Equally, it can be used to avoid liability. You can say, "Maybe it's biased, but we did due diligence, it's not our fault!" Maybe though, maybe Microsoft is trying to avoid another Tay.
If you've ever worked in advertising, you'll find that anyone who's been there long has developed some kind of internal justification for why it is ok to work in an industry where harassing and annoying people is most of what they do. At my previous company, saying, "We are trying to replace Mad Men" was a common justification. Find an enemy who is worse than yourself.
Seriously, if you haven't done it yet, install an ad blocker.
This is the biggest flamebait article I've seen in a long time, and I blame Trump. Not only does it have cute little furry animals, it simultaneously calls Google employees geniuses and really dumb. It makes environmentalists mad, but also people who hate the environment (and kill cats).
Of course, avoiding making every application developer write his own application-specific serialization/deserialization routines was largely the point of this Java feature, but in hindsight it appears that was a bad decision.
Yeah. It seems like there's no really good way to make this feature work. Whitelists can help, but ultimately there is no way to avoid thinking about security when you read things off the wire.
Young children have better algorithms, data structures, more processing power, and probably better learning techniques (although that is arguably algorithm).
A company that locks you in to their platform, but generally respects your privacy (at least to our knowledge), or a company that's far less locked down, but pisses all over your privacy.
You can do something about the privacy problem. You can't do much about the lockdown problem.
I can and do fault people who give their money for this locked down, anti-freedom system. It is true that many people do not understand the issues, but a lot of techies do (or should) and buy this stuff anyway. Despite repeated examples of why it's a bad idea, they allow themselves to be locked into a platform. "This time will be different" or some such nonsense. Well, here is a good example of why it's bad, right here. This time is not different.
You complained above that translating dukkha as "suffering" is something
That word "suffering" misses the meaning of "unsatisfying" and it is not just me saying that. Even if you had everything you wanted, even if you magically had health and immortality, and could completely remove any problem any suffering, you would still find a deep sense of unsatisfactoriness in life.
This is the legendary situation the Buddha found himself in, late at night after a party, looking at the beautiful women sleeping all around. He realized life was short and impermanent, and he left.
Slashdot Mirror
Equally, it can be used to avoid liability. You can say, "Maybe it's biased, but we did due diligence, it's not our fault!" Maybe though, maybe Microsoft is trying to avoid another Tay.
Or build desalinization plants. There is no shortage of water, it's a problem of infrastructure.
If you're good at seeing where the numbers are wrong, you can make money like Steve Jobs did.
If you've ever worked in advertising, you'll find that anyone who's been there long has developed some kind of internal justification for why it is ok to work in an industry where harassing and annoying people is most of what they do. At my previous company, saying, "We are trying to replace Mad Men" was a common justification. Find an enemy who is worse than yourself.
Seriously, if you haven't done it yet, install an ad blocker.
Anyway, you seem to be a debutant, you forgot to end with "F1RST POST!"
Yeah humor doesn't come naturally to me.
This is the biggest flamebait article I've seen in a long time, and I blame Trump. Not only does it have cute little furry animals, it simultaneously calls Google employees geniuses and really dumb. It makes environmentalists mad, but also people who hate the environment (and kill cats).
It's probably all because of Hillary.
What sort of people do you think we'll be when we are more evolved?
unless we're a bit too distracted and/or time-constrained by our busy little lives.
And if the people aren't paying attention, there is no law you can make that will get rid of corruption. Vigilance is the price of democracy.
Of course, avoiding making every application developer write his own application-specific serialization/deserialization routines was largely the point of this Java feature, but in hindsight it appears that was a bad decision.
Yeah. It seems like there's no really good way to make this feature work. Whitelists can help, but ultimately there is no way to avoid thinking about security when you read things off the wire.
If they build it using agile methods, it can be cheaper, too. Win-win, right?
Yeah. Poor people are leaving, rich people are coming in. Net is that more people are leaving than coming.
They're leaving too, check it out: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/1...
Today's real engineers also understand how cimputers work, so you'll have to throw assembly onto your list or something.
He's been in a dialogue with Charles Babbage.
Young children have better algorithms, data structures, more processing power, and probably better learning techniques (although that is arguably algorithm).
That's a lot of writing attempting to justify a bad decision.
You are an Apple fanboy. Come back when you turn your brain back on.
it doesn't create an additional attack surface
Unfortunately, yes it does.
Our customers need greater transparency and optics
Oh, they are laying fiber now?
A company that locks you in to their platform, but generally respects your privacy (at least to our knowledge), or a company that's far less locked down, but pisses all over your privacy.
You can do something about the privacy problem. You can't do much about the lockdown problem.
I can and do fault people who give their money for this locked down, anti-freedom system. It is true that many people do not understand the issues, but a lot of techies do (or should) and buy this stuff anyway. Despite repeated examples of why it's a bad idea, they allow themselves to be locked into a platform. "This time will be different" or some such nonsense. Well, here is a good example of why it's bad, right here. This time is not different.
You complained above that translating dukkha as "suffering" is something
That word "suffering" misses the meaning of "unsatisfying" and it is not just me saying that. Even if you had everything you wanted, even if you magically had health and immortality, and could completely remove any problem any suffering, you would still find a deep sense of unsatisfactoriness in life.
This is the legendary situation the Buddha found himself in, late at night after a party, looking at the beautiful women sleeping all around. He realized life was short and impermanent, and he left.
I agree with your point here, an agreement is the best possible outcome for Kim. He makes things better for his people and doesn't get assassinated.
The problem with these reports is that the U.S. has been intensively monitoring for various forms of sound, radio waves, radiation, etc.
Sounds like the monitoring devices are causing brain damage. (Seriously? Brain damage?)
To be fair,it took one death plus dismissal of the head of the program and losing a lawsuit to google (yeah they settled, but)