eh, there really are experiments to see if for example antimatter has antigravity type interaction with regular matter. No such thing has been detected yet though. Also there have been experiments to see if there are other forces than the ones of the Standard Model plus gravity.
wait till you get old, you'll find e-books superior. I can't focus on the tiny print in paper books for long. And the prices for the books I like are much cheaper for electronic version
MS market share declining, their chunk of the console pie is half the size of Sony's. Better than the usual Microsoft following of a trend late in the game I'll agree, though. the list of other laughable failures, too little too late, is huge
Maybe more older people are wisely avoided sugared soft drinks and drinking the diet sodas but have the increased risk of dementia and stroke purely because of age.
My father drinks diet drinks, he's 75. I'll let everyone know when the poisonous effects kick in. My dead grandma also drank them and she was cut down at the tender young age of 90 by the artificial chemicals causing fatal stroke
yes after giving the prime causes, even that article mentions that *lately* climate change is also given as reason....without citation of course. because it isn't relevant at all next to the primary factors
You're funny, my working class neighborhood can afford internet access and many other things for schools. But somehow you imagine some other neighborhoods' people ought to be parasites on me.
sharing of "intimate images" (defined) that were taken without consent is what is prohibited:
2. Article 1168 of reference (a) is added to read as follows:
a. 1168. Nonconsensual distribution or broadcasting of an image
(1) The wrongful distribution or broadcasting of an intimate image is prohibited.
(2) The distribution or broadcasting is wrongful if the person making the distribution or broadcast does so without legal justification or excuse, knows or reasonably should know that the depicted person did not consent to the disclosure, and the intimate image is distributed or broadcast:
(a) With the intent to realize personal gain;
(b) With the intent to humiliate, harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the depicted person; or
(c) With reckless disregard as to whether the depicted person would be humiliated, harmed, intimidated, threatened, or coerced.
I mainly am filled with dismay seeing how bad modern UI have fallen after reaching a state of maturity. Now high IQ morons churn features, adding steps to operation, making commonly used things less accessible. Exhibit A, the chrome menu system...
a mere machine can't be bullied or harassed or receive cruelty, they are lower than animals in that regard.
they can be sabotaged, interfered with, destroyed, vandalized, hacked....but not bullied
so we've had prop and jet propelled flying cars, buses and trucks for over a century. Also spacecraft, which are even scarier when they crash on land
happened to me in my first car that was 17 years old, I used the parking brake to stop, some of that redundant system magic.
eh, there really are experiments to see if for example antimatter has antigravity type interaction with regular matter. No such thing has been detected yet though. Also there have been experiments to see if there are other forces than the ones of the Standard Model plus gravity.
they merely are removing a redundant copy, what's the big deal?
wait till you get old, you'll find e-books superior. I can't focus on the tiny print in paper books for long. And the prices for the books I like are much cheaper for electronic version
eh? they are easy to share, I've borrowed some e-books from my friend via Amazon.
because this data isn't already redundantly archived under data.gov domain?
this "news" is hysterical pants-shitting over nothing being lost
pfft, unnecessary as info was already archived on other sites such as under data.gov domain.
bunch of hysterics over non-news.
MS market share declining, their chunk of the console pie is half the size of Sony's. Better than the usual Microsoft following of a trend late in the game I'll agree, though. the list of other laughable failures, too little too late, is huge
two things mainly, retirement account and sales of something related to my employer doing really well.
you're confused, this one is "cloud enabled"
now pony up on those MS stocks, boy
systemd enables any hardware to pointlessly redo or restart things at a random time for no good reason.
they should have been running Oracle Unbreakable LInux and none of this would have happened!
*snicker*
Maybe more older people are wisely avoided sugared soft drinks and drinking the diet sodas but have the increased risk of dementia and stroke purely because of age.
My father drinks diet drinks, he's 75. I'll let everyone know when the poisonous effects kick in. My dead grandma also drank them and she was cut down at the tender young age of 90 by the artificial chemicals causing fatal stroke
false, 2-8% of sucralose consumed is metabolized.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I'm already doing better because of some of the things Trump has done, and I'm just a middle class plebe
one of the customers of those hotels is business people...what's your definition of "rich"?
Maybe businessmen know how to get shit done and politicians don't?
nonsense.
this situation with La. coastline has zero to do with climate change, even the "rising sea level" cited as reason is not valid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
yes after giving the prime causes, even that article mentions that *lately* climate change is also given as reason....without citation of course. because it isn't relevant at all next to the primary factors
Q: what do you call a stalker who waits six years before taking a step to follow target
A: not much of a threat
You're funny, my working class neighborhood can afford internet access and many other things for schools. But somehow you imagine some other neighborhoods' people ought to be parasites on me.
joke is mostly on the gangs though, in only 7% of the finger cuttings were they able to get the matching credit card
no, the article defines "intimate" too, look it up if you are curious what they meant
sharing of "intimate images" (defined) that were taken without consent is what is prohibited:
2. Article 1168 of reference (a) is added to read as follows:
a. 1168. Nonconsensual distribution or broadcasting of an image
(1) The wrongful distribution or broadcasting of an intimate image is
prohibited.
(2) The distribution or broadcasting is wrongful if the person making
the distribution or broadcast does so without legal justification or excuse,
knows or reasonably should know that the depicted person did not consent to
the disclosure, and the intimate image is distributed or broadcast:
(a) With the intent to realize personal gain;
(b) With the intent to humiliate, harm, harass, intimidate,
threaten, or coerce the depicted person; or
(c) With reckless disregard as to whether the depicted person
would be humiliated, harmed, intimidated, threatened, or coerced.
I mainly am filled with dismay seeing how bad modern UI have fallen after reaching a state of maturity. Now high IQ morons churn features, adding steps to operation, making commonly used things less accessible. Exhibit A, the chrome menu system...
No president candidate nor elect is under any legal obligation whatsoever to release tax returns, not relevant to open.gov discussion.
Now it may be a good idea to make revealing tax returns a law, but right now that's just a good idea