Slashdot Mirror


The Sopranos Ends With a ...

If you still have your copy sitting unwatched on your Tivo, I'd suggest that you stop reading before you are spoiled. The show is done at last and apparently fans are freaking out over the bizarre ending. At my house, we thought at first that the DVR crashed until the credits appeared in silence. Personally I thought that a show known for such excess tried to take an artful bow: It didn't work for me, but I get it at least. Anyway, I had a number of Sopranos submissions this morning and figured I'd just post this comment to give people who were interested in discussing the end of the show a nice place to discuss before they cancel their HBO.

519 comments

  1. He's dead, Jim by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's dead, Jim.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sup /b/

    2. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word - MOVIE

    3. Re:He's dead, Jim by zarkill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whatever the original artistic intent of this ending was, it occurred to me that if I was going to depict a guy getting whacked who never saw it coming - from that guy's own perspective - this might be just how I'd portray that.

    4. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is Jim?

    5. Re:He's dead, Jim by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Though I like the Sopranos, I prefer the 'Three Tenors'. ;-)

      It climaxed in the penultimate episode of the season just like every other season has. Did you really expect Tony to die? There's no movies/specials/mini-series in the future if Tony dies.

    6. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Who is Jim?

      Don't worry about it. It's just some obscure reference to a short-lived TV show from the 60s.

    7. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a line from Star Trek. Specifically, four episodes in Star Trek.
      "Jim" is Kirk.

    8. Re:He's dead, Jim by sgholt · · Score: 1

      I agree...I swear that was one of the Ukranian hit men at the counter (the guy who went into the restroom)...I think it was from Tony's point of view ....didn't see it coming...sudden blackness!
      I thought is was a great ending, he never had a chance to "stop believing" :)

    9. Re:He's dead, Jim by jeremy_hogan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's alive. And not just to leave it open for a movie or new series, but because the entire show was about this same cycle. The show was never about closure, or redemption, or the hero's journey. It was about making you sit in his seat for awhile, and see the world through his eyes, not a glorified "Top of the world ma!" go out in a blaze of glory type thing. It was an "end up in a wheel chair unaware of who you are" sort of thing.

      The break away to black was a crescendo to the tension they created with the folks walking in, looking shifty. "OMG, that guys gonna whack him!", "OMG, that dude is gonna shoot AJ", "OMG, Meadow's car will blow up."

      Why kill him? Why not show him being killed if he is? What lesson would we learn from that that we don't learn by him being alive, but trapped. By the life, the fear, the machine. He's not afraid to die, he's afraid of that senile old man in the chair.

      "This thing of ours, once you're in, there ain't no gettin' out." Which is a fitting prison for Tony, locked in a life of his own making, nostalgically trying to reach out for the "old days" when his Dad and Uncle June ran N. Jersey. But those days are gone, if they ever existed. There are no good old days, just days, and life goes on. Let's get some onion rings tonight, b/c there's a good chance we'll all be dead tomorrow.

    10. Re:He's dead, Jim by taniwha · · Score: 4, Funny

      The full quote is "he's dead Jim, you get his phaser, I'll get his wallet"

    11. Re:He's dead, Jim by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Oh .... to have some moderator points! "Laugh, it's funny"

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    12. Re:He's dead, Jim by beschler · · Score: 1

      They are all dead Jim. The "three" hit men where just waiting for the daughter to arrive so they could do them all at the same time.

    13. Re:He's dead, Jim by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasn't it:

      He's dead, Jim. Leave the gun. Take the canoli.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    14. Re:He's dead, Jim by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Even if you did have the points, you couldn't use them now since you posted...

      Doh!

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    15. Re:He's dead, Jim by Poppler · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, the guy going into the bathroom was clearly alluding to that scene in the Godfather - but Tony getting hit doesn't really make sense. The war with New York was over and Phil was dead, who would kill him? Did I miss something?

      --
      What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    16. Re:He's dead, Jim by Jim222 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'd prefer to believe. We can only speculate though, and the whole tony dead scenario does have a lot of merit. It goes back to what he said with bobby on the boat about total darkness and you wouldn't see it coming.

      --
      SIG: Free PS3
    17. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just got this e-mail from a friend, obviously a cut-and-paste but I don't know the source:

      "So here is what I found out. The guy at the bar is also credited as Nikki Leotardo. The same actor played him in the first part of season 6 during a brief sit down concerning the future of Vito. That wasn't that long ago. Apparently, he is the nephew of Phil. Phil's brother Nikki Senior was killed in 1976 in a car accident.
      Absolutely Genius!!!!
      David Chase is truly rewarding the true fans who pay attention to detail. So the point would have been that life continues and we may never know the end of the Sopranos. But if you pay attention to the history, you will find that all the answers lie in the characters in the restaurant. The trucker was the brother of the guy who was robbed by Christopher in Season 2. Remember the DVD players? The trucker had to identify the body.
      The boy scouts were in the train store and the brothas at the end were the ones who tried to kill Tony and only clipped him in the ear (was that season 2 or 3?). Absolutely incredible!!!! There were three people in the restaurant who had reason to kill Tony and then it just ends.
      This was Chase's way of proving that he will not escape his past. It will not go on forever despite that he would like it to "don't stop".
      Not the fans!!! Tony would like it to keep going but just as we have to say goodbye, so does he"

    18. Re:He's dead, Jim by quarmar · · Score: 1

      At least the Sopranos got an ending. As a frustrated fan of Carnivale and Deadwood, I'd like to point out that it could have been much worse.

    19. Re:He's dead, Jim by fatboy · · Score: 1

      He's alive. And not just to leave it open for a movie or new series, but because the entire show was about this same cycle. The show was never about closure, or redemption, or the hero's journey. It was about making you sit in his seat for awhile, and see the world through his eyes, not a glorified "Top of the world ma!" go out in a blaze of glory type thing. It was an "end up in a wheel chair unaware of who you are" sort of thing.

      My thoughts exactly. It goes on and on and on and on...... Oh wait, they cut just before those lyrics in the Journey song.

      --
      --fatboy
    20. Re:He's dead, Jim by MontyApollo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People had been complaining a lot for last few seasons about not enough whacking, so the creator gave the audience the ultimate whack - he whacked them. He set up a lot of tension and put you in the moment, while distracting you at the same time, and then whack - everything goes black. You never saw it coming.

      The 2nd to last episode was a trick to make people think they he had given in to the complaints and was going to have a whack-fest, but it was just a diversion. He was just setting the audience up to make the ultimate whack even sweeter.

    21. Re:He's dead, Jim by greenstrat · · Score: 1

      I think you're dead on, mostly. I think it left you thinking about two distinct possibilities. Godfather 3, his daughter dies, all James Cagney "top of the world" movies, the hero dies. I was thinking both the entire time I was watching it. I think though that the real thing they left you with was the paranoia, like you said. He's not going to die, but he's going to live the rest of his life thinking that he could. And so will his family.

      They knocked Phil off to close that chapter specifically so that everyone wouldn't automatically think he was going to get shot.

    22. Re:He's dead, Jim by detect · · Score: 1

      Most interesting comment on here so far. I'll have to go through the old episodes to be sure but this all sounds correct.

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    23. Re:He's dead, Jim by detect · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or maybe not...

      "That all sounds like urban (emerging) legend. The NY Times reviewer was on ESPN radio a couple hours ago and was asked about the Italian-looking guy at the counter and the 2 black guys, and if they appeared in earlier episodes. The NYT guy said no. The Italian-looking guy isn't even an actor. He works at a restaurant in the area and the Sopranos people asked him to do the scene because he looked the part.
      And Tony was supposed to have killed one of the black guys who tried to kill him way back when."

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    24. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they hired Leon B. Little to do the hit.

    25. Re:He's dead, Jim by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...or they could have canceled it and instead shown a Terrance and Phillip special!

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    26. Re:He's dead, Jim by shmlco · · Score: 1

      You mean Tony never saw it coming. Every time the restaurant door opened the bell tinkles and the scene switched to his POV. He watches some people come in, Carmela come in, AJ come in. Then Meadow approaches the restaurant, we hear the bell... whack.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    27. Re:He's dead, Jim by mvokla_1 · · Score: 1

      Au contrair, Their will be a sequel, and Tony will be there.

    28. Re:He's dead, Jim by MontyApollo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just re-watched the scene. The last few seconds is of TONY looking up from the table. Our POV is probably Meadow, but definately NOT Tony. I was fairly on board with Tony being whacked, and maybe the audience whacking was just a shared experience, but the fact that it is not Tony's POV kind of kills that reasoning for me. In fact, it was like Chase was taunting us - "see, Tony is still alive," then blackness. He wins, we lose. We just got whacked. The end. Their story goes on, but we won't be apart of it anymore.

      I guess it could be argued that the POV is a killer and Tony looks up just as the end comes, but I am not sure I like the idea of switching back to Tony's POV after he is dead.

    29. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Jim" is Kirk.


      Ok, who is Kirk?

    30. Re:He's dead, Jim by crumley · · Score: 1

      Yep, it is an myth. After I first read this somewhere else, I watched at the credits again. The guy in the diner is credited as "Guy at the counter in Member's Only jacket", or something of the sort. He is not a Leotardo. Tony would have recognized a Leotardo.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    31. Re:He's dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh my God, they killed Tony! YOU BASTARDS!
      </southpark>

  2. mmhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It completely sucked. It left you with thinking "he either got shot.. or didn't get shot."

    I guess their main objective was to leave question, but leave everyone realizing that he's got to spend the rest of his life in anxiety, wondering if he's going to get shot at any time.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    1. Re:mmhm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think that the ending brings the question back to the viewer, and the viewer's desire for a just or balanced moral universe, at least in fictions. We want closure in our stories because we despair of having it in our lives. I unapologetically believe that tragedy, and narrative that denies that kind of closure, is more grown-up and artistically viable than stories which satisfy that itch to see wrongs righted, the meek inheriting the earth, and everyone living happily every after (or at least stewing in their just desserts.)

      Kudos to the creators of Soprano for refusing that kind of pablum.

    2. Re:mmhm... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      he either got shot.. or didn't get shot.

      If Schrödinger wrote the script, all you had to do is open your TiVo box to know.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, parent post was a clicheic string if I ever saw one..

    4. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Schrödinger never said anything about voiding the warranty...

    5. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And subsequently gas the whole family while opening the tivo...

    6. Re:mmhm... by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the cat which we were repeteadly shown in the beginning but not in the end, and didnt know if he was killed or not, represented shroedingers cat. Which is what ended up happening to Tony.

      --
      the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    7. Re:mmhm... by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the final scene from Dallas, to me. Funny parallel, that.

    8. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I unapologetically believe that tragedy, and narrative that denies that kind of closure, is more grown-up

      I unapologetically believe that you are an arrogant snob.
      Sad-ending vs happy-ending, or realistic-ending vs fantastic-ending, is just a matter of taste, not a matter of maturity.

      Intelligent dialogue might be more "grown up" than fart jokes, but only someone who wants to gaze down his nose at anyone with different tastes would say tragedy is more grown-up than comedy.

    9. Re:mmhm... by thegnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      only someone who wants to gaze down his nose at anyone with different tastes would say tragedy is more grown-up than comedy.

      Now tragicomedy... That's smart.
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    10. Re:mmhm... by dsandler · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the cat...represented shroedingers cat. Which is what ended up happening to Tony.
      That thought occurred to me too, but because you say "supposedly" it sounds like you have a source of some kind. Care to share a citation?
    11. Re:mmhm... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      It completely sucked. It left you with thinking "he either got shot.. or didn't get shot."

      Try being a Blakes 7 fan. Meh.
    12. Re:mmhm... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope, but opening the box kinda voids the suspense. Essentially, that's the same in case of TiVo.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:mmhm... by been42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Schrödinger wrote the script, all you had to do is open your TiVo box to know.

      Thanks for the suggestion!


      (Spoilers below):


      Tony makes a loud buzzing noise and catches fire. My house burns down. Damn, an interactive show finale! Great job, HBO!

    14. Re:mmhm... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Traumedy. Without looking, I'm sure that word's been used somewhere.

    15. Re:mmhm... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I agree it's a little more realistic, but some people (like me) enjoy a story with a clean ending. What if they had a slow motion Frodo tossing the ring into Mount Doom, then cutting to Aragorn turning just in time to see a troll's hammer come down. You just wouldn't know what happened and you'd likely go mad because of it. It's bad enough that even the movie didn't clarify if the Balrog had wings, or if it was Eowyn (the woman) or Merry (the Hobbit) who finally did in the Witch King (who no man may hinder!). If I wanted obscure endings I'd re-watch Final Fantasy.

      Waaay too early in the morning to respond to Slashdot posts...

    16. Re:mmhm... by CrashPoint · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough that even the movie didn't clarify... if it was Eowyn (the woman) or Merry (the Hobbit) who finally did in the Witch King (who no man may hinder!).
      Granted I haven't seen the movie in a couple of years, but I think Eowyn ramming a sword through his face answered that question fairly well.
    17. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      http://www.google.com/search?q=Traumedy


      About 1 470 hits, including Urban dictionary and the play "Ball: A traumedy".

      /AC

    18. Re:mmhm... by Goaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I unapologetically believe that tragedy, and narrative that denies that kind of closure, is more grown-up and artistically viable than stories which satisfy that itch to see wrongs righted, the meek inheriting the earth, and everyone living happily every after (or at least stewing in their just desserts.)

      Or maybe tradegy is just the hack writer's easiest way to make his story seem more profound than it actually is, because people think the way you do?

    19. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. But Eowyn did not kill the Witch King in Tolkein's version.

    20. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I admit it... I don't get the joke! Could you please explain?

    21. Re:mmhm... by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. Who needs to write proper conclusions when it's far more "mature" and "artistically viable" (a non-concept if there ever was one) to just leave them out altogether!

      To privilege tragedy over other forms of narrative outright is silly like when a clown hits an 80-yr-old old man in the face with a grocery bag full of feces.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    22. Re:mmhm... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hamlet, The Musical!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    23. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes she did. Are you illiterate?

    24. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I kind of like it more and more after it sinking in over night. You knew from season one, there is only one way out for a guy like Tony, he dies. Either of natural causes or not.

      They could do a movie if they wanted to, they sort of can't because so many of the important and interesting characters were rubbed out in the last few episodes. but they leave you with that wanting. Tony might get killed infront of his family, or maybe they'll just sort of keep on keeping on which is really waht made the show so interesting.

      Nobody expected what they got.

      Sort of beautiful in a way. Tony is a sociopath. Carmela has repressed guilt, probalby some codependence and who knows what else going on. Meadow and A.J. turned out remarkably "normal."

    25. Re:mmhm... by Stochastism · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that the ending brings the question back to the viewer, aren't soprano's people that get high notes without having to kill people for them?
    26. Re:mmhm... by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      I think you're relying on semantics.

      Then tottering, struggling up, with her last strength she drove her sword between crown and mantle, as the great shoulders bowed before her. The sword broke sparkling into many shards. The crown rolled away with a clang. Eowyn fell forward upon her fallen foe. But lo! the mantle and hauberk were empty. Shapeless they lay now on the ground, torn and tumbled; and a cry went up into the shuddering air, and faded to a shrill wailing, passing with the wind, a voice bodiless and thin that died, and swallowed up, and was never heard again in that age of this world.

      I would say she "killed" him inasmuch as Frodo "killed" Sauron and Wormtongue "killed" Saruman. Poof, they're gone, no more to trouble Middle Earth. Are they dead, well, no, not technically, but then again, I thought not enough people actually died in Tolkien's original, at least not enough popular characters. Sure, you hear about an army of dwarves dying here, and a couple thousand humans biting it over there, but it was all so detached.

      To get somewhat back on topic, if Tolkien had written the Ringwraiths with the same level of absolute violence that the Sopranos writers used (for example, dropping farmer Maggot with a mace to the head, or, on finding the hobbits had tricked them at the Inn, they go ahead and burn it down just in case they were still in the building) I think it would have fit better. To me, the ringwraiths weren't quite "evil" enough. Scary, hell yes, but not evil like their master.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    27. Re:mmhm... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess their main objective was to leave question, but leave everyone realizing that he's got to spend the rest of his life in anxiety, wondering if he's going to get shot at any time No...the "main objective" was to leave the door open for future movie deals...
      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    28. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given it would have cut an hour or three from the movie, I personally would welcome such a change!

    29. Re:mmhm... by korebantic · · Score: 1

      I don't find these comments snobby in the least. I think so many people have grown up on Disney endings, they can't find anything else satisfactory. Actually, this is one of the biggest reasons I enjoy Anime so much -- the endings are often unsettling, unpredictable, and non-cliche.

    30. Re:mmhm... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Well, here's the book version, talking about Merry's sword he used to stab the Witch King's leg:

      So passed the sword of the Barrow-downs, work of the Westernesse. But glad would he have been to know its fate who wrought it slowly long ago in the North-kingdom when the Dúnedain were young, and chief among their foes was the dread realm of Angmar and its sorcerer king. No other blade, though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.

      So yes, Eowyn with her pretty speech and flowing hair handled the dramatics, but I'd say the technical work was left to the hobbit.

    31. Re:mmhm... by essh10151 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I've been trying to put words on what it was about the ending that bugged me -- "hack writer's easiest way to make his story seem more profound than it actually is" is perfect.

    32. Re:mmhm... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The ringwraiths were on a mission of stealth. Though they did win a battle with the Rangers at Tharbad according to Unfinished Tales, Sauron wasn't about to use up his fiercest weapons so early in the war, for many reasons. Revealing them clearly would urge everyone on the sidelines to prepare, and a trail of dead bodies kind of makes it hard to tail the ringbearer all quiet-like. Also, the ringwraiths' innate power was tied to Sauron's, and he was still recovering his strength.

    33. Re:mmhm... by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It completely sucked. It left you with thinking "he either got shot.. or didn't get shot."

      I guess their main objective was to leave question, but leave everyone realizing that he's got to spend the rest of his life in anxiety, wondering if he's going to get shot at any time.


      Their main objective was to have everyone talking about it, weighing in with their own theories as to what happened as the screen went black. I think it worked flawlessly.

      You may not like it, but you are still talking about it. Isn't that the goal of art? Not to produce something that everyone likes, but to produce something that has people thinking and talking about long after it's gone. You have to admit, it is brilliant!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    34. Re:mmhm... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I think you missed his point. The point is not tragedy vs. comedy, the point is that life just doesn't end. It goes on. The ending of the show didn't wrap everything up in a tight bow, and of course, it gives you the chance to think about what it meant, other than just watching Fat Tony get whacked or not, and being given a simple concrete ending. (We are talking about "The Simpsons", right?). From what I've read, it sounds like a good ending to me.

      I've never watched "The Sopranos" BTW, it's just that I'm interested in these kinds of stories, i.e., reaction of fans of TV show to something big and/or daring by the producers.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    35. Re:mmhm... by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sad-ending vs happy-ending, or realistic-ending vs fantastic-ending, is just a matter of taste, not a matter of maturity.

      But doesn't being able to enjoy more complex issues make you more mature in general? Or at least require an individual with an "aged" outlook on life.

      Rather than a matter of taste, it would be simply impossible for someone to enjoy a tragedy unless they themselves understood it from experience themselves?

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    36. Re:mmhm... by lostguru · · Score: 5, Funny

      shroedinger was a famous veterinarian who liked to put cats in boxes with a vial of poison and a radioactive isotope. then if the isotope decayed the vial burst and the cat died. of course you couldn't tell if the cat was dead or not until you opened the box, but that spoiled the fun. so to please the humane society he decided that the cat was both dead and alive while in the box, thus proving the idiocy of humane societies.


      some say he was a physicist but he was really a veterinarian who had been attacked by a cat during his childhood

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    37. Re:mmhm... by iocat · · Score: 1
      The best tragicomedies are very special episodes. Note to the young: it's an 80's thing, you may not understand.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    38. Re:mmhm... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      But you understand - Anime is it's own cliche of trying to be non-cliche?

      I didn't watch many Disney movies, thanks. But I do like stories to have an ending, which besides the credits rolling, we still haven't gotten. Unsettling? No. The family is just fine. Unpredictable? Nope - they've been pulling this shit since Season 2. Non-cliche? Well, I don't know what your version of cliche would be for a show about the mob.

      Using the word cliche is so cliche.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    39. Re:mmhm... by Bagggy · · Score: 1

      Well that's a way to respect his tastes, call him a snob. I think what he was getting at is that the typically popular happy-ending/closure to modern entertainment is becoming a cliche, and once a cliche emerges it becomes more artistically viable to go against that grain and make the viewer say, "Wait, where's the closure? What happens??". Maybe he didn't quite word it the best way, but you can be perfectly mature and like both. He doesn't say that happy endings are immature, just that it takes a taste for the harsh reality of the real world to be able to enjoy an open-ended, tragic story.

    40. Re:mmhm... by bluephone · · Score: 2

      In an odd coincidence, I was just have the same debate with a friend a couple days ago. I feel the same way. And not just about comedy. He was on about a particular film, and how a certain other film was tripe because it had little artistic value. The key to his argument was that movie A was a smaller production that didn't get much media attention, while movie B was a big Hollywood blockbuster. So any successful Hollywood film can't be art in his eyes. I only responded that I'm glad I'm not a snob, because it allows me to enjoy so many more good movies.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    41. Re:mmhm... by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But... this isn't a new show. It's the last episode. Honestly, it ended as poorly as the last few seasons of shows. You'll watch the entire 4th season and... nothing happens. They introduced new characters, plots, and themes at every corner and let them die out with never any explanations, resolutions, anything.

      It got really old. I watched the show anyways, because what else is on Sunday night; and it's on before Entourage. I was always disappointed. Probably more so, because the show had a lot of potential to be so much more.

      There's really nothing brilliant here. They just used the same MO as the last four seasons where nothing ever happened.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    42. Re:mmhm... by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      The ringwraiths were on a mission of stealth. Revealing them clearly would urge everyone on the sidelines to prepare, and a trail of dead bodies kind of makes it hard to tail the ringbearer all quiet-like.

      Well, the ringwraiths should have brought along a nailgun and dumped the bodies in abandoned row houses.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    43. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think that the ending brings the question back to the viewer, and the viewer's desire for a just or balanced moral universe, at least in fictions. We want closure in our stories because we despair of having it in our lives. I unapologetically believe that tragedy, and narrative that denies that kind of closure, is more grown-up and artistically viable than stories which satisfy that itch to see wrongs righted, the meek inheriting the earth, and everyone living happily every after (or at least stewing in their just desserts.)

      Kudos to the creators of Soprano for refusing that kind of pablum. Tragedy is also the realm of soap opera, which guess what? That's what you're talking about, not fine art, but soap opera. The Sopranos is nothing but an overhyped melodrama.

      And to think that tragedy is the only natural conclusion in life, and thus the only grown up resolution to a story is the mindset of the emotionally stunted individual, stuck at the emo teen stage of development.

      Many of the most sophisticated literary classics are comedies or satires, with guess what? happy endings. The people that demand tragedy are not the pragmatists, they are the people that want the emotional orgasm of pretend loss. They are sensualists first, and want to evaluate art on the basis of emotive expression.
    44. Re:mmhm... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      wondering if he's going to get shot at any time.

      That's odd. The show does a really good job of showing the levels of power in these kinds of organizations and a hit on a boss isnt something that is done lightly. Of all the characters, I would assume Tony is one of the safest because of his influence and position. The occasional mob war happens, but its usually the lower-level guys who get killed, not the bosses.

    45. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it ended as poorly as the last few seasons of shows I've read references like that in several other posts, and yet all you people keep watching....

      what else is on Sunday night Well that explains it. Since there is absolutely nothing else anyone could possibly do on a Sunday night other than watch television.

      because the show had a lot of potential to be so much more More? More than a TV show? Hold on to your hat, because I suspect they'll be making a movie. Possibly some action figures and maybe lunchboxes.

      There's really nothing brilliant here You are absolutely right about that, if by 'here' you mean 'on TV'.
    46. Re:mmhm... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I remember when I watched The Little Mermaid and it ends on that cliff-hanger with the machine gun and the cocaine. And Bambi! And Back to the Future!

      I can see what the GP was saying - kids films are nicely finished, with a good ol' moral heaped on top, a nice lesson wrapped in a bow. It *is* more mature to be able to do away with any notion of what has to happen in the end of a piece, than to simply give in and tie up all the loose ends, send out a FAQ, draw some diagrams, and have a Q&A. Art isn't supposed to be formulaic, and I hate to say it, but spelling everything out in small words for the audience to lap up is formulaic.

      It's not about tastes. There's nothing that says you can only like cliff-hangers, or you can only like nicely-sewn-up endings. Tastes are things like comedy/drama/art-house/snuff/whatever. This is a device we're talking about, not a style or genre.

    47. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit, it is brilliant!

      No, I don't have to admit that. I can instead be annoyed that he used an OLD cliche cop-out that leaves the audience hanging. That works for season to season / episode to episode cliff-hangers, but it doesn't work for a show finale. IMHO, the real reason Chase did this is because he was REALLY tired of the series, didn't want to do the last few seasons, and neither did a bunch of the cast. This was the big middle-finger to fans done in a fashion that allowed pseudo-intellectuals to convince themselves that they "get it". Congratulations for being delusional.

    48. Re:mmhm... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Hamlet, The Musical!


      You mean the Lion King?

    49. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the actual killing (about 1 page earlier)? Eowyn beheaded both the Nazgul and the Ringwraith. Merry merely wounded one leg making the wraith stumble and miss its target.

    50. Re:mmhm... by baggins2001 · · Score: 1

      It was a Schrodinger ending?

      --
      He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    51. Re:mmhm... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      That's a musical? Thought it was a cartoon.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    52. Re:mmhm... by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reading Slashdot at comment level 3 and up leaves you wondering "WTF" sometimes when the last comment you see is about the artistic merit of the Sopranos ending, and the next comment you see has someone talking about why the Ringwraiths weren't brought out early in the Lord of the Rings.

      Seriously, total non-sequitur. It's like playing memetic telephone.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    53. Re:mmhm... by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or maybe tradegy is just the hack writer's easiest way to make his story seem more profound than it actually is, because people think the way you do?

      It certainly worked that way for The Departed.

      "Hmm, curious, I wonder how they'll resolve this loose end, it could end up being trouble for---oh... I see, everyone is conveniently killed."

    54. Re:mmhm... by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1

      I've never watched "The Sopranos" BTW, it's just that I'm interested in these kinds of stories,

      Ah. Well then, to clarify WtF people are talking about, the Soprano's ended with an ambiguous ending. It suggested that Tony was about to be shot by an assassin, but in a really vague way, so it could have been totally innocent. Then just when you might expect some resolution, the screen literally goes black.

      IMHO, this is precisely the kind of BS that hack writers use to make their story seem more profound than it really is; spent all this time on build-up, can't decide how to end it, so hack some ambiguous crap that "lets the reader/viewer decide for themselves", i.e. punt and give up.

      I'd make some analogy to code, but I can't think of one because code doesn't seem to have the same need for resolution that drama does. So it is like an Olympic ski jumper doing an awesome back flip of a jump, and then failing to stick the landing. Or just not bothering to show the landing, the way a lot of snowboard videos do :-)

    55. Re:mmhm... by treeves · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Soprano's fan, so I don't know the chronology of the story line, but couldn't they kill his character and still do a movie later - a prequel or something?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    56. Re:mmhm... by indros13 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's better: a) that a thread about the Sopranos can devolve into a discussion of Sauron's strategy in the use of ringwraiths in the LOTR or b) that the ultimate post in the tangent received a +3 insightful I love Slashdot.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    57. Re:mmhm... by jruschme · · Score: 1

      It completely sucked. It left you with thinking "he either got shot.. or didn't get shot." Oh my... it's Schroedinger's mobster!

    58. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not mix up pathos and tragedy.

    59. Re:mmhm... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Who is?

    60. Re:mmhm... by Omega+Xi · · Score: 1

      Can't everyone evaluate art based on what appeals to them? I like to think that while some things are universally popular that doesn't mean popular opinion is the only one that is "right". It's impossible to make something everyone finds asthetically pleasing no matter what disipline you are working in. For some art is about emotion, for others it can be about abstraction. //Xi

      --
      Simplicity lies within chaos
    61. Re:mmhm... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I wanted to see harsh reality I'd put the book down, turn off the TV, or stop playing the video game.

      I have nothing against people who enjoy tragedy. To each their own. But to me, happy endings in entertainment will never be cliche. No matter how many hundred shiny happy people appear on screen, you can see billions of tragic endings in real life.

    62. Re:mmhm... by adelord · · Score: 1

      Or maybe tradegy is just the hack writer's easiest way to make his story seem more profound than it actually is, because people think the way you do? It certainly worked that way for The Departed. "Hmm, curious, I wonder how they'll resolve this loose end, it could end up being trouble for---oh... I see, everyone is conveniently killed."

      And it worked for Six Feet Under. Everyone's life story really does end with death. I will pick the easy "everyone dies" over the kitsch "happily ever after" any day of the week: I remember the movies in the 80's. I prefer it to the arthouse/French "nothing changes, no one grows" as well. Killing everyone off at the end of the narrative is better. It worked for the Greeks, it worked for Shakespeare. It is true to life.

      As for the Sopranos, if he lives or dies is immaterial to me: I felt like it portrayed his anxiety in a realistic manner for the first time. He is paranoid of everyone, even when he appears calm and unaware, it seems to Tony like anyone could be his killer and some disaster is about to happen to his Meadow any second now. The source of his fear is not specific, it is the human condition as far as he knows. I would prefer that he died in some totally mundane way: heart attack or better yet traffic accident. That would match the tone of the show. After that I would've chosen a violent tragic death that results from his tragic flaw: continually shitting on his wife.

      Tony emerges from below-deck, post-coital grin on his face and humming. Camera follows from behind, and pans counter-clockwise to show Carmela only a few feet away, standing on the pier. Tony, sees her, grunts (or other verbalization of indifference), and turns to return to the cabin.
      "Tony, I've had enough,"
      cut to black, with sound of gunshot. Two second pause, then sounds of wet gasping with heart beat. Pause. Two rapid gunshots. Silence. Three second pause. Roll credits.
      --
      Eugene Debs: "Money constitutes no proper basis of civilization"
    63. Re:mmhm... by svallarian · · Score: 1

      That's OK, I understand, I read Neil Stephenson novels.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    64. Re:mmhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on this, as far as art is concerned. But, unfortunately, the comments that are posted aren't about art itself. The reason so many people think it is bad, isn't because of the statement, but because of the type of audience that was drawn to it.

      If it were actually a Sundance film, meant for it's artistic form and new ideas, it would have been an incredible hit. But, the audience that watched it religiously, had been used to blood, violence and entertainment in it's most primal form. They DID get some of that throughout the episode, but the end didn't fit the audience who were most loyal to it.

      It was original and artistic in most ways, you're right. And everyone has their voice of criticism, but we're not dealing with artists or critics... we're dealing with people who want to see others get wacked and have some closure.

      I do see what you're saying though.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    65. Re:mmhm... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I refuse to debate the subtleties of Tolkien with an Anonymous Coward who cannot differentiate between a fell beast and a Nazgul. Off with you, peasant!

      I keeed, I keeed. ;-)

    66. Re:mmhm... by Daffy+Duck · · Score: 1

      Why? What'll happen?

    67. Re:mmhm... by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

      I'd make some analogy to code, but I can't think of one because code doesn't seem to have the same need for resolution that drama does.

      I take a stab at it. Alright, maybe it's documentation and not code. Anyway:

      --gurfle
      Engages the gurfle option. An explanation of the gurfle option is not within the scope of this document.

      AAAaaaarrrrggghhh!

      --
      My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    68. Re:mmhm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      In this regard, I am an unapologetic (that word is getting used a lot, isn't it?) snob, though I appreciate the defense. I think the difference is as stark as that between a Brittney Spears album and the works of J.S. Bach. Simply calling it a difference of taste minimizes other important differences.

      I have my not-very-sophisticated pleasures as well. I just recognize them for what they are: spiritual junk food.

    69. Re:mmhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      I posted this in another post as well, and it's not a flame or opinion.. but, I do think that the regular audience that watches Sopranos isn't the type that enjoys a non-cliche type ending. Most of them have watched Sopranos for the excitement and violence, rather than it's artistic value. Though the last episode may be suitable for movie critics, it's core audience and followers are the one's who really don't go for it.

      To each their own, I guess. If I were to watch a Monty Python film, I wouldn't want it to be directed by Quentin Tarantino and end with like a David Lynch film... (maybe Monty Python is a bad example... lol)

      Anyway, you get what I'm saying. This last episode may appeal to the likes of a Sundance film festival audience, but not the audience that is accustomed to it. You wouldn't like an anime movie (that you're used to) to end like a Disney movie, ya know?

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    70. Re:mmhm... by heraclitus23 · · Score: 2

      Arrogant snob is a bit much even if you disagree...

      The ending is akin to the ending of Mean Streets (although in that movie we know the protagonist survives given the opening). What's important is that he is shot, not whether or not he dies.

    71. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading Slashdot at comment level 3 and up leaves you wondering "WTF" sometimes when the last comment you see is about the artistic merit of the Sopranos ending, and the next comment you see has someone talking about why the Ringwraiths weren't brought out early in the Lord of the Rings.

      Seriously, total non-sequitur. It's like playing memetic telephone.


      Yeah, isn't the Slashdot censorship ("moderation") system great? It is pointless to post a reply without quoting the post you are replying to, otherwise there is no continuity whatsoever. It wouldn't be so bad if the pagination actually worked in the -1 nested view, but it doesn't. I'm appalled that such a popular site could go on like this with such horrific bugs for so long. And the irony of discussions on censorship is never lost on me.
    72. Re:mmhm... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      The part that sort of freaks me out is that anybody on Slashdot would raise an arguement that people of any importance would leave the theatre not knowing how The Lord of the Rings had ended.

      I mean, duh. It's a book. If you didn't read the trilogy at least once before seeing the film, your opinion about how the movie ends really doesn't matter.

    73. Re:mmhm... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1
      How about the tried and true...

      // This contrabulates the grommetron

      void ContrabulateGrommetron( Grommetron * pGrommetron ) {

      }

      I don't know how many times I've seen this kind of crap in code, or worse in API documentation. While your example is more relevant to the TV show, this is much more common, and worse because instead of saying "I won't bother writing real documentation" like the above example, it implies that it _is_ real documentation.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    74. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douglas Adams, is that you?

      Nicely done, AC.

    75. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRAMA BOMB!

      *BLAMMO!*

    76. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think excitement and violence are not artistic?

    77. Re:mmhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be true sometimes, but I think you have to look at the larger picture of tragedy, before you dismiss all tragedy as a tool of 'hack writers'.

      First, not all fiction is created with the intent merely to entertain. Tragedy can serve an author's purposes, giving the story the ending it needs to be the creation the author wanted. For example, let's say someone wanted to create an 'issue' story, exploring the dangers of reliance on DNA evidence in the modern legal system. I've played with an idea for a story like this before, but, not being a writer, I doubt I could really do it justice. The basic premise being, in modern courts, DNA evidence is considered to be un-assailable proof of guilt. But, couldn't DNA evidence be planted like any other evidence? Someone gets some hair, maybe some skin scrapings, maybe even blood or semen, in ways that the protagonist/victim would never have even been aware of. Then, the someone kills someone else, and puts skin and blood under the fingernails of the murdered person. Plants other DNA samples in other 'strategic' places. Leaves all the signs pointing to the person they are trying to frame.

      Now, with such a story, you could end it with the protagonist being exhonorated. But, that kind of lets the audience off the hook. Leaves people feeling that everything will come out alright. No need to worry about it, these things work out OK in the end. Maybe the ending of the person going to prison, maybe even being executed, for a crime they didn't commit would really drive the point home to people that this is a potentially real problem that people should be concerned about. Leave the audience on the hook, so when they are finished reading or watching your story, they don't just forget about in in a 'world-will-be-alright' happy haze.

      On the other hand, the GP's statement seems equally over-simplistic. Tragedy has it's place. So does comedy.

    78. Re:mmhm... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Ahh, so you're one of those "TV is the devil" type folks. Do you live in a mud hut with grass for a roof, too?

      So fucking typical, especially how you take everything I say out of context.

      "I've read references like that in several other posts, and yet all you people keep watching...."

      As I said, what else is on TV on Sunday night? And I did clearly point out that part of the reason I watched was because it was on before Entourage.

      "Since there is absolutely nothing else anyone could possibly do on a Sunday night other than watch television."

      I work on Monday morning. Maybe you're a hippie pot smoker that works nights at Starbucks, but I'm not. No, there's not much else to do on a Sunday night at 10PM besides be at home, getting ready for the week of work, and bed. What is one supposed to do, save the world at 10PM on Sunday?

      "More? More than a TV show?"

      No, fucktard. More OF a TV show then it was. The premise was good. James Gandolfini is a great main character for that genre. The supporting actors were all good. They set up the show for great things to happen, yet nothing ever really did.

      If you think modern Television shows are somehow "less" then movies, then you have no idea what goes into producing a high budget TV show do you? Shit, even Stargate SG-1 was costing them millions PER EPISODE. And that wasn't as high a budget as Sopranos by a long shot.

      "You are absolutely right about that, if by 'here' you mean 'on TV'."

      Again, you assume that all TV is bad. If you actually watched some shows without your arrogant "I'm too good for TV and you" shit head attitude, you'd see that. Do you honestly believe that TV is the most popular form of entertainment in the entire planet because ALL of it sucks? And you're the only one to see the light?

      There's a lot of crappy TV shows, for sure. But there's good ones too. Just like *anything else.*

      Grow up dude.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    79. Re:mmhm... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Musical is the type of movie, animation is the medium.

  3. The Sopranos by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never was an avid fan of the Sopranos. My roommate was seriously in love with it and I'd catch an episode with him. I've seen only a handful and they spread across a broad spectrum from an interesting first season episode full of mob action & scheming to a kid shitting in a shower and stepping on it. Ok, so maybe I'm oversimplifying the episodes that slowly build up family strife and psychological problems that must come with being in organized crime families.

    Last night, it was very easy for me to accept the ending of the series finale. Because I wasn't addicted to the show. Logically, not all mob stories end in a Scarface-like explosion where everyone dies ... if they did, mobsters would have just killed each other off. But there are smart mobsters out there and what I took the ending to mean to me is that Tony is, after all, a smart mobster. He made it. Guys around him were dying left & right and his time had come but he struck a deal after holding out. I think they killed his brother or at least someone close to him but he was smart enough to write that casualty off. Not a lot of people could do that. Maybe this series chronicles the growth of an intelligent mobster? The old Tony might have made an offensive after that.

    I kept waiting for an assassin to pop out & kill Tony for the last half of the show. But, I didn't have a reason why that should have happened. Am I so trained by movies & books on endings that I can't accept one without a climax? My roommate new it was coming because he kept looking at his watch and saying stuff like "ok, shit better start happening because they've only got like 15 minutes." But you know, you're at the mercy of the writers and creaters of the show.

    It was unorthodoxed for it to end that way. I'm reminded of the utter ripoff I felt when I saw the last episodes of Neon Genesis Evangelion. But that was due to funding, I think this was the idea of the minds behind the show. Good for them. I like seeing deviations from normality when I don't have to suffer from it. :)

    In the end, there were a lot of things that weren't wrapped up and I think that's the big problem a lot of fans are having to deal with. I think the reason so many fans are going to feel this is that the show started off as a badass mob series that attracted viewers of a certain nature who enjoy living a vicarious life of crime. Unfortunately, the ending just wasn't juicy enough to satiate that kind of appetite and I think that's why you'll hear so much about this. Personally, I liked it although I recognize that too many questions were left unanswered, too many futures were left uncertain & too many problems were left unresolved.

    But, hey, that's life, isn't it?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Sopranos by giorgiofr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm reminded of the utter ripoff I felt when I saw the last episodes of Neon Genesis Evangelion. GAAAH the pain! The agony! Why did you have to bring this up? Back then, I felt so deceived. Later on, after the trembling and self-clutching and the head-against-wall-bouncing, I started to think better of NGE's ending. NGE's main themes had been perception of self, identity crisis, fear of abandonment etc. for the whole series. Sure, I didn't like it when they did not bother to explain anything about the background story, but the movies make up for that.
      That said, GO AYANAMI <3 <3 <3
      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:The Sopranos by Trigun · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it was the first 23 episodes that sucked. The ending credits of the 24th was the series highlight!

      Whiny punk-ass emo kid. Just shut up and kill.

    3. Re:The Sopranos by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone complain about the end of Evangelion? I thought it was perfect.

      The complaint was about the last couple episodes of the TV Series, not the End of Evangelion movie. Though apparently there is a compelling theory out there that the two are not only compatible but in fact take place at the same time (some flashes in the episodes are of events from the movie.)

      Congratulations, congratulations, congratulations, you made her sick.

    4. Re:The Sopranos by Ultra64 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, I meant the end of the tv series. I thought it was great the way shinji worked through his mental breakdown and came out of it a better person. That is what evangelion is really all about. The giant robots fighting angels is just the background on which the story happens.

    5. Re:The Sopranos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But, hey, that's life, isn't it?"

      No, it is entertainment. If I want life I'll watch a documentary and even those are passed through the director's filter.

    6. Re:The Sopranos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's performed by Alabama 3, written by Leonard Cohen.

    7. Re:The Sopranos by FacePlant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the reason so many fans are going to feel this is that the show started off as a badass mob series that attracted viewers of a certain nature who enjoy living a vicarious life of crime.

      This show started off as a show about a mobster who's mother had driven him to panic attacks.
      It was not really until the actress playing Livia Soprano died that the show really took its turn into
      badass mob series. It was the quirk of a mobster in therapy that drew me to the show. It made for
      interesting drama.

      Unfortunately, the ending just wasn't juicy enough to satiate that kind of appetite and I think that's why you'll hear so much about this. Personally, I liked it although I recognize that too many questions were left unanswered, too many futures were left uncertain & too many problems were left unresolved.

      You have to give credit where its due. They sure as hell created massive tension in the last 5 minutes with all the cuts between the family at the table, the guy at the counter, meadow trying to parallel park, the other customers in the diner. The cut to black left me sitting in my dark living room, with my heart racing. It was a great ending. Life is tense. Life goes on. Life sucks, then you die. Shit happens. Shit fails to happen. Resolution is for the lucky.

      That was significantly better than a climactic gun fight, a last second hit, a wake-up from a dream, or, heaven help us, an animal-house-style what-happens-to-the-characters montage.

      Go black. Never go back.

      Ciao Tony Soprano. Thanks. It was fun while it lasted.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    8. Re:The Sopranos by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. After "sex and The City" wrapped, my wife got into "The Sopranos". Now, the show came on when I started my IT career and I was not enamored by the premise. Being an NJ native (though I will never swear to that under oath), I thought it did little to enhance NJ's reputation for being an over-populated, tax-burdened, garden of asphalt. Mind you, I've caught a few episodes over the years, and I believe the acting and writing to be excellent, though the premise still doesn't do anything for me.

      That said, I thought the ending was perfect. To paraphrase a line from the online comic PvP, "David Chase is my master now." He took all the angst, the drama, the gut-wrenching of 84 episodes, and boiled it down to a simple formula: life goes on. Very Vonnegut ("And so it goes."). In one fell swoop, he gave an ending that was perplexing to the hard-core viewer and at the same time satisfying, in that Tony lives on... or not. I've seen the allusion to Schrödinger's cat, and that's exactly the point: you cannot know whether Tony's world catches up with him or whether he skates through it. Diabolical.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    9. Re:The Sopranos by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      *approaches with garrote*

    10. Re:The Sopranos by Himring · · Score: 1

      It was the quirk of a mobster in therapy that drew me to the show. It made for interesting drama.

      And was totally ripped by the "analyze this" movies....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    11. Re:The Sopranos by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      No, it is entertainment. If I want life I'll watch a documentary and even those are passed through the director's filter.


      Psst... don't look now... but life? The series of events going on around you even as you read this? Passed through your own personal filter. And possibly even with less perspective than afforded a documentary director who on occasion is able to collect viewpoints from differing sources. Nobody gets a complete, unadulterated perspective. Unless you believe in God who, being omniscient, gets a heck of a good seat to the action.
    12. Re:The Sopranos by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      They sure as hell created massive tension in the last 5 minutes with all the cuts between the family at the table, the guy at the counter, meadow trying to parallel park, the other customers in the diner.

      My roommate had the idea that perhaps, for just a few minutes, we were living in Tony's world, where almost everyone and everything is a threat, and so he's always watching things -- which is how he stays alive -- and where the appearance of a loved one is an enormous relief. If that's true, then it's a very unpleasant experience, and it's no wonder that he finds the escapes that he does.
      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    13. Re:The Sopranos by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely, in spirit. If I want life, I just turn off the TV and look around and how shitty it can be. One of the big draws of the TV is the escape it offers.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    14. Re:The Sopranos by cbreaker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A hot girl can give you massive tension in 5 minutes too, but would you give her credit if she suddenly just got up and walked away without finishing? "She left me in a dark room with my heart racing." Awesome!

      Now, I don't mean to get on a rant here, but if you think that was a great ending, you're a wannabe "artistic" shit for brains that thinks you're better then us. If you honestly said "YEA!!!" when the screen went blank instead of "What the fuck" like every other -normal- person that watched the show, you should get outside more and say hello to the world.

      I think just about anything other then what they did would have been an improvement. Like, who didn't want to see AJ die?

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    15. Re:The Sopranos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that NGE ended as it was intended for the Japanese audience. In a society that seeks conformity Shinji accepts that he is part of a larger whole and completes the Instrumentality Project. Aftewards the movies seemed to show how the series would end if Shinji retained his sense of individuality (and sort of a 'fuck off' to detractors of the original ending).

      Also the money issues that Gainax suffered did not occur until 1998 when they were audited for tax evasion. The difficulties at the end of the original series were due to time constraints (due to the broadcast season) and the recent Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelion#After_the_ series

    16. Re:The Sopranos by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      And was totally ripped by the "analyze this" movies....

      The Sopranos premiered in January, 1999.

      Analyze This! was released in March, 1999.

      Given production lead times, it's hard to say which one "ripped" the other, if at all.

    17. Re:The Sopranos by Himring · · Score: 1

      Good point and research. I figured it did rip on sapronoes. Then again, I simply look for things to gripe about, so never trust most of what I say to start with. Then again, life is mostly negative, so, I tend to be right. Hrm. Now I'm all thinking again....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    18. Re:The Sopranos by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Obviously it was a great ending, because it's gotten your undies all bunched up. You needed that, didn't you?

    19. Re:The Sopranos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right with most of what you are saying. I just think that people, who put so much time in to watching a show for so many years, want some kind of closer on what happens with all the characters they have come to know. I think a good example of this is what they did at the end of Six Feet Under, when they kind of did a fast forwarded of the rest of all the lives of the characters so you could see what they ended up doing and get that closer of the show.

    20. Re:The Sopranos by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Personally, I come here to watch these little bitchfights. Nerdsniping is just amusing to me.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    21. Re:The Sopranos by Scaba · · Score: 1

      A hot girl that can make you say "What the fuck?" at the end of sex is kinda what you want, no? Same with such a brilliant series. Any other ending would have been kind of obvious (which is maybe what -normal- people like you need?)

    22. Re:The Sopranos by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      "A hot girl that can make you say "What the fuck?" at the end of sex is kinda what you want, no?"

      Nope. I usually aim for "Awesome!" or "That was great." Not "What the fuck was that?" See that, you aren't normal.

      Any other ending wouldn't have been obvious because nobody knew what was going to happen. Tony killed? AJ killed by mistake? Maybe the wife? Maybe Tony gets sent to jail? Everyone had their own ideas as to what would happen, and it was fun to try to figure it out. What they did was a huge let down to their entire fan base.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  4. So it ended... by ellem · · Score: 4, Funny

    and I canceled HBO.

    Not just because the ending sucked but because there's nothing else I watch on those channels.

    But that episode really sucked. I get it, "You won't know it's coming. Everything will just go black."

    I don't care.

    Besides I really wanted to see Meadow and AJ beheaded. There I said it. I can't take it back. It's out there.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:So it ended... by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      Actually, I already cancelled my HBO this morning. It's simple through the DirecTV website, just a few clicks and you're done. Sorry you're an unbeliever, but some of these companies at least have some tech clue and good integration to make it happen. I know last time I made a programming change, it took only a few seconds for my receivers to be "updated" and to start getting the channel (or not).

    2. Re:So it ended... by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Entourage entertains me, if it wasn't coming back in a few weeks i'd have turned HBO off as well. once it's over though, HBO is off again until it comes back.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    3. Re:So it ended... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I don't watch The Sopranos, and I didn't watch the last episode. What actually happened? Send me a private message if you don't want to post a spoiler.

    4. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 'Curb Your Enthusiasm'. Pure hilarity.

      I've also heard that 'The Wire' is an exceptional show.

    5. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen the last episode of Sopranos yet, probably won't, but it couldn't have been any worse than the end of Deadwood. The most raw, violent, sinister show on TV ends with everybody just agreeing to disagree and riding off into the sunset.

      What is wrong with HBO?

    6. Re:So it ended... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      Entourage entertains me, if it wasn't coming back in a few weeks i'd have turned HBO off as well. once it's over though, HBO is off again until it comes back. There's a new Cathouse on Saturday.

      Just so you know.
      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    7. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The removed all the thetans from their bodies and reached OT 3. This angered the church of bad SciFi who sued them off the air.

    8. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I canceled HBO when they took Carnivalle off the air. That finale was anything but, and yet they proclaimed that they were satisfied with how everything was wrapped up. HBO is run by cowardly network execs. Unless a show is really cheap to make and follows a nice 'safe formula', don't get too hooked on it, you never know when it might abruptly end.

    9. Re:So it ended... by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      But that episode really sucked. I get it, "You won't know it's coming. Everything will just go black."

      Thats kind of why I enjoyed the ending, because thats 100% not how I took it. I don't think he got whacked at all. But your theory fits, and I think my theory of the ending fits too. Its all vague and ambiguous, just like every other episode of the sopranos.

    10. Re:So it ended... by pvera · · Score: 1

      I am about to (as in, in the next 10 minutes) cancel it too, since there is no appeal left. Why spend so much on premium packages when so much of my viewing time falls on either the big three networks or the documentary channels?

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    11. Re:So it ended... by ellem · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm an American Goddammit! I demand to be TOLD things.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    12. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks for walking us through your thought process there, ace. Here all this time I was paying all this money for something I never used. You make an excellent point though, "IF I don't want something, don't pay for it!" Brilliant!

    13. Re:So it ended... by pvera · · Score: 1

      Done. It was an interesting call actually. The first time they simply hung up on me, the second time they tried to move me to their triple bundle (premium digital, VoIP, internet) for 24 months.

      I told her the triple bundle was a triple miss:

      1. I got a 2-for-1 deal with Sunrocket, and I still got 11 months of the "free" year to burn.
      2. I have been a loyal comcast customer for 10 years, it is not fair to ask me to sign a 2-year service agreement.
      3. They still make me take channels I no longer want.

      After that the comcast rep was very helpful.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    14. Re:So it ended... by effinlance · · Score: 1

      @jaredmauch Who is the "unbeliever" you're post (or plug for DirectTV) is aimed at anyway? it was a direct response to the original "So it ended..." post, which mentions nothing about troubles canceling HBO... so who is this unbeliever you are talking about?

    15. Re:So it ended... by wordsnyc · · Score: 2

      I can't believe they had the nerve to reference Carnivale in their pre-show promo clip last night. It was a great show (Clancy Brown as the preacher was abso-frigging-lutely brilliant) starved by budget cuts and finally cut short with a stupid rushed ending.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    16. Re:So it ended... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      The removed all the thetans from their bodies and reached OT 3. This angered the church of bad SciFi who sued them off the air.

      Oh for mod points, not that it would do any good in a story I've posted a comment to.

    17. Re:So it ended... by Evardsson · · Score: 1

      That's ok - that's kind of what I did* when Rome ended. (When is season 2 going to show up on DVD???) It was the only reason HBO ever came on in our house after the end of Oz and the (I feel) too early aborted Carnivale.

      *Actually switched from having all the HBO stuff, to having the expanded basic, with all the Science Channel, Intl History, IFC, BBC America, etc.

      Since some of my friends watch the Sopranos I thought I would check this thread to see what the ending was like. Sounds like the post title hit it on the head?

      --
      Death looks every man in the face. All any man can do is look back and smile. - Marcus Aurelius
    18. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to guess from your clueless response and ridiculously high user ID that you're pretty new to Slashdot and don't realize that Slashdot has a moderation system

      He's responding to someone that's been moderated to -1, and thus invisible to people with their threshold set to default. You can read the post he's responding to by clicking on the "parent" link on his comment.

    19. Re:So it ended... by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, bravo sir.

    20. Re:So it ended... by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      > Besides I really wanted to see Meadow and AJ beheaded.

      She has a head? http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/image2/jamie-lynn -discala.jpg

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
    21. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HBO:
      Carnavale
      Rome

      Showtime:
      Tudors
      Weeds
      Dexter

      If HBO ends Carnavale like shit, I will cancel HBO. I already knew how Rome would end. Showtime kindo f dropped the ball with the second season of Sleeper Cell but they are kicking ass with those other three shows I listed.

      But those shows alone are worth my subscription costs. I could give less than a shit about watching movies. I think both channels need to focus more on their series.

    22. Re:So it ended... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      If HBO ends Carnavale like shit, I will cancel HBO. I already knew how Rome would end.

      Spoiler: It get sacked!!

    23. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He responded with the @Name convention. He's a fucking Digg user.

      @DiggUser Get the fuck out of here and go digg your nuts in some shit.

    24. Re:So it ended... by VonGuard · · Score: 1

      As far as nothing good being on HBO anymore....

      The Wire season 5 will be it's last, but it'll still be on HBO. Frankly, I think The Wire is the single best television show ever made.

      --
      Don't Crease the Weasel!
    25. Re:So it ended... by fireylord · · Score: 0

      shhhhh, or you know who will sue slashdot. and make unfounded personal attacks on everyone who posted.

    26. Re:So it ended... by RobFrontier · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never seen "The Wire". Infinetly better than "The Sopranos" or anything else on television today.

    27. Re:So it ended... by effinlance · · Score: 1

      Just going to point out neither of you bothered to show your faces while you flamebait, oh wait, its /. :)

    28. Re:So it ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately you are an ignorant idiot who has never read any books about Scientology written by L. Ron Hubbard, you are obviously a sheep who receives whole heartedly the pablum that the running dog press feeds you about anything that is trying to make a difference in the world and you think that since you know some terminology you can spout off about Scientology.

      It is people like you who helped Hitler engage in genocide, since "those Jews aren't like us and we shouldn't have to put up with them"

      Well, the difference between Jews and Scientologists is that Scientologists won't sit back and put up with suffering and bigotry and hatred without fighting back and exposing the evil and the lies of the people that belittle Scientology and Scientologists. There is nothing cute or funny about belittling a person's belief system.

      Especially since there is no evidence about anything regarding the tangible proof of any religion, I don't know if there is a heaven or a hell, or some sort of God keeping tabs on us, the poor little thetans stuck out here on planet Earth, I don't know if there is some dude who was born to a virgin mother or some little blue dude running around asking people to sing Hare Krishna in order to gain entrance into some other plane, but I don't openly hold them up to ridicule.

      If you want to see if you are a thetan, close your eyes, get a picture of a cat and then ask yourself who was looking at the cat?

  5. Popular online explanation (excuse) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That sense of tension and anxiety at the end is how Tony has to lead his life, every minute of every day. He doesn't know what's going to happen next, and now you know what that's like.

    1. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, that's exactly what I go out of it. The tension of that would drive me insane.

      People didn't get that? Christ, it was like a fucking neon sign. All they needed was a slow pan of a white wall.

      They set it up exactly as though there we going to be a hit on Tony. They did 3-4 minutes of just exposition, showing the happy couple, the Cub Scouts, the creepy guy at the bar. They played a memorable song (Journey's Don't Stop Believin' -- "it goes on and on and on and on...").

      People feel gyped because it wasn't a Hollywood ending. I loved the ending. It was memorable and it spoke to exactly what the series was about.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    2. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by djw · · Score: 1

      Same is true of every fictional character other than Billy Pilgrim. Doesn't make it good storytelling, though.

    3. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it is like my commute to work on rt 128 in Massachusetts?

    4. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by jkiol · · Score: 1

      That's how I took it as well. Every second of his life he is looking at the people coming in the entrances, wondering why his family is late to dinner. Is that guy getting up to shoot me or is he going to the bathroom? I think for the last 5 minutes of the show, you feel like Tony is supposed to feel all his life. I think thats why they ended it so dramatically, so you would feel the fear of not knowing like Tony does.

    5. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by colmore · · Score: 1

      Dammit people, he's dead. How many times in season six did the "you won't hear the one that gets you, it will all just go black." conversation happen. It was clever and artful. Meadow survives. She was always the one member of the family at least halfway working to get away from the evil at the core of their life, the only character in the whole series really. But Carm held on for $600,000 and AJ never took any opportunity to get away from the heart of darkness, and Tony well... Tony is Tony. They bit it. They didn't hear the one that got them, it just went black.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    6. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      I didn't watch the show or see the finale, but there was a short column in the paper this morning that suggested that David Chase was thumbing his nose at all the people who bitched about loose ends from earlier in the series.

    7. Re:Popular online explanation (excuse) by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      It was funny though how Meadow was talking about going into civil liberties law, and using her dad as an example of civil rights abuses. Even Tony looked embarrased when she said that his FBI arrests were civil rights issues. She wasn't trying to get away from evil, she just had her blinders on. She went into hiding with the family without question - the mob was trying to whack her dad and there was no whining about "why oh why do these people want to hurt you". It's just the way things are and she had long accepted it.

  6. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Karganeth · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I agree. This has nothing to do with tech. It sucks. Soprano's isn't even a sci-fi.

  7. Hey, this is like theold days... by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back when Slashdot was just a "stuff that Taco thinks is cool" site. I miss those days.

    1. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well once you get married you fully realize you are no longer cool, and no longer allowed to think without your wife's permission.

    2. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by flacco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Back when Slashdot was just a "stuff that Taco thinks is cool" site. I miss those days.

      what is this place? what is 'slashdot'? i searched google for "stuff that taco" and ended up here.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    3. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      You and me both. Slashdot is dying. Digg is not a viable alternative, as it seems to be populated by the mentally handicapped.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    4. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      I searched "stuff that taco" and ended up with Slashdot (slashdot.org/tacohell) at #10.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Jeezus. Your post is less than 2 hours old and already it's made Slashdot the #2 Google hit for "stuff that taco".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      what is this place? what is 'slashdot'? i searched google for "stuff that taco" and ended up here.

      That was lucky. I'm at work and I googled for "stuff that taco" and had to suddenly switch off my monitor.
    7. Re:Hey, this is like theold days... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Did you actually click through? The first thing on that page is an absolutely enthralling entry about airlines, laundry, and personal hygiene. Link for the brave...

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  8. Re:Soprano's and tech? by NeoTerra · · Score: 1

    It's about the 42"+ Plasma or LCD. (But they left that part out)

  9. News For.... by The+Media+Mechanic · · Score: 2, Troll

    News for Couch Potatoes. Stuff that doesn't matter.

    --
    I can throw as many stones as I wish; my house is made of transparent aluminum.
    1. Re:News For.... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      I think the only thing treasured over tech on /. is the good old high horse. It's a fine beast, but it seems to get way too much exercise.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  10. Can I see the rest? by GreggBz · · Score: 1

    I felt like I was watching a David Lynch movie. It was a pure WTF!?! moment. I have psychological blue balls. As others have said, I think the cat was either Adriana, or Christopher. Despite the trick ending, there were a several fascinating plot tidbits.

    1. Re:Can I see the rest? by pla · · Score: 1

      I felt like I was watching a David Lynch movie. It was a pure WTF!?! moment. I have psychological blue balls.

      So we can expect the movie to wrap up everything in one tidy little package, yet make absolutely no sense? ;-)

  11. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Albanach · · Score: 1

    Why did you click to read it? Did you expect a tech link?

    It's a news site with a heavy tech influence. Get over it.

  12. Re:Soprano's and tech? by haluness · · Score: 0, Troll

    I just clicked to reply, not to read

  13. The rest... by Mockylock · · Score: 1

    The rest will probably be the full-length movie they're talking about.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  14. I thought EW had a pretty good take on the ending by sdo1 · · Score: 1

    I've read a few things this morning... I rather liked Lisa Schwarzbaum's writeup in Entertainment Weekly.

    My wife was horribly dissapointed but I'm glad we get to wonder what they might be doing now, albeit without us watching...

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  15. As a european ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not been broadcast here yet, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:As a european ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not been broadcast here yet, you insensitive clod!

      Let's see...There's nothing in the summary that gives anything away, other than that the ending was bizarre. Any European interested in the show with half a brain would know not to even think of clicking on this article, since its entire purpose is to discuss how the show ended. So either you're incredibly dim, or you're a troll...

  16. Re:Never watched it by aftk2 · · Score: 1
    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
  17. Re:Soprano's and tech? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    The motto for the site is "News for nerds, stuff that matters". I think the ending falls under the second part of that. While it may not matter for you, it matters for the expected 10m people that watched last night. If you don't want to read about the Soprano's, don't click on the thread. Seems pretty simple to me.

  18. He's dead by avalys · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was pretty clear to me that he died. Remember the flashback in the previous episode, where Bobby says "You never even hear it when it happens, do you?" Implying everything just goes black - you're dead before you even hear the gun being fired. Well, that's exactly what happened. The last thing Tony say was Meadow walking in the door.

    Earlier in the episode, he was eating an orange, which is a reference to the Godfather files that has been made before in the series. They signify death, don't they?

    I thought it was an excellent episode. It would be so cliche if they just showed him getting his head blown off, or even ended with a black screen and gunshot. If you pay attention, you pretty much know what happened. But you have to think about it.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is NOT dead. The last frames were of Tony not of Meadow. That guy never came out of the bathroom and there was no gun or gunshot. The last shot is us looking at Tony. We are not seeing it though his eyes. We are looking at his face. This isn't Goodfellas: think harder (or watch the last scene again).

    2. Re:He's dead by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, what happened is that all the fanboys and fangirls wanted it to end with a big grisly bloody killing spree and Chase didnt let it happen. The suggestion here is that their lives go on but you dont get to watch them anymore. Plus not killing off the main Sopranos family opens the show up to movies.

      The oranges, etc are red herrings. The show is full of red herrings. Not to mention that the show isnt from the POV of Tony, so going black doesnt mean the "camera" died.

    3. Re:He's dead by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      That was my first gut reaction in that instance too, though I'm not fully convinced the more I think about it. What kind of helped sell it for me was what happened to Phil. I kept thinking he didn't even know that he was being whacked - it just went black for him. If I was Tony I would have wanted Phil to know that he lost and I won - just give a him a slight moment of "oh crap!", then whack him. So it kind of made an impression on me that Phil had none of that, just black. So that was my first thought there at the end when it went black. (Actually it was my second thought, my first thought was that my Tivo was jacked.)

      Other people have good arguments too, so I'm not sure.

    4. Re:He's dead by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Sorry, on The Sopranos it's always eggs that indicate death. Funny enough, egg substitute often means 'extreme injury' (see Tony's girlfriend catching fire in Season 6).

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    5. Re:He's dead by Jonny_eh · · Score: 3, Funny

      He might also have not been shot. I just had to point that out.

    6. Re:He's dead by essence · · Score: 1

      what happened is that all the fanboys and fangirls wanted it to end with a big grisly bloody killing spree Yeah. I was actually hoping he would put that machine gun to use!
    7. Re:He's dead by Himring · · Score: 1

      The godfather died while playing with his grandson and putting an orange peal in his mouth, pretending to be a monkey. Also, I think when he was shot earlier in the movie he was at a produce stand on the street picking over oranges....

      Good catch though. I never made the connection with oranges in the godfather movies....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    8. Re:He's dead by PoderOmega · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The best comment I have read (on the imdb forums) regarding the ending that it is the viewer who was "wacked" at the end. We didn't even see it coming.

    9. Re:He's dead by elborrachogato · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't think it was tony that got shot.. it was us, the viewer. They lived on, but for us the show ended.

    10. Re:He's dead by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the show isnt from the POV of Tony

      Sure it is! Tony Soprano was indisputably the subject of the entire series.

      If you're saying that the 'camera' wasn't consistently located inside Tony's head, well, that's true. But very little film is actually shot from that perspective, and for good reason; see the first sequence from the "Doom" movie to understand why not.

      It's an open question. Maybe the fade to black meant Tony died in that final instant; maybe it just meant that the series was over.

    11. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just pure speculation. I thought the same thing at first then after thinking about it there was no concrete evidence given to us that Tony was killed. Saying Tony survived has the same amount of weight. If the ending is up to interpretation then it takes on a symbolic meaning. The Sopranos is filled with this kind of symbolism, if you think the Sopranos was just about a gangster then you are missing out the on the majority of the show. Honestly it wouldn't be right for a show that is so deeply layered to end on something so obvious.

    12. Re:He's dead by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is more about The Godfather and oranges. Note that at the top of the page I link to, that the cinematographer claims that he simply liked the color.

    13. Re:He's dead by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many times can I use the word "that" in a sentence? How sad. I previewed and I still mangled the English language.

    14. Re:He's dead by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Yeah, actually, in all the sopranos episodes where somene important has been killed, the defacto food of fortelling is EGGS. Not oranges.

      --
      sig?
    15. Re:He's dead by Himring · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As my Koine Greek professor stated in illustrating the many uses of 'that,':

      "Is that that that that man talked about?..."

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    16. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's a brilliant comment, and changes my whole view of the ending...
      He never saw it coming...
      Poor Tony, at least he went quickly and painlessly.

    17. Re:He's dead by klenwell · · Score: 1

      Ah ha! Now I get it.

      Actually, I thought it was a brilliant ending. But I thought for sure Tony was going to pick Layla from the jukebox and we were going to roll out with the coda. That Journey song was a bit tongue-in-cheek.

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    18. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you believe obfuscation removes cliche?

    19. Re:He's dead by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      And if you think back to season one, when Junior's hitmen go after Tony, they blast his bottle of orange juice, but fail to kill him. To me, that was always sort of the show's way of indicating that, unlike the characters themselves, they acknowledged all that Godfather trivia but they weren't bound by it. Contrast that with Christopher's "Lucas Brasi sleeps with the fishes!"

    20. Re:He's dead by soxos · · Score: 1

      How about. In your sign that says "Fish And Chips", I would have made a bigger space between Fish and And and And and Chips.

      Also, check this

    21. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry, there is nothing wrong with that.

    22. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I tink dat dat was what dat dere guy tawt dat dat was. In udda words, dat was dat dat dat guy was tawkin about. Ah, fugget about it...

    23. Re:He's dead by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

      Ok then, so what do onion rings mean?

    24. Re:He's dead by Traiano · · Score: 1

      You've over-analyzed this one. First, that guy in the diner was clearly a fed. Only some government douchebag would wear a members-only jacket. Second, as Tony's lawyer said, 80-90% confidence that he (Tony) was going to be indicted. Third, the producers have been talking major motion picture following the series for years now. He didn't get shot, he got arrested. And Sylvio will be back.

    25. Re:He's dead by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      'We pwned Phil'?

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    26. Re:He's dead by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Fred, where John had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had the teacher's approval.

    27. Re:He's dead by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, but is that like how many times you can use "fuck" in a sentence?
      Fuck those fucking fuckers.
      Those fucked-up fucking fuckers are fucked.

      And many other versions. Basically, you can use the word in every part of a sentence. Versatile, as it were.

      Remember everyone - profanity is the crutch of an inarticulate motherfucker! ;-)

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    28. Re:He's dead by Himring · · Score: 1

      I'll take a stab, but I am rusty. Anyone can correct if they like:

      "Is that that that that man talked about."

      verb, preposition, object noun, preposition, adjective, subject noun verb preposition.

      "Those f*cked-up f*cking f*ckers are f*cked."

      Predicate nominative, adjective, adjective, subject noun, helping verb, verb.

      Basically, "that" ranked 3 parts of speech & f*ck (sry at work) ranked 3 as well. A dead heat!

      Either way, I don't think my professor woulda used your word to illustrate....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    29. Re:He's dead by Zwack · · Score: 1

      I think that you are mistaken...

      I would say this as
      "Is that that that that that man talked about?"

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    30. Re:He's dead by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      "Wouldn't the sentence "I want to put hyphens between Fish and And and And and Chips on my Fish-And-Chips sign" have been clearer if quotation marks had been used between Fish and and and and and And and And and and and and and And and And and and and and and Chips as well as after Chips?"

      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    31. Re:He's dead by dbitter1 · · Score: 1

      How about "The fucking fuckers are fucking fucking me, fuck!" ?

      --
      For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    32. Re:He's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, on The Sopranos it's always eggs that indicate death. Funny enough, egg substitute often means 'extreme injury' (see Tony's girlfriend catching fire in Season 6).

      Not necessarily. Near the end of an episode in one of the early seasons, Tony and Bobby go to a diner and have peppers & eggs. Neither dies for quite some time (and maybe not at all in Tony's case).

      - T

    33. Re:He's dead by fireylord · · Score: 0

      agreed, and preferably either in a 'say hello to my little friend' style, or a 'its a tommygun akakakakakakak' style best parodied in The Mask.

    34. Re:He's dead by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      'James, where Sally had had "had", had had "had had". "had had" had been judged the correct usage'

      Ta da!

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  19. Re:Soprano's and tech? by u-bend · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They're testing their new "-1000000000000 Offtopic" rating designator. But now it's for stories instead.

    --
    u-bend
  20. It ends with a what? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 0

    Ba-wimper?

    A Wang?

    What? You could at least have taken first post to get things started.

    Now I'm curious, so I'm off to TV w/o pity just to find out...sheesh, so much for
    getting work done...don't wanna spoil it?

    Bah!

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:It ends with a what? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Shows only end with a wang on Cinemax or Asian networks.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  21. Lady or the Tiger? by pedropolis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After 8 seasons I was hoping for an ending that was little more then a riff on The Lady or the Tiger, with a parsnip of The Godfather all set to a Journey soundtrack. Chase apologists will say this was an artful conclusion to the series, but that only stands so long as there is no Sopranos movie. It's an audacious end to the series, but as with most great TV shows an 8 season burden of developing plots cannot be concluded in 65 minutes with total satisfaction.

    1. Re:Lady or the Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mike Greenberg of the "Mike & Mike in the Morning" radio show made the same comparison (to Lady or the Tiger).

  22. Re:Soprano's and tech? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just clicked to reply, not to read

    In which case you're absolutely at the right site.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  23. Sounds like.... by Torqued · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like they got the Seinfeld writers to come out of retirement to do the series finale episode.

    1. Re:Sounds like.... by mrzaph0d · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jerry: It's a finale about nothing.
      Tony: Nothing?
      George: Nothing.
      Tony: WTF do you mean about nothing?
      George: What'd you do this evening?
      Tony: Well, I had a meeting with some guys, then I went to dinner with my family.
      George: There, that's a finale.
      Tony: How is that a fuckin' finale?
      Jerry: Well, uh, maybe something happens on the way to dinner..
      George: No, no, no. Nothing happens.
      Jerry: Well, something happens.
      Tony: Get the fuck outta here!

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    2. Re:Sounds like.... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they got the Seinfeld writers to come out of retirement to do the series finale episode.

      If that would have been the case, everybody would have least ended up in jail.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Sounds like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment here. By far.

    4. Re:Sounds like.... by flynt · · Score: 1

      seconded

    5. Re:Sounds like.... by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      Dude, as a Sopranos/Seinfeld fan that is one priceless comment =]

  24. The music says it all.. by jeillah · · Score: 1

    They played "You keep me hangin' on" by Vanilla Fudge 3 times through out the episode and finished with "Don't stop believing" by Journey. Oh there will be a movie alright...

    1. Re:The music says it all.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm pretty sure the thugs in the diner weren't there to fulfill a contract on Tony, but only to get a bite to eat. It was only when Tony chose to play that execrable Journey song on the jukebox that they decided to shoot Tony. Anyone who likes that Journey crap deserves to be whacked.

  25. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Prolly Taco just wanted to get it out of the way, so we can get back to discussing tech stuff without people filling the firehose with Sopranos submissions and the system grinds to a halt since there ain't anything else left.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. B-bye HBO by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    I could have tolerated the ending of the Sopranos if Deadwood was still there to help you fogetaboutit. But they canceled that, too. Didn't even bother to wrap it up. Suck ending to the Sopranos, no Deadwood and instead some stupid surfer show that doesn't even make sense and Big Love which should be renamed Big Snoozer. No decent concert series, their comedy shows have gone down the toilet and all the movies you want to see are available on Netflix. C'ya.

    That giant sucking sound you hear today are millions of people just like me canceling their subscription.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:B-bye HBO by artaxerxes · · Score: 1

      Wait, don't cancel... one more season of the best show on HBO, and on television in my opinion.

      The Wire.

      --
      man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren
    2. Re:B-bye HBO by PaulMorel · · Score: 1

      Cost of a season of The Wire on DVD: $30 - $60
      Cost of HBO for a year: $96 (for me, $8/mo.)
      Yup, The Wire is great, but it's the only thing worth watching. Unless they bring back Deadwood, then I am happy to save the $8/mo.

      --
      burrocrisy
      and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
    3. Re:B-bye HBO by mknewman · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, no more Rome either, although they did wrap that one up in a kind of lame way, but it was a pretty decent series. I sort of liked John from Cincinatti, we will see how it develops.

    4. Re:B-bye HBO by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      Wait, don't cancel...

      Too late. HBO sleeps with da fishes. (drops gun, walks away)

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    5. Re:B-bye HBO by Comen · · Score: 1

      I really like entorage, and I loved Rome, is that not coming back either?
      I am hoping that new series Fight of the Concords will be good, It might take some getting used to, there standup music stuff is funny as hell.
      I am a little pissed about the Deadwood thing.
      But HBO can cast well, and that is why there series are so good, the casts are great.
      I need to go back and watch all of the wire cause I missed those.
      Ill keep my HBO, as well as my Showtime (Dexter is awsome) and Cinemax cause, well you know, and all so my TMC cause its all a package I guess :)

  27. Re:Soprano's and tech? by haluness · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The motto for the site is "News for nerds, stuff that matters". I think the ending falls under the second part of that

    I always thought that the "stuff that matters" actually mattered - like rights, events and so on, with a tech flavor.

    It is unfortunate that a TV show now comes under "stuff that matters". I'm surprised that we don't have Paris Hilton updates as well - I'm sure that matters to a good number of people.

  28. non-conspiracy explanation by glorpy · · Score: 1

    He lived, always a little unstable, always a little wary, but part of both families. Real life has loose endings and the ending reflected that.

  29. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there are about a million websites devoted to TV shows and their fans. No reason the interested slashdotters can't go there. Just because it matters to someone, doesn't mean it belongs on slashdot.

  30. Re:Soprano's and tech? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Informative
    From Slashdot's own FAQ:

    Why did you post story X?

    Slashdot is many things to many people. Some people think it's a Linux site. To others, it's a geek hangout. I've always worked very hard to make sure that Slashdot matches up with my interests and the interests of my authors. We think we're pretty typical Slashdot readers... but that does mean that occasionally one of us might post something that you think is inappropriate. You might be interested in my Omelette rant.

    Personally, I have a pet peeve when people post comments saying things like "That's not News For Nerds!" and "That's not Stuff that Matters!" Slashdot has been running for almost 5 years, and over that time, I have always been the final decision maker on what ends up on the homepage. It turns out that a lot of people agree with me: Linux, Legos, Penguins, Sci (both real and fiction). If you've been reading Slashdot, you know what the subjects commonly are, but we might deviate occasionally. It's just more fun that way. Variety Is The Spice Of Life and all that, right? We've been running Slashdot for a long time, and if we occasionally want to post something that someone doesn't think is right for Slashdot, well, we're the ones who get to make the call. It's the mix of stories that makes Slashdot the fun place that it is.

    Slashdot is meant to be a giant mixing bowl of stories. They focus primarily on the tech but there are some things that pop up other than tech or sci-fi stories that are worth noting
    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  31. Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by TheFlyingWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, I came up with a rather nice ending about a year ago that involved Big Pussy coming back from the dead as zombie and using voodoo to take over Tony's crew, then going to war with Phil and then the rest of the Five Families. I even wrote a theme song (to the tune of the Three's Company theme song)...such a pity they didn't use it. Now that would've been a great setup for a spinoff. People like the mafia, they like zombie flicks...how could it fail?

    1. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      You know, I came up with a rather nice ending about a year ago that involved Big Pussy coming back from the dead as zombie and using voodoo to take over Tony's crew, then going to war with Phil and then the rest of the Five Families. I even wrote a theme song (to the tune of the Three's Company theme song)...such a pity they didn't use it. Now that would've been a great setup for a spinoff. People like the mafia, they like zombie flicks...how could it fail?


      Comming next: "a made for sci-fi orginal movie"
    2. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      People like the mafia, they like zombie flicks...how could it fail? Will zombie Yakuzas do?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by ajakk · · Score: 1

      People like the mafia, they like zombie flicks...how could it fail? I have a great name for it: "Cleaver"

    4. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by jcenters · · Score: 1

      You just outlined the plot of Gungrave.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    5. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How'd you know about that? Word is they tried, but some crazy hollywood director came in and just absolutely had to have the "pussy wagon", so they eventually had to scrap that idea.

    6. Re:Big Pussy and the Zombie Mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the ending proposed by the Showbiz Show...the one where it turns out the entire Sopranos series was just a dream of Turtle from Entourage.

  32. errr end by vx922 · · Score: 0

    i think i will go watch the who gives a shit channel

  33. Obviously you aren't paying attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Tony was shot last year he got a bionic arm and ears, also season 2 took place entirely on Europa.

  34. spoiler alert! spoiler alert! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    This mental patient wakes up and we realize the whole series was just a dream.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:spoiler alert! spoiler alert! by robbkidd · · Score: 2, Funny

      This mental patient wakes up and we realize the whole series was just a dream. Just so long as the mental patient doesn't get up from bed and find Bobby in the shower.
    2. Re:spoiler alert! spoiler alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, he does. He finds him in the shower... with HIS boyfriend!!!!

    3. Re:spoiler alert! spoiler alert! by necdeus · · Score: 1

      And the mental patient is JR Ewing...

    4. Re:spoiler alert! spoiler alert! by chad.koehler · · Score: 1

      It's alright, it was just a dream...

      What's family guy?

  35. It was a comment on our current state of FEAR! by c1one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Life goes on even though there is the impending "threat" of violence. It was an attempt to let us see through this character's (Anthony's) eyes a constant threat, similar to that of many Americans. If you let it consume you, you will end up anxious or worst case scenario, preemptively attacking another country, "God forbid."

  36. TV.com by antdude · · Score: 1

    I don't watch this series, but it was interesting to see how the rating was on TV.com. I guess everyone didn't like this series finale. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.... by technomom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    HBO hates, hates, hates time-shifting and anything else that replicates their content without paying them tribute. It was not in their best interest to put on a great show that would be Tivoed and passed around the internet.

    It has been stated many times that Chase filmed several endings. He did not do that to keep the actors and writers from knowing the ending.

    He did that so that HBO could put the better, alternate endings onto highly marked up "collector's edition" DRM'ed DVDs for us to buy.

    Here's my belated Sopranos prediction: Within a few short months, certainly in time for Christmas, the alternate endings will appear on DVD. This will be heavily advertised. The base price DVDs will be a piece of crap. Ysou'll have to buy the collector's edition to get the alternate endings plus other "exclusive" content. The DVD will use a "better" encryption than ever before, followed by the inevitable posting of the decryption key or keys by some geek on digg.

    It's not personal, it's just business.

  38. I never watched ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show. Not the finale or any before.

    Now I know how the people feel who never watched Star Trek :-)

  39. Mod this whole thread offtopic already by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It is unfortunate that a TV show now comes under "stuff that matters". I'm surprised there are still idiots who come in threads to complain about the thread. How hard is it to just go "that's not interresting" amd to move on?

    I don't even watch that show, I just came to know what's the big deal about the ending. I do not, however, want a list of the stuff you don't care about, so STFU already.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Mod this whole thread offtopic already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      How hard is it to just go "that's not interresting" amd to move on?

      Move on to what exactly? Slashdot is full of irritating Politics and "Your Rights Online" articles which have fuck all to do with IT or Technology. When a technical story does come up, it gets maybe 50 comments, 30 of which will be bad trolls, 15 of which will be whiny kids who don't even grasp the basic premise of the article, 4 people complaining about an obscure technical mistake in the article and 1 interesting comment that's worth reading.

      The majority of comments on Slashdot have always been shit[1], but at least there used to be some interesting articles to read. Even the trolls used to try. Now it's a fucking wasteland. You know what's even more pathetic: it's still better than the alternatives!

      Take a look at the Firehose. It's packed full of political and "Rights" stories that have been done to death and are not interesting. I vote each and every one of them down, in a vain attempt to stem the tide, and still they get through.

      It's high time Slashdot split the Politics & YRO sections into a seperate site and let Slashdot get back to doing Tech and IT, like it used to. Perhaps if we're really lucky, Zonk will go with it.

      [1]: Yes, including this one. You made a funny. Ha. Ha.

    2. Re:Mod this whole thread offtopic already by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      why do you come here again?

  40. Question for older fanboys by alienmole · · Score: 1

    I'm curious, of the people who watch Sopranos and are old enough to have gone through the previous pop culture obsession with the mob, around the time of The Godfather, what's the attraction still? It all seems so '80s to me.

    This probably reads like a troll, but I'm genuinely interested, because I so don't get it. Think of it as a personal failing on my part, and point out the cultural riches I'm missing out on.

    1. Re:Question for older fanboys by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, of the people who watch Sopranos and are old enough to have gone through the previous pop culture obsession with the mob, around the time of The Godfather, what's the attraction still? It all seems so '80s to me. Crime and violence never go out of style.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Question for older fanboys by PaulMorel · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone call you a troll? because you say 'around the time of the Godfather' and 'it all seems so 80s'? Why would that be considered trolling?

      Oh right, because The Godfather came out in 1972, Godfather II in 1974 and Godfather III in 1990. Right. Were you around to witness the pop culture obsession that you don't actually remember?

      --
      burrocrisy
      and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
    3. Re:Question for older fanboys by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm curious, of the people who watch Sopranos and are old enough to have gone through the previous pop culture obsession with the mob, around the time of The Godfather, what's the attraction still? It all seems so '80s to me.

      This probably reads like a troll, but I'm genuinely interested, because I so don't get it. Think of it as a personal failing on my part, and point out the cultural riches I'm missing out on. People have a fascination with badasses and few people have a better image of badassery than mobsters. All of us live life constrained by the rules and subservient to those with power. Mobsters take power and make their own rules. We see the danger they live in and see ourselves as too timid to embrace the prospect of self-destruction at any moment but our popular image of the mobster is that he lives and dies hard. Of course, since most of us also have no direct experience with these people, we fill in the blanks with our own romantic ideas of what goes down. I remember reading about one mobster who went with his mugs to go see a crime picture. He was very impressed with the fictional mob rites of loyalty and oath-taking. "Dis stuff is good," he said to one of his goombahs. "We need to be doin' dis."

      Mobsters were simply the latest flavor of the generation. Before the mobster fascination we had cowboys and gunfighters. Before that we had romantic notions of pirate kings and exotic foreign lands. If you think the mobsters are bad, you don't even want to read about what hardcore pirates were like. The level of violence and brutality is sickening to see described in words on paper, I cannot even imagine what it looked like in person. And somehow, despite all that, we see pirates celebrated as shady but with hearts of gold.

      But here's the funny part. What do you call a truly successful pirate or mobster? Your majesty. Seriously. Where do you think the ruling houses and nobles came from? Sure, ten generations down the line the House of Someguy is represented by some effete twit but I guarantee you the original Someguy was a badass you did not want to cross. And the best mobsters were the ones who figured out how to operate with the law on their side. Robber-baron was not a title of pressroom hyperbole. Where did Daddy Kennedy make his money? Rum-running. How did George W. Bush's grandpappy get rich? Doing business with the Nazis.

      We don't see movies made about average joes living contented lives. We never read about the farmboy who stayed home, obeyed his fathers wishes and took over the farm. We read about his brother, the one who ran away to join the Navy, who decided to fight in some noble war in some far-flung land. We read about the man with the ambition to do something great, no matter how much blood was needed to grease the wheels. It is spectacle, it is horror, and it is a dreadful fascination, and newspapermen will continue to make money feeding that curiosity.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Question for older fanboys by LilBlackDemon · · Score: 1

      The interest in The Sopranos comes from the way that it examines the human psyche, and that it examines what is naturally a very interesting character. Imagine a reality show focusing on John Gati Jr.'s psychotherapy sessions. That's what The Sopranos was.

    5. Re:Question for older fanboys by alienmole · · Score: 1

      The '80s was just the last time I remember the mob being such a fad-like subject of interest. The Godfather movies may have started the fad, but it continued for years. By the time of Godfather III, the fad aspect was over, and they were probably attempting to revive it or just cash in. Of course, later there were movies like Goodfellas and Casino, but they didn't have the same kind of impact. I was wondering what it was about Sopranos that seems to have reignited the interest in the subject, since it all seems very familiar and quite dated to me.

    6. Re:Question for older fanboys by alienmole · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the reply. But you've tangentially hit on exactly why I don't find the classic fictional Sicilian mob very interesting: they're dumb. They physically hurt or kill each other for no good reason, or for reasons which only make sense in their twisted reality frame. They don't seem able to rise above this dumbness, no matter what happens. They're uncivilized, literally: they haven't quite figured out that "do unto others..." doesn't mean "do others before they do you".

      Mobster movies never end with a conversion into legitimate business. Casinos don't count, since at least in their fictional representation, they're little more than fronts, an excuse for the same murderous macho silliness in a modern context. Attempts at such a conversion typically end in disaster, presumably as some kind of morality play. So Sicilian screen mobsters are not like the Kennedys, Bushes, Carnegies, or Windsors.

      Perhaps it's similar to the fascination with celebrities and rich people having troubled lives: showing that the behavior we can't have doesn't lead to anything good, anyway. But in this case, who ever imagined that it did?

    7. Re:Question for older fanboys by johneee · · Score: 1

      There's probably going to be better answers to your question, but perhaps mine will be good simply for succinctness. Here goes:

      Sopranos wasn't a good/popular show because it was about mobsters, Sopranos was a good/popular show because it was a good drama, with good writing, acting, stories, directing and so on. it was about compelling characters in age old man against man/himself/nature conflicts.

      the mob thing was simply a backdrop with enough richness that the creators could keep coming up with things they could frame the real story in. It could have been anything really, but Mobsters are a reasonably good one to use.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    8. Re:Question for older fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading the parent, I feel like I need to wave an American flag as a lone tear rolls down my cheek.

    9. Re:Question for older fanboys by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thanks for the reply. But you've tangentially hit on exactly why I don't find the classic fictional Sicilian mob very interesting: they're dumb. They physically hurt or kill each other for no good reason, or for reasons which only make sense in their twisted reality frame. They don't seem able to rise above this dumbness, no matter what happens. They're uncivilized, literally: they haven't quite figured out that "do unto others..." doesn't mean "do others before they do you". Prepare for more disappointment in life: humans in general are dumb. The dotcom I worked at had so many deals walking in the door it wasn't even funny. Management could have actually paid to develop the snake-oil they were selling and turn it into a real product. Unfortunately, that wasn't even in their radar. You'd think that people would see the benefits in taking a modest cut of whatever business they're in and spread the wealth around, improving the quality of life for all and thus indirectly benefiting themselves. But people don't work that way. You remember what Milton's Satan said, "It's better to reign in hell than serve in heaven?" If you gave these power-crazed fucks the option of living in a high state of luxury along with everyone else or living in a dark ages castle as the king, they'd pick the kingship every time. Why? Because they have to be the king of shit hill. Life has no meaning if they cannot have more than someone else, a way of demonstrating superiority and dominance. So what if it means the kingship's living standards are worse than anything our modern American poor would put up with, that fuck still gets to be king.

      Mobster movies never end with a conversion into legitimate business. Casinos don't count, since at least in their fictional representation, they're little more than fronts, an excuse for the same murderous macho silliness in a modern context. Attempts at such a conversion typically end in disaster, presumably as some kind of morality play. So Sicilian screen mobsters are not like the Kennedys, Bushes, Carnegies, or Windsors. Um, have you paid any attention to the current war we're in? "Murderous macho silliness in a modern context" sums it up nicely. As for the Kennedeys, their worst scandals have been with the kids that will never amount to anything. With Windsor, it's been so many generations since they became a line of nobility that I don't think the family historian even remembers how they made their fortune. Carnegie was a motherfucker who built museums and contributed to charity to make himself feel better at the end of his days when he thought back to how many died to build that fortune. He used Pinkertons to break strikes and if there is a hell, he'll surely be burning there. I don't remember hearing anything about his descendants. If he has any, they certainly know how to keep a lower profile than Paris.

      Perhaps it's similar to the fascination with celebrities and rich people having troubled lives: showing that the behavior we can't have doesn't lead to anything good, anyway. But in this case, who ever imagined that it did? I think it's more a matter of schadenfreude. Look, those rich bastards aren't enjoying it any more than we are. Or it could just be that the average tabloid reader's life is such a yawning chasm of emptiness that they are forced to live vicariously through the thrills of others. "The only mark I'll leave in life is the splat on the sidewalk when I finally jump. To kill time until then, let's see what the beautiful people are doing."
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    10. Re:Question for older fanboys by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      Using violence as a means to an end may be morally improper, but that doesn't necessarily make it dumb. Without citing specific examples, there are a number of times in 'The Sopranos' where a little violence serves as a very effective may of removing some roadbloack, or of conveying a message. A thug beating someone with a bat for looking at him the wrong way is "dumb;" a capo judiciously ordering an act of violence is strategic. It seems pretty obvious to me that as long as people don't automatically have their every wish fulfilled, there will be some people who will be willing to steal or extort to get what they want, and sometimes it works. Of course, as you point out, mroe often it seems to ends in tragedy. That's largely the point of the Godfather trilogy: Michael enters the family believing that within a few years he'll be able to buy his family legitimacy and leave behind their violent past, only to realize that he will never escape, and ultimately the penalty for his sins is visited upon his children. And really, don't kid yourself. The Kennedy family is probably the single best example of a family making the transition from shady to legitimate in our modern time, but they're certainly not the only ones to have done it.

    11. Re:Question for older fanboys by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Using violence as a means to an end may be morally improper, but that doesn't necessarily make it dumb. Without citing specific examples, there are a number of times in 'The Sopranos' where a little violence serves as a very effective may of removing some roadbloack, or of conveying a message. A thug beating someone with a bat for looking at him the wrong way is "dumb;" a capo judiciously ordering an act of violence is strategic. It seems pretty obvious to me that as long as people don't automatically have their every wish Well, you answered your own question here. How useful is that "judicious violence" if it ultimately means your own end? I find it very interesting to contrast the reality of the people who lived it with the fiction you see on the screen. One of the more successful historical gunfighters said that his secret wasn't being a good shot, in fact he was fairly mediocre. His secret was that you could not flap him. Draw a gun on most people, myself included, and there will be absolute panic. Panic leads to mistakes. This guy would draw his gun against a better shooter and that shot would go wide while his would kill.

      The other thing that you never really see in the movies is that the fair fight is the one not worth being in. The better hired guns operated as assassins, killing people who didn't even know they were in someone's gunsights. But this makes for poor cinema. That gunfighter wasn't being a sporting chap, pip pip!

      fulfilled, there will be some people who will be willing to steal or extort to get what they want, and sometimes it works. Of course, as you point out, mroe often it seems to ends in tragedy. That's largely the point of the Godfather trilogy: Michael enters the family believing that within a few years he'll be able to buy his family legitimacy and leave behind their violent past, only to realize that he will never escape, and ultimately the penalty for his sins is visited upon his children. And that's the real problem. There's that old saying, "there's always someone out there bigger and badder than you." And sometimes all they need is a cheap shot. When you're involved in circles where violence is the norm, it's hard to stay out of it. If you're one of the ones doing the violence, you know someone will do violence back. And you can never be on your guard all the time. I didn't watch this episode of Sopranos but it's a nice idea to let the audience be as paranoid as the character, never knowing when "this is it."

      I have a coworker who came out of the bad part of Jersey and he said that the situation there was pretty crazy. He never got involved in crime there but there were plenty he knew who did, just stupid petty gang crap, and consequences could be deadly. All it takes is some little shit who wants to think he's a badass. You step out of your house, bang bang. He may be going to jail but you're still dead. What the hell is so important that you're willing to do 20 for murder just to kill someone? Nothing is, but people don't think. One of his cousins was trying to get his shit back together after a stint in jail. He got jumped by some people who didn't even know him just because they didn't like the way he looked. He defended himself with a knife he was carrying and now he's back in jail. Some whitebread like me with no record might have gotten probation but not this guy.

      And really, don't kid yourself. The Kennedy family is probably the single best example of a family making the transition from shady to legitimate in our modern time, but they're certainly not the only ones to have done it. Yup. But do they have anyone up and coming now in the public life? RFK Jr. is the only one I can think of offhand.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    12. Re:Question for older fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Carnegie was a motherfucker who built museums and contributed to charity to make himself feel better at the end of his days when he thought back to how many died to build that fortune."

      "I don't remember hearing anything about his descendants. If he has any, they certainly know how to keep a lower profile than Paris."

      For another facet of Andrew Carnegie, consider the Carnegie Conjecture. In a nutshell, Andy believed that large inheritances resulted in less motivated and less ethical heirs.

      This:

      http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/4118.html ... is an interesting study concerning that conjecture.

    13. Re:Question for older fanboys by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking at it backwards. You're looking at the world today and saying, "there's no one 'up and coming' today who came from a background of violent crime" and thinking that this means that criminal enterprise really does wipe out all those stupid enough to engage in it. My point is that the ones who succesfully make the transition to legitimacy are successful precisely because they escape the past so completely that there isn't anyone gunning for them, and they don't carry the stigma of their origin. The ones who succeed aren't the ones you read about in the papers. And while I'd agree with you that there's really no piece of property for which I'd be willing to risk 20 years in prison for, that's a personal value judgment. If I had no education, no prospects, and no one to live for, who's to say what risks I might be willing to take? For example, research has shown that the typical crack dealer makes less than minimum wage for a job in which he could easily be killed or arrested. Why? Because he hopes to be one of the few who climbs the ladder and reaches a better paying, more prestigious position. The odds are long, but the prize is so big, and the alternatives so sparse, that it seems like a good idea.

    14. Re:Question for older fanboys by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Prepare for more disappointment in life: humans in general are dumb.
      I'm old enough to have noticed that already, but that's a big reason why watching something like the Sopranos holds so little attraction for me. I'm not very interested in what drives such people. I'm sure monkeys also have interesting inner lives, from a certain perspective, but I wouldn't watch more than about a 45-minute documentary about that. Hmm... reminds me of the reality shows, which I similarly don't enjoy. OK, it's starting to make sense now.

      Um, have you paid any attention to the current war we're in?
      At least the stakes in that case are big enough to be interesting. So maybe part of the attraction of the Sopranos is that it's stupidity on a human scale, not on the global unsolveable kilodeath scale of Iraq and the Middle East.
    15. Re:Question for older fanboys by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Prepare for more disappointment in life: humans in general are dumb.

      I'm old enough to have noticed that already, but that's a big reason why watching something like the Sopranos holds so little attraction for me. I'm not very interested in what drives such people. I'm sure monkeys also have interesting inner lives, from a certain perspective, but I wouldn't watch more than about a 45-minute documentary about that. Hmm... reminds me of the reality shows, which I similarly don't enjoy. OK, it's starting to make sense now. That's the reason why soap operas hold zero interest for me. So much of it is people making mountains out of molehills and creating their own problems due to contrived drama. The hands of the writers can be seen manipulating these puppets. But at the same time, stuff that could be described as soap I find fascinating like I CLAVDIVS. Yes, it's basically Roman soap but it's good soap! And even better, the history is mostly correct.

      Um, have you paid any attention to the current war we're in?

      At least the stakes in that case are big enough to be interesting. So maybe part of the attraction of the Sopranos is that it's stupidity on a human scale, not on the global unsolveable kilodeath scale of Iraq and the Middle East. That's the reason why I find the Third Reich so interesting. There's nothing new there, just basic human stupidity. The only thing unusual is the scale of the consequences. Many people have psychological problems, few of them manage to get over 100 million people killed over it. The latest bunker movie that came out, the Downfall, that was one hell of a movie. The filmmakers could afford to pretty much jump in at the end of WWII because we all knew what went before. But it also struck me that this could make for one hell of a series finale of the Hitler Show. If you had a hundred episodes in the can covering the rise and fall of Hitler, that would be the karma getting paid episode. When I was hearing all of the hype surrounding the countdown to the end of Sopranos, I was thinking that a Downfall-like episode would be an interesting way to go.

      Seeing someone pay the price for his sins, that's good drama. But another fun angle to look at is dealing with a disaster that was not asked for. I always felt the best way to do the final season of West Wing would have been a bolt out of the blue nuclear attack on DC. You have a normal episode, things seem to be going routine, then BANG! Maybe 80% of the cast is killed off in the attack and the final arc of the season is the new President trying to scrape the pieces together, maybe twelve episodes. You'd end on the note that America has weathered the attack and recovery has begun.

      Even if you think that idea sucks, you have to admit that the cool part is even the Simpsons haven't done it yet (at least not outside of a Halloween episode.)
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  41. Made the viewer feel like Tony... by minniger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At first I was like: WTF?

    But then I realized we were looking at every action around him as a source of danger... Expecting anything to happen. And for that short few minutes we knew what it was like to be Tony. Could be the FBI waiting to grab you, could be some hired killers edging their way toward your table and entire family, the whole damn place could explode, etc...

    No nice tidy bow wrapped ending for us or Tony, just another rev of the same wheel.

    1. Re:Made the viewer feel like Tony... by analog_line · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems to be a reasonably tidy bow, it's just not an easy package it's wrapped around.

      The sudden stop is, visually, an extremely loud "Here ends The Story Of Tony Soprano"

      That phrase is just as ambiguous as the few seconds of blank. It could easily means he dies, it could just as easily mean he lives and does nothing worth telling after this. Or that this is all I'm going to tell you about Tony for now, maybe later I'll tell you more about old Tony. How you interpret the ending says far more about you than about the writer, the characters, or the situation.

      I've only seen a few episodes. It was certainly a good show, but I didn't think it was as amazing as most people seem to, by any stretch. I've got my own theories based on what I've read about the episode, and the series, but really, those theories don't matter. The story ended there, and that's all folks.

  42. But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I still want to know if the Russian is dead or not.


          -- chud

  43. Offer the viewer no solace by grev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't believe there is a correct interpretation of the ending, I think that's the whole point. Offer the viewer no solace, force them to think about what they have just watched, and let them decide on what that may be, regardless of what it is.

    1. Re:Offer the viewer no solace by charlieman · · Score: 1

      That's so cliché!

  44. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you don't like it, perhaps you could use slashcode to make your own site.

  45. ...a cop out by killmenow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's exactly what the series ended with. You can read into it all the "meaning" you like. The fact is, the writers, directors, producers, et. al., left it wide open. "How do we end it?" they all said to themselves. Then, HBO executives, said: "Just don't. Don't end it at all. Don't have Tony dead. Don't have him in jail. Don't have him run to his new FBI friend and make a deal. Don't resolve anything. Don't do anything that will lock us into or out of possible future revenue. Just cut to black." And the rest of them, in unison, standing their in muffled awe, breathed "Genius."

    1. Re:...a cop out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then they got whacked!

    2. Re:...a cop out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can agree with you, having never watched the show I have no real opinion of it. But these jackasses who are trying to find some great turth in a TV show are just kidding themselves and proving how much a bunch of techo-dweebs need to clutch onto anything to feel centered in their own little universe.

      It's almost as sad as the asshats who needed The Matrix to be some deep well of universal truth to justify their desire to dress up in black leather with sunglasses.

      Get over it people!

    3. Re:...a cop out by LihTox · · Score: 1

      But these jackasses who are trying to find some great turth in a TV show are just kidding themselves and proving how much a bunch of techo-dweebs need to clutch onto anything to feel centered in their own little universe.

      Yeah! And you know what else I hate? Art museums! All those people going in and trying to find some hidden meaning in paint slathered onto canvas. Such techno-dweebs.

      Wait, what's a techno-dweeb, and what does it have to do with being inspired by art?

    4. Re:...a cop out by noz · · Score: 1

      You're too young to be so cynical. ;-)

  46. before they cancel their HBO... by PaulMorel · · Score: 1

    too late. Also, to all the people saying Tony's dead: he might have just been pinched by the FBI. That ambiguity is the lousy part. I agree that signs point to him being dead; it's strongly implied, but it's not absolute.

    --
    burrocrisy
    and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
  47. Tony did not die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be too easy, too typical and not at all keeping with the series. The show died.

  48. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, post the thread to a TV website, not a tech one. Most people don't even get HBO and of those not all give a flying fuck about that show.

  49. Will the sequel be "The Contraltos"? by baomike · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for "The Baritones" an Italian Immigrant singing group with ties to the mob , making their way up the charts with
    less that honest methods. Trouble ensues when the tenor of the group falls for a bass and the plot turns fishy.

    1. Re:Will the sequel be "The Contraltos"? by technomom · · Score: 1

      All set to four part close harmony Barbershop tunes.

    2. Re:Will the sequel be "The Contraltos"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Baritones are already among us.

    3. Re:Will the sequel be "The Contraltos"? by Ranhert · · Score: 1

      I think it is obvious that the sequel will be The Mezzo-Sopranos which will feature such middle ground Sopranos as Paulie Walnuts and that guy from Doogie Howser M.D.

  50. funny post by razpones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I never thought to see a news like this in Slashdot, yet, i never watched the Sopranos either, the closest thing to watching it was an episode of the Simpsons where they play the music with chief Wiggum going on his car as if he was Tony Soprano, I have to admit i did see the intro to the show once and I like the music. Its funny that Slashdot posted this story on the front page, yet my journal story about itunes including users names and accounts numbers in itunes store songs files didn't make it.

    1. Re:funny post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its funny that Slashdot posted this story on the front page, yet my journal story about itunes including users names and accounts numbers in itunes store songs files didn't make it. That's because /. already covered that story, or are you upset because they *didn't* post your dupe?
  51. Catching up - Season 6 by tedgyz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm on Season 6, Episode 7. Thank you Netflix. This season is great and I can't wait to see Season 7 - it is getting hard to dodge the spoilers.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Catching up - Season 6 by will.perdikakis · · Score: 0

      it is getting hard to dodge the spoilers.

      Can we PLEASE keep the car analogies out of this?

      --
      -Will P.
    2. Re:Catching up - Season 6 by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      it is getting hard to dodge the spoilers.

      I hope you weren't a fan of The Lone Gunmen.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Catching up - Season 6 by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Technically there is no 7th season. They just had a really long break during season 6, and the series finale was episode 21 of season 6. But yeah, it was almost like a really short 7th season.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  52. Shoot me up by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    The Rev D Wayne came into my life many years ago and I have worshipped at his church in many venues in many cities. I shall be abasing myself once more in a month or so and begging for his blessing.

    1. Re:Shoot me up by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Hallelujah brother, yes sir the circus is hitting the road once again. Personally I have a date with the L - o - r - d on the 29th at what was once Bar Lorca on Brixton Road.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  53. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, of all channels in the US, HBO should care the least about TiVo beause it's main purposes are time shifting and skipping commercials. However, since HBO doesn't have commercials, they don't care if you skip them. And why should they care if you use a TV to timeshift? You still paid them. Also, I doubt most of the shows on torrent sites originated on TiVo, so much easier to go the old tv capture card route(and get software to snip the commercials or just do it yourself)

  54. Re:Soprano's and tech? by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

    People thought their TV/Cable/DVRs went out. If you see the ending you will understand why.

  55. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by dsandler · · Score: 1

    Here's my belated Sopranos prediction: Within a few short months, certainly in time for Christmas, the alternate endings will appear on DVD.
    And here's mine: Each alternative ending starts with a different song selected on the jukebox. (We all saw the "Journey" ending last night...)
  56. Like that Beatles song by keytohwy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It reminded me of that Beatles song, "She's So Heavy" on Abbey Road. They'd worked themselves into this song and didn't know how to end it. Eventually, the editor took a pair of scissors and cut it at a random spot. I wonder if there isn't some correlation. David Chase is a huge music fan. Anyway, it's not the ending many of wanted or expected, but I liked it. keytohwy

    1. Re:Like that Beatles song by darrienj · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the music, there was a little 10 minute thing where Chase and other were talking about how music is used in the Sopranos. They noted how sometime modern music kinda turns into the chorus from greek plays. Go back and listen to how they matched Journey's "Don't Stop Believin'' up to the scene. There's obvious bits, but for instance when AJ complains about work Steve Perry is singing "some were born to sing the blues" (which may also be a nod to his depression) is a bit more subtle. "it goes on and on and on" chimes in at point when Tony tells Carm that Carlo's testifying against him. I thought the ep was great, I don't understand how a people could believe that perfectly timed cut was their cable going out.

    2. Re:Like that Beatles song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      completely wrong - "the editor" did not eventually just take a pair of scissors and cut it in a random spot, john lennon personally pointed at a spot and said "here"

  57. Re:Soprano's and tech? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lots of people used their Tivos to record the last episode of The Sopranos.

    There's your tech flavor.

    Now shut up.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  58. Spoofs on final episode... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    I was listening this morning to 104.3 and the DJ was talking about how he gets to be a trivia question because it was his voice on the alarm clock that is the first thing you hear.

    Anyway, they start to play a little 'farewell' song, which is basically a reworked version of the L7 song. It starts talking about a few of the things that happened in the episode. About 30 seconds or so into it, they sing "Walks into a diner" and then the song just cuts off. I got a kick out of that.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  59. Re:Never watched it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. What else haven't you watched. I wanna know more about you and maybe why you've never watched it.

  60. Needs to be a Slashdot poll. by palewook · · Score: 1

    Final soprano's episode was:

    1. Re:Needs to be a Slashdot poll. by palewook · · Score: 1

      (1) waste of time.

  61. Re:Soprano's and tech? by dsandler · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure if it contained a 10 milliwatt laser, had Bluetooth, and was featured on ThinkGeek, then, yes, it would be OK to post about it. Because geeks would care.

    Geeks of both sexes, that is. "Finally: tampons you won't be embarrassed to run into the drugstore for!"

  62. and you were expecting... what? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Anyone who was expecting a pat, neatly wrapped up ending clearly hasn't been watching the series. Or if they were, they weren't thinking about the guy who wrote it. When was the last time we saw David Chase wrap up something neatly?

    I think the folks arguing that Tony was killed at the cut-to-black are on to something, but it's not really worth arguing about. Either there will be a movie or not (my money is on not), and if there is, the folks arguing that Tony is dead will likely feel pretty dumb.

    Anyway, this is probably the best thing I've read so far about the series conclusion. (Not my blog.) Make of it what you will.

  63. huh? by Animaether · · Score: 4, Informative

    "DRM'ed DVDs" and ''DVD will use a "better" encryption than ever before''

    huh?

    If it's a plain ol' DVD, that will play back in any regular ol' DVD player, then there's no DRM. There's encryption, sure, but the CSS encryption was cracked completely. Done. They *could* encrypt the thing better, but then it won't play back on DVD players - it's no longer a DVD.

    Now perhaps you actually meant it'll only be available on HD-DVD and Blu-Ray, and by some magic way the HD-DVD version won't be 'cracked' almost instantly (as the keys have been found for HD-DVD perpetually).. or, knowing that HD-DVD's only protection is swiss cheese, only go with Blu-Ray and its additional protection layer.

    Or maybe it is a DVD - but a data DVD, and you can only play it back on a special HBO set top box media center thingamajig?

    Anyway.. if it comes out on DVD at all, it'll be ripped in no time.
    ===
    Other than that, I fully agree with what you're saying - production companies are exploiting the Regular > Special Edition > Collector's Edition > Director's Cut > Director's Cut Collector's Edition > etc. thing up the wazoo. I wish it would stop - but it's a moneymaker, so I doubt it will. As you said - it's just business.. but it's pretty dirty business.

    I don't mind the model in general - I don't mind paying extra for additional content if that's what I want to see. What I do mind is if you have e.g. a Special Edition which has bonus features A, B, C and a Collector's Edition which has bonus features B, C, D, and a Director's Cut which has features B, D, E and F You'd have to buy all three to get the full extras. That's just lame.

    1. Re:huh? by technomom · · Score: 1

      The crappy one will be plain-ol' DVD. I suspect that the collector's edition will be Blu-Ray.

    2. Re:huh? by k_187 · · Score: 1

      yeah, and while there might not be any new DRM, this could be the release that gets the image constraint token left on by "accident" at the factory just to see how many people get pissed when they can't watch in HD.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    3. Re:huh? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is *no way in hell* they would ever release something like a Sopranos Collector's Edition exclusively on BlueRay. *None*. The market for BlueRay is plain and simply dwarfed by DVD, right now, and the minor losses to piracy aren't enough to justify throwing that market away. It just ain't gonna happen.

    4. Re:huh? by JacksBrokenCode · · Score: 1

      Other than that, I fully agree with what you're saying - production companies are exploiting the Regular > Special Edition > Collector's Edition > Director's Cut > Director's Cut Collector's Edition > etc. thing up the wazoo. I wish it would stop - but it's a moneymaker, so I doubt it will. As you said - it's just business.. but it's pretty dirty business.

      That's not dirty business, it's smart business. This is part of the model that will allow free digital content to flourish. Hopefully we're on the cusp of an age where companies stop trying to charge for the "featureless" version of their products and start charging for the extras and add-ins that accompany special editions. In other words, if people will pay good money for jewel cases with album jackets it becomes less neccesary to persecute the people downloading individual tracks via P2P.

      I think part of the reason (on top of the absence of a legal alternative) that illegal downloads became so popular was because there was no perceived loss-of-value. CDs have less and less tracks, oftentimes don't have anything in the jacket, and come in the same jewel case as all the other albums. There was less and less value in purchasing a CD from a brick & mortar store while the price never dropped.

      If DVDs come in multiple editions at multiple price points it will be a good thing. A featureless "Regular" version for $5, a Special Edition with some extra featurettes for $10-15, and a Collector's/Directors-cut/whatever version for $25+. If I could buy a DVD for $3-5 and I didn't have to sit through a stupid "Piracy is bad" commercial or see "Trailers for other movies" listed in the Special Features menu, I'd buy more movies. If I really like a particular film and want the associated special crap, I can pick it up for a little extra cash. Beastie Boys Criterion Collection wasn't cheap but I got a value that would have been absent from a download.

  64. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by technomom · · Score: 1

    Because if you time shift, they can't sell the episode to you from HBO OnDemand which costs an additional $5.99 per month over and above the base HBO cost, at least in my neighborhood (Cablevision).

  65. Re:Soprano's and tech? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 0, Troll

    The best time to plant corn also matters to millions of people, but we don't bother putting a farmer's almanac on /.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  66. Sopranos is drama and they took a tactful road. by kinglink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The last show kind of spoke to me in an odd way. I mean don't get me wrong, I loved the episode before with the huge blood bath, but that is a very rare occurrence in Sopranos. Sopranos is more about the drama, and that's what we get in the episode.

    That being said the ending had me hooked because every couple seconds I was saying "oh god don't do it here" and I had a feeling it was his final scene. But I believe the ending was his death, as Bobby Baccala said in the first episode this season you don't even hear it. Why else cut the music and the screen? I think the show was over and so was his life.

    But that will be a series ender people will talk about for years, and as such kudos to David Chase.

  67. Re:Soprano's and tech? by natet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, I think the point of this is, Slashdot is "News for nerds, stuff that matters [to CmdrTaco and friends]." If you don't like it, you're welcome to go and start your own news aggregation site. CmdrTaco and company have also conveniently provided the code you could use to run your site. Have at it. But, as long as you're coming here and reading the articles on this site, realize that maybe not everything discussed here is right up your alley.

    I personally haven't watched a single episode of the Soprano's. But, I came in here to read the comments because enough people have talked about the show over the years, and the build up to the final episode, that I was interested in hearing how it ended (especially in light of CmdrTaco's description of it).

    --
    IANAL... But I play one on /.
  68. Re:Never watched it by roXet · · Score: 1

    can I be as cool as you when I grow up? Please teach me your ways!!!

  69. "Happy Ending" not necessary by jagermeister101 · · Score: 1

    A series with as much depth as The Sopranos doesn't need to end with a Hollywood style ending. You don't need a shootout like Scarface or Tony going into jail or Silvio going into witness protection like Goodfellas. Any attempt at making a happy or concluding ending would have been a bigger disappointment to fans of the series. As it would have been very hard to make something like this "conclude" in some way. IMHO this is the best series ever seen on TV and one of the most realistic mob stories ever told.

    1. Re:"Happy Ending" not necessary by ICantFindADecentNick · · Score: 1

      It's not just that it doesn't need to have a neatly tied up ending - it's that it doesn't have to spoon feed it to you. The Sopranos are trying to break you out of the bad Hollywood habits like making sure that everybody in their demographic can understand it instantly. Go and watch some European cinema for example. You actually can't resolve who did what in Hidden (Caché) - and it doesn't matter - it isn't what it was about.

  70. Good riddance by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, I may be in a minority here, but I'm ecstatic that this show is finally over. Glorified sex, glorified violence, and power. The typical bullshit of "holding a mirror up to society" is more of a lie with this show than most movies that similarly glorify street violence, etc. Worse, they lower society's standard of acceptable behaviour.

    The last show I was this happy to see check out was Friends. Finally, another execrable piece of shite not wasting any more resources that could be used for a worthwhile purposes.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Good riddance by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Finally, another execrable piece of shite not wasting any more resources that could be used for a worthwhile purposes. Aside from the fact that you're trolling with "what you people like sucks", what mechanism, exactly, will now divert HBO's resources to "worthwhile purposes"? That show ended and now everyone involved (writers, actors, producers, stagehands, etc.) will spend their lives and bank accounts... curing cancer? Rescuing puppies? They won't go on pursuing their careers in TV? The Sopranos killed all their careers?

      Stop wasting yours, and slashdot's resources on your shit. Go out and do something worthwhile, instead of trolling the net, telling people that what they like is not good.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Good riddance by mattgoldey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sounds like the words of someone that never gave the show a chance. It's called entertainment. If it brings a little pleasure, then it's done its job. If it challenges our minds to think in slightly differnt ways, then all the better for us. But let's keep perspective here... it was a fictional TV show designed to entertain. It's not like all of the actors are going to join the crusade to fight poverty, hunger and AIDS now that they're done working on The Sopranos. They're going to do their best to get another job in the entertainment industry. Nobody's forcing you to watch The Sopranos or Friends. You can always change the channel or turn off the TV entirely.

    3. Re:Good riddance by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right--I didn't need to post a 'your show sucks' post. However, I've been holding my breath (metaphorically) for too many years, waiting for this show to go away. I feel like I finally have a chance to let my breath out and say, "THANK GOD!!!"

      As far as a 'waste of resources,' I'd be perfectly happy if they put their effort towards shows that are worthwhile. They don't have to be shows that I want to watch (there are tons of shows out there that are decent or mediocre or quite good that I don't watch), but they shouldn't deliberately try to be the worst show the creators can get away with.

      That's what I feel about the Sopranos: It's not that I hate it (which I do), but it's one of the very very rare shows I consider to be created as deliberately bad-but-enticing. It has made its audience from shocking and then manipulating people ("ooh, naked boobs on American TV!!!"), rather than creating a good story. It is anti-entertainment.

      Entirely my opinion, I realise, and no more valid than that of anyone else. Still, this show has always stood in my mind as an example of how the entertainment industry avoids having to create entertainment, and I'm glad to see it gone.
      (Random aside: I mentioned Friends, which similarly exemplifies how TV makes comedies that aren't funny--without the laugh track, the show wouldn't have lasted two seasons.)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:Good riddance by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      However, I've been holding my breath (metaphorically) for too many years, waiting for this show to go away. I feel like I finally have a chance to let my breath out and say, "THANK GOD!!!"

      Wow, I really hope they find and arrest those people who strapped you to that chair and forced you to watch it!

      A Clockwork Orange gave far too many people that bad idea!

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    5. Re:Good riddance by GreggBz · · Score: 1

      There has been "glorified sex, glorified violence and power" in our entertainment media since we've had entertainment media, and probably before that when we sat around fire telling stories. However, I'm not telling you to get used to it. It's good that the show pissed you off. What's the point of art if not to be provocative?

    6. Re:Good riddance by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Interesting angle on things! (and I sincerely wish that the moderator who bumped my post up had given it to your post instead.) The question is, is it art?

      Some would say that anything which deliberately evokes emotion is art, and strong emotion implies good art. To some degree, the abstract expressionists exemplify this--the nature of the response is strictly personal, with no guidance from the work itself. If you look at a Bosch or a Velasquez, the art is clearly designed and executed to evoke a certain reaction (both thought and emotion) from the viewer. Pollock and company, on the other hand, strove to avoid 'forcing' an opinion on the viewer, trying to draw something personal and unique out of their subconscious. That's part of the source of the 'anything evocative is art' philosophy.

      I personally don't subscribe to that belief. I believe that there is good art and bad art, and charlatanism masquerading as art. (Barnett Newman, I'm talking about YOU!) Being able to generate contempt and disgust for a creator is hardly artistic, in my mind.

      Also, I should qualify my 'sex, violence, power' comment. What I object to is glorifying one (or more) of them as a seedy replacement for actual art. Does it provide any social or artistic value? Nothing in the Sopranos I've seen does.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    7. Re:Good riddance by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      It only glorified sex, violence, and power if you weren't paying attention. Nearly every major character was killed during the course of the show. Of those that are left, nearly every one complicit in the criminal life are emotional wrecks unable to find happiness. It certainly didn't make me want to become a mobster.

    8. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I've been holding my breath (metaphorically) for too many years, waiting for this show to go away.

      Wow.

      Your life must *suck*.

    9. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because network US TV is so watered down so that your poor gun-toting masses don't flip out over a swear word or some nipples, doesn't negate the sopranos from being well-written.

      there are few american network programmes that are worth watching, and i think that trend is a global one too, but just because you felt that the sopranos made it's audience from being shocking doesn't mean it's true, or true for some of the die hard fans. i've watched far more shocking films than the sopranos, and barely batted an eyelid during the majority of it's scenes, but it was the story that kept me watching through six seasons.

    10. Re:Good riddance by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I mentioned Friends, which similarly exemplifies how You're even trolling for off-topic shows.
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  71. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many times has that flying horse turd Firefly and Battlestar Glaticarican been a topic here? It may not be sci-fi but people found it a relevant topic. It's nice to hear about show that doesn't involve a rabid fan base of people in latex masks wishing the mothership would come already. By the way, keep waiting.

  72. Slow news day and monday morning cooler talk by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    When a technical story does come up, it gets maybe 50 comments, 30 of which will be bad trolls, 15 of which will be whiny kids who don't even grasp the basic premise of the article, 4 people complaining about an obscure technical mistake in the article and 1 interesting comment that's worth reading.

    The majority of comments on Slashdot have always been shit Which is why people shouldn't be modding up comments that are useless, like people whining that the entire article doesn't interest them. ESPECIALLY when the summary explains that it's being posted because so many people asked for it ("hey, people like X, I'll go in there and say X sucks! I am t3h awesome, lol").
    This is a site for nerds to talk about the news, and apparently a lot of nerds want to discuss this bit of TV news. Let them talk amongst themselves.

    If people really need to tell the world about what they don't like, /. gives them a journal for their personal thoughts, they could even start their own tech blog... with blackjack, and hookers!

    Mod down the chaff, mod up the info.
    That is all.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Slow news day and monday morning cooler talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a site for nerds to talk about the news

      Utter, unadulterated, horse shit. Slashdot used to be a site to talk about nerdy news, which is not the same thing at all.

      apparently a lot of nerds want to discuss this bit of TV news.

      Then they can go to one of the million and one TV/Sopranos sites and do it there.

      Mod down the chaff, mod up the info.

      What info? There hasn't been any informative articles on Slashdot for a very long time. It's all chaff. This article is chaff. All the comments are chaff. The entire front page of Slashdot is chaff. I just checked the Firehose and every single aticle waiting there currently is marked as YRO!

      What a bunch of crap.

    2. Re:Slow news day and monday morning cooler talk by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      What info? There hasn't been any informative articles on Slashdot for a very long time. It's all chaff. This article is chaff. All the comments are chaff. The entire front page of Slashdot is chaff. I just checked the Firehose and every single aticle waiting there currently is marked as YRO!
      What a bunch of crap. So why, exactly, don't you move on?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Slow news day and monday morning cooler talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What, and let mediocrity win? Allow people like you to turn Slashdot into a poor parody of Digg? Let people like ESR and CmdrTaco think that they're some sort of political activists who have interesting and insightful commentary to make? Allow them to make people think that geeks should think like them and share their opinions?

      Apart from which, I have nothing better to do from within the heavily fire-walled fortress that is the company I work for. Even half of Slashdot is blocked from here (Happily including yro.slashdot.org & politics.slashdot.org. Sadly hardware.slashdot.org, too).

  73. nope by mythar · · Score: 1

    waiting for the final season here.

  74. I thought my cable box crashed again... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... So I switched channels, then went back and saw the credits.

    Weird.

    Still, nice way for Phil to go.. A distant Irish relation shared a similar fate, _NEVER_ pass out on the curb while waiting for the bus...

  75. Limbo ended the same way ... argh! by schwit1 · · Score: 1
  76. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    It was not in their best interest to put on a great show that would be Tivoed and passed around the internet.
    I've got a better, more radical solution. Why not simply not air the show at all, and release on DVD? Then no-one would pirate it! Then they could somehow start actually trying to protect DVDs from copying (because obviously they weren't before), and thus avoid the problem of piracy by TiVo (as opposed to piracy via DRM crack). It's genius! That way they could avoid through the labours of broadcasting on TV (which of course no popular show ever wants to do due to piracy) and still make money.

    Why, we could apply this to all kinds of businesses. The DVD shops could protect against theft by refusing to sell DVDs, insurance companies could protect against rampant fraud by refusing to offer insurance, taxi drivers could stop car theft by not owning a car! Wow, what a world we could live in!
    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  77. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by mrzaph0d · · Score: 3, Funny

    In that case, I'm waiting for the "Mega-happy" ending and then the "Scooby-Doo" ending.

    --
    this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  78. All wrapped up nice and neat *Spoilers* by lordmage · · Score: 1

    War done with Phil Dead
    AJ coming out of his depression
    Meadow pretty well set
    Tony Resettled and Wife has her job remaking houses.
    So you saw the terrorist reference in the end... the godfather bathroom reference..
    but listen to the MUSIC:

    The music goes:
    "Don't Stop"

    and they do. It all STOPS. The end of the series.

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  79. Re:Soprano's and tech? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that we don't have Paris Hilton updates as well - I'm sure that matters to a good number of people.

    Totally. You know if she was just smart enough to refuse the breathalyzer she would have slipped in under 0.08% BAC if the officer insisted on taking her for a blood test. None of her more recent troubles would have percipatated if if hadn't been for the DUI conviction. There. Was that sufficient for /. style Paris coverage?

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  80. Re:Never watched it by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your parents must be proud.

    --

    Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
  81. Awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't take any balls to say it was horrible! That being said, it was actually awful. Watch A&E reruns to see how good it used to be. What a let down. Not even an attempt to wrap up all those seasons.

    Anonymous Coward

    Joe M from Boston.

  82. Typical of Chase by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    While the ending was wholly unsatisfying, it was typical of Chase. He refused to just give the audience what they wanted (the Russian, return of Furio etc). It's what made it a great show in not pandering to the viewer, and at the same time a frustrating one for the same reason. Hard to end it any other way. Real life works like that. Similar how in the Wire (better than the Sopranos (IMHO) how the main bad guy of the first couple of seasons goes to jail while the new bad guy is sitting in the back of the court room ready to take it place. As the song at the end of the Sopranos last night goes, "it goes on and on , and on and on". Tony will always be paranoid, Carmela will always be focused on trivia and AJ and Meadow will remain vacuous.

    1. Re:Typical of Chase by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Somehow, Mr. Chase forgot how powerfully effective The Fugitive was when that series finally ended with a pretty satisfying conclusion back in the 1960's.

  83. 3.) Profit! by bunco · · Score: 1

    While many applaud (or loathe) the writers for this "artful" ending, the cynic in me sees this as a financial decision. Whacking Tony destroys the possibilities for a Soppranos movie. You'd be stuck with a prequel and those are _so_ passé.

  84. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by jollespm · · Score: 1

    Comcast gives you OnDemand for free, as long as you subscribe to the premium channel. I suppose it's a matter of market and company more so than HBO.

  85. Soranos ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > At my house, we thought at first that the DVR crashed until the credits appeared in silence.

    I thought the exact same thing (either cable went out or TiVo messed up), then they rolled the credits. Brilliant! I knew they would leave the door open for a movie.

  86. Needed a green light off in the distance by Guil+Rarey · · Score: 1

    ...Maybe the traffic light far down the road from where Meadow was trying to park.

    I didn't see the episode - haven't had time to follow the series this season - but I did read the episode summaries.... ...And fading to black on a green traffic light off in the distance, or better, reflected in a window of a cheesy store across the street from the diner... would have been perfect.

    Yes, that's a reference, and if you slept through English in high school, go back and re-read The Great Gatsby, dammit.

    --
    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball
    1. Re:Needed a green light off in the distance by nagora · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's a reference, and if you slept through English in high school, go back and re-read The Great Gatsby, dammit.

      Do not listen to this man! The Great Gatsby is dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, dull, and uninteresting too.

      If you want a much better insight into that period, place and people, read "Harpo Speaks!", the autobiography of Harpo Marx. It's a lot funnier, a lot more interesting, has a better story, and is about people you might actually give a flying fuck about.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Needed a green light off in the distance by pyite · · Score: 1

      Needed a green light off in the distance

      Too cliche. The show is powerful enough that its allusion to self, in just going to completely black without a sound, is more impactful than alluding to Gatsby. Though I do think there are parallels between the Sopranos and Gatsby.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  87. Movie anyone??? by bubbageek75 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else but me think that by ending it the way they did, they left it open for a movie?

    1. Re:Movie anyone??? by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Actually they've been talking about a movie for a few months now. Its pretty obvious that the finale was just a hook to keep people interested until the movie comes out.

      Its kind of funny how everyone is analyzing the symbolism and artistic merits of the unresolved ending. Nothing was completely resolved at the end of the story because the story isn't over yet. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

  88. Its a soap opera folks by DrFalkyn · · Score: 1

    It was a good show, but it was still a soap opera. It doesn't need resolution an ending any more than Days of Our Lives or General Hospital needs one. The final episode convinced me of that. Not only did they leave you hanging as to Tony's fate, but none of the other major characters(that didn't die) seemed to have changed much at all over the course of ~8 years. A.J is still the same confused and spoiled brat that he was before. Meadow is engaged, but she was before(to Finch) and it looks like the same road as Jackie Aprile, Finch, etc. And she's still in denial about Tony's mob involvement. Carmela has become a bit more independent, but is still basically the same character she was about the beginning of the series. 'The Sopranos' had great dialogue, good use of symbolism, good directing and acting etc. But the series wasn't essentially different than 'Dallas'

  89. Actually.. by jvagner · · Score: 1

    ..my biggest beef with the episode is that after 7 seasons of awesome musical choices, Chase goes out on Journey?

    "Don't stop..."

  90. Re:Soprano's and tech? by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

    >>I always thought that the "stuff that matters" actually mattered - like rights...

    Not too many rights issues apply to white, middle-class males with excellent job outlooks, so the articles become pretty redundant after a while...

  91. Better ending than most HBO series by grapeape · · Score: 1

    At least it had an ending which is better than I can say for Carnivale, Deadwood.

    1. Re:Better ending than most HBO series by milkypostman · · Score: 1

      Deadwood finale is coming.

      --
      D/E
  92. I loved it... by Boap · · Score: 1

    Life just goes on. Best scene is when AJ got his new BMW he is on the phone with the girlfriend and says something like the new car gets great gas mileage of 23MPG highway. That after lamenting through the season about the US dependence on foreign oil. Fitting way to say good by to JR and I love it that Pallie Walnuts ended up being the good guy/weasel that he has ever been. Also notice that the show only had snow in the first half of the episode. For me this was a fitting end to a great series.

  93. Whaddya know by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If you still have your copy sitting unwatched on your Tivo, I'd suggest that you stop reading before you are spoiled..."

    I'd just like to thank those involved for learning a lesson over the Lone Gunmen fiasco.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  94. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the hell up basement boy.

  95. Ebert's take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Ebert's take by porges · · Score: 1

      That's Jim Emerson's take; he's the "editor" of RogerEbert.suntimes.com and has an associated blog at that site.

  96. Re:Soprano's and tech? by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I personally haven't watched a single episode of the Soprano's. But, I came in here to read the comments"

    Same here. There are a lot of angles you could take on this story as to why its posted here. I for one find it interesting to see how people react to a television show ending in such an unorthodox way. Television is so pre-packaged and easily digestible and it has affected our perception of reality. People want quick fixes, they want stuff to resolve, all within the space of one hour. Well, sometimes it doesn't work that way. I for one, not having watched the show, find the concept of this particular ending ingenious.

    Plus, in accord with GP's point about /.'s editors choosing stories...I remember reading an interview with Taco here about a year or two ago. He wrote something to the effect that this site started as what would today be called a blog site -- his blog site. So Taco or his editors can post whatever the heck they want. If you don't like it, don't read it.

    People who complain about this story is a bit like me grousing about another article about the end of BSG just because I don't particularly care for the show: Frankly, nobody gives a damn.

    --
    blah blah blah
  97. Should Have Ended It Last Week by Ranhert · · Score: 1

    Of course if you asked me last week if that should have been the end, I would have definitely said "No". I agree with a lot of the opinions of last night's episode regarding not necessarily needing to know whether Tony (and possibly his family) are alive or dead. That being said there was little to no closure in my mind last night. Here are some of the closing points in last night's episode and why I feel they really didn't do it for me: Phil Leotardo got whacked: While Phil getting killed was probably the biggest point of closure in last night's episode, he wasn't much of an issue until the past 2 episodes (more so last episode then the one previous). Not to mention his head getting accidentally rolled over with the crowds' reaction was much too comical to be taken seriously. Tony and Uncle Junior: This just seemed forced. Tony wanted absolutely nothing to do with Junior until last night when he seemed compelled to go visit him and then become visibly annoyed with how Junior's Alzheimer's has blocked all memory of "running North Jersey". This confrontation in many ways gave me the feeling that this was the last time Tony would ever see Junior, which in this situation could be the case, but not so much with the next .... Tony and Janice: Seemed too much like two High School graduates discussing the future and what to do next. Though nice to see bro and sis seemingly getting along, it again felt very forced. Remember that at this point Tony still had a target on his back, but made time to visit his family and his sister. Tony and AJ, Tony and Meadow, Tony checking out Carmella as she walked by, and Tony with Paulie Walnuts were all fine because they either gave some closure or tastefully didn't. However, I could have done completely without all of those things listed above. Here's an ending for ya. One of Tony's capos gets whacked and another is in critical condition in the hospital. Tony himself is the next target and holes himself off in a hideout with some muscle and goes to sleep with the assault rifle that his murdered capo brother-in-law gave him. End of story. No need for anymore closure then that. Tony's life of crime has always led to death and fear for all those around him and finally it turns on him. Just some thoughts.

    1. Re:Should Have Ended It Last Week by Ranhert · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the horrible formatting. Here it is again in a readable format.

      Of course if you asked me last week if that should have been the end, I would have definitely said "No". I agree with a lot of the opinions of last night's episode regarding not necessarily needing to know whether Tony (and possibly his family) are alive or dead. That being said there was little to no closure in my mind last night.

      Here are some of the closing points in last night's episode and why I feel they really didn't do it for me:

      Phil Leotardo got whacked: While Phil getting killed was probably the biggest point of closure in last night's episode, he wasn't much of an issue until the past 2 episodes (more so last episode then the one previous). Not to mention his head getting accidentally rolled over with the crowds' reaction was much too comical to be taken seriously.

      Tony and Uncle Junior: This just seemed forced. Tony wanted absolutely nothing to do with Junior until last night when he seemed compelled to go visit him and then become visibly annoyed with how Junior's Alzheimer's has blocked all memory of "running North Jersey". This confrontation in many ways gave me the feeling that this was the last time Tony would ever see Junior, which in this situation could be the case, but not so much with the next ....

      Tony and Janice: Seemed too much like two High School graduates discussing the future and what to do next. Though nice to see bro and sis seemingly getting along, it again felt very forced. Remember that at this point Tony still had a target on his back, but made time to visit his family and his sister.

      Tony and AJ, Tony and Meadow, Tony checking out Carmella as she walked by, and Tony with Paulie Walnuts were all fine because they either gave some closure or tastefully didn't.

      However, I could have done completely without all of those things listed above. Here's an ending for ya. One of Tony's capos gets whacked and another is in critical condition in the hospital. Tony himself is the next target and holes himself off in a hideout with some muscle and goes to sleep with the assault rifle that his murdered capo brother-in-law gave him. End of story. No need for anymore closure then that. Tony's life of crime has always led to death and fear for all those around him and finally it turns on him.

      Last night's episode would have been a bit better (in my opinion) if Meadow would have been hit by a car running across the road. Is she alive, is she dead, is/was she pregnant, etc.

      Just some thoughts.

    2. Re:Should Have Ended It Last Week by porges · · Score: 1

      Tony went to see Junior for a specific reason: he was looking for some stash of money Junior had hidden somewhere. That's why he's pissed off that Junior's memory is gone.

  98. whimper by Zantoz · · Score: 1

    This is the way the world ends, not with a bang, but a whimper.
    - T. S. Eliot

    I often thought of Tony and those like him, living in a hell of their own creation, are living the lives they deserve. No sense of home, no resolution, constant fear, watching the door always.

    That said, Paulie still needs to get shot by the Russian.

    --
    weasels in a bag
  99. Meadow Shot Tony by Ikcor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or, the family did a bunch of gross stuff to each other and Tony says "The Aristocrats!"

  100. We got whacked. by daskrabs · · Score: 1

    We, the audience, got whacked. That's what we get for allowing murderers into our homes. I think it's a bullshit cop-out, but who cares what I think, because I got whacked.

  101. maybe i'm the only one seeing it this way.. but... by Churla · · Score: 1

    The ending was to bring around a sense of inclusion of the viewer.

    When the series started we were all outsiders seeing the dirty world of Tony, who was definitely a bad guy. We were boggling at how sadistic and brutal this world could be and not understanding how one could live in it.. yadda yadda yadda

    By that last scene we're now seeing the world through his eyes. Every little detail around the restaurant was something we now saw as "that guy might be here to whack Tony" or "look out for that". In essence we're on the other side of that fence now. The job of this story is done at that point. He's told a story engrossing enough to pull you across to Tony's perspective. Done.

    Essentially we've had 8 seasons of "a while in the life of Tony Soprano", it doesn't have any obligation to a morally just or redemptive ending. Life does, in fact, even for Tony, go on...

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  102. Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes black by moxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing to me how many people really just didn't get it.

    The ending left a lot open to speculation, but one thing that it didn't leave open (IMO) is Tony's fate.

    Tony is dead - if you watch episode #78 "Soprano Home Movies," while Tony and Bobby are on the lake they are talking about what happens to people like them, and specifically about what it's like to get killed. Tony says something along the lines of "you don't hear the one that gets you," and Bobby asks "what do you tin happens when you die," to which Tony replies "nothing, everything just goes black."

    Then, in last week's episode, "#85 The Blue Comet," Tony flashes back to this scene while he is lying in bed "everything just goes black."

    Even David Chase said in an interview that the key to how it ends is in that first episode (Soprano Home Movies), and to make sure people would remember this he put Tony flashing back to that moment at the end of "#85 The Blue Comet."

    On top of all of that there was so much death symbolism in the episode...I definitely had to watch it twice, but he definitely got clipped - and I think the finale was awesome.

    In addition to the death symbolism and foreshadowing, the show made a lot of points about America - hence the title.

  103. DRM'ed DVDs... by AxemRed · · Score: 1

    Ha. Haha... That's a good one. +1 Funny

  104. Thanks, CmdrTaco... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    For being considerate enough to not spoil the ending of the show in the synopsis.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  105. Things not wrapped up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the end, there were a lot of things that weren't wrapped up and I think that's the big problem a lot of fans are having to deal with.
    That's exactly what happens when someone gets whacked. Everyone around them has to continue on with their own stuff. Any loose ends Tony had lingering will have to be dealt with somehow without him - he'll never know what happens, and neither will you. The same is true for all the people he had killed during the series. It's an aspect to it that you never really thought about until it was presented from the point of view of the guy getting shot. Like Clint Eastwood said - You take away everything he has, and everything he's ever going to have. But now you see that it happens in an instant with no followup or resolution of any kind.
  106. Re:Soprano's and tech? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Sites to start:

    Slashdolt, funny news about dumb things

    Slashdoh, news about the Simpsons

    Slashdoowap, news about really old songs

    Slashdrama, news about daytime soaps

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  107. Re:Soprano's and tech? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    The only thing I know about the Sopranos is that Alabama 3 made some music for the show, the theme tune I suspect. Alabama 3 is a great band, go see them live if you ever get a chance. In case you hadn't noticed they are from from Brixton, London.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  108. I know what happened. by gijoel · · Score: 0

    Avon shot Tony Sophrano and then was killed by Federation troops.

    Least that's how I remembered it as a kid.

  109. Ya know... by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

    It's not nice posting spoilers up as stories. Jackasses.

    (Thankfully I watched it this morning.)

    1. Re:Ya know... by Ranhert · · Score: 1

      What part of the original post by CmdrTaco was a spoiler? The fact that there was an "interesting ending" or the fact that The Sopranos aired their final episode last night?

      Might want to reread the original post again before breaking out the name calling...

    2. Re:Ya know... by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      "Sopranos Ends With a ..." (note the blank)

      "At my house, we thought at first that the DVR crashed until the credits appeared in silence."

      "Personally I thought that a show known for such excess tried to take an artful bow: It didn't work for me, but I get it at least."

      Seems there's a "If you still have your copy sitting unwatched on your Tivo, I'd suggest that you stop reading before you are spoiled." warning now. Not sure if that was there earlier, but it's generally considered good form to either hide spoilers behind a link or at least cap or bold the warning and leave some whitespace.

    3. Re:Ya know... by Ranhert · · Score: 1

      I guess we can agree to disagree. I don't think any of the things you mentioned give anything away to someone who hasn't seen the episode. As two people who have, we know what to fill in the blanks per se.

      "Sopranos Ends With a ..." could be filled in with "Bang", "Hug", "Rebirth", "Funeral" really anything.

      The DVR crashed comment in no way says what happens right before the screen goes black. It could've been Tony was shot and then blackness even though we know (or think we know) that wasn't the case.

      The artful bow comment really could've been anything. The whole main cast of the Sopranos could've been on stage, during the credits, bowing which would've been different, not artful but artsy.

      Anyways I just don't see how someone who has had their ears/eyes closed entirely all day today could get any information out of Tacos post. But I'm not meaning to argue.

    4. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The struggling, morally fractured character ALWAYS dies in the end. This is just the nature of film. I had a discussion with my brother on this topic several years ago (he's writes film scores, I'll leave it at that) and I was trying to pitch some movie idea to him. I wanted to know, should MY struggling, morally fractured character go on to lead a normal life? My brother gave me a weird look and said "No, that never happens. He always dies."

  110. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by Zach978 · · Score: 1

    Brighthouse (TWC) gives us HBO on demmand for free to all HBO subscribers...

    --

    "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
  111. "everything just goes black" by Fitch · · Score: 1

    Thank you. After catching a few morning newscasts, I thought I was the only one to notice this.

    I suppose the vast majority of fans were expecting to see Chase steal a scene from Scarface, and were so disappointed they overlooked the dialog and plot.

    Subtlety, it seems, is a grossly under-appreciated art form in this day and age.

  112. never watched the show by ShorePiper82 · · Score: 1

    but take this into account... the massive amount of publicitly generated by this final episode alone was enough to get me thinking "should I buy this series on dvd/hd-dvd/blu-ray?"...

    the point: they just managed to open sales to a wider audience than their dedicated fanbase... those with marginal interest may now go and purchase some new box sets.

  113. Life Goes On.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the ending was good...it showed that this level of violence and uncertainty was the norm for these guys. It's just one more day in the life of the Sopranos and life goes on. As such, I thought it was a good ending for the series as a whole.

  114. What is this show anyway? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I've heard about the Sopranos but never got around to watching an episode. Anybody have a general overview for me? I assume it's like mafia or something?

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:What is this show anyway? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. It's not about the mob at all, but actually a traveling all-male choir. Why would you think it's about the mob? Because the name sounds Italian? racist.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:What is this show anyway? by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      Google? Or otherwise Wikipedia?

  115. restaurant by cahulaan · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice that Carmelia had made a reservation at a restaurant? That did not look like the type of place that took reservations. And they each showed up without the person they were with when Carmelia told what restaurant they were eating at. It was like it was a code word for the family to meet there. At any rate I for one have been disappointed with the last 2 seasons and the ending was par for the course. The show has been going down hill for some. The writers have some explaining to do, before I pay to watch a series like that again(it was the only reason I had HBO) And who gives a ripp about watching AJ get a lecture for parking his car on leaves. Yes I get that, they were lecturing while connected with murder, racketeering etc. etc. Whatever

  116. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Freshie · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a single episode either. I came in to see what fans thought of the ending. I know a lot of people who watched it.

    --
    'I don't want more choices. I just want better things.' - Edina Monsoon
  117. Fiction writing rule #2 by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    Finish the story.

    And, if you were curious about #1
    Start the story.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  118. It was the perfect ending. by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    Phil got his and they left it up to the imagination to decide what happens next - as it should be because life goes on and as far as the Sopranos go, what just happened was pretty much business as usual so they're just getting on with their lives. No great fanfare. No ridiculous twists and turns. It was the perfect ending to something that really didn't end. We just don't get to see what happens next. I think it's genius.

  119. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    You could use the same logic and apply it to the viewer, as others have said. "Everything just goes black" - the series has died. I think the more obvious (and Occam'sly) explanation is that they were fine and had dinner and life went on (for a while, at least). The recurring theme in the show is that the life he leads is one where you never know whats coming next. The final scene highlighted that - Tony has to be looking over his shoulder at all times for what's coming next, be it the law or the enemy.

  120. Re: We got wacked, not Tony by saxman44 · · Score: 1

    Nobody is getting it. We were the ones that got wacked! We didn't see it coming because we thought Tony was gonna get it but it was us.

  121. To get this back on-topic by mihalis · · Score: 1

    Tony is a replicant - an organised crime model for optimum viciousness. Everything went black because of the built-in deactivation circuit. He actually is the 7th of the replicants that escaped in the back story of Blade Runner and will appear in the upcoming 27-disc "Blade Runner, Binge and Purge" box set (with apologies to Metallica). He is shown whacking Gaff and remarking "F**king origami, fuggedaboutid!". Skynet sent him back in time to defeat the Architect before he could construct the Matrix, but he took a detour into some rather lucrative crime.

    This was not the ending you're looking for. You don't need to see this TiVo. You can go about your business. Move Along.

  122. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by juuri · · Score: 1

    This is just wrong.

    If HBO *hates* time-shifting then why are one of the fastest at putting up content and a strong proponent of OnDemand viewing? You just made that up. Good job on getting the mod points, I guess.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  123. Re:Never watched it by Bugmage · · Score: 1

    nice ending, the point was to make everyone scared that something bad was going to happen and then just to show you that everything back to normal an fine like the beginning of the show

  124. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by moxley · · Score: 1

    I guess that's the beauty of it

    You are right - it is possible that anything happened; but with that scene in the first episode of season6pt2, and the fact that they had it in a flashback at the end of the the previous episode to this one; coupled with the symbolism and David Chase's comments make me feel that he took one to the head.

  125. Meadow's Pregnant by Gotung · · Score: 1

    I think most people missed the fact that Meadow was pregnant. It was mentioned that she would be running late to dinner, because she had to see the doctor, something about "Switching Birth Control Pills". On her way in, and parking her car, she was extremely flustered. So Tony dies (all of a sudden everything just goes black, the one "creepy guy" that went into the bathroom probably came out with a gun in his hand), but life goes on (Meadow is pregnant).

  126. The ending fits the series. by labradore · · Score: 1

    I think the ending was well done. Everyone in my house was getting agitated about Tony getting killed. The music was loud. The suspense was up. Everyone is checking their watch and asking each other if this was going to be a 2 hour episode.

    And then black. And I'm sure millions of people, just like me, said, what the hell? Did my cable just go out? I was thinking, as the end was coming up, that there was no way to end the series normally because there just wasn't enough time left. There certainly wasn't enough time for reaction shots from the family that we would certainly want to see. It was also apparent, from the fact that we were spending so much time seeing the details of this little seemingly meaningless meal that we're seeing details of Tony's life that usually get left out. Seeing a little bit of his perspective and feeling a bit of the tension that he feels. It was, overall a good ending because the tenor of the series over all of these years just doesn't point to us seeing Tony die. No real fan of the show wanted to see that. It might have been a plausible excuse to end the series, but the fact of the matter is that we've tuned in for so long because we want Tony and his family to live on. I think that when we look back on it in years to come, we'll be more satisfied knowing that he's still around. Still, I have to admit that it was a bit disappointing. Not least of all because there was no music for the end credits which has been a Sopranos signature.

    I'd have to say that this ending doesn't compare favorably to the endings of other series such as HBOs own Six Feet Under. As far as I'm concerned their montage ending that touched on the highlights of the live of the remaining characters with some extra attention to Claire's point of view had unbelievable emotional impact.

    On the other hand, the focus of Six Feet Under was the struggles and the lives of the characters to get past their more-or-less ordinary personal challenges and make something meaningful of their lives within the norms of society. While the Sopranos relied just as heavily on the intimate details of the lives of the main characters, we're not rooting for Tony to overcome his own personal hurdles and to reach his dreams in any traditional way. We tuned into Sopranos to see Tony struggle and fight, to take on those same problems like a mobster. We want to see him do things the way he would do it and we can't (or at least probably can't get away with). Seeing Tony get old or finally succumb to the forces that would bring him down aren't what we want to see. So in this case, it's best to see him at the top of his game. I know that I will always want to remember him that way.

  127. I work at a startup... by JurassicPizza · · Score: 1

    ...I already know what that's like.

    --
    --- JurassicPizza
  128. Of course by Drell · · Score: 1

    To the person who was saying "Everything just goes black". Very well thought out. Of course you guys are forgetting that there is still talks about making a Soprano's Movie. If that is the case they HAVE to leave Tony ALIVE. Got to string you along just enough that either could of happened.

    1. Re:Of course by psbrogna · · Score: 1

      They don't have to leave Tony alive if the movie's a prequel about his dad.

  129. No. Really. by beschler · · Score: 1

    They are all dead. The "three" hit men where just waiting for the daughter to arrive so they could do them all at the same time.

  130. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you don't like George W. Bush, move out of America.

    Seriously, "if you don't like it, leave instead of criticising" has to be the lamest fallacy ever. You might as well just type "I have no valid response and you win."

    That you got modded up for it only speaks to the general lameness of the current /. community.

  131. The Sopranos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I saw .5 episodes of this. More HS dropout gorillas killing each other. Great. Just what I need to watch.

    The entertainment industry needs an enema. Ending this stupid show is a step in the right direction.

  132. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by zettabyte · · Score: 1

    Even David Chase said in an interview that the key to how it ends is in that first episode (Soprano Home Movies), and to make sure people would remember this he put Tony flashing back to that moment at the end of "#85 The Blue Comet."
    and

    ...coupled with the symbolism and David Chase's comments make me feel that he took one to the head.

    Do you have a link or reference to the article/interview where he states that? If you do that just about cinches the intent of the ending.

    Otherwise we're still speculating...

  133. He's alive by CFC_Web · · Score: 1
    The first 55 minutes of the show amounted to a happy ending, by Sopranos standards. At the end of the last episode, Tony was looking into the abyss. But he won -- the New York family sided with him against their own boss! -- and Phil lost. AJ turned around (to the extent he ever will). Tony and Paulie seemed closer than they have in a long time. Meadow is happy if clueless. There were some wonderful examples of the show's humor (AJ: "I'll have a leg up, as an Arabic speaker.")


    But then Chase reminds us that Tony's life is inherently unstable. One of his guys flipped. He's likely to be indicted. And then the last scene. Like everyone, I found the tension excruciating and I thought something awful was going to happen. But it didn't. The buildup of tension, the shots of suspicious characters in the diner, were reminders that Tony's world will never be safe. The dinner is a good time -- as AJ reminds us -- but the message of the ending is that good times are fleeting, the world is full of scary people, and death is never far away.


    Why do I think he didn't get killed? Well, because ... WHO WOULD KILL HIM at this moment? Phil is gone, and his crew explicitly endorsed the hit. And Tony, who is nothing if not cagey, feels safe enough to be out in public. To believe he was killed, you have to imagine killers not even hinted at IN THE ACTUAL STORY. This makes a lot less sense to me than the alternative.

  134. Tony is not dead! by Bueller_007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would like to espouse the theory that Tony is not dead. I believe *the viewer* is dead. People may have had a point about Tony dying if the series were shot primarily in first person. But it's not. And besides, Tony tied up most of his loose ends during the episode. Who was left to whack him? (Not to mention that David Chase seems to have taken some pains to add the little-known song "I'm Alive" by Tommy James & The Shondells to the jukebox list, and the fact that the final song was called "Don't Stop Believing".)

    No. *We* got shot by the suspicious Italian guy when he was coming out of the bathroom, or perhaps by the two African-American guys (just like Tony's close encounter in Season 1).

    Clearly the end was meant to be somewhat ambiguous (to understate the point), but I truly believe that the intention was to kill US, not to kill Tony. Life goes on for the Soprano family, just like it has in every other episode. It does NOT go on for us. The viewer finally experiences what has happened to so many other characters on the show. We're dead before we even hear the shot.

    Tony didn't get whacked. WE DID.

    I find it hard to believe that anyone would complain about the ending. It's difficult to get more closure on a TV show than one's own death.

    1. Re:Tony is not dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw this post on Sopranoland:

      "The credits at
      the end refer to the man at the counter just as "man in diner", not
      Nikki Leotardo. So here is what I found out. The guy at the bar is also
      credited as Nikki Leotardo. The same actor played him in the first part
      of season 6 during a brief sit down concerning the future of Vito. That
      wasn't that long ago. Apparently, he is the nephew of Phil. Phil's
      brother Nikki Senior was killed in 1976 in a car accident. Absolutely
      Genius!!!! David Chase is truly rewarding the true fans who pay
      attention to detail. So the point would have been that life continues
      and we may never know the end of the Sopranos. But if you pay attention
      to the history, you will find that all the answers lie in the characters
      in the restaurant. The trucker was the brother of the guy who was
      robbed by Christopher in Season 2. Remember the DVD players? The
      trucker had to identify the body. The boy scouts were in the train store
      and the black guys at the end were the ones who tried to kill Tony and
      only clipped him in the ear (was that season 2 or 3?). Absolutely
      incredible!!!! There were three people in the restaurant who had reason
      to kill Tony and then it just ends. This was Chase's way of proving that
      he will not escape his past. It will not go on forever despite that he
      would like it to "don't stop"."

      Thought it was interesting

    2. Re:Tony is not dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.eog.com/news/full-article.aspx?id=25632

      Update:

      That all sounds like urban (emerging) legend. The NY Times reviewer was on ESPN radio a couple hours ago and was asked about the Italian-looking guy at the counter and the 2 black guys, and if they appeared in earlier episodes. The NYT guy said no. The Italian-looking guy isn't even an actor. He works at a restaurant in the area and the Sopranos people asked him to do the scene because he looked the part. And Tony was supposed to have killed one of the black guys who tried to kill him way back when.

    3. Re:Tony is not dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. We got wacked. We talked about family business too much. We were greedy. We let in outsiders. We weren't loyal. We should have seen it coming but sometimes yo.........

  135. "This is the end, my only friend, the end. . ." by tekshogun · · Score: 1

    Paulie turned out not to be a turncoat in the end. The ending, whilst it pissed me off at first, makes close just fine and I should have expected. I want to re-watch the episode where Paulie and Christopher are chasing the Russian in the Pine Barrens. No closure there, but it became one of the show's most popular (if not the single most popular) episodes and I loved it. Just the speculation of what happened to the Russian, whom was beaten up and shot in the head. So now, the end of the series gave us just that, what you had watching Tony watch everyone else in the diner, anxiety as someone mentioned before. You can take the scene however you won't make your own story. It's over. I kind of like that, very poetic. Kind like the girl (or boy) you had a break-up with and while you may wish for it to continue and you still wonder what it would be like, you continue happy just the same. Certainly one of the best shows ever made for TV. This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end Of our elaborate plans, the end Of everything that stands, the end No safety or surprise, the end I'll never look into your eyes...again Can you picture what will be So limitless and free Desperately in need...of some...stranger's hand In a...desperate land Lost in a roman...wilderness of pain And all the children are insane All the children are insane Waiting for the summer rain, yeah There's danger on the edge of town Ride the king's highway, baby Weird scenes inside the gold mine Ride the highway west, baby Ride the snake, ride the snake To the lake, the ancient lake, baby The snake is long, seven miles Ride the snake...he's old, and his skin is cold The west is the best The west is the best Get here, and we'll do the rest The blue bus is callin' us The blue bus is callin' us Driver, where you taken' us The killer awoke before dawn, he put his boots on He took a face from the ancient gallery And he walked on down the hall He went into the room where his sister lived, and...then he Paid a visit to his brother, and then he He walked on down the hall, and And he came to a door...and he looked inside Father, yes son, I want to kill you Mother...i want to...fuck you C'mon baby, take a chance with us C'mon baby, take a chance with us C'mon baby, take a chance with us And meet me at the back of the blue bus Doin' a blue rock On a blue bus Doin' a blue rock C'mon, yeah Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end It hurts to set you free But you'll never follow me The end of laughter and soft lies The end of nights we tried to die This is the end ~'The End' by The Doors

  136. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by ArmyOfFun · · Score: 1

    I certainly think your interpretation makes sense. The other one does too (it was meant to reflect that Tony's life is a tense one where his untimely demise is always just around the corner). Soprano Home Movies captured this feel too (with Bobby in Tony's final episode role). Much of that episode was a tense buildup of Tony likely killing Bobby for beating him up (the wives worrying, the worry when Tony asks to pull over in the middle of nowhere). But it never comes, Tony doesn't harm a hair on Bobby's head.

    So, what was Chase referencing in Home Movies? The boat scene or the trip to meet the Canadians?

  137. Just like Seinfeld by zymano · · Score: 1

    Anyone think so?

  138. Re: Penultimate? by sasdrtx · · Score: 2, Informative

    He knows that, you pedantic twit. There's a good case to be made that the season's climax was in the next-to-last episode. Perhaps you don't agree, but that doesn't make his word usage wrong.

    --
    Most people don't even think inside the box.
  139. Vegas by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
    It completely sucked. It left you with thinking "he either got shot.. or didn't get shot."

    I wonder how Vegas is going to handle this. After all, they were taking bets on Will He or Won't He.

    Methinks the director is going to have to fess up as to wtf happened, less he end up on the wrong side of some "fade-to-black" folk.

  140. I feel... by christurkel · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out, "The fuck?"

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  141. I'm all up in knots by smwoflson · · Score: 1

    I must admit, I'm torn up about the episode. Part of me loves it. That was the absolutly most dramatic way it could end. Tony getting out of the business would have been sappy, overdone, and (I think) not in line with the rest of the show. Tony and the family getting killed would have been expected, overly dramatic, and not really in line with the rest of the show. But the way it did end was like "well, that's it..." with an elipsis. Just like the show has always been, an elipsis. No conclusions. No TV drama. It, more than most shows, did not cave in to television/movie conventions. It was not a story about a TV family; it was a story about a 'real' family. Yours or mine. This one just happens to be a mafia family, but its really not so different from anyone elses. And it ends in the in a very 'realistic' way: that is to say, it doesn't. As the last words in the episode say: "Don't stop..." Our minds fill in the "believin'."

    So I loved the ending, right? well, yes I did. But at the same time, I think it was a little bit of a cop out. This was probably the easiest way for the writters to end the serries: without doing anything. Indeed, they build all that tension in the final scene (more on that in a second), but then the show ends before even a hint of a payoff. Again, I get it. And part of me really likes it. But as realistic as this is...as much of a docudrama about an american family it is, it is still a television show. And we, as faithful viewers need some closure. Instead we get a /shrug "who knows" sort of ending. And a "wait till we cash in on a movie we say we aren't going to make, but then do when everyone wants another paycheck." So, on that level, it annoys me just a bit.

    But I still loved it. When the show ended, I said, out loud, "What the f***!" I honestly thought my TiVo didn't record everything. It was an amazing, gut reaction. It will be remembered.

    Now, a few quick points. I don't think that Tony dies after the black out. First, that is the TV drama ending that everyone expects. And, as we have seen, Sopranos does not give you what you expect. Second, it doesnt seem to fit with the "Families don't get hurt" stuff and the resolutions made in the final episode. Still, there was all that tension in the final scene. What I think that is is the life that Tony lives and will always live: there will always be that threat out there. So, the final scene is filled with tension. How much suspense can be built from Meadow trying to park a car? Holy crap! But its all a red herring. Its there but it isn't there. We see the suspicious guy sitting at the bar. We see the suspicious guy with the hat. But that doesn't mean they are killers. The point is: they could be... in the life of Tony. The threat is there but it is not there. Families don't go to war now. The real threat in Tony's life is from the upcomming indictments, not the guy at the bar. But Tony will be forever suspicious. So, he will always raise his head when someone comes in the door, just in case. In case it is a killer or a FBI. Who knows?

    But what about the 5 or so seconds of black without any music? Good question. It could signify death, but I think that is too obvious. I think this is the 'the series is over' queue, not the 'the family is over' queue. It was like lowing the curtain and the lights. The play is done. What happens happens. Life goes on, but the Sopranos show is done. There are stories that will never be told... and they will be more stories of a family just like yours and mine. Music would have suggested a continuance--some sort of resolution. Instead you have none--just like life. In life there aren't resolutions. There is just life.

    So yea, I was frustrated by the episode. And I wish that there were answers. But this ending was amazing nevertheless. I am sure that people will disagree with me, but that is just another reason the episode was so great: it leads to coversations.

  142. Re: We got wacked, not Tony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like that idea ^_^ although I have to admit I've never seen the show...

  143. Very clever ending by lotd · · Score: 1

    It was very clear that Tony was killed at the end. During the entire final scene after Tony sits at the booth, every time someone enters and the bell rings, the camera focuses on Tony for a second then you get Tony's perspective of the person coming in. As meadow runs up to the restaurant, the bell rings Tony looks up and rather than seeing meadow and hearing the music it suddenly becomes dark and silent (the fact that music also stopped confirmed it for me) and you are essentially seeing and hearing what Tony is: nothing.

  144. Lion King by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    Disney has both animated and live-stage musical versions of The Lion King.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    1. Re:Lion King by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      And they're coming out with a porn version, "The Loin King".

  145. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by pyite · · Score: 1

    The audience took one to the head. Not Tony. Tony being shot... big deal. Probably 50% of people hyping the show expected that. Anyone expect the audience to get whacked? Not I.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  146. Re:Ask? by repvik · · Score: 1

    Ok, since I got modded offtopic and redundant for asking, let me rephrase the question. Why the fuck is this in "Ask Slashdot"? I can't see a single questionmark in the story, can you?

  147. Agree: The viewer was wacked by leftie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pauley: "Some guy's been watchin' every ting we been doing for years. I took care of it."

  148. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by Talian · · Score: 1

    I felt it was more just that things go on. We just saw a brief peek in the life, not a beginning and an end. Our view into the life of the sopranos cut out, but life as it is for the fictional characters "goes on." Of course it's all very open to interpretation, but I choose to believe he lives on, at least for a while.

  149. Duh: Macrovision DRM on DVDs by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    If it's a plain ol' DVD, that will play back in any regular ol' DVD player, then there's no DRM. Considering all the hoops me and my old engineer buddy had to go through to get our DVDs to play on his crummy old TV, I might have to say that you sir, are full of shit.

    There is DRM a plenty on DVDs.
    Heck, region lock? Hello?
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Duh: Macrovision DRM on DVDs by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Okay... while the rest of us are in 2007 with our regionless players and devices which -all- either have the macrovision chip or yea olde 'signal cleaner' box which, as a 'side-effect' removes the macrovision spike.. for us, no, there's no real DRM to speak of.

      You -are- right, of course... region code is certainly a form of DRM. the macrovision spike is a form of DRM. But the barrier is pretty much non-existant; unlike the CSS -was-, and the AACS stuff 'is' (it might as well be considered 'was' by now as well - but who knows).

      What I meant was that there'd be no additional DRM on the things - as the players would not be able to play them back.

      =====

      As somebody who's worked in an electronics repair shop, I'm extremely curious what TV that is though :)

  150. Sopranos: A National Rorschach Test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyway - that's what a blogger on Multichannel.com said. Kinda interesting. Here's the link:
    http://www.multichannel.com/blog/1300000330/post/9 90010499.html

  151. 8 Minute Sopranos by aichpvee · · Score: 1

    Since I've never watched the Sopranos how about someone add the last season to 7 Minute Sopranos so that I can see what happens.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  152. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    HBO hates, hates, hates time-shifting

    Which is why they put everything on On-Demand the day after it airs. Bastards!

  153. horrible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was as if millions of unresolved plotlines suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

  154. Oh Jeez by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Gimme a break.
    I am not one for the 'it doesn't belong on slashdot' complaint, but I can not see if the slightest reason this should be on slashdot.

    And no, it doesn't matter.
    Maybe next week we can have stories about American Idol and which TV anchor has the best fuckin' hair.

    BTW, I am using Safari on windows, so all misspelling are Apple's fault. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  155. They all die by Cycon · · Score: 1
    First off, as far as our relation as viewers to the characters themselves, they are all "dead" now that the series is over.

    For the director, writers, actors, and everyone else involved with the show's production, these roles have all been played for the last time.

    Second, beyond the open-ended cliffhanger regarding Tony, I feel they did a good job of walking each major personna across the stage for a final bow over the course of the final episodes.

    Third, as far as Tony is concerned, we don't know what happens but does it really matter? Its implied that he might be killed suddenly by the shifty-looking character who walks past into the bathroom, especially considering Bobby's remarks during the "Soprano Home Movies" episode and the flashback last week, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. Of course with Phil dead (and Tony having received permission prior) there is nothing in the episode to suggest who might still want to have him killed or why. It may be that the two guys walking into the restaurant just before Meadow are Feds coming to arrest him - even if he isn't killed that night it is understood that he'll have to face the Rico case that been built against him throughout the series. Perhaps nothing happens at all everything follows what others have stated, that the last five minutes are just expressing to the what every moment of Tony's life is like, never knowing what might happen next. The greatest part of about the ending (whether you liked it or not) is that it opens the floor for the viewers to think, discuss, and decide for themselves.

    Finally, bonus points simply for being different.

    --
    Your Brain + EEG + LEGO Robots = Brainstorms
  156. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good points! I had forgotten about the foreshadowing previously, but I totally got the fact that he was killed (after hurling an expletive at my TV cable, thinking it had gone out at THE most inopportune time). The screen goes black, you're shot in an instant. Like those old Jetta commercials where the passengers are chatting and then bam, they're in an accident, catches the audience off guard, because that's what car accidents are like. Plus, a show that always ended with music, ended in silence and black, in memoriam, for Tony.

  157. Better BBC shows by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    It was on here (Canada), but I didn't watch it. Never got in to it.

    The series finale that had me gibbering "What the fuck?! What the fuck?! What the fuck?!" was Life on Mars. That was fun.

    ...laura who was 12 in 1973

  158. Viewer disappointment & Rorschach tests? by gordette · · Score: 1

    covered in Multichannel News. The blogger calls Sopranos a "national Rorschach test" which pretty much sums it up, for me anyway. http://www.multichannel.com/blog/1300000330/post/9 90010499.html Also, this blogger spotted the NY Post television columnist fishing the HBO board for viewers who were threatening to cancel their subscriptions...so I guess we'll be seeing that story pop-up soon, too.

  159. Re:Soprano's and tech? by rlazarus · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! You have discovered the primary distinction between a democratic country and a privately-owned website. Have a cookie.

  160. What is a 'soprano'? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Oh, some lame TV show. Thanks for wasting my time.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:What is a 'soprano'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god you posted. I was wondering what nurb432 though. Now I can rest assured that he's better than the rest of us.

  161. Re:Tony's reply: "nothing, everything just goes bl by shma · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is the exact dialog from that episode:

    'Bobby: "I mean yeah, our line of work, it's always out there...bet you don't even hear it when it happens, right?"
    Tony: "Ask your friend in there, on the wall"
    Bobby: "(laughs) Listen to us...morbid fucks." '

    Nowhere does anyone say 'everything goes black', or anything even remotely like that (and if you want to see what it looks like to 'not even hear it', I suggest you re-watch the execution of Jerry Torciano). The truth is that there are some people out there who just have to have some kind of closure to the series, people who have to see the bad guys get what they deserve. Well, that didn't happen here. Think of all the times he evaded death or capture, mostly through shear luck. Hell, look at the beginning of the episode! Are you honestly saying that the whole series was nothing more than a series of red herrings leading right up to the last second? I have more respect for the writers than that. If there was going to be a surprise hit, why bother with Phil ordering the 'decapitation' of the Family, or the entire second to last episode?

    Personally, I find fans like to play guessing games now with shows, looking for symbolism and clues that aren't even there. Sometimes, what you see is what you get, and what you see is the Sopranos, presented one last time for our viewing pleasure. Remember the last lines:

    'AJ:"...right. Focus on the good times."
    Tony: "Don't be sarcastic."
    AJ: "Isn't that what you said one time? Try and remember the times that were good?"
    Tony:"I did? Well, it's true,I guess."'

    --
    I came here for a good argument
  162. inconsistant by floatt · · Score: 1

    That's fine to say the ending was artsy and made you think. All true, though I would argue, "To what end?" Either way, the end was totally inconsistent with the rest of the series. The show makes the viewer remember things and understand things, but hasn't ever implied things before. Even after Tony was shot and had the dreams of being dead for a few episodes the viewer wasn't left hanging. Some speculation, sure, but even though it could have gone either way it didn't. Calling the ending an artistic existential triumph is a little much. It's never been that before and shouldn't have been now.

  163. harry potter spoiler *alert* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the last chapter is just blank pages

  164. Religious bigotry is now "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When Scientologists are bashed for abusing the legal system, that's OK.
    When Scientologists are bashed for breaking the law or harassing people, that's OK.
    But just mocking their belief system? How is that defensible?

    OK, they believe in thetans and attempt to audit them out. So? Why am I supposed to laugh at that when the supermajority of the world believes similarly barmy nonsense?

    1. Re:Religious bigotry is now "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientologists do not try to audit out thetans. There is no way to audit out a thetan as the thetan is the spirit, the life force of the body, there is no way to audit one out. There is a way to forcefully remove a thetan from a body, shoot the body with a gun, shoot it a few times and make sure the body is no longer functioning and you will have removed the thetan. I also would like to thank the person above that posted about religious intolerance not being humorous, it really isn't and just shows that you are a bad person at heart.

  165. The point wasn't alive or dead by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The point was to make the viewers feel, if only for a few moments, the way Tony Soprano feels every single moment of his life.

    The absolute paranoia. The focus on every single little detail. The search for the smallest scrap of meaning in anything as if our lives depended on it because they do.

    I watched it with a bunch of friends and every single one of us was on the edge of our seats, every single one of us was muttering something along the lines of "oh, no, here it comes," and every single one of us jumped when it went to black, just completely confused.

    As endings go, Six Feet Under was *closure* and it was brilliant. The Sopranos wasn't closure, not by a long shot, but it left me with something just as satisfying - I got it. I finally understood, just for a minute, how Tony Soprano works and I felt sympathy for this monster.

    That's pretty good in my book!

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  166. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that addresses the logical fallacy of responding to criticism with "go away if you don't like it" how, exactly? If I don't like it, but I like the site, why shouldn't I express my grievances in the hope that things will change?

    Wasn't Slashdot designed to be democratic in nature, anyway?

    Why is a privately-owned website whose entire raison d'etre is centered around public contributions and activity supposed to be immune from criticism?

  167. Just like Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sopranos finale left me feeling exactly like the last season of Stargate. The Space channel in Canada just dropped Stargate altogether about one third into the last season after carrying it for a decade. It was only about 5 months later that I read here on slashdot that Stargate actually ran for another five months. I'm still pissed at the Space channel.

    The Sopranos suffered from the same affliction as Stargate in later seasons, the spark of creativity that was present in the early seasons slowly dwindled to nothing in the last few seasons.

    The last few seasons of the Sopranos were a bloody low grade family soap opera. I'd watch All My Children, Coronation street or the Eastenders if I wanted that shite. I'm not the least bit surprised they used such a weak final episode, it pretty much sums up what happened to the series.

  168. Technical Glitch by Forrest+Kyle · · Score: 1

    I think it would be funny if there actually was this elaborate, climactic ending, but there was a horrible technical glitch at HBO and the episode was accidentally cut off. Then the network panicked and decided to just leave it how it was shown and let everyone go nuts talking about it.

    1. Re:Technical Glitch by dipskinny · · Score: 1

      AWESOME!! If this were true, it'd be one of the best cover-ups, ever!! I can just hear the head engineer of the HBO crew threaten the others .... "If one of you snitches, your all dead!"

  169. I hate you! And I hate the bands you like! by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

    nt

  170. who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cmdrdildo is a fucking fucktard who thinks he rocks. he's an arrogent shithead with no skills and no desire to see through on what he claims to beleive in. fuck slashdot. troll this bitch to death!

  171. Chock full of even more anti-American propaganda ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A.J. is apparently the writer's voice this season in expressing his hatred of America and the Bush administration. He's moved on from Meadow and her "poor little innocent Muslim victims" kick. It seems more fitting that this hatred be emoted by a whining, quivering pile of bisexuality like AJ, though I'm sure that wasn't the primary intention.

    Merely alluded to in other episodes, since its the finale he goes all out. "...jerkoff fantasy that we're winning" or some such. Sorry flakey pacifists, but we ARE winning. If we didn't have mewling enemy collaborators like you to fill our legal system with crap lawsuits, and to saturate young minds with your lies through your media/university control, this war would have been over long ago. But since we have to care what you bedwetters and what murderous 7th century religion-crazed barbarians think of us, it has drug on for years.

    Truth is, people like this WANT us to lose. The alternative is to finally accept that their "multiculturalism/diversity/take-it-in-the-ass-cau se-it-must-have-been-something-YOU-did-to-deserve- it" curriculum has been wrong all along. And that, they cannot do.

  172. He was dead the whole season.... by Lagerhowen · · Score: 1

    Guess not many people noticed... If you pause last nights episode, he comes from jr to the diner at the end in black coat and grey shirt- he SEES HIMSELF at a table - then it cuts to him in a diff shirt - THE SAME shirt from s6e1 when jr shot him. Was he dead the whole season?

    1. Re:He was dead the whole season.... by amrust · · Score: 1

      Wow, I *just* watched the ep on my Tivo, and noticed that very same thing.

      Somebody said it's the same shirt from the first episode, but I don't have that one.

      --
      VOTE!
    2. Re:He was dead the whole season.... by dipskinny · · Score: 1

      wow ... not!

      I just watched the diner scene ... again. But to me, it looks like Tony was wearing the same shirt he walked in with. The black collar is hard to see, but you can just make it out under his jacket when he walks into the diner. Also, I'll admit the sequence of edits makes it seem like he sees himself at the table. But he clearly doesn't. Instead the editor just skipped the part of Tony walking to the diner table.

      Move along. Nothing to see here.

    3. Re:He was dead the whole season.... by Lagerhowen · · Score: 1

      Thats not what I said... He wasn't wearing that shirt when he visited Junior.

  173. Re: HBO giving the finger to the Tivo generation.. by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

    Here's my belated Sopranos prediction: Within a few short months, certainly in time for Christmas, the alternate endings will appear on DVD. This will be heavily advertised. The base price DVDs will be a piece of crap. Ysou'll have to buy the collector's edition to get the alternate endings plus other "exclusive" content. The DVD will use a "better" encryption than ever before, followed by the inevitable posting of the decryption key or keys by some geek on digg.

    And I will get a copy of it from tvtorrents. It's gonna be sweet.

  174. Something to add to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...The opening shot of 'Made In America'. Tony lying prose in his bed, eyes closed, church bells going off, all harken to a funeral. Or an up-and-coming one. I don't see how so many people missed mentioning that shot in their reviews of the last episode...

  175. Re:Soprano's and tech? by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    Couldn't find them on eMusic or iTunes. That's unfortunate.

    I found their site, interesting to say the least. I like real country (Old Crow Medicine Show, Hank Williams, Doc Watson, Buckaroos) and I like electronic music (Thievery Corp, Colder, Thunderball, Portishead, etc). I don't know if they do as much for me, but I'll give it another listen. Interesting mixture of music, though. Not many folks fusing country and electronic, you know?

    --
    blah blah blah
  176. I remember by Interfacer · · Score: 1

    I was a Blakes fan when the show ran in Belgium, 20 years ago or something close to it.
    I remember the ending scene. Most of the 7 shot down, and what's-his-name being completely surrounded, standing ready with his gun in his hand....
    The end...

    Not a bad ending actually. Not knowing can make it much more interesting.
    Like not knowing the contents of the box in 'Ronin' for example.

    1. Re:I remember by mgv · · Score: 1

      I was a Blakes fan when the show ran in Belgium, 20 years ago or something close to it.
      I remember the ending scene. Most of the 7 shot down, and what's-his-name being completely surrounded, standing ready with his gun in his hand....
      The end...


      Ok, it seems hard to put spoilers in for a show as old as Blakes7, but..

      Spoiler Warning
      There was an official sequel to Blakes7, called AfterLife. It never made it to film form, to my knowledge.

      However, it revealed that two of the Blakes7 cast members survived - Avon and Villa.

      Villa survived because he dropped to the ground as soon as he heard shooting - a fairly creditable thing for him to do.

      The final shooting after the fade to black wasn't Avon getting shot, either - rather more it was bad news for the federation troops.

      The only problem with the book, was that by the time you go to the end, the future was so bleak, and so Blakes7 like, that you just wished that Avon and Villa had died and it all ended there...

      Michael
      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  177. better than the rest of us by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Why yes, yes i am. Nice of you to finally notice.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  178. It's The Cat by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

    Brilliant, brilliant ending. I had the same viewer reactions everybody else did - but that's what you're SUPPOSED to feel for thirty seconds as a viewer. The ending itself has to last on forever upon endless reflection after those thirty seconds are over as being a worthy finale. The key, of course, is the cat - the final animal used to define Tony in a symbolic sense. (Hey, you don't think it was just coincidence that there was the sound of ducks off camera when waste was dumped into their pond water when Tony "got it" in a bone-dry desert a few episodes back, do ya?) This was no normal cat - Tony theorizes it can sense dead things behind walls. That's about as oblique a reference as you can get for the ultimate in existentialism, namely Schrodinger's Cat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrodinger's_cat So now Tony lives on forever in a storybook quantum instant where all possible outcomes exist, both alive and dead simultaneously, and the viewer never gets to look in the box and see (or by looking, determine absolutely) Tony's ultimate outcome. Brilliant, brilliant ending, Mr. Chase. Kudos to you.

  179. Re:Soprano's and tech? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Heh, from your listings you should get on with them ok. I'm surprised they dont feature in the online stores though, seeing as they had the exposure of the Soprano's thing. I'm not usualy one for listening to lyrics but most of their tunes get a chuckle out of me, all very knowing stuff if you know what I mean. I fondly imagine that the folks over at Alt.Slack might play music like this.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  180. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's right. white, middle-class males with excellent job outlooks deserve absolutely no rights. as long as they keep on toiling away with their excellent job outlooks - to pay for all the dregs. fuck you racist asshole.

  181. Re:Soprano's and tech? by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

    I've never understood that - why is it embarrassing to purchase tampons? Are you ashamed of buying toilet paper? Afraid to buy condoms?

    Good grief. It's better than buying adult diapers I bet.

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  182. that's a hell of a box by SaberTaylor · · Score: 1

    Adiabatic sun-protection-factor 10^8 membrane is more like it.
    In other words, a 1990's style blackhole is required for macroscopic quantum entanglement.

    Great ending, btw. Good tunes, good times. Thanks, writers for re-working the #1 movie.

    --
    If you need text styles to communicate then you don't have a message.
  183. Re:Soprano's and tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you ashamed of buying toilet paper?

    Yes.

    Afraid to buy condoms?

    Yes.

    Personal hygiene, while prized highly in the United States, is also generally taboo. It's embarrassing to be seen at the grocery checkout with a 12-roll pack of 2-ply tucked under your arm, even though it's absurd to imply that you somehow have no need to purchase toilet paper. Same thing with condoms, plus you tack on the stigma associated with prophylactics and sex in general around here.

  184. Good Riddance by fongaboo · · Score: 1

    Good riddance to Sopranos.. Maybe HBO will make a drama series about ruthless Jewish bankers now..

  185. Re:Soprano's and tech? by cparker15 · · Score: 1

    -1, Troll, eh?

    Truth hurts, doesn't it?

    --
    Have you driven a fnord... lately?

    You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.