Slashdot Mirror


Unpaid and Abused: Moderators Speak Out Against Reddit (engadget.com)

In a joint investigation, Engadget and Point spoke to 10 Reddit moderators, and all of them complained that Reddit is systematically failing to tackle the abuse they suffer. Keeping the front page of the internet clean has become a thankless and abusive task, and yet Reddit's administration has repeatedly neglected to respond to moderators who report offenses. From the report: "I've had a few death threats," said Emily, who asked to be referred to by her first name and her Reddit username, lolihull, to prevent the online harassment from spilling over into her real life. [...] "I had three death threats this past month," said abrownn, who moderates r/Futurology, with more than 13 million subscribers, and r/technology, with more than 6 million subscribers. abrownn asked only to be known by their username. All the moderators interviewed confirmed they had received death threats, which they said can take a toll.

[...] It's hard to pin down how many moderators there are: Even the moderators themselves don't know, but most estimate their numbers are into the tens of thousands. Some spend hours each day working for free on the site. Whatever the actual figure, they far outnumber the higher-ranking and paid administrators, whose job it is to respond to the evidence that the moderators collect.

363 comments

  1. Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you wouldn't say it to their face then don't say it online. What's wrong with people?

    1. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm guessing that it's easy to type out a death threat and the people doing it know that it is likely to have maximal impact. The majority of people doing it would probably crap themselves if they were confronted about it in person. It's weak and underhanded.

    2. Re: Why so many death threats? by BeauHD+(5) · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Golden Rule Of Slashdot

      "If You Don't Have Something Positive To Say Then Don't Say It.

      I'm talking to YOU, AC.

      -=xXx==v==[BeauHD]==v==xXx=-
      s e n i o r -=- e d i t o r

    3. Re:Why so many death threats? by Revek · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banning people at random tends to make people mad.

    5. Re:Why so many death threats? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. But it’s not the same as making an actual death threat to someone’s face either; an online death threat is the internet’s equivalent of a strongly worded letter to the editor

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:Why so many death threats? by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and also death threats are illegal in the UK. This isn't a problem for Reddit to solve; it's a police matter. These mods are just idiots if they don't go to the police.
      (or... they're terribly unlucky if the police don't know what to do)

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    7. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt police would take online threats too seriously.

    8. Re:Why so many death threats? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      It isn't at random.

    9. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Also, if someone sends a death threat after having been banned from a subreddit, then it seems likely that the ban was justified.

    10. Re: Why so many death threats? by weilawei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that the golden rule of Slashdot has always been Voltaire's line about defending speech one disagrees with.

    11. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is only one thing worse than censors, and that's the need for censors.

    12. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that the golden rule of Slashdot has always been Voltaire's line about defending speech one disagrees with.

      What planet is the Slashdot you're accessing located on?

      Because the golden rule on this Slashdot is "If you dare post something that disagrees with the current received "progressive" groupfeelz, we will mod you to oblivion! Because no-platforming, you RAAAAACIS' Nazi!"

    13. Re:Why so many death threats? by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      For public figures like celebs, MPs, etc. in the UK they do - people have been arrested, tried, and fined/jailed for it. Whether that would hold true for members of the general public working on a voluntary basis online is another matter, of course, especially if (as is statistically quite likely the case) the perpetrator was not a UK citizen, but ISTR a few instances where threats against non-celebs have resulted in a successful prosecution.

      Note that the UK doesn't have the same level of free speech protections that the US does, but does have various applicable laws about hate speech and threatening behaviour, so it's also probably much easier to get a prosecution in the UK. YMMV as to whether that's a good thing or not.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    14. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send someone to prison for a trivial "crime" such as possession, he comes out as a thief and a killer. See, it was justified!

    15. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here

    16. Re: Why so many death threats? by jd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe so, but Voltaire never said it. It's a fictional quote by a biographer.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    17. Re:Why so many death threats? by ledow · · Score: 0

      Established case law indicates otherwise.

      Sure, it's got to be more than just a idle childish threat, but if it's at all sustained or targetted, they'll take it seriously.

      Hell, they have identified and prosecuted any number of people who said racist things on public transport.

    18. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem wit this mentality is that you either affirm that people making threats online are the kind of people who act on them in real life as well, therefore ascertaining that there is cause and effect to justifiably police;
      or you make fun of people making threats online by denouncing their ability to act on it in real life, therefore undermining any arguments for policing a bunch of jokers who are snowflakes in real life.
      Mischaracterization itself leads to a problem.

    19. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wouldn't say it to their face then don't say it online.

      Of course it helps, but you are forgetting the world is full of crazy freaks.

      What's wrong with people?

      That's part of the problem. You can't possibly know before things had already gone to shit.

    20. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This applies to moderators, too. If you wouldn't glue people's mouths shut in the real world, don't do it online.

    21. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Nonetheless, if the King of France wanted to put someone to death for criticising the Catholic Church, we'd all be in there fighting.

      The right to send death threats to random people... not so much.

    22. Re:Why so many death threats? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kindof true though, I know people that went to prison for DUI and came out ruthless gangmembers.

    23. Re:Why so many death threats? by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      However there is an avatar between the people. So technically it is one avatar threatening to kill another avatar. Once you remove real identities from the equation, than it all ceases to be as real. Reddit moderation runs pretty egoistically ie the main driver to be a moderator, control others, feeding ego and the ego once fed too much, starts to moderate egoistically and hence conflict with those moderated.

      Reddit is a cesspoll of egoistic moderation, using it as a forum well, make sure you forum participate only with those of like mind, and you don't mind sucking up to egoistic moderators, most of them are and petty and snarky and well no better or worse than typical reddit commentors.

      Solution, stop taking it so fucking seriously, fuck off with the serious bullshit which the idiots at reddit are pushing only because reality earns an advertising dollar boost. Treated more as fun, then advertising snuck in as reality, as truth, does not sell for as high a price. Treat reddit like an avatar based playground where nothing is serious and you have no fucking problems. The more seriously the dick brains at reddit try to make it, to raise advertising revenues the worse it will become.

      On your title "WE DON'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, WHY SHOULD YOU", right above the tabs, want it to be less serious, well, you dumb fuckers make it more fun ;D. Ban real names from the forum and people will take it all less seriously and have more fun.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    24. Re:Why so many death threats? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or: these aren't credible threats.
      Or: these are people looking for attention.

      There are quite a few options, and considering the trend to play the victim, combination of that first name and user as well as the source being well known for social justice activism which specializes in victimhood weaponisation suggests this is a standard "we have a victim here, company needs to do what we say" social justice attack vector.

    25. Re:Why so many death threats? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The majority of people doing it would probably crap themselves if they were confronted about it in person.

      There was a story a couple of years ago about a middle aged woman who was trolling someone online. A TV crew caught up with her on the street and asked her about it. She seemed rational and well spoken, said it was her "right" and "freedom of speech". A few days later she killed herself.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Why so many death threats? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except when they follow through and call in a SWAT team or turn up at your house. Those things happen regularly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re: Why so many death threats? by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Funny

      The golden rule of Slashdot is "never RTFA". Petrified and naked in hot grits or something.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    28. Re:Why so many death threats? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Don't like the moderation on Reddit - or for that matter, on /.? Then be glad you're not on Slate.

    29. Re: Why so many death threats? by mjwx · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that the golden rule of Slashdot has always been Voltaire's line about defending speech one disagrees with.

      What planet is the Slashdot you're accessing located on?

      Because the golden rule on this Slashdot is "If you dare post something that disagrees with the current received "progressive" groupfeelz, we will mod you to oblivion! Because no-platforming, you RAAAAACIS' Nazi!"

      He's closer to the Slashdot you're on... Because here if you dare criticise people for being hateful little shits or pointing out the flaws in Trumps administration you'll get modded down.

      Just try saying that FREEZE PEACH doesn't protect you from criticism, let alone applying that to Alex Jones and you'll be modded into oblivion in no time.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    30. Re: Why so many death threats? by Maritz · · Score: 0

      I like it when people censor their own private platform. Freedom of association, dickhead, you liked it when it meant black people couldn't go in a cafe.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    31. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a need. If you think so, then the problem is with you.

    32. Re: Why so many death threats? by weilawei · · Score: 1

      Well played, sir, well played.

    33. Re: Why so many death threats? by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      now that's a callback.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    34. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you heard a politician?

    35. Re:Why so many death threats? by Wolfrider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      -There is an EASY way to stop this. In order to communicate with a Reddit mod in any personal way, you need to go through a Cryptographically Signed process that PROVES your identity. Any communication mentioning death threats in ANY WAY gets auto-routed to a Special Task Force (paid) that works directly with the Police/FBI.

      -No one ever even needs to SEE a death threat. I guarantee you, 1st time that ever happens to me I will be DEMANDING to speak to an owner IN PERSON and will NOT do any more work for them until it is Resolved to my satisfaction. PERIOD.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    36. Re:Why so many death threats? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1, Troll

      > an online death threat is the internetâ(TM)s equivalent of a strongly worded letter to the editor

      -Bullshit. People that think like this are PART OF THE PROBLEM. Would you be OK if someone doxxed you and threatened you, your family/dog -- online or otherwise? If it's committed in writing, it is an Actionable Offense. Writing is much stronger than verbal, because the writer ALWAYS has the option to modify their speech before sending - or not send it at all. Someone makes a death threat to me, my friends, family, whatever - I'll be showing up to their door after I find them, like Jay and Silent Bob.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    37. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol wut? Dude, get help.

    38. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wouldn't say it to their face then don't say it online. What's wrong with people?

      Not everyone is mentally stable

    39. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What planet is the Slashdot you're accessing located on?"

      Earth, and quite often that exact Voltaire quote appears in the quotes section at the bottom of the page.

      So much for you knowing what the fuck you're talking about.

    40. Re:Why so many death threats? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      You're talking about millions of active users. Are you telling me you're surprised out that group that a tiny percentage of those people might not be perfectly well adjusted (never-mind outright suffer from mental or emotional problems?)

      The barrier to access and use websites is zero. I really have trouble figuring out how anyone can be surprised that out of millions of people, some of those people are capable of unacceptable social behavior.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    41. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah you're just a sensitive faggot

    42. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > an online death threat is the internetâ(TM)s equivalent of a strongly worded letter to the editor

      -Bullshit. People that think like this are PART OF THE PROBLEM. Would you be OK if someone doxxed you and threatened you, your family/dog -- online or otherwise? If it's committed in writing, it is an Actionable Offense. Writing is much stronger than verbal, because the writer ALWAYS has the option to modify their speech before sending - or not send it at all. Someone makes a death threat to me, my friends, family, whatever - I'll be showing up to their door after I find them, like Jay and Silent Bob.

      Shut up before you end up dead old man.

    43. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of Trump supporters and Russians on reddit. Idiots like that will say anything to get a rise.

    44. Re:Why so many death threats? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    45. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Death threats are illegal pretty much everywhere in the Western world that I know of, not just the UK.

      The problem is simple: what the fuck are the police supposed to when user shitcock69 sends a death threat to a moderator? How do you get their real-life info? Local police simply do not give a shit - at all - because they are not equipped to deal with this. Maybe state/province police are, and the FBI or whatever the equivalent is in other countries certainly are better equipped for it. Back to the question: what are they actually going to do? What information do they have? They can subpoena Reddit (or ask nicely, I am sure they would help willingly in these cases) and get... some random gmail address for the account and some IP addresses. Neither correlates with a specific person which can be held accountable.

      There is very little law enforcement can do about this. They can either spend days or weeks chasing vacuous evidence about someone saying something mean on the internet, or realize that is a waste of time and invest those resources in other internet ventures such as removing child porn traffickers from society.

    46. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slash dot is a bunch of old cranks who complain about SJWs unironically.

    47. Re: Why so many death threats? by negRo_slim · · Score: 2

      You must not be paying attention to events as of late.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    48. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Austin had a startup called Authenticated Reality that did exactly this. However they got shut down by death threats.

    49. Re:Why so many death threats? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Because it is something you can say without consequences for saying it.
      I can think someone is ugly, or just being a bad person. But I wouldn't say it to them to their face, or in a way they would track it back to me. Especially if I need to work with this person in the future. Because while I may be free to voice my ideas, having to work with a person who knows what I actually think of them, will just create extra friction with no benefit to me.
      My opinions isn't going to change a person, especially if I make them not trust or like me.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    50. Re:Why so many death threats? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "If you wouldn't say it to their face"

      On the one hand, it is possible to be incredibly rude, vulgar, even truly violent towards people you don't know, to their face, in person. Watch the media.

      On the other hand, as an AC, you don't even have a face. Try posting as a person, unless of course you think it's dangerous. Which, here, I doubt it is.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    51. Re: Why so many death threats? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      If only the moderation knew that. These days anything that goes against the groupthink is modded "troll" or "flamebait".

      Maybe we should get rid of the "flamebait" mod, it's basically "you annoyed me with your opinion so I will punish you".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    52. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up discrimination laws. Educate yourself please.

    53. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The very act shows something disturbingly wrong in upbringing, respect for others and tolerance. Even if the person is otherwise rational, it is criminal and punishable. Maybe they need more security and love, but who can help them when anonymous and hostile?

    54. Re:Why so many death threats? by alexo · · Score: 1

      If you wouldn't say it to their face then don't say it online. What's wrong with people?

      This is what's wrong with people.

    55. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, God will punish you.

    56. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why strong anonymity is important: so that they CAN"T call a SWAT team to your house, because they have no idea who you are.

    57. Re: Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Evelyn Hall never tried to pass it off as a quote of Voltaire, merely a description of his beliefs. Which I believe she hit right on the head. And it's good enough line I'm cool with quoting Hall's words of wisdom as they are pertinent and powerful.

    58. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      it's easy to type out a death threat

      Exactly, and anyone saying otherwise can go DIAF.

      OH SHIT! That's another death threat. So sorry to anyone that "takes a toll" on. But the mods at Reddit likely get way WAY worse. On the other hand, mods on Reddit are typically little tin-pot tyrants. They LIKE having power. Why else would they do it? They're not getting paid. If they didn't like it they can just... stop.

      If they continue to work for free, that really puts a kink in that whole "We should get paid for this" argument.

    59. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you need to go through a Cryptographically Signed process that PROVES your identity.

      Hahaha! oh wait, you're serious. Ok, walk me through that. "It's encrypted" isn't good enough. Prove... WHAT identity? Prove that it's tied to an email? pft. Tied to a credit card? Also not so good. Do you really want a background check just to question authority?

      No one ever even needs to SEE a death threat.

      Correct, it's not needed. But if they're an adult in society I can guarantee you it's going to happen. The same way that they're going to meet people who disagree with them, don't think they're good people, insult them, question their motives, cast unsubstantiated aspirations upon their mother, and call them gay. If you are in a position of authority where your job is to censor people, I can guarantee you that you will receive abuse. And I can also guarantee you that the position will be abused. Human nature is a bitch, isn't it?

      Obligatory "go DIAF" statement that's needed in these threads so everyone can pad their victim card. There you go. If this is your first time... I guess you have to call someone at... it's not DICE anymore... it's BizX. Good luck with that. If you're not full of shit and you actually meant it when you said you wouldn't be "doing work" until it's "Resolved" then... well... sorry for kicking you off of slashdot.

    60. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edgy mofo

    61. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the bigger portion of the problem is that there are people like you that try to brush off the issue in exactly this way - which encourages the idiots out there into thinking it's perfectly legal to threaten to kill someone online.

    62. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb fuck he literally said those laws should apply online too, go back to third grade and learn your context clues.

    63. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do what, exactly, when you show up at their door? One could certainly assume by the tone of your post that you intend harm when you show up at that door.... See how easy it is to make a threat online. See how you use the threat as an emotional underscore to your message. Perhaps you should take a long look in the mirror when considering who is "PART OF PROBLEM".

    64. Re: Why so many death threats? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What bullshit. I've never agreed to that and even if I had it would only be to say what I really wanted to say anyway.

    65. Re: Why so many death threats? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also the other golden rule of slashdot, "if you disagree with me you are a SJW virtue signalling libtard."

    66. Re: Why so many death threats? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's what "overrated" is for.

    67. Re: Why so many death threats? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I work on IoT censors all day.

    68. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe some people just think your habit of passive-aggressive accusations and disingenuousness is trollish behaviour?

    69. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to communicate with a Reddit mod in any personal way, you need to go through a Cryptographically Signed process that PROVES your identity.

      Maybe come up with the tech to do that first. The best we have is PKI third-party trust. Not really proof there, ripe for abuse if not implemented and maintained perfectly. Nefarious people and companies have taken advantage of those flaws already.

    70. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "cryptographically signed process that proves your identity" != EASY.

      If you don't want to keep doing your voluntary JOB for NO PAY, you can QUIT immediately.

      Well, actually there is some compensation isn't there? Not from reddit, but by 3rd parties who want their products/services/articles promoted. Maybe it is worth the death threats for those mods.

    71. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -There is an EASY way to stop this. In order to communicate with a Reddit mod in any personal way, you need to go through a Cryptographically Signed process that PROVES your identity. Any communication mentioning death threats in ANY WAY gets auto-routed to a Special Task Force (paid) that works directly with the Police/FBI.

      -No one ever even needs to SEE a death threat. I guarantee you, 1st time that ever happens to me I will be DEMANDING to speak to an owner IN PERSON and will NOT do any more work for them until it is Resolved to my satisfaction. PERIOD.

      Not that it's right but why bother with any of that when they're just BS anyways? You're just creating overhead for a non-problem that will never be solved. It's not like there are a ton of people acting on these. In fact, I can't remember the last time I heard about someone following up on an anonymous death threat. Nothing, and let me be clear, NOTHING is going to stop it. Do you think the anyone is going to investigate to thousands of anonymous death threats sent daily? That's just an epic waste of money. Plus it's trivially easy to use a VPN or proxy. Or maybe they aren't in the US. Hell, I would script the whole process to send as many as possible every day all day just to overwhelm a system as ridiculous as what you describe.

      PS: If someone actually wants to kill you they likely aren't going to send you death threats first anyways.

    72. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure the actual Golden Rule of Slashdot is " If Natalie Portman is naked, she MUST be petrified!"

    73. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if mods have to go through the same process to prove their identities and prevent mod abuses like multiple accounts owned by one person or entity spanning all the default subs, astroturfing, and arbitrary "fuck you, that's why" removals and bans.

      Mods already have too much power to shape reddit and the news and conversations on there, and there are no checks to their power, either.

    74. Re: Why so many death threats? by MoralCharacter · · Score: 1

      The quote is not a 'fictional quote' that was made up, it was written by a biographer to describe Voltaire's response to a book burning - and is that biographers own words.
      The specific excerpt from the book The Friends of Voltaire - is thus

      "What a fuss about an omelette!" he had exclaimed when he heard of the burning. How abominably unjust to persecute a man for such an airy trifle as that!
      ‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,’ was his attitude now.

      Voltaire isn't saying anything in the latter half, it's not a 'quote' but a description of his response (by the biographer) towards the burning of books written by Claude-Adrien Helvétius in 1758.
      The Friends of Voltaire, can be found online

    75. Re:Why so many death threats? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > If you're not full of shit and you actually meant it when you said you wouldn't be "doing work" until it's "Resolved" then... well... sorry for kicking you off of slashdot

      --LOL, I only get 5 modpoints on Slashdot and I'm not even a mod on Reddit

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    76. Re:Why so many death threats? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Why, are you planning to send me death threats?

    77. Re:Why so many death threats? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      -No one ever even needs to SEE a death threat. I guarantee you, 1st time that ever happens to me I will be DEMANDING to speak to an owner IN PERSON and will NOT do any more work for them until it is Resolved to my satisfaction. PERIOD.

      Questions.

      You are a Reddit mod?
      Owner of what? Reddit?
      Who do you work for again?

    78. Re:Why so many death threats? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      I'll be showing up to their door after I find them

      So you'll drive across the country and murder someone for threatening you on the internet and go away for 25-life. Seems like a troubling escalation of the problem.

    79. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good comment. Nice to see a person using common sense in this day and age.

    80. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a faggot, AIDS has you already.

    81. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      Soooo, your "guarantee" and all those capital letters was more along the lines of "bullshit".

      Well in that case, I TOO guarantee that the first death-threat I receive from someone on Mars, I will be DEMANDING to speak to an owner of Mars IN PERSON and will NOT do any more space advocacy until it is Resolved to my satisfaction. PERIOD.

      Whelp, this'll get to +5 insightful for sure now that I know the formula.

    82. Re:Why so many death threats? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      How do you know, did I fuck you in the ass on slashdot previously?

      HIV doesn't infect people through internet rape though. You'll have to find a way to propagate your illness some other way.

    83. Re:Why so many death threats? by Mozai · · Score: 1
      > and will NOT do any more work for them

      That's the goal; the threat isn't meant to kill you, it's meant to stop you. And you just said you would stop if you are threatened. Therefore: threatening you is a valid tactic to achieve the goal.

    84. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imma patent hiv over the internet and swim in gold coins like scrooge mcbezos

    85. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regularly and rarely can be the same thing. Ten people are bitten by sharks every day but you're not likely to be one of them.

    86. Re: Why so many death threats? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I see your patent and play "e-condom". Your move.

    87. Re:Why so many death threats? by nasch · · Score: 1

      But if they're an adult in society I can guarantee you it's going to happen.

      I've been an adult for a long time and I don't think I've ever been threatened with death. Have you? If so, over what?

    88. Re:Why so many death threats? by nasch · · Score: 1

      Whoa, we got a badass here!

    89. Re:Why so many death threats? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --No, dumbass. These trolls think they can get away with *anything* - including SWATting - until you CONFRONT them. I never said anything about murdering or hurting anyone. However, a death threat made in writing MUST NOT be ignored. You have to draw the line somewhere - that's where I draw it.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    90. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign ze papers old man.

    91. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Well ok, time to pop that cherry. You can go DIAF. Boom. Done. I told you to go die. In a fire. Horrific, I know. But I trust that, as an adult of "a long time", you'll learn to move on. To carry forth. To look past this dark time of villainy and cruelty. To be a better person from what we can all hope is a character building exercise.

      Have you? If so, over what?

      Yeah. Last time that I remember? I think I said that NAZIs had the right to free speech just as much as they did. Then they called me a NAZI and said they'd kill me. It was cute.

    92. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you for saying that...

      (Sorry, had to.)

    93. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      I'll kill you and your family.

      There. You're welcome.

    94. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you, your family, and your little dog too.

      Come at me, bro.

    95. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you.

      Death threats aren't generally legally actionable unless they are credible. shitcock69 says "I'll kill you, groksterlover11! How dare you say Transformers gen 2 is the best transformers!" I think it's safe to say the cops wouldn't exactly tackle you if they heard you say it in the street.

    96. Re:Why so many death threats? by nasch · · Score: 1

      DIAF is not a threat. And even if you now reply with "I'm going to kill you" I would consider that a joke, not a threat.

    97. Re: Why so many death threats? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      You forgot "imagine a Beowulf cluster of..." and "Netcraft confirms it!".

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    98. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that it's easy to type out a death threat and the people doing it know that it is likely to have maximal impact. The majority of people doing it would probably crap themselves if they were confronted about it in person. It's weak and underhanded.

      Well, then these people are not only lazy and cowards, but pretty stupid as well. I don't know if it's ever been tested, but typing it out surely must leave a digital trail of evidence. Death threats are, after all, quite illegal, and, I think (although I could be mistaken), a mandatory jail sentence. One made verbally could, conceivably, be tossed out of court due to lack of evidence, but it would be pretty hard to claim lack of evidence with a transcript right there for all to see...

    99. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read at -1 and higher for a reason. From what I see, if you're being modded down to -1 regularly, the problem may not be the "others".

    100. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plebs found it time to jump ship ! ;)

    101. Re: Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoe+1 Truthâ mod does not exist, but if it did you would get it.

    102. Re: Why so many death threats? by BrianMahoney1357 · · Score: 1

      Evelyn Beatrice Hall (pseudonym S. G. Tallentyre) , not Voltaire. It is from Friends of Voltaire, so close but no cigar. Most people think Voltaire is a superhero. Sad. Good name, though.

    103. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Ok, this is important: Not everyone would consider that a joke and not a threat.

      Reddit mods UNDOUBTEDLY get way more flak than this. But any time someone talks about receiving "death threats over the internet" remember that "go DIAF" technically counts. In this age of trigger-happy victim-card-play snowflakes, getting some details about just what exactly they mean by "death threat" is important. AND, remember that you can't control how other people feel. If they feel threatened, that's that. Before the divorce, the wife pulled a knife on me and had some playful little threat but I didn't feel threatened. I walked into it and she pulled away. We laughed about it afterwards. And a few months later shit hits the fan and she's pushing to collect on that half mil of life insurance money. The bitch. I guess that's a long round about way of saying that even if people don't feel threatened, they maybe idiots.

    104. Re:Why so many death threats? by nasch · · Score: 1

      But any time someone talks about receiving "death threats over the internet" remember that "go DIAF" technically counts.

      I disagree. "Go die in a fire" may be offensive or scary or hostile, but it is not a threat. "I'm going to kill you" is. One indicates an action the speaker is planning to take, and the other does not.

    105. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      No no no... No take backs:

      "And even if you now reply with 'I'm going to kill you' I would consider that a joke, not a threat."

      You can't NOW say it IS a threat.... Except, of course, you CAN. Just as anyone can. It might make you a hypocrite. It might make them pansies. It might make their worldview not jive with your or mine. But the way our legal system works, if you FEEL THREATENED, it's a threat. And when I say "you" I mean the impersonal other-person sort of you. Not you specifically, of course. Because the thing I really wanted to point out to you is that IT'S NOT UP TO YOU. Or me. It's actually up to a judge, but they've been ruling really fucking lax about what constitutes a threat. I mean, jesus. That old guy put his arm on Cheney's shoulder while talking to him. "That's battery". Wow. But the charge stuck.

      But hey, that's just the legal system and the underpinning of what our government defines as true. THESE PEOPLE on the other hand are MAKING CLAIMS about how many death threats they've gotten. And it's prompting people to suggest things like "you need to go through a Cryptographically Signed process that PROVES your identity" like that's not a laughable piece of unworkable bullshit. And that's at +5 insightful so don't tell me it's not an issue.

      He thinks "-No one ever even needs to SEE a death threat." but fails to understand exactly how low the bar is for what SOME PEOPLE (not you or I) would constitute a threat.

      You can disagree all you want but you're missing the bloody point.

    106. Re:Why so many death threats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I was a bit imprecise. "I'm going to kill you" can be a threat. In this context, with you saying it to me, *I* would not *consider* it a threat. It's possible I could be mistaken, and you really do intend to kill me (or at least really do intend it as a threat).

      But the way our legal system works, if you FEEL THREATENED, it's a threat.

      I'm pretty sure that's not true. I think the standard applied is the "reasonable person" standard.

    107. Re:Why so many death threats? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Read to the bloody end of the fucking paragraph: "It's actually up to a judge, but they've been ruling really fucking lax about what constitutes a threat. I mean, jesus. That old guy put his arm on Cheney's shoulder while talking to him. 'That's battery'. Wow. But the charge stuck."

      And.... did you entirely dodge the entire point that followed? "That's just the legal system" "THESE PEOPLE on the other hand..."

      Fuck hell nasch, how lazy can you get? Very first instant you can jerk that knee and you spam a half-hearted bullshit excuse and don't even read the rest? That's just plain rude.

      and I don't think I've ever been threatened with death.

      If this thread is any example, you probably just never bothered reading them. I guess ignorance is bliss...

  2. Fascist mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was banned from /r/Futurology.

    Fuck them.

    (the captcha was "shooting", haha)

    1. Re:Fascist mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you do?

    2. Re:Fascist mods by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Predicted the wrong thing, I'm assuming.

    3. Re:Fascist mods by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      I was banned from /r/Futurology.

      Fuck them.

      Can't you leave your disagreement with /r/Futurology in the past?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:Fascist mods by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Can't you leave your disagreement with /r/Futurology in the past?

      That's how he got banned!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re:Fascist mods by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      There's actually a sort of "dualism" between /r/futurology and /r/collapse. The bookends of the future. Super-great or the end of society. The nutters over on collapse are typical doomsayers. Society has always has a percentage of people who think the world is ending soon. All in all I think it's harmless when they're "preppers" as long as they don't take it too far. When they're more like "why go to work, the world is ending?" or "to be prepared for the end of soceity, I'm taking my kid out of school to learn how to dress a rabbit", then that's a problem. The nutters on /r/futurology on the other hand are much much less likely to go off the deep-end and be a sociological problem. They're still crazy, but it's more like a delusion of optimism. The UBI crowd is big over there. But recently there's been a stronger trend of "hey what if AI takes all our jobs?" which is bucking the narrative of futurology. Those posts should really stay in /r/cyberpunk so we can all live our happy little lives inside the comfortable bubbles we know and love.

      Obligatory go DIAF comment that's needed in these kinds of threads so we can all pad our victim card.

    6. Re:Fascist mods by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Obligatory go DIAF comment that's needed in these kinds of threads so we can all pad our victim card.

      Hey! I haven't received my victim card! I'm being discriminated against! Disenfranchised! Mother!

  3. Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    SJW anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

    1. Re:Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If "SJW" now means "someone who thinks it's wrong to send death threats to Reddit moderators" then it's officially lost all meaning.

    2. Re: Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey

    3. Re: Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      To be fair, "then whined about it to the news media."

      Most of us suffer trolling of some kind. Most of us don't go whining to the press about it.

  4. Reddit moderation is bullshit... by blahplusplus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. like 90% of the channels you can tell people of low education and people who are young tend to be moderators. AKA people with lots of free time.

    The reason reddit is so popular because it is a confirmation bias wonderland for people who are not very bright and that is most of our species. So reddit is a wonderland of egoboost for the none too bright and uninformed. It's just 100% drama generating machine between the informed, uninformed, young and old and it has to do with the karma and moderation system. Reddit is just one monkey ego war where opinions no matter how dumb are fought and defended by drive by upvoting and downvoting of whatever subgroup is most dominant on the sub unfortunately for our species .

    The whole thing thrives off putting people of various ages and education backgrounds together and watching them go at it. It's just a battle royal, to a large extent.

    1. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess it depends where you go. I occasionally visit some of the smaller, more technically-oriented subreddits, like for programming languages and game development, and I've found most people there to be pretty nice and helpful.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Kiuas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reddit is just one monkey ego war where opinions no matter how dumb are fought and defended by drive by upvoting and downvoting of whatever subgroup is most dominant on the sub unfortunately for our species .

      The whole thing thrives off putting people of various ages and education backgrounds together and watching them go at it. It's just a battle royal, to a large extent.

      The whole thing thrives off putting people of various ages and education backgrounds together and watching them go at it. It's just a battle royal, to a large extent.

      This is perhaps true, but at the same time this describes most of the conversations on the internet between strangers. At least to Reddit's credit the possibility of downvoting eliminates the most obvious cases of trolling and flaming. Look at some other platforms like Facebook that do not allow downvoting at all and the discussion culture is many times more toxic because no matter how stupid a statement is there will always be a bunch of fools that like it and this feeds the trolls and the morons.

      Reddit isn't perfect by any means, but it's a small step in the right direction. Keep in mind that the vast majority of online users have been discussing online for 10-20 years, and during that time both the number of platforms and the number of people have grown immensely. The internet and the culture that comes wth it is still very much a work in progress, even though we don't tend to think of it like that.

      I like the moderation system of Slashdot over simple votes (in fact it was the main thing that got me to register here almost a decade ago precisely because I was fed up with the level and moderation of discussion elsewhere), although I admit I'm not sure if something like this would work on the scale of Reddit and the amount of content being posted there. If anyone is aware of other platforms doing interesting things with discussion moderation that's not just a simple free-for-all, I'd be interested to hear about them.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    3. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do it like 4chan were the mods are anonymous, and saying you are a mod leads to your mod privs being revoked. Still a lot of clearly uneducated mods being tasked with moderating boards that they have no domain knowledge of, but at least when they nuke a thread it wasn't for ego.

    4. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      .. like 90% of the channels you can tell people of low education and people who are young tend to be moderators. AKA people with lots of free time.

      How is this different from most online forums?

      The whole thing thrives off putting people of various ages and education backgrounds together and watching them go at it. It's just a battle royal, to a large extent.

      How is this different from the rest of the internet?

      I remember that in the past, "no matter who you are, you can speak your mind and only be judged by your words" was a good thing, but apparently now the trend
      is neo conservatism (from both the left and the right) and a desire to see the return of noblety (whether blue blooded or academic).

    5. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this different from most online forums?

      You can't have genuine discussion when people are fighting for internet points like at reddit, the difference between reddit and actual forums is the element of psychological attacks via upvote downvote button and mod censorship. For instance, you go against the group mind of a given reddit even though you are posting civil rational discussion you will often find your posts deleted for "not being civil" is code for : Mods don't like your point of view.

      The worst part is just mods censoring everything they don't agree with willynilly, it's nothing like slashdot. Slashdot has it's own problems, but reddit is an alternate reality where cretins mod and high five other cretins in a mutual circlejerk to such an extent where finding actual truthful information becomes an exorcise in pointlessness.

    6. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Downvoting promotes groupthink. It's all well and nice when people push racists and bigots into the negatives, but post something vaguely unpopular and watch yourself get hammered.

      It's the reddit equivalent of "shouting down" dissent. If they don't like what you are saying, they will try to silence you by any means necessary.

    7. Re: Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *creddit

    8. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least to Reddit's credit the possibility of downvoting eliminates the most obvious cases of trolling and flaming.

      Most posts are downvoted simply because they present a different opinion, reinforcing the echo chamber.

      I like to learn things, and have my opinions challenged in a constructive way. Reddit sucks for that. I can either pick a group of people who completely agree, or a group that disagrees. Both cases are rather pointless.

    9. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've given me an idea for a reddit-style forum with an online intelligence test as a signup criterion...

    10. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /r/iamverysmart

    11. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has it's own problems, but reddit is an alternate reality where cretins mod and high five other cretins in a mutual circlejerk to such an extent where finding actual truthful information becomes an exorcise in pointlessness.

      Slashdot is just the same as reddit in that regard, but with more power given to the right in comparison to reddit. I suspect that the reason you dislike reddit and like slashdot because you are just enough right wing. (This is not a criticism against right/left, this is just me stating that people find "better" what resonates better with their opinions).

    12. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many larger subs are a shitpost idiocracy of noise, but the smaller ones can be pretty reasonable.

      r/futurology is a terrible example of a subreddit. I think it might be a default subreddit, which means it gets a lot of random visits, and 99% of the posts there are pretty much fantasy clickbait. "Scientists discover way to use Earth's rotation to create free energy and world peace."

      I will say that it is a harsh web site. When your're wrong on most subs, man, are you wrong.

      My city's local subreddit is also dominated by a very narrow political/age spectrum where deviating from the party line will result in bans. I got banned for 30 days (only sub, ever) even though I had a positive karma of something like +5 for my history in the sub over hundreds of posts and comments.

      Overall I mostly like reddit, but there are times where it's just too mean or too stupid. You have to put some effort into finding worthwhile subs and avoid most of the big ones.

    13. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by zmooc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know the Reddit mechanism, but I can imagine Slashdot may provide a much better mechanism for picking moderators that have proven that they are also capable of making a valuable and civilized contribution to a discussion. Obviously, that selection begins with moderation, but thanks to this mechanism, it has had the chance to grow a culture of pretty OK moderation and pass it on to the next generation. Also, random selection of moderators helps tremendously here; this way, the culture of the group determines moderation as opposed to the individual moderators.

      So, no, I think Slashdot is completely different. In fact, it is probably unique.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    14. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Most people aren't in that group as most people don't participate in cesspool that is most reddit discussions, especially the kind that goes in the garbage fire that is front page, and most certainly do not moderate them.

    15. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      .. like 90% of the channels you can tell people of low education and people who are young tend to be moderators. AKA people with lots of free time.

      The reason reddit is so popular because it is a confirmation bias wonderland for people who are not very bright and that is most of our species. So reddit is a wonderland of egoboost for the none too bright and uninformed. It's just 100% drama generating machine between the informed, uninformed, young and old and it has to do with the karma and moderation system. Reddit is just one monkey ego war where opinions no matter how dumb are fought and defended by drive by upvoting and downvoting of whatever subgroup is most dominant on the sub unfortunately for our species .

      The whole thing thrives off putting people of various ages and education backgrounds together and watching them go at it. It's just a battle royal, to a large extent.

      So, kinda like Slashdot ...

    16. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot gave me 15 mod points after posting a few posts that got upmodded. It's really not that good, and can be abused (karma burning).

    17. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "So reddit is a wonderland of egoboost for the none too bright and uninformed"

      Posting anon because I don't want to link anything between my /. and my reddit use, but reddit can be a very helpful tool for support groups. For example the alcoholism subreddit is a very helpful and open group that tries to support people. Reddit can be very helpful for 'you and me against the world' type of groups where you can talk with people sharing the same problems.

    18. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never ever gotten 15 modpoints. It's always been 5 and they come with a ridiculously tight time limit (3 days or so) that when I notice I have those modpoints I usually only have a single day to spend them...

      And if I don't use the modpoints (i.e. miss their existence), slashdot won't give me any until I make a few posts.

      No, I don't log in every day.

    19. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by zmooc · · Score: 1

      I think that's exactly why it works: no single individual has too much of an influence specifically thanks to those limitations.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    20. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by J-1000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slashdot's moderation system is the primary reason I still visit. A cap on the upward moderation leaves more comments on equal footing. And no fixed moderator means no boogeyman. When you take the moderation out of the hands of the few you still end up with (mostly) thoughtful discussion, and the conversation is more likely to reflect the views of the users rather than the overlords. I occasionally see contradicting viewpoints sitting at 5.

      The interface probably holds it back a bit. That's necessary for Slashdot, whose users have no desire for a change, but if this moderation system were transported elsewhere it would be one opportunity for improvement.

    21. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      Lately I rarely post to Slashdot and seemingly out of sheer randomness I'm granted mod points which evidently have an expiration date. Gods only know I'll get some for making this post and be encouraged to "use it or lose it" on whatever whim I might follow. I try to be constructive with them, but I've never gotten the sense that were hard to obtain, just unpredictable.

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    22. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Clearly you like to think of yourself as one of the annoited elite. That is basically all you said. You're smarter, more educated and more civil than other people online.

      Of course you never learned to think about people whose behaviour you don't like as having their own deep seated and legitimate motivations and that they act in accord with those motivations in ways that just offend you No they're just garbage who needs to be educated by people, like you, for example,

    23. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      That balanced moderation seems to hold true until you get to the stories that are intended to contribute to whatever political narrative has become trending. Then I'm reminded that Beauhd and msmash can put their thumb on the scale with unlimited mod points as I'm seeing a string of +5 insightful posts where many of them just amount to name-calling or spreading FUD.

      I'm not saying that at least some central moderation isn't necessary, just that there's no visibility for it. Currently it's indistinguishable from users who game the system with sockpuppet accounts, and I wish that could be changed.

    24. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, While some of the subreddits I'm subscribed to are this way, others are not.

      Reddit shouldn't really be viewed as one thing. Instead, think of it as a platform for others to host forums on.

    25. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit downvoting is garbage because they don't ban anybody for downvoting for other reasons besides being off topic.

      Slashdot at least has metamoderation, though I don't know what the penalty is for bad moderation.

    26. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Aside from Facebook, Reddit is where I like to get most of my fill of Internet Drama from the sidelines, specifically in /r/TwoXChromosomes. It's a popcorn-grabbing good time!

    27. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear about these mythical 15 modpoints, and I've also heard that their expiry date wasn't always so hasty, but I've never experienced either myself. I find that quite odd, really. [1]

      I think it is kind of harsh that if the system allocates you modpoints but you never even see them if you happened to not log in, and then they're gone and you'll never get more until you make posts. The last part especially is harsh, for a mostly read-only member like me.

      Well, I guess if they didn't expire them like that, you could have 'sleeper' accounts with modpoints ready to use, when you need them. That's not a desirable situation either.

      [1] Not that I want *more* of them. Trying to find five decent (or indecent) posts when the expiry is 24 hours away is quite a chore. Hell, just finding two or three of them is often hard enough. I just wish the expiry'd be a bit more lenient.

    28. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post disproves what I just said, usually on slashdot, the only topics that aren't truthful are politics related because the vast majority of slashdots audience is american and americans are the most indoctrinated country on the planet to vote against their political interests.

      As for your observations on my politics, I don't believe in the political system because I know our species is stupid.

    29. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Copying and pasting to r/iamverysmart

    30. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no matter who you are, you can speak your mind and only be judged by your words

      /. seems to follow this fairly well... unless the poster is an AC.

    31. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been to Reddit? A large percentage of them are garbage. Not all of them, but it doesn't take all of them to ruin Reddit.

    32. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by doom · · Score: 1

      I've always complained that slashdot's moderation system was very weak because it used free, unverified accounts-- if political operatives were not running hundreds of sock-puppet accounts it was because they didn't care about slashdot, not because slashdot could do anything about it.

      It's remarkable how every other site out there, reddit definitely included, has succeeded in rolling out moderation systems that are even weaker, and even more easily gamed. Then everyone acts stunned and amazed to realize that they are being gamed-- but why wouldn't they be? Either the site is a toy and no one bothers, or the site is influential, and it gets gamed.

      (Remember back when this sort of thing was regarded as paranoid raving? THE_TOY_WEB.)

    33. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by nasch · · Score: 1

      Some of them are not even shy about it. For example, here's one of the rules from /r/LateStageCapitalism: "Support for capitalism--and the political parties which uphold it--is strictly prohibited; comments showing support for capitalism and capitalist parties and politicians will be removed and the user punished at moderator discretion. As a corollary to this, anti-socialist and anti-communist comments are also forbidden. Anti-socialism/communism is pro-capitalism."

      It's explicitly and intentionally an echo chamber. I assume there are subreddits on the right with similar rules.

    34. Re: Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      It's really just a platform in the truest sense. The individual community you're a part of is what dictates the sort of people in the community and the people in charge.

      I would never put my personal details on Reddit because it is a huge platform and there are risks beyond your community, but it's just a tool, like a hammer. A hammer can be used for peace, or it can be used for war.

    35. Re: Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      That's a really good point. It's one thing somewhere like /r/askhistorians where they're trying to build not a discussion but a sort of appliance. It's quite another where they're actively silencing a discussion.

      The only real defense is that it's just one subreddit. Don't like it? Start your own. They're free. Mods don't spring from the aether, they are usually selected by previous mods.

    36. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamer Ghazi is the harassment mob and the ones that faked screenshots including one of Brianna calling someone a "gross fucking aspie", GamerGate is the one that points out abusive behavior of technology press and political extremists (and also pointed out the fake "gross fucking aspie" comment).

    37. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Ah, it appears I pissed of the Gator idiots. If only they'd fuck back off to KiA.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    38. Re:Reddit moderation is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Scientists discover way to use Earth's rotation to create free energy

      Wind turbines?

  5. When all is said and done... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... A great deal more is said than done.

    I've been getting death threats since the FIDONET days, and once in a while one of the losers trying to scare me has mentioned where I was living or working at the time in their threat, but not one of them has even showed up to TP my house, let alone try anything dangerous.

    If you can't ignore the Internet Tough Guys, then get off the internet, for fuck's sake. If you actually believe that any of them will show up, get a pump-action shotgun: problem solved.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually believe that any of them will show up, get a pump-action shotgun: problem solved.

      These days when n'erdowells make a death threat, their method of implementation is called SWATing, and no kind of weapon helps here, since they're relying on panicking law enforcement with a fake call.

    2. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a pump-action shotgun

      Then you have two problems, internet tough guy.

    3. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you know that putting your nick at the end of every post makes you look like a douche bag?

    4. Re:When all is said and done... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back in the BBS days, then Usenet, mailing lists and early forums I never got that kind of abuse. These days threats of violence and doxing are often the first thing you get hit with. And I have been doxed and had stuff sent to my home, my wife's home, our email accounts flooded etc.

      It's illegal to own a shotgun for personal protection where I live, and I doubt it would be effective against floods of spam mail or people calling my employer.

      All of that is designed to shut down free and open debate. It's censorship. Intimidation designed to silence views that the perpetrator does not like.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally I agree, except jcr has stood the test of time for me, generally has insightful posts.

    6. Re:When all is said and done... by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do it just to piss you off, sunshine.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or learn how to use the Internet without getting into fights with people.

    8. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your "debate" went a little bit too far if you had people doing that. A big part of it is knowing when to back off before some nutcase starts that kind of behavior. You don't need to win every argument on the Internet. Choose your battles wisely.

    9. Re: When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JCR - Jewish Cock Receiver

    10. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been getting death threats since the FIDONET days, and once in a while one of the losers trying to scare me has mentioned where I was living or working at the time in their threat, but not one of them has even showed up to TP my house, let alone try anything dangerous.

      If you can't ignore the Internet Tough Guys, then get off the internet, for fuck's sake. If you actually believe that any of them will show up, get a pump-action shotgun: problem solved.

      I see that you have never been a target of a concentrated harassment campaign. It's really easy to ignore a loon or two once in a while. It's much more difficult when there are a few dozen guys who actively try to destroy your life and perhaps about a hundred or several who join the bandwagon for lulz and send a message or two.

      There was that one youtuber, I'm not certain if it was TotalBiscuit or someone similar, who downplayed abuse that gamergate threw at its targets, but who started to complain loudly when he himself got targeted in return. The easy to ignore nonconsequential threats suddenly weren't easy to ignore and without any consequence.

      And just a hint: your Internet Tough Guy act of buying a pump-action shotgun will get you killed when you get swatted, if you actually do it. And the shotgun will not protect you against losing your job for baseless complaints after you get doxxed.

    11. Re: When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Zing. You showed him!

    12. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The issue here is that when you're identified in some way online, and you have strong beliefs, you're going to get targeted by either people who are diametrically opposed to you or trolls that nihilistically love the schadenfreude they spread to everyone.

      Any time there's a new scandal of sorts, you can guarantee that people like these will follow. You can't really prevent it, even by saying "don't do it", because I'd imagine that's just bait for the trolls to *keep on going*.

      So... do *you* have control over potentially thousands, maybe even millions, of people who either dislike you or dislike everybody? I sure don't. Aside from trying to stop the genuinely unlawful ones (which are they and which are trolls??), I have no answer.

    13. Re: When all is said and done... by jcr · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm just reeling from the impact of his wit over here...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:When all is said and done... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Not in this state, you don't.

    15. Re:When all is said and done... by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      The reason for all that is that you are annoyingly illogical and live in a complete bubble and cannot seem to comprehend any other worldview than your own. If you are constantly getting into fights online or offline you need to examine your own behavior. That is not normal. I don't personally care about people like you, because you are just misinformed and have chosen a "side" like many people, but you might want to broaden your horizons a bit and see things from perspectives other than your own.

    16. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would be amazed what a .22 up the nose can do

    17. Re:When all is said and done... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Assuming you are right and I'm some kind of glorious asshole (and presumably all my friends are just wrong, they should hate me but haven't realized it yet) does that justify threats and sending stuff to my wife?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:When all is said and done... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You and your wife both own homes?

    19. Re:When all is said and done... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I think you underestimate the power of words. I'm not so worried about an Internet tough guy showing up at my address. I am more concerned, however, with an Internet tough guy saying the right few words to send a team of heavily armed officers crashing through my front door.

      The only time anyone ever managed to really annoy me in my many years as an admin/moderator was when someone registered a handle that was visually identical to my own, then proceeded to make bomb threats against government buildings, seemingly in my name. I was able to ban the account and delete the offending content within a few minutes of it first appearing, and I know full well that I could have eventually explained the situation to everyone's satisfaction, but it's easy to imagine a scenario where an enforcement agency is tipped off to the "threat" and takes immediate action against me in response to what appears at first glance to be an immediate threat from me.

      That's the sort of line-crossing that I don't like dealing with as much, and having a shotgun at the ready in that scenario would likely make things worse, not better.

    20. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Parent's post about not being an asshole is brilliantly ironic.

    21. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's what everybody says when they are called out on some annoying dork behaviour.

    22. Re:When all is said and done... by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Back in the BBS days, then Usenet, mailing lists and early forums I never got that kind of abuse.

      I can quite remember back in the BBS days of this happening. I ran a fido:net node, and there were always people just unhinged and had to be blocked at the node level because of this shit and Usenet too. Early forums? Yep. You can still find instances of it back on the wayback machine.

      These days threats of violence and doxing are often the first thing you get hit with. And I have been doxed and had stuff sent to my home, my wife's home, our email accounts flooded etc.

      Yeah well, ask the political and radical left how much they enjoy it. Since they were the ones to popularize these methods back in the 80's and 90's. Everything from doxing someone's home because they ran a shelter, to a research worker having bombs sent to his home because he killed rabbits in the course of his research. The the more modern stuff of the 00's, with anti-MRA feminists and their ilk that pull fire alarms in buildings, call in the bomb threats and so on. Or with Gamergate, and all of the open-public events from restaurants, to meeting halls having bomb threats called into them. Or the more recent stuff, that's become a hallmark of the feminst left. If you committed the dangerous thing of "sexual allegations" which haven't been proven in court, law, HR, or anything else. Well? The mob will come and try to get you fired. Oh, but if the accuser is female? They'll just circle the wagons and hope it disappears.

      All of that is designed to shut down free and open debate. It's censorship. Intimidation designed to silence views that the perpetrator does not like.

      It sure is. Now you seem to be having a problem here. Your regular anti-speech stands seems to contradict your current open speech debates. Guess what? Tthe bullshit from campuses in Ontario has gotten so bad that the provincial government is stepping in and stating that universities MUST have a free speech policy, and can no longer restrict speakers by trying to land them with heavy security fees or other nonsense issues. Or you will loose funding. Then again this is the that Jordan Peterson were warning about universities in Canada 5 years ago. Groups like FIRE and CampusWatch have been doing the same in the US.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    23. Re: When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if I had an account I would upmod you.

      The Internet is a mass medium with all that implies for its userbase. If you're going to tell me off, all I ask is that you put some witty creativity into it. I've been zinged once with such a funny image I LOLed and still remember it. I was called "nothing more than poo flinging monkey" for shitposting once.

    24. Re:When all is said and done... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Since they were the ones to popularize these methods back in the 80's and 90's

      Yeah! Remember when they started shooting abortion doctors at home and in their churches?

      Oh wait....

      Maybe you're not exactly looking at the whole field here.

    25. Re:When all is said and done... by nasch · · Score: 1

      If you actually believe that any of them will show up, get a pump-action shotgun: problem solved.

      If you believe that meeting threats of violence with violence is a solution. Sounds more like an act of desperation when there is no sign of a solution.

    26. Re: When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the impact of his Jewish cock?

    27. Re:When all is said and done... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Remember when they started shooting abortion doctors at home and in their churches?

      Yeah, remember when people on the right and religious individuals vocally disavowed them? Then went further to root out people who were like that, supplied police and investigators with every bit of evidence they could. Noticed that it stopped pretty hard and fast? Hey, ever wonder why that doesn't seem to happen with mulsims and Islam?

      I sure do.

      Hey remember those leftist groups from the late 1960's and 1970's? You know the ones that planted bombs, murdered people, engaged in open terrorism. Executed families for not being the "right type of person." And all that?

      I sure do. That was Canada, US, and Europe.

      Maybe you're not exactly looking at the whole field here.

      Maybe you're just ignorant on the facts of this? Sure seems like it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    28. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you are right and I'm some kind of glorious asshole (and presumably all my friends are just wrong, they should hate me but haven't realized it yet)

      You don't seem to understand how a bubble works. When you're in a bubble, your friends and associates think like you too, so they wouldn't hate you.

      Your blurb in the parenthesis is like a KKK member saying "but all my clansmen friends think I'm great!"

      does that justify threats and sending stuff to my wife?

      Well, we live in an age where people think violence is ok if it's done to a Nazi, and people also seem to think just being associated with Nazis makes you just as guilty (aka guilty by association)

      The slashdot "groupthink" as you describe elsewhere opposed this sort of thinking and warned people that it's a bad direction, but hey, you passive-aggressively dismissed them as groupthink.

    29. Re: When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      I generally don't much care about mean words, but I've pulled back from the internet since people started confusing it for real life.

      I'll call you an asshole any day of the week and expect just as bad back. The point has always been that if you don't like it you can turn off the screen, go outside, have a walk.

      By contrast, these new internet users want to track down where you live, send nasty emails to your employer with the intent to get you fired, lie to the police to have you jailed or killed. That isn't cool.

      I do think that most of the "threats" aren't credible and people just like to whine, particularly if it might mean they get concessions out of the deal. Pretty much everyone has received a stupid non credible threat or something similar. The first response to my first post on slashdot was someone saying they wanted to fuck my mom. My first forum on my first website got hit with goatse. Shit happens, it's the Internet. It's when the threats become credible or someone actually acts on them that the words are no longer just words, and that's the biggest tragedy of the rise of the internet.

    30. Re:When all is said and done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, ever wonder why that doesn't seem to happen with mulsims and Islam?

      Easy. You've fallen prey to Fake News.

      Plenty of Muslims speak out against terrorism. Plenty of Muslims even aid the US in fighting terrorism. The fake news media just rarely cover them, and whenever they speak of Islam, they bring in speakers from one side (e.g apologists, Christians on the left who would say the religious on the right aren't "true Christians")

      Former Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali who are very critical of Islam gets swept away by the Fake News, grouped together with the "radical right" so as to discredit her and her ideas.

      Though I suppose the right don't like Ali much either, what with her not just being former Muslim but being an *gasp* atheist...

    31. Re:When all is said and done... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, remember when people on the right and religious individuals vocally disavowed them?

      Disavowing an event does not mean the event did not happen.

      Noticed that it stopped pretty hard and fast?

      There's been bombings and shootings for multiple decades. You have an odd definition of "fast" and "stopped".

      Hey remember those leftist groups from the late 1960's and 1970's? You know the ones that planted bombs, murdered people, engaged in open terrorism

      You mean the ones that actually stopped?

    32. Re:When all is said and done... by not+flu · · Score: 1

      Assuming you are right

      He is.

      I'm some kind of glorious asshole

      You are.

      all my friends are just wrong

      They are.

      does that justify threats and sending stuff to my wife?

      No.

  6. Never understood why people want to be moderators by ayesnymous · · Score: 4, Funny

    So many people are willing to do a job for a web site (in this case reddit) and not get paid for it. Suckers.

  7. Volunteer Moderators are dumb by bobstreo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't get a tax write off for your time spent herding assholes on reddit as a moderator. If you have a need to help, volunteer at a library, food bank, or soup kitchen.

    Reddit's business model heavily depends on people being so power hungry and loyal that they don't get paid for what is for some a full time job. As time goes on, the power hungry become somewhat insane, until they are deposed or regain their senses.

    1. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You clearly enjoy posting your outrage to Slashdot, otherwise you wouldn't keep coming here to do it. Slashdot is like it is because it has a user run moderation system. Clearly you get some value out of that.

      It therefore doesn't seem unreasonable to thank the people who invest their time in making Slashdot/Reddit a better place to post and debate, and try to address their concerns lest you lose that resource that you use regularly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I honestly never really understood the value of Reddit. It's basically usenet, with a more centralized infrastructure. The only thing that accomplishes is that the assholes don't get groups for themselves, spill into other groups and troll there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      It's like Usenet but you don't need a client or have to pay to access it, that's the value. Well, the moderation is more effective too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      One of the key features of usenet was exactly the absence of moderation. You could moderate (via killfile) if you so please, but you could choose yourself to do so, nobody forced it upon you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usenet has better porn.

    6. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Which is one of the major reasons it died off for discussion. Too much spam and trolling, people moved to forums and mailing lists where they didn't have to deal with that shit.

      That's the point that is always missing from these debates. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can force other people to listen. If they want a moderated forum where they don't have to put up with APK's spam or Nazis or whatever then they are entitled to it, and Reddit is entitled to provide it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You can't get a tax write off for your time spent herding assholes on reddit as a moderator.

      I can't get a tax write off for the time I spent arguing with people who are wrong on the internet either, yet here I am. Not because I expect to be paid for calling your post silly, but because I actively enjoy it.

      Your post is silly.

      Maybe do something more productive and go watch TV.

    8. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Your post is silly. Your life is silly. Your cat is fine. :)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I think that many people prefer to live in an echo chamber where they see their own views reflected by those around them. That can be the case in boards and forums where those with conflicting opinions (conflicting with those of board ops) can easily be eliminated. Finding unbiased boards that actually allow a sensible exchange of diverging ideas has become rare. On many of the more insane ones, "diverging idea" already means "didn't drink the whole jug of kool-aid alone".

      And that's sad. I mean, let's be honest here, we often found ourselves on the opposite ends of opinions. And yes, I do enjoy it. I already know my opinion, I don't need anyone else to have the same. That doesn't help me, it's great to feel supported, but in the end, it's not going to allow me to see a different angle. And I have to verify my view against that presented by another one. That's not always comfortable, because it just might give one input one didn't consider when forming an opinion.

      But it sure leads to a better view of the whole picture.

      And yes, that also means dealing with fringe views like religious nuts or nazis. Although, I have to admit, that's more a guilty pleasure of mine rather than trying to get sensible input, because usually what I take from a conversation with one of them is "Well, I might not have everything right. But at least I'm not THAT wrong."

      It's a bit like watching afternoon TV with dysfunctional families.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You clearly know nothing about my cat.

    11. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      And that's why usenet died. It was a great idea in the early days. Then spam became a thing.

    12. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I honestly never really understood the value of Reddit. It's basically usenet, with a more centralized infrastructure.

      It's more like Slashdot with more than just computing (and politics) topics, except with an even shittier moderation system. People go there to ask questions or discuss URLs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What's sad is that my post was modded "troll". Slashdot used to be one of those places were you could express a genuine opinion and make your argument, and even if people disagreed at least they wouldn't accuse you of trolling.

      I feel like it's not just Slashdot though. Politics in general and most media has become more polarized.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: Volunteer Moderators are dumb by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We don't judge. We all know about your "cat".

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Modded troll doesn't mean gone, that's the whole point I was trying to make. Yes, someone with mod points might not like your opinion but it will still prevail and people who don't just go for the karma-whoring +5 comments (which are actually the people I'm interested in reading my comments) will still read it.

      It's not a popularity contest. I don't have to convince anyone, and that's actually not really my goal. My goal is to state my opinion and get opinions to it from others. Feedback. Is what I say valid or is it bullshit? I can't change anyone but myself, so my goal is to be the best me that I can possibly be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I use it for TV shows now since IMDB removed their message boards. It's fun and get to talk about shows with people that enjoy the show (or enjoy bashing it.)

      I must admit, I don't actually check how my posts are modded and most the time just read because I am usually so far behind on a show that the thread has been archived.

    17. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insult a user, get modded troll, complain about being punished for a 'genuine opinion'. Interesting.

      Then a comment about political polarization, followed by a sig that is in itself trolling and inflammatory.

      Try some self awareness if you want to be taken seriously.

    18. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      I'm not so bothered about my own posts, someone else usually says the same thing after the snowflakes have run out of mod points. But by then the debate haa been screwed up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Volunteer Moderators are dumb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's when you have to "mod" it yourself and simply ignore it, and discuss matters with others who have something more worthwhile to say. I stopped trying to respond to everyone long ago. Especially if it dissolves into meaningless drivel and ad-hominem attacks it's simply not worth my time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Simple by eneville · · Score: 1

    Vote with your feet, if you don't like the club rules, join or start another club.

    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes they don't give you a choice. I grew two different subreddits to over 100k members the past ten years, and both times reddit banned my account and replaced all of the mods. It's bad enough volunteering for a thankless job, but it's much worse to have your hard work stolen by a corporation.

    2. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join or start another club then, as the OP has said.

    3. Re: Simple by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 2

      Then stop giving it to them. People used to have webpages. Now they have Facebook pages. If you don't own your stuff, it's just a matter of time before someone takes it from you.

    4. Re: Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt they took it away for a good reason.

      What did you do?

    5. Re: Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time, I didn't ban news stories that made minorities look bad. The admins wanted me to make the subreddit biased against whites by not allowing positive stories about them or negative stories about minorities.

    6. Re:Simple by tepples · · Score: 1

      Assuming "club" as metaphor for a particular website on a particular domain:

      Once I have started another club to compete with the existing club, what steps should prospective members take to find my club, and what steps should members take to become notified about activity in my club? In the current web platform, unless I missed something, recommendations and notifications deliberately do not work across clubs.

  9. Couldn't have happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't have happened to nicer persons.

    Moderators...

  10. moderators working for FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are undermining the capitalist society with their communist activities

    either that or they should be classified as voluntary slave laborers .

    passphrase === 'executor'

  11. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the power and control they get from being moderators. Some people deal with this good feeling by becoming politicians. Others become message board moderators. It feels wonderful to slap people you don't like with bans, doubly so when you get to attach a shitty little message to it that the recipient can't reply to. Especially when your life offline is nothing.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Revek · · Score: 1

    You make me want to erase my post to mod you up.

  13. Moderators are often out of control by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is something wrong with people who are moderating 100+ subs. Often they have an agenda/axe to grind and moderate for the sake of power. Some subs are moderated very well but many have mods that are completely missing the point of their being there. Paid shills are rife in some subs where other people are banned for posting unambiguous facts that don't line up with the moderators tastes.

    But unless there is a sub for people who spend 150 hours a week on redit moderators need to be cut way back in what they can do. Limit the number of subs any individual can moderate. Have a team who replace moderators who are clearly abusing their power.

    And if that team has any spare resources, fight the shills, especially the chemical company shills.

    1. Re:Moderators are often out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But unless there is a sub for people who spend 150 hours a week on redit moderators need to be cut way back in what they can do. Limit the number of subs any individual can moderate. Have a team who replace moderators who are clearly abusing their power.

      Reddit is a business and is making money off of fools who moderate their site for them.

      Do you seriously expect them to tell the moderators not to work so hard?

    2. Re:Moderators are often out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 18 hours a week to sleep, eat, or bath. Lack of sleep should impair there judgment. Don't be to harsh they just are overworked.

    3. Re:Moderators are often out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that team has any spare resources, fight the shills, especially the chemical company shills.

      Hey, you know those computers you program for a living? That basic skill which in your eyes somehow elevates you above your fellow man?

      They're literally made of chemicals. You should be out there shilling for them as hard as you can, because if they ever do fail, you and your shitty little autistic lifestyle are beyond fucked.

    4. Re:Moderators are often out of control by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      You should see the moderators on /r/TwoXChromosomes - they ban folks for even subscribing to certain subreddits. Even though its against the reddit rules for moderator behaviour.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    5. Re:Moderators are often out of control by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong with people who are moderating 100+ subs.

      That's something I've found utterly crazy with reddit. I wish they would implement a policy of limiting moderators to some number of subs of specific sizes. I could probably moderate 10 subs of 100 people each pretty easily. But there's no way I could effectively moderate 10 subs of 10,000 people at all. One sub was enough.

      Look at /r/science with 1500 something mods. I understand the rationale but it's utterly absurd that there's no segmentation of authority there.

  14. Reddit is the underbelly of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inhabited by the worst scum the internet has to offer.

    It needs to be wiped and the domain suspended

    1. Re:Reddit is the underbelly of the internet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When have you been banned?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Reddit is the underbelly of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to know where you've already been... because if you think reddit is the worst, you're in for a surprise...

  15. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mate, it's a bipartisan effort. Look at the prison system. Conservative politicians looking to "create jobs" by building more prisons, criminalizing trivial stuff (or keeping it criminalized, ala Jeff Sessions). On the other hand you have people like Bill Clinton expanding the prison system in their own ways. This shit is hardly an exclusively "libtard" problem though.

    My experience on reddit: I was banned from /r/the_donald for questioning Trump's allegiance to the Saudis and Israel, and banned from /r/futurology for suggesting "eat the rich" in response to an article that was about rich people shock-collaring guards to keep them under control as they worked to stop poor people from getting to food supplies in a post-apocalyptic world.

  16. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical evidence that capitalism requires slavery for it to exist.

  17. Reddit is the new Usenet by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reddit is what Usenet was. With a worse interface and images. It also made it impossible to follow a discussion.

    And the majority of groups are not interesting to you. So concentrate on the ones thar are, if you can find them.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Reddit is the new Usenet by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Usenet was only "moderated" with killfiles. That's the big difference.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  18. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You mean like people who moderate Slashdot?

    People want to build communities, for companionship and socializing or for free and open debate in a marketplace of ideas. Both of those things require moderation, and for people who get a lot from those communities it's a reasonable trade to make.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means that the abuse occurred after the Internet escaped academia, but that makes sense due to ignorance being the main motivation of violence.

  20. Harden up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat after me:

    Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will NEVER hurt me.

  21. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    I got someone to pay me to not mute him in a forum. Also, it got me nude pics from girls and a few friends.

  22. Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death threat by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

    Than you obviously aren't a person who uses the internet very often. I think this is one of those trial balloons for an increase in AI censorship.

  23. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you do with the nude pics from friends?

  24. Why do they stay? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Even if I was paid, receiving a death threat with zero backup from above to deal with it is a good reason to quit.

    If I was not even paid, why even wait for backup from above?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Why do they stay? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 0

      Because they don't want to let go of their power. It's quite simple if you try not to overthink it too much.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:Why do they stay? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What power? Since you can only moderate in the way the owner of the board wants, there is no power.

      That kind of power is like riding a raging bull. Sure, everyone's afraid and runs from you, but in the end, nobody gives a shit about you. Everyone's running from the bull.

      And it's also the bull that says where you're going.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Why do they stay? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Yes. To reasonable people like yourself and me, it would seem ridiculous, I agree.
      You're still overthinking it. There are no analogies needed here.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  25. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, nobody ever threatened to kill me. Not even in jest. And yes, I do moderate a few boards. None of them the size (or toxicity) of Reddit, but ... well, pick and choose your battles well would be my advice here...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference is that on Slashdot, all you really do is mod them down. You can still read all the app apps and all the GNAA, not to mention the cosmonaut Golden Girls.

    No idea why anyone would, but you can.

    The information is still there. That's the difference.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. If you're good at something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...never do it for free. Words to live by.

  28. Quit = Problem Solved? by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If i understand correctly, they aren't getting paid, and thus have nothing to lose besides being moderators. Yet, being moderators is valuable enough for them to endure no pay and death threats.

    People desiring the power of a moderator that much, have historically rubbed people the wrong way ie. the kid who helps the teacher enforce rules.

    I am 100% for worker's rights. However, being that they can leave at any time, with zero penalty (other than, you know, not getting to moderate), I struggle to sympathize here. People who crave the ability to exert power over others to the extent that they will endure death threats, for nothing, have issues of their own. It's kind of unsurprising that they evoke strong emotions from those with an equally strong hatred of being controlled. I mean, wars have been fought for less.

    1. Re:Quit = Problem Solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you know they care about the board they are moderating. Quitting would likely put another in place that would crave the power more in a way that others have described. There is something to be said for perseverance.

    2. Re: Quit = Problem Solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      Perseverance in the face of a goal you're trying to achieve, for sure. Being in charge of a chat room on the Internet hardly qualifies.

      That being said, it sort of rings hollow anyway. I think these people are complaining because it's an easy thing to do that will potentially net them more power. Opportunist is right, if it's that bad they should (and would) quit.

  29. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical evidence that capitalism requires slavery for it to exist.

    Um, these people don't have to do this. They are just dumb.

    I'm pretty sure slaves didn't volunteer to pick cotton, dig guano, or anything else slaves have been made to do.

  30. Hah couldn't happen to better people by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    One the abusive nature of Reddit's management is legendary. No surprise the WANNABEES are getting shat upon by the people they fancy as their victims.

    Anyway I'll just observe as long as you want to create a bubble of insanity, you better be prepared to take a lot of abuse doing it, or find true believers stupid enough to take the abuse for you. (Reddit's management strategy)

  31. No sympathy for gauleiters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the second world war they could be found mutely swinging from lamposts.

    1. Re:No sympathy for gauleiters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #godwin

  32. Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by shanen · · Score: 0

    I've spent a while trying to find ANY attractive feature of Reddit. Maybe someone can give me a hint?

    My current theory is that newcomers start out at the bottom of some sort of pit, and they can't actually see what is going on. Looks crazy, but I'm just "playing the game" wrong so I can't get far enough out of the pit to see anything redeeming.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are massively overesitmating the human desire for reasonable discourse and productivity.

      That explains Reddit, among many other things.

    2. Re:Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /r/gonewild and its related subs. NSFW.

    3. Re:Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a fantastic array of amateur porn.

    4. Re:Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      It's just a forum website basically. Good for some niche things like Windows Phone a few years back.

    5. Re:Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by shanen · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the attempted reply, but I think you lost me when you put "Good" in the same sentence with "Windows Phone".

      Maybe it would help if I understood the sense of "forum" you intended in your first sentence? I've noticed that there are supposed to be discussions of some sort, and lots of private areas, and also some kind of one-dimensional reputation metric.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re: Can anyone explain the point of Reddit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      The nice thing about it is There is a really fast feedback cycle. Comment, and within a couple minutes you've gotten feedback.

      I know I took off because I don't like how they run things, but there aren't many places where you can have a conversation that fast paced.

  33. if you're getting death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're getting death threats, then maybe you took that little argument a bit to far. A key thing about responsible web usage is knowing how to choose your battles, and when it's best to step back.

    1. Re:if you're getting death threats by ledow · · Score: 2

      Nice victim-blaming there.

      There are people on the Internet that will issue death threats because they disagree with you - whether or not you enter into any argument whatsoever.

      And it doesn't matter how "controversial" you are. A death threat is a criminal offence. People can, do, have and will go to jail for uttering them in a serious manner.

      "A key thing about responsible web usage" is that it's no different to the real-world, because it is the real-world. And you can no more threaten someone's life online as you can offline.

      Trust me, threaten my life - not in jest - offline and I'll prosecute. Do so online, and it's the same. Especially if you take it anywhere beyond actually just posting a comment (e.g. private messaging, revealing information, chasing, harassment, etc. etc. etc.). Just because it's online doesn't grant you an exception.

      And there's no web-forum-argument in the world that's justifiable of a death-threat, the same way that there's no web-forum-argument in the world worth going to jail for, or living in fear of death threats of.

      I have a friends who's a children's author. He's received death-threats because he posted a political comment that wasn't in any way offensive. He's had actual death-threats, over involved and proloned conversations (including literal offers of meeting him at the airport when he flies to an announced meeting to kill him, including threats of gun use) because he was mildly sexist in jest in a tweet.

      Sorry, but the world's full of nutters. We can no more live in fear of saying something that might offend them in case they make a death threat than we can allow people who make death threats to say "Oh, it's just a joke", or "oh, that happens online, just deal with it".

    2. Re:if you're getting death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I find it strange that some people manage to get death threats and some of us do not. I've basically lived my life online since 1995, through IRC, MUDs, BBS, 20-30 forums, numerous online games in a wast specter of genres. In some of these I have been purely an user, but in a huge number of these I've been a mod/op. I have never, ever, to this date, received a death threat. Never. It has not happened. I have never been threatened with violence. I've been called names, people have bragged about humping my mother and stuff like that though.

      Maybe some people aren't just victims, but behave in ways that makes them more prevalent receivers of abuse? it could also be that some of us shut shit down, before online abusers get the chance to go that far. It could be numerous effects in play here. Why is victim blaming your knee jerk reaction?

    3. Re:if you're getting death threats by ledow · · Score: 1

      I admin game servers, moderate forums, write articles, etc.

      I have received such things. I treat them as the worthless, uninformed, non-threat that they are (it's not like they even know who I am, thus not a threat to me).

      But that doesn't mean I invited them or even, in some cases, was even part of the dialog that led to them until people were asked to moderate their tone, leave, etc.

      "but behave in ways that makes them more prevalent receivers of abuse?"

      Abuse is very different to a death threat. Abuse begats abuse in many cases. It's unlikely they are a moderator for a platform for long if they are the cause or incitement of such abuse. But a death threat isn't justified, no matter what. Honestly, there is no wording of a single statement in law that can justify retaliating with a death threat, even a death threat itself.

      Hence why this is victim-blaming. Maybe the victim said something nasty which incited it? Still a death-threat. Maybe they were being a prick? Still a death-threat. Maybe the victim was literally threatening to beat people up? Still a death-threat. Describing them as somehow "inciting" the abuse because of the way they deal with a situation? Maybe that's a reason to question their skills as a moderator, or blame them for inciting larger arguments or trolling, but it's not a reason to blame them for receiving death-threats.

      Hey, I once had a guy threaten to do all kinds of things to me "because I banned his friend, who only cheated once!". Literally nothing to do with him, and he went from server to server of mine yelling and threatening until I just banned his ID globally from all my servers.

      Sure, I'm thick-skinned and know that he wasn't a serious threat, not least because he wouldn't know who I was anyway. But if I had credible belief that he would know who I was and continued to make those threats... police action (even though I know it would just be recorded and not much else).

      Victim-blaming is precisely what "Well maybe they did something to prompt a death prompt" is.

    4. Re:if you're getting death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a death threat is a death threat. You said that already - how insightful! The point is, someone who has been in the game for more than twenty years - magically has avoided this? How? Why? That's not victim blaming, I'm asking specifically how I (and I know many more from my community) who has been able to avoid these types of situations for more than twenty years, despite being extremely active online, i "countless" fora.

      Telling someone it's easier for thieves to enter your house, if you do not lock your door or close your windows is probably victim blaming in your eyes, right?

    5. Re:if you're getting death threats by ledow · · Score: 1

      I've never been burgled in my life.

      How? How have I magically avoided this? How? I'm asking specifically how I avoided that, despite living between neighbours who were both burgled and in high-burglary areas, and not having advanced security systems, how?

      Yeah, it's my neighbour's fault that someone sneaked round the back, smashed the door in, and stole things, running off before anything could be done. It's the other neighbour's fault that someone forced their way into their house, threatened a teenaged girl and stole jewellery.

      It's all their fault for not having advanced security systems, not keeping weapons, not training themselves in the martial arts... right?

      You've been lucky (no threats). I've been lucky (by only having received threats that were never credible). When we're not lucky, does that make it not a death threat? Does that make it our fault? Do you think that someone who's stupid enough to make a death-threat on a public forum is actually applying rational logic to who they threaten and why? Do you think that because you get into a heated argument, you're "inviting" death threats?

      P.S. Go ask females that you know how many times they've been threatened with violence where they had done nothing to "deserve" that... In my experience it's almost every one, whether it's because they turned down someone's advances, didn't want to be groped in a club, or were raped (1/3rd of all women). A death-threat doesn't require some impetus to be issued from the people stupid enough to issue them.

      And no amount of "polite" appeasing behaviour stops them. You've been lucky. Go ask your local A&E (Casualty / ER) staff how many death threats they've had, and they're just literally trying to help people as a career. A paramedic. A firefighter. Front-line customer service staff.

      You're saying that the victim is doing something "wrong" that somehow incites people to threaten them, where you don't do that thing. Then drawing the line as "victim therefore does something that causes someone to issue death threat", rather than "guy who issues death threat is the problem".

      I could walk up to you in the street and swear and shout at you. A death threat, in that context, is still unjustified, uncalled-for, disproportionate, illegal and arrestable.

      The problem is "people who issue death threats". Whether they claim that's because you're the wrong religion, because you insulted Mohammed by drawing a cartoon, because you "look funny", because you're gay, because you support the wrong team, because you like Donald Trump, because you're different somehow, or whatever - it does not mean that you should be blamed for those things leading to a death threat. Those things are NOT ENOUGH to justify a death threat. Because pretty much nothing is. That's it.

      As such, the person on the receiving end of a death-threat because they do those things... is being blamed as the victim. And they are the victim - because it's a crime to utter a death threat. But it's not a crime to be rude to people, kick them out a game, block them from being on a website, etc. etc. etc.

      "He swore at me so I hit him" is the essence of this. One of you committed a criminal act. Hence is a victim. And no amount of incitement, in law, justifies a death threat.

      It's INCREDIBLY worrying that you don't get this. Your behaviour, attitude, or approach has *nothing* to do with whether you received a death threat or not. Statistics did. Similarly, your behaviour, attitude or approach also has ZERO relevance to any issuance of a death-threat - you could call the guy the worst names in the worse and harass him to the end of the earth, and do all sorts of shit. And it still doesn't justify receiving a death threat from him.

    6. Re:if you're getting death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have not learned to not answer questions with questions and false equivalencies? Then we are done here.

      I'm not saying the victims are doing something wrong, I'm saying I'm doing something right, that they are NOT doing. You don't seem to understand the difference. It's almost like you don't understand that the aggressor is always to blame. In every instance. The victim is never to BLAME for being victimized. However, despite accepting that the aggressor is always to blame, there is some ways to avoid being victimized.

      I mean, if you walk through the favela in Brazil with expensive cameras, using 100-dollar bills as a fan, or walk through a part of town where there is high density of members of "The Bloods" with signs saying "The Bloods are pussies", it will always be those who rob, beat or kill you that are doing the wrong thing - but you didn't exactly help the situation. But you don't seem to understand this concept. You are not willing to look for reasons why things happen, you just keep believing it's due to luck. That's just fine, because that means you will be victimized, rather than me. Go ahead, be the easy victim. You see, that's very much what this is about in your examples.

      Being robbed or pick-pocketed? It's the thieves that are wrong. Obviously, you shouldn't be stealing. However, situational awareness will go a long way, to prevent that stuff from happening.

      I don't get into heated arguments. I sniff out people like that and use the tools available to me, to avoid them from contacting me. I don't answer spam emails either, but you probably do. It's not your fault that the Nigerian prince who is going to give you 2 trillion dollars, aren't real. Right? There was nothing you could do to prevent being scammed? Right? Yeah, that's not how the real world works. Yes, the scammers are criminals, but wake up and smell the coffee. Scammers are real! Don't give them your hard earned cash!

      You keep arguing that death-threats are illegal. Yes, no one is arguing that. That point is mute. Just like breaking and entering is. That does not mean you have to HELP the thieves by placing a sign in your window saying: "HEY! I'm on vacation for two weeks, just received ten thousand dollars in cash, that is stored in my pillow! By the way, I keep the back door open!"

      These concepts aren't difficult to understand. I'm just wondering if it's ability or will to understand that's keeping you.

  34. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by weilawei · · Score: 2

    Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    This is the root of why I stick around. Anyone can (and does) say anything here. I am free to read it all and make my own decision on who's an idiot and who I want to talk to.

  35. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you must be so obtuse that getting a death threat feels like someone sent you flowers.

    Also, I'll kill you for your blissful ignorance ! die die die, you capitalist commie infidel nazi chicken!!

    passphare === 'hearing'

  36. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was like the Fapocalypse.

  37. I can attest to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After endless instances of being exposed to terrible moderators on Reddit, over and over for years, I finally got fed up, and decided it was payback time.

    I managed to get hold of a subreddit with an inactive moderator, for a topic that I really don't like. But that has its fans. Let's call it: Anime.

    The rules are now ridiculous. The fundamental purpose is to post critical statements about Anime. A combination of obscure weasel words with a catch-all "exceptions will be made when deemed in the interest of the sub". Anyone can post anything at all negative about Anime, but posts positive about Anime must be balanced, fair, use reliable sources, fully take into account the argument responded to. And not contradict the fundamental purpose of the sub which is to be critical of Anime.

    Bans are liberally handed out for 6 months, but subject to appeal. People are auto-muted until the 6-month date. I haven't had anyone appeal after 6 months yet, but if they do I'll just say their appeal is denied.

    Needless to say, there is a steady stream of enraged redditors.

    Feelsgoodman

    1. Re:I can attest to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      After endless instances of being exposed to terrible moderators on Reddit, over and over for years, I finally got fed up, and decided it was payback time.

      I managed to get hold of a subreddit with an inactive moderator, for a topic that I really don't like. But that has its fans. Let's call it: Anime.

      The rules are now ridiculous. The fundamental purpose is to post critical statements about Anime. A combination of obscure weasel words with a catch-all "exceptions will be made when deemed in the interest of the sub". Anyone can post anything at all negative about Anime, but posts positive about Anime must be balanced, fair, use reliable sources, fully take into account the argument responded to. And not contradict the fundamental purpose of the sub which is to be critical of Anime.

      Bans are liberally handed out for 6 months, but subject to appeal. People are auto-muted until the 6-month date. I haven't had anyone appeal after 6 months yet, but if they do I'll just say their appeal is denied.

      Needless to say, there is a steady stream of enraged redditors.

      Feelsgoodman

      Awesome! Do you have any more stories about shit that obviously didn't happen?

    2. Re:I can attest to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After endless instances of being exposed to terrible moderators on Reddit, over and over for years, I finally got fed up, and decided it was payback time.

      I managed to get hold of a subreddit with an inactive moderator, for a topic that I really don't like. But that has its fans. Let's call it: Anime.

      The rules are now ridiculous. The fundamental purpose is to post critical statements about Anime. A combination of obscure weasel words with a catch-all "exceptions will be made when deemed in the interest of the sub". Anyone can post anything at all negative about Anime, but posts positive about Anime must be balanced, fair, use reliable sources, fully take into account the argument responded to. And not contradict the fundamental purpose of the sub which is to be critical of Anime.

      Bans are liberally handed out for 6 months, but subject to appeal. People are auto-muted until the 6-month date. I haven't had anyone appeal after 6 months yet, but if they do I'll just say their appeal is denied.

      Needless to say, there is a steady stream of enraged redditors.

      Feelsgoodman

      Awesome! Do you have any more stories about shit that obviously didn't happen?

      Thanks for illustrating my point, dipshit. It's precisely this level of shitty, worthless trash that infests Reddit and exemplifies the level there.

      For anyone who doesn't know Reddit: there is nothing remotely implausible about what I have written. You get subreddits through /r/redditrequest. If you are lucky and do well, you will find one with a widely known name and a single suspended or inactive moderator. That's really the only marginally difficult step.

      Once that is done, all the rest of what I wrote is obvious. Effortless, cost-free, no problems to do at all.

      So why the shitty and worthless "shit that obviously didn't happen"? Why would you even go on the internet, read something that very obviously could easily happen, and just throw out a "THAT SHIT OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T HAPPEN" for no good reason?

      That's really the level of antihumanity now. A shitty, putrid pond of worthless shit, some rotten blob of flesh in a skin suit, at once completely clueless and complete certain in its utter idiocy. Nothing of value, no humanity, nothing that can contribute in any positive way to the world. Literally Reddit, literally something that grows on Reddit.

      Oh yeah, because I actually care about making correct statements: https://i.imgur.com/3IKnv9c.png

    3. Re:I can attest to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and to add to that:

      Reddit makes stupid people feel they are correct. So correct that they can throw out anything that sounds good in the moment, and it's effectively for all practical purposes treated as correct. After they have sought out the right communities, they will just throw out something that sounds good and get upvotes. Any dissent is downvoted, hidden away, for all practical purposes irrelevant and nonexistent. Pander to the crowd and you will get a gold star - preferably pander with something bold and harsh or aggressive because the crowd loves that.

      A machine that trains people to feel that being correct doesn't matter, only being popular, having the right crowd and dropping the right snappy oneliner.

  38. Europe... by DrYak · · Score: 1, Troll

    These days when n'erdowells make a death threat, their method of implementation is called SWATing, and no kind of weapon helps here, since they're relying on panicking law enforcement with a fake call.

    You know, there still exist some countries, where the police hasn't felt the need to turn themselves into some kind of military branch.

    And as long as you're not actively shooting at police, it will never cross their mind to take out their weapons.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Europe... by butchersong · · Score: 2

      I know Europe is a wonderland of homogeneity safety but even so, the entire point of SWATing is to create a high tension situation where the police have been told there is an active shooter.

    2. Re:Europe... by nasch · · Score: 1

      And as long as you're not actively shooting at police, it will never cross their mind to take out their weapons.

      You're still describing those non-US countries, right?

    3. Re: Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      The US has a unique viewpoint on guns as a solution to problems. I don't know exactly how it came about, but the way it's ingrained in people is such that the US has more school shootings annually than the rest of the world combined.

      I can't help but think it's that same viewpoint that makes swatting a uniquely effective form of murder in the US. Make a false allegation and suddenly the cops are on high alert with guns drawn.

      It isn't the guns themselves, it's the idea that guns are a solution to your problems.

  39. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will kill you in cold blood, I am repulsed by people who never get any death threats.

  40. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Also, I'll kill you for your blissful ignorance ! die die die, you capitalist commie infidel nazi chicken!!

    Put your labels on the pile back in the corner, I'll ignore later.

    Maybe it does help to not take death threats serious. Like, well, pretty much everything else on the internet.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    C'mon, say it like you mean it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Walk Away. Just walk away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're putting in your time day after day FOR FREE and it is having a toll on your mental health just walk away. Holy Shit, if someone worked at a somewhat well-paying job and was subjected to a toxic work environment like this, they would usually start thinking about looking for a new job. WALK AWAY. It's not your responsibility to "save" reddit especially since you're not getting paid for it.

  43. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is one of those trial balloons for an increase in AI censorship.

    I think it's more of a case that self entitled little shits need to grow up and act like adults instead of throwing hissy fits and sending death threats just because someone else doesn't share their POV.

  44. Rules of The Internet by James+McGuigan · · Score: 2

    8. There are no real rules about posting
    9. There are no real rules about moderation either - enjoy your ban

  45. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have to jump in here.

    > It's the power and control they get from being moderators. Some people deal with this good feeling by becoming politicians.

    I know it's all the rage to dump on politicians. But there are so many, many problems with where things are headed.

    For example? Can in imagine if you're an *honest* politician? And one that just wants to solve a few problems, wants to generally 'fix' something they see broken? Not in it for the power, or money, but honestly just want to make things better.

    Sure it's somewhat selfish in the end, because they want to make it better for their family, their friends, their community. But that's the sort of selfish we want!

    So you have a TV interview. Or, say something on twitter. Welp. Everything is completely distorted out of context, quotes are taken and slapped together with other quotes, the list goes on. If you tell the truth? It will be distorted, taken out of context, and if you discuss something for an hour? They'll take a 4 second quote and slap it on the air.

    Things I remember a Prime Minster I *didn't even like*, but couldn't believe he was being harassed for:

    - he wore a sweater, and was mocked because it looked a little off
    - he shook his son's hand one day, when he left for school -- everyone called him a cold, calculating bastard because he didn't hug his son (I didn't want hugs from my dad when 10!)
    - his hair was too neat (boy, he sure must use a lot of hair spray!!)
    - his smile is a little funny, he must be a psycho

    I could list a 100 of these. What. The. Fuck.

    How about people actually commenting on policy?

    But no you become a politician, and every single aspect of your life is examined. People think death threats on the internet are bad? Well I wonder what sort of vile crap gets thrown your way, if you're a politician? I'm sure death threats would almost be preferable to some comments sent via no-return address letters, or phone calls, or whatever.

    Yet, let's say you put up with all that. The threats, the vile spew coming out of people's mouths, the criticism for the smallest things, and hell -- even being criticized for doing what you said you'd do in campaign speeches?

    Well, you put up with all that -- and you STILL get no-where often with the things you WANT to genuinely help with.

    And then everyone dumps on you. Again. Because the opposition and sometimes even your own party works against you.

    I don't know. I'd have to say that being an honest, open, caring politician is the worst job on the planet.

    And this is what disturbs me. Because all day long, every day, I see little cracks like the one you made about politicians. I see them regarded as scum. I see what they do equated to a waste of time. I see them assumed as thieves, assholes, pricks -- when people aren't even aware of the person behind the office, nor of what they've done -- good or bad.

    If people want things to REALLY turn around, then people need to create an environment where an honest, caring, loving GRANDMOTHER would be happy being a politician.

    Why?

    Because -- if only scum can stand the job, wtf!

  46. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    So many people are willing to do a job for a web site (in this case reddit) and not get paid for it. Suckers.

    Some of us are volunteer distributors of insults. It's an enjoyable pastime. We get paid by the joy in our hearts of calling silly people silly people. And you are quite a silly people.

  47. Very well paid moderators: 'owned' subreddits by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know from personal experience that, for one example, the AlbionOnline (MMO game) subreddit is controlled and operated by employees of Sandbox Interactive, the company that makes and sells the game. They quash any meaningful criticism of the game in the Reddit forums.

    So that is an example of heavy bias in a Reddit forum where the mods are quite well paid for their effort.

  48. Deal, change or leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderators have three options :

    - deal, which they don't want to
    - change, or attempt to change
    - leave

    As they're unpaid moderators - for what, in my *entirely* subjective opinion, are sub reddits that won't be changing the world or anyone's life - they need to STFU and leave, get on with their lives.

    You could argue that Wikipedia has in the small, and large, changed access to *information* for the better. I have a hard time seeing that for reddit. I for one, like Slashdot mods, as it does a decent job of eventually surfacing insightful posts. Do the reddit moderators allow multiple voices like Slashdot?

  49. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    I got someone to pay me to not mute him in a forum. Also, it got me nude pics from girls and a few friends.

    So that's why the TLAs are hording all the porn.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  50. It's a strange and beautiful world by UnixUnix · · Score: 2

    There are people who threaten mods, there are mods who abuse their power, and luckily there are also quite a few people with a sense of humor, e.g. see comments in https://www.reddit.com/r/video...

    1. Re:It's a strange and beautiful world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and there is the CEO, the only true winner in any of this, laughing all the way to the bank.

  51. Reddit is a sewer. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    I bailed when a mildly technical post I made with regards to fan nozzles for cooling prints in 3D printers generated a lot of insults and animosity. There were plenty of good people asking useful questions, but too many "my dad designed jet engines for Boeing and he said that what you're saying is impossible" childishness and name calling.

  52. Just a tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help thinking that death threats are probably a tool of the Russian troll factories, trying to target good mods to let shitty mods take control.

  53. Soros pays many of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soros and his affiliates pay a large number of the moderators (and posters) on Reddit. Maybe they should ask him for a raise and promise to be even more biased and loyal to his agenda.

  54. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I've read the opinion that anyone who wants to be a moderator should never be allowed to be one.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  55. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by HoodCrowd · · Score: 1

    I have been banned from most front page sureddits over little to nothing. I just walk on, but, I can see where someone would go bananas and take it personally. The mods ban anyone on a drop of any reason.

  56. So ... don't do it? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you are choosing to moderate these forums.

    And unlike most things we choose to get outraged about, you don't have to do it to eat (since they don't pay you anything).

    I get that it sucks and all, but ... you know, just stop doing it?

    1. Re:So ... don't do it? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Internet companies became convinced that their users should experience a sense of "community." The thing they didn't think about was that a sense of community comes along with a sense of ownership. So instead of just moving on, your community criticizes you for ruining "their" message board / site / game / whatever.

  57. Mods are unhappy human beings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reddit mods are pretty narcissistic power mongers, I don't doubt that gets tiresome after a while. I'm sure most of them are just really unhappy with the person they've become not Reddit. Source: I have been banned from 12 sub reddits.

  58. Working for free? by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

    I guess those folks who spend multiple hours working for free don't value their time much. It's one thing to volunteer at the local animal shelter, for example, but what actually does Reddit contribute to society?

    1. Re:Working for free? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      They're not volunteering for Reddit. Reddit themself doesn't offer moderation services for communities unless global rules are violated --- you can pretty much write anything you want, even junk nobody wants to see. These moderators are members of a Reddit subcommunity who either (A) Created the Community or "SubReddit", Or (B) Were appointed by the creator of the SubReddit, usually after Volunteering to help create more "Catered" content by enforcing that community's rules/standards on posters ---- such as removing Offtopic or low-quality spammy posts such as "Meme pics"/stupid jokes outside a Meme community.

      If the people who have volunteered regularly read and post that Sub, then they are helping out both the community and themselves by helping to keep the spammers out ---- ultimately without the community-specific moderation: spam would lower the quality of everybody's experience, including that of the moderators.

      There are MANY of users active on any given major community other than the moderators who may spend a lot of time reading and posting, that could very easily take on moderation as an extra side-task while reading ---- And if a current moderator feels "abused", to the extent that the abuse outweighs the benefits they get from moderating (Like helping keeping the community active and interesting for everyone INCLUDING themself), then they can always resign their moderator position. Usually there would be PLENTY of people willing to take a moderator position to help delete crap and ban deliberate extreme violators and repeat rulebreakers -- perhaps letting one resign and adding 4 in different timezones to replace them would be a viable strategy, and reduce the per-person workload.

  59. Maybe we need a public fund to sue by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that death threats are a criminal offense, so we should be be prosecuting those individuals. I assume the moderators haven't the time to spend or the knowledge to pursue that, and I am not sure the local police would know what to do. But stopping this kind of behavior would pay probably have a positive payback because it would curb future abuses. Reddit should be helping out with that.

  60. So don't do it by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Keeping the front page of the internet clean has become a thankless and abusive task, and yet Reddit's administration has repeatedly neglected to respond to moderators who report offenses.

    Umm, then don't do it. If it really is that odious a task and you aren't being paid then feel free to do something else. If you continue to do it then it must not be all that bad. The nice thing about being a volunteer is that you can quite any time without any personal consequences. I assure you that the world will go on if Reddit moderators start quitting.

  61. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I always thought, if I was going to go cannibal, I would EXCLUSIVELY eat the rich. They would be the equivelant of those ducks force fed a high quality diet so their livers are extra delicious.

    Think about, rich people would taste like all the rich stuff they've been eating, they would be the most seasoned meat on planet earth. A delicacy!

  62. Reddit is an autistic faggotzone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those unpaid moderators who devote their time are asperg shut-ins who have no commitments beyond picking up their next welfare check. The sputtering, repetitive nature of their own shitbrain is a perfect match with the hypersensitive anime faggot atmosphere of reddit, and thus no remuneration is necessary. The highest reward for these bitchmade autists is a special 16x16 block of pixels that identifies them as a no-life piece of shit who feeds their OCD by playing "moderator" on the Internet, which is likely to be the peak accomplishment of their useless, undesirable existence -- or at least it must seem that way to all the lonely trash that reddit attracts, with years of life to burn typing "LITERALLY" and "THIS" over and over.

  63. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by atomicalgebra · · Score: 1

    A lot of moderators are people who enjoy exercising power against others. That is why they become moderators. That tiny bit of power gives their meaningless lives purpose and joy. Recently I got banned from an energy sub because I replied to someone calling me an idiot. I replied with a citation and called him an idiot back. I was immediately banned for life.

  64. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    This.
    I got booted from a thread, with a nastygram from the mods about 'here's where you send any appeal to your ban'. Sent email asking what post comment had resulted in this ban... got banned from ANY communication on reddit for 30d for 'harrassment'.

    It's a cesspool.

    These people are doing this for the epeen and (putative) power of being mods. If they don't like the consequences of being head shit-thrower in the shit-thrower zoo, walk the fuck away.

    --
    -Styopa
  65. Asked to moderate forums and google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but not for pay.

    No thanks.

    Plus they expect moderators to be respectful and helpful. I just couldn't commit to those stipulations. They had a code of contact that wouldn't allow a snarky reply on their forums. After helping someone for 3 days, you'd think that telling them to RTFM or use google would be allowed.

    Google sent an automatic note after I'd posted 3 questions to a chromebook support forum - which was useless, their support. The person asking the question doesn't get to pick the best answer. What bullshit. I needed to create an SDHC card with the OS loader for my chromebook, but do it from Linux. This is supported, explicitly, but the moderation team saw "linux" and said it wasn't supported. I provided a link to the google.com site where I got the script, but wasn't able to understand that searching for the correct build required using some "code name" for the device. Searching by "Toshiba" didn't work - zero results. After 10 days, I finally discovered that "gandof" was the code name I was supposed to know. More Google bullshit. Every chromebook has a different code name. To reload the OS, you have to know it.

    There was a hint that a t-shirt might be available if I did sufficient helping. Oh boy. I didn't choose to join the google support team either, BTW.

  66. Moderators have always been abused by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't really see the complaint here, you know what you are getting when you become a moderator. And even if you didn't you can just stop any time, as noted you are a volunteer and not being paid so why not quit if you cannot take it? There's always someone with more fervor for the job to take over that role.

    I moderate a photography board and have received death threats before. So what? You get all kinds of creepy losers on the internet who can say anything.

    If you can't handle the worst of the internet you probably should just stop moderating. Just laugh at the poor idiots whose lives suck so badly they send death threats over the internet.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. If volunteering is unpleasant, just quit. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

    Just walk away.

    Many of the major tech sites are built around profiting from user-generated content (and the users themselves). If you volunteer your time to generate content or moderate, you're fueling their business at your expense. The easy solution is to stop posting cat videos, stop moderating someone else's site and limit social media use.

    (And, yes, the irony of this comment is that Slashdot is profiting from this user-generated thread).

  68. Something is missing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why moderate at all if it's so horrible?
    Why would anyone who is n00b enough to be bothered by internet threats be deemed mod material?
    More likely these people moderate because they like power and dislike the current system because they have to defer to paid overlords. They're probably used to kissing up to the right clique and then becoming boss. It astounds me when I recognize a name from the days of 4chan and 7chan and now see that they're moderators somewhere brand new 10 years later.
    They usually claim that it's a special skill and they need experienced people but I have seen little proof of this.
    Longtime moderators who can't code. Longtime moderators who defend posting borderline cp content, moderators who throw temper tantrums or have bad attitudes.
    Must be a rare breed of man who can follow ban guidelines and delete content that could shut the board down.

  69. Know what you're getting into by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Lots of folks sign up to be moderators not really understanding what it means to be one. They don't quite understand that using that power to silence others ( legitimate or otherwise ) comes with drawbacks. . .

    You're effectively a human firewall catching and filtering out all the bad shit coming in from the net. The very nature of the job is going to generate a lot of hate for those doing it right.

    A quote from Batman sums it up pretty well:

    " Come on, Harvey. You're Gotham's D.A. If you're not getting shot at, then you're not doing your job right. "

  70. Interesting that /. user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting that /. user "Dallas May", who said the following only 2 articles prior to this one, is nowhere to be found in the comments of this article.

    Dallas May ( 4891515 ) on Monday September 03, 2018 @09:55PM (#57248370)

    Facebook, twitter, etc should all (voluntarily) require all users to complete an identity verification process, and then real names should be used as handles.

    If you aren't anonymous, then you are far less likely to be a jerk.

    Perhaps because this article pokes a big hole in the anti-anonymity argument.

    "I've had a few death threats," said Emily, who asked to be referred to by her first name and her Reddit username, lolihull, to prevent the online harassment from spilling over into her real life.

    Furthermore, there are plenty of people who are "bad" (ie. full blown criminal) in real life when witnesses (sometimes even police who will strike them down on the spot) and cameras are present and paying attention and accountability is 100%. Those "bad" people don't let a lack of anonymity hold them back, now do they.

    It must be so hard to be an agenda-pushing authoritarian when your feel-good solutions to made-up/overblown internet "problems" such as online jerks can be shown to be so much more chilling than said "problems". If only they could look in the mirror and regain some humanity... or at the very least see themselves victim of their own evil ideas and back down before it's too late.

    captcha: insight

  71. An echo chamber by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    The reason reddit is so popular because it is a confirmation bias wonderland for people who are not very bright and that is most of our species. So reddit is a wonderland of egoboost for the none too bright and uninformed. It's just 100% drama generating machine between the informed, uninformed, young and old and it has to do with the karma and moderation system. Reddit is just one monkey ego war where opinions no matter how dumb are fought and defended by drive by upvoting and downvoting of whatever subgroup is most dominant on the sub unfortunately for our species .

    This is what I have observed: Reddit is class warfare. The unhappy, alienated, lost, etc. have found a site where they can make reality appear as they want it to be, instead of how it is, and have others confirm their bias as positive. It produces truly toxic, badly-behaved users.

    Reddit moderators are tasked with enforcing unpopular, biased, and vaguely written rules. For example, if someone gets killed in an article and you reply, "Good job," you are guilty of inciting or glorifying violence. If the moderators do not ban you, their sub gets banned, and all the work they put into it goes out the window.

    This is why some have suggested unionizing Reddit moderators. While generally I oppose unions, moderators deserve (1) some compensation and (2) some kind of official appeals process to protect their hard work.

    1. Re: An echo chamber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      Chatting online is a hobby. Moderating is a hobby. If you don't want to do either, then don't. Saying that your hobby is hard and you want to be paid for it smacks of entitlement.

  72. Not really by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    This is perhaps true, but at the same time this describes most of the conversations on the internet between strangers.

    I do not share this bleak goal of humanity. I have pleasant and informative conversations across the net, but find that Reddit and Twitter are somehow the least likely to convey that experience.

    Something tells me that any site which attracts people looking for power which they should not have, sort of like shouting FIRE! in a theater, will bring out the absolute worst in humanity.

  73. A toxic mentality by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    It's the reddit equivalent of "shouting down" dissent. If they don't like what you are saying, they will try to silence you by any means necessary.

    That is essential to maintaining the echo chamber.

    The point of downvotes is to let the group exclude any troubling reality that peeks into their safe space.

    We might consider it the ultimate extension of democracy, where you vote for what you believe will benefit you best at the expense of the group, truth, and civilization.

  74. Massive polarization by alternative_right · · Score: 2, Informative

    I like to learn things, and have my opinions challenged in a constructive way. Reddit sucks for that.

    It presages the American political landscape in 2018 where if you are not with Blue Team, you are assumed to be Red Team and that's the end of the story: they will censor you, exclude you, defame you, and try to get you fired from your job, depending on level of dissent.

    The problem with Reddit is the users. Having seen them transplanted to other sites where they immediately begin calling for censorship and violence, I think it is something inherent to that group which makes them so hair-trigger and doctrinaire.

    This might explain why they are so quick to make death threats.

    1. Re: Massive polarization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      That's a good point about some redditors. I don't believe it works as a perfect generalization, but I've seen a few groups within Reddit who really want everything to be super locked down.

  75. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Came to say the same thing. I say all sorts of wild shit online, and I don't believe anyone has ever actually threatened to kill me. People have (hilariously) threatened to beat me up. But not kill me. Sometimes people say shit like KYS but that's not a threat. Real death threats should be taken seriously I say.

  76. My experience is similar by alternative_right · · Score: 2

    You can't have genuine discussion when people are fighting for internet points like at reddit, the difference between reddit and actual forums is the element of psychological attacks via upvote downvote button and mod censorship. For instance, you go against the group mind of a given reddit even though you are posting civil rational discussion you will often find your posts deleted for "not being civil" is code for : Mods don't like your point of view.

    The worst part is just mods censoring everything they don't agree with willynilly, it's nothing like slashdot. Slashdot has it's own problems, but reddit is an alternate reality where cretins mod and high five other cretins in a mutual circlejerk to such an extent where finding actual truthful information becomes an exorcise in pointlessness.

    All of these ring true. The people who get selected mods at Reddit are those who do not offend the hive mind. I like the "alternate reality" description. The worst part is that, in a community with that many toxic users, if you do not start out as a censor, being a mod for a few weeks will do it to you.

  77. Translation by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is just the same as reddit in that regard, but with more power given to the right in comparison to reddit.

    You mean, the Right is not actually censored with double-standards and a dogmatic admin team?

    1. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll kill you!

      People on both the left and the right get up in arms because their pet subreddit did or did not get banned. Somewhere with so many partisans is going to be a problem because even the complaints have an ulterior motive.

      Hate to say, might be the case in this story. They're saying "we get abused". They're really saying "give us more powers"

  78. Persecution mania by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Reddit can be very helpful for 'you and me against the world' type of groups where you can talk with people sharing the same problems.

    This might not be a helpful mentality outside of those sharing those same problems.

  79. Death "threats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much of this is people defining "death threats" extremely loosely?

    e.g. I was once accused of making a "death threat" by requesting that somebody take a long walk off of a short pier. The problem is, there was absolutely no THREAT involved. I never said that I was going to make them do it, but merely saying that I think they should do so.

    Sort of like "school shootings" which are often highly mischaracterized (a drug deal gone bad half a block away from a school is often called a "school shooting" nowadays), as demonstrated by the recent NPR report.

  80. Once a cesspool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once a cesspool, always a cesspool. Sometimes the cesspool even gets deeper; just look at /..

  81. ooga booga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You your family and friends are going to dye.

  82. What makes you think we wouldn't? by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    It's easy to assume that everyone in meatspace is going to play nice, but reddit puts psychopaths in unaccountable positions of power over what millions of people can think.

    Guess what? Not all of us are OK with that. If you put many kinds of people in the same room, you're going to get a fight. And for some of us, that includes reddit mods.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  83. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by HeckRuler · · Score: 0

    For example? Can in imagine if you're an *honest* politician? And one that just wants to solve a few problems, wants to generally 'fix' something they see broken? Not in it for the power, or money, but honestly just want to make things better.

    Yes. I can imagine. I think most politicians are trying to do good. Most even, are trying to do good for people other than themselves. Even those nutjobs that want women to be second class citizens, to ban contraceptives, to ban alchohol, to ban rock'n'roll, and to put scripture into the lawbooks. They just want to do good because they see a bunch of stuff that's broken, and they want to fix it. Unfortunetely, their definition of "broken" doesn't quite line up with mine, and their ideas about how to fix it is absolute nightmare fuel and I disagree with them on the best way forward. Hardly any of them are actually EVIL.

    GRANDMOTHER would be happy being a politician.

    That's a weird bit of ageism. But anyway, we tried that. Hilary is a grandmother. So was Margaret Thatcher.

    You overall argument is that we should be kind to politicians. While I agree that the personal attacks are pointless (distracting even), we should MOST ASSUREDLY give politicians a hard time and be skeptical as hell of anything they're pushing. Even if society at large kept all commentary to the issues (pft, good luck with that), then it would still be a stressful job and rightly so. Because we should definitely NOT trust these people.

    But go on, give me a couple of names of "open, honest, caring" politicians. I imagine they exist, but I doubt they're in any place of power.

  84. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    I too, have read Hitchhiker's Guide.

  85. The information is still there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that makes all the difference.

    All moderator abuse that I've encountered seems to be motivated by the dictionary definition of bigotry: intolerance of other points of view. They extend this intolerance even to supporting information.

    It's censorship, pure and simple. It is the enemy of free and open discussion.

  86. Similar situation on other websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get death threats almost every time I post anything on 4chan and they also call me a faggot. We need to do something about this as a society.

  87. Work for Free, Quit for Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a moderator voluntarily, then you can quit voluntarily. Nobody is making you work. Last I checked, these moderators aren't chained to their desks and forced to work for Reddit.

  88. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong,

    Comments do get erased here on slashdot by your moderators/overseers/...

    passphrase === 'southern'

  89. Re:Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it seems like the original comment got removed.
    Since it was written as A/C

    guess who did the removing.

    it's clear you're free to say what you want, as long as you stick to the company directive.

    welcome the the fascist anti fascist states of turderica, you arrogant ignorant geek.

    also, thanks for quoting. at least some of it remains.

  90. commenting to remove mod by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    Whoops

  91. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've observed the opposite, that the moderators rarely ban even blatant rule violators. I imagine it varies with the moderator.

  92. Re: Never understood why people want to be moderat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citizens trashed Herr Harper over his sweater because of his government's scrofulous policies and behaviour. Shame he and his cronies didn't allow meaningful input where it mattered.

  93. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by nasch · · Score: 1

    It got you a few friends, and nude pics from girls? Or it got you nude pics from girls, and nude pics from a few friends?

  94. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by nasch · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should be in this thread:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskRe...

  95. Real simple solution... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Pass a law saying that if you can prove someone made a death threat against you, you can have a contract put out on them without penalty - think of it as preemptive self defense. I think it would put an end to this death threat horseshit really fast.

    --
    That is all.
  96. Dirty redditors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many reddit moderators does it take to change a lightbulb?
    "I'M LOCKING THIS THREAD BECAUSE I'M A LITTLE BITCH T.T"

    Redditors need to learn they don't own their subs, or even their accounts. They only license them. When you look at things like r/subredditcancer or r/lgbt or r/creepypms you see that a lot of redditors will justify, endorse, condone, and even perform abusive actions. One mod on r/creepypms was actually defending an OP who committed extortion against someone who sent a dick pic, saying "OP IS NOT ON TRIAL HERE!".

  97. Re: Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll kill you! (Cross that one off your bucket list!)

    The other key point is the size of the community. If you have 30 users, odds are you won't have any room for nutjobs who make threats. 3000 users, you might have a problem with one or two users. Start talking about 30 million users, and there's thousands of bad actors. Is it a toxic place because those people exist, or is it a statistical certainty come to life?

  98. Re: Suck it up...If you haven't gotten a death thr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll kill you!

    Maturity is a two way street. By one count, sure, these people are being asinine by sending death threats. By another, paying attention to the same petulant children and letting them get under your skin is something most of us grew out of in grade school.

  99. Re:Never understood why people want to be moderato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! you are talking about stephen harper the conservative canada ex prime minister.
    the point you are trying to make is going nowhere with this example...
    Media did comment about his policy, but it was so bad everyone was ashamed of him:

    here is the guy in a nutshell:

    -got canada out of UN security council
    -disregarded the environnement (billions into alberta tar sand)
    -climate change denier
    -pro capital punishment / harsher prison sentence
    -anti gay
    -anti abortion
    -anti immigrant.
    -threathened internet with new laws (got rejected)
    -Yes man for the US
    probably more that I don't remember.

    to be faire he did reduce the canada debt a bit. He was probably less corrupt than the liberal before and after him but you can see at what price.

  100. lol oh geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, they request and apply to be moderators knowing that it's a volunteer position and is not a thing that is paid and has never been paid....then they whine and complain that they do it without getting paid. Logic...if they don't like it or don't want to put time aside in their lives to do it, JUST DON'T DO IT! A simple solution to a simple problem. Who'da guessed right?

  101. The old adage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90% of everything is crap.