That's not redundant at all. Mod parent up. Sensei's Library is a very good website. It's a Wiki devoted to Go, and it's loaded with all sorts of strategy and tactics.
You need to score so that you can get an idea of your rank, which you need (among other reasons) so that you can play fairly even games. Of course, I pretty much only play Go online, so it's a somewhat different situation. (Everything's calculated nicely and quickly for you.)
The Go World already has readily accepted the idea of playing Go on oddly shaped boards, and considers it to be a completely valid, if a little silly, form of Go. I was chatting on KGS the other day and someone was talking about a 9x9x9 board where each stone has 24 liberties, and everyone seemed to accept that it was Go, even if it was a completely absurd form. Anyway, even in the standardized form of Go, there are a few different kinds of board, anyway. 5x5 is very different from 9x9, which is very different from 19x19, which is very different from 38x38. This merely makes experimentation much easier.
1) Don't use the phrase Aunt Tillie. You'll only encourage ESR. 2) He wasn't saying everyone has to use it. He was saying Slashdotters should use it. Software doesn't have to be good for everyone in order to be good. 3) MLDonkey is written in such a way so that the UI is very very seperate from the backend. It's not very hard at all for Some Guy to write a better UI for MLDonkey.
Yes, but "soft artsy" doesn't mean "magic elves." There was still science going on, it's just that, as you said, the curdling was evenly distributed and the butter helped emulsify the sauce, (Or something.) so the science which was going on was a little bit more advanced than you expected.
Science means, first and foremost, testing theories.
RRrrghhhhh... please don't compare "political correctness" with Orwellianism. The paralells exist, but... no, you're wrong.
City banners are not meant to be static. Changing banners so as to have the government not endorse the Christian religion (which is an important part of the seperation of Church and State) does not, in any way shape or form, rewrite history. We're not saying the town wasn't founded by missionaries.
Anyway, this seal is more than just saying "oh, we were founded by missionaries." The portion in question consists of a GLOWING crucifix floating above a church. The glowing of the crucifix clearly implies holiness, and that means that the banner endorses Christianity as true, something which states are forbidden from doing, due to the first amendment in conjuction with the fourteenth.
It's not rewriting history.
And replacing mentions of Paul Revere with mentions of some lady who did the same exact thing doesn't rewrite history. It tells the truth, just a different part of the truth.
There's nothing wrong with rewriting history books per se. There's so much history, and our knowledge of it is constantly growing, of course books are going to change now and then. There's nothing wrong with this. Perhaps Abigail Adams is a better example of history than Paul Revere. So what? What's Orwellian and wrong is with rewriting history books to present false information.
One isn't a prime number. Prime numbers have two factors, itself and one. One only has one factor. Which is kind of pragmatic, because if one was a prime number, prime factorizations wouldn't work out very nicely.
Yes, but he's arguing that, because global warming is such a big deal, we have to use a short-term band-aid as a stopgap for until we roll out solar power.
No, it's because although he is certainly doing good by donating, it's so frigging easy for him to donate money, it's hard for us to give him that much credit for it.
That, and we just don't like Billy because he made Windows and BASIC popular.
Full-on armed revolts are always illegal. Anti-gun laws only make them slightly more difficult. If you aren't gonna follow the anti-revolt laws, what are the odds you're gonna follow the anti-gun laws?
Some scenes are in-game (with slight modification to remove the status bars) and some, (like the camera panning over the stream in the first shot) are not. The action scenes appear to be mostly in-game, but the slower scenes with the fancy atmospherics are not. Although they might still be possible to have in-game, to some degree, because Nintendo has never been big fans of pre-rendered cut scenes. (They feel that having cut scenes having better graphics than the rest of the game is stupid because it breaks the flow of the game.)
Oh yeah, I guess I should guessed that from when I walked around inside the Stata Center. Well, it looked like the actual offices were seperate from the halls when I managed to peek in there.
They'll never be able to keep that place locked down though.
You oughtta try out plain-old-text mode. There must've been an update or something, it's quite good now. It handles paragraphs just fine AND automatically parses HTML quite nicely. Although it does some weird stuff with blockquote.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not redundant at all. Mod parent up. Sensei's Library is a very good website. It's a Wiki devoted to Go, and it's loaded with all sorts of strategy and tactics.
You need to score so that you can get an idea of your rank, which you need (among other reasons) so that you can play fairly even games. Of course, I pretty much only play Go online, so it's a somewhat different situation. (Everything's calculated nicely and quickly for you.)
The Go World already has readily accepted the idea of playing Go on oddly shaped boards, and considers it to be a completely valid, if a little silly, form of Go. I was chatting on KGS the other day and someone was talking about a 9x9x9 board where each stone has 24 liberties, and everyone seemed to accept that it was Go, even if it was a completely absurd form. Anyway, even in the standardized form of Go, there are a few different kinds of board, anyway. 5x5 is very different from 9x9, which is very different from 19x19, which is very different from 38x38. This merely makes experimentation much easier.
Yes. As quote myself, "Just because we can't understand it doesn't mean magic elves did it."
The video game came first, actually, although the cartoon is still very very bad.
He said "has anyone online." Cesar Chavez had a very very small online presence.
1) Don't use the phrase Aunt Tillie. You'll only encourage ESR.
2) He wasn't saying everyone has to use it. He was saying Slashdotters should use it. Software doesn't have to be good for everyone in order to be good.
3) MLDonkey is written in such a way so that the UI is very very seperate from the backend. It's not very hard at all for Some Guy to write a better UI for MLDonkey.
And that emotional experience occurs when you eat it. Knowing where to go, that's art. Knowing how to get there, that's science.
Yes, but "soft artsy" doesn't mean "magic elves." There was still science going on, it's just that, as you said, the curdling was evenly distributed and the butter helped emulsify the sauce, (Or something.) so the science which was going on was a little bit more advanced than you expected.
Science means, first and foremost, testing theories.
RRrrghhhhh... please don't compare "political correctness" with Orwellianism. The paralells exist, but... no, you're wrong.
City banners are not meant to be static. Changing banners so as to have the government not endorse the Christian religion (which is an important part of the seperation of Church and State) does not, in any way shape or form, rewrite history. We're not saying the town wasn't founded by missionaries.
Anyway, this seal is more than just saying "oh, we were founded by missionaries." The portion in question consists of a GLOWING crucifix floating above a church. The glowing of the crucifix clearly implies holiness, and that means that the banner endorses Christianity as true, something which states are forbidden from doing, due to the first amendment in conjuction with the fourteenth.
It's not rewriting history.
And replacing mentions of Paul Revere with mentions of some lady who did the same exact thing doesn't rewrite history. It tells the truth, just a different part of the truth.
There's nothing wrong with rewriting history books per se. There's so much history, and our knowledge of it is constantly growing, of course books are going to change now and then. There's nothing wrong with this. Perhaps Abigail Adams is a better example of history than Paul Revere. So what? What's Orwellian and wrong is with rewriting history books to present false information.
One isn't a prime number. Prime numbers have two factors, itself and one. One only has one factor. Which is kind of pragmatic, because if one was a prime number, prime factorizations wouldn't work out very nicely.
Are you talking about the "The Madness of King George III" story?
So if you play it forwards you just see Dog?
Yes, but he's arguing that, because global warming is such a big deal, we have to use a short-term band-aid as a stopgap for until we roll out solar power.
Granted. But pencils are better than pens.
1) Erasable.
2) Full grayscale instead of monocrome.
3) Will not leak or explode, so you don't NEED a pocket protector.
4) Slightly cheaper.
This is yet another day which makes me think that there are magical elves who follow me around purely to mod me up.
Larry Wall invented Perl. If that doesn't show the mind-twisting effect that religion can have on some people, I don't know what does.
Of course, Knuth is an absolutely wonderful computer scientist, so clearly religion goes either way.
No, it's because although he is certainly doing good by donating, it's so frigging easy for him to donate money, it's hard for us to give him that much credit for it.
That, and we just don't like Billy because he made Windows and BASIC popular.
Two steps. Turing links to World War Two, which links to China.
Full-on armed revolts are always illegal. Anti-gun laws only make them slightly more difficult. If you aren't gonna follow the anti-revolt laws, what are the odds you're gonna follow the anti-gun laws?
Some scenes are in-game (with slight modification to remove the status bars) and some, (like the camera panning over the stream in the first shot) are not. The action scenes appear to be mostly in-game, but the slower scenes with the fancy atmospherics are not. Although they might still be possible to have in-game, to some degree, because Nintendo has never been big fans of pre-rendered cut scenes. (They feel that having cut scenes having better graphics than the rest of the game is stupid because it breaks the flow of the game.)
For reference, I like both Noam Chomsky and Richard Stallman. But still.
On a completely unrelated note, Noam Chomsky is also moving into the Stata Center.
Oh yeah, I guess I should guessed that from when I walked around inside the Stata Center. Well, it looked like the actual offices were seperate from the halls when I managed to peek in there.
They'll never be able to keep that place locked down though.
You oughtta try out plain-old-text mode. There must've been an update or something, it's quite good now. It handles paragraphs just fine AND automatically parses HTML quite nicely. Although it does some weird stuff with blockquote.