they still do exist. As with most things. The more functions a device tries to do simultaneously the greater the suckage of all operations performed.

      For example, an integrated DVD/Tuner/Amp. They all blow in comparison to the separates. Of course there is a major difference in price, however that difference in price is there for a reason. I think that these speakers will end up being sub-par and make tons of little jitters and ripples on the display. I can just see heavy electronica making the entire screen ripple with every bass hit.

    2. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by TheCrimsonUnbeliever · · Score: 1

      I think the idea of slashdot - less than 'News That Matters' is news that we might find cool

      Sure - Most people here use CRT with a decent set of speakers

      But this is a kinda nifty idea - And I don't know about you but I get a nice little glow when I learn about some new geeky toy

    3. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by subreality · · Score: 1

      So do I, of course. That's why I said I didn't want to put down the tech. It's still cool stuff.

      I was just wishing Slash would be less like the mass media, and resist the urge to exaggerate things, like sound quality.

    4. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and to watch some video clips from the news online


      If you think the primary use of a multimedia computer is to watch video clips of the news... boy-o you need to come out from under your mormon rock... /me goes back to the one arm shuffle
    5. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Alright, yes. Separates ARE better. I'll give you that. And yes, CD's and MP3's are not created equal. And yes, I'll even grant you the fact that devices that are integrated tend to be a bit crappy in comparison to good versions of the real thing. BUT! All of the little things have their place in the big techie world. A speaker like this would be ideal for many applications like laptops (the sound there is already rubbish - this might even be better), they'll have a smaller footprint on your desk and less expensive than buying a separates system to hook up to your computer that for most people isn't going to be generating high quality sound in the first place. Load's more apps that I've not got the energy to think up right now. Wouldn't think it would ripple either - if it's done right anyway. Choose a material with a low refractive index for starters and all in all it shouldn't move much anyway - tap your desk. You hear a sound, right? Tap it harder. It still doesn't ripple. Even if you drive the desk with a piezo or someting (for that continuous wave effect) you wouldn't see it ripple. Same goes for a sheet of hard (or approx hard depending on tension or whatever) acryllic unless you're driving it at unfeasibly high levels. Right tool for the right job. That's all I'm saying here. ;)

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
    6. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by etcreed · · Score: 1
      I think the only people who will think that their monitor can also function as a sweet speaker, are the same people who cannot differentiate between a C.D and a 128kbps MP3, and sadly they still do exist.
      Sadly they still exist? Please. Just because somebody doesn't live up to audiophile standards doesn't mean they're complete idiots, or even lesser music fans. This isn't just your comment that I'm referring to. I wonder what the reaction will be to this, but I usually use the internal speaker in my G4 tower to listen to music. It's good enough for me. I can hear the music and it doesn't take up any more room in my dorm room. If I really need to hear a part with complete clarity (in order to learn it, for example, yes I am a musician, too), then I can put in headphones. My personal opinion is that audio equipment that costs thousands of dollars in unnecessary. I have friends that disagree. That does not make either of us wrong or "idiots" (not in the post that I'm replying to, but in another one somewhere...). I'm sorry if this is taken as a flame, it wasn't intended as one. I just want to assert the view that just because people have differing needs when it comes to audio, they're not any less intelligent. Personally, this would be very cool for me. This is a tech that would be perfect for someone like me. Sadly, we do still exist.
    7. Re:Superb multimedia quality? by phelddagrif · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that you are an idiot for being happy with the sound that is output with a G4 internal speaker, or even with a 128kpbs MP3. At least you know there is a difference. A lot of people don't, and I think that is upsetting, because they really don't know what they're missing.

      My current setup isn't the greatest either, but it works. I don't have the money for a good set of separates, so an old reciever and speakers I got from my grandfather are going to have to do. I just have a problem with people spending a ton of money on crap-ier gear, when they could get the good stuff for marginally more money. Whether they've been brainwashed by advertising I don't really know, but it bothers me when companies make junk and profit, because of uneducated users.

  33. The answer is... it doesn't. by pr0ntab · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NXT argues its technology has major advantages over conventional speakers. It says its SoundVU technology distributes frequencies evenly across a room, producing what audio buffs call a universal "sweet spot".

    I read that as it's a speaker that fills the room with a single channel of sound. If it was in stereo, then it wouldn't be room filling if you could discern the channels. You could probably deal with it if the screen created two virtual speakers by superposition using exciters on opposite sides of the monitor. But then the sweet spot would be very small, aimed at the person sitting a few feet away. Definitely not room filling.

    Plus, they go on to say how they intend to use it in mobile phones and PDAs. All single channel devices when used without headphones.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:The answer is... it doesn't. by nattt · · Score: 1

      Because it's a distributed mode vibration speaker, you can't do things with the exciters to get stereo out of a single panel. You need two seperate panels for stereo.

      Also, the NXT panel does not do any bass at all - so you still need a woofer / sub-woofer of conventional design.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    2. Re:The answer is... it doesn't. by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 2, Funny
      It says its SoundVU technology distributes frequencies evenly across a room, producing what audio buffs call a universal "sweet spot".

      Well thank goodness for this technology. I have been waiting for a product that will allow me to bother everyone in the room while playing video games.

    3. Re:The answer is... it doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is that vibrations in the panel are random, for all practical purposes, so the two channels don't cancel out. I had a smaller pair of panel speakers for my computer a while back, and they sound pretty much the same anywhere in the room, so I guess that's where the universal sweet-spot thing comes from. With cone speakers, once you're out of the projected cone, sound quality drops off dramatically.

    4. Re:The answer is... it doesn't. by keriaan · · Score: 1

      Well thank goodness for this technology. I have been waiting for a product that will allow me to bother everyone in the room while playing video games.

      Why wait? You can get the Gameboy Advance SP and start bothering everyone today!

  34. A Moment In History by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Scientist #1: "You got your liquid crystals all over my average multimedia speakers!"

    Scientist #2: "Well, you got your electromagnets all over my active matrix organic composite screen prototype!"

    *blink blink*

    In unison, reeling with implication: "Whooooooooaaa...."

  35. Fills a non-need with a nifty non-solution by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, it's interesting, but it seems like another inappropriate use of technology. Just because something is possible to do, doesn't mean it's worth doing.

    Just like the combined TV/VCR units, sure, it's nice when both functions work well, but if either function takes a dive, you're left with something that's less useful than either would have been if bought separately.

    Maybe it'll be fine for people who don't particularly care about sound (and/or visual) quality, but I think this is another time when discrete components are the appropriate way to do it. It's not like the world has been sadly lacking for want of a speaker-monitor.

    One question: what happens when you turn it up to 11?

    1. Re:Fills a non-need with a nifty non-solution by Nihilanth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a common occurance of innovation being poo-pooed because the masses can't think of any way to apply it except to a desktop PC.

      I wouldn't mind seeing this in my PDA or Cellphone (this would make a handy speakerphone), or in a handheld gaming system (the gameboy SP EX AR TL BW!!), or a tablet PC (where's the sound coming from? its c-r-a-z-y!!), or a laptop.

      How about weather resistance. Speaker aperatures can let in water, but a weather-tight LCD screen that can project sound might be a boon indeed.

    2. Re:Fills a non-need with a nifty non-solution by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not saying it's a bad technology, or a bad technique, but that for sitting on someone's desk it's fixing a problem that doesn't exist. Sure, it'd be great to have a PDA/cellphone that uses this (or would it? What does that solve that a speaker/mic does not?)? I could see combining this with a touchscreen for a kiosk-type system, but again, speakers are pretty cheap - what problem exists that this solves in a unique, or even superior, way?

    3. Re:Fills a non-need with a nifty non-solution by nizo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the look on your roomy/spouse/sig. others face when the computer monitor starts speaking to them can't be measured in usefullness or dollar value alone.

    4. Re:Fills a non-need with a nifty non-solution by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      size and weather-resistance would be reason enough to utilize it. I beleive i've mentioned these above. Speakers take up space, and they let dust and moisture in.

  36. Re:i don't know what's happening by joelhayhurst · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you too lazy to search Google for "Japanese invisibility cloak", here is the link that started it and the project home page (with movies).

    The objects are NOT truly transparent. They just appear that way due to optical tricks. Basically, they project what is behind an object to what is on the front of it using cameras, projectors, and mirrors. It's a neat idea, and he suggests some useful applications, but nothing like most were expecting upon seeing the pictures. Still, makes for some kick-ass videos.

  37. flawed business model? by zaqattack911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly, aren't LCDs on their way out for cheaper, better quality, and thinner OLED displays?

    Once those are out, there is no need for a backlight, and I seriously doubt people will want to waste space putting in a crappy ass "sound membrane" (that's what I call it) inside.

    Yes they are right, this sort of speaker does create a universal "sweet spot" because it distributes the sound evenly over distance but there is a shitload more thats needed to produce good sound. The freq range of the mambrane alone is complete ass, so they would have to sell you subwoofers integrated with computer case to rattle around your HDs harmoniously :)

    1. Re:flawed business model? by watzinaneihm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When OLEDs come out they will put a acrylic membrane over the OLED screen and sell it .
      From the article it looks like the membrane is external to the screen, basically put a plastic sheet over the LCD and made it vibrate. It, as it looks to me, doesnt have anything to do with the screen technology.They did it to LCD (and not CRT) because laptops have a space constraint.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    2. Re:flawed business model? by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1
      The freq range of the mambrane alone is complete ass, so they would have to sell you subwoofers integrated with computer case to rattle around your HDs harmoniously :)

      Like this?

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
  38. Hi-fidelity sound? by solarlux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting concept. The article speaks this producing "high-quality audio" -- yet I assume this must be mainly mid to high frequency sound. Any significant production of lower frequencies would certainly cause screen vibration, which might give new meaning to the term "flicker".

  39. makes sense! by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    A picture says more than a thousand words.

    1. Re:makes sense! by digifuzz · · Score: 1

      if a picture says more than a thousand words, i tremble at the thought of having to listen to that many words and then some once these pictures are actually given a voice... given the ammount of pictures i see on any given day...

      isn't there already more than enough noise pollution in this world?

      might as well give my girlfriend the ability to forgo breathing in between shouting-spouts.. although i speculate as to whether or not she already has this gift.. :-X

      or maybe not.

      --
      http://www.digifuzz.net
  40. If I enable Cleartype� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will that Aphex Twin turn into Sinatra?

  41. flat??? by wickedj · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The world is going to be flat going forward," said Mr Williams.

    Ahhh... come on, they've been beating into my head that the world was round since elementary school, how do they expect me change my thinking now?!?!

  42. WTF are you talking about? by pr0ntab · · Score: 3, Informative

    How did this get modded Interesting?

    If you go to the FAQ on NXT's website, you'll discover they use superposition principles to produce virtual channels in the sweet spot. They can do two; supposedly three (L, R + center) is possible.

    Watermark, joint-stereo, give me a fucking break. Add nonsense buzzwords to a post and get modded up! A 2-step plan for slashdot success. (Unless you meant to be funny... in which case a big YOU ARE TEH 1Di07s!!! to the mods active today)

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:WTF are you talking about? by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 2, Funny

      I modded it funny...but I have a weird sense of humor.

    2. Re:WTF are you talking about? by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 1

      doh. I fucking hate Monday's. Then I realized that it let me post to the discussion.

      Not the brightest bulb in the cube this morning.
      H

  43. Re:this would be cooler if... OFF TOPIC? by digifuzz · · Score: 1

    How is this off-topic? i think it's right on..

    --
    http://www.digifuzz.net
  44. cell phones? by dextr0us · · Score: 1

    i think this will probably net some cool celly-telly designs. i'd like a t-mobile sidekick, with the screen/speaker.

    --
    "Martha Stewart can lick my Scrotum......do i have a scrotum?" -- Sharon Osbourne
  45. ugh indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you cant get somethin for nothing, iin order to have top quality bass you need the right stuff for it...it would be tuff to squeeze out high quality sound out of a flat (thin) speaker of any kind. Why would anyone want this? average speakers are crappy sounding, and of course this will cost an arm and a leg as well to now have that crap come out of ur screen. I also see this as a begining to a more restricted computer, one that doesnt play illegal mp3's since the computer now has control over the monitor....and thus the speakers...see what im gettin at?

    1. Re:ugh indeed by djdole · · Score: 1

      Obviously anyone who loves their music won't want this, just like how gamers don't like integrated videocards.
      But for those people who don't really care about the best sound, and hate the wires of external speakers, it would be great. (obviously not your average slashdotter)

      (Think of the most PC-retarded person you know...)

  46. CRT/Speaker by silvakow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the inside of the CRT looked more like a speaker, with a big magnet and a speaker-cone shape coming off of it going to the glass. But, alas, the CRT screens that were also speakers were made by Packard Bell or Compaq and had speakers attached to the side of the screen. It's quite interesting that the LCD beat the CRT to market with this technology, being that CRTs have been out for a while longer, ie. in everyones homes by the 1950s

    --
    In the long run, we're all dead.
    1. Re:CRT/Speaker by DoubleD · · Score: 1

      I thought the inside of the CRT looked more like a speaker, with a big magnet and a speaker-cone shape coming off of it going to the glass.

      Except for the fact the entire assembly is rigid, unmovable, and utterly incapable of functioning as a speaker.

      It is not an issue of looking like a speaker, but rather being able to move in such a way to produce a compression wave in the air.

      Electrostatic speakers use an electric field to move a membrane. Apparently this can be accomplished by using the membrane of an lcd, although the small size would limit the range and quality of the sound. Also I imagine the effects of a vibrating visual display would run contrary to the desire for a stable-nonflicking presentation.

      --
      "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep in order to gain what he cannot lose."
  47. Re:One last blow by spot35 · · Score: 1

    How is this offtopic? I thought it quite funny! A vibrating screen when showing your pr0n...

  48. That's nothing by MoeMoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hearing through visual devices is cool but seeing through audio devices is cooler!
    If you want something really cool try this:

    Get this (right click link >Save As), look through your headphone jack in your cdrom, click extracted file at the same time. Enjoy! *Attention Mods* File was checked virus free, please imagine what could happen before rating.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:That's nothing by Torqued · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can do this with LSD.. why do I need to buy expensive hardware

  49. What I want to know by thedbp · · Score: 1

    is how they get the thing to vibrate enough to make decent sound without having the screen image vibrate and otherwise cause nausea-inducing eye strain.

  50. Want Bass? by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

    The subwoofer for the speakers will set you back a rocket high stack of coin, cause 21 inch LCDs are still moronically priced.

  51. while im on slightly off topic on my girlfriend... by digifuzz · · Score: 1

    thought some of you might get a kick out of this.

    from googlefight

    Number of results on Google for the keywords my girlfriend and my sanity:

    my girlfriend (1 620 000 results)
    versus
    my sanity ( 485 000 results)

    The winner is: my girlfriend

    and you know if it says so on google, it HAS to be true.

    although i've assumed this for a long time, and didn't really need googlefight to confirm this for me.. its always good to be able to know something for fact.

    ~ fuzz

    --
    http://www.digifuzz.net
  52. Is it disturbed by pr0n? by arcanumas · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the sound would be affected by watching pr0n. :)

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
  53. We're Never Satisfied by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

    Ho hum. If you can finally come up with a flexible touch screen that emits/absorbs sound, light and radio waves, THEN I'll be impressed ... single-sheet computers with all the fixin's. Remember those handhelds in the movie "Red Planet"? They were like sheet metal and were highly interactive with their environment. Gimme dat, dog.

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  54. Noisy LCDs by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, if anyone can tell me how to get my LCD to STOP making noises, that I'd pay you for.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  55. In a related story .... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A speaker manufacturer has developed a speaker that can produce moving pictures as well. They claim that the picture quality is quite good, and compare it to average computer flat screen. Also NEC is making and selling computers that use this technology in Japan. Hardware integration like this should make for some interesting appliances in the next few decades.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  56. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whont having the screen vibrating cause eyestrain?

    ...not any more than your monitor afects spalling.

  57. Invisibility cloak? by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is a non-invisible link. Basically imagine if you had a camera on your back and wore a movie screen on your front. Then you set up a projector several feet away to shine the scene from the camera on your screen. This is a 5th grade science project invisible cloak. Not sure why it made the news.

  58. Almost like Star Trek by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Hmm, it seems we are getting closer to Star Trek technology.

    1. Re:Almost like Star Trek by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Actually it's very like Star Trek. If you have the Technical Manual for the Enterprise D there is a section detailing the user interface terminals to the computer (i.e. the touch panels in TNG / DS9 / Voyager etc). Biofeedback is provided with sound that is generated by a layer of the display matrix.

      For touchscreen feedback applications it will be superb.

    2. Re:Almost like Star Trek by joey+shabadu · · Score: 1

      This is true ! We still need that biofeedback, full voice interface, biometrics built in to the LCD surface (I recall an episode where it's pointed out that say a child can not touch anything dangerous on the ship), intergrated with electronics in the glass surface (recent /. post) and a unified and open LCARS interface to run it all !

    3. Re:Almost like Star Trek by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      I think voice control has a LONG way to go though - imagine the scene with present technology:

      "Computer! Inspect the warp core."

      "Acknowledged. Ejecting Warp Core"

      "Nooooooo!"

  59. Bound to fail by luugi · · Score: 1

    I often see new ideas that are popping out that are really cool to see
    but are bound to fail in the real market. But these business are
    convinced that they are going to sell. Cool is not enough to sell. When
    are they going to get it? Patent the idea and wait for a real
    use of the technology.

    The sound will obviously not be that good. I like to listen to my hip
    hop music with bass. Am I going to need a second screen on the floor
    for bass? Maybe have DualHead to get stereo sound...

    It's simple, why spend more money for something that doesn't have the
    same quality? Because it's cool? It won't be enough to convince
    people.

    Maybe this could work with laptops and handhelds if they could keep
    the price reasonable. But I doubt they'll be able to do that.

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    1. Re:Bound to fail by djdole · · Score: 1

      But what percentage of the PC market buys things just because they are cool? I know this would be great for my parents who know nothing about their computer except that the cords are a mess. (And don't know a sub-woofer from a sump-pump)

    2. Re:Bound to fail by luugi · · Score: 1
      But what percentage of the PC market buys things just because they are cool? I know this would be great for my parents who know nothing about their computer except that the cords are a mess. (And don't know a sub-woofer from a sump-pump)

      Are you saying that there's a big percentage that are buying stuff because they are cool or not? Do you think that your parent's hate for cords represent a big percent of the population?

      --
      Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    3. Re:Bound to fail by djdole · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that this idea wouldn't be bad for the market of PC users who don't need anything more than "average" speakers. Such as office use.
      Obviously anyone who appreciates high quality sound wouldn't want to comprimise the quality over the convience.

      My parents dislike for the nusance of many tangeling cords, was just an example of how this could be a convience.

      (The knots I've seen in my parent's computer cords could make the most hardened boyscout cry. :-p)

  60. surround sound DVD by uwbbjai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I want to watch DVD in surround sound, I'd need 4 of these LCD screens. Too bad DVDs don't usually have multi-angled views... Imagine what that means to 3D games, you actually have to turn your head around to see what's behind you.. This technology can make some things really interesting

  61. LCD with Video Camera! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the cool thing. Somebody out there have it already? or still in research?

  62. Touch screen conflict? by djdole · · Score: 1

    I wonder how they plan on resolving the conflict that would arise with the need of the new Tablet-PC's or Pocket-PC/Palm devices to have a touch sensetive screen?
    (That is if they even would decide to place the membrane there)

    1. Re:Touch screen conflict? by axxackall · · Score: 1
      You cannot talk if I put my finger to your mouth, right? I think that touchscreens and speakers cannot exist on the same place of the surfice.

      Perhaps they will solve the problem by reducing the touch-sensitive area and living the border (1 inch enough?) for speakers.

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:Touch screen conflict? by ChrisJC · · Score: 1

      And what conflict would that be?

      --
      -- PC architecture - what a mess.
  63. Re:i don't know what's happening by rushiferu · · Score: 1
    "Damnit, you can't just casually mention quasi-invisibility cloaks without posting a link."

    Here is your link, picture included. I hope you like green.....

  64. Big Difference!!! by acoustix · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between "quite good" and "average computer speakers". So which one is it?

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  65. Why does it have to be on the screen? by djdole · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they can place this membrane on the screen, they should open up to placing this membrane on other things....
    ...Toilet seats, window glass (windshield?), coffee cups, sneakers?.

    Then again...maybe not.
    I fear the day my cubicle talks to me.

    1. Re:Why does it have to be on the screen? by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 1

      I can see it now: toilet seats in public restrooms that play back embarassing sounds when patrons stay too long, coffee mugs with chemical sensors that say "You're drinking Maxwell House decaffinated" or "Wait a minute, that's not Maxwell House, this cup will self-destruct in five seconds" and then vibrate and shatter themselves, and talking windshields that say "Clean me, I'm dirty" or "It's time to replace your windshield wipers".

      Perhaps this technology is best left on the shelf!

  66. What they arent telling you..... by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    is that what THEY are calling good sound is actually CRAPPY sound. I have spent my life in the audio industry serving the speaker makers around the world. This NXT and flat panel stuff pales incomparison to any 1/2 way decent speaker system. Sure for a laptop they may even make sence (keep things light and small) but if you want great sound from your laptop try a good set (or even not so good set) of headphones. But to think that you can replace your good speakers with this technology is a luaghable joke, JUST LIKE NXT's technology. Its cute and novel, but not really a practical application. It just proves that anything these 'new high tech' speakers can do, older speaker technology can do better, cheaper, and with way better results. But then again most people are happy with crappy sound, and these are the same people that purchase speakers based on Peak Music Power and not based on HOW THEY SOUND!!!! Ah ignorance is bliss, and there are lots of blissful people in this world!!!

    --
    . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    1. Re:What they arent telling you..... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i would totally mod you so much up..

      though they tell you that it's 'average multimedia speaker' level quality.. which translates to "it's light and portable but crap, and we'll lie to you when we sell it but nobody cares because that's how it is in this biz".

      it's f**** joke how they bring 'new' sound enhancing technology to the cheap/crap mini-stereo sets market that rattles right when it's out of factory.. 9 times out of 10 those people who buy such things have better speakers(and amps) right in their attic from their 80's stereos, it's not really about them blinkenlights machines being cheap even, i looked up nice mini-set from yamaha for my sister last fall that was on-par with price but so much more quality than the cheap sets sold at supermarkets.

      and for those buying soundcards to get better sound: buy first decent speakers and a real amplifier, the audio quality has been very good in any soundcard that's not buggy(or faulty by design) for the last 8 years.

      ah this turned out to be offtopic rambling but i got karma to burn and no need to use ac.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  67. lol by PseudoThink · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a joke...I'm guessing someone modded it interesting beacuse they thought "synesthesia" was a cool word. Remember, just because you want to believe it doesn't make it true!

  68. Cell Phone Screens by thomasdelbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That could have the effect fo making a cell phone smaller yet making the display larger. Cooooool

    - Thomas;

    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  69. Compare apples to apples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) An acrylic panel has much more mass than a conventional cone. Transients will be lost, there will be more overshoot and ringing, etc.
    2) The rectangular shape will have serious problems with resonances with reinforced standing waves. I doubt they have any closely representative of a flat frequency response at a reasonable (game level) volume, and their THD figures should show this.
    3) How do they expect to do stereo, or surround? Multiple screens? I guess everyone is headed for multi-display setups.
    4) They take up quite a bit of real-estate for their coils in the screen. Notice the three inch frame on the right and left side. I feel this pretty much blew all the advantages of integration.

    1. Re:Compare apples to apples by nattt · · Score: 1

      You can't think of an NXT panel as a normal loudspeaker - it works by driving the panel into breakup mode - the exact oposite of what you'd do with a conventional speaker.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  70. Re:Average... by EvanED · · Score: 1

    True, but that doesn't change the fact that most computer speakers suck. Of course, I'm in a dorm and do save space am using my computer as a stereo so am much more picky about sound quality than most people, but still.

  71. Of course you can get stereo... by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

    What I took from the article was that the sheet of material being used to generate the sound is excited by some means (ah, moving coil motors, that's it) with the result being vibration of the sheet at audio frequencies. If you want to create stereo all you'd have to do is set up one half of the sheet to vibrate and the other half not to for each different channel.

    This (while presumably quite difficult to achieve in practice) is quite simple in theory. You can treat it as you would the old "waves on a string" bounding problem from your old physics course. Ignoring the additional dimension, a simple Fourier analysis will show that by adding frequencies in various combinations of phase and anti-phase you can replicate the situation where one side of the screen has signal and the other doesn't for any frequency you like (with obvious limitations due to physical factors). Vibrations in the sheet give vibrations in air and since you can control the two sides of the screen (approx) independantly you can get stereo sound.

    I'd guess the only problems you'd run into would be the responsivity of the plastic sheet to vibrations at various frequencies but if you're only trying for signals across the audio band then that shouldn't be a worry.

    --
    If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
    1. Re:Of course you can get stereo... by nattt · · Score: 1

      Nope! I know the materials expert at NXT who develops these speakers and you can't work them like that. The panel is driven into breakup and the patterns of vibrations on it are chaotic, so you can't cancel them out with another exciter. These speakers don't work in a pistonic fashion - they're distributed mode loudspeakers.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    2. Re:Of course you can get stereo... by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. Just checked out the NXT website for more info and found the abstracts for the conference proceedings and such. That's actually pretty darn cool stuff.

      Take the point now that you'd need two for stereo - possible to fit two together side by side on one screen perhaps? Don't need to contact them I suppose or maybe even join them with a material of sufficiently different properties...

      Hah! Listen to me gabbin' away with work to do...

      Cheers for the correction - gave me something to check out on my coffee break ;)

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
    3. Re:Of course you can get stereo... by nattt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks - NXT is an interesting technology that came out of the military working on anti-noise for jet fighters.... As a high end loudspeaker, it works well and is meant to sound quite nice, but acts as an area source rather than a point source, so you'll get more room effect than normal (or wanted) and because the sound is quite "fast" it can be hard to integrate a woofer with the right sonic characteristics.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  72. Are you kidding me? by kid_wonder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hardware integration like this should make for some interesting appliances in the next few decades.

    Like what? Let's hear some ideas of other integrations you'd like to see...

    Refrigerator/Web browser? wow.
    Watch/Telephone? uh huh.
    Car/Plane? dream on.
    Person/Jet pack? wake up.

    You probably get all this from a speaker/LCD, right? Get down off the damn cloud. All they did was merge an LCD and speaker - flat speakers have been around for years using a variety of materials.

    --

    "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
  73. My apologies kind sir. by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    Cleary, it's the mods on crack, today and everyday. That's _real_ synesthesia. (oooh pretty words make me hear stereo, MOD UP INSIGHTFUL!!!!! FOR GREAT JUSTICE)

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  74. cell phones would be a nice application by Jafa · · Score: 1

    Using this in cell phones would be cool. The phone could increase the screen size as you wouldn't need room for a speaker.

    But then you'd end up with ear wax on your screen eventually. Ich.

    Jason

  75. Why bother? by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    We have these things called 'speakers' that do this now.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  76. Re:Noisy LCDs (cancel it!!!) by jetmarc · · Score: 1

    > Now, if anyone can tell me how to get my LCD to STOP making noises,
    > that I'd pay you for.

    Oh, I'm sure some geek will be able to do it with that screen, along the
    lines of "active noise cancellation". All it takes is a good measurement
    (or prediction) of the noise that your LCD generates, and then playing an
    exact inverse of it. This cancels the noise.

    The same principle is used in propellor avionation (remove motor noise
    from comm headphones), and luxury cars ("shape" motor noise by removing
    uncomfortable components, while retaining the desired ones).

    Marc

  77. April Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this story be fake, do you think?

  78. Target Market by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

    This tech is obviously not for everyone. If all you want your computer to say is "click" and "beep" and "you got mail" then this tech would be fine for you. Otherwise, turn your monitor speakers off and plug into your stereo or some nice computer speakers and subwoofer.

    Of course they will have a disclaimer on this fact. Somewhere in that manual you read. You did read the manual, didn't you?

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  79. Aren't these just ribbon speakers? by neonfrog · · Score: 1

    Here's a story about this from October 2002.

    Here's a link to ribbon speaker tech.

    I remember lusting after big flat panel speakers when I was a teen (15 years ago!) because they were cool-looking and were a different technology than a magnet wiggling a cone of some random material. I just love it when people rail about Bose speakers using 20 year-old technology when in fact nearly every speaker you can buy is using the same decades old technology -- the primary difference being WHAT type of cone the magnet is wiggling. Sure, some polymers sound better than some papers but its like the combustion engine - it can only go so far until a new tech replaces it.

    --

    I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    1. Re:Aren't these just ribbon speakers? by nattt · · Score: 1

      If you read the article you mention, you'll see that the NXT speakers are oposite of Ribbon Speakers in how they work.

      Ribon speakers are also very old. I've seen one of the earliest and that was made in the 50s.

      Moving coil cone loudspeakers date to the 1930s, with Paul Voigt in England and Kellog and Rice in the USA working on them independantly. K&R got the patent, but that's another story...

      The fact is that although since the 30s speakers have got smaller and amps larger (in watts), sound quality hasn't improved, and in fact, got worse in the 70 when transistors became popular.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    2. Re:Aren't these just ribbon speakers? by ChrisJC · · Score: 1

      What do you mean?, sound quality got worse in the '70s when transistors became popular.

      You are wrong. Amplifiers became vastly better, a valve amp gives much more distortion, mostly second harmonic. This happens to make the sound 'warmer' or 'mellow' which people may prefer but no way is it such a good facsimili of the original recording.

      --
      -- PC architecture - what a mess.
    3. Re:Aren't these just ribbon speakers? by nattt · · Score: 1

      70's transistor amps were awful. Sure they measured well in terms of THD, but had really bad crossover distortion through running in mostly class B, where as valve amps are usually class A or AB (heavily biassed into A).

      Modern transistor amps don't have crossover distortion, but also generally use less feedback, and sound a lot better because of it.

      Valve amps don't give out mostly 2nd harmonic. Most valve amps are Push/Pull, which eliminates the 2nd harmonic, leaving your hearing mostly odd harmonics. Pentodes give more 3rd than 2nd, triodes give out more 2nd than 3rd, but they're much less common.

      Any warmth or mellowness in a valve amp is a problem of frequency response, not distortion characteristics, and probably because of a mis-matched loudspeaker with nasty impedance characteristics. Valves don't have to sound warm, it's a stereotype that they do - not a fact that they have to.

      And if the original recording was made in the 60s, with valve equipment and engineered to be heard on a pair of Quad ESL53 electrostatics driven by Quad II, Quad 22 valve amps, they are therefore going to give the most accurate rendition of the recording.

      Finally, if you do prefer your music warmer, and that allows you to listen to recordings that would normally give you a headache if played on modern transistorised equipment, you're not just expressing a preference, but you're enjoying the music - which is the whole goal of hi-fi reproduction!!

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  80. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. I'd like to seriously fuck that guy up.

    The ass, that is.

  81. Great. A BSOD plays the blues... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Now... How do I get it onto a laptop LCD?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  82. I saw these last October... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw these guys last October at the AES show in LA. I was amazed at the sound quality. They were showing a Stones concert DVD. I went right up to the display and looked all around it - not a speaker in sight! One of the coolest things I've seen...

    - Calfee Jones

  83. New Font Features by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Screw font anti-aliasing. Just shake the screen a little. Looks smoother already.

    I like it.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  84. These have been around for a while.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NXT technology has been around for a while. They are ok, but the problem is you always need to have a subwoofer to make it sound better. Wharfedale used to use the NXT technology until NXT squeezed their patents too much.

  85. It's all coming together... by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    I was waiting on tablet PCs for quite a while before they came out. This idea with speakers in the LCD sounds kewl to me.

    I want to see cell phone, PDA (particularly all the normal stylus capabilities), on-screen keyboard with some kind of special anti-smudge material on the LCD, voice recognition software built-in (not that we're super far along on such things, just like to see today's technology in this available), TV, stereo, laptop, Star Trek tricorder functions (ones we can actually duplicate with today's technology), MP3 (or preferably OGG) player functions, video phone (yeap I said video phone), card reader (I use CF mainly, but 6-in-1 functionality would be nice), magnetic RAM (when it's available and dirt cheap to buy gigs of), scanner+copier+printer capabilities (one sheet at a time albeit), full speed Athlon XP or G4 or opteron chip, etc, etc. all integrated into a tablet PC style form factor.

    I know that's very ambitious, but it's what I want to see happen. Basically what most engineers would try (or at least want) to do if left to their own devices :)

  86. Cool technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tempest for Eliza was getting a little old :-)

  87. Bah... by mivok · · Score: 1

    My CRT has topped that one for a while now.

  88. First step: Install Windows by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    That should be enough for anyone to have a BSOD.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  89. Sound is "Quite good", meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they were surprised that anything intelligible was able to be outputted from the panel.

  90. They'd make great storefront displays. by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    With appropriate weatherproofing these things could be used to spam sidewalks quite effectively.

  91. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or are the slashdot editors jumping the gun a bit on april 1st.

    First the gzip article now this.

  92. Re:*bzzt* *right* by Grab · · Score: 1

    When you can pack your complete surround sound system into a laptop bag, give me a call...

    Grab.

  93. Re:i don't know what's happening by hplasm · · Score: 1
    If not they could piss off many a network admin

    ..Not for long......

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  94. oxymoronic by sincewhen · · Score: 1

    ...the sound quality is quite good, and compare it to average multimedia computer speakers...

    so... which is it?
    good quality or like the average multimedia computer speakers?

    --
    -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  95. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Proposed Additions to the PDP-11 Instruction Set:

    BBW Branch Both Ways
    BEW Branch Either Way
    BBBF Branch on Bit Bucket Full
    BH Branch and Hang
    BMR Branch Multiple Registers
    BOB Branch On Bug
    BPO Branch on Power Off
    BST Backspace and Stretch Tape
    CDS Condense and Destroy System
    CLBR Clobber Register
    CLBRI Clobber Register Immediately
    CM Circulate Memory
    CMFRM Come From -- essential for truly structured programming
    CPPR Crumple Printer Paper and Rip
    CRN Convert to Roman Numerals

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...