Slashdot Mirror


FBI Conducts Raids Over Half-Life 2 Source Theft

TheXerox writes "According to a recent weblog post, a San Francisco native had his house raided by the FBI last week, and 'lost upwards of 9 machines, and lots of misc equipment besides' in a seizure related to the theft of the Half-Life 2 source code from Valve Software." The scanned-in search warrant posted on the site indicates the FBI were looking for "...any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks... Valve passwords and/or usernames... any and all items... related to Valve Software, Half-Life, Half-Life 2", and the Hungry Programmers page mentions that "...several Hungries were raided on January 14th by the FBI and Secret Service, and their computers seized."

957 comments

  1. slow already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    full mirror inc. warrent here

  2. Secret Service by pvt_medic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency?

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
    1. Re:Secret Service by proj_2501 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I forget exactly why it's technically under their jurisdiction, but 2600 has (had?) a large section on their website detailing the Secret Service's activities against suspected hackers, crackers, etc. such as busting up 2600 meetings and seizing any computer bits anybody had on them at the time.

    2. Re:Secret Service by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Secret Service charter gives them jurisdiction in many computer crime cases. They tend to work with the FBI, but not always.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Secret Service by LocoSpitz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since 1984, our investigative responsibilities have expanded to include crimes that involve financial institution fraud, computer and telecommunications fraud, false identification documents, access device fraud, advance fee fraud, electronic funds transfers, and money laundering as it relates to our core violations.
      Secret Service Website

    4. Re:Secret Service by Scyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the Secret Service provides Technical Forensic services for other agencies.

    5. Re:Secret Service by menn0nite · · Score: 5, Informative

      No,
      the secret service has never been all about protecting the president. They started out primerily as treasury cops, however if I remember correctly, all cases of computer related fraud where damages pass the $10,000 mark and cross state lines fall into their jurisdiciton. That why they're always involved with all the big time hacker cases.

      for more info, check out United States Code (USC) 1030

    6. Re:Secret Service by Kenja · · Score: 1, Interesting
      For more information, check out the following page. Note that just about all the contact info is to the Secret Service.

      http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/reporting .htm

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:Secret Service by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      Since 1984...

      Oh, the irony...

    8. Re:Secret Service by jimi1283 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't you seen Hackers? The Secret Service does everything!

    9. Re:Secret Service by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 0

      Why is the secret service involved?

      Yes... I thought it was the RIAA's job to raid houses.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    10. Re:Secret Service by allism · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's the RIAA's job to hijack property from street vendors.

    11. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the year *1984*. Coincidence? I think not!

    12. Re:Secret Service by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was protecting the fake president and currency, myself...

    13. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...such as busting up 2600 meetings and seizing any computer bits anybody had on them at the time."

      That's a lot of meetings to bust. Guess not enough action at the home office!

    14. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the crime involves a computer does not mean it's a threat to national security.

      How can they violate constitutional rights (unreasonable search and seizure) and not get sued? The only way they can violate your constitutional rights is for "national security", and this is clearly not the case.

      Feh. Time to denounce that us citizenship and move to canada. I do NOT want anything to do productively with this country anymore...let the slackers and beurocrats drown in their shit...

    15. Re:Secret Service by Diamondback · · Score: 1

      The secret service is also in charge of copyright violation prosecution. If I'm not mistaken, that was the original reason why they were formed.

    16. Re:Secret Service by LnxAddct · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know a Secret Service Agent (family member) and I know an FBI agent through a computer related crime that happened at my firm. What you said is much more true then you probably realize. The Secret Service really is involved with everything, and I mean everything. Protecting the President is a very small portion of what they do. The FBI is pretty involved with alot of things, but the SS is crazy.
      Regards,
      Steve

    17. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey awesome one less moron down I'd love to say you'll be missed but I'd be lying though I do feel sorry for all the candians you'll come into contact with

    18. Re:Secret Service by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you seen Hackers?

      Ah yes, the best nerd-are-cool fantasy ever.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    19. Re:Secret Service by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why is the secret service involved?"

      And why didn't they raid the set-top box companies thought to have used GPL code without a license?

    20. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shave your armpits you hippy!

    21. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot harassing role-playing games companies: http://www.sjgames.com/SS/

    22. Re:Secret Service by Picard42 · · Score: 1

      Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency? Of course. If you're about to frag the President while he's playing a FPS, the Secret Service bursts in and kicks your ass.

    23. Re:Secret Service by probbka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doubleplusironic...

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    24. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      doubleplusdoesntknowthemeaningofthewordironic...

      God is an iron.

    25. Re:Secret Service by prell · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the Secret Service's two main jobs are personal security, and counterfeiting. Check out their homepage, it's even hosted on the U.S. Treasury's site: Secret Service Home Page.

    26. Re:Secret Service by wishus · · Score: 1

      Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency?

      A thorough explanation can be found in The Hacker Crackdown.

    27. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't know the laws but the Secret Service, from what I understand, is supposed to protect politicians (The President, Vice President, and a few others). That's what they are supposed to be doing. These days they are into a lot more.

      One might ask why. My theory is that the Secret Service, just like the CIA and DEA, have become BUREACRATIC entities. That is to say, they care more about self-preservation than doing anything else. Breaking into crackers' houses, monitoring encrypted communications, etc are not what the Secret Service is supposed to do. Yet they do it. I have no numbers (these are all secrete I think) but I would guess that more than 50% of the Secret Service budget goes towards activities which have nothing to do with protecting politicians.

      At the rate it is going, it wouldn't surprise me if the Secret Service's "jurisdiction" is increased to other activities. Already they are heavily involved in monitoring anti-war protestors and activists (supposedly these non-violent people are a threat to the US president :( ). I think one of the first new "responsibilities" they will gain in the near future is the ability to shut down websites hostile to the US president. Of course, they would have to circumvent freedom of speech but that hasn't stopped others in the past. I mean, remembering that this is Martin Luther King day, one just has to remember how Martin King was minitored and tracked by the FBI and CIA even though it is illegal to do so--at that time and even now. Remember, a bureaucracy can break any law--they just need to cook up something bogus (like Martin Luther King is going to overthrow the US government).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    28. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 0, Troll

      Feh. Time to denounce that us citizenship and move to canada. I do NOT want anything to do productively with this country anymore...let the slackers and beurocrats drown in their shit...

      First of all, you should never run away from oppression unless your life is under threat. At least that's my philosophy. If USA sucks, you should take it upon yourself to change it. When the US govt threatens you (via CIA or Secret Service) then hop over to Canada. You are always welcome here :) ...

      Having said that, Canada seems to be blindly following the path of USA. There have been several recent cases where people were sent to Syria to be tortured even though they were Canadian citizens. Canadian government got them out but only after some diplomacy, and well after these people suffered some abuse and torture.

      Next, it seems the present Canadian government is "rolling back" its plans to legalize small amounts of marijuana. It is also slowing down in granting equality to homosexuals. What does all this have to do with the issue at hand? Well, the goverment is shifting to the right due to the "war" on terrorism. Right wing goverments are more prone to abuse civil liberties than left-leaning ones. Let's also not forget that Canada passed its own Patriot Act, although it was called something else (Bill xxxsomethingxxx) and wasn't as harsh.

      Fortunately, Canada doesn't have a Secret Service and the bureacracy that goes with it. Canada's security issues are generally handled by the RCMP and they are more respected than the FBI. FBI is highly corrupt and at any given point in time, at least 10% of FBI officials work for organized criminals. This is why the FBI is hated by more Americans than any other police force in the developed liberal world (Russia, China, etc don't count). RCMP isn't that bad. However, I think CSIS (equivalent of CIA) went rogue. The recent cases with Syria, as well as a bunch of others imply that. Also, it seems the politicians responsible for CSIS don't know what CSIS is doing--a clear indication of how rogue the agency is.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    29. Re:Secret Service by Helevius · · Score: 1
      A Secret Service agent told me that his agency has a mandate allowing it to investigate any Federal crime. They have spent lots of money training agents in "cyber crime" over the last few years and consider it a high priority.

      Helevius

    30. Re:Secret Service by dorsey · · Score: 1

      I don't know the laws but the Secret Service, from what I understand, is supposed to protect politicians (The President, Vice President, and a few others). That's what they are supposed to be doing.

      You're right, you don't know the laws. Nor do you understand what the Secret Service is supposed to be doing. Maybe you should do a little reading first about what they are supposed to be doing before spouting paranoid crap.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    31. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You really had me going, you were making a lot of sense and I was agreeing with everything that you were saying untill you wrote:

      FBI is highly corrupt and at any given point in time, at least 10% of FBI officials work for organized criminals. This is why the FBI is hated by more Americans than any other police force in the developed liberal world

    32. Re:Secret Service by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you have evidence to the contrary? Or is this just your inner child refusing to believe that the decendants of Elliot Ness couldn't possibly do such a thing?

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    33. Re:Secret Service by flyonthewall · · Score: 1
      Having said that, Canada seems to be blindly following the path of USA. There have been several recent cases where people were sent to Syria to be tortured even though they were Canadian citizens. Canadian government got them out but only after some diplomacy, and well after these people suffered some abuse and torture.


      Err... seems to me that he was coming in from overseas via NY and was deported by the US to Syria without so much as a note to Canadian officials.

      Not much a gov can do if they do not know of a occurance.

      Al
      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    34. Re:Secret Service by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any evidence to prove it? You're the one making claims. It falls upon you to prove it.

      If I claim there was electricity in Elizabethean England, it's my responsibility to prove it, not yours to disprove it.

    35. Re:Secret Service by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Do they also include impersonation of Secret Service agents?

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    36. Re:Secret Service by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Screw being cool, I just want to be able to break into the government through cool 3D sequences!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    37. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CSIS has not gone rogue. What country do you think this is? CSIS is so small in scope, especially compared with other agencies, that it is basically irrelevant. They have so little power, they can basically work only on an on-request basis from other law enforcement agencies (a.k.a. RCMP), and have almost no monitoring capabilities unless required for specific tasks.

      Privacy in Canada is still relatively intact. Unless you do something really bad and really noticable, no one is going to bother or monitor you. In the US, multiple agencies can descend like the plague and end your life.

    38. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything that you linked to that refutes my view. The Secret Service is supposed to protect national interests only. Originally this meant currency and some politicians (especially the US president). Everything else was acquired recently. I don't have any evidence off the top of my head (I don't track SS) but if you go with this message here, it seems they acquired many of their new powers in 1984.

      So I don't know what your point is. Do you really believe that the SS is supposed to be responsible for computer fraud, etc? I don't think so--and you haven't shown anything to the contrary. SS is supposed to be responsible for national defense only.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    39. Re:Secret Service by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      You were about a half hour late, and not even near as funny. Be gone.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    40. Re:Secret Service by xigxag · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency?


      I think you mean, they're only concerned with protecting the fake president, and currency.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    41. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      All this is speculation since it is all secret and no one is saying anything but anyway... Canadian goverment was culpable in the Mahed Arar (sp?) case. They were the ones that gave "evidence" to the US officials. It seems that the Canadian government knew what was going on. The apartment records (or whatever it was) was likely from CSIS or RCMP (unless US operatives is operating in Canada illegally--possible but unlikely in this case).

      With the other recent case, it was supposedly CSIS that sent the information to Syrian authorities. This resulted in the person being apprehended at the Iraqi border. If CSIS had a problem, it should get the RCMP to arrest him when he came to Canada. Sending information to another country and letting them do their dirty work is just plain wrong.

      As I said before, I think CSIS has gone rogue. I really don't think the Solicitor General (or whoever is responsible for CSIS) really controls it. I think this will become evident as more and more of these "situations" occur.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    42. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If I have time, I'll try finding some proof. I was just basing that on my impression. If you look at organized criminals from the 20's to the 90's, they always had FBI agents working for them. There were many cases where the Italian mafia bought out many FBI agents. I just remember reading about that in news, books, etc. I don't have any proof off the top of my head but I'll see if I can find some examples.

      I'm pretty sure I can find evidence of sizeable infiltration of the FBI by the Italian mafia (in the 70's). In particular, I remember reading that Las Vagas was built entirely by the Italian mafia. Before they showed up, it was town in the middle of nowhere. This would have required significant help from the FBI. I'm also sure I can find some stuff where earlier gangsters, including Al Capone, infiltrating the FBI. I'm not sure about modern day (simply because these stories only come out after a while). If I have time, I'll dig up some stuff.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    43. Re:Secret Service by ThePorkHawke · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Right wing goverments are more prone to abuse civil liberties than left-leaning ones

      From my experience this is not true.

      For example.

      USA, right wing, fairly intrusive on its own people but mostly extremely biased against the rest of the world because it is able to act like a big bully with its power. It will insist on biometric passports for any foreign citizen coming in to the country - but is not immediately going around fingerprinting all of its own citizens.

      U.K. left wing, no respect for its own people, treats them like the idiots that they are, nanny state attempting to control every aspect of your life, there are more spy cameras in London than any other city in the world. We have one of the most evil men in first world politics going largely undetected (David Blunkett), mainly because the blind fucker gets some sort of sympathy vote.

      Its ridiculous that we have to rely on the old farts in the house of Lords to decline a lot of the proposed bills by Blunkett and Blair, if they did not stand up to the government the situation could be much, much worse.

      Blunkett actually tried to do away with the right of trial by jury. The basic democratic right to be tried by your peers, was almost gone (and actually is in some circumstances). He wanted a single judge to decide "minor cases". Very fucking minor when some judge who gets out of bed the wrong side that day decides to convict you and you spend the rest of your life struggling to get a job other than flipping burgers. Add to this the attempt to remove double-jeopardy, so if they decide they don't like you they can keep trying till they find a jury that agrees with them. The list goes on with the situation with asylum seekers, the hysteria surrounding paedophilia, etc. Of course none of this goes through without Blair watching, and Blunkett is merely there so that Blair can stay one step removed from the delicate issues that Blunkett relishes trampling on. This UK Government is about grabbing power and not much else.

      OK, so this is well and truly a rant now, however it should serve it purpose to show that leftie governments are terrible and respecting ivil lberties albeit in a verbose way. Hmm, I guess I just could have mentioned any one of several communist states to get the point accross.

      I am seriously looking to move to another country that will let me live my life without feeling watched all the time, and without feeling that I am enjoying the good stuff because we are fucking half of the world up the ass. Unfortunately I have not found anywhere yet.

    44. Re:Secret Service by joeytsai · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the best nerd-are-cool fantasy ever.


      Nah man, that award goes to Swordfish. Please, take me to the world where hackers look like Hugh Jackman and score babes like Halle Berry!
      --
      http://www.talknerdy.org
    45. Re:Secret Service by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      That was just his screen saver coming on.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    46. Re:Secret Service by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      FBI is highly corrupt and at any given point in time, at least 10% of FBI officials work for organized criminals. This is why the FBI is hated by more Americans than any other police force in the developed liberal world

      I liked your post and agreed with nost of your points -- but this one (above) kind of confuses me. Where did you read/watch/hear this? I'm an American and I've never heard these charges of corruption in the FBI (and am vigilantly suspicious of our law enforcement here).

      Thanks
      --

      -Turkey

    47. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Busting in and taking computers? Gee, where am I when all the good things go down. I have a whole room full of computers they can have. Loaded with SuSE, Debian, Mandrake, and Redhat! Lots to sieze and take back to Washington! No, I don't have any Half Life stuff, but look here: Here's a list of my equipment, just begging to be taken away in a Government SUV!

      l. Macintosh Quadra 660av, with monitor capable of 16 bpp.
      2. IBM PS/1, only capable of 8 bit color, but with SuSE installed on a 1 GB HDD!
      3. A Compaq 575, with a 360 MHZ upgrade processor. (Yes, a Compaq 575, that only sells in pallets, not one-at-a-time.)
      4. An IBM 350-P90, fitted with a screaming 200 mmz processor!
      5. A botched-together FIC VA 503+ motherboard, with a 380 MHZ amd processor, overclocked to 391!

      There is one 20 GB HDD here, too. Guess which computer it is installed in! Hint: It's not the one I'm using right now!

      Also, one external modem, and one internal modem! Wow! Downloads at 5 kps! -drool-

      So, what are you waiting for, Washington? Come on down and bust in my house and take all this crap home with you!

      (Then, I can go to Office Depot and buy a new computer, of course it will have XP preloaded, so I will be in full compliance with the Feds!)

      Then, I'm going to Borders Bookstore, and grab onto that big green box with SuSE Linux, 9.0 Professional, and install it alongside XP!


      So hurry! I can hardly wait!

    48. Re:Secret Service by blincoln · · Score: 1

      If you want to avoid Flamebait mods next time, be sure to use his proper title of Imperator Mundi Dubyus Maximo.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    49. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure how liberal Blair and his government is. I'm not from Britain so I only see stuff from far. But it seems that Blair might even be a conservative in many aspects. The war in Iraq is an example. His opinion of Guantanomo Bay and holding people without trial seems purposely vague. Does he support what is happening in Guantanomo Bay or not? I know he is getting his own people (i.e. Britons) out of there and being prosecuted by Britain. But how about the whole concept of it? The Iraqi mess implies he is not a liberal either. For instance, he does not seem to support an election, and is instead supporting the US system of going with hand-picked causus system.

      I don't know about the Blunkett dude. Never even heard of him in my life. I'll let you worry about him ;)

      I might be biased since I'm a leftist but I still think that left-leaning governments are better on liberties. This is not to say that one should blindly follow them. There are bad governments on both sides (one just needs to look at USSR and China, which are supposedly left-leaning). However, overall, I think left-leaning ones are better. It is almost automatic why that is so. Liberal ideology simply meshes well with liberties than conservative ideology. Consider the following. Left leaning parties are the ones that always defend non-citizens. This is a key test for liberty. Left leaning parties generally do not support large scale monitoring of protestors. Right wing ones generally want limitations (for example, Toronto actually wanted protestors to get an order before they protest). Left leaning ones are the only ones that support legalization of drugs. Or giving equality to homosexuals. Both of these are good tests for liberty. Freedom of speech is another good test (although everyone claims to support it).

      Britain may not be great but can you be sure it would have been better under a right wing government? I have a feeling that it would have been even worse. I would imagine that right wing governments will support things like ID cards, jailing "criminals" without charge, treating non-citizens as inferior (ie. no laws apply to them), etc.

      So, I still think left-leaning ones are better. You just need to look at the last 50 years of ONE COUNTRY. Having said that, all governments can be totalitarian. I don't advocate blindly following one just because it is left-leaning.

      I am seriously looking to move to another country that will let me live my life without feeling watched all the time, and without feeling that I am enjoying the good stuff because we are fucking half of the world up the ass. Unfortunately I have not found anywhere yet.

      There is always Antartica. Too cold for most governments. A place where penguins outnumber humans. Truly a free place ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    50. Re:Secret Service by junkgrep · · Score: 1

      I don't understand: is the principle here that the FBI shouldn't investigate crimes now? Is there something wrong with getting warrants to look for stolen material worht millions of dollars?

    51. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the secret service involved? Arent they only concerned with protecvting the president and fake currency?

      Yeah, but since Adobe stopped all currency counterfeiting with one fell swoop with that new "feature" in PhotoShop, the Secret Service have been at a loose end!

    52. Re:Secret Service by deepvoid · · Score: 1

      Right wing goverments are more prone to abuse civil liberties than left-leaning ones


      Complete nonsense: Left-leaning govenrments squashed more civil liberties than any other form of government combined in the last century. For you say otherwise is either ignorance or an outright lie. Case in point: Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, Breshnev, Saddam Hussain, Idi Amin, and even the aclaimed Gorbachev, killed, incarcerated, and subdued more people than any right wing authoritarian ever did. They did it under legal systems that encouraged murder and mayhem, and discouraged "conventional" morality. For goodness sake, these low-lifes killed priests and pregnant mothers! I am not defending extremist of any sort, but merely correcting your knee-jerk assesment of history.


      I find your figures on crime in the FBI rather dubious as well. For one tenth of FBI officials to be corrupt, a general acceptence of corruption would have to be in the culture of the organization. Granted, some actions may have been politicised by office holders, line officials work very hard to keep their subordinates on the up and up. Heck, if an FBI agent even breathed something inappropriate, his boss would come down on him hard.


      This is why the FBI is hated by more Americans than any other police force in the developed liberal world (Russia, China, etc don't count): Huh? Don't count? Tell that to the twenty five million christians in China who are monitered day and night. I guess for a liberal, freedom of religion does not include Christianity. I know a family in Bejing who has been monitered for thirty-five years, uninterrupted. Try that in the west and see how far you get. Finally: the US never send people to Syria for torture, especially since that country is being watched closely for it's own nuclear program. (Yet another socialist country)


      If you are going to be an apologist for the left: At least get the facts right.

      --
      Fast machines, powerfull AI, impulsive invention,... All I lack is a good espresso machine!
    53. Re:Secret Service by ThePorkHawke · · Score: 0
      Everything you said sort of makes sense in theory, but when you ask if it would have been better under a right wing government I can confidently say "yes". The tories (conservative party, more to the right) used to be in power, and we have been on a very slippery slope since the power mad lefties got in. For instance, Blunkett wants ID cards, and it is his dying wish to force them upon us (and in anther audacious slap in the face to the British people, charge everyone 40 to buy their ID card).

      The Conservatives, in large, do not support this mass scale monitoring, or at least don't shout for it with quite so much vigour.

      The main problem with right wing parties, which you touched on, is that they do tend to be more against the minorities for various reasons (e.g. homosexuals), this is an aspect I find very distasteful in itself. However if you drop the bigotry then that might actually be a side I could claim to lean to.

    54. Re:Secret Service by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      > I'm not really sure how liberal Blair and his government is....But it seems that Blair might even be a conservative

      You seem to be confusing liberal and left-wing a bit. It is as possible to be rightwing and liberal as it is to be leftwing and liberal. libertarianism (ie individual liberty) is opposed to authoritarianism (ie state takes priority over individual needs), just as left wing (social responsibility) is opposed to right wing (every man for himself).

      tony blair while nominally left wing (he was elected on a left wing platform) is probably just right of centre. At the last election there was little to differentiate the conservative and the labour party in the UK. I would say that Blair is more authoritarian than liberal, but nowhere near as authoritarian as that nasty piece of work GWB (please don't rise to my bait unless your response doesn't involve US "neo-patriotism" :-).

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    55. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any computer that's ever had anything to do with halflife's website is suspect in this case. Where's the probable cause? They are accusing them of being criminal and then disproving it later after, the witch hunt is over, and people are just accepting it as OK (except for the poor guy who's losing his hardware) becuase it has to do with computers. People fear what they don't understand.

    56. Re:Secret Service by rickbrodie · · Score: 1
      I don't know about the Blunkett dude. Never even heard of him in my life. I'll let you worry about him ;)
      I would imagine that right wing governments will support things like ID cards, jailing "criminals" without charge, treating non-citizens as inferior (ie. no laws apply to them), etc.
      Blunkett is possibly the most right leaning member of the cabinet. He very much wants to introduce compulsory ID cards (we even have to pay for them ourselves) ostensibly as a crackdown against bogus asylum seekers (economic migrants). We have several "terrorist suspects" currently detained without charge, indefinitely. Asylum seekers are kept in conditions little better than prisons, often for months or even years, while their applications are processed - read lost - meanwhile they are prevented from working. All this under a Labour government.

      As for Tony Blair, he is supposed to be a leftie, but he is currently trying to force through (despite his huge majority in the commons) a law giving universities the ability to charge more than others, while making all students have to pay back every fee, loan and bursary after graduation. This could easily add up to 15,000, not a very typical left policy.

      With Bush the Lesser, Tony seems to be following him blindly. It is hard to get an impression of where his politics actually lie as regards Iraq, as he just rubber stamps Bush's blunderings. He is certainly a very persuasive man and has convinced some very smart people that he knows exactly what he is/was doing. I personally liked to believe that Tony had knowingly made a "deal with the devil" (Bush) in return for Bush's action on the Israel/Palestine mess. Sadly this does not seem to be progressing as expected, so it looks like Either Tony or myself was wrong.

      As it is, the government, and especially Blair are in for a very tense week. The vote for the next stage of the tuition fees vote is next tuesday. If it fails, and despite the huge majority, it might - Labour high command is running around trying to convince all the back benchers that it is "in their best interests" to vote with the government on this one. If it fails, it could very well mean a resignation for Blair.
      And if that wasn't enough, the very next day, the report on the death of the government weapons inspector David Kelly is published. It is expected to lay heavy blame on the the government and the BBC for the roles they played in the poor man's suicide.

      Richard
    57. Re:Secret Service by Ost99 · · Score: 1
      Nah man, that award goes to Swordfish. Please, take me to the world where hackers look like Hugh Jackman and score babes like Halle Berry!

      And what was wrong with Angelina Jolie?
      And in 1995? Noone will ever be hotter than she was back then...

      - Ost
      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
    58. Re:Secret Service by topham · · Score: 1

      CSIS hasn't gone rogue.

      CSIS exists to do what the RCMP isn't allowed to do.

      They were designed to be 'rogue' from day one.

      By the way, CSIS doesn't like it if you talk about war-driving.

    59. Re:Secret Service by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      > I don't know about the Blunkett dude. Never even
      > heard of him in my life. I'll let you worry
      > about him ;)

      Blunkett actually is a more left wing than Blair - but very authoritarian, as the home secretary he is pushing for national ID cards, and biometric passports. also he has given the police and all sorts of government bodies incredible and wide-ranging surveillance powers, so even the National Health Service can request details of who you've emailed which is a bit of a joke!

      > However, overall, I think left-leaning ones are better [on liberties]. It is almost automatic why that is so.
      > Liberal ideology simply meshes well with liberties than conservative ideology.

      Nonsense! in a lot of respects, right wing ideas merge well with liberties - for example the idea that people should be free from interference from the state is very typically a conservative idea (like tax cuts is a conservative policy, whereas tax rises is a left wing policy).

      as I said in my other reply to your post politics is better represented as authoritarian/libertarian and rightwing/leftwing, and you cant really combine them that much.

      Google for political compass for more info.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    60. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you are confusing it (although I'm not helping by introducing libertarian issues). Liberalism is different from libertarianism. Libertarianism is the one that is in favour of liberties (and is the enemy of authoratarianism, the most extreme form of which is totalitarianism). Libertarians can be both left and right. Most Americans who call themselves Libertarians are actually from the right wing (libertarian-right). People who call themselves anarchists (at least in the tradional leftist sense) are left-wing libertarians. Liberalism, on the other hand, is the one that is left wing.

      So liberalism and left-wing go together, while conservatism and right-wing go together. Liberatarianism on the other hand can be both left and right.

      Generally, liberalism is more compatible with libertarianism than conservatism is (although it doesn't have to be). For example, people who are liberals are more progressive and hence are in favour of legalization of drugs, in favour of prostitution, etc. Most of the things that liberatarians take for granted is due to the left wing, even though many libertarians on the right support it. For example, the Libertarian Party of USA support legalization of drugs, supports homosexuality, is against jailing people without trial, etc. However, if any of those policies were to be implemented, it will most likely be due to the left wing and liberalism.

      Even though liberalism (and the left wing) is responsible for most of the present liberties (check history for who is responsible for equality for women and non-whites; abolishment of slavery; universal human rights; etc), it is also at times the one that suppresses liberties. This happens because the left-wing, while in favour of liberties, is also in favour of government intervention. Excessive government intervention is the cause of the loss of liberties.

      Anyway getting back on topic, I said Tony Blair doesn't seem like a liberal. He may be authoratarian but my point is more about liberal ideals. For instance, liberals are generally anti-war. Not always but generally are. Tony Blair, who is supposed to be a liberal, is supporting a largely unpopular war. That is not generally liberalism. He is also shunning international humanitarian organizations (like the UN) in favour of unilateralism. That is not the hallmark of liberalism. If anything, liberalism is what calls for bodies like UN. On top of all that, liberals generally will not support detaining people without trial (whether citizen or not, within the country or not, criminal or not). It's not clear to me what Tony Blair's position is but it seems that he supports mass dentions without trial (eg. Guantanomo Bay).

      So, it seems that Tony Blair is neither a liberal nor a libertarian--at least on international issues.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    61. Re:Secret Service by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      ok I agree with you now.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    62. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main problem with right wing parties, which you touched on, is that they do tend to be more against the minorities for various reasons (e.g. homosexuals), this is an aspect I find very distasteful in itself. However if you drop the bigotry then that might actually be a side I could claim to lean to.

      I don't think you can just ignore that "bigotry". That is one the reasons conservatism rarely supports liberties. I'm not saying YOU are a bigot or that all conservatives are. However the ideology lends itself to it.

      It's not as if conservatives are evil, or bad, or whatever. It's just that their beliefs lead to undesired (from a liberal point of view) effects. For example, the reason conservatives are against homosexuals is because of religion. If you are religious, you are on the right. And if you are on the right, you likely won't support equality for homosexuals since religious texts claims that homosexuals are inferior (or some such thing).

      In any case, the enemy of freedom is totalitarianism. Both conservatives and liberals will oppose that to the death...

      I think you are a conservative or a centrist/moderate (eg. center-right). Just for reference, I'm on the far-left. We will likely disagree on 90% of the issues but we are getting along well here :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    63. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      They were designed to be 'rogue' from day one.

      No organization is designed to be rogue. Someone with power would always want to control it and hence these organizations aren't designed to be rogue. Some branch of the goverment is always supposed to control these organizations. In the Canadian case, I think it is the solicitor-general but I'm not sure (someone correct me if I'm wrong). One just needs to look at other notorious spy agencies like the SS and KGB to see that they were actually supposed to be controlled by people at one time. It's just that they "acquire" their rogueness over time. Especially if left to their own will. In the case of USA, for example, Iran-Contra was supposedly not approved by President Ronald Reagan. Yet here you have the CIA facilitating some illegal activity without the support or knowledge of the President of USA.

      By the way, CSIS doesn't like it if you talk about war-driving.

      What's war-driving? Anyway, CSIS probably already monitors me due to my harsh criticism of USA, Canada, and others.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    64. Re:Secret Service by ThePorkHawke · · Score: 0
      I have had discussions about this in the past, and I think the main problem is that we try and place everyone somewhere along a 1 dimensional line. Certainly some issues/beliefs have side effects and influence thoughts on other areas, (e.g. religeon & homosexuality) however there is certainly more than one degree of freedom when thinking about the best way to run a country, but our simplistic left-right method forces you to really pick what you think your "core" beliefs are and flatten yourself onto that line somewhere.

      I probably am in the middle, but I say that only because I have, what would commonly be considered, far left and far right views that cancel each other out, or something. Its a crap explanation, but then again its a crap system. More accurately, I am at grid coordinate (+1, -1)

      And yes, of course we are getting along fine, don't most people? If you started talking about tea being better than coffee, how XP is a good operating system or how the world series is correctly named even when most of the world does not compete in it, _then_ we might have issues.

    65. Re:Secret Service by ydrol · · Score: 1

      For instance, Blunkett wants ID cards, and it is his dying wish to force them upon us (and in anther audacious slap in the face to the British people, charge everyone 40 to buy their ID card).
      The Conservatives, in large, do not support this mass scale monitoring, or at least don't shout for it with quite so much vigour.
      Remember opposing parties hate to publically agree unless disagreeing makes them look really stupid. Whenever government changes hands you rarely see laws being repealled that the ruling party opposed when they were in opposition.

    66. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I actually support the Political Compass system. I always recommend others to follow it too (BTW, what's your "results"? don't tell me if you don't want to).

      My point is that liberalism is more compatible with libertarianism. If what I say is correct, another way to looking is that you would see FAR MORE people/parties/etc on the bottom-left quadrant of Political Compass than bottom-right. Also, you would see parties/people/etc on the left that are further down (i.e. extreme libertarian) than on the right. You would see this if you look at the following charts (scroll down to the chart):

      Britain
      USA
      Composers
      Famous people

      If you go by the charts, you'll note that most libertarians are left, and left tends to be even more extremist libertarian than right. Of course, these charts may or may not be biased and it doesn't have enough sample points. One can argue that the chart is inconclusive since you also get extreme authoratarian on the left (like Stalin), and it might even seem that there are more extreme libertarians and extreme authoratarians on the left (which kind of erases everything out).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    67. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      There is actually a 2 dimentional system. Check it out: it's called Political Compass. Take the test and see how you place yourself. It is the most accurate system I have found on the web.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    68. Re:Secret Service by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      And get blowjobs while cracking encryption...?

    69. Re:Secret Service by torpor · · Score: 1


      Yeah, don't kid yourself, the Secret Service have very long arms... no Western society is currently safe from their gaze, nor their interest. The Agents look like Secret Service people for a reason.

      Its the New World Order Version 3.0-beta2, kiddies! Just remember, if you didn't do anything wrong, you have nothing to fear ... except maybe losing the primary tools of your livelihood for months on end, innocent or not, irrespective of guilt proven or unproven at a future point in time determined by individuals who previously had no bearing on your existence whatsoever ... until they decided on having some in the name of the protection of society.

      bonk! thats the sound of a human fist saluting its temple, over and over and over again, forever and ever, millions and millions of times.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    70. Re:Secret Service by torpor · · Score: 1

      right, therefore iron wouldn't actually be in the newspeak dictionary.

      it'd be more like 'doubleplusmalread', wouldn't it? thus illustrating orwells' point that newspeak was the tofu^H^H^H^Hsoylent green of language ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    71. Re:Secret Service by Babbster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Eliot Ness wasn't an agent of the FBI. He was an agent of the US Treasury Department Prohibition Bureau, performing duties that would later be taken over by the Bureau of ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms).

    72. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the parent poster does mean extreme left when he speaks about left-leaning.

      Have a nice day.

    73. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, the original statement ("right-wing governments are more prone...") is offensively tendentious. The OP could have said "extreme right wing governments are more prone to abuse than moderate, barely left-wing ones", as you suggest he meant, but then that makes the statement so obviously true as to be moronic.

    74. Re:Secret Service by tealover · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's what they teach in the "developed liberal world" where facts aren't required.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    75. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because nobody has filed any complaint at a law enforcement agency against said STB company?

      Some Hungarian ranting on a website doesn't count.

    76. Re:Secret Service by selsine · · Score: 1

      I really think it depends on what you think it means to be left wing or right wing.

      Personally I'm confused by your idea that:
      left wing == communist == socialist == Stalin == Hussein

      Not the definition that I'm used to at all.

    77. Re:Secret Service by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      It's not as if conservatives are evil, or bad, or whatever. It's just that their beliefs lead to undesired (from a liberal point of view) effects. For example, the reason conservatives are against homosexuals is because of religion. If you are religious, you are on the right. And if you are on the right, you likely won't support equality for homosexuals since religious texts claims that homosexuals are inferior (or some such thing).

      Please replace 'religious' with 'christian'. I am technically religious, but my religion does not discriminate against people based on sexuality.

    78. Re:Secret Service by tealover · · Score: 1

      We'll be waiting for your research, dot head.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    79. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, man, they took mine, and I just VISITED the HL website.

      Shut up.

    80. Re:Secret Service by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      There have been several recent cases where people were sent to Syria to be tortured even though they were Canadian citizens.

      Are you refering to the Canadian citizen sent to Syria by the American government, who detained him (IIRC) when he caught a connecting flight through the States?

      Next, it seems the present Canadian government is "rolling back" its plans to legalize small amounts of marijuana.

      After discouraging words from south of the border.

      It is also slowing down in granting equality to homosexuals.

      Didn't we just legalize gay marriages, granting them equal status? It there a second Canada I don't know about?

    81. Re:Secret Service by JPriest · · Score: 1

      What did you think the HL2 source was for? :)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    82. Re:Secret Service by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

      What's MPU?

    83. Re:Secret Service by strateego · · Score: 1
      Please replace 'religious' with 'Christian. I am technically religious, but my religion does not discriminate against people based on sexuality.
      Do not put just one religion on trial here. Correctly state that pretty much all western monotheistic religions condemn homosexuality. Most condemnations on homosexuality occur in the old testament of the bible, which is most of the jewish holy texts.

      When you call yourself religious do you mean to say that you are spiritual? Because religious implies that you subscribe to one of the major religions.
    84. Re:Secret Service by ronabop · · Score: 1

      SAN FRANCISCO Title: Bay Area Electronic Crimes Task Force Address: 345 Spear Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415/744-9026 Fax: 415/744-9051 Contact: SA Erik Enos Office #: 415/744-9026 Alternate: SA Susan Broad Office #: 415/744-9026 Email: eenos@usss.treas.gov From: http://www.ectaskforce.org/regional_locations.htm

    85. Re:Secret Service by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      No, moron, disagreeing with the current majority rightwing Republican worldview doesn't constitute "flamebait." Whoever's in charge here needs to relieve this pinhead of his moderating privileges. I do what I can as a meta-moderator, but there are only so many idiots I can set straight that way. Any jackass who doesn't understand the very basics of American history has no business moderating anything. And as I have suggested before, there should be a way of preventing folks who haven't been potty trained yet from even posting here.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    86. Re:Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case some of you missed the original post because the morons at the FBI who read this modded it down to -1, here it is again. Go back to work you morons. Does the boss know you're jerking off instead of doing your jobs? No wonder nobody caught the damned terrorists learning how to fly airplanes:

      I didn't claim anything. I was just annoyed at the high-handed dismissal of the proposition, as if it weren't possible somehow. The fact is that many FBI agents in the deep south cast a blind eye to the abuses of local law enforcement agencies during segregation in the US. And there was a period when the abuses of this agency came directly from the top, i.e., J. Edgar Hoover, the world's most famous cross-dresser. It seems only reasonable to assume that remnants of these attitudes still exist in the agency, though obviously I can't prove it. If I had that evidence I certainly wouldn't post it here under my own name. Also keep in mind that the folks currently doing the dirty work of the big corporations in regard to IP policing and the like are the same subclass of humanity who, under the guise of the various states police, assaulted and murdered union organizers during the 30s. As the old Chinese proverb asserts, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

    87. Re:Secret Service by gracep2 · · Score: 1

      J-turkey (187775 You are absolutely WRONG... The FBI is NOT corrupt; I don't know where do you get your facts I'm an American and I don't know anybody who hates the FBI, unless you are a criminal If anything MUST Americans admire the FBI. I can safely assume you are not an American Gracep2

    88. Re:Secret Service by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      J-turkey (187775 You are absolutely WRONG...

      Buh? Was that directed at me? All I did was politely ask where that information came from.

      Your post is confusing -- perhaps you should proof-read. I'm not a grammar freak, but in your case punctuation will help.

      --

      -Turkey

    89. Re:Secret Service by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      the phrasing of some of the sites questions are kinda leftish biased imo......

    90. Re:Secret Service by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      As for Tony Blair, he is supposed to be a leftie, but he is currently trying to force through (despite his huge majority in the commons) a law giving universities the ability to charge more than others, while making all students have to pay back every fee, loan and bursary after graduation. This could easily add up to 15,000, not a very typical left policy.

      From reading the Economist I was under the impression that pay back was only required if, upon graduation, a student landed a well paying job - although I do not remember if they discussed what defines a "well paying job". Also, it sounded like the Tories were more against it then Labour. Anyway I guess my questions are: is public financing of higher education economically viable? should people be responsible for their own education?

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    91. Re:Secret Service by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      If we really knew what their service did, then it wouldn't be much of a secret, now would it?

    92. Re:Secret Service by rickbrodie · · Score: 1

      As I live in Scotland, I may be confusing it slightly with our system. But I thought that you had to begin paying it off once you started earning something like 10-15,000. This, clearly, is not very much. I admit this may be way off the mark though. Personally, I believe that society benefits as much from a well educated workforce as do the well educated individuals. If graduates get better paying jobs then they will, over the courses of their lives, pay more income tax and pay for their education many times over. What these tuition fees amount to is nothing more than an extra tax on graduates. And thay hit them at a point in their lives when they are earning the least, so as to make it all the more crippling. I really don't like this as it seems to be totally undermining what Labour is supposed to stand for. And none of them seem to have the balls to stand up to Tony and his whips.

    93. Re:Secret Service by gracep2 · · Score: 1

      J-turkey (187775 My apologies Grace

    94. Re:Secret Service by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ok here are some links... I didn't spend much time so there isn't much... but it should give you an idea. As I mentioned earlier, it is harder to find stuff fore the present day (90's and 2000's), not because they are less corrupt, but because the information only comes out after a while. Some of these stories may be duplicates--I didn't spend time weeding them out...

      DISCLAIMER: I have not checked the sources. I am hoping that none of this is fabricated information. Questionable sources are marked with (Q)

      Hoover's F.B.I. and the Mafia: Case of Bad Bedfellows Grows
      J Edgar Hoover (Q)
      Black Mass: The Irish Mob, The FBI and A Devil's Deal
      Deadly Alliance: The FBI's Secret Partnership With the Mob
      FBI Protection Of Informants Condemned In Mob Ruling
      FBI Corruption & The Justice Department ....05.04.00
      Round Up The Usual Suspects (Q)
      The Government-Criminal Connection - Part Three (Q)
      Armed Conflict in America (Q) (blatantly biased against the left-wing... just read the quoted article in the middle of the page)
      Ruling due on FBI link to mob: Immunity offer claim at center of decision.

      Funny story, Bush blocks mob investigation (read the 2nd story): Bush Invokes Executive Privilege in Mob-FBI Case
      Anyway I hope that provides A LITTLE BIT of the FBI corruption.

      BTW, what the hell is a dot head? Does this mean that you work for the FBI? Did I just blow your cover? ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  3. it would ... by jkcity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would really piss me off to lose my machines if I never did anything, I wonder how long it would be before you got them back and what kind of condition they would be in.

    1. Re:it would ... by nat5an · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People always seem to think that if the feds take your computers they'll trash them and wipe them and then give them back to you. Though I don't have any personal experience, if you think about forensic techniques and chain-of-evidence type stuff, most likely they'll copy your drives and not even touch your original equipment (this is the standard technique anyways). Really the question is if you ever get your machines back. They might wipe them out, but that would probably seriously screw up their case if there was any evidence on them.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    2. Re:it would ... by tomcrick · · Score: 1

      It would really piss me off to lose my machines if I never did anything...

      Definitely. You hear horror stories of computer equipment being impounded for months and months and when you get a court order for them to release it, you find nothing works.

      Obviously part of the rigorous 'investigation' involves shorting the motherboard and trashing the hard drives...

    3. Re:it would ... by RowdyReptile · · Score: 1

      It would really piss me off to lose my machines if I never did anything, I wonder how long it would be before you got them back and what kind of condition they would be in.

      In the analog world, Police are allowed to tear up your house, or have drug dogs scratch up your car on suspected charges. Then if you're found to be innocent, I don't think they have any responsibility to clean up their mess or repair your property. IANAL, of course.

      --

      You want a sig? I can get you a sig... Hell, I can get you a sig by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish.
    4. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      never if they found any illegal items such as warez, drug referances, or suspected underage porn. anything remotely considered 'suspect' would allow them to keep the equipment.

      I think it's wronge they took his xbox or anything else that could be used to store data.

      I mean why take the entire machine? they can just pop the hdd and run off with it.. sounds like this is how they get 'free' upgrades for the field offices.

    5. Re:it would ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

      Steve Jackson Games had this happen back in the 80s...you know, before the invention of Half-Life and Everquest, and hence before computers were interesting. They were raided by the SS (for a totally bogus reason) and had their computers siezed. Came really, really close to shutting down the company for good because of this. Years later, when the computers were obsolete, and after the SS had been criticized by a federal judge for being abusive, SJG got its 286 computers returned. Hooray for justice!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:it would ... by sch1sm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Took me 18 months, and I was innocent. Got my equipment back and it was covered in grime and obviously had not been taken care of, had masking tape and residue all over it.

    7. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jackson Games had this happen back in the 80s...you know, before the invention of Half-Life and Everquest, and hence before computers were interesting. They were raided by the SS (for a totally bogus reason) and had their computers siezed. Came really, really close to shutting down the company for good because of this. Years later, when the computers were obsolete, and after the SS had been criticized by a federal judge for being abusive, SJG got its 286 computers returned. Hooray for justice!

      Sue the government?

    8. Re:it would ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, forgot to add, SJG got $250,000 in damages from the government for its ill-treatment. $50,000 compensation (subject to taxation as income) and $200,000 for the lawyers. Who really won in this case?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:it would ... by jebell · · Score: 1

      While I don't know the specifics of this case, the award of damages is generally not taxable as income. In addition, it is generally unethical for attorneys to pocket a fee that is far in excess of the award. While it's not impossible that it happened the way you relate it, I have my doubts.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    10. Re:it would ... by psyki · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Steve Jackson Games was raided because the government suspected that the GURPS Cyberpunk RPG was a "handbook for computer crime". At least that was their excuse.

      Read all about it here.

    11. Re:it would ... by jebell · · Score: 1
      I just read a little about the case - you were right about the attorney's fees. The company was awarded $50,000 and attorney's fees of $250,000. This is different than an award of $300,000 - of which the attorneys take $250,000.

      As for the tax treatment of the judgment, I still have no idea.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    12. Re:it would ... by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Then if you're found to be innocent, I don't think they have any responsibility to clean up their mess or repair your property.

      True, but not entirely the whole story. The basic rule is that they have no responsibility to fix anything, but you have the right to file a (fully itemized) claim of exactly what was damaged, how much it's worth, etc, etc. And you'll generally get it, too... if you don't mind filling out some paperwork; talking to some local, state, DOJ, or military lawyers; and then waiting awhile (18 - 24 months isn't uncommon). Remember...

      No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

      But that doesn't mean they have to make it easy for you. ;)

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    13. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      True story, I swear it...

      In 1997 I cracked a machine in a nearby school district. Not for any particular purpose, but because it was running SunOS. Of course, being lazy and actually somewhat bad at covering my tracks, I got caught about a month later. I just wasn't cut out to be a badass hacker, I guess.

      Anyway, the police came to my school and "arrested" me (although I think it was all a setup, because I was never read my rights, and I was never handcuffs -- I think it was a scare tactic, and I was never officially "arrested"). They allowed me to drive my own car back to my house, so they could collect evidence.

      They played "good cop, bad cop" with me. But the good cop really was good. He seemed impressed with my skill level, and he actually smiled and talked with me in a conversational tone, like he was interested in how I'd pulled it off. He promised to try and convince his boss to let me off easy. They took my machine into evidence, and I didn't see it for 7 months.

      Later that year, after serving my community service, I got a call from the evidence room saying my computer was ready to be picked up. I drove over as fast as possible, fearing the drive had been wiped and all my source code lost. Imagine my surprise when I picked up the machine and it had a Post-It note on it saying "I took the liberty to upgrade your computer. A real hacker needs a 33-MHz, not a 20."

      I raced home and popped the case. Sure enough, the detective had installed a 33 MHz 486, and also an additional 4 meg of RAM. I was blown away.

      To this day, I am thankful for the detective making the effort to prevent me from going to jail for what I did. I learned my "lesson" the moment the reality dawned on me that I had police officers searching my mother's house. I haven't hacked since, and I hold that detective in the highest regard for seeing that I was just a stupid kid who didn't mean any harm.

      I count myself truly lucky to have been arrested by such a man :-)

    14. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I went through this after a car wreck.

      Punitive damages and awards for lost wages are taxable as income.

      awards for tangible damage (ie, broken things, medical bills, etc) are not.

    15. Re:it would ... by Casualposter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A friend of mine caught a person stealling his VCR out of a college dorm. The VCR was taken and held for evidence for nearly two years. It was totally trashed when he got it back. This was in the early days of the VCR when a good machine when for many hundreds of dollars.

      It's not just if you get your machine back; it also could be broken beyond all recovery. Oh yeah, the cops claimed that the damage all occurred during the crime, even though we are pretty sure that was not the case.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    16. Re:it would ... by theArtificial · · Score: 0

      Going on 3 years :) they kept the hds.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    17. Re:it would ... by Free_Meson · · Score: 1

      In addition, it is generally unethical for attorneys to pocket a fee that is far in excess of the award.

      If the $200k was to cover his legal fees incurred protecting himself from the wrongful prosecution and civil rights abuses then it would be understandable for those damages to go to his lawyers. Rather, the FTCA (which I believe would be the governing law in this case) limits lawyer fees to not more than 20% of awarded damages. Unless some of the damages that Jackson sued for were lawyer fees, losing 80% of his award to lawyers would have not only been unethical, but illegal.

      An analagous situation would be OJ Simpson suing LA for wrongful prosecution, and using his legal fees and lost income as a basis for his damages. IANALY, but such lawsuits are uncommon, or are not often successful, because the plaintiff has to prove that the prosecutor was incompetent or malicious. In Jackson's case, I would assume that he won because he was able to prove that if the FBI had adequate understanding of computers that they would not have bothered him. This is all, of course, a guess based on an unsubstantiated allocation of awarded damages, so it might not reflect what actually happened at all...

    18. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's just consider your case for a minute and nothing that's related to national security. Why would police demolish the VCR? For what purpose, to see if the head was lined w/ narcotics?

      And why the fuck would they keep it for two years after they caught the guy and the evidence? The case went on for two years?

    19. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot" is two words. You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?

      You would however say 'awhile'. So while I agree with your conclusion, your means of getting there are a bit suspect.

    20. Re:it would ... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Before doing anything else they would make image copies of the drives, but there are some tricks too be done with software that will allow you to do interesting stuff with data on drives. One such trick I head of as a kid, was to have some sort of secret security device that if not activated your hard drive was completely screwed over no chance of recovery. Never saw it in action couldn't afford the extra hard drive as a kid.

    21. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 4, Informative

      The important lesson here is that you can be deprived of all that stuff, so long as there is due process. In other words, once the cops seize your stuff, they don't have to give it back, so long as the initial seizure was legal.

      It's really bad in civil cases. They can take your stuff (house, car, boat, whatever), never charge you with anything, and you'll never see it again. Seizing assets in a civil action this way is a big part of the War on Drugs. All the cops have to do is make the assertion at the time of seizure that the property in question was being used in conjunction with a drug operation. But they never have to prove that in court. As I said they never have to charge you with anything. But they will file suit against your property; there are plenty of court cases like "US v. $17.254.38" and I'll let you guess who wins.

      It sucks, but as the only people really directly affected are
      (1) drug dealers
      (2) black people carrying hundreds in cash when their cars are pulled over
      (3) computer geeks
      most people are ignorant of the problem and/or don't see it as a problem.

    22. Re:it would ... by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have recent experience with this (sorry can't give any more details) and typically everything that can be duplicated is duplicated and a copy is given with whoever is pressing charges (I don't believe they give a copy to the defendant but don't quote me on that). The holders of the duplicated data must keep it in a secured and locked place so that during testimony they can honestly swear that they know that noone has changed the data. The Feds can keep their own copies and originals as long as they want/need, and from talking to agents, it seems they make quite a few. But as far as having your data backed up, there is nothing quite like having it taken by the FBI in a raid, and Linus thought FTP was good:)
      Regards,
      Steve
      P.S. He probably will get his stuff back, they are only hesitant to give things back if there was stuff found on any one of the machines. This guy says he's clear so I wouldn't be too worried about it.

    23. Re:it would ... by tommck · · Score: 1
      What kind of residue was it? Were they "interrogating the prisoner" to all your pr0n?

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    24. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my attorney claims that they don't even take your PC anymore, they just copy your hard drive and leave.

      For what it's worth, he's real expensive. :)

    25. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who really won in this case? Steve Jackson's competitors in the entertainment business. The suit basically broke a thriving company. Jackson wouldn't ever have sold his company at that point for $250K to be received after a ton of hassle several years later, but that was the net effect. (SJG still exists, but is a shadow of its more successful pre-raid incarnation.)

    26. Re:it would ... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      Its pretty much a given that when lawyers get involved, usually the only people who profit are lawyers.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    27. Re:it would ... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "It would really piss me off to lose my machines if I never did anything, I wonder how long it would be before you got them back and what kind of condition they would be in."

      "Never", and "not applicable", respectively. The EFF was founded over just such a situation, where computers were essentially, stolen, under the premise of "gathering evicence"

      As a side-note, it's always worth thinking about this when you design your backups policy (or disaster-recovery in work-speak) -- it needs to be just as resistant to legal attack and raids as it does to fire or theft.

    28. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long it would be before you got them back and what kind of condition they would be in.

      Innocent or guilty, you don't get them back.

      Not until they're long past their useful life, anyway.

      Don't bleat about the Bill of Rights. They trashed that long ago, and you did nothing about it.

    29. Re:it would ... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you don't know from personal experience, then you have no room to talk.

      No one seems to remember what the secret service did to Steve Jackson Games.
      Just for a short on topic refresher here is a quote from the EFF site:
      But now the board was closed down -- the Secret Service physically removed it from Steve Jackson Games on March 1, 1990, and did not return it until sometime in the end of June of that year. All in all, the Secret Service seized 3 computers, 5 hard disks and more than 300 floppies from Steve Jackson Games on that fateful day.

      No criminal charges were ever brought against Steve Jackson Games. Yet, when the computer equipment was returned more than three months after the raid, it appeared that someone inspecting the disks had read and deleted all of the 162 electronic mail messages contained on the BBS at the time of the raid. Not one of the users of the BBS was even under investigation from the Secret Service. Steve Jackson, owner of Steve Jackson Games, was angry. During the three months his systems were under Secret Service investigation, he had to layoff nearly half of his work force. Publication of at least one of his games books was delayed, resulting in loss of revenues to the company. He was written up in Business Week magazine as being a computer criminal. Steve Jackson decided to fight back.


      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    30. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Got my equipment back [from the police] ... had residue all over it."

      Well I guess that explains a few things...

    31. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what the FBI/Secret Service are doing should be illegal.

    32. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early 90s wasn't it, no?

    33. Re:it would ... by jimlintott · · Score: 1
      "A lot" is two words. You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?

      Not only that but 'a lot' is a place where you park cars, build a house or play a pick up ball game. Frequently the word that 'a lot' is used to replace is 'many'.

    34. Re:it would ... by frost22 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This guy says he's clear so I wouldn't be too worried about it.

      Huh ? I've yet to see a single computer that is completely "clear". Not to mentionm nine of these, probably together with backups going back several years.
      Think about it: did you never ever copy some piece of software ? did you always pay that Microsft tax ? is all your pr0n lily white and safe in every conceivable community ? What about your email archive - what did you discuss ? You sure the feds will "understand" every joke you sent out ? Did you stay clear of all those forbidden topics ? Growing hemp, copying dvds, red or left wing direct action politics, guns or anti guns, computer securtity, encryption, viruses, islam, your hollidays in afghanistan or cuba, or whatever else gets people into jail over there these days ?

      If they want, they can and will keep these machines forever.
      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    35. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've been waiting 3 years for the return of a $17,000 server the FBI 'borrowed'...

      I don't expect to ever get it back, nor receive any monies to cover the costs of the server. Not that I care, really - it's old hardware now - hardly worth more then $3 or 4k in today's market. If that.

      This is typical of everything in the US. If the government only effects a few citizens in a negative fashion - they can abuse their power until the end of time. If they did that to 100,000 people there would be hell to pay.

      It's really sad how government agencies can single out people and pick on them. There is NO justice in this country - not unless you can afford to buy it.

      Welcome to America - where to poor die to preserve the freedom of the rich.

    36. Re:it would ... by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

      http://www.sjgames.com/SS

      --Xan

      --
      "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
    37. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long it would be before you got them back

      Well, given that it took them four frickin' months to get started on this case, need you ask anymore?

    38. Re:it would ... by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the days of Operation Sundevil.
      The first attempt by the JBT's to appear like they had something resembling a clue.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    39. Re:it would ... by euggie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Out of curiosity: Since you're innocent, would it be possible to sue them in small claims court for damage, and perhaps for lost time and depreciation?

      I am not sure if you can that; even if you are allowed to do that /and/ win, you can't get a whole lot from small claims, and the actual act of collection is also a bitch. But hey, it's better than nothing, right?

    40. Re:it would ... by probbka · · Score: 1

      But they will file suit against your property; there are plenty of court cases like "US v. $17.254.38" and I'll let you guess who wins.

      Hahah... that's great. Any actual proof of that though? Be hilarious if it's true...

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    41. Re:it would ... by brian728s · · Score: 0

      It is called a bit of c4 attached to the drive.

    42. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's alittle compared to the psychological strain caused by this raid.

    43. Re:it would ... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      It's probably hosting the FBI website among other things now. ;-)

    44. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had computer equipment seized by the Secret Service about 8 years ago, in Chicago. I got it back about a year later (by which time, of course, it had lost about half its value anyway). They were real dicks about giving it back too. They wanted me to produce the original sales receipt to prove that I hadn't stolen the computer. Yeah, like it was me that came into their fucking apartments and stole their fucking equipment for no good reason other than shitty detective work.

    45. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, there's plenty of proof.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=civil+forfeiture

      no so hilarious when you're driving down the street with a thousand bucks to buy a big screen tv, you get pulled over, and the cops take your money because they aribtrarily determine you were going to buy drugs with it.

    46. Re:it would ... by sch1sm · · Score: 1

      Intresting thought. I never considered it however, I'm just glad it's all over and squarely in the past. Not something I want to drag out when I've got other things to do.

    47. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no so hilarious when you're driving down the street with a thousand bucks to buy a big screen tv

      Why the fuck would you ever want to carry that much in cash? Haven't you heard of "credit cards" or "checkbooks" in the USA?

    48. Re:it would ... by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If reports of past activities by other "law enforcement" agencies are anything to go on...don't hold your breath. Instead start saving for new equipment. If they ever do bother to return it, it's likely to be many years from now. (And that's assuming that they can't find, or appear to find, anything that could plausibly be interpreted as illegal on it.)

      I suspect that if you are lucky, they'll just forget about it, and some "office of the law" will give it to his kid. If you aren't lucky, they may come back for all of your property and cash. (I might, with some plausibility, be asserted to be involved in something that might be related to gangsterism under some argument. So we must remove anything that you could use to practice your profession, hire a lawyer, or otherwise do something besides live on welfare.)

      I know an MD who's been fighting the DEA for over five years now. It's looking like he may eventually win, since they have essentially no evidence. (I hear his side.) But he's already served time in jail, had all his medical records and computer equipment confiscated. Had his license lifted. Etc. The charge? He prescribed a few more pain killers to cancer patients than the feds decided the patients needed. (The other charges got dropped after the first hearing, when the prosecutor refused to defend the charges.)

      So. He hasn't been found guilty of anything, but his professional live has been destroyed. His license has been lifted. All his possessions have been confiscated. He's served time in jail (without being found guilty!) Etc.

      So. Well, trust them to nicely hand back your computer if you want. But consider yourself lucky if they just forget you. And DON'T expect THEM to consider themselves bound by any laws. Laws are for others.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    49. Re:it would ... by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      Intresting thought. I never considered it however, I'm just glad it's all over and squarely in the past. Not something I want to drag out when I've got other things to do.

      I understand your desire to move on with your life, but this is exactly why they'll continue the practice with other people (and maybe you again at another time). People figure they're lucky they didn't get arrested, their life didn't completely fall apart, and they're ready to forget about the whole thing. Any government agency that benefits from a secretive police state thrives on this sort of thing.

      I'm not saying I would be any different, but I'm just pointing out the vicious cycle.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    50. Re:it would ... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I know of at least one doctor who was impacted. He's still in court, but he lawyer is a volunteer (almost), because all of his assets were impounded, and his license was lifted so that he couldn't practice. He'll never recover from this, even though he'll probably be found not guilty. (That's his assessment. But it's the feds that have been repeatedly delaying the hearings so that he'll run out of support.)

      Justice system? I hear there used to be a justice system around hear, but I haven't heard of it in decades.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    51. Re:it would ... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The real question is... Do they install trojan horses and viruses on the computer that they confiscate? Would it be safe to use a confiscated computer or would those computers always be monitored?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    52. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot about terrorists.

    53. Re:it would ... by warpath · · Score: 1
      Frequently the word that 'a lot' is used to replace is 'many'.
      Yeah. Unfortunatley, I that a lot... er, many... er, frequently.
    54. Re:it would ... by warpath · · Score: 1
      Yeah. Unfortunatley, I that a lot... er, many... er, frequently.

      er... I DO that, I mean.

      Dammit. heh.
    55. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend had a car stereo get stolen one time. The Miami Police found it (amongst many other stolen stereos). They said they needed to keep it for a little while as evidence for the case pending. Three years later, a dozen or so phone calls asking about it later, they still were telling him they needed it for evidence, but it would be returned to him shortly. He bought a new stereo. He doesnt bother them anymore. They still haven't given it back. It's been over six years now.

      And this is what happens if it is YOUR property stolen by a criminal, retrieved by the police! When it comes to property being seized, forget it! Maybe this is conspiracy theory of me, but everybody gets spam advertising kiddy porn... Maybe you didnt delete it yet (or didnt even see it yet) with the three hundred other spams you got the other day. Well... could that not be contraband, perchance? Even though you did not want it, are disgusted by it, and would never condone it? That's what worries me. They can find any excuse to keep it.

      Seizing property is profitable. And the general public is okay with it because they see it as criminals getting what's coming to them. They just don't see how it affects innocent people.

      Half the reason the "drug war" still exists is because of the fact that police departments and feds can seize not just property pertaining to the production of drugs, but all property that is suspected of being purchased BY drug money, not to mention the suspected drug money itself. They have a happy auction, and fund the department for another year...

      Gotta love it.

    56. Re:it would ... by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe you're buying it used from some guy who put an ad in the paper.

      maybe you don't trust the banks.

      maybe you just went to the bank to withdraw the cash and you're buying it from some pawn shop who will give you a better price if you pay in cash.

      there are plenty of reasons why you would carry that much cash around.

    57. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that's the case, then you should "donate" said computer to one of your "friends".

      Substitute "friends" with "people you hate" and "donate" with "incriminate" and you get the idea..

      Seriously though, I doubt they would bother installing that stuff, to easy to detect and they have much more efficent options (ring ring, this is Carnivore calling!).

      One thing is for sure, if you do get the equipment back and you are well, the tin foil hat type, you may want to change the NIC card, as the MAC address would be perfect information if they really wanted to spy on you!! :D

      -=DR=-

    58. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got my equipment back and it was covered in grime and obviously had not been taken care of, had masking tape and residue all over it.

      Are you sure it wasn't in that way to begin with? As your description sounds exactly like the state of most geeks equipment "normally" ;-)

    59. Re:it would ... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Steve Jackson Games had this happen back in the 80s...you know, before the invention of Half-Life and Everquest, and hence before computers were interesting. They were raided by the SS (for a totally bogus reason) and had their computers siezed.


      Bruce Sterling wrote a piece on this event called The Hacker Crackdown.
    60. Re:it would ... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Why would police demolish the VCR? For what purpose, to see if the head was lined w/ narcotics?

      Probably to check out if anything is inside it. And if they mess up when disassembling it, just bash it and claim it was already like that. Interestingly I just watch the famous film The French Connection the other day. The cops had to break apart the car but in the movie they somehow managed to put it back together like the original (or did they replace it with a new one? It wasn't clear to me). When they were taking apart the car, they trashed certain parts of it. If these cops trashed the VCR then what better than to make up an excuse? Interestingly The French Connection is based on a true story (BTW, I recommend the film if you are into 70's crime dramas. Very good film with one of the best car chase scenes).

      And why the fuck would they keep it for two years after they caught the guy and the evidence? The case went on for two years?

      Inefficient bureacracies perhaps. Is there an upper limit on the amount of time they can keep seized assets? If not, then they can hang onto them I guess...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    61. Re:it would ... by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      Seems like 3 years is an excessively long time to keep a $17,000 piece of equipment, whether it's obsolete now or not. If the police confiscated your car as evidence and then never charged you with anything but kept the car in storage, you'd expect your car back and compensation, wouldn't you? Seems like all you guys who still haven't gotten your equipment back years later should sue to get it back and/or get compensation for replacement hardware.

    62. Re:it would ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Because, of course, you got the money from selling drugs and you don't want there to be a subpoenable record the IRS can get their hands on...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:it would ... by veritron · · Score: 1

      1997? 33 MHz 486?
      "I took the liberty to upgrade your computer. A real hacker needs a 33-MHz, not a 20." = sarcasm.

    64. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so full of shit :)

    65. Re:it would ... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 0

      I really have a hard time believing this. If this is actually true scan your warrant receipt and post it which yes you would have or the poor schmuck who conducted the raid would get fired. This is the perfect example of why anonymous freespeech is counter productive. You have no requirement to back up your claims. There is no company line any longer since the shakedown in the late 90s. Agents want their pensions, if they did get wronged or forced to break the law they could make 50k from a tabloid or talk show to tell their story.

      I think you are others here are full of BS on topics such as this. It is sad what used to be a good news/posting site has turned into a liberal progoganda/paranoia machine. Mark me as troll/flamebait I dont give a crap. The reason why attitude towards the US has turned sour is partly because of false claims such as this. If you really are oppressed no one is holding a gun to your head to stay. Go move to "free" country like france, it worked out good for them a couple times last century.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    66. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not to mention that even if you're in the clear if you get caught up in something like this the computers are instantly effectively lost which itself can be quite a financial burden.

      I had my computer taken by into custody once, saw it over 2 years later(no charges raised, no compensation paid, and this wasn't in usa).

      What one should do in this kind of situation is that don't admit to anything before you know what you're admitting to, they can easily try to get you to admit something that was effectively impossible to do! REVIEW THOSE STATEMENT PAPERS CAREFULLY(questionnaire logs? anyways the paper that has all the things you're signing as the ones that you said while being questioned) BEFORE SIGNING!

      though personally I happen to think in this case that valve is just full of shit. Can't ship a product, being horrible behind schedule? well let's blame the hackers! (having seen the leaked thing - the engine was not fit for the release dates that were in effect when this was published, the engine must have been behind the schedule for months already so that it should have been very fucking obvious that they were not going to be able to ship it when stated)

      anon for some reason or another..

    67. Re:it would ... by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Funny

      hrm...1997...Pentium II was released then...

      quite the hacker you were with your 1989 486.

    68. Re:it would ... by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      The secret service nailed me back in 1998 for phreaking (ATARI RULEZ!!!) and took all my machines, and LITTERLY every single piece of paper with any number written on it. I eventualy got it back a year later, but didnt get any of my disks back.

    69. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lost my (2) machines for nine months into the first year of a CS major. 400x31/2" floppies were also taken. So the timing was impeccable. Not to mention that when I got them back I recieved a 'cease and desist' regarding some of the pirate software I *did* have on my machines; ie : a VC++ compiler and some crappy car game I can't even remember the name of.

      I must say though, that the machines came back in okay condition. But it was still incredibly invasive.

      What really sux0rz is that they had the wrong guy, but I still got burnt while the real perpetrator was probably laughing his/her ass off in Tahiti or something.

      Fuck the feds.

      Fuck them up their stupid asses.

    70. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, I once bought a car for $1500 in cash from a guy whom I was pretty sure was a drug dealer.

      Had the cops appeared, I'd probably be out the cash and the car.

    71. Re:it would ... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If you think that's the case, then you should "donate" said computer to one of your "friends". Substitute "friends" with "people you hate" and "donate" with "incriminate" and you get the idea..

      hehe :) An ingenious plan ;) What better way to defeat enemies than by giving them free computers? ;) ... Although I would probably just sell it on ebay and let some poor soul (who doesn't know anything about computers) let the government monitor their whole life...

      Seriously though, I doubt they would bother installing that stuff, to easy to detect and they have much more efficent options (ring ring, this is Carnivore calling!).

      Carnivore is overrated. From what little I understand of it, Carnivore just monitores data. This is very inefficient. A virus or something, in contrast, can be used to selectively minitor something. Instead of looking at raw packets or something, a virus can simply look at (say) everything going out on port 21 (ftp). Or a virus can log the programs you run most frequently. And so forth.

      In any case, I don't think people will know. Clearly non-geeks would have no idea of any of this (they can't even tell what a trojan horse is). I consider myself a geek but even I wouldn't know if a program I'm running is a trojan horse (unless it does something nasty like deleting files, using up too much CPU relative to expected usage, or something). I won't really know if a keylogger is installed. Will you? Would you know if a keylogger is installed on your machine? How about some virus that tracks what programs you use?

      Most viruses, worms, etc that you run into are easily detectible by a geek. The reason is because they are malicious. They do things that you expect: destroy some files, read the hard drive like crazy, try contacting another machine, etc. A similar program designed by the government will not exhibit those characteristics. It will be quiet, probably using up very little CPU. It might not even show up as a process or thread (depends). It won't destroy anything. And so forth. I think you will have a hard time telling if such a thing is installed by the government.

      One thing is for sure, if you do get the equipment back and you are well, the tin foil hat type, you may want to change the NIC card, as the MAC address would be perfect information if they really wanted to spy on you!! :D

      I AM a tin-foil-hat type. I'm on the far left and I'm quite familiar with what the governments of Germany, USSR, USA, and France did to "dissidents". One just needs to look at what the FBI and CIA did to Martin Luther King and other civil rights activists. I would be changing more than the NIC card. I'm dumping the whole computer :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    72. Re:it would ... by Ondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, forgot to add, SJG got $250,000 in damages from the government for its ill-treatment. $50,000 compensation (subject to taxation as income) and $200,000 for the lawyers. Who really won in this case?

      The Electronic Frontier Foundation. They were the lawyers in said case, which was their first. Hardly a bad result.

    73. Re:it would ... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      In the US the defendant is permitted access to EVERYTHING the prosecution has. If the prosecution has a copy of the data, so does the defense. In a case like this, though, I would think there'd be some strict controls on it.

    74. Re:it would ... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Guess you've missed out on all the fun of the last 15 years.

      If any drugs are found in your car, any at all, the police can seize the car without ever charging you. You will never get it back; they will sell the car to fund their activities. If you rent a house and the renters have drugs on the premises, the police can seize the house without ever charging you.

      I forget the legal term, but the drug war has effectively amended the "deprived of...property without due process of law" clause out of the Constitution.

    75. Re:it would ... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      Anonymous free speech is sometimes very productive. It can lead to investigations that prove out the facts. If you're not interested in investigating, then stop pretending that you're interested in free speech at all. The burden of proof rests on the concerned public, not on one person who feels wronged.

      I don't care how freaking anonymous Deep Throat was; his tips to the press resulted in the resignation of the President of the United States - who had broken the law.

      The system works, don't knock it.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    76. Re:it would ... by junkgrep · · Score: 1

      Depends on the warrant though: if it's narrowly drawn to apply to HL2 related thefts, then other material is inadmissable. Of course, if they find kiddy pron, they might well try to find some way to nail the guy anyway. But not for random two-bit warezing.

    77. Re:it would ... by treat · · Score: 1
      I really have a hard time believing this.

      The really amazing thing is that most people in the US don't believe it is true when they hear about civil forfeiture. It just sounds so outrageous that it can't possibly be true. So nothing gets done to stop it.

    78. Re:it would ... by Horizon_99 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, wonder why the phrase "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts" suddenly popped into my head...

      Ah there's my hat! Good ol' foil.

    79. Re:it would ... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 0

      I will concede that I should have said usually counter-productive wrt anonymous free speech. But the fact remains, misinformation and outright lying are common when you don't have to provide evidence. Just look at these boards. If you want credibility for what you spew, you have to back it up.

      Deep Throat wasn't completely anonymous btw. Go google it.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    80. Re:it would ... by sean.m.bober · · Score: 1

      Ryan N. is that you?

    81. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming he's telling the truth. Why would he get on irc and "warn" others from his friends house. What's to warn if no one is guilty, huh?

    82. Re:it would ... by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

      The *D*, probly got that 486-33 CPU from someone elses PC that had been sitting there as evidence for about 6 years. :P

    83. Re:it would ... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why the fuck would you ever want to carry that much in cash? Haven't you heard of "credit cards" or "checkbooks" in the USA?

      Yeah, credit cards and checks are a good thing. Much better than carrying large quantities of cash. It's just so ridiculous carrying large amounts of cash that the police should be able to grab it at will.

      Heck, who needs nine computers in their house? It's ridiculous too! Maybe the cops should confiscate those as well?

      In fact, the cops should be able to grab anything suspicious. They should define "suspicious" as anything "unusual". People with mohawks should have their hair took and god help you if you should happen to be dancing in the street with an iPod.

      Maybe if I paint my car hot pink it should be inpounded. My bible too. Because who on earth would be reading on of those _in public_ anyway. I must be hiding drugs in it.

      TW

    84. Re:it would ... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Well, here's a real-life account if that's of any interest to you.

    85. Re:it would ... by TomServo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the demolishing, but I'm shocked he even got it back. My roommate in college had his truck broken into, and a neighbor saw this while it was happening and called the police. The police came and actually caught the guys doing it while they were trying to run off with the stereo.

      They took it in as evidence and told him he'd get his stereo back pretty quickly. That was about 6 years ago, and I don't think he ever got it back. Funny how catching the theives in the act didn't actually prevent it from getting stolen...

    86. Re:it would ... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      I think it would be better now to open up the drive carefully place some magnesium strips and an igniter. Set it up so that if the drive is opened or accessed improperly then Uh Oh there goes the igniter!!! Then no one could make a physical copy of the drive and only you could access the data.

    87. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know. The detective also found it hard to believe I'd been using such an outdated box. But it was "inherited" from my mother when she upgraded to a Pentium in 1995.

      The upgrade was intended as a joke, I think. But he really did upgrade the CPU :-) His way of showing he thought I was a cool kid, I guess.

      I swear it's all true :-) I've still got the machine, with the evidence sticker attached to the bottom.

    88. Re:it would ... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, that's bette than the "War on Drugs" here in Thailand where suspicion of drug dealing is carte blanche for the police to open fire on you. Some thousands killed that way last year in the north.
      Funny thing is that people in the know tell me that the cops and the army go in halfsies on the organized portion of the drug business.

    89. Re:it would ... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      OT
      A lot is a generic word replacing the count / non-count dependent many and much.

    90. Re:it would ... by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1
      bzboyz is definately a fraudulent advertiser, at least in my experience. They didn't have the parts that were on sale, but i did get them eventually. Took 2 extra weeks, but i saved about a half a grand on my rig. They also sent the wrong ram (unregistered sent), and it took a month to straighten them out. Finally i had to tell them i was coming down personally to see them after obtaining thier address from a site online. (It's not on the web page.) My guess is it's hosted out of a trailer or something.

      Just because its the cheapest price on pricewatch.com doesn't mean its quality. Sometimes paying the extra $50 is worth the lack of aggravation. Now you know to do searches on the validity of the businesses you purchase from. Not such a hard lesson to learn, hopefully you didn't get burned for too much. Live in California? OFfer to go see them personally, it works like a friggin charm. Peace.

    91. Re:it would ... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 0

      Ah yes the infamous "You don't know what is good for you, but I do".

      Let it snow, let it snow, let is snow....

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    92. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to be guilty to get screwed over.

      My dad was in jail for 19 months waiting for a trial regarding a crime he didn't commit. When he finally got his trial it lasted 30 minutes before the judge threw it out. He lost his job, career path ruined and they broke his spirit.

    93. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're carrying a hammer and running with an iPod, you should be stopped at once before you smash a giant TV.

    94. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though you may want to provide a few more words than just "Deep Throat" for the search ;)

    95. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC sed...Post-It note on it saying "I took the liberty to upgrade your computer. A real hacker needs a 33-MHz, not a 20."

      do u think we're idiots?

    96. Re:it would ... by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      Who really won in this case?

      Donno, but I'll tell you soon as I finish studying for my LSATs..

      --
      Moo
    97. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently so.

    98. Re:it would ... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      OK, I need you to explain this to me.

      French Connection. Gene Hackman and some other goober as gumshoe detectives.

      The "car chase" was a car, driving under an elevated train, for about two minutes. It was no "greater" than a car chase on TJ Hooker.

      I watched that horrid movie end to end, waiting for a great car chase.

      It.
      Didn't.
      Exist.

      Want car chases? Watch Blues Brothers. Watch Bullitt. Watch Ronin and get two for the price of one.

      French Connection? Bah. Terrible flick.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    99. Re:it would ... by iocat · · Score: 1
      They really screwed SJG, but I don't know if a 13 year old case is the best example of how the Feds treat confiscated hardware *today.* Anyone have any more recent examples?

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    100. Re:it would ... by zowch · · Score: 1

      Of course, the problem with this way of looking at things is that it significantly impairs the ability of law enforcement to do what they need to do. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for due process and putting an end to some of the rampant misuse of power out there, but... It seems to me that if every person found innocent could sue the government/law enforcement agency for damages and lost time...well, it would make it very hard for these organizations to legitimately investigate a case. Sometimes innocent people are obvious suspects, and the fact that your computer didn't have anything on it doesn't necessarily mean they weren't justified in confiscating it for use in their investigation. It just sets a pretty complicated precedent...

    101. Re:it would ... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I can tell you first hand (since this happened to me), you can generally expect to get your machines back in reasonably good condition - but it'll probably be long after they've depreciated to zero value. You're also likely to be missing a few odds and ends (connecting cables, power cords, and that sort of thing), and might even get a few items thrown in that weren't yours in the first place. (When I finally got my systems back, I found a pair of headphones I never owned before, and a pair of Compaq speakers, minus their AC adapter.)

      And yes, it *will* piss you off, immensely, for at least the first year or so -- but like most things, you eventually get over it. By the time you see your stuff again (if you ever do), you'll own much better hardware anyway.

    102. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      balls

    103. Re:it would ... by Nevo · · Score: 1

      In theory, this is true.

      Ask Kevin Mitnick how well it works in practice.

    104. Re:it would ... by euggie · · Score: 1

      My bad actually, I talked to some folks and I don't believe you can actually take the government, or entities for that matter to small claims for the reason that small claims courts are not represented by lawyers, and there's no individual that you can call to the stand.

      I stand corrected :-)

    105. Re:it would ... by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      I don't see this as a problem. If a law enforcement official tomorrow were to confiscate your vehicle in the course of investigation because they suspected that you were involved in some sort of illegal practice, where would this leave you? Given that you only have one vehicle, and that you need the vehicle to work in order to live, wouldn't you say that you've suffered damages? For that matter, if you get the vehicle back in 2 years when they determine you're innocent, how useful is it to you then? Will you even have your job still?

      Law enforcement needs to operate as efficiently as possible, but they also need to be certain that what they are doing is correct. If they aren't correct, then that should effect them in a negative manner so that they will make an effort to be correct. I still believe that people are innocent until proven guilty, and seizure of property without 100% certainty of wrongdoing is IMO ridiculous.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    106. Re:it would ... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      a long time ago a good friend of mine was big into the pirate software scene on the C64 (I won't say his handle here, but if you had a C64 you'd recognize it). So much so that he used various ITT numbers to dial bbs's in Europe to download the latest warez. Needless to say he did get in trouble eventually...

      When the FBI eventually did take his C64, two 1541's, monitor, VCR, box of copied software and a book about telephone hacking - for some reason they never charged him with anything. Eventually returned everything except for the book, the monitor and the VCR.

      What would you do? I mean back then a monitor and VCR were expensive items - but if he called the FBI to get his things back you know what would happen. If he hired a lawyer it would cost more than the VCR and monitor were worth.

    107. Re:it would ... by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You are full of shit (sorry, can't give any more details).

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    108. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why the fuck would you ever want to carry that much in cash?"

      gee..maybe because in a free country i'm FREE to do so if I want...
      I DON'T have to answer any questions about it.
      I DON'T have to give it to anyone if I don't want to.
      I DON'T have to worry about jackbooted THIEVING 'officials' robbing me.

      My only question is...where do I find this country...

    109. Re:it would ... by zowch · · Score: 1

      Yes, except it wouldn't work that way in practice. Investigations simply have to be carried out, and part of that is always going to be at the expense of the innocent. Saying that law enforcement needs to be efficient is all fine and good, but the fact of the matter is that it's never going to be 100% efficient, and there are going to be "casualties."

      The way it would more likely work in a system like the one proposed is that, yes, law enforcement would become somewhat more efficient, but costs would skyrocket as every person on the block began suing them and recovering damages. To cover these costs, there would be two options: Cuts to law enforcement, or increasing taxes to cover the increased costs of law enforcement.

      Neither of those sound too great to me...

    110. Re:it would ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Regardless of whether or not you are an idiot, the story is true.

      You don't exactly need a lot of computing power to hack into systems.

      Upgrading the CPU was just a joke the detective played. And I thought it was very funny, and touching.

      I can produce a photograph of the machine in question, along with "Evidence" sticker on the bottom, if you tell me where to send it.

    111. Re:it would ... by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Ronin has one of the best car chase sequences ever filmed.

      Play on on a nice large 16:9 display, with a big surround sound system, and you will reach a state of nirvana.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    112. Re:it would ... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      But they will file suit against your property; there are plenty of court cases like "US v. $17.254.38" and I'll let you guess who wins.

      They had a guy on jepardy just the other day that was the prosecuter in a lawsuit against 2000lbs of caviar. he gave a short blerb about it on the show, so yes it happens. He also stated that in the end after the case was won the caviar was destroyed.(burned)

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    113. Re:it would ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      And what's really strange is that while "you wouldn't say alittle," you can say belittle.

    114. Re:it would ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I stand corrected

      So those new orthopedic shoes are working out OK for you, then?

    115. Re:it would ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      So I awoke this morning and arose to a chilly house, the window having been left ajar.
      I snuggled up to my computer to peruse slashdot awhile. Alas, it was awash with A words. A lot of them.
      I was agast.

    116. Re:it would ... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ok it wasn't exactly like a typical car chase. The car was chasing a train. It had tension. Something seriously lacking in modern day car chase scenes like Matrix Reloaded.

      I admit that Ronin is great. As someone below says, it has good sound (although I don't have a good tv or a sound system). Ronin, if I remember correctly, has the ACTUAL sounds of the cars. Most films have fake sounds (fake in the sense that the sounds aren't necessarily from the car that they are driving; the sounds may be generic). Ronin used real sound from the car engine.

      French Connection is better than Ronin, as a film. Not sure about the chase scene but the films don't compare...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    117. Re:it would ... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      No, my friend.

      TWO of the best car chases ever filmed.

      The first one with the A8 and the motorcade, and the second one with the Benz diesel and the BMW. Backwards, through the tunnel.

      Yowza.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. Looks like the riaa has a competitor by Ohm1e · · Score: 1

    and its of the cs persuasion

  5. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    January 15, 2004
    The whole surreal story

    So at 6:30am on January 14th, I woke up to the doorbell buzzing. Not a short lived buzz. Someone had their thumb pressing the button and holding it there. "Fucking drunkard" I thought, and rolled over, intent on ignoring it. It then started a rythmic *buzz* *buzz* *buzz* *buzz*, over and over again. After about 5 minutes battling to get back to sleep, I gave up and got up. Put my pants on, grabbed my sweatshirt, and stumbled off toward the door.

    As I walked down the steps I heard them talking to the nextdoor neighbor, asking him where the landlord lived. I reach the door just as the neighbor's door closes. I compose myself to deal with whatever is behind the door, and open it.

    Immediately there's a flashlight in my eyes. "Are you Chris Toshok?" "Uh, yes" "Mr. Toshok, we're with the FBI. We have a warrant to search the premises." I looked down out of the glare of the flashlight and saw the FBI badge of the long haired blonde woman standing in front of me. I also saw two people behind her, bodies turned sideways so as to present less of a target. Guns drawn? It was too hard to tell really with the glare of the flashlight, but I'm assuming yes.

    I mumbled something about turning on the light so I could see the warrant (pages 1 2 3 4 5)they'd thrust into my hands and turned and groped on the wall for the switch. They all tensed. The light came on, and I looked over the warrant for a second.

    "Please come out here Mr. Toshok," and a hand on my arm pulling me onto the porch. Once I was out on the porch several agents started up the stairs. I said that my roommate was still asleep in bed. They asked his name, I said "Peter". They continued up the steps, yelling his name. "Peter, this is the FBI." "PETER" "PETER, are you awake? this is the FBI"

    I didn't watch it happen but apparently Peter awoke, naked, to a doorway full of FBI agents with guns out, yelling at him to get up. He asked if he could get some clothes on. They said yes. He asked if they could turn on the light so he could see. So Peter got to get dressed under the watchful gaze of government employees. Must have been fun.

    They took Peter to the back of the house, and took me back upstairs to the front of the house, and proceeded to start going through everything in my room and the office.

    I was questioned by the FBI agent in charge and a Secret Service agent at length about the Hungry Programmers, people I used to live with, whether particular people had the capacity/knowledge to do what they were investigating, etc. During the questioning she says "Now we're going to take all your computers." She sees the look on my face and says "Yeah, this is going to be hard for you." I said "uh, when will I get them back?" She said it depends, that they'd try to have them all back as soon as possible, but it depends on if they find anything suspicious on them. If they found contraband (kiddie porn, talk of drugs, or stuff they were actually looking for), that particular computer would never be coming home.

    After the questioning I basically sat in the front room on a folded futon mattress, with at least one agent with me at all times. Sometimes two. At one point I said I really needed to brush my teeth and the SS agent assigned to me at the time walked with me back to the bathroom and stood behind me watching me in the mirror as I brushed my teeth. On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One looking at the condoms and stickers in my nightstand, one going through my underwear/sock drawer, and one looking through my books.

    After a lot more sitting in silence in that room, interspersed with tidbits of conversation (an fbi agent asking me about the guitars, talking about the piano lessons in his youth, and how he was kicked in the chest by a horse.) I must say, the SS agents were a lot nicer than the FBI agents. One in particular was pretty cool - we joked a lot about just how absurd the whole thing was

    1. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As if there were ever doubt any longer that America were a police state ...

      Do backups people! BACKUPS!!!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I had backups, they took those too. Good 'ole 40MB tapes!

      I guess they should have been off-site ;)

    3. Re:Article text by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Yes, 'cause they're not likely to take those, too. Heh.

    4. Re:Article text by stevey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Offsite-backups though - the way these things work is that they will take anything that looks technical, and anything that looks like it could store data.

      Hell in some cases they will take your VCR. (I know of some cheap backup systems that write data to video tapes; although I've never seen one in use).

    5. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "After a few more minutes of listening to the bumbling idiots in the next room arguing over how to turn off my machines"

      Hmm, that's odd, according to a (very believably sounding) description I once got of computer forensics here in the UK the first thing the cops do is disconnect the power. This is so you can't have installed a logout script which erases data if the machine is not turned off in the right way. Guess the FBI aren't there yet ;-)

    6. Re:Article text by kathgar1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just store everyone on your C=64! Once they yank the power it's gone!


      (Yes, I know about recovering data from RAM, It's a joke.)

    7. Re:Article text by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As if there were ever doubt any longer that America were a police state ...

      You don't really have any concept of what a police state is, do you?

      These people had a warrant. Issued by a (mostly) impartial judge. They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude commited against a company that I, for one, am very grateful for making.

      In a real police state (Nazi Germany, Stalist Russia, etc...), the FBI would not have rung your doorbell at 6:30am. They would not have had a warrant, and they most certianly would not have been civilized while they hauled only some your stuff out the door. They would have kicked down your door at 3am, killed your family, and set your house on fire. All because you belived in the wrong religion, or were the member of the wrong political party.

      FBI raids are not pretty, but like it or not, this is how a fair and just legal system works. When you have to balance the rights of victims and the rights of the accused, nobody comes out happy. I don't know if this guy is guilty or innocent, but he should keep his mouth shut, call a lawyer, and take advantage of every other right that he has. And he can do that because he doesn't live in a police state, he lives in a free country. That's why he's laughing about this whole thing instead of next in line to get his hand chopped off at the local prison.

    8. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? It's possible to recover data from ram once it's been turned off?

    9. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So obviously you don't use Microsoft products. You machine gets MSBlast and tries to shut itself down - you lose everything because your script is pedtantic.....

    10. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 1

      offsite, man, offsite. preferrably in an out-of-our-jurisdiction locker in some foreign country.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    11. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm .... no. a police state is any country where the cops come over, refuse to let you confirm their identity, show you some papers, take all your shit ... and you let them!!!

      dude just walked off, left his whole apartment to the cops, people he will probably never see again, whose identities he is not allowed to confirm.

      *that* is a police state. when the populace are so apathetic on the subject, that they're willing to just bend over and take it in the ass.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    12. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, you're a fucking moron.

    13. Re:Article text by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Funny
      "On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One [was] looking at the condoms ... in my nightstand."

      On my way back down the hall I looked into my room and saw 3 FBI agents rifling through my belongings. One [was] looking at the mPlayer & mySQL source code ... in my nightstand.

      Fixed. I don't know how that slipped by the editors...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    14. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when the populace are so apathetic on the subject, that they're willing to just bend over and take it in the ass.

      Well bud, when it is going down, there's really not a whole fucking lot you can do about it. Unless you're not really attached to being alive.

      When it is going down, just sit tight, be cool, ride it out.

      Once shit settles down and some time has passed, say five or ten years, then you are in a better position to do something about it.

      By then you've had time to quietly probe around, find out who they were, where they live, what they do now. What their schedule is.

      Then you are the one in a position to bend someone over and take their ass as hard and as long and as often as you like.

      Don't you know it'd suck if you were to go on vaction maybe go off to the beach, maybe out to the woods, and then some vengeful mother fucker that you screwed over years ago comes out of the woodwork for some payback? That'd really be a bitch wouldn't it?

    15. Re:Article text by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1
      "They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude commited against a company that I, for one, am very grateful for making."

      So if hacking into a computer, downloading the PARTIAL source, making no money off its distribution, and causing no financial loss to Valve (everyone is going to STILL have to buy the game) is a crime of serious magnitude, where do you place murder, rape, torture, drug use, kiddie porn, war, embezzlement...?

      I think the Feds have better things to do than chase around an incomplete source tree for a friggin demo.

    16. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Israel Doing now with palestian!

    17. Re:Article text by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No that actually isn't a police state. In a RAID they don't have to fucking show you any ID. Thats kinda ruins the point of surprising someone. You know, in a RAID? Jesus fucking christ.

      The problem is rank and file Slashdotters like you cannot seem to comprehend that hackng and stealing code is a REAL crime that needs to be investigated and prosecuted. You also believe that any law enforcement action is the indication of us all living in a police state.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    18. Re:Article text by inc_x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They use bulldozers these days to destroy houses.

    19. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 0, Troll

      The problem is rank and file Slashdotters like you cannot seem to comprehend that hackng and stealing code is a REAL crime that needs to be investigated and prosecuted.

      The problem with you Americans is that you think that a police force is the only way to solve your problems.

      America is a corporate-fascist police state.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    20. Re:Article text by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

      So, uh, what do you suggest? We let people steal your code and commit other crimes? Huh?

    21. Re:Article text by Jason+Hood · · Score: 0

      This should serve as a good wake up call to you and others. Not only should you do things that arent illegal but you should probably not hang out with people that are.

      Sounds like the FBI and the SS did their job. If they left stuff off your receipt you should have not signed it. People make mistakes and I would imagine the people that do these raids could get rather forgetful if they were doing them everyday.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    22. Re:Article text by wheresdrew · · Score: 0

      Coolatoola ( http://www.coolatoola.com/ ) makes one for OSX that'll backup your data to a MiniDV tape. Not speedy, but you get a nice, portable backup of 10-15GB (depending on tape speed) that'll fit almost anywhere.

    23. Re:Article text by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Actually we think the courtroom is the only way to solve our problems, you useless anarchist fuckwit cockface.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    24. Re:Article text by Blimbo · · Score: 1

      "One looking at the condoms and stickers in my nightstand"

      Ok, the condoms I get, however I have never used stickers....are they used in conjunction with the condoms or applied separately ?

      More info please !!

    25. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude


      No crime was commited. Please point out which criminal law was broken.

      Your Sig: "Socialism is Death"

      Oh. You are so kill filed. I hate fascists.
    26. Re:Article text by randyest · · Score: 1

      You, sir, just made a friend for reading my mind and posting the result -- verbatim.

      It's my pleasure to meet you.

      --
      everything in moderation
    27. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, as much as you may think life is polar, it isn't.

      How do you know a crime was committed in this circumstance?

      How does -he- know he's -actually- a suspect, and this wasn't
      just a con job?

      The cops shouldn't be able to just walk into someones house, un-chaperoned, un-watched, hand over some official documents, and charge off with his posessions while the guy just walks around in the street, in a daze, like some sheep.

      Instead, the cops should bring public representation -with- them, who will observe all activity until the innocent person is able to arrange their own representation to have all details of the incident witnessed.

      That public representative should be there for two reasons: one, legitimacy at face value, of the government in this action, and to provide witness of the entire event -for the innocent person, and for the investigation. Hey, why not give TV camermen a real job and require all police activity of this nature to be taped and archived to absolutely -ensure- justice?

      Then, its no longer a police state, where the cops can do anything they want to any citizen under their suspicion, it is instead a public state where witness is borne, and facts are revealed and recorded every step of the way, from both the investigation and the 'protection of the innocent' perspectives.

      The primary intent of those people walking into that guys house at 6:30am in the morning was to find evidence to prove him guilty of wrong-doing. That was their job, thats what they were there to do. They had gotten up bright and early in the morning, gotten their coffee at Starbucks on the way into work, and went off to interrupt that persons life on the basis of suscpicion.

      There should -also- have been someone there, at the same time, to ensure justice is served to the innocent. These two roles cannot be trusted to a single person.

      It is an open society which promotes the rigorous protection of the innocent more stringently than it prosecutes as completely as possible the guilty.

      Incidentally, a policy of non-secrecy like this one would be good for the whole 'data records' issue too. If there is an item in a database with my name on it, it belongs to me and should be visible to me at any time I request it. Since I believe that the rights of some corporation are not greater than my individual rights, issues of 'business trade secret' are irrelevant.

      Another sign of a 'police state' is 'secret files'. The fact that so many corporations have so many amazingly detailed facts about citizens, none of whom have -any- access to this information, nor recourse over its use and influence on their daily lives, leads to just a few more alarm bells about the current situaton in the US of A, Inc...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    28. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 1

      It seems like antagonism appears to be your #1 problem-solving technique, though ... and, well, that fits the general picture of human by-products from states such as yours.

      I am not an anarchist. I'm the anti-christ, trying to destroy your Police Religion.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    29. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IMHO it doesn't mean that they shoot up your family and whatnot. (Though that happens in some police states.)

      Just click here

      The greatest trick the devil ever pullled was convincing the world he didn't exist. - Kaiser Soze, The Usual Suspects

    30. Re:Article text by Tom · · Score: 1

      You mix up police state and oppressive regimes.

      A police state can still be very nice to you. It just watches your every move, and investigates every crime with the utmost, shall we say, "care". It takes your fingerprints as a routine measure, and has laws so thick and convulted that no matter what you do, you are certain to break one.
      It also has policemen on every corner, two at intersections.

      I've travelled to police states. They can be quite nice and friendly. It's still a bit frightening when the officer gets out of his car and waves the Kalashnikov around as a "make way" signal.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    31. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your Sig: "Socialism is Death"

      Oh. You are so kill filed. I hate fascists. "

      fascism=socialism you moron...read a history book
      Oh. You are so eating tofu now, commie

      which,btw also =socialism/fasicm

    32. Re:Article text by danila · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit. I live in Russia and I have friends whose grandparents were arrested in 1937-1939 by NKVD. I'll tell you about it.

      These people either had a warrant or they had the legal authority to arrest people/search their homes. They were investigating an actual crime of serious magnitude commited against the country (treason, sabotage, espionage) that we (the Soviet people) loved dearly.

      The NKVD would often come at night, but often in the morning or any other time of the day. They either rang or knocked, they didn't break the door. They were civilized and they didn't kill anybody. They also didn't steal any property from the house. People, who were arrested, were taken into jail, where they were treated according to the procedures and with all necessary paperwork. The house was, obviously left intact, no fire. This never happened because you believed in wrong religion (nobody cared much at that time, since a very large fraction of the population was religious) or were the member of the wrong party (there was only one party), but because you were charged with a serious crime, such as conspiring to kill our beloved leader Josef Stalin.

      The point is not, whether the crimes are real or not, it doesn't really matter whether you are sent to gulag for sabotaging a power plant that you didn't or for copying a DVD that you did. What matters is that once the state becomes too powerful, it will gradually transform into a police state and a bit later into a totalitarian police state. That's what is happening in the US.

      The fact that you have rights is irrelevant to whether the country is a police state - you are confusing it with a lawless dictatorship. In a police state you may have rights, but they are trumped by even greater rights of the police. This guy is laughing, but would he if he was accused of assisting terrorists?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    33. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'I am not an anarchist. I'm the anti-christ, trying to destroy your Police Religion.'

      or you're just some pasty face 30 yr old still living with mom and dad and posting from your 'lair' in the basement, trying to be uber l33t with your edgy views on our 'police religion'. it's definately one of those.

    34. Re:Article text by drxenos · · Score: 1

      And how do you deal with suspected criminals in your country? Surrender to them or use suicide bombers?

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    35. Re:Article text by torpor · · Score: 1

      Investigate them, but always with an eye on their innocence.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  6. YOU LOOSE IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a mirror has already been posted. -1 redundant

    1. Re:YOU LOOSE IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 RACIST PIG

  7. WOw by M3wThr33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just when I thought they would let it die down, due to it being a bit more personal and involved, it seems like they went in to full gear.

    But I'm still a bit doubtful that ANY network admin wouldn't notice 11GB of traffic to an outside location on the network.

    1. Re:WOw by Kenja · · Score: 0

      11GB over what time period? Most network admins have beter things to do with their time then to read network activy reports or etherial output while on the john.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:WOw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that on many networks 11GBs of traffic to an external source would be perfectly normal.

    3. Re:WOw by Sparky77 · · Score: 1

      You don't the net admins where I work.

      --
      One bad monkey spoils the whole barrel.
    4. Re:WOw by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      Are you shitting me? MRTG is your friend. It is easy to setup and takes about two seconds to check (depending on how fast your browser is). Unless whoever downloaded all that stuff was very careful not to use more than a smidgeon of bandwidth, the spike would stick out like a sore thumb. Otherwise (in the event of a _very_ slow download) you should notice a connection that has been up for days. Nobody is perfect, but if your job is network admin, this is stuff you *have* to look at at least once a day -- it only takes a couple of minutes of your time.

    5. Re:WOw by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      And if you're a network admin on a network with valuable content that you don't want the outside world to have, any external IP address that you haven't met and whitelisted should stick out like a sore thumb. It might not lead directly to the people responsible for the break-in, but it is the first place you have to go in order to start tracking the path...

    6. Re:WOw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically means that someone's been download divx movies or video_ts folders over the network...any cool net admin wouldn't give a damn...

    7. Re:WOw by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Who ever did this wasn't dumb. And they knew how illegal it was. Of course they would cover their tracks.

      >Unless whoever downloaded all that stuff was very careful not to use more than a smidgeon of bandwidth, the spike would stick out like a sore thumb.

      They didn't have to get all 11 GB out over a single period of time.
      Also art work would be large, so a spike wouldn't be so big.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    8. Re:WOw by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

      It depends, does Valve's STEAM system go over the same pipe?

    9. Re:WOw by frenetic3 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it would not.

      Steam's download servers are very likely hosted at some colo facility on some serious backbone.

      Corporate offices are usually some little T1 from a local ISP, at least for a small company (valve probably has better than a t1, but still.)

      Not to mention the bonehead move it would be to have a dev environment on or near a highly public, visible network like Steam.

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    10. Re:WOw by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      They didn't have to get all 11 GB out over a single period of time.

      Even still some of those files are going to be a couple of hundred meg. You are going to see a couple smaller spikes almost as easily as one huge one.

      Also art work would be large, so a spike wouldn't be so big.

      Huh? Either they download a big file as fast as they can (spike) or they take their time by throttling their connection. Either way, unless the perpetrator hacked the router, the logging server, and everything else on the network, someone should have noticed something.

      Who ever did this wasn't dumb. And they knew how illegal it was. Of course they would cover their tracks.

      Agreed. 100%.

    11. Re:WOw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 GB is NOTHING. I'm sure the programmers could hit 11 GB just downloading there news everyday. If you think that's high just assume the fact that submitting this ONE message used AT LEAST 500K-1MB of data, and that's just to make a POST!! Imagine serving up one of the most played video games ever?

    12. Re:WOw by Fembot · · Score: 1

      Quite a few international development companies send builds around the world daily/hourly at extremly high speeds. 11GB over a week (I think it was a week wasn't it??) is nothing compared to that.

    13. Re:WOw by Ykant · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the bonehead move it would be to have a dev environment on or near a highly public, visible network like Steam.

      As opposed to the bonehead maneuver it would be to have a development machine connected to the outside world?
      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    14. Re:WOw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: upload and download. Do you know the difference? Lamer.

    15. Re:WOw by MattBurke · · Score: 1

      the spike would stick out like a sore thumb

      an 11GB transfer during office hours at 100Mbits wouldn't make a dent on my network graphs.

      you should notice a connection that has been up for days

      You're making the presumption that Valve's internet connection is used by one person who knows exactly what's going down it at all times. We're talking about a corporate network, not a home network

      From what I can tell, Valve run steampowered.com from their network which with the release of Steam hasd probably been close to maxing their line (155Mbit?) out 24/7. If you've got a graph that's hovering between 80% and 100% of a 155Mbit pipe, tell me how you'd expect to see anything as trivial as a 10GB transfer?

  8. they were pissed! by ayersrj · · Score: 5, Funny

    how else are they supposed to train their agents with the latest technology if it continues to be held past the release date!

    1. Re:they were pissed! by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      They could always play Secret Service: Security Breach which, besides being appropriately titled, shipped in October as probably the first game to attempt to use lots of DOOM 3's tricks, like bump mapping and per-pixel-kablooey, thanks to the AMP 2 engine.

      Kinda weak on the game side though.

  9. Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The warrant says they're looking for "internal IP addresses" associated with the machines at Valve. Uh.... what the hell? If it's a private network, the chances of those IPs being the same as the IPs on some other private network are approximately... 100%.

    This is like saying, "The murder victim's last name was Smith, and this guy has a reference to a Mr. Smith in his Rolodex. He must be guilty."

    Sure, what the fuck ever. This is trivially defensible in court.

    1. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by lobsterGun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agent 1: Hey Look! 192.168.1.100! I remember seeing an IP address like that at Valve!

      Agent 2: Looks like we have our man!

    2. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by m0rphin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of those 'internal' ip addresses was '127.0.0.1' and the culprits had an active connection to that computer when the FBI raided.

      --
      for great justice
    3. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Who knows? Valve may have been using nonprivate ip addresses. After all these where the same people that ran a know insecure email client on systems that they where using to develop a product that would bring in 10's of millions in revenue.

    4. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by jimi1283 · · Score: 1

      There are always IP addresses for externally visible machines, like web and ftp servers.

    5. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      that joke would be funnier if I didn't keep getting 'connection refused' whenever I tried connecting. :-/

    6. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! That's the exact same IP I have on my suitcase ! What an amazing coincidence !

    7. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, whatever the FBI has right now isn't enough to fly in court. Their actions say that loud and clear because they didn't slap the cuffs on the guy when they were there.

      In order to be able to grab every device with a hard drive in the house, the FBI has to make some statement to the judge about what they're going to look for on the drive. Clearly, one thread to go on is to search for any logs that mention the internal IP address, and see what follows. Yeah, there's a pretty good chance that there could be a machine on his own home network that has the same internal IP as the machine the break-in happened at Valve, and those are going to be useless matches that are going to have to be thrown out... what the FBI is hoping to find is some communciations program that associates that IP address with a description of "Valve Code Server" or such... that'd be incriminating.

      Yep, the FBI's going fishing. However, they have a right to since they went to a judge and got a warrant. He's clearly a suspect... of course, suspects aren't always guilty, but they're the ones being investigated like they might be...

    8. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my ATM PIN!

    9. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The culprit may have used the company's VPN to steal the code, which would have entailed the use of both private & public IP addresses. There wouldn't necessarily be a record of those specific addresses on that person's computer, but the event logs for the times his VPN client was used could possibly pinpoint the addresses.

      You'd think whoever it was would have just wiped his hard drive clean afterward. But people who commit such acts usually aren't paradigms of common sense to begin with.

    10. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. I changed it after I stole all your money.

    11. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Arti · · Score: 1

      Clearly they're looking for those IP addresses stored on the searchee's computer.

    12. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by snyps · · Score: 0

      In my experience in a case like this they would find the ip of the entire network and then narrow it down. In the case of a college lan or apartment building you can have upwards around 100 people on one lan so you really have to narrow it down or you will be searching an entire apartment building and the criminal would have time to remove his hdd's and use thermite on them or something like that.

    13. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Whoa shit!

      Thanks for the warning... time to wipe all the hard drives and shred all my CDs.

      Goddamn diabolically clever Secret Service...

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    14. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      You are correct, however 24 bits is a lot to work with if using 10. I could see a clever admin shying away from the "obvious" 10. addys like 10.0.0.x etcetcetc, and may actually have left a plausible signature on an attackers machine, like 10.137.231.66

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    15. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Sure, what the fuck ever. This is trivially defensible in court.

      I wouldn't be so sure. Juries of average people I don't imagine have the patience to listen to lots of tech talk.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    16. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Tofino · · Score: 1

      Oh no! That guy's got an active connection to me, too! :O What's more, according to my hosts file, he seems to have his fingers in all sorts of spam and advertisement sites! Where will it all end?

    17. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I'd say simply bringing up the analogy I just mentioned would be sufficient. People might not be technically minded but they aren't idiots.

      An even better analogy would be, "The crime was committed on 28th street. This guy's private records indicate that he's been to 28th street in the last several weeks. Hence, guilty as charged."

      Except that's pretty much every city in the world has a "28th street." I'm quite sure a jury is capable of understanding this.

    18. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAC addresses maybe?

    19. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 1
      MAC addresses maybe?

      A MAC would only show up in the ARP table (which is memory-only, not stored on disk), and only if he was physically connected to their LAN. Assuming he did connect to their network, it would have been over the Internet proper, and MAC addresses would never come into the equation.

    20. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "ATM machine PIN number"?

    21. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I do not use 192.168.0.0/24 on my internal network. Doing so just gives away a critical peice of security information. I use a /29 (248 subnet mask) in an odd place. I also make sure any unused IPs are taken by dummy NICs to make it harder to get on my internal LAN.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    22. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny


      I use a /29 (248 subnet mask) in an odd place.

      "What, like the back of a volkswagen?"
      - obligatory Mallrats reference:

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    23. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by coene · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's approximately... 0%. You can't route from internal 10.10.10.0/24 to another 10.10.10.0/24 past your initial network. Think about it.

    24. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      uncomfortable place, not odd place.

    25. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 1
      "Oooh look, this guy made a little mistake, what an ignorant American!" Aren't you making a whole fucking boatload of assumptions yourself? Such as, for example, what my attitudes are toward the rest of the world, for one thing?

      My point was that there are common private IP addresses, and common street names. s/28th street/Station Road/, okay?

      I can think of far more important mistaken assumptions to make, than whether all cities have numbered streets in them. Such as Nixon giving the "V" sign to the citizens of Italy, for example.

    26. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by pclminion · · Score: 1

      No, my point was if he did have some private IP in a logfile somewhere, there's no way to demonstrate that that IP came from Valve's internal LAN, as opposed to some other internal LAN.

    27. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uncomfortable place, not odd place.

      Like your head, stuck in your arse?

    28. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      The warrant says they're looking for "internal IP addresses"
      No, it says "any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks". The warrant also says that they can seize whatever they like for offsite examination so the specifics really don't mean that much.
      This is like saying, "The murder victim's last name was Smith, and this guy has a reference to a Mr. Smith in his Rolodex. He must be guilty."
      It's a warrant, not a case. It says that if a machine has a Valve IP address then that may be evidence of hacking. They're not going to prosecute if all they find is an IP address. It's code, documentation, Valve usernames and passwords, and the like that they will want to build a case.
    29. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky it wasn't me. I'm 10.0.0.1

    30. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor? [colingregorypalmer.net]

      American Weblog in London [colingregorypalmer.net]


      Stop your fucking spamming
    31. Re:Looking for "Internal IP Addresses?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the back of a Volkswagon???

  10. upwards? by BitchAss · · Score: 4, Funny

    lost upwards of 9 machines

    Um - how many machines did he lose? 1? 5? 8.5?

    --
    Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
    1. Re:upwards? by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 1

      I took that to mean they seized the parts necessary to assemble "upwards of 9 machines". Make sense?

    2. Re:upwards? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      Hell, in that case I've got around 14 machines strewn around in the closet, attic, under the bed, and out in the garage. I'll be sure to mark them all down on my renters insurance.

    3. Re:upwards? by metlin · · Score: 1

      The blonde agent handed me the seizure receipt to look over and sign. It looked ok to me, but I really had no idea at the time that some items they'd taken weren't on the list.


      I wonder if he will ever get back those things that weren't on the list.

    4. Re:upwards? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      It's more like I wonder if he will ever get back anything that was on the list forget about things off the list. US laws are horid since the 80's about getting any ammount of respect from the law guess thats what happens when you declare war on your populace.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    5. Re:upwards? by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if renters insurance covers items seized by the SS? :)

    6. Re:upwards? by John+Hansen · · Score: 1
      I wonder if renters insurance covers items seized by the SS?

      You could put it down as an "act of God." Maybe they'd accept the claim that way.

  11. Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember the raid on Steve Jackson games? As far as I know those computers still haven't been returned.... even after it was obvious to everyone involved that the raid was a farce and there was nothing illegal going on.

    1. Re:Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Informative

      It had something to do with the fact that Steve Jackson was producing a Cyberpunk game.

      More info:
      http://www.boogieonline.com/revolution/express/tec hno/jackson/
      http://www.sjgames.com/SS/
      http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/SJG/

    2. Re:Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was the main bit, yeah. But as it turns out, an employee there at the time was associated with the Legion of Doom hacker group - some of which were the folks who got a copy of Bellsouth's E911 document, which Bellsouth tried to claim was worth hundreds of thousands of dollars (basically by adding up all of the man-hours logged, AND the cost of every computer used to type the thing up). Operation Sun Devil (which the SJG raid was a part of) was primarily focused on this issue, IIRC.

      The funny bits I remember about that whole episode was SJG telling the SS guy "This is a game" and the guy insisting "No, this is real."

      --

      "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    3. Re:Nothing new... SteveJackson games anyone? by docbombay · · Score: 1

      This incident popped in my head when I first read this article, too. An interesting difference about this situation is that, in the case of SJ, the Secret Service seemed to be acting on its own against against a game company; this time, the FBI and the judicial system appear to be acting on behalf of a game company. Just goes to show you: we geeks are finally taking over the system. :-D

  12. Always on the small guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they raid SCO or someone elso who deserves it AND has the lawyars to do something about it?

  13. Google Cache by OctaneZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is Available of his Weblog entry

  14. FYI... by Bytal · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, Chris Toshok (toshok), the person who wrote up this experience is also one of the head programmers on Ximian's Evolution mail client.

    1. Re:FYI... by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm. As a head programmer I'd imagine he has privledged access to Ximian's machines. Ximian may want to look into data storage if their own computers are taken...

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      when do they arrest the people who wrote nautilus?

    3. Re:FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm, there's a conspiracy against our gnomies going on. First we lose three dedicated GNOME members, and now this?

    4. Re:FYI... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Also, the Hungry Programmers used to be the guys behind the Japhar clean-room Java JVM, the LessTif LGPL Motif-clone and other stuff. These days, I dunno what they are up to, perhaps not much as a group anymore.


      It doesn't really seem like the type of group that would be into breaking into coporate networks and stealing source code for games. I think the FBI/Secret Service get into their mind some sort of crazy "hacker collective" schtick straight outta an IBM commercial and go to town with it. It definitely reeks of a personal vendetta informant kind of deal - you know, "yeah, it was these guys, the 'Hungry Programmers', they are all hackers, and Chris Toshok is behind the whole thing". Drop liberally on IRC #2600 and other known Fed hangouts, and in a few weeks, presto, probable cause and search warrants.

    5. Re:FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. As a head programmer I'd imagine he has privledged access to Ximian's machines.

      [conspiracy] Hmm... increased cooperation among intelligence agencies... Ximian may want to watch out for NSA-types seeking commit privileges to the main development systems.. [/conspiracy]

    6. Re:FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for their "clean-room" Half-Life clone!

  15. Little do they know... by robson · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the raid on the Hungry Programmers was the result of a miscommunication between Valve and the FBI -- Valve had actually traced the breakin back to an ip address in Hungary.

    (collective groan)
    Thanks, thank you, I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:Little do they know... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know, Hungarians are too busy making porno movies to actually be hacking... seriously... I'd provide a link to back it up, but I'm at work...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  16. Now is about the time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    he's really regretting downloading all of that German shizer porn.

  17. Bring me Gordon! by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 1

    G.W. must really want to play some Half Life 2, because he sent out the secret service agents to nip it in the bud!

  18. external IP addresses by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boy.... I better delete that 207.173.176.142 off my caching DNS server quick.

    *ding dong*

    Oh no!!! TOOO LATE!!!!!

    Seriously, that's about the dumbest warrent condition ever IMHO.

    1. Re:external IP addresses by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Having the IP address on a DNS cache not very incriminating, but what they're basically saying is that they know remote contact with Valve's IP space was involved in the crime, so they want any device in his house capable of keeping any IP-based log to see if anything incriminating turns up there...

  19. Wording and tense.. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Interesting
    look at how the summary was phrased "San Fransisco native had his house raided by the FBI and lost...."

    Rather than "FBI agents, acting under a warrant issued due to probable cause having been ascertained, ..."

    welcome to slashdot.

    1. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innocent until pr...nah.

      FBI is my friend. FBI protects us.

      FBI? We stayed alive because of me!

      Not listening.

      Sooooftware Piiirate...

    2. Re:Wording and tense.. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Didn't you know? Geeks are always presumed innocent on Slashdot. Unless they are infringing on the GPL or accused of spamming. Then they are presumed guilty.

      Slashdot is a good example of why a true democracy would be a bad idea. A person can be smart, but people are dumb.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Wording and tense.. by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you have to love the bit about whether the agents had "guns drawn" when he opened the door. There's nothing to suggest they actually did - but by tossing the reference in there, the FBI sounds much more menacing, don't they?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "probable cause"? Damn good thing I lived by myself my college years, since the SF native's crime was apparently that he roomed with a member of these Hungry Programmers once upon a time (he wasn't even charged, though they reserve the right to charge him after they're done plan^H^H^H^H"recovering" evidence from his system).

      It would be nice to know what the FBI took that wasn't listed on his seizure receipt. Its pretty much guaranteed that he's not seeing those items back ever, and he's pretty much going to have to write off the rest of the computer equipment as well as the FBI (from what I've heard, anyway) usually keeps it for years, guilty or not.

      Now, the rest of the seizures of the actual Hungry Programmers' equipment, that would be a valid use of the power, as those people are actually members of the suspected group.

    5. Re:Wording and tense.. by Mononoke · · Score: 1, Troll
      Rather than "FBI agents, acting under a warrant issued due to probable cause having been ascertained, ..."
      Thanks to Bush's raping of the Constitution: Probable cause isn't even a requirement anymore, nor is judicial oversight. In other words, some clerk in the courthouse can sign your life away now solely on the whim of someone with a badge and a gun.

      Oops, pardon me. Someone's at the door...

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    6. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, we learned after those pictures of the feds pointing their guns at the kid from Cuba that running around pointing guns at people is standard operating procedure in all home invasions.

    7. Re:Wording and tense.. by joepa · · Score: 1

      Yes, my friend, if you want Fair and Balanced, you're at the wrong place.

      /me hopes someone appreciates the double entendre.

    8. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TROLL? This is one of the most relevant and insightful things I've read on slashdot in recent memory.

    9. Re:Wording and tense.. by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was that executive action or did it have to be passed partially by congress as well? In other words, there's a lot more people to blame then just Bush. (And they should all be blamed.)

    10. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah sorry, a good editor beat michael to his sensationalistic and editorilistic headlines

    11. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, Kenja. Quit acting like anyone gives a shit.

    12. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and you're not just talking out of you ass.

    13. Re:Wording and tense.. by radixvir · · Score: 1

      he later said in the blog that his roommate woke up to guns drawn, then had to dress in front of the agents

    14. Re:Wording and tense.. by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      heh

      his bit on snl a week or two ago was pretty good

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    15. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, guns drawn! On butcher paper! With crayons! In menacing multicolor!

    16. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't bother us with facts!

    17. Re:Wording and tense.. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't be too careful when you're raiding the homes of suspected hackers. You know they all play those shooting games, like Earthquake and Counter Strike, so they're pretty much trained killers.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    18. Re:Wording and tense.. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like its standard practise as they don't know what will be behind the next door they knock.

      All a by-product of IT ignorance and calling all "hackers" terrorists regardless if they just hack their own system or download some code or break into the CIA, its all the same to someone with no computer knowledge (ie the police/security services).

      O/T. I had a friend once in the UK (so police never have guns unless its serious) who lived in a shared house. The gasman came to check the meter one day and noticed a firearm on the sofa. Of course it was a plastic model...My friend was sat smoking up in his front room when the door was knocked by 8 policemen with guns asking about "a firearm". He instantly realised what it was, said "ah you mean this", went to pick it up and promptly got jumped on by 5 armed police who thought they were about to get blown away. All got happily sorted in the end, I'd imagine had he been in America he wouldn't be around to tell that tale.

    19. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait ... you mean that Al Franken was playing a little joke on Fox?! He wasn't really trying to rip them off?

    20. Re:Wording and tense.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      All got happily sorted in the end, I'd imagine had he been in America he wouldn't be around to tell that tale.

      In America, there would be no tale. It's legal to own guns.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    21. Re:Wording and tense.. by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the US, people are assumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when they're really nice people who work for respected open-source software companies. Chris Toshok is fairly well-known in the open-source community (I'm amazed the summary didn't mention the he's an Evolution developer). If this happened to someone you knew, and you couldn't imagine them having done it, you'd probably use the same type of language.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    22. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than "FBI agents, acting under a warrant issued due to probable cause having been ascertained, ..."

      Oh, come on. Do you really think there was a probable cause? That safeguard meant something 20 years ago when the USA was a free country with constitutional protections against government excess, but it doesn't mean squat today.

    23. Re:Wording and tense.. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 5, Informative

      Geeks are always presumed innocent on Slashdot. You think that's bad? I hear there's a place called "America" where EVERYONE is presumed innocent until proven guilty! Talk about insane! It must just be a legend.

    24. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think that the judges, prosecutors, and investigators are all involved in a malicious plot to steal 9 computers. Not only that, but I believe that they were duped by the bush administration into believing that the theft of some video game source code was equivalent to terrorism because they're too stupid to know otherwise. Furthermore, I believe that you, some tin-foil-beanie AC with no real knowledge of the actual world works but rather snippets of conspiracybabble gleaned from reading slashdot paranoia is smarter than them all. Praise Jeebus!

    25. Re:Wording and tense.. by frost22 · · Score: 1
      In the US, people are assumed innocent until proven guilty

      Huh ? What US are you talking of ?

      The same US that just invaded a whole country and killed hundereds - if not thousands - of its inhabitants in the process on unproven and probably made-up charges ?
      The same US that created a special prision where it keeps people indefinitely without any (due or not due) process, without access to a lawyer and where it claims these people have absolutely no rights whatsoever, on a technicality ?

      You must be kidding....
      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    26. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are menacing. they can do whatever they want -- and most do. wake up.

    27. Re:Wording and tense.. by damiam · · Score: 1

      Actions on the part of one politcal administration do not counteract 200 years of law. The US invasion of Iraq (which, let it be known, I disagreed with) probably saved more innocent lives than it cost, if you agree that Saddamm Hussein did kill thousands of his own people (fairly well-documented) and would have killed more over time. The people held in Guantanamo are (correct me if I'm wrong here) not US citizens, so however badly they may be treated, it's not relevent to my point - which is that, in the US, citizens are legally assumed to be innocent until proven guilty.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    28. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, look, a police state apologist. Never saw one of *those* before.

    29. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same US that just invaded a whole country and killed hundereds - if not thousands - of its inhabitants

      You can't throw that out without mentioning the hundreds of thousands of people that Saddam killed.

    30. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is indeed true. Don't forget that ESR, officially the world's #1 Person Most Likely To Describe Himself As A Hacker Even If His Audience Equate That With Pure Evil, is also a gun nut^W^Wadvocate for second-amendment rights...

    31. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but assume the police were there for some other reason and he so much as looked at his toy gun. Life expectancy tending rapidly toward zero there methinks.

      Whenever a cop shoots someone dead in Britain, they talk about it on prime-time TV for weeks. Kinda hard to imagine that from an American perspective.

    32. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hear there's a place called "America" where EVERYONE is presumed innocent until proven guilty! Talk about insane! It must just be a legend.

      Tell that to the "unlawful combatants" in Camp Delta.

      Oh, wait, your courts managed to find a legal technicality there, didn't they?

    33. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You didn't actually mention that people had to be US citizens before they acquired any rights. And I have to say that I'm not very impressed by the principle of "innocent until proven guilty or foreign" - I'd have expected an advanced democracy founded on the principle that all humans are created equal to be able to respect the rights of those unfortunate enough to be citizens of other states (including Britain, which was a democracy and one of our fucking allies last time I checked.)

    34. Re:Wording and tense.. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Whenever a cop shoots someone dead in America, it's big news - particularly if that person is in their own home. In some parts of the country, that's almost guaranteed to spark riots and protests.

      The bullets don't fly here nearly as much as some might expect. :-)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    35. Re:Wording and tense.. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "My friend was sat smoking up in his front room when the door was knocked by 8 policemen with guns asking about "a firearm". He instantly realised what it was, said "ah you mean this", went to pick it up and promptly got jumped on by 5 armed police who thought they were about to get blown away. All got happily sorted in the end, I'd imagine had he been in America he wouldn't be around to tell that tale."

      If this was in America, they would have laughed at the toy gun, and then sent him to jail for 5 years for possession.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    36. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be too careful when you're raiding the homes of suspected hackers. You know they all play those shooting games, like Earthquake and Counter Strike, so they're pretty much trained killers.

      Yeah and whoever stole the HL source would better trained than most ;-)

    37. Re:Wording and tense.. by justins · · Score: 1
      And you have to love the bit about whether the agents had "guns drawn" when he opened the door. There's nothing to suggest they actually did - but by tossing the reference in there, the FBI sounds much more menacing, don't they?

      Since they had their guns drawn when they approached his roomate it's not exactly an absurd assumption. Perhaps you didn't read that far.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    38. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they have some really hard core armour.

    39. Re:Wording and tense.. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      good point, no arguing with that, france? :-)

    40. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stereotypes of Americans are rather amusing.

    41. Re:Wording and tense.. by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      I hear there's a place called "America" where EVERYONE is presumed innocent until proven guilty! Talk about insane! It must just be a legend.

      Welcome to America! You must be new here.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    42. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you know, San Francisco has the most lenient courts in the country. Supposed to be a bastion of liberty and liberalism. I believe the title was meant to depict the level of the activity in regards to regional culture.

    43. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Earthquake" is what sells it.

    44. Re:Wording and tense.. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Umm... I'm very much inclined to believe they did have guns drawn when he opened the door.

      Why do I say that?

      Personal experience. I ran a multi-line BBS for quite some time, and my parents' place was raided by the FBI, over suspicion of "copyright infringement" on the BBS. I wasn't even home at the time, but my parents told me a team of at least 8 federal agents came in with guns drawn, and one of them waving a search warrant.

      Even more ridiculous, at least one of the agents was apparently there just to learn more about how to conduct these types of raids. She was picking up CDs in my room with such things as Linux distros and asking the other agents if they were pirated software or not.

      (A couple of them even had a debate over whether or not they should confiscate one of my stereo speakers.... a bass subwoofer on the floor that was in a black wood enclosure. One of them seemed to think it might be a part of a computer.)

    45. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is the case in most modern democracies...

    46. Re:Wording and tense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is there a democracy? The US is a republic.

    47. Re:Wording and tense.. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Hahahahahahaha!

      You don't see what's funny about that, do you?

    48. Re:Wording and tense.. by k8to · · Score: 1

      This has happened with startling regularity in Oakland, California, in which I live. Sure, each incident makes the news, but it isn't discussed for weeks, and hasn't sparked any sort of riot.

      The overall TREND has certainly earned the Oakland police department a terrible reputation, and has caused some changes including the castigation of the "Riders", causing most of them to no longer be employed by the police department. However, each incident has not become a public focus for weeks.

      --
      -josh
  20. HL2 code theft by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part. Until now it was just harmless marketing lies. The delay had little if anything to do with the code theft -- that was only a convenient excuse.

    Someday I would like to see a game company create a game in an open way. They should have all their engine code out in the open so anybody could follow the progress and even contribute if they felt like it. They would not need to make up stuff about release dates because the public could easily find out the status of completion themselves. And if their source code gets stolen by other companies, they can just go all SCO on their asses. On the other hand, they can also make clear that if a hobbiest uses the engine code that they own the copyright. Smart game companies do that last part already.

    All it will take is one brave company to revolutionize the industry. Happens all the time.

    1. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you try looking at the Relic Developer Network www.relic.com

    2. Re:HL2 code theft by iii_rjm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And why would I, as a developer, be the least bit interested in some wannabe adding to my codebase. If you are any good and I want your help I will offer you a job. Further, What business is it of anybody in what progress I am or am not making in producing a product that I want to sell. If you can't wait what do I care. If I lose a sale because I am taking to long it's nobodys business or problem but my own.

    3. Re:HL2 code theft by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Soldner? http://www.secretwars.net/ It's got an open engine.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:HL2 code theft by servognome · · Score: 1

      If your code is open then somebody will bring the game out to market before you are finished. Some people could care less about quality, just look at HL2 being sold in Russia.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:HL2 code theft by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Unless you're answerable to a publicly held company. Then it's the SEC's business.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    6. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such an open development model would make sense for say a multiplayer strategy game, but maybe not (for) a FPS solo adventure, where often much of the wow factor comes from surprises in the plot, seeing and experiencing the game world and visuals for the first time (excluding limited demo peeks), and stuff like that. Multiplayer FPS games in turn would suffer from the inevitable cheats springing up quickly.

      But good for some game types, for sure. (And indeed "first person shooter" is ne of the most primitive types of game; much more sophisticated concepts and genres could be developed with the open approach...)

    7. Re:HL2 code theft by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of game developers do it for money. Some do it because they like to bring enjoyment to others. I do not have a problem with you not being one of those; that you program for simple ego is none of my business, surely. But that does not make you in any way relevant. I suggested a way for those interested in making money to make more money. If you do not want money, that is fine.

    8. Re:HL2 code theft by Dalroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part. Until now it was just harmless marketing lies. The delay had little if anything to do with the code theft -- that was only a convenient excuse

      How do you know it didn't affect and delay the product? Do you work for Valve? Where's your proof?

      I can tell you, at my company, if there was a break-in that got all our code, we'd be up shit creek. There would be a complete overhaul of all our processes, interviews with all the personel, new security training, new procedures, a complete audit, and worst of all talented and hard working people would get fired. All of this would take time, affect everybody, and slow every project down.

      I find it hard to belive that Valve didn't go through something similar internally. If you're going to make drastic claims like this, at least provide some proof or reasoning behind your logic.

      Bryan

    9. Re:HL2 code theft by Matt2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part.

      Wrong. Charging Valve with fraud would require that they were somehow illegaly profiting from delaying the release date. Since the product isn't for sale, pray tell how this can be considered fraud under any aspect of law!

      Golly I completely forgot about the 1987 Digital Entertainment act that required game makers to hold to tentative release dates! Bastards!

      >Until now it was just harmless marketing lies.

      What's this? Oh no! A company that markets their product! Where is the justice!

      > Someday I would like to see a game company create a game in an open way. They should have all their engine code out in the open so anybody could follow the progress and even contribute if they felt like it.

      And some day I would like to see all commercial ventures opened up under the watchful eye of a high council of elves, leprechauns, and magical wood faries! Using their arcane magics for the betterment of mankind, we will transform the world into an utopian paridise, where every jack-ninny can voice their opinion equally, even in private commercial and private forums! Lo, in this brave new future disease will be cured, everyone will earn $50K USD annual salary because knowledge is intrinsically designed to be free and open to everyone!

      Viva la revolution!

    10. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get this attitude. The shareholders can always sell their stock, no? The boss can always fire you for incompetence, no?

      What's this weird need to get the SEC babysitting everything everywhere?

    11. Re:HL2 code theft by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I did not say that they would get charged with fraud. They won't, surely. I meant that if they claim more damages in court than exist in reality, that is fraud.

      The "elves" and "leprechauns" part of you post suggests some sort of increasing impairment as you were writing.

    12. Re:HL2 code theft by Amnesiac1 · · Score: 1

      And if their source code gets stolen by other companies, they can just go all SCO on their asses.

      Yeah, just look how well THAT strategy is working out...

    13. Re:HL2 code theft by iii_rjm · · Score: 1

      Really? The SEC can tell me to hire more programmers? The SEC can tell me I am taking to long to produce my product?

    14. Re:HL2 code theft by iii_rjm · · Score: 1

      You need to stop looking at motivation as A or B or C. People are much more complex then that. Really. I love writing software. I love getting paid to write software. I love the ego boost I get when customers express their delight in the product I have made for them. I love the feeling of satisfaction I get when it all works right, even more so when it works right the first time :). Be that as it may perhaps you could give some examples of how your two sugestions have made people who write software more money? Has it worked for you? How much time do you have to spend separating the wheat from the chaff?

    15. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amazing thing about slashdot is how some asshat can post tripe that's so incoherent it doesn't make any sense (what is the business model in what he describes, why would this be in a company's best interests, etc), but as long as it involves making source code available and some wanna-be vision about that leading to a revolutionlized industry, then whamo! Modded up city.

    16. Re:HL2 code theft by Arti · · Score: 1

      I quite like the surprise associated with buying a fresh game or downloading a high quality demo after receiving no more information than a few tantalising previews or screenshots. One of the best gaming experiences I ever had was buying Xcom: Apocalyps hot off the shelf after walking into a game shop and seeing it sitting there with no warning, just BAM, having previously been unaware of its existence.

    17. Re:HL2 code theft by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      I have the feeling that you did not read the first post that carefully. Examples of something that hasn't been tried? Well, anyway. The main point is that it is a way to keep customers up to date on release dates without embarassment. (If you don't think that release dates are a big deal, then you don't know the market.) If someone does not want to accept user contributions to code, then they don't have to. All I am saying is that code secrecy does not buy them as much as is commonly supposed.

    18. Re:HL2 code theft by EverDense · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of game developers do it for money.

      Quite frankly, this is bullshit.
      [A] You can earn heaps more developing business apps.
      [B] No semi-sane person works ridiculously long hours on something they don't enjoy.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    19. Re:HL2 code theft by SQLz · · Score: 1
      Quoted Material:

      I can tell you, at my company, if there was a break-in that got all our code, we'd be up shit creek. There would be a complete overhaul of all our processes, interviews with all the personel, new security training, new procedures, a complete audit, and worst of all talented and hard working people would get fired. All of this would take time, affect everybody, and slow every project down.

      Or you could just have people uninstall Outlook Express...

    20. Re:HL2 code theft by SQLz · · Score: 1

      All this because Gabe couldn't resist opening the attachment on that 'Lose W.e.i.g.h.t, Feel Younger and Look Great' email.

    21. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Whoa, you've got to be joking! This is IP we're talking about! If a company let's it run wild, then sooner or later they will let all of their competitors catch up and steal their ideas, if not code. Valve stands to make millions of dollars on this one game... they have probably spent millions as well to develop it. So while you're sympathizing with the hackers, maybe you should give some thought to the hard working coders who put time into this project.

      I seriously doubt that FBI agents are as clueless as they used to be. I wouldn't be surprised if these guys are at least somewhat culpable. The only explanation if they're not is if someone broke into their own networks and planted the evidence on them.

    22. Re:HL2 code theft by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      Or you could just have people uninstall Outlook Express...

      UUCP, POP3, IMAP, and IMAP over HTTPS are blocked at the router level at my company. So is Hot Mail, MSN, Yahoo Mail, Juno, as well as a number of other web based mail sites.

      Uninstalling Outlook Express has little effect when it doesn't even work in the first place, now does it?

      Bryan

    23. Re:HL2 code theft by Drantin · · Score: 1

      *hears exclamations of 'don't bite the trolls', but ignores them*
      Of course you aren't interested in having some 'wannabe' adding to your codebase, who would be? But, rather than have them just add to the code itself, they could submit code/patches that help you get done in days what may have taken weeks, you still retain control of the codebase, if they submit stuff you don't like, just ignore them for a while and see if they go away. If they submit large amounts of code that fix or enhance things your projects need, then you know you've got someone worth hiring. How can you know who to hire if you don't allow all the people you might hire to start submitting code? You don't. If you open the code, and the project is interesting enough, you will most likely get people trying to help, look at any interesting open-source project from over the past few years (and/or decade) How much of the functionality that those submissions from people who had other jobs they wouldn't have wanted to leave would be in there today if it had been developed in a more restricted environment? Or what about people like Marcello Tosatti who started working on such things when they weren't old enough to have a job in the states? (He did have one, but it wasn't in the States..), And the really nice thing about open sourceing whatever your project is? If you don't like the way those random guys are doing things to your project, rewrite the stuff so it works better, you don't have to accept ANY of the patches sent in by outside people... none at all...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    24. Re:HL2 code theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "impairment" being the growing feeling of "I can't understand why I'm wasting my time replying to such a callow opinion."

    25. Re:HL2 code theft by randyest · · Score: 1

      You're attempt at damage control only made me laugh harder at your idiocy and the hilarity of the poster that 0wned you, in a humourous and polite manner.

      Let's face it -- YOU FAIL IT!

      --
      everything in moderation
    26. Re:HL2 code theft by SQLz · · Score: 1

      When Valve first annouced the problem they said they cracker got in by exploiting a buffer overflow in the Outlook preview pane which installed a key sniffer. Several people at the company fell for the trick. Hence, I made a comment about Outlook.

    27. Re:HL2 code theft by BigCdawg · · Score: 1

      Do I smell copious sarcasm? And actually that's "Viva la revolucion"...

    28. Re:HL2 code theft by randyest · · Score: 1

      No, please ignore the idiot.

      --
      everything in moderation
    29. Re:HL2 code theft by randyest · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. No matter how many times anyone reads your first post they will not find any mention of "a way for those interested in making money to make more money".

      And if you think giving daily updates on release schedules will make more money (hell, I know it's weak, but that's the only meat in your vapid post), it is you that doesn't "know the market".

      Judging by your posts in other threads you seem like a relatively sane and intelligent individual, so why are you posting such stupidity in this one? Is it trolltime?

      Show use how open-source game engines can (or better, do) make more money than closed-source ones or please STFU. Your silly ideology is getting annoying.

      --
      everything in moderation
    30. Re:HL2 code theft by randyest · · Score: 1

      How can you know who to hire if you don't allow all the people you might hire to start submitting code?

      Look for the best mods after you release your (safe) SDK.

      look at any interesting open-source project from over the past few years (and/or decade)

      You first: name a financially successful open-source game engine.

      --
      everything in moderation
    31. Re:HL2 code theft by randyest · · Score: 1

      "It" doesn't exist yet. We can pick up from here when (if) it's released.

      And where did you learn that its engine is open? Their FAQ does not mention it. Seems like it would, were it.

      --
      everything in moderation
    32. Re:HL2 code theft by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Valve have said, publically, that they're putting the launch back to ensure those with the leaked source code can't engineer cheats/cracks/whatever for HL2. As they had the source code, it would be quite simple to do. Understandably, they don't want to release a huge game (possibly the biggest so far) to an army of 14-year-old script kiddies with the latest HL2 cracks, and watch them tear it apart.

      They simply have too much riding on this game to take any chances.

      Your idea about public contribution is pretty insane. Have you ever played many online games? As soon as there's a hint of a cheat for one, every little loser in the world uses it. Yes, theoretically, the game producer could make a flawless game impenetrable to even the most tenacious cracker, but that's never going to be 100% successful. It just takes 0.01% of a game to be vulnerable for it to be made useless online. The leaked code is 100% vulnerable - you do the maths.

    33. Re:HL2 code theft by iii_rjm · · Score: 1
      Can you point me to a for profit open souce project? It does not even have to be one that is making money at this point. It just needs to be one who think they can make money doing this.

      I ask because I have a hard understanding how a person/company expects to make money selling software developed in this manner. One cavet it must be a company selling the 'software' not one selling 'support for the software'.

    34. Re:HL2 code theft by Drantin · · Score: 1
      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
  21. Yeah ok... by codefungus · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...remind me to never do anything with Valve!

    ---
    stupid 20 seconds.

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  22. System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The FBI came with a blonde woman agent carrying the warrent and trying to be as nice as they can to a suspect. Let's face it, that's what this guy, and his entire group, appears to be right now.

    You don't need to be proven guilty by any standard to become a suspect. To get a warrant, they do need to present something to a judge, but what that something is usually remains sealed. That's how the system works, there was a due process for taking his property.

    So, the good news for him is so far that the FBI's just fishing on his machines right now. If they find what they're looking for, or anything else very illegal to have, then they'll be back with the cuffs.

    1. Re:System working.... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Ok, then, so just out of curiosity, do you place more blame on the agents for being shady, or for being incompetant? Same question regarding the judge(s).

      Not trying to be a troll. I just think that no matter how solid the case might be against someone, there are always going to be people that might as well call themselves anarchists ready to point the finger to blame someone else.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    2. Re:System working.... by Alric · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post touched on a very important topic: If they find what they're looking for, or anything else very illegal to have, then they'll be back with the cuffs.

      What is the legal scope of their search?

      For example, let's pretend this Toshok fellow is completely innocent, and the FBI search of his computers establishes zero link to their original investigation. However, on one computer they find thousands of dollars of unlicensed software and thousands of pirated MP3s and divx vids. Can they confiscate his computer for such an unrelated offense? Can they charge him with a crime? What if during the search of his apartment they found some drugs and an unregistered weapon?

      Exactly where is the line?

    3. Re:System working.... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it really working?

      Is it reasonable to sieze everything (including things not on the list, if his story's true...) in sight on a mere suspicion? Sounds like unreasonable search and siezure to me. Considering that the Hungry programmers aren't the ones that were off and bragging about it, I have a very big suspicion that we're seeing another Steve Jackson Games debacle playing before our eyes. While I'm going to give the Feds some benefit of doubt- it's not a lot, as they're not all lilly-white pure followers of what the law states, including the Constitution and they've been guilty of some rather heinous acts themselves in the relatively recent past.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    4. Re:System working.... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      As long as the search and warrant were carried out by the book, you can indeed be nailed for other crimes if evidence turns up during the search. If the warrant says they can search his hard drives, and they find loads of kiddie porn, you bet they can use that in court.

      The line is written out in the search warrant, as to what they can search. It's not like they're supposed to find evidence of an unrelated crime and turn a blind eye to it...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:System working.... by bssea · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to cases that I've looked at (which isn't many), you are technically wrong.

      I quote:

      United States v. Carey, 172 F.3d 1268, 1270-71 (10th Cir. 1999). In Carey, the Tenth Circuit suppressed evidence of child pornography seized under a warrant authorizing officers to search for evidence of the sale and possession of cocaine. See id. In this case, however, the search at all times remained focused on the seizure of items related to alleged acts of sexual misconduct. At all times the warrants sought only evidence of sexual crimes and the warrants were not disregarded to seize evidence of other, unrelated crimes. The holding in Carey does not apply to this case.

      Source:
      http://www.supremecourt.nm.org/pastopin ion/VIEW/00 ca-062.html

      Number 17.

      So a court *can* suppress evidence found using a search warrant if that evidence is taken using a warrant meant for something different.

      --sea

    6. Re:System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but here's the basics of the rules of evidence...

      As long as where they've gotten where they are on investigation X legally, and they just happen to stumble into something that starts investigation Y, it's fair play.

      They can't go breaking down doors for no good reason and looking for a dead body. However, if they had a legal reason to be in the house, and there's a rug over what looks like the shape of a dead body, they do have the ability to look at what's under the rug even if that wasn't in their original warrant... such a thing is just too big to have ignored.

      So, I doubt they're going to do a low-level scan for kiddie porn since kiddie porn has absolutely nothing to do with the investigation they're doing. However, if they find a kiddie porn image as his main desktop image or as part of a screen saver... that's just too big to miss and they're going to then start looking deeper at that. I doubt he's that stupid, so he'll get his PCs back in a few months.

    7. Re:System working.... by bssea · · Score: 1

      If they took something not on the list, that can be shown to not fit into any categories that the FBI is authorized to search for... then a court can, and probably will, supress the evidence. See my above post.

      --sea

    8. Re:System working.... by gozar · · Score: 1
      IANAL, but I do watch a lot of Law & Order :-). If the warrant was only for information on Valve and Half-Life, I'm pretty sure that anything else that they find would not be admissible into the court. Now, this doesn't mean that they couldn't find some reason to go back to a judge and get another search warrant for other things, but they would have to find some evidence of wrong doing going on that did not involve the first search. It would be pretty hard to do.

      As always, I'm sure it would be prudent to clear this through a lawyer!

      --
      What, me worry?
    9. Re:System working.... by chaoticset · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The FBI came with a blonde woman agent carrying the warrent and trying to be as nice as they can to a suspect. Let's face it, that's what this guy, and his entire group, appears to be right now.

      People unwilling to identify themselves significantly are not, in my opinion, being "nice". As far as these guys know, they were invaded by a bunch of extremely well-organized burglars. The badges mean nothing if you cannot compare them to something else.


      As for the "fishing"...if he's got anything deeply encrypted on those machines, he'll never get them back. Period.

      --

      -----------------------
      You are what you think.
    10. Re:System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The proper thing to do would be once they stumble into the first signs that there's likely to be a trove of kiddie porn on a general hacking suspect's computer would be to run back to the judge and basically say: "While we were searching for X, we opened up the C:\ drive icon on the system and discovered a folder labelled 'kiddie porn'. Based on that label at face value, it's highly likely that illegal child pornography is in that directory. Can we have an expanded scope to go looking into that?" New warrant gets issued... and everything's clean...

    11. Re:System working.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else would they show him? They announced their identity as FBI agents, produced their badges, and showed him the search warrant, while standing outside his domicile. They didn't do a no-knock, they didn't force their way in, they didn't threaten him or rough him up in any way. Just what constitutes "identify[ing] themselves significantly" in your world? Or is this your "I hate the MAN" knee-jerk out of control again?

    12. Re:System working.... by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

      So, the good news for him is so far that the FBI's just fishing on his machines right now. If they find what they're looking for, or anything else very illegal to have, then they'll be back with the cuffs.

      From my understanding of how the Constitution works, the "or anything else very illegal" shouldn't be in there. If they had knocked on this guy's door serving the warrant, and they found a bag of weed on his coffee table, they couldn't do anything about it. The guy would hopefully have the humility and common sense to dispose/hide it once he realised that the Feds were in his house, and the Feds --might-- have some power to dispose of it, but he couldn't be charged with anything related to the pot.

      Now, in searching of this guy's hard drive, if they had found nothing relevant to the investigation, but did find instructions on how to build a meth lab, 2 GB of kiddie porn, and a copy of the source to Windows, they couldn't do anything because it's not what the warrant allows them to search for.

      It comes from the fifth amendment (I'm pretty sure... don't feel like looking it up right now...)

      From my understanding of what's going on, this guy will get his computers back "soon" (a couple of months) unless a) he's actually guilty of something, or b) the actual guity party used his computer as some sort of intermediary device.

      Even from the guy's own account, the agents seemed to have been polite and operating within every limit of the law. His complaints of having to be monitored every minute while the search was happening seems completely logical to me, as it is important to make sure that he's not off destroying what they are looking for.

      -mo

    13. Re:System working.... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's an interesting case, but if you read further, it sounds like the proper way to proceed is for the investigator to seek an expanded warrant, when he/she first finds unrelated, yet criminal material. In the Carey case, the officer found kiddie porn, and diverted his search from drug-related files to assessing how much illegal porn was on the machine, going outside the scope of his warrant. If he had stopped right away and sought another warrant, it would have been OK.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    14. Re:System working.... by jratcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The key issue for search warrants related to physical (i.e. non-cyber) evidence is "plain sight." In other words, if the cops get a warrant to search your apt for drugs, and you have an illegal machine gun lying on the kitchen table, that's admissable. If they've got a warrant to search for drugs, and they find kiddie porn on your (turned-off) computer, that likely wouldn't be admissable, since there's no way that a search for packets of white powder could reasonably involve booting up the PC.

    15. Re:System working.... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      I can answer that. If they find evidence of another crime, then that evidence is valid as along as the search warrant was valid. For example, if they were looking through all his belongings for a CD-ROM (limited to anything in which a CD-ROM can fit), and they find some drugs, then the drugs are admissible in court.

      I'm not so sure that they'd bother prosecuting him for violating copyright, because it's generally not a criminal offense unless you're in it for the money (or violate parts of the DCMA, I suppose). But say they find child pornography? Then he's going up the river for a very long time, unless he can show that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and was therefore invalid.

      Actually, since you can put 128Mb or more on a keychain USB drive, they can probably toss his entire home looking for data.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    16. Re:System working.... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      It's not a mere suspicion. A reasonable suspicion is enough for a cop to stop you on the street and ask questions, or pull over your car. A search warrant must be supported by "probable cause", which means the FBI had to have gotten some information, maybe from an informant, or from a chatroom or something, that lead them to reasonable conclusion that there is evidence of a crime in the home, and that evidence would be found with a search.

      At this point in time, we don't know what the search warrant was based on, because we haven't read the warrant.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    17. Re:System working.... by Soothh · · Score: 0

      As off topic as this may be,(in your sig) the words "taxpayer" and "citizen of the united states of america" dont really belong together, sub taxpayer with resident, sure. Atleast be open to the idea, with all the word trickery they use in things like "the patriot act" and so forth, they have been doing it for years in the tax codes.
      state and local.

      --
      We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
    18. Re:System working.... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What else would they show him? They announced their identity as FBI agents, produced their badges, and showed him the search warrant, while standing outside his domicile. They didn't do a no-knock, they didn't force their way in, they didn't threaten him or rough him up in any way. Just what constitutes "identify[ing] themselves significantly" in your world?

      2 items (though I'm not the previous poster, obviously), assuming that his account was correct:

      1) They pulled him outside to let the agents get into the building. This certainly isn't rough treatment, but it's also not the way a search warrant is supposed to be carried out. They're not permitted, in any way, to remove you from your home.

      2) They refused to allow him to have any form of identification from them, though he didn't try to copy down their names and badge numbers (at least he didn't state he tried to do so, he did ask for pictures of them/their badges, which seemed a rather strange thing to ask, though useful in the event that you need to report your stuff stolen by a bunch of people claiming to be agents).

      Frankly, the guy also waived a number of his rights during the search, which is his own fault for not having a lawyer on the way (or someone calling a lawyer for him) the minute he saw the FBI and USSS at his door. You should never consent to a search or any part of a search just because they have a warrant. The warrant gives them specific areas they can search and specific things they can search for, any consent may expand the area and/or items they can search. You also do not have to consent to an interview with them, and do not have to answer their questions (though it's best to answer questions relevant to the search authorized by the warrant, as being too stubborn may lead to obstruction of justice). Anyway, get a lawyer, as quickly as possible, as this person should have. Leaving was definitely a bad idea beyond all else, and was his problem, not any fault of the officers and agents involved.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    19. Re:System working.... by zarr · · Score: 1

      Why would they need to get a new warrant? The original warrant already gives them the right to look through the _entire_ disk. If the police finds kiddy porn on som guy's computer, but aren't allowed to arrest him at once, you guys (i'm not an american) really need to take a good look at your laws. Or, on second throught, please take a look at your laws anyway.

    20. Re:System working.... by bssea · · Score: 1

      Actually, even if the officer had stopped right away, he may not have gotten a warrant. In order to get a warrant an officer has to have probable cause from material that is in "plain view". These files may or may not fall into that category because the officer had to open the file to see the contents of it. The case pointed to by yourself shows this fact.

      In that case, it just so happened that the officer didn't follow proper procedure anyway, so the issue of the files not being in "plain view" didn't have to be addressed.

      --sea

    21. Re:System working.... by Kethinov · · Score: 1
      What is the legal scope of their search?

      For example, let's pretend this Toshok fellow is completely innocent, and the FBI search of his computers establishes zero link to their original investigation. However, on one computer they find thousands of dollars of unlicensed software and thousands of pirated MP3s and divx vids. Can they confiscate his computer for such an unrelated offense? Can they charge him with a crime? What if during the search of his apartment they found some drugs and an unregistered weapon?

      Exactly where is the line?
      Oh so because pirated MP3s isn't a severe enough crime they should just ignore it? Before you flame me, I think that there should be nothing illegal about unlicensed software, MP3s, and pirated TV/movies. But strictly legally speaking, they're illegal. Now let's put this in prespective. Same example you gave me, they find no HL source violations in Toshok's house, but they find a dead body. By the logic you're implying, should they just leave and ignore the dead body?
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    22. Re:System working.... by filtur · · Score: 1

      You're not allowed to go fishing expeditions, so they are only legally allowed to search for things related to their warrent. If they find other things like tax fraud or something they'd have to get a new warrent issued if they want the evidence against the it to stand up in court.

    23. Re:System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      "On the coffee table" would fall into "plain sight" which means that they could grab that bag, and then go back to the judge and quickly get another warrant to search for more based on the first discovery.

      They can also go after absolutely anything that it looks like somebody's trying to destroy... that creates an emergency that doesn't give them time to get the warrant, and therefore cause to grab immediately.

    24. Re:System working.... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. It gives them the permission to search the entire disk, but only for the stated purpose. If they discover a new purpose, they need a new warrant. The good news is, such an open-and-shut warrant comes absolutely instantly... it's just a matter of waking up the judge on call that night.

    25. Re:System working.... by FussionMan · · Score: 1

      What I'm wondering is whats to keep some agency from planting illegal data on one of his computers?

      And would they have some way of proving that data was not placed on his computers after they were seezed?

      Seems like md5 sums should be run on his data before it is confiscated, inorder to insure that the data is not going to be altered. Otherwise, this type of action gives some currupt agencies the power to jail anyone. And don't tell me that there is no such thing as curruption in government.

    26. Re:System working.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but an officer of the law has the duty to "react" on any illegal items.

      I believe the rule of "plain view" applies, if according to the warrant you are not suppose to "look" (see) the item, it is not admissible.

      In a search for cocaine chances are the search warrant will not give the rights to search numerous sub-directories on the hard drive.

      But the other way around, if the warrant is to search for illegal electronic material, including computers, CD, DVD, and memory chips, you are permitted to check under the bed, and in every drawer for the CD, hard drives and memory chips. If the cops find cocaine in your drawers you are busted.

    27. Re:System working.... by Alric · · Score: 1

      I was merely asking. I was using no logic to imply anything.

      Judging from the responses my post received, there is much debate about exactly where that euphemistic line lies.

      The only point I was trying to make is that I don't know much about law and am too lazy to search through cases. That's it.

      I've read some very interesting examples of similar searches on cars stopped for speeding, and I was wondering what the precedents are for computer affairs.

  23. Now that the Feds have raided by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    the lesstif team, what open source project will be next? the guys at freeciv? mysql?

  24. I think... by Caseyscrib · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe its just Sierra in FBI jackets.

    The evil has spread.

    =)

    1. Re:I think... by silicon1 · · Score: 1

      you mean vivendi right?

    2. Re:I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no, Sierra wrote Half Life and Half Life 2, so they would be the ones doing the raiding. Vivendi has nothing to do with it. You aren't up on this "joke" thing, are you?

    3. Re:I think... by silicon1 · · Score: 1

      no smart guy, Valve Software wrote half life and halfe life 2, Sierra was the publisher of half-life 1 and Vivendi will be the publisher of Half-life2, look who's smart now? huh...

  25. Did he say hes not guilty? by slash-tard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did he say he doesnt know anyone involved, or they didnt use his computers?

    I read the mirror and I didnt see anything about it. If hes guilty, or did have anything to do with this then they should be able to take his computers and serve a search warrant. Try looking at this from law enforcements perspective. Im not some Nazi who supports gestapo like law enforcement either, I just didnt read anything that seemed wrong to me.

    1. Re:Did he say hes not guilty? by jimi1283 · · Score: 1
      At the very end he says he did not do anything illegal. What constitutes legallity in his mind is up for question, but I believe, based on his phrase "the wolves were circling, and everyone pretty well freaked out." indicates at least some level of guilt or conspiration with a guilty party.

      Frankly I was also pretty surprised they did not take his roommates computer(s) as well.

  26. I can imagine the search process... by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    "hmm...kiddie porn...kiddie porn...kiddie porn...dang, nothing here at all."

  27. I don't visit the Games section often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the Secret Service should be raiding whoever came up with this color scheme!

  28. Copying, not theft by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    Unless they no longer have the original, it is not theft. It is copying.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Copying, not theft by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I Belive that now copying something is considered theft by law. I do not agree with this, but if they have now defined it as theft, they are legaly correct in that statement, even if theoricly they are not right.

    2. Re:Copying, not theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it was copying, but you're assuming that's all Valve (and the SS) care about.

      Presumably the entire Valve network (and all computers) would have had to be completely rebuilt & reinstalled after the intrusion. Not even the code itself could be trusted anymore, especially when they're trying to write commercial software.

      This is lost time for the Valve employees when they won't have been able to be productive - trespassing with possible destruction of property leading to damages.

      Then (if memory serves me correctly) whoever had the source attempted to threaten Valve by saying that the game was not as complete as Valve had said.

      This is blackmail.

      Then a boxed copy of HalfLife 2 shows up for sale on the Russian black market.

      This is copyright infringement.

      Whoever hacked Valve has a lot more to worry about than simply "taking a copy" as their actions snowballed into bigger and bigger trouble.

    3. Re:Copying, not theft by imadork · · Score: 1
      I Belive that now copying something is considered theft by law.

      I recently got a GameCube, and Madden 2004. I do read all my software licenses, mostly for a good laugh. The Madden 2004 licence included a phrase that went something like this (paraphrasing, but the stuff in scare quotes was in scare quotes in the license):

      Any duplication of this software is against the law, for any purpose. "Back-Up" or "Archival" copies are not necessary to protect your software, and are not allowed.

      That's nice of them, isn't it? Getting rid of all that messy Fair-Use stuff by saying it's not allowed. I wonder how else my software is protected, if it gets lost, stolen, or my dog eats it?

    4. Re:Copying, not theft by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      What if the infringement causes the original to be worthless? Might stolen be an apt term then?

      Someone got a hold of the HL2 code, which presumably makes it easier to write cheats, thus eliminating most of the fun of online play, which is a big selling factor. Let's say Valve releases the game, only to have cheaters ruin it from day one. They are not going to sell many copies of the game, at least until they fix the issue. Which, when someone holds your entire code base, means doing almost a complete rewrite.

      So, it is reasonable to think that much of the code is entirely useless, as they will have to rewrite it to keep value in the game. However, they already have spent countless hours and dollars developing what they had. Sure, they still have the code, but the time and money is gone, hence stolen.

      I agree with you that in the digital era, things aren't "stolen," per se. However, there are other issues in this case where stolen might be the case, as in time and money. Copying implies that no real damage is done, however, Valve will be delayed in their release date and have to spend probably hundreds of thousands of dollars because of this. Damage was done. "Stolen" may be too harsh, but "copied" is surely too weak.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  29. Hail the power of corporate America! by placeclicker · · Score: 1

    Hail the power of corporate America!

    You think any open source projects could have gotten this done?

    --

    Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    1. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sidenote, im thinking along the lines of GPL violation, not 'stealing' source code.

    2. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by pyros · · Score: 1

      Hail the power of corporate America!

      You think any open source projects could have gotten this done?

      And exactly why would they? It's open source, the source code is given freely to anyone who wants it. If you're talking about a GPL violation by way of not disitrbuting the source to the set of people they distributed the binaries to, wouldn't that be a civil suit? Would the FBI and SS even be involved in a civil suit?
    3. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its just annoying, they have shit for security (remember, it was copied because of OUTLOOK EXPRESS), and now they're using extremley easy to get warrents to raid someone's property, probably to cover it up since they dont have a fucking lead.

      Plus, almost everyone in government is a fucking idiot on technical issues, value could make shit up and they'd hand them a warrent

    4. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by bedurndurn · · Score: 1

      Do I think that the FBI and SS would respond to the theft of code from an open source project? I think whoever sold you your Slashdot phrasebook owes you a refund.

    5. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read

      Im sayng, value was being FUCKING RETARDED to lose the code, and overall the justice system is so stupid on technical issues that valve could make something up that sounded intelligent and they'd get a warrent.

    6. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      Hey, go easy on 'em, they could be from SCO...

      On second thought..

    7. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll fall over dead the day anyone raids a corporatoin to see if any GPL'd code is included in their products.

      can you even do a raid with a civil suit?

    8. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK That'd be a civil offense, not something the FBI/SS/ATF/ETC would be involved in.

    9. Re:Hail the power of corporate America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: -100, Idiot)

  30. What I need by ModernGeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is about 10 floppies that are all identical, if I pop one in, I want a gov't level reformat (6 times low level) done in a linux-based distro. Anyone know of a utility like this (like a doomsday device one or somthing, so this guy could have been protected).

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Such a beast already exists...
      http://dban.sourceforge.net/
      YMMV, enjoy

    2. Re:What I need by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah there are tools that let you wipe your hd, but considering the time it takes to complete a 6X wipe, you'd barely get started between the time they knocked on the door and the time they unplugged your machines. If they did find "illegal" data on your system, you're now guilty of trying to conceal evidence and you can kiss any decent defense goodbye. A long time ago someone told me they wrapped wire a whole bunch of times around their hard drive and connected it to 120VAC and a switch. If needed, hit the switch and your HD gets de-gaussed. Dunno if this would work anymore since HD's seem to be shielded pretty well. That and I'm sure the tools exist that can reconstruct the data anyway.

    3. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/dban/

      Darik's Boot and Nuke ("DBAN") is a self-contained boot floppy that securely wipes the hard disks of most computers. DBAN is appropriate for bulk or emergency data destruction.

    4. Re:What I need by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Takes too long...GNU shred will do as many overwrites and other things as you like though.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    5. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wipe.sf.net

      'nuff said.

      -- vranash

    6. Re:What I need by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Psh... that's amateur stuff. What you need is some thermite. ;)

    7. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget it. Simple overwrite/deletes prevent someone from finding a file, if they don't want to try very hard and/or they don't have access to unlimited funding. However, data that's been on magnetic media for a long duration leaves "pits" in the media, so that even when the data on the media has changed, the pits around where the old data was are still there. So you can physically scan the disk for pits that do not correspond to the data in them, and you can reasonably assume that different data was in those locations for a long time, and was recently overwritten.

      I'm afraid if you want to be sure, you need to follow these steps AFTER doing a multi-pass overwrite:
      1) Shred the disk in an industrial shredder
      2) Burn the shreds

      After that, you're pretty safe.

    8. Re:What I need by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it wouldn't work here because he didn't have time; he had to get permission to go brush his teeth. You'd basically need to booby trap the computers, a la the electromagnet door frame in Cryptonomicon. Anyone know how well that would work in practice?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    9. Re:What I need by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Anyone know of a utility like this (like a doomsday device one or somthing, so this guy could have been protected).

      Not only have I heard of it, I've seen it. At the beginning of The Core, when that far-too-skinny kid that was also in Road Trip gets (ominous tone) "the knock". Except, in this case, it wasn't so much a disk, as it was a giant hand-held electomagnet device...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    10. Re:What I need by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just use an encrypted file system?

    11. Re:What I need by xenocide2 · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert in electromagnetic interference, but if cell phones can cause cancer, then a electromagnetic would probably be dangerous enough to give the doorman a brain tumor the size of your average human head =)

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    12. Re:What I need by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because you'd be ordered by a judge to turn over the key, and "I forgot what the key is" or "I lost it" would get you thrown in jail for contempt and obstruction.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    13. Re:What I need by lohphat · · Score: 1

      But it would buy you time.

    14. Re:What I need by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      A long time ago someone told me they wrapped wire a whole bunch of times around their hard drive and connected it to 120VAC and a switch.

      I've heard of similar ideas, but hooked into the transformer from a neon sign. Pull the chain, presto blammo, hard drive be fried. Now, whether it would obscure the data on the drive enough to be unrecoverable, hard to say.

    15. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all well and good, until they shut off the power and spike it to knock out any UPS systems before entering.

    16. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a key that somehow mangles the data permanently instead of providing access?

      Or a key that provides access to a limited amount of harmless data, but mangles everything else in a way that makes it appear as though it was just free disk space all along?

    17. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the drive would be ghosted, replicated, with back-ups. if you hand over a tricked-up key that does anything but unlock your files, as requested, you're toast.

    18. Re:What I need by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Time for what? Time to make friends with the guy in the top bunk? If the computer's in their control, they've got all the time they need.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    19. Re:What I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      So you use a filesystem with two or more keys that has different information in different sections. You give them the innocuous one.

      See http://www.rubberhose.org/. It's out there for, say, human-rights investigators to help keep them alive if they're captured by the nasty people they investigate.

    20. Re:What I need by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      If he lived under it forever, maybe. I'm thinking something you activate with a harmless looking wall switch that will turn any electronics carried through it into so much scrap. Then you turn it off after the SS and FBI leave. They can have fun trying to SQUID a few kilobytes of useful data off it at massive expense.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  31. Freeze punk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    192.168.1.1 we have a warrant for your arrest. Come out with your bits up!

  32. Ouch. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Poor bastard got Steve Jacksoned.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  33. These aren't the IP addresses you're looking for by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks... Valve passwords and/or usernames... any and all items... related to Valve Software, Half-Life, Half-Life 2
    They were looking for IP addresses? What does that mean? I can find any IP address I want from any machine connected to the internet.

    I can just imagine some clueless FBI agent rifling through the poor guy's Rolodex and demanding that he tell them where his IP addresses are. "Sir, where do you keep your IP addresses sir?! This isn't a joke, son! You think this is funny?! Keep it up punk! You can laugh at the judge when we tell him that you wouldn't tell us where your IP addresses were!"
  34. Hah hah! by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    This makes up for all the flamebait ratings I get for arguing copyright should be abolished. Moron.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Hah hah! by cb8100 · · Score: 0

      Eat shit and die, communist pig! Why is it that I shouldn't be able to own something I create? What's yours is yours and what's mine is yours, too? Sorry, pal, but I don't live in a fucking commune.

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  35. Special Half-Life level by Code-Ex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will Half-Life have a special "FBI Raid" level when it is released? =)

    1. Re:Special Half-Life level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no but you can bet your nine computers, your xbox and your tivo that someone is going to make that scenario in Counterstrike soon...

    2. Re:Special Half-Life level by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, it would be just at the end of the 13th level: send the elevator #2 one floor up, jump in the shaft, breake the metal grill to your right and crawl inside, thats it- loading...

  36. And what machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did that include his electric toothbrush, refrigerator, toaster, vacuum cleaner and laundry machine?

  37. Re:Hungry? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Considering that Hungarians actually refer to their country as "Magyarorszag," not "Hungary," I'd say it doesn't really fucking matter how you spell it, since it isn't even the actual name of their country.

    And it still doesn't equate to not knowing what's going on in the world -- it just means somebody doesn't know how to spell. Duh.

  38. Out of curiosity..... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many times has Slashdot been approached by law enforcement agencies to obtain access to records or postings?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Out of curiosity..... by wcdw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the FBI can investigate anyone - without a warrant - and with a built-in gag order, you'll never know the answer to that question. And it is against the law for /. to tell you.

      Is this a great country, or what?

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:Out of curiosity..... by dgp · · Score: 3, Informative

      the last couple fbi-power-expanding laws include being able to gag the raided company from answering just such questions.

    3. Re:Out of curiosity..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Bomb the US!!! raid me!

      I will shoot the president!!

      RAID ME!

    4. Re:Out of curiosity..... by (trb001) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, as other posts have noted, if /. has been approached, and a gag order been put in place, then Taco can't you ("I can not divulge..."). However, if it hasn't happened, he should be able to tell you that it has never happened. So it's more a boolean thing rather than a number-of-times thing.

      --trb

    5. Re:Out of curiosity..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn good question, one i would like to see the answer to, please mod this up

    6. Re:Out of curiosity..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if /. has been approached, and a gag order been put in place, then Taco can't you

      Say it isn't true! You mean Taco can't us?

  39. Poor guy is screwed. by xankar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the future, if he's ever unemployed, that warrant will be a big ugly red mark that will deter employers from hiring him.

    I knew someone whose ex-wife accused him of abuse because she hated him. He never came close to being convicted, but he hasn't been able to get a job since.

    You don't have to be convicted to be branded a criminal.

    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
    1. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Qeantk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think they can legally ask if you have ever had a warrant out for your arrest. Don't job applications ask about "convicted" at most?

    2. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make sense. How would future employers know about a warrant?

      Is there a public record of police searches?

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure in all honesty. All i know is that he gets turned down by employer after employer simply for being suspect.

      It may even be due to the fact that they asked him straight out, "Have you ever been a suspect in a criminal case." and he replied honestly.

      I'll see if I can contact him and reply later.

    4. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by bssea · · Score: 1

      It depends on who you are applying for. *Most* job applications will only ask about convictions.

      However, these warrants do show up on a standard background check done by most employers - and *can* be used as a reason to not hire you.

      When I was being interrogated by the CIA when I tried to get clearance (and 9 hours in a polygraph rooms counts as interrogation), I was asked about *suspected* crimes - even when I was a minor.

      And damn me if they wouldn't give me clearence because of my *suspected* use of copyrighted material. I was never convicted of anything, but the suspicion was cited for the reason to not give me clearance - and thus I lost my "conditional offer of employment". And this was upheld by both my appeals.

      That's ok.. HP paid me more :-)

      --sea

    5. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by bssea · · Score: 1

      Unless sealed by a judge, yes all warrants are public record.

      Just one source:
      http://www.gannett.com/go/newswatch/2002/ november/ nw1108-13.htm

      I'm sure given time, I could find an actual database somewhere.

      --sea

    6. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      I don't think they can legally ask if you have ever had a warrant out for your arrest. Don't job applications ask about "convicted" at most?

      These days, many employers conduct background checks before hiring. Just imagine you're trying to land a job at $SOFTWARE_COMPANY and they see that you were investigated by the secret service and FBI for breaking into a corporate network and stealing data.

      The fact that you weren't convicted (or were even innocent) doesn't change the fact that your prospective employer knows you were investigated--and they would have to be smoking crack to offer you a job.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    7. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by theCat · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be convicted to be branded a criminal.

      In America, yes you do have to be convicted. Unless by "branded" you mean by society. As for what people think, they can go fsck themselves until the trial is over. But like I said that's America, so depending on what dictatorship you reside under YMMV.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    8. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant socially.

    9. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

      I knew someone whose ex-wife accused him of abuse because she hated him. He never came close to being convicted, but he hasn't been able to get a job since.


      I assure you that I was called "booger brain" in elementary school, yet did manage to go on and lead a productive and employed life style. So much for YOUR theory then.

      In fact having proposed such a Snopes quality story for us, I hereby accuse you of FOOLISHNESS! Hide THAT red mark next time you go to get burgers at the burger barn Mr. smarty pants.
    10. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlation does not equal causation.
      Perhaps your friend was incompetent or was the unfortunanate victim of a failing job market. If I were actually interested in your story I'd want some more details and factual evidence.

    11. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by Qeantk · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there would be any grounds for you to sue. If there isn't there SHOULD be some legal protection from adverse effects of an unproved charge.

    12. Re:Poor guy is screwed. by randyest · · Score: 1

      warrants do show up on a standard background check done by most employers

      {ding} says the bullshit detector

      When I was being interrogated by the CIA

      The CIA does a lot more than a "standard background check done by most employers"

      Methinks you are confused.

      --
      everything in moderation
  40. A few questions for anyone with experience by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are found innocent...

    a) What countermeasures/damages can you persue

    b) If your computers are for business use, can you sue for lost revenue?

    c) If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc), but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?

    d) You got no card, how can you call to find out about your stuff?

    e) 9 computers, decent chance one is a server. How about if the server was hacked (cmon, if they hack valve wouldn't they redirect through dummy servers)

    1. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      A)none
      B)no.
      C)yes
      D)you can't.
      E)You're still legally responsible for what your computer does.

    2. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by forkboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As Steve Jackson will tell you, this guy is pretty much screwed. Anything they seize in the course of an investigation is pretty much theirs now and there's nothing you can do about it. Federal Law Enforcement is basically untouchable. Welcome to Amerika.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by __aawavt7683 · · Score: 1

      With this, why did they even seize cables (power cables, misc wires, as put on the receipt) and obviously pressed cd's (music to massage to...)? Further, why did this guy post his win XP product key (or possibly ME) on the web? ;-)

      -DrkShadow

    4. Re: A few questions for anyone with experience by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting


      > If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc),

      Don't the rules limit them to using what was specified on the warrant? Otherwise it's too easy to use a warrant for something trivial as the justification for a fishing expedition.

      Of couse, in these days of the all-important War on Blacks^wDrugs and War on Arabs^wTerror, the rules don't seem to matter very much.

      > but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?

      AFAICT, you might as well kiss your stuff goodbye even if you're innocent. Remember the outcome of the clueless cop's crusade against Steve Jackson Games?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr, it's pretty simple:

      a) What countermeasures/damages can you persue

      None, this is a government agency and they supposedly have probable cause (however mistaken). Unless they are outright abusive in some way ($$$ to prove this).

      b) If your computers are for business use, can you sue for lost revenue?

      No, see first question.

      c) If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc), but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?

      Yes. Besides, it's likely you'll never see them again even if nothing at all is found.

      d) You got no card, how can you call to find out about your stuff?

      You don't really. They'll be in contact anyway (court dates usually).

      e) 9 computers, decent chance one is a server. How about if the server was hacked (cmon, if they hack valve wouldn't they redirect through dummy servers)

      It's all up to the courts at that point. Get a good lawyer.

    6. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by *weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANYourLawyer
      IANYourLegalCounsel

      a) none. Unless they went beyond legal procedure. (harassment, malicious prosecution, vandalism, etc). In this case it sounds like they were well within procedure.

      b) Your legal fees will be excessive, your lost time will kill more revenue than your loss of machines, and you won't get a dime unless you can prove they wrongfully prosecuted or acted on a tip they knew to be bad. You can try, but if that revenue/hardware really mattered, you'd be a dead company long before it is settled. Ask Steve Jackson Games.

      c) Yep. Though a 'hack for program x' is likely within your legal right to possess and/or create. proof of distributing or using it is the damning part.

      I don't know what the impact of the DMCA is on copyprotection schemes prior to its enactment, so it may be possible that a sufficiently old classic (eg winzip95 keygen) might be technically legal, even if applied. it's still not a good idea legally to have it though.

      any pirated software would certainly not be legal. pirating software is a civil crime (if you're not selling it) but possession of that contraband is enough to keep your box forever, even if charges are never brought against you for the crime. They likely won't be shaking you down for your windows license, but if you cause a stink all they have to do is request licenses and proof of ownership to dissuade you from pressing the issue.

      but yeah, 90% of /.-ers probably have at least 1 item of contraband - meaning they'd never see their machines again. that's the risk factor for partaking in victimless crimes - even if you're innocent of something serious - kiss your hardware goodbye.

      d) He'll have received a seizure receipt (he'll have to sign that) with case number and lot number. all the items they take will be itemized. He can inquire about them at any time, though the legal process is slow - and your hardware will be obsolete long before you get them back.

      e) there's already a precedent for that, so it might be a plausible defense. Provided of course the prosecution doesn't simply disprove it by having an expert witness inspect the machine.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    7. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by Micro$will · · Score: 1
      E)You're still legally responsible for what your computer does.

      This probably doesn't apply in the US, but some clown in England got one over on the courts by saying the kiddie porn on his machine was aquired by a trojan. It was a /. story not too long ago. I forgot the details of the case, but it seemed like a rediculous excuse to me.

      While it is possible for someone to backdoor a machine and set up an ftp server, if there was any evidence that the owner was viewing and/or editing the files, it should show up somewhere. Web browsers will maintain a cache and history, photo viewers usually create thumbnails, and some text editors will usually create a backup somewhere, not to mention the "Recent Documents" in 9x/ME/2K/XP systems.

    8. Re: A few questions for anyone with experience by phorm · · Score: 1

      Remember the outcome of the clueless cop's crusade against Steve Jackson Games

      Nope, never heard of it. Got a link?

    9. Re: A few questions for anyone with experience by imroy · · Score: 1

      Geez, spend two seconds with Google: SJ Games vs. the Secret Service

    10. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      If you are found innocent...

      a) What countermeasures/damages can you persue
      Usually none. If you're wrongly caught up in an investigation, you're not owed anything on that alone. You have to prove an abuse of power, that the government wasn't mislead, but knowlingly followed a wrong path to get anything.

      b) If your computers are for business use, can you sue for lost revenue?
      Yes, but you have a responsibilty to limit the damages to the best of your ability. You can't just shut down the business and throw your hands in the air. You likely have the abilty to run out to a store and buy at least one or two computers on which your business can limp along, and your employees likely can work from home on their own equipment. Yeah, you might have the claim for the revenue your really lost, but most businesses hit with these things lose everything because they gave up, not because the FBI truely disabled them.

      c) If they find something illegal (who doesn't have a "hack for program x" or keygen etc), but it is found that they came after you mistakenly, are your computers still lost?
      Yep. So long as they were acting in good faith when they stumbled into it, they can go back an get a revised warrant to dig further into that crime. Just like how they go after teflon mobsters, they catch them on tax evasion... if they can't get you for the big crime, they might go for a little one.

      d) You got no card, how can you call to find out about your stuff?
      Call the main switchboard at the local office, the FBI and Secret Service both have numbers in the phone book whereever they are. You don't need an exact name, "that pretty blond woman who was on the team that raided my house" is enough identifying infromation for them to know who you were talking about.

      e) 9 computers, decent chance one is a server. How about if the server was hacked (cmon, if they hack valve wouldn't they redirect through dummy servers)
      That's still evidence... and this goes to the agents strong suggestion that you come clean with anything you do know. If you didn't do it but let somebody route through you to hide their tracks, you better turn over anything you know about that person. If you think you have been hacked, you'd better tell anything you know or suspect about the hacking right away... coming up with that story later will be less credible.

    11. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by Detritus · · Score: 1
      If the police want to be assholes, they can hold on to your stuff for a very long time. If it is evidence, they can hold it while criminal proceedings are pending or in progress. If you have the money for a lawyer, he can make motions to the judge to force the government to return your stuff or justify why they need to hold it.

      These sorts of problems are common in cases involving guns, where even if you are innocent, you may have to spend many thousands of dollars to get a court order forcing the police to return your property. The BATF is notorious for cases like these, where they seize someone's gun collection on questionable charges, intentionally damage the collection, and even if they drop the charges or lose, refuse to return the collection.

      The problem is that many government officials believe that they can ignore the law when it is convenient or advances their agenda. They know that most people don't have the time, money and bloody-mindedness to get a court order and have it enforced.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I said the same thing way before you yet you get modded up. Moderators are morons.

      Anyway, the whole thing with having an illegal hack or whatever is a moot point. As you also mention, no matter what, you won't be seeing your hardware for years so it doesn't really matter if you get it back.

      Fair and speedy... riiiight.

    13. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by randyest · · Score: 1

      As Steve Jackson will tell you, this guy is pretty much screwed. Anything they seize in the course of an investigation is pretty much theirs now and there's nothing you can do about it. Federal Law Enforcement is basically untouchable. Welcome to Amerika.

      Huh, funny -- Steve Jackson told me something entirely different:

      most (but not all) of the hardware was returned. The Secret Service kept one company hard disk, all Loyd's personal equipment and files, the printouts of GURPS Cyberpunk, and several other things.

      In early 1993, the case finally came to trial. . . . And we won. The judge gave the Secret Service a tongue-lashing and ruled for SJ Games on two out of the three counts, and awarded over $50,000 in damages, plus over $250,000 in attorney's fees.

      Yeah, it was a hassle, and yeah, it sucks, but you started with a good point and took it to the point of bullshit. I'd say $50k would cover a hard drive, some miscellaneous equipment not worth enumerating, and some printouts. Wouldn't you, or are you too mired in Amerika-Angst to think clearly?

      --
      everything in moderation
    14. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned the hard way. YOU CANNOT SUE THE GOVERNMENT FOR NON TANGIBLE ITEMS. THerefore, no, you cannot sue for lost revenue.

    15. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I'd say $50k would cover a hard drive, some miscellaneous equipment not worth enumerating, and some printouts.

      Perhaps. But has it never occurred to you that _time_ has value too? Does it cover the lost business revenue for 4 months due to those machines (and especially the game/book) not being there and usable - which almost drove the company bankrupt as stated on that very same page?

    16. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by randyest · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm with you -- you're preaching to the choir. My gripe is with the extreme anti-Ameri"k"an blatantly wrong claim, to wit:

      Anything they seize in the course of an investigation is pretty much theirs now and there's nothing you can do about it. Federal Law Enforcement is basically untouchable. Welcome to Amerika.

      Taking something like this so far as to make false, FUD-mongering claims is worse than saying nothing at all. It destroys our credibility and makes us look like ninnies.

      --
      everything in moderation
    17. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by BigCdawg · · Score: 1

      First of all let's get something strait shall we? I don't ever recall hearing a vertict of "innocent". At best you're not guilty and can never be tried again. At worst(short of being found guilty) the charges will be dropped and the authorities will investigate and follow you until statute of limitations is reached. With either, you are still labeled a criminal. It stays in you're record that you were arrested. It doesn't matter if the arrest was baseless. The next time a crime of that genre is committed they'll come looking for you. Compensation, damages.. you've got to be kidding. Look at OJ, he spend his fortune defending himself. (I'm not comparing this guy to OJ, because we all know OJ was guilty).

    18. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by forkboy · · Score: 1

      You're asserting then that Federal Law Enforcement agencies, especially those that are in the limelight of hot social issues (terrorism, immigration, drugs) do not operate with relative impunity? I think you're gravely mistaken about your government and how much it "cares" about you.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    19. Re:A few questions for anyone with experience by randyest · · Score: 1

      Relative to what -- Nazi Germany? Then yes, that's exactly what I am asserting. There is always some recourse and accountability (however slow) as far as I've seen (unverifyable /. anectodes notwithstanding), and I don't think any person or group is really that far above the law in practice.

      To be fair, I tried to come up with an answer to "relative to what?" that would make me reverse my assertion, but I can't think of one. Maybe you can help?

      --
      everything in moderation
  41. Heh heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German Guy: Essen mein Scheisse!
    Cartman's Mom: Ooookaaaay!

  42. Obvious question... by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    sorry, but i've not kept up on the HL2 code theft story...

    but can anyone fill us in on why he's not guilty of backing into the servers and stealing the code?

    I'm just asking - i'm sure there's a logical explanation of why - not being a smart ass.

    fwiw - while i work with many govt agencies in the classified world, i generally assume the FBI is a bunch of fsck-ups and morons.. like most of us do.

    or

    is there some possibility that he is guilty, even tho the warrants are technically lame (internal IP addresses?)

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:Obvious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The code has been around on P2P networks for a while. Tons of people have it.

      Even if they find the code on his computer, that still doesn't mean he actually hacked valve in the first place.

  43. Fact or Fiction? by faust13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When did a weblog become fact? I understand they had scanned documents, but I just get very nervous about allowing blogs to become sources of fact.

    1. Re:Fact or Fiction? by rplacd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The scanned documents list an FBI (or is it SS?) agent's name, and a judge's name. You can look them up online -- I understand that the judge really does exist and lives/works somewhere in Bay Area.

      I doubt that they'd be happy seeing their name on a fake search warrant. That's the type of stuff that gets you thrown in jail.

    2. Re:Fact or Fiction? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      A weblog isn't fact, but it's first person testimony to the public. The FBI hasn't exactly come out contesting the thing, so it's pretty likely that some sort of morning raid did take place... and it seems like a pretty by the book one at that.

    3. Re:Fact or Fiction? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      When did a weblog become fact?

      A weblog can be as credible as a newspaper report, magazine article, or television broadcast.

      Interpret that as you will.

    4. Re:Fact or Fiction? by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      When did a weblog become fact? I understand they had scanned documents, but I just get very nervous about allowing blogs to become sources of fact.

      Ever since http://www.drudgereport.com. Just ask Bill and Monica, and countless others. It may not be completely factual, but it shouldn't matter that a person doesn't have a media outlet when he says his own mind on his own webpage. So much information you get from the media these days isn't credible anyway. (Here's an example - why the hell is Iowa so important anyway? It's a very small state, the winner of the caucuses doesn't win the Presidency often, and it's a single issue (farming) state. But why, oh why, is Iowa deemed so important in national politics? It's so, because the media says it's so, and they say so because people will pay attention to them allowing them to earn more ad revenue.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    5. Re:Fact or Fiction? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I would suggest the original poster also ask Jayson Blair about the reliability of traditional media outlets.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  44. Uh oh by Isbiten · · Score: 1

    Better delete my copy of the source then ;)

    rm -rf -P ~/HLsource

    Anyway interesting story, and it must be hard for him, I mean wouldn't you if you lost all your computers.

    --
    I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
  45. Here's an interesting idea by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With multiple companies hoping IPv6 enabled home appliances will be in the "home of the future", will search warrents looking for Internet devices mean the feds will be seizing everything from your fridge, toaster, and can opener?

    The debate over that ought to be interesting.

    1. Re:Here's an interesting idea by Robotdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Can I at least keep the beer?" -Negative, we have to question it.

    2. Re:Here's an interesting idea by criordan · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet that the FBI already managed to seize the contents of his fridge.

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    3. Re:Here's an interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm.... maybe getting that IP6 enabled brain implant isn't such a good idea after all.... !

      Could bring a whole new meaning to the term "getting left on the shelf".

      Oh yeah our Bill's just been returned by the Feds unfortunately he died 10 years ago and they didn't notice until last week. *sighs* Still we do still have some of his memories.... [checks memory card]... oh... it's been wiped... DAMN!

    4. Re:Here's an interesting idea by Dumbush · · Score: 1

      Next year's headline:
      Toaster with embedded IP6 chip hacked xxx.com network!

    5. Re:Here's an interesting idea by jaysones · · Score: 2, Funny

      By the time HL2 comes out, you'll have to upgrade your toaster to play.

    6. Re:Here's an interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear I didn't do anything, officer! It was the milk that went bad, I know it!

    7. Re:Here's an interesting idea by tyldis · · Score: 1

      Mitnick: I *really* need to use the bathroom! Feds: Nope, no Internet for you!

  46. A bit torn by muzzynat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, I have to say, that would be the absolute worst morning of my life if it was me, the kind of stress that could give a guy an ulcer. He seems to be handling things pretty well though which is good. Nobody wants the FBI and Secret Service Raiding their home, no matter what.

    However that said, and my condolences to his lost PCs, if he is resposible for stealing the HL2 code, he kinda did deserve it, because I for one am a little pissed about the delay, and if he's guilty I guess karma(and not the /. kind) is biting him in the ass. I don't really care if Valve was using Outlook, If i hang a bed sheet over my door, and you walk in and take my stuff, you're still breaking and entering, even if the bedsheet wasn't the most secure door I could have used.

    --
    "I am the Flail of God!" -Genghis Kahn
    1. Re:A bit torn by rplacd · · Score: 1

      Would he really have posted about it (and brought more attention to himself) if he had stolen HL2?

    2. Re:A bit torn by zeroclip · · Score: 1

      because I for one am a little pissed about the delay

      Valve would have delayed it anyway. The "hack" is just a convenient scrap goat. Looking at the code that got out in the wild it's quite obvious that valve had a long way till release

    3. Re:A bit torn by Enucite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because I for one am a little pissed about the delay

      The person who copied the code wasn't the cause of the delay.

      The actual cause of the delay was Valve not being anywhere near finished.

    4. Re:A bit torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that if he is guilty he should be prosecuted but please don't blame the delay on anyone but Valve. Saying it was delayed because the source was stolen is obviously incorrect and I'm surprised they are using such a lame excuse.

    5. Re:A bit torn by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      If i hang a bed sheet over my door, and you walk in and take my stuff, you're still breaking and entering, even if the bedsheet wasn't the most secure door I could have used.

      Whilst I agree with the rest of your post, this isn't really true. They would be guilty of trespass and if they took anything that would be theft. But it isn't breaking and entering unless something is damaged in order to gain access. If the sheet was firmly fixed and it they had to rip it to gain entry that would still be B&E, but just lifting it out of the way and walking in doesn't qualify.

      Pedantic post over!

    6. Re:A bit torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "if he is resposible for stealing the HL2 code, he kinda did deserve it, because I for one am a little pissed about the delay"

      Yeah because since the HL2 code was stolen they had to start over from scratch....
  47. Yes, in fact; Lesstif. by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, you meant done for them, not done to them; my mistake!

  48. Now here's a question worth asking... by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Toshok is so concerned about what's being taken from his apartment, and he hasn't done anything wrong, then why does he leave during the search and go to a friends place to "spread the word"? Something doesn't add up there.

    If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated. It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by endoboy · · Score: 1

      furthermore-- the folks he visited are now likely to receive a followup visit from the Feds....

      Care to bet that their machines are grabbed in the near future?

    2. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't he say something about their asking about his friends? If I'm sitting there watching them take all of my hardware while they are also asking about my friends, I am pretty sure I would conclude they will head to my friends' places next and take all of their equipment as well. As such, I would want to give my friends a heads-up about possible hardware lossage.

    3. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated.

      No point in doing that. They give you a receipt for anything they take, and they can't use and item as evidence in court without first proving that they gave you a receipt for that item. So everything they touched is going to be clearly itemized.

      It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

      Makes sense to me.

      "Hey guys. I thought I'd let you know, there's a bunch of cops searching my apartment right now, so if I end up missing by the end of the day, you'll know what happened. In that case, could you please call a lawyer for me?"

      It's the kind of thing friends tell each other, don't you think?

    4. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If I hadn't done anything wrong, I'd stick around to see what's being confiscated. It seems like this guy's first priority was to sound an alarm...

      If I was being raided and hadn't done anything wrong, I'd want to get the word out to friends, since whatever mistakenly pointed them toward me is likely to also point toward friends.

      Since these raids tend to take everything, including stuff that is obviously not useful as evidence (what kind of evidence are they going to find in power cables, or in pressed music CDs?), I'd want to give my friends a chance to get that kind of stuff out of the house.

      Give me 10 minutes warning that the FBI is coming, and I can have a recent backup safely offsite, so when they are gone, and I get a new computer, I can be back up and running fast. Note that this in no way would hurt their investigation. I could also grab things like my external DVD writer, DSL modem, sound card, and stuff like that, so that would be less to replace.

    5. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by rplacd · · Score: 1
      Something doesn't add up there.

      Looking at it another way, why did the FBI let him go? If they were likely to find something incriminating on his machines, they'd want to arrest him, right?

    6. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its more like..."hey guys u know that hl2 source we stole? well we got caught."

    7. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      They didn't have enough evidence to arrest him (after which they'd need to file charges). More interestingly, I would have had an agent follow him discreetly after he left. Who knows, perhaps they did...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alarm bells went off on the BS meter when he mentioned condoms, the blonde FBI agent and the cute asian photographer. Mix that with the guns drawn comments and it sounds like he's trying to look cooler than he is. Now he can tell his friends how he stood up to FBI agents with their guns drawn and kicked back with two babes in his apartment. LIke any good story this will get better and better with each telling unti lwe get to hear how he fcuked the two chicks while having an all out gun fight with the rest.

    9. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by imr · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous.
      First, the last thing you want when you are in an underground movement is to lead the forces fighting you to the rest of your group.
      Second, whats for sure is that INNOCENT people are in a state of schock when confronted to such a deployment of force. It is a traumatic experience. No surprise that he behaves "strangely" afterwards.

      I know for sure that i think that I would note everything they take. And i know for sure that I really don't know how I would REALLY behave through such an event.
      But yes, i would gladly talk to someone uninvolved about this if I could. To have a reality check.

    10. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From personal experience.

      Step 1: Watch housemates panic.

      Step 2: Call lawyer.

      Step 3: Let panicked housemates talk to lawyer.

      Step 4: Have a stiff drink.

    11. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      They give you a receipt for anything they take, and they can't use and item as evidence in court without first proving that they gave you a receipt for that item.

      He states himself that he later discovered that some things were seized that were not listed on the receipts. If that happens, your stuff may not be used against you in court, but it IS gone forever.

      Makes sense to me.

      So it's a legitimate concern of yours that if your property ever gets searched, you might end up 'disappeared' by Big Evil Government Agents? Have a little faith in the system...

      If I were him, I would have dug out the yellow pages in full view of the agents, called up a law firm, and arranged for an attorney to show up at the house RIGHT THEN AND THERE.

    12. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by rplacd · · Score: 1

      They could've come across the evidence they were looking for (or evidence of some other crime) during their search. I mean, they didn't raid the hundreds of people who, by now, have copies of HL2 -- they went after this one person. What was special about him?

      But yeah, they could've had him followed.

    13. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they can't use and item as evidence in court without first proving that they gave you a receipt for that item.

      They don't need to prove they gave you a receipt. Besides, there's no way they can prove that anyway unless you give them a receipt for the receipt. But your point about court evidence is still valid because if they try to present something in court that's not on the list then you just have to show the receipt. Unless you lose it, then you're screwed.

    14. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by cicci0 · · Score: 1

      No point in doing that. They give you a receipt for anything they take
      the poster mentioned there were other items missing besides what was claimed to be taken "Hey guys. I thought I'd let you know, there's a bunch of cops searching my apartment right now, so if I end up missing by the end of the day, you'll know what happened. In that case, could you please call a lawyer for me?"
      he was told he was not being arrested, why have a friend call a lawyer when he could do it himself?

    15. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      Besides, there's no way they can prove that anyway unless you give them a receipt for the receipt.

      It's called a signature

      --

      -

    16. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree. I think that there are plenty of heartstrings to be pulling on here. Some "hungry programmer" that has written a fair share of free software is mixed up for a criminal and has his computers taken. That cut's to the soul of your average slashdotter, I mean, they took his computers away the frickin' jack booted thugs! And they call this America!? Shouldn't they be finding the anthrax mailer or solving some crimes?!?

      I think the reality of the situation is probably that it's a little bit more than a case of mistaken identity, if it is, my heart goes out and I honestly hope that there is a speedy remedy and he has all of his gear returned as quickly as possible. I just don't believe that someone spoofed their IP addresses, ripped off the source code to an insanely popular game and is skating free while innocent hackers are being worked over by the system. Was there anybody he knew that needed to know that the wolves were circling? I don't know if the police were taking stuff from my place I'd be overseeing every single thing they laid hands on, especially computer equipment, I'd want it all documented, I'd want to know. If you think you're going to have a hard time getting things back, imagine how it's going to be when you have a you say they say with the FBI about a missing computer or something? Anyway, my money is on the dude knows what happened and was some how related to it, maybe indirectly.

      On the other side. Take heed. I've been saying a lot lately that it's a different world since 9/11. We have a ministry of homeland security, that sounds like something from an Orwell novel or like some Soviet beaurocracy to me.. "Homeland?!?" I just don't like the sound of that, I'm all about security and protecting our freedom from terror and what not but just the name of that organization gives me the willies. Over the last 15 years or so I've witnessed a number of these raids from a far. I remember when the FBI had their operation phoenix and busted a ton of pirate BBSes, to Steve Jackson Games getting raided, and a number of others of varying degree of interest. Uniformly, the people raided took part in activities that made them suspect. With the current laws and social climate, I think it's reaching a point where you become suspect and unless you take special pains to make sure your computer is clean, you're probably going to have something suspect on there. Recorded material you didn't purchase or made by circumventing piracy protection. Pirated software. Pr0n that is copyrighted by someone else and of questionable legality. It's a different world. I think once they've got you under that microscope, it's simply a matter of time before you break a law unless you're extremely careful. I bet 90+% of the computers out there have something illegal on them.

      Look at the patriot act, it's supposed to fight terrorists, over 90% of the people it's been used on were American civilians that had nothing to do with terrorism. Prosecutors get bonuses for higher conviction rates, as a result in the 1950's a typical prosecutor might have a 60% conviction rate, now it's not that uncommon for it to be over 90% Why? They hang 11 felonies on you and you have no choice but to plea to something because you were morally passive. I promise you that they find something on this guys computers, be it talk of drugs, porn, pirated software, or other copyrighted material; heaven help him if he's got that source code on there.

    17. Re:Now here's a question worth asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What good is a recipt?

      You think that makes a difference? I suppose you've never heard of corruption. And with computer parts there is a business dedicated to fencing stolen parts, it's called ebay, it's one of the darlings of the dot.com boom.

  49. IP addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think they were trying to say that if they found any non-public Valve IP addresses saved or in the history of any FTP clients, web browsers, or VPN clients.

    It would look pretty suspicious if he had a VPN client configured to connect to Valve's VPN tunnel. That is assuming they have a VPN.

    See?

  50. Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by danidude · · Score: 4, Funny

    root@loot:~# cd stolen_stuff/
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# ls
    windowssrc.tar.gz half_life2.tar.gz eletronic_votinghck.tar.gz
    root@loot:~/stolen_stu ff# scp half_life2.tar.gz dood@hackr.kr:
    dood@hackr.kr's password:
    half_life2.tar.gz 100% 00:00
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# rm -f half_life2.tar.gz
    root@loot:~/stolen_stuff# ^D
    logout

    --
    - no sig.
    1. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you forget to delete: /var/log/secure /root/.bash-history ...

    2. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The filesystem would still have a record of it.

      You need to have a boot diskette with the following ... dd if = /dev/random of=/dev/hda ... be executed up to 7 times in a row. Of course this would take awhile and may not be enough time but then there would be no trace.

      MacOSX panther has secure delete. IT basically deletes an item 7 times in a row so there is no trace. How cool is that?

    3. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "windowssrc.tar.gz half_life2.tar.gz eletronic_votinghck.tar.gz"

      You forgot the file:

      stolen_sco_code.tar.gz

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually,
      It depends on the arial density of the drive. older drives may need upwards of 30 passes and it must be an alternating pattern of 1 and 0 to cause the magnetic flux to change.

    5. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, on MY computer (truthfully):

      root@localhost# mount /dvd/leaked.iso -o loop=/dev/loop3,encryption=AES128 /mnt
      Password:
      root@localhost# exit
      ac@localhost:~$ cd /mnt
      ac@localhost:/mnt$ find ./Microsoft ./Microsoft/dos600src.zip ./Microsoft/win311src.rar ./Microsoft/w2kHAL.zip ./GameEngines ./GameEngines/hl2src.rar ./GameEngines/quake1_leak.zip ./GameEngines/quake2_leak.zip ./GameEngines/quake3_engine.tgz ./GameEngines/[censored] ./GameEngines/[censored] ./Other ./Other/ios_11.2src.zip .. ecetra. All of which are easily available within maybe 5 minutes of searching on the net.

    6. Re:Meanwhile, in the thieve computer... by asm0deu5 · · Score: 1

      Woah, you've got the source to Quake 1 and 2? Hardcore!

  51. Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So 6:30 must be their favorite time for these types of raids. I woke up in 1994 to FBI, SS, Sheriff's Dept, US Attorney's office standing over my bed.

    They gave me a SS baby sitter too, and we sat in the kitchen watching Weird Science. I went up to my room at one time to gather my backpack for my 2nd day of Univ and saw the same thing, as they disassembled my machines, flipped through all of my books, etc. They actually went out to my car and took my cell phone.

    Never expect to see your machines again, or if you do, they'll be 10 years out-dated. My friend got his C64's and 128's back about the time the 486/66 came out.

    1. Re:Sounds Familiar by eclectro · · Score: 1

      So 6:30 must be their favorite time for these types of raids

      Probably designed that way to catch people completely off guard and prevent them from destroying evidence.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wee hours of the morning is a good time to serve warrants for precisely the reason of catching people off guard. Not many drug dealers are awake at 5 or 6 am.

      Now as for the agent in charge saying that they wold throw the book at him *when* they found evidence, that's just bad people skills. You can do your job without being an asshole. I would have said something to give the poor chap the impression he had some control over the situation. But that's just me.

    3. Re:Sounds Familiar by whittrash · · Score: 1

      Half Life is a pretty cool game. It is a shame they were hacked like this and their code was stolen. They had a nice story line and decent graphics and seemed to have a quality, independant development team. This could well destroy the company. The people who put their work into the project over the past few years could likely end up on the bread line. It isn't cool to destroy someones lifes work for cheap thrills and bragging rights. I am all for cracked copies of photoshop and free software but destroying peoples lives like this isn't cool. It is malicious, mean spirited and rotten. I don't feel sorry for anyone who would help with spreading this code around so they can ruin the game for everyone with cheats or worse. They deserve to go to jail for potentially ruining hundreds of peoples lives and doing $ tens of millions in damage. The people at Valve have families and need to pay rent too, and doing this makes their life really hard. The hackers who did this were petty, mean, cheap and stupid.

      For whom the bell trolls?...It trolls for you!

    4. Re:Sounds Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit..

      have you seen what was this stuff that was stolen? as it is it's worth just about 0 $ alone, it being out there in the wild doesn't matter at all(all that it's worth is that you can do few cool hacks with it but apart from that it's worthless, much like the leaked alpha of the new doom or the leaked unreal or unreal tournament betas).

      Valve was LATE LATE LATE LATE LATE VERY LATE doing their game and they had abosolutely no chance to get it shipped(the thing that's circulating the net is horribly broken and would have taken the time they're taking to finish anyways).

    5. Re:Sounds Familiar by spooje · · Score: 1

      So are you saying it's ok to steal a little or that it's ok to steal as long as it isn't something you care about?

      --
      Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    6. Re:Sounds Familiar by whittrash · · Score: 1

      So are you saying it's ok to steal a little or that it's ok to steal as long as it isn't something you care about?

      Good point, the way I would answer though is that its the size of the crime that matters. Jaywalking, speeding and eating a grape at the supermarket, installing photoshop and downloading an MP3 are all small crimes, so small in fact that they amount to nothing except when taken to excess. Destroying someones livelihood is a big crime. Destroying the livlihoods of dozens of people and destroying vast amounts of property is a huge crime and must be punished severely.

  52. Xbox Controllers by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to know why they seized his xbox controllers? How the fuck is that evidense?

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Xbox Controllers by rplacd · · Score: 1

      They went after storage devices. The Xbox has a hard drive, as does his Tivo.

    2. Re:Xbox Controllers by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Controllers don't have harddrives. Unless its one those that have macro functionality to store button clicks.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    3. Re:Xbox Controllers by rplacd · · Score: 1

      Oh, right. Duh. I missed the "controllers" word. Nevermind.

    4. Re:Xbox Controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easy, they have to open them in a controlled environment to check if they don't contain a 27U rack filled with RAID servers.

    5. Re:Xbox Controllers by BlackHorse · · Score: 1

      They can have memory cards in them. Take the controllers and the cards in one swoop, then they don't have to go get controllers themselves to plug it in to. I'd be really impressed if someone hid their stuff on the memory card of an X-Box controller!

    6. Re:Xbox Controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The xBox controllers are evidence -- of your stupidity for buying an XBox in the first place.

    7. Re:Xbox Controllers by CarlPatten · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for the capacities of the Xbox, but Linux PS2 hackers have been able to write files to memory cards for a while. So there's some basis in fact for taking the controllers.

    8. Re:Xbox Controllers by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      An XBox memory card is basically a USB keychain drive (in fact, the XBox controller bus is USB, just with a different physical interface on it). If you run EvolutionX on your XBox, it has an FTP server that gives you access not only to the hard drive partitions and the DVD drive, but also to the memory card. It only holds a couple of megs, but that should be enough for the really important stuff.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    9. Re:Xbox Controllers by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want to know why they seized his xbox controllers?

      Halo LAN party in the evidence locker. Why else?

    10. Re:Xbox Controllers by Psychotext · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't help feeling that it would be even cooler to hide a bluetooth memory stick somewhere (Maybe the lining of a curtain or something) and use that for all your dodgyness. Sure, you'd need to pull it out to change the batteries now and again but it's still quite a neat little trick.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  53. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Magyarorszag

    Gesundheit

  54. Real encryption anyone? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny


    As Khan would say, "Let them meet static!".

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Real encryption anyone? by Jobby · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's let them eat static. Idiot.

    2. Re:Real encryption anyone? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whatever.

      --
      This is my sig.
  55. Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Really the question is if you ever get your machines back.
    Judging from every story I've ever read, the Feds always hang onto "evidence" machines for years upon years. Which is effectively the same as confiscating them. Good reason to have offsite backups -- unless they take those too.

    In other threads, people have suggested that the Feds didn't understand how IP addresses work, and raided the wrong network. I suppose that's possible, but I think it unlikely, especially since they must know about the crack being traced to a user in Europe. It's more likely that they know or suspect that the HP guys have copies of the stolen source, and the raid is just a way to "send a message" to others who might consider downloading it.

    Technically, computers get seized so the cops can gather evidence, which is supposed to lead to some kind of punishment if all the due process requirements are met. But as often as not, the seizure itself is the only punishment metted out, and is obviously meant as such. Which is pretty scary, when you consider your total lack of recourse when you are punished in this manner.

    1. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My friend had his computer seized by the FBI freshman year of college (including his speakers, oddly), they gave it back to him in 6 months.

    2. Re:Seizure seizures by placeclicker · · Score: 1

      They probably don't understand anything about the internet.

      Look at Congress and the RIAA.

      --

      Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    3. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      hopefully i'm not using the same IPs as the ones they are looking for.

      192.168.69.0/24
      10.69.69.0/24

      anyone on the inside know if i should start changing these addresses? i would find it rather annoying if i get raided simply because i'm a programmer and have networks "on" the same network addresses.

    4. Re:Seizure seizures by arf_barf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The company I worked for got their computers "taken". This happend in 97, the suit has been settled out of court in 99 and they still haven't received any equipment back. And at this point it would cost more in lawyer fees then it's worth it (including all their data)

    5. Re:Seizure seizures by ehvoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the machines had references to IP addresses in the 10.x.x.x range, valve's internal subnet. Looks like this guy is guilty

    6. Re:Seizure seizures by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I think that's a standard spare DHCP; hell, my Airport Extreme gives out 10.0.1.x by default. Standard DHCP/NAT thingummy.

    7. Re:Seizure seizures by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Woosh! That sound you just heard was the joke flying overhead.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Seizure seizures by EyelessFade · · Score: 1

      yeah me to I have 127.0.0.1 :p

      I hope you was joking...

    9. Re:Seizure seizures by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      RFC 1917 is your friend. *sigh*

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    10. Re:Seizure seizures by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      They probably don't understand anything about the internet.

      Look at Congress and the RIAA.

      Maybe they understand the Internet just fine, but want to turn it into a much more tightly controlled and regulated medium.

    11. Re:Seizure seizures by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps you should ssh into 127.0.0.1 and restart your humour daemon.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    12. Re:Seizure seizures by JInterest · · Score: 2, Informative

      To the contrary, you clearly have a recourse. It is called the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which plainly prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. You have the right to hire a lawyer, go to court, and force them to either demonstrate that they have good cause to retain the machines or else to turn them over. You have a claim for damages should it turn out that they didn't have a good basis for retaining the machines. You have a recourse. Most people won't exercise it however, because they have to pay a lawyer for assistance, although if you are in fact entitled to recover for the malfeasance of officialdom, you can recover your attorney's fees.

    13. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is this. Idiots not getting jokes. Morons referring to 10/8 as some "standard DHCP" because their shiny toy happens to use it. And finally, old farts mixing up RFC numbers. It's 1918.

    14. Re:Seizure seizures by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      No, you can't, I own 127.0.0.1 and it's firewalled.

      Stop trying to promote a DoS on my ip address!

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    15. Re:Seizure seizures by wein0 · · Score: 1

      Refer to RFC 1918.. you might find one or two other people/ companies have 10.x.x.x addresses.

    16. Re:Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Sure, they're dumb, we're smart. What could be simpler?

      {idiot}

    17. Re:Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I had heard of the 5th amendment. Sounds like a real good idea. Enforcing it would seem to be problematic.

      Your theory about how the courts work is very interesting. If your theory is valid, all you need is determination, and you're sure to get adequate damages from any government agency that abuses your constitutional rights. But theories, no matter how well constructed, can only be validated or invalidated by testing them in the real world. Judging from all the news I've read about computer seizures, you need a new theory.

    18. Re:Seizure seizures by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Lawyer to Judge] Your Honor, my client wishes to compel the authorities to show good cause, or to return his seized computer equipment.
      [Judge to Lawyer] Get bent.
      [Lawyer to Client] That'll be $20,000. I'll bill you. Have a nice day.

      woo. Justice in action.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:Seizure seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got a friend who lives in a co-op house. One of their house-mates was arrested for suspicion of being involved in the fire bombing of a SUV dealership. A day or two later the house was searched by the FBI and a lot of stuff, including all their computers, was seized as evidence.

      Almost exactly a month later they got most (but not all) of the stuff back, including most of the computers. (My friend in particular got her computer back, but was still missing a pair of underwear, and some rope, which seem like odd items to be seized as evidence)

      Of course the items may have been returned relatively quickly because the person in question is no longer being considered as a suspect. However at least two months after the raid they suspected their phone was being tapped, because an illegal party was busted by the feds after someone gave them directions to it over their phone.

    20. Re:Seizure seizures by fm6 · · Score: 1
      (including his speakers, oddly)
      Acting on a tip that he was playing loud music while his dorm-mates were trying to study, no doubt.
  56. Not a full mirror.. by placeclicker · · Score: 1

    the warrent pictures are still slashdotted, anyone have a mirror of them?

    --

    Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    1. Re:Not a full mirror.. by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      meh... something funkys going on. ill fix the urls once i get back. anyway: http://uninteresting.myby.co.uk/siezed_files/page0 001.jpg thru six

  57. Chris' call to Valve by xorbe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi, Valve? Yeah, this is Chris Toshok. Yeah, I got no computers to play your next game on, you know? Not your problem you say? Just a sec... I'm adding a couple new obfuscated filters to Evolution..."

  58. XP CD Key by MirgNave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone notice they took down his XP CD-KEY for his Dell laptop? That key is toast now!

  59. Yet Another Mirror by SiGiN · · Score: 1
  60. Don't even bother trying to get the computers back by Ender77 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the odds of getting them back are next to nill, and if you do get them back it will be so long that the computers will probably be Obsolete.

  61. Found Innocent? by w.p.richardson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aren't you supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in San Francisco?

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Found Innocent? by rplacd · · Score: 1
      Aren't you supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in San Francisco?

      Being a suspect doesn't mean you're guilty.

    2. Re:Found Innocent? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Theoretically yes, but a suspect can still be detained, have his/her possessions confiscated (in relation to the crime) and many other things that happened here. It's when you go from that step of "presumed 100% innocent" to "presumed innocent but under suspicion" (with evidence) where they get a warrant.

      You don't have to be "proven innocent" so much as guilt must be proven. But you do have to be "found not guilty" in order to get your life back in order. I'm wonder what - in that eventuality - steps one may take to restitute the disruption on one's life.

      I mean, the guy may never see his PC's again. Probably won't... as all it takes is a bit of pirated/cracked software, maybe a bad item cached from the web-browser, or maybe even some pirated mp3's?

    3. Re:Found Innocent? by frkiii · · Score: 1

      YOu are "supposed" to be presumed innnocent.

      However, our court system was messed with long ago to the point where your life can be completely messed up (lost equipment, business, etc.) including being jailed if you are considered a flight risk just because you were suspected of committing a crime.

      As far as I am concerned, as practiced in the U.S. right now, you are presumed guilty until you are proven not guilty by a court of law. This area of police, courts and justice is probably one of the worst corruption of our rights as citizens as guaranteed by the Constitution. But then again, the Constitution is only a piece of paper, "we the people" are the only guarantee of these rights.

      And, to have government officials sworn to "uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" allowing this, is the worst tragedy of all in this country.

      Despite the distate that myself (and others, I am sure) have for politicians, they have to be written to and communicated with regarding your concerns for yours and others rights, unjust laws, etc. That is the only way that there will even be the possibility of some of this will be corrected. Being silent and an "innocent" bystander, will surely allow things to get even worse. I will get off my soap box now.

  62. In GW's america by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're guilty until confirmed guilty in a court of law.

    There are no innocents.

  63. Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    You almost never get the shit back. Half the reason for only having $300 used eBay computers at your house/apt/dorm. You don't want them stealing your $3500 Alienware rig or the setup you just built with $1000 of parts from Pricewatch, or your shiny new Apple G5 or G4 TiBook.

    I've been popped before. All because I had a fake CNN web page made, a few months before the 'CNN fake news generator' got popular. It wasn't even hosted on my home systems!

    The FBI was waiting for me one day when I walked outside my apartment to go to work. They marched me right back upstairs. They asked me a few questions and took the following:

    White box AMD 800mhz that I built from spare parts. Old Powermac 8600. Old Pentium II-233MHz.

    They did not, however, take my mice/keyboard/monitors, they did take the Mac stuff though.

    They also did not take every floppy disk and CDROM I had in the house. You always used to hear news stories with headlines like "OVer 5,000 disks siezed in piracy raid" in the early years of home computers.

    As the agent was leaving, my roomates newer Compaq laptop caught his eye, but I told him that machine wasn't mine and he didn't question me.

    They have you sign a bunch of crap, and they write down serial numbers, give you copies of everything...This was about 3 years ago too.

    I called the FBI offices, sometimes once a month. They would never return my calls, and always were telling me things were transfered to another office, etc. Originally I was told that they would be done with my stuff in 6-8 weeks.

    After a while, I figured no news was good news, and didn't want to even deal with them any more over $500 worth of computers.

    Ironically, I had to help the FBI/Customs on a case they were working on, someone in our office was looking at kiddie porn from a work computer. Figure they'd be looking out for me but that's the government for you.

    Now, on the other hand, your police departments are a little better. My friend had his computer missing for nearly 6 months, and when he got it back it was covered in identifcation stickers but it was pretty much the way it was when they took it.

    Posting as AC, of course.

    1. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you bought a rig from Alienware, you've already been robbed.

    2. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ironically, I had to help the FBI/Customs on a case they were working on, someone in our office was looking at kiddie porn from a work computer. Figure they'd be looking out for me but that's the government for you.

      I wonder if that is why they knew to come after you (did you show them your 1337 hack0r sk1iz? ;)). Deal with the Devil, get burned.

  64. Wrong wrong. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    It's copyright infringment.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Wrong wrong. by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      It is consider theft see this page http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/netsum.ht m signed in to law by Clinton in 1997. or see this page http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju 48724.000/hju48724_0.HTM

  65. If you are brave by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 0

    http://igloo.bigfiber.net/~the1/hl2_src.rar

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  66. well i am in trouble....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i own a couple half life cds (demo) and other value programs....

    i better trash them and WIPE those areas of my hard drives... good thing i never got into half life.

    posted as AC to keep the FBI off me.

    and i think i will not use/buy value programs again.

  67. Re: trolling for "evidence" by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    Just one of the many reasons I decided to encrypt my entire filesystem.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  68. i'm glad i wasnt the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm glad i wasnt the only one who noticed this... if the FBI came to my place with a search and seize warrant, and I had committed no crime, I'd be all over their asses taking notes and names for a future lawsuit.

  69. This could have been avoided! by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Had Valve made the code Open Source, none of this would have been necessary and we would have that amazing game to play during the Xmas holidays. Including with Ogg Vorbis support to play your own personal soundtrack.

    Such a pity. Hopefully ID Software will learn something from Valve's mistakes and make Doom 3 Open Source. They would be much better for it. It could become a tool of productivity, since the Doom 3 graphics engine would be able to provide a graphical interface for NETSTAT, IFCONFIG and of course, WHOIS.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:This could have been avoided! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawns*. YLI, Lieutenant Dan. My cats can troll better than that.

    2. Re:This could have been avoided! by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

      Wow. I have a cat as well. Does that change your opinion of my lame post? Please?

      --
      Wearing pants should always be optional.
    3. Re:This could have been avoided! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Interesting. Maybe you'd also like to suggest how Valve could have made any money off their open source "product"? By providing "Gamer Training Services" perhaps? The hardware to run the game maybe? Or even by selling the sprites for $5.99 a pop?

      I'd really be interested in looking at your theoretical business model, as long as it doesn't include "???" anywhere.

      Thanks.

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. Who knows... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're sure as hell not going to see something like this get presented by news outlets. Not sensational and it's just some geeks getting busted for hacking, afterall... Never mind that while due process might have been done, it may still be an unreasonable search and siezure of his property by virtue of the fact that they had little real worth to go on and used PATRIOT or something similar to rush a warrant through the courts. Since I don't know the whole story, I'm not going to venture a guess either way- but to ask me to think of it as fiction just because it's a blog is a bit much as well.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Who knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I am a Citizen of the United States of America...

      Funny I had you down as an Induhvidual of the United States of America !

  72. offsite backups! by theCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We just added another reason (you needed another?) to keep your important code and data resources backed up and stored in a secure off-site facility.

    The FBI/SS/Interpol can take anyone's machine anytime they want to and hold it forever, even just looking for emails that might be from someone you might know who might have committed a crime. You get email, right? And bits of interesting code? From a lot of people some of whom are developers, right? You know what all of them are up to all the time? Well you are in their email addressbook so maybe you should know.

    The dark side social networking...

    As things go, and as companies become even more litigious than they already are, I suspect that such loss of equipment and code to search and seizure might become as likely as catastrophic earthquake, fire or flood. Anyone in the code business better wisen up and assume that everything in your dev suite could be named in the next search warrant.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:offsite backups! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, taking someone's computers for a few years or even throwing them in jail for years before trial is seen as an unpleasant unconveinence, not a major issue. So the kid didn't get to play internet games for a few months until he bought another computer. Big deal. So someone who probably did SOMETHING wrong was jailed for a bit and let go because we couldn't prove precisely WHAT. Who cares.

      However, you take computers from an operating business and the rules are different. You don't fuck with America's economy. Americans are already suspicious about mere enforcement of legitimate laws against business, and perfectly willing to limit the liability a company can face in court to relatively trivial amounts (see recent laws passed in Texas, and expect them to be immitated around the Nation). A jack-booted thugocracy will catch REAL political heat very fast for messing with a business of any size.

      The FBI and other law enforcement have internalized these same standards. Without ever consciously realizing the difference, when evidence is needed from a company, law enforcement typically expects to go in and find someone, a sys admin or whatever, who will help them Organization Man to Organization Man collect the necessary stuff without perturbing the course of the business day, and haul off some employee if necessary, but no Steve Jackson style shutdowns.

  73. Re:MORE LIKE +5 RACIST PIG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't you get the e-mail?

    white people: the new minority

  74. So the FBI is looking for internet crooks by spidergoat2 · · Score: 0

    Yet Osama Bin Laden hasn't been caught. While all criminals are bad, why don't we get the big ones first?

  75. The interesting part by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To me the most interesting part of the story is this line:

    I was questioned by the FBI agent in charge and a Secret Service agent at length about the Hungry Programmers, people I used to live with ...

    So he lived with people of the same racial background of those commonly believed to have been involved with the break in. I know that being of the same racial background dose not make them guilty, but it does raise some red flags as to were the probable cause came from. Come to think of it he never really bothered to say he was innocent or anything in the article. And the bit about the wolves circling or what ever makes him sound even more suspicious.

    --
    man .sig
    No manual entry for .sig.
    1. Re:The interesting part by thebatlab · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm..it's hungry not Hungary.

      At least that's what I got out of it. I thnk it's just a group of programmers not necessarily of the same racial background.

    2. Re:The interesting part by rplacd · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand how his race or that of his former housemates' had anything to do with it. Please explain. And -- how did the investigators know the race of the people who broke into the Valve systems?

    3. Re:The interesting part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent should be scored +5 Funny, shouldn't it? I mean, this IS an Emily Lattela gag, right? Should someone be posting something like this:

      Umm, Ms Soul, that's HUNGRY, not HUNGARY...HUNGRY.

      Never mind.

    4. Re:The interesting part by lahosken · · Score: 1

      The Hungry Programmers are not from Hungary. They are (mostly) from Idaho.

    5. Re:The interesting part by federal_employee · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are from the University of Idaho. I'm surprised no one has heard of the hungry programmers. They developed lesstif

      --
      ____
      null
  76. Re:Irony of 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure that's technically irony. Irony is about a consequence having the opposite effect of its intention. The fact that this tyranny comes from the right-leaning American government rather than a British socialist government is ironic, in a way. But otherwise this is exactly what Orwell foresaw. This kind of invasion of privacy was perhaps an inevitable of all types of government.

  77. Halflife by sm0yby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone know what the halflife of a search warrant is?

    --
    Been modded interesting, insightful and funny. Why does real life have to be so different?
    1. Re:Halflife by Shriek · · Score: 0

      This was for the new version so the halflife is twice as long as before

  78. Depends... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're in shock, you might not be thinking. Also worth mentioning is that you might not want to be around anyway- the agents are going to take things from your property and since they're armed, are you going to try to stop them from taking something NOT covered by the Warrant? I, personally, wouldn't want to be about unless I had to be- the stress of seeing them take my stuff and me being absolutely POWERLESS to prevent any of it would drive me physically ill.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  79. Cryptographic filesystem by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like someone needs to use a cryptographic filesystem.

    1. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      good idea. could one be charged with obstructing justice or something similar if the target data of a search warrant was encrypted so strongly?

    2. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by damiam · · Score: 1

      No, of course not. But, you could be ordered to turn over the key, and then be charged if you didn't.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by hyperstation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but what if i "forgot" the passphrase? what if it was stored in a hardware key that they didn't find or was stored elsewhere?

      would invoking the 5th amendment at this point fly? i mean, if the answer is in my head, they can't really seize that now can they?

    4. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      If the answer's really in your head, you haven't nearly enough bits.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    5. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by damiam · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It generally doesn't work to tell them, "I encrypted the entire contents of my hard drive, and I remembered the password every single time I used it, and it's only a coincidence that I'm forgetting it just now." Even if you could sell that, they would still press you for info (did it have numbers? was it someone's name? how did you choose it?), which you would definately remember (barring a lobotomy).

      In any case, a normal-length passphrase (8 chars or less) could get brute forced fairly easily. If it was a longer key stored in hardware (and they didn't have the hardware), they would ask you where it was, and refusing to tell them would not be a good idea.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      heh heh, okay one more: say there was only one hardware key, no wetware backup due to key length and complexity. they did not recover it, and now it is destroyed because of one thing or another. the data is now entirely unrecoverable. what then?

    7. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by LightningTH · · Score: 1

      An easy fix is to use a floppy disk that is the key where upon this is stored in a special holder that upon failure to remove properly (just pass them the whole thing) results in the floppy passing thru a magnetic field would render the system useless if the encryption scheme is implemented properly.

      Of course, if you are that sensitive about your data, they are likely to brand you the criminal they are looking for due to not cooperating.

    8. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by damiam · · Score: 1

      If it's obvious that you had nothing to do with its destruction, than (IANAL) I think you're okay. Otherwise, I'd think you're in trouble.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well, officer, the usb key *was* plugged into the computer when you confuscated it, so I guess you must have it somewhere. What? No, sorry, that was the only copy..."

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    10. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      There is a law enforcing this (key/password turnover to law enforcement on demand) in the UK. I'm not sure whether this applies to the US.

    11. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I suggst using a usb flash drive with a 64MB copy of /dev/random on it, all I have to do is memorize two numbers (start and stop) and I have a roughly 16KB long key that nobody will ever break.

      If I wanted to be sneaky and cared to memorize more numbers I could even use non-continuous segments of the data stream.

      Of course, the cops would just beat my head against the wall until I told them how to decrypt it "Funny, he wasnt like that when we left him alone in the interrogation room. Must be self inflicted"

    12. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shameless plug - check out http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/qryptix for my GPLed project that aims to make the use of Loop-crypto filesystems as home directories painless under Linux.

    13. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In any case, a normal-length passphrase (8 chars or less) could get brute forced fairly easily.

      A normal-length passphrase (though not trivially a dictionary word) along with a salt of 24 bits is *not* going to get brute-forced anytime soon.

      Generate a cryptographic hash (preferably using md5crypt) out of this, and use it to encrypt a true cryptographically random key (generated from /dev/random) and store the encrypted key publicly in a well-known location.

      When you need to use the cryptographic filesystem, decrypt this key and use it. Discard at the end of the session.

      This, in substance, is what my project Qryptix seeks to do. Check out http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/qryptix

      Filesystem ciphers include Blowfish, Twofish, 3DES, AES (128,192,256), or generally anything that is supported by the Kerneli CryptoAPI.

    14. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by programmeratarms · · Score: 1

      "deniable cryptography" systems allow multiple keys or passwords, each producing different decrypted data; when you are tortured or otherwise coerced, give out the "innocent" key. Obviously, the "innocent" data must be set up with plausibility in mind. One such system: http://www.rubberhose.org/

    15. Re:Cryptographic filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. I know the Secret Service reads Kuro5hin by wiredog · · Score: 1

    from the Lee_Malatesta incident.

    1. Re:I know the Secret Service reads Kuro5hin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the Secret Service reads Kuro5hin

      God imagine getting paid to read Kuro5hin articles.... what could possibly be worse....

    2. Re:I know the Secret Service reads Kuro5hin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely that a fellow citizen reported him to the SS.

  81. Wonder if... by YECoyote · · Score: 1

    They will sue me, if I register a domain called "MyCrotchsSore.com"

  82. You dont automatically get it back by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I belive, if memory serves me right, once your stuff is siezed, it can be retained forever.

    You have to prove to a judge, at your expense, that you deserve your stuff back, regardless of innocence or guilt.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:You dont automatically get it back by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Wow... if that's true, that's the most idiotic thing I have heard in my life... I thought only totalitarian governments had laws like that--guess I was wrong :(

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  83. Comments by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The comments are the amazing part to me. You'd think people savvy enough to have read this story would be bright enough to understand why they absolutely HAVE to take the computers, not sit there dicking around trying to pull hard drives out.

    1. Re:Comments by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      You'd think people savvy enough to have read this story would be bright enough to understand why they absolutely HAVE to take the computers, not sit there dicking around trying to pull hard drives out.

      Well, I'm apparantly not that bright, so could you explain it to me? The only reason I can see is that the FBI (perhaps appropriately) places a higher value on their agents' time than on their suspects' property, and so they find it more efficient to take a $1000 computer than to hire someone to remove the $100 hard drive on-site. They should want to remove the hard drive off-site anyway, to analyze it from another computer rather than booting into it's own operating system.

      Of course, if the suspects were really guilty and were prepared for a raid, it would be risky to take the computer at all: how do you know that all your evidence isn't on a RAM drive (or on a "rubber hose" filesystem with cryptographic keys on a RAM drive) that has to be manually saved to disk before a shutdown?

    2. Re:Comments by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm apparantly not that bright, so could you explain it to me?

      You don't want field agents trying to figure out what hardware is important and what isn't, in the field. That distinction should be, and is, made by technicians in a lab.

      Sometimes cases are booby-trapped to explode when opened.

      It's less likely the hard drive will be damaged when transported if it's left in the case.

      Time stamps on the system are more meaningful if you can show that the PC hardware wasn't set for the wrong date.

      Of course, if the suspects were really guilty and were prepared for a raid, it would be risky to take the computer at all: how do you know that all your evidence isn't on a RAM drive (or on a "rubber hose" filesystem with cryptographic keys on a RAM drive) that has to be manually saved to disk before a shutdown?

      Unfortunately, you don't. Does that mean the gathering of evidence should longer be done? Yes, it's possible to store data in such a way that field agents can't gather it. Is it what happens the majority of the time? Hell, no.

      Especially when you're talking about a case of somebody stealing many megs of source code. The odds that they left all the code, and all the incriminating information such as log file entires, on a RAM disk is pretty damn slim.

      But, yes, it's true; sometimes crimes don't get solved.

      BTW, I asked the guy in charge of my local sheriff's department's computer forensics lab what he looks for when vetting a deputy for that duty. Technical knowledge is not only not on the list, but he considers it to be a detriment in some cases. Not to mention the fact that he'd have to pay us three times as much.

    3. Re:Comments by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Right. So they can use them for something else.

      You trust them? Well, that's your right. I don't. I've seen a few too many abusive actions. And I've heard of more. Now it's true, the people who are guilty don't complain much, but neither do the one's who are innocent. Both groups are equally beaten down. Which causes me to believe that the main purpose of such actions is to make people fear their government. Not respect it, fear it. Like being in a small room with a rabid skunk. It will bite you and spray you if you torment it...but it's almost as likely to bite you if you leave it alone. (I'm not sure about spraying you...)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Comments by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Only a jack-booted thug such as yourself would think that is OK. The warrant should list exactly what they are taking, and should not enable a fishing expedition.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    5. Re:Comments by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Right. So they can use them for something else.

      How does them only taking the hard drives improve this situation?

      You trust them? Well, that's your right. I don't.

      How does them only taking the hard drives improve this situation?

      How is the government more frightening if they take the whole PC? The data is the part that's important to you, right?

      The chain of evidence is the part that's important to them. Whether you think their goal is to solve a crime and secure a conviction, or you think it is to scare people for no reason whatsoever just because they're mean, taking the whole PC is still the technically correct thing to do.

    6. Re:Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, if no-one else is going to dignify this troll with a response...

      becuase if they only take the hard disk THEN you only have to replace a $100 HARD DISK, if they take your whole computer you are going to need to spend at least a grand on a new computer, CHURL! SOME PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT SPENDING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BECUASE IT IS A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THEIR INCOME YOU CLUELESS WHITE FLIGHT RICH SCUM!!!!

      (a/c for tax purposes)

    7. Re:Comments by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      SOME PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT SPENDING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BECUASE IT IS A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THEIR INCOME YOU CLUELESS WHITE FLIGHT RICH SCUM!!!!

      Then don't break the law. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. The vast majority of computer confiscations are followed by a conviction, and your same argument could be made against confiscating a firearm from an arrestee.

  84. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISO code .HU seems pretty well entrenched.

  85. The incident by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:The incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, you are a fucking idiot to ever have posted anything like that in the first place. Got what you deserved. Why the fuck would you (EVEN JOKING WHICH I REALIZE YOU WERE) post such a stupid fucking thing in the web. You deserve to be behind bars because you are too stupid for life. Late.

  86. Re:Now here's a question worth answering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about - "Dude, the FBI just came and confiscated all my stuff even though I did absolutely nothing wrong! Now I know you haven't done anything wrong either, but they may come along and grab all your stuff anyways!". You may want to store that copy of your thesis somewhere else because you'll have to redo the whole thing if they confiscate all your stuff!"

  87. Another Mirror. by SiGiN · · Score: 2, Informative
  88. Re: trolling for "evidence" by Bluecoat93 · · Score: 1

    Which will keep you safe exactly as long as it takes a judge to order you to give up your encryption key. Refuse and go to prison.

  89. Confiscated Items -Major Income and Incentive by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether this fellow is guilty in any way or involved in the theft of the code but I do know that he'll have a horrible time trying to get his possessions back. A lot of police departments around the country make a nice little profit from the use and sale of such property. It's not right but it happens.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  90. dealing with the fbi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Two of my friends were raided a while back and had over 20+ systems taken from their apartment. I won't disclose any details, so don't ask.

    Some things to point out from seeing how the FBI works in computer-related investigations:

    One thing to note is if you ever are convicted and sentenced after a federal raid, not only will you not get your computers back, they will come back and seize all your personal assets. Your house, car, furniture, anything and everything you own, regardless whether it had anything remotely to do with the crime or not, and you will never get it back. The federal courts are radically different than any circuit court by far.

    Secondly, expect to be watched. They will tap your phones, house, install a gps tracking device in your vehicle, for at least the first few weeks after the raid.

    Another thing to note is in a hacking case, you will be tried in the state where the hacked systems resided. Expect to shell out alot of money not only for a lawyer, but traveling expenses as well if it's on the opposite side of the country.

    Regardless whether you are guilty or innocent, they will definitely fuck up your life.

    1. Re:dealing with the fbi by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Secondly, expect to be watched. They will tap your phones, house, install a gps tracking device in your vehicle, for at least the first few weeks after the raid.

      You know, I was wondering if that guy that he drove over too, while the fuzz was doing their thing, is going to get a knock in his door in the next few days....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  91. Nope, not a right.... by Svartalf · · Score: 1
    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


    Unless they had probable cause, they can't be issued a warrant in the first place. A fishing expidition doesn't constitute probable cause. Either they truely suspect him of the alleged crime and have some proof thereof to lead them to believe this is the case- or they don't. Sounds like they don't, to me. Having a warrant doesn't mean much these days- with PATRIOT, etc. they're really, really dangerous documents that are given out more on a whim in this day and age...
    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Nope, not a right.... by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      He should get a good lawyer and get the warrant quashed. Then that lawyer could have the judge demand that all this kid's personal property be returned. If the feds really didn't have grounds for a good warrant (ie they lied to the judge or didn't really meet all the requirements for a warrant) then a good lawyer could get it quashed. IANAL but that's what I'd sure look at doing.

    2. Re:Nope, not a right.... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Unless they had probable cause, they can't be issued a warrant in the first place. A fishing expidition doesn't constitute probable cause.
      The FBI have a warrant therefore a judge has agreed that the evidence the FBI have shown constitutes probable cause. Now they get to fish for evidence that will make a case.
      Either they truely suspect him of the alleged crime and have some proof thereof to lead them to believe this is the case- or they don't. Sounds like they don't, to me.
      But then what would you know? All you've seen is a account written by the suspect. It's a bit of jump for you to say the FBI don't have any evidence from that.
  92. ENTIRE machines? by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

    I wonder why they don't just take the harddrives and other storage. It's not like they'll find anything on his video card or NIC...

  93. Re:Hungry? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    ISO code .HU seems pretty well entrenched.

    And if I was a Hungarian, I'd be pretty damned ticked off about it. The Germans refer to their country as "Deutschland," and their country code is appropriately ".de".

    The Hungarians deserve the same, but were apparently marginalized by ISO along with probably a few dozen other countries.

    The OP said it was ignorant to misspell the name Hungary. I'd say it's vastly more ignorant to assume that because we call a nation "Hungary" that Hungary must therefore be its actual name. That is the epitome of Ameri-centricity.

  94. Hungry? I think not! by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    They thought they were hungry NOW?
    Wait until they get their bandwidth bill!

  95. Cypherpunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what would be the ultimate way to secure your data from the Feds in a situation like this? Is there one?

    It sure would suck to have them turn your hard drive over to the *AAs because I'm sure most of us have at least one copyright violation.

    1. Re:Cypherpunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak for yourself, you dirty pirate...

  96. What if you're not guilty... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    What then?

    Suck it up? That's about all you can do.

    It'll be 5-15 years at minimum before that man sees ANYTHING they siezed from his place of residence. Innocent or guilty doesn't matter in that case- that's just how long they get around to returning things to be returned. It all sounds like they were on a fishing expidition or out to send somebody a message- both of which are not allowed by the Fourth Ammendment in the first place.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:What if you're not guilty... by bssea · · Score: 1

      Yes, suck it up. You *could* get a lawyer and go after the government, but that would still take ltos of time and money.

      In order for them to get a search warrant, the FBI must present ample causation to a judge. Checks-and-balances are supposed to help prevent fishing expeditions.

      If this is fishing expedition, then it'll be effective - and against the law. However, merely saying so, do not make it so. Wait until the FBI does what the "need" to do before crying foul.

      --sea

      People do the most wonderous of things behind closed doors.

    2. Re:What if you're not guilty... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In order for them to get a search warrant, the FBI must present ample causation to a judge. Checks-and-balances are supposed to help prevent fishing expeditions.


      BZZZT! Wrong answer, thank you for playing.

      If you haven't been paying attention, Congress has been essentially eliminating most of those checks and balances for some time now. And we've been letting them do it to us. If you don't believe me, look CLOSELY at the PATRIOT Act. Don't need probable cause for warrant or even the warrant for a search and siezure if they label you as a terrorist. The law allows the FBI that privilege, in violation of the Fourth Ammendment- and they've been using it. The law also gives the FBI the right to arrest you and treat you as a foriegn national if you're labeled a terrorist- no due process or anything inconvienient like that. And they've used those features too.

      Anyone that thinks that the checks and balances are currently being acknoleged as being anything much more than toilet paper is sadly deluded.
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  97. This guy is going to make a fortune by Corbie · · Score: 1

    Selling "My Other Computer Was Confiscated By The FBI" stickers.

  98. They're not going to find anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know from a reliable source that the hacker who broke in Valve's server is not american and does not live in the U.S.

    Posted AC for obvious reasons.

  99. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say it doesn't really fucking matter how you spell it, since it isn't even the actual name of their country.

    You are so fucking idiot!!

    If avreage joe have these thoughts about other countries how are we going to stop the world from hating us??

  100. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? "Ameri-centricity"? Pretty much EVERYONE calls that country Hungary except Hungarians, and you are calling it "Ameri-centricity"?

    Smearing America at every chance like that is pretty lame. Besides, you most definitely NOT being Hungarian have no idea what their thoughts are on the matter, so everything you say is coming straight from your ass.

  101. This man was an idiot. by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, points for keeping his composure I guess, but no points whatsoever for intelligence. He seriously just wandered off to take a walk while they were going through his apartment?!

    Folks? If this ever happens to you? CALL YOUR LAWYER. Not the next day, not the day after, but the instant you can convince them to let you get your hands on a phone. If you don't have a lawyer, call a friend that you trust to find you a lawyer.

    It's all well and good that the raiders in this case were relatively polite and friendly, but once the legal system takes notice of you in this way, Mister Policeman is no longer your friend. They have a job to do, and that job is to put your ass in jail. If being nice to you helps them to do this, they'll be nice. If scaring you senseless helps them to do this, they'll do that too. But the fact remains: they are not paid to catch someone who they know for a fact is guilty; they are being paid to catch someone they can convince a District Attorney is guilty, and those are two very, very different things.

    If you are ever in this situation, the only words that come out of your mouth when speaking to the feds should be "I'd like to call my attorney." His job is to keep you out of jail.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:This man was an idiot. by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just so you know, they don't have to let you see your lawyer or speak to your lawyer during the search. The only rule about seeing a lawyer is during a custodial interrogation (ie, you're under arrest). If you then ask for a lawyer, then anything you tell the cops after that is inadmissible as direct evidence against you. Those statements, however, would be admissible in court as rebuttal evidence to contradict your own testimony in court later.

      But sure, calling your lawyer at that point in time is a pretty good idea. But how many people have criminal defense lawyers on call, anyway? Besides former Enron executives?

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    2. Re:This man was an idiot. by chmod000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      They did make clear that he wasn't in custody, early on. And they did allow him to leave the premises, too.


      I just wonder why he didn't start calling lawyers first, even before brushing his teeth. It's not like they would be offended by his geeky halitosis over the phone. "The system", as a whole, is not out to get you, but when something like this occurs, you can be sure that certain people within the system definitely ARE. You need somebody else in that system on YOUR side. That's the way it works.


      As to having a criminal lawyer "on call", not necessary. Just call the first one you find and ask for a referral if your case is not his cup of tea. You can change lawyers if you need to, but it's like changing majors in college. Do it early, if at all.

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    3. Re:This man was an idiot. by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      I do! After 6 DUI's you can bet I got that number memorized!

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    4. Re:This man was an idiot. by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Leaving the premisis was probably a big mistake.

      Had he been there he would have been able to verify the siezure list as they were siezing it. As things are now, there is no way he can contest what was siezed and what wasn't

    5. Re:This man was an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a job to do, and that job is to put your ass in jail.

      That is not true. The job is to get facts as to what the truth is. Many cops forget this. the job is not to pin it on anyone inparticular, but to find out who did it.

      But the fact remains: they are not paid to catch someone who they know for a fact is guilty; they are being paid to catch someone they can convince a District Attorney is guilty, and those are two very, very different things.

      I've found that finding someone I know for a fact is guilty makes it very easy to convince the prosecutor they are guilty.

      "I'd like to call my attorney." His job is to keep you out of jail.

      Actually, his job is to ensure your rights are not violated during the process. Mounting of a defense is something that generally does happen, but is not required by law.

    6. Re:This man was an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Just so you know, they don't have to let you see your lawyer or speak to your lawyer during the search"

      I think your statement is a bit misleading. True, there is nothing that says they have to let you speak with an attorney; but if you aren't being detained, they have no right to stop you, either.

    7. Re:This man was an idiot. by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

      sounds like you need the number to AA memorized.

      --

      --
      Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    8. Re:This man was an idiot. by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Just so you know, they don't have to let you see your lawyer or speak to your lawyer during the search.The only rule about seeing a lawyer is during a custodial interrogation (ie, you're under arrest)

      If you ask them "Am I free to go?" and they say no. Ask them if you're under arrest. If you're not under arrest, they can't detain you. And if they can't detain you, at the very least, you can knock on your neighbor's door and ask to borrow the phone, or perhaps you could even ask to borrow your neighbors web connection.

      When a student columnist was raided by the SS for writing an article on Chelsea Clinton, he had the presence of mind to tape record the search and the questions. I don't know if videotaping would be allowed, but it's certainly worth a try. Just promise your friend that you will replace the video camera if gets confiscated or damaged.

    9. Re:This man was an idiot. by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      He could have left at any time. He was never detained in any way (really). If he wanted to use his telephone he could have and they couldn't have stopped him, legally anyways. He would have been wise to have called though. Even if he didn't have a lawyer he could have flipped through a phonebook and picked any old one he found. "Um, yeah, the FBI and SS are here raiding my house. Do you think you could stop by and interpret for me? Thanks."

    10. Re:This man was an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its also to your best interest whether guilty or innocent to say NOTHING if this happens to you. You have that right under the 5th Amendment. EVERY defense lawyer will tell you to say nothing, and there is nothing illegal about saying nothing.

      Most people do not know this.

      The "buddying" up to you is just a trick. Its the good cop/bad cop act they put on to get a confession out of you. Check some defense lawyer website to see for yourself.

    11. Re:This man was an idiot. by goldmeer · · Score: 1
      But how many people have criminal defense lawyers on call, anyway? Besides former Enron executives?

      I would have to say any number of former presidents of the USA, almost ALL politicians in my home state of AZ, professional criminals and of course, lawyers. (would you consider the last two redundant?)
    12. Re:This man was an idiot. by mandolin · · Score: 2, Funny
      I would have to say any number of former presidents of the USA, almost ALL politicians in my home state of AZ, professional criminals and of course, lawyers. (would you consider the last two redundant?)

      Actually, most of those terms are redundant.

  102. Well, how about the Debian & Soureforge break- by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


    not so much fuss when Sourceforge & Debian were compromised.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  103. Re:Hungry? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Smearing America at every chance like that is pretty lame.

    Relax, I only brought it up because the OP did. He claimed it was stereotypically American to misspell the name of another country, I just countered that it's also stereotypically American to not even know what the hell the actual name of a country is.

    And yes, I'm well aware it's a stereotype, I'm not saying all Americans are stupid or anything of that sort. Relax.

  104. All true but by phorm · · Score: 1

    Several others on that thread listed a virus that did just that... use your machine as a gateway for others to swap their underage smut

    You make a good point about the "recent docs" etc etc though... but if those weren't there I'd say the guy could be interested.

    Hell, we had an FTP hacked at work and what was it used for? Storage of illegal material, including warez, hacks, and porn. I didn't view the JPEG's, mainly because I don't want to know what they were, nor do I want to be caught viewing something that could very well end up being illegal.

    Mount the drive safely off a static machine, wiped it out. Probably some residuals there but god only knows what could happen it were one of my home boxen and a cracker led the police to me.

  105. They scanned the computers... by Lord+Graga · · Score: 0

    ... And found a lot of Ip's, allready from the MBR:

    0xE3 0xF2 0xB7 0x87
    Definetly a h3x IP... it continued like that throught the whole HDD :)
    Get it? :P
    If you don't then it's YOUR fault that I lose even more karma.

  106. Re:Hungry? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    I'm an idiot because I know that Hungarians don't refer to their country as Hungary? And that I choose not to get all bunched up when someone misspells a word that isn't even the actual name of their country?

    Yes, I'm really sure that every person in Hungary must want to kill me right now, for pointing out that they call their country by another name. How dare I take their side?

    Christ buddy, sit down.

  107. why they took cd's, and why he told his friends by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    reading these posts, there are two questions that have REALLY obvious answers. I'll give them anyway, since they seem to be stumping so many people.

    cds: its just policy. One can make a burned cd look pressed if they really want to. Instead of wasting time inspecting each cd, just take them all. Fairly simple.

    why he told friends: Some may be students, who have their school work on their systems, but won't see those systems for years if they get taken. Some may be have files of business importance - perhaps they were writing a program for a company, perhaps they have an extensive cvs repository sitting on a server. Perhaps its just business contacts, or hell - email archives.

    There are a LOT of things that will screw up your life for months, if not years, if you suddenly lose it. Keep in mind that while you may make backups, those backups will be taken as well. Offsite backups even will be, if they know about them (which more and more lately, they will know).

    Think about what would happen if all of your computers, backups, media, and etc all disappeared in an instant. If you're 100% innocent, it will still take a couple of years to get things back. In our tech-dependent world, that's a long time to be in hell for no reason.

  108. Re:These aren't the IP addresses you're looking fo by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

    Depends where you find the IP addy. If it's in an FTP client, you might have something.

    --
    I am NOT a man!
    I am a free number!
  109. Re:Hungry? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    Yeah, kind of like how the Japanese call "Japan"
    "Nihom", not "Japan".

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  110. What is this? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Sorry some one fill me in - how is this theft?? if anything the FBI have been involved in theft of his computers. Did he actually take the source code and delete the original? Granted it might not be right but i really hate when its called theft, its not theft, theft is when you actually loose something, not a hypothetical sale or integrety of your data.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  111. Re:Hungry? by dabadab · · Score: 1

    Well, thanks for speaking up for our the injustice that our TLD (or rather the ISO code) is. Considering that our Finnish brothers had the same injustice happen to them, one must suspect that there's some grand anti-Finno-Ugric conspiracy is going on.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  112. tangential moral of this story. by rplacd · · Score: 1

    If you have an access point, don't leave it open. If someone abuses it, The Man will come down on you because your IP address was involved.

  113. Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't be hungry any longer with the jail meals they shall soon be eating. Then again, they won't be doing much programming, either.

  114. Re:Hungry? by emilymildew · · Score: 1

    Nothing like adding to the perception that Americans don't know how to make proper nouns plural, either.

  115. But is the system good? by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's how it's supposed to work, but that you can lose tens of thousands of dollars of equipment, and quite possibly your livelihood, on mere suspicion doesn't strike me as a very fair and just system.

    For actual police work, all they would need is to take, or even copy the hard drives. Confiscating all this property is just harassment, or possibly incompetence.

  116. Re: trolling for "evidence" by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    "i forgot". what exactly is the crime?

  117. Re:Hungry? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
    Yeah, kind of like how the Japanese call "Japan"
    "Nihom", not "Japan".
    And nobody corrected them? No wonder you see Japanese tourists everywhere. Once they leave Japan, they'll never be able to find it again. Poor souls.
  118. throw something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would prefer 7g solid lead in an aerodynamic package travelling at 6'000km/h through their braindamaged heads. At a whopping 600 rounds per minute, I might add...

  119. Website with more info on the HLII source link by laddhebert · · Score: 1
    Probably already posted, but...

    http://gtwy.net/hl2/

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
  120. Re: trolling for "evidence" by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    Contempt of court. The judge will say "bullshit, you forgot", and lock you up until you "remember".

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  121. Absolutely right by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    Many of the forensic program suites out there are designed to basically "ghost" an image of the suspect system's hard drive, particularly because it also theoretically copies "hidden" data, and data in the slack space. EnCase does this, if memory serves.

    Simply copying the filesystem isn't enough... you need a bit-for-bit copy of the hard drive, not only to gather all the evidence, but to have that evidence hold up in court. If your copy is not exact (and reproducable), your evidence can be challenged, and you can lose it. That alone is one good reason to leave the suspect hard drive untouched and simply ghost an image... if the defense demands another analysis, you can hand over the original drive and say "be my guest, monkeyboy"

    I've never known a law enforcement agency that routinely wiped drives.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Absolutely right by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I've never known a law enforcement agency that routinely wiped drives.
      ---
      All of any evidence pertaining thereto would be summarily ruled incompetent if they did.

      C//

  122. Hacker, not a gamer by lonb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly this person was only in it for the programming -- if they were a real gamer, they could've TOTALLY strifed out of the way of the feds.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    1. Re:Hacker, not a gamer by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Clearly this person was only in it for the programming -- if they were a real gamer, they could've TOTALLY strifed out of the way of the feds.

      Er, don't you mean strafe? Strife is more like what the guy went through.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Hacker, not a gamer by lonb · · Score: 1

      I did in fact mean strafe. ooops.

      --
      "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
  123. Overly broad search warrant and seizure by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but it appears to me the search warrant and seizure was overly broad. Being able to seize all computers, storage equipment and media, monitors, and peripherals without demonstrating proof that the device was used in the commission of a crime and/or stored data relevent to the commission of a crime should be illegal. Seizure before cause and/or proof is illegal. I can see taking storage media (so long as it contains data - not music/video), but taking computers, monitors, keyboards, modems, etc?!? WTF is that all about? If they cannot hire judges that are knowledgable regarding technology than the judges they have cannot/should-not be signing search warrants.

    Personally, I would have reviewed the search warrant closely then told the agents that it was overly broad and covered equipment and devices that cannot possibly be of any value to any investigation and that they will need to secure a new warrant. The new warrant should name devices and equipment relevent to an investigation and exactly what software/data they are looking for. Even a first year law student should be able to see this warrant was too broad, and that they can only seize items described in the warrant (it doesn't matter how much porn, pirated music/video, drug talk, contact info for al Qaeda, whatever - if it isn't named they can't seize it and/or use it against you if it isn't in the warrant).

    If anything, this seizure should help point out how messed-up our law-enforcement and legal system really are. With Bush and Ashcroft in charge, now is a good time to invest heavily in the ACLU and EFF. Know your rights - Defend your rights!

    --
    1. Re:Overly broad search warrant and seizure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what exactly do think will happen to someone who refuses the FBI access to the property by claiming that the warrant is "too broad?"

    2. Re:Overly broad search warrant and seizure by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      That's why they carry guns. All kinds of accidents happen around political dissidents unkind enough to insist that the Consitution of the United States be followed by law enforcement.

    3. Re:Overly broad search warrant and seizure by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Actually I would say sieving all computers and storage equipment is fair.

      Just because a drive currently has porn does not mean it always did. The agents siezing should not be expected to do the forensics while at the guys house.

      Also siezing assembled computers is fairly reasonable, . As for monitors keyboards ect. That is clearly irrelivent. Unless of course they are USB. Just because I am clever enough to hide a USB device in my keyboard should not mean I am immune to having my storage media siezed?.
      If the specific things listed on teh warrent are computers/storage media how is that overly broad?

      And unfortunatly anything found on the media can be used against him for any crime, as can anything that is in plain sight as they search for storage media, if there is not a specific place listed to look then any container that could hold a flash card is pretty much fair game. Unfortunatly that is the way it has to be.

      If one of your children's teachers (assuming you have any children) is reasonably suspected of running a child pornography ring using their students wouldn't you want the investigators able to take the time needed to make sure that the hard drives they sieze are indeed clean? And that the whole thing is not stored on a stack of flash cards that are scattered about the house?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  124. I'd say this was pretty overt by Attaturk · · Score: 1

    "And you have to love the bit about whether the agents had "guns drawn" when he opened the door. There's nothing to suggest they actually did - but by tossing the reference in there, the FBI sounds much more menacing, don't they?"

    And quoting Toshok from the article:
    "I didn't watch it happen but apparently Peter awoke, naked, to a doorway full of FBI agents with guns out, yelling at him to get up."

    I'll take it with a pinch of salt too, but that does sound pretty menacing to me. Maybe it's because guns aren't part of my country's constitution but unless I'm considered armed & dangerous I wouldn't expect that kind of a wake-up call. What happened to Valve was bad - but IMHO defending corporations with armed raids is very dangerous territory.

    1. Re:I'd say this was pretty overt by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I once was woken up at 4 am by the sound of gun shots in my apartment building. I called the police, and they arrived at my door about 15 seconds later. The door had a sticky deadbolt (one of about five), so I couldn't get it open.
      Meanwhile, another set of police were banging on the fire escape side door, screaming for me to open it. When I finally got the front door open, there were five cops shoulder to shoulder with their guns drawn on me.
      Being half asleep, I just said something like "Wait a minute" and went to open the back door. The cops came in and interrogated me quite thoroughly. My neighbor had called the police about two minutes before I did and told them that the shots came from my apartment. They ran through all the blood on the first floor and past the rivels of human flesh on the walls to get to me, apparently without thinking that the problem might be down there. Lucky that they didn't shoot me when I turned and walked away from them, I guess.

      I guess what I'm trying to say is that I was too shocked by it all to feel menaced or, really, anything at all.

  125. So ... by michajoe · · Score: 1

    if these are actually the thiefs and the "source" is found and returned to Valve, can the guys at Valve finally get back to work?

  126. i had my machine taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Commodore 64 and my 1541 disk drive were seized in 1986 for breaking into a mainframe and creating user accounts, exploring the system. When I got the computer/equipment back about 7 months later, it was untouched. As a matter of fact it was in a large sealed bag.

    deathcow

  127. Kevin? by slackingme · · Score: 0
    I think it's obvious this man is guilty (why else would the FBI raid him?) and has caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to Valve and Valve's IP. I really don't think the death penalty is enough for this guy and if you think otherwise you're a sushi-eating, latte-sipping, wacko liberal loser. This man is a TERRORIST and has harmed Valve and our economy with his TERRIFYING THEFT of TOP SECRET Valve IP. DMCA, USA PATRIOT, the works, this is a bad man. Valve lost billions and billions of dollars because of the delay caused by this guy and he should be shot. Or at least never get his hardware back and rot in a cell for five years waiting for a trial. Yeah.

    ... patiently waiting for Doom3 ...

  128. Those really are my arp tables! by commonloon · · Score: 0

    Or someone's spoofing my mac addresses... really truly Mr. FBI man.

  129. Any Response, Taco? by krysith · · Score: 1

    From the previous posts, it would appear that if /. has been approached by the FBI there might be a gag order in place. If so, then of course they couldn't tell us. However, if they have been approached without a gag order being in place, then they could tell us (I think that would probably result in a front page article, but I could be wrong). So I see four possibilities:

    1) FBI approached /., gag order in place (Taco remains ominously silent)

    2) /. never approached, Feds think geeks are just jabbering idiots, are likely correct (Taco says, "Nope, FBI doesn't care what you think about SCO)

    3) /. approached, perhaps informally, no gag order in place. (Taco gets to brag about importance of website, privacy activists run for Kuro5hin where they can get prime Secret Service attention)

    4) Nobody at /. notices this thread, editors are too busy posting duplicate stories. (Taco remains ominously silent, posts story about FBI raid for Half-Life 2 source)

    So, does Taco or one of the other editors care to respond? Otherwise we may have to take the implication that they ~are~ under a gag order. Not that I would care; I would never say anything here I wouldn't want to be public knowledge, but many in the /. community would be very interested to know about such a thing.

    1. Re:Any Response, Taco? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Waiting for a response from Taco (or any editor) is like waiting for a retarded kid to make it through the alphabet in the right order. Some things just ain't gonna happen in this lifetime.

      And last I checked, Taco was still struggling around "g... h... i..." with Michael hot on his heels at "a...".

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  130. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    adjective? what's that?

  131. The Microsoft Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to point out the connection between Microsoft and Valve (Gabe Newell & Mike Harrington were Microsoft Exectutives before they started Valve); as well as Microsoft's historic record for turning lemons into lemonade, and let rampant speculation do the rest.

  132. hmm by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    is posession of a copy of the code illegal? cuz there's lots of copies floating around...

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think? Really. Do you really think it could possibly, under the most bizzre loophole, be legal or are you just trying to fill a post-quota. (I know I am).

  133. Half Life 2 for sale in russia by lub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to this article Half Life 2 has been translated into Russian, compiled, and is for sale on the shelves of a Russian trader in Novosibirsk.

    Sack the sigs

  134. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the more reason to keep your important data encrypted offsite.
    Also encrypted wireless tech is also fun. By the time they get enough tech onsite to track down the wireless server, (hopefully in neighbors dorm/house-new warrent), should be enough time to have someone else clean up.

    Also a webcam so your fans can whatch you being raided by the feds :P

  135. Re:Hungry? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    Those are very good points.

    Spain has ".es", Switzerland has ".ch", Croatia has ".hr", so you're right, why didn't Hungary get theirs? Mind you, Morocco would have been left in the lurch.

    Perhaps they should have used the Olympic 3-letter designation for countries?

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  136. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nippon. Domo.

  137. valve customer by moojin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    from the search warrant, it looks as though just about anybody who has bought a valve product (valve software or manuals) or even just surfed over to their website (ip address in web browser history) or contacted anybody at their office via email (product support) would qualify for a visit from the secret service / fbi.



    a law must be enacted where computers can not be held for a certain period of time (5 business days) unless charges are brought up against the owner. the 5 days would give the confiscator enough time to copy the hard drives on the machines. if not, why should the citizen be responsible for the time it takes the secret service / fbi to analyze the contents of a hard drive. this kind of reminds me of the ibm sco case.

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  138. SS and FBI raid for game code? by js62 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when is game code that important? WTF is in the game that got the feds involved. How does Valve rate this kind of assistance? Shit gets stolen everyday and nothing like this ever happens. Anyways if this guy has half a brain he has backed up the important shit offsite like all good coders should do. As an offtopic thought, I wonder how they would do against Apple's filevault? Would they be able to crack it?

    1. Re:SS and FBI raid for game code? by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      Because they are a corporation with lots of money and the leak of the Halflife 2 source could negatively effect their business.

      Duh.

      Things that get stolen from people or groups that don't have lots of money don't get investigated because, by definition, they don't matter (since they don't have money).

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  139. The worst part is by abolith · · Score: 1
    that they will likely never see the computers again, or if they do it will be in 18+ months even if they are innocent of all crimes. happened to me (only with a firearm not computers) because someone thought they would be cute and alter the serial number on an assault rifle that happened to be the same as the one I happened to own. It took almost 2 years to get it back (and that was WITH a lawyer) turned out that it was "misplaced" right into the personal collection of an agent... nice huh? fucking thieves is all they are.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  140. Here's my comment to the guy who is busted.. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Posted this on his site, noticed it was running like ass - now I see it linked here - it all makes sense now :)

    1You guys are all taking sides on this shit to support a poor chump who lost his PC's.

    and as geeks, understanderbly - fuck I'd be crying if someone took my PC's - totally, it's truely a horrible horrible thing to happen to a geek. :(

    None the less - why the fuck is everyone on this posting board making the assumption this guy didn't do this? - mmmmmmm? anyone got an answer?

    Of course he can't fucking admit it here or to anyone - and therefore he may have done it but can't speak of it (poor bastard)

    I feel sorry for you either way, but I'm sure as fuck not making comments about how wrong this is - that source leaked fucked all us gamers up - if you did take it,...... well I think a nasty slap on the wrist or something is in order, not losing PC's and shitting yourself from the f.b.i- but either way no one gets my support until I know for a *fact* they are innocent.

    Also,..... and I hate to say this to you, but I myself have been raided (much much smaller scale) and I can tell you this,.... you don't want to hear it but they WILL find something they don't like if you're an average geek - these kind of people are assholes - they don't give a fuck about you and they don't respect your technical skill.
    if you're a "self employed I.T Proffessional" or a college kid or whatever - the world still has a closed mind on geeks - you will be discriminated against.
    If they find more than 20 mp3's they might look at doing something through that, or if there's porn (and cmon as if there wouldn't be over 9 boxes) they will do something with that.
    If there's rips of movies / games- even one, these kind of people blow it out of proportion. :(
    I personally have been to court over 2x 9$ mice...... I shit you not.....

    Good luck......


    Poor bastard,... damn I'd hate to lose my boxes,..... well at least it's a good excuse to start fresh :(

    1. Re:Here's my comment to the guy who is busted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mice? Why mice!?

    2. Re:Here's my comment to the guy who is busted.. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      3 guys robbed my school for about 12 computers - they were students.

      When the cops met up with these 3 guys and raided them - they took a video card I sold one of these guys - he said "this is not stolen from the school, this is actually mine, I bought it from (insert my name here"
      (which he did)

      The police came to me suspecting I had something to do with this robbery since I was also a "dork" - they wouldn't leave until they found something basically - they found a plastic bag with 2 broken mice which I had "lifted" from the school - I went to court over the 2 mice - total cost 18$ worth

      Lovely stuff.

  141. Wrong, fucktard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They never pointed the guns AT THE KID, you moron. They were pointing at the person HOLDING the kid, and the guys finger wasn't even in the trigger guard.

    More importantly, if those relatives gave a shit about the kid, then why would you force cops to do a raid by holding up in a house? And why would you stand around with lots of cameras to take pictures of the event?

    Asshole.

    1. Re:Wrong, fucktard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they didn't want the poor little squirt to become the property of the Cuban government? Oh, but I bet you're going to wax poetic about what a great man "Dr. Castro" is.

      Carry on, asshat.

  142. Riiiiight by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    And why, precisely, would a developer want to open their engine up? The engine is where many developers make most of their money. The best examples are the iD engines and the Unreal Tournament engine. These get licensed for so many games it's amazing. Why? Well because theya re good at what they do, and in the case of many dev houses, it really saves on costs over writing your own.

    Also engines contain what would be called trade secrets. That is, they work out how to do something better, faster, whatever than the rest. If the code was in the open, people would find out how, and copy it, even if not the code directly.

    For most companies, there is NO incentive to open engine code until later. Look at iD. It's quite clear that Carmack supports open source, as you can see from the opening of old engines. However it's not done with teh current ones. That would be bad for bussiness.

    1. Re:Riiiiight by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      I am glad that out of all the comments in reply to my post, one person has finally posted some reasonable criticisms.

      In answer:

      Some engines do get licensed by other companies, but most do not. Even in the case of developing something that will be sold, I would argue for taking a hard look at how opening it would affect your ability to sell it later. It is extremely hard work to copy an engine without leaving enough evidence in the binary and game itself to provoke a lawsuit down the road. I doubt a respectable company would take the risk -- instead buying the code legitimately. In fact, having your engine stolen by less legitimate companies may in fact bring you more business from the legitimate ones. More developers will become familiar with the engine and want to use it, and some gamers will come to expect certain elements of the engine as standard in their games. It in not impossible that the Photoshop dynamic is most likely here.

      As for trade secrets, I am skeptical about the actual monetary loss from opening the code. Code tricks worthy of being kept secret do exist, but are rare, and most often fairly insignificant to a big project. Code is simply hard to copy. The best coding tricks are harder still. Again, I would argue at taking a look at what you gain from opening the code and comparing it to what you lose.

    2. Re:Riiiiight by randyest · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry for my other reply. You really are an imbecile. A thousand pardons. Time for your meds now . . .

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Riiiiight by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      All right, you have made me interested. How exactly did you manage to get upset over a discussion about how to market video games? You seem representative enough here. I have had a dozen heated replies and only one reply with any substance, all over what seems like a fairly pablum topic.

      I would like to hear a bit more about how your thought patterns on this work. A subscription to your newsletter would be great too.

    4. Re:Riiiiight by randyest · · Score: 1

      Who's upset? Your comments were laughable. At least, at first. Then, after a few kind sanity checks (and a few less than kind ones), you defended your position further, which honestly made me think you were most likely, you know, touched in the head. Slow, in some way, if you will. Were it not for the fact that your other posts are mildly sane, you wouldn't be reading this reply.

      I think you'd do well to re-read your own posts in context and think about each sentence. I'll try to help, but I'm afraid IHBT already so I'll keep it minimal to get the points across, though I will include both of your posts:

      If Valve tries to make the claim in court that HL2 was postponed until April because of the source code theft, that will become fraud on their part.

      This is a non-sequitir. If souce code containing security routines (both anti-online-cheat and copy-protection/serial validation) is compromised, a delay is reasonable. Whether or not it's true is irrelevant here -- if they say so, no one can reasonably contradict. In any case, it wouldn't be "fraud" to claim that martians delayed the source code by failing to create a sufficient number of crop circles. It's unprovable and irrelevant either way. See, Valve and no one else (including you) gets any input whatsoever into what their release date is -- if the say the foo caused it, then the foo caused it -- who cares?. If you meant to say that if they claim damages due to a release date extension, well that's not fraud either, it's simply irrelevant -- Halflife2 does not have a market window to compete with other Halflife2's -- so no damages would be awarded on the delay in any conceivable suit. Damages might be awarded because of time and money spent to re-write compromised code, and that's reasonable. Fraud isn't playing a role in this.

      Until now it was just harmless marketing lies.

      To what antecedent does "it" refer? This makes no sense -- do you mean "delays/schedule slips"? If so, how is this relevant? It's a rather acidic comment that, well, distracts and annoys.

      The delay had little if anything to do with the code theft -- that was only a convenient excuse.

      You have no idea of the source of any delay. Had you, you would posit some evidence (or at least some reasoning). Again, the words of a ninny befoul my eyes.

      Someday I would like to see a game company create a game in an open way.

      Here's where it gets extra silly. It's been tried, and it failed. Try researching some before spewing your "great ideas" that are this far out of the box.

      They should have all their engine code out in the open so anybody could follow the progress and even contribute if they felt like it.

      Suuure. ("Riiight" was taken). Why should they do this? To be as successful as the other open source game engines (read: not at all)?

      They would not need to make up stuff about release dates because the public could easily find out the status of completion themselves.

      Your incredible lack of understanding of marketing rears its ugly head. Hype, anticipation, and fanboi fury simply add to the desire (and ultimately, the sales) -- it's often intentional, and it works. Why should any developer care to have the public (fanbois, especially) looking over their shoulder as they code, weathering annoying questions from the wholly unqualified masses (such as yourself)? What's the benefit? Truly, the fact that you care enough to ask (or whine) about release dates simply means you care and you will buy it if it ever makes it to market -- how hard did you cry for updates and release date info for Halflife1? Zero -- because you didn't even know they were making it or that it would be so good -- did that hurt HL sales? Would giving more insight into their development status have helped the sales, or simply wasted their time? (Uh oh, I shouldn't ask rhetorical ques

      --
      everything in moderation
    5. Re:Riiiiight by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      After your last comments, I am just dying to read your newest mountain of prose. I have bookmarked it and will get back to it when I have the time. Before 2006, I promise. Keep checking back religiously for my reply. It's coming.

  143. Re:Hungry? by frost22 · · Score: 1
    there's some grand anti-Finno-Ugric conspiracy is going on.
    Of course there is - every foreigner who has had to learn that language gets conspiracy memebership offered afterwards. I have it on a good source that 97% accept that offer.
    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  144. They already had a warrant. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    They are taking your stuff one way or the other. If you are confident there's nothing on your PCs then what is getting a lawyer going to do other than put you further out of pocket?

    If they are taking all your PCs then perhaps the first call you should make should be to Dell ;)

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:They already had a warrant. by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Maybe if he'd called a lawyer, he wouldn't have signed off on a confiscation list that didn't include everything that was confiscated. I'm sorry, but if it wasn't on the list, he won't be seeing it ever again.

  145. Hacker, The Game by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    And as a direct result of that raid and its aftermath, SJG published the classic card-based games "Hacker" and "Hacker II" as a thumbed nose at the cluelessness of that organization (I sure hope they've STARTED to wise up). Though they're out of print, they're GREAT games, and I am glad to have Ebayed a copy of Hacker.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:Hacker, The Game by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Actually they're back in print as the deluxe edition.

  146. Well personally by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I'd be calling a lawyer. If you don't happen to have one that is a normal contact, get your phone book and find one. Get them down to you house to monitor things, such as taking things not on the warrant. Yes, it's going to cost you a few hundred bucks.

    It's worth it.

  147. Re:Irony of 1984 by kscguru · · Score: 1
    It is irony, in that they are attempting to provide information that portrays the Secret Service in a positive light - they "investigate crimes" (ooh how exciting!) to protect the public. 1984 contradicts that positive light.

    As a bit of trivia, the country in 1984 - "Oceania" - was the North America plus the UK. The story was set in Britain, but it implied the US was equally draconian.

    --

    A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

  148. Computer laws are messed up by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The nation's computer hacking laws are really messed up. You get ACCUSED of hacking, they take all your electronics (all of them, tv's, vcr's, etc). If you get convicted, you never seem them again. Even if it was your wife's computer, she'd be sans that computer (and all the data on the hd). If don't get convicted, all bets are off as to what happens to your data.

    Let's say you get convicted. You get, let's say, 10 years in the slammer. You get out, and are not allowed to touch a computer for a while, and when you are, it's even longer before you can use internet, email, etc. You aren't allowed to make any profit (write a book, work in computer security) from computers. Your life (computers) has been taken away from you.

    Now, let's say you murdered someone. It wasn't a bad murder, you got off with 20 years. You get out, you can't legally buy guns (but you can still have access to them). Other than a black mark on you record (which you have with computer crimes anyways), your life is relatively back to normal.

    Computer crimes should be more civil (fines) rather than criminal. The problem is a lack of education in lawmakers about computers (in general too). They're scared to death of hackers, and want to stop hackers, but probably don't realize how little effect their laws have.

    1. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      Valve could go under because of this. $tens of millions in damage has been done. The programmers who work there could have their work destroyed. That is a crime. The hackers who did this should go to REAL prison and spend REAL time. This crime is as serious as an arson attack. This isn't about fear, it is about justice. These hackers ruined lives! They need to pay a price for that.

    2. Re:Computer laws are messed up by db10 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's gay. programmers don't give a shit, they get paid the same $$$ (usually crap pay for game programmers) regardless. The rights of the SUSPECTS should be held sacrosanct until proven guilty. Arson endangers lives, fool. A potential hacker just highlights the need for better better security. Now put your panties back on and regain a measure of self respect.

    3. Re:Computer laws are messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If valve goes under it will mostly be because fanboy wannabe 2600 supporters decide they are a bad company and quit buying their stuff.

      Look at all the people who worked for WorldCom (MCI) who did BILLIONS, not MILLIONS of dollars of damage. Not one of them has seen the inside of the clink yet. I guess the hackers only crime was they were 3 orders of magnitude off, no ? If they'd done it a thousand times they would petted and fetted at Party fundraisers, right ?

    4. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      What if the company goes under, lays people off or other bad shit. No one got hurt 'physically', but neither did anyone with Enron, except everyone who was involved with the company, the people who lost everything when their retirement plan evaporated. The point is that it may seem harmless to toss around a bit of code, but the effect is to destroy people's work and hard earned benefits. Its one thing to pull peoples pants down, deface a web site, leave an amusing message, whatever, but to destroy a company is something else. Its probably going to be another 6 months before they get a product to market, Valve is in deep shit. I don't see how you can excuse this kind of blatant theft that ruins lives. I don't see what rights were violated here on the part of the person who was searched, they had a search warrant signed by a judge. They didn't send him to Gitmo and aren't beating him with a phone book. They took his computer, and that sucks, but this isn't the Gestapo hauling him off in the middle of the night to a concentration camp! Seven of those computers were probably pulled from the trash anyway.

    5. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      If I hacked your SS number, took your identity, trashed your life, wouldn't you be pissed off? These hackers did worse than that. They took stuff of zero economic value to 'them' and tossed it around the world to be trashed for no apparent reason except to say that they hacked Valve. Big wooo! Big man hacked Valve. Big man put Valve on life support. WTF is wrong with people when they think beating up a small company of video game geeks is a 'good thing'!

    6. Re:Computer laws are messed up by db10 · · Score: 1

      You are denying the fact the guy is innocent until proven otherwise. The intelligent answer for Valve is to be cognizant of security concerns. The security was poor for an asset that is worth millions of $$$. The answer is NOT to ignore the rights, property, and privacy of a SUSPECT. I'm not sure if you can grasp these simple concepts, but I'm sure you would if you were in this guys shoes.

    7. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      They got a warrant and took his computers legally. I agree that computers get taken for too long, but the fact remains they had a warrant. They had every RIGHT to take those computers because a judge said they could. How else are they supposed to collect evidence? Beat down your door and haul you away to be interrogated with rubber truncheons, jumper cables and ice water? They ignored nothing, this is what the police have ALWAYS done. The person being searched was treated fairly if his article is accurate. A word to you people who want to keep things private. Tell your wife, a clergyman or your lawyer, anything else can be used against you. If they have probable cause they can and will search anywhere and everywhere, you do not have a right to stop them from searching unless that search is without merit. That is just the way it is and has always been. You can't put something in a box and say, "That box is private, you can't go there." That isn't the way the law works, that is the first place the police will look.

      You are denying the fact the guy is innocent until proven otherwise.

      I am not saying anything about his guilt. I don't know who the FBI is after, perhaps him, perhaps a friend, perhaps his machines had been compromised and were zombies being used by the Russian mob, who knows. But if the police do not have the right to investigate, no criminal will be found EVER. They got a warrant from a judge because they had a reasonable expectation that this guy had some stolen material. That was a reasonable expectation given observations they had made. And given that he did not cooperate with the police in tracking down what was a blant theft, also given that he probably knows more than he is telling, I am more than a little suspicious of what he is saying. This isn't some innocent kid downloading MP3's, he knows what he is doing and what is going on if his pals are into the hacking scene. I'm not saying he is guilty, but his conduct indicates he is not being fully honest and he is associated with people who may have knowledge of a crime. Hence, they tossed his flat and took his computers.

    8. Re:Computer laws are messed up by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      So, since everyone is innocent until proven guilty, then no search warrant should ever be granted since that has a negative effect on someone's life? And because Valve's security was less than perfect, it's their fault they got hacked? And because she had on too much makeup, and was wearing a short skirt, she was "asking for it"?

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    9. Re:Computer laws are messed up by db10 · · Score: 1

      You are completely missing the point. If you are willing and supportive of the mistreatment of a fellow citizen, then don't shed a tear when you are put in the same position, and nobody gives a shit (in the same manner that you are judgemental and unsupportive of this particular SUSPECT). You continue to imply his guilt, but that is contrary to his assertion that he is innocent.

    10. Re:Computer laws are messed up by db10 · · Score: 1

      No, a search warrant is fine. The question is whether the guys computers should be confiscated and kept from him for an indeterminant amount of time on a suspicion of guilt. Let me ask you this: If you are innocent, and the FBI confiscated your computers, which might contain essential and irreplaceable personal/business information, with no promise of return... would you feel hard done by? Nah, you'd probably be fine with it.

    11. Re:Computer laws are messed up by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      No, it would suck if that happened. But it would also suck if crimes couldn't be prosecuted because the police couldn't secure evidence... my computer, his car, your bank account. Imagine this post on ./: "Ha ha! Stupid fucking FBI grabbed my hard drives, copied them, and handed them back. Here's me uploading the HL2 source code to every FTP server in Asia... let them stop me now!"

      Fundamentally, there's a point when innocent people have to be inconvenienced because the enforcement of law isn't perfect, and the choice is to allow some of that inconvenience to avoid letting guilty people go free because law enforcement's hands are tied too tightly.

      I asked a lawyer this afternoon about this, and if my computer with crucial business info on it was confiscated, I would petition the court to get a copy of the hard drive back, or at least specific files I needed that could be verified not to contain [kiddie porn|HL2 source code|anthrax bomb making instructions], with reasonably good chances of success. The courts aren't nearly as stupid and thuggish as people here are portraying them to be.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    12. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      What mistreatment? They didn't kick his ass or harass him at work in front of his boss to get him fired. All they did was toss his flat on a tip. He is innocent until proven guilty, but how are you supposed to investigate if you don't have 'suspects'. You have to be able to create some kind of link to a suspect or it would be impossible to try anyone for any crime. Innocent does not mean you have a right to be free from reasonable suspicion. It means you cannot be put in jail until you are convicted of a crime by a judge and jury of your peers.
      Ex: A man has a smoking gun in his hand next to a dead body full of bullet holes, that must mean he is without suspicion by your logic!

      don't shed a tear when you are put in the same position

      All I have to say to that is "Top of the world ma, top of the world!"

    13. Re:Computer laws are messed up by eWarz · · Score: 1

      So what work exactly was destroyed? Nothing was deleted. Nothing was lost. A COPY of the code was stolen. That's it. Nothing else.

    14. Re:Computer laws are messed up by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      How many murderers do you know? I doubt that they leadany kind of normal life.

    15. Re:Computer laws are messed up by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Right. Or maybe, just maybe, their work was merely copied, and they're just using this leak as an excuse to explain why they haven't finished Half Life 2. Ooh, it might make it easier to cheat on online games? Tweaking some lines of code to obfuscate the online mode might take, oh, a few days.

      "Arson attack", indeed. Get a sense of perspective.

    16. Re:Computer laws are messed up by LCookie · · Score: 1

      Hell, WARRANTS are worth shit.. FBI sucking a judges dick is not what *I'd* call "a reasonable expectation that this guy had some stolen material". I wouldn't be the least surprised if they even had blanco warrants lying around just waiting to be filled in. If they wish they can always try to get my stuff.. I got backups of all important stuff an a few DVD's spread among my friends and burried safly on a few places. And yeah, I wear my tinfoil hat 24/7 ;-) My HDD's are encrypted (with a self programmed alg.) so I wish them good luck in decrypting it. What people like you don't realise is that the "system" in itself has a good base, but with time it became just as corruped and criminal as the scum they're chasing. And what happens if an innocent man gets caught in their all so rightous procedures? Well tough luck, too bad for him! I saw that story a year ago of a man who spent 10 years of his life in jail before they found out he was innocent. He got like 10 bucks per day in jail. (10 * 365) * $10 = $36.500 Would you like to lose 10 years of your life for 36.500? I don't think so.. If you ask me the police state is not about to come, it's ALREADY THERE. FBI and Secret service is like old NAZI SS or GESTAPO. "We need to protect ourselves etc etc etc" is what politicials say, well that's exactly what the NAZI told people too. Plus I'd like to see some of the protection they're talking about, the only thing that is protected are financial interrests, nothing else. So ppl wake up, it's time for a change! Democracy might be nice in theory, but practically it's a complete failure. Democracy is dictatorship of the stupid masses, it can't work that way!

    17. Re:Computer laws are messed up by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Wasn't a bad murder? What a good murder?

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    18. Re:Computer laws are messed up by whittrash · · Score: 1

      Nazi, fascists, Gestapo? No! I agree they go to far, especially locking people up without a trial, but that doesn't excuse people from stealing code from Valve. You may hate the FBI and Secret Service, but who are we going to rely on to protect ourselves?? Valve was royally fucked by a bunch of vandals who went in and thouroughly ransacked their operation. What are they supposed to do? OK I will get my Mk-23 SD and a couple of clips, wait in the shadows accross the street from the fool who hacks my shit and put a bullet in his brain? Is that the solution? Perhaps we should let corporations/RIAA enforce the law?

      Like it or not we need law enforcement. They often abuse their power, but they are necessary. I am probably trashing my Karma over defending the FBI but the truth is people on /. like to talk trash about the FBI but if they were the victim of a crime like identity theft or a family member was kidnapped they would run straight to the FBI and the FBI would probably help them. I don't excuse violations of peoples rights but we need to be reasonable about this.

    19. Re:Computer laws are messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm aware they haven't actually been proven guilty yet..

  149. What I want to know... by michrech · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is why they are called the "Secret Service" when they aren't, well, secret...

    =]

    --
    bork bork bork!
  150. Perhaps he should get a video camera AND a lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it would be a good idea to get a friend to come over with a video camera and record the actions of the agents. That way if there is any dispute over the condition of the equipment or what was taken you have a vidoe inventory.

  151. Here's the part I liked by beacher · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The blonde FBI agent was nice (and annoying) enough to tell me repeatedly that the judge would go easier on me (and they could all go home earlier) if I would just tell them where the stuff was. If I had it, of course. But if I denied having it, they'd really throw the book at me *when* they found it."

    The prosecution and defense attourneys are the only ones that can do sentance negotiation / mediation. This line is *often* used by cops on evedince fishing trips. It's legal because he *isn't* in custody and not under formal interrogation.
    I agree though - Call the lawyer.

  152. If they raid YOU... by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    (or for that matter, ME...)
    I suggest you (politely but firmly) insist on logging everything they take out of your place on a yellow legal pad as it goes out the door, don't take "no" for an answer on this matter, and make the agent in charge counter-sign the list at the end. Also, protest ANYTHING that doesn't match what the warrant still in your hot little hand specifies; if it ain't on the warrant, they aren't entitled to seize it. (Commercially-pressed music CDs, for example.) You ARE within your rights to do this, and you can probably even embarrass them into not seizing obviously unrelated stuff, and you *will* get an accurate inventory.

    You can also kiss it all goodbye on the way out, 'cause the legal system purely sucks on your rights wrt return of seized property in its original condition.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  153. They get a little crazy. by Izang · · Score: 1

    Back in the 80's, an old high school friend of mine was war dialing the local numbers. He stumbled upon a GTE dial-up line which required no password. I guess he played around a little too much and his house was raided the following night. About 30 local cops, GTE officials, state and FBI came in "guns drawn." A female local officer said, "Touch and key and you're dead." They seized random parts from random computers. They took a monitor here and a printer there. They even took an Atari ST. My friend had a lot of pirated software. I'd say thousands of Amiga disks. They took all of that and literally threw it into the back of a van.

    He didn't actually get into much trouble but the local papers made him out like he was trying to rip off people. It took him 5 years to get his computers back and for a year it sat in boxes at the local jail. They also gave back all of his pirated software. Almost everything had bat shit on it and was marked for destruction.

    1. Re:They get a little crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he could sell the stuff marked for destruction and with evidence tags on ebay, especially if accompanied by a xerox copy of any newspaper articles describing the event. There are people who collect that kind of stuff.

    2. Re:They get a little crazy. by evil+crash · · Score: 1

      Pirated software was all you could get for the Amiga. And after 5 years, it's abandonware...

      --
      "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."-THG
  154. In other news... by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Hey boss, I'm heading out for lunch right now. I've been coding all morning and now I'm really Hungarian.

    In other news, FBI raided John Lebowski's premises as they heard the hackers were using Reverse Polish Notation.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  155. Re:Hungry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I will start referring to Hungary as "Country of motherfuckers", Afghanistan as "Country of camel fuckers", and Egypt as "Country of mummy fuckers".

    Since Hungary, Afghanistan, and Egypt aren't what those countries *call* themselves, obviously this is OK. Because I'm smart enough to know that's not what they call themselves.

  156. Re:Perhaps he should get a video camera AND a lawy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously doubt that FBI and\or Secret Service agents would allow this.

  157. Filevault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get FileVault for OS X. Never get caught, assuming you use a big password.

  158. Refuse and go to prison...Bzzt - wrong! by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    Plead fifth amendments rights - non-incrimination, seizure of property without due process, and seizure of property without compensation (in case there was due process).

    Check out these articles on findlaw...
    Fifth amendment

    Self-incrimination

    Knowledge and wisdom can take you a long way. For everthing legal hire a good lawyer. Join the ACLU and EFF today.

    --
    1. Re:Refuse and go to prison...Bzzt - wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't try that in the UK, where it is actually illegal not to provide your keys. I guess it depends how serious whatever you're trying to cover up is...

    2. Re:Refuse and go to prison...Bzzt - wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so you want to play legal hardball with the Secret Service, eh? I bet a few months in Guantanamo would change your attitude.

    3. Re:Refuse and go to prison...Bzzt - wrong! by lithiumcloud · · Score: 1

      Not in New Zealand, where you are required to give up your encryption keys - unless the password itself is incriminating evidence. So make sure you password is something like i3am9going14%&^%t7o%BLOW*UP.?parliame5nt and you're away laughing.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  159. He should have... by jeremy_dot · · Score: 1

    challenged the FBI and SS agents to a game of Half Life.

  160. A message to valve. by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    IMO: Valve has not provided any convincing and unquestionable proof that they were actually atacked by any hacker group, the attack they described is surrounded by inconsistencies: Why did the hackers only stole 1/3 of the code and left all media behind? why they didnt attacked any other product in the company like CS:zero and Cs:xbox? And anyway how can be they be so SURE that this so called hackers are American? an IP can be easily be faked and tracers can fail attackers could be anywhere in the world (and therefore outside of FBI jurisdiction)

    If valve continues this actitude, Im not buying any of their products anymore and Im discontinuing my use of hl and steam until further notice
    If valve cares for their clients, I invite them to use their time to FINISH HL2 and release it in a reasonable time. Instead of hunting down so called hackers with questionable evidence.

    This is just my opinion, but it is also the course of action I will take

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  161. Re:System working....The FBI came with a blonde... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The FBI came with a blonde woman

    And now from this moment in time.... thousands of script kiddies will be trying everything possible to get raided in the hope of that a real woman (other than their mom) will enter their bedroom.

  162. Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why PGP and DriveCrypt inverts and re-inverts your cached passphrase while it resides at system memory. Static data "burns in" and can be read even after the power has been shut down.

  163. Important things we've learned about Valve, id by defile · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When the Quake source code was leaked, it was distributed far and wide and John Carmack received a patch for a Linux port within 48 hours. No one went to jail, and the patches became a foundation for a serious Linux port (squake).

    When the Half Life 2 source code was leaked, all that Valve could say is "FBI FBI FBI jail jail jail you will all pay for this embarassment". And that's all this is about, saving face. There's absolutely nothing that can be done with the source code being out there that couldn't be done if they kept it secret. In fact, if there was no fear of arrest Valve could've turned this into a positive event, inviting contribution, public review, and ports (as happened with Quake).

    What this tells us about id Software is that they're a technology oriented forward thinking company that "gets it".

    What this tells us about Valve is that they can't turn this into something positive and instead can only think of revenge.

    I have faith that the market will punish them in the end.

  164. Not being facetious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    286? Is that the CPU or the actual number of PCs returned?

    The firm may have won but for holding them for that long, the authorities have effectively neutered them as a gaming company contender...

  165. Under PATRIOT II, the Feds DO NOT NEED A JUDGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Under PII, the feds do not need a judge for a search warrant.

    To tap your phone lines, search your bank or medical records, they do not even need a search warrant.

    1. Re:Under PATRIOT II, the Feds DO NOT NEED A JUDGE by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      Actually, under the 4th amendment no judge is required. Re-read that thing one more time...

  166. Internal IP address can *certainly* be evidence by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    This is trivially defensible in court.

    Perhaps not. If I'm taking notes as I'm breaking into a network, and say that "10.31.4.15 IIS DNS vulnerable", that's certainly evidence.

    On the other hand, frankly, while having a prescedent of breaking into networks is bad, even if he did it, I hope he gets off on a technicality. The Hungry Programmers have produced a lot of really good free software with huge amounts of their time and talent, benefiting society as a whole. Having them in the wild, instead of behind bars, helps everyone. Valve, on the other hand, has refused to support Linux, has dicked around on their latest release, and generally failed to do nearly as much to make *my* life, at least, better. I'm a lot less sympathetic to a random corporation in it for the money than I am towards really good open source programmers. Talk about "paying a debt to society" -- this guy's done enough to get out of a grand theft rap, in my book.

    Plus, if he comes this close to being burned, it's a good bet that he won't be cracking again...

  167. Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that at *least* when they walk outside of the house into the public area, he'd have the right to video record them, simply because they're in public.

    I'm also a little surprised that they were able to say that he couldn't take pictures.

    1. Re:Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Sure, he could have. They couldn't have done anything about it. He didn't know that though so their statement to the contrary kept him from whipping out is 35mm. It worked for them. Now if his buddies had come over and started rolling film from the sidewalk, the FBI and SS couldn't have prevented it. I'm more fuzzy on what he could do with them in the house. I know he could pick up a camera off the shelf and snap off some pictures and they couldn't stop him. I don't know if they can require him to stay in any old room though. IMHO I think he can go anywhere in the house he wants and long as he doesn't prevent them from fulfilling the warrant. They probably wouldn't like it though if he stood over their shoulders with a voice recorder dictating into it their every move. Best advice is consult a lawyer. Even though something might be your right doesn't mean the feds will let you do it. He could have probably walked out at any time legally but they might have tried to stop him. It may very well have been his right since he wasn't under arrest but that wouldn't necessarily prevent them from making him think he didn't have that right. They wouldn't dare violate that right if his lawyer was there though. IANAL

    2. Re:Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so certain about being able to photograph secret service agents and I wouldn't be so quick to advise someone to do it. Especially if YANAL.

    3. Re:Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      There's nothing illegal about it. If they don't want their photo taken, they shouldn't go out in public. They shouldn't stand in/on his property (where here can photograph just about any damned thing he pleases). They might not like you doing it but there's nothing illegal about it. That doesn't mean they won't steal his camera or film. That doesn't mean he'd be doing anything illegal by doing that however.

    4. Re:Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about the legality of it. I am just recommending against you recommending someone mess with a government group with Secret for a first name if YANAL. There are plenty of ways the government can mess with you that 1. are outside the court system and 2. are completely constitutional. There are some fights that can't be won and there isn't much gained by taking their picture.

    5. Re:Can FBI/SS restrict video records? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether he's got the legal right to do something is not so important in that situation as the fact that they ordered him not to do it.

      When the cops force their way into your house and search it without a warrant, you'd be stupid to try to stop, all the while lecturing them about the law. They have lots of means at their disposal to fuck you over if you piss them off. Best thing to do is to clearly state, "I do *not* consent to this search." (extra points for having a witness)

      Similarly, don't whip out your camcorder right after they told you that, no, you may not take pictures, even though you know that CC 12.54.452 says you can. Instead install the cameras beforehand and turn them on when you hear, "*Bzzzzt* This is the FBI, we have a search warrant!"

  168. Time for protest outside of Valve? by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

    This is what will get press, is a protest in front of Valve. It worked against Adobe.

    They're Address is :

    Valve Software
    10500 NE 8th St
    Bellevue, WA 98004
    (425) 889-9642

    --
    Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    1. Re:Time for protest outside of Valve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With any luck, you'll be plowed into the streets of Bellevue by soccer-mom-driven Hummers.

    2. Re:Time for protest outside of Valve? by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

      What's the matter pussy, afraid to reveal who you are?

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    3. Re:Time for protest outside of Valve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. When you have reason to believe you may be dealing with a disturbed or deranged person online, discretion is the better part of valor.

  169. You didn't RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DIalogue between Chris & agent:

    "Toshok? That's Hungarian, right?"

  170. Police State by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I work for the KGB I wear a black fedora and a black suit. I carry a pistol in my jacket, I use it for shooting puppies and the occasional baby. It has a point on the butt I use to beat suspects. Sometimes when I take a shower I have to strip down though, hope that doesn't cut into my stereotype. I'm also into black leather... call me. -KGB Blind Date Application

  171. This makes me wonder... by stealth.c · · Score: 1
    I wonder if the hassle of guarding code will eventually become outweighed by the benefits of sharing it. Of course, game developers would need to find a new profit model besides point-of-sale...MMORPGs would be the most likely candidates to OS their work. Their revenue already comes from subscription fees for gamers using their servers. The EverQuest people could be giving away cd-roms willy-nilly and still make a profit.

    Obviously there are some games (single-player for example) that you really couldn't do that with... yet I wonder about the future of entertainment software.

  172. More Important than Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...Encrypted Root Filesystem HOWTO.

    Those fuckers can probably crack it, but it's worth it just to make their lives harder. I only encrypt /home personally, though I'll probably go all the way soon (especially now that I have enough RAM to go without swap).

  173. Talk about drugs, lose your PC? by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1
    If they found contraband (kiddie porn, talk of drugs, or stuff they were actually looking for), that particular computer would never be coming home.
    Now, let me get this straight. If you've ever sent an email to a friend where you talk about smoking some pot, the FBI gets to keep your computer? What if you're talking about how pot should be legalized? It seems like they get to keep the computer without ever having to convince a judge that they have a legitimate reason to do so.
    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    1. Re:Talk about drugs, lose your PC? by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have some experience in this. The answer is that the 'talk of drugs' has to be evidence of drug posession or trafficking. The general rule, if they find something on your machine that could be used as material (key word) evidence in court they can keep the machine for as long as there is a case in which it could be used (otherwise they have 180 days I beleive).

      Contrary to what most of the ill-informed Slashdotters are posting here, there are a variety of property rights that you have in cases like these. While I've never had machines siezed, I have two very good friends that are District Attorneys. I've worked with them as technical consult on a few computer crime cases. In 3 of the 5 cases (2 of which involved the feds) the machines where back in their owners hands in less than 4 weeks. These where all pretty clear cut cases that involved those machines being hacked and used for illegal purposes.

      One thing to note, the warrants generally apply to searches involving very specific goals. They actually can't wantonly search every file on your computer (in theory anyways) looking to turn up evidence of some other crime. This is actually a pretty entertaining legal fight...

      For those keeping score, the other 2 cases where clear (and I mean CRYSTAL clear) violations of law. 1 resulted in a plea bargain, and the other is awaiting trial. So from MY experience (take it for what it's worth), the experience is not nearly as draconian as your seeing here. While it does suck to have your equipment taken (i'm assuming), these people really don't want to sit on it for years. They want to do there job, gather evidence, and move on with life.

      ***beginning rant****
      As with most things, the government is neither as onerous or interested in you as popular culture wants us to beleive. it's really a far to disparate collection of little agencies to effectively do that. It CAN really screw people, but for the most part people really do get treated fairly. My perception of government has really changed as I've become more and more involved with various portions of it. But I guess fear mongering is really more entertaining at the end of the day. *sighs*
      ****/end rant*****

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  174. FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abolish the Intellectual Property laws. Value is under no obligation to produce anything.

    FBI involvement is a waste of US tax dollars.

    1. Re:FBI by lithiumcloud · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  175. About your sig... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    "Mankind" is one word. You wouldn't say "mank" or "ind," would you?

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  176. SJ Games by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    Remember the outcome of the clueless cop's crusade against Steve Jackson Games?

    Yah, actually. Quoting from SJ Games' own account of the whole thing, "a federal court awarded damages and attorneys' fees to the game company, ruling that the raid had been careless, illegal, and completely unjustified."

    So yah, of course it sucks big time. And your original machines are very likely gone forever. But, if you were really victimized, you do have recourse. And in that case, I'd definitely rather have monetary compensation than the computers that were seized and are out-of-date now.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:SJ Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the lawyer fees suck away most of anything you get. The whole situation is a cluster fuck.

  177. Why you should calibrate your monitors by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The exact address is blacked out in these scans, but if you have your monitor calibrated properly, you can see the censored parts of page 3 shining through in page 2. Of course on uncalibrated monitors, which they presumably used to scan these documents, you only see white.

    Another reason to calibrate your monitors before creating stuff that you publish :-)

    1. Re:Why you should calibrate your monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not off-topic. Mod parent up!

  178. You Have No Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..on the Internet, or even to own a computer. The final solution will be to outlaw computers as we know them now, and to implement a system that centralises all actual computing to gov.-run mainframes that people access thru "dumb" terminals, with extensive hardware policy/permission management. Actual "computers" will only be allowed in a similar way to concealed-handgun permits, with similar, if not more stringent enforcement/punishment. It's already on its way. Go ahead and say you'll revolt. There are plenty of out-of-work construction workers that can be put to work building new prisons for anyone foolish enough to be involved in terroristic/copyright-infringing tools like a non-registered PC.

  179. On Moving to Canada.... by waltc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was amused to see numerous "move to Canada" suggestions, as well as "America is a police state" warnings provided to this person in comments relating to this person's allegations as printed on the person's web site. Evidently I was misinformed when told that Canada, and, indeed, every civilized nation on earth, has prisons full of convicts who got there as a result of being arrested by the police, including some who were convicted in trials by the weight of evidence seized with search warrants.

    I'm in debt to those authentically brainy people who've set me straight about Canada, reminding me that Canada has no laws, no prisons, no convicts, no courts or trials, no police, and of course...no such thing as search warrants. And I guess the same is true of other European nations whose citizens reacted with shock and horror at this person's account, because like Canada, those nations, too, have no laws to break, no courts to convict, and of course no police forces to serve search warrants, not to mention no judges to sign such a warrant even if such a thing was possible in those countries. Yes, thanks to all of the "big brains" out there who have enlightened me in my ignorance. Naturally, if you hail from a country with no laws and no police and no search warrants, such a tale would have to inspire nothing short of dread and terror and a certain specter of a "police state."

    And, too, I have to bow to the indisputable logic of those who insist that Valve has no moral right whatever to be incensed that its servers were broken into and its source code stolen--rather, as these people most brilliantly postulate for my poor benefit, Valve would be better served by throwing a party for the hackers, congratulating them an a job well done, and even, possibly, mailing them a big fat check for the service these unselfish, altruistic hackers have done them. How foolish of me to think it natural to want to involve the police when one's personal property is stolen--how foolish, indeed. Double foolish, really, but what can one expect from a poor underling such as I who has been raised in a country with laws, prisons, crimes, and search warrants? Since other countries, like Canada, have no need for such primitive mechanisms, it's no wonder I thought of this issue as I originally did. Woe is me.

    But, to tell you the absolute truth, until I see some independent corroboration of the events alleged to have taken place, I must wonder if...

    (a) Such alleged events ever occurred

    (b) Such events occurred for the purpose this person has alleged

    Even though I am not all that bright, really, as you can tell from my misapprehensions as to other countries having laws and prisons and search warrants, it nevertheless seems to me that...

    (1) It is a simple thing to manufacture, or change, such "search warrants," using commonly available programs such as Photoshop

    (2) It would be a simple thing to simply add "Valve" to a search warrant issued for another purpose, such as some kind of credit card fraud involving the use of computers

    It occurs to me that this person might have had data belonging to other people on his machines prior to seizure, and that the "Valve" story is simply that--a story contrived, with the aid of Photoshop or something like it, to explain to his friends why their data, if not some of their computers, have been seized by the authorities.

    Gosh, sometimes it's just so hard to think, and my head hurts...:) But it also occurs to me that possibly, just possibly, it might not always be a good idea to believe everything one sees printed on the Internet. Yea, right--what could I possibly know?...:)

    1. Re:On Moving to Canada.... by albin · · Score: 1

      [blah]
      > Evidently I was misinformed when told that Canada, and, indeed, every civilized nation on
      > earth, has prisons full of convicts who got there as a result of being arrested by the
      > police, including some who were convicted in trials by the weight of evidence seized with
      > search warrants.
      [blah]

      Fallacy: oversimplification. (and overrated, and pompous, if you ask me) The allegation is not that other countries have no laws and no police, but rather that the FBI and Secret Service are worse/much worse than other federal police groups in the world. I don't know if that's true, but it is easy to believe such a claim (which doesn't make it true) in connection with the infringements on personal freedoms which I am led to believe are happening in the States.

      Anybody out there with experience with such groups in other countries? Better? Worse?

      --
      A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg. -- Samuel Butler
    2. Re:On Moving to Canada.... by waltc · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I see nothing in your response except an allegation. I see nothing in your response to support that allegation. Pardon me for saying so, but popularly held, politically inspired cultural impressions such as yours are usually utterly bereft of fact when examined, and are generally myths.

      My point was simply that that all civilized nations employ search warrants--all of them--in which citizens have their property searched and seized. The case here is of one (1) such incident, the facts of which have been *alleged* as opposed to corroborated independently, and therefore any such argument of the kind you make pertaining to "worse/much worse than other federal police groups in the world" is absolutely not sustainable on the basis of this single, alleged (as opposed to verified) account. How you could make such a mountain out of such a molehill is beyond me, I'm afraid...:)

  180. In austin... by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Informative

    they've developed a mobile data forensics lab where technicians download your harddrives, copy your CDs and everything else to their own systems and then return the equipment to you. The process takes time, obviously, but the van is loaded with equipment.

    news story about it

    --

    -

  181. So uh - didn't we feel sorry for Valve before? by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    So - uh - what if he's guilty? Is he still a Mitnick? What if the FBI raided someone that hacked kernel.org? I could see a lot of /. posters sort of exploding from the internal conflicts...

  182. Lying by Tritoph · · Score: 0

    Has it occurred to anyone that this is a weblog and that this guy might be lying? Maybe?

  183. We got our computer seized too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother wrote some stupid graffitti on a bathroom wall at his high school and got caught. This was post-Columbine. So the cops show up and take our computer. They kept it for several months. It was a crappy old Mac Performa (and there was little incriminating on it, since my brother had not been planning any actual crime).

    Anyway, when we finally got it back (with a dirty case--us too!) from what we could tell they had never even booted it up!

    Foiled by a Macintosh. Bwahahahahah!!

    (For the uninitiated, the old Performa's power switch was on the keyboard--sure to foil the most dastardly and clever PC user.)

    We had to buy a new computer in the interim, though. That was a PITA. But the Performa died a year or so later anyway, so it was all for the best.

  184. Mirror by aerojad · · Score: 1

    http://theaerozone.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic =1870

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  185. All well and good. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Did he have insurance to cover it? Did insurance pay out, even though it was being held in evidence?

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  186. Right or Left: Equal abusers of civil rights by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    Sivaram_Velauthapill is reported to have said:

    Right wing goverments are more prone to abuse civil liberties than left-leaning ones.


    Have to take issue with this one. Both the right and the left have abused (and respected) civil rights at various times.

    For every Nixon or Hitler, there is an FDR or Mao, that is willing play fast and loose with our civil rights, if they believe it is to reach a "just end" (as defined by there needs).

    Remember that the first suspension of "Habeas Corpus" was by Lincoln.

    Yours,

    Jordan

    1. Re:Right or Left: Equal abusers of civil rights by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What did FDR do?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Right or Left: Equal abusers of civil rights by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

      Well, to start with how about trying to pack the Supreme Court, because he "didn't like the decisions" it was making.

      Then of course, there was the order excluding Americans of Japanese Ancestory from the West Coast and putting them into concentration camps for their "own safety".

      There are several others I could come up with, but these are at the top of the list.

      The reality is that neither the left nor the right is clean and perfect. They have equally, when they say it as "the right thing to do" for the "good of the country" abused civil rights and trampled on the constitution.

      Yours,

      Jordan

  187. I hold VALVE responsible for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hold VALVE responsible for this violation of this man's privacy, rights, and the theft of his property. They are greedy. They made millions on Half Life, and they will make millions on Half Life 2. They destroyed someone's life so they could go on some kind of a crusade against pirates who will have little to no actual effect on their bottom line.

    They sicken me, that they would do this to innocent people, and I will not be buying Half Life 2 as a result.

    Even if this one man turns out to be guilty, they did the same thing to a number of people. They can't all be guilty. I'd rather have 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man treated in this manner. We need laws to protect people from such seizures. Laws which state the the government MUST return the property within 30 days unless charges are filed, and once charges are filed, they must return the property _immediately_ upon the defendent being found innocent.

    1. Re:I hold VALVE responsible for this. by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

      Valve Software
      10500 NE 8th St
      Bellevue, WA 98004
      (425) 889-9642

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
  188. FBI by max+born · · Score: 1

    Hasn't the FBI enough on their hands with kidnappings, bank robberies, terrorism ....?

  189. My only question is by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Is there any evidence against these people?

    If they had reasonable suspicion or probable cause, then I have no problem with raids. If they are bootstrapping, IE saying that they have no evidence but that they KNOW they'll get some if they are allowed to raid, then I have a serious problem with that.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  190. Tough guy! His *cough* is pierced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...in doing some light research, I dug up this little tidbit:

    Holey Prince Albert!

    Now I'm sure it's only a matter of time before he gets his own show!

    -AC

  191. Just take the hard drive by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    After reading some of the posts I'm surprised no one alluded to this.
    They took the power cables, CDs, laptops, and other computers and misc items. I don't think that's fair. All they are really looking for it data . I think what they should do instead is confiscate burnt CDs and HDDs.
    What evidence are they going to find on a motherboard? I can understand, however if they get the MAC addresses from the NICs. At least HDDs are cheap and easy to replace. They don't have to worry about someone demanding for the rest of their hardware back. I'm sure it would make him a bit happier.

  192. Well... by HiggsBison · · Score: 2, Funny
    Haven't you seen Hackers? The Secret Service does everything!

    Well... all I've got to say is that they shouldn't have left Half-Life 2 Source lying around on the Gibson. I mean, that was just asking for trouble, wasn't it?

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  193. *Just some tips if this happens to you* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Most people don't realize that you have the right to say NOTHING to the police, FBI, etc. There is nothing they can do to you for saying nothing, and its your right under the 5th amendment. Tell them you want to speak to a lawyer and you won't be answering any questions. Their threats of going easy on you in court is an absolute LIE. They do that to get you to confess to something. Go to most any defense lawyer webpage and you will find that out. They have absolutely ZERO control over what punishment you get if you are guilty... only the Judge and Prosecutor can do that, the police have ZERO say in it. They are also known to "buddy" up to you to get you to confess to them. Again this is another trick on their part. They are also known to lie to you to get a confession... apparently its ok for them to lie, but not you. EVERY defense lawyer will tell you to say NOTHING to them. Its in your best interest to say nothing, whether your guilty or innocent. The only info you would be required to give is your Identification if they ask for it.

  194. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why the fuck would you ever want to carry that much in cash? Haven't you heard of "credit cards" or "checkbooks" in the USA?

    I lost my job during the post dot-com bust and quickly ran through my savings, such that they were. I ended up having my car repo'ed and my checking account was closed. There's no way I can get a credit card any more -- even a secured card... and I haven't had a checking account since 2001. I now have a decent job again and am slowly climbing my way out. But I cash all my checks at a local "Money Center" -- they charge me a 4% "fee" for every check -- I drive home with the remainder. Usually this is around $1400.

    I can't say I want to drive around with that much cash. But until I get more on my feet and clean up some of the mess I got myself into, I don't have much of a choice. Stuff happens to people. Just because I'm a black man and I have $1400 with me in my car doesn't mean I'm a drug dealer. That's why we supposedly have a presumption of innocence. Scary to see that that might be erroding.

    I wish I had more of a point. I just wanted to let you know that it happens more often than you might think... Money Center is doing a booming business in my city. 2 new ones opened within 10 blocks from my apartment in just the last 6 months.

  195. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that they hut down the @$$h0les and kill them.

  196. Hungries? by flynns · · Score: 1

    Not to be pedantic, but isn't the proper adjective "Hungarian"?

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  197. Please... IF it's them, hang them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... along with all other theiving punk black hats. It's you *nix using pieces of crap that cost the farking industy, IT departments, and government so much damned money tracking down all the viruses, hacks, stolen property and IP, etc... burn you stupid farks.

    And btw... a monitor tan, 25lb pot belly, and an innie where an outie should be is NOT sexy.

    We need some clorine dumped in the gene pool, that's for sure.

  198. Quake was relesed, not stolen by hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quake was only leaked if "leak" is taken to mean "post on our ftp server with a copy of the GPL included, and link to it from a press release on the front page of our web site"

    1. Re:Quake was relesed, not stolen by hackers by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot. Quake's source code was leaked back in 1996 by hackers... the same year Quake went gold. Many years later, once Quake 3 was released, Quake's source was officially released under GPL. So your post ignores nearly half a decade of history. But what the hell, you are an idiot gamer.

    2. Re:Quake was relesed, not stolen by hackers by defile · · Score: 1

      You haven't contradicted anything that I said. Why don't you read my post first before you incorrectly tell me that I've got history wrong.

      The point is that when the Quake source was leaked, id Software was annoyed but didn't send the authorities after anyone.

      Valve has maintained from the start that they're going to punish whoever is responsible, and it has apparantly already begun.

      But what the hell, you're an idiot Slashdot troll.

  199. What if hes a gamer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...any IP addresses related to any of the Valve internal or external networks... Valve passwords and/or usernames... any and all items... related to Valve Software, Half-Life, Half-Life 2"
    So if he has a copy of CS loaded on one of his machines he's fucked? Shit thats sad.

  200. Two keys? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Hmm... would it be possible to have two keys? One would be your regular key, and the other would open up an innocent but convincing (eg, containing "safe" emails, installed legal programs, etc.) file system. It might be possible to tell that there is other stuff if a certain portion of the disk is used, but if the encrypted disk was 100% full (with blank space being "encrypted" as random junk, it might be impossible to tell.

    1. Re:Two keys? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this is that, if the cops figure it out (well, their technicians figure it out), you're sunk: you've wilfully hidden something from them that they were looking for or wanted to look at. You couldn't do more to convince them of your guilt if you signed a confession.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  201. Only if he has something to hide by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    If you don't have anything to hide (and aren't interested in trying to make a point) then in practical terms you are probably better off letting them come to that conclusion that so they get off your back.

    I don't see how looking like you are hiding something would help you in any way whatsoever unless you particularly wanted your friends/family/neighbours/co-workers interviewed about you and god knows what other forms of attention that may be directed your way.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  202. This man was horny... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    "I walked upstairs, and found the long haired blonde agent and the (admittedly very cute) asian evidence photographer still there, finishing up."

    Geeze... you can tell he's a little frustrated... while retelling what would seem to be a harrowing experience, he can't help but mention the attractiveness of the females... the appearence of the males gets no mention, but these two get 'long haired blonde' and 'admittedly very cute asian'.

  203. I went to school with these guys! by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
    I went to school with Chris Toshok at the UofI in Moscow (Idaho, not USSR ;)).
    Nice kid, kind of quiet, mostly keep to himself. ;)

    (Actually Chris was not a loner, lots of friends for a Computer Science major ;)).

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  204. Hungry programers gave us LESSTIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lesstif.org/

  205. Re: trolling for "evidence" by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
    Which will keep you safe exactly as long as it takes a judge to order you to give up your encryption key.

    It's not about being safe.

    It's about denying the slimy sneaks the satisfaction of being able to blithely rifle through my files whenever they darn well please.

    Refuse and go to prison.

    Ordinarily, I refuse to accept government charity. But in this one case, yes, I would be willing to accept "three hots and a cot" rather than comprimise my principles.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  206. Unreasonable seizures by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    They don't need the equipment. All they really need is a ghost image of your hard drive. If they hunt around on your system they are going to destroy their data & "evidence".

    Someone should challenge this in court.

    1. Re:Unreasonable seizures by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Good point. However, lawyers don't work for free. Ready to contribute to a legal fund?

  207. You forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blender.

  208. Valve Potential GPL Violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The extracted file list clearly shows various OSS libraries being included in full source form within the build tree.

    http://gtwy.net/hl2/hl2.txt

  209. Next step? FBI hands over the HDs to the RIAA ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard it on /. first ...

  210. Licensing by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Nope. Engine licensing is a huge business; id makes money off every game that uses the Q3 engine. Same with Epic, Monolith, and even Valve (who licenses their new Source engine.)

  211. Are you William (Bill) L? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool story.

  212. Re:These aren't the IP addresses you're looking fo by drxenos · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, that has to be the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. I'm glad I was done with my coffee. Thanks for the laugh.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  213. Can't have your cake and eat it by waltc · · Score: 1

    Assuming for convenience that the story relating to this thread is true in all its particulars...

    The central hypocrisy here...is the notion that "search and seizure" of private property is only morally wrong when it is the government doing the searching and seizing. Well, if it is "wrong" for the government to do it under the legal sanction of "probable cause and due process," how is it "right" for the hacker to search and seize the property of others without any legal sanction whatsoever?

    I cannot see how searching Valve's computers and seizing Valve's source code without Valve's consent might be considered less of an affront than the hacker having his own property searched and seized by the FBI without his consent.

    Turnabout is fair play, isn't it? If you think it is OK to search and seize the property of others without their consent, then you should not object to your property being searched and seized in a similar manner, it seems to me.

    Heh...:) Of course, hackers of the type who stole the HL2 source aren't concerned with the rights of others in the first place, else they wouldn't have done what they did. That is why, when you hear such people discuss "rights," it is only their own which they find of compelling interest.

    Personally, I wish this experience as it is alleged to have occurred might happen to all hackers who search and seize the property of others without consent. Perhaps this kind of thing is the only way to pierce the numbing shroud of rationalization and equivocation afflicting such people, so that they will finally know what it feels like to have their privacy invaded and their property searched and seized against their will. I would only hold out the dubious hope that they might learn something from such an experience. Doubtful, but at least conceivable.

    1. Re:Can't have your cake and eat it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You claim he thinks it is okay to "search and seize" Valve's property. You're assuming he's guilty, are you? Doesn't he have to be convicted by a jury of his peers or some other trivial time-waster? Who are you to make unsupported accusations and pass them off as established fact? He may well be guilty, but until convicted the law is supposed to see him as innocent and so should you.

  214. too lazy to use m-w.com by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    is actitude english, or lawyerese?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  215. Hi Jared. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    Posting on this subject is getting old. I just want to study neurology.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  216. OT: Re:it would ... by euggie · · Score: 1

    >> I stand corrected

    >So those new orthopedic shoes are working out OK for you, then?

    Yeah. Too bad my feet smell just as bad :-)

  217. You don't know either way... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    A cop can have a reasonable suspicion to stop you, but depending on what his "suspicion" is, he may be facing the prospects of a wrongful arrest charge against him- especially if the gravity of what he was "suspecting" you of was sufficiently bad enough and you were obviously NOT doing something wrong. Now, trying to PROVE this is fun, so you really, really don't want to be in that position- but the reality is always there. They have authority, yes. Should they always use it? No.

    Since, as you say, you don't know what the warrant covered (I do, thank you very much- I did read the thing before making any comments...), you can't say pro or con on that. Reading the Warrant, it was pretty broad to begin with and I doubt they actually had much of any probable cause because of the broadness thereof- it'd be hard to make anything stick on anyone based on what they were searching for (it feels like a fishing expidition, more than anything else...). Oftentimes, this sort of thing is done of late to "send a message" to the actual people that are doing it- because they can't nail the actual guilty parties. This sort of thing happens often enough that people will make that comment- they're sending a message to everyone.

    If this is, in fact, what transpired- THAT is what the Fourth Ammendment was put in place for in the first place.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  218. personal ad - he wants the photographer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  219. Here's the creditable source by faust13 · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3414157.stm

  220. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now by going over to his friends' houses, the FBI knows who all of his friends are...

    I'm sure they're delighted to be known by the FBI...

  221. Theft? Valve sent the code on request! by RedTheRat · · Score: 1

    How can this HL2 issue be theft? Did the hacker enter Valve's premises and stole the CD from Gabe Newell's desk?

    No! He asked Valve's computers to give him the privileges over the network. And Valve's computers gave him the privileges.

    He asked Valve's computers to send him the source code. And they sent him the source code.

    Who's fault is this? Valve sent the source code deliberately on request by network.