my bad on ahanix! thanks for the link... now i know not to buy from them again. fuckers.
the back of my mentioned psu is about 3 feet from my head when i'm sleeping and i can't hear the damn thing, so, good enough for me. the cat sleeps by it too and she's not bothered (normally bothered by anything). =)
i second the zalman psu. i have the 400w one and it's fantastic.
silenx psus are nice too. the company that manufactures them, ahanix, also made the htpc case i'm using. i only went with the zalman because the silenx was on a few weeks backorder
i don't have any links handy, but dell has/is investing pretty heavily in a server appliance product that is amd based. the company manufacturing it is also in tx iirc
probably because saddam wasn't terribly religious until he realized he could benefit by flipping the 'jihad' card?
the provisional authority is pretty much working off of sharia(sp?) law now. hopefully the women there can get organized and be sure to be heard in the future.
iraq was, for some time, the intellectual capital of the world. there are a lot of smart people there. unfortunately, there are a lot of stupid (religious fundamentalists) people too.
gpl is all about the developer's rights. user access to code is a by-product. bsdl is all about the user's rights to do whatever they please with it.
Re:The BSDs require GPLed code to develop
on
BSD For Linux Users
·
· Score: 1
yea, and?
those are the only tools in the tree because, like you said, that's all there is. if there were suitable replacements and the replacement effort was worth it, those would be the first to go.
tendra may one day be good, but it's not there yet, nor does it work for all arch(1).
then there is the plan9 toolchain. all ready to go, smokes gcc, but the license isn't quite right. search for theo's thoughts on it on google groups. here's a shortcut to one such discussion
this is the real difference between bsd and linux
on
BSD For Linux Users
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
1,2c1,4 ,
The GNU General Public License (GPL) > Version 2, June 1991 > Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA 4c6,7
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies > of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. 6,9c9,125
nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
Preamble > > The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. > > When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. > > To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. > > For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. > > We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. > > Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. > > Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. > > The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. > > TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION > > 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". > > Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if
gateway has 3 devices. they should combine them into one. dvr+dvd burner+streaming media(wired and wireless). for say, $400, that'd be a pretty sweet deal.
i haven't used them in about 2 years, but it was a pretty slick service. i was one of the first X to sign up (i think 1000), so i got it for free
basically, you tell the peeps billing you to send your bills to pmb.com. pmb.com scans in the bills, and you could download the scan in pdf and do whatever with it. then, you could pay your bills... eg, pay $50 of phone on 12/4, etc.
when i moved, i lost interest because i could pay all of my bills online (i couldn't when i was using pmb.com), but having it all in one place was definitely nice
i'm not sure exactly how they made $$ on the deal, but i think it was when you'd pay part of a bill, they'd stick that in a bank account somewhere, earn like $2 interest after 3 days, then pay your bill. not sure tho
Slashdot Mirror
Hatchet, a pf log -> html parser, is now using sqlite. fast too. =)
my bad on ahanix! thanks for the link ... now i know not to buy from them again. fuckers.
the back of my mentioned psu is about 3 feet from my head when i'm sleeping and i can't hear the damn thing, so, good enough for me. the cat sleeps by it too and she's not bothered (normally bothered by anything). =)
i second the zalman psu. i have the 400w one and it's fantastic.
silenx psus are nice too. the company that manufactures them, ahanix, also made the htpc case i'm using. i only went with the zalman because the silenx was on a few weeks backorder
i don't have any links handy, but dell has/is investing pretty heavily in a server appliance product that is amd based. the company manufacturing it is also in tx iirc
hmm. scalia. i think you mean justice cheney?
probably because saddam wasn't terribly religious until he realized he could benefit by flipping the 'jihad' card?
the provisional authority is pretty much working off of sharia(sp?) law now. hopefully the women there can get organized and be sure to be heard in the future.
iraq was, for some time, the intellectual capital of the world. there are a lot of smart people there. unfortunately, there are a lot of stupid (religious fundamentalists) people too.
according to sco, that'd be your legally purchased DVD's on your illegal linux platform.
i can't wait for the ibm lawyers to finish with darl and friends. they'll make goatse.cx look like a cakewalk
personally i think he's a whining dick, but, he did submit this story.
personally, i find sandin's fc products to be better, but, who knows
yes, bmw has a car with a computer with some version of windows running it. it sucks, it will probably crash. blah blah blah
yup
couldn't agree more. google is definitely a class act. like their pop-up blocking software. it blocked 3 for me from that refdesk site.
heh
his bit on snl a week or two ago was pretty good
in my original post s/protects/saves ass of/
gpl is all about the developer's rights. user access to code is a by-product. bsdl is all about the user's rights to do whatever they please with it.
yea, and?
those are the only tools in the tree because, like you said, that's all there is. if there were suitable replacements and the replacement effort was worth it, those would be the first to go.
tendra may one day be good, but it's not there yet, nor does it work for all arch(1).
then there is the plan9 toolchain. all ready to go, smokes gcc, but the license isn't quite right. search for theo's thoughts on it on google groups. here's a shortcut to one such discussion
microsoft also works perfectly with the rights of the license
bsdl = protects user
gpl = protects developer
wow
i think Microsoft Windows would be a good choice for you
1,2c1,4
,
The GNU General Public License (GPL)
> Version 2, June 1991
> Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
4c6,7
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
6,9c9,125
nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
Preamble
>
> The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
>
> When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
>
> To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
>
> For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
>
> We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.
>
> Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations.
>
> Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.
>
> The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
>
> TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
>
> 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".
>
> Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if
i am an internet user and i am not social
so, that study is wrong
slashdot editors, please remove that misleading title. it might make people think this is a reliable source of info
is also *ONE* very biased person
who gives a shit what he thinks? not me, probably not you. obviously not apple and hp. big whoop
and i choose to not use your "enabling" products
yea, i noticed that too.
gateway has 3 devices. they should combine them into one. dvr+dvd burner+streaming media(wired and wireless). for say, $400, that'd be a pretty sweet deal.
here ya go. my boss has been eyeing one
and epson just came out with a whoopass hdtv. something like 72", built in photo printer, etc. $4k
bullshit it's called getting a collar the sco execs can very much buy and sell without the sec knowing
... the 82 year old deaf-mute in the backwoods of georgia ...
i haven't used them in about 2 years, but it was a pretty slick service. i was one of the first X to sign up (i think 1000), so i got it for free
... eg, pay $50 of phone on 12/4, etc.
basically, you tell the peeps billing you to send your bills to pmb.com. pmb.com scans in the bills, and you could download the scan in pdf and do whatever with it. then, you could pay your bills
when i moved, i lost interest because i could pay all of my bills online (i couldn't when i was using pmb.com), but having it all in one place was definitely nice
i'm not sure exactly how they made $$ on the deal, but i think it was when you'd pay part of a bill, they'd stick that in a bank account somewhere, earn like $2 interest after 3 days, then pay your bill. not sure tho
that's where i ended up getting it. =)