A 51% attack against this cryptocurrency would be a direct substitute for counterfeiting US dollars.
A 51% attack doesn't let you spend bitcoin you don't own. It merely lets you reverse some of the recent transactions. Creating bitcoin or spending bitcoin you don't have still can't be done, though.
It's worth mentioning the banks largely didn't do anything illegal. They either had a lawyer verify all their decisions, or they bought new laws. They were able to stay exactly within the letter of the law, be unethical without crossing the line. You have to be foolish to break the law when you have those kinds of options. (Like Madoff).
We can look at a practical example instead of using intuition. Remember a couple months ago when ZTE nearly went bankrupt because of sanctions from the US?
This is by far the biggest issue. Basically the only thing that will happen is those people will die. Natural selection will work its way through. Sad but true.
Someone pointed out that in an import/export imbalance relationship, the country that does the exporting feels the pain more quickly and deeply. Presumably, if China blocked all exports, manufactured goods would become more expensive in the US or hard to find. However, on the flip side many companies in China would have severe cash flow and revenue problems and go bankrupt, leading to massive unemployment, etc. Bad for one side, worse for the other.
tbh honest, I don't think MISRA is that great. It's a grab-bag of miscellaneous error prevention ideas, but without a clear conception of how to avoid bugs, it prohibits some things that aren't a problem, and allows things that are.
Because its convenient sometimes and not a problem. "Giving up convenience for things that are not a problem" may be the source of everything wrong in Pascal.
How many errors are due to C syntax, e.g. "=" vs "=="?
I haven't seen that error in many many years. The compiler gives you a warning in most cases, when you look at code with that mistake it really jumps out at you, and if it somehow does get through the compile phase, rudimentary testing will catch it. You are testing both branches of your if statements, aren't you?
Java is useful because you can throw a team of lowskill developers at it and they won't mess things up beyond the point of unmaintanability. It will be a pain to maintain, sure, but the same developers using C would make memory errors that push things beyond hopeless, and if they were using Python or JavaScript the types would become more and more jumbled as the size of the program increases that no one would be able to understand it and things would start breaking more and more. Java enforces a minimal level of order (note that this is the explicit design philosophy of Maven).
On the other hand, if you download the app and they find your passcode, they then have no way to correlate that passcode to a specific phone, unless they are doing some kind of serious targetted attack, in which case they could also just film the person unlocking their phone.
Slashdot Mirror
What are the equations governing crypto-gravity?
mv = pq
and
Qd = F(d) + cP
Qs = F(s) + dP
Probably others but those are the main sets.
A 51% attack against this cryptocurrency would be a direct substitute for counterfeiting US dollars.
A 51% attack doesn't let you spend bitcoin you don't own. It merely lets you reverse some of the recent transactions. Creating bitcoin or spending bitcoin you don't have still can't be done, though.
It's worth mentioning the banks largely didn't do anything illegal. They either had a lawyer verify all their decisions, or they bought new laws. They were able to stay exactly within the letter of the law, be unethical without crossing the line. You have to be foolish to break the law when you have those kinds of options. (Like Madoff).
We can look at a practical example instead of using intuition. Remember a couple months ago when ZTE nearly went bankrupt because of sanctions from the US?
I don't know if they care more or less than the US government, but the Chinese government definitely cares what the people think.
c) it's a much more difficult problem to solve.
This is by far the biggest issue. Basically the only thing that will happen is those people will die. Natural selection will work its way through. Sad but true.
Sounds like you have high self-awareness.
That's a good way of putting it.
Someone pointed out that in an import/export imbalance relationship, the country that does the exporting feels the pain more quickly and deeply. Presumably, if China blocked all exports, manufactured goods would become more expensive in the US or hard to find. However, on the flip side many companies in China would have severe cash flow and revenue problems and go bankrupt, leading to massive unemployment, etc. Bad for one side, worse for the other.
Then your codebase is better.
Because its convenient sometimes
When?
I'm sorry, I mistook you for someone who understands what they're talking about.
tbh honest, I don't think MISRA is that great. It's a grab-bag of miscellaneous error prevention ideas, but without a clear conception of how to avoid bugs, it prohibits some things that aren't a problem, and allows things that are.
Because its convenient sometimes and not a problem. "Giving up convenience for things that are not a problem" may be the source of everything wrong in Pascal.
How many errors are due to C syntax, e.g. "=" vs "=="?
I haven't seen that error in many many years. The compiler gives you a warning in most cases, when you look at code with that mistake it really jumps out at you, and if it somehow does get through the compile phase, rudimentary testing will catch it. You are testing both branches of your if statements, aren't you?
Java is useful because you can throw a team of lowskill developers at it and they won't mess things up beyond the point of unmaintanability. It will be a pain to maintain, sure, but the same developers using C would make memory errors that push things beyond hopeless, and if they were using Python or JavaScript the types would become more and more jumbled as the size of the program increases that no one would be able to understand it and things would start breaking more and more. Java enforces a minimal level of order (note that this is the explicit design philosophy of Maven).
Not a problem. When technology stops advancing, we'll just rewrite everything in Rust and Haskell, that'll do it for a while.
Strictly speaking, those NIMBY people are not delusional: they've been mostly successful at keeping new housing out.
Now you're just trolling. That's a non-sequitur.
What refugees have the problem of database tampering?
She was not a leader, she was a charlatan and a crook.
Some would say those three are compatible, indeed, synergistic. Her only mistake was not making money.
On the other hand, if you download the app and they find your passcode, they then have no way to correlate that passcode to a specific phone, unless they are doing some kind of serious targetted attack, in which case they could also just film the person unlocking their phone.
Nah, they reinstall it within a week. Some people delete the app multiple times.
We don't judge. We all know about your "cat".
Your post is silly. Your life is silly. Your cat is fine. :)
may soon learn the hard way what "Common Carrier" means.
Common Carrier doesn't really mean anything to websites. They have some protection if they follow the DMCA, though.