Dude, it's a statement, not an expression - you can't assign a value to "0x2B | !0x2B", just like "1 + 1 = 2" is an invalid expression because you can't assign a value to "1 + 1"
printf("0x2B | !0x2B = 0x%X\n", 0x2B | !0x2B);
Although I forget whether %X is the correct thing for upper hex or not, but that's *about* right
I don't own a Mac, but I work with the art dept who do. Me being the computer guy they expect me to be able to fix things, even though my experience with OSX is *very* limited. Having looked through all the menus, and some of the program folders, I can't even seem to find the shell in the first place - where the fsck is it?
Mozilla is much like java in that it's a root word for many things, but nothing specific in itself - there's the mozilla XUL/CSS/Javascript development platform, the mozilla browser, the mozilla mail, the mozilla calentar etc. "Mozilla" simply means whatever sub-section people are talking about at the time.
Mozilla: that's how it works IE: That's how it works
> then again to select words
Mozilla: Double-click to select a word IE: IE doesn't select words, it's all or nothing
> And you can double click sections to select just a word
Mozilla: Works IE: Doesn't
> you can't select words automatically
I just did
> and you click once to select individually
Select what individually?
> and then again to select it all
Mozilla: Initial click selects all, One click selects a position, double click selects a word, triple click selects it all IE: Clicking, single or double, toggles all or nothing
> I finally uninstalled it
fool
> middle-click scrolling
*scrolls the mousewheel* - yup, mozilla's mouse scroll works fine, so does IE's. The only difference is that IE's is smooth & slow, Mozilla's is direct & fast.
I for one would be glad if someone could take my intelligence, temporarily store it somewhere, and upgrade my hardware while I'm gone. Surely a computer that's already into being one with hardware and whatnot would actively *ask* for better harware as it comes out?
What's wrong with the GIMP's UI?
on
GIMP goes SVG
·
· Score: 1
Everyone says that the GIMP's GUI is horrible, but I've used both the GIMP (linux) and photoshop (OSX). The only difference I can see is that phososhop's menu is in the mac's menu location, and the GIMP's is right-click. (Personally I prefer the right click). So what's the massive difference that I haven't noticed?
Seeing as a gazillion IP/search pairs would be too much for even google's mighty RAM, it figures they're using cookies. If so shouldn't it be possible to open up the cookie file and hand edit it?
I always got the impression that MIT was on linux / *nix / BSD, eg the protest when Bill Gates came to visit them. Why would a school for the technically advanced use the technically sucky "we designed it so that a tellytubby could use it" OS over a more appropriate technically advanced one?
Slashdot Mirror
Erm... ^^;;
#include
int main() {
printf("0x2B = 0x%X\n", 0x2B);
printf("!0x2B = 0x%X\n", !0x2B);
printf("0x2B | !0x2B = 0x%X\n", (0x2B | (!0x2B)));
return 0;
}
0x2B = 0x2B
!0x2B = 0x0
0x2B | !0x2B = 0x2B
So... everything that is ! 0x2B is zero.
I think we just uncovered the answer to a great philosophical question - what is to be is to be, what is not to be is nothing.
That makes so much sense on so many levels...
*/me goes off in a maze of philosophical thought*
WTF?
0x2B = 00101011
!0x2B = 11010100
00101011 | 11010100 = 11111111 = 0xFF
Dude, it's a statement, not an expression - you can't assign a value to "0x2B | !0x2B", just like "1 + 1 = 2" is an invalid expression because you can't assign a value to "1 + 1"
printf("0x2B | !0x2B = 0x%X\n", 0x2B | !0x2B);
Although I forget whether %X is the correct thing for upper hex or not, but that's *about* right
1) Claim to be the virus writer
2) Get $250k
3) Bail yourself out of jail
Wow! Profit at stage #2 and no ???! This *has* to be a good plan!
I don't own a Mac, but I work with the art dept who do. Me being the computer guy they expect me to be able to fix things, even though my experience with OSX is *very* limited. Having looked through all the menus, and some of the program folders, I can't even seem to find the shell in the first place - where the fsck is it?
So how long until I can put the usage stats from my car's black box onto my website? Can I hook it up to GKrellM? Is there a /proc interface?
> bits of boilerplate text that ruin Slashdot.
All your linux zealots are belong to us?
I for one welcome our new terrorist overlords?
In soviet russia, terrorists are linux?
Blame MicroSCOft?
I haven't seen any of the above being posted, all I see is semi-or-entirely-rational comments and interesting discussion...
Looks like you want to meet... great teacher Largo!
http://www.megatokyo.com/index.php?strip_id=153
I can't even get there - can somebody lend me a map to "far". I'm a linux zealot, but I've never been to far...
Mozilla is much like java in that it's a root word for many things, but nothing specific in itself - there's the mozilla XUL/CSS/Javascript development platform, the mozilla browser, the mozilla mail, the mozilla calentar etc. "Mozilla" simply means whatever sub-section people are talking about at the time.
> you click it once to select everything
Mozilla: that's how it works
IE: That's how it works
> then again to select words
Mozilla: Double-click to select a word
IE: IE doesn't select words, it's all or nothing
> And you can double click sections to select just a word
Mozilla: Works
IE: Doesn't
> you can't select words automatically
I just did
> and you click once to select individually
Select what individually?
> and then again to select it all
Mozilla: Initial click selects all, One click selects a position, double click selects a word, triple click selects it all
IE: Clicking, single or double, toggles all or nothing
> I finally uninstalled it
fool
> middle-click scrolling
*scrolls the mousewheel* - yup, mozilla's mouse scroll works fine, so does IE's. The only difference is that IE's is smooth & slow, Mozilla's is direct & fast.
I for one would be glad if someone could take my intelligence, temporarily store it somewhere, and upgrade my hardware while I'm gone. Surely a computer that's already into being one with hardware and whatnot would actively *ask* for better harware as it comes out?
Everyone says that the GIMP's GUI is horrible, but I've used both the GIMP (linux) and photoshop (OSX). The only difference I can see is that phososhop's menu is in the mac's menu location, and the GIMP's is right-click. (Personally I prefer the right click). So what's the massive difference that I haven't noticed?
Seeing as a gazillion IP/search pairs would be too much for even google's mighty RAM, it figures they're using cookies. If so shouldn't it be possible to open up the cookie file and hand edit it?
Won't everyone pinging their gigabytes of data back and forth totally screw the net, a la slammer?
That's exactly it - I *am* using "plain old text" /break - there should be a break before that, I pressed enter twice for a new paragraph
/break
(break)
(break)
Right.... lines that start with '/' have their breaks discarded, WTF?
Huzzah, I get post #666 and the newlines mess up. Anywho, check /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt
WTF? These line breaks are messed up (yes, I USED THE PREVIEW THIS TIME!)
> Now how about a good story and use for the SysRq key? /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt, duh
I always wondered what that feature was for... What *is* it for?
I always got the impression that MIT was on linux / *nix / BSD, eg the protest when Bill Gates came to visit them. Why would a school for the technically advanced use the technically sucky "we designed it so that a tellytubby could use it" OS over a more appropriate technically advanced one?
> Besides, haven't you always wanted to know what that telemarketer type person on the other end of the line looks like?
Broken nose with leaflets shoved up his ass if he comes near my house...
> Last I checked my screen resolution didn't change the size of my monitor.
I was assuming some weird CAD hardware or something. What size monitors do CAD guys have for their 2000 x 3000 pixel screens anyway?
Damn it, I *am* showing my ignorance. This is not my day. Wait a minute... /me checks flies
DAMN!
4000 x 25000? now *that's* widescreen!
(Or am I showing ignorance? is this really not a typo?)
Valid emails can be picked up as viruses, and valid viruses (eg me using back orifice to remotely fix a friend's PC) don't get through at all...