Slashdot Mirror


Immaturity Level Rising in Adults

Ant writes to tell us that a Discovery News article is exploring the old adage, "like a kid at heart", which may be closer to the truth than we would like to admit. New research is showing that grown-ups are more immature than ever. From the article: "Specifically, it seems a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth. As a consequence, many older people simply never achieve mental adulthood, according to a leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry."

862 comments

  1. To that I say... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are all just poopy-heads! Big, smelly, ugly, poopy-heads!

    --
    Space for rent, inquire within
    1. Re:To that I say... by Zindagi · · Score: 1

      Wheeeee..adults are immature. Wheeeeee

      --
      Everyone I talk to didnt vote for him - how is he in office ..for the second time ?
    2. Re:To that I say... by Skidge · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They are all just poopy-heads! Big, smelly, ugly, poopy-heads!

      Nu-uh! You're a poopy-head!
    3. Re:To that I say... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, um, you've got cooties!

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:To that I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the immortal words of Eric Cartman, "Screw you guys ... [*points*] ... I'm going home."

      Maaaaam, Skidge called me a poopy-head! Can I have some more cheesy poofs?

    5. Re:To that I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are, but what am I :p

    6. Re:To that I say... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Well, um, you've got cooties!

      He'd have to be a girl for that, and we all know there are no girls on Slashdot.

      At least, there aren't supposed to be any until sometime around the Apocalypse. I think one of the four horsemen is actually supposed to be a female Slashdotter.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    7. Re:To that I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a wall and you're like glue, what you say bounces off me and sticks to you............

    8. Re:To that I say... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna hold my breath until they stop saying that. Then they'll be sorry!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:To that I say... by Photar · · Score: 1

      I'm rubber and your glue...

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    10. Re:To that I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > Everyone I talk to didnt vote for him - how is he in office ..for the second time ?

      Because you only talk to people who you agree with. This can cause emotional stunting and atrophy in the various brain parts associated with... well, with everything.

  2. Boooo! by jamesjw · · Score: 0, Redundant



    The original poster has farty pants!

    And on that note, my work as an adult is done :)

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  3. Myspace by xoran99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Case in point: How many "adults" have a myspace account? I'll admit it...

    --

    Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

    1. Re:Myspace by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

      You failed it.

    2. Re:Myspace by crazyjimmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Myspace? Bah.

      How many of us post on /. ???

    3. Re:Myspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not me.
      Oh damn...

    4. Re:Myspace by deevnil · · Score: 1
      I gots a myspace account, it's great. Twice a month I get together with in meatspace with internet ppl for coffee. Most of us are in out 30s and so far I've met about 15 ppl in the area that I wouldn't know otherwise.

      :p

    5. Re:Myspace by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Informative

      Myspace started with a group of 20-somethings and 30-somethings from the California area(1). It was all adults when I joined around 3M. They didn't even allow kids on.

      (1) Change the friendID to see the first members:
      http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us er.viewprofile&friendid=2

    6. Re:Myspace by diamondmagic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You even post replies like you have one.
      ("ppl"? give me a break... You are on SLASHDOT. Sorry.)

    7. Re:Myspace by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      Case in point: How many "adults" have a myspace account? I'll admit it...
      Probably a lot, there are tons of sexual predators on myspace.
      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Myspace by sgt_doom · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Naaah...you're confused --- this article means those adults who are always arguing about facts, as if they can never accept them.

      You know, the BUSH SUPPORTERS....

    9. Re:Myspace by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      "Ppl" is the proper perfunctory infarctive of "people," which is absolutely correct in online conversations. Check your Strunk and White.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    10. Re:Myspace by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to check the "Post as AC" dealy.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
    11. Re:Myspace by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      Yes I know that.
      Too bad Slashdot isn't an IM service.

  4. Resignation. by haeger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    [Stolen from some website]

    Adult Resignation
    To Whom It May Concern:

    I am hereby officially tendering my resignation as an adult.

    I have decided I would like to accept the responsibilities of a 6 year old again.

    I want to go to McDonald's and think that it's a four star restaurant.
    I want to sail sticks across a fresh mud puddle and make ripples with rocks.
    I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.
    I want to play kickball during recess and paint with watercolors in art.
    I want to lie under a big Oak tree and run a lemonade stand with my friends on a hot summers day.
    I want to return to a time when life was simple.
    When all you knew were colors, addition tables and simple nursery rhymes. But that didn't bother you, because you didn't know what you didn't know and you didn't care.
    When all you knew was to be happy because you didn't know all the things that should make you worried and upset.
    I want to think that the world is fair. That everyone in it is honest and good.
    I want to believe that anything is possible.
    Somewhere in my youth...I matured and I learned too much.

    I learned of nuclear weapons, war, prejudice, starvation and abused children.
    I learned of lies, unhappy marriages, suffering, illness, pain and death.
    I learned of a world where men left their families to go and fight for our country, and returned only to end up living on the streets... begging for their next meal.
    I learned of a world where children knew how to kill...and did.

    What happened to the time when we thought that everyone would live because we didn't grasp the concept of death?
    When we thought the worst thing in the world was if someone took the jump rope from you or picked you last for kickball?

    I want to be oblivious to the complexity of life and be overly excited by little things once again. I want to return to the days when reading was fun and music was clean. When television was used to report the news or for family entertainment and not to promote sex, violence and deceit.

    I remember being naive and thinking that everyone was happy because I was.
    I would walk on the beach and only think of the sand between my toes and the prettiest seashell I could find.
    I would spend my afternoon climbing trees and riding my bike.

    I didn't worry about time, bills or where I was going to find the money to fix my car.
    I used to wonder what I was going to do or be when I grew up, not worry about what I'll do if this doesn't work out.

    I want to live simple again.
    I don't want my day to consist of computer crashes, mountains of paperwork, depressing news, how to survive more days in the month than there is money in the bank, doctor bills, gossip, illness and loss of loved ones.
    I want to believe in the power of smiles, hugs, a kind word, truth, justice, peace, dreams, the imagination, mankind and making angels in the snow.

    I want to be 6 again.

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Resignation. by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      *Sniff* Man, you rock. You totally rock!

      To being a kid again! /raises rootbeer float

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.

      Clearly you were unimaginative as a kid, and thus missed out on the special trip to the hospital.

      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour.

    3. Re:Resignation. by MrPsycho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Find a fucking hobby.

    4. Re:Resignation. by dhalgren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want that too.

      Now I just have to find somebody to clothe, feed, and house me while I indulge myself.

    5. Re:Resignation. by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny
      Clearly you were unimaginative as a kid, and thus missed out on the special trip to the hospital.

      Wow, you guys went to a hospital ?
      We went to a place called "Enterprise Village", but I was sick on the day everyone picked jobs, & got stuck working a dead end job as a cashier at Eckerd Drugs instead of the radio station like I wanted.

      Holy Shit ! I just realized that thoose special trips really do have an effect on the rest of your life !
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    6. Re:Resignation. by cybercobra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that goddamed phoney Holden Caufield was placed in today's world, I'm sure he'd have written a similar document.
      For Chrissake, it even mentions his desire to be a child again, like that phoney Michael Jackson.

      ========
      Ignorance is empty, meaningless bliss.

    7. Re:Resignation. by Chrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't like what I've found, so rather than do what I can to change anything for the better, I'd rather revert to a state of ignorance and pretend there's nothing to fix."

      I find this to be a rather appalling abdication of responsibility. Which I suppose is the entire point.

    8. Re:Resignation. by Skroggtar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmm. I don't quite agree.

      Being young, wee and full of vim is certainly a fun thing to be; of course our memories of the times are rosy and wondrous, etc. etc. But saying such glory cannot be found again, that innocence and purity and what-have-you are vital to true happiness is misguided and overly nostalgic. I'm sixteen years old, and despite the weight of earning the driver's license, getting a job, working on those grades, and the horrors of social contact in general, I'm twice (if not thrice!) as happy as I was when I was six. It's the feeling of moderate independence, the freedom to make absurd decisions that in no way affect the long term, the feeling of accomplishment at just about everything you do (well at least all the stuff you like), and (especially) the quasi-distorted, palpable, truly scrumptious view of the future.

      I know that eventually I'll have to trade it in for some less-than-stellar job and a smelly home with a wife I quickly tire of, but in the meantime, life is as delicious as a ham salad, and just as savory.

      In other words, I'm more correct than you.

    9. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just want to say I hate shit like this.

      This chain-letter bullshit is all the same. On some ultra-shallow level it seems great, and sentimental, but with 3 seconds of thought and usually two sentences in it becomes obvious what trite crap it is. Whether it's wanting to be 6, or learning everything you need to know from your dog, or whatever other BS that gets mailed around it all sounds like it was written by the same person on a Robotussin binge. Just awful stuff, horribly written and with no intellectual value whatsoever.

      On a less general note, if you want to be 6 again, fuck off and go be 6. Work in a factory, it's got about the same level of responsibility. It doesn't sound like somebody whistfully remembering childhood, it sounds like a man-child that doesn't want to contribute to society because it's hard.

      Now, before you ask who pissed in my Fruit Loops, nobody did. I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. This type of "humor" just manages to push almost every last button I have. The only way it could get worse is if some sadist let George Carlin have a whack at it, with lots of Jeff Foxworthy-worthy lists, some booger-eating references, and "fuck" every 4th word to make it sound adult. When are people going to realize that guy's a hack?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    10. Re:Resignation. by Cannelloni · · Score: 1
      I don't care if yopu stole that. It's still the most beautiful thing I have read in a long while, and I wiull save it for ever and ever on my Mac's hard disk. Thank you.


      I walk around in the world and think like that all the time, every day. When a child sees an old bum in the street, he says: "Poor old man!", but when he grows up he says "What a smelly, dirty old fart!"

      My point is that children are in some ways more sane and normal than most people.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    11. Re:Resignation. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't want to be 6 again, lack of sex would suck. Oh wait - most /.'ers don't know about sex yet... Did I let the secret out?

    12. Re:Resignation. by mcknation · · Score: 1

      When are people going to realize that guy's a hack?

      Foxworthy or Carlin?

      I'm not sure either of them are "hacks".

      hack2 (hk) pronunciation
      n.

            1. A horse used for riding or driving; a hackney.
            2. A worn-out horse for hire; a jade.
            3.
                        1. One who undertakes unpleasant or distasteful tasks for money or reward; a hireling.
                        2. A writer hired to produce routine or commercial writing.
            4. A carriage or hackney for hire.
            5. Informal.
                        1. A taxicab.
                        2. See hackie.

      Some of both of those guys stuff is orignial...sometimes not funny...but original.

    13. Re:Resignation. by vistic · · Score: 1

      This is kind of depressing... whoever wrote this must have had a really bad life as an adult.

    14. Re:Resignation. by Randseed · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother.

    15. Re:Resignation. by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Oh my,
      when I was six, I was afraid, afraid of Ghosts, I learned about nuklear weapons by the age of four, thanks to being directly at the frontier lines of the cold war between the west and the east.
      I learned about wars also when I was four thanks to the family stories of people in my family, having lived through two wars.
      And when I was seven, I already became aware of being the one getting beaten by the class bully.
      Thanks no thanks I do not want to be a child again.
      The problems are the same as an adult (instead of getting beaten by the bully, the bully is your boss) but you at least have sex and you do not have this typical childish fears (instead of being afraid of ghosts the chances are high that you have talked to dead members of your family in dreams ;-) ):-)

    16. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True story....

      My girlfriend dumped me. My cat died. I realized I have more white hair than otherwise. (What's left of it, that is.)

      So, I traded my Video Conferencing Project Manager job for a job as a English Teacher for 4-10 year olds in a different country.

      Now...
      -I live "colors".
      -I give encouraging words relentlessly, and I receive hugs in turn.
      -I bark like a d-o-g, Dog. I meow like a c-a-t, cat. I roar like a l-i-o-n, lion.
      -I play kickball. (And tag, and hacky-sacky, and hide-n-seek.)
      -I run just to run.
      -I sing songs just because.
      -I throw waterballoons. (Female teachers in wet T-shirts. Ulterior motive.)
      -I don't pay rent. (My employers do that.)
      -I walk 10 minutes to work.
      -I went for a 6 hour bike ride today because I had nothing else that I "HAD" to do.

      Call me immature if you want, but I like it.

      It's not all wine and roses.
      -I've had 5 family and friends die this calendar year.
      -All the bad stuff that always has been, still is.

      But, thanks to 300 or so little kids, I don't worry about that.

      On a daily basis, all I worry about is:
      -ABCDE...XYZ
      -Smile (Not me, them.)
      -And, most of all, encouraging the belief that, Everything IS possible.

      -----

      Btw... Here's a good song you can use to help teach your youngsters about colors....

      Red and yellow
      Red and yellow
      Black, Green, Blue
      Black, Green, Blue
      Sing a song together
      Sing a song together
      Me and you
      Me and you

      (Make sure you point at the colors while singing, and gesture appropriately during "Me and you")

    17. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it sounds like a man-child that doesn't want to contribute to society because it's hard

      Most insightful part of the post.

      This chain-letter bullshit is all the same. On some ultra-shallow level it seems great, and sentimental, but with 3 seconds of thought and usually two sentences in it becomes obvious what trite crap it is. Whether it's wanting to be 6, or learning everything you need to know from your dog, or whatever other BS that gets mailed around it all sounds like it was written by the same person on a Robotussin binge. Just awful stuff, horribly written and with no intellectual value whatsoever.

      My gripe lies here. Sure it's great to pass judgement, tell people to get over it (or themselves), but why the sourness? What's wrong with the carefree attitude? I see the jelousy behind the reasoning. As you said, you're a pretty laid back kind of guy, but somehow this pushes your buttons. It pushes the buttons of everyone who has worked hard to get where they are. They have worked hard by the mantra that power (through money, friends, charity, activism, etc) will make you happy. It usually will, but there are other ways.

      Immaturity is another way. You could call it hiding from the world, or laziness, but it is another valid way. The real argument against it (which you failed to highlight amongst all the whinging in your post) is that it ill-prepares you for the world, that when you wake up to yourself, it will be harder to survive. I disagree. It ill-prepares you for your world. Any change in lifestyle is hard, and the same applies to the transition between living a mature lifestyle and leading an immature lifestyle.

      An immature adult has the luxury of being oblivious, of enjoying simple pleasures. Sure they accumulate very little, but who cares? I don't. They take nothing from me. They don't. It takes very little to keep them happy when they enjoy such common, simple pleasures. You do, which is a shame, since you have nothing to lose, and it does them no charity. People with your attitude are spoiling their dream, not helping their future.

      That said, the post above was a little trite.
    18. Re:Resignation. by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. Specially the part that somehow starts inserting some effing product like McDonadls and M&Ms.

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
    19. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >a man-child that doesn't want to contribute to society because it's hard.

      Society can bend over backwards and shit up its nostrils. I don't contribute to society. I only work for the money, and that's because fuckin' society forces me to.

      Seriously, people, if you're deluding yourselves into thinking you have to "contribute" anything to this fuckin' world, you ought to put a shotgun to your head and blow it off. Nobody ever asked you if you wanted to be born at all, you're put into a world you have no hope of ever changing, and you should CONTRIBUTE to it?

      The friggin'world can die of AIDS. Fuck it.

    20. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but you'll have to go to bed at 9:00 pm sharp to be ready for school tomorrow. Don't sass me back! Right! That's it! You go right to your room this instant, old man, and no internet for a week!

    21. Re:Resignation. by Starcub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A hack: 2 bit, second rate, a cheap immitation. The guy started his post with profanities, then critisized George Carlin, not for being an emotionally immature liberal, but for being a hack at it. Usually when people start using profane language I read what they have to say and promptly ignore them. It's usually good that I ignore them because that kind of behavior signifies that a persons intellect is being stunted by anger issues. However, it struck me as ironic that slashbot moderators thought his post was insightful when in fact he was exemplifying precisely the type of immature behavior they condemned adults for. That's a very effective 'anti-moderation' system me thinks.

    22. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow thanks for your shitty chain letter

    23. Re:Resignation. by Kasis · · Score: 1

      fuck off and go be 6. Work in a factory, it's got about the same level of responsibility

      How incredibly arrogant, not to mention ignorant.

    24. Re:Resignation. by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Well fuck.. you all know yer fucking 6 when: - you shit yerself an you dont really fuckin care - the people around you dont fuckin care neither - biggest fuckin decisision of the day involves a merry-go-round

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    25. Re:Resignation. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour.

      I go back there every other weekend, it's called amphetamines!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    26. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shit myself and I don't really care. Of course, I'm the President of the United States. I'm the decider. I decided I like doody in my pants. It keeps the terrorists away.

    27. Re:Resignation. by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      Kudos to you, sir.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    28. Re:Resignation. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Immaturity is another way. You could call it hiding from the world, or laziness, but it is another valid way."

      Funny, very funny. Only an immature would think immaturity is valid.

      "They take nothing from me. They don't. "

      Except, of course, the ability to enjoy a movie without inane comments or phone interruptions, being able to drive along without worrying about the immature jackass who can't control his temper or keep his friggin' cell-phone off his ear, or any of a vast number of things that someone with no self-control (maturity) prevents. "People with your attitude are spoiling their dream, not helping their future."

      Uh, perhaps you didn't read the post. Immatures don't really think about the future, so they don't have one.

    29. Re:Resignation. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Pardon for the snipe, but just because you teach children, don't assume everyone else is as immature as they. I don't need you to tell me how to teach a child colors, or anything else. It wasn't helpful, it was condescending.

    30. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're seeking alzheimer's or to be partially pithed?

    31. Re:Resignation. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People complain about the "real world", but many studies have shown that from 14 to 18 or so is the most stressful time of you life. When you have a job, you can separate the job and home. You can't do that when you're studying for exams.

    32. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned of a world where men left their families to go and fight for our country, and returned only to end up living on the streets... begging for their next meal.

      I learned of a world where selfish, cynical old men convince young men to leave their families and kill other humans in the name of vague glories and ambiguous morality only to end up believing in the validity hatred... and helping recruit for the next war.

    33. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever petter pan.

      Only adults want to be young aggen. Children cant grow up fast enough. When you are young you are stupid and week and have no real freedom. Ignorence is nouthing to be proud of.

      Of corse when I get older I will probably have some F***ed up delousions about childhood too.

    34. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robotussin binge

      Mostly I thought the post was a steaming pile of brown, but I liked that phrase.

    35. Re:Resignation. by gravy.jones · · Score: 0

      The article about the researcher was unintersting and somewhat sterile. I feel sorry for a man who makes it a goal in his life to try to prove such a thing as adult immaturity. Here is someone who must have went willingly straight into adulthood. This is the topic he should really be studying. What is the effect on children who are forced into adulthood too early? Entering adulthood due to academics comes to mind, also when you are forced to bear arms is another. Other than that I found the reaction of /. readers interesting. To me this article and the comments are not at all about being physically, emotionally, or even mentally 6 years old again. Here is a topic that throws /. readers for a loop becuase it is about a metaphor and an irony. The metaphor is about being 6 years old and trusting unconditionally and the irony is that we superimpose our experience and knowledge onto that metaphoric 6 year old. As grown adults with life experience we know that we can never go back to trust like a 6 year old and it would be impossible anyway. We have the rudder now and we steer our vessel into the reefs, the rapids or the head wind. If you truly want to feel like 6 again then simply do an anonymous nice thing for someone you know or a stranger. The real test is that you must really want to do this nice thing and not for gain, loss, or even lifting your own spirit up. A 6 year old would do such a thing because they want to; not because they need to for their own wellness.

      --
      Where's the 0xBEEF
    36. Re:Resignation. by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      I want a world where kickball is referred to by its proper name - FOOTBALL

    37. Re:Resignation. by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Work in a factory, it's got about the same level of responsibility"

      Remember that statement the next time you stop at a streetlight in your car, and it actually stops. Or when you want something to eat. Or a thousand other examples.

      Without those 'factory workers' your 'adult' life would be pretty dismal.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    38. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can try a sex chage operation. ouch!

    39. Re:Resignation. by xanalogical · · Score: 1

      Uh, so what about those of us who are 'work as home self-employed consultants'? We have that same blur of mixing home and work that those silly 9-to-5'ers never seem to understand. One minute you're working and the next you're relaxing in the pool, in the middle of the day. And like day/night boundaries, weekends have no meaning, as you sometimes work them but take off days during the week.

      I guess this is some of the child-like ways of living the topmost article is referring to.

    40. Re:Resignation. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1
      Wow. This topic is really bringing out the slashdot poets.

      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour.


      I love that! Thanks.
      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    41. Re:Resignation. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      This deserves more than a 5. This is one of the best posts I've seen here. Thank you for taking the time to write it.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    42. Re:Resignation. by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Now I just have to find somebody to clothe, feed, and house me while I indulge myself."


      I'm sorry, my ex-wife already has that position filled.

    43. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that a lot of school teachers tend to do that, knowingly or not; especially those who teach small(er) children.

      I think is has something to do with an inferiority/superiority complex where since the 'teacher' is an 'educator', they are therefore more schooled and applicable to life than thou.

      That said, the original comment didn't come off much in that matter at all, however the non-sequitur 'bonus song' is kind of characteristic of that mentality. Why, in all honestly, would any of us find that song helpful or useful in the context of this article discussion?
      Any parents in the house are excluded from this. It seems to be hard for geeks to reproduce, anyway ;).

    44. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of Kool-Aid, Jolly Ranchers, and Slushees or shaved ice.

      Now try and tell me green isn't still a flavor.

    45. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See Ecclesiastes 1:18

    46. Re:Resignation. by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour
      Eat the parsley that comes on the entree's plate. That is green, personified.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    47. Re:Resignation. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      On a less general note, if you want to be 6 again, fuck off and go be 6. Work in a factory

      He wants to be 6 in a rich country, not in the third world.

      "fuck" every 4th word to make it sound adult. When are people going to realize that guy's a hack?

      No comment.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    48. Re:Resignation. by haeger · · Score: 1
      Relax. Breathe a few times. Now, doesn't that feel better?
      Not everything you read on the internet is true. I quite enjoy my life as an adult and wouldn't trade my wife and kid away for the world, although I thought the text was quite appropriate considering the topic.

      .haeger

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    49. Re:Resignation. by tukkayoot · · Score: 0, Troll
      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour.

      At least you've retained your inability to spell.

    50. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to share the organization you do this through?

    51. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing he has. You stupid americans keep misspelling things like colour and flavour. G'damnit.

    52. Re:Resignation. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gentle Reader,

      As a fellow curmudgeon, I have to say that you're not doing it properly. You have to do something to hide it, or you won't get invited to peoples' birthday parties. When you attempt to paint yourself as "a carefree guy with a sense of humor," don't follow it up immediately with the humorless excoriation of a popular comedian. That undermines your message and makes your curmugeonosity obvious. Instead, try following it up by complimenting some piece of popular culture.

      WRONG: I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. Jeff Foxworthy is stupid, and is betraying his fellow southerners to make money.

      RIGHT: I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. For example, this morning's Family Circus had me chuckling all day. Billy wandered the entire neighborhood looking for a spatula. Why did he expect to find one down by the river? Nobody knows.

      In the case of the WRONG example, people see that you've become so adept in your curmudgeoning that you can't even think on the subject of humor without going on a rant about the parts that piss you off. In the RIGHT example, you are shown to share your audience's taste for shallow, hackneyed popular culture. This will get you invited to social gatherings.

      If, on the other hand, you're like me and have embraced your inner misanthrope, then there is no reason to describe yourself as either funny or carefree in the first place. I find it to be a refreshing way to live.

      I'm AOC, and I hate pretty much everything! C'mon, now you give it a try. It will be like a weight lifted off your shoulders.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    53. Re:Resignation. by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      >This chain-letter bullshit is all the same.

      Yeah, allright, but I choose to read these things and be reminded how great it was to be a kid, like how great it was to grow up and become me, because even after all that, you cannot say any season is the best season, they all have their glory, let's not dis the memory...

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    54. Re:Resignation. by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I learned of lies

      Except truthfulness is a learned behavior...lying comes natural... Only in science fiction is it the other way around.

    55. Re:Resignation. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, color and flavor are the actual Latin words, colour and flavour are poor imitations of the French coleur and flaveur. Why the hell do you imitate the French, of all people?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    56. Re:Resignation. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1
      If anything should have pushed your buttons, its TFA, not that "I wanna be 6" letter. The article paints it bad-- everyone is either mature or immature, and both have bad points, lots of bad points. If you're mature, then you're cognitively inflexible and less able to thrive and succeed in contemporary life. If you're immature, enough said, that's bad too. Unfinished brain, hmm.

      The article's choice of terms and characterizations were deliberate, to be as provocative as possible. Standard editorial trickery to create "good copy". The stereotypes help with swallowing all this. Never mind accuracy. Let's take some admirable traits like flexibility and adaptability, make the well-worn observation that it is the young and "young at heart" that more often exhibit these traits. Then we'll also observe that young people can tend to be, shock and surprise, immature. Therefore these good and bad things go together, even contribute to and cause each other? There aren't any external factors at work, like, oh, more brainwashing and less education of late? A desire for more easily manipulated "flexible" consumers? Buy more stuff now, for the sake of our economy! "Contemporary life", yeah. Besides, contrary to the usual doom and gloom reporting, we are improving.

      People can be both responsible and adaptable. People can have traits from both of the 2 contrived categories that the article pigeonholed everything into. All in all, it's an article that at first glance is pretty good at saying something not quite right. Look harder, and the article starts looking like so much swiss cheese.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    57. Re:Resignation. by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      This is no world where kickball is known as football - you're thinking of soccer/football. In the US, football is the game where everyone is in battle armour. Soccer is the game where you kick a ball into a net. Kickball is the game like baseball, except that you kick a big rubber ball instead of hitting the ball with a bat. It is more humane for the ball, and easier for the little kids...

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    58. Re:Resignation. by really? · · Score: 1

      Well, you just have to find a place with better divorce laws. :-)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    59. Re:Resignation. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "Work in a factory, it's got about the same level of responsibility"

      Remember that statement the next time you stop at a streetlight in your car, and it actually stops. Or when you want something to eat. Or a thousand other examples. Without those 'factory workers' your 'adult' life would be pretty dismal.

      Hmmm...I don't think that really invalidates his point. Indeed, stuff that comes from factories is good and necessary, but as a former factory worker myself, I can tell you there are plenty of folks working the line who're the equivalent of 6 year olds.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    60. Re:Resignation. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Latin 'flavor' is pronounced like English 'flower'. When (at age six) I learned this, my mother became extremely grateful that no belladonna grew nearby.

    61. Re:Resignation. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      And it's highly recommended to not live like that when you are self-employed.

    62. Re:Resignation. by masterzora · · Score: 1

      That's one I haven't heard before.... American soccer is football, American football is American football... but kickball being football? That's ridiculous!

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    63. Re:Resignation. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there are also lots that are not.

      And to me it seemed that he was trying to dismiss the entire population of 'assembly line workers' as a bunch of boobs that dont have any bearing on quality and safety of life today.

      While ive never been on the line myself, i have worked with *many* ( IT in the automotive industry ) over my life and was rather offended by his comment.

      Perhaps i misunderstood his comment and went off to fast. Donno.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    64. Re:Resignation. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Latin 'flavor' is pronounced like English 'flower'.

      OT, but I have always had trouble believing this, even though I know it's how Latin scholars believe it was pronounced.

      As evidence, I present Brennus, the Gaul invader who yelled "Vae Victis" at the Romans. I think any reasonable person will agree that "Way Wictis!" is far too ridiculous sounding, and therefore the Romans must have pronounced Vs like we do.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    65. Re:Resignation. by netwiz · · Score: 1

      A counterpoint:

      Innocence is a synonym for ignorance. The price we pay for the power we have as adults is the understanding of evil. It's this understanding that allows us to chose between the abyss and the more noble pursuits. Without it, we wouldn't be human. Sure, it's fun to be a kid, pretending that there's nothing bad or detracting about such things. Sticking your head in the sand brings temporary relief from the misery that accompanies adulthood. But it's a deception, of the worst sort, as it's one where the deceived is yourself.

      That said, there are some good parts to being an adult. For one, there's the fun of switching that level of responsibility on or off, knowing that it's simply an act, and we can will ourselves back to full responsibility at any time. I actually like being able to do this, casting off stuffed-shirtedness when presented the opportunity, but only because I know it's a facade. It's chance to play-act, something I think most people fail to enjoy enough. There's also the nearly unlimited potential for personal growth. Only a fully-developed, responsible adult can appreciate some of the more visceral interactions found in nature.

      Here's a good example. Later today, I'm going to load up my new Mossberg 500 and a few boxes of shells, some random crap I've laying around, and drive them and my 4x4 out into the absolute boons, and blow stuff up. Now, this is something that lots of us growing up would have dreamed of doing. Several of us here probably have done that while growing up. The trick here is that neither of the above activities would be viable forms of entertainment were it not for the fact that childlike playfulness on the one hand is thoroughly tempered by an adult sense of responsibility and safety.

      I work hard, and play hard. High-performance equipment of any kind is really neat, but mix in some stupidity (of the little-kid kind), and you've a recipe for disaster. IMO, the power garnered from the knowledge of good and evil is worth the pain and suffering it brings with it.

      Note: High-performance equipment == any system containing forces capable of rending a human.

    66. Re:Resignation. by flacco · · Score: 1
      This chain-letter bullshit is all the same. On some ultra-shallow level it seems great, and sentimental, but with 3 seconds of thought and usually two sentences in it becomes obvious what trite crap it is.

      you seem to miss the obvious - that the thing you reference isn't a prescription for reality, it's a lament.

      and it's not "ultra-shallow", it's actually ultra-deep. it may seem shallow if read literally, but the particulars of the writing are not meant to be taken literally; they're supposed to resonate with something you yourself have experienced in a different way. you may have no real desire to play with sticks in a mud puddle; you have your own memories and carefree representations of past happiness. if you have had the same emotional and intellectual experience that the author tries to convey, you recognize the message. if you haven't, you don't - and it seems shallow and trite.

      i would point out, lastly, that you are likely to recognize this particular message if you are older rather than younger. how old are you?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    67. Re:Resignation. by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      In french it's "couleur" and "saveur". And huh, why was 30% of english taken from french ?

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    68. Re:Resignation. by JuicyBrain · · Score: 1

      Don't worry.

      Give yourself some time. Soon enough, you will look like you're 6 again: Shitting in your pants and eating mood stabilizing M&Ms. You won't remember about nuclear weapons and abused children. You will be oblivious to the complexity of programming your VCR and be overly excited about finishing yet another word puzzle.

      Be patient...

    69. Re:Resignation. by Talinth · · Score: 1

      And you've retained your ability to be ignorant to world culture!

      Flavour
      Chiefly British variant of flavor.

      --
      71.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    70. Re:Resignation. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Queue the Supertramp "Logical" song...

    71. Re:Resignation. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.] Clearly you were unimaginative as a kid, and thus missed out on the special trip to the hospital.

      "My poop is more valuable than your poop"

    72. Re:Resignation. by calzones · · Score: 1

      Adult Resignation ...
      I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.
      I want to play kickball during recess and paint with watercolors in art.
      I want to lie under a big Oak tree and run a lemonade stand with my friends on a hot summers day.
      I want to return to a time when life was simple. ...


      Unfortunately, living such a simple life is dependent upon being supported by someone who absorbs all the complicated things for you.
      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    73. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken just like someone with a six-year olds' grasp of reality.

      Bugger off, fuckwit.

    74. Re:Resignation. by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want to live a life again where going to McDonald's was the rarest of treats, and having enough food to eat every day until the next paycheck my parents brought in was an exception, not the rule.

      I want to go back to a time when I wasn't allowed to make my own decisions, or spend my time in the fashion that pleases me most. Back to a time when just about everyone else in the world had the authority to tell me "no", sometimes for good reasons, sometimes simply because they knew I couldn't fight back.

      I want to go back to a time when an angry mother would haul off and beat me with a rolling pin, or force open my mouth and pour a bottle of tabasco down it, all in the name of "discipline".

      I want to go back to a time when children would sometimes torture each other for no particular reason, engaging in childish evil simply for the sake of being evil, while adults shrugged it off as "kids will be kids". Back to a time when adults naively told each other that it's impossible for children, those little darlings, to be cruel, vicious monsters.

      I want to go back to being at the mercy of a drunken father who spent so much of his paycheck on booze that there often wasn't enough left to cover the bills, much less buy basic necessities. And with that the constant screaming fights between parents who couldn't stand one another, yet didn't know what else to do except try to live with one another.

      I want to go back to a time when religion was rammed down my throat, and any attempt to repudiate the house gods ended up with a furious parent shoving a bar of soap into my mouth to "wash it out".

      I want to return to a time of never knowing whether a parent would actually come home that day, especially after one of the regular marital blowouts, and being afraid that they'd never come back - or sometimes, that they would.

      Yep, I want a return to fear and misery and despair, to destitution and hunger, to hopelessness. I want to return to a time when I had no control whatsoever over anything at all in my world, and when others did whatever the hell they felt like to me because I was too small to fight back. I want to return to the world where every day I prayed I'd grow up just a little bit faster, so that I could become an adult that much quicker and get far, far away from my own personal and very real hell.

      Sometimes, people forget that the happy middle-class childhood envisioned in Hallmark-style e-chainletters was something enjoyed by only a tiny minority of people on the planet. The rest of us weren't quite so lucky.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    75. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You can imitate yourself, too. Both of therse guys have had a couple good ideas, and then built careers out of them. I thought their acts were funny the first time I saw them. Hell, I thought Carlin was funny for years, until I realized it was all the same crap, and most of it was dressed-up fart jokes.

      To be fair though, I didn't know the exact definition of "hack", and probably shouldn't have used the word. Luckily, in this case it still fits.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    76. Re:Resignation. by Associate · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he had a lisp.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    77. Re:Resignation. by dmyze · · Score: 1

      You must have been an only child. When I was 6 my brother was 8 and nothing seemed to be fair at all.

    78. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If profanity turns you off that strongly, maybe you've got your own issues. The moderation wasn't ironic, you're just unable to deal with strong language. I stand by every curse in my previous post. That chain-letter is bullshit. I think bullshit is a pretty succinct word that puts the general idea in people's head with a minimum of effort. As for the "fuck off", I absolutely stand by that, I'm sick of these people having responsibility, shirking it, and it's left to me to pick up the pieces.

      As for anti-moderation, your insightful mod is baffling me. I suppose it's for your assertion that profanity is a sign of anger "issues" but the main point of your post, that I was being immature, is completely unanswered. I fail to see how "no, you're immature" is insightful, and invite you to provide the insight that you've already been modded up for.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    79. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      First I'll address the arrogant part. You seem to be saying that I'm wrong for saying that factory work does not carry responsibility. While there may be jobs in a factory that carry responsibility, we all know what I'm talking about. The average assembly line worker can decide to not show up to work any day they want and it doesn't really affect anyone. If they make a mistake and screw up a product, or thousands of them, maybe even hurt people, the only thing that happens is they get fired and have to get another $8 an hour job. That sounds like a pretty low level of responsibility to me.

      Second, for the ignorant, no it's not. I've never personally worked in a factory, true, but I've known enough people that have, people who were very successful in their factory jobs, to say that your average factory worker is immature.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    80. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      No comment.

      I don't think that means what you think it means.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    81. Re:Resignation. by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Oh man... Thanks for this. Made me sniff...

      I've just spent a weekend with my wife and kid. Tomorrow morning I have to go work for the week 150km away again. I'll see them on next friday again.
      And my cars tires are shot. I need new ones. But I don't have any money. But I gotta get there to get money ... to buy new tires ... to get there ....

      And this is the simplest of the problems involved.

    82. Re:Resignation. by jelle · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry dude, but there is a 'stop loss policy' on adulthood. You can't get out until either we all get out, or you reach retirement age.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-loss_policy

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    83. Re:Resignation. by TeaSeaLancs · · Score: 1

      Can you mod for teen angst, because seriously, my angstmeter is reading 1.21 jigasucks at the moment.

    84. Re:Resignation. by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful? Cutesy-kind-of-funny, maybe, but not insightful. Sorry to be a cynical adult, but there are many 6-year-olds in this world who have real problems that make their life hell. They have adults or older children in their lives that beat them or abuse them sexually, or they don't have enough to eat, or there's a war going on around them.

      This sentiment of, "I want to be 6 again," only makes sense if you were fortunate enough to grow up with a good family in a decent place. Some people would rather die than go back to their childhood. While I'm at it, the laundry list of "adult problems" above is pretty fucking weak too. If mountains of paperwork and gossip are among your biggest problems, then your life isn't all that bad.

      Seems to me that this chain letter^H^H^H^H^H^H^post is the sort of thing one would expect to hear from an immature adult that thinks the world owes them a cushy life.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    85. Re:Resignation. by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      That's a lovely sentiment.... if you had an idyllic childhood. Many of us did not. I'd rather die than relive my childhood, unless I were to get a new set of parents living in a better place.

      As to the subject of the article, I must agree. Adults nowadays can't seem to interact with each other in a mature manner. Why is that? I think it has to do with the ways kids were treated in school. Remember the kids that picked on so terribly? Most often nothing was done about that. At some point it became acceptable for kids to treat other kids like crap and teachers turned a blind eye toward it. Kids were allowed to act as cruel and immature as they wanted so long as they didn't disrupt the class too much, pretty much amounting to near-constant torment for the poor kids who were targeted. In times past all of that was completely unacceptable and most kids who did that sort of thing to other kids could expect discipline from their parents. Now it's dismissed as "kid's stuff". We let kids treat other kids like crap and now we're surprised when these kids grow into immature adults.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    86. Re:Resignation. by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Yea, factory work is rough, and physically exhausting. Get a job at a walmart, they won't fire you even if all you do is avoid customers and fiddle with the game displays all day.

    87. Re:Resignation. by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      As evidence, I present Brennus, the Gaul invader who yelled "Vae Victis" at the Romans. I think any reasonable person will agree that "Way Wictis!" is far too ridiculous sounding,


      Wow! A french guy saying something that sounds ridiculous.

      What is the world coming to?

      and therefore the Romans must have pronounced Vs like we do.


      This must be the first time that I've seen the way the french pronounce non-french words caled upon as evidence for the way native speakers pronounce them.

      (Hint: we know a lot about the way people including the Romans pronounced things from the way they mis-spelled them. Future archaeologists will know how "you're" was pronounced from the number of people who spell it "your".)

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    88. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I just have to find somebody to clothe, feed, and house me while I indulge myself.

      Don't worry, you don't have to wait long. It's called an "old people's home". You even get to wear nappies again.

    89. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but when I was six I was worried about the troll that the neighbor kids across the street said might eat me.

      I can honestly say that I was more afraid of that then than I am of nuclear war now, because now I understand more about the world. The troll seemed almost a certainty. OK, maybe I was 4 instead of 6 then, but you get the idea.

      I feel that my adult life was hard won, having to go through the gauntlet of everyone else telling you what to do and when, and now I can finally live my life the way that I see fit.

      I wouldn't trade that for anything.

    90. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, perhaps you didn't read the post. Immatures don't really think about the future, so they don't have one.

      It sounds more like you didn't read my post. The whole point of the post is show how they don't care about their future, that the present, and all the simple pleasures that it brings, is much more valuable to them. This doesn't mean they have no future, it just means they have a future that you would find undesirable.

      I don't know how you figured that one. I guess that when you close your eyes, the world ceases to exist, right?
    91. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I'm not missing the obvious, it's just a dumb lament. I wish I had wings and could stop time. Man, that'd be cool. It's really too bad I can't fly or stop time. Man. It's not fair.

      I do have memories of carefree times, but because I take the responsible route I have those carefree times ahead of me too. This weekend is one of 'em, other than some tendonitis from being a tard and lifting too much I don't have to do any work to do this weekend at all. My house is clean, my bills are paid, and other than the fact that I have to go to work tomorrow life is good and I can enjoy this slack-off guilt-free.

      I have experienced exactly what the author is describing, but I'm enough of a grown-up that the pressure of day-to-day life ain't no thang for me, and when it is I accept it. Sure, I have to worry about maybe sending kids to college someday, or supporting my parents in their old age, or myself for that matter, but that's reality. I know a dream for a dream and don't waste time wishing for selfish irresponsibility. I'd say that if that thing resonates strongly with you, don't worry, you're immature enough.

      To answer your question, I'm 27.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    92. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You win this thread, probably this whole post, and maybe, just maybe, all of Slashdot.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    93. Re:Resignation. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Being young, wee and full of vim is certainly a fun thing to be...

      Excuse me? I thought the phrase would be "full of emacs...".

      --
      That is all.
    94. Re:Resignation. by xanalogical · · Score: 1

      I've not read many books or editorials advising against living like that. Self-discipline certainly, so that you don't let schedules slide and never get done the things that need doing.

      Indeed, some worklife experts talk about how the artificial distinction between work and personal in today's world causes stress. We have to put on our work faces and behaviors and become different people when we go to the office and sometimes forget to take them off when we come home.

      And for creative people, like programmers, blending work and personal life increases creative productivity, providing that child-like imaginative environment implied by the top-poster.

      In the future, all the grunt work will be done by machines, leaving the creative work for humans.

    95. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, why don't you post images of Successories posters and then post more text from your vast collection of Chicken Soup For the Soul? Maybe later you can post some of your chain letters about abortion (Dear Mommy: Why Did You Kill Me?) or that list by "George Carlin" about why he is a bad American when they become relevant to the conversation?

      Seriously, this is a bunch of tripe. Please, if you have any decency, use your mod points to mod the parent down instead of (or as well as) me.

    96. Re:Resignation. by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Oh man...what I wouldn't do for a frosty glass of Slimer's ecto-juice brand koolaid (what the heck was that flavor called again?)

    97. Re:Resignation. by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      cant believe you DONT want to run naked across the neighbors lawn.. ah forget it lawn has a different meaning for you now.

    98. Re:Resignation. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Eh, he had me going until this line:

      "I learned of a world where men left their families to go and fight for our country, and returned only to end up living on the streets... begging for their next meal."

      Live in Berkeley for a year, and learn that the beggars who claim this crap are completely full of it. I'm amused that the poet is that much of an easy mark for one of the nation's oldest and most well-known con-games, though. (Seriously, there are a huge number of 30-ish beggars nowadays claiming to be vietnam veterans... I salute their brazenness, but i haven't watched enough Desperate housewives for my intelligence to have dropped quite that low yet.)

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    99. Re:Resignation. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Wow, my childhood was spent chugging bottles of tabasco and beating each other with rolling pins, and getting religiofied, and having neither parent around occasionally... but those were the parts I enjoyed. I guess having happy parents changes one's outlook on a lot of things.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    100. Re:Resignation. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      I'd say if you have a good family, the decent place part is optional, too, barring actual physical assaults on your well-being. But yeah, for a lot of people the journey tends to involve turning out all right in spite of what life throws at them, so I'd imagine most wouldn't want to head back there.

      Personally, I had a pretty cushy childhood. I jsut wouldn't want to go back because I was a cynical little bastard that no one liked. I prefer being a big cynical bastard that no one likes.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    101. Re:Resignation. by Mulkiatsch · · Score: 1

      You pronounce "flavor" as you do "flower"? You English speaking people are funny :D

      As far as I know, the Latin "a" is pronounced like English "ah", "o" like the "o" in "ton" (that's actually not quite right, but I can't think of an English word with the right sound... maybe such a thing doesn't even exist), and "v" as something in between "v", "w" and the sound right in the middle of "flower". I'm not sure how the "r" is pronounced at the end of a word. I always pronounce it like I do in German (a bit like the "a"), but it may well be supposed to be spoken like a normal German (or Latin) "r", which is something that English doesn't even have (it's a very rough sound).

      That's how I learned Latin. I still don't think that's the exact pronounciation. I consider it highly probable that the Romans had what we would call an Italian accent. There might have been regional differences, too, of course. But "flower" for "flavor"? Definitely not! I'm 100 % certain that my German-accent Latin is much more accurate than your English-accent one :)

    102. Re:Resignation. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Um, almost every destressing book says you need to separate work and life. You need to be able to let go and not think about work during your free time.

    103. Re:Resignation. by rarkm · · Score: 1

      Eloquently put - and a pretty good explanation of why adulthood is a declining state. I'm guessing that EVERYONE wishes at one time or another that someone would step in and take care of everything and clean up all the messes. Accepting that this is not possible and that it is necessary to accept responsibility for oneself, one's family and one's society is a 'boring adult' message that is the subject of pervasive mocking on a pop and high culture level.

      And why not? In a largely affluent society, it's easy to stay disconnected and entertained. But when tough times arrive, the hubbub of demands, complaining and accusation are those of children ("unfair!") wrested away from playtime rather than of adults.

      Same as it ever was. Every affluent culture in history has eventually crashed, partly as a result of its own prosperity and the corrosive effects of wealth upon culture and society.

      The jihadists and Islamofascists that seek to take down Western culture are not stupid and are depending on history repeating itself. But we are also not stupid -- just childish and narcissistic because we can be. I pray for the sake of our grandchildren and great grandchildren that when the tough times occur as they always do that we will be able to drop our toys and do what's required of adults.

      --
      [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
    104. Re:Resignation. by Photar · · Score: 1

      Some people have crappy childhoods and happy adult lives. Others have happy childhoods and crappy adult lives.

      Then there are those that get happy childhood and happy adult lives. And yes, those with crappy childhoods and crappy aduld lives.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    105. Re:Resignation. by Photar · · Score: 1

      Are you teaching in Japan? http://outpostnine.com/editorials/teacher1.html

      Kancho Assassin!

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    106. Re:Resignation. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      why was 30% of english taken from french ?

      Because the French didn't deserve it.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    107. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man, that'd be cool


      This weekend is one of 'em.


      . . . from being a tard and lifting too much


      . . . pressure of day-to-day life ain't no thang for me


      To answer your question, I'm 27.


      Dude!!! Like, really?!?!? I'm, like, fuckin' 36, man!! An' I still talk like I'm in fuckin' high school. Guess I got ya beat at that immaturity thang!!
    108. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vewy well. I shall welease... Wodewick!

    109. Re:Resignation. by rip_1956 · · Score: 1

      Who wants to revert back to being a virgin again ???

      Hey, wait a minute, I've been married for years. It seems like I'm heading in that direction anyway...

    110. Re:Resignation. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. The two are reasonably close if you're muttering or slurring.

      Latin 'r' was most likely a tap or a trill; Spanish 'r' or 'rr' would be closest. At any rate, English 'r' is different and has a significant effect on the preceding vowel that would not be present in Latin. Thus, a native Spanish pronunciation of 'or' would work for the last syllable.

      For the first, though, my English pronunciation barely deviates from my Latin. I'm told I speak English with an odd accent, though. (I'm a native speaker. Go figure.)

      And I'm sure your accent is better. Hey, let's find a native Latin speaker from the classical period to compare.

  5. Laugh or Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's because as the world turns increasingly to s h i t, people develop a imaturity complex derived from the "laugh" half of the proverbial "laugh or cry" syndrome.

    1. Re:Laugh or Cry by cp.tar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a reason why most stand-up comedians are people with a hard personal history.

      Humour, cynicsm, sarcasm... all defence mechanisms.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    2. Re:Laugh or Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that you can just type the word "shit" right? There's no censorship here.

    3. Re:Laugh or Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anything can be considered a defense mechanism. Generousity: preemptive purchase of good will. Niceness: signaling lack of aggressive intent. And on and on. Classifying as you did, especially humour, more describes 'who you are' than 'what there is'.

    4. Re:Laugh or Cry by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      Two things:
      1) Is the world really *increasingly* turning to shit, or has it always been and we just hear about more of it now?

      2) This reminds me of Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land". Throughout the book, Michael Smith (the human raised among Martians) doesn't understand humour or laughter. In the end he realizes that we have to laugh - we have to laugh at all the "wrongness" because if we didn't we'd be crying all the time.

      Upon which realization he breaks into fits of hysterical laughter. :)

    5. Re:Laugh or Cry by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      The world is still better for first worlders than it has ever been in history (except for those 18 months in the fifties).

      My neighbors are not trying to kill me. I eat fresh fruit allyear around. I have meat every day. I'm educated and can read and write. None of my kids died before age 5 from a common disease (this was the fate of about 50% of children until about 200 years ago), I will not die from infection if a get a bad cut, I have a refrigerator, indoor plumbing and central heating, I can travel halfwar around the world in a day, the law is written down and fairly applied without regard to my social class, etc...

      There is still room for improvement, but we have it good.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    6. Re:Laugh or Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because as the world turns increasingly to s h i t, people develop a imaturity complex derived from the "laugh" half of the proverbial "laugh or cry" syndrome.

      I think it's the other way around, I think the world's turning to shit because adults are acting less responsibly.

    7. Re:Laugh or Cry by mqduck · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why most stand-up comedians are people with a hard personal history.

      That's a good point, but I'd like to add that that goes with creative people in general. I don't think it's fair to say that expressive art (and however you feel about stand-up comedy, it's still art) is necessarily defensive. Maybe we don't really disagree, maybe I just don't like the word you chose. I think "coping" might be better than specifically "defense." Cracking jokes about your life to a crowd can (of course, I'm only assuming, here) be theraputic in the same way talking to a shrink can be.

      --
      Property is theft.
    8. Re:Laugh or Cry by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Coping, defending... call it what you like.

      And it is therapeutic. Way more than talking to a shrink. Believe you me.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    9. Re:Laugh or Cry by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Defense is the wrong word, as it implies that it actually prevents bad things from happening.

      Perhaps the word you're looking for is 'relief'? Humans relieve emotions by externalizing them, communicating them to others to deal with and leaving their own mind clear to continue doing things that it finds productive. At least, that's what I do. It doesn't defend against anything, but it orders the mind and puts priorities in an appropriate order.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    10. Re:Laugh or Cry by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      It does prevent bad things from happening.

      Not the actual events, but the bad things that can happen to your psyche as consequence.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  6. Does this surprise anybody? by agent+dero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the focus in the past few decades on feelings, emotions, and our complete obsession with "our inner child." It's not surprising at all, it's been a while since we cared about some responsibility.

    There's a reason people are suing everybody, there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts; we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.

    That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by toroidal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a reason people are suing everybody, there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts; we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane. I'm also sick and tired of the ol' nanny state. I'm afraid that the next generation will be the same way becuase some might think that this type of behavior is acceptable.

    2. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's a reason people are suing everybody
      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it.

      there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts
      Yes, they are deliberately killing people. Or put more accurately, but lengthily, they knowingly lied about the medical risks and addictive qualities of cigarettes, portrayed them in advertisements as cool, including marketing that was deliberately designed to appeal to children, and, as if all that wasn't bad enough, they knowingly added ingredients which are very toxic and purposefully formulated cigarettes that are even more addicting than they naturally were!

      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity
      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days". If you want the divorce rate to go down, the number one thing you can do is to make it so that the middle class is strong and vibrant, and that people have great financial security and physical health. If you, on the other hand, make it so that both members of the married couple have to work long and hard just to scrape by, how can you possibly be surprised that the stress of daily life will have a detrimental toll on their marriage?

      because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.
      Wishful thinking made by someone who clearly hasn't turned on a television in the last 20 years. Just as it had always been, youth culture will reject the rigid demands of old coots like yourself. Just like always, there will be a segment of the youth who will be very responsible and upstanding. And just like always, life will go on and a whole new cadre of old coots will spout the same old nonsense about how the "youth of today" are worse than ever, just as it has always been for thousands of years.
    3. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by rabuksak · · Score: 1

      AMEN! ...and I certainly hope you are right about the last part.

    4. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by highonlife · · Score: 5, Funny

      always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.


      Did it happen during english class when they were teaching the word "throw"?
    5. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.
      Eight year olds can spell "country" and "threw". Now write both of them 100 times, or I'll keep you in at recess.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    6. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by uarch · · Score: 1
      There's a reason people are suing everybody
      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it.
      Yes, there are several instances in which lawsuits are perfectly reasonable. There are also plenty of instances where they are completely frivolous. Too many people are using them as a lottery and a way to blame everyone but themselves. Tort reform is dearly needed in the US.


      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity
      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old.
      That's not entirely true. Traditionally each generation has looked at the generation or two after it with concern. Today you have both the generations that preceded the baby boomers and the generations that follow the baby boomers looking at them thinking they need to grow up and develop some personal responsibility.

      Maybe they'll be different, maybe they wont. Just don't be so sure you can predict what's going to happen.
    7. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by maxume · · Score: 1

      No one who has smoked a cigarette in the last 30 years can claim that they didn't know it was bad for them. 30 years is probably a conservative estimate.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a difference between "I know this piece of fried chicken is bad for me" and "wow - this piece of fried chicken was prepared with rat poison because Fried Chicken Inc's research showed that rat poison would make me crave it more".

    9. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      Wishful thinking made by someone who clearly hasn't turned on a television in the last 20 years. Just as it had always been, youth culture will reject the rigid demands of old coots like yourself. Just like always, there will be a segment of the youth who will be very responsible and upstanding. And just like always, life will go on and a whole new cadre of old coots will spout the same old nonsense about how the "youth of today" are worse than ever, just as it has always been for thousands of years.

      You're so right, I mean, it's a good thing I'm not part of the generation I made mention of. We're the generation that's being left with social security, pollution, and a lot of the problems created by the cold war, reaganomics and not-in-my-backyard syndrome.

      Presumably we'll never have a middle ages again, because it's our responsible as a younger generation to learn from the "coots" that came before us, same applies to us, hopefully we'll never have a cold war again.

      You're criticism is baseless, people have been evolving socially, it's not "just as it has always been for thousands of years." What a load of shit, we don't tolerate slavery, racism, or feudalism anymore, because we've learned from past mistakes.

      Call me an idealist, but I trust that my generation will do the same.

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    10. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      We all have an "inner child", and this doesn't involve irresponsibiliy. It important because it is the beginning of (our) life. Immaturity is a thing different that the child we all have inside.

    11. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days".

      Yeah, and guess what? They were right. Those civilizations really did become decadent and were supplanted.

    12. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I don't mean to go to bat for big tobacco. What I do mean to do is point out that as hard as it might be to stop smoking, there hasn't been any sort of justification for "I didn't think smoking was bad because they told me so" for decades. Extending your analogy, "My doctor told me I would die if I kept eating the chicken, but man, it's just so juicy and delicious."

      If people expect to be able to hold anybody responsible for anything, a good first step is taking responsibility for themselves.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by XAlba · · Score: 1

      And yet still we're trotting merrily down the same path...

      --

      All I want is to live in a world where everyone acknowledges my obvious superiority. Is that so much to ask?
    14. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All tort reform will accomlish will be the ability of corporations and the govt to kill people without paying the consequences.

      I would be in favor of tort reform if the monetary damages were limited but if found guilty the doctor or the CEO went to jail. You know hold people personally responsible for their actions and decisions.

      It will never happen of course. They will limit the monetary damages and also make themselves immune from any other punishment too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    15. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days". If you want the divorce rate to go down, the num...

      Aha! This one has been popping up and getting to me recently. You see, what happened in the Greece and Rome you are talking about, is that over a relative short period - couple generations maximun after the peaks - they _declined and fell_ at least part way, but away from the peaks of literature etc. when, of course the "old guys" were writing. (Greece controlled by Macedonia, Rome split into pieces, never as strong).

      So - The old guys were right! :-P. The triteness of this morality tale is matched by its inaccuracy.

      I'm much more pessimistic than you, to me this "faith in our youth" is a sort of cargo cultist defensiveness and escapism -- in the face of the oncoming disaster the society faces this century.

    16. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've read those Greco-Roman documents... but the problem is that they say the youth is horrible, and the post you're replying to says that the youth is good and that they're going to turn things around and make it better.

      In my experience, the reason both parents have to work so hard and scrabble is usually because they are financially irresponsible. My boss and his wife barely make it by each month, not because they don't get paid enough, but because they have almost $30,000 in credit card debt, on top of a mortgage, car payment, etc. I can't speak for the rest of college students, but examples like him and like my father were enough to make me tired of the bullshit, like the above poster wrote, and I'm going to do my best to be financially responsible to the extent that I can live comfortably on the same thing other people barely get by on.

    17. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by kv9 · · Score: 1

      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now

      have you seen myspace lately?

    18. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      There's a reason people are suing everybody, there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts; we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.
      Yeah, I wish everybody else could be as wonderful and mature as me, too. (Surprisingly enough, that sentiment is almost universal. Just look at the moderation of your post).

      But you really should RTA, since the hypothesis has nothing to do with what you wrote and is really quite interesting.

    19. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There's a difference between..."

      Of course there is. That's because you constructed a straw argument. A known, unhealthy habit which contains known addictive poisons was compared to a normally healthy food doped with poison.

    20. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      It's early on a Sunday morning, I can't be bothered to read the article.

      It's counter to all that Slashdot stands for! ;)

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    21. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it.

      You obviously have never watched any daytime television. Any given commercial break has a few ambulance chasers asking if you've been hit by an 18-wheeler, or hit by a drunk, or took Fen-fen, or got injured on the job. And then you said this with a straight face:

      including marketing that was deliberately designed to appeal to children...

      What's the difference?

    22. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the disciple and descendant of big government, there is no difference. Organized coercion (government) is always the solution.

    23. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
      If you, on the other hand, make it so that both members of the married couple have to work long and hard just to scrape by, how can you possibly be surprised that the stress of daily life will have a detrimental toll on their marriage?
      This is only tangential to your post, but I don't think most couples, at least in the US, are really in this predicament. "Scraping by," or even getting by reasonably well, could probably be done with one breadwinner. But we have so many toys now, and everyone wants the new, bigger house, and a flashy car, etc, that eventually you do need two incomes to support the lifestyle. A liveable house and food on the table, lights, air-conditioning, the basics, are affordable in most areas. I'm not saying that the decisions are wrong, only that they are decisions. I know many people who are living paycheck-to-paycheck, barely scraping by, and none of them lack a PS2, DVD player, $50 shoes, etc. The only exceptions are the ones who have a lot of kids they can't afford--now THEY are broke. Can't imagine why that might be. Again, I'm not saying that their decisions are wrong, only that they are decisions.
    24. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever consider the possibility that the youth have been getting progressively worse over that last millennia?

    25. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it.

      Hell yes there is, there's a plague of stupid lawsuits. Remember those commercials in the 90s that they used to air all over TV saying if you slip and fall on someone else's property you could get millions of dollars? Just run up on someone's lawn and retire! What about the idiotic IP-driven business model, patent now and sue later? As a bonus, look how much stupider political campaigns are getting. It's more finger pointing, blame game, and win-by-smearing-your-opponent bullshit.

      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days".

      People are much more mature, truth-seeking, and anti-bullshit. The rise in awareness of beurocracy, authority/political abuse, all point to people getting more pissed off about this. The fact that people are organizing things such as the EFF and FSF and OSS (heck, even blogs like mini-msft) and choosing to stick to their ideals even when it hurts them, in order to combat such stupidity, is a sign. These movements and organizations are growing in strength and number, and people are more aware of them as they are becoming more relevant due to media and participation.

    26. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Belial6 · · Score: 1
      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity


      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days". If you want the divorce rate to go down, the number one thing you can do is to make it so that the middle class is strong and vibrant, and that people have great financial security and physical health. If you, on the other hand, make it so that both members of the married couple have to work long and hard just to scrape by, how can you possibly be surprised that the stress of daily life will have a detrimental toll on their marriage?


      Uh...what part of the parent saying the youth of today is BETTER, did you not understand? You know, exactly the opposite of what you want to believe he said.
    27. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... The world has gone mad today
      And good's bad today,
      And black's white today,
      And day's night today, ..."

      "... If driving fast cars you like,
      If low bars you like,
      If old hymns you like,
      If bare limbs you like,
      If Mae West you like
      Or me undressed you like,
      Why, nobody will oppose!"

      "... When mothers pack and leave poor father
      Because they decide they'd rather be tennis pros,
      Anything Goes. ..."

      "... Good authors too who once knew better words,
      Now only use four letter words
      Writing prose, Anything Goes. ..."

                -- _Anything Goes_, Cole Porter, composed 1934

    28. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.

      I can say from experience that this is not going to happen. When I was in high school in the late 70s I was generally appalled by the way the "adult" world behaved. I was excited by the prospect of my generation growing up and setting things straight. It was a slow realization that my generation was just as greedy, dim-witted and insensistive as the previous one.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    29. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by psylew · · Score: 1

      I'm suddenly reminded of the mistakes poster on despair.com. "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others." I think that if kids are learning from having such a large portion of the population screw up around them, at least there's some benefit to it. I actually find it comforting that there's a good side in there somewhere. :-)

    30. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You're criticism is baseless, people have been evolving socially, it's not "just as it has always been for thousands of years." What a load of shit, we don't tolerate slavery, racism, or feudalism anymore, because we've learned from past mistakes.

      Sure we do, just not in this country. Some places, racism is the way of things, just like slavery is still practiced to this day.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    31. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Mortamer2k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tobacco companies are being sued because of immaturity. Why can't people learn to accept telling people your product is fine while you know its slowly (or not so much) killing everyone that uses it? Those tobacco companies should have been protected by lawsuits from the state secrets act! That would be maturity. /Sarcasm off

    32. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.

      As someone who recently graduated from college, you've got to be joking. This generation mostly takes after the generations before it. Lots of whining, avoids taking responsibility for anything, obsessed with material goods, likes getting drunk and having a good time, views college as just another step to landing a job rather than a place to learn, isn't concerned with many issues in the world today, and doesn't take marriage or relationships seriously at all. The generation after is looking to be worse, as the constant connectivity seems to have created a generation of people who can't think for themselves. Both in the sense that they can't seem to make even a trivial decision without surveying atleast half a dozen friends, and in the sense that they seem to rely on the computer and the internet for things like spelling and general knowledge, rather than learning it for themselves. Atleast I remember back when cellphones and internet connectivity weren't commonplace.

    33. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days".

      This is a horrible argument. Why? The people who wrote those statements were noticing the slow start of the collapse of their societies. Have you noticed that the Greek Empire fell? Or that the Roman Emipire fell? Or that there are many other societies where generations worked hard to build up what future generations squandered and lost due to their complacency? Just because we, (humanity in general), have advanced over those millennia, doesn't mean there weren't societies that rose and fell in that time period, or that there weren't centuries where civilization took turns for the worse.

      The whole point of studying history is to avoid the mistakes that were made in the past. However, we know that when a society become too rich, too powerful and too comfortable, they stop doing those things that helped make their society great. For example, Rome hired "barbarians" to be in their legions because the Romans themselves didn't want to be bothered. It must have been a real shock when "barbarians" actually managed to sack Rome.

      I think the same thing is happening in the US and other countries. No one wants to work hard and do the dirty or demeaning jobs for a chance to move up. Yes, there is the "American Dream" where someone starts out with nothing and makes it to the top. However, people conveniently forget that the full story is when someone starts out with nothing, works hard, and makes it to the top.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    34. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      A known, unhealthy habit which contains known addictive poisons was compared to a normally healthy food doped with poison.


      Alright - fair enough. Analogies are rarely accurate and prone to extremes to make the point. However, fried chicken could only be called "healthy" when compared to something extremely unhealthy... such as smoking. And there are very few brands of cigarettes that don't include additives (ranging from the benign to very questionable). As bad analogies go, I don't think mine was THAT far off.
    35. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      With the focus in the past few decades on feelings, emotions, and our complete obsession with "our inner child." It's not surprising at all, it's been a while since we cared about some responsibility.

      You're clearly one who hasn't RTFA. In said article, they mentioned that the "problem" is one that has been becoming more prevalent over the past century, due not to pop psychology, but to the fact that more and more of us are getting better formal educated long into adulthood.

      Honestly, I think it's all crap though. You want to talk about abdication of responsibility by adults and sensation-seeking? Throughout the 19th century, most men drank, and drank hard. Often to the detriment of their families, their jobs, and society as a whole. Today, alcoholism isn't anywhere near as big of a problem. During the 18th century in Europe, it was fashionable for those who could afford it to have their children raised exclusively by nannies, so that the parents could lead lives of wild debauchery and baccanalia.

      You want to talk about short cycles of arbitrary fashion? Throughout all of history, human beings have subjected themselves to all manner of torture and mutilation for the benefit of the fashion of the day. From chinese foot-binding to African body piercing and neck-stretching, to the actual flattening of people's skulls (Aztecs, I think).

      I don't know what ideal period that TFA's author believes to exist, but I file this entire article under "get off my lawn, you damn kids!" Besides, it's thin on details and proof, and I'm extremely skeptical that there is any real evidence of this effect.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    36. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do.

      Good question.

      What's wrong with killing someone? It's often a necessary thing to do. Opinions differ on whether it's legitimate.

      What's wrong with just beating someone up instead of killing them or suing them? What's wrong with just taking what you want instead of hiring a lawyer to do it for you?

      Those other things are illegal, which means that a bunch of guys got together and decided to substitute their authority for yours. But illegal is not the same as wrong. Ask Anne Frank if you're confused on the difference.

      What's wrong with suing someone? When you sue someone, you are attempting to take something from them, by force, against their will. That's inherently wrong. It has been decided that it be allowed in this special circumstance, with many special protections placed on the process. Those special protections have been eroded (by lawyers and politicians, for profit) to the point where they are inadequate.

      The process is a lot more like stealing or extortion or kidnapping for ransom than it used to be. With the current rules, it's simply unjust. That's what's wrong.

    37. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      I blame the (now female-dominated) psych analysists. A person can do themselves a world of favors by researching what psych was like 40+ years ago and apply its principles to their own lives, if only in part.

      We've gone from "not being able to control your emotional displays is a sign of weakness" to "emotional displays are a sign of being in touch with your inner self" in the blink of an eye, and society is worse off for it.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    38. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      Tort reform is to prevent SLAPP suits and frivolous suits.

      If the RIAA had to pay the losers legal fees everytime they lost they would be a lot more careful about who they are suing.

      Tort reform does not stop the little guy from suing the big guy. It stops the big guy from using the courts as a weapon.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    39. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      And yeah, my generation, to a large extent, is sick of the "free love" movement's lies and bullshit. Many men of my generation are clueing into how men and women are wired and acting like men instead of children.

      So hopefully, we'll at least see a partial turnaround.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    40. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I buy shoes in the $50 - $70 range, because they are cheaper. How so? Because they last for a year or more as opposed to cheap shoes lasting three months.

    41. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1
      Have you noticed that the Greek Empire fell? Or that the Roman Empire fell? Or that there are many other societies where generations worked hard to build up what future generations squandered and lost due to their complacency? Just because we, (humanity in general), have advanced over those millennia, doesn't mean there weren't societies that rose and fell in that time period, or that there weren't centuries where civilization took turns for the worse.
      I've never understood what people meant when they said that the Greek empire fell. Weren't they conquered by the Romans? Being conquered can happen to any civilization no matter what it's like.

      OTOH, the Roman empire fell due to uprisings by parts of that empire (is that correct?). But, since that empire was made up of numerous different civilizations with little in common, I don't see how that's relevant.

      I agree with the grandparent. Go back and talk with parents in the 60's and I'm sure that they would have lots to say about the kids going down a terrible path. Yet, at least a few people in those generations were able to do some kickass world changing for the good. Just think of all the awesome things that have been discovered and created since then.
    42. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by npsimons · · Score: 1
      With the focus in the past few decades on feelings, emotions, and our complete obsession with "our inner child." It's not surprising at all, it's been a while since we cared about some responsibility.

      So what you are saying is that the liberals' touchy-feely policies are responsible for the conservatives faith-based policies? Oh, the irony!


    43. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1
      I would be in favor of tort reform if the monetary damages were limited but if found guilty the doctor or the CEO went to jail. You know hold people personally responsible for their actions and decisions.

      I'd really rather not be jailing people based on civil court standards of evidence.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    44. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Why not? We jail people now based on no evidence whatsoever. Guantanamo is full of them and so are other prisons all over the world.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    45. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Have you noticed that the Greek Empire fell? Or that the Roman Emipire fell? Or that there are many other societies where generations worked hard to build up what future generations squandered and lost due to their complacency?

      And do you think that this will be the empire to turn that around? Empires die not because of internal moral decay, but because they build themselves on an economic model of unlimited expansion (which looks fairly likely at the beginning of empire). When the expansion stops, there is no more capital left to buy weaponry or soldiers to defend the empire from its (rather disgruntled) controlled subjects and the outer regions revolt, leading to a feedback cycle of shrinkage. There really is no issue of morality (except for those at the top who become less and less moral in their desire to grab more and more of a shrinking pie), just economics, baby... just economics.

      --
      That is all.
    46. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by rblum · · Score: 1

      Tort reform does not necessarily mean reducing or abolishing punitive damages. One possible alternative is to have the punitive damages go to a not-for-profit. Still hurts the guilty party, but neither plaintiff nor lawyers have a chance to enrich themselves.

    47. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never watched any daytime television. Any given commercial break has a few ambulance chasers asking if you've been hit by an 18-wheeler, or hit by a drunk, or took Fen-fen, or got injured on the job.

      You're saying there's too many suits for medical malpractice and job injuries? Are you saying only SOME people who have those things happen to them should recieve compensation? I'm confused.

      (PS: the selfishness of those who put out those adds isn't a factor in the "too many lawsuits" question)

      --
      Property is theft.
    48. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it ws the day they taught you about verb tenses?

    49. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 0

      In a nutshell you're mostly right, but don't forget that societies go through trends that do change youth for better or worse. How about all those 12 year old girls dressed like complete (forgive the term) sluts? You didn't see that in 1960! (BTW I'm 21 :-) )

    50. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Civil law is to deal specifically with things that aren't criminal. If it carries a jail sentence, it needs to be a jury court with a public prosecutor and defender, evidence gathered under warrant, and police oversight. If we start jailing people for civil offenses, we're just going to turn America into a fricking Dickens novel, and then we won't even be able to microwave a burrito without twenty-seven minutes of narration, and where would we be, then?

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    51. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      There's an industry based on coming up with stupid shit to sue people over. It's why prosecutors can afford to only charge for winning cases. Example: almost any medical malpractice trial.

      People. Knew. Tobacco. Was. Bad. For. Them. Since. The. Seventeenth. Century. The fact that it was a little more bad than expected doesn't mean that smokers are not idiots essentially responsible for their own health problems. Well, the ones that sue over it are idiots, anyhow. Those that accept responsibility and try to bully their own HMO into actually providing them with medical care for once instead are just humanly flawed.

      While I agree that stupidity is eternal (the outcomes of many of the aforementioned lawsuits being ample evidence), the divorce rate could easily go down. Also, two working parents is not 'scraping by' with full-time jobs in any first-world country. Unless you're talking about scraping by for the next payment on that 12 foot plasma television. Well, I suppose if neither parent had any clue how to spend money, it's possible... ok, sure, I'll accept your point under the universality of idiocy principle.

      I also agree with this paragraph. Those of us who want things done properly will do them properly. The rest will jack around, and (while this is mean, i'm going to add 'hopefully' here) fail miserably, and a few will rebound to complain about how they miss the good old days while trying to make up lost ground on those that got it right the first time.

      Ok, this post officially indicates I have to much time to waste on message boards. Back to my useful activities.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    52. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 1

      Two things:
      One, the advangate to technology is that it can do the dirty and demeaning jobs. People are too important to do something so simple.
      Two, you shouldn't have to demean yourself to improve your life. The "American Dream" defeats itself, because there is only so much room "at the top". People are so busy trying to improve that they forget to look around and improve where they are. The American Dream also leads to immituraty, because people focus so much on money that they forget that true wealth is people, not how big your car is.

      --
      I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
      I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
    53. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      So, You're saying this is a good thing that we need more of?

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    54. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I am saying the cat is out of the bag. You can't put it back now.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    55. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Ok, I see now. Because we're on a slippery slope, it logically follows that we must slide down it.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    56. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Alas with law that's the way it works. This president has set precedent on a number of issues which are now set in stone as the law of the land. It's not a matter of a slippery slope it's more like a one way gate. Now that we are on this side we can not go back even if we want to.

      You can now be jailed without reason for ever without a trial, without evidence, without charges. Furthermore you can be tortured or shipped to other countries to be tortured. You can be killed at will too.

      Sorry but that's the law now.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  7. American Electorate by Palal · · Score: 1, Troll

    Judging by the way American Electorate makes its decisions, I concur with the OP that the adults are getting dumber and electing duby... sorry dumb people.

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:American Electorate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh, and the popular right never panders to vicious childishness. Nope.

  8. LOLOOLOL!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YUO R TEH FAGG0T! LOLOL!

    Seriously, you see this more and more online. With people who arent 13.

    I work at a movie theatre and I see grown men acting like children over the stupidest shit....

    Though this study also explains companies like SCO and the MPAA and RIAA.

    "WE'RE NOT GETTING WHAT WE WANT.. WAH WAH WAAAAAAAAAAH"

    People use the kid at heart excuse too much. Basically they're justifying acting completely anti-social and not having to be decent to other people.

    1. Re:LOLOOLOL!! by centipetalforce · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Basically they're justifying acting completely anti-social and not having to be decent to other people."

      Kinda sometimes definitely... although it may also be the other way around. I think people are desperate to reach out to other people in SOME way, anyway possible.

  9. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course maturity being a RELATIVE CONCEPT

  10. Not sure about this guy's definitions by Bombula · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "immature ... in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact."

    I'm not sure if that's the world's best definition of immaturity, since its corollary would suggest that maturity is defind by predictability, having balance of priorities (what does that mean?), and not overreacting (does that mean reacting appropriately - how do you define appropriate?).

    I hate to reduce things to an argument over definitions, but this stuff seems a little fruity to me. I think a simpler definition of maturity is a willingness to accept responsibility for oneself and for others. By that definition, then we definitely do see a lot of immature, i.e.: irresponsible, behavior among adults - probably because irresponsibility no longer gets you eaten by lions and tigers and bears the way it did for our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

    But this guy is definitely right about the value of maintaining mental elasticity as an adult. My grandfather is a good example. He was a prof at a big university and has always had an amazingly agile and adaptive mind. And today I got an email from him of some pictures he took on his digital camera that he doctored in photoshop. Th guy is 86 years old. Email went mainstream when he was in his late 70s, for God's sake.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1
      I think we posted the same conclusions at the same time - you won the race, so I'll get moderated redundant

      P.S. My father, emeritus Professor of Statistics at London University, sounds a lot like your grandfather.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      balance of priorities means knowing what to priotorise above other things,example during college days,you are supposed to give greater priority to your exams than to parties,after marriage its supposed to be wife/kids/health first,career second,everything else third.

      but look at people nowadays,you'll see that some of them have their priorities wrong.there are those who work too hard,resulting in marriage problems,there are nothers,like i read in a /. comment yesterday,that people are first measuring how much material "value/kick" you are giving them and based upon that decide if to continue their relation with you or not.that's basically the reason for the large number of divorces.look at the country,as a poster just pointed out,like 8 year olds we are pointing fingers at each other,what ever happened to maturity ?.
      nowadays there ssome interesting trend going on which eveyone follows like sheep,it was first "boobies will be the death of us all",then its "save the children!",all along in the background someone is shouting "terrorism!".when was the last time out politicians or we as a socitey questioned what we are doing,kid experiments with a chemistry/experiments set and gets hurt,gets to sue the manufacturer.its a sue happy culture,but consider this,where does being sue happy come from ? from the lack of maturity,like kids who complain to the teacher everytime their friend does something they dont like instead of solving it themselves.

      what we need is a dose of maturity,but that will not come as long as the money keeps flowing.but not to worry,life has interesting ways of teaching people,you too will be atught one fine day.

    3. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read the article expecting some thoughtful insight--perhaps how people still buy toys for themselves, or like to eat at McDonald's or something. What I didn't expect was something so utterly useless. I do hope that the article doesn't really represent what the biology professor was trying to say.

      Maturity isn't defined by any specific set of characteristics, it's described by them. By that I mean, you look at something that is mature (finished its final growth stage) and whatever state it's in is what is "mature" for that thing. These days, "maturity" means something different, psychologically, than it (apparently) did 100 years ago (I'm not so sure about this--I can think of many great people from centuries and even millennia ago who were just as "immature" in their maturity as the professor is saying we are today).

      To me, one of the fundamentally key ingredients that makes the human mind so powerful is the fact that it doesn't have to "mature", in the sense that it doesn't have to reach a relatively unchanging state during life.

      On the other hand, I don't see any reason one can't keep a child-like mind while still being financially responsible and dependable. Like I said, given that the article seems to paint such a seemingly arbitrary view of "maturity", I really do hope it's a case of bad reporting.

    4. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by MayonakaHa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reminds me of some of the customers I get at work. Usually older gentlement trying to get a handle on computers who don't have quite the mental flexibility of others saying they were "born too early".

      The funny part about that is the last customer who said that was talking to our Toshiba representative who's got a pretty good grip on current tech. When the rep asked when he was born in response and got something back that was around the 50's, the rep replied by saying he was born in the 20's. Just shows you that if you keep your mind fresh instead of just letting it sit there unchallenged you don't have to be left behind.

    5. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      I don't see any reason one can't keep a child-like mind while still being financially responsible and dependable.
      Greetings! My daddy used to be the nigerain minizter for candies and in my house I have a very enourmus jar of sweets. Unfortunatly this jar is guarded by my big brother, but if you give me ten bucks I will bribe him to open it for me ... er us and I will share them with you.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    6. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Spikeles · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I hate to reduce things to an argument over definitions, but this stuff seems a little fruity to me. I think a simpler definition of maturity is a willingness to accept responsibility for oneself and for others. By that definition, then we definitely do see a lot of immature, i.e.: irresponsible, behavior among adults - probably because irresponsibility no longer gets you eaten by lions and tigers and bears the way it did for our hunter-gatherer ancestors.
      This links back to post #15599659("What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it." http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=189448 &cid=15599659), this is the reason everybody is sueing everybody, because they don't take responsibility for their own actions.

      "Oh no.. i dived off the edge of bridge and cracked my head open because i didn't check first for things in the water.. it's not my fault somebody didn't put a sign up, it's the councils fault! Yeah.. let's sue them!"

      Or in politics where the politician is NEVER at fault, it is always someone else.
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    7. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by illaqueate · · Score: 1

      if you look at his web site there is all sorts of meaningless although learned speculation. his professionalization is a conjunction of psychiatry and evolutionary psychiatry - two disciplines that frequently suffer from strong hypothesis with little evidence.

      that said, the article he wrote about depression as malaise is much more interesting than the very poorly worded, badly argued article being discussed here.

    8. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Based on that point you made... I.E. the line "immature ... in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact." means that every single corperation on his planet is an immature 8 year old.

      I see corperations causing their own brain drain because of company attitudes that will cut off their nose to spite their face. I see them doing incredibly stupid things like reducing the number of high paid people that get work done and hiring more and more middle managers and reorganizing and writing new mission statements.

      By definition of that line, every upper manager on this planet that worls for a large corperation is an immature brat that needs a good spanking and a time out in the corner.

      I checked out, I left a high paying job in the big corperation world to work for a company that allows me to be my definition of immature.

      I go to work with a smile on my face every day because I am allowed to think like a 5-12 year old again. Way the hell outside the box. I am allowed to be creative and imaginative and recieve rewards for my ideas.

      I love being a child again and am so happy I never embraced the american definition of "grown up".. It gave me troubles in the corperate world as I was ready to tell any management that their ideas or actions were "big dumb poo-poo head" actions or ideas and then explained why. (MBA's tend to think they know much more than the engineers and IT staff.)

      I now because of my incredible immaturity have brand new home I will pay off in 7 years, no credit card debt and I am not stupid enough to buy into the adult idea that you must drive a $50,000.00+ car from a european country to be a success. Fools drive their $1000.00+ a month car payment into the ground every day of the week.

      I'm really immature. Instead I bought that Z06 that is fun to drive, and all the BMW owners drool over in the parking lot the rare perfect summer weekday I drive it in.

      I get toys, I get happiness because I dont have much debt, and I get to tell the "poo-poo heads" that I'm taking my ball and leaving.

      Only fools grow up and act "adult" and do what "adults" do.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      The lawsuits aren't because people are immature.

      The lawsuits are because society is crumbling as the 'haves' take more and more pie for less and less of them, so everyone else is reduces to grabbing whatever they can.

      It isn't immaturity, it's desperation to stop being fucked over, even if the people themselves don't realize it.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      That's the most insidiously honest Nigerian Scam letter I have ever read :)

    11. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Spikeles · · Score: 1
      I think it might be a bit of both.. I see three types:
      1. The ones that don't take responsiblity for their actions and who think that the rest of the world should pay them, these people are not desperate, they are the leeches of society. I think these are the immature ones ( as in my above example )..
      2. And then you have the have nots. These are people who(like it or not) in today's society are at the bottom of the food chain. Whether they were born into it, or just never had the chance to rise above it they sue mostly for reasons as you said "in desperation" because they see a world where everybody else has something
      3. And finally the "fucked over". These are people who mostly through the machinations of other people(who are probably grouped in the 1st item), have been "fucked over" through no fault of their own and just want to get their lives back on track. These are probably the most deserving.
      (I can so see this turning into a flame post for this post.. :( , so let's play nice eh? :) )

      At any rate, i was just trying to highlight the fact that with maturity usually comes a sense of responsibility for you own actions, which i believe is lacking in almost all areas of.. well.. everything.

      I work in a software team and we must take responsibility for our code, but don't blame anyone, it's no ones "fault"! Hmm.. does this mean software developers are more mature.. i can see a billion dollar research grant comming up!
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    12. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      I hate to reduce things to an argument over definitions, but this stuff seems a little fruity to me. I think a simpler definition of maturity is a willingness to accept responsibility for oneself and for others. By that definition, then we definitely do see a lot of immature, i.e.: irresponsible, behavior among adults - probably because irresponsibility no longer gets you eaten by lions and tigers and bears the way it did for our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

      Here's something interesting:

      Figure for yourself which of these descriptions of maturity most matches your own ideas..!

      It may be better to write out your own ideas first, before seeing the list, because the list is arranged in such a way, and with an eye to certain sort of details- if you're categorizing maturity on fundamentally different axes, that's not something you want to miss.

      There are probably a zillion ways of describing maturity; I'm interested in discovering different maps of the space.

  11. It's all about definitions by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA

    A "child-like flexibility of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge" is probably adaptive to the increased instability of the modern world, Charlton believes. Formal education now extends well past physical maturity, leaving students with minds that are, he said, "unfinished."

    and

    "By contrast, many modern adults fail to attain this maturity, and such failure is common and indeed characteristic of highly educated and, on the whole, effective and socially valuable people," he said.

    So it looks like his definition of 'maturity' coresponds to my 'boring old fart', which, at the age of 53, I hope I'm not.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:It's all about definitions by austus · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you. His research is pure rubbish because it begins with a bogus premise, specifically his stupid definitions.

    2. Re:It's all about definitions by alas_anon · · Score: 1
      >> So it looks like his definition of 'maturity' coresponds to my 'boring old fart',
      >> which, at the age of 53, I hope I'm not.

      When mammals are young they they have a mental flexibility to learn. When they get older their brains lock into the modes of thought that they learned in youth and find it difficult to see things in new ways. This is an old concept typified by the old addage "you can't teach an old dog new tricks". Maturity is the mental state of turning off observation and going into an auto-pilot mode of preconceived notions. The story of "The Emperor's New Clothes" is another example of this effect, in which the child sees the truth and the adults are blinded by their maturity.

      In physics, most new discoveries are made by young people, below the age of 30. After the age of 30 a mature individual will often develop existing theories by compiling information, but seldom will they come up with unique observations that break new ground.

      If people are required to learn all their lives, it conflicts with the normal stabilization into rigid thinking that happens at maturity. Mature people need to lock into the misconceptions of their youth and take action without thought. It's part of normal development.

    3. Re:It's all about definitions by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      Maturity is the mental state of turning off observation and going into an auto-pilot mode of preconceived notions.

      Sorry but I really can't let that pass. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/maturity has the definition The state or quality of being fully grown or developed.

      I, but then this is a fifty year old talking, would argue that maturity is about having the range of experience to make balanced judgements, and to know that 'preconceived notions' are often wrong.

      As for an old dog learning new tricks, you don't stay in the IT world for long without having to learn something new all the time, otherwise I'd still be looking after Win 3.11 PCs, and not *nix systems. Where maturity comes in is that, when there's a crisis, I have a bigger set of mental tools to cope with it than a raw newcomer.

      I take your point about physics discoveries - ignoring Newton, of course. This is even more true in Maths which has a quicker burn out rate, but across the wider field of human endeavour I think you'll find there's more spread to the bell curve.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    4. Re:It's all about definitions by alas_anon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> Sorry but I really can't let that pass. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/maturity
      >> has the definition The state or quality of being fully grown or developed.

      The author is not writing for pop-psychology, this is a scientific argument. The definition you have from the popular dictionary is of physical maturity, not of psychological maturity from a scientific, biological, evolutionary viewpoint. In the field of biology, maturity is when the animal has acquired enough Stimulus --> Response reactions to make quick decisions. These S-->Rs become hardcoded into the brain and become knee-jerk reactions. They have evolved for purposes of survival. The adult must often make quick decisions to survive. This age-related hardwiring of the brain has been proven many times and in many ways in brain research. It's a bio-chemical thing that is difficult to reverse.

      I'm right close to fifty, also. You can't let pride get in the way of science, though. The things I'm discussing are just part of who we are, like it or not. Adults are rigid thinkers and immaturity implies creativity of S-->R patterning. Maybe knowing this is true can help older people listen more to the ideas of young people.

      I'm presently a teacher (college) and I repetitively spit out my knowledge to my students. Every now and then a bold student asks why something is the way it is. My knee-jerk reaction to say it is just that way and accept it. That's my old age talking. I find that as I get older it becomes more painful to even consider new solutions to old problems. I have learned to listen to the student's questions and go back to rethink why things are the way they are. It has been very educational. I have to tell myself that it is successful to rethink these things because I know maturity has made me mentally blind to new ideas. I can overcome that if I try.

      Most all of the posts on this thread are way off track and people don't realize this author is writing a paper on the topics of psychology, evolution, and biology from a scientific standpoint. The ridge thinking of the mature mind is not a new theory, it is old, well accepted, and proven. The author is discussing what happens when the mature adult can't solidify a S-->R rule set because the environment will not allow it. What is the outcome on development of the individual's psychology? Will the necessity to create new S-->Rs through a lifespan require the individual to remain in a psychologically immature state? Probably so. How will this change society?

      Freud also mentioned, in his lectures, that people in creative fields seem to be in a mentally juvenile state well into adulthood. This is not a new concept.

  12. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. youth culture killed my dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot posters especially tend to overstate the value of youthful flexibility and forget what evil little pricks children often are.

    Part of maturing is learning to handle the fact that you are part of the world and that you don't always get what you want. Adult temper tantrums are increasingly viewed as the way to get things done, a vicious and childish response to being balked is hailed as being "forceful" and "practical".

    1. Re:youth culture killed my dog by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      True maturity is discarding the "evil little prick" part while retaining the "wide eyes of wonder" part. Unfortunately, too many think the two are tied together and end up dull and unhappy.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:youth culture killed my dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too true, but the most common attribute of childishness I see in adults in day to day life is the unthinking selfishness and cruelty of children.

      If you can keep a flexible mind, and develop the good attributes of maturity then all is well, but the majority of childish adults seem to be as dull and unimaginative as anyone else.

  14. Compulsory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insert compulsory "slashdotters living with their moms" here ->

  15. Let the flamefest starts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...having lived in the US I can say it's quite true. People there, more than anywhere else, love their toys. Except that the tiny remote controlled car has turned into a 4x4 with huge tires and raised suspension. Or a huge collections of guns that go 'bang!'. Or many other examples like the fact they react violently or in a completely immature way when someone tries to tell them they are wrong (freedom fries indeed). On the other hand I have no idea what 'adult maturity' would be like, myself...

  16. Thought you should know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just pooted. ;)

  17. It's a symptom of the cause, by centipetalforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...not the cause of the symptom. I hear jokes that sound ridiculous when heard from third person all the time that I might laugh at if told to me. But stupid jokes don't cause immaturity, nor vice versa necessarily. It does all depend on the taste and context though, as some third grad jokes are as good as ever if done in the right context and aren't done in a derisive or tasteless sense.

    But the real cause of bad jokes is that people are as desperate as ever to be well liked. I blame that on the growing culture of sexual presumptiveness in our society. You can't just go up to a stranger and start conversing with them usually without her/him thinking your up to something, no matter how natural you are (unless you have a reason to be talking). People in general are paranoid, presumptive, and take themselves too seriously. They have nightmare stories in the back of their minds from 'Unsolved Mysteries' that tell them never to talk to strangers because they will rape and kill you!

    At least, that's the way people are in my town. I dunno about yours.

    1. Re:It's a symptom of the cause, by budword · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on your town. Funny story, in the little town I grew up in, 10,000 people or so, guy gets into his hotel, hits the mini bar quick, and is a little tipsy when he goes out to hit the bar and meet up with his buddy. At the bar, everyone he ran into said "Hello" or "Hi". For no reason at all. Freaked him out. Didn't help he was already drunk. He's starting to get scared. Where he's from strangers don't even look at each other. So he leaves the bar. Every stranger he walks past on the street not only doesn't ignore him, but looks him in the eyes and says hello. He gets even more freaked out, feels like he's in an episode of the twilight zone. RUNS back to the hotel, where his buddy finds him crying, thinking he lost his mind.

    2. Re:It's a symptom of the cause, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are just plain afraid. They live in fear of everything. Why? I'm afraid I don't know the answer.

  18. But ... what is maturity ? by torviz · · Score: 1

    Could someone please define what is maturity ? I am lost here !

  19. Immaturity Level Rising in Adults by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No duh!

    -Peter

  20. Personal position by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can only speak for myself.

    I reject the traditional concepts of maturity. I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.' The pressure to grow up, to think like an adult, is ridiculous and useless from an objective standpoint.

    This doesn't mean shirking responsibility is part of the mindset. It simply means I try to retain a childlike viewpoint on the world. One of the most important things children have that most adults lack is a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.

    That said, I didn't actually read the article, as it were, so I may be wildly off-topic. In true immature fashion, whatever.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Personal position by arkaino · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One of the most important things children have that most adults lack is a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.

      Well I think that's because of our daily life. Humans tend to follow different patterns which they think bring some kind of "order" to life, and those people who think in a really different way are usually treated as "freaks" by society.

      It's not due to human nature that adults lack sense of wonder, but a human behavior because he/she once learnt that thinking and acting in some particular way you can get better results.

      Now, it's really hard for me to define what "maturity" is after saying that. Isn't it just a learnt human behavior ?? and if it is, how can we judge people by that then ??

      cheers
    2. Re:Personal position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a perfectly mature point of view to me.

    3. Re:Personal position by maxume · · Score: 1

      A decent working definition of maturity starts with taking responsibility for ones choices and actions. After that it is graduated with consideration of consequences further into the future and across larger and larger groups of people.

      Now->tomorrow->next week->next year
      Me->my family->my village->my country->the world

      They intersect when a person begins pondering the effects of thier actions on the future population of the world.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Personal position by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.That said, I didn't actually read the article

      So much for your sense of wonder and discovery.

    5. Re:Personal position by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      That said, I didn't actually read the article, as it were, so I may be wildly off-topic.



      Don't worry. The only description of immaturity in the article was...



      "People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact."



      No real examples. Just a wack at academics. Real insight there... An entirely worthless article to begin with.
         

    6. Re:Personal position by arkaino · · Score: 1
      They intersect when a person begins pondering the effects of thier actions on the future population of the world.

      It's true they intersect, but in principle, isn't by example that one starts being "mature" ?. If my parents would have said, "hey son don't worry about anything, we'll take care for this and that". Then I could have learnt to be pretty lazy, or OTOH see they have responsibilities and take them in the future.

      So if someone isn't "mature" I wouldn't blame people neither society for that. It depends on you more than anyone else, doesn't it ?
    7. Re:Personal position by dildo · · Score: 1


      I reject the traditional concepts of maturity. I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.' The pressure to grow up, to think like an adult, is ridiculous and useless from an objective standpoint.


      Good luck with that. I hope you enjoy starving to death.

    8. Re:Personal position by Jetson · · Score: 1
      I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.'
      Isn't it ironic that we spend our teenage years being warned about the dangers of peer pressure, only to turn into adults who are then expected to modify our behavior in order to "fit in" with our neighbors or coworkers?
  21. My motto... by vanyel · · Score: 1

    ...has always been: "I may be getting older, but I refuse to grow up!"

  22. Responsibility by abdulwahid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think part of the problem might be that people are not forced to grow up and take responsibility at such a young age as they were before. I am now living in Africa but comparing my experiences to when I was living in the West I see this every day. Many children here have to take serious responsibilities in life from a young age. Perhaps they have to look after whole families or simply go out and find food every day for themselves. Regardless, when speaking to some of the young people you find that they are relatively mature.

    Perhaps in the West people are too protected and hence don't need to grow up. Many people by the age of 18 have never gone to bed with hunger pains. They have probably never had a real job. They are probably given an allowance from their parents that they can go and waste on useless luxuries. The kids in the West are pampered and spoilt. No wonder there is a trend towards immaturity.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    1. Re:Responsibility by Planesdragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think part of the problem might be that people are not forced to grow up and take responsibility at such a young age as they were before.

      Nope, sorry.

      The friends of mine who HAVE had to take responsibility at a young age, who HAVE gone to bed with hunger pains (and not out of choice) are far more immature and unable to take care of themselves than those of us who were children until the age of 18. Being introduced to hardship doesn't cause one to grow up faster -- it causes one to stop growing and start muddling through, even if they're not ready.

      If you look at the rate of war, murder, and general chaos, you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west. While I won't argue that western children are "spoiled" far more often than their african counterparts -- I think I'd rather my children be spoiled than broken.

    2. Re:Responsibility by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The kids in the West are pampered and spoilt. No wonder there is a trend towards immaturity.

      I think you left out one of the most important factors - the government's use of hysteria about "protecting the children" to justify all kinds of nanny-state laws. We have this strange dichotomy enforced on us that people are helpless, naive babes in the woods until they reach 18 (and in some cases 21) years of age, which is completely geared to isolating them from any maturity-developing life experiences.

      I see it as the social sciences version of that recent study indicating that children raised in too clean of an environment end up with weakend immune systems because they've never been exposed to grit and grime of the real world and thus never had the opportunity for their immune systems to mature and build up sufficient biological defenses.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Responsibility by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      To be fair, though; responsibility is not the same thing as hardship.

    4. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Many children here have to take serious responsibilities in life from a young age. Perhaps they have to look after whole families or simply go out and find food every day for themselves. Regardless, when speaking to some of the young people you find that they are relatively mature.

      That's precisely the reason why Africa is a haven of stability and prosperity.

      The kids in the West are pampered and spoilt. No wonder there is a trend towards immaturity.

      That's precisely the reason why the West is such a quagmire of war, hunger and disease.
    5. Re:Responsibility by trajik2600 · · Score: 1

      I think that children want to immitate the life they were accustomed to as children. I grew up in a family of seven, from lower class to lower-middle class, because my parents tried their hearts out to not let us know we were poor. I remember the days of macaroni and cheese with hot dogs, up to the point my parents would spend $250 every paycheck on food while I bitched that I didn't have a Playstation.

      I'm 23 now, and totally understand where my parents were coming from. There is only me and the woman, a combined income of $60k, an 840 sq ft apartment, and no money. I commend my parents, as they've set goals for me to live for. I grew up in a 2500 sq ft, 5 bedroom home, and never knew of anything worse. Now I live in worse, and strive for the status quo I was raised to know.

      I think that people only try to achieve the better that they've known. Any better might be uncomfortable or wasteful.

    6. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a product of hunger pangs, foster homes, and physical abuse as a child, I agree. My wife has just given birth to our daughter four months ago, and my mission is to spoil her to no end, and I've already started.

      Children are supposed to be nurtured and allowed to toe into the water - no thrown in wholesale.

    7. Re:Responsibility by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Insightful
      you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west.
      Correlation != causation.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:Responsibility by abdulwahid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you look at the rate of war, murder, and general chaos, you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west. While I won't argue that western children are "spoiled" far more often than their african counterparts -- I think I'd rather my children be spoiled than broken.

      I don't think that is true - at least not universally. Where I am there is obious poverty and hardship wherever you look however the city is thousdands of times safer than most Western cities. Crime is very low here (virtually unheard of) and most of the crime that might happen is very small petty theft.

      It is of course true that hardship can lead to desperation and desperation could lead to violence. So if you point is Africa is more violent than Western Europe then that might be true. However, there are other factors involved rather than just poverty and hardship. However, I would hardly say the US is a non-violent nation it is just the type of fighting undertaken by the US is usually more distant. Long range missles rather than street to street. The visual impact is therefore different and people mistakenly think that dropping cruise missles is somehow more humane.

      However, my point is not directly about hardship but about responsibility. People here (in Africa) generally have to act responsible from a young age where socially they are required to look after themselves and their families from a younger age. In the West the children are generally spoilt and don't even have to look after themselves.

      Also, I am not saying that one way is better than the other. I think childhood is great time and it is a shame that many children here in Africa miss out on being children. I am just highlighting what might be a potential cause of the alleged increase in immaturity.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    9. Re:Responsibility by Trifthen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think to a certain degree, that something like this happened to me. I grew up dirt poor, and worked diligently to absolutely pulverize school, finish a fully loaded IB curriculum, and get a college degree to escape that whole mess. I went to bed hungry, lived in trailers, moved a lot, and basically ran the house myself until I went to college.

      There's something about barely having a childhood that makes me want to be childish. I was 40 when I was 15, so I think I deserve the luxury of a few video games and a silly outlook now that I've made something of myself. I know what it's like to live a banal existence where laughs are forced or tied to shutting out everything looming menacingly ahead. I burned out at 18, and reached the conclusion that people take life too seriously; I made a vow to live and enjoy the little time I've been allotted. It's a cycle, really. I could spend the rest of my days resenting my past, be a bitter old fart ranting of rules and rigid discipline to reach success, but I know where that road leads.

      Responsibility? Sure, no question. Maturity to a fault? No. We have a rare opportunity to retain some of our childish antics in our old age, so why not enjoy it? Ever notice people generally calm down considerably once they are grandparents? They've experienced the utter maturity of raising children, they've tried the rules and regulations, punishments and experimentation. Grandma knows the deal now, she conspires with your children to undermine your authority, because she knows something you haven't quite learned: sometimes it's better to be "immature."

      But the parent poster had a major point: spoiled children aren't merely immature, they're sheltered and unprepared for maturity. It's a critical difference, and one the article misses. Without any other recourse, people continue with what they know and slowly realize it doesn't suffice when confronted with the inherent complexity of the adult world. Without a bailout, these people flounder horribly, and make immature decisions mostly through ignorance. They'll "grow up," but it'll take longer. Now we see where "helicopter parenting" truly leads.

      Not pretty, is it?

      By the way, some of those friends of yours who act immature? Talk to them sometime. That part of them which lived hard and grew up before their time is still there. Tell them to flip the switch and speak candidly, and they'll likely comply. If you ever want to see one of your funny or seemingly flippant friends suddenly become a wise old sage, it's a simultaneously terrible and awe-inspiring sight to behold.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    10. Re:Responsibility by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Oh, I almost forgot...

      penis, fart, vagina, testicle, queef, cooties, and silly monkies!

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    11. Re:Responsibility by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      I'm an American with that particular experience. I was basically a fully functioning adult at eleven or twelve. I've come to terms with the fact most people here don't value self reliance, and must consult a dictionary to decipher responsibility: but it's not their fault. You've read stories linked here and elsewhere concerning "helicopter parents," I assume, so it's worse than simply being spoiled. Kids here aren't *allowed* to mature, out of some misguided sense of parental overprotectiveness. Unfortunately there's no antidote to that except for time.

      The next twenty years or so will definitely be entertaining, if nothing else.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    12. Re:Responsibility by Gramie2 · · Score: 1
      So where do you live, in a city that is "thousdands of times safer than most Western cities"? I'm having a hard time thinking of one that is like that:
      • West Africa: Nigeria, Cote d'Ivoire, Mali? Nope.
      • North Africa: Egypt, Morocco, Algeria? Nope.
      • East Africa: need I even try?
      • Central Africa: DR Congo, Congo, Cameroon? Nope.
      • Southern Africa: South Africa, Zimbabwe, Lesotho? Nope.

      One of the most depressing experiences of my several years of living in Africa was seeing how corruption allowed the influential and not-so-poor people to prey on the very poor.

      In addition, because of the concentration of wealth there, the cities were magnets that attracted the very worst elements of society. Not just petty theft, but assault, rape, and murder to start the list. The checks and balances of village life (i.e. you have to live among the people you abuse) were gone, and nothing had replaced them. I liked leaving my village to have a hot shower, watch a movie and talk with other expatriates, but it was always a relief to get back to the more human dimensions of rural life. Not that it was perfect, but I generally preferred it.
    13. Re:Responsibility by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Whoa time out. A combined income of 60K, an 840Sq ft apartment, and you don't have any money? I can't imagine that rent being more than $1k/month. That leaves a whopping ~$2000 in take home pay at the end of every month. Student loans, car payments, cc payments, cell phones, cable + internet, monthly easynews subscription can't all add up to more than ~$1k. How is it you don't have any money?

      Maybe I'm making some insane assumptions, and forgive me if I am, but you shouldn't be even close to broke at those numbers.

    14. Re:Responsibility by TaggartAleslayer · · Score: 1

      In DC, $60k will get you in debt and not much else. In Dallas you could live quite well. In many places $60k is just enough to get by. In quite a few it isn't even close. It's all about location, really.

    15. Re:Responsibility by jone1941 · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah I had the exact opposite reaction. Damn you only make $60k and you have an 850sqft apt, shit that's amazing. I've got to get out of NYC, my views on the value of things are going completely out of whack. For those not in the know an 850sqft apartment in my neighborhood is $2400-$3200.

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    16. Re:Responsibility by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I had a downtown highrise apartment in Denver. Underground secure parking, gym, balcony, water, trash, 1000sqft @ $755/month 18 months ago. The prices haven't risen much since then. I'm not denying what you're saying, but there's probably other places that aren't so bad for less.

    17. Re:Responsibility by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Where I live, Northeast Georgia, two-thirds of that, 660 dollars or so a month, will get you half a duplex, with two beds and full baths, a carport, and a yard.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Responsibility by nexarias · · Score: 1
      Ignorant posts.

      Using your personal anecdotes to form a causal relationship in the overall population is ridiculous. For one, I assume that your friends who experienced such hardships did so while growing up in Western culture, which is vastly different from African culture. After all, the pervasiveness of Hollywood, hip-hop and shiny gimmicks only exist on such a level in America.

      Being introduced to hardship doesn't cause one to grow up faster -- it causes one to stop growing and start muddling through, even if they're not ready.

      That is an incredibly stupid comment, drawn from folk psychology and intuition.

      What psychological research has shown is that rats exposured to higher levels of stress in the experimental condition do mature faster than control rats. This "maturity" level in rats is measured by behavioral pattern exhibition. Of course, we are not sure if this general research can extend to humans -- it would be unethical to conduct experimental studies in humans.

      The possibilities are complex; it could be that a significant amount of stress facilitates maturity but TOO much stress shatters the personality. It is also obvious that people have their own unique defence mechanisms; some persevere in the face of hardship while others withdraw and retreat into themselves. Some actively resolve problems, while others wait for problems to dissolve. This personality disposition is then actively combined with the culture (North American, Western European, Eastern, African..) to produce behavioral patterns and growth/change in the personality.

    19. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If you look at the rate of war, murder, and general chaos, you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west."



      You win for the most racist post I'll see today. Before saying anything more, please buy and read "Guns, Germs ans Steel" by Jared Diamond, then come back an apologize. While you're at it, a 20th Century history of the West is recommended as well. That you dare blame conditions in Africa on a lack of individual maturity says more about your own than you should be comfortable knowing.

    20. Re:Responsibility by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm making some insane assumptions, and forgive me if I am, but you shouldn't be even close to broke at those numbers.

      By "no money" he meant "no savings."

      It's easy enough to do in America.

    21. Re:Responsibility by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What psychological research has shown is that rats exposured to higher levels of stress in the experimental condition do mature faster than control rats. This "maturity" level in rats is measured by behavioral pattern exhibition. Of course, we are not sure if this general research can extend to humans -- it would be unethical to conduct experimental studies in humans.

      Did you, by chance, RTFA? "Maturity" is implied to be a state of stunted expansion, and the "immature" ability to adapt to new situations is suggested to be caused by not by the civilized method of child-rearing, but by the higher fiscal reward given to those who can adapt to new situations.

      Do I draw from "pop psychology and intuition" to make my point? Yes. That's the venue we're talking in. Psychology is still a young enough science that its terms of art are out of sync with standard language. There's nothing "immature", as the term is used in TFA, about liking fart jokes or not paying one's bills on time. In fact, an "immature" person would be better able to stop liking fart jokes and pay their bills on time than a "mature" person, once they are convinced that doing so is benefical to them.

      Of course, we are not sure if this general research can extend to humans -- it would be unethical to conduct experimental studies in humans.

      It would take no more than a simple statistical suvey to show the exact same correlation in Humans -- when we are introduced to stress, we start exhibiting more adult-like behaviors. The 11-year old who has to start earning money to feed his mother and siblings is going to stop wanting to go to McDonalds every day and is likey to stop worrying about his toys.

      But that's not the measure of maturity, as the OP and common usage use the word. Thinking that it is make me think that you're, to use your word, "stupid."

    22. Re:Responsibility by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine that rent being more than $1k/month.

      Sure it can. $1500-$1700 is more normal in DC. Where I am, a 800sf condo can be had for $2k/mo.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster didn't connect any attribute to any race, nor was any race implied to be better or worse than any other. That means what what said was not racism. Whether the plight of the Africans is entirely the responsibility of outside forces, entirely their own fault, or some combination thereof is a different question.

      And this seems like as good a thread as any: Grow up and get over this knee-jerking problem of yours!

    24. Re:Responsibility by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      How many jobs in NE Georgia pay $60k and up? Also, what's there to do? I'm not really familiar with Ga, aside from hearing about Atlanta and Fulton County.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    25. Re:Responsibility by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I agree fully with you.. while I didnt live in trailers I did live with tremendous financial insecurities..

      I destroyed my childhood in work in the same way.. but I too decided to loosen up in my recent years.

      I say real maturity is when you learn that it's OK to sacrifice some of those things quantified by numbers (some gpa, some wealth/salary, some status, some karma) in order to be yourself and live your life.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    26. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My apology for being sloppy then. Change it cultural bigotry.

      "Whether the plight of the Africans is entirely the responsibility of outside forces, entirely their own fault, or some combination thereof is a different question."

      No, it was the point of the grandparent to illustrate immaturity as a consequence of hardship by using an entire continent and, presumably, the people who populate it. It more than smacked of cultural superiority. If my knee jerked at anything it was seeing the notion that an adolescent life of TV and X-Box somehow made for a better, more mature adult than fending for one's own survival ride on such a mis-representation.

    27. Re:Responsibility by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      We have this strange dichotomy enforced on us that people are helpless, naive babes in the woods until they reach 18 (and in some cases 21) years of age
      I don't remember where I saw this quote (probably Fark), but it summed up what you're saying very succienctly

      18 is not the age at which we believe you are no longer too stupid to take care of yourself.

      18 is the age at which we, as a society, stop caring if you aren't.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    28. Re:Responsibility by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >my point is not directly about hardship but about responsibility
      37% of adults in Botswana are HIV positive
      Leave aside the irresponsible governments, which are a minority of their people. Leave aside wars like Congo. The Congolese war is fueled from outside and doesn't tell you about the Congolese. Leave aside the desertification of the Sahel, which is probably part climate change, and even the overgrazing may be the result of desperation rather than irreponsibility.

      A 37% infection rate of a disease as cheaply preventable as AIDS does not square with the idea that Africans are more responsible than Westerners. They're human beings and therefore just as screwed up as we are.

    29. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crime is very low here (virtually unheard of) and most of the crime that might happen is very small petty theft.

      Only because you are looking in the wrong place.

      Look at the reasons why they is so much poverty and hardship. Hmmm? Government? Far larger crimes than the West.

    30. Re:Responsibility by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Where I'm talking about is essentially an hour and a half away from Atlanta, road-wise, and about three hours traffic-wise.

      And there is, indeed, nothing to do, unless you stay in Atlanta.

      OTOH, the few things there to do are pretty cheap. Movies for 7 dollars and whatnot.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  23. A way to deal by demon_2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that this is just a way for adults to deal with the stress of current day life. Or a side affect if you will.

    1. Re:A way to deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Side 'effect' perhaps? On second thought, the root of 'affectation' is more appropriate for the topic.

  24. Who wants to be six again? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes that's all very sentimental but why do you want to be six again, an age where from time to time you can sail a stick across a mud puddle but more often than not you are told you can't go near the mud muddle because you're wearing good clothes/at a wedding/supposed to stay dry? Who yearns for a time when everything is out of your control and sailing sticks across a pond is fun because you've still to undeveloped mentally to enjoy a good game of Risk?

    I prefer a world where I have greater control over my freedom, where my education is in my own hands as is my destinty. A world where I can paint watercolors any damn time I feel like no matter what I'm wearing and while I am aware of nuclear weapons I can also dismiss such vapid fears casually to enjoy a warm summer day.

    Being an adult is awesome if you just follow the golden words of Paul McCartney and let it be!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Who wants to be six again? by etherelithic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When you are 6 you are unburdened by the full weight of reality, and even though you may not have the intellect to enjoy a game of Risk, you don't care about that. You get enough from the simple things in life, and you didn't have to worry about anything. I fail to see the point you're making about being mentally undeveloped. So what if you're 6 and you can't enjoy a game of chess? If a 6 year old were to get the same enjoyment out of playing with sticks in a puddle as you do in playing Risk, who's to judge the 6 year old for being a simpleton? Whatever brings you happiness, is all that matters to you, no matter what anyone else says.

    2. Re:Who wants to be six again? by coopaq · · Score: 1

      You took the red pill didn't you.

    3. Re:Who wants to be six again? by turgid · · Score: 1

      Being an adult is awesome if you just follow the golden words of Paul McCartney and let it be!

      We might as well give up now.

    4. Re:Who wants to be six again? by hyfe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who yearns for a time when everything is out of your control and sailing sticks across a pond is fun because you've still to undeveloped mentally to enjoy a good game of Risk?

      If you enjoy Risk I'd say you're still undeveloped mentally.

      signed
      a Tabletop Gamer

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    5. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, Risk?? lol...

    6. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Novalight_2550 · · Score: 1

      by coopaq (601975) Alter Relationship on Sunday June 25, @03:28AM (#15599794)
      You took the red pill didn't you.

      I lost mine, can i have another please?

      --
      I have the doomed life of a PC gamer and a MS hater...

      You find item: AOL install disk
    7. Re:Who wants to be six again? by maraist · · Score: 1

      Who yearns for a time when everything is out of your control and sailing sticks across a pond is fun because you've still to undeveloped mentally to enjoy a good game of Risk?

      Risk? I have an 8 year old niece who plays risk.. Come on, Axis and Allies!!

      --
      -Michael
    8. Re:Who wants to be six again? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      You obviously do not spend much time around 6 year olds. Many of them get terribly upset over trivial things.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to go back to any period of my past.

    10. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because you've still to undeveloped mentally"

      Uh... case in point?

    11. Re:Who wants to be six again? by frankyfranky · · Score: 1

      but more often than not you are told you can't go near the mud muddle because you're wearing good clothes/at a wedding/supposed to stay dry

      So instead now you're at the wedding thinking to yourself, "how did I get into this mess?"
      We waste our time learning, working, and drinking at the bar just so that one day we might reproduce, drink some more and die.

    12. Re:Who wants to be six again? by sleppy1 · · Score: 1
      "When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once, when I was six, I did. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal." --Maximilian Cohen, PI

      I actually did this when I was six. My mom told me I'd go blind and I was thinking "no way" so I sat there staring at the sun for like 30 seconds, maybe a minute, till everything else disappeared. Believing in magical reality, I hoped it was some big secret, like if you actually did it and weren't afraid then you'd see some incredible truth. All it really did was some funky stuff to my vision. Then afterwards all I could see was a big circle wherever I looked. I could see it a little bit if I wasn't looking at anything else for years afterwards.

      I don't think I'd really like to be six again. I was pretty stupid.

      --


      "Nobody's ever going to make any money on the internet"
      --VP of the company I worked for, circa 1995
    13. Re:Who wants to be six again? by r00t · · Score: 1

      As an adult, I get to worry.

      Will I need to find a new job or even a new career?
      What will I do if my wife dies?
      Will my kids have kids before growing up?
      Is this house a bad one to buy?
      Am I walking somewhere where I'll get mugged?

      But yeah, being a kid sucked too. Bullies, icky stuff for dinner, nobody to fuck...

    14. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
      But yeah, being a kid sucked too. Bullies, icky stuff for dinner, nobody to fuck...
      I'm quite sure that there are some adults who *ahem* would be very interested in meeting a kid who is so deeply concerned about the availability of sexual partners. They will solve that problem too!
    15. Re:Who wants to be six again? by r00t · · Score: 1

      I was male (still am), straight (still am), and not turned on by teachers (still mostly not).

      I wanted the cute blonde in my 1st grade class. The girl on my street was pretty decent too, though a tad chubby and dark. By 4th grade there were two that I really wanted, and a couple others that were decent.

      I admit that I didn't actually ask any of my classmates for a fuck, but somehow I doubt that I'd have gotten a positive response. There's a decent chance they wouldn't even understand.

      It's so nice being married. :-) Boys growing up a century ago in China sure had it made: around age 5, your parents bring home a girl for you.

    16. Re:Who wants to be six again? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      >> You took the red pill didn't you.
      >
      > I lost mine, can i have another please?

      I'll take a blue one. I wanna be dumb, with a huge weiner, a good lookin' face, a somewhat hairy chest, someone with money, and power. And I want to rember nothing.

      Nothing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    17. Re:Who wants to be six again? by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 0

      You're right for the most part! Instead of being taught what they wanted me to be taught I can chose what I want to learn! I can buy my own M+M's when I want to, and not depend on my parent's donations! I can work as much or as little as I want and lead the life I want to lead! On the other hand, I wish time passed as slowly as when I was 6. And sometimes life can crash down on you hard when you understand how the world works... Oh well I guess it's a good compromise for being able to do what I want when I want!

    18. Re:Who wants to be six again? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      As an adult, you choose to worry.

      Everything is temporary, it's just a matter of duration.
      What will she do if you die? A better question is what will you do while you're both alive?
      Have you tried talking to them so they understand the risks?
      It may be good, it may be bad. It depends partially on the house, but mostly on if you choose to find the good or bad in it.
      Are you aware of your surroundings wherever you go? Lack of awareness is a key contributor to looking like a victim.

      All of those things can affect children as well. The difference is that they don't have enough experience to know what they're expected to worry about.

  25. Sadly, that would explain a lot of posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of the posts are very immature. The shear amount of trolls are incredable. I used to think that it was just kids, but over the ages, I have realized that a fair number are adults who wish to be something that they are not.

  26. Academics, eh? by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the artice:

    The theory's creator is Bruce Charlton, a professor in the School of Biology at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England...
    "People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence..."


    I'm amused that he singles out academics, teachers and scientists - pretty much the exact description of people he has in his department. Not that I wish to suggest that the fine fellows at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne are in any way immature (I did my Bachelor's degree there), but I can't help thinking that his paper is by implication not exactly flattering to them.

    1. Re:Academics, eh? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Emphasizing academics and teachers seems accurate to me. They spend a lot of time with youngsters, and the attitudes rub off. Evidence is available in the extreme left-wing political bias common among educators, and high union membership to replace mommy and daddy.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Academics, eh? by pcatiprodotnet · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Academics, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence is available in the extreme left-wing political bias common among educators

      I thought you might have had a valid point until you said that...

    4. Re:Academics, eh? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Two minor points:

      Criticizing one's collegues, no matter how good it might feel at the moment, is not usually seen as a particularly mature thing to do. Why do I get the feeling that this might not be the most reliable person to go to for opinions on maturity?

      Q: Why are academic squables so vicious and petty?
      A: Because the stakes are so small.

      Think about it...

      --
      That is all.
  27. Stolen from Tom Waits... by da · · Score: 1

    When I'm lyin' in my bed at night
    I don't wanna grow up
    Nothin' ever seems to turn out right
    I don't wanna grow up
    How do you move in a world of fog
    That's always changing things
    Makes me wish that I could be a dog
    When I see the price that you pay
    I don't wanna grow up
    I don't ever wanna be that way
    I don't wanna grow up

    Seems like folks turn into things
    That they'd never want
    The only thing to live for
    Is today
    I'm gonna put a hole in my TV set
    I don't wanna grow up
    Open up the medicine chest
    And I don't wanna grow up
    I don't wnna have to shout it out
    I don't want my hair to fall out
    I don't wanna be filled with doubt
    I don't wanna be a good boy scout
    I don't wanna have to learn to count
    I don't wanna have the biggest amount
    I don't wanna grow up

    Well when I see my parents fight
    I don't wanna grow up
    They all go out and drinking all night
    And I don't wanna grow up
    I'd rather stay here in my room
    Nothin' out there but sad and gloom
    I don't wanna live in a big old Tomb
    On Grand Street

    When I see the 5 o'clock news
    I don't wanna grow up
    Comb their hair and shine their shoes
    I don't wanna grow up
    Stay around in my old hometown
    I don't wanna put no money down
    I don't wanna get me a big old loan
    Work them fingers to the bone
    I don't wanna float a broom
    Fall in and get married then boom
    How the hell did I get here so soon
    I don't wanna grow up

    TOM WAITS - "I Don't Wanna Grow Up" lyrics

    Apologies for length - but feel the width...

    --
    I reserve the right to be wrong.
    1. Re:Stolen from Tom Waits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If only there was a way to mod parent "Oh, hell yes." I'd give a different that is close to making sense like interesting, but I've been M2ed "unfair" like crazy lately on textbook moderations, such as redundant for people copying and pasting the article from sources that have no registration requirements, no signs of /. effect kicking in, etc. So I'll just post anonymously instead.

      It's obvious from the posts here that about two people RTFA before posting. What the article is basically saying is that flexibility of mind is essentially a childhood trait. Societal pressures are forcing people to retain a more and more flexible mind with the result that the mind does not reach a "mature" state with side effects "including short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness." Although I'd really question that last bit "a sense of cultural shallowness." Academics often complain about this so called modern phenomenon, but don't provide any statistics to back this up. I claim that this idea is patently false. While there may be certain literary, musical and artistic works that were once held as great art which are being largely ignored today the fact is two generations ago the vast majority of people had no hope of being exposed to these works of art and culture, it was simply the elite (I.E. wealthy) who really had a chance to experience them. I feel that there are more people interested in and actively participating in deep culture now than were 100 years ago. You just won't find them if you sit in your ivory tower, you have to go across the street to the art galleries and coffee houses to find them. You won't hear great musical innovation on the radio, but have to go to small seedy bars and clubs to find the musicians pushing the envelope further and refining and expanding the art, just as you did with the jazz greats.

      One important question to ask is whether "maturity" in the for the article talks about does not come, or if it simply sets on later than it used to. If maturity does not ever set in, then I could see obvious negative effects. However, if it simply is taking longer for people to reach maturity, that would mean a world of a difference. This means that people have more time to gather data and obtain different opinions before their general world view is cemented. It may also mean that in times past, people were forced to suddenly mature before they were actually ready resulting in a mind that is not as fully developed, similar to how a fruit that is picked when still green and force ripened in transit will not taste as good or be as nutritious as one picked fresh when ripe. One very likely cause of delayed maturity is having children of your own. Having children often forces people to adopt a mature role, but these days it makes more and more sense to delay having children untill the economic security that comes with a degree and experience in the workplace has already been achieved. Untill that time a person is free to live for the moment a little. And acting a little immature (I.E. seeming like a fun and interesting person to be around) really is in itself a necessary ingredient to courting a mate to have that first child with.

      That said, I would probably find the paper that the researcher is writing to be an interesting read. I might question some of his conclusions and even research methods, but it's still an interesting concept and one worth thinking about.

  28. Kohlberg scale and selling/war? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having too many of the peasent moving up the Kohlberg scale is bad for
    profits, war and control?
    What if they start wanting and understanding ethical principles?
    Best keep them all at stage 2?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlberg's_stages_of_ moral_development

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Kohlberg scale and selling/war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was several articles a few weeks ago about how public education in the USA was designed to keep people in a child-like state. In particular, keeping people from reaching stage 5 (where there are shades of grey and no one right way) seems to be important. It's much easier to control the populace if they see everything in black and white. Preventing the populace from maturing to the point where laws are social contracts... keeping them in a state where laws are absolute... must seem like utopia to certain politicians.

  29. Easy by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's easy to move in a world of fog, you just need more sunshine in your outlook to burn the fog away.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Worldwide? by Bazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some people have commented that this is only happening in developed nations. But if it happens all over teh globe, would that make it a Peter Pan-demic?

    1. Re:Worldwide? by (negative+video) · · Score: 1

      Ha! I salute you.

  31. Haha by EMIce · · Score: 1

    What's the definition of mental adulthood?

    1. Re: Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mental adulthood is publishing a scientific paper with peer review instead of self-aggrandizement via MSM and a vanity journal.

    2. Re:Haha by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Adulthood is...
      Doing what you must do, before doing what you want to do.
      Doing the right thing, especially when no one will ever know.
      Knowing that your actions and words affect those near you.
      Realizing that like it or not, every word and deed has a consequence; often unforseen.
      Understanding implicitly that in spite of the previous two items, the world does not revolve around you.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    3. Re:Haha by Wildclaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And here is society's definition of Adulthood

      Doing what the boss above tells you and never question it.
      Accepting that everything that the boss/media tells you is the right thing.
      Knowing that your place in life is to earn as much money as possible by any means so you can spend it on shiny things.
      Realizing that anyone not confirming with these rules are evil or misguided.
      Understand implicitly that the world revolves around those that tell you what to do.

      Unfortunally, what I wrote is only half a joke. Too often maturity is seen as becoming a cog in society and do/think what others tell you.

  32. It depends by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before we got married, my wife and I decided to not have kids. Over the years since and to this day, when people ask us why we don't have any kids, we simply say "We're not done being kids, ourselves."

    And its true. We'd just rather spend all of that child-rearing money on ourselves and keep our options open (go out/take trips whenever), while not having to put up with the hassles of tending to kids.

    I'm sure many traditionally-raised folks might see this as immature or selfish, but it all depends on the point of view.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:It depends by Bazman · · Score: 1

      And of course your tax is paying towards their kids' education, and if you live somewhere with a decent welfare system, your tax is probably paying for their birth. Parental tax breaks mean you are paying for their food as well. How unselfish can you get?

    2. Re:It depends by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the "traditonally-raised" part these actually is the problem with the orignal article. It seems to hold the tranditonal way of doing things as the gold standard of maturity. As though if you were inflexable, but utterly reliably to do whatever mindless task you'd been trained to do that was "mature". That's no longer such an asset in society, and people are chinging. I think perhaps a better definition of maturity is the skills necessary to be a successful, productive, happy member of society.

      So something like: If you can't deal with society's rules, you aren't socially mature. If you can't succede in modern jobs you aren't intellectually mature. If you cannot find happiness in life you aren't emotionally mature. That kind of thing. That we don't defie it as some traditonal lifestyle to meet, but rather as having a good life in the world as it is today.

      Also an interesting thing about the childless it is it perhaps a new kind of maturity that we have to accept. There is a limit to the number of people we can have in the world, that's just a simple fact. It would seem we are already pushing that limit too far. Well, it will eventually solve itself via things like starvation, but I think a better idea might just be to procreate less. Given the number of people who decide that they want to have more than two children, it is socially repsonsible to have no children. That is, of course, not to advocate everyone goes childless, but there's something to be said for those that don't have kids.

      I just don't think that the definition of maturity as "Living your life like the last generation" is a useful one.

    3. Re:It depends by jozmala · · Score: 1

      Before we got married, my wife and I decided to not have kids. Over the years since and to this day, when people ask us why we don't have any kids, we simply say "We're not done being kids, ourselves."

      Evolution at work, reducing immaturity in future generations.

      --
      ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
    4. Re:It depends by eyeye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately the dumber you are the more kids you have, all the dumb people I know have multiple kids, all the smart successful ones have none.

      If it was reversed then civilization would have been much further ahead by now.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    5. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brains can't grow beyond the size of a mother's hipbones. Likewise evolution is not going to let median intelligence rise to the point at which people realize parenthood will rob them of most of what they can otherwise accomplish and experience. We're stuck where we are until we fix society so that people can have both a child and a life. (It would also help if we stop pressuring women that it's more natural to tear up their sex organs and crush fetus' heads in agony than to deliver by surgery.)

    6. Re:It depends by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a limit to the number of people we can have in the world, that's just a simple fact. It would seem we are already pushing that limit too far.

      The world isn't over-populated. Some parts of the world are overpopulated. I believe Japan has recently been experiencing negative population growth, and Australia is predicted to in the near future. That is why, in Australia at least, they introduced new tax breaks for new parents - because, especially as people live longer past retirement, there are not going to be enough people to keep the country running to the same standard as it is now.

      Of course, compare that to countries like China, with its noted overpopulation problems, or India (not exactly sure on that one; India is heavily populated, not sure if it's overpopulated). It seems to me the countries that have large populations are generally those where it is beneficial for the family unit to have a large number of children (generally agricultural societies). In Western societies, having children is more a case of personal desire, rather than economic desirability. Therefore fewer people opt to have children, and those that do have fewer children.

      I don't think it's some sort of global population "invisible hand", I think it's simply people doing what they feel is best for them. The effect that may have on the local, national or global population is incidental, not the cause of the phenomenon.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    7. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That attitude is not immature or selfish at all. Someone who is immature and selfish would have children and then try to carry on doing everything you want without taking responsibilty for the children. The attitude you take is a mature well reasoned one.

      Just make sure if you do want kids at some point that you don't leave it until you are too old to care for them properly. The people who get fertility treatment to have children in their 50-60s are selfish and irresponsible, as there is a good chance that they won't be well enough to take good care of their children or perhaps even live long enough to see them into adulthood.

      Personally, I'm 24 and have a daughter who is nearly 3 and although I'm a single father that looks after my child full-time, which can be quite restrictive, I love looking after her and I'd like more children before I get too much older. I'd say there isn't anything I'm missing out on that compares to missing out on having children. Once my child (or children, if I have more) has grown up I'll have more freedom to do things that are difficult to do with a child. Even if I don't get that opportunity, I know I won't regret having had a child whilst I'm young and looking after her.

    8. Re:It depends by abdulwahid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately the dumber you are the more kids you have, all the dumb people I know have multiple kids, all the smart successful ones have none.

      Surely it depends on your definition of success and not everyone works towards the same goals in life. If sucess is having a big house, international holidays and a fast car....then you might want to forget about the kids. However, for me success is having a happy family. I much prefer to spend days playing with my children than staying in some luxury resort. So in that way when I have children I am successful as I am achieving my goals.

      I have a friend who has 12 children in the UK. It seems extreme but I have never seen a family who are as happy, polite, well mannered and as educated. I don't think it is true that the dumber you are the more kids you have. The parents of these children are like walking encyclopedias and have knowledge of so many things in life. They are also generous and peaceful. I would say they have been successful in life. But the father drives a mini-bus rather than a sports car (he has to with 12 kids).

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    9. Re:It depends by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      This does seem unreasonably childish when put that way, but maybe this attitude is actually born from something else.

      The population growth in the world is WAY too high. We cannot support this type of growth forever. Your decision to enjoy life without kids lets another couple who LOVES kids have more than their 2 and not cause harm.

      My only problem with this attitude is that if everyone with a mind of their own did this, we'd have only mindless followers having kids. That's not a genetic trait I want the human race to have.

      So I'm on the line of whether this is a good or bad idea. I guess the answer is 'As long as only a few do it, it's fine. If everyone did, it wouldn't be.'

      Not that I have -any- say in how you live your life... It's just that the future of the human race concerns me a bit. Though if we haven't killed ourselves off yet, we aren't likely to any time soon.

      For the record, I not only don't have children, I don't have a girl to have those children with and haven't for quite some time.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    10. Re:It depends by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 1

      No, if it were reversed we would have died out as a species :-P

      The problem is that we define successful as making/having money and materialistic items, as well as having a "good" (read high-paying) job. People/couples without children can attain this much more easily because they don't have to pay for the kid and can devote a lot more time to their career.

      One of two things happen with the "smart, successful people." Either A) they don't have kids, or B) they do, but don't take proper care of them because they're too focused on their career. In case A, we have the race dying out, and in case B we have a generation of children raised by nannies and daycares with a whole slew of mental problems, usually including prolonged immaturity.

      Having a bunch of kids isn't a sign of stupidity or failure, as you seem to imply. It is simply an indication of different priorities. Sure, there are some people who are just dumb and have more kids than they can afford or who specifically try to have kids so they can cheat the welfare system out of a few more bucks, but despite the stereotype those are actually minority cases (in reference to first world countries). I would have no problem working an entry-level tech job fixing computers, even though the pay isn't that great, because I like fixing computers and because being "successful" in that sense and making a lot of money isn't my priority. My family is my first priority, and being able to spend time with and provide for them (not just financially, but emotionally) is what I consider successful.

      Maybe if more of our parents thought of raising their children as more of a success than raising their stock portfolio, we'd have a lot less problems in this world.

    11. Re:It depends by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      Brains can't grow beyond the size of a mother's hipbones
      Now with the progress of medicine they can, it's just another c-section; now even the mother survives it, she can even bear more than one Vaginamax kid before dying. So small head children no longer have an evolutionary advantage with regard to large head children.

      Even without c-section, men are conditioned to love large hips, which gives a selection advantage to large hip women.

      So you're right to say that the hipbones are a bottleneck, but the bottleneck is not fixed in dimension: it evolves too, and there is an evolutionary advantage at it being marginalized.
    12. Re:It depends by mark99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think thhe "too many people" argument is simply wrong. As technology advances, the world can easily support more and more people. The environment is far better off than it was when I was a child, although it has close to twice as many people, and is still improving. The problem in the future will be a lack of population, as our societies all strongly discourages children by putting those who have them at a tremendous economic disadvantage.

      I would guess that with careful use of new technologies (like genetic engineering) and moving some of industries off planet, earth could support something like 20 billion people. In fact it is unlikely to even see 9, and no one is sure where the population will level off once it starts shrinking.

      In fact as all of our economic systems have evolved to cope with growing and not falling populations, it is not clear that we can cope with decling populations at all. Look at the political paralysis about funding retirement shemes in Japan, Germany and the USA. We might see a very long worldwide depression once the big two pops (India and China) start to decline as well, but as most of the readers here will most likely be dead, I guess it doesn't matter much.

    13. Re:It depends by Starcub · · Score: 1

      I have had several friends that have become married and have either adopted, or had children themselves. Some of them went into thir relationships also not wanting children, but later changed thier minds. Some people are ready for the responsibility and some aren't. For those who are ready, children are an eternal investment -- they return spice to life; and all of my friends who have children are happy they have them. Of course, their children are all still in single digits ;) In my opinion it is more selfish to have children just because you want them, than to abstain realizing you're not ready.

    14. Re:It depends by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      [overpopulation] will eventually solve itself via things like starvation
      No, it won't. Starvation = no more food. People die. Unless we go canibal, there is not more food before than after the starvation. Even if the production rate may now sustain the consumption rate, there is still "overpopulation", i.e. not enough food for more people to come.

      Malthusian catastrophes like starvation are no more a solution to overpopulation than selling your car/house to finance your gambling addiction is.

      Personally I do not think there is a solution to overpopulation: given any viable possibility (an unoccupied ecological niche) any living being will just reproduce, and if it doesn't, his neighbour will, and if none of neighbours will because they are "educated", someone will just migrate into the available niche and occupy it. And even if once upon a time the education problem is solved (utopic, but not impossible), we'll still have to deal with greed and selfishness.

      And now for the fun calculation: let's assume the developed world is about 1 billion people out of 6.4b, and let's divide that number by ten to have a sustainable population of 100m people. Let's be humane and not exterminate the undeveloped populations. If everyone on the planet were to apply a one child per woman policy (so everyone can have a child which seems fair), it would take a whole 8 generations (200 years) to reach that 100m population. According to my calculation, we're currently at 2.76 per woman. In other words, we're fucked.
    15. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. 12 kids in the UK - lemme guess who's paying for them... the taxpayers.

    16. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's the alternate (and less expensive) way to get the darwin award, by deliberately not getting children. Personally I think life's not worth living unless you can pass it on to someone new when you're gone. :-)

    17. Re:It depends by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      And of course your tax is paying towards their kids' education, and if you live somewhere with a decent welfare system, your tax is probably paying for their birth. Parental tax breaks mean you are paying for their food as well. How unselfish can you get?

      That's true, but it's also true that sooner or later, those children whos education he's paying for; will eventually be paying for his retirement and old age health care. And the circle is complete.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    18. Re:It depends by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1
      I have a friend who has 12 children in the UK. It seems extreme but I have never seen a family who are as happy, polite, well mannered and as educated.

      That sounds to me like they have made a conscious choice that their contribution to society is as the parents of well-educated, healthy, happy and successful children. If both parents are highly educated, and want to pass that on to their children, I applaud them for that decision. Unless something happens to my wife and I remarry to a girl fresh out of university, I doubt that level of procreation is even possible for me. May there be more people like this in the world.

      However, your example is the exception rather than the rule. It doesn't change the trend in western countries with welfare programs, where a non-working, never-married, single mother may have 8-12 children on the taxpayers' dime, while well-educated, married couples are having fewer children on average.

      Most of us don't have the privilege of knowing someone with that kind of dedication and commitment to the future, and even having two children is becoming a rarity among the people I know and admire. Congratulate him for us, and encourage him in his effort. I hope he succeeds in bringing them all up to be happy, healthy, functioning adults.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    19. Re:It depends by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surely it depends on your definition of success and not everyone works towards the same goals in life.

      Yes and no...

      Talking about "nontraditional" happy people - People who (could) make quite enough to compete favorably in the rat race but choose to only work 20 hours a weeks and live in a double-wide so they can afford frequent vacations. Those people validate your point, but come few and far between.

      Talking about the ever-growing masses of n'th generation welfare families, you have it absolutely wrong. When you need to live on the dole to survive, you should NOT have kids. But those people seem to have the most kides - Look at a cross section of the US in terms of income (or education) vs average number of children, and you have a VERY strong inverse correlation. The poor breed, the wealthy breed (but don't suffer for it or exist in large enough numbers to sway the above-mentioned correlation), the middle class have to choose between lifestyle and kids.


      I heard a story on NPR the other day, about TN cutting back on their socialized healthcare system. They portrayed this as a real sob story, a poor victimized crippled woman who had to choose only five prescription drugs per month to fill.

      Mind you, this woman already got $600/mo just for existing! For breathing and eating the government cheese, she gets paid. Then she gets five prescriptions per month... Not one or two, but five. They went on to tell a tale about how, when she got an infection, she had to pick which drug to temporarily live without. And of course, after rent and food and basic bills, she only had $9 out of her free $600 remaining per month.

      Do you know how many free prescriptions I get? ZERO! Do you know how much I have left each month from my government pay-me-to-exist check? ZERO, because I don't get one! And $600 wouldn't even pay all of my rent, because I don't qualify for section-8 vouchers. Can ya hear the goddamned violins? Can you???

      But back to the NPR story... The next generation no doubt did better, right? Her kids can help... Nope. Her kids also live as white trash, getting their own little slice of government cheese, and can't afford to help Mom because their own kids have huge regular medical bills (apparently also over the five-script limit? The story didn't make that part clear).

      This story absolutely infuriated me - This woman needs to take just one last prescription - for the lead pill; and her progeny need to stop spreading their legs until they can afford to feed themselves! End-of-fucking-story. I didn't just describe a situation of "differently happy" - I described a case of hereditary poverty largely through their own acceptance of that situation.

    20. Re:It depends by Coleco · · Score: 1

      The number of malformed arguments based on a poor understanding of genetics and biology in this thread is staggering. It almost like watching people argue religion.

    21. Re:It depends by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the dumber you are the more kids you have, all the dumb people I know have multiple kids, all the smart successful ones have none.

      One need look no further than the inverse correlation between slashdot karma and getting laid, but still you should read the The Bell Curve, and some of the associated commentary. The book was extremely controversial: although the author was generally dismissed as a racist, there were some clear correlations studied between IQ and offspring, with obvious implications for evolution in the long term. Not really addressed, but especially relevant to the adult maturity question, are the implications of the birth control pill, which has practically separated sex and procreation... people in the first world have the means now, if they choose, to have "real" sex while postponing practically all personal responsibilities indefinitely.

      If it was reversed then civilization would have been much further ahead by now.

      Define "further ahead". It's certainly interesting, but I don't know that we're worse off in terms of "advnacement". I you think of "civilization" as the antithesis of "animal nature", then surely it's advancing! Specifically, if you believe there is an inverse relationship between IQ and breeding, then this seems to predict a shrinking (hence more concentrated in power) intellectual elite. I don't know whom to blame except "the advancement civilization" for driving us to such behavior.

    22. Re:It depends by nexarias · · Score: 1
      This is true on a statistical level alone.


      However, there is of course no real logical link. There are plenty of very smart and successful people who produce more than two children. For example, it is not rare to read reports of CEOs of major companies who have quite a number of children. Politicians, despite their bad rep, and are intelligent in some dimension also have children in good numbers. Oxford philosopher GEM Anscombe had seven children -- although this was partly due to her being a devout catholic.

      What is important would rather be the sort of personality underlying intelligence.

    23. Re:It depends by nexarias · · Score: 1

      Considering how recent C-section has been, the dissolution of the evolutionary advantage of small head children will take many, many generations to show any effect.

    24. Re:It depends by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Which is why TFA is talking about how little immaturity there is today. It all got evolved out of us.

      Err... wait.

    25. Re:It depends by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      as does every evolutive process

    26. Re:It depends by Bazman · · Score: 1

      You've obviously not seen how much a state pension is in this country (UK). Compare that with the cost of 13 years of full-time education...

    27. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how are your wife and my kids, anyway?

      Oh, I forgot that I was addressing a /. regular. The question should have been phrased 'How are your mom and my other kids, son'?

    28. Re:It depends by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure many traditionally-raised folks might see this as immature or selfish...

      And people who are not insane will see it as mature and responsible.

      People who do not want children should not have children.

      People who think everyone should have children, or that anyone has any kind of "duty" to have children, are childish and immature. They can't separate their own desires from those of others, and they don't understand that it is the basest kind of evil to create a human being who is not fundamentally wanted and loved, but rather considered a burden or a duty.

      We live in a society that doesn't particularly value children, and I frequently see parents who view their kids as a burden. If you listen to the "back-to-school" ads at the end of summer you will see how anti-child we are, and how wide-spread the assumption is that everyone is really looking forward to shipping their kids back to the warehouse. As a parent who actually likes children, I hate the end of summer as much as they do. And yes, I do work for a living--just in a way that gives me time to do what I really care about.

      If you don't like doing kid-stuff with kids, you shouldn't have kids. Anything else will just increase the unhappy population of the Earth, which is more than large enough already.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    29. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anon for obvious reasons.

      I'm a resident in a moderately large southern hospital. Black, white, whatever: you never run out of stupid. I've lost track of the number of 24-year-olds I've come across who have 4 or 5 children and are working on another.

    30. Re:It depends by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, without continued population growth, you can't have significant economic growth.

      Technology is changing the balance between the # of workers & economic output, but tech doesn't remove the need for workers.

      Even China is worried about their population imbalance (more guys than girls & more old than young people) causing serious economic problems in the near future.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    31. Re:It depends by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Which is why places like Australia and New Zealand are worrying about population decline on a national level. But for everyday couples, more children are a financial drain rather than a financial asset like they would be for a farming family, where more kids mean more hands to do the work. Your average suburbanite kid doesn't do much to contribute to a family economically. So you have an imbalance in regards to the value of children: good for the national economy, bad for the parents, which is why the Australian government gave tax breaks, to try and redress the balance. I don't think that's a particularly good idea myself (it's encouraged immature teenagers to have kids for the money, which ends up being an even greater drain on public resources, as they are generally not actually ready for children) but that's the rationale.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    32. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it is true that the dumber you are the more kids you have.

      It doesn't matter what you "think" or what your anecdotal observation has been, idiot. It's a statistical fact. Congratulations in proving that you yourself are in the "dumb people with kids" category.

    33. Re:It depends by gg3po · · Score: 1
      We'd just rather spend all of that child-rearing money on ourselves and keep our options open (go out/take trips whenever)

      I think you meant to say that you'd just rather eat, drink, be merry, then push the responsibility off onto taxpayers to bankroll things when you get old, decrepit, and you have no family to help bear the financial burden of caring for you. If everyone lived like you civilization would fall apart in short order. A society that refuses to reproduce is a society committing suicide.

      , while not having to put up with the hassles of tending to kids.

      When I reach retirement age, with a sizeable family to help me out financially, and when you're rotting in some government nursing installation, all alone in the world, and the tax man comes to ask for funds to pay some stranger to feed you/change your bedpan, please remind me to respond: "I don't want the hassles of tending to that shortsighted old man".

      --
      ---
  33. Their photo for illustration by simdan · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are using a photo of a traffic cop dancing in the street to illustrate their point. I could have sworn I've seen that cop on TV. He does these crazy moves and motions as he directs traffic. Pretty entertaining to see and a lot better then a cop with a chip on his shoulder. I have doubts that he is really all that immature. Just a guy having fun at his job.

    1. Re:Their photo for illustration by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      They are using a photo of a traffic cop dancing in the street to illustrate their point. I could have sworn I've seen that cop on TV. He does these crazy moves and motions as he directs traffic. Pretty entertaining to see and a lot better then a cop with a chip on his shoulder. I have doubts that he is really all that immature. Just a guy having fun at his job.

      Not to mention a bit of exercise. This world would be a happier place if more people danced in the streets.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  34. Obivous? by rgravina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't understand why someone tagged this "obvious". I had no idea that adults, on average, are more immature now than they were in the past. It does sound reasonable, yes, but certainly not obvious.

  35. Responsibility is key by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the immaturity discussion at hand has really anything to do with becoming one of the Sheeple and conforming to expected norms. I think it has everything to do with accepting responsibilities. That I think is a growing problem that people seem to be less responsible than in the past...

    I myself am happy to maintain a child like outlook on life but I also take responsibilities and commitments and relationships very seriously. Perhaps it is the erosion of serious relationships in society (and that could mean anything from partners to very close friends) that is tainting other aspects of life for some people.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Responsibility is key by lxs · · Score: 1
      I don't think the immaturity discussion at hand has really anything to do with becoming one of the Sheeple and conforming to expected norms.


      From the article:
      Brooks believes such individuals have lost the wisdom and maturity of their bourgeois predecessors due to more emphasis placed on expertise, flexibility and vitality.


      It appears that this is exactly what Brooks is talking about. I suspect this is yet another British academic yearning the Good Old Days.
    2. Re:Responsibility is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Bruce Charlton is the professor the first part of the article discusses, while it is David Brooks who is only a social commentator with The New York Times who is said to have commented as you have stated in the last part of it. Reading comprehension is important at this level.

    3. Re:Responsibility is key by maxume · · Score: 1

      A statement that uses the word "sheeple" is, by definition, not insightful. Thanks.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Responsibility is key by lxs · · Score: 1

      Ooops. It appears that my brain simply is too immature to correctly process the article.

      It really is a sign of the times because... OMG Kittens!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!11!!!!eleven!!!

    5. Re:Responsibility is key by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      The huge debt load and negative savings rate of Americans is a pretty quantifiable aspect of this irresponsibility.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    6. Re:Responsibility is key by Whitemice · · Score: 1

      > I don't think the immaturity discussion at hand has really anything to do with
      > becoming one of the Sheeple and conforming to expected norms.
      > I think it has everything to do with accepting responsibilities. That I think is a growing
      > problem that people seem to be less responsible than in the past...

      I though the article was kind of vague as to what it meant by maturrity,

      One quote from the article is "Charlton pointed out that past cultures often marked the advent of adulthood with initiation ceremonies." I think this is a pretty important bit. A real issue here is the definition of adulthood, when it begins, and what it means. Modern life is conspiculously free of specifically ritualistic activities (except perhaps ritual-lite such as graduations). I suppose there are upsides to this, but I think it also does leave people kind of wondering where they are or what they are supposed to do. All those societies can't have created all those rites-of-passage and initiations if in people there wasn't some need, or at least, desire for such things (having some of the basics of life defined FOR you can be comforting, and maybe if that doesn't happen - then it has happened: the basics of life are undefined/undefinable. A situation I don't think most people actually find much comfort in.

      A little more depth concerning that the author(s) meant by "Neoteny" would have been helpful.

      >Perhaps it is the erosion of serious relationships in society (and that could mean
      >anything from partners to very close friends) that is tainting other aspects of life
      >for some people.

      Yep, I think it may only be truly possible to be adult, in conjunction with other adults. The decay of traditional institutions has made it harder, or at least less likely, for adults to come together outside of recreational or work related activities. The psuedo-recreational activities of religion, orders, or lodges (that often included hosting speakers and participating in charitable functions, etc..) have basically vanished. It is easy to forget how enormous (in membership) and influential organizations like lodges and orders were in the not too distant past.

      --
      Using "Common Sense" is being either to arrogant or to ignorant to ask people who know more about something than you.
  36. something I noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It seems adults in the USA have stolen the toys of their children.

    Take comics for example, I was surprised to know that comic book companies in the USA now target adults much more than children. I was surperised more to find that adults dress up as comic characters in conventions. The same applies for Sci-Fi movies and TV shows. I don't know about video games, but with the increasing violence I'm guessing that again the main target is now a mostly adult audience.

    The aim of this post isn't attacking adult comic readers (or whatever), but there's a difference between some people buying something they like, and the current situation where adults 'hijacked' whole categories of products initially marketed for their children.
    Can anyone explain to a non-American how this happened?

    1. Re:something I noticed by cliath · · Score: 1

      The reason that has happened to comics is simply that new mediums (cartoons) which took over that spot in children's lives. People who grew up on comic books, grew tired of the childish themes, and the new generation weren't interested in them since they had animated comics.

    2. Re:something I noticed by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      ...and the current situation where adults 'hijacked' whole categories of products initially marketed for their children.

      They weren't initially marketed for their children. They were initially marketed to them, when they were children. As they grew up, they simply didn't abandon the product. The product matured with its audience. You see it quite frequently in TV shows (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) and books (Harry Potter) where the books initially start out marketed to a young audience, and keeps that audience throughout. However, as time progresses, and audience matures, and so the product has to change to keep contact with its audience. It's why people keep saying the Harry Potter series gets "darker" with each book.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:something I noticed by cynical+kane · · Score: 1

      Harry Potter might have been "marketed" to children, but it certainly wasn't written for them. Just ask the author.

  37. Fast Food by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I'm scared to post in this topic, I could be a poster child for immature behavior...

    It all started when I had to answer to a 16 year old boss being 18 at that fast food joint.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  38. This is great! Now I can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    feel perfectly comfortable telling people my own age to get the hell off my lawn!

  39. This topic is producing a lot of childish replies by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ironically it's the ones that aren't intentional that we should be worrying about...

  40. Well I dunno man by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    If what it takes to be "responsible" or "mature" is starvation, child labour, and so on then please, sign me up for immaturity. I would also point out that in that "mature" environment we have more crimes against humanity than, well, proably anywhere in the modern world. Ethnic clensing, tribal warfare, brutal torture, etc. Seems that perhaps having the weight of the world thrust on your shoulders as a kid and haivng to mature fast is perhaps not the best method for a stable and successful future.

    I'm not trying to say America has the be-all, end-all answer for raising kids. Clearly we get screwed up adults here. But pointing to Africa as a good example of maturity is rather shocking. While perhaps people have to be mature on an individual level and accept responsibility for immediate concerns like food, socially it's very immature. Brutal fighting against someone who happens to be an arbitrary different tribe than you is not mature. It is indeed very much like little kids ostracising certian members because of trivial differences, it's just done in the grown up world and thus has more dire consequences. It is overall more mature to have a society where it's not just what's good for you and yours, but good over all. A warlike, tribal view is extremely immature in that context.

    I think perhaps there's something to be said for being less "mature" in some ways. Being mature often seems to be tied to being cynical and depressed. People who are bright eyed and idealistic are looked down upon as immature and young. Ok, maybe so, but it is those bright eyed idealists that can bring about real change. If you are "mature" about life in that you accept it as it is then you don't stand much chance of changing it. It's only if you have the perhaps naive view that the world can and should be a better place that you'll have the will to go try and make it such.

    1. Re:Well I dunno man by abdulwahid · · Score: 2, Informative

      If what it takes to be "responsible" or "mature" is starvation, child labour, and so on then please, sign me up for immaturity. I would also point out that in that "mature" environment we have more crimes against humanity than, well, proably anywhere in the modern world. Ethnic clensing, tribal warfare, brutal torture, etc. Seems that perhaps having the weight of the world thrust on your shoulders as a kid and haivng to mature fast is perhaps not the best method for a stable and successful future.

      I think you are missing my point. It is not about the poverty but about the responsiblity. Socially here people have to be responsible from a young age but in the West they don't. Also, it is unfair to paint all of Africa with one brush. Africa is a massive place and has diverse cultures. To think that it is all "Ethnic clensing, tribal warfare and brutal tortue" shows a complete lack of understanding of what Africa is like. Sure these things do exist in Africa but not everywhere. They also exist in all other parts of the world. Some of the worst Ethnic cleansing the world has seen has been in Europe. Also horrific tortue is carried out in many parts of the world (including by the US) and is not something particular to Africa or even the norm. in Africa.

      The point though is taking responsiblity. Having to be responsible for yourself and other makes you more mature at a younger age. It might not always be a good thing but it is a factor.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  41. Definition of mental maturity/adulthood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there an agreed-upon defintion of mental or psychological maturity? If so, what is that? When I'm lyin in my bed at night I don't wanna grow up Nothin ever seems to turn out right I don't wanna grow up How do you move in a world of fog Thats always changing things Makes me wish that I could be a dog When I see the price that you pay I don't wanna grow up I don't ever wanna be that way I don't wanna grow up Seems like folks turn into things That theyd never want The only thing to live for Is today... Im gonna put a hole in my tv set I don't wanna grow up Open up the medicine chest And I don't wanna grow up I don't wanna have to shout it out I don't want my hair to fall out I don't wanna be filled with doubt I don't wanna be a good boy scout I don't wanna have to learn to count I don't wanna have the biggest amount I don't wanna grow up Well when I see my parents fight I don't wanna grow up They all go out and drinking all night And I don't wanna grow up Id rather stay here in my room Nothin out there but sad and gloom I don't wanna live in a big old tomb On grand street When I see the 5 oclock news I don't wanna grow up Comb their hair and shine their shoes I don't wanna grow up Stay around in my old hometown I don't wanna put no money down I don't wanna get me a big old loan Work them fingers to the bone I don't wanna float a broom Fall in love and get married then boom How the hell did I get here so soon I don't wanna grow up (tom waits/kathleen brennan)

  42. marks of mental adulthood by waterbear · · Score: 1

    What's the definition of mental adulthood?

    Sigmund Freud wrote somewhere that psychological maturity was about the ability to love and to work.

    You can take your pick, but that sounds like a start to me.

    -wb-

  43. What's the definition of maturity? by MonkeyBot · · Score: 1
    "The faults of youth are retained along with the virtues, he believes. These include short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness."
    Aside from short attention span, is any of this really indicative of immaturity? Sounds a bit more like a shift in social paradigm to me...I still see people working 8-5 to make ends meet so that a family can be raised. How are these people defining "mental adulthood?"

    It sounds like this guy's main argument is that education requires mental immaturity, and education now continues into the 20s. If this is the case, then shouldn't the New Adult be more capable of learning than the older generations? I don't understand, but maybe it is just a consequence of my short attention span...

  44. Its Simple Really by artoffacts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Adults are typically hard to sell to. Children on the other hand typically make easy marks. So how do you make sure that your target market remains in a blissful pre-lapsarian haze in the face of age and oncoming responsibility?

    You produce them as such.

    Thomas Doherty once quipped that "movies reflect teenage, not mass - and definitely not adult - tastes". Hollywood, The TV industry, glossy magazines, etc, are all interested in doing one thing: producing you as an unquestioning consumer whose core concerns are childlike.

    Take for example these new Nike Ronaldino ads whose catchphrase is "never grow up". I don't want to go all Barthes here but these ads are so shameless in their meaning production that you wonder how any adult with an IQ over 80 could fall for their message. It's pitiful really.

  45. The trouble is.... by WontStopTrying · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm 19. To politely state how I feel about my generation is that I strongly dislike them. What's worse though is having to deal with adults at my college, who attend to get a "second chance" at whatever it is they want. What's annoying about them is that they are immature. They act exactly like my generation. A group of people who are more focused on social aesthetics rather than concerning themselves with the overall good, they don't even focus on a goal besides graduating. It's annoying, and it probably won't stop. Education is being pushed on younger people to attend at an early age so they don't have to go back, or won't have to do a lot of work later in life while raising kids, and that might make it change because they'll be able to focus on adult responsibilties and socialize with people who are farther along in their life. As far as people in "the west" living in cushy little houses and having everything provided for them by their hardworking parents, that is untrue. My mom made me go get a job. My mom told me if I didn't save money that I would be the man who had to walk to work because he blew it on a game system instead of preparing for an accident from his car or saving for my retirement. Currently I'm renting my own house leased under my own name and sure I had her help finding it, but it's me and my roommates paying for it. She prepared me for it, but I am proof that "the west" doesn't have everything given to them and that some of my generation can appreciate deeper things than how many friends you have on myspace, or who got drunk at what party. Personally I find my generation offensive, but that's just me.

    1. Re:The trouble is.... by ComradeSnarky · · Score: 2, Funny

      My mom told me if I didn't save money that I would be the man who had to walk to work because he blew it on a game system instead of preparing for an accident from his car or saving for my retirement.


      Your game system costs as much as a car plus your whole nest egg? I didn't know the PS3 was out already.

    2. Re:The trouble is.... by WontStopTrying · · Score: 1

      I lol'd

    3. Re:The trouble is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have news for you, it isn't your generation - it is *the* world.

      the world is incredibly selfish and self centered in nature. in fact, if you don't see your own selfishness, you are icnredibly self centered, too. ;-)

      if you are frustrated now, wait until you "grow up" and find out that your wife thought sex's useful wore out once she used it to "get a husband." oh, and so did that exercise bike, too. soon *after* you get married, you'll get the "i look cute fat" routine.

      that's how the proprietary marriage model works, and just like proprietary OSes, the model dominates the market.

      i bet my life my fiance wouldn't do that to me... and i lost.

      now the only question i have to answer is whether i will be getting a divorce in just under 13 years - once my child hits 18.

      oh, and did i mention how she will try and turn you into an *ogre* even though it was her who lied during the dating phase (never mentioning sex annoyed her and that her goal was to "look cute fat" and unhealthy) and she has no compassion for your biologically driven desires but expects reverence during her bouts of PMS (much of this brought on by a poor diet, no less - the insanity)?

      or how, after a decade of paying the mortgages, the expenses, saving for retirements, paying for vehicles, paying for vacations, etc... she will only criticize and b* about you aren't her vision of a perfect father, etc... but still have the nerve to ask, "can i have a BMW" (read, can you buy me a BMW).

      you *think* you are cynical now. i put forth that you still have a lot of experiences ahead of you to tke you down the life long path of cynicism. all i can do is warn you in advance - a warnign i *never* received.

      ps - i do not advocate divorce and remarriage, either. think about it - if you werre duped once, you can easily be duped again. if you have kids, suffer through it (you are not alone!) and raise your kids out of love and responsibility. i've seen too many people with strings of failed marriages - and that *is* worse than a single failed marriage. much worse.

      the the sad part... what my wife stole from me was the ability to be married and provide for a really nice woman who loves and appreciates me deeper than my ability to provide for her. b/c of her 5 year lie, i will never experience that... it is sad. i thought i dated that person, but i now know i was wrong.

      pss - for the lady or two out there in slashdot land, if you pull this crap, you validate the guys who use and lose women... their reasoning is that they are going to lie and get what they want (sex) prior to you lying (i'm so sexy -> get married -> morph into ice queen) and getting what you want (money, material security in marriage).

    4. Re:The trouble is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a fuckin' river. You're a loser and we should be supposed to care? There is a way out of your sorry state, you know: it's called "suicide".

  46. I guess alot of people think like I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! I remember thinking at the age of 10: "wow, being an adult sucks. I could go without the goodies if being an adult is as bad as my parents complain it is. I mean, I don't have to do anything. Having to spend most of my day at some crappy repetitive job would suck" I guess that sentiment has caught on.

  47. Are Farts Funnier in Church? by Quirk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's really impossible to address the range of issues such a claim covers. In evolutionary terms we're thought by many to be neotenic. From wikipedia: " There is controversy over whether adult humans exhibit certain neotenous features, or juvenile characteristics, that are not evidenced in other great ape species. Stephen Jay Gould was an advocate of the view that humans are a neotenous species of chimpanzee; the argument being that juvenile chimpanzees have an almost-identical bone structure to humans, and that the chimpanzee's ability to learn seems to be cut off upon reaching maturity."

    An argument could be made that as we're neotenic by evolutionary design it's "only natural" that psychologically we exhibit overextended developmental immaturity.

    Our sense of humour is based on broken symmetry. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience by Erving Goffman was an early effort to set out the myriad markers we use to establish a contextual frame and the wit we employ to break that frame for various reasons, humour not least among them.

    Our relatively oversized brain is conjectured to be an outgrowth of our intricate social relationships. Our fetishes and rituals have come under scrutiny by dint of recorded history and cultural cross fertilization. In the vein of familiarity breeds contempt it may be that we've simply come to more easily poke fun at ourselves.

    The Marx brothers said it best: Groucho:"I wouldn't want to join any club that would have me as a member"; and Karl: "Moi, je ne suis pas marxiste."

    It may be that those who are now seen as relatively immature are those whose lives most correspond with the material wealth that permited playful immaturity. I suggest that Freud's concept of polymorphous perversity can be extended from sexuallity to all aspects of our lives as a description of our ability to transcend our basic nature.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  48. "The faults of youth" by Rational · · Score: 1

    "sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion" etc.

    I submit those are the symptom of exactly the opposite - mankind finally beginning to grow up.

    --
    "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  49. bs by norteo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth"

    Oh my God!!!! Adults don't think about money any more! what are we going to do?! Don't tell me wars will soon be over!! Quick, you, "leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry", give me some aderol!!!

  50. Explaination by Zemran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Growing old is mandatory but growing up is optional... and I opted out.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are sufficently self centered and poor/uninterested in reading social cues, you'll never realize that you are pathetic middle aged man sponging off his parents and frittering away all his time on their broadband connection.

      In a way if you are sufficiently far from realizing you are pathetic, it is indistinguishable from not being pathetic. It's like being so far away from being a normal human being that you approach a semblence of it, as it were, coming from the other direction.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Explaination by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      How _OLD_ are you exactly? Frittering?

      --Joey

    3. Re:Explaination by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      And you sound too old... and maybe a little bitter. Is this a way of telling everyone that you wished you were a "sufficently self centered and ... are pathetic middle aged man sponging off his parents and frittering away all his time on their broadband connection"?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:Explaination by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      I use the word frittering from time to time and I'm only 29.

    5. Re:Explaination by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Groovy!

      (FWIW I don't think the word "fritter" will ever die, considering its use in the song "Time" from Dark Side of the Moon, a timeless album that just won't leave the charts)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Explaination by DannDana · · Score: 1

      The only people who grow old were born that way to begin with.

    7. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you sound too old... and maybe a little bitter. Is this a way of telling everyone that you wished you were a "sufficently self centered and ... are pathetic middle aged man sponging off his parents and frittering away all his time on their broadband connection"?

      Bitter?

      No. It only sounds that way because of the general paucity of irony in the world.

      I think of this as an optimistic viewpoint.

      What I'm saying is nobody is pathetic -- or at lest nobody needs to feel pathetic. And if you don't feel pathetic, then the contempt of others is a waste of time. It's the person who is disturbed by others who don't measure up to his values is closer being pathetic than the object of his scorn. If the only way you notice other people is to scorn them, then the person who doesn't notice other people at all is better off.

      The example I used was chosen to be the most conventionally contemptible one I could come up with. Apparently it hit some moderator a bit close to home.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      How _OLD_ are you exactly? Frittering?

      Well, depends on how you measure age:

      (1) Old enough to remember a 300 baud modem as an upgrade.

      (2) Old enough to have used TIPs to access the ArpaNet.

      (3) Old enough to remember bang notation on email addresses.

      (4) Old enough to remember V7 Unix and have worked on Multics.

      (5) Old enough to remmeber how sdb was big improvement on adb, but still using adb sometimes because it was easier to patch object code with it if you knew machine language.

      (6) Old enough to remmber CPU clock speeds measured in KHz.

      (7) Old enough to have worked on a system with a 5MB hard disk.

      (8) Old enough to have seen punched cards, drum memory and CRT memory in the flesh, albeit as surplus hulks in the basement and not working machines.

      (9) Old enough to have bootstrapped a computer via its front panel switches.

      (10) Old enough to remember when "core" memory was actually made out of cores -- magnetic beads.

      (11) Old enough that when I started in the business, I had older colleagues who would say things like, "I remember getting 4K of RAM on our 1401; we thought we had the world by the balls. That was a stored program jobbie, you know". Sometimes, as we sat around on the cracker barrels whittling new dot matrix print heads, a few would admit to being old enough to have worked on Whirlwind (which was programmbed by plug boards).

      (12) Old enough to have a five digit /. user id.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Explaination by MageWyn · · Score: 1

      (12) Old enough to have a five digit /. user id. Five whole digits? Well, Poopy!

    10. Re:Explaination by Sippan · · Score: 0

      (7) Old enough to have worked on a system with a 5MB hard disk.

      You had hard drives!? My system had one 800KB floppy drive...

      --
      Frog blast the vent core.
    11. Re:Explaination by rjshields · · Score: 1

      You had floppy drives!? My system had a cassette drive!

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    12. Re:Explaination by frietbsd · · Score: 1
      This article feels to me like a grumpy old man complaining about "them kids these days".
      From the article:
      The faults of youth are retained along with the virtues, he believes. These include short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness.

      I think without sensation and novelty seeking columbo wouldn't have set sail into the unknown. having a rapid changing culture doesn't make it shallow. Naughty humor is also almost as old as rockpainting. never dropped in popularity since.

      I feel exactly the opposite of Bruce Charlton, i think that our youngsters are more and more forced to act as adults. They get the mobile phone for free and the bill follows a month later. Often far above the months earn of the spotfaced kid. In the netherlands the school systems are also growing towards more personal responsibility for the students.

    13. Re:Explaination by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      You had a cassette drive? My system was connected to a hand-cranked Victriola!

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    14. Re:Explaination by chrish · · Score: 1

      LOL, n00b!

      Not only have I seen punch cards, I've used them. We had to use them to set up a batch job on the mini in highschool (PDP 11/34 running RSTS-E) to get printouts.

      I've been on the 'net since before the web existed. I remember USENET before MAKE.MONEY.FAST invented spam. I remember a time when AOL users couldn't access the 'net at large.

      IIRC I'm the same age as the Internet itself. But I still want a flying car.

      --
      - chrish
    15. Re:Explaination by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Luxury!

      I had to catch a bird and press it's beak against a revolving stone slab!

    16. Re:Explaination by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the wonderful memories. The days when the net had a signal:noise ratio that was bearable, even in USENET groups like talk.abortion and talk.origins. The days when USENET numbered under 1000 groups. The day the net began its transformation to the "intarweb": when AOL connected to USENET. Bleah.

      I missed punch cards by 1 semester in college, and I still wave thrushes daily that I had the priviledge of working on VT100s.

      As for =5 digit /. accounts, if I could only find out what my original account was... after all, I predate /. by quite a bit. :) Unfortunately, none of my email addresses from that time are functioning at this point. :(

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:Explaination by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I remember bitnet and using it to access Yale relay chat.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    18. Re:Explaination by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Hand-cranked?!? Well, ladi-da, your royal highness! In my day, all we had was a communal water wheel down at the creek. And you had to wait in line behind all the other peasants to even use THAT!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Explaination by 6 · · Score: 1

      Old enough to not be impressed with a five digit user id :)

    20. Re:Explaination by lullabud · · Score: 1

      I don't think you sound bitter, I think you sound italic.

  51. Old fart maturity? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe that being mature simply means to accept the consequences of our acts.

    Being mature doesn't have anything to do with being predictable, boring, let-me-read-my-diary old fart or being playful, childish, fun and sometimes impredictable and impulsive.

    As long as I accept the consequences of my acts let me play all I can and enjoy simple things and not worry more than I have to.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  52. prepare for economic activity?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "The psychological neoteny effect of formal education is an accidental by-product -- the main role of education is to increase general, abstract intelligence and prepare for economic activity,"

    prepare for economic activity.... am i the only one that thinks there's something wrong about that one?
    .... abstract intelligence and prepare for a corporate life??? that's growing up???
    i've been reading too much chomsky http://www.understandingpower.com/...
    1. Re:prepare for economic activity?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >.... abstract intelligence and prepare for a corporate life??? that's growing up???

      Yes, because whether you like it or not, there is no other choice beside poverty. It's that simple.

      The society you have been born in is economics-driven and, yes, it is a corporate-dominated society. There's nothing you can do about it. You will live and die in it, and your kids (if you have any) will live and die in it.

      Part of "growing up" is recognizing once and for all that the world is not like you wish it to be, and that you have to adapt to it. It will not adapt to you. You're insignificant. A small cog.

      Get used to it.

    2. Re:prepare for economic activity?? by luckygofarms · · Score: 1

      so we achieve maturity and work hard & vote dumbasses like a herd of sheep so they can do whatever... retire w/ underfunded pensions... work at mcd the rest of our lives? What's so sad is you don't have to be a cog. You got used to it. not me. don't you see that its YOUR LIFE that's insignificant???

  53. HUH?!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wat teh fucken u d00dz no abt waht is matrue and waht peeple wanna do now?!!? thins is change all teh time an were teh new way 2 go u fagz r stuk inna tim wrap!?! GO back to teh 70s u r 2 0ld!?!!!

  54. Burden is an illusion by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you are 6 you are unburdened by the full weight of reality

    What weight? Is there a physical cinder block upon you? Put it to the side then. All other weight, especially mental weight, is chosen by you. You are the one who decides if weight of your imagining is dragging you down or something to stand upon.

    The point I am making is that being much older I have had many more experiences and am able to enjoy them in ways a six-year old is not, as I can enjoy more esoteric pleasure just as much as splashing in a puddle (alluded to in the words of the musical Chess with "The Queens we use would not excite you"). My higher level of awareness also leads to greater ability to experience joy. While it is true that also means a greater ability to experience esoteric suffering, I would not give my far vaster scope of ability to simply feel more just because sometimes there is pain. There was pain when I was six as well so what would be the difference except that by opting to stay six forever I would wish myself to be enclosed in a box.

    Have you ever read Flowers For Algernon? There is a reason why that story is a sad tale instead of a joyous return to a blissful state of ignorance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Burden is an illusion by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Have you ever read Flowers For Algernon? There is a reason why that story is a sad tale instead of a joyous return to a blissful state of ignorance.

      Well Í have. It's sad BECAUSE two personalities (genius vs. retard, excusez les mots) are described, and none are preferable. The responsibillity of having to make choices, and be doomed to bear the consequences: thát's what it's about. Being cared for at six, play with sticks and mud-pools, enjoy life as it is without having to thing further than another day, perchance a week. When summer holidays lasted forever, chocolate was plain good, bikes could fly if you just tried hard enough and animals could speak. Have you ever read Calvin and Hobbes? Winnie the Poeh? 'His Dark Materials'?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    2. Re:Burden is an illusion by greenrd · · Score: 1
      His Dark Materials was not that fun for me. I guess if I had read it as a kid I would have enjoyed it much more.

    3. Re:Burden is an illusion by Chrax · · Score: 1

      I was a bit disappointed in His Dark Materials, or at least the execution of it. The story was interesting, and overall the writing was good, but there were a few times in each book where the narrative loses its flow and you're suddenly dragged out of the fantasy and made painfully aware that you're reading words on a page.

      That, and sometimes the dialogue felt like it had been written by someone who had the vaguest notions of how humans interacted.

    4. Re:Burden is an illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What weight? Is there a physical cinder block upon you? Put it to the side then. All other weight, especially mental weight, is chosen by you. You are the one who decides if weight of your imagining is dragging you down or something to stand upon.

      The burden caused by a mortgage and bills are not an illusion. They are quite real. And they are not something you can 'stand upon'. They are a necessary evil required to keep your quality of life at the level to which you are accustomed. This quality of life was set when you were young, say.. 6 perhaps? So to have the equivalent life of a 6 year old, you need to put up with these burdens. And even then you're not 100% of the way there becuase you now lack an over-seeing protective guardian that will physically pull you out of harm's way. But I guess that benefit would come with a loss of freedom, so most people opt not to choose it.

    5. Re:Burden is an illusion by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      Have you read The Idiot (by Dostoyevksy I believe) or just about anything that Blake wrote. I won't say that experience is bad, but I think the control-freek mentality that drives it sometimes is wrong. We want know everything, to be like God, and that is our Fall. As the Green Lady in Perelandra (by C.S. Lewis) said "to take the good you wanted and not the good that was given to you".

    6. Re:Burden is an illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The burden caused by a mortgage and bills are not an illusion. They are quite real. And they are not something you can 'stand upon'. They are a necessary evil required to keep your quality of life at the level to which you are accustomed. This quality of life was set when you were young, say.. 6 perhaps? So to have the equivalent life of a 6 year old, you need to put up with these burdens

      WTF? When I was six I had my own bedroom. A few toys, some favorite TV shows and a mother who would take me to the library when I wanted to go. How much money do I need to make an hour to replicate that "quality of life" today?

    7. Re:Burden is an illusion by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      His Dark Materials was not that fun for me. I guess if I had read it as a kid I would have enjoyed it much more.

      That's one of the things that change when growing older: the joy in fiction. A childs ability in believing something is incredible compared to that of an adult. To dream the dreams of an innocent child... my youngest (3 yrs old) didn't walk on the grass next to the sidewalk, while it seemd much more enjoyable thing to do. So I asked 'why?'. 'Because of the monsters, they only move under the grass', she answered happily. To me that was incredible, to her it was that days' reality.

      Rowlings first books were not thát good either: interesting concepts, but she lacked a bit experience. She learned fast :c)

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    8. Re:Burden is an illusion by Bastian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't read His Dark Materials, but I have read the others.

      Calvin and Hobbes I don't take as a great example. Calvin is emotionally unstable, creates a lot of problems for those around him, and doesn't strike me as being particularly much happier than the other characters in the story. Hobbes makes an interesting foil; he's often used to underline the silliness of Calvin's destructive behavior. He's much more mature than Calvin, gets along with others better, and doesn't harbor nearly as much anger. Calvin may be the protagonist, but he's not the hero.

      Winnie the Pooh was written for children, so the characters are naturally going to be very childlike. However, I don't see a single life lesson that comes from Pooh which can't be applied in adult life - indeed, Pooh's easygoing attitude is something I see in adults far more often than in children. I don't have kids of my own, but at least in public I often marvel at how strongly they can fixate on small, inconsequential objects, which strikes me as just about the last thing Winnie-the-Pooh would ever do. I'd say that, of all the characters in the Pooh series, Pooh and Christopher Robin represent the attitudes and ways of thinking of children that I've met the least well. Far more often, they remind me of Rabbit or Tigger.

      Really, if I had to say anything about Pooh's character, I'd say that he represents the patience and equanimity that are the best qualities of well-mannered adults, and that he was made somewhat dim in an effort to counteract his otherwise overhwelming wisdom in an effort to keep the character entertaining, as well as to make it easier for children to relate to him.

    9. Re:Burden is an illusion by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What bothers me here is the assumption that 'maturity' means giving up mental flexibility, energy, etc. The baseline assumption is wrong. You can do more with the data you acquire with experience, if you remain open to the data in the first place.

      Misery is a choice. It's *all* a choice. I fail to see anything at all wrong with retaining the good stuff of youth, coupled with the experience of age. Old men I know are always moaning "if I had the energy they have with what I know now.."

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    10. Re:Burden is an illusion by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1
      The burden caused by a mortgage and bills are not an illusion. They are quite real. And they are not something you can 'stand upon'. They are a necessary evil
      I think it's overstating things quite a bit to say that a mortgage is an evil of any sort. It's certainly a burden, but you can choose the size of your burden. Regardless of what you are accustomed to, you will get used to living someplace smaller if you choose a lesser burden.

      Examples of necessary evils: taxes.

      Actually, that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
    11. Re:Burden is an illusion by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And just because you're viewing the world from a mature perspective doesn't prevent nor negate the joy of playing in a mud puddle, if you feel the urge.

      I'm 51, and despite all my mature attitudes [g] I still swing around the corner pole EVERY time I go to the post office, and I don't care who sees me do it. I watch ants. I examine interesting pebbles. I dig in the dirt (okay, so we call it "gardening" -- but it's still fundamentally digging in the dirt).

      No smart remarks about my second childhood... :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Burden is an illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, wake the fuck up, realize that "god" is a human invention, and realize that to be "like god" is to not exist.

    13. Re:Burden is an illusion by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

      you write very well.

    14. Re:Burden is an illusion by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Heh, I take it you noticed I didn't do any proofreading, too? ;)

    15. Re:Burden is an illusion by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

      ;) i dont really mind whether a text is fastidious about grammar etc, esp online; it's just nice to read prose that has good flow, excellent sentence structure and a natural progression of original ideas. I consider Slashdot posts akin to something like a haiku; and although I don't know the exact criteria for success I do know a good one when i see it. cheers

    16. Re:Burden is an illusion by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you read The Tao of Pooh or The Te of Piglet yet? I didn't find them to be all that captivating but after reading your comment they seem like they'd be right up your alley.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  55. Hey, wait a minute... by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

    ...is he talking about us?

  56. Wolf children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Human culture and religion has a huge effect on 'maturity'. Think memes, 'nature vs nurture', etc.

    Here's a quote from the sf novel Emergence, by David R Palmer:

    'Note that of the 1,284 incidents wherein wild animals of varying descriptions "adopted" human children, none (with the exception of the very youngest - those recovered from the wild below age three) developed significantly beyond the adoptive parents. They could not be taught to communicate; they evinced no abstract reasoning; they could not be educated. IQ testing, where applicable, produced results indistinguishable from similar tests performed on random members of the "parents" species...

    'Finally, most authorities... are agreed that Man is born devoid of instincts, save (a point still in contention) suckling; therefore, unlike lesser animals, human development is entirely dependent upon learning and, therefore, environment.'

    Plenty of evidence of human capability - childhood prodigies (Norbert Wiener, Stephen Wolfram), autistic 'idiot-savants' - perhaps provides a glimpse of truly 'mature' humans. As a former teacher, I've seen enormous potential damped or smothered by upbringing. A crying shame.

    Bring up babies without culture, religion, prejudices, lowest-common-denominator TV, sexism (which, as demonstrated by Douglas Hofstadter, exists at a fundamental level in language) - and show them instead nature, science, music, art, rationality, super-rationality (again, Douglas Hofstadter). We may then meet real humans.

    Other references? Unfortunately, the only other one I've come across is Howard Fast's rather comprehensive treatment in the novelette 'The First Men'. The title sums it up. Essential reading.

  57. They can stick it by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
    One 30-year-old's summary of this problem (maybe this is trolling/flamebait/offtopic - I don't care and you can't make me care):

    Old farts who judge me: "In my day, we didn't act like you, and we didn't blah blah blah."

    Me: "STFU, you old fart."

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  58. What is "maturity"? by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    Were the two world wars, the Vietnam war, the thermonuclar arms race signs of this thing they call "maturity"? Is rape, murder and the systematic plunder of the world's dwindling resources also "maturity"?

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  59. s2pid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a worthless thing to say. i am a member of several high iq societies, where i debate with 140-160+iq, 20-80 year old gifted - high genius people (ceos, scientists, et cetera) and i have fathomed the reality that "maturity" whatever that means, is not even half important. it is even more worthwhile to speak with a child than a corrupted, trashcan-brained ""adult"".

    payawal john

  60. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree with you, even though I must say it's only a subset of the phenomenom, other things like the rampant ignorance and erosion of the middle class (not just in the US, it's bloody everywhere!) are good indications of what all this globalisation steamroller has in store for us.

    And I'm pretty surprised nobody else has mentioned this fact on Slashdot, as the majority of responses were like those of 6 year olds.

  61. Strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not to promote sex, violence and deceit.

    Violence is bad and deceit is bad, but what's your problem with sex?

  62. Red and Blue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You took the red pill didn't you.

    Oh I took both the Red AND Blue pill. I skipped the one marked "bitter" though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. I remember being six... by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it wasn't the paradise you remember. Sure, someone stealing you jump rope was you biggest problem, but at the time you felt like it was the end of the world. You would often throw fits, yell, and generally colapse. Now we look back at that stuff and think how easy we had it, because we have grown up and can handle it.

    Instead of "wishing to be six," I want to learn to be a adult that thinks like a six-year-old. I want to be able to deal with problems in a responcible manner, but still understand the fun of silly hats. I want to understand that there are bad things in the world, but still meet the world with smiles and a it-will-work-out deminer. We have the misconception that we must be cyical adults just because we have reached a certain age. I'm going to be a kid forever!

    Oh, and remember, if you became 6 again, you would have your teenage years to look forward to *shudder*

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
    1. Re:I remember being six... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you already spell as badly as a six year old, so you're part way there! And your teenage years are the best of your life for most people.

    2. Re:I remember being six... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "teenage years are the best of your life for most people"

      Mine was kinda like this: DEATH SWEETE DEATH, PLEASE GOD TAKE ME, DONT LET ME WAKEUP TOMORROW

      I still suffer from it, but its not as bad, I do know that I would have choosen death over life if I had an option when I was put into this world. But I live, and I have to "live" with that I guess.

      As you stated "for most people" and not for all.

      Buy the way, when I was six I was still happy.. ignorant and happy.

    3. Re:I remember being six... by prod-you · · Score: 1

      >Oh, and remember, if you became 6 again, you would have your teenage years to look forward to *shudder*

      Hmm, then maybe I can get some the second time around.

    4. Re:I remember being six... by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      Maybe adulthood is worse, but being a teenager is no party either. I should know, I'm 15.

  64. Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody?) by kaiwai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You hint it right on the noggen; the number of so-called adults who seem to have the maturity of a child seems to be an increasing phenomenon in our society; I just look down the road and on the news; the 'everyone elses fault except my own' syndrome. There are people on the benefit having children, knowing full well they don't have the funds to pay for the associated costs, we have couples having more children than they can afford, then demanding that the tax payer for the bill for their lifestyle choice.

    All this is actually a biproduct of our modern day welfare state, and the nanny state complex which people have adopted, that we shouldn't take responsibility for our actions, because good old nanny state will always be there to whipe out bottoms, and stop us from doing moronic things.

    Regarding smoking, the health issues have been known for over 60 years, if people CHOOSE to live under a rock, and REFUSE to take in the information that is readily out there, who is to blame? I don't blame the cigarette companies - they're like any other company, make their product look sexy, close over any possible health issues, and keep on pushing.

    If you're going to blame cigarette for the associated health costs of smoking, why not allow people to sue fast food companies who fail to put warning labels and advertise that if their product is consumed in excess, it could cause health problems? why not extend it to the confectionary and snake food companies? heck, why not put a big sticker on cars that warn that due to the bad driving of others, you could possibly die!

    Honestly, it is getting to the point where I ask, when are people going to take responsibility for their actions - that is the cornerstone of being an adult, making your choices and accepting the consequences of those choices.
  65. Taht is where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the governments want their citizens and megacorps want their customers... easy to influent... buying any lie they want to sell...
    In the Soviet Union the same was achived by giving citizens cheap vodka.

  66. Suzy Sociologist Says... by mugwumpus · · Score: 1

    It's real, and it's profound. The tendency is both a cause and a symptom of the "Information Age" -- cf. Industrial, Feudal and Agricultural -- making it a positive feedback loop, such that the rate of human evolutionary change is increasing, putting we geeks and goofballs in the avant guard, seeing as how we're less distracted by the common plights and predators of previous ages, unfortunately leading to the clash with Those Who Would Control Everything. I think. Without a trace of hubris, nosiree.

  67. Really? by PhakeDC · · Score: 1

    Well I don't know what to make of this. Has all this dumb marketing turned us into childish sheep? It's certainly someone's fault, that there are entire nations comprised of "TV cry-babies", adults failing to live up to their responsibility etc. There's nothing wrong with the occasional juvenile escapade, but when fully grown individuals start acting like babies, then the whole of society is expected to become even more dysfunctional. Soaring divorce rates, the erosion of the middle class, blatant consumerism... Really the top brass are short sighted, because all this will eventually come back and bite them in the arse, or at least their next of kin. The stupid responses here aren't assuring either.. "What is maturity?" is just as laughable as those cry-babies on Tyra, Oprah or Dr. Phil.

  68. Boys will be boys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but men are better at it ;)

  69. '...promote sex, violence and deceit.' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with this sentence?:

    'When television was used to report the news or for family entertainment and not to promote sex, violence and deceit.'

    Hint for immatures: replace 'sex' whith 'chocolate' and read again.

    1. Re:'...promote sex, violence and deceit.' by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I did. Then I replaced the other two with "fatty foods" and "generalized pressure to consume, consume, consume until we've wrecked the environment and otherwise massively screwed over the next three hundred generatons."

      Then, for some reason, I started having very negative feelings towards chocolate. I'm not sure why that happened.

      Still, point taken. I used to be a very religious, conservative person. Now I don't understand this attitude of "sex is a sacred and holy act to be shared by exactly one man and exactly one woman, within the bonds of a legally and religiously sanctioned marriage, to be performed annually and in the missionary style, then never talked about until it's time to have another go at it next year."

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  70. Well Duh by Novalight_2550 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who knows an old person or two could have told you they're freaking weird and like to act like they're young.

    --
    I have the doomed life of a PC gamer and a MS hater...

    You find item: AOL install disk
  71. I love being a grown-up by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

    I love having control over my life and my personal space.

    I love being able to stay calm when things are stressful.

    I love having the personal resources to really help my friends.

    I love being able to buy ice-cream when I feel like it.

    And there's nothing stopping me from playing Pooh sticks if I feel like it!

  72. Was this world made by "mature" people? by Cannelloni · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did people used to be more responsible and "grown up" when they sent their sons into battle in Europe or Asia against the sons of some other "adults"?

    I don't claim to know what maturity means, exactly, but it seems to be the ability to care, love, to provide for others, and to not be impressed by propaganda och values created by somebody else, perhaps with a political or religious agenda.

    But what do I know? I'm not exactly a model person. I'm just happy I've made is this far. All I want is to do what I love and love what I do.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    1. Re:Was this world made by "mature" people? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The people who cause the trouble spots in the world - Sadam Hussein, Qadhafi, Kim Jong-il, et alii - are like spoiled children with far too much power. It's the adults of the world whose responsibility it is to punish or eliminate these foul men before they become even more damaging. (Insert Godwin's law here.) To oppose war and fail to recognize that in most cases one side is much more evil than the other, is like failing to fight cancer because "It's a living thing, too."

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Was this world made by "mature" people? by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Never mind the casualties and "collateral damage". Btw, you failed to mention a few other politicians the world would perhaps be better off without. Oh, how great it is to have a simplified world view! Isn't it wonderful to always know what's what and what's best! We are the good guys, and they are bad.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    3. Re:Was this world made by "mature" people? by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      I was of course refering to the two world wars, not to the ongoing disaster in Iraq. But I guess it follows the same logic.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  73. well by Ichigo+Kurosaki · · Score: 1

    Personally I think that this is a bus response to the growing number of adults playing video games because many of the non gaming public sees video games as for kids.

    When video games are accepted by the main stream as for everyone we will stop seeing ridiculous laws targeting video games and reports like this.

  74. Already being dealth with in eduction - loans by zenst · · Score: 1

    Whilst the observation is indeed accurate I would wonder if there was any coralation to the autistic groups and that this my be a form of asbergurism.

    Now if you had somebody who was intelligent and had asbergurgers (mild autism) would it not be possible for them to adapt to there `alledged handicap` to the extent wer upon they general fitted in. Given they would adapt early on in youth thru obeservational mimicery then such traits would be explianable.

    ANyhow

    The observation to educational systems and the extension into work is whilst corrct also being addressed baturaly. We now give students loans and expect them to pay for everything to the extent that when they finish there course there so in dept they forget how to have fun very quikly or end up on the streets.

    One observation not considered is that given how we have gone from evolving to the extent were upon our worries have moved on from hunting/gathering food and as a genral shift from essentials to were do we go for holiday and what stock options can I get if I.... That and increased leasuire time and financial ability to furfill more childhood dreams we natural find ourselfs staying in the learning inqusitive stages longer than the more practical stages of the brain/life.
            This is how some could observe natural evolution and the stretching of the devolopment stages. We still measure in age were upon a 20 year old a 100 years ago was nothing like a 20 year old today who's lifespam would be more akin to twice as long so from a social basis's it would be very concievable that whilst they are more intelligent there sence of responsibility would be less due to the enviroment and extended lifespan they now enoy. So to equate them on a scale of responsibility to a 10 year old when comparitvly there IQ would be comparable to a 30 year old and you see another good fit to the observation.

    Another thought, if we were all mature - somebody would have less fun in there work writting such papers :).

  75. You should not by mad at the "inner child". by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 1

    What you should be mad at is the startlying lack of accoutability, of everyone. Teaching people to be in touch with themselfs does not cause lack of responcibility, refusing to aknolage how you affect the people around you does. We are taught in America that you job is to take care of you, and people neglect the people around them. The reason I am responcible is not the affect it will have on me, but the affect on others. Lack of accountabilty is the reason the tobacco companies are being sued. Lack of accountabilty is the reason people are being sued. And lack of accountabilty is exactly the reason that people get called 5 year olds!

    We are not islands. It's time we stopped acting like it.

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  76. Re:The fact that that was modded "insightful"... by Silas+Palmer-Cannon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that that was modded insightful is proof of this phenomena. And also a little ironic.

  77. Maturity by Channing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the formal definition of maturity ? I RTFA and didn't see one so its impossible to agree or disagree with it.

    1. Re:Maturity by alas_anon · · Score: 1
      >> What is the formal definition of maturity ? I RTFA and didn't see one so its
      >> impossible to agree or disagree with it.

      The author is writing about maturity as defined by the field of developmental psychology, specifically of mammals. When the animal is born it is bombarded with information and starts to assemble order by looking for patterns. As the animal matures, these patterns are remembered so that the animal can make decisions more quickly when it sees them happen.

      What this implies is that young animals will have delays on reacting to certain situations because they are still developing a pattern definition and reaction for that stimulus. A mature adult who has seen the pattern before does not think about the pattern, but reacts immediately without thought.

      For you programmers out there, the child is still writing the "if (pattern==true){ reaction }" code and the mature individual stops programming and only runs the code, without thinking about it. Mature individuals have the initial speed advantage, but if their reaction is wrong then they will get stuck in a loop of illogical behavior and will be unable to change the hardcoded logic of their mind. One symptom of maturity is that the adult can't remember why they do things a certain way, but they are very adamant about doing it that way.

      Maturity is like having your software get ROMed, bugs and all.

  78. people hate responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maturity = shouldering of responsibility
    people hate responsibility
    the information age allows people to shirk responsibility with ever greater efficiency.

    this comes as no surprise, i've been harping on this failing of society for awhile now.

    1. Re:people hate responsibility by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
      Plus we're a more mobile society. When you spend your whole life in a village where everyone, I mean everyone, knows you and your entire family, then no one forgets anything. If you stole a piece of candy or said a bad word when you were three, someone remembers. But when people move around every few years, change jobs, change homes, and you don't really know anyone, social censure isn't nearly as formidable of a problem. Now you can be the adulterer, or have a DUI, and most people just won't know about it. I don't think this made people irresponsible, only allowed us to indulge our latent irresponsibility. Falstaff's character was written 400 years ago, and he probably resembed somene Shakespeare had met.

      Plus, it's not as if the prominent members of society, of any political persuasion, are wracked by guilt for things they've done. Morality is much more forgiving now, as well--Ronald Reagan was a divorcee, which used to be considered a sign of bad character. Now it's normal. We're all about "putting things behind us," even if the "things" happened last month and are still under grand jury investigation.

  79. I see two definitions by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One definition is the idea that mature people "don't like silly things." I personally think these people need a pie in the face. Life is hard, life is stressful, and sometimes you just have to enjoy the silly and simple things.

    The other definition (and I feel the more relevant one) is the responsibility factor. I would say "accountability" works better than "responsibility," even though responsibility is how everyone is refuring to it. As for this, I feel it is definately true that people aren't accountable enough. People (in America at least) seem to be told to watch themselves, and people stop looking out for the guy next to them. We all affect each other, and we all need to be accountable for that. NO PERSON IS AN ISLAND.

    The trick is to take the best of both worlds. Enjoy a good pie fight, but have the courtecy to help clean up

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  80. What is wrong with being child-like by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 1

    This guy doesn't want to be six to avoid responsibility as much as to be able to look at things like a 6-year-old again. He is talking about the part in all of us that wants the simple life again.

    And you have to admit, sometimes the 6-year-old has it right. "Why don't people just talk instead of having wars?"

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
    1. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >sometimes the 6-year-old has it right. "Why don't people just talk instead of having wars?"

      Have you've ever seen two 6 year olds fight over a useless toy both of them will forget in about 2 hours?

      Have you've ever seen a 6 year old go into extreme crying/temper tantrum mode causing fustration to their parents (you know, the ones who feed and love them) just because they can't get a small shiny colourful package of candy?

      Sometimes 6 year olds don't have it right.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Why don't people just talk instead of having wars? When I was 6 I was violent, now I am no longer violent and maybe now slightly diplomatic. I think this is one of the best things about growing up, violence sucks.
      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    3. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, why don't we just talk... If you think that's insightful I think that the article is about you.

      Here's a clue for you, you don't talk to invading generals. You don't talk to people committing genocides. You only talk when you lack means or courage.

    4. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Pichu0102 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Adults do that too still. Just look at congress.

    5. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish I had mod points right now. That should be modded insightful, not funny.

    6. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Inner_Child · · Score: 1
      Here's a clue for you, you don't talk to invading generals. You don't talk to people committing genocides. You only talk when you lack means or courage.
      President Bush? I didn't know you read /.!
      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    7. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations." -- David Friedman

    8. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      ultimately force is the only way to deal with an issue in which the other party is both uncooperative and prepared to use force themselves. countries as the highest entities in the world cannot just ask a higher power to use force so they have to do it themselves both to each other and on some of thier own citizens.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, the world needs more 6-year-olds making preemptive strikes on the others playing in the sandbox, because hey, they might be thinking of stealing their toys.

    10. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the other way around. The six year olds usually fight over a toy rather than "just talking about it".

      Unfortuantely, international politics (and this isn't a recent thing either) resembles a bunch of six year olds. More unfortunately still, some of these six year olds in crusty 60 year old bodies have nuclear weapons.

  81. A poem for a poem by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 2

    Life never stays the same
    no matter how much we wish it would
    for time runs as a river does
    and though the pattern may repeat
    the drop cannot run the coarse again.

    So we do remember
    times that were good and fair
    as we ever on prepare
    for the day that now lies ahead.

    The past is the past
    and there is no point in living there.
    The future is before us
    more life to live and tales to tell.

    Self author-ed
    There is something to be said for the world of the 6-year-old, but there is something to be said for this world as well.

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  82. mental maturity? by tofus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the hell *is* 'mental maturity'? No really? Having an IQ of 150? Or an EQ of 240?

    I dare claim that whomever came up with the term 'mental maturity' was mentally immature enough to come up with a better term.

    I mean, a man/woman is physically 'mature' when all the reproductive organs have fully developed and the person is capable of human reproduction.

    Are you mentally mature when you start thinking about sex more then your gameboy? What?

    I say the entire term 'mental maturity' is popular marketing speak for 'total nonsense'...

  83. Most of you seem to be missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am seeing way too many responses missing the point of adult maturity. I believe those responses that are telling you that it is about adults taking responsibility are correct. For those who seem to be missing the point, let me give several real-life examples:

    My fiancee lives on the third floor of a 3-story 3-apartment house. About 8 months ago two girls who recently were done with college moved in. The apartment building rules are made very clear: each apartment has assigned parking and there is no smoking indoors. The first day the girls parked in my fiancee's spot. She thought nothing of it as they were moving in. The second day they were done moving in and they continued to park where they want and in a manner that reduced 4 parking spots to 3. My fiancee knocked on theie door and politely told them that they were in her spot and explained where their spots were. She was greeted with:

    "Who the fuck do you think you are? The lanlord told us we could park anywhere we wanted."

    Shocked, my fiancee went upstairs and called the landlord to tell him of the incident and that she had no idea how to proceed. He called the girls and explained to them where they were to park. The next day, things seemed better, as everyone parked where they were supposed to. But over the next few weeks, the parking degenerated and the girls went back to parking where they wanted, having friends park in spots that were'nt for parking, etc. The times they used my fiancee's spot, she would knock on their door and be greeted with rudeness and indignation. The girls got to the point that they would flip us off if they saw us. Yet all we wanted was the one parking spot we were paying for.

    Then, they started smoking in the house and coming home late from the bars bringing in untold number of people. The smoking policy is there for two main reasons: the air system is such that smoke in the house moves throughout all of the apartments and it smells like you smoke in the apartment when you don't. Also, it is a fire hazard. So when the girls would smoke, my fiancee's apartment smelled like we were running a bar. I went and asked them once to please stop and they denied they were doing it. "We don't smoke." So we complained to the landlord. He came by and confronted them, to which we got a nasty letter written in bad english stuck to our door. It rudely introduced themselves to us, explained that the polite and neighborly way to handle things was not to go through the landlord and that if we had problems we should talk to them.

    Smoking continued off and on, but the girls decided to be even worse. They would come home at 3am, deliberately bang doors, stomp up and down stairs, just to make the point that they could do what they wanted and we had no say. However, to our advantage, all the while the second floor apartment was keeping notes and also calling the landlord. Long story short, the girls decided they could do whatever they wanted since they were paying for the apartment. They had no respect for the other apartments, lied when convenient, broke good policies for their benefit, denied any responsibility, and wen tout of their way to exact revenge for their own out of control behavior.

    Foruntantely, the landlord evicted them. Unfortunately, he was afraid of being sued and waited until just recently to do so, and did it in a manner which really wasn't an eviction but more of a denial to renew their lease. My fiancee is moving out and we only have one more month until we can get her out of there. The second floor apartment already vacated.

    I see more and more of this kind of behavior within the people just coming out of college. (I am only 31 and in fact in grad school so I am still in college). They seem to do what they want and take no responsibility for themselves. I had my own "girls" story with a group of four living in my apartment complex that would play loud music and one night I watched as a very drunk one came home (in pants too tight to carry keys I guess) and

    1. Re:Most of you seem to be missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was wrong with paying 10 bucks to some local junkies to go, rape them and give'em AIDS? That would have been the manly thing to do.

  84. Why grow up ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple question : why should we need to grow-up, when the gouverment is activily trying to become our parents ?

    They tell is what to do, how to behave, and what to think (every four years something else, but that is not the point :-) ).

    If they are taking away our freedom as adults to decide for ourselves what is good us and our family (the sometimes hard, but allso positive points), why than try to keep the appearance of adulthood, with all the obligations that come with it (the negative points), alive ?

    Nope. No adult rights, no adult obligations.

    In short, the article describes a simple cause-and-effect. :-)

  85. Maturity by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    The only thing you mature toward is death.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  86. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    There are people on welfare who fully know well that they are being deprived
    of having children by an economic system designed to cause abject poverty.
    They make use of what they've got and procreate anyway. Other people ekeing out
    a living with five jobs per couple also have children, in spite of the supposedly sterilizing effects of low income. As far as "doing it on your tax dollar" is
    concerned, there is no such thing as "your tax dollar". They reach into your pocket
    and whatever they take is theirs. In fact you should be glad they're still spending
    an ever decreasing small fraction of it on the people they have seen out into the
    streets although not out of humanitarian considerations. They put welfare systems
    into place to keep the raped, plundered and robbed from burning down their houses.

    As far as the "Nanny State" is concerned, I agree with you wholeheartedly that people
    have to take responsibility for their own action. However one thing that has been
    bred out of them completely from early schooling to adult working life is to take
    action itself. That we desperately need to work on.

  87. more demands of education making childishness? by bobamu · · Score: 1

    So folk spend more time these days (officially) learning things and have to be more flexible in terms of what they need to know to do what ever they need to do.

    And some guy years and years ago was more mature because past environments were more "stable" so there was nothing alternative or additional to learn, folk already knew exactly what they needed to know.

    "the main role of education is to increase general, abstract intelligence and prepare for economic activity"

    Isn't abstract intelligence something that is increased by the mere act of exploring your own life? I also suspect that a few in academia may be upset that the other main role of education is for its economic enablement.

    If maturity means that I will only ever perform one single type of "economically motivated" activity all the time knowing everything that I'll ever need to know, or rather knowing my place in the true order of things, then I'm glad to be a child. At least it means I have some hope of something better.

    Perhaps nuances of what the guy is trying to say have been lost in the conversion to a news article, or perhaps he's talking out of his arse.

    But for some reason, it all sounds a little condescending to me, maybe I'm being childishly sensitive.

    1. Re:more demands of education making childishness? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >But for some reason, it all sounds a little condescending to me

      It is condescending. I think what he's saying is that engineers can't give speeches, teachers can't throw parties, and in the end, an uneducated breeder family will end up the boss of both of them.

      Just another way of saying, "C students rule the world."

  88. Huh? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Just because you have a Ph.D. doesn't mean you're all there. (I'm in college I know. Did ya know the leader of the National Alliance has a doctorate?)

    I don't get what this guy is trying to say. "Teachers, etc. are mostly rather immature except at work" to paraphrase. Right. So, basically, as a society, we now value /enjoying life/ more than working ourselves into injury?

    OK. I'm fine with that. I'm gonna go dance in the street now... ooh look a robin!

  89. What is being an adult in mind anyway ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    If it is the 'adult' understanding of the 50s, know that, it is out of fashion and practice already.

    Dull people showing to be more serious and strong than they were ...

    1. Re:What is being an adult in mind anyway ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone rewrite unity100's post for me in English? It's only 2 sentences, but I have no frackin' clue what they are trying to say.

    2. Re:What is being an adult in mind anyway ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Therae sunnan beorthnan is comman to richan and pooran. Better now ? Ancient anglosakson

  90. The original story by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 0

    Here's what the auther says himself: http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-boygenius.html

    1. Re:The original story by alas_anon · · Score: 1

      The scoring system here is weird. You have one of the few posts of any real value and you get the lowest score (0). I think the scores are either randomly generated or only based on humor.

      That is an extremely long and informative abstract. Is there anything left to be said in the paper? =-}

      The author says the driving force for this sustained immaturity is our culture's admiration of youth, but I think he is wrong on that. If this effect is really becoming more prominent then I would guess that the driving force is the rapid change in technology. New methods and gadgets come out every year and at an unprecedented pace. This requires people to relearn everyday tasks such as how to make a phone call, etc.

      Another reason for extended immaturity stated in the abstract is the extension of formal education without an endpoint ceremony that signals the end of all learning and the beginning of adulthood. After "graduation" there are always more academic hills to climb into an endless horizon of learning. I would point out that even if there was one, the continuous bombardment of changing technology in our everyday lives would make it null and void.

      This extended immaturity of creative people is a well know effect, but the author implies it is becoming more common. I wonder what metric he used to prove this, or is it just a hypothesis? He points to the increasing divorce rate as a symptom of immature thought, but that sure is a stretch. The full paper online would be nice.

    2. Re:The original story by alas_anon · · Score: 1

      >> Here's what the auther says himself: http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-boygenius.html

      Somehow the moderator forgot to allow the author to be represented in this debate. Thank you Arlem Tashkinov for posting the above link to the full paper (I mistakenly called it only the abstract in another post).

  91. money fuelds my immaturity by Municipa · · Score: 1

    You can make lots of money and not be a butt kisser or Stodgmeiser concerned with how you look in your Stodgemaster 4000 XL and know when to wear a tie or shoes. This sort of relates to that friendship/my space article where some folks in the comments talked about how everyone having lots of money means you see less troubles, rely on less people and therefore have less close relationships. This stuff is all tied together. The next major world war or global disaster may change that. Another way people forge deep relationships is through scientific or artistic achievement - though this is rare and I am not sure exactly what it is about the certain individuals that are able to achieve this.. or what would have to change about our society to make this more common place. Probably it would have to be less shallow.. and that's probably not happening any time soon.

  92. People bashed you, but I won't... by hummassa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived all my adult life -- hell, since my teens -- wanting the things you wrote.
    Now I have a 6yo boy and a 2mo girl. And I have it all again.
    Everytime he smiles because of his new YuGiOh card -- he made himself in a piece of A4 paper with his color pencils -- and everytime she smiles satified after feeding and everytime I hug both of them at night when it's cold and the three of us just cuddle watching the Simpsons or the Fairy Oddparents on TV, I forget about all the crap that is being an adult, and I am just there with the two people I love most in the world, completely happy.
    A couple of years ago, the boy asked me "Dad, why do the adult make all the decisions", and I answered: "life is not fair -- adults got to make all the decisions, and children got to have all the fun."

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  93. Adult are children by mad_pupp3t · · Score: 1

    As the life expectancy gets older we as a race are going to become more apt to be as we once were, children.As most of older folk look back there are things we regret and things we wish could live over.KMON people use a little common sense.Is this mean the older we live the dumber we get as a species or should we force our children to become more adult.UMMM NO.Always be a child at heart, no matter how old you are.Act your age fools.

  94. WoW! by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 0

    Well, given the number of 20somethings I've seen playing World of Warcraft and still incapable of spelling simple words or avoiding ethnic slurs, I gotta say... YUP.

  95. People acting like their in high school by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    I guess this would explain why people act like they're still in high school. It makes me wonder if maturity is linked to intolerance. People that tend to be racist and homophobic also seem to be more immature. But that's just my opinion.

  96. tragedy of the commons by stud9920 · · Score: 1
    The population growth in the world is WAY too high. We cannot support this type of growth forever. Your decision to enjoy life without kids lets another couple who doesn't act so selfless have more than their 2 and still cause harm.
    fixed if for you
  97. no way by pacificWebsurfer · · Score: 1

    as i got older people said i should grow up but i haven't yet

  98. Maturity by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1
    We don't stop being children because we grow old, we grow old because we stop being children.
    No idea who said it, but I like it...
  99. No, really by oheso · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    Specifically, it seems a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth.
    It seems? This is followed by lots of material from the prof, but nothing is given to back up this statement. At least as far as what's available in the Discovery article, it's all hand-waving and hot air.

    We'll have to wait for publication of the good Doc's paper to make any judgement of this claim. Or even to see if he is in fact claiming it.
  100. Indulgence? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is enough food in the world to feed every human on the planet, though hundreds of people starve to death every day.

    There would be enough shelter in the world too, if we only looked after what we had and built things to last.

    Practical clothes can be churned out by machines in a matter of seconds, if we set them up and tell them to do it, yet much of what is worn in the so-called first world is made by hand by people leaving in poverty conditions in less-developed countries.

    One can say similar things about medicine, education, the natural environment, and a host of other important issues.

    What's the common thread among all of these shortcomings? A lot of adults haven't grown up, and still suffer from greed, selfishness, and other negative emotions. With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.

    If you're an adult who has grown up, please consider what you can do to help. Make a small donation to a charity that supports someone less fortunate than you. Change something in your life to be a little more environmentally friendly. Volunteer a couple of hours of your time to a good cause. Have the courage to vote for a someone who stands for these values, even if they have no chance of getting elected (this time), and tell everyone why you voted that way.

    The more people grow up, take some personal responsibility for the state of the world, and do their small part in improving it, the better life will be, and there's really nothing indulgent about it.

    Or we could just say "Yeah, whatever" and make it someone else's problem. Not that that would be childish, or anything.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Indulgence? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Practical clothes can be churned out by machines in a matter of seconds, if we set them up and tell them to do it, yet much of what is worn in the so-called first world is made by hand by people leaving in poverty conditions in less-developed countries.

      Whilest having people work for a crumby wage is bad, I'm not sure why you think having machines do their job is better - now they've gone from working for a crumby wage to being unemployed... hardly progress.

    2. Re:Indulgence? by drsquare · · Score: 4, Insightful
      With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.


      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.
    3. Re:Indulgence? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
      With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.
      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      What he said, but the opposite!
      Who has time to support an assertion these days, huh?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Indulgence? by caseih · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a logical fallacy to me. How can anyone work on developing new technology when they are starving to death? Somehow you have to break past that initial barrier and then people will begin to not only feed themselves, but also learn and grow and work. Yes the handout mentality is a problem, and the original poster's comment about working 20 hours a week was silly.

    5. Re:Indulgence? by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      What makes you think that? It is pretty easy to demonstrate that a large portion of North Americans do that now. The other 20+ hours per week is usually sunk into entertainment and comfort rather than necessities.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    6. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your Right! Its not like we spend 20 of those hours browsing slashdot anyway.

    7. Re:Indulgence? by WhiplashII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the common thread among all of these shortcomings?

      I think about this a lot - the common thread is politics. Politicians (warlords, whatever) deciding that they are more important then the people they control. When you give to a charity, what percentage of the money/help makes it to the people that need it? In some countries, it is close to zero - and in most countries with serious problems the charity money ends up buying weapons for the warlords, making the problem worse (see food for oil, the African relief efforts, etc.). The best thing to give to right now seems to be people that go there themselves - doctors without borders, etc. (I also donate a large portion of my income to charities).

      The sad thing is that what these people really need is an invasion - remove the dictators, put it "good" people. The catch 22 is that the kind of people that would invade/revolt are not the kind of people that you want running the country! Even democratic republics (though typically better than other alternatives) do not work reliably - see Iran where the elected people are hate mongers, see Argentina where the elected government took the american continent's second best economy and destroyed it in 5 years through handouts, etc.

      There doesn't seem to be a perfect solution - I don't think we really even understand why the US has been so successful. Other countries have more resources, more land, more people, more freedom, less corruption, etc - but none of those countries can match the US technologically or economically.

      Why isn't politics run as a real science? Let's stop treating the most important aspect of modern life as an emtional game, and start doing double blind studies and experiments to figure this out. Want to really end world hunger? Become a true political scientist!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    8. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we work 40 hours a week and the government steal half of our money and wastes it. So it's actually quite doable.

    9. Re:Indulgence? by flacco · · Score: 1
      Whilest having people work for a crumby wage is bad, I'm not sure why you think having machines do their job is better - now they've gone from working for a crumby wage to being unemployed... hardly progress.

      the idea is to have machines do all our jobs for us. but as long as there exists in mankind the impulse to amass ever more and more wealth and to bend other people's backs to providing a paradise on earth for a select ruling class, that won't happen. quite right. as long as existence is presumed to be an eternal struggle of the rich to get as much as possible for oneself

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    10. Re:Indulgence? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      There was a time where most people worked 80 hours a week farming, and relied on a non-market system for distribution of goods.

      Somehow we go to a point where we could work 40 hours a week and live much better than surfs ever did, and still progress at a much faster rate. There is no reason, with constantly improving technology, that we shoulnd't be able to get away witth working even less.

      The trick is to make sure that a decent portion of the profit goes to the producers, instead of fuedal lords or CEOs.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:Indulgence? by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      Is that brand new 35 inch plasma TV really worth working 60h/weeks?

      Does buying a first generation Blu-Ray burner really compensates for commuting 2h/day every day?

      Does getting a SUV instead of cheaper car really compensates for not going on vacations for 3 months to a paradisian island?

      Buying stuff is a means to and end.
      Working is a means to an end.

      Here's a sugestion - everytime you want to buy something, ask yourself the following:
      • Do i need this?
      • If so (for example toothpaste), do i get anything for it to be an expensive branded product or is a white brand version good enough?
      • If not (35'' plasma TV), will the pleasure i get from it be worth the hours i have to work in order to earn the money to pay for it?

      In my experience most people could work 2/3 or even 1/2 as many hours as they do now and still have the same level of living that that have now ...... if they didn't waste so much money in things that aren't really that much enjoyment-giving or in paying for the name of the product instead of the product itself.

      In many countries that would be 30 or even 20h/week.
    12. Re:Indulgence? by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that brand new 35 inch plasma TV really worth working 60h/weeks?
      Of course not. It would take at least a 72 inch to be worth that.

      Does buying a first generation Blu-Ray burner really compensates for commuting 2h/day every day?
      Actually, I walk to work as it's across the street. If I had a 2 hour commute, then I'd probably have to start actually killing people on my way to work.

      Does getting a SUV instead of cheaper car really compensates for not going on vacations for 3 months to a paradisian island?
      3 months of anything wears pretty thin, really. I've done it. After a couple weeks, you kinda want to go inland a bit. You can pull off the beach thing only for about a month before you need something else.

      Oh, and BTW, railing on SUV owners is very passe nowadays, man. It just shows that you're one of the new enviromentohippies of this day and age, and that you really don't have to be taken seriously. Anybody who is unable to recognize that SUVs have their uses and place in society is generally not somebody worth listening to.

      Buying stuff is a means to and end.
      Working is a means to an end.

      No.

      Buying stuff is a method of acquiring the stuff you want.
      Working is a means of actually getting shit done.

      In my experience most people could work 2/3 or even 1/2 as many hours as they do now and still have the same level of living that that have now ...... if they didn't waste so much money in things that aren't really that much enjoyment-giving or in paying for the name of the product instead of the product itself.
      In many countries that would be 30 or even 20h/week.


      Well, hey, I don't know about you, but I get great amounts of enjoyment out of my big screen TV, or my techno-nerd toys, or my quality vehicle (not an SUV, admittedly). I like to use products that work, which isn't always the case with generics (although some do indeed work well). I like to dress in nice clothes. I like to have nice vacations on the beach. What's more, I like my job. I get enjoyment out of doing what I do.

      So, from my perspective, you're basically suggesting that we all use substandard products and live joyless lives in order to actually work less.

      So you'll have to forgive me, but I just don't think your argument holds a lot of water.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    13. Re:Indulgence? by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually only a few hours of your work week goes to you. Most of the rest of your time is taken to support those who don't produce (Investors, Managers, ...)

      If everyone actually produced and stopped over-consuming and not working or just "working" by pushing money around, we'd all be able to work just a few hours a week.

      Instead we have many people causing hundreds of us to work producing just for them maintaining their extravagant lifestyles.

      Although you could call this "Creating jobs", since you are only producing for the sake of one individual (or, more generally for "Luxuries") you really aren't creating technology, food or clothing so a HUGE segment of society could just stop working and we'd still be producing enough of the basics for everyone.

      The problem at this point becomes distributing it--Capitalism is not an appropriate solution for the case where people don't actually need to work because a society is overproducing. It does not work when there is only an hour of work a week for everyone but many people would choose to work more, it just falls apart--so instead we have a lot of "Made up" jobs that don't actually produce but just make some other non-producer's life even easier.

    14. Re:Indulgence? by Bastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That reminds me of a parable.

      There once was a man who made his living by waking up in the morning, fishing until he caught enough to feed his family, taking it home to cook, and spending the evenings talking with his family.

      One day, a rich man saw what he was doing and told him that, if he would just fish a little bit longer so that he could catch more fish than he needed, he could sell the extra. If he saved that money, he could buy a boat. With a boat, he could catch more fish, until he had the money to hire others to run the boat for him. Then he could live a life of leisure and do anything he wanted with his days while he paid others to catch fish for him.

      The fisherman thought a moment and replied, "If I could do anything I wanted today, I'd get up and fish all morning. Then I'd go home, eat a good meal with my family, and play with my wife and children the rest of the day."

    15. Re:Indulgence? by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Buying stuff is a method of acquiring the stuff you want.


      I reckon this is were we diverge - for me buying stuff is a method of aquiring the stuff that you need or gives you pleasure.

      Just buying stuff because you want it is a great way of spending your money in tons of wortless underused stuff and only a couple of really fun things.

      Personally, i'd rather invest the little time and brainpower required to discern the chaff from the rest and so that i only buy the fun stuff.


      So, from my perspective, you're basically suggesting that we all use substandard products and live joyless lives in order to actually work less.


      That's exactly the oposite of what i'm sugesting.

      It goes like this:
      - Think before you buy stuff and you'll end up with a lot more stuff you really derive pleasure from instead of a ton of expensive stuff you never use (and a lot less fun stuff).
      - Work isn't everything. If you're spending so much time at work that you don't have the time to do other things you like (like playing with all the neat toys you bought) then your priorities are badly skewed: what's the point of working long hours to buy stuff you rarelly have the time to use?

      BTW: Use some common sense when buying or not white branded stuff - products in well developed, very mature product areas differ very little in quality, often there's no difference at all between branded and generics: thanks to outsourcing, they end up comming from the same factories
      More expensive is not necessarilly best, it's just more expensive.

      Ask yourself: is this product worth the extra money or am i paying extra just for a label?

      I see it as being a discerning consumer, not a sheep - u seem to see it as use substandard products and live joyless lives.

    16. Re:Indulgence? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I've heard this parable as well. Googling for fisherman parable turns up the version I heard, as well as another version.

    17. Re:Indulgence? by J+Story · · Score: 1

      This is spot on.

      What is the difference between Singapore and the Philippines? The first ranks with the top tier economies, but the second seems destined to remain frustratingly among the "have not" nations. Yet the Philippines is blessed with natural resources, a free press and an educated populace. What is holding it back?

      In a word, corruption. Corruption that seems to be interwoven into the fabric of daily life and familial responsibilities.

      Feeding the hungry in the Philippines is a laudable cause, but it seems that it also acts as an "enabler" (in the alcoholic sense) of political misfeasance. Feed the hungry by all means, but to truly effect better long-term change it is important to work on the root cause that is corruption.

    18. Re:Indulgence? by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 0
      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      +5 Insightful? Maybe I'm missing something, but here's a counter-argument, because I don't see where he said we would all be relying on handouts.

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, we would have a lot more technology research being performed, clothing being made, and resources being gathered worldwide.

      Maybe you forgot how many people are on this planet. Maybe you forgot that most unemployment percentages, depending on the country, don't include part-time workers which may or may not even work 20 hours per week. Maybe you also think that your specific country and it's single digit unemployment rate are the indicator for how much of the rest of the worlds population is unemployed. Maybe you missed the continent of Africa on whatever unemployment chart you may have been looking at before you made that statement.

      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here and take your meaning of "everyone" to be "every able bodied person." I would guess that if we dropped the 40 hour per week workers down to 20 per week, the population that was working under 20 hours per week or none at all would more than make up for that loss in the work force.

      Am I missing something? Is it necessary for us to have people that don't 'work' in order for us to thrive as a race?
    19. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can pull off the beach thing only for about a month before you need something else...live joyless lives in order to actually work less..."

      When you realize that there is infinite detail in everything you see, nothing is boring.

    20. Re:Indulgence? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I like entertainment and comfort. I want to live in a world where for only one third of my day's time in labor, I can not only support myself, but have enough money left over not only to save but to spend on nonessential things. I'm far from that day myself as a student, and I agree that people do waste too much money on unnecessary crap, but what's the point of being alive, and of being mature adults who can appreciate beauty and entertainment, if we never indulge that capacity? Isn't the great thing about being human--and being a mature, adult human--that we develop appreciation for these things? If I can't go to a concert or buy DVDs of Battlestar Galactica, or get a more comfortable chair for myself, or go on vacation to Aruba, or go out to eat once in awhile at good, expensive restaurants, why the fuck am I even alive? Working, eating, sleeping, and amusing myself without money in my spare 92 waking hours of the day? If that's the best I can do as an adult, then maybe being six years old is better. Six year olds don't have to work.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    21. Re:Indulgence? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Yah, reminds me of an episode of Stargate where an planet had things so well off they had devolved or something like that.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    22. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the press in the Philippines is not so free as all that - at least one major newspaper was shut down by the government a few years ago. The education isn't too bad, but the competition there isn't on the same level as in Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Korea or the PRC. The problems of the Philippines come not just from corruption, nor from the universal nepotism that isn't yet seen as corruption there, but a colonial inferiority complex built into the culture along with fundamentally insane assumptions borrowed from the mental illness that is Spanish Catholicism. Also, the Filipino culture puts too much emphasis on superficially smooth interpersonal relationships to allow one to be able to tell whether someone who says they will do something will actually do it. Gossip/networking/schmoozing takes the place of getting things done in the Philippines - to Americans, it often looks like laziness or passive-aggressive behavior.

    23. Re:Indulgence? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      Well... Once we have strong AI and general application robotics, no one will have to work ever again and technology will propagate itself.

      Of course the technology may see the need to phase out the people who aren't working, but who am I to argue with a sentient robot with the collective thinking power of all humans that ever lived and will live.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    24. Re:Indulgence? by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not true.

      We no longer have a production problem. The first world produces way more than it needs. It has so much excess production capacity that we can use a large percentage of our productive capacity to make luxury items. The biggest problem facing large corporations is not production - it is convincing people that they want/need the lastest gadget. Think about it, if one, or even half, of the worlds car manufacturers just stopped making cars would their be a car shortage? At worst the price of new cars would go up a bit.

      If fact, in rich societies marketing departments spend most of their time inventing "new" things or new reasons for people to buy more crap they don't need because all the neccessities are so cheap there is very little profit to be made. Look at all those new "swifter" products (new fangles brooms and mops with lots of disposable parts that need replaced often). A broom works fine and lasts for 10 to 20 years. But they have invented the "swifter" so you can run out and buy those nifty sheets of paper refills it uses.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    25. Re:Indulgence? by Fizzl · · Score: 1
      ...instead of fuedal lords or CEOs.

      It's feudal you ignorant paesant! .... ;)
    26. Re:Indulgence? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm not getting this - the problem with capitalism is that it produces too much stuff? I'll take that over the too little of non-capitalistic economies.

      "Made up" jobs that don't actually produce but just make some other non-producer's life even easier.

      Isn't that the point - the well-off can get more than just the basics, and in doing so they create jobs for other people - and both are better off.

    27. Re:Indulgence? by Nurgled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My lifestyle is pretty cheap. I don't really buy many expensive things. I generally just buy what I need to live and some simple things to make life fun, such as books or TV show DVDs. I could easily live on half my salary and work half as many hours.

      However, no-one is interested in a part-time software developer. There's less overhead in one full-time (40hr/week) employee than two 20hr/week employees. Even though I would love to work a 20hr week in exchange for half of my salary, there are lots of people out there that are happy to work 40hr weeks, meaning there's no market for 20hr/week staff. Unless everybody agrees to half their hours, and thus allows the economy to adjust, as far as I can tell I'm stuck with my 40hr weeks and more money than I really know what to do with.

      (and no, I'm not earning that much compared to most developers. I don't know how those guys manage to spend it all.)

    28. Re:Indulgence? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Practical clothes can be churned out by machines in a matter of seconds, if we set them up and tell them to do it, yet much of what is worn in the so-called first world is made by hand by people leaving in poverty conditions in less-developed countries.

      Would it be much better if we just built the machines and leave these people unemployed? You want to live in a world where everyone gives a thirsty man a drink, but I think you give human nature too much credit. But the world isn't lost simply because we lack total compassion; if you can give a thirsty man a drink and make a profit, the only places you'd find thirsty people are dictatorships with no interest anything but the maintaince of their own power.

      Refusing to support people who employ those people is akin to enforcing a permanent beggar class. The kernel of your argument appears to be "it's not fair!" I've heard that from a number of children.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    29. Re:Indulgence? by Platupous · · Score: 1

      "railing on SUV owners is very passe nowadays, man."

      Man, that is so not true. I wish there could be a real study, but for worth, the empirical evidence prooves that SUV owners are in general wasteful.

      80% of the SUV's I see on the road aren't carying anything more than their 120 - 350 lb driver. That simple, easilly observable FACT proves that most SUV owners are wasteful.

      I'll rail all over the ESSUVEE owners all that I please, man. And you know what? It dosen't prove that I am one of the new lables you want to give me in order to confuse the argument.

      There, man.

    30. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      SUVs have their uses and place in society
      The only advantage of an SUV is being able to take it offroad. Most owners never do that. In fact many SUVs are now built on car (not truck) frames and really can't, and their owners don't even know the difference. But all SUVs are less efficient and harder to handle safely than the minivans they replaced. The actual motivation is to demonstrate (to your spouse, kids, and/or neighbors) how much more money than necessary you can spend.
    31. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      Would it be much better if we just built the machines and leave these people unemployed? You want to live in a world where everyone gives a thirsty man a drink, but I think you give human nature too much credit.

      No, I want to live in a world where, since there's abundant supply of water, no man is ever thirsty in the first place. Your arguments based on employment all essentially presuppose an inadequacy of supply and a money-driven economy. I am simply pointing out that in today's world, with the resources and tools available to mankind, these traditional assumptions simply don't hold any more.

      The kernel of your argument appears to be "it's not fair!" I've heard that from a number of children.

      Does that make it any less true?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    32. Re:Indulgence? by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Somehow we go to a point where we could work 40 hours a week
      I think you misspelled "Because of unions".
    33. Re:Indulgence? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      It's nice to know that even when companies seem so much more powerful than you (like when you're looking for a job), they still spend millions just to get on TV and beg me to buy their stuff.

    34. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good pont, but it's kinda in there:

      The trick is to make sure that a decent portion of the profit goes to the producers, instead of fuedal lords or CEOs.

      Somewhere we'll need a discussion of checks and balances, and how power corrupts (both unions and CEOs) ...

    35. Re:Indulgence? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      80% of the SUV's I see on the road aren't carying anything more than their 120 - 350 lb driver. That simple, easilly observable FACT proves that most SUV owners are wasteful.

      Is it more wasteful to own 1 SUV or a SUV and another car? Do you know what they have in the back? Maybe they only really load it up once a week for the trip to the sports fields. Hell, 80% would translate to one out of every five trips using the extra capabilities of an SUV. Heck, let's make it 90%, that's still ~36 trips a year using the extra capabilities. Hell, we could say the same thing about cars. If you're just moving yourself around 80% of the time, get a motorcycle.

      For that matter, my mom now drives a (smaller)SUV. She has a problem with her hips that make it difficult to get out of low seats. Her choices would have been an even larger van, truck, or the SUV. She'd be included in your '80%' easily observed statistic. Populations are aging, she's not the only one with this problem.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    36. Re:Indulgence? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts...

      Who said anything about handouts? Well, maybe that's what he meant, but you don't have to read him that way. Our economy needs to be structured to provide everyone with a quality job instead of to make a few extremely rich, which would produce everything we have now and give us lots of labor power left over to produce whatever further luxuries and infrastructure we like. The market, despite twisted interpretations of the 20th century, is illogical and inefficient in a developed economy.

      --
      Property is theft.
    37. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, why don't they drive a wagon? Or perhaps a people carrier? A small truck would also do the same job. I can think of plenty of people in Virginia who drive SUVs where there is no need, they never go off-road and they don't use the space 99% of the time.

      Whilst the smaller SUVs aren't so bad (RAV4), there are far too many ones that get sub 20 MPG being used for driving people in and out of work/to the shops/etc. Yeah, when you do that in a car you are just moving yourself but at least you'll get over 30 MPG in any sort of good small car. That is 50% better... if you get a diesel or a hybrid, you'll likely get over 100% more MPG.

      Other things like accidents/energy to make a big car are also things to consider.

      I am sure for some people, SUVs are a good fit. For a lot of people, it is just a joke.

    38. Re:Indulgence? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Your post oozes the rabid consumerism that plagues modern western society. Expensive things are not any more enjoyable than less expensive things. Good does not equate to expensive. The rich are not happier than the poor, they are just miserable about different things.

      If you are amused, how is it better to be amused by something that cost a lot of money instead of something that did not cost money? Explain how spending $20 on the latest idiotic black comedy and watching it is in any possible way better than spending 2 hours reading this http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/?

      If you think that expensive things are the same thing as the finer things in life then you have a great deal to learn. The expensive things, especially in the modern western world, are the things that advertising and capitalists have told you to want. They are false needs, invented by the capitalists and then filled by the capitalists.. IF you are willing to enslave yourself to them or worse, become one yourself.

      Spend 3 days camping next to the rotting carcass of a child that starved to death then explain again why your DVD was better entertainment than some other activity that could bring equal or greater enjoyment AND allow that child to eat tonight.

      The purpose of life is not blowing money and extreme waste. Skip the DVD, contemplate the meaning of life a bit, then play again next week.

    39. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who is unable to recognize that SUVs have their uses and place in society is generally not somebody worth listening to.

      They have their uses; just not in the city. Most don't even have more volume than a midsize sedan. I don't even care about gas -- I drive a sports car -- but SUVs are ridiculous.

    40. Re:Indulgence? by Platupous · · Score: 1

      I agree, it is true that there are many legitimate uses for an ESSUVEE, including people with mobility problems. I don't dispute this in the slightest.

      What I am saying is that ~something~ like 80% of all the SUV's I see are single driver, and generally not carrying anything other than a passenger or two. From the cabin of a high stanced wagon, I can see into the cabins of most SUV's, so I know that they are *generally* devoid of cargo, although I will say that an amazing ammount carry kids ( that accounts for the majority of the remaining 20% ).

      I think it would be cheaper to own a high mpg sedan - wagon to carry the family about during the week, and on the weekend outing that you ABSOLUTLY HAVE TO HAVE 4X4 SUV, rent it. If you are a camper/fisherman and hit the trails frequently, it is probably more economical to get a small sport awd SUV.

      But for the rest of world, the ESSUVEE is mostly just plain wasteful, face it, I *see* it every day with my own eyes.

    41. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If everyone actually produced and stopped over-consuming and not working or just "working" by pushing money around, we'd all be able to work just a few hours a week.

      There's a word for that...

    42. Re:Indulgence? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I disagree with your arbitrary speculation regarding the feasability of what you are suggesting. However, accepting it as a premise and moving on:

      With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.

      People who are mentally mature don't want to be provided for, they want to provide for themselves. While most of us don't mind doing a fellow a favor and feeding him occsaionally, I'd say that in general it's better for us all if we try to pace ourselves to the most productive/smartest/most brilliant members of society rather than standing around waiting for those who are incapable to catch up, or carrying them along.

      And if you seriously believe that this plan of yours won't kill human advancement almost entirely, I have some prime land in Florida you might be interested in, and I can also hook you up with a new car. Well, almost new, it was owned by a little old lady that only drove it once a month to get to the farmer's market...

      (I would have made the quote about the technology not existing in the first place if people followed your plan, but it seems i was beaten to it)

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    43. Re:Indulgence? by drsquare · · Score: 1
      Although you could call this "Creating jobs", since you are only producing for the sake of one individual (or, more generally for "Luxuries") you really aren't creating technology, food or clothing


      If there's no demand for luxuries like TVs and cars, then there is no advancement of technology to create better TVs and cars.

      If people who worked doing anything other than producing food, clothing or technology gave up their jobs, are you willing to carry them? You'll actually find that most jobs are actually necessary, even if they don't appear so.

      With no managers, the fruit-canning factory doesn't work, because all the workers are slacking off, there's no-one to fire them or to hire new workers. There's no-one to order in the fruit or the machinery, or to find people to sell it to.

      With no investors, the fruit-canning factory doesn't exist at all.
    44. Re:Indulgence? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Brooms don't clean up sticky shit, and swiffer = cleaner and more effective than a mop, which you would normally use to clean up sticky shit.

      While your point is perhaps valid, your example is rather excessively technically inaccurate.

      Also, how exactly are you measuring production? If it's in dollars, then you're an idiot. "Wow, most of our dollars from produced goods come from luxury items, which are the most expensive and often replaced items in any economy? Well, shiver me timbers and avast me wooden leg!"

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    45. Re:Indulgence? by dhalgren · · Score: 1

      Thank you for arguing my point.

      Bit thick on the polemic, though. Take a look at my banks records before lecturing me on charity.

    46. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A lot of adults haven't grown up, and still suffer from greed, selfishness, and other negative emotions.


      What's this have to do with being grown up? These emotions are part of what makes us human.
    47. Re:Indulgence? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      What's this have to do with being grown up? These emotions [greed, selfishness, etc.] are part of what makes us human.

      Yes, they are. But part of maturing is learning when to place reasoned judgements ahead of emotional reactions. Many of the decisions and policies mentioned during this discussion shouldn't be made based on emotional reactions, at least not if you want a good outcome.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    48. Re:Indulgence? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Do you seek to enslave me? Telling me that I must help others, is in effect to enslave me.

      Saying that spending money is wrong, well, show me one commune that hasn't failed.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    49. Re:Indulgence? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      At 40 hours, you are a part time developer. =)

      Developers are generally exempt positions, so it's not uncommon to find many full time development jobs requiring 60-80 hours per week.

      The trick to spending it all is compressing your expenses to respect the lack of free time. For example, why try to figure out why your car is acting weird when you can just go out and replace it for less than half a day's pay every month? =)

    50. Re:Indulgence? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Explain how spending $20 on the latest idiotic black comedy and watching it is in any possible way better than spending 2 hours reading this http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/?

      Whoops, there goes at least a few hundred dollars for a computer, and more likely than not, a monthly fee to my ISP. I'm still spending money on things that aren't necessities. Rod's contention here was that "the other 20+ hours per week is usually sunk into entertainment and comfort rather than necessities"--as if we could only work 20 hours a week and forego entertainment and comfort entirely. That's one perspective. My perspective is that an extra 20 hours a week is a low price to pay for savings and a few choice luxuries.

      Spend 3 days camping next to the rotting carcass of a child that starved to death then explain again why your DVD was better entertainment than some other activity that could bring equal or greater enjoyment AND allow that child to eat tonight.

      Buying DVD's causes children starve to death? I hope you didn't waste too much disposable income on whatever you're smoking.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    51. Re:Indulgence? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Ok, why don't they drive a wagon? Or perhaps a people carrier? A small truck would also do the same job. I can think of plenty of people in Virginia who drive SUVs where there is no need, they never go off-road and they don't use the space 99% of the time.


      Like I said, cars/wagons don't sit high enough for her. As for the 'people carrier' do you mean a van? Mom usually drives alone, she doesn't need any extra capacity from a car, the reason she drives the (small)SUV is the seat height. As for the truck option, small trucks get even worse gas milage than her SUV, which is front wheel drive only, and having the enclosed cargo/seating area is nice if my parents need to drive somewhere with luggage or with three to five people in the rain, snow, or other incliment weather.

      Whilst the smaller SUVs aren't so bad (RAV4), there are far too many ones that get sub 20 MPG being used for driving people in and out of work/to the shops/etc. Yeah, when you do that in a car you are just moving yourself but at least you'll get over 30 MPG in any sort of good small car. That is 50% better... if you get a diesel or a hybrid, you'll likely get over 100% more MPG.

      We test drove a hybrid (ford escape), but I felt that the technology just wasn't mature enough yet. For one thing, car salesman uncle recommends never buying the first year model, and the price difference was high enough to negate any gas savings even at high gasoline prices. Mom doesn't drive a huge number of miles. Heck, I don't either. I'm at half the milage they'd expect by it's age.

      I am sure for some people, SUVs are a good fit. For a lot of people, it is just a joke.

      My personal philosophy is to get a vehicle that covers 98% of my driving. That works out to renting 1 week a year. I drive a small car that gets better than 30 mpg. If I need to haul alot, I figure I can just rent a truck.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    52. Re:Indulgence? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Buying DVD's causes children starve to death? I hope you didn't waste too much disposable income on whatever you're smoking."

      Yup. Every step of the creation, advertisement, distribution, and the consumption of the content gathered wealth. We like to seperate money from the resources that money represents but it is perfectly valid to translate money into ears of corn. When you gain $5 and keep it, you have chosen to let someone else have fewer ears of corn than they need to survive. I would not be at all suprised to discover that difference between what was spent on movies, music, and TV 40 years ago (adjusted for inflation) and what is spent today would be enough in itself to eliminate hunger in the US and provide quality healthcare to the population. I would not be at all suprised if I were to discover that the sum was enough to not only solve those issues, but to put a dent in world hunger in general.

      Those of us who live in temperate climates with vast natural resources (like the United States) like to pretend that we earn what we have and it is all about merit. That is simply false. Africa is poor because it is poor of natural resources. The people here are wealthy compared to there, not because of any superior government, economic or trade system, or work ethic. The people here are wealthy compared to there because we have land that can better exploited to produce food and have greater natural resources in general.

    53. Re:Indulgence? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Are you saying you and I should be free to do as we please without limits? Or do you believe there should be limits? Perhaps so long as we don't hurt others? If you impose a limit like that are you attempting to enslave me?

      Do you perhaps believe that you have some kind of fundemental right to accumulate wealth and excess regardless of the consequences to others who must go without to accomodate your excess? What is your basis for this belief? What on earth makes you think you have ANY sort of fundemental right? And if you do believe in fundemental rights, how can you justify choosing the right to accumulate massive wealth and excess over the basic right to have food, shelter, and healthcare?

      Believe it or not, there are very few rights that anyone would likely claim that DO NOT take precendence over your rights to do what you want with the resources you have hoarded.

    54. Re:Indulgence? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      How do you figure? He didn't say we could all veg on the couch, there is work involved. I think most people would choose to work 20 hours a week for a good lifestyle as opposed to goofing off and living on the bare minimum food clothing and shelter.

      Some people (the sort that NEEDS to be creative and invent) might even choose to live a minimal lifestyle in order to finance their inventive process and bring us MORE good technology. The Free software community proves that given adequate liesure time, a decent number of people will put it to a useful purpose.

      It's a useful thought experiment to consider the consequences if we could create an economy where the consequences of not working were minimized. For one, we could all become a lot more efficient by doing away with the huge bulk of 'work' that isn't actually useful attending managerial ego-stroking meetings, filling out endless forms to get anything done, rubber-stamping or shredding those same forms, etc. Those things would go away because when people can just say NO and walk out with little consequence, and human hours are an expensive resource, those annoyances tend to be minimized to retain workers.

      Most of the labor laws could go away. Labor laws primarily aim to place an upper limit on the level of exploitation that happens when employer knows the employee can't afford to quit no matter how bad it gets.

      To give a more concrete evidence for the 20 hour figure, consider world war 2. The U.S. sent all the able bodied men overseas to dedicate all of their time to a non-production goal (shooting at the enemy builds nothing) AND was able to maintain sufficient production to feed, clothe, and shelter everyone as well as build massive amounts of bombs, planes, ships, tanks, etc.

      Feminism ended the expectation that half of our potential workforce would 'retire' in their early twenties as they got married. Yet, somehow, nobody ended up working any less. We just invented additional busywork to fill the gap.

      Many people today are employed to do things that could as easily be done by a machine and would be if workers were just a few dollars more expensive.

      The problem, of course, is that in a capitalist labor market, the more we can reduce the demand for hours, the less suppliers (that is, workers) get paid for them. This assures that as technology fulfills the longtime dream of relieving humans from the burden of work, we get poverty and unemployment rather than liesure time.

      The question is why do we choose to serve our economy rather than have it serve us? Put another way, unemployment and poverty (especially in those who are ready, willing, and able to work for a living) are bugs to be fixed. Our political ideology keeps trying to redefine them as features. We maintain the belief that hard work is in and of itself a good thing without asking 'to what end'. Dedication and hard work for a truly useful purpose IS a virtue. The same dedication and hard work on a bunch of forms that will never be seen by human eyes again is NOT.

      In some ways, our economy would become even more capitalist if necessities were simply granted. How many people with great ideas never start a business to develop and market them because they're far too busy trying to get enough hours to make the car payment, rent, overdue doctor bill, buy clothes for the kids AND have enough food?

      I have no doubt that if necessities were granted that some segment of the population WOULD get a TV and then plop their ample ass on the couch only getting up long enough to go to the bathroom. That's unfortunate, but it's probably a self limiting problem. For one, they'll die early. For two, such an environment could be defined as child abuse, so while there genes might be passed on, their attitude need not be. We can always hope they'll be too lazy to actua

    55. Re:Indulgence? by sjames · · Score: 1

      In my experience most people could work 2/3 or even 1/2 as many hours as they do now and still have the same level of living that that have now ...... if they didn't waste so much money in things that aren't really that much enjoyment-giving or in paying for the name of the product instead of the product itself.

      AND if their job wasn't an all or nothing proposition. There's not much call for part time plant managers, architects, doctors, etc. There are plenty of 'part time' service jobs, but usually that means work 39.5 hours and not one less or you're fired (for absenteeism).

    56. Re:Indulgence? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about the majority of SUV owners that don't actually need an SUV. I would say that 80% of them should actually be driving minivans. My Hyundai Elantra hatchback has fit pretty much everything I've needed to put in it. During multiple moves, the only things that fit in my friends' SUVs that wouldn't fit in my Elantra were 4'x8' sheets of lexan and my couch. The bed and dining table still necessetated a moving truck.

      (Mini-)Vans are generally better at sitting lots of people comfortably, if that's what you need. They can also usually carry more cargo. SUVs are built on truck frames, and minivans on car frames for better mileage and smoother ride. The simple fact is that most people who buy SUVs are buying into the "bigger is better" mentality.

      Regarding working less, one big thing that seems to be missing is retirement. Working just enough to pay for what you need now will most likely:
      1) Leave you without health insurance (or working many many more part-time hours to pay for your own)
      and
      2) Keep you working until your dieing day because you didn't work extra early in life and save up.
      To them I say, "Good luck with that!" :)

    57. Re:Indulgence? by Otto · · Score: 1

      I reckon this is were we diverge - for me buying stuff is a method of aquiring the stuff that you need or gives you pleasure.
      Just buying stuff because you want it is a great way of spending your money in tons of wortless underused stuff and only a couple of really fun things.
      Personally, i'd rather invest the little time and brainpower required to discern the chaff from the rest and so that i only buy the fun stuff.


      Are you suggesting that you want things you don't need *AND* which don't give you pleasure? Why in the hell would you want useless stuff that makes you unhappy?

      Sorry, but I'm a bit more rational than all that. If I don't need it and I don't think it's fun, then I probably don't want it. :P

      - Think before you buy stuff and you'll end up with a lot more stuff you really derive pleasure from instead of a ton of expensive stuff you never use (and a lot less fun stuff).

      Where did you get the impression I just buy stuff on a whim? In point of fact, I buy very little "stuff", as I already have most everything I want and need. I know *very* few people who do nothing but impulse shopping.

      - Work isn't everything. If you're spending so much time at work that you don't have the time to do other things you like (like playing with all the neat toys you bought) then your priorities are badly skewed: what's the point of working long hours to buy stuff you rarelly have the time to use?

      Why not get a job where you can use those toys you bought instead? Or maybe, just maybe, do work that you *enjoy* doing, eh? I know, it's a crazy suggestion, but my opinion is that if you don't like your job, you should quit and find one you do like. Radical thinking, I know.

      BTW: Use some common sense when buying or not white branded stuff - products in well developed, very mature product areas differ very little in quality, often there's no difference at all between branded and generics: thanks to outsourcing, they end up comming from the same factories
      More expensive is not necessarilly best, it's just more expensive. Ask yourself: is this product worth the extra money or am i paying extra just for a label?


      True, however the "generic" version is usually exactly the same only in the case of very generic products. Commodoties (sugar/milk/basic foodstuffs), for example. Or drugs, sometimes. But don't tell me that you can't taste a difference between the brand name cereal and the white label stuff. Not everything is available in a generic at the same level of quality, and it's important to determine what is acceptable to you and what is unacceptable.

      There are generics for virtually every product out there, but they are not always equal.

      I see it as being a discerning consumer, not a sheep - u seem to see it as use substandard products and live joyless lives.

      No. What I see is somebody who calls anybody who purchases brand name materials or buys anything above and beyond their basic needs is a "sheep".

      What I am telling you is that I am not a sheep. The cases where I purchase brand name products because I have come to the conclusion that they are better than the competing generics. The cases where I buy beyond my needs are to fulfill my own desires. And I enjoy my work, therefore it is not a chore.

      It is possible for somebody to be a discerning consumer and still disagree with you.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    58. Re:Indulgence? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      You seem to be under this misconception that there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world. While it's true, in a trivial sense, that any time and resources spent on anything other than producing and distributing food reduces the amount of food available in the world, we easily have enough food production to feed everyone already. If it wasn't for warlords and occasional genocides screwing things up in Africa, they might even be able to trade with us for the food they can't grow themselves--which is more than you'd think. (African dictators are famous for growing large amounts of food and then selling it for export instead of feeding their starving people.) Africans starve because of politics, not because of natural resources or American greed.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    59. Re:Indulgence? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "You seem to be under this misconception that there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world."

      Fixed is not the right word, limited is the right word. At any given moment there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world. The number of US Dollars for instance, is (supposedly) carefully matched to the resources of this nation, those resources are limited not merely by a go getter attitude, but by nature. No matter how hard you work the miners, there is a fixed amount of coal in the ground. Working the miners harder might create more available coal today, but it will deplete the mine faster.

  101. So? by Nyckname · · Score: 1

    I've been describing myself as 'adolescent going on mid-life crisis' since sophmore year in high school. Then it was more of the later, now it's more of the former.
    cheers

    1. Re:So? by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, here's the deal with tradition. Obviously, slavish devotion to an idea or behavior simply because it is "tradition" is not always a good thing. But *most* traditional mores are a good thing (as I will explain later). I don't think acting reflexively is good, but not everyone will engage in deep reflection before they decide to take a particular action. If somebody needed a quick guide of right or wrong in regards to a course of action (i.e if one had to quickly pick between reflexive acceptance of tradition and reflexive rejection) then the acceptance would be better. In other words, its better to error on the side of caution.

      Human societies (note the plural) are not young. There have been many trials and errors of different ways of organizing society from simple hunter-gather societies to urban industrial societies. Over the many generations, a certain wisdom gets distilled about what works and does not work. You might think of it as a form of social evolution where useful behavior/ideas are selected (i.e. socially encouraged or rewarded) and harmful behavior/ideas get non-selected (punished/discouraged). The selection of good behavior can range from a mild form such as being considered trusted as honest to stronger forms such as achieving higher social status and privilege . The non-selection of harmful behavior/ideas can range from strong forms such as criminalization to milder forms such as shunning or scolding. This selection of good behavior is transmitted to the next generation as a traditional social moral

      So what you will find is that traditional mores are adopted because they served some social good. Now the traditional mores that most people dwell are those involving sexual behavior. So, lets talk about that. First consider the social goal (i.e. "the Good Thing [tm]) that you want to encourage. In most societies, it has been protecting and providing for the weakest members of society, the children. Most societies, through trial and error, have determined over the generations that best way to provide for children is to have a strong and stable family where at least both parents are available to support the children. Sexual behavior, obviously has a strong impact on families from the actual conception of children to the drama and turmoil that follow adultery. Consequently, social rules in this area revolve around those dedicated to discouraging behavior that would undermine families or lead to children without support. So these social rules were not adopted to sexually repress people or crimp their fun, but to protect the weak.

      No obviously, some past traditions have either outlived their usefulness or were never useful at all (such as racism). Perhaps they were based on pure superstition or the way of life has change sufficiently to render them obsolete. But more often than not, neither is the case, because they are usually about human nature and human nature does not change.

      As far as hypocrisy and religion goes, just because somebody does not follow his own advice does not mean the advice itself is not sound, it just means he is weak and imperfect. And most of the traditional mores that are incorporated into religion can stand on their own. The bible may say "don't commit adultery" and "don't murder", but adultery and murder are bad ideas independent of the bible. More likely than not, the ideas were incorporated into the religion, because they were good ideas to begin with, rather than being pulled out of thin air

      So to reflexively reject social convention, just because you can, really is a sign of immaturity. As I stated before, its really just adolescent rebellion (and hubris), to think you are smarter than the several thousand generations before you.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically true.
      But too far down that path and you get China.

    3. Re:So? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      It's really just adolescent rebellion (and hubris), to think you are smarter than the several thousand generations before you...

      Well, actually, we are. We have much more knowledge about the world around us. We (even though it doesn't seem so very often) make and use better models of human behavior and decision making. It's called science (both physical and social) and it seems to make us advance a bit more quickly than those in thrall of rules handed down from superstitious tribes a few thousand years ago are comfortable with. So they yell that we aren't smarter (though we are) and they accuse us of hubris. I guess I say that if this is the same hubris that led us away from slavery and is leading us towards treating all people (be they of a different color, sex, or sexual orientation) as equal, then I hope that we hubristically make the most of our opportunity.

      --
      That is all.
  102. immature adults? by TCaptain · · Score: 1

    Man, I could have shown them that any given day playing World of Warcraft!

    Or ANY online game....

    --
    "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
  103. I agree! by rspress · · Score: 1

    I have seen WAY too many people acting like they were 12 or below no matter what their age is. Darwinian law will sort most of them out but as always some will make it through.

  104. In the words of Theodor Geisel by kalel666 · · Score: 1

    "Adults are obsolete children, and the hell with them."

    -Dr. Seuss

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  105. Is mankind domesticating itself ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mankind has domesticated many species and the most common characteristic among domesticated animals is that they are very close, physically and socially, to young elements of their respective original savage species. Domesticating is done by selecting at each generation, elements who are the most docile element, which in a litter is often referenced as the dominated one.

            But how the "docility" factor is evaluated ?
            1- is the element aggresive in any maneer ?
            2- can it be teached something ?
            3- are the drawbacks of its presence minimal ?
            In short: those are the criteria of specialization and profitability.

            What are domesticating currently used means ?
            1- controling access to food: gratifications/sanction process.
            2- simulating social hierachy and dominance.
            3- controling access to knowledge, which is the root of authority: basically allowing or not one individual autonomy to choose its own food and way of survival.
            In short: those are the means by which you lock someone in a consumer-only attitude.

            Maybe one side effect of our specializing and consumering based societies is to produced domesticated people, in which case it is no suprised that someone found new generations more and more far from what the observer think "being adult" really is.
    Maybe it is also how civilizations die: specializing people to be more efficient regarding profitability, locking them in a strict consumering attitude to ensure that profitability will last and one day waking-up as a big well grown fruit for the "barbarian hordes" from the outside. This may explain why anciant Greks, Romans and all other society that once dominated the world they knew have always found its youth as "immature". Specialization and consumering have simply domesticated them. And then they died.

  106. Unfortunately they can vote... and sue by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately these immature people can vote and sue. Their political attitudes basically boil down to an extended version of adolescent rebellion and "self-expression" that is all about self but neither contains substantive content that expresses an idea nor adds to the public discourse. They are usually against traditional social mores (especially religious mores) because they have a vague sense that tradition is somehow repressive of their "self-expression", but they can't really tell you why because they have to admit that any society must have rules to control bad behavior in order to make collective living bearable.

    If you look closely, you'll see that those who protest the loudest about "self-expression" are usually the most conformist, but their conformity is within their own group. They will claim that weird hair, tattoos, and body piercing are about expressing themselves and they don't care what other people think, but here is what puts the test to their lie; All (or most) of their friends will also have weird hair, tattoos, and body piercing. They would never wear a plaid polyester leisure suit in front of their friends, precisely because they do care what their friends think and they have a need to conform within their own social group.

    When these folks have an idea to express other than senseless reflexive nihilism, I'll be listening. But I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Re:Unfortunately they can vote... and sue by Coleco · · Score: 1

      I wonder if "they" have the ability to form cogent arguments based on sound critical thinking skills or if "they" are forced to resort to selective quoting and vague generalizations.

      I think we can both agree that the problem is that "they" are not receiving enough prayer in schooling any more. "They" need to start "expressing themselves" less and acting like you more.

  107. No kidding by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just spend 15 minutes on the average interstate during rush hour.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  108. backwards! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because as the world turns increasingly to s h i t, people develop a imaturity complex derived from the "laugh" half of the proverbial "laugh or cry" syndrome.

    I think maybe you've got it backwards. By historical standards, life is better, for more people, than it ever has been. For most westerners, we live in the lap of luxury, doing relatively little back breaking work, cut down ever less often by capricious diseases, and with a standard of living that would make our ancestors blush. It's precisely because we have it so easy that we're still experiencing the world the way that a child does (with the hard stuff handled by your parents, you can just "be a child" and not sweat stuff). So, when a little bit of adversity comes along, it feels not unlike that first round or two of angst that clobbers so many teenagers ("It's, like, so not fair!").

    Dealing with some adversity personally is one of the things that brings on a mature, rational, balanced outlook. Despite some obvious exceptions, I think that very trying participation in sports, or some truly rough-and-ready outdoorsy stuff, or even a short stint in something like military service tends to produce much better-rounded people than simply shifting from couch to couch in front of an increasingly sophisticated variety of game consoles. Yes, horrific trauma is an exception, and the results from that stress are not what I'm talking about. Although, a lot of young people today consider not having a new smart phone at least once a year to be true deprivation.

    The "I don't know whether to laugh or cry" symptom is, I think, actually literally true. People without experience in certain trying circumstances literally don't know how to process the low-level stuff they're feeling in the context of their rather cushy lives. I've been pretty convinced for a while now that most of the professional people I know (like techies) don't really grow up (if at all) until they're in their late 30's - usually it takes things like death in the family, a couple of layoffs ... the modern equivalent of the bad stuff that used to happen continually to people from a very young age, and built the mental toughness required for better perspective on what is, and is not, a hard life.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:backwards! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've noticed the same problem of a growing immaturity level in supposedly-mature adults. I attribute it to a whole generation that has never had to interact with the Real World (note that we now have a 3rd generation away from the farm, which I think is a critical factor -- they don't even have grandparents who know about "the old ways" and doing things for themselves like it or not.) -- Very much what you're saying, in fact.

      And I think the article's author has his causes backward... the "never done being educated" thing is a SYMPTOM, not a cause, and it's been there for anyone to observe as far back as universities have existed. It's simply EASIER now for those wired that way to stay in the coccoon, since non-3rd-world countries now have pretty much universal higher education.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  109. Knowing consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    At 36 I think I'm starting to be an adult. Ten years ago I made a choice between investing some windfall profits and a sports car. The sports car won. Six months ago I had a similar choice between investments and another sports car. This time the investments won, even with the growing shadow of MIDDLE AGE fast approaching and the fact that as a percentage of income, the sports car is a lot more affordable now than it was ten years ago.

    I think it all comes down to realizing that people depend on me. I forego immediate gratification because I'm putting away for my daughter and making her life easier. I think about her before I think about me. Almost every decision, major and minor, is changed by how it affects her. Sports car? No back seats so I can't drive her with me. New laptop? I could put the money in a bond and she'll have five times that in a few years. Even my choice in food is affected since she likes to eat what I eat.

  110. Typically in people not required of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see this typically in good-looking males and females, or otherwise adults that parents and society has continued to spoil well past their childhood. People who were and are not requiring much of themselves will not "grow up" mentally.

  111. As evidenced by slashdot tags by AntiGenX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I find it ironic that people tagged this story with "obvious" and "duh." They essentially have the same meaning, but one is much more immature than the other.

  112. We have a great role model/leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You are either with us or against us"

    "Bring 'em on"

    "Dead or alive"

    we are a nation of immature adults, led by a frat boy

  113. This is news? by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Geez, a workday drive on almost any SoCal freeway could have told you the same thing ten years ago. Every time I go to work I feel like I'm driving with a bunch of six-year-olds. Self-centered, arrogant, and rude to excess. Driving skills to match...

  114. Bah, nothing but promises. by sedyn · · Score: 1

    For starters, I am 22, and probably just about to finish up my post-secondary education (barring a higher degree).

    That being said, people can have all the hope in the world, and it is worthless. So what if people are hopeful that the ills of life don't plague them? How does that make them any different than their ancestors? You're perfectly right, things DON'T change, unless there are enough people to change them. And let me explain something I've noticed, my generation (on average) is too used to things being handed to them. I am including myself in this. I think this generation will succeed on an industrial scale, but I have little hope for it on a personal one.

    There are some benefits to being in this generation, but overall, we're no different. I predict the divorce rate is going to skyrocket under my selfish generation.

    As for wanting no responsibility and being carefree... That is what alcohol is for. If only for a few hours.

    --
    Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
  115. Re:We have a great role model/leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    critiqued by somebody who can't use mature detractions.

  116. 6 year olds? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't they the little people who you see anoying everyone in public places because they won't stop crying their eyes out? I've always wondered what could be so awful about their lives that they feel the need to cry so much. You've done little to enlighten me.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:6 year olds? by why-is-it · · Score: 1
      Aren't they the little people who you see anoying everyone in public places because they won't stop crying their eyes out? I've always wondered what could be so awful about their lives that they feel the need to cry so much.

      The problem is not with the chidren, it is with the adults. Kids can only handle so much activity and stimulation, and there comes a point where they need a nap. Kids will be kids, and when they do, we as the adults need to behave like adults. Yes, it is difficult to get all the things done we need to do in the limited time we have available, but their needs trump ours.

      Trust me, nobody deliberately plans for their 5 year-old to totally freak out in the middle of the check-out line. It's not the kid's fault, they are tired and cranky and have had enough. I think a bit of empathy is called for, rather than being offended by any inconveneince you might have to endure.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    2. Re:6 year olds? by Pep+Strebek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I think a bit of empathy is called for, rather than being offended by any inconveneince you might have to endure."

      Sorry, no. It's not the kid's fault that he/she is crying but that's not necessarily what upsets people. People are upset because 9 times out of 10 the parent is ignoring the child that is having a fit rather than:

      A: Calming the child down
      or
      B: Removing the child from the area

      Both of these things are what parents should do in order to show a little consideration for the general public. Your kids needs trump your own, but they don't trump everyone else's.

  117. Immaturity by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    I actually think that adults are letting the world note their immaturity more than before.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  118. I know you are by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    You said you are

    But what am I?

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  119. Wasted energy competing. by FatSean · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think his point was much energy is wasted on the fancy shit. Luxury cars, when all we really need is a model T, so to speak. Buying those 'nice' clothes to impress your preferred sex, or the neighbors, or to show people that you have 'grown up' and can be 'taken seriously'.

    Most of society and culture is wasteful and useless if your goal is to live and be happy.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Wasted energy competing. by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      Most of society and culture is wasteful and useless if your goal is to live and be happy.

      Like it or not and I don't, a lot of progress comes from people who can only be happy if they feel like they have more than everybody else. The trick is in letting such feel like they're "winning" without selling everybody else down the river.

    2. Re:Wasted energy competing. by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't remember where the quote came from but it seems in the same vein as what you are saying:

      It is not enough for some people to be happy that they win. Others must lose as well.

    3. Re:Wasted energy competing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. That's an interesting perspective. Can you provide some examples?

      My knowledge, sadly, is more-or-less restricted to scientific achievements, and from what I understand, those successes are typically derived from the hacker mentality.

    4. Re:Wasted energy competing. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      If nobody 'loses', how do you know you've won?

      I'm not saying that's what I do or don't believe, just pointing out the thought behind it.

      The only way to change that dynamic is to change the way success is measured... and based on human history, that ain't gonna happen.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Wasted energy competing. by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      Hmm. That's an interesting perspective. Can you provide some examples?

      I'll give you a couple from the hacker/engineering point of view. Thomas Edison clearly could not stand being "the loser". Google up the "The War Of The Currents" and Edison's treatment of Nikola Tesla for several examples. Edwin Armstrong was a highly gifted inventor and engineer. He invented FM Radio and also was the TRUE inventor of the regenerative and superheterodyne radio circuits. Lee DeForest was a tinkerer who nonetheless got VERY lucky with the invention of the triode vacuum tube. DeForest basically seemed to feel that he owned any possible circuit that could be built from tubes. DeForest was an early user of frivolous patents to shut down true innovators. His shabby use of lawyers against Armstrong eventually drove the man to suicide. To give you an idea of the DeForest's actual engineering ability, his idea for a telephone answering machine was an arm that picked up a telephone receiver and held it up to a tape recorder. Despite his stumbing onto the triode arrangement, he hadn't the slightest idea how it or any other circuit really worked. It was nonetheless progress. The fruits of that progress were used to a destroy a man more gifted but less medacious than he.

    6. Re:Wasted energy competing. by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Free-market anti-capitalism [wikipedia.org]

      Interesting idea, but hasn't the labor theory of value been throughly discredited?

    7. Re:Wasted energy competing. by master_p · · Score: 1

      Impressing girls is anything but useless. It is nature at work, and it happens at almost all levels of nature: the male tries to impress the female in order to get her available for mating. In some species, the roles are reversed, but the meaning is the same.

    8. Re:Wasted energy competing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If nobody 'loses', how do you know you've won?"
       
      "This is what I decided that I wanted, I worked for it, and I eventually got it, so I won." Nobody else need figure into the equation.

  120. Absolutely! by why-is-it · · Score: 4, Funny
    Growing old is mandatory but growing up is optional... and I opted out.

    Absolutely! You are only young once, but you can be immature forever!

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:Absolutely! by really? · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You just described me to a T. And, you know what, I am _PROUD_ of it.
      (Sure my family is ... let's just say ... less than impressed. Shrug.)

      However, being immature does not, for me, mean I am not serious about things it's necessary to be serious about.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, I remember the day I realized that most adults were just like kids with a bit more experiance...

    3. Re:Absolutely! by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Do you mean "immature" or "childlike"? The former is not worth having, the latter has often been valued but is often confused (incorrectly) with immaturity. I prefer to regard myself as childlike.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    4. Re:Absolutely! by really? · · Score: 1

      When you put it that way, definitely child like.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:Absolutely! by Tekoneiric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. It's best to responsible but maintain playfullness and a childlike sense of wonder, to do otherwise would be to stagnate and die mentally.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    6. Re:Absolutely! by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
      Do you mean "immature" or "childlike"?

      Which term would describe a 40 year-old living in his mother's basement, watching 7 hours of Adult Swim every night as an alternative to being employed?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    7. Re:Absolutely! by trentblase · · Score: 1

      I prefer "whimsical"

    8. Re:Absolutely! by qwerty+asdf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be "loser"

    9. Re:Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hero!

  121. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Honestly, it is getting to the point where I ask, when are people going to take responsibility for their actions - that is the cornerstone of being an adult, making your choices and accepting the consequences of those choices.
    I'd say roughly never. I doubt there has ever been a time when people were really that anxious to claim responsibility for the consequences of their actions. We as a species seem only willing to take responsibility for what we meant to do, not for what we did. Military personnel take credit for defeating the enemy, but it gets kind of quiet if you imply that they might be responsible for the non-combatants they killed--that isn't their fault, just collateral damage. Is that because of the welfare state, too?

    There are other aspects of our culture that dilute personal responsibility. Corporations, by design, insulate managers and shareholders from actions they benefit from personally. We're okay with that, though. No problems there. But if an INDIVIDUAL avoids responsibility, suddenly western civiliazation is in dire trouble. If a corporation files bankruptcy so the shareholders don't have to ante up to pay the debt for the entity they own, we don't bat an eyelash, but if Joe Sixpack declares Chapter 11 then we get all concerned about the state of humanity.

    Government habitually hides behind secrecy to avoid responsibility. Where is the hue and cry? Why is it only the morons on Jenny Jones who get our contumely?

  122. What about Wars of Choice? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Our so-called 'Mature' leaders, products of the old school, seem more stuck-in-their-ways rather than 'mature'. The 70-80 year-old fuckers who insist on driving and never thought that maybe they'd have to give up driving at some point and make lifestyle changes to accomodate that? The mature older people who insist on forming our society and law in the vein of their 2000+ year-old religion based on a savage proto-civilization?

    This article smells of some old, crusty and un-adaptive person looking for funding. Maturity seems to be giving up and toeing the line.

    --
    Blar.
  123. Argument between reserachers and adults... by sgentry6 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Researchers: "Specifically, it seems a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth. As a consequence, many older people simply never achieve mental adulthood, according to a leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry."

    Adults: "Are not!"

    Researchers: "Clearly if you look at the results of the study there is a clear correlation between adult and child behavior."

    Adults: "Is not!"

    Researchers: "You are proving our point now."

    Adults: "Are not!"

    Researchers: "Are too!"

    Rinse. Wash. Repeat.

  124. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, the nanny state isn't the cause of absolution of responsibility.

    If it was the nanny state, surely most social/democratic states - such as Canada or Switzerland - should now be 3rd world hellholes. (Since no one would learn to take care of themselves, right?) Yet, they somehow maintain a decent standard of living and moderately high education levels.

  125. Interesting memory by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    I remember how I got worried when 2 leaders with lots of nukes each argued about a spy-plane like two 8-year-old boys.

    - It fell on my backyard, so it's mine

    - No. It's mine. Give it back to me.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/asia_pacific/2 001/spy_plane_row/default.stm
  126. Case in Point: George W. Bush by sprocketbox · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's studies like this that make the behavior of George Bush start to make sense. The big baby.

    1. Re:Case in Point: George W. Bush by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Oh, grow up!

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  127. Dreams and responsabilities by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Accepting that one has responsabilities doesn't mean giving up on one's dreams.

    Being friendly and joking with people is not the same as being immature.

    Being serious all the time and totally giving up one's pleasure in life for the sake of family, community or just to be like everybody else is not maturity, it's being a drone (in my opinion, a sheep).

    Real maturity is achieved when one achieves the level of self-confidence needed to outgrow the "fitting a mold just because thats what one is '(not) expected to do' behaviour" and one finds out it's possible to balance responsabilities and fun without beraking the first or giving up the second.

    Unfortunately, our society is designed around the expectation that most people will "settle down", and become "hard-working family men/women". The push is constantly there to be a nice little drone, work hard to make money, buy loads of stuff that don't really make you happy (consume, consume, consume), become what your neighbours expect you to be and expect the same back from them, accept that you're just another average working stiff, accomodate and don't make waves.

    BTW: Dressing up in a specific style (geek, retro, necro, whatever) to "make a statement", "be different" or "cause a reaction" can be just as much a form of "trying to belong", "accomodating to a sterotype" or in general "being relative to others" as wearing a suit for work - ask yourself "am i dressing this because of who i am or because of who i want to be?". Clothes are a tool - dressing a certain way can help you progress to certain aims, and it's what you are aiming at that matters, not what you wear.

    1. Re:Dreams and responsabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, our society is designed around the expectation that most people will "settle down", and become "hard-working family men/women". The push is constantly there to be a nice little drone, work hard to make money, buy loads of stuff that don't really make you happy (consume, consume, consume), become what your neighbours expect you to be and expect the same back from them, accept that you're just another average working stiff, accomodate and don't make waves.

      I'm sure there are at least a few people who would tack the "sheep" label on you for your post. Your "insight" is not at all new. Nor is it or constructive in any way to the people who you are berating for being "sheep." In fact, your post is a pretty typical display of immaturity in that it exhibits a lack of empathy with, or understanding of, people different that you. (Not that it isn't unexpected if you are younger.) For future reference, many people "settle down" and become "hard-working family men/women" out of responsibility. So yes, self sacrifice and responsibility are societal pressures on someone who has taken on the responsibility of raising kids.

      It sounds like you feel the pressure to do these things, or that you think that doing any of these things negatively identifies you with the "average working stiff" drones. That's unfortunate. Because the way to reach the "drones" is to communicate with them and live amongst them. (Do you know what "empathy" is?) If you are like my friends who share your "people are sheep" attitude, you may avoid people who are not like you-- unless it means an opportunity to flaunt your "individuality" or independence from societal pressures. (God they piss me off. But I still love 'em.)

      BTW: Dressing up in a specific style (geek, retro, necro, whatever) to "make a statement", "be different" or "cause a reaction" can be just as much a form of "trying to belong", "accomodating to a sterotype" or in general "being relative to others" as wearing a suit for work - ask yourself "am i dressing this because of who i am or because of who i want to be?". Clothes are a tool - dressing a certain way can help you progress to certain aims, and it's what you are aiming at that matters, not what you wear.

      I am an engineer, and, by the power of the engineer stereotype, I am immune to fashion pressure. But I do dress up for customers and special visitors, as a show of respect for them. So yes, in that way my dress is a tool for communication. And it DOES matter that I actually dress up to communicate my respect. Tattoos, dressing up goth, body-modding or whatever communicates to everyone around you what you are or want to be, or even how you feel towards them.

    2. Re:Dreams and responsabilities by version5 · · Score: 1
      Real maturity is achieved when one achieves the level of self-confidence needed to outgrow the "fitting a mold just because thats what one is '(not) expected to do' behaviour" and one finds out it's possible to balance responsabilities and fun without beraking the first or giving up the second.

      I think maybe people are thinking that maturity is a binary property, but I think it is better represented with two bits - emotional variability and cognitive variability. Both are in 'on' position during childhood, which we think of as immature, and maybe an infant has high emotional variability, low cognitive function. As people mature, they want to switch emotional variability off because its unpredictable and potentially harmful, and because its not completely independent from cognitive variability, its easier to switch them both off. Now people are wondering why that's necessary, so maybe some people want to switch them both on again like when they were kids, but really, they aren't that closely linked. And what if increased cognitive flexibility is in fact necessary to emotional stability in today's world? I can't imagine that a rigid, inflexible person would be able to maintain emotional stability for very long in the chaos of a modern city. In any case, I really don't think maturity is dualistic like the way people are portraying it. Its not necessary to throw temper tantrums in order to maintain imagination and curiosity -- I think that maintaining these properties might actually make people more emotionally stable.

      Dressing up in a specific style (geek, retro, necro, whatever) to "make a statement", "be different" or "cause a reaction" can be just as much a form of "trying to belong", "accomodating to a sterotype" or in general "being relative to others" as wearing a suit for work...

      I agree with that -- subcultures are generally trying to make the point that society unfairly marginalizes people like them or who have their values. What makes suit-wearing people different is not that they want to be included, while Goths, let's say, don't care about being included. They differ in that suits may care about being rejected, while Goths don't. Goths dress up to make the statement that society ought to be more accepting of personal expression, but someone wearing a suit (e.g. parents) could be interpreted as saying that they accept society's narrow standards. And in fact, Goths have been reasonably successful at creating space for their subculture.

      Ultimately, the argument is that their middle-class parents live average lives absent of vitality and meaning, and the wearing of suit is a symbol of sacrificing one's individuality. That's not to say that wearing a suit is completely incompatible with vitality and meaning though.

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

    3. Re:Dreams and responsabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone is incapable of judging me substantively but can be swayed by nothing more than clothing, I dress up to manipulate them and conceal my contempt. I respect those for whom I don't dress up.

  128. More kids = dumber? by tmh+-+The+Mad+Hacker · · Score: 1

    Think back to your childhood. Remember when you were 6, and you thought you were a pretty big kid? And when you were 12, you remembered being 6 and immature, but you were quite sure that you were "pretty grown up now". As you look back and remember the memories of our youth, it doesn't seem that we were much different from now. We felt about as adult -- or more -- then as we do now, the only difference being that now some things that seemed to make perfect sense to us then don't quite now. ("I really thought that?")

    My experience is that MANY (but certainly not all) people who haven't yet married and chosen to have children (many are in school, but many more are busy chasing careers looking for fulfilment) show many signs of maturity -- but like the 6 year-old, they don't view themselves as immature (and neither do their friends in a similar state), but instead look down on everyone else around them as inferior. They see themselves as more mature than everyone else around them, even though to others they look like educated idiots. When that view is threatened, they often throw fits that reveal their underlying lack of confidence gained through maturity and varied responsibilities.

    I think that having children (and actually participating actively in the raising of them) does a lot to mature young adults, particularly men. It's amazing to see the changes that can happen in a young man when he has a child under the proper circumstances (i.e. where he has married and with his wife chosen to have children, not just slept with her and gotten stuck with the child support).

    Then again, I have to agree that there are a plenty of people with quite a few children that make me think "Will someone please STERILIZE them!??" -- my sister being one of them... :-/ Actually, she is truly mentally retarted (fetal alcohol effect) but not so much that many people would have noticed. My mother is raising her first child that she abandoned, but couldn't do much about the rest of them that she delivered and raised in terrible circumstances due to poor choices she continues to make. Then again, she probably doesn't view having more kids as stupid, because the state pays her more money for every one she gets, so neither her nor the latest bum she hooks up with has to work....

    "It's hard to figure out if you're insane, because if you are, your best diagnostic tool is broken!" This holds true for self-evaluation of maturity, too. The best I can do is to try to objectively catalog my actions and see if I do things that might not be the best choice, then try to correct any tendancies to do things that don't further my goals and values, and just keep trying to "grow up"!

  129. Pretty Much... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    I think the old farts are pissed that they gave up their ideals at a younger age than the current generation. They probably hit 22-23 and resigned themselves to the culture and societal norms. This generation(s) refuses to give in and the previous gen is pissed. They thought that if they knuckled under to the demands of THEIR elders, the cycle would continue. Whoops, guess it didn't!

    Besides, these wise oldster who flocked to the Suburbs where a car is needed to live...weren't wise enough to extrapolate old age = inability to control a motor vehicle.

    Into the old-fart ghetto with you un-wise jerks.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Pretty Much... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1
      This generation(s) refuses to give in and the previous gen is pissed.


      Every generation thinks that exact same thing. Each generation thinks they're special, they're the rebels, and they're the important ones. They're not. Just another link in the chain.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  130. Because it has to be done by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I reject the traditional concepts of maturity. I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.'

    Man I would hate to see your toilet, though you neighbours can probably smell it... I, on the other hand, still watch cartoons, still throw paper airplanes, but when I 'have to' do something I don't like to do, I fucking do it.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Because it has to be done by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      The best advice my mom ever gave me was to get a maid. If I didn't listen to her, your insight into my toilet's condition would be dead on.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Because it has to be done by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with you, my MythTV knows Adult Swim very well.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Because it has to be done by wilec · · Score: 1

      "Man I would hate to see your toilet"

      Meaning that the poster never flushs it? Heck that's the fun part, watch the little brown boat go down, down, down. It's even more fun to try and hit a moving target like a tuff of paper with a warm stream, though that usually means flushing twice. However with my water costing $25 per 1k gal the mature part of me usually makes me live without the extra fun.

      Matthew

  131. Someone needs a hug by why-is-it · · Score: 1
    Pardon for the snipe, but just because you teach children, don't assume everyone else is as immature as they. I don't need you to tell me how to teach a child colors, or anything else. It wasn't helpful, it was condescending.

    His post was not condescneding - I thought it was rather charming. I have found that spending time with kids, helps me keep things in perspective. Perhaps they find delight in silly things that are contrary to my adult sensibilities, but seeing them happy makes me happy.

    FWIW, I think that making them laugh and smile is one of my jobs as an adult, even if it does make me look a bit foolish on occasion. We all take ourselves too seriously at times, and spending time with kids can be a useful reminder of that.
    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  132. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    "Honestly, it is getting to the point where I ask, when are people going to take responsibility for their actions - that is the cornerstone of being an adult, making your choices and accepting the consequences of those choices."

    Personally I think immaturity is a sign of stress and helplessness people feel under modern capitalism, it's becoming harder and harder to make a living. If you want to blame something for the state of society, the economy and how businesses use people is the first place to look.

  133. Parent post is "insightful"? by DrKyle · · Score: 1

    Wow, your poor parents, they must have been really dumb to have you then.

    I teach molecular biology at a University, and I'll have you know that the proportion of professors with multiple children to those with none that I work with, or know of is about 8 or 9 to 1. Very smart people have multiple children, it is not the dumb, but the selfish who have none. I've met a number of people who say they are never going to have kids, and do you know what the unifying personality trait is? They are selfish and conceited. It is cowardly to think "I'm not going to have kids because I don't know what kind of world I'll be bringing them up in."

    My wife and I have 3 kids under 2, and are planning on 2 more. I know that I can't buy toys like I used to, I was the first of my friends to have a dvd player, digital camera, GPS, MP3 player, PDA and you know what? Those things only bring happiness at the shallowest of levels, while watching my twins crawl around chasing each other and laughing hysterically - that is a joy that goes right to your soul.

  134. Maturity as fitness by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    not having to put up with the hassles of tending to kids.
    I'm sure many traditionally-raised folks might see this as immature or selfish, but it all depends on the point of view.


    On the point of view of Darwin, you're gonna be out-bred by the traditionalists, and your lifestyle will go the way of the dodo.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Maturity as fitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did Darwin make pronouncements on "lifestyle"? Also, I wouldn't be too concerned about the political ramifications. Progressives are not born... they are made. Usually this happens after years of disasterous conservative rule.

  135. Mod parent Interesting by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    ...because it damn well is. And it does make sense - today's environment does not allow you to learn one thing and just keep doing that for the rest of your life. You have to keep learning and learning while doing at the same time. It makes sense that this environment doesn't allow the mental wiring to solidify.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Mod parent Interesting by alas_anon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> It makes sense that this environment doesn't allow the mental wiring to solidify.

      .. and that is the grand experiment that is happening right now. We evolved to be fully functional in our early teens, but now it is not possible to be fully functional, ever. The environment is a rapidly changing landscape and we will have to run fast to stay in the same place. How to use the phone changes. How to get to work changes. What to do at work changes. We have to keep up. What effect will this have on the psychology of the individual and the structure of our society?

      We have not evolved to be this way. Interesting experiment, no?

      One side effect of this sustained immaturity will probably be that people learn to keep learning and society will have the ability to adapt more rapidly to new situations. In the past the elders would retain rigid rules that made society more stable, but also make it inflexible to change over several generations.

      "Psychological neotony" is a perpetual state of relearning and rethinking the environment. It is what creative and innovative people do. It is also called "arrested psychological development". Arrested development might become the norm and people who are not arrested will need treatment.=-}

  136. So? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Better to conform within a sub-group than to conform to the entire group. For a self-acclaimed mature person, you sure do see things in black and white! Or is that the sign of maturity?

    Besides, tradition is the must incredibly inane reason for doing ANYTHING. Sure, look at it, and then make your own decision...but to do it because it is traditional, and everyone else is doing it...that just makes you a tool.

    I think religious mores are hated because of the inherant hypocracy in the rules and the practicioners both. We can pick and choose the good from religion and leave behind the socials rules of the savage originators that condems eating kinds of animals, or kinds of sex or behaviours within family groups.

    Your post is a perfect troll if I didn't htink you were actually serious. We're all nihilists if we don't succumb completely to the demands of the aging populace?

    --
    Blar.
  137. Re:The fact that that was modded "insightful"... by tsa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hey, everybody knows men usually never grow up. Have you ever seen a grown-up man? They're scary.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  138. Commercials and Reality TV by VGfort · · Score: 1

    All you have to do is watch some of those and it clearly shows why this is happening :p

  139. That's why conformists push for children. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Children demand time and money. The social system in this country is set up and even helped by government to encourage people breeding. My opinion is that they know they've 'got you' when you have a kid. You become more predictable and less risk-taking. You are the ideal citizen who will choose the status quo more often because the children and increased costs increase your stress level...why choose for more stress by encouraging a changing environment!? You realize that you can lean on society in ways that child-less people cannot...and therefore you want to maintain the ability to lean...which means not rocking the boat and changing things.

    Just a though.

    --
    Blar.
  140. Interesting bit of trivia by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    The dancing cop in the picture? That's Providence, RI's own Tony Lepore, the Dancing Cop. They trot him out around holidays and he's usually directing traffic on Dorrance St. between Westminster and Weybosset.

  141. Let's Try a Few by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm telling Congress on you.

    My lawyer could beat up your lawyer.

    Boy: I never said I knew where the WMDs were.
    Father: We saw you do it, son.
    Boy: No, no, no, no, no.

    Boy 1: That idea is mine!
    Boy 2: No, you gotta share!
    Boy 1: It's mine! (punches boy 2)

    Boy 1: Wanna play Kerberos?
    Boy 2: Yeah! Only you gotta show me how.
    [They play]
    Boy 2: No, you can't use MD5.
    Boy 1: Yes I can, we always used MD5.
    Boy 2: It's my house, we play by my rules.

    Yup, sounds about right.

  142. I don't want to be a kid again by tsa · · Score: 1

    Al of the above is great, but many of those things you can still do as an adult. Yes of course, as an adult you know a lot of things the world can really do without, as the parent explained. But life as a kid is also not always pleasant. You get bullied at school or by your brothers and sisters, there's homework, puberty and lots of other horrendous things. Not to mention kids who grow up in unstable families, for whatever reason. In every phase of our lives there are hardships. You have to find a way to deal with them, and make the best out of life.

    I find that as an adult I have more power to do the things I like, without my parents or other people telling me what's good for me. I can make my own choices in life, and I am the one responsible for them. I like that a lot. Besides, the toys I had as a kid where loads of fun, but in my job I get to play with electron microscopes, dangerous chemicals and e-beam machines! What else could an immature man wish for?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  143. One telling quote from the article: by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article did a rather piss-poor job of explaining what the research is suggesting, which is a pity because the topic is an interesting and complex one. Only one paragraph got the proper consequences:

    "People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact."

    So yes, childlike wonder and flexibility are good for learning new stuff, and tend to follow with a more dynamic society. The consequences of it are that people are going to be unbalanced, rash, irritable, and childish.

    There is a guy I work with. He's in his mid-30s, and generally a nice guy. However at times (typically six or eight times a day) I want to scream at him, "GROW UP!!! Take some responsibility for what you're doing!!!" However, I don't. Now there are three 'maturity' issues at play here.
    1) His lack of self-responsibility is immature (lack of responsibility)
    2) My instinctive reaction is immature (ranting and raving like a kid)
    3) My actions are mature (either nothing, talking to his manager, or talking to him professionally)

    I bring this up not to prove my maturity (there are a lot of other cases that aren't so complimentary to me :-), but to illustrate what almost everyone has experienced.

    In a modern workforce, I would expect that maturity equates fairly close to professionalism, and I can definitely say that I've seen a decline in professionalism in the last decade or so. Outside of the workplace, it's a bit trickier. People with kids who try to hard to be their kids' best friends and refuse to apply any discipline are a target, but it's a hard line to draw cleanly. Similarly, one poster mentioned that he and his wife have decided against having kids, because they're not done being kids themselves. This personally strikes me as a bit selfish (a fundamentally immature behaviour), but at the same time they seem remarkably mature in their immaturity.

    At the base of it, I put a lot of the blame on pop culture and society. We venerate and idolise people who embody every negative aspect of immaturity (actors, rock stars, etc.) and naturally come to not only forgive but accept and rationalise their behaviour. At the same time, we know that getting stoned and trashing a hotel room is wrong, so we don't emulate them--however, the bar has already been set, and it's sitting in the mud. We have such a LOW standard of behaviour to exceed that an average eight-year-old is a more mature person than the stars who show up in the tabloids.

    Society's final anti-maturity shot is the entire 'hide your age' industry. Makeup, surgery, and clothes are all designed to avoid aging, because aging reminds us of death. We're a culture so terrified of death that we'll spend billions to shove it under the rug. Unfortunately, that leads to consciously NOT acting like we think grown-ups should do, but rather as kids.

    I could also mention a lawsuit-happy culture discouraging people from taking responsibilty for their own actions, but that would be another page of text, and this post is long enough already.

    Maturity means responsibility. Taking responsibilty for your own life and your own actions, as well as acting responsibly and dealing responsibly with the actions of those around you. It is my personal belief that it doesn't necessarily preclude doing frivolous or foolish things when appropriate, but that historically it was never considered appropriate for adults to do such things. (Anyone remember Mary Poppins?) One exception has always been academics--the image of an absentminded or childlike genius professor is an old one indeed. In contemporary society, immature behaviour is allowed for all adults, and even encouraged. The new marque of maturity will be one who behaves in a mature and responsible fashion (a) when necessary, and (b) when desirable, but not necessarily (c) when not needed.

    Maybe it's really a weakening of true maturity, but as long as (a) and (b) are achieved, I can happily deal with a society that has accepted (c).

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:One telling quote from the article: by Coleco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Maturity means responsibility. Taking responsibilty for your own life and your own actions, as well as acting responsibly and dealing responsibly with the actions of those around you."

      I agree with that statement but disagree with the premise that one needs to be childish in order to adapt to a changing environment.

      You define the problem in vague terms, generalize it to society in general then propose a solution based on a false premise.

      Your argument is taking the general form of many of the comments:

      I observed Problem A once, therefore the problem with society is problem A. Problem A seems be getting worse in recent years. I blame Problem A associated group with the increase in Problem A. If only we could get Problem A associated group to understand that they are cause of society's decline, then they would stop and society would stop declining.

      For instance:

      The problem with society is that people don't discipline their kids anymore. When kids aren't disciplined they don't learn boundaries and think they can do whatever they want without consequences. This is why crime is getting worse and society is falling apart.

      It just seems to me that some people are doing a lot of finger pointing and blaming of things which may not even be problems. Blaming other people and the inability to accept other people's behavior doesn't seem very mature to me.

    2. Re:One telling quote from the article: by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. Apparently I wasn't clear enough in all of my arguments. The fact that I agree with what you say pretty much proves it. :-)

      "I agree with that statement but disagree with the premise that one needs to be childish in order to adapt to a changing environment."

      I didn't mean to make that claim--from what I gather, that's one of the arguments the original article (not the one on Discovery Channnel's website) put forth, although not necessarily as a hard fact. Personally, I wouldn't state that at all. I think that childlike attitudes towards learning and the environment may lead to better and faster adaption to a changing environment. Childish behaviour on the other hand, often accompanies such an attitude but I would say isn't necessarily a linked event. The former allows the latter for the most part, but doesn't necessitate it.

      As for the cop-outs you mention, I was pointing to a number of individual examples, but trying to avoid claiming them as sole evidence for my hypothesis (and really, that's all it is). The examples serve to illustrate what I feel in my gut--that yes, we are getting less mature, and society is encouraging it, either implicitly or explicitly. However, I have to state something that in retrospect wasn't clear enough: We are all responsible for our own actions. Regardless of how Nike would like 40-year-olds to behave, it is our own choice if we behave maturely or not. My example with a coworker was exactly that--my instinct was to react to immaturity with more immaturity, but I consciously chose to not act on that instinct.

      So now if we're all ultimately self-responsible, then how can we point fingers at society? Society--ANY society--defines out background, and our "normal" behaviour. Fifty or five-hundred years ago, it simply wasn't acceptable to behave like a bratty four-year-old at the age of 30. Therefore, the default action was to behave maturely. Thoughts and actions follow each other, so we arguably would have been more mature in our thinking in a more mature society. Simply put, it's more difficult to be mature in an immature environment, that is an environment that promotes and sells immaturity.

      But ain't no one who can make you behave immaturely if you don't let 'em. YOUR maturity (or lack thereof) is YOUR responsibility. MY maturity (or lack thereof) is MY responsibility. What the media packages and sells to us is OUR responsibility to accept or ignore. If any of my blathering is to suggest a solution to the problem, then this is it: Behave well for yourself, those who depend on you, and those who don't. And yes, do have fun.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  144. Age of consent? by RPoet · · Score: 1

    If people mature slower than before, mentally, then that sounds like a reason to raise the age of consent further.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  145. Manmaking by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Becoming an adult used to take an explicit ceremony, with months or more of preparation, which every adult completed. Encoding cultural history as well as the expectations of adult behavior.

    As more traditional culture is lost, more people go through life without the benefits of it, or a "new version" that can update it to work in modern society.

    Girls have lost more of these procedures, filtered out along with lots of oppressive female institutions, and probably represent lots of the people not converted into adult personalities. If women's culture included explicit "rites of passage" from girlhood into womenhood, more girls would become women. At least some men have the bar mitzva, or the fraternity pledging.

    I think that if every girl learned about the biology of becoming a woman in "midwife clubs" assisting a group of adult midwifes for a year, then celebrated their own "coming of age", they'd be a lot better integrated with their gender identity as well as their maturity identity. Boys would benefit from it as well, but not as much as girls, just as girls benefit from the masculine cultural bar mitzva, but not as much as boys.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Manmaking by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Becoming an adult used to take an explicit ceremony, with months or more of preparation, which every adult completed. Encoding cultural history as well as the expectations of adult behavior.

      For some societies, yes. But, contrary to pop psychology, this hasn't been common in the Western/First World for hundreds - if not thousands of years.
       
      As more traditional culture is lost, more people go through life without the benefits of it, or a "new version" that can update it to work in modern society.

      There's not an 'old version' to replace with a 'new version' to start with.
    2. Re:Manmaking by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Europeans practice Confirmation in the Roman Catholic Church. Which in turn was adapted from the cultures it supplanted. There are other rituals in other Western cultures. What does "pop psychology" have to do with this documented history?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Manmaking by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Europeans practice Confirmation in the Roman Catholic Church.
      So what? Confirmation marks you as an adult in the church. It never has had anything to do with ones status as an adult in society at large. (No matter what that website states).
       
      There are other rituals in other Western cultures.
      That's just the thing - there aren't, outside of some minorities.
       
      What does "pop psychology" have to do with this documented history?
      Pop psychology insists that one of the causes of social decay in modern western society is the lack of these ceremonies, ceremonies that have 'disappeared without being replaced'. The problem with this theory is that within Western culture - these ceremonies never existed in the first place. There is no 'documented history' of such ceremonies.
    4. Re:Manmaking by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Europeans practice Confirmation in the Roman Catholic Church.

      Sorry, missed this in my earlier reply;
       
      This is so laughably wrong.. Roman Catholics celebrate confirmation - regardless of their national origin. Not all Europeans are Roman Catholic (which is a minority in Europe), and not all Roman Catholics are European (which is a minority within the Roman Catholic church).
    5. Re:Manmaking by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The value of Catholic Confirmation, like other coming of age rituals, is primarily the change in the person going through the ritual. Secondarily in the people around them. I didn't talk about "society at large", though "European Catholics" certainly was (and is) society at large. I talked about the people undergoing the ritual, or not.

      You try to dismiss this simple anthropological fact of Western "coming of age" rituals by saying they didn't exist. Then, that the vast majority (Roman Catholic) culture wasn't "society at large". Then that the resulting minority cultures, which you concede had them, don't count.

      It really sounds like you've got some kind of problem with "pop psychology", whatever that is, which you invert to deny something that "pop psychology" agrees with.

      I've already given you a citation to a well-known Western ceremony that helped define Western civilization. I'm not going to spend any more time plugging every hole in the weak argument you're posting.

      Frankly, I think you need to grow up.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Manmaking by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "all Europeans". I said "Europeans". At one time, for centuries, practically all Europeans were Roman Catholics.

      Next you'll be trying to argue with me about the definition of "Europe". Like I said in another reply to your ridiculous hairsplitting, you need to grow up.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Manmaking by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The value of Catholic Confirmation, like other coming of age rituals, is primarily the change in the person going through the ritual.

      You'd have a point - if that was what Confirmation does. It doesn't. Unlike the coming-of-age ceremonies common in aboriginal cultures - Confirmation doesn't change whether or not the society around you views you as a legal adult. (Which is the key defining point of a coming-of-age ceremony.)
       
       
      I've already given you a citation to a well-known Western ceremony that helped define Western civilization.

      No, you gave a link to a pop psychology website that doesn't understand the role of Confirmation in the Church.
       
       
      I'm not going to spend any more time plugging every hole in the weak argument you're posting.

      If you'd plugged any holes, you'd have a point. But to plug holes - you first have to to a) understand the issue and b) be able to frame a coherent argument. You've met niether criteria.
  146. Evolutionary psychiatry by Tenebrarum · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it. Are you sure you don't mean evolutionary psychology?

  147. Stupid people write stupid articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess noone considered that this supposed perception of 'adult maturity' is subject to change as culture changes.

    I don't think the definition of maturity has nor ever will truly be valid enough to claim that adults are more or less mature. On a more realistic stance maturity is nothing but the state of being an adult. If the majority of adults decide they want to play video games, have sex with random people, do drugs, and listen to loud rock music then that is in fact the new state of maturity rather than claiming they are less mature simply because they don't act exactly the same as the predisessors. The notion that you can call a generation of adults more or less mature than the generation before them is laughable. What other purley subjective critisisms can we generalize entire populations with?

    Next they will be telling us how studies 'prove' this generation of adults are uglier than the last. Articles like these just show how oblivious the common person is to the idea of perception. What is attractive or mature today has not always been considered so in the past and will not always be considered so in the future. If there is any real measurable prerequisite to maturity it's puberty and just about every study I've ever seen shows that age to be dropping. Social behaviour is simply not a reaonsable way to claim a person is mature or not and generalizing an entire generation of people with subjective claims just because they are not directly comparable in simplistic psychological models holds no real substance. Some day robotic automation will change the shape of the working class and social behevious will change with a new work ethic that doesn't mindlessly focus on the utilitarianism. The concept of maturity must change to fit peoples social behaviour, not define it.

  148. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  149. heaven forfend... by flacco · · Score: 1
    As a consequence, many older people simply never achieve mental adulthood


    you mean they don't become sullen meat-robots doing nothing but going to and from their jobs and cultivating adult-approved recreations like golfing and needle-point? what a tragedy.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  150. Miri, Jeremiah, and the death of all Adults by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Maturity and Immaturity are not symmetric. Maturity is a convergence on certain behaviors and attitudes that have been observed or hoped to have a collectively positive effect on society.

    There's nothing wrong with deciding to avoid war in a different way, but there is something questionable about saying that war will be avoided by unilateral disarmament because you've relinquished any capability of enforcing that. It works great when it happens to work, but it's unrealistic to think it's going to work in the real world. It's fantasy. It's immature.

    Immaturity is not just The Other Set of Rules Not Tried. It is a lack of rules, and a lack of consistency, and it leads to a lack of Society At All. Maturity requires some form of internal consistency, while immaturity does not.

    It is clearly true that Society has changed so fast lately (due to the Information Explosion, as accelerated by the Internet) and perhaps the world itself has changed quickly (due to, or exemplified by, Global Warming) that parents/adults/elders have less to offer in the way of information to children/youth about how to live life successfully. It's hard to make true predictions about how life will go if you live a certain way, as might have been done in the past. (Maybe the predictions were never true in the past, but society was still arguably in better balance.)

    Maturity will come at that point where we as a society come to grips with what we have done with ourselves and start to feel that following the advice of anyone else we see around will routinely lead to improvement in our own lives. In some sense, I think rampant immaturity is a way of society saying "it just doesn't matter what I do--it will lead to the same outcome". And while none of us may aspire to live in a world where we can't affect things, I think to some extent there's more truth to such a statement than we might wish...

    There's a danger here that Organized Religion will assert itself, not as a belief system but as a force for order, because part of what religion exists for is to fill that void--to offer answers to the unanswerable. And the more Society makes everday questions unanswerable, the more Religion will offer answers.

    In that regard, Religion is a looming threat to Freedom. And don't get me wrong--I'm not anti-Religion. I think Religion and Freedom could easily co-exist in our better times. But it's one thing for someone to seek Religion freely just because they want what it offers; it's another to seek Religion because they it is the only game in town and they are just tired of a needlessly dysfunctional society. Religion is ready to fill those gaps, but it will of necessity fill the gaps with rules, not freedoms. In recent times, civilized society has begun to offer answers to the questions "how do I live, what makes my life purposeful, etc." But if the power political grabs for money, the wanton depletion of natural resources, the inability of a legal system to protect individuals against obviously-unethical acts, etc. lead people to take refuge in Religion because it is the only game in town, that's not the same. It's more like the Republicans claiming they wont the election because the Democrats had no one credible to offer... it takes more to have a winning plan than the absence of an opponent.

    Society needs to start re-asserting leadership and offering ways for people to succeed through honest, hard work. That will bring back maturity. Otherwise, the mature thing will, perversely, continue to be "grab what you can while you can because none of it matters anyway". Right now, that's what we're up against: Telling people that if they follow the rules, behave well, be honest, etc. they will succeed when it's obviously not true, is no recipe for having anyone respect you. The Youth of today will just laugh and say "You call what you're doing succeeding? You're just wasting your life." And they'll be right.

    Just look at the people likely to run in the next US election. Unless the

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  151. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  152. Re:The fact that that was modded "insightful"... by mrogers · · Score: 1

    Is that what they mean by meta-moderation?

  153. From the "The more things change" department... by AWhistler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 1979 "The Logical Song" by SuperTramp was my theme...and I was 14.
    So what is so new about this? Some doctor needs to be published and put a name to this thing.

    When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful,
    a miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical.
    And all the birds in the trees well they'd be singing so happily,
    joyfully, playfully watching me.
    But then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensible,
    logical, responsible, practical.
    Then they showed me a world where I could be so dependible,
    clinical, intellectual, cynical.

    There are times when all the world's asleep,
    the questions run so deep, for such a simple man.
    Won't you please, please tell me what we've learned?
    I know it sounds absurd, please tell me who I am?
    ...

    This isn't about not maturing, but wishing that he wasn't forced to mature so young,
    and wanting to go back to a simpler time.

    Today kids are kept from learning a lot of things that would get them ready for adulthood.
    I mean please...removing swings and other equipment from playgrounds because they're too dangerous?

    http://kutv.com/health/local_story_086170456.html

    In an effort to shield children from anything dangerous while they grow up, parents and other adults
    fail to prepare children for the real world. And any public institution (read schools) that doesn't
    conform to this complete "safety" policy for children get sued out of existence or can't afford insurance.

    Growing up, I thought my generation would be smart enough to avoid the dumb things my parents' generation
    did to shield us kids from life. Unfortunately my generation is screwing it up even worse.

    It's no wonder so many people have "psychological neoteny" but I doubt the explanation is as simple as TFA says.

  154. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

    Let's take a scientific approach to this hypothesis: people have more children because they know the taxpayers will pick up the bill! Doesn't this predict that people will have more children in countries that have more welfare?

    So, testing what do we find? The exact opposite relationship exists. People in countries with less welfare have far more children. Europeans have fewer children that Americans, Israelis have fewer children than Palestinians. The average German couple has one child -- it has to rely on immigration to maintain its population, which it imports from countries with booming populations that have no welfare.

    Do people sue each other more because of the nanny state? That is, the "nanny state" induces a kind of psychological condition that makes people sue each other more? An alternative hypothesis might be that there are more lawsuits in the United States because the legal system left much more to civil enforcement than to what would be prosecuted by the government in other countries. Ignoring that alternative for the moment, what testable prediction does the nanny state hypothesis make? Doesn't it predict that countries with more nannyish systems have more lawsuits? Doesn't it pretty clearly predict that?

    But of course, we all know that the United States has far more lawsuits than more nannyish states in Europe.

    This is why, I think, it makes a lot of sense to apply scientific priciples to political theories like this.

  155. from biblical standpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 Corinthians 13:11 (KJV)
    When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

    I guess we're all ignoring the last half of the scripture.

    1. Re:from biblical standpoint by MoronBob · · Score: 1

      Or maybe your ignoring this one...."Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom" (New Testament KJV | Matthew 18:3

      --
      Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  156. Bread and Circuses by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am suprised there has been no reference to Rome just prior to it's fall. The reason the maturity level is lowering is directly related to the amount of maturity needed to survive. Rome was the mightiest civilization throughout history and it fell not from an outside intruder but from apathy from it's citizens. Rome had become so strong that the majority of it's people did not need to protect themselves for they were protected by Roman Centurions. As they became increasingly restless, and immature, Rome enacted the Bread & Circuses policy to provide food and entertainment to keep it's people engaged. Ultimately it could not stem the growing unrest and the people revolted. The current popularity of BLOGS is a perfect place to see the unrest in todays society.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  157. Interesting hypothesis, crackpot research by xPsi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I did not personally find the article or the research very credible. The reasons are quite numerous, and I won't discuss them all. But first let me say that I think the underlying hypothesis is fairly reasonable. If I look around me I might say, to first order, that people I know appear to have the "fresh" attitudes of a 20 year old well into their 40s. I might point out that the article is not saying people are "childlike", like a 6-year-old, as other threads have implied -- only "immature". However, this observation has a very skewed baseline. What are we using as a control when we make such an observation like "people used to be more mature"? We are using our childlike memories of our parents, teachers, doctors, etc. as we saw them from the eyes of someone growing up. But I've often been very surprised to learn, post hoc, what my folks and childhood mentors were up to during they're 20s, 30s, and even their 40s and 50s when they weren't interacting with me. Far from stagnating into "maturity" many of them retained a childlike curiosity for the world. They strove to understand themselves and experimented with a lot of crazy stuff (and I'm not just talking drugs here). However, I only saw them through a very specific filter. I feel the article is falling into the same trap, and it even admits this:


    People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence...


    Again, I ask, what is the "research" described in the article using as a control or baseline? This is never discussed -- and it sounds like this "research" is nothing more than an elaborate opinion-piece. TFA even use David Brooks as a kind of "reference." I enjoy David Brooks, even if I don't always agree with him. He is a respectable social commentator and pundit, but he is ultimately a professional opinionist, not a respected psychological researcher.


    Also, can someone help me out with this quote from the article:


    Charlton added that since modern cultures now favor cognitive flexibility, "immature" people tend to thrive and succeed, and have set the tone not only for contemporary life, but also for the future, when it is possible our genes may even change as a result of the psychological shift. [bold emphasis mine]


    Genes shifting as the result of a psychological shift? WTF? It was my understanding that genes needed a bit more than "psychology" to change. Are these guys implying a Lamarckian evolution based not even on physical characteristics but somehow "attitudes affecting evolutionary physiology"? With little snips like this, it makes this work seem very fishy to me, bordering on crackpotism.


    Anyway, while the basic hypothesis has merit, the research the article describes doesn't seem to demonstrate or prove (or even have the ability to demonstrate or prove) the proposed effect.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    1. Re:Interesting hypothesis, crackpot research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Genes shifting as the result of a psychological shift? WTF?

      If there *is* a genetic tendency to be more immature, and people who are immature thrive and succeed and people who are immature are attracted to each other and have children, then...

    2. Re:Interesting hypothesis, crackpot research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't RTFA, but I would assume that by 'genes changing' they mean gene *activation* changing. How much our gene activation patterns are affected by our environment is a very hot topic right now. EG, exposure to some chemical could de-activate a neurotransmitter gene, changing your personality (and it might never get activated until exposure to another specific chemical!). Many of our genes go unused (it's thought..), and even twins will have different activation patterns.

  158. You're An Idiot!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.

    You are an idiot! How do you think the available technology and resources came to be? They came from long hours of hard work! How long do you think the technology and resources would continue to last if everyone started doing half the work or less? Not long at all.

    Your post clearly demonstrates the immaturity, naivete, inexperience and ignorance of youth that older individuals are not growing out of, as the article discusses.

    Now, some people will say that I too am immature because I called you an idiot. But, the fact is that I am not immature, I have simply chosen to be rude and dismissive because I am weary from dealing with, well... Idiots!

    1. Re:You're An Idiot!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How long do you think the technology and resources would continue to last if everyone started doing half the work or less? Not long at all."

      Then, could you please tell me how is it possible that First World's last 150 years is the History about working less and producing more... with better living conditions too?

      Can you please tell me when this became to an end so it is now possible no more to produce more working less?

      Oh! and how is it possible for a millionaire to work less and living better than a low red/blue/whitecollar?

  159. Create Immature Adults through Marketing by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, I believe you have got something here. Given the level of immaturity of the characters on "Friends", "Seinfield" and many other television programs combined with the behavior of the actors in various beer commercials, we may have lowered the bar for maturity. If the major media formats in our culture show examples of adult behavior that is, essentiallly, childish then who can blame the viewers for adopting those standards?

    I'm reminded of an ex-girlfriend who seemed to me to over-react to situations. I was puzzled until I realized that she was acting as if she were a character on a television program; where drama is important. We may have a couple of generations now doing the same thing.

    Nice work. :)

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Create Immature Adults through Marketing by tilminator · · Score: 1

      And somehow, exuberant overreacting even makes girls cute, perpetuating the problem.

      --
      -- up-modding policy: make a good point, write self-contained.
    2. Re:Create Immature Adults through Marketing by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Yup, I once had a girlfriend for a brief moment that actually verbalized this explicitly. She was a drama queen, vain as hell, and ultimately impossible to be around (which is why we broke up), though incredibly endearing and adorable and feminine on the surface of things. She could only be trusted in certain ways: trusted to start a ruckus, be the life of the party, cheat on you, start fights with you, let you down, forget important responsibilities and take on unimportant ones, spend energy trying to look good all the time, even when it made no sense.

      She wasn't a dumb girl, though, her IQ and education level were very high. One night while we were having something of a mix between a fight and a heart-to-heart, she explained it to me something like this:

      "I'm a woman. Anthropologically, genetically, at my core, I want to compete for attention. I want other women to know that they're inferior to me and I want men to pursue me. But this is the modern world. I have stiff competition for that attention. I have to compete against video games where you get to bed prostitutes and shoot cops. I have to compete against Rachel on friends and Elaine on Seinfeld, not to mention all the college football teams where it's all muscle and adrenaline and combat.

      If don't stimulate everyone more than all of these other things, whats to stop them from watching these other things instead of watching me? And I want people watching me. Its instinct. It leads to better social networks, increased opportunity, increased wealth, increased mate selection, lots of general success if I can be the watched one.

      So as long as Friends is on TV, buddy, you'll find that I'm going to be a better character than any of them so that you'll pay attention to me and other women will defer to me just as much as they would defer to Lisa Kudrow if she walked by. I'm going to be sluttier than the hookers in the video games and I'm going to be more exciting than the entire Miami football team.

      It's not that I go to bed every night planning all of this. But it's instinctive for me as a woman. You're my man and I want your attention. And the other men in the room... well, I want their attention, too, just in case."

      Needless to say, we broke up. She forgot a couple of important points: television is only interesting in small doses (most sitcoms are only half an hour), while real people are "on" all the time when you're around them; if you've seen all the episodes in a show, unless it's TRULY SPECTACULAR you often don't care for the re-runs; once you've played a video game, you're done with it; men watch TV and play video games mostly to get away from women for a while. ;-)

      In any case, the point is that this subthread is right on. Television and entertainment culture competes in a crowded marketplace for our attention, and as a result must rely on ever more basic instincts (motion, sex, fight/flight) to win it, and this bleeds into our personal lives, silently educating generations about social interaction both by example and by suggesting similar adaptations to human personalities in order to compete.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    3. Re:Create Immature Adults through Marketing by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      I should follow this up by saying that she's still one of my best friends. But thank god I'm no longer the boyfriend and can just laugh at her behavior and help to pick up her many pieces all the time, rather than having to be responsible for it. :-)

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  160. I agree wholeheartedly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As an adult, I am subject to a wider variety of feelings and emotions than a 6 year old. Being an adult is more subtle - we gain access to joys that a child couldn't even understand. When you're six, you know happy, sad, fear, hungry, tired. As an adult you also can experience bemusement, irony, sarcasm, terror, bliss, longing, melancholy, and a host of other things that make the experience of just living through your day more deep and meaningful. Your mental palette is larger. Yes, it means you can be hurt or suffer in larger ways than a child. But you can also rise above them in ways a child could not. The game is bigger, so the rewards are bigger.

    And speaking of the palette, food is an excellent way of describing the difference. As a 6 year old, all you crave is candy. Big ugly blocks of sugar. As an adult, you're complex enough to tell the difference between good sushi and bad. Really expertly done fresh sushi with fresh ground wasabi and some nice sake on the side is sublime, and that's the joy of it, and a child could never understand it. Think of how many things there are like that.

    Another good reason - look at what you would have to go through today. At the risk of sounding like an Auld Farte, think about how bad teenagers have it today. All the good music is gone. Pepsi decides what is cool these days. You have three choices basically. Stupid thumping gangsta rap whose only function is to shake your car's quarter panels, bubblegum crap pop, or Nu Metal where guys with long hair get up in front of the mike, blast the distortion and whine about their relationships.

    And you can't do anything fun or dangerous in this bubble-wrap world we've made. As soon as one kid gets hurt doing something it gets outlawed or regulated past the point of any fun whatsoever. How many childhood memories do you have where you were experiencing both big fun and mild danger at the same time? Are their any stories you have about your childhood that you haven't told your parents yet because you don't want to give them a heart attack? Kids today will never have those kinds of vivid childhood memories. We've outlawed them.

    If God All-Mighty came down from the clouds and told me he would be willing to make me a six year old again, I would politely decline. I've got it better now than I've ever had it, and I feel genuinely sorry for children born in this time.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excellent post!

      The subtleties of maturity beat the thrills of immaturity anytime. The world is a complex place, and I love the complexity of it. The best taste in life is bittersweet, with only enough sweetness to prevent the bitter from being bland. It's no surprise that diabetes is on the rise. People have lost the palate for strong tastes. Even fibre comes in a pill, as if eating raw oats and bran is some sort of trial too harsh for people to bear. The world is divided into simple primary colors and basic binaries: red and blue, left and right, liberal vs conservative. Only the caricatures that pass as media personalities fit into these categories. The world is just not that simple.

      It is revealing to contrast the tone of public discourse 50 years ago to what it is today. Ronald Reagan abandoned formal rhetoric for folksy chat, and now we're stuck with it. G W Bush got elected by appearing to be just a regular guy--at some point, people forgot that you don't want just a regular guy as your leader, you want the best and brightest. Distrust of intellectuals is at an all time high, because it takes work to understand what they're saying. But democracy takes work, every single day.

      I've always suspected that the main point of "family values" and all of these exhortations to "think of the children" are just scare tactics to turn the world into the largest nursery in history, where you cannot even have an adult conversation, and where kids aren't even allowed to play unsupervised. Can you imagine a childhood where you have to make "play dates," where it is no longer possible to just walk anywhere? Thanks to media scaremongering, parents see the world as a frightening place with a child molestor or Satanic cult member lurking in every playground. The fact is, your kids are about a hundred times as likely to get killed by a car as they are to be kidnapped. But that doesn't sell soap.

      Even God has been turned into the cosmic wetnurse, who will rapture us up, clean our nappies, and dry our tears. ID promises us the fantasy of every child; that we are the center of the universe, that it's really all for us. Since you're saved by faith alone, you don't have to do jack, just show up at the mega-church for the show and listen to a postmodernist drivel which is equal parts fairy tale and new-age glurge. You gotta hand it to them, they know their market. Why stop at frying your pancreas with candy, when you can get diabetes of the soul too?

    2. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even fibre comes in a pill, as if eating raw oats and bran is some sort of trial too harsh for people to bear.

      I have celiac disease, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. When I was growing up back in the 60s, there were tons of kids in the neighborhood - baby boom, after all - and we all knew how to make our own fun without adult interference. The doors would fly open and kids would head out into their own world, and as long as you were back by dinnertime everything was cool. These days I see how tightly scheduled and supervised my nieces and nephews and neighbor kids are, and it makes me feel fortunate I grew up when I did. It's possible that kids now are getting something positive out of this new environment; perhaps they're learning to take instruction and be good employees, I don't know. What they're not learning, however, is leadership, creativity, and initiative. I often wonder what the long-term political consequences of that are, and whether I really want to be around to see it.

    4. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by shadwstalkr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even fibre comes in a pill, as if eating raw oats and bran is some sort of trial too harsh for people to bear.

      Great line. It's funny that when I was a kid one of my favorite technology predictions was that we would have an entire meal in a single pill. Oh, the things I would have missed.

      Distrust of intellectuals is at an all time high, because it takes work to understand what they're saying.

      Unfortunately, the black hole of post-modern thought has (at least in the eyes of popular culture) thrown academia into obsolescence. Not only are a lot of academics (usually the loudest ones) wrapped up in circular, navel-gazing, meta-scholarship, the post-modernist attack on, and misapplication of, the scientific method has been taken up by religious and political ideologues. I think people just got fed up with the drivel and apparent infighting and stopped listening. (I know it's unfair and inaccurate to characterize all intellectuals this way, but it definitely seems to be how popular culture portrays them)

    5. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Gnostic+Ronin · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, I think part of the reason that adults don't grow up is that there aren't any real hardships to make them grow up.

      We can give the political equivilant of "I'm gonna hold my breath 'til you give me my candy" -- because we aren't in very much real danger. We live in the first world, a world where "poor" doesn't mean digging for food in the trash, dysentery, or even a shack made of cobbled together materials. "Poor" means no plasma screens, no statilite TV, and Dial up internet.

      We can waste time argueing about flag-burning and gay marriage because we really don't have that many serious domestic problems to be dealt with. Other nations would laugh at our battles. What -- we're "persectuted" because the Wal-Mart greeter doesn't say "Merry CHRISTMAS"? Okay, so exactly what is it called when a man can be beheaded for daring to not be a muslim? We think it's censorship because some jackass wants to ban the sale of M-rated games to 16 year olds? What about the http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/11/16/saudia12049 .htmSaudi teacher sentenced to 40 months and 750 lashes for "declaring listening to music, smoking, adultery, homosexuality and masturbation as permissible under Islam"?

      The problem -- if you could call it that, keeping Americans and Westerners in general in a "childlike state" is that we don't have nearly as many problems as other people. We stay childlike because the hardships that force other people to grow up quickly just don't happen here.

    6. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      This ties into my own theories on this. People learn maturity by practicing it. This means that they'll screw it up every so often. People need to suffer the consequences of their actions, not take it as an opportunity to score it rich.

      When I was young, I was more or less trusted in bringing knives to school. My grandfather could have brought a rifle. Today they're talking about mandatory year long suspensions for a swiss army knife, and we aren't talking about schools with 'gang problems' here. Not as many kids have part time jobs anymore. Many don't have to do chores.

      I mean, look at Europe. By vast majority they allow kids to drink below the age of eighteen, and they have far fewer dui/drinking problems than we do. Yet I hear an advertisement a few days ago talking about how if you drink before you're 21, your poor developing brain can't handle it and you have a higher risk of becoming an addict. Yet my theory is more along the lines of lactose tolerance, the younger you are when you're introduced to it, in small doses of course, the more your body is able to adapt to handle it.

      If you want people to mature, you have to give them the freedom to do so. I've seen it in the military, in the dorms. They treat 18-21 year olds like kids in many respects, and these young adults turn around and act like kids.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Another point that makes me thing TFA's author doesn't know much about kids, or maturity for that matter... kids like the world set in stone and completely immutable, and to a kid, change means "throw away everything that came before, and do something completely different" (ever notice that when a kid changes hobbies, they typically THROW AWAY all artifacts from their old hobby?)

      Kids also want everything to be black or white, and cannot cope with shades of grey.

      The flexibility to deal with change and to comprehend "all the colours of life" is a MATURE skill, NOT a "childish" behaviour.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely, especially the parent post's contention that kids aren't allowed to just go be kids anymore, without adult supervision. Omighod, what if junior fell off his bike and skinned a knee? or worse yet, made up his own games that don't profit some corporation??

      As to maturity being something you gain by practice, this goes along with my contention that the most important thing you can give your kids isn't love, or security, or anything else; it's PRIVACY. Privacy implies trust; that is, acknowledgment that the child is a thinking person (not just an extension of the parent) and the faith that he can make, or at least LEARN to make intelligent decisions without mommy and daddy hanging over his shoulder 100% of the time. (Which is why I also contend that home schooling is child abuse -- the homeschooled kid is NEVER out from under parental supervision, NEVER gets to just go be a kid or learn from the supervision of OTHER adults; this ultimately is VERY stressful to the kid.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Whitemice · · Score: 1

      >Unfortunately, the black hole of post-modern thought has (at least in the eyes of popular culture) thrown academia into obsolescence.

      Agree. I'm a big defender of 'intellectual-ism' but there is allot of truth to this. Academia is indulging enough of that kind of noise that it leaves itself open to being easily discredited. And there are lots of people with their own narrow agenda that want it discredited.

      Fortunately, all you have to do with watch CPAN's book TV to know there are very credible reasonable people of all political stripes rationally discussing all manner of issue. But the general public has lost all patience for such things.

      --
      Using "Common Sense" is being either to arrogant or to ignorant to ask people who know more about something than you.
    10. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by CrashPoint · · Score: 1
      I agree generally, but...

      "Another good reason - look at what you would have to go through today. At the risk of sounding like an Auld Farte, think about how bad teenagers have it today. All the good music is gone. Pepsi decides what is cool these days. You have three choices basically. Stupid thumping gangsta rap whose only function is to shake your car's quarter panels, bubblegum crap pop, or Nu Metal where guys with long hair get up in front of the mike, blast the distortion and whine about their relationships."

      Corporate entities decided what was cool when you were a kid, too. And the adults of your time hated your music as much as you hate the kids of today's, and for the exact same reasons. Nothing has changed.

      "And you can't do anything fun or dangerous in this bubble-wrap world we've made. As soon as one kid gets hurt doing something it gets outlawed or regulated past the point of any fun whatsoever. How many childhood memories do you have where you were experiencing both big fun and mild danger at the same time? Are their any stories you have about your childhood that you haven't told your parents yet because you don't want to give them a heart attack? Kids today will never have those kinds of vivid childhood memories. We've outlawed them."

      Previous generations said the same thing- we were sure to be raising a generation of kids that would never know danger, what with our "speed limits" and those newfangled plastic toys. Kids found ways to endanger themselves via their own curiosity and stupidity anyway, and they continue to do so today. Again, nothing has changed.

    11. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by trixillion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This applies to you as well, or just to other people? That is to say, have you sufferred extreme hardship and as a consequence come to a kind of maturity that others lack? If not, then are you really qualified to wish such things on other people? I've sufferred hardship, but I don't think it gave me maturity so much as compassion. It isn't the sort of thing I'd wish on others.

    12. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Even God has been turned into the cosmic wetnurse, who will rapture us up, clean our nappies, and dry our tears. ID promises us the fantasy of every child; that we are the center of the universe, that it's really all for us. Since you're saved by faith alone, you don't have to do jack, just show up at the mega-church for the show and listen to a postmodernist drivel which is equal parts fairy tale and new-age glurge. You gotta hand it to them, they know their market. Why stop at frying your pancreas with candy, when you can get diabetes of the soul too?

      Good grief, where did this come from?

      Do you actually know anything about Christianity (presumably the faith you're referring to here)? If you have a problem with todays human-God relationship resembling that of a child-parent one then it's got nothing to do with the present generation (or the previous 75 for that matter).

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    13. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is not bad mouthing Christianity. He has a problem with the all the fake Christians hence the line "...just show up at the mega-chruch for the show..." That is not Christianity. It a yet another quick fix scheme wrapped up in a few choice bits of Christian teachings for colour.

    14. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      With regards to drinking in Europe, I think it's also a very different attitude. Because they've had access to alcohol before they reach the legal age, it's not a huge deal. "I can do something that I've been doing for ages! Meh". But in the US, once you pass the magic threshold (18 or 21 or whatever), you're thrown in the deep end "Let's all get plastered! Drinking must be awesome if it's been kept from us for this long!".

      I realise that not everyone behaves like this and that this post has probably been expressed really poorly. I guess the basic idea I'm trying to get across is not to underestimate "the lure of the forbidden".

    15. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

      most of the sentences in your 1st paragraph, and many in the rest, are too short. That said i like the energy and style of your writing and i personally agree with much of your content, nicely done. Score: 8/10

    16. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it is a matter of the general public losing interst. I think reasonable people don't sell ad time.

    17. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by anaesthetica · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ronald Reagan abandoned formal rhetoric for folksy chat, and now we're stuck with it.

      If you're looking for folksy one-on-one's with buddy-prez, you should go back further to FDR's "Fireside chats." Reagan was the "Great Communicator," but he certainly didn't invent Presidential pandering to the lowest common denominator.

    18. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Trogre · · Score: 1

      If that's the case then perhaps the GP and myself have more in common than first thought.

      Though his use of the term 'fairy tail' is a bit telling.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by yusing · · Score: 1

      I've always suspected that the main point of "family values" and all of these exhortations to "think of the children" are just scare tactics to turn the world into the largest nursery in history, where you cannot even have an adult conversation, and where kids aren't even allowed to play unsupervised.

      Roger that. Rod Serling based more than one episode of Twilight Zone on a similar premise. The climate of fear angle has a similar purpose (one exploited by organized religion for THOUSANDS of years) - to keep people dependent on authorities (hence TFYQA), and so distracted that they can't hear their inner voice saying over and over: WAKE UP!

      In many ways it's great to be a child. The trouble with being a child in a disfunctional family is that it's only later that you rudely discover that you got the big, big shaft.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    20. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Gnostic+Ronin · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe we don't mean "maturity" in the same way.

      What I mean by "maturity" is that what we see and do in the real world is connected to the real world, we aren't self-centered, thinking everything is about us, happeneing to us, and worrying about how something will affect us. It's not fantasy or wishful thinking or anything like that. That's why a 5-year old living in Ghana is more mature than on living in the USA, they have to be in the real world to survive. They can't be thinking of Ninja Turtles and Toothfairies, etc. They don't have the luxury of free time before the Xbox, eating sugary foods while watching the latest cartoon, etc. The third worlders in general have very little time for the bread and circuses that dominate our waking life.

      It's just something I've noticed. We in the west get obsessed with trivial slights, trivial inconvienience, things that at the end of the day just don't matter. And part of it is that we are comparatively speaking rather sheltered. We don't even read about the horrors that go on elsewhere on the planet. We live in a bubble where more people know more about entertainers than world affairs.

      I'm not suggesting that westerners need to experience 3rd world conditions first hand, but they are in bad need of a reality check. We should at minimum read about what the third world is really like, look at photographs of the third world, maybe volenteer or donate to such causes. I think it might be good to go without on a semi regular basis -- I'm thinking more of camping or something similar. A week or two in a tent without TV and Xbox and so on, living on canned goods or whatever you can catch would give at least a small, highly sweetened taste of what it's like not to have everything at your fingertips the instant you want it. That's what we need -- at least for a short time not to have everything handed to us, instantly available, and exactly the size and color we want. Without that, we magnify minor inconvienience to the point where it becomes rediculous.

      I think it's also partially the reason the rest of the world hates us. They hate us because we're a decadent society that obsesses over stuff that much of the world just doesn't get. We feel oppressed because some Wal-Mart greeter says "Happy Holidays", as I said before, compared to much of the world, that's not even on the radar. We worry about animal rights and stem cells and geneticly enhanced foods, I think the rest of the world frankly would be laughing at us IF our thinking that such things were "icky" didn't make it much more likely that some African kid will die of Cholera or Dysentary. I think this kind of stuff and frankly our need for instant gratification is proof positive that we ARE children. Especially considering that the west could probably solve many of these problems if we really wanted too. We're failing both our own country and the world because we're children, selfish, self-centered spoiled children.

      I'm not going to ask people to live like the third world, just to recognize that it exists, and that compared to the rest of the planet, we really don't have many problems.

    21. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      As an adult, you're complex enough to tell the difference between good sushi and bad.

      Yeah, the same way as I'm complex enough to tell the difference between good E.coli and bad E.coli.

    22. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Stupid thumping gangsta rap whose only function is to shake your car's quarter panels, bubblegum crap pop, or Nu Metal where guys with long hair get up in front of the mike, blast the distortion and whine about their relationships.

      Most teenagers with a brain are listening to older music anyway. Not to say that I don't like some Nu Metal, but those who haven't found anything from before 1980 are too late to be saved. I suggest we just put them out of their misery; they're a lost cause.

      There is some good music now-days though, it's not all complete and utter bollocks as you describe. But good luck getting it in Australia; over here a lot of things are either US or EU order. Also means you miss out on lots of good bands over here if you attempt to keep to legitimate channels. So no-one does that.

    23. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I can see where you're going with this, and I agree somewhat. Your second point does make sense - we've been bubble-wrapping society for many many years now and it does have a cumulative effect. It's good in moderation - children do need to be protected somewhat. If it wasn't for this trend we wouldn't have child labor laws, for example. But over-protecting them is also harmful, IMHO. I agree with the George Carlin approach to childhood - if you sanitize everything your kids will have weak immune systems later on in life and get sicker with greater frequency. Same goes for dangerous situations. I can handle a crisis well, and part of the credit goes to my being in perilous situations early and often.

      But I must disagree somewhat with your first point.

      Corporate entities decided what was cool when you were a kid, too. And the adults of your time hated your music as much as you hate the kids of today's, and for the exact same reasons. Nothing has changed.

      Things were different when I was a kid, and after thinking about it for a day I've come up with a way to describe it better. I'll use Led Zeppelin as an example. They weren't my favorite but they illustrate the point well.

      Back in the day those guys could get away with anything they pleased. They could check into a 5 star hotel, order crates of champagne, invite half of New York to their place and tear holes in the walls. Then tell their liason to the recording industry, "Deal with it - we're Led Zeppelin. Pay the bills. We've got better things to do. And if you don't like it, well Fuck You - we're Led Zeppelin. Who else are you going to get to fill Madison Square Garden next week? I didn't think so." They were in charge. And as a result, their music was exactly what they wanted, with no compromises. Just imagine a recording exec telling those guys, "Hey - about this Kashmir song...it's a bit long to be on the radio. Could you trim it to under 3 and a half minutes?"

      Today it's not the bands that are calling the shots, it's the execs. That's the difference.

      Best example of that is American Idol. Stars today are manufactured items, like Bic lighters. And just as disposable. Since they know that, they know that they have to obey their recording industry people. They're in charge now, not the musicians - and the music shows it.

      If any musician these days gives the execs any trouble, well they're SOL - they can just manufacture some other musician/group/whatever to replace them with minimal effort. Kashmir would never have been written today. The execs would do a projection on it, study the revenue hit they'd take by not having the song fit under 3 and a half minutes, and nix it. And if the band argues, well then it's adios and we'll get someone else who looks and sounds exactly like you to take your place. The fans today wouldn't even notice the switch most likely.

      It's a shame really. Kids today will never know the joy of seeing a truly huge band. They're extinct now.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    24. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      This is not an indictment of Thangodin.

      "Since you're saved by faith alone, you don't have to do jack..."

      Exactly right! You have detected the fact that salvation is for everyone, not just adults. The price of entry is free and the mentality necessary to understand is unbelievable low. Even children grasp the concept readily. There is no eletist mentality to salvation. All are welcome and the path has been made smooth.

      Of course that is just the tip of the iceberg. For some the tip is all they will see. However if you look at the mechanics of salvation in scripture you will realize that even the faith itself that is required for salvation is a gift from God.

      Now, a child will accept a gift without understanding what it is, and the immature, who may know the value of the gift, accepts it as their due. However, a true adult looks on the value of a gift and through responsibility, humility, and recognition reciprocates. Therefore, the method and quality of that reciprocation is based on the integrity and capacity of the one who receives the gift. A child does not know the appropriate response. The immature cannot overcome their own ignorance and lack of humility. Only mature adults posess the ability to properly evaluate, understand, and respond to a gift like this.

      However, this does not restrict children of all ages from participating in the salvation, which is as it should be. In fact, the smart reversionists realize that they don't even have to go to the mega-church. The salvation is from God, not from a pastor of building.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    25. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Because they've had access to alcohol before they reach the legal age, it's not a huge deal.

      It's fully legal for them to have it at the age they do. The difference is that they're not driving yet and are still under their parents thumb.

      I'm not saying to throw kids into the 'deep end' early on, but to let them venture out there under the watchful eye of their parents. The parents shouldn't necessarily dive in at the first sign of trouble, but should be there if the child turns out to truly need them.

      My mom was a great example of this. Generally speaking, if it wasn't going to result in permanent injury, criminal record, or expulsion from school, she'd simply observe and give advice. After going against said advice a few times, only to suffer the dreaded 'I told you so', we started listening.

      Many of my friends with more controlling parents were more scared of her than their own parents. Why? She seemed to know everything. It was easy to sneak stuff by other parents, her, well, there have been wars less planed out than some of the stuff we tried to avoid her knowing about it.

      not to underestimate "the lure of the forbidden".

      I had a phase like this, but it didn't last too long because I couldn't find anything that mom wouldn't allow that I didn't feel was too expensive for my rebellion. When I wanted to get an ear pierced, Mom simply said 'Pay for it yourself'.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    26. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      As to maturity being something you gain by practice, this goes along with my contention that the most important thing you can give your kids isn't love, or security, or anything else; it's PRIVACY.

      Now this I don't agree with. My parents always knew what I was doing, but they allowed pretty much everything that wouldn't result in permanent injury, criminal record, or expulsion from school. Even then I feel that they would deal, depending upon circumstances(I got into a couple fights that they felt were justified when I gave my side). They were my guardians, and thus need to know what I'm doing, even if they simply give some common advice to avoid trouble.

      Now, if the parent never lets the teenager be home alone, or anywhere alone for that matter, we might have issues. Heck, I wasn't even in my teens when my parents would give me money to go watch the movies or rent something from the local store. But they knew what movie I was going to go see and where, and I knew what movies I was allowed to rent.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    27. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by sjames · · Score: 1

      I would say that hardships on that level can certainly kill off the child-like qualities in a person, but if anything impede the process of mental maturation. In particular, the ability to look below the surface of a situation.

    28. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the issue of the kid needing to have something and somewhere of their OWN, where they can do stupid kid things (not harmful stuff, but stuff like play with a toad without being told not to touch the icky thing, etc.) without adult censure, and keep stupid kid things (rocks, special toys, whatever) without being forced to share. It's these small privacies that let a kid know they're a PERSON, with their own inherent value.

      This has nothing to do with sensible parental inquiries about where you're going tonight and which movie you're seeing, or which friends you hang out with. In fact, kids allowed to have their own private space are much more sharing about the rest of their lives, as they don't feel FORCED to sneak just to have that one tiny thing that's wholly their own.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  161. An aside on clothing & "dress-up" by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    Funny you should bring up clothing; It's something I've been thinking about a lot lately.

    Particularly: "How can I explain Second Life dress habits? How can I explain my own personal desire to dress how I feel?"

    Note that I dress geek conservative, which is to say: "Backpack." It consists of cheap shoes, t-shirt, blue jeans, and a backpack. The t-shirt is upgradable to a shirt known as "nicer," or "nice." I do not dress goth, or otherwise stylized. This is to say: I'm hardly fashionable.

    The traditional reasons given for dressing up include: narcissism, to fit peer stereotype, manipulation.

    But I've been questioning that lately; I don't think it truely fits what I see, in these goth communities, and so on. I think it can be those things, but I don't think that's truely it. In fact, where I do see those things, it's more in the "traditional" or "conservative" spheres; not the youth scenes. (Or, I suppose I should say, youthful scenes.)

    I'm thinking about putting together an essay: "The Moral Virtue of Narcissism."

    The basic idea, I'm developing in my head, is this: Dress-up has roots in communication. It's a way of communicating: "This is what I'm thinking, this is how I feel, this is what I aspire to, this is what I value, this is what I aim for, this is what's going on for me." It can be connected with the virtues of sincerity, and appreciation, and beauty.

    If communication is valuable, then why not dress-up?

  162. Lets Look at Some Facts by Doug+Dante · · Score: 1

    "There are people on the benefit having children ... then demanding that the tax payer for the bill for their lifestyle choice."

    OK, I agree that there are some people, and yeah, I pay for my kid, but let's look at a few facts:

    - In the US, the child care tax credit is for 80% of child care expenses - the tax credit for viagra is 100%. Why are old guy boners worth more than children's care?

    - Similarly, the tax credit for child care is around $3000. Please. My provider charges over $40 per day, or over $160 per week. If your provider is charging you $120 per week, it's about market minimum, and that's $6,000 for a 50 week year.

    - The normal child tax deduction is only good for 15 1/2 years, it's limited if you're making decent money, or if you don't make any money, you don't get it.

    - Public assistance comes with many strings, one of which is that the unmarried father (normally) must be signed into a program (TANF-D) where if he doesn't make child support payments, he can be imprisoned - no excuses - get sick and go to jail - normally for 6 months at a stretch. I know children whose mothers who cohabitate with the father, and they are afraid to sign the kids up for help, so those kids just don't have access to Medicare, etc. Also, "child support" in this context can mean the majority of the money is going to fees, late fees, court imposed lawyer fees, court imposed counseling, and court imposed this and that, and not actually helping the child. I've heard reports that 40% or more of a parent's income can be taken out with as little as $50 per month actually going to the child. Bankruptcy will not save you, and the fees and fines will dog you until you die.

    - Also, if you're a parent under 35 or so, which is probably most parents, you're paying about 14% of your income, with no exemptions, to social security and Medicare, and if you look at your yearly statement, it says that by the time you retire, they will have no more than about 74% of the money available - if that. So you're being screwed there. How about getting that 26% back so that those people can feed and house their children? Nope. Grandpa needs his state subsidized Viagra.

    So, whose being selfish here? A government that's out for it's own good first? An older generation willing to screw the young rather than give up extras? Or some poor, miseducated, smucks who think they can get away with having kids that they can't aford and not get seriously screwed?

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
    1. Re:Lets Look at Some Facts by Courageous · · Score: 1

      ...the tax credit for viagra is 100%.

      False.

      C//

  163. It's about the end of manhood. by hey! · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 70s and 80s, we woke up to a real problem.

    We were wasting half our population, by not encouraging young girls to be everything they could be. A huge amount of societal energy went into teaching girls to have leadership qualities, a vision of themselves as agents in the world capable of doing anything their desire and talents qualified them for. As a result, in recent years we have had a bumper crop of dynamic young women, with a plan for their future, the education, the experience of competition fields (athletic, academic and artistic) to make those plans work.

    This is a good thing.

    But we've lost our way with boys. It's not that there aren't young men who have these qualities, it's just that it seemed for some time less urgent to foster them in boys; it was expected they would just be that way, or that somehow they'd be able to make their way because the playing field was tilted their way. Therefore we see relatively more young men with somewhat passive attitudes towards the future and their community than we did in the past.

    Being a "guy" used to be a role that you took as the occasion demanded. At the weekend softball game, you were a guy. When duty called, you acted like a man. Now "Guy" and "Man" are more like mutually exclusive vocations.

    I believe that gender makes a difference, but people are more complex than just their sex. I coach a little martial arts; when you coach somebody in, say sparring, you have to assess their strengths and weaknesses, and help them exploit their strengths, and build up or work around their weaknesses. Some people are very aggressive by nature, which wins fights with inexperienced opponents. Some people are very careful, which usually loses. But a well coached cautious player can exploit his greater affinity for tactics and technique to beat a poorly coached agressive one. Eventually you take somebody and you make him more than he used to be; not just a strong, reckless agressive attacker, and not just a cautious "runner". Coaching is about understanding the big picture of what usually works, but at the same time coming to grips with each athlete's individuality.

    I can say from experience that education today is far superior to education 40 years ago, even though it was the post-Sputnik era. But it's a long way from making the most of every individual. If we spent twice as much effort on each student, in twenty years we'd get it back a hundredfold.

    In any case, the way most young male persons learn what it is to be man is finding out they're about to become a father. It's not the exclusive way, but there's nothing like it to kick in the role appropriate behaviors of responsibility, sobriety, and duty. Since pepole are starting families later, I think that late adolescence is more often prolonged.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  164. Customer service by bceaglejoe · · Score: 1

    I think that this story is old news for anyone here who works in any aspect of the service industry. Whether it be answering phones, working as a retail clerk, or even waiting tables at a restaurant, the levels to which "adult" customers will stoop to get what they want is at once amazing and alarming. There are many so-called "adults" who are impossible to even reason with, let alone come to an amicable solution to whatever the problem is.

    One great chronicle of such behavior is the blog Waiter Rant, where a server in an upscale New York bistro works constantly with the patrons from hell. I've done a decent amount of customer service, and people get all bent out of shape over the smallest things, many of which we have no control over. We're in a culture of entitlement, and everyone is supposed to receive exactly what they want, when they want it. And if they don't, then they'll scream, yell, threaten to sue, etc.

    1. Re:Customer service by cornface · · Score: 1

      One great chronicle of such behavior is the blog Waiter Rant [waiterrant.net], where a server in an upscale New York bistro works constantly with the patrons from hell. I've done a decent amount of customer service, and people get all bent out of shape over the smallest things, many of which we have no control over. We're in a culture of entitlement, and everyone is supposed to receive exactly what they want, when they want it. ...when they've paid for it.

  165. I already knew this by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Look, it doesn't take a clinical psychologist to recognize immaturity in adulthood. I could have pointed to my ex-finace' as a prime example of someone who was a good 10 years behind the curve. It's amazing how some people don't learn how to deal with real life situations and revert to child like reactions. Nobody is perfect but I certainly see a lot of simple minded reaction to complex issues.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  166. Farther by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I can tell you are immature because who wants kittes with all these OMG PINK PONIES!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  167. Pooh by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In the book there are nto two personalities but a continuum of one.

    In order to understand Pooh totally you must also read the Tao of Pooh.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Pooh by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
      "...In order to understand Pooh totally you must also read the Tao of Pooh."

      Ahh yes, the Tao Of Pooh... Because there is so much you can learn from a bear of very little brains.

      --
      Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    2. Re:Pooh by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      The Te of of Piglet is better. As Piglet actually grows in character, though some might argue Eeyor does too.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  168. I think a bit of empathy is called for by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Oh, I've no problem with screaming kids. Note how I don't criticize either the kids or the parents. I just find it hard to imagine being a 6 year old again and remembering just what could have been so awful so often.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  169. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by MattWhitworth · · Score: 1

    > I don't blame the cigarette companies - they're like any other company

    Yep, because I'm sure every company sells addictive drugs that eventually kill the customer - and then construct a massive advertising campaign to get more customers (i.e. children) - definitely a winner for society.

  170. Ch' Ch' Ch' Changes by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Charlton explained to Discovery News that humans have an inherent attraction to physical youth, since it can be a sign of fertility, health and vitality. In the mid-20th century, however, another force kicked in, due to increasing need for individuals to change jobs, learn new skills, move to new places and make new friends. A "child-like flexibility of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge" is probably adaptive to the increased instability of the modern world,

    I tend to agree. When learning new stuff or encountering new situations, I find it easier to try to go with the flow rather than worry about the future. For example, if I start thinking, "Do I need to learn this? What will happen if I don't learn it fast? How long will I need it?" etc., then I tend to feel overwelmed. However, if I take it minute-by-minute and stop thinking and planning and find humor in it, I can get into the groove better.

  171. Calcification? by MythoBeast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ability to change one's mind about things is something that tends to be exclusive to childhood. As people age, changing your mind about something becomes more difficult as the burden of existing evidence increases our psychological momentum. This is a process that I refer to as calcification. Eventually, a person decides that learning new things and changing their minds is no longer worth the effort. The person becomes less flexible and less adaptable to their environment. It isn't a given, but it's very difficult to avoid as one ages.

    Although the article doesn't describe this, I'm wondering if calcification is happening earlier due to a lack of urgency to change one's mind, or if it's happening later because people are presented with more tempting options.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  172. That explains it! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    That explains it! This story sheds considerable light on the behavior of posters on DailyKos, Democrat Underground, and yes, even Slashdot. They're not all children, they're just immature adults. :-)

    Seriously, I think this phenomena (and the behaviors of the sights above) occurs because 1) people don't have to "grow up" to be survive/thrive in the world anymore, and 2) we are coddling our children too much, refusing to discipline them, and providing them with too many surrogate parents.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  173. I must have missed it... by ao_coder · · Score: 1

    Where was the science in this experiment? How was "psychological maturity" defined and tested for? Is there some sort of indisputable characteristic associated with this, or did he just get a large sample size and ask them if they still liked scooby-doo? Without that, this just seems like pseudo-science supporting a world view in which todays' generation is less responsible that the last.

    --
    The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. -Yeats, The Second Coming
  174. Lewis Black has it right by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

    He says that we are obnoxious to the rest of the world. We constantly say we are the best and believe it. Just like the jock in school though we will eventually
    find somebody who can kick our ass and then we'll grow up, at least we better grow up or we'll find the ass whoopin' only gets worse.

  175. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1
    ...There are people on the benefit having children, knowing full well they don't have the funds to pay for the associated costs...

    How much damage is this really doing? And to what extent do these people have other options? It's far too easy for people with plenty of resources who will never be stuck in these kinds of situations to judge those who are desperate and have little choice -- for the conservatives, it's "How could these people even think of an abortion?!", ignoring the actual situation these people are in, and for you it's "How could these people even think of having a child?!", again ignoring their situation and culture.

    I think this is especially strange since the US, which has some of the highest birth rates in the western world, is still just barely edging out the death rate. People say ominous things about overpopulation, while much of Europe is slowly killing itself by not having children, and if you got rid of the poor US families who have children despite economic hardship, we'd probably be doing the same.

    why not allow people to sue fast food companies who fail to put warning labels

    And if fast food companies deliberately put dangerous chemicals in their food to make it more addictive (I mean, more than they already do), then maybe such lawsuits would be justified. The lawsuits against tobacco companies are (at least some of the time) a lot more complicated than just people claiming they didn't know smoking was bad for you.

    --

    I am the man with no sig!

  176. Hmm by Etriaph · · Score: 1

    I both agree and disagree with this. I'm of the mind that so long as I take care of everything I have to take care of, everything else is fair game. I play video games, I watch cartoons, I like to have stupid, mary-jane fun with my friends, but I am responsible about everything I do. I think adult maturity is accountability, respect for others, proper use of empathy, comprehensive communication and being responsible for yourself. You can still be a complete ass and be an adult so long as you follow these precepts. The lines blur in the middle these days.

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
  177. "Adult" redefined in modern dictionaries. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    In old dictionaries, "adult" is defined as;
    a lazy, slothful person. disgusting, stupid, immoral.

    It is figured that because those days were emphasized to grow as a child under God, that is is recognized that a child is of the same substance of the Creator; being quick to love, slow to anger, defend the innocent, honest, work to ability, study and meditate constantly, pray without ceasing, love neighbor in same likeness, not provoke fellow children to anger, don't lie, no double-law to same qualified people, et al. (you all get the idea: a child is a *blessing* to everyone.

    An adult, however, appears to be more qualified to be governed and held to ward of the SOCIAL SERVICES agency of the day because of the lack of intelligence to prove competancy in those matters.

    --
    without prejudice
  178. So? by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    I look at my parent's generation, and yes, in general, they were probably a bit more mature at my age than I and the family members and friends of my generation. On the other hand, our parents got married and had kids on average, a decade or more earlier than people of my generation. As people in my generation have begun getting married and, more importantly, having children, they seem to mature quite quickly to handle it (though this is far from being an absolute. Obviously some don't).

    But the definition of maturity is really hard to objectify properly. I am 37, unmarried, and have no children. In some ways, I'll admit, I'm less mature than some of my married with kids family and friends my age. I'm freer. I've been able to travel more, change jobs more, live outside of the country, etc. Not that I'm unstable. I've worked almost without pause since I was 15. I have good jobs that entail responsibilities, but I'm pretty free to leave a job when I've had enough. Does that make me less mature? Maybe by some standards, but it also means I'm not as tied down. Maturity, in some ways, results from losing freedom. You have kids and you can't do some of the things you did before. You're not always as free to quit jobs and relocate, at least not without negatively impacting your family.

    So we get to have our childhood a little longer than our parents. We're also going to live a good bit longer, on average, than our parents. So it stands to reason, to some degree, that we'll take advantage of that by stretching out some of the stages of aging. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with that. Personally, I've enjoyed the freedom not being tied down has brought me. Not that I don't want to have kids, but honestly, I'm not entirely sure I personally want to make the sacrifice, despite the obvious rewards. So go ahead and call me immature. At least I'm happy.

  179. As if you can choose not to be addicted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, but making a poison more addictive is just plain wrong, IMHO.

    Then again, I would purposefully cause the extinction of the tobacco plant if I could. And give tobacco execs a knee in the groin* for all the suffering their product has caused, including to members of my family.

    You do realize that they've caused many, many times as many deaths as you could even blame Bush for, right? And yet we act like people can choose not to be chemically addicted once they make the mistake of getting hooked and as if it is okay to make it hard for them to quit.

    * I guess I'd have to give female execs a bitchslap or a throat punch.

  180. What I've come to realize. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adult maturity is a myth. (Think about this during your next series of meetings at work.) Adult responsibilty is a reality.

  181. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Personally I think immaturity is a sign of stress and helplessness people feel under modern capitalism, it's becoming harder and harder to make a living. If you want to blame something for the state of society, the economy and how businesses use people is the first place to look.

    Outstanding!

    You have identified the root cause in America: rampant unchecked capitalism/commercialism. Because of this, we have ad-clogged mass media telling people they live in a 'microwave society' where you can 'buy today and pay tommorow.' As a result, people are on the 'rat race treadmill' fueling all this and lining the coffers of fatcat businessmen who view their workforce as 'a necessary evil' and a 'constant drain on the bottom line'. Why is there a relentless drive to computerize as much of business workflow as possible? So they can downsize and save on labor as much as possible. Case in point: I heard/read that WAL-MART
    has such a sophisticated IT infrastructure that only the one in place for the Department Of Defense (the Pentagon) surpasses it!

    Charlie Chaplin was preniscient when he made MODERN TIMES. If you've seen his misadventures in the factory scenes, you realize employees are little more than 'small replaceable parts' in a much larger machine--use them up as long as they are useful then replace them/discard them when worn out or no longer needed.

    It looks like to escape the rat race, you have to 'fire your boss' and become 100% self-employed somehow (without breaking the law if you so desire). Good luck!

  182. thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your explanation makes sense ( along with cliath's observation that new generations of kids get their entertainment from elsewhere).

    But why is this prominent in the USA? Perhaps because American production companies spend much more than others on promoting their works thus have lots of 'franchises' that more people cling to?

  183. Green is the yucky flavor. by r00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know what chemical they use, but it sure is icky. I don't know if it's the green coloring or the fake "lime", but I sure can recognize it. It's kind of soapy tasting.

    Green Jello is NOT lime. It's green flavor.

    The worst is probably Surge. Eeeeew.

    1. Re:Green is the yucky flavor. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      There's three flavors of "green":

      1. Lime
      2. Mint
      3. The flavor of pistachio ice cream, which is actually the same as that used in maraschino cherries, and I don't think has anything to do with pistachios.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Green is the yucky flavor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Green is yucky because it's people!

  184. Did I miss it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I scanned over the article and could not find a definition of what the author of this study considered "maturity" to be.

  185. I wish I could stop myself, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the word is "phenomenon" and the plural is "phenomena".

  186. there would be no room for stupid shit by r00t · · Score: 1

    the McDonald's toy
    the Furby
    the Chia Pet
    any "beauty" product
    chrome trim

    Oh, what was I thinking. People would go hungry to get the stupid shit.

  187. Mental adulthood by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Mental Adulthood? Been there and tried it. Its overrated and very boring. Decided to regress and enjoy life again.

  188. please don't be a parent by r00t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, one ought to avoid getting into a situation where the child will be tired and cranky, but...

    Once it happens, you have to live with it. The parents who allow themselves to be controlled by a screaming fit are the ones who will get screaming fits. The kids wants control. The kid isn't stupid. If screaming makes you cave, then screaming is what you will get. It's training a kid to scream whenever he gets annoyed.

    1. Re:please don't be a parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, totally ignoring the child works best for their parent, but for the rest of us, not having the kid there at all would also be an acceptable solution.

      Personally, I sometimes feel that a solid bit of negative feedback could clear up most screaming fits - for example, a broken jaw or nose. I wait with bated breath on the technology which will allow me to filter out noise - including people - from my perception.

      Ahh, the bliss of simply replacing the screaming child with an iconic representation of "disturbance, only enable if you must."

    2. Re:please don't be a parent by Pep+Strebek · · Score: 1

      "If screaming makes you cave, then screaming is what you will get."

      Well, nobody says that you have to cave. If the kid is crying and throwing a tantrum nobody is saying that you do whatever the kid wants. You need to remove the kid from the area (sit with the kid out in the car until they calm down or bring him/her back home) or you need to get the kid to shut up (Ask my mom about which quiet threats work best for shutting up an unruly kid). However, ignoring the child and letting them cry and whine and carry on (so that you don't appear to "cave") is disrespectful and inconsiderate of the rest of the general public that is then being forced to put up with your kid's shenanigans.

    3. Re:please don't be a parent by r00t · · Score: 1

      Removing the kids is exactly what they want.

      Thus, it trains the kid to scream when they want to be removed.

      As kids go, mine are very well behaved. (and I have 5 under the age of 7) They almost never have screaming fits in public, because they know they'll be ignored.

      The problems you see are with parents who have a reachable breaking point. The parent trys to resist, but ultimately they cave in. This trains the kid to be persistant.

    4. Re:please don't be a parent by r00t · · Score: 1

      There are squeamish people who can't bear the thought of a little physical discipline. These people report parents to social workers, who then assume innocent until proven guilty and no right to privacy or protection against search.

      Were it not for that, parents could better deal with the problem.

    5. Re:please don't be a parent by Pep+Strebek · · Score: 1

      "Removing the kids is exactly what they want."

      I'll have to assume that this is what your kids normally want. Most kids I see carrying on in public are doing so because the parent is (rightfully) not purchasing some candy bar/gadget/shiny toy that happened to catch the kids attention in the supermarket checkout line. In such a case, removing the child is not what the kid wants (so you're not caving in) and it is also considerate to the general public. Again, a softly spoken threat has been known to keep a kid in line as well without the need to remove them from the scene.

      There are all different ways to handle such a scenario.

  189. One acronym to demonstrate this is right on: by thisnow1 · · Score: 1

    YTMND

  190. tru for most slashdotters... by cedspam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    if you look a post subjects other than computationnals and or course porn ones , it seems to corfirm the lack of adultehood of slahdotter.

    yes it may be indeed a trollbait somehow, but its not a reason not to post..:)

  191. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    I just look down the road and on the news; the 'everyone elses fault except my own' syndrome.

    Because there might be a high chance that we have no free will to begin with... Or rather we must believe in free will because we have no other choice, yet if you look at the big picture of our existence then we were simply destined to do these things such as me writing this for example and anyone who finds the had to reply to this and say "Free will exists!". Well you were just destined to do that but sure luck, fate, chance, or some other awkward destiny in the chaos fabric of time... But I digress.

    There are people on the benefit having children, knowing full well they don't have the funds to pay for the associated costs, we have couples having more children than they can afford, then demanding that the tax payer for the bill for their lifestyle choice.

    I think having children to begin with should be limited to one child per couple and perhaps the government should pay mean $1,000 if they volunteer to have a vasectomy. However, wanting to have children is another one of those ingrained natural insticts that people refuse to believe in. After all... After several hundred million years of having evolution, we are simply programmed to desire to have as much sex as possible and have as many children as we can. We actually get measurable joy in this and our natural reaction to someone saying "Don't have kids!" is rejection and disgust.

    That is because most humans have no understanding of their programming and natural desires.

    In truth, the only way to be free of these things is to become an Ascetic or Buddhist.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  192. Are you retarded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If everyone worked 20 hours a week, they wouldn't need to rely on handouts. Working 80 hours a week to make a select few people grossly wealthy is why so many people need handouts. Stop competing with each other for the right to be a slave.

  193. Nonsense by wytcld · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The faults of youth are retained along with the virtues, he believes. These include short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness.

    This is a bizarre list. In my fifties now, I can recall as a teenager having a much longer attention span. For instance, if I began reading a book in the evening I'd often stay up through most of the night to finish it. I don't do that any more. Sometimes I'll get that focused on a programming problem - but the young have all the advantage in attention span there too.

    Cultural shallowness? Most cultural depth comes from youth. Many of the greatest works of the greatest classical composers were achieved while they were young. And all of the great musical advances and inventions of the 60s - aside from those of Ornette Coleman and Miles Davis - were accomplished by people in their twenties - many of whom had encyclopedic knowledge of the musics they were extending from.

    Short cycles? Sure, invention can move quickly. But arbitrary fashion? Are long-cycle fashions less arbitrary? Should we more respect the whale-bone corsette than bell bottoms on boys? Were the centuries of wearing powdered wigs more "mature" than the several years of goatees and mullets?

    And are we better off in life with no sensation? Would this psychiatrist prefer we were all comfortably numb? Figures. But I'd hardly call his the "mature" approach.
    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Nonsense by mqduck · · Score: 1

      And all of the great musical advances and inventions of the 60s - aside from those of Ornette Coleman and Miles Davis - were accomplished by people in their twenties

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be implying that that didn't continue to be true. I disagree. In fact, one of the most depressing things to me is how musicians grow up and never do anything substantially different than what they'd always done (or, perhaps, gone on to explore the roots of what they'd always done). I truly loath the day when I won't get new music. "Everything on the radio these days is shit!" Everything on the radio has always been shit.

      --
      Property is theft.
  194. I'm trying! But modern selective pressure... by r00t · · Score: 1

    By far, the biggest thing affecting human evolution right now is birth control. The second biggest thing is probably the welfare and child support, eliminating the need for long-term pair bonding.

    There are two ways that is will affect us. The desire to have kids will be stronger, and the ability to use birth control correctly (being smart, etc.) will decline.

    The desire to have kids is the big win for selection, but it can't be selected fast enough. Birth control is an extremely powerful selective force. We're going to get stupid before we all decide that we like to maximize the number of kids we have. Once we have evolved to defeat birth control by not wanting it, our intelligence might recover.

  195. What research? by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot summary makes reference to research. The article's title is "Serious Study: Immaturity Levels Rising." Unfortunately, the article did not mention anything about any actual study that was being done. It presented a theory called "psychological neoteny." The article didn't tell us about any sort of data that had been collected or any research that had been done in this area. I'm rather curious to know how you could confirm this theory. How can you measure how mature people are? And how could you possibly measure how mature people were in the past?

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  196. Inept parenting, and lack of responsibilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all immaturity is harmless - much stems from lack of responsibility, and a growing inequality gap. This is particularly true for the sub-peasant classes that have evolved. Here in the UK, some people's only economic contribution is to have children that they don't have the means to care for (hence they get benefits and a free house, then they have more children to get more benefits). There are too many inept young parents, many of whom are just children themselves. If you have ever worked in education, and tried to reason with the parents of the ones that have behavioural problems, you will know that it is a lost cause. Such people should be sterilised. The right to reproduce should be means tested to prevent these social parisites from sucking up our tax money. Firstly, their income should be assessed to see if they can provide for children, then their home background and lifestyle should be assessed (ie. not getting drunk every week). If we permit animal like behaviour as the acceptable norm in our society, our society will rapidly decay even further. The sub-peasant morons must accept responsibility, and must be made to feel that there are social consequences to their moronic behaviour. I would like to see every noisy drunk arrested for being 'Drunk and Disorderly'. This would soon put a rapid halt to sub-peasant behaviour. The difference between these people and a peasant, is that a peasant works for a living, and can be respected, whereas, these people exhibit a form of civilisation less advanced than the inhabitants of the primates enclosure at the local zoo (which always seems to remind me of a certain US president)

  197. Is using tools intelligently "idiocy"? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Blockquoth the AC:

    You are an idiot! How do you think the available technology and resources came to be? They came from long hours of hard work!

    A good workman knows his tools, and a good workman with good tools can produce higher-quality work at a faster rate than the same workman without the tools. Why spend long hours doing hard work by hand, when you can develop a tool that does the same job just as well with less effort, and then devote the freed resources to more useful tasks?

    How long do you think the technology and resources would continue to last if everyone started doing half the work or less? Not long at all.

    As others have pointed out, this is exactly what humans have done throughout their history, yet in recent years our technology is improving at probably the fastest rate in human history. We have developed effective, world-wide communications and transport infrastructure. We have manufacturing processes, and design and engineering tools that surpass anything we had 50 years ago, never mind 500 or 5,000.

    Moreover, a lot of people in this thread make an unfounded assumption that putting in longer hours of harder work actually results in doing a better job. This is known to be untrue among research circles -- there isn't really any doubt left about that one -- yet incompetent managers persist in believing it. This is simply another example of my original point: our current ways of organising society, in particular at the senior management/politico level, is not acting in the best interests of our society, but the system functions as a vicious circle that acts to prevent change for the better.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  198. am not! by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Seems like this could be the problem with all of the stupid lawsuits over stupid stuff.

  199. The difference between aging and maturing by wahini · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The author of this article lacks any understanding of the difference between the negative effects of aging and maturing. Being flexible and adaptable are good things, which if kept while you are getting older are a sign of wisdom. Acting irresponsibly is totally unrelated to being flexible. People tend to become inflexible and set in their ways if they don't make an attempt to keep growing. However, personal growth takes effort and while necessary to achieve a minimal state of competence as you grow up, it becomes less important once you reach minimal competence. As a result many people would rather coast and become set in their ways than to put forth the effort and take the risks of growing further.

    Once you have become familiar which one area of life, you take a risk branching off into a less familiar areas of life/learning and expose yourself to the possible ridicule of (small minded) others for making the beginners mistakes in this new area of growth or learning. The payback is well worth it, but you have to be willing to put forth the effort and accept the growing pains.

    People tend to coast if they are not goal driven in some way to continue to improve. Sometimes, a wiser person gives us a nudge or sparks our curiosity so we continue to grow. Most people become more inclined to settle for less as they grow older, especially if you achieve a certain level of financial success intitially.

    The problem is, once people become set in their ways, they want everyone else to act the way they do, so that they feel less insecure. I'm over 50 now, and my worst nightmare is becoming set in my ways, and fearful of change. In the meantime, I will continue to downhill ski down expert ski slopes, go backpacking in the mountains, learn new computer languages, tools and techniques and meet new people.

  200. Finally, I can quote Jimmy Buffett on /. by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    I'm growing older but not up,
    My metabolic rate is pleasantly stuck,
    Let those winds of change blow over my head,
    I'd rather die while I'm living than live while I'm dead

    --
    This sig is false.
  201. To me, true maturity... by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1

    ...is being able to enjoy the small things in life, as a child would, while also being able to take the difficult things in stride, as an adult should.

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  202. This AIN'T research by obnoxiousbastard · · Score: 1

    New research is showing that grown-ups are more immature than ever.

    Once again, I question who would be doing research, spending money and wasting time on this candy-assed bullshit! This isn't even close to research and to call it that is an insult to the people who are doing real research like physicists, chemist, mathimaticians, biologist, bio-chemists, microbiologists, etc.

    This is is a bunch of little old blue-haired ladies gossiping while they are having their hair done.

    OK /.ers, here the bar for what we can call ligitimate research: it is research ONLY if it is done using there or more of the following: particle accellerator, electron microscope, supercomputer, advanced mathmatics, radio telescope, remote sensors, data acquisition, orbital observatory, vintage HP calculator (can sub a slide rule here), uses the scientific method.

    Furthermore, legitimate research MUST demonstrate a hypothesis using non-antecedotal evidence.

    --
    Is that a SCSI connector or are you just glad to see me?
  203. Not Quite by pikakilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ill bite....

    The "Vae Victis" saying is just part of the myth's of early republic times unless you honestly believe that a conquered people would argue over the amount of tribute in order to save their city. Secondly, latin does not pronounce "v's" like we do. All V's are pronounced as w's and that is that. How hard is it to believe that something sounds "odd" to your ears but sounds normal to those living in that society (ie: japanese substituting r's for l's). Therefore it is very foolish to assume that because something sounds odd it is wrong.

  204. so college kids binge drink by aDSF762 · · Score: 1

    -Brooks believes such individuals have lost the wisdom and maturity of their bourgeois predecessors due to more emphasis placed on expertise, flexibility and vitality.

    I haven't gone to college and sure I gained some insight of the lost wisdom & maturity and I've seen the other side of the fence and it is a drunken sex-fest of sweet sweet immaturity(runnn onnn sentences see kids stay in scool:)..! but a new type of maturity has risen from the ashes of this -short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness- youth. This new bred of persons are the real heroes they didn't cut-n-run while they watched everyone around them act like drunken animals. No they stayed, they made a difference, they gave good advice, support, hell I'm sure someone out there probably even turned down some easy drunk sex with a stranger just to adhere to some moral sense of decency(look nothing wrong with being drunk and haveing sex u know when it's right or when your just taking advantage of some poor sap) or put their body on the line to protect those in need even if it makes them a social outcast, and they do these deeds for no rewards those people are truly wise & mature. I hope we can all take a page outta their book! :) fuck even if you haven't done any of that shit you'll be ok just sit back and enjoy the abuse your partner for 30seconds, crack open another beer on me, and piss caution to the wind after all you just miight be president someday....

    --
    sense of security, like pockets jingling...
  205. Easy Work Around by ukemike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a way you can re-experience the joys of childhood (and they are many) while maintaining the rich experience of adulthood.

    Become a parent. Then spend lots of time with your children.

    --
    -- QED
    1. Re:Easy Work Around by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Become a parent. Then spend lots of time with your children.

      Seconded! I have three. There's nothing like chasing a playground full of kids around while doing a Velociraptor impression.

      (Yes, it includes lifting them off the ground and disemboweling them. In a tickly sort of way.)

      Other adults actually feel a bit jealous when I do it. I can only assume they wish they were less inhibited.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    2. Re:Easy Work Around by FishinDave · · Score: 1

      You've never tried to get laid with a 6 year-old in the next bedroom, obviously.

    3. Re:Easy Work Around by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Nice post.

      Parents that play with their kids are probably the best parents in the sense that the children appreciate the "common ground" that can be shared between them. It's related to a child's ability to understand the authority of mommy and/or daddy but also to understand that there is also time where both can communicate "at the same level".

      As kids get older they tend to appreciate having being treated as real people.

    4. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As kids get older they tend to appreciate having being treated as real people.
      (I assume you meant 'having been treated'...)

      This is definitely true. My father had a "second batch" of children when I was about 22 so I've had an opportunity to watch him parenting from an adult perspective. One of the things that he does REALLY well is to talk to babies and kids without baby-talking. He has real conversations that are somehow at their level, about things they're interested in.

      He's also very in tune with their truly being small people, with complex feelings and viewpoints. One of the things that annoys him is when a parent tells an embarassing story about a young child while the child is in earshot. I think he's quite right in his belief that kids are able to tell when they're being laughed at before they can really express that they feel embarassed.

      I think paying attention to these things really does a lot to help kids develop, both emotionally and intellectually. My little siblings are two of the most articulate little kids I've ever seen. I think in large part this is because they've been exposed to "adult" talk since long before they could put syllables together. They've definitely been allowed to be kids, but they have also been given a lot of respect as humans. This is definitely something I hope to emulate when I become a father (in about 8 weeks... *gulp*).
    5. Re:Easy Work Around by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      This is definitely something I hope to emulate when I become a father (in about 8 weeks... *gulp*).

      I raise my glass to you, sir. Congratulations!

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    6. Re:Easy Work Around by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      It isn't so bad the first few weeks. Mine is 3 wks old. At this age you just have to meet their basic needs. You still have a little while to figure out all of the trickier parenting things and such.

      Jeremy

    7. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

    8. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 1

      That's more or less what I'm trying to tell myself. It helps a little bit... Hearing it from someone who's going through it helps even more. Thanks, and congratulations!

    9. Re:Easy Work Around by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      (I assume you meant 'having been treated'...)

      Yeah. I always tell others to be careful with language, so I guess in this case I was foisted (upon) by my own (inner) retard. Sorry for the malapropism.

    10. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 1

      No sweat.. I try not to be too picky about typos, especially on a forum like this. I only clarified my interpretation because I wasn't 100% sure whether you meant "appreciate having been treated" or "appreciate being treated," which have different meanings here.

    11. Re:Easy Work Around by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Parents that play with their kids are probably the best parents
      And parents that don't play with their kids shouldn't be parents at all.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Easy Work Around by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I recommend the book called "The Happiest Baby on the Block" by Karp. It breaks down their first few months of life in easy to understand terms. The book is pretty much all about how to calm down babies so they cry as little as possible. I can attest first hand the techniques really do work quite well. Also get one of those battery powered/motorized swings. Ours absolutely loves to sit in his swing. Our arms would have fallen off swinging him by now.

      Jeremy

    13. Re:Easy Work Around by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "There is a way you can re-experience the joys of childhood (and they are many) while maintaining the rich experience of adulthood. Become a parent..."

      Nah...I figured it out...if you have kids, then you HAVE to stop being the kid.

      No kids = never have to grow up.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Easy Work Around by crotherm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've definitely been allowed to be kids, but they have also been given a lot of respect as humans. This is definitely something I hope to emulate when I become a father (in about 8 weeks... *gulp*).

      My wife and I raised our son this same way. We noticed that he prefered to talk with adults rather then children at his age. And, not having the social skills that adults learn through years of social interaction, he would often either embaress adults by catching their mistakes, or faulty logic. We had teachers telling us that he would constantly correct them when they were wrong and his baseball coach used to call him the union rep!

      Ah yes... Aside from all that, interacting with your child on a deep and REAL level is wonderful. All children should be raised as such. And I really feel that it will help with learning in that the child is presented with more complex conversations and thus forcing the brain to learn..

      Congrats...

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    15. Re:Easy Work Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Become a parent. Then spend lots of time with your children.

      You jerk, there are already 6.5 billion of us on the planet. We've won, and
      we don't need any more of us. Please figure out a different, more responsible
      way to re-experience the joys of childhood, like slot cars with M-80s taped on
      top!

    16. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 1
      We noticed that he prefered to talk with adults rather then children at his age.
      Is your son old enough to tell whether this gets in the way of interacting with other kids at all? My little brother, who's about 5 now, has been having a little bit of trouble feeling comfortable at preschool. As I live across the country and only see him on occasional vacations, I don't really have a whole lot of insight as to why, but I wonder if he feels he doesn't relate well to the other kids. Do you have any thoughts on that matter as it might relate to your son?

      Thanks...
    17. Re:Easy Work Around by zobier · · Score: 1

      Congratulations Man!

      My wife and I just had our 2nd on Monday (20060626). We were always annoyed by baby talking adults too, and try to treat ours as intelligent beings.

      Our main obstacle at the moment is that our 1st understands her Mother's language (Polish) well but is reluctant to converse e.g. with her grandparents in it.

      Regards

      Mike

      :)
      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    18. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and congratulations to you as well. 20060626 is a cool birthdate. It's fun to write and has a nice rhythm when you say it.

      A number of my friends grew up with parents who speak other languages (mostly East Asian) who wound up very fluent listeners but poor speakers. It just seems that it's hard to get a kid to practice speaking a language that's not used in their wider social circle. Kind of a bummer -- most of my friends in this situation are kind of upset they don't speak the languages better. Ah well.

    19. Re:Easy Work Around by crotherm · · Score: 1



      It did at first, but his elementary school was a peforming arts magnet which got him into the drama crowd. So once he got to Middle School, he started hanging out with all the other drama geeks, which also tend to be precocious. I will catch him butting heads with other kids once in a while, but over all, due to his drama friends and loads of cousins he hangs with, he has managed to outgrow it.

      Of course it could be that now he is a teen, he might just be like the rest of them that think us grown-ups are all kooks... :)

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  206. Take heart by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    As members of my Gen (Baby Boomers) and the Gen that immediately followed (GenX) start to kick the bucket the overall maturity level will I'm sure, begin to increase. Either that or the boomes will have destroyed enough to make it a moot point.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  207. Tried it, didn't like it by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Ah, but I was so much older then.
    I'm younger than that now.

    - Bob Dylan

    I expect to live longer. And if not, at least the quality is better.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  208. maturity = 1/communicativity by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    If communication is valuable, then why not dress-up?

    Reading your comment made me realize that a big portion of what people call "maturity" is the ability to refrain from communicating, and keep the communication we can't get by without confined to narrow acceptable set of topics and manners.

    Pre-school kids talk all the time. Some kids change their shirts 4 or 5 times a day, to suit their mood of the hour.
        They've got questions about everything. They're not afraid to tell the old guy in the next row at church that his clothes look wierd and he smells funny. They know when they're being lied or talked down to, and they'll call you on it every time.
    Teenagers may not respond to their parents, but they still communicate extensively with their friends. They'll dress goth or punk or preppie to show who they are and how they feel. They hash over every personal, social and academic problem with their peers.

    Then you have adults, mature people who say little and communicate less: a non-commital politically-correct greeting here, a meaningless "have a nice day" there, a few low-content emails and a meeting full of corporate newspeak in between. They don't tell the boss his ideas are unworkable and he has spaghetti sauce on his tie. They know all the candidates are lying, but they vote anyway and never call them on it. Instead of burdening friends with personal problems, they keep it to themselves lest they appear immature (or pay big bucks for a therapist to hold the same conversation high-school friends used to have every day for free). They dress the same way every day because it's expected of them, and because expressing your opinions about music, sports, politics, etc on a T-shirt is for teenagers.

    Maybe "maturity" is just the word for doing exactly what everyone around you expects, and doing it very quietly...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:maturity = 1/communicativity by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      Fascinating!

      I appreciate your analysis of the presently conventional understanding of maturity. :)

      Hey, not to pull you into something, but you might want to check out: LiteracyOfHumanNature, (a page of a couple of us yacking on CommunityWiki,) and these moving answers to the question: "What is a mature human being?"

      I resist statements of just what is and is not a mature human being; But I find value in these stories.

  209. Immaturity Level Rising in Adults? by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

    Is not!

    --

    There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

  210. Adult children are the intended product of schools by davedoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In his exceptional book "The Underground history of American Education" John Taylor Gatto details that the stated intent of our education system is to produce permanent childhood.

    He explains that, due to an unusual set of circumstances at the time the USA was formed, young people where given adult responsibility and adult work. The concept of the teen years as a part of childhood did not exist. It was only with the introduction of mass forced schooling that young people lost the ability to deal with adult responsibilities. In fact Gatto contends that compulsion schooling has produced a measurable drop in literacy, inventive thought and maturity.

    Some quotes:

    Now, you needn't have studied marketing to know that there are two groups of people who can always be convinced to consume more than they need to: addicts and children. School has done a pretty good job of turning our children into addicts, but it has done a spectacular job of turning our children into children. Again, this is no accident. Theorists from Plato to Rousseau to our own Dr. Inglis knew that if children could be cloistered with other children, stripped of responsibility and independence, encouraged to develop only the trivializing emotions of greed, envy, jealousy, and fear, they would grow older but never truly grow up. In the 1934 edition of his once well-known book Public Education in the United States, Ellwood P. Cubberley detailed and praised the way the strategy of successive school enlargements had extended childhood by two to six years, and forced schooling was at that point still quite new. This same Cubberley - who was dean of Stanford's School of Education, a textbook editor at Houghton Mifflin, and Conant's friend and correspondent at Harvard - had written the following in the 1922 edition of his book Public School Administration: "Our schools are . . . factories in which the raw products (children) are to be shaped and fashioned.. . . And it is the business of the school to build its pupils according to the specifications laid down."

    This is from the book:

    The second document, the gigantic Behavioral Science Teacher Education Project, outlined teaching reforms to be forced on the country after 1967. If you ever want to hunt this thing down, it bears the U.S. Office of Education Contract Number OEC-0-9-320424-4042 (B10). The document sets out clearly the intentions of its creators--nothing less than "impersonal manipulation" through schooling of a future America in which "few will be able to maintain control over their opinions," an America in which "each individual receives at birth a multi-purpose identification number" which enables employers and other controllers to keep track of underlings and to expose them to direct or subliminal influence when necessary. Readers learned that "chemical experimentation" on minors would be normal procedure in this post-1967 world, a pointed foreshadowing of the massive Ritalin interventions which now accompany the practice of forced schooling.

    The Behavioral Science Teacher Education Project identified the future as one "in which a small elite" will control all important matters, one where participatory democracy will largely disappear. Children are made to see, through school experiences, that their classmates are so cruel and irresponsible, so inadequate to the task of self-discipline, and so ignorant they need to be controlled and regulated for society's good. Under such a logical regime, school terror can only be regarded as good advertising. It is sobering to think of mass schooling as a vast demonstration project of human inadequacy, but that is at least one of its functions. Post-modern schooling, we are told, is to focus on "pleasure cultivation" and on "other attitudes and skills compatible with a non-work world." Thus the socialization classroom of the century's beginning--itself a radical departure from schooling for mental and character development--can be seen to ha

  211. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a senior citizen, I feel it's my duty to point this out: LOL! PWNT! W00t

  212. Re:aaw c'mon by dragonbutt · · Score: 1

    screw all that, let's go play in the sandbox!!

    --
    it was like that when I got here.. I wasen't here when that happened... second shift musta done that....
  213. It's not true.. by kbox · · Score: 1

    Whoever done that research is a stinky poo poo face, I'm telling my mummy..

  214. 29 is old. nt by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
    1. Re:29 is old. nt by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      What's that sonny? My hearing isn't so good anymore.

  215. How do you figure? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find any studies that claimed my parents' generation was acting more child-like. If anything, the studies seemed to imply 'over maturity' in that my parents' generation were over-worked and under-family-timed as compared to THEIR parents' generation.

    I agree with your statement in most cases, but not this one.

    --
    Blar.
  216. Preference by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Actually I greatly prefer Axis myself (well I don't know about greatly but I did really liked Axis), but I wanted to frame it in terms most people might understand rather than throw off an obscure reference that would enhance my mad gaming street cred. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  217. Chosen burdens by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The burden caused by a mortgage and bills are not an illusion. They are quite real. And they are not something you can 'stand upon'.

    A mortgage is determined by what you choose to buy, where you choose to live. Some choose to live without a mortgage by saving enough to pay for housing outright or wandering the earth with a backback.

    Mortgages and bills all represent payments for things you have chosen, and in at least one way they are indeed something you can stand upon for they are all tools for establishing good credit in order to acquire larger loans in the future - if indeed that is your choice.

    Nothing is inherently wrong with choosing the life of a large mortgage and some debt over the life the monastic wanderer. Just don't think fate handed you that mortgage any more than it put the backpack on the pack of the wanderer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  218. Let me tell you a joke by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me tell you a joke about nostalgia. Two veterans meet at some war-ending aniversary and have a little chat:

    "Ah, do you remember when they captured us and took us to a concentration camp?"
    "Oh yeah."
    "And how they wanted to take us to the gas chamber?"
    "Aw man, how can I forget that?"
    "And then there was this bombing raid, explosions everywhere and we ran through a hole in the fence? And they chased us with dogs and we hid in the swamp for a week?"
    "Oh yeah. Man, those were the good times."

    Well, admittedly, childhood usually isn't _that_ bad, but still, everyone remembers the good parts, but never remembers the annoyances and frustrations. Or remembers some sanitized rose-tinted version of them. I suppose it must be some mechanism of the brain to stay sane.

    But if I'm to really remember childhood, and without even going into the parts that were due to my parents being... well, completely unfit to be parents, it wasn't _that_ idyllic anyway.

    E.g., take school alone. I could read since the age of 3. In fact, I could read and write in two foreign languages by the time I got into school. I could calculate a transformer or solve other physics problems up to that level. (I guess I must have asked something like "why is the sky blue?" and my parents, god bless their totally nerdy souls, gave me a physics book.) And yet there I was in school required to write a page of oblique lines or loops. Or to write a page worth of the letter "a". How boring is that?

    And that's just one of many issues.

    On the whole, I'll go and say I'm actually a _lot_ happier as an immature adult than I ever was as a child.

    _Now_ I can actually do what I want. If I want a chocolate, I can go buy a chocolate. If I want to buy a doll, I can go buy a doll. (Or The Sims, which is one hell of a doll house simulator.;) If I want to stay up late playing with it, I can jolly well stay up and play with it. Back then I had a ton of people who knew better what I should be doing, what I should be thinking, what I should be saying, etc.

    As for Calvin and Hobbes, or Winnie the Pooh, they're not written by a kid. They're written by an adult, and through rose-coloured nostalgia glasses _and_ from second-guessing the "enemy" at that. They see "man, this kid never listens to a word I say", or "man, he's throwing a tantrum again when I'm trying to teach him proper manners", and from there they go and paint some image of the kid being completely care-free and living in some imaginary wonderland. They don't however, see the frustrations like being treated like a brainless idiot. Or the frustration of that "teaching manners" meaning "Moraelin, say 'hello' to the nice lady?"... again... in front of 10 strangers and 2 of my friends. Or about a hundred other little issues.

    In fact, I'll go and say that all that seeing the kid as a care-free brainless _idiot_ is just... selective confirmation. People start with the preconceived idea that the kid is inherently retarded and unable to ever comprehend adult logic, and from there remember every detail that confirms that, but conveniently forget the details that don't. Or acts like they're some one-in-a-million occurance that's surely just a freak accident.

    And let me also say that a lot of the time, "adult logic" _isn't_. Adults are just as good as kids at rationalizing backwards from what they'd like, to some half-arsed unconvincing "facts" to justify it with. E.g., they start from some pre-conceived wish, like that they want to go camping or fishing (bonus points when it's just to fit in some group, not because they actually like it), and from there work their way backwards to some half-arsed justification, like that shivering in a tent in the rain builds character or that fishing is some kind of valuable RL skill. (How? What for? Exactly in which situation can one possibly catch enough fish with a fishing rod to support a family that way?) Even when they actually do have a point there, they're so convinced that you're an idiot and can't possibly

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Let me tell you a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you see, the thing is, it takes time for a child to develop logical thinking. When a child is like, 3-4, and you try talking logic to it, you are likely to meet with some failure, or at least frustration. When a child is like, 10, then you are probably talking with a more sensible individual. Somewhere in between, gradually, the child develops the capacity for logical thinking.

      So, the problem is that as a parent, you would find that it is hard to switch from the "this little creature does not really grasp logic very well, so it's not productive to try it" mode, to the "it understands logic, and it makes sense to communicate with it under this assumption".

      Basically, just wanted to point out that the understanding of logic is a gradual thing, and it's not so simple to figure out when exactly it "dawns", so to speak. The issue is not exactly as simple as you describe it.

      Now, as regards your general opinion about adult logic... well, just think how stupid the "average person" is. Then realize that half the population is even dumber than that. So sure, a large bulk of the human population is not going to be doing so well in the logic arena. Is that really such a big surprise? :)

    2. Re:Let me tell you a joke by try_anything · · Score: 1

      You seem to forget that Calvin stresses out about facing the school bully every day, constantly being disciplined by his parents, and being shamefully mediocre at schoolwork. Actually, he's pretty awful at every aspect of his life that anyone else attaches any importance to, and he only finds relief in isolation. I wouldn't call that idyllic.

    3. Re:Let me tell you a joke by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And let me also say that a lot of the time, "adult logic" _isn't_. Adults are just as good as kids at rationalizing backwards from what they'd like, to some half-arsed unconvincing "facts" to justify it with.

      Well, that's the self-deception... but you've got another important factor that builds the bullshit-o-meter, and that's when you're trying to cover up the gaps in your schoolwork. I know I've managed to pass off some very convincing arguments using a mix of distraction, pseudo-logic (corrolation != causation) and fact-fitting. I don't mean on the large scale, but it's often the difference between a decent grade and an excellent grade, because you seem to be on top of everything. Not to mention what I would call "inverse research", figuring out what you want to say, then finding sources that are consistent with that. This is particularly true for "real-world" sciences of complex systems where you can't break it down to lab experiments, but rely on models and case studies. Also, have you ever seen a politican when he doesn't want to answer a question? That's not lack of logic, it's quite deliberate and comes from hard training. Or it can be as innocent as getting out of doing something with a friend without offending him. Either way, I think you get more skilled at coming up with these bullshit rationalizations, not less.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Let me tell you a joke by giarcgood · · Score: 1
      And let me also say that a lot of the time, "adult logic" _isn't_. Adults are just as good as kids at rationalizing backwards from what they'd like, to some half-arsed unconvincing "facts" to justify it with.
      Isn't this what university is for? Train adults in arguing their pre-concieved notions.
    5. Re:Let me tell you a joke by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      You sound a bit bitter but anyway...

      One problem with treating a child as an adult is that they don't have the experiences to back up their decisions. Kids and teens especially think they "know everything". They make bad choices, i.e. "I can drive as fast as I want on this windy road, I know what I'm doing. Seatbelts are for pussies!". A little knowledge is a dangerous thing and kids have less than they think. Face it, the vast majority of kids don't speak multiple languages fluently by 1st grade or can do basic physics by then. Even if they could, learning facts and being able to apply them to real life are two different skills.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Let me tell you a joke by Photar · · Score: 1

      I've got two kids and another on the way, and I have to say, kids are the smartest people around. My son memorized word for word several books that I read to him. He could open up one of the books, to a page and recite what the two pages said and flip through it and do the same. But the catch is he was maybe 2 and a half and didn't even know how to read yet. I can't do that, and heck I'm the one who read the book all those times.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    7. Re:Let me tell you a joke by Moraelin · · Score: 1
      One problem with treating a child as an adult is that they don't have the experiences to back up their decisions.


      Oh, we can aggree there very quickly. In fact, I find that a very productive attitude. I wish more people thought that way.

      It's in a way the exact opposite of the "kids are illogical little idiots" attitude I was against. Once you've accepted that they _can_ follow at least basic "cause ==> effect" reasoning and just lack the experience to make much use out of it, the road is open to a honest discussion and giving them the data that they lack. I find that very productive.

      Face it, the vast majority of kids don't speak multiple languages fluently by 1st grade or can do basic physics by then.


      Well, looking back, I certainly hope they don't need to. In my case it was just a bad auto-allergic reaction that transformed the slightest cold into an asthmatic bronchitis that pinned me in bed for _months_. It's a lot easier to read a book in bed than to go play with sticks and puddles, when you barely have enough air even to survive horizontal in bed. I must thank grandma for teaching me to read there. It would have been a lot shittier to just stare at the ceiling instead.

      I must say, though, I don't think it's been that bad on the whole. Learning that the lightbulb works because of an electrical current going through the wire there wasn't that horrible, I must say. It's an age where you're pre-programmed to learn as much new stuff as you can, so, well, it's not any worse to learn that instead of some wonderful pseudo-explanation with pixies and fairies. And it made just as good fantasy material: you can dream of flying bikes just as well when you have some crude and inaccurate idea of what would take to make a bike fly.

      Languages too come pretty naturally to learn at that age. It's actually a _lot_ easier to learn a foreign language when you're three and, well, that's what you're pre-programmed to do at that age. Even your mother tongue is a foreign language you're learning at that age. And doubly so when it's the highlight of the day that grandma comes over to your bed to teach you French using Pif comics. Heck, it sure beat being sick and alone.

      But I digress. The point, sorta, was just that small kids aren't idiots. I don't think I was anyone special. Just, you know, your average Calvin. Those shitty circumstances, sure, they gave me enough incentive to learn, because there was nothing else to do, but I'd think the mental capacity is there in most kids. That was, really, the whole point.

      Even if they could, learning facts and being able to apply them to real life are two different skills.


      Nothing against that point of view either.
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    8. Re:Let me tell you a joke by mrspandex · · Score: 1

      _Now_ I can actually do what I want. If I want a chocolate, I can go buy a chocolate. If I want to buy a doll, I can go buy a doll. (Or The Sims, which is one hell of a doll house simulator.;) If I want to stay up late playing with it, I can jolly well stay up and play with it. Back then I had a ton of people who knew better what I should be doing, what I should be thinking, what I should be saying, etc. Wow, exactly what I was thinking with all this crap. I would much rather have my freedom than a lack of responsibility any day.

    9. Re:Let me tell you a joke by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      And yet there I was in school required to write a page of oblique lines or loops. Or to write a page worth of the letter "a". How boring is that?

      Oh my holy Jesus, you are so right about that. I wasn't quite at your level but I went to a private school for a while, and then when that ended I went to a public school and they put me in Kindergarten due to my age, when I'd been learning Spanish, doing mathematics at a third grade level or so (according to their standards anyway) and I found myself making american flags out of construction paper and tracing letters.

      I think what this really illustrates is the unwillingness of most people to treat children like humans. They act like they're some kind of pet or something. Even my mother, who was very supportive of me on the surface, acted like I was a plant or something. Until I was old enough to steal money from her purse and go buy my own music, the only thing I was allowed to listen to was classical music, because she'd read it would make me smarter or some shit. The only thing I know it did was make me hate the majority of classical music.

      (How? What for? Exactly in which situation can one possibly catch enough fish with a fishing rod to support a family that way?)

      Actually, people do it. It's not impossible. At least, you can feed your family that way, if you add in some gathering. One funny thing to think about is that most people have weeds in their gardens that are more nutritious than the veggies they planted. Or, in other cases, the flowers they planted are more nutritious, but the only thing eating 'em is the deer. (Pardon my aside.)

      Even when they actually do have a point there, they're so convinced that you're an idiot and can't possibly understand adult logic, that they'll give you the half-arsed idiot version anyway. And then when the kid sees that it doesn't add up that way, or not convincingly, the parents act as if it's more proof that the kid is unable to comprehend adult logic.

      Again, adults don't seem to realize that children are humans too. What I see is that they were treated like idiots when they were children, and they decided that was the way to treat children, forgetting entirely the frustration of being treated that way. It's kind of sad that I'll probably never be a father, because I have not forgotten.

      It's not that sad though, because the time to act like a child pretty much ends when you have some. In this society, you no longer have time for a proper life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  219. I yell because I care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calvin: Dad, what's a control freak?
    Dad: That's what lazy slip-shod workers call anyone who cares enough to get things done right.
    Calvin: Am I in the presence of their King? Should I kneel?
    Dad: If anything works in this world, it's because someone took charge.

  220. This is what makes us human by davidbofinger · · Score: 1

    "Orangutang scientists report on the phenomenon of psychological neoteny. Certain apes (the Homo genus) are retaining childlike behaviours (curiosity, etc.) into adult life. In a real sense, these apes are failing to grow up."

    Seriously, neoteny (physical and psychological) is one of the mechanisms by which evolution made us human. If the modern world is making us move further along that path, why should it bother us? Unless you think coming down from the trees was a mistake.

  221. I was a bit disappointed ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    TFA used the biologists' term "neoteny", but didn't define it or give examples. It turns out that humans have a lot of examples of this evolutionary phenomenon.

    Its basic meaning, of course, is the extension of "juvenile" characteristics into adulthood (or whatever the mature, reproducing stage of a species is called).

    One of the curious examples in humans is the ability (mostly in Europeans) to digest milk as an adult. Most mammals, and most humans, lose the lactase enzyme as part of maturing.; But in "Caucasian" people, lactase production usually continues into adulthood. This is interesting because it's probably an adaptation to the domestication of cattle and goats. Usually when domestication is discussed, people are talking about modifications of the domesticated animals. In this case, it was a population of the dominant species that changed, so as better to exploit the domesticated species.

    But my favorite example is that a number of scientists have proposed science itself as an example of neoteny in humans. The explanation is that science is fundamentally based on curiosity about the world, plus a willingness to explore and test rather than just accepting what society tells you. In most animals, including our primate relatives, curiosity and exploration are characteristics of juveniles. Adults have learned all they want to know about the world, and new things outside their experience are mostly causes of concern and fear. This is still true of most humans in most societies. But in many societies, there is an active scientific community that institutionalizes curiosity and learning new things, and many people remain working scientists (some of whom also drink milk ;-) their entire lives.

    Of course, there have been precursors of this throughout history. Many societies have produced explorers, sometimes in great numbers. The ancient Greeks, Phoenicians and Chinese did this, as did the later Norse and Arabs. Polynesia was settled by a whole society of them, as was North America a thousand or so years later. These were people willing to abandon the home they knew and face the challenge of learning to live in a strange new place. Normal, mature people stayed behind no matter how bad the situation was at home; only neotenic "adult children" would engage in such adventures. (Of course, not all went voluntarily, so this doesn't apply to all such emigrants.)

    In any case, TFA does mention that academics, teachers and scientists are often "strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence ...". I was disappointed that the author didn't mention that this is effectively a job requirement in any field that explores new ideas. Mature primates don't explore new things; only immature primates do that. So of course people in those professions are "immature". More properly, they are exhibiting a neotenic characteristic.

    Also disappointing was the comment "... such individuals have lost the wisdom and maturity of their bourgeois predecessors due to more emphasis placed on expertise, flexibility and vitality." There is no conflict between these characteristics. The immense success of the scientific enterprise over the past few centuries, especially its success in improving our lot in life, is a good illustration that "wisdom" should imply recognizing the importance of both expertise and flexibility. Those two words succinctly describe what it takes to produce a good scientific result. You need the expertise to understand and judge the value of the data, and you need the flexibility to consider new ideas (no matter how wild) and systematically work out tests of their validity.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:I was a bit disappointed ... by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >I was disappointed that the author didn't mention that this is effectively a job requirement in any field that explores new ideas.

      Can these people dress themselves? Neoteny might be useful in scientific fields but the ultimate benefit is to the boss. Shower and clothe on-site, and pass on your useful inventions to the corpration. I guess it comes down to whether this is an effective use of our scientific talent.

  222. Mythbusters - the ultimate in immaturity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I reject your reality and substitute my own!

  223. SUUUUURGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved that stuff when I was a freshman in high school, used to drink it and eat those spicy Doritos. Went perfectly with whatever else they had, be it pizza or a hamburger.

    I'd be happy to be sixteen again, let alone six. At 26, you know what you've got to look forward to, and that's pretty goddamn bleak.

  224. To quote The Doctor... by cybernezumi · · Score: 1

    "There's no point in being grown-up if you can't be childish sometimes."
                -- The Doctor, in "Robot"

  225. how go about aging and maturing? by tilminator · · Score: 1

    So, how do you go about personal growth? I have my theories, but really don't know.

    At 25 it's a bit horrifying to read your diary and notice you've had all the problems you're now complaining about already 2 years ago.

    --
    -- up-modding policy: make a good point, write self-contained.
    1. Re:how go about aging and maturing? by wahini · · Score: 1
      So, how do you go about personal growth?

      I think that you have to get back in touch with your natural curiosity and with things that were fun for you when you were younger. What subjects interested you when you were younger and are there any you enjoyed in school and didn't pursue further at the time? I took a Fortran programmming course the last semester of college and enjoyed it more than anything I had done before. Being heavily in debt with student loans I couldn't pursue it at the time. Eight years later, after being laid off from my job, I went back to school and got a Masters Degree in Computer Science and have enjoyed it ever since.

      What hobbies, sports and other activities did you find to be fun or thought would be fun and never did? I always thought it would be fun to ski when I was young but I didn't have the money or the easy access to a ski hill. When I was about 35 years old I decided to join a ski club and I learned to ski and have enjoyed it ever since and I still keep improving.

      Joining a club or group of some kind is a good way to try new things. The same ski club I learned to ski with, also did other things depending on what anyone came up with including white water rafting, canoeing, scuba diving, backpacking, going out to plays, fancy dinners, bungie jumping, picnics, ski trips to Europe and all sorts of unusual things.

      One key thing in the process of growing is you have to get out of your current comfort zone. This is where a group, friend, or girl friend can help you try something new. Check out any trips, one day seminars or other activities your local junior college or park district might be sponsoring, that you might enjoy doing.

      Take a look at your life and identify places where you habitually spend too much time (like reading /.) so you don't have time to try something new.

      Consider reading some books or magazine articles on the psychological aspects of personal growth. One good book is "The Art of Possibility" by Zander and Zander. But there are no lack of these types of books - buy a cup of coffee at a bookstore and browse through a few of these books and buy the most interesting one.

      Finally, look at people who you don't like because they are so set in their ways and try to figure out how they got there, and let their behavior motivate you to not let yourself be like that!

  226. The joys of childhood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joys of childhood typically don't include frequent sex with a really hot woman. A colleague reading over my shoulder has just asserted that this is true for most adults, to which I can only say, nyah nyah.

  227. Howard Dean makes sense now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As does Anne Coulter. (And probably me, and anyone else who replies to this story, or even read it.)

  228. Omnes viae Romam ducunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But isn't imaturity the cornerstone of American society? Isn't that main reason for the french feud? :) So as the cultural exporter of our capitalist niche, how can anyone claim to be amazed? It is this desperation that fuels the economy, it is a self realizing totality. Take Italy as an example, old society, good erudition, good life standards, good climate, even good genes, get the point?

  229. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    Where is the tag, insightful but wrong.

    If a corporation files bankruptcy so the shareholders don't have to ante up to pay the debt for the entity they own

    Um, If I own a corp at $50 a share and it goes bankrupt and its share value drops to $.01, I've just lost $49.99 per share! Seems like I took a loss. Here is what you ment to ask...

    If a corporation goes bankrupt because the heads of the corp run it in to the ground spending all there money on mansions and personal jets, why do they not go to jail. We put these people in charge, and they build golden parachutes incase things get bad.

    At least a few people I know are FAR more concerned about corporate irresponcibility then any one individual. And yes western civilization because we 'individually' allow our respective goverments to give incorporated entities far more power then any one individual would receive.

    __
    My spelling sucks far worse then yours.
  230. No no no you are all missing the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girls grow into women. Boys just get old.

  231. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you'd lose your investment. But when people go into business, they are advised to incorporate, for the very reason that it limits liability while retaining the money-making potential. Sole proprietorship is discouraged, explicitly because it doesn't shield an owner (the one making the decisions and the money) from responsibility as well as a corporation. This legal entity exists explicitly for this reason. My only point is that there are other aspects of our culture that undermine the idea of personal responsibility, and the evil "welfare state" isn't the culprit. People want to make decisions and reap rewards while excusing themselves as much as possible for any ill consequences of their own decisions, and we not only allow them to do so, but respect them for their business acumen. Where exactly is one supposed to learn the value of personal responsibility when so few people actually believe in it? For themselves, I mean, not for other people.

  232. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

    I learnt a new word from your post, 'contumely'. Thanks! ;-)

  233. Did anyone else think by Scoldog · · Score: 1

    That this finding is offset by the fact that children seem to be getting mature (Not sure if "mature" is the correct word, see next sentence for context) younger?

    I was reading yesterday about the increase of teenage pregnancy, especially younger teens 14-15.

    The article doesn't specify what age people where wanting to be again, I thought "child" was before "preteen" (10-12 onwards). A lot of kids seem to be going through puberty earlier these days.

    Then again, the article was more about the mental state of mind rather then the physical body.

    --
    This space for rent
  234. Fried chicken actually healthier with rat poison by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    The bad health effect of fried chicken is that the high fat content will clog your arteries, leading to a clot that will stop your heart, cause a stroke in your brain, or cause you to lose a leg.

    Now if they put a little rat poison in it (Warfarin, Coumadin), well rat poison of this kind is actually used in the treatment of people with clogged arteries to prevent stroke, heart attack, and other clot damage. Maybe if they put the right amount of rat poison in the fried chicken, it would counteract the bad effect of the fat and make for an even slightly healthful product.

  235. Too bad if you're actually a child of these people by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    Of course, this is all fine and dandy until these permanently immature people have kids themselves. Then it's a big interesting competition to see who can be the child. For that matter, to see whether one or other parent can manage to stick around long enough to raise the actual children, or whether someone is going to go rocketing out the door once the next 'teenage crush' (oops, I mean, 'true love with a life partner who really understands me') turns up.

    I was fortunate enough to be raised by actual adults, and am married to one. But I saw too many of my friends growing up with the consequences of being raised by the first generation of PermaChildren, and there doesn't seem to be a huge difference with many of my generation.

    A lot of that stuff about "innocent 6-year-olds" is very disingenuous. 6-year-olds can be innocent largely because there are adults out there shouldering the burdens of adulthood. A side point: unlike the mawkish chain letter thing posted on this thread implies, you need to do this (shoulder adult burdens) without doing too much whining about it. Moaning about how tough it is to wake up in the morning and go to work and deal with irritating stuff in your e-mail is usually a fine warning sign of someone who's about to flip right back into PermaChild status again. Suck it up.

  236. recast of a classic by 1/137 · · Score: 1

    This entire article is just a sad addition to the various sayings about how eventually liberals face the real world and become conservative. As far as I can tell, locked in my ivory tower forced to work with people from all around the world, the "real world" consists of taking a job where someone that makes a whole lot more money than you tells you and a bunch of other people exactly like you what to do each day. They pay you enough money to live in the suburbs with a bunch of other people that make the exact same amount of money and have the exact same color skin as you.

    Funny thing about the "real worlders" is that they are *always* asking for help with there "real world" stuff: broken cars, electrical wiring, computers.

    --
    My handle breaks slashcode, what does your handle do?
  237. :) O! They make me smile! :) by spx · · Score: 1

    These are the people I point & laugh at. Kidding aside, I dont laugh, I just point.

  238. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. Those who fail to learn history CORRECTLY, they are just doomed.

    Poor familys have ALWAYS produced more offspring than wealthy ones. History has shown that the more comfortable people are in their life, the less likely they are to reproduce.

  239. Obligatory... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    I know you are, but what am I?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  240. Immature Adults by psibrman · · Score: 1

    D'oh. Do psychs think this predominately a Neocon job or the libbys just as guilty. Tune into the next election where we hear the Bushits say, "I want my Mapo." and we hear the Plame prosecutor say, "We have no comment on any pendimg or ongoing investigation," for the three thousand and first time. And then all of a sudden state they're not going to indict Carl Rove and then return to "We have no comment," to the bitter end of the Grand jury proceeding. And don't forget the congress who will immaturely vote themselve four or five $3200 dollar raises so that they can feel jusitified in raising the minimum to probably a whopping 6.15 an hour in 2008. Hopefully the American public will pay back those who so kindly paid them. I don't know. Those gutless wonders are probably too cowardly to confront their government in its obvious lie.

  241. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    If a corporation files bankruptcy so the shareholders don't have to ante up to pay the debt for the entity they own,



    It looks like you need to read up on the concept of "limited liability". Shareholders are limited in their liability to the amount of shares they own. They will never ever have to pay any debt of the company (that's exactly _why_ incorporation happens). The worst that can happen (and probably will happen when a corporation files bankruptcy) is that they lose their ownership of the company (read: their shares go *poof*) and the company ends up being owned by the former creditors. If that is not sufficient to pay the debt of the company, then the creditors end up losing money.

  242. I DISagree wholeheartedly by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, from what I can tell, "growing up" is just a matter of enculturation. Or to put it otherwise, of pretending to be X, so you can fashionably fit in a crowd of X. Where X can be something like "rebellious teenager" (huzzah for immitating someone in the name of being an independent individual) or "responsible adult and member of the community" or whatever.

    To put it even less diplomatically: SFV. Stupid Fashion Victim.

    You're just told that once you've reached age Y, you suddenly aren't supposed to play any more, because that's not what an adult does. You're suddenly supposed to become over night uninterested in exploration and imagination -- which is what playing is -- and just become a slave. You're supposed to go to work from 9 to 5 and produce value for your slave driver, like a good slave should, then go pretend to like your neighbours for community standing, and then flop on the sofa and watch football. Again, not necessarily because you actually like football, but you wouldn't want to be different from your neighbours, would you? It would be sooo unfashionable to have different interests than the neighbours. God forbid that you show that by not knowing exactly who passed the ball to whom in yesterday's game.

    And let me state that again: children's "playing" is running scenarios in a safe environment, exercising your natural curiosity and imagination. E.g., if you watch a small girl enacting a tea party with her dolls, it's actually running a simulation of a social situation. It's exploration and imagination at their finest hour. That's what playing is, and not only in humans. Watch kittens or rabbits play, and you'll see that they too "play" by exercising their respective survival skills. In humans it's exercising your brains, which is _the_ survival advantage that nature gave you. Yet somehow people are supposed to "grow up" and basically give all that up. Give me a break.

    Want to know what makes the western world increasingly reject that idiocy? The simple fact that society is increasingly unable to enforce that uniformity.

    A quote comes to mind: "A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular." That's all there is to it. It's finally become safe to risk being the unpopular one, and the effect is cascading. When person X decides to drop the SFV pretense, and persons Y and Z around him see that nothing bad happened, they too might drop that sad masquerade. People are gradually discovering that they're not surrounded by drones who'd drive them out of town if they didn't fit the "responsible pillar of the community" stereotype to the letter, but by people like them who didn't particularly like that retarded stereotype either.

    In the middle ages if you were the unpopular serf that thought too much, you'd find yourself a good candidate for the next inquisition trial. Don't think for a moment that witch hunts were only for the heretics. At least half those burned at the stake were just the unpopular guys and girls that told some community leader or village gossip to fuck off. (Having some wealth that the inquisition could confiscate also helped.)

    Later society had to do with just ostracizing and occasionally bullying you if you refused to fit the stereotype reserved for you.

    Nowadays what we're finally at the point where you can say "fuck them, I'll continue to be an intelligent and imaginative person if that's what _I_ want to be." Even if they ostracize you, you can find a thousand people on the Internet sharing _your_ interests, instead of having to fit in some SFV community. If you'd rather talk about your cat instead of the prescribed "manly", "adult" things like cars and football, you can just drop by in some cat-lovers chat room and there you go. If you want to still maintain a healthy "child-like" imagination and curiosity, there you go, you can find a ton of places to satisfy that curiosity or to exercise your imagination and creativity. You no longer _have_ to become an unimaginative drone, whose sole interests are football and earning enough money to keep up with the Joneses, just to fit the community.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I DISagree wholeheartedly by fitten · · Score: 1

      And let me state that again: children's "playing" is running scenarios in a safe environment, exercising your natural curiosity and imagination. E.g., if you watch a small girl enacting a tea party with her dolls, it's actually running a simulation of a social situation. It's exploration and imagination at their finest hour. That's what playing is, and not only in humans. Watch kittens or rabbits play, and you'll see that they too "play" by exercising their respective survival skills. In humans it's exercising your brains, which is _the_ survival advantage that nature gave you.

      I guess that if today's (and our future's) survival skills rely on being able to sit still for hours on end while grasping something and repeatedly striking it with your thumbs, many kids born in the 1980s and later will be masters of their universe.

    2. Re:I DISagree wholeheartedly by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Today's survival skills are, same as always, being able to use your brains. The kid sitting and pushing thumbsticks is solving more mental problems per minute than the idiot grown up spending the same time watching football. The kid with the gamepad is going through such quick problems as "does this block fit here or there?", or "in which sequence _do_ I jump on these platforms?" or "what do I have to say to Darth Traya to get dark side points?" It's problem solving.

      It may not solve an exact replica of a RL problem, but then doing pushups doesn't resemble any RL problem either, yet it helps your body stay fit anyway. That's what that kid is doing too: the equivalent of mental pushups.

      By comparison, it seems that the prescribed way to be a proper grown up and upstanding pillar of the community is to be a sad vegetable with exactly zero brain activity when you can avoid it. Mindlessly pushing buttons on a remote control is about as mentally stimulating as watching paint dry. And any organ which isn't used much tends to become less and less fit. A proper adult whose only mental activity is some gossip at the factory, followed by some good old fashioned watching football with a beer in the hand, is just working his way towards the mental equivalent of a beer gut.

      So, yes, between the football-watching channel-surfing adult kind of a button pusher, and the kid pushing the buttons on a console controller, the kid may well be more fit to be the master of the universe. Or at least to solve the everyday problems in his life.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  243. More Gatto resources by nido · · Score: 1

    I picked up a copy of Mr. Gatto's A Different Kind of Teacher the summer after finishing my 4-year college degree (from an expensive science/engineering school), and realized that I didn't really know how to read.

    Gatto had discovered that most of his 7th graders couldn't read beyond the level required for a multiple choice test, and offered his readers a question on the classic All Quiet on the Western Front. I went to the library, borrowed the book, read the first 20 pages as best I could... And had no idea whatsoever what was going on.

    I'd tried to read many books before - The Hobbit, Moby Dick, texts for college course, etc. I couldn't even read Harry Potter.

    Someone posted a link to some Gatto videos when I posted a comment linking to Underground History some months back. So if you're like me, and can't really read, then at least you can watch the movies. :)

    http://www.edflix.org/gatto.htm

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  244. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by LtOcelot · · Score: 1

    The poster you're responding to understood all this perfectly well; it is exactly the point of the line you quoted.

  245. You only have to read the comments at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .........to know how true this is.

  246. Why not be like a child!!!!!1!!!11one? by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    How can "be like a child" be a bad thing? You are agile, flexible, good-looks, healthy, active, humourus, spontaneous, creative, friendly, open, receptive, giving, nurturing (ever see a child nurture a smaller?), smiling, laughing, loving, caring, happy, giggling, joking, dancing, singing, playing, ..., I can go on and on...

    Being "like a child" when above 20-30 years old means you now have the freedom and means to do what you wanted to do when you were a child. While being what someone else tells you, can be totally unnatural. Something inside you will speak to you what is needed.

    The only catch is "responsibility". If you don't take it, you will regret it, because the finest moments of life, comes from when you have taken responsibility. Doing the right thing all the time, includes taking care of yourself, your family and friends by having a good time.

    So I see this as a good trend, as long as people become more conscious of the roots of their new-won freedom: responsibility. Responsibility when taken will ensure a deep happiness, not a shallow and superficial one where you can't even manage to be alone, just to avoid feeling empty. Sometimes, there will be a storm, a war, a hail or thunder, but when you are with the responsibility, you are unshakable and know exactly what to do, and grow on the circumstances.

    Innocent like a baby, wise like a (wise) king. =)

  247. Then raise age of consent! by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 1

    If people are less mature then we must obviously protect them by raising age of consent. What should we decide on this time? 25? 30?

    Think of the children!

  248. Boomer Immaturity by caramuru · · Score: 1

    One thing afflicting my US boomer generation is an extreme denial of the level of savings it takes to retire. I've read that the average portfolio value of people in their 40s and 50s is $50,000. If one excludes the poor and near poor, the average portfolio value is maybe $100,000. Living off of that plus Social Security requires a large intake of dog food and other similarly delicious delicacies. Complaining about our relatively measly Social Security benefits or the disappearance of defined benefit pensions is a diversion. These benefits are what they are and, in fact, Social Security and Medicare are endangered as the boomers begin to retire. My generation's pathologically high preference for current vs. future consumption sounds pretty "immature" to me. Does this ring true to anyone else?

  249. Cool to be young by jlehtira · · Score: 1

    Thing is, being "adult" used to be something very cool and people learned to fake it. Many adult adults will still be very childish if you annoy or challenge them.

    Now it's cool to be dumb, ignorant and naive.

    Oh the humanity!

  250. Information overload by master_p · · Score: 1

    Reacting in an immature way is a response to stress...and stress is increased due to information overload: most people in western societies feel they are no longer important members of society, due to information overload: they are always receiving messages about other important members either directly (through the news) or indirectly (through ads, music etc), and that makes them feel small and insignificant.

  251. Re:The fact that that was modded "insightful"... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Also, a little scary!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  252. Generational meaning of the word "Mature" by netsavior · · Score: 1

    Each generation has a right to define what the terms "Grown-up" and "Mature" mean. Just because we do not fit the definition of "grown-up" in a 17th century sense of the term, doesn't mean I don't make my contribution to the world and take care of my peeps.

    I play video games, I read comics, I still shop the toy isle at target.
    I also have a house, 4 cars, 2 children, a decent investment portfolio, and an early retirement plan.

    Every generation has the right to define how they should act... It just seems like my generation is the first one to actually exercise that right in a long time (maybe since the first Renaissance). Comic book target audience was 8-12 years old from the early 1900s untill 1990 when it steadily grew up with my generation. Video games were for kids when they went mainstream... their target audience is now my age group.

    I just think the definition of "Mature" or "Grown-up" which says that you are no longer allowed to have fun is an antiquated one, and one that will eventually die out.

    Also Coffee tastes like shit. Viva La Mountain Dew.

  253. w00t ! Enterprise Village! by xWastedMindx · · Score: 1

    Been there! I worked as the bookkeeper for AT&T. Funny how back then, what I really wanted to do is work the fry machine at MacDonalds. Now all grown up I won't go to McDonalds at all.

    good times, good times..

  254. Not realistic choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some choose to live without a mortgage by saving enough to pay for housing outright..."

    Unless I choose to have a 2 hr drive to work every day I'd be 60 before I could buy a house outright just by saving. I guess I could get a crappy shack and feel like a bum but my wife would object.

    "...or wandering the earth with a backback."

    A nice idea but see #1 about my wife. I also need to eat decent food and have clean clothes and body. People who do nothing can only do it because other people have struggled to do all the work.

    And don't say the wife is a choice, companionship is a need for most people.

  255. Charming, but so what? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Life has always been like that.

    I suppose all generations harp back to an idealized golden era when things were uneniably better.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  256. Heh... it doesn't work that way by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Heh... I think I understand what you're saying. Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. And it's just normal human biology, not anything even remotely blamable on "immaturity" or on the western culture or anything.

    See, the brain doesn't see absolute levels, when it comes to being happy or unhappy. It sees a differential. It sees the difference to the previous state, not absolute values. You can't just say "at standard of living X you're perpetually unhappy, at standard Y you're perpetually happy." If both X and Y are were constant at all time, both would have zero difference to the previous state at all time, so both would be stuck somewhere in the middle: neither happy, nor unhappy.

    Well, it's not even that simple. The more detailed explanation is that the brain gives you "I'm happy" or "I'm unhappy" chemical signals for stuff that is respectively judged as being an improvement or a worsening of your current situation. E.g., if I'm getting hungry, I'm getting less happy, and if then I'm eating, I'm temporarily happier for fulfilling that need.

    But here's that catch: those chemical signals also immediately trigger the release of the "antidote" that will gradually bring you back to the baseline. Otherwise eating once would keep you happy for the rest of your days. And you're not supposed to stay perpetually happy like that. You're supposed to almost immediately need to work on your next "I'm happy" signal, e.g., fulfill your next need.

    What I'm saying is that old farts ranting and raving stuff like "back in my day we didn't have TV or microwave ovens and we were happy like that" are missing the whole bloody point. It just doesn't work that way. Humans back in the 50's, or humans in Ghana, were adjusted to one given "point" in the space of desires and available means. Happiness or unhappiness are judged with that point as a reference point. They were the deviations from _that_ point. Humans in the USA or EU in 2006 are adjusted to another point. So, yes, they judge their happiness or unhappiness, their achievements or losses, compared to that other point. Now they're the deviations from _this_ point.

    Or to put it otherwise, imagine that you took a caveman and let him live 5 year intervals in various times in history. Let's say you moved him from his cave to a hut in ancient Greece. For a while he's happy, then this improved standard becomes his new baseline. From there happiness and sadness, achievement and loss, are compared to this new state, not to his old days in the cave. If from there you moved him to a modern day third world, he'd be happy again for a while... then get adjusted to this new standard. Then you'd move him to being a rich homeowner in the suburbs, and he'd now be happy for a while, then... adjust to this new state as his new reference point.

    There is no maturity or immaturity involved there, since it's the same human that grew up with the same hardships. It's just adjusting to a different reference point. What's a signifficant positive delta for one situation ("yay, I have some meat today") is just the baseline for another ("yeh, so I have meat, just like every day. What's the big improvement or reason for celebration?") to being a _negative_ delta compared to a very high reference point ("oh, dear, the meat today isn't baked in fine french wine and the spices are rather bland").

    In fact, you don't even have to believe that hypothetical scenario. There are plenty of RL scenarios showing just that. E.g., just look at how consumerism is a never-ending race because of that very phenomenon. It may seem like "man, if I had a plasma TV I'd be soo happy"... and you actually would... for a couple of days, until it becomes the baseline. Then it's back to needing the next delta, if you want to be happy again. E.g., see how winning the lottery jackpot is way more likely to make one depressed for life, instead of locking them into perpetual bliss.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  257. Yeah, whatever. by qwijibo · · Score: 1

    Maybe we could feed, house and clothe everyone in the world. But why would we want to do that? Is the goal to teach these people that we'll take care of them, so they don't have to? I just don't see the point. I doubt they'd do the same thing for me. In fact, I know they wouldn't. They're only in a position to take, not to give.

    I'm sure I could support 10 families in some third world hell hole if I were willing to live in poverty. Granted, poverty in the US is much more comfortable than in the third world. However, my family would have a much lower standard of living in order to do that. I don't think there's anything altruistic about denying some people opportunities to give them to others.

    It's not selfish or greedy to put yourself and your family's needs above those of others. You may want to only work 20 hours a week. Saying "we" doesn't change that it's your own selfish desire. I don't want to only work 20 hours a week. I don't mind working more to give my family an advantage over those who aren't willing to do more.

    The world isn't going to become a better place if you can convince more rich people to donate to "charities" that skim heavily off the top before any of that money helps the poor. If you want to make the world a better place, DO something positive. If you want to help someone, help that person as an individual. Most "charities" work just like any other profit motivated corporation. If people really were interested in helping others, they'd do it free of charge. There aren't a lot of "charities" built on my idea of charity.

    My wife has two kids from a previous marriage that I've taken in and treated as my own. We have two dogs we got from a rescue group and another that would have been put to sleep if we didn't give him a home. We drive Corollas, which have low emissions and get good gas mileage. I believe that if you want to make the world a better place, you actually have to take an active role in making it happen. Talking about it or donating to charities is only a baby step. For every dollar that goes into trying to help people in a third world country, there are probably 100 that go into exploiting the same people.

    People are motivated by their own interests. It really is that simple. Maturity or "negative emotions" have nothing to do with it.

  258. "Pathetic" is in the eye of the beholder by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Careful about throwing that word around. Some of us consider middle-aged married men with kids to be just as pathetic as middle-aged men living with their parents. At least the middle-aged guy living with his parents doesn't have to ask for *permission* to go hang out with his buddies. And he never has to wipe anyone's ass either.

    And, for the record, no I do not live with my parents. Nor do I live with a wife who tells me what I can or can't do.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:"Pathetic" is in the eye of the beholder by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      No. An anti-magic cone is in the eye of the beholder.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:"Pathetic" is in the eye of the beholder by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      "I cast...MAGIC MISSILE!"

  259. My translation by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    This may be obvious and simple-minded on my part, but isn't it the other way around? It's not "adults are immature," it's that immature people are simply getting older.

    I have long known that maturity has nothing to do with age.

    I started working when I was 14 and I've never had a summer break since. I don't feel that made me mature, but it certainly made me a responsible person.

    I've often associated with people older than me. My psychologist from years past stated this had to do with my intellect level and seeking like-minded company. Still not a sign of maturity, but a sign of thinking beyond my years.

    I always dated (and married) girls/women older than I am. One time I tried dating someone younger than me. She talked constantly but never really said anything. She also couldn't understand my humor. Once more not really a maturity signal, but a sign that any age can accept or refuse maturity.

    So what is maturity to me? Taking responsibility for your actions (as another poster stated) regardless of whether they are responsible actions or not. Consideration for those around you and your environment (teens [or adults] cursing in public locations is a good counter-example). Knowing your age, acting it when appropriate and knowing how to play young at heart without interfering with anyone else's fun or seriousness.

    I repeat, it's not so much that we have adults being immature (though I know a few), it's simply the immature crowd of the past 20 years finally becoming adults and entering the workforce, the social structure and more importantly to this study, surveys.

    The last few decades have done nothing but speed things up: restaurants, ovens, service, traffic, communication, gratification, etc. et al. What do we expect when a 20-something feels they should steadily move up the corporate ladder by throwing tantrums? Our society created these brats. Now it's time to accept them into the workplace or spank them back down where they belong so they can wait in line like everyone else.

  260. Now that you're done with your childish rant . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . I would like to ask two questions:

    1) Who pissed in your Froot Loops?
    2) Do you actually still eat Froot Loops?

  261. Are you stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you also think that listening to "heavy metal" inspires violence?

  262. What I've noticed by rantingkitten · · Score: 1
    as the technical director for a small VoIP provider, and before that having done tech support for a major corporation, is that, despite college education, wealth, fancy suits, and other trappings of success, people, by and large, are really immature when it comes to social interaction.

    It's as though they never get past the stage where you're supposed to realise that you are not Ptolmey, sitting at the center of the universe while everything revolves around you, and that if you yell and scream enough, eventually you'll get your way.

    A few actual excerpts from some of the stuff that comes across my desk, with only identifying information removed; nothing else whatsoever is altered.

    Subject: This #$%#
    IT IS TIME FOR YOUR TECH PEOPLE TO GET TOGETHER WITH [our ISP] HERE IN TAMPA. IF THIS SERVICE ISN'T ABOUT 10 TIMES BETTER THAN AT PRESENT, YOU ARE GOING TO GET ALL OF IT BACK AND THEN SOME. WE ARE LOSING BUSINESS BY THE TRUCKLOAD, SO LET'S GET THIS FIXED.
    For the record, he's pissed because his net connection sucked, which means his VoIP sucks, but that's not our problem. Which he was told, numerous times, yet for some reason, he thinks it's acceptable to write this.

    PHONES ARE DOWN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Third time he's told us this in a fifteen-minute timespan, after we'd already spoken to him and told him we're working on it. I have not added any exclamation marks; this is exactly how he wrote it. And this is ALL he wrote; nothing before or after. Real mature.

    I have a problem listening to my voicemail. I think it started about an hour ago. None of the office phones are letting us get to our messages. When we hit the button messages the lady says comedian mail mailbox. We enter our extension and then she says password. We enter our password and she says password incorrect.


    One of my favorites. "The lady" referred to here is, of course, the recording that says things like "You have.. one.. new.. voice message. To play new messages, press one..." That a grown adult is referring to this announcement as "the lady" strikes me as utterly, utterly infantile. This sort of broken, stilted ramble is precisely what I would expect from a six or seven year old, not from an allegedly professional adult.

    I sure hope someone answers this before Monday. If I have to wait until Monday, you can stick this phone system where the sun don't shine.
    Sent on a Sunday morning. We're closed on weekends except for emergencies, which he knows, but more to the point, what kind of adult says stuff like this?

    People, this is just off the top of my ticket list here. If I really felt like digging around I could find dozens of examples even better than these, and oh, if only I had recordings of phone conversations I could post. :) These sort of playground insults and me-me-me nonsense is what passes for grown up, rational adult communication with these loons -- most of whom are considered "successful" by society's metrics.
    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  263. Old, perhaps by garote · · Score: 1

    Old, perhaps ... old enough to recognize when someone's feeding Eliza into their slashdot postings. ;)

  264. Life is for my own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Life is for my own
    To live my own way"- Metallica

    With kids and a wife:

    Life is for work and chores

  265. Be thankful then by hey! · · Score: 1

    my other /. emacs Macro does towers of hanoi.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  266. I forgot that could even happen. by r00t · · Score: 1

    It's rare, but I suppose most of my kids try that a couple times.

    Punishment for grabbing the candy bar: mom buys it, goes outside, and eats it herself! The kid has to watch. :-)

  267. Smart for Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To accept muslim immigrants then. To get the birthrate up with 12 kids. I would like to see th British race die off anyway.

  268. Very realistic by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Unless I choose to have a 2 hr drive to work every day I'd be 60 before I could buy a house outright just by saving. I guess I could get a crappy shack and feel like a bum but my wife would object.

    Oh really? What city do you live in? That you live in a city at all is a choice. That you think you have to live in one with a 2 hour drive to work just to make mortgage payments says much about your priorities. You profess to desire one thing but act in a different manner.

    A nice idea but see #1 about my wife. I also need to eat decent food and have clean clothes and body. People who do nothing can only do it because other people have struggled to do all the work.

    I have read endless stories about couples that travel together on the budget of school teachers. If you have kids, well - that was another choice, As is choosing a wife not willing to life like that. How can you be blind to the repercussions of choice? No choice is nessecarily bad but it does alter the possible future choices you may make. That you do not understand this means you will simply continue to make seemingly random choices without any long term goal. If that frustrates you then make a goal! Or do something that moves you to a place of less frustration. That is, in the end, your Choice.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  269. It's so obvious (wait for it...) by Torodung · · Score: 1
    Took a long time to get to the place where they described what he thought immaturity was, but:

    These include short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness.

    And this has been going on since the 1950's? What else has been going on since the 50's? Hmmm.

    Television.

    What he's talking about is an observation of what happens to a society that watches television. His associations of maturity or immaturity are immaterial. All of those traits are caused by television exposure and are encouraged by advertisers to get us to buy stuff.

    How thick can you get? :^P

  270. Can't belive someone needs this explained by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    "Man I would hate to see your toilet"
    Meaning that the poster never flushs it?


    No, after a while, a toilet bowl grows a nice, strong bacterial colony in its well oxyenated waters regularly, supplied with organic matter and fresh new unicellular recruits.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  271. Person is an idiot by thesuave1 · · Score: 1

    He's just basing it on literature that has traditionally been based upon "normal" stereotypes. There is no real evidence for this occuring. Also, being immature as an adult is different than being immature as a child.