AT&T hasn't learned anything from their monopoly days as they seem to headed in that direction. I guess they are just taking the cue from this piss poor Bush regime that doesn't think twice about trampling our rights.
and there is no "right amount of copy protection". Its a waste of your time and money to even try and implement it. If someone wants your program bad enough and you have some form of copy protection, they WILL find a way around it. Any argument it is intended to deter the casual user, etc is complete and udder bullshit. So forget about it.
There is no morality in advertisement. The folks in marketing are of the lowest scum on the earth. They lie. There is no law nor should there be that says I must watch some form of advertisement. A business should have no rights like an individual.
Doesn't matter. Americans are stupid idiots anyway they will still think its a wonderful use of tax payer money. I wonder just how much taxpayer monies were pissed down the drain and other resources waisted over Prohibition. That was another bright idea some moralist idiots had and was able to convince government officials it was a fine endeavor. Of course all it really succeeded in doing was given the Mafia and other criminal organizations an unprecedented amount of power and millions of dollars they otherwise would not have had. Of course Prohibition didn't last long and the very same people who pushed for it latter admitted it was a failure.
by our government officials. Wrap themselves in the cloak of "protect the children" when it really means, "We will be censoring the internet to OUR advantage". What a bunch of mealy mouth losers.
Find a project you like, grab the source code, compile it, play with it, find bugs, report bugs, offer a patch if your capable, rinse and repeat. It's really that simple. And who knows, at some point the project leader might ask if you want to be a developer for them.
Well duh...... it is real simple. If you use GPLed code and distribute then you have to abide by its terms. There is NO FORCING about it. You either ACCEPT the licensing terms or YOU DO NOT accept the licensing terms. So if you use GPLed code to "lock down a device" and distribute that device with the code, that means you HAVE ACCEPTED the licensing terms and MUST make that lock down code available as source code.
Of course your not going to find a statistical difference between the greenhouse gas emissions of regular unleaded fuel and 10 per cent ethanol-blended fuels. Because those gases make up ONLY A TINY percentage of green house gasses. And as any grade school experiment will show you, it's the water vapor idiots.
Sounds like to me F-Secure wants to be the fox guarding the hen house. It also sounds like it is a half-assed solution. Why is it the proprietary world always choose half-assed solutions. Oh wait I know, so they can sell you some snake oil down the road.
Not patching security flaws no matter their "level of criticality" is like standing in the middle of some railroad tracks that's lightly used. Sure you might stand there for a long time before a train comes along but when it does your toast.
Slashdot Mirror
Why do you think the original founder of Greenpeace QUIT?
AT&T hasn't learned anything from their monopoly days as they seem to headed in that direction. I guess they are just taking the cue from this piss poor Bush regime that doesn't think twice about trampling our rights.
and there is no "right amount of copy protection". Its a waste of your time and money to even try and implement it. If someone wants your program bad enough and you have some form of copy protection, they WILL find a way around it. Any argument it is intended to deter the casual user, etc is complete and udder bullshit. So forget about it.
There is no morality in advertisement. The folks in marketing are of the lowest scum on the earth. They lie. There is no law nor should there be that says I must watch some form of advertisement. A business should have no rights like an individual.
Doesn't matter butt monkey.
Doesn't matter. Americans are stupid idiots anyway they will still think its a wonderful use of tax payer money. I wonder just how much taxpayer monies were pissed down the drain and other resources waisted over Prohibition. That was another bright idea some moralist idiots had and was able to convince government officials it was a fine endeavor. Of course all it really succeeded in doing was given the Mafia and other criminal organizations an unprecedented amount of power and millions of dollars they otherwise would not have had. Of course Prohibition didn't last long and the very same people who pushed for it latter admitted it was a failure.
With all the troubles this country has that is the best thing you can come up with? Your a loser.
Well what the lame ass site is REALLY trying to do is CHUM UP HITS.
Yes, the thinking used by PHBs has always been short sighted at best. It is extremely obvious they have NEVER read a EULA.
Phht, no HTML standard can possibly be complete without *OFFICIAL* sarcasm tags.
by our government officials. Wrap themselves in the cloak of "protect the children" when it really means, "We will be censoring the internet to OUR advantage". What a bunch of mealy mouth losers.
Now which version of the 7 versions of VISTA should I get?
Find a project you like, grab the source code, compile it, play with it, find bugs, report bugs, offer a patch if your capable, rinse and repeat. It's really that simple. And who knows, at some point the project leader might ask if you want to be a developer for them.
Yeah. Sounds like some government officials want to know how they can pull some shenanigans away from public view.
Perfect way for a POS show to end. Nothing with the first episode, nothing in the middle and nothing at the end. Good riddance.
Ahh I love the smell of snake oil in the late afternoons.
Um you didn't really read the draft did you?
Well duh...... it is real simple. If you use GPLed code and distribute then you have to abide by its terms. There is NO FORCING about it. You either ACCEPT the licensing terms or YOU DO NOT accept the licensing terms. So if you use GPLed code to "lock down a device" and distribute that device with the code, that means you HAVE ACCEPTED the licensing terms and MUST make that lock down code available as source code.
Well I hope they spend some of that 100K to make the friggin thing compatible with Python-2.5.
No. The bigger factor is the simple fact there is only a finite amount of tillable ground. That doesn't require any further explanation.
Of course your not going to find a statistical difference between the greenhouse gas emissions of regular unleaded fuel and 10 per cent ethanol-blended fuels. Because those gases make up ONLY A TINY percentage of green house gasses. And as any grade school experiment will show you, it's the water vapor idiots.
Any fucking idiot could have foreseen that. Well, except for the blind idiots.
Sounds like to me F-Secure wants to be the fox guarding the hen house. It also sounds like it is a half-assed solution. Why is it the proprietary world always choose half-assed solutions. Oh wait I know, so they can sell you some snake oil down the road.
Not patching security flaws no matter their "level of criticality" is like standing in the middle of some railroad tracks that's lightly used. Sure you might stand there for a long time before a train comes along but when it does your toast.
You forgot one question. Just WTF were the police doing for that 2 hour span? Eating dognuts?