It is just wrong to assume that all the diseases adults get, including depression, could be cured by operating our bodies the way they were "designed."
True. That's why instead of assuming it, scientists are performing experiments.
Christmas. It's the freaking winter solstice celebration
Then maybe it shouldn't have the same freakin' name as a certain Messianic figure who has nothing to do with the changing of the seasons. Not to mention the "Mass" in the name. In short, if what you say is true, then there's absolutely no reason to call it Christmas.
People in the U.S. are "generally" Christian (=~ 85%). So whenever you see an American on Dec. 26th or soon after, I'm sure you'd think it's appropriate to say "How was your Christmas?"
You know what else teens hate? If you spread a thick layer of fresh pig manure all over the parking lot of your establishment. You see, their noses respond to the smell. Can't stand it.
You know for sure that Satan laughed the day that leaf-blowers were invented. This, while evil, probably only gave him a slight chuckle.
In related news, the cyborg collective known as the Borg announced that they will open up the proprietary format used to convert biological entities to subcomponents of their organomechanical hive mind.
"Organo-mechanical" needs a hyphen. Otherwise, this is ready for publication.
Oh, yeah? How do you explain that one casino that lost some money that one time? Well? Is that data too inconvenient to fit into your precious hypothesis?
There's that 0.27% number again. You like to cook your statistics, don't you?
the plateau and dip in temperatures in the graph, which refutes the idea that it's been a very steady increase in gases since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
ROFL! That's some good reasoning. Let me see if I understand this: since temperature has not been on a steady rise since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, there has not been a steady increase of "greenhouse gases." God, that's funny.
Penn calls "Bullshit" on what most of the rest of the intelligent world recognizes because it gives him a big old stiffy to pretend that his "superior" perspective comes from his being more of a man. What moral deficiency is your excuse for this shoddy thinking?
The fact that reviews are blind means that they are also unaccountable, which fosters even more bias.
Not true. Maybe you don't understand what blind reviews are.
Reviews are "blind" in the sense that the identity of the reviewer is not revealed to the author of the article. The editor, by contrast, knows who the reviewers are and what they've written, so there is accountability.
Some people have already mentioned application bundles as a kind of descendant of the resource fork (to which we might add "Frameworks" and "Components"). Let me just add one more plus. One very good thing about.app bundles is that they make installation so much easier; all the app's libraries can live in the bundle, which helps avoid.dll or dependency hell.
Re-reading my own comment, I see that it could be construed as recommending that humans have sex with many bonobos, which is not what I was trying to say. Oh, well.
I don't know anything about what causes buggy software, but years of training by the press, television, and movies have meticulously prepared my brain to accept the oversimplifying fiction that it must be one of them and not the other.
Slashdot Mirror
Tell me how "proceed" in "designed to proceed police" can possibly be intransitive, given that it's taking a direct object.
True. That's why instead of assuming it, scientists are performing experiments.
In 2005, over 50% of Americans surveyed believed that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
I second your comment. It's an error of logic on the same order as writing '=' in your program when you mean '=='.
I understand. They might get grotesque quantities of Unfreedom all over your compiler. Who wants that to happen? :-/
Then maybe it shouldn't have the same freakin' name as a certain Messianic figure who has nothing to do with the changing of the seasons. Not to mention the "Mass" in the name. In short, if what you say is true, then there's absolutely no reason to call it Christmas.
"Fevered" politically-correct "delusions" such as "some Americans are Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, or atheists"? Check your own damned fever.
People in the U.S. are "generally" Christian (=~ 85%). So whenever you see an American on Dec. 26th or soon after, I'm sure you'd think it's appropriate to say "How was your Christmas?"
Well, you're certainly failing to sound like you know anything about anything, so I guess you belong here, too.
Call Mr. Lee.
He'll know the code is broken.
Tell him the dog is turning red.
You know what else teens hate? If you spread a thick layer of fresh pig manure all over the parking lot of your establishment. You see, their noses respond to the smell. Can't stand it. You know for sure that Satan laughed the day that leaf-blowers were invented. This, while evil, probably only gave him a slight chuckle.
Refreshing the whole page would take a long time. That's why you use AJAX with SSH wormhole tunneling for distances in the parsec range.
I imagine that http://porn/ could be worth a lot.
"Organo-mechanical" needs a hyphen. Otherwise, this is ready for publication.
By your reasoning, there's no point in trying to defend yourself if someone is trying to kill you because, you know, you're just gonna die anyway.
Oh, yeah? How do you explain that one casino that lost some money that one time? Well? Is that data too inconvenient to fit into your precious hypothesis?
</global-warming-denier>
the plateau and dip in temperatures in the graph, which refutes the idea that it's been a very steady increase in gases since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
ROFL! That's some good reasoning. Let me see if I understand this: since temperature has not been on a steady rise since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, there has not been a steady increase of "greenhouse gases." God, that's funny.
Penn calls "Bullshit" on what most of the rest of the intelligent world recognizes because it gives him a big old stiffy to pretend that his "superior" perspective comes from his being more of a man. What moral deficiency is your excuse for this shoddy thinking?
Not true. Maybe you don't understand what blind reviews are.
Reviews are "blind" in the sense that the identity of the reviewer is not revealed to the author of the article. The editor, by contrast, knows who the reviewers are and what they've written, so there is accountability.
The New York Times? Neglected?
It's easy to block individual sites, but not so easy to block particular content.
Some people have already mentioned application bundles as a kind of descendant of the resource fork (to which we might add "Frameworks" and "Components"). Let me just add one more plus. One very good thing about .app bundles is that they make installation so much easier; all the app's libraries can live in the bundle, which helps avoid .dll or dependency hell.
That's a pretty cheesy quote, son, but then again, you have to milk these things for all they're worth.
Re-reading my own comment, I see that it could be construed as recommending that humans have sex with many bonobos, which is not what I was trying to say. Oh, well.
Bonobos have the very good moral sense to have sex with numerous other bonobos. Humans could learn from their example.
I don't know anything about what causes buggy software, but years of training by the press, television, and movies have meticulously prepared my brain to accept the oversimplifying fiction that it must be one of them and not the other.