What's the problem - you want to record Trump's tweets then record them, they're openly available. Ffs there's even a JavaScript API for Twitter you can use to do it automatically.
I won't state the company but a similar accidental deletion of a huge number of records from a database occurred at a company I was working for.
This was a DBA who'd been working there for a considerable time, unfortunately when he realized what he'd done he edited the logs to try and hide who was responsible.
Naturally he got fired but (at least from the gossip I heard) the principal reason for firing him was the log business - whether he would have been fired for the original mistake was much discussed but nobody really seemed to know the answer.
Incidentally - it took nearly 12 hours working completely through the night to figure out exactly what had happened and restore from backups, although there was still some data loss even though we had pretty good back up provisions.
I stuck with ABP for years - it had always worked well for me so why change? It was only when they started with this white-listing that I looked around for an alternative. uBlock has worked well ever since.
I've got a ZTE - bought it as a back up in case I break my main phone - I used it for a couple of months to get used to it / check it worked for me.
Seems fine for the basics, sat nav was a bit flaky but I don't use my phone for that much. Otherwise perfectly fine for voice, sms, and a bit of browsing.
My point is that the anecdotal example of a guy who had to fight for custody of his kids is pretty well trumped by the statistical example of 1500 women killed by their husbands/boyfriends each year.
What are you talking about? Trumped? What is the connection - how does women getting killed by their husbands relate to child custody. Are these not unrelated issues?
No what's your point? Apart from (possibly) one or two nut jobs everybody in the MRM is opposed to husbands or boyfriends killing women too. Even if they weren't what does the one have to do with the other?
Really scared that I won't get their content if I don't put up with their ads - not. These ad slinging bastards can take their "content" and shove it up their "channel".
Trouble is it's not all in the past. Microsoft is still up to the same old tricks and continues to be as much of a blight on the computing world as ever.
So Paterson claimed - I guess it was never definitively proven to be stolen but we have an eye witness account of Kildall demonstrating QDOS used CPM code.
Yes both "PC loser" and "SJW" are ad hominem but they're insults not arguments. An ad hominem attack is a response to a person based on them rather than the content of their argument. This was not a response to his argument, please note he's the one that started throwing insults around.
Your claim of "Tu Quoque" is also wrong, I objected to him telling everybody who disagreed with him not not say anything "ever", but never suggested in my response that he should remain silent.
On a personal note: the "no you are!" defence? Really? I haven't seen heard that since I was six. What a pitiful attempt at rational argument.
Typical SJW if you disagree with him you're a fathead who doesn't know anything about the subject and should just STFU. The only thing that surprises me about this PC loser is he didn't say "check your privilege". Come on AC, report me for "abusive" posting - trying to silence any dissenting opinion is the modern feminists movements stock in trade.
Yes, yes, yes, shift those goalposts! We all know we were talking about a modern western society not the "dozens of countries" you bring up. And as for CEOs - ever think that maybe that's because of the choices women make, maybe they choose not to have that sort of career. You're not against women having choices are you . . . sexist pig.
Slashdot Mirror
Never mind all that "clicker" crap - I remember when my remote control was a pool cue.
You might like Vernor Vinge.
Yeah but watch out for when you need a new install of MINT - they wipe your entire system.
What's the problem - you want to record Trump's tweets then record them, they're openly available. Ffs there's even a JavaScript API for Twitter you can use to do it automatically.
I won't state the company but a similar accidental deletion of a huge number of records from a database occurred at a company I was working for. This was a DBA who'd been working there for a considerable time, unfortunately when he realized what he'd done he edited the logs to try and hide who was responsible. Naturally he got fired but (at least from the gossip I heard) the principal reason for firing him was the log business - whether he would have been fired for the original mistake was much discussed but nobody really seemed to know the answer. Incidentally - it took nearly 12 hours working completely through the night to figure out exactly what had happened and restore from backups, although there was still some data loss even though we had pretty good back up provisions.
I stuck with ABP for years - it had always worked well for me so why change? It was only when they started with this white-listing that I looked around for an alternative. uBlock has worked well ever since.
Besides which "cracker" is a racist name for caucasians not asians.
I've got a ZTE - bought it as a back up in case I break my main phone - I used it for a couple of months to get used to it / check it worked for me.
Seems fine for the basics, sat nav was a bit flaky but I don't use my phone for that much. Otherwise perfectly fine for voice, sms, and a bit of browsing.
The Barnett formula has NOTHING to do with oil revenue.
Always makes me laugh how Scots believe if they got all the oil revenue they'd be rich - despite the economic facts.
Fuck off and try it then!
If they really believed it the greedy gits would have voted themselves out of the UK no doubt - truth is they know better.
I had hoped that once they'd had their referendum they'd shut up their whining - fat chance.
The Scots have already had a referendum and decided to stay.
Still waiting for the rest of the UK to get a referendum on whether to kick them out anyway.
My point is that the anecdotal example of a guy who had to fight for custody of his kids is pretty well trumped by the statistical example of 1500 women killed by their husbands/boyfriends each year.
What are you talking about? Trumped? What is the connection - how does women getting killed by their husbands relate to child custody. Are these not unrelated issues?
No what's your point? Apart from (possibly) one or two nut jobs everybody in the MRM is opposed to husbands or boyfriends killing women too. Even if they weren't what does the one have to do with the other?
Really scared that I won't get their content if I don't put up with their ads - not. These ad slinging bastards can take their "content" and shove it up their "channel".
Perhaps he should use it to refund all the people he ripped off.
like it or not, Gates did actually have a lot of talent at what he did.
You mean he's a natural crook?
Do a Google search for Jerry Pournelle - I don't have to spoon feed you.
Trouble is it's not all in the past. Microsoft is still up to the same old tricks and continues to be as much of a blight on the computing world as ever.
So Paterson claimed - I guess it was never definitively proven to be stolen but we have an eye witness account of Kildall demonstrating QDOS used CPM code.
QDOS code was copied from early versions of CPM
You need BASIC to steal someone else's operating system and run a company based on illegal anti-competitive business practices?
It is an avoidable risk, in that we can tell idiotic humans to stop flying quadcopters near planes, you fools!
Oh, just tell them to stop and that will solve the problem. How little some people know of human nature.
Yes both "PC loser" and "SJW" are ad hominem but they're insults not arguments. An ad hominem attack is a response to a person based on them rather than the content of their argument. This was not a response to his argument, please note he's the one that started throwing insults around.
Your claim of "Tu Quoque" is also wrong, I objected to him telling everybody who disagreed with him not not say anything "ever", but never suggested in my response that he should remain silent.
On a personal note: the "no you are!" defence? Really? I haven't seen heard that since I was six. What a pitiful attempt at rational argument.
Typical SJW if you disagree with him you're a fathead who doesn't know anything about the subject and should just STFU. The only thing that surprises me about this PC loser is he didn't say "check your privilege". Come on AC, report me for "abusive" posting - trying to silence any dissenting opinion is the modern feminists movements stock in trade.
Yes, yes, yes, shift those goalposts! We all know we were talking about a modern western society not the "dozens of countries" you bring up. And as for CEOs - ever think that maybe that's because of the choices women make, maybe they choose not to have that sort of career. You're not against women having choices are you . . . sexist pig.
No, with most bosses it's what the words sound like.