Perhaps this is where "pledge based" OSS can come in. If enough people offered to chip in some dough, I bet someone could devote themselves to developing an app that would satisfy you.
It's called Academic Freedom. I don't think Princeton wants to start dictating what it's people can and cannot publish. If you have problems with the author, complain to the publisher, not Princeton.
I'm a fairly centrist Democrat, and with hindsight, one of my greatest political regrets is not voting for Dole. Dole was the last of the major non-extremist ultra-partisan Republicans. It's really a shame that he seemed so stern and grumpy during his campaign, when he is really a warm and very witty human being.
I'd say Chris Matthews is slightly left of center, but he certainly has an axe to grind with the Democratic Party. From what I can tell, he belives that the DNC has let us all down. He has been especially hard on Clinton for lying.
All in all, I like Matthews. He is a bit too argumentative at times, but he is fair. I don't think there is any comparison between him and the bozos at Fox.
There's a lot of pent up jealousy amongst the borg here on/. A lot of speculation being posted ass if it were fact. And no, I'm not particulary new here, so I'm not suprised.
>BTW: I've seen this story multiple times in several forums, and it doesn't garner you any sympathy. It just reiterates that you still refuse to take responsibility for your own actions.
No, it reiterates nothing. You've been trolled. I'm so happy for you! =)
>Then it really comes down to these asshats being nothing more then movie reviewers then doesn't it. And how often is a movie reviewer accurate in thier evaulations?
1) Movie reviewers don't see special versions that are different than what the rest of us see.
2) Movie reviews are subjective opinions. Hopefully, informed subjective opinions. Although product reviews generally include the reviewer's subjective opinion, there is usually a factual basis for that opinion. Consider these questions: "Did the product work as advertised?" vs. "Did Johnny Depp do a competent job of acting?"
"I drive high regularly and have never had an incident (That's right, never, not a ticket, not an accident, not even backing into a pole or wall or anything)." YET
You've been lucky so far. Your lucky experiences to date do not make a sound basis for intelligent policy.
I think that you are mistaken in thinking that the court system had anything to do with this. It was the Copyright Office. Now, maybe the Copyright Office employs an administrative judge to decide on cases like this, I don't know.
Slashdot Mirror
Another downside to the Mac Experience is that graphics cards tend to cost more, because there aren't as many vendors competing for your money.
I thought it was just white out!
Perhaps this is where "pledge based" OSS can come in. If enough people offered to chip in some dough, I bet someone could devote themselves to developing an app that would satisfy you.
It's called Academic Freedom. I don't think Princeton wants to start dictating what it's people can and cannot publish. If you have problems with the author, complain to the publisher, not Princeton.
Dude,
Look up partisan and bipartisan in the dictionary. Your definitions are double plus ungood.
I'm a fairly centrist Democrat, and with hindsight, one of my greatest political regrets is not voting for Dole. Dole was the last of the major non-extremist ultra-partisan Republicans. It's really a shame that he seemed so stern and grumpy during his campaign, when he is really a warm and very witty human being.
No, he's just an ass.
I'd say Chris Matthews is slightly left of center, but he certainly has an axe to grind with the Democratic Party. From what I can tell, he belives that the DNC has let us all down. He has been especially hard on Clinton for lying.
All in all, I like Matthews. He is a bit too argumentative at times, but he is fair. I don't think there is any comparison between him and the bozos at Fox.
Leave it to a poster named Acidic_Diarrhea to make blanket statements about a political leaning. I guess you're proof that "you are what you eat".
You're right. Kick me now, please.
You mean those non-voting shares that were sold long ago? Or are there other shares that you have discoverd and are ervealing for the first time?
And what about that sports commentator who made some racially tinged comments, then a week later, he goes into a rehab for addiction to oxy-contin?
There's a lot of pent up jealousy amongst the borg here on /. A lot of speculation being posted ass if it were fact. And no, I'm not particulary new here, so I'm not suprised.
Labor was roughly $700. $1000 if they ordered two toppings.
>BTW: I've seen this story multiple times in several forums, and it doesn't garner you any sympathy. It just reiterates that you still refuse to take responsibility for your own actions.
No, it reiterates nothing. You've been trolled. I'm so happy for you! =)
It was grant money.
Where are you getting your numbers? And, just as important, when were these numbers collected?
Yes, your point is probably valid.
It's always, "One day at a time" and "Don't use Kazaa"!
>Then it really comes down to these asshats being nothing more then movie reviewers then doesn't it. And how often is a movie reviewer accurate in thier evaulations?
1) Movie reviewers don't see special versions that are different than what the rest of us see.
2) Movie reviews are subjective opinions. Hopefully, informed subjective opinions. Although product reviews generally include the reviewer's subjective opinion, there is usually a factual basis for that opinion. Consider these questions: "Did the product work as advertised?" vs. "Did Johnny Depp do a competent job of acting?"
"I drive high regularly and have never had an incident (That's right, never, not a ticket, not an accident, not even backing into a pole or wall or anything)." YET
You've been lucky so far. Your lucky experiences to date do not make a sound basis for intelligent policy.
Except that it wasn't the courts that made this ruling it was the copyright office.
I think that you are mistaken in thinking that the court system had anything to do with this. It was the Copyright Office. Now, maybe the Copyright Office employs an administrative judge to decide on cases like this, I don't know.
I was always disappointed that Brando got that role, and not Elmer Fudd, for whom it was written.
"I dweamed of a snaiw cwawing acwoss the edge of a wazor. That is my dweam, that is my nightmawe. Eh-h-h-h-h!"
Wrong. Read the Watson FAQ.