There is also a bright spot in the water where the reflection might possibly be. Could test this by looking at other photos where the lamp is on, se it the lamp puts a reflection there too.
1. Is the trajectory staight, or does it drop slightly. Putting a ruler up against my screen indicates it drops slightly, but that doesnt mean anything.
2. Is it a flash, or is it a steady bright light (like what a meteor head would be). Need to know the exposure time for that info.
3. Is there any sign of the trail in the after photo.
4. How long is it before the after photo was taken?
5. It the flash infront of, behind, or exactly congruent with the pole top.
6. Is the trail wider at the top than the bottom. If it is, is this dispersion of smoke or paralax and the object was moving away.
7. Is the image film or digital.
8. What is the white stuff? Shock front? Something disintegrating? Why is it that funny shape?
9. Was the light working previously? When was it last known to be working? There may be pictures of it from the night before.
The scientific concenus was 'nothing to see here, move along'. The media still went crazy, even when the theory was discredited by subsequent research.
So blame the media for misrepresenting the scientists. The even the previously sensible BBC has been doing this lately.
Re:Shouldn't this be posted Anonymously...
on
Preview of KDE 3.4
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Shouldnt you be posting this under your logon, so we can mod your whineing OT comments down?
Why stop there. I dont know exactly what jEdit is doing, but have an undo history that goes back beyond the last save, and also survives reboots and application restarts.
Well, its lucky you arnt calling the shots at your company, otherwise you'd condem your product to poor interfaces, no portability, longer development times and more code (with attendant maintenence and increased bugs).
The source of your problem is in the browsern written in a strongly typed language.
You diagnosed the bug using a debugger written primarily in a weakly typed language. The competing browser seems wedded to its strongly typed roots and so doesnt even have a degugger unless you pay for it and even then its nowhere near as good.
I think they traced the Beagle (1) to a shed in Norfolk (UK).
It was semi-retired and became a customs vessel moored mid-stream in the Norfolk Broads. It lost its name 'Beagle' and was known by a number. Eventually it was moved to a berth at the side of the river, and was eventually sold and broken up by local businessmen that bougtht it. The wood appears to have been used in a local workshop.
Osamas recent statement indicates Reagan policy is to blame. He allowed Isreal to invade the Lebenon in 1982. To be fair, Isreal was being attacked from the Lebenon, and it had previously been attacked by Syria and Egypt.
The first attempt to hit the WTC was in 1993 (1st year of Clinton's presidency). It's been assumed that the first Gulf War was the trigger for this attack. The USA had troops stationed in Saudi Arabia which is a Muslim holy-land.
The 2nd WTC attack (911) probably took several years of planning. The planning obviously started during Clinton's presidency, but its also now evident that Clinton's policies didnt inspire it.
Object Rexx is not the one used on IBM Mainframes.
Mainframe rexx is more like the (already open source) regina, only without the IO functions, and its been 'functionaly stabilised' (aka no new features) for a while now.
Personally I cant see much use for this Object Rexx, what they need to do is fix the error handling and data passing problems in the non-object Rexx interpreters.
I think youve missed the point of the S/M. It can play tit for tat with everyone except opponents identifying themselves as slaves. It will always win in this situation. Unless someone cracks the code of the slaves and starts abusing them too, or its gets its own slavebots to identify and target the opponents master. Also, it is possible for slaves to try and identify what opponents are using what strategies and communicate that to the master who can adjust to exploit it.
Its means that a new evolution in game theory experiments is occuring, in that now a cold war situation is arising where alliances will have to form against other alliances.
I think a similar thing is occuring in online casinos, where bot networks are working against real players. This may be fraud, but its very hard to detect.
Why not make up some information for them to steal.
Us UKians have loads. Tony could lend you his 'Dodgy Dossier', full of made up stuff about Iraq. You could copy Shell's accounts, the Tory Party manifesto, NHS performance figures, my tax return, Peter Mandlesons mortgage application, the Hutton Report, various court transcripts (The Birmingham 6 will do), howto fireprrof a submarine, etc.
You could even try passing them stuff that would embarrass them, like photos of Kim Jong with a sheep.
The Archos looks good on paper, but the stats are an outrageuos lie. Battery life is probably more in the 4 hour area, and the version I had (it got returned sharpish) locked up unrecoverably playing MP3s. The small amount of use it got indicated it could actually be OK if it worked and met its specifications.
The screen was useless for viewing photos, and its now cheaper to get 3 1Gb flash cards or better.
Q: What is the difference between SHA-0 and SHA-1? Is SHA-0 widely used?
A: SHA-0 was initially proposed in FIPS 180 (May 1993) as hashing standard by the U.S. government, but was replaced by SHA-1 in FIPS 180-1 (April 1995). SHA-1 adds an additional circular shift operation that appears to have been specifically intended to address the weaknesses found in SHA-0. SHA-0 is not widely used and should not be used in new systems.
This indicates that the US Govt had already shown SHA-0 was weak by 1995. I dimly recall there was a similar involvement in RSA or DES, where a weakness was avoided by the US govt requesting a (at the time) seemingly irrelevant change to the algorythm.
Im currently looking at turning chips from an old Mobo into cufflinks.
I was planning on using the magnets from a hard drive, but I think that may cause problems with credit cards, as well as turning into a pair of handcuffs at inopportune moments.
Also looked at using the capacitors from same mobo, but I dont like the thought of leakage.
Not necessarily true, as there is quite a bit of overlap of technical language and concepts. It may be harder to convert than it is to learn from scratch, though. Assembler is about efficiency at all costs and I see many BAL guys who have real trouble with HLLs and start GOTOing all over the place. I understand procedural guys have trouble with OO concepts as well.
But at the end of the day, a loop is a loop and recursion is recursion is recursion...
There are emulators for old IBM mainframes (S360 S370). Hercules is one of these.
Unfortunatly, the massive cost of liscencing the MVS (OS/390, zOS) operating systems means there is no way that a normal user can run a PC based mainframe. IBM employees can do it, of course.
I guess thats also true for the PDP-11 and many old Vaxen, its just cheaper to migrate to new hardware/OS.
Slashdot Mirror
I throw one of my large fat stuffed fingers in the general direction of the key, if it misses I give up.
There is also a bright spot in the water where the reflection might possibly be. Could test this by looking at other photos where the lamp is on, se it the lamp puts a reflection there too.
1. Is the trajectory staight, or does it drop slightly. Putting a ruler up against my screen indicates it drops slightly, but that doesnt mean anything.
2. Is it a flash, or is it a steady bright light (like what a meteor head would be). Need to know the exposure time for that info.
3. Is there any sign of the trail in the after photo.
4. How long is it before the after photo was taken?
5. It the flash infront of, behind, or exactly congruent with the pole top.
6. Is the trail wider at the top than the bottom. If it is, is this dispersion of smoke or paralax and the object was moving away.
7. Is the image film or digital.
8. What is the white stuff? Shock front? Something disintegrating? Why is it that funny shape?
9. Was the light working previously? When was it last known to be working? There may be pictures of it from the night before.
Well, thats my questions. I think its a meteor.
Oi 'av a roilly wiord ak-sent, will 'at do Meary Popeens?
cf: cold fusion, MMR, vitamin C.
The scientific concenus was 'nothing to see here, move along'. The media still went crazy, even when the theory was discredited by subsequent research.
So blame the media for misrepresenting the scientists. The even the previously sensible BBC has been doing this lately.
Shouldnt you be posting this under your logon, so we can mod your whineing OT comments down?
Why stop there. I dont know exactly what jEdit is doing, but have an undo history that goes back beyond the last save, and also survives reboots and application restarts.
Well, its lucky you arnt calling the shots at your company, otherwise you'd condem your product to poor interfaces, no portability, longer development times and more code (with attendant maintenence and increased bugs).
The source of your problem is in the browsern written in a strongly typed language.
You diagnosed the bug using a debugger written primarily in a weakly typed language. The competing browser seems wedded to its strongly typed roots and so doesnt even have a degugger unless you pay for it and even then its nowhere near as good.
EDS were also the ones responsible for Sainsburys and their IT debacle. £500 million and the shelves were empty.
That just screams 'security issue' of the sort that gave us the Word macro virus.
I imagine that done wrong, this would leave the user open to having searches of thier hard drive report back to remote sites.
I think they traced the Beagle (1) to a shed in Norfolk (UK).
It was semi-retired and became a customs vessel moored mid-stream in the Norfolk Broads. It lost its name 'Beagle' and was known by a number. Eventually it was moved to a berth at the side of the river, and was eventually sold and broken up by local businessmen that bougtht it. The wood appears to have been used in a local workshop.
Osamas recent statement indicates Reagan policy is to blame. He allowed Isreal to invade the Lebenon in 1982. To be fair, Isreal was being attacked from the Lebenon, and it had previously been attacked by Syria and Egypt.
The first attempt to hit the WTC was in 1993 (1st year of Clinton's presidency). It's been assumed that the first Gulf War was the trigger for this attack. The USA had troops stationed in Saudi Arabia which is a Muslim holy-land.
The 2nd WTC attack (911) probably took several years of planning. The planning obviously started during Clinton's presidency, but its also now evident that Clinton's policies didnt inspire it.
Um ,just in case someone actually tries this, you could accidentally kill someone with a pacemaker, or damage equipment belonging to the innocent.
So make sure you dont look obvious when you do it, OK?
It's not extinct, it's just pining for the fjords.
Object Rexx is not the one used on IBM Mainframes.
Mainframe rexx is more like the (already open source) regina, only without the IO functions, and its been 'functionaly stabilised' (aka no new features) for a while now.
Personally I cant see much use for this Object Rexx, what they need to do is fix the error handling and data passing problems in the non-object Rexx interpreters.
I think youve missed the point of the S/M. It can play tit for tat with everyone except opponents identifying themselves as slaves. It will always win in this situation. Unless someone cracks the code of the slaves and starts abusing them too, or its gets its own slavebots to identify and target the opponents master. Also, it is possible for slaves to try and identify what opponents are using what strategies and communicate that to the master who can adjust to exploit it.
Its means that a new evolution in game theory experiments is occuring, in that now a cold war situation is arising where alliances will have to form against other alliances.
I think a similar thing is occuring in online casinos, where bot networks are working against real players. This may be fraud, but its very hard to detect.
Why not make up some information for them to steal.
Us UKians have loads. Tony could lend you his 'Dodgy Dossier', full of made up stuff about Iraq. You could copy Shell's accounts, the Tory Party manifesto, NHS performance figures, my tax return, Peter Mandlesons mortgage application, the Hutton Report, various court transcripts (The Birmingham 6 will do), howto fireprrof a submarine, etc.
You could even try passing them stuff that would embarrass them, like photos of Kim Jong with a sheep.
The Archos looks good on paper, but the stats are an outrageuos lie. Battery life is probably more in the 4 hour area, and the version I had (it got returned sharpish) locked up unrecoverably playing MP3s. The small amount of use it got indicated it could actually be OK if it worked and met its specifications.
The screen was useless for viewing photos, and its now cheaper to get 3 1Gb flash cards or better.
So what do we do if quantum computers can decrypt anything in almost real-time?
All I can think of is making the data streams uninterceptable, which leads us back to encoders/decoders built using quantum entanglement.
Q: What is the difference between SHA-0 and SHA-1? Is SHA-0 widely used?
A: SHA-0 was initially proposed in FIPS 180 (May 1993) as hashing standard by the U.S. government, but was replaced by SHA-1 in FIPS 180-1 (April 1995). SHA-1 adds an additional circular shift operation that appears to have been specifically intended to address the weaknesses found in SHA-0. SHA-0 is not widely used and should not be used in new systems.
This indicates that the US Govt had already shown SHA-0 was weak by 1995. I dimly recall there was a similar involvement in RSA or DES, where a weakness was avoided by the US govt requesting a (at the time) seemingly irrelevant change to the algorythm.
Im currently looking at turning chips from an old Mobo into cufflinks.
I was planning on using the magnets from a hard drive, but I think that may cause problems with credit cards, as well as turning into a pair of handcuffs at inopportune moments.
Also looked at using the capacitors from same mobo, but I dont like the thought of leakage.
Not necessarily true, as there is quite a bit of overlap of technical language and concepts. It may be harder to convert than it is to learn from scratch, though. Assembler is about efficiency at all costs and I see many BAL guys who have real trouble with HLLs and start GOTOing all over the place. I understand procedural guys have trouble with OO concepts as well.
But at the end of the day, a loop is a loop and recursion is recursion is recursion...
Sorry, We worship the zero, and will honour the grandparent with -1 Trolls till it reaches perfection.
There are emulators for old IBM mainframes (S360 S370). Hercules is one of these.
Unfortunatly, the massive cost of liscencing the MVS (OS/390, zOS) operating systems means there is no way that a normal user can run a PC based mainframe. IBM employees can do it, of course.
I guess thats also true for the PDP-11 and many old Vaxen, its just cheaper to migrate to new hardware/OS.
Its 5, which is also wrong.