"I refuse to work even one hour that I do NOT get paid for."
Isn't that the right you give up with a salaried position? The boss can tell you to work anytime; you're paid the same no matter how much time you work anyway.
"Interestingly they aren't walking around demanding recount after recounts, disenfranchisement or claiming the elections were stolen. That seems to be a tactic that will gain more support in the next election cycle."
So what? If there were evidence of fraud or disenfranchisement, they would be complaining as loud as anyone.
You'd assume so, but copyright law only explicitly excludes works by the U.S. federal Government. States and other local governments can and often do claim copyright on their work. http://cendi.dtic.mil/publications/04-8copyright.h tml#30
"There is a market for people who want to live densely where they can walk where they want to go, yet not be in a complete drug den -- city planners just need to let it happen!"
Response: Those people are poor. We don't need any more poor people in Our Fair City.
"how much money is not being a Muslim or dead worth to you?"
A lot. But what did Iraq have to do with that? Why don't we bomb every other country just to be safe? You never know, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil could be having dreams of imperialism! We must invade before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud!
Doing background checks on individuals--especially those with access to your company's till--should quite often include seeing if they're in the position personally to be more likely than others to steal if given the chance.
Oh, there's a solution to that. Simply ask them how much in money or goods they have stolen in their previous jobs. Something like this will do just fine: 1. What is the amount of money you have taken without permission from previous employers? A) $0 B) $1 - $20 C) $21 - $50 D) $51+
Why was this modded offtopic? It's called an analogy, and the GP is at about the same level of paranoia.
BanjoBob, let me rephrase your post:
Two women failed! It's obvious that women make bad executives, especially all these women. Never trust anything that bleeds for 7 days and doesn't die.
What about this?
The machine stores each ballot individually in order. instead of just running totals. Each ballot has a UID (random). The machine does two hashes: one of the ballot+UID and one of the running totals. The two hashes are printed on the voter's receipt. The ballots can then be readded independently and the hashes listed publically. A voter can look up their ballot and be sure that it has been counted properly, as long as the machine verifying the counts can be trusted. A receipt with hashes that aren't in the system is then evidence of a problem.
Slashdot Mirror
What makes your opinion any better?
"I refuse to work even one hour that I do NOT get paid for."
Isn't that the right you give up with a salaried position? The boss can tell you to work anytime; you're paid the same no matter how much time you work anyway.
There are ATMs with headphone jacks, so a blind person can plug in and get verbal directions that way (privately).
Pitchforks at dawn!
The police don't use turn signals here half the time (southern California).
You want more violence, life in the United States is just too dull for you, leave.
"despite scientific evidence."
Do tell.
"Interestingly they aren't walking around demanding recount after recounts, disenfranchisement or claiming the elections were stolen. That seems to be a tactic that will gain more support in the next election cycle."
So what? If there were evidence of fraud or disenfranchisement, they would be complaining as loud as anyone.
Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General%20d isclaimer
You'd assume so, but copyright law only explicitly excludes works by the U.S. federal Government. States and other local governments can and often do claim copyright on their work. http://cendi.dtic.mil/publications/04-8copyright.h tml#30
They shouldn't have bought the land in the first place if they planned to do nothing with it. Or is that too complicated?
"There is a market for people who want to live densely where they can walk where they want to go, yet not be in a complete drug den -- city planners just need to let it happen!"
Response: Those people are poor. We don't need any more poor people in Our Fair City.
"how much money is not being a Muslim or dead worth to you?"
A lot. But what did Iraq have to do with that? Why don't we bomb every other country just to be safe? You never know, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil could be having dreams of imperialism! We must invade before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud!
I think it's some kind of birth control. At least I hope so, because that's how I've been using it.
Apparently it's called "mere exposure," the idea that just seeing something will make you subconciously prefer it. Here's a page on the subject: http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/student/97_fa ll/theory/mere_exposure/index.html .
Maybe it's so they don't fly into thunderstorms or so they know when one is coming. Not that I would know, I'm not a bird.
Uh-huh. You know this how, Mr. PhD?
Oh, there's a solution to that. Simply ask them how much in money or goods they have stolen in their previous jobs. Something like this will do just fine:
1. What is the amount of money you have taken without permission from previous employers?
A) $0
B) $1 - $20
C) $21 - $50
D) $51+
BanjoBob, let me rephrase your post:
You may even have to pump your own gas!
Here's another article: http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1297922&p age=1
What about this? The machine stores each ballot individually in order. instead of just running totals. Each ballot has a UID (random). The machine does two hashes: one of the ballot+UID and one of the running totals. The two hashes are printed on the voter's receipt. The ballots can then be readded independently and the hashes listed publically. A voter can look up their ballot and be sure that it has been counted properly, as long as the machine verifying the counts can be trusted. A receipt with hashes that aren't in the system is then evidence of a problem.
You're wrong. I'm right, but I won't tell you why. Just know that when you're older and wiser you'll understand.
That doesn't mean that they should be allowed to use that data for something unrelated without good cause.
"This launch seems to be in line with AOL's 'tearing down the wall around the garden' strategy."
Right in line with their "think outside the box" and "make the pie higher" strategies.