The tenant is paying the bill for the service, not the landlord. The tenant should be allowed to choose if it's reasonable to do so. The cable companies are mostly responsible for maintaining the service anyway.
It's not about not fitting social norms, it's about the complete inability to be social with anyone. And no, most scientists and mathematicians do not have autism.
You're right, but I think the point he was trying to make was that it's not the CC company's business that the price was unreasonable. All they care about is whether or not the transaction took place as authorized. If Amazon believes customers owe them money, they should get each customer to authorize another transaction and take it to court if they refuse.
What you're forgetting is that they don't have to be prosecuted. They could be instead required to get counseling or psychatric help. Don't you think that's a better solution? I would compare it to suicide. Suicide is illegal, but we don't throw people in jail for attempted suicide, we make them see a shrink.
That's only one factor that has to be taken into account. The law doesn't say "it must not have a negative effect," it says that the effect is one of the factors to be considered.
Slashdot Mirror
But then how am I going to drive up that long steep grade to my house at 90 mph?
Example?
He wasn't bound to a new agreement, and he kept his job. What's wrong with that?
The tenant is paying the bill for the service, not the landlord. The tenant should be allowed to choose if it's reasonable to do so. The cable companies are mostly responsible for maintaining the service anyway.
That's assuming the product is actually sold by Amazon and not one of the many shady retailers they host.
How is Congress abridging freedom of speech? You're free to give money to any candidate you want.
Most science/engineering schools already charge materials fees (even when no materials are actually consumed).
You fail at reading comprehension.
"except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger"
This exception only applies to people in the military.
It's not about not fitting social norms, it's about the complete inability to be social with anyone. And no, most scientists and mathematicians do not have autism.
To be fair, you're comparing a product released every few months to one released every few years.
Lost is mostly filler/bullshit.
Are you a lawyer?
omg. uppercase letters are so uncool.
In the US it's short for "cafe latte" (espresso and milk).
You're so badass! Fight the power!
At least in California, all tips have to go to the employee or employees.
You're right, but I think the point he was trying to make was that it's not the CC company's business that the price was unreasonable. All they care about is whether or not the transaction took place as authorized. If Amazon believes customers owe them money, they should get each customer to authorize another transaction and take it to court if they refuse.
The child is the victim when child porn is produced. How can someone be the victim and the perpetrator of the same crime?
What you're forgetting is that they don't have to be prosecuted. They could be instead required to get counseling or psychatric help. Don't you think that's a better solution? I would compare it to suicide. Suicide is illegal, but we don't throw people in jail for attempted suicide, we make them see a shrink.
They can pry my right to shoot people anonymously from my cold dead hands!
That's only one factor that has to be taken into account. The law doesn't say "it must not have a negative effect," it says that the effect is one of the factors to be considered.
People will pay more if it sounds fancy, even if they just make it up.
Blocking account creation is optional.
That's for creating an image and burning it, not for burning a pre-made image.
Won't the two just merge eventually?