Ok, here's a scenario that flips it around. If a company's non-licensed PI IT department or outsourced IT investigated an employee's computer for criminal activity and found such then either the person was let go or charged with a crime. Could that person who was the subject contest the investigation in a court with the argument that the people in the IT department weren't licensed private investigators?
You might want to think about how you want to shape his world view before you choose books. Some books can be light hearted but a little pessimistic like the works of Douglas Adams. Some can be more intellectual stimulating like the works of Arthur C. Clark, Ben Bova or Kim Stanley Robertson.
On the surface Orson Scott Card's works might seem a good choice but his religious views tends to taint his works.
I think Arthur C Clark's book The City in the Stars would be a good read for a young person.
The right wing is more likely to be the ones to tease the left into a panic allowing the right to exploit the issues financially. People on the left aren't the ones driving the SUVs, owning stock in oil companies, etc. Liberals usually don't have the financial resources that the right does.
Over the last decade the right has gotten quite skilled at working the left up into a tizzy then exploiting the issues.
That is so much BS and purely designed to cause more Prejudice against overweight people. I have seen skinny people eat far more than an overweight people.
I have been overweight most of my life and my uncle who was only 6 years older than me was skinny. While growing up he always ate three times what I did.
Yes some overweight people do over eat but most due to environmental factors or genetics just tend to process & store food more efficiently than skinny people do.
Accessibility for blind users also makes the pages easier to view for sighted people on mobile devices. Web sites developers should target multiple levels of users. It only goes to increase their audience. The best choice is to put content into almost a database like form or XML and use multiple interfaces to serve content.
The ISPs need to figure out that the content providers are providing a valuable service to the ISP. Free content lures customers to the ISPs. ISPs or online services (AOL, etc) used to have to pay for content or work out partnerships with content providers to have something to lure in customers. Without online content the Internet would be just a place to email, IM and spam.
The big thing is that ISPs just don't want to put out the money to upgrade their aging infrastructure. They want to put the blame on someone other than themselves for the bandwidth problems. If they had to pay for online content, they'd still have to upgrade their infrastructure so it looks like they are getting a bargain for not having to pay for the content.
I think it should be a mix of allowing more experienced users more control and others less. I work on a corporate help desk for a large company w/many many many PCs. I find that the robot management of PCs sometimes causes more problems than it fixes. PCs slow down because their overloaded with corporate monitoring software, lack of regular maintenance that experienced users could do if they had access.
I've seen many systems take 15 minutes or longer to boot. I've had to remote into PCs to delete user profiles for people who haven't touched the machine in years. One time I delete several hundred profiles off one PC.
The call center I work at has moved to an semi-open layout which results in a lot of noise and no privacy. I myself would rather have well designed spacious cube rather than a open area where your constantly looking over your shoulder to see who is behind you. At the desks where I work, people tend to sit lower to not be seen over the partitions but in cubes people tend to sit up. As far as the more open communication point, one of my friends can't say hardly anything to anyone at her work for fear of someone taking offense and management calling her into a conference. The new open layout is used more to put people on display like some sort of human zoo. I'm all for collaborative spaces but there has to be some semi-private areas too because not everyone is social, many are even phobic about social interaction. I wonder how long it'll be before companies going to open spaces gets a law suit filed against them for violating the Americans with disabilities act.
It's most likely they would only use that if you did something to really screw the company over shortly after you left or invented something really big. Depending on the state, I doubt it would be really be enforceable unless it was notarized. What I'd like to see is laws passed to consider those employment contracts and require companies to pay you for the duration of the NDA.
They still working on that??? Sounds like the Firstware/CME stuff they were working on years ago. Back then they had a Linux based OS in an ImageCast disk image tucked away in protected space on the hard drive with various apps installed and a custom boot loader. Sounds like the same thing.
If you want to ease your emotional pain, try some Black Mamba. You'll ease your emotional pain but get a fairly intense burn for awhile and a nice buzz for about an hour or so.
I've see lots of women that look like guys and lots of guys that look like women. It's none of their business what people play online. Who died and made them the gender police? I see a massive lawsuit brewing over this.
A reboot isn't really needed. What should be done is to get together a large amount of people who worked on Star Trek in the past and put together a large fan forum online. Then go about examining every Star Trek TV episode, movie and book to classify what is cannon and what isn't. If a TV episode or movie could be minorly cut to make it cannon, then do so, if it steps too far outside the redefined cannon for the series then it would be considered to have happened in an alternate universe or to be just non-cannon Star Trek entertainment. From then on, all books, movie/TV scripts or comics would have to go through a process to see if they fit into the cannon of the Star Trek universe. One of the things they could look at is if it boxes the universe in too much and prevents people from writing other stories.
Companies much of the responsibilities for health issues. They put people in stressful environments, overwork them to the point where all they have time for food wise is fast food or break rooms loaded with unhealthy drinks and snacks. If companies want to solve the health crisis and some of the escalating medical costs, they should start by cleaning up their own acts. Provide more time off, hire more people to spread the work out, don't box their employees into deadlines or metrics that cause people's stress levels to go up, replace office snacks with healthy alternatives, etc. The options are out there; they just need to become more people orientated rather than labor exploiting.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok, here's a scenario that flips it around. If a company's non-licensed PI IT department or outsourced IT investigated an employee's computer for criminal activity and found such then either the person was let go or charged with a crime. Could that person who was the subject contest the investigation in a court with the argument that the people in the IT department weren't licensed private investigators?
You might want to think about how you want to shape his world view before you choose books. Some books can be light hearted but a little pessimistic like the works of Douglas Adams. Some can be more intellectual stimulating like the works of Arthur C. Clark, Ben Bova or Kim Stanley Robertson.
On the surface Orson Scott Card's works might seem a good choice but his religious views tends to taint his works.
I think Arthur C Clark's book The City in the Stars would be a good read for a young person.
True but is killing something over ego issues really worth it?
I can just see it, his thought was "rage building, blood pressure climbing...". Maybe he should change his name to Mr Furious.
It's better to try to join them than try to kill someone.
Why kill her? Why not just join them. :)
The right wing is more likely to be the ones to tease the left into a panic allowing the right to exploit the issues financially. People on the left aren't the ones driving the SUVs, owning stock in oil companies, etc. Liberals usually don't have the financial resources that the right does.
Over the last decade the right has gotten quite skilled at working the left up into a tizzy then exploiting the issues.
That is so much BS and purely designed to cause more Prejudice against overweight people. I have seen skinny people eat far more than an overweight people.
I have been overweight most of my life and my uncle who was only 6 years older than me was skinny. While growing up he always ate three times what I did.
Yes some overweight people do over eat but most due to environmental factors or genetics just tend to process & store food more efficiently than skinny people do.
Accessibility for blind users also makes the pages easier to view for sighted people on mobile devices. Web sites developers should target multiple levels of users. It only goes to increase their audience. The best choice is to put content into almost a database like form or XML and use multiple interfaces to serve content.
The ISPs need to figure out that the content providers are providing a valuable service to the ISP. Free content lures customers to the ISPs. ISPs or online services (AOL, etc) used to have to pay for content or work out partnerships with content providers to have something to lure in customers. Without online content the Internet would be just a place to email, IM and spam.
The big thing is that ISPs just don't want to put out the money to upgrade their aging infrastructure. They want to put the blame on someone other than themselves for the bandwidth problems. If they had to pay for online content, they'd still have to upgrade their infrastructure so it looks like they are getting a bargain for not having to pay for the content.
I think it should be a mix of allowing more experienced users more control and others less. I work on a corporate help desk for a large company w/many many many PCs. I find that the robot management of PCs sometimes causes more problems than it fixes. PCs slow down because their overloaded with corporate monitoring software, lack of regular maintenance that experienced users could do if they had access.
I've seen many systems take 15 minutes or longer to boot. I've had to remote into PCs to delete user profiles for people who haven't touched the machine in years. One time I delete several hundred profiles off one PC.
I think the first few missions to Mars should have people shorter than 5 ft to minimize the resource requirements.
Why not just split the difference and adjust year around time to the half way point between standard time and daylight savings; no more switching.
It's better that no life is found so that there will be less resistance to human settlement and teraforming in the future.
The call center I work at has moved to an semi-open layout which results in a lot of noise and no privacy. I myself would rather have well designed spacious cube rather than a open area where your constantly looking over your shoulder to see who is behind you. At the desks where I work, people tend to sit lower to not be seen over the partitions but in cubes people tend to sit up. As far as the more open communication point, one of my friends can't say hardly anything to anyone at her work for fear of someone taking offense and management calling her into a conference. The new open layout is used more to put people on display like some sort of human zoo. I'm all for collaborative spaces but there has to be some semi-private areas too because not everyone is social, many are even phobic about social interaction. I wonder how long it'll be before companies going to open spaces gets a law suit filed against them for violating the Americans with disabilities act.
Is ADS GPL compliant with their Linux based NAS Drive Kit? I've searched their site and they don't have the source on it anywhere.
It's most likely they would only use that if you did something to really screw the company over shortly after you left or invented something really big. Depending on the state, I doubt it would be really be enforceable unless it was notarized. What I'd like to see is laws passed to consider those employment contracts and require companies to pay you for the duration of the NDA.
They still working on that??? Sounds like the Firstware/CME stuff they were working on years ago. Back then they had a Linux based OS in an ImageCast disk image tucked away in protected space on the hard drive with various apps installed and a custom boot loader. Sounds like the same thing.
Kind of reminds me of the Augments from Star Trek. Combine that with the mutation that drops myostatin levels, increases muscle mass and also happens to decrease aggression. Hopefully, you'd have a super strong and fast creature/person with normal aggression.
If you want to ease your emotional pain, try some Black Mamba. You'll ease your emotional pain but get a fairly intense burn for awhile and a nice buzz for about an hour or so.
I've see lots of women that look like guys and lots of guys that look like women. It's none of their business what people play online. Who died and made them the gender police? I see a massive lawsuit brewing over this.
A reboot isn't really needed. What should be done is to get together a large amount of people who worked on Star Trek in the past and put together a large fan forum online. Then go about examining every Star Trek TV episode, movie and book to classify what is cannon and what isn't. If a TV episode or movie could be minorly cut to make it cannon, then do so, if it steps too far outside the redefined cannon for the series then it would be considered to have happened in an alternate universe or to be just non-cannon Star Trek entertainment. From then on, all books, movie/TV scripts or comics would have to go through a process to see if they fit into the cannon of the Star Trek universe. One of the things they could look at is if it boxes the universe in too much and prevents people from writing other stories.
Companies much of the responsibilities for health issues. They put people in stressful environments, overwork them to the point where all they have time for food wise is fast food or break rooms loaded with unhealthy drinks and snacks. If companies want to solve the health crisis and some of the escalating medical costs, they should start by cleaning up their own acts. Provide more time off, hire more people to spread the work out, don't box their employees into deadlines or metrics that cause people's stress levels to go up, replace office snacks with healthy alternatives, etc. The options are out there; they just need to become more people orientated rather than labor exploiting.
Reminds me of this episode of Batman The Animated Series
or Dublin Dr Pepper.
IT'S ALIVE! Wahahahahaha