Slashdot Mirror


Plasmon Exhibits Working Blue Laser DVD Drive

tedgyz writes "CDR-Info has an article describing the first working prototype of a blue-violet laser optical disk drive. The drive boasts 30GB of storage, dubbed Ultra Density Optical (UDO). The article has technical details and images of the drive and media." We've been hearing about the advantages of blue light for seemingly years now. It's cool to see a product prepare for market that actually uses it.

229 comments

  1. Kazaa Users! This one's for you! by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    30G? I think I shall have one.

    1. Re:Kazaa Users! This one's for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to DVDs hold 18GB of data? That never happened...

  2. Soon by stanmann · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'll see this soon... does that mean before or after Duke Nukem Forever

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Soon by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      It won't be soon, it'll be when it's ready... ;-)

    2. Re:Soon by old7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      After Team Fortress 2: Brotherhood of Arms but before Duke Nukem Forever.

      Old7

    3. Re:Soon by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      Damnit! And I just bought a DVD-burner! Now I'm stuck with lame "red-laser". ... . I am no longer l33t .....

      WAIT, I'll just make sure that I'm the first one in line for GREEN LASER, w00t! Who's with me?!

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Soon by Bobo_The_Boinger · · Score: 1

      Green? Wouldn't that need to be indigo/violet to have a better wavelength than blue? (Ahhh, good 'ole ROYGBIV!)

      --
      --David
    5. Re:Soon by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yoda used a Green laser. Therefore Green must be coolest.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:Soon by mikehilly · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Wavelength, smevelength. Green is the coolest.

  3. As a side note... by Hayzeus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is only slightly relevant, as these aren't laser diodes, but but I noticed this AM standard long-wave UV LEDs have hit the electronics surplus market in big numbers lately for cheep (All Electronics has these at $1.75). All you experimenters out there can stock up now!

  4. We can't stop with blue! by petronivs · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've been hearing about the advantages of blue light for seemingly years now.

    We can't stop with blue light! We need to branch out into purple, yellow, even magenta! Soon all the colours of the world will be under our umbrella, and we will be all powerful!

    --
    This is the real signature
    (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
    1. Re:We can't stop with blue! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      simmer down, Saruman...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:We can't stop with blue! by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      One color to rule them all, and in the darkness (or ultraviolet, for our limited vision will be the same) bind them? Too much LOTR

    3. Re:We can't stop with blue! by thinkninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      SPECTRUM is green!

      *bump, ba-bump, ba-bum*

      --
      "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
  5. Awfull read/write speed? by NorthDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it me or it would take an awfull lot of time to fill in this drive?

    At 4MB/sec and a total capacity of 30 gig, it would take 2 hours and 8 minutes to burn the media.
    And half that time to read it all?!?

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
    1. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by unborracho · · Score: 1

      If i'm not mistaken, DVD-writers burn DVDs faster than normal CD-writers. The amount of time it takes a CD-R to be burned at 2x is the same amount of time it takes a DVD-R to be burned at 2x, only DVD-R's hold much more data than CD-R's. So the speed is about equal, as I'm sure the burn rate would increase with the blue-violet laser, compared to traditional red-beam.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
    2. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

      2 hours for 30 gigs isnt that slow it takes me about 1 hour to burn a full dvd-R and thats only 4.3 gigs (disks says 4.7 buy ive never been able to get it to burn that much)

    3. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Well, the article states the speeds I mentioned,
      which are only 4MB/sec for a 30 GB device...
      I hope I got it wring somewhere!

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    4. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      So, a CD-Burner is indeed faster then a DVD-Burner?
      Because if it takes 5 minutes to burn a full 700MB CD,
      This would amount to 35 minutes to burn 4.7 GB of data.
      So the DVD-Drive is actually half as slow?!?
      I'm sure I'm missing something here...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    5. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      The advantage of a blue laser is that it has a smaller wavelength, and therefore can write data far more densely. It isn't faster or anything, so any speed increases would only be due to speed increases on DVD-writing in general. I would definately be interested to hear what kind of write-speed that this new system has, as a 2 hour write time could seriously impact its usage as a general storage medium. It could still be used quite well for backups, though.

    6. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm with you on that one!
      Backing up those 60 and 80 gig HD becomes
      more and more painfull...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    7. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. A 1x DVD burned burns at the same rate as a 10x CD burner. Now you have 4x DVD burners which are the equivalent of 40x CD burners (in terms of MB/s), which doesn't exist. Period.

      And don't be mistaken between a 40X burner and a 40X MAX burner.

      DVD burners are faster and always will be since the spinning speed of current CD burners reached a maximum. DVD has a greater density so we can burn faster at the same speed. (5.8 times faster actually).

    8. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by RyansPrivates · · Score: 1

      CD speeds are multiples of only 150 KB/s. Therefore, a top-o-the-line 50x CD-RW can only read/write at 7500 KB/s. So this being the first generation of this technology, that seems pretty damn good to me.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed... How does that go again? Ah, forget it.
    9. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 5, Informative
      This is still faster than a 24x CD-R burner (24 x 150 KB/s = 3600 KB/s = 3.52 MB/s). 4x DVD writing is 5.54 MB/S and they are in the fifth generation.

      Not as fast a tape drives for writing (you can get 22 MB/s with compression 2:1, 11 MB/s real), but the random access capabilities of this type of media would put a tape to shame.

      Their aimed at replacing MO drives, I currently don't know anybody with one of these at home, as they are still expensive (about $1500 USD). The people using these I am guessing are very interested in long-term archiving without degradation.

      Seeing how this is a first generation drive, I guess this is "1x" speed, when the get the 60GB (2nd gen) and 120GB (3rd gen) drives out, if they double this in each generation, that would give you a "4x" (16 MB/sec - equivalent to a 109x CD-R) 120GB drive, this would still take 2 hrs 8 min to fill at "4x", but a 30 GB disc would only take 32 minutes.

      --
      This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
    10. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right, as a 48x CDR burns at approx 7000 KB/Sec and a 4x DVDR Burns at approx 5500 KB/Sec so approx 4096 KB/Sec would be a good baseline all other factors being equal. I wouldn't mind the long burn times as long as I can reduce the size of the stacks of cds all over the place.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    11. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by swb · · Score: 1

      Any of the MO drives I've used (which all ancient by today's standards) had abyssmal R/W speeds. They were a godsend for archiving "big" files in their day, but only for archiving. Too slow to work off of and the drives and cart pricing were stratospheric.

    12. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by unborracho · · Score: 1

      yeah, this makes sense. thanks for correcting me.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
    13. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Unless they're as flexible in write/rewrite as MO drives, then I won't be replacing mine for a while yet.

      MO is everything Iomega's Zip format wishes it was - assortment of large capacities, sturdy and reliable discs, not much bigger than a floppy.

      The thing that makes it so great is that a 2.6Gb MO drive can take el cheapo 230Mb MO discs as well as the super expensive 2.6Gb discs and all the flavours in between, so I can choose the right size media for the job.

      Now, if only more people had MO drives... Although, the only advantage to the scarce tech is that people don't steal your discs!

    14. Re:Awfull read/write speed? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Actually it's closer to a 9x difference, so a 2x DVD-R drive is equivalent to an 18x CD burner (as far as data rate goes).

      My Pioneer DVR-104 drive is a 2x DVD-R, 1x DVD-RW, 8x CD-R and 4x CD-RW drive.

      It takes roughly 9 minutes to burn a full CD at 8x (including file buffering, lead in and lead out) and take about 28 minutes to write a full DVD-R disc at 2x speed.

      A DVD-R holds ~4,700,000,000 bits which to marketing people is 4.7 GB, but to anyone with more than 12 brain cells, is 4.3 GB of usable data. Same problem you see with hard drive manufacturers claiming their drives are bigger than they actually are.

      What this boils down to is that a DVD-R disc holds ~6.71x the data that a CD-R does (assuming you're using 80min CD-R) which works out to roughly 1.5 hours of Mpeg2 video with full audio quality or a heck of a lot of pr0n...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  6. Until I have it in my computer.... by macshune · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's vaporware.

    1. Re:Until I have it in my computer.... by Gossy · · Score: 1

      Wow, those 64-bit processors must be vapourware, sine I don't have one in my computer.

      Oh, and mainframes. Don't have one of them either.

      I think it's fair to say that since the product has actually been demonstrated, that yes - they do have a product to make & sell.

    2. Re:Until I have it in my computer.... by osgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm usually pretty quick to cry "vapor", but these blue-laser DVDs are already a proven concept to lots of companies in their consortium, and they have a standard for it. Unlike other vaporish storage technologies that are always too good to be true, promoted by a small unknown company, rely upon nebulous revolutions in technology, etc. -- blue ray DVDs and their ilk are on the way.

      It's a done deal, now we're just waiting to see who wins the race to get them out first.

    3. Re:Until I have it in my computer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a Ferrari is vaporware too. Fuckers still don't have one in my garage.

    4. Re:Until I have it in my computer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats because retards cant drive...

    5. Re:Until I have it in my computer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And until Jesus comes with his fiery hand of God and smotes you it's just religion.

  7. Just as DVD-R approaches affordability... by Gossy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..they have to torment me with 30Gb drives. As I work up to getting a DVD-R, now they're under £200 I've been thinking 'Ah great, smaller stacks of CDs, easier backups..' - and but with these it'd be even easier.

    Great. Can't sit around forever I guess, though.

    It'd be nicer if optical media had kept pace with hard drive storage. At least it's now starting to catch up - I spotted in the article that "Future generations of drives and media will increase the usable capacity of discs to 60GB and 120GB. Backward read capability will be maintained throughout the whole product roadmap."

    120GB on a single disk? Optical media may be really useful once again - providing it's cheap enough, soon enough.

    1. Re:Just as DVD-R approaches affordability... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, in a few years you will be able to pick these up for $200 in a blue light special. Of couse by then they'll be too small to be really useful, like your CDs are now.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Just as DVD-R approaches affordability... by Gossy · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. Then again, I wonder...

      My CDs are on average, 700mb, lets say 0.7Gb for convenience.

      I probably have about.. 300gb total capacity over all of my network. That'd take me around 430 cds to cover all of that.

      Now, if I had those 120GB disks, and we assumed that when they were affordable, they'd be as much use as my CD, I'd have approx 51600GB storage on my network!! Hmm.

      I wonder if our growth in need for hard drive capacity is leveling off, and if not - when it will. I'm in no doubt it'll be a long time before it stops, since we always seem to manage to come up with some new space eating use for our computers. However, we're already seeing that for a lot of average users, they don't have a hope of filling a 40gb drive without the help of mp3s/movies.

    3. Re:Just as DVD-R approaches affordability... by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact the K-Mart is going out of business, so there won't be any more blue-light specials.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    4. Re:Just as DVD-R approaches affordability... by isimbor · · Score: 1

      It'd be nicer if optical media had kept pace with hard drive storage.

      As many Asimov fans will know, many things are possible but not practical.

      Would putting 30GB on a !cd be practical for any use other than backups at this point in time? With the read speeds as they are right now, I don't believe so.

      But thats beside the point. Why doesnt the "research community" start worrying less about putting a HD onto a cd (again, at this point in time) and start worrying about making HD read speeds / read speeds in general?

      Not implying to stop all progress on CPU performance in any way, but these efforts in the long run would be much more fruitful that if we do otherwise.

  8. Uses by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 2, Funny

    It supports the new UDO disks and it is developed for professional data storage markets, covering archiving, document imaging, call centers, email archiving, GIS, medical, telecom, banking, insurance, legal and government.

    ... and for the non-professional data storage of personal pictures, pr0n pictures, legal music, pirated music, movies, and pr0n videos.

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    1. Re:Uses by unicron · · Score: 1

      Or somehow make it usable in your DVD drive and put your favorite trilogy on there.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean back to the future?

  9. Sounds like a Jellyroll Morton tune... by CommieLib · · Score: 2, Funny

    The laser's woman done him wrong...

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  10. This is good news for the moral community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have always been wary about purchasing a so-called "red laser" DVD unit due to the historical ties that the color red has to Communism. Communism, as you are probably aware, resulted in hundreds of millions of death in the 20th Century. I could not, as a moral man, purchase a laser of this color. Who could sit down and watch Attack of the Clones without thoughts of the Soviet gulags distracting you?

    Blue is the color of capitalism. It is also the color of patriotism and masculinity (as opposed to red, which is very close to the feminine color of pink.) It warms the heart to know that I can now watch my John Wayne collection on a moral device that is consistent with the ideals that I donned my country's uniform for in Grenada and Panama.

    1. Re:This is good news for the moral community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ideals that I donned my country's uniform for in Grenada and Panama.

      You say you are a real man, but I am skeptical. What real American man do you know that has a special outfit for one particular activity. That's more like something that a girly man would have.

    2. Re:This is good news for the moral community by DeadSea · · Score: 2, Funny
      Even better, you and your friends will no longer have sneak over to the "red light" district to purchase one of these players. The players will soon be available in the safer, more upright, "blue light" special district (where you always get the best deal).

      Critics may say that some people will try to use the new blue laser dvds to watch their old "red laser" content, thrust at them by the marketing engines of the sinful pornography industry, but we are working on new DMCA protected schemes so that you will not have to see this filth on your shiny new blue laser player.

    3. Re:This is good news for the moral community by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      Well, we gotta redo that american flag then, there's way too much red!! Replace it with, i dunno, black maybe. Hehehe

    4. Re:This is good news for the moral community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saddam?

    5. Re:This is good news for the moral community by CactusCritter · · Score: 1

      Anyone else remember Freddie Slacks record (circa '44-'46) "The House of Blue Lights"? I was told that "blue light" referred to an African-American bordello (OK, so I'm being PC).

    6. Re:This is good news for the moral community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't be able to buy them on Sunday though: Blue laws.

  11. It a lot a space, its a lot slower... by eldimo · · Score: 1

    sustained write speed = 8MB/s. Then it would take more than 1 hour to fill the entire drive. That's like the old CDRom 1X!

    1. Re:It a lot a space, its a lot slower... by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a 1X CD-ROM only transferred 150KB/sec. 8MB/sec is quite a bit more than that.

    2. Re:It a lot a space, its a lot slower... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Almost like the old "CDRom" I do believe you mean CD-Writes...EXCEPT
      -its a ton more storage. a ton. as in roughly 50 times more

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  12. standard??? by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 5, Interesting
    UDO is about to become the next generation standard on 5.25-inch optical drive technology, replacing the existing magneto-optical (MO) base of drives and discs of the same diameter.
    So this is about to become the standard? IMHO, there are still issues with normal DVD's with standards (DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD R, etc.). I think this is a step forward, but I think all the companies manufacturing the new line of blue laser DVD burners need to agree with a standard and keep with it. The other point though... when will this "generation" be the current technology? I still think that by the time the drives and media are cost effective, you might as well buy a hard drive to store the data. Yes, I know that obsolete technology like the floppy disk is still around, but I still think that 30, or even the possible 120 gigs as seen in the article will be too small by the time the drives hit the main market at reasonable price.
    --
    take off every sig for great justice
    1. Re:standard??? by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      But it's not a DVD drive. It's based on DVD blue laser tech (as stated in the article), but it's geared towards the MO market NOT the DVD+-~R market and it's certainly not aimed at consumers.

  13. Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be surprised if these discs end up costing more than $1/GB. You might as well just use hard disks to store your MP3s, warez, and pr0n.

    1. Re:Not when you see the price by LibertineR · · Score: 3, Insightful
      With the current reliability of hard drives outside of RAID 5, this might be worth the money. I dont like having to devote 5 drives to a SCSI Array just to insure I dont lose data. If I can move a lot of rarely used crap over to a disk of that size, I think it would be a good deal.

      I've had 3 Seagate 18Gb Ultra SCSI drives die in the last 6 months.

    2. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only $1/gig? Probably much more then that. And, these discs are in cartridges (which personally I think normal DVD's should have been like) so that will add a little cost too.

      I'm betting at least $60 a disc when they first hit market.

      Cool stuff though, and I'd love to have a re-writable version of this for a real backup solution without mucking around with DLT tapes like I do now. (at home)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I still think RAID is the #1 way to protect data from hardware failure. Backups are never the newest data, and generally backups are only used to recover data from user error, data traansportation (copy a large database to tape, mail it to DR site), archival. Way way down on the list is recovery due to hardware failure, because RAID is such a perfect solution.

      I worked at a data center with thousands of drives, some of them in a 30+ drive RAID set. In the five years I worked there, not once did we lose data due to drive failure.

      For home, IDE/ATA RAID is becomming more and more of a reality. When serial ATA comes to saturation, I forsee lots more built-in hardware raid functionality due to easy cable management.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    4. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want to look into ATA RAID solutions. I just built an ATA RAID 5 solution for less than $2 per Gigabyte.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:Not when you see the price by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RAID still won't save you from user failure. Archives and backups are good :]

    6. Re:Not when you see the price by jwjcmw · · Score: 1

      Why 5?...SCSI 5 is a minimum of 3 drives...of course you lose the space of one of them.

    7. Re:Not when you see the price by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Not only does RAID's redundancy allow for faster read times (even on slower equipment) it's redundancy also is a kind of "backup"

      works well, Raid is pretty sweet :)

      It even sounds tough. "Lets setup our RAID storage stuff" hah.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    8. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you have an archive solution as well. A RAID will save you from hardware failure and will do that seamlessly. And Anyhoo, users don't usually notice "user failure" until months later after backups have expired anyway.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    9. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I would assume he is referencing having multiple "hot spares" esp since he mentioned having 3 drives fail recently. Even so, you only need one hot spare up at any given time to limit risk, and a RAID 51 solution will beat hot spares fairly effectively if reliability is your worst fear.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    10. Re:Not when you see the price by div_2n · · Score: 1

      RAID does nothing when you have complete disaster. I wonder (but don't know) if any of the WTC companies relied only on RAID and failed to do offsite backups.

      I bet dollars to doughnuts that if they did, they are somewhere in Chapter 11 or worse right now.

    11. Re:Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm betting some SATA hard drives in a RAID 1 (or 0+1) configuration would still be cheaper than UDO.

    12. Re:Not when you see the price by wurp · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's what we thought, until our RAID controller died catastrophically. Immediate and complete data loss.

      RAID is nice; daily backups are better. Both together, plus a revision controlled and journalling file system is best ;)

    13. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, when you lose the headquarters, 75% of upper management and 30% of your staff, I would guess that offsite backups of last weeks e-mail would be the least of your worries.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:Not when you see the price by Deth_Master · · Score: 1

      RAID is nice; Daily backups are too;
      so do both, and your data will stay new;
      with Raid you get speed;
      and with backups saftey, indeed,
      So doing both works just fine,
      Your data will be perfect 100% of the time.


      :)

      --
      find ~your -name '*base* | xargs chown :us
    15. Re:Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOAGE, will you buy me one?

    16. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 1

      When presenting poetry it is generally key to correctly spell safety Indeed your rhyming will be perfect frequently

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    17. Re:Not when you see the price by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, if you weren't an AC, Perhaps I would. Ah well. Your chance has passed. No further requests will be honoured.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    18. Re:Not when you see the price by Deth_Master · · Score: 1

      Although I cannot spell safety;
      I believe that formatting is good;
      And I'd go back to correct it, if I could;
      But even mispelled, it sounds pretty nifty

      god, this is sad....

      --
      find ~your -name '*base* | xargs chown :us
    19. Re:Not when you see the price by MartinG · · Score: 1

      What is the purpose of a backup?

      1) Enable recovery from user error. ie, a user deletes stuff they shouldn't have. A backup from last week can be used to retrieve it.

      2) Recovery from catastrophic failure. eg. UPS failure, drive controller failure, or fire in the server room.

      3) Recovery from a failed drive without downtime.

      RAID solves neither of (3) but not (1) or (2). A backup solves (1) and (2) but not (3)

      If you think about it, RAID is useful, but is certainly not a good backup strategy. In fact, it is not a backup strategy at all.

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    20. Re:Not when you see the price by div_2n · · Score: 1

      There were many companies that lost 100% of their office but 0% of their staff. Those are the ones I am talking about.

      Here is the thing . . . the R part of RAID stands for Redundant. Business continuity is only as secure as the weakest link. All the RAID technology in the world isn't worth squat if a 3AM office fire burns up all your servers. Of course, backups are no good if you don't have offsite storage for disaster situations.

      In reality, a combination of all the technologies is the best practice:

      -Server colocation for uptime redundancy
      -RAID+1 systems for maximum hard drive tolerance
      -Clustered servers for maximum server redundancy
      -Offsite and onsite backups
      -Backup generators
      -multiple ISP's

      This is all expensive but if your business lives or dies by your data, there is no question that ALL of these should be employed.

    21. Re:Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My Address:
      Coward, Anonymous
      1 AC Blvd.
      Wankerville, NC 101101
    22. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Considering that planes aren't going to fly into most workplaces, I think they are okay.

      Plus, I said "way down on the list" because it's a damned rare occurance that total system failures occure. If it's a single machine, you should have some sort of backup machine sitting ready to go (cluster type thing) anyways, since a backup restore could be hours away.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    23. Re:Not when you see the price by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      First off, most of the people in the WTC got out. Second, lets say that your corporate headquarters was hit by something else; like say, a Tornado, or a Huricane, or an Earthquake (nothing is retrofitted for earth quakes east of the mississippi; when that fault goes us east coasters are screwed).

    24. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      OMFG! I even said in my post that RAID won't prevent your (1) or (2)!

      My post was in reply to the guy that said "Well with this new medium as backup, I won't need the RAID!"

      Does anyone ELSE want to remind me why RAID isn't a replacement for a backup, and completly miss the point?

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    25. Re:Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, RAID doesn't protect for user error, you are mistaken.

    26. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Ho Ho Ho.

      (Now I have a Machine Gun.)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    27. Re:Not when you see the price by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I've had 3 Seagate 18Gb Ultra SCSI drives die in the last 6 months."

      I doubt all the drives were of poor quality or defective.

      1. Check your power supply. If the 5V rail in particular is erratic or just too weak (say 10% too low) then that is likely the problem. Most people don't think about this, but it can kill most computer components.

      2. Use S.M.A.R.T. capibility to determine the drive's temperature and see if it is getting too hot and needs cooling. This can also kill a drive.

    28. Re:Not when you see the price by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      I run 4 drives and a spare. Running only 3 loses too much space. With 4 it's 25% rather than 33% on 3.

    29. Re:Not when you see the price by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Thanks. The box is definetly cool enough, but the power supply is a 250V OEM in a Supermicro SC750a case, which also powers dual PIII 450's, a CD burner and a DVD drive.

      You might be exactly right.

    30. Re:Not when you see the price by addaon · · Score: 1

      All I've really wanted for a while is a distributed raid system. When working on things like source code and documentation, I couldn't care less about disk speed... 10kb/s is more than enough most of the time. So why not have some server that I can run on about five computers around the world that automatically does raid mirroring of my document directories? Even with the overhead of five reads / five writes per operation, speed should still be an easy 100kb/s over a fast internet connection, and you could recover from a nuclear war without much difficulty. The only downside is the inability to do offline work (or rather, offline work would not be backed up immediately), but that's what ubiquitous wireless is for.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    31. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      For what you speak of you could use one of the many, many applications out there to simply sync your local data store with a remote one.

      rsync comes to mind. You could even schedule it to run every couple of minutes if you really needed to.

      I think a WAN raid filesystem would be kinda flakey. I mean, it's pretty easy to lose connectivity temporarily over the Internet.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    32. Re:Not when you see the price by jafac · · Score: 1

      Comdisco did a study of the companies in the 93 WTC bombing that did not have a disaster recovery plan, 70% were out of business within a year.

      And those sites were simply inaccessible for a period of time, not destroyed utterly, like they were in 2001.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    33. Re:Not when you see the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yippee ki-yay, motherfucker ;)

    34. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Of course, it IS possible that the drives just died and you had bad luck. Stranger things have happened.

      Heat can be a factor like the other guy said, but I have these two 10k 9GB SCSI drives in a linux box, along with three other drives in a mini-tower case with one fan, and they get so hot you can't touch them. They've been running for over three years now without a problem. =) Not saying you SHOULD have the drives poorly cooled... but it makes me wonder how hot a drive needs to be before it's too hot.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    35. Re:Not when you see the price by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Actually, a hot drive case is not a bad thing, if you are confident that the heat is going somewhere, rather than just radiating inside the case. I had those drives sitting right on top of each other, in an already warm case from the twin CPU's. If you are familiar with the SuperMicro case, you can add enough fans to cool the thing to the point where you could almost keep your beer cold in it, so I added a couple of fans.

      However, I think the fans, in addition to the underpowered supply might have done the damage.

    36. Re:Not when you see the price by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Cantor Fitzgerald and subsidiaries eSpeed and TradeSpark, located on floors 101, 103, 104, and 105 of 1 WTC, lost 700 of 1000 employees, and were up and running again 44 hours later. Why? Live off-site backups of all data.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    37. Re:Not when you see the price by addaon · · Score: 1

      Right, but I don't want it to run every couple of minutes. I want it to run every time that a write occurs to the file system, and I want a read to occur from all sources every time I make a request, and at least get a consistent response for a majority before data is considered read. And yes, connectivity is flaky, but if you have five data sources, and one of them is the local host, you only need to be able to access two out of four remote sites to have workable data. How often do you lose more than half the 'net? Also keep in mind that I'm not proposing this be done for applications or anything which needs rapid access, just for small but valuable data files.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    38. Re:Not when you see the price by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      What if you are the one with the internet connection problem? In that case you would only have access to one data source.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    39. Re:Not when you see the price by phorm · · Score: 1

      No kidding. When the user accidentally removes or overwrites his/her 50-page document which is due to be presented before a board etc the next day... backups are much more useful than RAID.

      RAID coupled with backups is the best way to go though... even with near-full backups the downtime associated with a crash can be annoying.

  14. media cost? by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much blank media will cost. seing how when cd-r's used to be about $1 a disk and DVD-r's are currently around $4-5 a disk. I am guessing probly going to be around 15 a disk when this first comes out but at the current price of Harddrives thats a bargein. Of course when this hits the market Harddrives and other storage media will be alot cheaper.

    1. Re:media cost? by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 1
      Don't pay $4-5 for DVD-R. There is something like 4 companies in the world that physically make discs, and others just put their name on them.

      I regularly see 100 packs of DVD-R discs going for less than $200 on eBay.

      The scam started with floppy disks, in my Apple ][+ days, 5.25" discs were $6-7 a pop, then it carried to 5.25 HD, 3.5, 3.5 HD, CD-R, CD-RW, and so on.

      --
      This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
    2. Re:media cost? by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

      I was just going by what a 5 pack was at best buy around 20-30 or so depending on who was marketing them. I get em from my friend who gets em wholesale.

    3. Re:media cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? If you're paying more than $.70 per DVD-R, you're getting screwed. DVD+R's are another issue, but are still less than $2 a disc.

    4. Re:media cost? by Ringthane · · Score: 1

      Bulk General Purpose DVD-Rs can be had for less than $1 each on spindles at this website:

      http://www.supermediastore.com/index.html

      Standard disclaimers apply: I don't have any connection with these guys; I'm just a satisfied customer... :D

      --
      Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
  15. let the format wars begin! by e40 · · Score: 1

    All this low-level hardware tech is great, but how long before 2 or 3 camps form with different formats? It sure slowed down the adoption of writable DVD (I went with DVD+RW, myself). Bleh.

  16. Not only that... by inertia187 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But in about ten years, they will combine this technology with that technology and dub it "Density Optical Hybrid" (DOH!).

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  17. ultraviolet by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The purpose in using blue instead of red is because blue has a shorter wavelength. Going further, the next step is in ultraviolet LEDs for shorter wavelengths and higher storeage densities.

    1. Re:ultraviolet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait until we get X and gamma ray-based DVDs!

  18. Blue Light Special!! by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny
    Attention K-Mart Shoppers! Available Now!

    (you heard it here first, get used to it)

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  19. *Seemingly* years? by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Try 10 years... I remember talking about these in 1993 as water cooler discussions as a sales rep for Egghead Software long before they became the Mayan Empire and made a complete transition to the Internet so they could sell volleyballs.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  20. Re:FIGHT THE POWER!!! by mike77 · · Score: 2, Funny
    you'll be heard from a slashdot forum?

    riiiigggghhhhttt.......

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  21. How do they handle scratches and dirt? by spanky1 · · Score: 1

    A single fingerprint probably covers several hundred megabytes. :)

    1. Re:How do they handle scratches and dirt? by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I guess I just exposed myself as a lamer who didn't look at the article before posting. The shell around the disk would certainly help keep them clean. It works great for minidiscs!

    2. Re:How do they handle scratches and dirt? by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Assuming you got your finger past the protective shell, you're fingerprint would obscure ~7.4Gb. Read the specs before posting!

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  22. Re:Director by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, I think the thread you're lookin for is thattaway, son
    <-----

  23. Cartridges by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank God they used cartridges in this thing! That solves a plethora of headaches.
    Lets hope that the big software makers like Sony/Matsushita et al. decide to use cartridges when they release their (possibly blue laser) HD-DVD players next year (presumably).
    Nothing is worse than having media skip from a mere fingerprint or a slight scratch- especially when you are watching a movie!

    1. Re:Cartridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did just that. The new Sony Blue-Ray recorder uses cartridges. Sony's new pro blue laser camcorder and decks use cartridges as well, probably the same ones. They did this with Beta the first-gen pro rigs used exactly the same cassettes as the consumer Betamax.

  24. Re:Director by licketyspit · · Score: 0

    damn

  25. Am I the only one worried that... by LeoDV · · Score: 1

    ...UDO is its own standard of blue laser technology. The other great thing about Blu-Ray was that it was one standard: no DVD-R/RAM/-RW/+RW/ARGH! and now people come out with their own blue laser technologies? I want a 5.25 Blu-Ray drive that I can use to read Blu-Ray movies, make ISOs of them, backup my data, and not a billion standards.

    *grumbles and walks off*

  26. Re:FIGHT THE POWER!!! by Visaris · · Score: 1

    I'm one paranoid mother fucker... and I think you're out to get me! I will not post in favor of your coments for fear that the man will find me! THE MAN WILL FUND ME! And stop posting that anyways. It's been in like all the stories for the past day and no, it's never on topic.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  27. correction by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    correction: big HARDWARE makes... DUH

  28. So what's comes after "Ultra" by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    We have ultra density. Will the next standard be called "extreme density"? And after that "unbelievable density"?
    They are going to start running out of adjectives in a little while. Quick! Somebody start a adjectives standards body!

    1. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by haggar · · Score: 1

      Well, there's at least one thing you can leave the marketoids to worry about. I honestly often wonder what the f*ck are they paid for, expecially in my company (large mobile phone company).

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by lazn · · Score: 1

      "Ludicrous Speed captain."

      "They went plaid!!"

      ==>Lazn

    3. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      super ultra

      mega ultra

      super mega ultra

      ludicrous (spaceballs)

    4. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by jayspec462 · · Score: 1

      Prepare media for ludicrous density!

      --
      $comment =~ s/($verb)\s+($noun)/IN SOVIET RUSSIA, $2 $1s YOU!/g;
    5. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      Density... TO THE MAX!

    6. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by Stween · · Score: 1

      Damnit! Numerous people went for the 'ludicrous speed' joke before I got to the post.

      Oh, how long I've waited to make a good ludicrous speed joke. :sniff:

    7. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Oh, I know that one!

      ULTRA
      ULTRA WIDE
      ULTRA 2 WIDE
      ULTRA 160
      ULTRA 320

      You see, SCSI encountered this little issue a few years back...

    8. Re:So what's comes after "Ultra" by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      If detergents are any indicator, it'll be "Ultra blu-light with colorfast bleach-alternative!!!"

  29. x-ray by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

    Definetly x-ray lasers. Yeah baby! Of course the CDs will have to be lead or gold foil...

    1. Re:x-ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD-Rs ARE gold foil....

  30. Re:ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I would have gotten this first post, but I have a chainsaw chain tangled up in my pubes...

    A LITTLE HELP PLEASE??? SOMEONE??

  31. The price of coasters just went up by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming the blank disks will cost more.

  32. Re:FIGHT THE POWER!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wish the man would fund me. i've been a little on the underfunded side

  33. First prototype? by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Informative

    If there haven't been prototypes, how is Sony going to start selling them in a few weeks? What am I missing?

  34. How resistent to dust and scratches? by haggar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am very well aware of the rendundant coding used to provide for a certain amount of resliance of the data, both on CDs and DVDs, but at a certain point when the data density becomes this high, I would imagine that the media would lose data when you just touch it.

    One thing that would put me at ease is a kind of media that is completely hermetically protected by a transparent plastic shell. Perhaps a stationary disk while the reader is the one to rotate. That way you wouldn't even need the hole for the rotating spindle.

    OTOH, with 30 GB, I can imagine I could put my whole collection of classical CD music on 5 UDOs, uncompressed. Or they will think about some abherration such as AudioDVD, so that the whole 30 GB will be just enough for some 60 minutes of music....

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:How resistent to dust and scratches? by amalcon · · Score: 1

      "One thing that would put me at ease is a kind of media that is completely hermetically protected by a transparent plastic shell."

      All this would do is move the potential for damage from the media to the shell. If you scratch the shell, you'd have to move the disc into a new (hermetically sealed) shell. "Perhaps a stationary disk while the reader is the one to rotate. That way you wouldn't even need the hole for the rotating spindle."

      Sure, if you want to replace your drive once a year or so. I don't know about you, but I'd prefer paying $5.00 for a few backup discs to paying $100 for the latest drive, only to have this new moving part break on me.

      --
      -Amalcon
    2. Re:How resistent to dust and scratches? by haggar · · Score: 2, Informative

      All this would do is move the potential for damage from the media to the shell.

      That's not entirely correct. The way CDs/DVDs work is that they actually focus the laser ray with a little but powerful lens, a few millimeters above the CD/DVD. Small optical obstacles that are somewhat removed (distanced) from the focal point, which is the surface of the media will interfere much less with the signal than it would do if on the surface itself.

      That's exactly why dual layer DVDs can work! You focus the laser about half a millimeter lower in order to read the lower layer, while the middle layer doesn't interfere at all.

      --
      Sigged!
  35. But does it ... by mustangdavis · · Score: 1




    Come with a black face plate?


    That white color would look terrible in my "stealth" case .... but the blue light would match perfectly!!


  36. I may be nitpicking, but... by amalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Plasmon Exhibits Working Blue Laser DVD Drive"

    This is not DVD. It's an optical disk drive, which uses much of the same technology as DVD, but is definitely not the same specification. You would not be able to read a blue-laser disc in any 100% DVD-compliant drive.

    Optical discs that can hold more than CD's are not necessarily them DVD's.

    --
    -Amalcon
  37. Mini-DVD's by rf0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would be cool if we could get these density DVD on an 8cm mini-DVD. That way it would be a nice solution for portable MP3 player/high denisity hard disk. Just a clue for any product people reading :)

    Rus

    1. Re:Mini-DVD's by booms · · Score: 1

      Do you know what else would be cool? A Beowulf cluster of these!!!!!!!!111 Just think of all the possibilities!!!!!!11111

      Sorry.. couldn't resist. :)

  38. Re:Director by osgeek · · Score: 1

    Mod this parent up! It makes a very important statement. While you're modding it up, see if you can move it to the Flash article.

    Heh, sometimes it's worth it to surf at zero.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. DataPlay by jetkust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about dataplay, 500MB in the size roughly of a quarter. Very neat, but i think they ended up filing for bankruptcy over competition with flash cards and hard drive based mp3 players. I think even Britney Spears was scheduled to release an album using this technology.

    1. Re:DataPlay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with almost any new post-CD writable/removable media, DataPlay had crippling DRM built into it from the word go. When consumers are aware of this "feature" prior to making the hardware purchase, the hardware purchase doesn't get made.

      That's why all the media companies will fight tooth and nail over that bill (discussed on /. yesterday, but I'm too lazy to link) requiring that copy-protected shit be clearly marked as copy-protected-- because people won't buy it. The big companies prefer the status quo, where they get your money and tough shit if your CD player doesn't like the disc they sold you-- no returns allowed, store policy.

    2. Re:DataPlay by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      "What about dataplay, 500MB in the size roughly of a quarter ... I think even Britney Spears was scheduled to release an album using this technology."

      I thought she was scheduled to appear on an album cover wearing this technology.

      [rim shot]
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    3. Re:DataPlay by brandorf · · Score: 1

      I think the $8 or so cost for a write-once disk is what did them in. Even sony knew better thanb that when they released Minidisc.

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
  41. Double sided by rf0 · · Score: 1

    The article says that the disks are double sided. Does this mean that you have to flip them as with DVD's?

    Rus

    1. Re:Double sided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I believe you pull out the cartridge, flip the drive over, and then insert the cartridge again.

  42. New Poll Request by lazarus · · Score: 1
    "It's cool to see a product prepare for market that actually uses it."

    For unintelligible statements in a story description like the one above, CowboyNeal should be sent to:

    • KinderCare's Hooked on Phonics Class
    • Jail -- Do Not Pass Go...
    • Iraq -- To work as a translator for Baath
    Also, as neet as you may find this "blue light" optical device, it's unique in that it is "Blue-Violet" not just blue. Prototypes of blue laser devices have been out for almost a year at least.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  43. Can't wait for this by japhar81 · · Score: 1

    For those of us that have to do near-line storage, write-once archival (FTC guidelines for email retention, etc.), and other backup-ish stuff, this is a dream come true. Take that 10,000 disk DVD jukebox, swap the drives, and go from 40,000MB (about 3.5TB) to something nearly 10 times as dense (close to 28TB). God I can't wait for one of these. Toss in on your SAN, virtualize, and archive everything.

  44. Compared to 4MB/s by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    on newer DLT drives, this is amazing.

    When having discrete, 30GB matters (for doing backups and archives and stuff), you almost always end up sacrificing speed to access said media. But this format is a vast improvement.

    Of course, we won't now how much these systems will cost in the near future; just adding more tape drives in parallel could be more affordable!

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  45. First Working Prototype? by dmayle · · Score: 1

    Sony already has a shipping blu-ray unit. Granted, it's only available in Japan, but thta's what your local neighborhood import shop is for... This is just a list of specs and pictures... Check out all those inputs!

    1. Re:First Working Prototype? by sunbane · · Score: 1

      The sony blue-ray drive actually goes on sale in Japan on April 10. (See bluray.com) I totally agree with you - first working prototype? Give me a break!

      hmmm... apparently here are pictures of prototypes by sony, jvc, panasonic, philips, pioneer, samsung, sharp, and zenith. :)

      Cnet had an article on this as well on March 3. Sony has been showing prototypes since last October.

    2. Re:First Working Prototype? by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      Article is the same Reuters story I posted, but more US-friendly & with a picture or two.

      The prototype pictures you linked to were quite informative and interesting. Looks like CDR-info has a conflicting article as well.

  46. Not really that different from old optical disks by LynchMan · · Score: 1
    If you take it all into perspective, this 30 gig of storage is not really that much. At least 6 years ago, I helped clean out the 'Clover' (an old department store) offices in Philadelphia. One of the boxes we took was full of 1.6 gig rw optical disks (looked exactly like these new 30 gig ones). I was so estatic - there were 50 of these disks.

    Now, back in 1996-1997, 1.6 gig on removeable media (not counting tape) was pretty damn cool, especially since the largest hard drives were what, 10 gig?. I thought I was going to have 80 gigs of removable storage. But after I checked the price of the drives (1000+), the disks just stayed in the box.

    So I can see these catching on in the corperate world for massive data backups, but probably not in the consumer market, IMHO. That is, unless, the drives are on the same pricing level as CD/DVD burners.

  47. They come in cartridges by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    Like zip disks, floppies, and mini-disc. Hence, you protect it from grubby fingers.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:They come in cartridges by haggar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am aware of those, but I have noticed the first (very fine) grains of dust inside some of the minidisks I have. I guess it's inevitable.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:They come in cartridges by Snover · · Score: 1

      Also, don't forget what happened to 3.5" diskettes when you got the tiniest bit of anything in them. "What? You want the data WHERE? *grinding noise* Error reading data
      Abort, Retry, Fail?"

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
  48. KMart by lunenburg · · Score: 1

    KMart has been using the blue light for YEARS, and look where it got them!

  49. I'll believe it when I see it on the shelf... by jafuser · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to FMD-ROM?

    How about Penny-sized CDs

    Or were these just another round of VC scams?

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it on the shelf... by satterth · · Score: 1

      Well, you see... first they lost it in some developers couch at home along with the rest of his change. Then while they were looking for it, it got sucked up by some vacume cleaner and now its gone.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it on the shelf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FMD-ROM: Too many layers = very, very hard to manufacture in quantity = not commercially viable.

      Penny-sized CDs: Uh, you need an Atomic Force Microscope to read them. AFM = not commercially viable.

      End of story.

  50. yeah... by gvonk · · Score: 1


    We've been hearing about the advantages of blue light for seemingly years now. It's cool to see a product prepare for market that actually uses it.

    Interesting that you say that... You see, for me, It's been cool to see a product prepare for market that actually uses it for seemingly years now.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  51. Yum! by darkmayo · · Score: 1


    Anyone else here licking there chops at a chance to play with one of these.

    --
    "I am a kernel in the linux army"
  52. 30 GB? Perfect... but by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 1


    This media is just the right size for my needs. I just have one pressing question:

    Will this new DVD drive turn all of my pr0n blue?

  53. blue laser diode!! by zod1025 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when can I get my blue laser pen?

    Please, everybody, buy these drives! Drive the price down so I can get it three years from now.

    --

    -ZOD-
    1. Re:blue laser diode!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm an anon coward.

      You can already buy green diodes for more than 10x the cost of red ones ($15-$30 compared to $400). God knows how muc a blue diode would cost; it was hard enough to just get the diode to emit light let alone amplify it.

  54. Time to Market? by WatertonMan · · Score: 1
    How long does it usually take from prototype to market on these things? I know for computers it is typically six months to a year.

    Are we likely to see the initial (expensive) drives for sale a year from now?

    This will really put the fear into Hollywood since it'll allow DVDs to be copied with ease.

  55. Burst out in song by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    This just makes me want to burst out singing.

    KING:

    Oh, better far to live and die
    Under the brave black flag I fly,
    Than play a sanctimonious part
    With a pirate head and a pirate heart.
    Away to the cheating world go you,
    Where pirates all are well-to-do;
    But I'll be true to the song I sing,
    And live and die a Pirate King.

    For I am a Pirate King!

    And it is, it is a glorious thing
    To be a Pirate King!

    For I am a Pirate King!

    ALL:

    You are!

    Hurrah for the Pirate King!

    KING:

    And it is, it is a glorious thing
    To be a Pirate King.

    ALL:

    It is!

    Hurrah for the Pirate King!
    Hurrah for the Pirate King!

  56. Re:Other Wavelengths by PyrotekNX · · Score: 1

    I'm sure companies know about other wavelengths. The reason why they don't drop in an even smaller wavelength is that they will miss out on all the sales of this blue laser technology and secure their places so they can sell and market different optical technologies for hundreds of years down the line. The only time you will see the next technology coming out is when they have milked this one for all it's worth, Don't be fooled, there are plenty of technologies that work but are not yet shown to the public. There are false claims that there isn't a way to expand certain technologies, yet they come out at just the right time.

  57. Black Lite lasers by PenrosePattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the Black Lite lasers finally come out we'll finally be able to store trillions of Elvis and sad dog pictures.

    --
    Seuss - I'm telling you this 'cause you're one of my friends. My alphabet starts where your alphabet ends
  58. Darth Vader by scottjantz · · Score: 1

    It seems your theory also holds true in distant galaxies.

    Red light saber = Evil

  59. ULTRA density? by allanc · · Score: 1

    Here's something that bugs me about this industry. Whenever they come out with some new technology that blows away the previous iterations, they give it a name like that. Which is... silly, given the rapid rate of change in the field. Yeah, it's superlative now, but give it a few years and it'll be quaint.

    Instead of naming this one Ultra Density and naming the next one Super Ultra Density, then Superfly Fantastico Jumbo Ultra Density, seems like it would be a better idea to plan for the future and call this one "Medium density"

    Rhetoricians have the same problem. They keep naming new writing styles things like "Modern poetry," which means that the next one has to be "Post-Modern" which just sounds silly if you don't say it so frequently that it stops having any real meaning.

    --AC

  60. not the first... by op51n · · Score: 1

    If you read what, because of the statement of first, is a dupe post. Was it Sony or one of the 'P' companies released their statement on this a few weeks back, which hit /.

  61. Nooo! by nomel · · Score: 1

    This is not good!

    As you can see, we are still stuck with optical. In my opinion this is the worste imaginable idea!

    CD's don't last that long because of scratching...and they can take a lot...DVD's are worse, with fingerprints rendiring them useless...imagine how bad this will be!

    I have never considered optical as being a nice technology. I would honestly rather use magnetic disks like a hard disk platter or something similar...something that requires a very strong magnetic field to change the data (high coercivity like magstripes on industrial strength badges use).

    The only thing I could see this used for would be a very low low usage application...like movies that you watch once every two or three months. I just hate the idea of having to be *more* carefull about touching the disk.

    If *anything*, they should start covering the disks with a plastic container like minidiscs. This would fix everything wrong with optical media.

    Like I put in a previouse comment
    Hold on...let me clean the nanodust off.

    1. Re:Nooo! by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      Many optical disks are actually magneto-optical.

      And as to the harddrive platter idea - try getting dust inside your HD and see how long it lasts. The only reason optical media is more vulnerable is because it isnt hermetically sealed in with the reading electronics.

    2. Re:Nooo! by nomel · · Score: 1

      Like I said, something *like* a hard drive platter. I believe the only reason that the dust can harm the surface is because the heads are so close (don't they contact, cause old hard drives have lots of circular scratches). That's why I said with less density, so they could possibly put the heads further away from the surface.

  62. Check out the telerobot! by PseudoThink · · Score: 1

    Hey, sell a web-operated telerobot kit! That's be awesome to freak out my roommate's cat while at work. I'd buy one.

  63. New Topic by sQuEeDeN · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who noticed there's a new topic on slashdot: storage...
    I'm not sure why this warrants it's own topic, but, hell, I guess it's okay. Things like this don't reall fall under 'science'

    --

    Recursive (adj.): see 'Recursive'
  64. All I want by miracle69 · · Score: 1

    All I want is a friggin shark with a blue laserbeam on its head.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  65. Blue Light Special by infinite9 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    We've been hearing about the advantages of blue light for seemingly years now.

    You can say that again! K-Mart rocks! I just can't resist those blue light specials.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:Blue Light Special by cactopus · · Score: 1

      ROOOOXXXAANANNE! you don't have to put on the RED LIGHT.... you don't have to show your DVD to the night....

      Man I got the blues... those MPAA Blue light DVD blues...

  66. Blue laser by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    This is _NOT_ a troll, I would seriously like to know what the problem is in producing blue/violet or maybe even ultraviolet lasers. I know (vaguely) about the advantages of shorter wavelength of blue light compared to red, but nothing really in depth. Could someone enlighten me?

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    1. Re:Blue laser by TheSync · · Score: 1

      It is tough to find semiconductors with wide band gaps. The larger the band gap, the higher the energy photon produced by an electron moving from one band to another. Higher-frequency photons have higher energy, thus you need larger band gaps to produce blue light than red light. That is the problem, but it is slowly being solved.

      The benefit of higher-frequency photons is that they can be focused into a smaller area. The higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength. The smaller the wavelength, the less diffraction limiting of focusing optics.

  67. 30gb on the unit? by Levine · · Score: 1
    The drive boasts 30GB of storage
    At about 31 million times the size of today's fastest IDE hard drive caches, that's one gigantic freakin' buffer. I wonder what the throughput on one of those babies is...
  68. Why is blue so great? by MegaFur · · Score: 1
    We've been hearing about the advantages of blue light for seemingly years now

    Okay, I'm forgetful and I'm too lazy to google. I forget--what are the advantages of the blue laser?

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  69. Re:Genocide in Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A human lose of no military significance, but even children were killed.

    I like it when arab/palestinian children die. I hope they all die so that there is enough room for Israel to grow.

  70. Why have DVD in article title? by nedron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nowhere in the Plasmon information does it call this a DVD drive. In fact, the CDR-Info page specifically points out that this is NOT DVD.

    It would be nice if the people releasing submissions would check the article titles for accuracy.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  71. Ludicrous Density/ Plad Density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't forget those two! :)

  72. Support HD-DVD by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    There are already 4 standards out trying to become the next DVD standard. One format is to use standard DVD discs and MPEG-4. The other is to use Blu-Ray discs to deliver HD-DVD using less compression for a better image.

    Most people of course are in support of the new Blu-Ray discs but just like Beta\VHS and DVD-A\SACD there are competing formats that may delay the technology.

    Click here to support ONE HD-DVD FORMAT

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Support HD-DVD by Eccles · · Score: 1

      One format is to use standard DVD discs and MPEG-4.

      I'd like that, my new HTPC should be capable of playing those already. Then a higher-density format can come later for seasons-on-a-disk or higher quality. Since the former is a formatting spec, not a hardware one (granted, current DVD players can't handle it), it seems to me it's not that much of a competing standard.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  73. 30Gig does not excite. by nortcele · · Score: 1
    "Future generations of drives and media will increase the usable capacity of discs to 60GB and 120GB. Backward read capability will be maintained throughout the whole product roadmap."
    It seems that the media has to be on the order of a magnitude greater capacity than previously available before folks get excited. Get them under $1000 and there will be a huge market.
    1. Re:30Gig does not excite. by swb · · Score: 1

      I find DVD-R a useful increase over CD-R. Our disc images for desktops are all too big to fit on a single CD-R, and dumps of user data have been going over this amount for a while, too.

      My most recent bootable DVD-R for imaging fits 4 platforms, Win2kSP3, Office2000 and some other bricabrac on a single disc. Archiving old user data is much easier, and they're happier to have it archived to a single media.

      30G would be a worthwhile upgrade over 4.7G as well, since its about the same jump as CDR-DVDR.

  74. Imagine, audio of all of al gore's boring speeches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on a single disk.

    All ready for the a T f to play over loudspeakers at the next waco seige.

  75. Imagine... by Cranx · · Score: 1

    ...how much data a beowulf cluster of these could store...

  76. Re:One fish, two fish, red laser, blue laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Truly inspired filth!
    I don't understand why your flamebait hasn't gotten the attention it justly deserves.

    Anyhow, kudos, and keep up the good work.

  77. WORST POEM EVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I read that...

  78. Not the first by flimflam · · Score: 1

    I saw a working Blu-Ray prototype almost exactly one year ago at last year's NAB. OK, it's a different format, but it uses a blue laser, and has pretty much the same storage capacity.

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  79. Good job they're coming out with 120Gb discs... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    ...because AOL Version 9 is going to be about 100Gb

    As much as I need coasters in my house, I'd rather one AOL disc per version over 10 or so.

  80. Blue Laser? by Saiai+Hakutyoutani · · Score: 1

    I KNEW it wasn't just a Japanese accent in the Pillows song "Razorlike Blue"...

  81. Cartridges? by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    This is all very fine and dandy, but it will be expensive as hell and almost useless to "the rest of us" if the cartridges aren't standard across the different manufacturers... we all know what happens to vendor-specific standards...

    Note: (unless it's a $40bil megalomaniacal company :)

  82. Special Thanks Are In Order by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

    On behalf of the Rainbow Coalition, I would like to congratulate the technical community on the acceptance of blue lasers in DVD technology. For generations, blue and other wavelengths of color have tried to break into the technological field, especially in rapidly advancing areas such as data storage, consumer video, and gaming consoles. This is a great step towards the full integration of blue wavelengths into the national and world economies.

    Remember, it's not the length of your wave, it's the motion of your amplitude.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  83. Re:Cartridges (business decisions) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't you know it.

    While I am much happier with the video and audio quality of DVDs and now rarely rent VHS, I can say in one year of renting DVDs, I believe I have rented as many (if not more) defective DVDs than I ever have of videotapes (in 17 years).

    Unfortunately, we live in a consumeristic throw-away society where defective merchandise makes more business sense so it wouldn't surprise me if the numbnuts who made the decision not to put DVDs in cartridges all got pay-raises. Bastards!

  84. More Blu-ray info by cleanroom · · Score: 1

    www.blu-ray.com

  85. I thought they used blue light already... by norite · · Score: 1
    I thought that DVD's used blue light already? If they use red light, like ordinary CD Players, how can you get 4.7Gb on a disc? does it use a red laser with a smaller wavelength than an "ordinary" red laser? or does a DVD have more than one layer?

    And what happened to those Flourescent Multilayer Discs (FMD's) that supposedly had 7 or so layers on a disc on which to store data? I heard they had a potential to store 120Gb on each disk!

    --
    -- Fuck Beta
  86. Re:One fish, two fish, red laser, blue laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truly inspired filth!
    I don't understand why your flamebait hasn't gotten the attention it justly deserves.


    This is Troll Library quality stuff, at least for the next couple of months.

  87. Ow! My eye! by sbillard · · Score: 1

    Because I had to

  88. BTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dataplay discs used DRM. You can get 512MB CF and SD cards that don't require you to burn another disc everytime you want to add a song or change a playlist.

  89. Re:30 GB? Perfect... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, this brings a whole new meaning to "working blue".

  90. 100 million dead people by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    This is not a joke. 30 million in China, 1 in 7 cambodgians, etc (See the Black Book of Communism by Curtois et al.)

    Try making a similar joke about fascism.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:100 million dead people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese communist had a little phrase they used for supporters of capitalism. They called them running dogs. The origin of this phrase was from hunting dogs that were eaten after they had served their purpose.
      I introduce this story in order that you will appreciate the following:
      Fetch vlad!

  91. But... Blue is also the Color of the Smurfs... by Sunlighter · · Score: 1
    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
  92. The Spaceship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's all the different colors that lets those UFOs fly I guess

  93. Blue laser and negative refractive index? by john82 · · Score: 1

    Consider that one reason for using the blue laser is the optical characteristics. Also note that Plasmon's unit has a 0.7 numerical aperature lens to focus the beam.

    Makes me wonder. How much higher density could be achieved with a blue laser and a lens made from left-handed (neg refractive index) material?

    Order of magnitude (300GB)?

  94. Not the first product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony either has already released or will release (in the VERY near future, as in weeks or days) a blu-ray optical disc video recorder in Japan. Price is going to be about $4000 for the recorder, and $25 each for the media, but it's the first one, so of course it will be expensive.

  95. Re:Other Wavelengths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creating the laser's wavelength has been discussed elsewhere in this thread, but remember that semiconductor blue lasers have only just recently been long-lived and thermally stable enough for mass markets. (Gas lasers like HeCad and Argon Ion have been used for decades now.) The problem domain shifts when you get to UV. Standard (read cheap) materials used in optics don't focus UV light well, they absorb them. You need a lens, beam splitter, 4 quadrant photodetector, etc. to consider. Electron beam stuff is cool, but handling it is vastly different... you use magnetic fields instead of optics. Then there's the necessary vacuum... making stuff with e-beams is way more difficult.

  96. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are
    3.155 x 10^7, you won't even try to remember it. On the other hand,
    who could forget that, to within half a percent, pi seconds is a
    nanocentury.
    -- Tom Duff, Bell Labs

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...