We're also moving towards a world in which the vast majority of internet traffic is worthless or outright malicious. Eventually, the benefits of computer licensing really will outweigh the drawbacks (unless something changes soon).
Yes, because the dish *is* a mirror, just like the concave visible-light mirror on a reflecting telescope. The radio waves bounce off the dish and are gathered by sensors at the point of convergence above the center.
Anything that requires the end user to do more work than they do now will never work (this includes setting up signing services and managing whitelists and blacklists). It has to be fully automated and performed by the ISP.
The next thing that will probably happen in the spam wars is that port 25 outgoing gets blocked by most ISPs to combat trojaned home PCs. No, it's not a perfect solution. Yes, it will inconvenience some innocent users. Email has become a textbook tragedy of the commons; spam is a constantly growing problem and sooner or later the flaws in the current email system will outweigh its benefits and the current system will be replaced by something less capable but more resistant to exploitation.
They may be too expensive for YOU, in which case not buying one is the logical choice. The objection most people raised was that people who had resolved to buy an MP3 player in that price range would not be willing to pay the premium for a cut-down iPod. The point of this article is that that premium was a myth and the iPod is in fact quite competitive with players with equivalent (or lessser) capacity.
You can question a law without breaking it. Or, you can practice civil disobedience- break the law, get arrested, go to jail, get the story on the evening news, and wait for a groundswell of protest over how unfair your incarceration is. But you still have to go to jail for that.
I thought the current plotline was a pretty clever idea to solve the continuity problems (or at least avoid them in the future). By moving the action far away from Federation space, they've ensured that the ship won't encounter anything from another Star Trek series. Now, all they have to do is arrange for the Enterprise to never return to the Federation or even communicate with them- and nothing that happens in this show would have any effect on the stories that take place after it.
How could they possibly discuss online music and DRM in 2003 and not mention Apple and the ITMS? This may be the most significant product in the growth of legal online music yet released. It's far more popular than any of its competitors, and much more friendly to its users, and yet the online music scene is "dominated by Microsoft". I can't decide if they deliberately left it off because they hate Apple or if they're just stupid/uninformed.
In response to point a, this is the first time that non-scientists have owned the GM fish, and non-scientists tend to do stupid things like flush unwanted pets down the toilet or otherwise let them out into the wild. These fish have previously only existed in controlled laboratory environments.
Remember that the food chain is a cycle. Anything organic and/or consumable that isn't hurled into outer space is going to go back into the cycle and sooner or later you'll eat a few atoms from it.
The real problem is the vast amounts of money spent on remedial education and accommodating the "edge case" students. Ever wonder why so many bright kids hate school? They have nothing to really occupy them, it's all going towards the students who can least appreciate and leverage it.
If I lost a limb, I'd try anything to get it back, even something crazy like this.
Conversely, there will likely come a day when artificial limbs are superior to natural ones (and advanced brain surgery like this would likewise be easier, safer, and more commonplace).
Plus, you get much more time to think about what you're going to say. Ever been in a real-life conversation where the other party tolerated a 20-second delay in your response?
The number of standalone CD players in the world is orders of magnitude greater than the number of PCs. It will be a very, very long time before that switch makes economic sense.
If you want the site's content enough, you'll pay. If you won't pay, it's obviously not worth that much to you. Economics 101. I have no objection to your choosing either option, but don't pretend that there's something fundamentally wrong with charging a fee for web content or that you deserve to get the content for free despite the author's wishes.
The idea that making them exactly like animals is a primary goal of this project is a misconception. The only similarity between these robots and a real dog is that they have 4 legs and they're about the same size. The 4-legged design was chosen so they could navigate more varied terrain than a wheeled robot.
Slashdot Mirror
We're also moving towards a world in which the vast majority of internet traffic is worthless or outright malicious. Eventually, the benefits of computer licensing really will outweigh the drawbacks (unless something changes soon).
Yes, because the dish *is* a mirror, just like the concave visible-light mirror on a reflecting telescope. The radio waves bounce off the dish and are gathered by sensors at the point of convergence above the center.
Anything that requires the end user to do more work than they do now will never work (this includes setting up signing services and managing whitelists and blacklists). It has to be fully automated and performed by the ISP.
The next thing that will probably happen in the spam wars is that port 25 outgoing gets blocked by most ISPs to combat trojaned home PCs. No, it's not a perfect solution. Yes, it will inconvenience some innocent users. Email has become a textbook tragedy of the commons; spam is a constantly growing problem and sooner or later the flaws in the current email system will outweigh its benefits and the current system will be replaced by something less capable but more resistant to exploitation.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology.
Superscalar refers to multiple execution units, not pipelining.
So, why hasn't anyone ever written a benevolent worm that would go around closing security holes?
That must be why Apple went out of business in the early 80s instead of successfully selling expensive, high-quality products for the past 20 years.
They may be too expensive for YOU, in which case not buying one is the logical choice. The objection most people raised was that people who had resolved to buy an MP3 player in that price range would not be willing to pay the premium for a cut-down iPod. The point of this article is that that premium was a myth and the iPod is in fact quite competitive with players with equivalent (or lessser) capacity.
You can question a law without breaking it. Or, you can practice civil disobedience- break the law, get arrested, go to jail, get the story on the evening news, and wait for a groundswell of protest over how unfair your incarceration is. But you still have to go to jail for that.
If the guy committed a crime, what's wrong with putting him in prison?
I thought the current plotline was a pretty clever idea to solve the continuity problems (or at least avoid them in the future). By moving the action far away from Federation space, they've ensured that the ship won't encounter anything from another Star Trek series. Now, all they have to do is arrange for the Enterprise to never return to the Federation or even communicate with them- and nothing that happens in this show would have any effect on the stories that take place after it.
How could they possibly discuss online music and DRM in 2003 and not mention Apple and the ITMS? This may be the most significant product in the growth of legal online music yet released. It's far more popular than any of its competitors, and much more friendly to its users, and yet the online music scene is "dominated by Microsoft". I can't decide if they deliberately left it off because they hate Apple or if they're just stupid/uninformed.
It exists solely to measure THE SHAPE and SIZE of the UNIVERSE.
Actually, I think that would be COBE...
In response to point a, this is the first time that non-scientists have owned the GM fish, and non-scientists tend to do stupid things like flush unwanted pets down the toilet or otherwise let them out into the wild. These fish have previously only existed in controlled laboratory environments.
Remember that the food chain is a cycle. Anything organic and/or consumable that isn't hurled into outer space is going to go back into the cycle and sooner or later you'll eat a few atoms from it.
Weren't we supposed to run out of oil in, like, 1993?
The real problem is the vast amounts of money spent on remedial education and accommodating the "edge case" students. Ever wonder why so many bright kids hate school? They have nothing to really occupy them, it's all going towards the students who can least appreciate and leverage it.
If I lost a limb, I'd try anything to get it back, even something crazy like this.
Conversely, there will likely come a day when artificial limbs are superior to natural ones (and advanced brain surgery like this would likewise be easier, safer, and more commonplace).
Plus, you get much more time to think about what you're going to say. Ever been in a real-life conversation where the other party tolerated a 20-second delay in your response?
Does playing Diablo 2 count as D&D?
The number of standalone CD players in the world is orders of magnitude greater than the number of PCs. It will be a very, very long time before that switch makes economic sense.
No.
If you want the site's content enough, you'll pay. If you won't pay, it's obviously not worth that much to you. Economics 101. I have no objection to your choosing either option, but don't pretend that there's something fundamentally wrong with charging a fee for web content or that you deserve to get the content for free despite the author's wishes.
Surely you mean, to better serve our new HP overlords.
The idea that making them exactly like animals is a primary goal of this project is a misconception. The only similarity between these robots and a real dog is that they have 4 legs and they're about the same size. The 4-legged design was chosen so they could navigate more varied terrain than a wheeled robot.