How ironic that you used the word "responsible". A responsible person weighs the impact of different problems and solutions, and acts accordingly. This involves seeing that tightening pollution standards raises prices, weakens the economy, and thereby relatively strengthens people who want to kill Americans. A responsible person fights the anti-civilization killers, instead of pretending that they're not a problem as Clinton and Carter did.
In related news, all persons purchasing DVDs will have their eyes glued permanently open, their heads glued to the TV screen, so that they must view each frame of the movie as the director intended. No more closing your eyes to avoid seeing that painful scene. No more walking away to get a drink when the action slows.
Please get this straight. It's so simple, and almost everyone gets it wrong. Life has existed as a continuum for millions of years. The question is not "When does this clump of cells become alive?" It is obviously alive and has been for some time. The proper question is "When does this clump of cells become an (individual) human being?"!
For a big ship, a movable keel is probably not an economical option. If you need the keel for sailing in the open ocean, you can't pretend it's not there when you're using your engines in port.
HP was an engineering company selling to engineers, starting from their very first product, an audio oscillator. It should come as no surprise that engineers have a better idea of what enginneers want and need than marketing personnel do.
Thanks for ponting to an interesting article. I don't understand how this differs from forged vanadium steel, which has been used for long enough in high quality tools that a claim of "vanadium steel" is now used even in cheap tools.
Your economic analysis is important and correct. However,
"The key is balancing their needs against the rest of society."
is completely wrong. At all times, in all circumstances, the proper guidance for public policy is the maintenance of justice. This means protecting individual rights (which are the only rights that exist.) Any attempt to "balance needs" results in the violation of the rights of those "balanced" against.
About 25 years ago someone in NH didn't like the motto and painted over it on his plates. He got in legal trouble for doing so, and a lawsuit ensued. How interesting that both sides had a self-contradictory position: the state claiming that no freedom to oppose freedom existed, and the car owner claiming the freedom to oppose freedom.
Your advice would have been useless to him. He never let them in; they forced their way in once he opened the door. In light of that, what should he have done? Go to an upstairs window and speak to them through the open window?
Assuming he could tell in advance that this would go badly, his best bet would probably have been to phone neighbors and say, "Help. Help. I need witnesses." But then, in all likelihood, he would have been arrested for inciting a riot.
Now, he should probably sell his home and flee. He will never be safe in a city where he has gotten the enmity of the police.
Nashua has a population of about 100,000, large enough for police to be beyond effective civilian control and to protect its bad apples. Also large enough to have a thriving population of lowlifes; he needs to get his sons out of there. Overall, Nashua is pretty nice, but there are rundown areas.
The people who cause the trouble spots in the world - Sadam Hussein, Qadhafi, Kim Jong-il, et alii - are like spoiled children with far too much power. It's the adults of the world whose responsibility it is to punish or eliminate these foul men before they become even more damaging. (Insert Godwin's law here.) To oppose war and fail to recognize that in most cases one side is much more evil than the other, is like failing to fight cancer because "It's a living thing, too."
Emphasizing academics and teachers seems accurate to me. They spend a lot of time with youngsters, and the attitudes rub off. Evidence is available in the extreme left-wing political bias common among educators, and high union membership to replace mommy and daddy.
"These are few points made by an ex-atheist historian who tried to falsify bible based on historical context, he failed and became christian.
You must not have tried very hard. Nazareth and several other towns alleged to have existed during the alleged life of Jesus have been demonstrated not to have existed during the period 0 to 50 of the Common Era.
If aerodynamic drag is the primary form of resistance to motion, doubling the power will only increase top speed by 26%. This is a cube root relation, assuming that the type of air flow (laminar, attached, etc.) does not change. Furthermore, doubling the available power should not cut MPG by as much as half, even if it is done very clumsily.
But at -5 K the processing speed would become negative, and the CPU would become an uncomputer. Feed it results, and it provides the raw data. Useful for decryption.
12 miles is a problem. Long lines have loading coils to boost the line's characteristic impedance in the voice range. These coils effectively block high frequencies. They must be replaced with repeaters or other expensive devices. The twisted pairs must be consistent (to avoid reflections) and in good condition (no broken or degraded insulation). Replacing the twisted pair to your isloated farm every twenty years or so as the cables age is not an inexpensive operation.
Some rural areas don't have twisted pair, but still rely on open pairs. Sending high frequencies through these is not likely to be practical.
Page 3 of the June 15, 2006 issue of Investors Business Daily neatly refutes the myth that the discovery of penicillin was an accident or the result of sloppiness.
"A researcher in bacteriology, Fleming didn't throw anything away for at least two weeks after he'd worked on it. Instead, he let it sit on his desk for a while, to see whether there was any change in his thinking or in the projects themselves before he scrapped anything."
His discovery was the result of a deliberate, systematic practice.
The idea that streaming is bad is jealous stupidity. No person capable of doing more should be held back to the pace of a dolt. No dummy could keep pace with a highly intelligent person learning at his proper rate, no matter how hard the dummy tried.
Carried to it's logical conclusion, keeping everyone at the same pace would destroy civilization because no-one could learn more than the moron. Who could ever become a doctor or an engineer?
There's a big difference in how the body reacts to sugar, and how the body reacts to chemicals that are eventually converted to sugar. The ability to convert other chemicals into sugar allows people to not have to eat sugar.
Sugar isn't just one chemical, there are many that qualify as sugars. There are also sweet alcohols (like xylitol) that can replace sucrose or fructose in some applications, with advantages like not promoting cavities.
"I've heard it described as the technology gap will, and has already started to push the first and third worlds further apart. More importantly, it is becoming ever more difficult to improve the living conditions and economies as this gap widens."
So your claim is that impoverished nations, too poor to help themselves, are capable of helping other impoverished nations? The primary cause of national poverty is tyranny.
Slashdot Mirror
How ironic that you used the word "responsible". A responsible person weighs the impact of different problems and solutions, and acts accordingly. This involves seeing that tightening pollution standards raises prices, weakens the economy, and thereby relatively strengthens people who want to kill Americans. A responsible person fights the anti-civilization killers, instead of pretending that they're not a problem as Clinton and Carter did.
Q.E.D.
Religious: "All men are created equal before God." God values each soul equally.
Political: "All men are created equal before the law." This expresses a goal of justice, that the law be applied impartially.
Using the shortened version is a cheap, dishonest, populist trick.
This is a complete non sequitur because homosexuals (assuming they act only as homosexuals) do not reproduce.
We do not yet know how or why homosexuality exists.
In related news, all persons purchasing DVDs will have their eyes glued permanently open, their heads glued to the TV screen, so that they must view each frame of the movie as the director intended. No more closing your eyes to avoid seeing that painful scene. No more walking away to get a drink when the action slows.
Please get this straight. It's so simple, and almost everyone gets it wrong. Life has existed as a continuum for millions of years. The question is not "When does this clump of cells become alive?" It is obviously alive and has been for some time. The proper question is "When does this clump of cells become an (individual) human being?"!
For a big ship, a movable keel is probably not an economical option. If you need the keel for sailing in the open ocean, you can't pretend it's not there when you're using your engines in port.
HP was an engineering company selling to engineers, starting from their very first product, an audio oscillator. It should come as no surprise that engineers have a better idea of what enginneers want and need than marketing personnel do.
Thanks for ponting to an interesting article. I don't understand how this differs from forged vanadium steel, which has been used for long enough in high quality tools that a claim of "vanadium steel" is now used even in cheap tools.
"The key is balancing their needs against the rest of society."
is completely wrong. At all times, in all circumstances, the proper guidance for public policy is the maintenance of justice. This means protecting individual rights (which are the only rights that exist.) Any attempt to "balance needs" results in the violation of the rights of those "balanced" against.
About 25 years ago someone in NH didn't like the motto and painted over it on his plates. He got in legal trouble for doing so, and a lawsuit ensued. How interesting that both sides had a self-contradictory position: the state claiming that no freedom to oppose freedom existed, and the car owner claiming the freedom to oppose freedom.
Assuming he could tell in advance that this would go badly, his best bet would probably have been to phone neighbors and say, "Help. Help. I need witnesses." But then, in all likelihood, he would have been arrested for inciting a riot.
Now, he should probably sell his home and flee. He will never be safe in a city where he has gotten the enmity of the police.
Nashua has a population of about 100,000, large enough for police to be beyond effective civilian control and to protect its bad apples. Also large enough to have a thriving population of lowlifes; he needs to get his sons out of there. Overall, Nashua is pretty nice, but there are rundown areas.
The people who cause the trouble spots in the world - Sadam Hussein, Qadhafi, Kim Jong-il, et alii - are like spoiled children with far too much power. It's the adults of the world whose responsibility it is to punish or eliminate these foul men before they become even more damaging. (Insert Godwin's law here.) To oppose war and fail to recognize that in most cases one side is much more evil than the other, is like failing to fight cancer because "It's a living thing, too."
Emphasizing academics and teachers seems accurate to me. They spend a lot of time with youngsters, and the attitudes rub off. Evidence is available in the extreme left-wing political bias common among educators, and high union membership to replace mommy and daddy.
You must not have tried very hard. Nazareth and several other towns alleged to have existed during the alleged life of Jesus have been demonstrated not to have existed during the period 0 to 50 of the Common Era.
Wrong. Atheism makes no predictions about (creatures with) an intelligence far greater than man's.
Atheism denies the existence of anything outside of nature.
Nature exists. Nature is all that exists, and is all that can exist.
Your statement is self-contradictory. A "child molestation, rape, murder, or terrorist act" IS a "violation of fundamential civil right principles."
If aerodynamic drag is the primary form of resistance to motion, doubling the power will only increase top speed by 26%. This is a cube root relation, assuming that the type of air flow (laminar, attached, etc.) does not change. Furthermore, doubling the available power should not cut MPG by as much as half, even if it is done very clumsily.
But at -5 K the processing speed would become negative, and the CPU would become an uncomputer. Feed it results, and it provides the raw data. Useful for decryption.
Some rural areas don't have twisted pair, but still rely on open pairs. Sending high frequencies through these is not likely to be practical.
"A researcher in bacteriology, Fleming didn't throw anything away for at least two weeks after he'd worked on it. Instead, he let it sit on his desk for a while, to see whether there was any change in his thinking or in the projects themselves before he scrapped anything."
His discovery was the result of a deliberate, systematic practice.
Pentodes have three grids in series. These so-called three-gate FETS are more like having three gates in parallel.
Carried to it's logical conclusion, keeping everyone at the same pace would destroy civilization because no-one could learn more than the moron. Who could ever become a doctor or an engineer?
Sugar isn't just one chemical, there are many that qualify as sugars. There are also sweet alcohols (like xylitol) that can replace sucrose or fructose in some applications, with advantages like not promoting cavities.
So your claim is that impoverished nations, too poor to help themselves, are capable of helping other impoverished nations? The primary cause of national poverty is tyranny.
The phrase you are looking for is "per se".